Optimizing PSMA scintigraphy for resource limited settings - a retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

PSMA PET/CT is the most sensitive molecular imaging modality for prostate cancer (PCa), yet much of the developing world has little or no access to PET/CT. [99mTc]Tc-PSMA scintigraphy (PS) is a cheaper and more accessible gamma camera-based alternative. However, many resource-constrained departments have only a single camera without tomographic or hybrid imaging functionality, and camera time is frequently in high demand. Simplifying imaging protocols by limiting the field of view (FOV) and omitting SPECT/CT or even SPECT may provide a partial solution. The aim was thus to determine the adequacy of PS planar-only and/or SPECT-only imaging protocols with a limited FOV.

METHODS

The scans of 95 patients with histologically proven PCa who underwent PS with full-body planar and multi-FOV SPECT/CT were reviewed. The detection rates for uptake in the prostate gland/bed and in metastases were compared on planar, SPECT, and SPECT/CT. The agreement between modalities was calculated for the detection of metastases and for staging. The impact of imaging a limited FOV was determined.

RESULTS

Pathological prostatic uptake was seen in all cases on SPECT/CT (excluding two post-prostatectomy patients), 90.3% of cases on SPECT, and 15.1% on planar images (p < 0.001). Eleven (11.7%) patients had seminal vesicle involvement on SPECT/CT, which was undetectable/indistinguishable on planar images and SPECT. The agreement between modalities was moderate to good (κ = 0.41 to 0.61) for the detection of nodal metastases, with detection rates that did not differ significantly (SPECT/CT = 11.6%, SPECT = 8.4%, planar = 5.3%). Detection rates for bone metastases were 14.7% (SPECT/CT) and 11.6% (SPECT and planar). Agreement between modalities for the detection of bone metastases was good (κ = 0.73 to 0.77). Three (3.1%) patients had visceral metastases on SPECT/CT, two of which were detected on SPECT and planar. There was good agreement between modalities for the TNM staging of patients (κ = 0.70 to 0.88). No metastatic lesions were missed on the limited FOV images.

CONCLUSION

When PS scintigraphy is performed, SPECT/CT is recommended. However, the lack of SPECT/CT capabilities should not preclude the use of PS in the presence of limited resources, as both planar and SPECT imaging are adequate and will correctly stage most PCa patients. Furthermore, time-based optimisations are achievable by limiting the FOV to exclude the distal lower limbs.

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination site as possible pitfall on somatostatin receptor imaging

SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) vaccination numbers are globally increasing. Therefore, an increased chance exists that patients undergoing Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) or diagnostic radionuclide imaging for Neuroendocrine Tumours (NETs) may have recently received vaccination. We report the imaging findings of two NETs patients, A—following [¹⁷⁷Lu] Lu-DOTATATE PRRT post therapy planar scintigraphy and single photon emission computed tomography with computed tomography (SPECT/CT), and B—following [⁶⁸ Ga]Ga-DOTA-NOC positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) respectively. Both studies were done few days after COVID-19 vaccination. Patient A showed a new focus of uptake in the left deltoid muscle; and Patient B showed uptake in the left deltoid and a left axillary lymph node. Nuclear Physicians need to be aware of pitfalls with somatostatin receptor radionuclide imaging post-vaccination to ensure accurate interpretation, as well as dosimetric considerations with vaccine-related post-therapy uptake.

A comparison of tube leukocyte adherence inhibition assay and standard physical methods for diagnosing colorectal cancer

In vitro antitumor immunity, measured by means of a tube leukocyte adherence inhibition (LAI) assay, was able to demonstrate early colorectal cancer in cases yet undiagnosed. Testing 106 patients attending a colonoscopy clinic, we found that nine of 15 (60%) patients with colorectal cancer were LAI-positive. The nine included: five of six with Dukes' A and B; one of two with Dukes' C; and three of seven with Dukes' D lesions. Of 58 patients without colon neoplasia, one had a positive test. By contrast, barium enema results were diagnostic for 13 of 15 (87%) cases and colonoscopy for 11 of 15 (73%). There were 32 colon polyps discovered by means of barium enema and colonoscopy. Of 13 adenomas removed, four had stimulated positive LAI responses. Of another 19 polyps not removed two incited positive LAI responses. Two patients with histories of recurrent adenomas were LAI-positive, though only one had a new polyp that could be detected by means of barium enema. For a procedure to be of diagnostic value for a given disease, sensitivity and specificity must be at least 1.0. If this sum is 2.0, the test is ideal. The sum of sensitivity and specificity for the tube LAI assay, barium enema, and colonoscopy were 1.58, 1.87, and 1.73, respectively, for colorectal cancer; 1.81, 2.0, and 2.0, respectively, for early colorectal cancer; and 1.42, 1.77, and 1.55 respectively, for advanced colorectal cancer. In this limited series of patients, the barium enema seems to be superior to the tube LAI assay for diagnosing colorectal cancer, but the difference in sensitivity and specificity is not statistically valid by the paired chi square test. The results of this study shows conclusively, that the tube LAI is of diagnostic value and suggest its use for evaluating suspected cases, especially early ones, of colorectal cancer.