Persons 'never treated' in mass drug administration for lymphatic filariasis: identifying programmatic and research needs from a series of research review meetings 2020-2021

As neglected tropical disease programs rely on participation in rounds of mass drug administration (MDA), there is concern that individuals who have never been treated could contribute to ongoing transmission, posing a barrier to elimination. Previous research has suggested that the size and characteristics of the never-treated population may be important but have not been sufficiently explored. To address this critical knowledge gap, four meetings were held from December 2020 to May 2021 to compile expert knowledge on never treatment in lymphatic filariasis (LF) MDA programs. The meetings explored four questions: the number and proportion of people never treated, their sociodemographic characteristics, their infection status and the reasons why they were not treated. Meeting discussions noted key issues requiring further exploration, including how to standardize measurement of the never treated, adapt and use existing tools to capture never-treated data and ensure representation of never-treated people in data collection. Recognizing that patterns of never treatment are situation specific, participants noted measurement should be quick, inexpensive and focused on local solutions. Furthermore, programs should use existing data to generate mathematical models to understand what levels of never treatment may compromise LF elimination goals or trigger programmatic action.

Exploring innovative ways to conduct coverage surveys for neglected tropical diseases in Malawi, Mali, and Uganda

Currently, a 30-cluster survey to monitor drug coverage after mass drug administration for neglected tropical diseases is the most common methodology used by control programs. We investigated alternative survey methodologies that could potentially provide an estimation of drug coverage. Three alternative survey methods (market, village chief, and religious leader) were conducted and compared to the 30-cluster method in Malawi, Mali, and Uganda. In Malawi, drug coverage for the 30-cluster, market, village chief, and religious leader methods were 66.8% (95% CI 60.3-73.4), 74.3%, 76.3%, and 77.8%, respectively. In Mali, results for round 1 were 62.6% (95% CI 54.4-70.7), 56.1%, 74.8%, and 83.2%, and 57.2% (95% CI 49.0-65.4), 54.5%, 72.2%, and 73.3%, respectively, for round 2. Uganda survey results were 65.7% (59.4-72.0), 43.7%, 67.2%, and 77.6% respectively. Further research is needed to test different coverage survey methodologies to determine which survey methods are the most scientifically rigorous and resource efficient.

Drug coverage surveys for neglected tropical diseases: 10 years of field experience

Mass drug administration is one of the public health strategies recommended by the World Health Organization for the control and elimination of seven neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). Because adequate coverage is vital to achieve program goals, periodically conducting surveys to validate reported coverage to guide NTD programs is recommended. Over the past decade, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and collaborators conducted more than 30 two-stage cluster household surveys across three continents. The questionnaires gathered coverage data and information relevant to improving NTD programs including NTD-related attitudes and practices. From the 37 coverage survey estimates obtained in those surveys, 73.3% indicated an over reporting of coverage, including all three that assessed school-based distributions. It took an average of 1 week to conduct a survey. Our experiences led us to conclude that coverage surveys are useful and feasible tools to ensure NTD elimination and control goals are reached.

Field detection of Schistosoma japonicum cercariae in environmental water samples by quantitative PCR

A species-specific quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay was combined with two novel water-sampling methods and compared with the mouse bioassay for the quantitative detection of S. japonicum in surface waters. The novel methods were capable of capturing cercariae and, with subsequent analysis through qPCR, detecting the presence of a minimum of 1 cercaria.

Ganciclovir treatment of gastrointestinal infections caused by cytomegalovirus in patients with AIDS

Ganciclovir (DHPG) treatment of 69 AIDS patients with gastrointestinal infection due to cytomegalovirus (CMV) was studied. Sites of infection included the colon (46 patients, 67%), esophagus and stomach (15 patients, 22%), rectum (five patients, 7%), liver (two patients, 3%), and small bowel (one patient, 1.4%). Ganciclovir was given in a dose of 5 mg/kg intravenously every 12 hours for 14 days. Maintenance therapy consisted of 6 mg/kg daily. Positive clinical responses were seen in 52 (75%) of the 69 patients, stable responses in 9 (13%), and worsening in eight (11%). The virologic response was positive in 47 patients (68%), while virologic findings did not change in three patients (4%) and could not be evaluated in 19 patients (28%). Toxicity was mainly hematologic, with moderate leukopenia (1,000-1,900 leukocytes/mm3) in seven patients and severe leukopenia (less than 1,000 leukocytes/mm3) in three patients. The median survival time was 18 weeks (range, 1-68 weeks). Forty-seven patients survived for 4 weeks; of these, 22 (47%) relapsed. The median time to relapse was 9 weeks. Despite the uncontrolled nature of this study, ganciclovir is probably an effective and safe agent for the treatment of gastrointestinal CMV infections. The high probability of relapse (50%) should be considered and maintenance therapy offered to most patients.