1
|
Riley BL, Valaitis RF, Abramowicz A, d'Avernas E, Jolin MA. Pause, re-think, go virtual … pandemic adaptations from 20 diverse mental health promotion intervention projects across Canada. Ment Health Prev 2022; 26:200235. [PMID: 36570868 PMCID: PMC9764095 DOI: 10.1016/j.mhp.2022.200235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 02/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
The Government of Canada's Mental Health Promotion Innovation Fund (MHP-IF) is a platform for learning across diverse projects, facilitated by a Knowledge Development and Exchange Hub. MHP-IF projects were getting underway before the COVID-19 pandemic escalated in 2020 and dramatically shifted their circumstances and activities. Using storytelling methods, this study explored 20 project experiences during the first year of the pandemic, including how and why assumptions, plans, and activities were adapted; early signals about what was working well or not; and how adaptations influenced equity, access, and cultural safety. Project teams generally navigated through four stages: pausing, re-thinking, adapting, and settling into adjustments. Within and across these stages, projects addressed similar processes, including meeting fundamental needs of participants and project teams, managing unanticipated benefits, and engaging with online formats. All projects experienced the pandemic's influence of amplifying both inequities and public and political attention on mental health. This study provides experiential evidence from diverse settings and populations in Canada about pandemic adaptations. The multi-project model and storytelling methods can usefully contribute to additional research, including ways to address inequities and promote cultural safety.
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Engaged scholarship includes the coproduction and use of research by partnerships that blend research, policy and/or practice perspectives. This way of doing research attempts to bridge-the-gap between knowledge and its application. Recent reviews have described practices that support engagement and involve the community in research and patients in healthcare but there is less known about how to engage individuals working to inform public policy. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES The purpose of this research was to articulate the actions and context that support the coproduction and use of research to inform public policy decisions. The study focuses on partnerships between researchers and stakeholders working in public policy across different levels and sectors of government. METHODS A scoping review methodology was used. Relevant articles were identified from six electronic bibliographic databases of peer-reviewed literature. FINDINGS A total of 9904 articles were screened and 375 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. The included 11 studies were from research partnerships internationally and described actions and contextual factors contributing to the coproduction and use of research to inform public policy. Key actions included facilitating frequent interactions with public policy stakeholders, joint planning for research, and collaboration to execute data collection and analysis. Contextual factors included clarity in responsibilities, prior relationships, and mutual respect for partner priorities and perspectives. CONCLUSIONS Key actions and contextual factors were identified in this review and warrant further study to strengthen research-policy partnerships and their outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessie-Lee D McIsaac
- Faculty of Education and Department of Child and Youth Study, Mount Saint Vincent University, 166 Bedford Highway, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3M 2J6, Canada.
- Healthy Populations Institute, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 4R2, Canada.
| | - Barbara L Riley
- Faculty of Applied Health Sciences and Renison University College, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Boyko JA, Riley BL, Willis CD, Stockton L, Zummach D, Kerner J, Robinson K, Chia M. Knowledge translation for realist reviews: a participatory approach for a review on scaling up complex interventions. Health Res Policy Syst 2018; 16:101. [PMID: 30348180 PMCID: PMC6198505 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-018-0374-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2018] [Accepted: 09/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Knowledge syntheses that use a realist methodology are gaining popularity. Yet, there are few reports in the literature that describe how results are summarised, shared and used. This paper aims to inform knowledge translation (KT) for realist reviews by describing the process of developing a KT strategy for a review on pathways for scaling up complex public health interventions. Methods The participatory approach used for the realist review was also used to develop the KT strategy. The approach included three main steps, namely (1) an international meeting focused on interpreting preliminary findings from the realist review and seeking input on KT activities; (2) a targeted literature review on KT for realist reviews; and (3) consultations with primary knowledge users of the review. Results The international meeting identified a general preference among knowledge users for findings from the review that are action oriented. A need was also identified for understanding how to tailor findings for specific knowledge user groups in relation to their needs. The literature review identified four papers that included brief descriptions of planned or actual KT activities for specific research studies; however, information was minimal on what KT activities or products work for whom, under what conditions and why. The consultations revealed that KT for realist reviews should consider the following: (1) activities closely aligned with the preferences of specific knowledge user groups; (2) key findings that are sensitive to factors within the knowledge user’s context; and (3) actionable statements that can advance KT goals, activities or products. The KT strategy derived from the three activities includes a planning framework and tailored KT activities that address preferences of knowledge users for findings that are action oriented and context relevant. Conclusions This paper provides an example of a KT strategy for realist reviews that blends theoretical and practical insights. Evaluation of the strategy’s implementation will provide useful insights on its effectiveness and potential for broader application. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-018-0374-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A Boyko
- Propel Centre for Population Health Impact, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.
| | - Barbara L Riley
- Propel Centre for Population Health Impact, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - Cameron D Willis
- Movember Foundation, P.O. Box 60, East Melbourne, VIC, 8002, Australia.,Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, John Street, Hawthorn, VIC, 3122, Australia
| | - Lisa Stockton
- Propel Centre for Population Health Impact, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - Dana Zummach
- Propel Centre for Population Health Impact, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave West, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - Jon Kerner
- Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, 145 King Street West Suite 900, Toronto, ON, M5H 1J8, Canada
| | - Kerry Robinson
- Public Health Agency of Canada, 130 Colonnade Road A.L. 6501H, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0K9, Canada
| | - Marie Chia
- Public Health Agency of Canada, 130 Colonnade Road A.L. 6501H, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0K9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Riley BL, Kernoghan A, Stockton L, Montague S, Yessis J, Willis CD. Using contribution analysis to evaluate the impacts of research on policy: Getting to ‘good enough’. Research Evaluation 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvx037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
5
|
Willis CD, Greene JK, Abramowicz A, Riley BL. Strengthening the evidence and action on multi-sectoral partnerships in public health: an action research initiative. Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can 2017; 36:101-11. [PMID: 27284702 DOI: 10.24095/hpcdp.36.6.01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Public Health Agency of Canada's Multi-sectoral Partnerships Initiative, administered by the Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention (CCDP), brings together diverse partners to design, implement and advance innovative approaches for improving population health. This article describes the development and initial priorities of an action research project (a learning and improvement strategy) that aims to facilitate continuous improvement of the CCDP's partnership initiative and contribute to the evidence on multi-sectoral partnerships. METHODS The learning and improvement strategy for the CCDP's multi-sectoral partnership initiative was informed by (1) consultations with CCDP staff and senior management, and (2) a review of conceptual frameworks to do with multi-sectoral partnerships. Consultations explored the development of the multi-sectoral initiative, barriers and facilitators to success, and markers of effectiveness. Published and grey literature was reviewed using a systematic search strategy with findings synthesized using a narrative approach. RESULTS Consultations and the review highlighted the importance of understanding partnership impacts, developing a shared vision, implementing a shared measurement system and creating opportunities for knowledge exchange. With that in mind, we propose a six-component learning and improvement strategy that involves (1) prioritizing learning needs, (2) mapping needs to evidence, (3) using relevant data collection methods, (4) analyzing and synthesizing data, (5) feeding data back to CCDP staff and teams and (6) taking action. Initial learning needs include investigating partnership reach and the unanticipated effects of multi-sectoral partnerships for individuals, groups, organizations or communities. CONCLUSION While the CCDP is the primary audience for the learning and improvement strategy, it may prove useful for a range of audiences, including other government departments and external organizations interested in capturing and sharing new knowledge generated from multi-sectoral partnerships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C D Willis
- Propel Centre for Population Health Impact, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.,Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,School of Population Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - J K Greene
- Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - A Abramowicz
- Propel Centre for Population Health Impact, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - B L Riley
- Propel Centre for Population Health Impact, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Willis CD, Riley BL, Stockton L, Abramowicz A, Zummach D, Wong G, Robinson KL, Best A. Scaling up complex interventions: insights from a realist synthesis. Health Res Policy Syst 2016; 14:88. [PMID: 27993138 PMCID: PMC5168709 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-016-0158-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2016] [Accepted: 11/22/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Preventing chronic diseases, such as cancer, cardiovascular disease and diabetes, requires complex interventions, involving multi-component and multi-level efforts that are tailored to the contexts in which they are delivered. Despite an increasing number of complex interventions in public health, many fail to be ‘scaled up’. This study aimed to increase understanding of how and under what conditions complex public health interventions may be scaled up to benefit more people and populations. A realist synthesis was conducted and discussed at an in-person workshop involving practitioners responsible for scaling up activities. Realist approaches view causality through the linkages between changes in contexts (C) that activate mechanisms (M), leading to specific outcomes (O) (CMO configurations). To focus this review, three cases of complex interventions that had been successfully scaled up were included: Vibrant Communities, Youth Build USA and Pathways to Education. A search strategy of published and grey literature related to each case was developed, involving searches of relevant databases and nominations from experts. Data extracted from included documents were classified according to CMO configurations within strategic themes. Findings were compared and contrasted with guidance from diffusion theory, and interpreted with knowledge users to identify practical implications and potential directions for future research. Four core mechanisms were identified, namely awareness, commitment, confidence and trust. These mechanisms were activated within two broad scaling up strategies, those of renewing and regenerating, and documenting success. Within each strategy, specific actions to change contexts included building partnerships, conducting evaluations, engaging political support and adapting funding models. These modified contexts triggered the identified mechanisms, leading to a range of scaling up outcomes, such as commitment of new communities, changes in relevant legislation, or agreements with new funding partners. This synthesis applies and advances theory, realist methods and the practice of scaling up complex interventions. Practitioners may benefit from a number of coordinated efforts, including conducting or commissioning evaluations at strategic moments, mobilising local and political support through relevant partnerships, and promoting ongoing knowledge exchange in peer learning networks. Action research studies guided by these findings, and studies on knowledge translation for realist syntheses are promising future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron D Willis
- Propel Centre for Population Health Impact, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada. .,Menzies Centre for Health Policy and the Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Barbara L Riley
- Propel Centre for Population Health Impact, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Lisa Stockton
- Propel Centre for Population Health Impact, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Aneta Abramowicz
- Propel Centre for Population Health Impact, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Dana Zummach
- Propel Centre for Population Health Impact, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Geoff Wong
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Kerry L Robinson
- Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Allan Best
- InSource Research Group, West Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Willis CD, Corrigan C, Stockton L, Greene JK, Riley BL. Examining the unanticipated effects of public-private partnerships for preventing chronic disease. Eur J Public Health 2016. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw169.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
8
|
Riley BL, Robinson KL, Gamble J, Finegood DT, Sheppard D, Penney TL, Best A. Knowledge to action for solving complex problems: insights from a review of nine international cases. Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can 2016; 35:47-53. [PMID: 25970804 DOI: 10.24095/hpcdp.35.3.01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Solving complex problems such as preventing chronic diseases introduces unique challenges for the creation and application of knowledge, or knowledge to action (KTA). KTA approaches that apply principles of systems thinking are thought to hold promise, but practical strategies for their application are not well understood. In this paper we report the results of a scan of systems approaches to KTA with a goal to identify how to optimize their implementation and impact. METHODS A 5-person advisory group purposefully selected 9 initiatives to achieve diversity on issues addressed and organizational forms. Information on each case was gathered from documents and through telephone interviews with primary contacts within each organization. Following verification of case descriptions, an inductive analysis was conducted within and across cases. RESULTS The cases revealed 5 guidelines for moving from conceiving KTA systems to implementing them: (1) establish and nurture relationships, (2) co-produce and curate knowledge, (3) create feedback loops, (4) frame as systems interventions rather than projects, and (5) consider variations across time and place. CONCLUSION Results from the environmental scan are a modest start to translating systems concepts for KTA into practice. Use of the strategies revealed in the scan may improve KTA for solving complex public health problems. The strategies themselves will benefit from the development of a science that aims to understand adaptation and ongoing learning from policy and practice interventions, strengthens enduring relationships, and fills system gaps in addition to evidence gaps. Systems approaches to KTA will also benefit from robust evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B L Riley
- Propel Centre for Population Health Impact, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - K L Robinson
- Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - J Gamble
- Imprint Consulting, Hampton, New Brunswick, Canada
| | - D T Finegood
- Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
| | - D Sheppard
- Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - T L Penney
- Cambridge University, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - A Best
- InSource Research Group, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Interorganizational networks that harness the priorities, capacities, and skills of various agencies and individuals have emerged as useful approaches for strengthening preventive services in public health systems. We use examples from the Canadian Heart Health Initiative and Alberta's Primary Care Networks to illustrate characteristics of networks, describe the limitations of existing frameworks for assessing the performance of prevention-oriented networks, and propose a research agenda for guiding future efforts to improve the performance of these initiatives. Prevention-specific assessment strategies that capture relevant aspects of network performance need to be identified, and feedback mechanisms are needed that make better use of these data to drive change in network activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron D Willis
- Cameron D. Willis and Allan Best are with the Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and the School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver. Cameron D. Willis is also with the University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. Barbara L. Riley is with the Propel Centre for Population Health Impact and the School of Public Health and Health Systems, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario. Carol P. Herbert is with the Department of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London Ontario
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Willis CD, Riley BL, Best A, Ongolo-Zogo P. Strengthening health systems through networks: the need for measurement and feedback. Health Policy Plan 2013; 27 Suppl 4:iv62-6. [PMID: 23014155 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czs089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron D Willis
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Population-level intervention is required to prevent cancer and other chronic diseases. It also promotes health for those living with established risk factors and illness. In this article, the authors describe a vision and approach for continuously improving population-level programs and policies within and beyond the health sector. The vision and approach are anchored in contemporary thinking about what is required to link evidence and action in the field of population and public health. The authors believe that, as a cancer prevention and control community, organizations and practitioners must be able to use the best available evidence to inform action and continually generate evidence that improves prevention policies and programs on an ongoing basis. These imperatives require leaders in policy, practice, and research fields to work together to jointly plan, conduct, and act on relevant evidence. The Propel Center and colleagues are implementing this approach in Youth Excel-a pan-Canadian initiative that brings together national and provincial organizations from health and education sectors and capitalizes on a history of collaboration. The objective of Youth Excel is to build sustainable capacity for knowledge development and exchange that can guide and redirect prevention efforts in a rapidly evolving social environment. This goal is to contribute to creating health-promoting environments and to accelerate progress in preventing cancer and other diseases among youth and young adults and in the wider population. Although prevention is the aim, health-promoting environments also can support health gains for individuals of all ages and with established illness. In addition, the approach Youth Excel is taking to link evidence and action may be applicable to early intervention and treatment components of cancer control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara L Riley
- Propel Center for Population Health Impact, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Riley BL, Stachenko S, Wilson E, Harvey D, Cameron R, Farquharson J, Donovan C, Taylor G. Can the Canadian Heart Health Initiative inform the population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada? Can J Public Health 2009. [PMID: 19263979 DOI: 10.1007/bf03405505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of the Population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada (PHIRIC) is to build capacity to increase the quantity, quality and use of population health intervention research. But what capacity is required, and how should capacity be created? There may be relevant lessons from the Canadian Heart Health Initiative (CHHI), a 20-year initiative (1986-2006) that was groundbreaking in its attempt to bring together researchers and public health leaders (from government and non-government organizations) to jointly plan, conduct and act on relevant evidence. The present study focused on what enabled and constrained the ability to fund, conduct and use science in the CHHI. METHODS Guided by a provisional capacity-building framework, a two-step methodology was used: a CHHI document analysis followed by consultation with CHHI leaders to refine and confirm emerging findings. RESULTS A few well-positioned, visionary people conceived of the CHHI as a long-term, coherent initiative that would have impact, and they then created an environment to enable this to become reality. To achieve the vision, capacity was needed to a) align science (research and evaluation) with public health policy and program priorities, including the capacity to study "natural experiments" and b) build meaningful partnerships within and across sectors. CONCLUSION There is now an opportunity to apply lessons from the CHHI in planning PHIRIC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara L Riley
- Canadian Cancer Society's Centre for Behavioural Research and Program Evaluation, University of Waterloo, Lyle S. Hallman Institute North, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cameron R, Riley BL, Campbell HS, Manske S, Lamers-Bellio K. The imperative of strategic alignment across organizations: the experience of the Canadian Cancer Society's Centre for Behavioural Research and Program Evaluation. Can J Public Health 2009. [PMID: 19263980 DOI: 10.1007/bf03405506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
The Canadian Cancer Society's Centre for Behavioural Research and Program Evaluation (CBRPE) is a national asset for building pan-Canadian capacity to support intervention studies that guide population-level policies and programs. This paper briefly describes CBRPE's experience in advancing this work in the field of prevention. The aim is to illuminate issues of central importance for advancing the goals of the Population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada. According to our experience, success in building the population intervention field will depend heavily on purposeful alignment across organizations to enable integration of research, evaluation, surveillance, policy and practice. CBRPE's capacity development roles include a) a catalytic role in shaping this aligned inter-organizational milieu and b) investing our resources in building tangible assets (teams, indicators, data systems) that contribute relevant capacities within this emerging milieu. Challenges in building capacity in this field are described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roy Cameron
- Centre for Behavioural Research and Program Evaluation, University of Waterloo, Lyle S. Hallman Institute North, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cameron R, Riley BL, Campbell HS, Manske S, Lamers-Bellio K. The imperative of strategic alignment across organizations: the experience of the Canadian Cancer Society's Centre for Behavioural Research and Program Evaluation. Can J Public Health 2009; 100:Suppl I27-30. [PMID: 19263980 PMCID: PMC6973817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/29/2024]
Abstract
The Canadian Cancer Society's Centre for Behavioural Research and Program Evaluation (CBRPE) is a national asset for building pan-Canadian capacity to support intervention studies that guide population-level policies and programs. This paper briefly describes CBRPE's experience in advancing this work in the field of prevention. The aim is to illuminate issues of central importance for advancing the goals of the Population Health Intervention Research Initiative for Canada. According to our experience, success in building the population intervention field will depend heavily on purposeful alignment across organizations to enable integration of research, evaluation, surveillance, policy and practice. CBRPE's capacity development roles include a) a catalytic role in shaping this aligned inter-organizational milieu and b) investing our resources in building tangible assets (teams, indicators, data systems) that contribute relevant capacities within this emerging milieu. Challenges in building capacity in this field are described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roy Cameron
- Centre for Behavioural Research and Program Evaluation, University of Waterloo, Lyle S. Hallman Institute North, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Riley BL, MacDonald J, Mansi O, Kothari A, Kurtz D, vonTettenborn LI, Edwards NC. Is reporting on interventions a weak link in understanding how and why they work? A preliminary exploration using community heart health exemplars. Implement Sci 2008; 3:27. [PMID: 18492247 PMCID: PMC2413262 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-3-27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2006] [Accepted: 05/20/2008] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The persistent gap between research and practice compromises the impact of multi-level and multi-strategy community health interventions. Part of the problem is a limited understanding of how and why interventions produce change in population health outcomes. Systematic investigation of these intervention processes across studies requires sufficient reporting about interventions. Guided by a set of best processes related to the design, implementation, and evaluation of community health interventions, this article presents preliminary findings of intervention reporting in the published literature using community heart health exemplars as case examples. METHODS The process to assess intervention reporting involved three steps: selection of a sample of community health intervention studies and their publications; development of a data extraction tool; and data extraction from the publications. Publications from three well-resourced community heart health exemplars were included in the study: the North Karelia Project, the Minnesota Heart Health Program, and Heartbeat Wales. RESULTS Results are organized according to six themes that reflect best intervention processes: integrating theory, creating synergy, achieving adequate implementation, creating enabling structures and conditions, modifying interventions during implementation, and facilitating sustainability. In the publications for the three heart health programs, reporting on the intervention processes was variable across studies and across processes. CONCLUSION Study findings suggest that limited reporting on intervention processes is a weak link in research on multiple intervention programs in community health. While it would be premature to generalize these results to other programs, important next steps will be to develop a standard tool to guide systematic reporting of multiple intervention programs, and to explore reasons for limited reporting on intervention processes. It is our contention that a shift to more inclusive reporting of intervention processes would help lead to a better understanding of successful or unsuccessful features of multi-strategy and multi-level interventions, and thereby improve the potential for effective practice and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara L Riley
- Centre for Behavioural Research and Program Evaluation, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - JoAnne MacDonald
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Omaima Mansi
- School of Nursing, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Anita Kothari
- Bachelor of Health Sciences Program, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Donna Kurtz
- School of Nursing, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Linda I vonTettenborn
- Bachelor of Science in Nursing Program, Faculty of Health Sciences, Douglas College, New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Nancy C Edwards
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
The evolution of health promotion in Canada between 1986 and 2006 is characterized by three major eras: Health Promotion in the Limelight, 1986-1992, Health Promotion Behind the Scenes, 1993-2003, and Health Promotion Restaged, 2003-2006. These eras are illustrated using the Canadian Heart Health Initiative as an example. The first era, backed by strong federal government leadership and support, was a progressive time of developing concepts, collaborations and infrastructure for health promotion across the country. Despite significant progress, by the end of this era, health promotion was neither sufficiently developed nor funded to make it a cornerstone of the health system. In addition, the emphasis was heavily biased towards changing individual behaviour. In the second era, health promotion continued to develop in pockets across the country and debates within the field intensified. However, these events went largely unnoticed and massive overall cuts at federal and provincial levels of government made acute care a much higher priority than health promotion. The third era, mostly shaped by fears linked to public health threats, saw a restaging of health promotion through efforts to strengthen public health infrastructure. Nevertheless, at the end of this era, the necessary intersectoral partnerships (such as in health, housing, education, food, income) remained scarce, and little progress was made to decrease health inequalities. The Canadian Heart Health Initiative was implemented over the same time period as the three eras. Its legacy includes collegial relationships across various levels of government and with non-government organizations, a culture that values pan-Canadian initiatives, and support for integration of research, evaluation, surveillance, policy and practice. It remains to be seen how quickly it will be possible to advance the vision of health promotion conceived during the Limelight Era in Canada.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne F Jackson
- Centre for Health Promotion, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Riley BL, Edwards NC, d'Avernas JR. People and money matter: investment lessons from the Ontario Heart Health Program, Canada. Health Promot Int 2007; 23:24-34. [PMID: 18086687 DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dam036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Resource allocation is a critical issue for public health decision-makers. Yet little is known about the level and type of resources needed to build capacity to plan and implement comprehensive programs. This paper examines the relationships between investments and changes in organizational capacity and program implementation in the first phase (1998-2003) of the Ontario Heart Health Program (OHHP)--a province-wide, comprehensive public health program that involved 40 community partnerships. The study represents a subset of findings from a provincial evaluation. Investments, organizational capacity of public health units and implementation of heart health activities were measured longitudinally. Investment information was gathered annually from the provincial government, local public health units and community partners using standard reports, and was available from 1998 to 2002. Organizational capacity and program implementation were measured using a written survey, completed by all health units at five measurement times from 1994 to 2002. Combining provincial and local sources, the average total investment by year five was $1.66 per capita. Organizational capacity of public health units and implementation of heart health activities increased both before and during the first 2 years of the OHHP, and then plateaued at a modest level for capacity and a low level for implementation after that. Amount of funding was positively associated with organizational capacity, yet this association was overpowered by the negative influence of turnover of a key staff position. Regression analysis indicated that staff turnover explained 23% of local variability in organizational capacity. Findings reinforce the need for adequate investment and retention of key staff positions in complex partnership programs. Better accounting of public health investments, including monetary and in-kind investments, is needed to inform decisions about the amount and duration of public health investments that will lead to effective program implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara L Riley
- Centre for Behavioural Research and Program Evaluation, Lyle S. Hallman Institute N, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy C Edwards
- School of Nursing and Community Health Research Unit, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont.
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Riley BL, Taylor SM, Elliott SJ. Organizational capacity and implementation change: a comparative case study of heart health promotion in Ontario public health agencies. Health Educ Res 2003; 18:754-769. [PMID: 14654507 DOI: 10.1093/her/cyf051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
This paper reports the results of a comparative case study that examines factors influencing changes in implementation of heart health promotion activities in Ontario public health units. The study compared two cases that experienced large changes in implementation from 1994 to 1996, but in opposite directions. Multiple data sources were used, with an emphasis on secondary analyses of quantitative surveys of health units and other community agencies, and in-depth interviews of public health staff, collected as part of the Canadian Heart Health Initiative Ontario Project. Guided by social ecological and organizational theories, changes in implementation were explained by examining changes in (1) organizational predisposition to undertake heart health promotion activities, (2) organizational practices to undertake these activities, (3) other internal organizational factors and (4) external system factors. Findings show that in communities with diverse characteristics, implementation change was most strongly influenced by an interplay of changes in internal features of public health agencies; notably, leadership, structure and staff skills. Findings support a social ecological approach to health promotion by demonstrating the importance of the institutional context in the implementation change process, the interaction of individual (skills) and organizational (structure) levels in explaining implementation change, and community context in shaping the change process. Findings also reinforce the value of strengthening capacity within public health agencies and suggest further research on the implementation change process, especially in different systems and over longer periods of time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara L Riley
- School of Geography and Geology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
This paper reports the results of an analysis of the dissemination of community-based heart health promotion strategies. The research draws on diffusion and socio-ecological theories to study the first 10 years of heart health promotion in the public health system in Ontario, Canada. Using case description and interpretive analysis, the study describes developments in five stages of dissemination, and examines the interplay of factors operating in the internal organizational setting and the external environment in order to explain these developments. Findings demonstrate that dissemination of health promotion is a long-term, iterative process involving multiple stages. Dissemination is influenced by a complex interplay of factors operating within the public health system (especially traditional public health practice and champions) and factors in the environment in which the public health system operates (especially research, practice information and health policies). Implications are that policy makers should take a long-term view of dissemination, identify intermediate and long-term goals consistent with dissemination stages, and capitalize on internal and external forces supporting dissemination goals. Similar case-study research in other public health systems and time periods, and in more advanced stages of dissemination, will add further insight into the dissemination process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara L Riley
- School of Geography and Geology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Riley BL, Taylor SM, Elliott SJ. Determinants of implementing heart health: promotion activities in Ontario public health units: a social ecological perspective. Health Educ Res 2001; 16:425-441. [PMID: 11525390 DOI: 10.1093/her/16.4.425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
This paper reports the results of a study undertaken to explain levels of implementation of heart health promotion activities observed in Ontario public health agencies in 1997. Organizational-level data were collected by surveying all 42 health departments in 1994, 1996 and 1997 as part of the Canadian Heart Health Initiative Ontario Project. Guided by social ecological and organizational theories, the model examines relationships between implementation and four sets of possible determinants of activity: (1) the predisposition of agencies to undertake heart health promotion activities, (2) their capacity to undertake these activities, (3) internal organizational factors and (4) external system factors. A small set of five variables explains almost half of the variance in implementation (R2 = 0.46): organizational capacity (beta = 0.40), priority given to heart health (beta = 0.36), coordination of programs (beta = 0.19), use of resource centers (beta = 0.12) and participation in networks (beta = 0.09). The results suggest that models integrating organizational and socio-ecological theories can help us understand the implementation of community-based heart health promotion activities by public health agencies. Implications for future research, policy and practice are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B L Riley
- School of Geography and Geology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|