1
|
Anthony G, Aronson J, Brittain R, Heneghan C, Richards G. Preventable suicides involving medicines: A systematic case series of coroners' reports in England and Wales. Public Health Pract (Oxf) 2024; 7:100491. [PMID: 38628605 PMCID: PMC11019265 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Background In England and Wales coroners have a duty to write a report, called a Prevention of Future Deaths report or PFD, when they believe that actions should be taken to prevent future deaths. Coroners send PFDs to individuals and organisations who are required to respond within 56 days. Despite the increase in mental health concerns and growing use of medicines, deaths reported by coroners that have involved medicine-related suicides had not yet been explored. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically assess coroners' PFD reports involving suicides in which a medicine caused or contributed to the death to identify lessons for suicide prevention. Methods Using the Preventable Deaths Tracker database (https://preventabledeathstracker.net/), 3037 coroners' PFD reports in England and Wales were screened for eligibility between July 2013 and December 2019. Reports were included if they involved suicide or intentional self-harm and prescribed or over-the-counter medication; illicit drugs were excluded. Following data extraction, descriptive statistics, document and content analysis were performed to assess coroners' concerns and the recipients of reports. Results There were 734 suicide-related coroner reports, with 100 (14%) reporting a medicine. Opioids (40%) were the most common class involved, followed by antidepressants (30%). There was wide geographical variation in the writing of reports; coroners in Manchester wrote the most (18%). Coroners expressed 237 concerns; the most common were procedural inadequacies (14%, n = 32), inadequate documentation and communication (10%, n = 22), and inappropriate prescription access (9%, n = 21). 203 recipients received the PFDs, with most sent to NHS trusts (31%), clinical commissioning groups (10%), and general practices (10%), of which only 58% responded to the coroner. Conclusions One in four coroner reports in England and Wales involved suicides, with one in seven suicide-related deaths involving a medicine. Concerns raised by coroners highlighted gaps in care that require action from the Government, health services, and prescribers to aid suicide prevention. Coroner reports should be routinely used and monitored to inform public health policy, disseminated nationally, and responses to coroners should be transparently enforced so that actions are taken to prevent future suicides.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G. Anthony
- Oxford University Medical School, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - J.K. Aronson
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - R. Brittain
- St Pancras Coroner's Court, London, N1C 4PP, UK
| | - C. Heneghan
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - G.C. Richards
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McFadden E, Heneghan C. The long-term impact of vaginal surgical mesh devices on pain clinic and psychological service referrals, anti-inflammatory testing and pelvic scans in UK primary care: A cohort study with the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. BJOG 2024. [PMID: 38646667 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine long-term complications in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP), with and without surgical mesh implants. DESIGN Longitudinal open cohort study from 1 April 2006 (or 1 April 2012) to 30 November 2018. SETTING The Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Gold database, which is linked to Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES) inpatient data, the HES Diagnostic Imaging Dataset (DID), Office for National Statistics mortality data and Index of Multiple Deprivation socio-economic status data. SAMPLE Women aged ≥18 years with a diagnostic SUI/POP Read code. METHODS Rates are estimated using negative binomial regression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Rates of referrals for: psychological and pain services; urinalysis, C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) testing; and pelvic ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. RESULTS A cohort of 220 544 women were eligible for inclusion; 74% (n = 162 687) had SUI, 37% (n = 82 123) had POP and 11% (n = 24 266) had both. Rates of psychological referrals and CT scans were lower in women with SUI mesh surgery, but this was offset by higher rates of CRP testing in women with SUI or POP mesh, MRI scans in women with SUI mesh, and urinalysis testing and referrals to pain clinics for women with POP mesh. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest a higher burden of morbidity in women with SUI/POP mesh surgery, and that these women may require ongoing follow-up in the primary care setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily McFadden
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Thomas ET, Glogowska M, Hayward G, Gill P, Perera R, Heneghan C. General practitioners' perspectives on diagnostic tests for children: a qualitative interview study. Br J Gen Pract 2024:BJGP.2023.0469. [PMID: 38499294 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2023.0469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Most healthcare contacts for children in the UK occur in general practice. Diagnostic tests can be beneficial in narrowing differential diagnoses, however, there is substantial variation in the use of tests for children in general practice. Unwarranted variation in testing can lead to variation in quality of care and exacerbate health inequities. No prior study has tried to understand why variation in testing exists for children in general practice. Aim To explore GP perspectives on using diagnostic tests for children in primary care and the underlying drivers of variation. Design and setting Semi-structured interviews were conducted with GPs and trainee GPs in England. Methods We conducted interviews with 18 GPs and 2 trainees between April and June 2023. The interviews were transcribed and analysed thematically. Results GPs reflected that their approach to testing in children differed from adults; their threshold to test was higher, but the threshold to refer to specialists was lower. GPs' perceptions of test utility varied, including objective testing for asthma. Perceived drivers of variation in testing included: 1) intrinsic (clinician) factors relating to their risk tolerance and experience, and 2) extrinsic factors, including disease prevalence, parental concern and expectations of healthcare, workforce changes leading to fragmentation in care, time constraints and differences in guidelines. Conclusions The findings of this study identify actionable issues for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers to address gaps in education, evidence, and guidance, reduce unwarranted differences in test use and improve the quality of health care delivered to children in general practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth T Thomas
- University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Margaret Glogowska
- University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Gail Hayward
- University of Oxford Medical Sciences Division, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Gill
- Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario Canada
| | - Rafael Perera
- University of Oxford Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Carl Heneghan
- University of Oxford, Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Soliman R, Bolous N, Heneghan C, Oke J, Boylan AM, Eweida W, Abouelnaga S, Elhaddad A. An overview of childhood cancer care and outcomes in Egypt: a narrative review. Ecancermedicalscience 2024; 18:1676. [PMID: 38439811 PMCID: PMC10911675 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2024.1676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Childhood cancer is an urgent priority in Egypt, owing to a large number of children with cancer, the great need and demand for paediatric oncology services, limited resources/funds and inferior survival outcomes. Therefore, an overview of the status of childhood cancer care in Egypt and an evidence-based approach towards optimal utilisation of resources/funds to improve this care are needed. This paper summarises key evidence about childhood cancer care and outcomes in Egypt. We conducted a narrative literature review using a structured search strategy of the MEDLINE database through the PubMed interface. All relevant evidence was summarised under five main sub-topics: (1) burden of childhood cancer in Egypt; (2) treatment approaches; (3) health outcomes; (4) costs and cost-effectiveness of treatment; and (5) barriers and facilitators to optimal childhood cancer care. We found high estimates of disease burden of childhood cancer in Egypt. Furthermore, childhood cancer treatment in Egypt is based on either implementing intensity-regulated protocols or adopting international protocols with or without adaptations to local contexts, leading to varying standards of care among the different treating centres. Limited data about the survival outcomes, costs and cost-effectiveness of treatment exist, although high-quality data from retrospective cohort studies were published from a large paediatric oncology centre (Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt-57357). As Egypt joins the WHO Global Initiative for Childhood Cancers as a focus country, it is prepared to move towards streamlining national efforts to implement a national childhood cancer plan to advance care, improve health outcomes and optimise resource use. Through these efforts, Egypt could become a beacon of hope and a role model to other low- and middle-income countries seeking to improve their childhood cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ranin Soliman
- Health Economics and Value Unit, Children’s Cancer Hospital 57357 Egypt (CCHE), Cairo 4260102, Egypt
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford, OX1 2JD Oxford, UK
- Co-first authors
| | - Nancy Bolous
- Department of Global Pediatric Medicine, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA
- Co-first authors
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, OX1 2JD Oxford, UK
| | - Jason Oke
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, OX1 2JD Oxford, UK
| | - Anne-Marie Boylan
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, OX1 2JD Oxford, UK
| | - Wael Eweida
- Chief Operating Office, Children’s Cancer Hospital 57357 Egypt (CCHE), Cairo 4260102, Egypt
| | - Sherif Abouelnaga
- Chief Executive Office, Children’s Cancer Hospital 57357 Egypt (CCHE), Cairo 4260102, Egypt
- Paediatric Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo 11796, Egypt
| | - Alaa Elhaddad
- Paediatric Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo 11796, Egypt
- Paediatric Oncology Department, Children’s Cancer Hospital 57357 Egypt (CCHE), Cairo 4260102, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
DeVito NJ, Morley J, Smith JA, Drysdale H, Goldacre B, Heneghan C. Availability of results of clinical trials registered on EU Clinical Trials Register: cross sectional audit study. BMJ Med 2024; 3:e000738. [PMID: 38274035 PMCID: PMC10806997 DOI: 10.1136/bmjmed-2023-000738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
Objective To identify the availability of results for trials registered on the European Union Clinical Trials Register (EUCTR) compared with other dissemination routes to understand its value as a results repository. Design Cross sectional audit study. Setting EUCTR protocols and results sections, data extracted 1-3 December 2020. Population Random sample of 500 trials registered on EUCTR with a completion date of more than two years from the beginning of searches (ie, 1 December 2018). Main outcome measures Proportion of trials with results across the examined dissemination routes (EUCTR, ClinicalTrials.gov, ISRCTN registry, and journal publications), and for each dissemination route individually. Prespecified secondary outcomes were number and proportion of unique results, and the timing of results, for each dissemination route. Results In the sample of 500 trials, availability of results on EUCTR (53.2%, 95% confidence interval 48.8% to 57.6%) was similar to the peer reviewed literature (58.6%, 54.3% to 62.9%) and exceeded the proportion of results available on other registries with matched records. Among the 383 trials with any results, 55 (14.4%, 10.9% to 17.9%) were only available on EUCTR. Also, after the launch of the EUCTR results database, median time to results was fastest on EUCTR (1142 days, 95% confidence interval 812 to 1492), comparable with journal publications (1226 days, 1074 to 1551), and exceeding ClinicalTrials.gov (3321 days, 1653 to undefined). For 117 trials (23.4%, 19.7% to 27.1%), however, results were published elsewhere but not submitted to the EUCTR registry, and no results were located in any dissemination route for 117 trials (23.4%, 19.7% to 27.1). Conclusions EUCTR should be considered in results searches for systematic reviews and can help researchers and the public to access the results of clinical trials, unavailable elsewhere, in a timely way. Reporting requirements, such as the EU's, can help in avoiding research waste by ensuring results are reported. The registry's true value, however, is unrealised because of inadequate compliance with EU guidelines, and problems with data quality that complicate the routine use of the registry. As the EU transitions to a new registry, continuing to emphasise the importance of EUCTR and the provision of timely and complete data is critical. For the future, EUCTR will still hold important information from the past two decades of clinical research in Europe. With increased efforts from sponsors and regulators, the registry can continue to grow as a source of results of clinical trials, many of which might be unavailable from other dissemination routes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas J DeVito
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jessica Morley
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - James Andrew Smith
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford Medical Sciences Division, Oxford, UK
| | - Henry Drysdale
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ben Goldacre
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Thomas ET, Withrow DR, Shine B, Gill P, Perera R, Heneghan C. Trends in diagnostic tests ordered for children: a retrospective analysis of 1.7 million laboratory test requests in Oxfordshire, UK from 2005 to 2019. Arch Dis Child 2023; 109:30-36. [PMID: 37949643 PMCID: PMC10803974 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-325550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To better understand testing patterns in children, we measured temporal trends in paediatric testing from 2005 to 2019 in Oxfordshire, UK. DESIGN Descriptive study of population-based secondary data. SETTING Oxfordshire University Hospitals National Health Service Trust laboratories. PARTICIPANTS Children aged 0-15 years in Oxfordshire who received at least one blood test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES We estimated average annual percentage changes (AAPCs) in test use using joinpoint regression models. Temporal changes in age-adjusted rates in test use were calculated overall and stratified by healthcare setting, sex, and age. RESULTS Between 2005 and 2019, 1 749 425 tests were performed among 113 607 children. Overall test use declined until 2012, when test rates appeared to increase (AAPC 1.5%, 95% CI -0.8% to 3.9%). Most tests were performed in inpatient settings, where testing rates stayed steady (AAPC -0.6%, 95% CI -2.1% to 0.9%). Increases were highest in females, those aged 6-15 years and in the outpatient setting. The greatest increase in testing was for vitamin D (AAPC 26.5%), followed by parathyroid hormone (9.8%), iron studies (9.3%), folate (8.4%), vitamin B12 (8.4%), HbA1c (8.0%), IgA (7.9%) and coeliac (7.7%). CONCLUSIONS After an initial decline, laboratory test use by children in Oxfordshire demonstrated an apparent increase since 2012. Test use increased in outpatient and general practice settings, however remained steady in inpatient settings. Further research should examine the root causes and implications for test increases, and whether these increases are warranted. We encourage clinicians to consider the individual and systemic implications of performing blood tests in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth T Thomas
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Diana R Withrow
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Brian Shine
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Peter Gill
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences Program, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rafael Perera
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
McFadden E, Heneghan C. The impact of vaginal surgical mesh devices on consultation rates by type and health care provider in UK primary care: A cohort study in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Maturitas 2023; 178:107829. [PMID: 37716135 DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2023.107829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine consultation rates by type of consultation and health care provider in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and/or pelvic organ prolapse (POP), with and without surgical mesh implants. STUDY DESIGN Longitudinal open cohort study from April 2006 to November 2018 in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Rates of consultations with general practitioners (GPs), nurses, other clinicians and administrators by consultation type (face-to-face, telephone or administrative), and types of administrative consultations, estimated using negative binomial regression. RESULTS Of 220,544 women eligible for inclusion, 74 % (n = 162,687) had SUI, 37 % (n = 82,123) had POP, and 11 % (n = 24,266) had both. Face-to-face consultation rates were stable over time, at about 9 per year. Administrative consultations with GPs and administrators increased between 2006 and 2018, but averaged 31 per year. After adjustment, for both SUI and POP mesh surgery, there were lower rates of face-to-face consultations with GPs, higher rates of face-to-face consultations with other clinicians, higher rates of telephone consultations with GPs and other clinicians, and higher rates of administrative consultations with GPs, nurses and administrators. The higher rate of consultations with GPs coded as administrative consisted of results recording and administrative codes, and the higher rates of consultations with administrators were coded as repeat issue, other, administration and third-party consultations. CONCLUSIONS Caring for women with mesh places a higher administrative burden on GPs and administrators. There may be potential to reduce this workload through a more streamlined care pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily McFadden
- Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dernie F, France HS, Thomas ET, Bilip M, DeVito NJ, Ferner RE, Cox AR, Heneghan C, Aronson JK, Richards GC. Preventable deaths involving opioids in England and Wales, 2013-2022: a systematic case series of coroners' reports. J Public Health (Oxf) 2023; 45:e656-e663. [PMID: 37605451 PMCID: PMC10687604 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 08/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioid deaths have increased in England and Wales. Coroners' Prevention of Future Deaths reports (PFDs) provide important insights that may enable safer use and avert harms, yet reports implicating opioids have not been synthesized. We aimed to identify opioid-related PFDs and explore coroners' concerns to prevent future deaths. METHODS In this systematic case series, we screened 3897 coronial PFDs dated between 01 July 2013 and 23 February 2022, obtained by web scraping the UK's Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website. PFDs were included when an opioid was implicated in the death. Included PFDs were descriptively analysed, and content analysis was used to assess concerns reported by coroners. RESULTS Opioids were involved in 219 deaths reported in PFDs (5·6% of PFDs), equating to 4418 years of life lost (median 33 years/person). Morphine (29%), methadone (23%) and diamorphine (16%) were the most common implicated opioids. Coroners most frequently raised concerns regarding systems and protocols (52%) or safety issues (15%). These concerns were most often addressed to National Health Service (NHS) organizations (51%), but response rates were low overall (47%). CONCLUSIONS Opioids could be used more safely if coroners' concerns in PFDs were addressed by national organizations such as NHS bodies, government agencies and policymakers, as well as individual prescribing clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Harrison S France
- Oxford Medical School, Medical Sciences Divisional Office, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Elizabeth T Thomas
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Maja Bilip
- Department of Internal Medicine, Thames Hospital, MacKay Street, Thames 3500, New Zealand
| | - Nicholas J DeVito
- Bennett Institute for Applied Data Science, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Robin E Ferner
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- West Midlands Centre for Adverse Drug Reactions, City Hospital, Birmingham B17 7QH, UK
| | - Anthony R Cox
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- West Midlands Centre for Adverse Drug Reactions, City Hospital, Birmingham B17 7QH, UK
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Jeffrey K Aronson
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Georgia C Richards
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Luo
- Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford, UK
| | - Nav Persaud
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cook J, Cook JA, Bongard E, Heneghan C, Butler CC. Conditional versus non-conditional incentives to maximise return of participant completed questionnaires in clinical trials: a cluster randomised study within a trial. Trials 2023; 24:710. [PMID: 37936228 PMCID: PMC10629007 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07604-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High participant retention enhances the validity of clinical trials. A monetary incentive can increase retention, but it is not known if when it is provided and if it is conditional matters. We aimed to determine whether there was a difference in the number of follow-up trial questionnaires returned when a monetary (gift voucher) incentive was given to participants at recruitment (non-conditional), compared to informing participants at recruitment that the incentive would be given only once their 14-day daily diary (questionnaire) had been returned (conditional). METHOD A cluster randomised study within a trial embedded within the Antivirals for influenza-Like Illness, An rCt of Clinical and Cost effectiveness in primary CarE (ALIC4E) Trial. Matched site pairs (GP practices) were randomised using computer-generated random numbers, to either a non-conditional or conditional monetary voucher incentive (only once their 14-day daily diary (questionnaire) had been returned. Sites were matched on previous recruitment levels and practice list size. Analyses were conducted according to randomised groups irrespective of compliance with a two-sided 5% level statistical significance level. The main analysis of the primary outcome (site proportion of diaries returned) was linear regression accounting for site pair (using cluster-robust variance). Additional weighted, paired and non-parametric sensitivity analyses were conducted. Secondary outcomes were the site average number of completed pages, time to return diary, and cost related to the incentive (administration and postage). RESULTS Of the 42 randomised sites (21 for each intervention), only 28 recruited at least one participant with only 10 practice pairs recruiting participants at both constituent sites. Raw diaries return proportions were 0.58 (127/220) and 0.73 (91/125) for non-conditional and conditional incentive groups. Regression analysis adjusted for site pair showed no significant difference in returns, - 0.09, (95% CI, - 0.29, 0.10, p = 0.34); when weighted, there was still no clear difference: 0.15 (95% CI, - 0.02, 0.31, p = 0.07). There was no clear statistical evidence of a difference in time taken to return questionnaires, nor the proportion of pages completed, by the intervention group in the main analyses (all p > 0.05). The conditional incentive was approximately £23 cheaper per diary returned based upon observed data. CONCLUSION There was no clear evidence of a statistically significant difference in the proportion of participant-completed diaries returned between conditional or non-conditional incentive groups. The time to questionnaire return and completeness of the returned questionnaires were similar in both groups. There was substantial statistical uncertainty in the findings. Some of the sensitivity analyses suggested that a meaningful benefit of a conditional incentive of a magnitude that would be meaningful was plausible. The conditional approach costs less in cash terms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Cook
- The Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
| | - Jonathan A Cook
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Emily Bongard
- The Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Carl Heneghan
- The Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Chris C Butler
- The Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Aronson JK, Heneghan C, Ferner RE. Drug shortages. Part 1. Definitions and harms. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2023; 89:2950-2956. [PMID: 37455356 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2023] [Revised: 06/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Drug shortages are repeatedly in the news. The earliest drug shortages were reported during the First World War, but the numbers of shortages have increased in recent years. In the first part of this two-part review, we discuss definitions of drug shortages and so-called stockouts, which are localized shortages, and the harms that they can cause. Drug shortages make it difficult or impossible to meet the therapeutic needs of individual patients or populations, but we lack an adequate definition. The problems are too complicated to be encompassed in a brief intensional dictionary-style definition, and that is reflected in the many different attempts at definition that have been proposed. We therefore propose an extensional operational definition that incorporates the processes by which products are manufactured, the causes of shortages and the contributory factors. A definition of this sort allows one to identify the main causes of a particular drug shortage and therefore the remedies that might prevent, mitigate or manage it. In the second part of the review we discuss the causes and solutions in more detail. Adverse drug reactions and medication errors attributable to shortages occur but are not often reported. Adverse reactions to substitute medicines are possible, and errors can occur because of unfamiliarity or unnecessary treatment with replacement medicines. Other harmful outcomes include withdrawal reactions, undertreatment, treatment delays and cancellations, failure of alternatives and disruption of clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey K Aronson
- Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK
| | - Robin E Ferner
- West Midlands Centre for Adverse Drug Reactions, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
- School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Aronson JK, Heneghan C, Ferner RE. Drug shortages. Part 2: Trends, causes and solutions. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2023; 89:2957-2963. [PMID: 37455465 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2023] [Revised: 06/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Drug shortages make it difficult or impossible to meet the therapeutic needs of individual patients or populations. In the first part of this review we proposed an operational definition that incorporates the processes by which products are manufactured, the causes of shortages and stock-outs (local shortages), and the contributory factors. Here we discuss causes and possible solutions. Drug shortages have complex causes, and a single cause cannot always be identified. Reasons include lack or shortage of raw materials, manufacturing difficulties, regulatory and political actions, voluntary recalls, just-in-time inventory systems, halts in production for financial or other business reasons, low demand (eg, orphan products, reduced usage), mergers, market shifts (eg, diversion to home markets) and unexpected increases in demand (eg, improved diagnosis, new trial information, epidemics and pandemics, inappropriate use, off-label use). Potential solutions are as diverse as the potential causes. Prevention is hard, because shortages are not easily predicted. Everyone in the supply chain is involved in anticipating and managing shortages, with responsibilities for preventing them or at least trying to mitigate their effects. This includes manufacturers and suppliers, particularly of generic formulations, pharmacists, prescribers, patients and governments. Solutions can therefore be linked to the causes and classified according to where the responsibility for implementing them lies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey K Aronson
- Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford, UK
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford, UK
| | - Robin E Ferner
- West Midlands Centre for Adverse Drug Reactions, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
- School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ferner RE, Brittain R, Cox AR, Heneghan C, Richards GC, Aronson JK. Recognition of Coroners' Concerns to Prevent Future Deaths from Medicines: A Systematic Review. Pharmaceut Med 2023; 37:357-363. [PMID: 37421561 DOI: 10.1007/s40290-023-00486-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coroners, who hold inquests to determine the causes of unnatural deaths in England and Wales, having recognised factors that could cause other deaths, are legally obliged to signal concerns by sending 'Reports to Prevent Future Deaths' (PFDs) to interested persons. We aimed to establish whether Coroners' concerns about medications are widely recognised. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science up to 30 November, 2022 for publications linking PFDs and medications using a combination of search terms "coroner*", "inquest*", "medicine*", "medication*" and "prevent*". We also searched the BMJ, a UK journal that carries news items; and the databases Nexis Advance and News On the Web for reports in national newspapers between 2013 and 2022, using the search terms ("regulation 28" OR "prevent future deaths" OR "prevention of future deaths") AND "coroner". We recorded the number of publications, as well as their citations in Google Scholar at 23 May, 2023. RESULTS Only 11 published papers on medicines referenced UK PFDs, nine of which were from our group. The BMJ carried 23 articles mentioning PFDs, five related to medicines. Of 139 PFDs (out of over 4000) mentioned in national newspapers, only nine related to medicines. CONCLUSIONS The PFDs related to medicines are not widely referred to in medical journals or UK national newspapers. By contrast, the Australian and New Zealand National Coronial Information System has contributed cases to 206 publications cited in PubMed, of which 139 are related to medicines. Our search suggests that information from English and Welsh Coroners' PFDs is under-recognised, even though it should inform public health. The results of inquiries by Coroners and medical examiners worldwide into potentially preventable deaths involving medicines should be used to strengthen the safety of medicines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin E Ferner
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
- West Midlands Centre for Adverse Drug Reactions, City Hospital, Birmingham, B18 7QH, UK.
| | | | - Anthony R Cox
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Georgia C Richards
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Jeffrey K Aronson
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Thomas ET, Thomas ST, Perera R, Gill PJ, Moloney S, Heneghan C. The quality of diagnostic guidelines for children in primary care: A meta-epidemiological study. J Paediatr Child Health 2023; 59:1053-1060. [PMID: 37335248 DOI: 10.1111/jpc.16454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
AIM To determine the quality of paediatric guidelines relevant to diagnosis of three of the most common conditions in primary care: fever, gastroenteritis and constipation. METHODS We undertook a meta-epidemiological study of paediatric guidelines for fever, gastroenteritis and gastroenteritis. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Trip Database, Guidelines International Network, the National Guideline Clearinghouse and WHO from February 2011 to September 2022 for guidelines from high-income settings containing diagnostic recommendations. We assessed the quality of guideline reporting for included guidelines using the AGREE II tool. RESULTS We included 16 guidelines: fever (n = 7); constipation (n = 4) and gastroenteritis (n = 5). The overall quality across the three conditions was graded moderate (median AGREE II score 4.5/7, range 2.5-6.5) with constipation guidelines rated the highest (median 6/7), and fever rated the lowest (median 3.8/7). Major methodological weaknesses included consideration of guideline applicability. Half of the guidelines did not report involving parent representatives, and 56% did not adequately declare or address their competing interests. CONCLUSIONS Substantial variations exist in the quality of paediatric guidelines related to the diagnosis of primary care presentations. Better quality guidance is needed for general practitioners to improve diagnosis for children in primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth T Thomas
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah T Thomas
- Department of Neurology, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rafael Perera
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Peter J Gill
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan Moloney
- Department of Paediatrics, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
- School of Medicine, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Richards GC, Carpenter J, Okpalugo E, Howard DJ, Heneghan C. Assessing housing exposures and interventions that impact healthy cities: a systematic overview of reviews. Perspect Public Health 2023:17579139231180756. [PMID: 37542406 DOI: 10.1177/17579139231180756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/06/2023]
Abstract
AIM There are direct links between housing and health. However, there is a lack of systematic reviews that bring together the evidence to outline the health impacts of exposures in housing and housing interventions. This article aims to address this gap by synthesising systematic reviews on the themes of housing exposures and interventions. METHODS We searched four databases: Scopus (Elsevier), PsycINFO (OvidSP), Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index (Web of Science Core Collection), and the Sociology Collection (Proquest). We used keywords related to 'health' and 'city*' and included all types of reviews. We extracted data into a predesigned extraction form and synthesised information narratively. RESULTS 745 articles were identified and screened, of which 256 reviews were included and 16 (6%) related to housing. All reviews related to housing exposures found that poor housing, including crowding, coldness, dampness, mould, and indoor air pollution had a negative impact on health. Most reviews found that housing interventions such as housing refurbishment, heating, and energy efficiency interventions positively impacted health outcomes. An online toolkit was developed to disseminate and communicate this research: https://www.healthycitiescommission.org/toolkit/. CONCLUSION Governments have a pivotal role in addressing health issues related to housing interventions and exposures in housing. This includes interventions through building regulations following international guidance and financial assistance to encourage housing modifications that will improve health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G C Richards
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - J Carpenter
- Global Centre on Healthcare and Urbanisation, Kellogg College, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6PN, UK
| | - E Okpalugo
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - D J Howard
- Global Centre on Healthcare and Urbanisation, Kellogg College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford University Department for Continuing Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - C Heneghan
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Global Centre on Healthcare and Urbanisation, Kellogg College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Soliman R, Heneghan C, Boylan AM, Oke J, Eweida W, Elhaddad A. Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Cost-Effective Evidence-Based Childhood Cancer Treatment in a Resource-Limited Setting in Egypt: A Qualitative Interview Study. JCO Glob Oncol 2023; 9:e2200424. [PMID: 37290021 PMCID: PMC10497298 DOI: 10.1200/go.22.00424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Childhood cancer treatment is complex, resource-intensive, and expensive, and resource-limited settings would benefit from providing cost-effective treatment approaches on the basis of evidence. Effective implementation of cost-effective evidence-based treatment requires knowledge about factors influencing its use. In this study, we determined the clinicians' perceptions of the barriers and facilitators to implementing cost-effective evidence-based treatment for children with cancer in a resource-limited pediatric oncology setting in Egypt. METHODS We conducted a qualitative study on the basis of semistructured interviews with senior clinicians who make high-level decisions on treatment protocols and tailored decisions for the atypically complicated group of patients. Purposive sampling was used to recruit the participants. Thematic analysis was conducted semantically to develop themes of barriers and facilitators. RESULTS Fourteen participants agreed to participate in the study: nine pediatric oncologists; three surgeons; and two radiation oncologists. We identified four main themes of barriers and facilitators: awareness and orientation; knowledge, skills, and attitudes; system, resources, and context; and clinical practice. The main barriers included absence of easily available costs/cost-effectiveness data, limited resources and inability to pay for expensive novel (cost-effective) drugs, and gap between evidence and practice. The main facilitators included adopting standard treatment protocols on the basis of clinical effectiveness, leadership support, availability of patients' clinical and cost data from local context, and existing knowledge and skills in clinical research and health economic evaluation. The interview participants also provided suggestions to promote the implementation of cost-effective evidence-based treatment in priority areas. CONCLUSION Our study findings provide an understanding of the barriers and facilitators affecting the implementation of cost-effective evidence-based treatment for childhood cancers in Egypt. We provide practical recommendations to address the implementation gaps with implications on practice, policy, and research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ranin Soliman
- Department of Continuing Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Health Economics and Value Unit, Children's Cancer Hospital 57357 Egypt (CCHE), Cairo, Egypt
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Anne-Marie Boylan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Jason Oke
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Wael Eweida
- Chief Operating Office, Children's Cancer Hospital 57357 Egypt (CCHE), Cairo, Egypt
| | - Alaa Elhaddad
- Paediatric Oncology Department, Children's Cancer Hospital 57357 Egypt (CCHE), Cairo, Egypt
- Paediatric Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rosca EC, Heneghan C, Spencer EA, Plüddemann A, Maltoni S, Gandini S, Onakpoya IJ, Evans D, Conly JM, Jefferson T. Coinfection with Strongyloides and SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review. Trop Med Infect Dis 2023; 8:tropicalmed8050248. [PMID: 37235296 DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed8050248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatments for COVID-19, including steroids, might exacerbate Strongyloides disease in patients with coinfection. We aimed to systematically review clinical and laboratory features of SARS-CoV-2 and Strongyloides coinfection, investigate possible interventions, assess outcomes, and identify research gaps requiring further attention. METHODS We searched two electronic databases, LitCOVID and WHO, up to August 2022, including SARS-CoV-2 and Strongyloides coinfection studies. We adapted the World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) system for standardized case causality assessment to evaluate if using corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive drugs in COVID-19 patients determined acute manifestations of strongyloidiasis. RESULTS We included 16 studies reporting 25 cases of Strongyloides and SARS-CoV-2 coinfection: 4 with hyperinfection syndrome; 2 with disseminated strongyloidiasis; 3 with cutaneous reactivation of strongyloidiasis; 3 with isolated digestive symptoms; and 2 with solely eosinophilia, without clinical manifestations. Eleven patients were asymptomatic regarding strongyloidiasis. Eosinopenia or normal eosinophil count was reported in 58.3% of patients with Strongyloides reactivation. Steroids were given to 18/21 (85.7%) cases. A total of 4 patients (19.1%) received tocilizumab and/or Anakirna in addition to steroids. Moreover, 2 patients (9.5%) did not receive any COVID-19 treatment. The causal relationship between Strongyloides reactivation and COVID-19 treatments was considered certain (4% of cases), probable (20% of patients), and possible (20% of patients). For 8% of cases, it was considered unlikely that COVID-19 treatment was associated with strongyloidiasis reactivations; the relationship between the Strongyloides infection and administration of COVID-19 treatment was unassessable/unclassifiable in 48% of cases. Of 13 assessable cases, 11 (84.6%) were considered to be causally associated with Strongyloides, ranging from certain to possible. CONCLUSIONS Further research is needed to assess the frequency and risk of Strongyloides reactivation in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our limited data using causality assessment supports recommendations that clinicians should screen and treat for Strongyloides infection in patients with coinfection who receive immunosuppressive COVID-19 therapies. In addition, the male gender and older age (over 50 years) may be predisposing factors for Strongyloides reactivation. Standardized guidelines should be developed for reporting future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena C Rosca
- Department of Neurology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Piata Eftimie Murgu 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Elizabeth A Spencer
- Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Annette Plüddemann
- Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Susanna Maltoni
- Division of Research and Innovation, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Sara Gandini
- Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Igho J Onakpoya
- Department of Continuing Education, University of Oxford, Rewley House, 1 Wellington Square, Oxford OX1 2JA, UK
| | - David Evans
- Li Ka Shing Institute of Virology and Department of Medical Microbiology & Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2E1, Canada
| | - John M Conly
- Departments of Medicine, Microbiology, Immunology & Infectious Diseases, and Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Synder Institute for Chronic Diseases and O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Tom Jefferson
- Department of Continuing Education, University of Oxford, Rewley House, 1 Wellington Square, Oxford OX1 2JA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
France HS, Aronson JK, Heneghan C, Ferner RE, Cox AR, Richards GC. Preventable Deaths Involving Medicines: A Systematic Case Series of Coroners' Reports 2013-22. Drug Saf 2023; 46:335-342. [PMID: 36811814 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-023-01274-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Medicines cause over 1700 preventable deaths annually in England. Coroners' Prevention of Future Death reports (PFDs) are produced in response to preventable deaths to facilitate change. The information in PFDs may help reduce medicine-related preventable deaths. OBJECTIVES We aimed to identify medicine-related deaths in coroners' reports and to explore concerns to prevent future deaths. METHODS We carried out a retrospective case series of PFDs across England and Wales, dated between 1 July, 2013 and 23 February, 2022, collected from the UK's Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website using web scraping, generating an openly available database: https://preventabledeathstracker.net/ . We used descriptive techniques and content analysis to assess the main outcome criteria: the proportion of PFDs in which coroners reported that a therapeutic medicine or drug of abuse had caused or contributed to a death; the characteristics of included PFDs; coroners' concerns; the recipients of PFDs; and the timeliness of their responses. RESULTS There were 704 PFDs (18%; 716 deaths) that involved medicines, representing an estimated 19,740 years of life lost (average of 50 years lost per death). Opioids (22%), antidepressants (9.7%), and hypnotics (9.2%) were the most common drugs involved. Coroners expressed 1249 concerns, primarily around the major themes of patient safety (29%) and communication (26%), including minor themes of failures of monitoring (10%) and poor communication between organizations (7.5%). Most expected responses to PFDs (51%; 630/1245) were not reported on the UK's Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website. CONCLUSIONS One in five coroner-reported preventable deaths involved medicines. Addressing coroners' concerns, including problems with patient safety and communication, should reduce harms from medicines. Despite concerns being raised repeatedly, half of the PFD recipients failed to respond, suggesting that lessons are not generally learned. The rich information in PFDs should be used to foster a learning environment in clinical practice that may help reduce preventable deaths. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/TX3CS .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harrison S France
- Oxford Medical School, Medical Sciences Divisional Office, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
| | - Jeffrey K Aronson
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK
| | - Robin E Ferner
- West Midlands Centre for Adverse Drug Reactions, Birmingham, UK.,College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Anthony R Cox
- West Midlands Centre for Adverse Drug Reactions, Birmingham, UK.,College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Georgia C Richards
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
McLellan J, Heneghan C, Roberts N, Pluddemann A. Accuracy of self-diagnosis in conditions commonly managed in primary care: diagnostic accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e065748. [PMID: 36627158 PMCID: PMC9835960 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the diagnostic accuracy of self-diagnosis compared with a clinical diagnosis for common conditions in primary care. DESIGN Systematic review. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and CINAHL from inception to 25 January 2021. STUDY SELECTION Eligible studies were prospective or retrospective studies comparing the results of self-diagnosis of common conditions in primary care to a relevant clinical diagnosis or laboratory reference standard test performed by a healthcare service provider. Studies that considered self-testing only were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION Two authors independently extracted data using a predefined data extraction form and assessed risk of bias using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. METHODS AND RESULTS 5047 records identified 18 studies for inclusion covering the self-diagnosis of three common conditions: vaginal infection (five studies), common skin conditions (four studies) and HIV (nine studies). No studies were found for any other condition. For self-diagnosis of vaginal infection and common skin conditions, meta-analysis was not appropriate and data were reported narratively. Nine studies, using point-of-care oral fluid tests, reported on the accuracy of self-diagnosis of HIV and data were pooled using bivariate meta-analysis methods. For these nine studies, the pooled sensitivity was 92.8% (95% CI, 86% to 96.5%) and specificity was 99.8% (95% CI, 99.1% to 99.9%). Post hoc, the robustness of the pooled findings was tested in a sensitivity analysis only including four studies using laboratory testing as the reference standard. The pooled sensitivity reduced to 87.7% (95% CI, 81.4% to 92.2%) and the specificity remained the same. The quality of all 18 included studies was assessed as mixed and overall study methodology was not always well described. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS Overall, there was a paucity of evidence. The current evidence does not support routine self-diagnosis for vaginal infections, common skin conditions and HIV in primary care. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42018110288.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie McLellan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Nia Roberts
- Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Annette Pluddemann
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Soliman R, Oke J, Sidhom I, Bhakta N, Bolous NS, Tarek N, Ahmed S, Abdelrahman H, Moussa E, Zamzam M, Fawzy M, Zekri W, Hafez H, Sedky M, Hammad M, Elzomor H, Ahmed S, Awad M, Abdelhameed S, Mohsen E, Shalaby L, Eweida W, Abouelnaga S, Elhaddad A, Heneghan C. Cost-effectiveness of childhood cancer treatment in Egypt: Lessons to promote high-value care in a resource-limited setting based on real-world evidence. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 55:101729. [PMID: 36386036 PMCID: PMC9646894 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Revised: 10/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Childhood cancer in low-and middle-income countries is a global health priority, however, the perception that treatment is unaffordable has potentially led to scarce investment in resources, contributing to inferior survival. In this study, we analysed real-world data about the cost-effectiveness of treating 8886 children with cancer at a large resource-limited paediatric oncology setting in Egypt, between 2013 and 2017, stratified by cancer type, stage/risk, and disease status. METHODS Childhood cancer costs (USD 2019) were calculated from a health-system perspective, and 5-year overall survival was used to represent clinical effectiveness. We estimated cost-effectiveness as the cost per disability-adjusted life-year (cost/DALY) averted, adjusted for utility decrement for late-effect morbidity and mortality. FINDINGS For all cancers combined, cost/DALY averted was $1384 (0.5 × GDP/capita), which is very cost-effective according to WHO-CHOICE thresholds. Ratio of cost/DALY averted to GDP/capita varied by cancer type/sub-type and disease severity (range: 0.1-1.6), where it was lowest for Hodgkin lymphoma, and retinoblastoma, and highest for high-risk acute leukaemia, and high-risk neuroblastoma. Treatment was cost-effective (ratio <3 × GDP/capita) for all cancer types/subtypes and risk/stage groups, except for relapsed/refractory acute leukaemia, and relapsed/progressive patients with brain tumours, hepatoblastoma, Ewing sarcoma, and neuroblastoma. Treatment cost-effectiveness was affected by the high costs and inferior survival of advanced-stage/high-risk and relapsed/progressive cancers. INTERPRETATION Childhood cancer treatment is cost-effective in a resource-limited setting in Egypt, except for some relapsed/progressive cancer groups. We present evidence-based recommendations and lessons to promote high-value in care delivery, with implications on practice and policy. FUNDING Egypt Cancer Network; NIHR School for Primary Care Research; ALSAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ranin Soliman
- Department of Continuing Education, University of Oxford, UK
- Health Economics and Value Unit, Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt – 57357, Egypt
- Corresponding author. Department for Continuing Education, Kellogg College, University of Oxford, UK; Health Economics and Value Unit, Children's Cancer Hospital 57357–Egypt (CCHE), Cairo, Egypt.
| | - Jason Oke
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM), Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Iman Sidhom
- Paediatric Oncology Department, Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt – 57357, Egypt
- Paediatric Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt
| | - Nickhill Bhakta
- Global Paediatric Medicine Department, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, USA
| | - Nancy S. Bolous
- Global Paediatric Medicine Department, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, USA
| | - Nourhan Tarek
- Health Economics and Value Unit, Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt – 57357, Egypt
| | - Sonia Ahmed
- Paediatric Oncology Department, Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt – 57357, Egypt
- Paediatric Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt
| | - Hany Abdelrahman
- Paediatric Oncology Department, Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt – 57357, Egypt
- Paediatric Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt
| | - Emad Moussa
- Paediatric Oncology Department, Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt – 57357, Egypt
- Clinical Oncology Department, Menoufia University, Egypt
| | - Manal Zamzam
- Paediatric Oncology Department, Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt – 57357, Egypt
- Paediatric Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Fawzy
- Paediatric Oncology Department, Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt – 57357, Egypt
- Paediatric Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt
| | - Wael Zekri
- Paediatric Oncology Department, Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt – 57357, Egypt
- Paediatric Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt
| | - Hanafy Hafez
- Paediatric Oncology Department, Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt – 57357, Egypt
- Paediatric Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Sedky
- Paediatric Oncology Department, Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt – 57357, Egypt
- Paediatrics Department, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mahmoud Hammad
- Paediatric Oncology Department, Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt – 57357, Egypt
- Paediatric Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt
| | - Hossam Elzomor
- Paediatric Oncology Department, Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt – 57357, Egypt
- Paediatric Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt
| | - Sahar Ahmed
- Paediatric Oncology Department, Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt – 57357, Egypt
- Paediatric Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt
| | - Madeha Awad
- Paediatric Oncology Department, Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt – 57357, Egypt
- Paediatric Oncology Department, Nasser Institute for Research and Treatment, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Sayed Abdelhameed
- Paediatric Oncology Department, Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt – 57357, Egypt
- Paediatric Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt
| | - Enas Mohsen
- Paediatric Oncology Department, Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt – 57357, Egypt
- Clinical Oncology Department, Beni-suef University, Egypt
| | - Lobna Shalaby
- Paediatric Oncology Department, Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt – 57357, Egypt
- Paediatric Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt
| | - Wael Eweida
- Chief Operating Office, Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt – 57357, Egypt
| | - Sherif Abouelnaga
- Paediatric Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt
- Chief Executive Office, Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt – 57357, Egypt
| | - Alaa Elhaddad
- Paediatric Oncology Department, Children's Cancer Hospital Egypt – 57357, Egypt
- Paediatric Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM), Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth T Thomas
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Selim Y, Di Lena É, Abu-Omar N, Baig Z, Verhoeff K, La J, Purich K, Albacete S, Valji R, Purich K, Safar A, Schellenberg M, Schellenberg M, Schellenberg M, Schellenberg M, Schellenberg M, Schellenberg M, Daza J, Glass LT, Verhoeff K, Johnson G, Guidolin K, Glass LT, Balvardi S, Gawad N, McKechnie T, McKechnie T, Purich K, Henley J, Imbert E, Li C, Skinner S, Lenet T, Lenet T, Metz J, Ahn H(S, Do U, Rouhi A, Greenberg B, Muaddi H, Park L, Vogt K, Bradley N, Deng SX, Murphy P, Alhabboubi M, Lie J, Laplante S, Lie J, Drung J, Nixon T, Allard-Coutu A, Mansouri S, Lee A, Tweedy J, D’Elia MA, Hopkins B, Srivastava A, Alibhai K, Lee C, Moon J(J, How N, Spoyalo K, Lalande A, Baig Z, Schweitzer C, Keogh J, Huo B, Patel YS, Patel YS, Jogiat U, McGuire AL, Jogiat U, Lee Y, Barber E, Akhtar-Danesh GG, Bondzi-Simpson A, Bowker R, Ahmadi N, Abdul SA, Patel P, Harrison L, Shi G, Shi G, Alaichi JA, Kidane B, Qu LC, Alaichi J, Mackay E, Lee J, Purich K, Castelo M, Caycedo-Marulanda A, Caycedo-Marulanda A, Brennan K, Brennan K, Brennan K, Garfinkle R, Sharma S, Candy S, Patel S, LeGal G, Spadafora S, Maclellan S, Trottier D, Jonker D, Asmis T, Mallick R, Ramsay T, Carrier M, McKechnie T, Shojaei D, Motamedi A, Ghuman A, Karimuddin A, Raval M, Brown C, Shojaei D, Wang H, Buie D, Wang H, McKechnie T, Buie D, Al Busaidi N, Rajabiyazdi F, Demian M, Boutros M, Farooq A, Brown C, Phang T, Ghuman A, Karimuddin A, McKechnie T, Raval M, Udwadia F, Marinescu D, Alqahtani M, Pang A, Vasilevsky CA, Boutros M, Oviedo SC, McFadden N, Spence R, Lee L, Hirsch G, Neumann K, Neumann K, Spence R, Johnson G, Singh H, Helewa R, Yilbas A, Netto FS, Katz J, Robitaille S, Sharma B, Khan U, Selzner M, Mocanu V, Dang J, Wilson H, Switzer N, Birch D, Karmali S, Mocanu V, Robitaille S, Jogiat U, Forbes H, Switzer N, Birch D, Karmali S, Verhoeff K, Mocanu V, Kung J, Purich K, Switzer N, Sadri H, Birch D, Karmali S, Tassé N, Tchernof A, Nadeau M, Dawe P, Beckett A, Biertho L, Lin A, Verhoeff K, Selznick S, Mocanu V, Kung JY, Birch DW, Karmali S, Switzer NJ, Fowler-Woods M, Fowler-Woods A, Shingoose G, Hatala A, Daeninck F, Wiseman V, Vergis A, Hardy K, Clouston K, Debru E, Sun W, Dang J, Switzer N, Birch D, Karmali S, De Gara C, Wiseman V, Halasz J, Dang J, Switzer N, Kanji A, Birch D, Modi R, Karmali S, Gu J, Jarrar A, Kolozsvari N, Wiseman V, Samarasinghe Y, Chen L, Hapugall A, Javidan A, McKechnie T, Doumouras A, Hong D, Laplante S, Stogryn S, Maeda A, Brennan K, Jackson T, Okrainec A, Birch D, Karmali S, Kanji A, Switzer N, Balas M, Gee D, Hutter M, Meireles O, Baker L, Jung J, Vergis A, Hardy K, Boudreau V, Hong D, Anvari M, Iranmanesh P, Barlow K, Cookson T, Bolis R, Ichhpuniani S, Shanthanna H, Shiroky J, Deghan S, Zevin B, Cloutier Z, Cookson T, Barlow K, Boudreau V, Anvari M, Brodie J, Johnson G, O’Brien E, Tedman-Aucoin K, Lawlor D, Murphy R, Twells L, Pace D, Ellsmere J, Evans B, Zhang T, Deehan E, Zhang L, Kao D, Hotte N, Birch D, Karmali S, Samarasinghe K, Walter J, Madsen K, Williams E, Kong W, Fundytus A, Holden J, Booth C, Patel S, Caycedo-Marulanda A, Chung W, Nanji S, Merchant S, Hansen B, Paszat L, Baxter N, Scheer A, Moon J(J, Ghezeljeh TN, Lapointe-Gagner M, Nguyen-Powanda P, Elhaj H, Rajabiyazdi F, Lee L, Feldman LS, Fiore J, Sutradhar R, Haas B, Moon J(J, Guttman M, Eskander A, Coburn N, Chesney T, Tillman B, Zuk V, Mahar A, Hsu A, Chan W, Hallet J, Moon J(J, Guidolin K, Servidio-Italiano F, Quereshy F, Sapisochin G, Prisman E, Mitmaker E, Walker R, Wu J, Nguyen A, Wiseman S, Moon J(J, Hong D, Gupta M, Pasternak J, Vergara-Fernandez O, Brar A, Conner J, Kirsch R, Brar M, Kennedy E, Govindarajan A, Paradis T, Gryfe R, MacRae H, Cohen Z, McLeod R, Swallow C, Ghasemi F, Delisle M, Stacey D, Abou-Khalil J, Balaa F, Bayat Z, Bertens K, Dingley B, Martel G, McAlpine K, Nessim C, Tadros S, Carrier M, Auer R, Lim D, Eskander A, Patel S, Coburn N, Sutradhar R, Chan W, Hallet J, Pickard F, Mathieson A, Hogan M, Seal M, Acidi B, Johnston W, Maalouf MF, Callegaro D, Brar S, Gladdy R, Chung P, Catton C, Khalili K, Honore C, Swallow C, Fu N, Kazazian K, Wachtel A, Pacholczyk K, Ng D, Swett-Cosentino J, Savage P, Shibahara Y, Kalimuthu S, Espin-Garcia O, Conner J, Yeung J, Darling G, Baronas V, Swallow C, Mercier F, Barabash V, Law C, Coburn N, Singh S, Myrehaug S, Chan W, Hallet J, Auer RC, Wiseman V, Muhn N, Heller B, Lovrics P, Ng D, Koerber D, Al-Sukhni E, Cyr D, Kazazian K, Swallow C, Apte S, Lie J, Nessim C, Ban J, Chen L, McKevitt E, Warburton R, Pao JS, Dingee C, Kuusk U, Bazzarelli A, Hong NL, Hajjar R, Gagliardi A, Nyhof B, Marfil-Garza B, Sandha G, Cooper D, Dajani K, Bigam D, Anderson B, Kin T, Lam A, Ehlebracht A, O’Gorman D, Senior P, Ricordi C, Shapiro AJ, Moser M, Lam H, Flemming J, Jalink D, Nanji S, Bennett S, Caminsky N, Zhang B, Tywonek K, Meyers B, Serrano P, Lenet T, Shorr R, Abou-Khalil J, Bertens K, Balaa F, Martel G, Caminsky N, Jayaraman S, Wei A, Mahar A, Kaliwal Y, Martel G, Coburn N, Hallet J, Williams P, Claasen M, Ivanics T, Gilbert R, Englesakis M, Gallinger S, Hansen B, Sapisochin G, Ivanics T, Claasen M, Gallinger S, Hansen B, Sapisochin G, Lenet T, Morin G, Abou-Khalil J, Balaa F, Martel G, Brind’Amour A, Bertens K, Balaa F, Bertens K, Martel G, Abou-Khalil J, Collin Y, Auer RC, Ivanics T, Toso C, Adam R, Ijzermans J, Sapisochin G, Polak W, Léveillé M, Lawson C, Collin Y, Tai LH, Phang T, Greene B, Jayaraman S, Tsang M, Al-Arnawoot A, Rajendran L, Lamb T, Turner A, Reid M, Rekman J, Mimeault R, Hopkins J, Abou-Khalil J, Bertens K, Martel G, Balaa F, Zhang C, Lemke M, Glinka J, Leslie K, Skaro A, Tang E, Hopkins J, Greene B, Tsang M, Jayaraman S, Bubis L, Jayaraman S, Tsang ME, Ganescu O, Vanounou T, Pelletier JS, Greene B, Levin Y, Tsang M, Jayaraman S, Ganescu O, Pelletier JS, Vanounou T, Choi WJ, Muaddi H, Ivanics T, Classen MP, Sapisochin G, Alam A, Caminsky N, Mansouri S, Lagace P, Lagace P, El-Kefraoui C, Mainprize M, Melland-Smith M, Verhoeff K, Verhoeff K, Nasser K, Mailloux O, Purich K, Whyte M, Li T, Ahmad MS, Sun W, Ahn H(S, Lee Y, Roach E, Chow A, Trac J, He W, Ramji K, Kouzmina E, Koziak C, Hossain I, Mocanu V, Hanna N, Castelo M, Pook M, Zuckerman J, Choi WJ, Watanabe A, Saravana-Bawan B, Cyr D, Brackstone M, Ivankovic V, Nair AG, Hirpara D, Stockley C, Ng D, Luu S, Meloche-Dumas L, D’Elia MA, Eom A, Tang K, Khan S, Schmitz E, Chen KT, Newman-Bremang J, Verhoeff K, Jette N, Mir Z, Griffiths C, Rajendran L, Zuckerman J, Choi WJ, Choi WJ, Gilbert R, Lenet T, Amhis N, Claasen M, Mansouri S, Workewych A, Lee A, Waugh E, Zhu A, Nabavian H, Roldan J, Lagrotteria A, Roldan J, Rajendran L, Safa N, Rahman S, Kaneva P, Feldman L, Baig Z, Ginther N, Gill D, Sarwar Z, Verdiales C, Moser M, Mocanu V, Fang B, Dang J, Sun W, Switzer N, Birch D, Karmali S, Alqaydi A, Wei X, Digby G, Brogly S, Merchant S, Verhoeff K, Miles A, Kung JY, Shapiro AJ, Bigam DL, Matkin A, Dumestre D, Peiris L, Turner S, Verhoeff K, Mador B, McLennan S, Jastaniah A, Owattanapanich N, Grigorian A, Lam L, Nahmias J, Inaba K, Liasidis P, Inaba K, Demetriades D, Benjamin ER, Cowan S, Owattanapanich N, Wong MD, Inaba K, Demetriades D, Owattanapanich N, Emigh B, Karavites L, Clark DH, Lam L, Inaba K, Benjamin ER, Owattanapanich N, Inaba K, Demetriades D, Anderson GA, Owattanapanich N, Cheng V, Lam L, Inaba K, Myers L, Cuthbertson B, Myles P, Shulman M, Wijeysundera D, Murphy PB, Allen L, Minkhorst K, Bowker D, Tang ES, Leslie K, Hawel JE, Ma O, Purich K, Skinner S, Dhaliwal R, Strickland M, Park J, Vergis A, Gillman L, Rivard J, Lin J, Zorigtbaatar A, Nadeem M, Ibrahim T, Neilson Z, Kim KY(P, Rajendran L, Chadi S, Quereshy F, Davidson M, Friedrich E, Champion C, Semsar-Kazerooni K, Kaneva P, Mueller C, Vassiliou M, Al Mahroos M, Fiore J, Schwartzman K, Feldman L, Purich K, Verhoeff K, Anderson B, Daniel R, Kruse C, Levin M, Lee Y, Doumouras A, Hong D, Eskicioglu C, Povolo C, Lee J, Lee Y, Park L, Doumouras A, Hong D, Bhandari M, Eskicioglu C, Lee E, Verhoeff K, Sydora D, Turner S, Strickland M, Boone D, Roberts S, McGrouther D, Manuel P, Dykstra M, Wang H, Snelgrove R, Verhoeff K, Purich K, Perry T, Strickland M, Dhaliwal R, Skanes S, Tropiano J, McIsaac D, Tinmouth A, Hallet J, Nicholls S, Fergusson D, Martel G, Tropiano J, Skanes S, Ivankovic V, McIsaac D, Tinmouth A, Patey A, Fergusson D, Martel G, Naqvi R, Noppens R, Hawel J, Elnahas A, Schlachta C, Alkhamesi N, Lenet T, Gilbert R, Mallick R, Shaw J, McIsaac D, Martel G, Pook M, Najafi T, Rajabiyazdi F, El-Kefraoui C, Balvardi S, Barone N, Elhaj H, Nguyen-Powanda P, Lee L, Baldini G, Feldman L, Fiore J, Purich K, Jogiat U, Mapiour D, Kim M, Nadler A, Stukel T, De Mestral C, Nathens A, Pautler S, Shayegan B, Hanna W, Schlachta C, Breau R, Hopkins L, Jackson T, Karanicolas P, Griffiths C, Ali S, Archer V, Cloutier Z, Choi D, McKechnie T, Serrano P, McClure JA, Jones P, Mrkobrada M, Flier S, Welk B, Dubois L, Khwaja K, Allen L, Tung L, Hameed M, Spoyalo K, Lampron J, Garcia-Ochoa C, Jastaniah A, Engels P, Talwar G, Cloutier Z, Minor S, Moffat B, Parry N, Vogt K, Ebeye T, Sharma BT, Samman A, Zulfiqar A, Purzner RH, Greene B, Tsang M, Jayaraman S, Allen L, Ball CG, Hameed M, Engels P, Nenshi R, Widder S, Minor S, Parry N, Bradley N, Moffat B, Vogt K, Liberman S, Wong E, Chughtai T, Turner J, Wiseman S, Li J, Mak N, Namazi B, Kiani P, Hashimoto D, Alseidi A, Pasten M, Brunt LM, Gill S, Davis B, Bloom M, Pernar L, Okrainec A, Madani A, Hamilton T, Nabata K, Zhang JW, Zhao D, Dawe P, Hameed M, Allen L, Leslie K, Drung J, Purich K, Verhoeff K, Skinner S, Dhaliwal R, Strickland M, Heller B, Wright V, Cho W, Wong M, Singh K, Comeau É, Collin Y, Oviedo SC, Rajendran L, Lamb T, Reid M, Turner A, Bertens K, Rekman J, Balaa F, Neumann K, Porter G, Teo I, Forse CL, Musselman R, Grozman L, Alshawan N, Fraser S, Bergman S, Pelletier JS, Vanounou T, Wong EG, Nolan B, Qiao L, Jung J, Raîche I, McDonald H, Gawad N, Cheifetz R, Hawley P, Rehany Z, Bakhshi M, Razek T, Grushka J, Boulanger N, Watt L, Vivier A, Clark G, Fata P, Deckelbaum D, Khwaja K, Jastaniah A, Wong E, Ren K, Qiu Y, Hamann K, Lalande A, MacNeill A, Park J, Alexis S, Spoyalo K, Patterson K, Gadhari N, Zhao J, MacNeill A, Ahmed R, Farooq A, Karimuddin A, Wiseman S, Chhor A, Begum H, Akhtar-Danesh N, Finley C, Manos D, Xu Z, Matheson K, Chun S, Fris J, Wallace A, French D, Baste JM, Shargall Y, Waddell TK, Yasufuku K, Machuca TN, Xie F, Thabane L, Hanna WC, Beauchamp MK, Wald J, Mbuagbaw L, Key BL, Green SM, Hanna WC, Behzadi A, Donahoe L, Nasralla A, Poon J, Safieddine N, Seyednejad N, Tavakoli I, Turner S, Sharma S, Hilzenrat RA, McConechy M, Frank I, Hughsman C, Yip S, Choi JJ, Yee J, Sasewich H, Turner S, Baracos V, Eurich D, Filafilo H, Bedard E, Samarasinghe Y, Patel J, Khondker A, McKechnie T, Samarasinghe N, Finley C, Hanna W, Shargall Y, Agzarian J, Whidden M, Aguirre F, Graham A, Chhor A, Begum H, Ewusie J, Mbuagbaw L, Yaron S, Keshishi M, Ademe Y, Tizazu A, Rose M, Uddin S, Ko M, Ddamba J, French D, Wallace A, Safieddine N, Gazala S, Simone C, Wright F, Finley C, Villeneuve PJ, Gilbert S, Sundaresan S, Seely AJ, Maziak DE, Manos D, Wallace A, Plourde M, Turner D, Ringash J, Manuel D, Kidane B, Gupta V, Decker K, Davis L, Darling G, Compton C, Coburn N, Boyes R, Pugliese M, Mahar A, Hsu A, Kokavec A, Ho E, Waterman R, Wang E, Harnden K, Malthaner R, Nayak R, Qiabi M, Malthaner R, Nayak R, Qiabi M, Patel Y, Farrokhyar F, Simunovic M, Hanna WC, Gowing S, Liu R, Srinathan S, Tan L, Malthaner R, Malik P, Patel Y, Hanna W, Fahim U, Hafizi A, Ashrafi AS, McKechnie T, Amin N, Doumouras A, Hong D, Eskicioglu C, Streu C, Wong C, Schiller D, Sue-Chue-Lam C, Paszat L, Scheer A, Hansen B, Kishibe T, Baxter N, Neary E, Ibrahim T, Verschoor C, Patel S, Merchant S, Chadi S, Romagnolo L, Verschoor C, Brown C, Karimuddin A, Raval M, Phang T, Vikis E, Melich G, Patel S, Patel S, Caycedo-Marulanda A, Merchant S, Booth C, Kong W, McClintock C, Bankhead C, Heneghan C, Patel S, McClintock C, Merchant S, Caycedo-Marulanda A, Booth C, Bankhead C, Heneghan C, Zhang L, Flemming J, Djerboua M, Nanji S, Caycedo-Marulanda A, Merchant S, Patel S, Demian M, Sabboobeh S, Moon J, Hulme-Moir M, Liberman AS, Feinberg S, Hayden DM, Chadi SA, Demyttenaere S, Samuel L, Hotakorzian N, Quintin L, Morin N, Ghitulescu G, Faria J, Vasilevsky CA, Boutros M, Mckechnie T, Khamar J, Ichhpuniani S, Eskicioglu C, Patel S, Merchant S, Caycedo-Marulanda A, Bankhead C, Heneghan C, Govind S, Lee J, Lee Y, Hong D, Eskicioglu C, Lu J, Khamar J, Lee Y, Amin N, Hong D, Eskicioglu C, Cardenas L, Schep D, Doumouras A, Hong D, Wong R, Levine O, Eskicioglu C, Mueller C, Stein B, Charlebois P, Liberman S, Fried G, Feldman L, Wang A, Liberman S, Charlebois P, Stein B, Fiore JF, Feldman L, Lee L, Wang A, Liberman S, Charlebois P, Stein B, Fiore JF, Feldman L, Lee L, Barkun A, Levy J, Bogdan R, Hawel J, Elnahas A, Alkhamesi NA, Schlachta CM, Caycedo-Marulanda A, Iaboni N, Hurlbut D, Kaufmann M, Ren KYM, Jamzad A, Mousavi P, Fichtinger G, Nicol CJ, Rudan JF, Brennan K, Caycedo-Marulanda A, Merchant S, McClintock C, Patel SV, McClintock C, Bankhead C, Merchant S, Caycedo-Marulanda A, Booth C, Heneghan C, Zhang L, Huo B, Donaldson A, Flemming J, Nanji S, Caycedo-Marulanda A, Merchant S, Brogly S, Patel S, Lenet T, Park L, Murthy S, Musselman R, McKechnie T, Lee J, Biro J, Lee Y, Park L, Doumouras A, Hong D, Eskicioglu C, Singh H, Helewa R, Reynolds K, Sibley K, Doupe M, Brennan K, Flemming J, Nanji S, Merchant S, Djerboua M, Caycedo-Marulanda A, Patel S, Johnson G, Hochman D, Helewa R, Garfinkle R, Dell’Aniello S, Zelkowitz P, Vasilevsky CA, Brassard P, Boutros M, Zoughlami A, Abibula W, Amar A, Ghitulescu G, Vasilevsky CA, Brassard P, Boutros M, Araji T, Pang A, Vasilevsky CA, Boutros M, Ehlebracht A, Faria J, Ghitulescu G, Morin N, Pang A, Vasilevsky CA, Boutros M, Robitaille S, Oliver M, Charlebois P, Stein B, Liberman S, Feldman LS, Lee L, Kennedy E, Victor C, Govindarajan A, Zhang L, Brennan K, Djerboua M, Nanji S, Merchant SJ, Caycedo-Marulanda A, Flemming J, Robitaille S, Penta R, Pook M, Fiore JF, Feldman L, Lee L, Wong-Chong N, Marinescu D, Bhatnagar S, Morin N, Ghitulescu G, Vasilevsky CA, Faria J, Boutros M, Arif A, Ladua G, Bhang E, Brown C, Donellan F, Stuart H, Loree J, Patel S, Zhang L, MacDonald PH, Merchant S, Barnett KW, Caycedo-Marulanda A, Brown C, Karimuddin A, Stuart H, Ghuman A, Phang T, Raval M, Yoon HM, Fragoso G, Oliero M, Calvé A, Rendos HV, Gonzalez E, Brereton NJ, Cuisiniere T, Gerkins C, Djediai S, Annabi B, Diop K, Routy B, Laplante P, Cailhier JF, Taleb N, Alratrout H, Dagbert F, Loungnarath R, Sebajang H, Schwenter F, Wassef R, Ratelle R, Debroux E, Richard C, Santos MM, Hamad D, Alsulaim H, Monton O, Marinescu D, Pang A, Vasilevsky CA, Boutros M, Marinescu D, Alqahtani M, Pang A, Ghitulescu G, Vasilevsky CA, Boutros M, Marinescu D, Garfinkle R, Boutros M, Zwiep T, Greenberg J, Lenet T, Musselman R, Williams L, Raiche I, McIsaac D, Thavorn K, Fergusson D, Moloo H, Charbonneau J, Paré X, Frigault J, Letarte F, Ott M, Karanicolas P, Brackstone M, Ashmalla S, Weaver J, Tagalakis V, Boutros M, Stotland P, Caycedo-Marulanda A, Moloo H, Jayaraman S. 2022 Canadian Surgery Forum Sept. 15–17, 202201. Operative classification of ventral abdominal hernias: new and practical classification02. Watchful waiting for large primary splenic cysts03. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks with and without dexamethasone in colorectal surgery04. What factors determine publication of resident research day projects?05. Characterization of near-infrared imaging and indocyanine green use amongst general surgeons06. Variation in opioid prescribing after outpatient breast surgery: Time for a streamlined approach?07. Trends in graduate degree types and research output for Canadian academic general surgeons08. Would you prefer to undergo breast-conserving therapy or a mastectomy for early breast cancer? Comparison of perceptions of general and plastic surgeons09. Lack of representation of women and BIPOC individuals in Canadian academic surgery10. Medical student interest and perspectives on pursuing surgical careers: a multicentre survey evaluating 5-year trends11. Difficult cholecystectomy with cholecystogastric fistula12. Surviving nonsurvivable injuries: patients who elude the “lethal” Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score of six13. Gunshot wounds sustained during legal intervention v. those inflicted by civilians: a comparative analysis14. The impact of delayed time to first head CT on functional outcomes after blunt head trauma with moderately depressed GCS15. Contemporary utility of diagnostic peritoneal aspiration in trauma16. Impact of delayed time to first head CT in traumatic brain injury17. Radiologic predictors of in-hospital mortality after traumatic craniocervical dissociation18. Measurement properties of a patient-reported instrument to evaluate functional status after major surgery19. The safety of venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis use in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography20. Characterizing Canadian rural surgeons: trends over time and 10-year replacement needs21. Contextual interference for skills development and transfer in laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial22. Evaluating the accuracy and design of visual backgrounds in academic surgical journals23. Defining rural surgery in Canada24. Validity of video-based general and procedure-specific self-assessment tools for surgical trainees in laparoscopic cholecystectomy25. Examining the equity and diversity characteristics of academic general surgeons in Canada26. Video-based coaching for surgical residents: a systematic review and meta-analysis27. Very-low-energy diets prior to nonbariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis28. Factors associated with resident research success: a descriptive analysis of Canadian general surgery trainees29. Global surgery pilot curriculum in Canadian undergraduate medical education: a novel approach30. How useful is ultrasound in predicting surgical findings of “mild cholecystitis”?31. Implementing a colorectal surgery “virtual hospital”: description of a novel outpatient care pathway to advance surgical care32. Trends in training and workforce planning for Canadian pediatric surgeons: a 10-year model33. Patient perspectives on intraoperative blood transfusion: results of semistructured interviews with perioperative patients34. Understanding intraoperative transfusion decision-making variability: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework35. Effectiveness of preoperative oscillating positive expiratory pressure (OPEP) therapy in reduction of postoperative respiratory morbidity in patients undergoing surgery: a systematic review37. Accuracy of point-of-care testing devices for hemoglobin in the operating room: a systematic review and meta-analysis38. Opioid-free analgesia after outpatient general surgery: a qualitative study focused on the perspectives of patients and clinicians involved in a pilot trial39. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on general surgery residency: an analysis of operative volumes by residents at a Canadian general surgery residency program40. Postoperative care protocols for elderly emergency surgical patients: a quality improvement initiative42. Adverse events following robotic compared to laparoscopic and open surgery: a population-based analysis43. Is accrual higher for patients randomized to pragmatic v. exploratory randomized clinical trials? A systematic review and meta-analysis44. Effect of preoperative proton-pump inhibitor use on postoperative infectious and renal complications after elective general surgery45. The early burden of COVID-19 in emergency general surgery care across Canada46. Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for the difficult gallbladder: evolution of technique at a single teaching hospital and retrospective review47. The demand for emergency general surgery in Canada: a public health crisis48. Attitudes of Canadian general surgery staff and residents toward point-of-care ultrasound49. Psychological impact of COVID-19 on Canadian surgical residents50. Validation of an artificial intelligence platform for the guidance of safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy51. Predictors of recurrent appendicitis after nonoperative management: a prospective cohort study52. The effect of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on colorectal and hepatobiliary oncologic outcomes at a tertiary care centre53. Trends in training and workforce representation for Canadian general surgeons working in critical care: a descriptive study54. White presentation: teaching safe opioid prescription and opioid use disorder management in Canadian universities56. How bad is really bad, eh? Impact of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on residents’ operative volume: the experience of a Canadian general surgery program57. Surgeon-specific encounters within a multidisciplinary care pathway: Is there a role for shared care models in surgery?59. A pan-Canadian analysis of approach to treatment for acute appendicitis60. Appendix neoplasm stratified by age: understanding the best treatment for appendicitis61. Predicting acute cholecystitis on final pathology to prioritize surgical urgency: an evaluation of the Tokyo criteria and development of a novel predictive score62. Obesity is an independent predictor of acute renal failure after surgery64. Validation of a clinical decision-making assessment tool in general surgery65. Moral distress in the provision of palliative care delivery for surgical patients in British Columbia: lessons learned from the perspectives of general surgeons66. Delays in presentation and severity of illness predict adverse surgical outcomes among patients transferred from rural Indigenous communities for acute care surgery67. Remote video-based suturing education with smartphones (REVISE): a randomized controlled trial68. Modified Delphi consensus on appropriate use of laboratory investigations in acute care surgery patients72. Impacts of inpatient food at a tertiary care centre on patient satisfaction, nutrition and planetary health73. Racial disparities in health outcomes for oncological surgery in Canada75. Risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury from thyroidectomy is lower when intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) is used: an analysis of 17 688 patients from the NSQIP database01. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on non-smallcell lung cancer pathologic stage and presentation02. Screening criteria evaluation for expansion in pulmonary neoplasias (screen)03. Robotic-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer provides better patient-reported quality of life than video-assisted lobectomy: early results of the RAVAL trial04. Breathe Anew: designing and testing the feasibility of a novel intervention for lung cancer survivorship05. Learning objectives for thoracic surgery: developing a national standard for undergraduate medical education06. Plasma cell-free DNA as a point-of-care well-being biomarker for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer patients07. Sarcopenia determined by skeletal muscle index predicts overall survival, disease-free survival and postoperative complications in resectable esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis08. The short- and long-term effects of open v. minimally invasive thymectomy in myasthenia gravis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis09. Optimizing opioid prescribing practices following minimally invasive lung resections through a structured quality improvement process10. Effects of virtual postoperative postdischarge care in patients undergoing lung resection during the COVID-19 pandemic11. Initiating Ethiopia’s first minimally invasive surgery program: a novel approach for collaborations in global surgical education12. Patient outcomes following salvage lung cancer surgery after definitive chemotherapy or radiation13. Replacing chest X-rays after chest tube removal with clinical assessment in postoperative thoracic surgery patients14. Updating the practice of thoracic surgery in Canada: a survey of the Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons15. The impact of COVID-19 on the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer16. Development of a prediction model for survival time in esophageal cancer patients treated with resection17. The development and validation of a mixed reality thoracic surgical anatomy atlas18. Routine placement of feeding tubes should be avoided in esophageal cancer patients undergoing surgery19. Nodal count is no different during robotic segmentectomy compared with robotic lobectomy20. Point-of-care ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsy of solid masses in the thoracic outpatient clinic: a safe, high-yield procedure to accelerate tissue diagnosis for patients with advanced thoracic malignancy21. Sarcopenia and modified frailty index are not associated with adverse outcomes after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a retrospective cohort study22. Near-infrared-guided segmental resection for lung cancer: an analysis of the learning curve23. Routine use of feeding jejunostomy tubes in patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal malignancy is safe and associated with low complication rates01. Ghost ileostomy versus loop ileostomy following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis02. Analysis of 100 consecutive colorectal cancers presenting at a Canadian tertiary care centre: delayed diagnosis and advanced disease03. Clinical delays and comparative outcomes in younger and older adults with colorectal cancer: a systematic review04. Recurrence rates of rectal cancer after transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME): a systematic review and meta-analysis05. Transanal total mesorectal excision for abdominoperineal resection (taTME-APR) is associated with poor oncological outcomes in rectal cancer patients: a word of caution from a multicentric Canadian cohort study06. Association between survival and receipt of recommended and timely treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer: a population-based study07. Trends and the impact of incomplete preoperative staging in rectal cancer08. Postoperative outcomes after elective colorectal surgery in patients with cirrhosis09. Bowel stimulation before loop ileostomy closure to reduce postoperative ileus: a multicentre, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial10. Recurrence following perineal rectosigmoidectomy ( Altemeier) with levatorplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis11. Nonmodifiable risk factors and receipt of surveillance investigations following treatment of rectal cancer12. Safety and effectiveness of endoscopic full-thickness resection for the management of colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis13. Impact of preoperative carbohydrate loading before colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials14. Statin therapy in patients undergoing short-course neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer15. Feasibility of targeted lymphadenectomy during complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer using indocyanine green immunofluorescence lymphatic mapping16. Feasibility of expanding an ambulatory colectomy protocol: a retrospective analysis of early discharge following minimally invasive colectomy in an enhanced recovery pathway17. Impact of rectal cancer on bowel dysfunction before treatment and its relationship with post-treatment function18. Canadian cost–utility analysis of artificial-intelligence-assisted colonoscopy for adenoma detection in fecal immunochemical-based colorectal cancer screening19. A comparison of outcomes following intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomotic techniques in laparoscopic right colectomies20. Assessment of metabolic signatures using desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (DESI) and rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry (REIMS) of rectal cancer samples to assist in determining treatment response21. The association between hospital characteristics and minimally invasive rectal cancer surgery: a population-based study22. Cancer centre level designation and the impact on treatment and outcomes in those with rectal cancer: a population-based study23. Oncological outcomes after colorectal cancer in patients with liver cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis24. Optimal preoperative nutrition for penetrating Crohn disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis25. Lymph node ratio as a predictor of survival for colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis26. Barriers and facilitators for use of new recommendations for optimal endoscopic localization of colorectal neoplasms according to gastroenterologists and surgeons27. Emergency colorectal surgery in patients with cirrhosis: a population-based descriptive study28. Local recurrence rates and associated risk factors after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for benign polyps and adenocarcinomas29. Bowel dysfunction impacts mental health after restorative proctectomy for rectal cancer30. Evolution of psychological morbidity following restorative proctectomy for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis31. Frailty predicts LARS and quality of life in rectal cancer survivors after restorative proctectomy32. Low anterior resection syndrome in a reference North American population: prevalence and predictive factors33. The evolution of enhanced recovery: same day discharge after laparoscopic colectomy34. Effect of ERAS protocols on length of stay after colorectal surgery: an interrupted time series analysis35. Practice patterns and outcomes in individuals with cirrhosis and colorectal cancer: a population-based study36. Understanding the impact of bowel function on quality of life after rectal cancer surgery37. Right-sided colectomies for diverticulitis have worse outcomes compared with left-sided colectomies38. Symptom burden and time from symptom onset to cancer diagnosis in patients with early-onset colorectal cancer39. The impact of access to robotic rectal surgery at a tertiary care centre: a Canadian perspective40. Management of rectal neuroendocrine tumours by transanal endoscopic microsurgery41. The gut microbiota modulates colorectal anastomotic healing in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer42. Is there added risk of complications for concomitant procedures during an ileocolic resection for Crohn disease?43. Cost of stoma-related hospital readmissions for rectal cancer patients following restorative proctectomy with a diverting loop ileostomy: a nationwide readmissions database analysis44. Older age associated with quality of rectal cancer care: an ACS-NSQIP database study45. Outcomes of patients undergoing elective bowel resection before and after implementation of an anemia screening and treatment program47. Loop ileostomy closure as a 23-hour stay procedure: a randomized controlled trial48. Extended duration perioperative thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin to improve disease-free survival following surgical resection of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomized controlled trial (PERIOP-01 Trial)49. Three-stage versus modified 2-stage ileal pouch anal anastomosis: perioperative outcomes, function and quality of life50. Compliance with extended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in rectal cancer51. Extended-duration venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after diversion in rectal cancer52. Financial and occupational impact of low anterior resection syndrome: a qualitative study53. Nonoperative management for rectal cancer: patient perspectives54. Trends in ileostomy-related emergency department visits for rectal cancer patients55. Long-term implications of treatment of fecal incontinence: a single Canadian centre’s retrospective cohort study: a 17-year follow-up56. Externally benchmarking colorectal resection outcomes in our province against the ACS NSQIP risk calculator: identifying opportunities for improvement57. Externally benchmarking our provincial colectomy outcomes against the ACS NSQIP using the Codman Score: to identify possible opportunities for improvement of outcomes58. Rural v. urban documentation of recommended practices for optimal endoscopic colorectal lesion localization01. Incidence of in-hospital opioid use and pain after inguinal hernia repair02. Ventral hernia repair following liver transplantation: outcome of repair techniques and risk factors for recurrence01. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on bariatric surgery in North America: a retrospective analysis of 834 647 patients02. Patient selection and 30-day outcomes of SADI-S compared to RYGB: a retrospective cohort study of 47 375 patients03. New persistent opioid use following bariatric surgery: a systematic review and pooled proportion meta-analysis04. Bariatric surgery should be offered to active-duty military personnel: a retrospective study of the Canadian Armed Forces experience05. Opioid prescribing practices and use following bariatric surgery: a systematic review and pooled summary of data06. Sacred sharing circles: urban Indigenous Manitobans’ experiences with bariatric surgery07. Gastrogastric hernia after laparoscopic gastric great curve plication: a video presentation08. Characterization of comorbidities predictive of bariatric surgery09. Efficacy of preoperative high-dose liraglutide in patients with superobesity10. The effect of linear stapled gastrojejunostomy size in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass11. Fragility of statistically significant outcomes in randomized trials comparing bariatric surgeries12. Weight loss outcomes for patients undergoing conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after sleeve gastrectomy13. Are long waiting lists for bariatric surgery detrimental to patients? A single-centre experience14. Does upper gastrointestinal swallow study after bariatric surgery lead to earlier detection of leak?15. Pharmaceutical utilization before and after bariatric surgery16. Same-day discharge Roux-en-Y gastric bypass at a Canadian bariatric centre: pathway implementation and early experiences17. Safety and efficiency of performing primary bariatric surgery at an ambulatory site of a tertiary care hospital: a 5-year experience18. Impact of psychiatric diagnosis on weight loss outcomes 3 years after bariatric surgery19. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for prevention of gallstone disease after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG): an Atlantic Canada perspective20. Fecal microbial transplantation and fibre supplementation in patients with severe obesity and metabolic syndrome: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial01. Incidence, timing and outcomes of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing surgery for esophagogastric cancer: a population-based cohort study04. Omission of axillary staging and survival in elderly women with early-stage breast cancer: a population-based cohort study05. Patients’ experiences receiving cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study06. Cancer surgery outcomes are better at high-volume centres07. Attitudes of Canadian colorectal cancer care providers toward liver transplantation for colorectal liver metastases: a national survey08. Quality of narrative central and lateral neck dissection reports for thyroid cancer treatment suggests need for a national standardized synoptic operative template09. Transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach (TOETVA): indications and technique10. Temporal trends in lymph node assessment as a quality indicator in colorectal cancer patients treated at a high-volume Canadian centre11. Molecular landscape of early-stage breast cancer with nodal metastasis12. Beta testing of a risk-stratified patient decision aid to facilitate shared decision making for postoperative extended thromboprophylaxis in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery for cancer13. Breast reconstruction use and impact on oncologic outcomes among inflammatory breast cancer patients: a systematic review14. Association between patient-reported symptoms and health care resource utilization: a first step to develop patient-centred value measures in cancer care15. Complications after colorectal liver metastases resection in Newfoundland and Labrador16. Why do patients with nonmetastatic primary retroperitoneal sarcoma not undergo resection?17. Loss of FAM46Cexpression predicts inferior postresection survival and induces ion channelopathy in gastric adenocarcinoma18. Liver-directed therapy of neuroendocrine liver metastases19. Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab use in microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) rectal cancer: benefits of its use in lynch syndrome20. MOLLI for excision of nonpalpable breast lesions: a case series22. Patients awaiting mastectomy report increased depression, anxiety, and decreased quality of life compared with patients awaiting lumpectomy for treatment of breast cancer23. Is microscopic margin status important in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) resection? A systematic review and meta-analysis24. Absence of benefit of routine surveillance in very-low-risk and low-risk gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors25. Effect of intraoperative in-room specimen radiography on margin status in breast-conserving surgery26. Active surveillance for DCIS of the breast: qualitative interviews with patients and physicians01 Outcomes following extrahepatic and intraportal pancreatic islet transplantation: a comparative cohort study02. Cholang-funga-gitis03. Evaluating the effect of a low-calorie prehepatectomy diet on perioperative outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis04. Toxicity profiles of systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review to guide neoadjuvant trials05. Should cell salvage be used in liver resection and transplantation? A systematic review and meta-analysis06. The association between surgeon and hospital variation in use of laparoscopic liver resection and short-term outcomes07. Systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors for early recurrence in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after curative-intent resection08. Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: ACS-NSQIP propensity-matched analysis09. The impact of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy on surgical site infections in pancreatic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis10. Does hepatic pedicle clamping increase the risk of colonic anastomotic leak after combined hepatectomy and colectomy? Analysis of the ACS NSQIP database11. Development of a culture process to grow a full-liver tissue substitute12. Liver transplantation for fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma: an analysis of the European Liver Transplant Registry13. Arming beneficial viruses to treat pancreatic cancer14. Hepaticoduodenostomy versus hepaticojenunostomy for biliary reconstruction: a retrospective review of a single-centre experience15. Feasibility and safety of a “shared care” model in complex hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: a 5-year analysis of pancreaticoduodenectomy16. Laparoscopic v. open pancreaticoduodenectomy: initial institutional experience and NSQIP-matched analysis17. Laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: Why not do a Warshaw?18. The impact of COVID-19 on pancreaticoduodenectomy outcomes in a high-volume hepatopancreatobiliary centre19. Transitioning from open to minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy: the learning curve factor in an academic centre20. Closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy following pancreaticoduodenectomy for prevention of surgical site infections in high-risk patients21. Robotic Appleby procedure for recurrent pancreatic cancer22. The influence of viral hepatitis status on posthepatectomy complications in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a NSQIP analysis. Can J Surg 2022. [DOI: 10.1503/cjs.014322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
|
23
|
Tringale M, Stephen G, Boylan AM, Heneghan C. Integrating patient values and preferences in healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e067268. [PMID: 36400731 PMCID: PMC9677014 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify and thematically analyse how healthcare professionals (HCPs) integrate patient values and preferences ('values integration') in primary care for adults with non-communicable diseases (NCDs). DESIGN Systematic review and meta-aggregation methods were used for extraction, synthesis and analysis of qualitative evidence. DATA SOURCES Relevant records were sourced using keywords to search 12 databases (ASSIA, CINAHL, DARE, EMBASE, ERIC, Google Scholar, GreyLit, Ovid-MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed-MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Records needed to be published between 2000 and 2020 and report qualitative methods and findings in English involving HCP participants regarding primary care for adult patients. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Relevant data including participant quotations, authors' observations, interpretations and conclusions were extracted, synthesised and analysed in a phased approach using a modified version of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Data Extraction Tool, as well as EPPI Reviewer and NVivo software. The JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research was used to assess methodological quality of included records. RESULTS Thirty-one records involving >1032 HCP participants and 1823 HCP-patient encounters were reviewed. Findings included 143 approaches to values integration in clinical care, thematically analysed and synthesised into four themes: (1) approaches of concern; (2) approaches of competence; (3) approaches of communication and (4) approaches of congruence. Confidence in the quality of included records was deemed high. CONCLUSIONS HCPs incorporate patient values and preferences in healthcare through a variety of approaches including showing concern for the patient as a person, demonstrating competence at managing diseases, communicating with patients as partners and tailoring, adjusting and balancing overall care. Themes in this review provide a novel framework for understanding and addressing values integration in clinical care and provide useful insights for policymakers, educators and practitioners. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020166002.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Anne-Marie Boylan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Primary Health Care, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
McCartney M, Bergeron Hartman R, Feldman H, MacDonald R, Sullivan F, Heneghan C, McCutcheon C. How are declarations of interest working? A cross-sectional study in declarations of interest in healthcare practice in Scotland and England in 2020/2021. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e065365. [PMID: 36332951 PMCID: PMC9639127 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To understand arrangements for healthcare organisations' declarations of staff interest in Scotland and England in the context of current recommendations. DESIGN Cross-sectional study of a random selection of National Health Service (NHS) hospital registers of interest by two independent observers in England, all NHS Boards in Scotland and a random selection of Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) in England. SETTING NHS Trusts in England (NHSE), NHS Boards in Scotland, CCGs in England, and private healthcare organisations. PARTICIPANTS Registers of declarations of interest published in a random sample of 67 of 217 NHS Trusts, a random sample of 15 CCGs of in England, registers held by all 14 NHS Scotland Boards and a purposeful selection of private hospitals/clinics in the UK. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Adherence to NHSE guidelines on declarations of interests, and comparison in Scotland. RESULTS 76% of registers published by Trusts did not routinely include all declaration of interest categories recommended by NHS England. In NHS Scotland only 14% of Boards published staff registers of interest. Of these employee registers (most obtained under Freedom of Information), 27% contained substantial retractions. In England, 96% of CCGs published a Gifts and Hospitality register, with 67% of CCG staff declaration templates and 53% of governor registers containing full standard NHS England declaration categories. Single organisations often held multiple registers lacking enough information to interpret them. Only 35% of NHS Trust registers were organised to enable searching. None of the private sector organisations studied published a comparable declarations of interest register. CONCLUSION Despite efforts, the current system of declarations frequently lacks ability to meaningfully obtain complete healthcare professionals' declaration of interests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret McCartney
- University of St Andrews, University of St Andrews Bute Medical School, St Andrews, Fife, UK
| | | | | | - Ronald MacDonald
- University of St Andrews, University of St Andrews Bute Medical School, St Andrews, Fife, UK
- University of Dundee School of Medicine, Dundee, UK
| | - Frank Sullivan
- University of St Andrews, University of St Andrews Bute Medical School, St Andrews, Fife, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Swift B, Heneghan C, Aronson J, Howard D, Richards GC. Preventable deaths from SARS-CoV-2 in England and Wales: a systematic case series of coroners' reports during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Evid Based Med 2022; 27:296-304. [PMID: 34933933 DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2021-111834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine coroners' Prevention of Future Deaths (PFDs) reports to identify deaths involving SARS-CoV-2 that coroners deemed preventable. DESIGN Consecutive case series. SETTING England and Wales. PARTICIPANTS Patients reported in 510 PFDs dated between 01 January 2020 and 28 June 2021, collected from the UK's Courts and Tribunals Judiciary website using web scraping to create an openly available database: https://preventabledeathstrackernet/. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Concerns reported by coroners. RESULTS SARS-CoV-2 was involved in 23 deaths reported by coroners in PFDs. Twelve deaths were indirectly related to the COVID-19 pandemic, defined as those that were not medically caused by SARS-CoV-2, but were associated with mitigation measures. In 11 cases, the coroner explicitly reported that COVID-19 had directly caused death. There was geographical variation in the reporting of PFDs; most (39%) were written by coroners in the North West of England. The coroners raised 56 concerns, problems in communication being the most common (30%), followed by failure to follow protocols (23%). Organisations in the National Health Service were sent the most PFDs (51%), followed by the government (26%), but responses to PFDs by these organisations were poor. CONCLUSIONS PFDs contain a rich source of information on preventable deaths that has previously been difficult to examine systematically. Our openly available tool (https://preventabledeathstracker.net/) streamlines this process and has identified many concerns raised by coroners that should be addressed during the government's inquiry into the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, so that mistakes made are less likely to be repeated. STUDY PROTOCOL PREREGISTRATION: https://osf.io/bfypc/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethan Swift
- Nuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Oxford, UK
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Global Centre on Healthcare and Urbanisation, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jeffrey Aronson
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - David Howard
- Department for Continuing Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Georgia C Richards
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Global Centre on Healthcare and Urbanisation, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Soliman R, Heneghan C, Bolous NS, Sidhom I, Ahmed S, Roberts N, Oke J, Elhaddad A. Systematic review of costs and cost-effectiveness of treatment for relapsed/refractory acute leukaemia in children and young adults. Expert Rev Hematol 2022; 15:345-357. [PMID: 35485262 DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2022.2069096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Survival outcomes of children with relapsed/refractory (r/r) acute leukaemia remain poor. Novel expensive treatments have been developed to improve their outcomes, yet, limited evidence exists about cost-effectiveness of alternative treatment strategies. AREAS COVERED A systematic review was conducted to summarize the health-economic evidence about costs/cost-effectiveness of treating r/r acute leukaemia in children/young adults. We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases until August 13th, 2021. Eligible articles included peer-reviewed original studies addressing r/r paediatric/young-adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Quality assessment was conducted using Consolidated Health Economics Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. EXPERT OPINION The majority of papers focused on CAR-T cell therapy, which is still a novel treatment for r/r ALL, and was found to be cost-effective, yet, there remain concerns over its long-term effectiveness, affordability, and equity in access. The next best treatment option is Blinatumomab, followed by Clofarabine therapy, whereas FLA-IDA salvage chemotherapy provides least value for money. The quality of evidence is moderate to high, with limited generalizability of findings due to high variability in outcomes obtained from modelling studies. Limited studies evaluated r/r AML. We provide recommendations to deliver cost-effective treatments in real-world contexts, with implications for healthcare policy and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ranin Soliman
- Department for Continuing Education, University of Oxford, UK.,Health Economics and Value Unit, Children's Cancer Hospital 57357 Egypt (CCHE), Egypt
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nancy S Bolous
- Department of Global Pediatric Medicine, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, USA
| | - Iman Sidhom
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Children's Cancer Hospital 57357 Egypt (CCHE), Egypt.,Department of Pediatric Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt
| | - Sonia Ahmed
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Children's Cancer Hospital 57357 Egypt (CCHE), Egypt.,Department of Pediatric Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt
| | - Nia Roberts
- Oxford Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jason Oke
- Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Alaa Elhaddad
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Children's Cancer Hospital 57357 Egypt (CCHE), Egypt.,Department of Pediatric Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Patel S, McClintock C, Booth C, Merchant S, Heneghan C, Bankhead C. Variations in Care and Real World Outcomes in those with Rectal Cancer: A protocol for the Ontario Rectal Cancer Cohort (OntaReCC) (Preprint). JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e38874. [PMID: 35930352 PMCID: PMC9391972 DOI: 10.2196/38874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Revised: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Individuals with rectal cancer require a number of pretreatment investigations, often require multidisciplinary treatment, and require ongoing follow-ups after treatment is completed. Due to the complexity of treatments, large variations in practice patterns and outcomes have been identified. At present, few comprehensive, population-level data sets are available for assessing interventions and outcomes in this group. Objective Our study aims to create a comprehensive database of individuals with rectal cancer who have been treated in a single-payer, universal health care system. This database will provide an excellent resource that investigators can use to study variations in the delivery of care to and real-world outcomes of this population. Methods The Ontario Rectal Cancer Cohort database will include comprehensive details about the management and outcomes of individuals with rectal cancer who have been diagnosed in Ontario, Canada (population: 14.6 million), between 2010 and 2019. Linked administrative data sets will be used to construct this comprehensive database. Individual and care provider characteristics, investigations, treatments, follow-ups, and outcomes will be derived and linked. Surgical pathology details, including the stage of disease, histopathology characteristics, and the quality of surgical excision, will be included. Ethics approval for this study was obtained through the Queen’s University Health Sciences and Affiliated Teaching Hospitals Research Ethics Board. Results Approximately 20,000 individuals who meet the inclusion criteria for this study have been identified. Data analysis is ongoing, with an expected completion date of March 2023. This study was funded through the Canadian Institute of Health Research Operating Grant. Conclusions The Ontario Rectal Cancer Cohort will include a comprehensive data set of individuals with rectal cancer who received care within a single-payer, universal health care system. This cohort will be used to determine factors associated with regional variability and adherence to recommended care, and it will allow for an assessment of a number of understudied areas within the delivery of rectal cancer treatment. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR1-10.2196/38874
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunil Patel
- Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Chad McClintock
- Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | | - Shaila Merchant
- Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Centre for Evidence Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Clare Bankhead
- Centre for Evidence Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Nunan D, Watts I, Kaji FA, Hansjee S, Heneghan C. Adherence in leading medical journals to the CONSORT 2010 statement for reporting of binary outcomes in randomised controlled trials: cross-sectional analysis. BMJ Evid Based Med 2022; 27:120-124. [PMID: 33526448 DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Clinicians and lay people tend to overestimate the effectiveness of a treatment when only the relative effect is presented, particularly if the relative effect is large, but the absolute effect is small. In recognition of this problem, item 17b of The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 statement stipulates authors present both absolute and relative effects for binary outcomes in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Adherence to item 17b and the effect of differing levels of CONSORT endorsement by journals on adherence is not well known. We assessed the extent to which item 17b is adhered to in 258 RCTs published in five leading medical journals (Annals of Internal Medicine, BMJ, JAMA, The Lancet and The New England Journal of Medicine) between January and December 2019 that all endorsed the CONSORT statement to varying degrees. Only 53 of 258 (20.5%; 95% CI 15.8% to 26.0%) included studies adhered fully to item 17b. Proportional adherence was higher in journals that endorsed the statement more strictly (BMJ and JAMA, 47.4% [34.0% to 61.0%]) compared with journals less strict in their endorsement (NEJM and Ann Intern Med, 12.2% [7.0% to 19.3%]; The Lancet, 14.1% [7.3% to 23.8%]). Journals that only recommend author adherence to CONSORT had a greater proportion of studies reporting only relative effects in the main results section (62.6%) and abstract (64.2%) compared with journals that require authors to submit a completed checklist (24.6% and 29.8%, respectively). The majority of RCTs (79.5%) with binary primary outcomes published in five leading medical journals during 2019 do not report both absolute and relative effect estimates as per item 17b of the CONSORT guideline despite its universal endorsement. Differences in adherence were observed between journals that endorsed the CONSORT statement to differing extents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Nunan
- Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Isabella Watts
- Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Shanil Hansjee
- Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Patel S, McClintock C, Merchant S, Booth CM, Caycedo Marulanda A, Bankhead C, Heneghan C. Incomplete preoperative staging results in suboptimal treatment in rectal cancer patients: A population-based study. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.4_suppl.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
20 Background: Individuals with rectal cancer require a number of pre-treatment investigations to determine the local-regional and overall stage of disease. Stage of rectal cancer determines treatment plan; therefore incomplete or inadequate staging may result in sub-optimal care and outcomes. Methods: This is a population based study of all individuals undergoing surgical resection for rectal cancer in Ontario, Canada (population 14.6 million) between 2010 and 2019. Individuals were identified using the Ontario Cancer Registry which includes approximately 95% of all incident cases of rectal cancer in the province. “Complete Staging” in Rectal Cancer has previously been defined and includes assessments of distant metastasis, local-regional stage and an attempt at colonic assessment for synchronous lesions. Patient and care provider characteristics, staging investigations, stage of disease, treatments and long-term outcomes were determined using linked administrative databases. Results: The study cohort included 10,957 individuals with rectal cancer; 24% Stage I, 21% Stage II, 40% Stage III, 7% Stage IV, 8% Missing Stage. The average age was 65 (STD 12.6) and males accounted for 63% of the study population. Incomplete staging occurred in 26%, with incomplete local regional staging being the most common deficiency (21%). Increasing patient age (< 0.001), low volume surgeons (P < 0.001) and low volume hospitals (P < 0.001) were associated with incomplete staging. There was significant regional variation in the completeness of staging (low 68% - High 84%). In those with locally advanced rectal cancer (Stage II and Stage III), incomplete staging was associated with lower rates of preoperative radiation oncology assessments (27% vs. 80%, P < 0.001) and medical oncology assessments (12% vs. 39%, P < 0.001). In addition, incomplete staging was associated with lower rates of any radiation (pre or postoperative) (45% vs. 82%, P < 0.001), lower rates of preoperative neoadjuvant therapy (22% vs. 74%, P < 0.001) and higher rates of post operative radiation (23% vs. 8.3%, P < 0.001). Those with incomplete staging had a lower 5 year overall survival (73% vs. 81%, P < 0.001). Conclusions: In this study, we identified several modifiable risk factors for incomplete staging prior to treatment for rectal cancer. Incomplete staging likely results in suboptimal care in this population, as demonstrated by less oncology referrals and less use of appropriate neoadjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunil Patel
- Kingston Health Sciences Center, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Richards GC, Aronson JK, Mahtani KR, Heneghan C. Global, regional, and national consumption of controlled opioids: a cross-sectional study of 214 countries and non-metropolitan territories. Br J Pain 2022; 16:34-40. [PMID: 35111312 PMCID: PMC8801686 DOI: 10.1177/20494637211013052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The consumption of opioids has increased globally since the 1990s. Previous studies of global opioid consumption have concentrated on morphine alone or a subset of opioids, with a focus on cancer pain and palliative care. In this study, we have determined the global, regional, and national consumption of all controlled opioids, including anaesthetics, analgesics, antidiarrheals, opioid substitution therapies, and cough suppressants. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from the International Narcotics Control Board (INCB). We calculated mean opioid consumption (mg/person) globally, regionally, and nationally for 2015-2017, where consumption refers to the total amount of controlled opioids distributed for medical purposes and excludes recreational use. We ranked countries by total consumption and quantified the types of opioids consumed globally. RESULTS Between 2015 and 2017, 90% of the world's population consumed only 11% of controlled opioids. An average of 32 mg/person was consumed annually, but this was not equally distributed across the world. Consumption was the highest in Germany (480 mg/person), followed by Iceland (428 mg/person), the United States (398 mg/person) and Canada (333 mg/person). Oxycodone (35%) was the most heavily consumed controlled opioid globally, followed by morphine (15.9%), methadone (15.8%) and tilidine (14%). CONCLUSION Large disparities persist in most of the world in accessing essential opioid medicines. Consumption patterns should continue to be monitored, and collaborative strategies should be developed to promote access and the appropriate prescribing of opioids in all countries and non-metropolitan territories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgia C Richards
- Global Centre on Healthcare and Urbanisation, Kellogg College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jeffrey K Aronson
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kamal R Mahtani
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Global Centre on Healthcare and Urbanisation, Kellogg College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
McFadden E, Lay-Flurrie S, Koshiaris C, Richards GC, Heneghan C. The Long-Term Impact of Vaginal Surgical Mesh Devices in UK Primary Care: A Cohort Study in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Clin Epidemiol 2021; 13:1167-1180. [PMID: 35002329 PMCID: PMC8728093 DOI: 10.2147/clep.s333775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) may be treated with surgical mesh devices; evidence of their long-term complications is lacking. PATIENTS AND METHODS Rates of diagnoses of depression, anxiety or self-harm (composite measure) and sexual dysfunction, and rates of prescriptions for antibiotics and opioids were estimated in women with and without mesh surgery, with a diagnostic SUI/POP code, registered in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) gold database. RESULTS There were 220,544 women eligible for inclusion; 74% (n = 162,687) had SUI, 37% (n = 82,123) had POP, and 11% (n = 24,266) had both. Women undergoing mesh surgery for SUI or POP had about 1.1 times higher rates of antibiotic use. Women with no previous history of the outcome, who underwent mesh surgery had 2.43 (95% CI 2.19-2.70) and 1.47 (95% CI 1.19-1.81) times higher rates of depression, anxiety, or self-harm, 1.88 (95% CI 1.50-2.36) and 1.64 (95% CI 1.02-2.63) times higher rates of sexual dysfunction and 1.40 (95% CI 1.26-1.56) and 1.23 (95% CI 1.01-1.49) times higher opioid use for SUI and POP, respectively. Women with a history of depression, anxiety and self-harm had 0.3 times lower rates of these outcomes with SUI or POP mesh surgery (HR for SUI 0.70 (95% CI 0.67-0.73), HR for POP 0.72 (95% CI 0.65-0.79)). Women with a history of opioid use who had POP mesh surgery had about 0.09 times lower rates (HR 0.91 (95% CI 0.86-0.96)) of prescriptions. Negative control outcome analyses showed no evidence of an association between asthma consultations and mesh surgery in women with POP, but the rate was 0.09 times lower (HR 0.91 (95% CI 0.87-0.94)) in women with SUI mesh surgery, suggesting that study results are subject to some residual confounding. CONCLUSION Mesh surgery was associated with poor mental and sexual health outcomes, alongside increased opioid and antibiotic use, in women with no history of these outcomes and improved mental health, and lower opioid use, in women with a previous history of these outcomes. Although our results suggest an influence of residual confounding, careful consideration of the benefits and risk of mesh surgery for women with SUI or POP on an individual basis is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily McFadden
- Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sarah Lay-Flurrie
- Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- EMEA Real World Methods and Evidence Generation, IQVIA, London, UK
| | - Constantinos Koshiaris
- Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Georgia C Richards
- Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Global Centre on Healthcare and Urbanisation, Kellogg College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Global Centre on Healthcare and Urbanisation, Kellogg College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Soliman R, Elhaddad A, Oke J, Eweida W, Tarek N, Hamza M, Yang Y, Abouelnaga S, Heneghan C. Childhood cancer hospital resource utilization and costs in Egypt, 2013-2017; patterns, trends, and associated factors for 8886 patients from Children's Cancer Hospital, Egypt. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68:e29347. [PMID: 34520099 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.29347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Revised: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is a lack ofevidence about resource use and costs of childhood cancer care in Egypt. Knowledge about resource use/costs can help in better resource planning to improve care and outcomes efficiently. In this study, we estimated patterns and trends of hospital resource use and costs for children with cancer (n = 8886, aged 0-18 years) treated at Children's Cancer Hospital, Egypt (CCHE), between 2013 and 2017, by ICCC-3 groups, at one and three years post-diagnosis. METHODS We estimated costs from the healthcare provider perspective, expressed in USD 2019. We also studied resource use/cost trends, and factors associated with inpatient days and costs. RESULTS For all cancers combined, median costs were $14,774 (IQR: $6,559-$23,738) at one year and $19,799 (IQR: $8,921-$34,204) at three years post-diagnosis. Median inpatient days were 38 days (IQR: 17-60) at one year, and 43 days (IQR: 20-74) at three years post-diagnosis. Patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and neuroblastoma imposed the greatest financial burden on CCHE, representing 53.1% of total costs. AML patients had the highest costs/resource use of all childhood cancers. Cost trends decreased by 2.9% (P < 0.001) for all cancers combined, due to economic instability in Egypt between 2013 and 2017. The use of IV supportive drugs increased by 24.3% (P < 0.001) over time for children with solid tumors. CONCLUSION These findings will inform hospital resource planning and budgeting to promote value in care delivery, with implications for pediatric oncology practice and policy in Egypt/CCHE. Estimated costs provide the foundation for cost-effectiveness analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ranin Soliman
- Department of Continuing Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Health Economics and Value Unit, Children's Cancer Hospital, Egypt (CCHE), 57357, Egypt
| | - Alaa Elhaddad
- Pediatric Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.,Pediatric Oncology Department, Children's Cancer Hospital, Egypt (CCHE), 57357, Egypt
| | - Jason Oke
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Wael Eweida
- Chief Operating Office, Children's Cancer Hospital, Egypt (CCHE), 57357, Egypt
| | - Nourhan Tarek
- Health Economics and Value Unit, Children's Cancer Hospital, Egypt (CCHE), 57357, Egypt
| | - Mahmoud Hamza
- Research Department, Children's Cancer Hospital, Egypt (CCHE), 57357, Egypt
| | - Yaling Yang
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sherif Abouelnaga
- Pediatric Oncology Department, Children's Cancer Hospital, Egypt (CCHE), 57357, Egypt.,Chief Executive Office, Children's Cancer Hospital, Egypt (CCHE), 57357, Egypt
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Rosca EC, Heneghan C, Spencer EA, Brassey J, Plüddemann A, Onakpoya IJ, Evans DH, Conly JM, Jefferson T. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 associated with aircraft travel: a systematic review. J Travel Med 2021; 28:taab133. [PMID: 34480171 PMCID: PMC8499932 DOI: 10.1093/jtm/taab133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2021] [Revised: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE FOR THE REVIEW Air travel may be associated with viruses spread via infected passengers and potentially through in-flight transmission. Given the novelty of the Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus, transmission associated with air travel is based on transmission dynamics of other respiratory viruses. Our objective was to provide a rapid summary and evaluation of relevant data on SARS-CoV-2 transmission aboard aircraft, report policy implications and to highlight research gaps requiring urgent attention. METHODS We searched four electronic databases (1 February 2020-27 January 2021) and included studies on SARS-CoV-2 transmission aboard aircraft. We assessed study quality based on five criteria and reported important findings. KEY FINDINGS We included 18 studies on in-flight SARS-CoV-2 transmission (130 unique flights) and 2 studies on wastewater from aircraft. The quality of evidence from most published studies was low. Two wastewater studies reported PCR-positive samples with high cycle threshold values (33-39). Index case definition was heterogeneous across studies. The proportion of contacts traced ranged from 0.68 to 100%. Authors traced 2800/19 729 passengers, 140/180 crew members and 8/8 medical staff. Altogether, 273 index cases were reported, with 64 secondary cases. Three studies, each investigating one flight, reported no secondary cases. Secondary attack rate among studies following up >80% of passengers and crew (including data on 10 flights) varied between 0 and 8.2%. The studies reported on the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 transmission from asymptomatic, pre-symptomatic and symptomatic individuals. Two studies performed viral cultures with 10 positive results. Genomic sequencing and phylogenetic analysis were performed in individuals from four flights. CONCLUSION Current evidence suggests SARS-CoV-2 can be transmitted during aircraft travel, but published data do not permit any conclusive assessment of likelihood and extent. The variation in design and methodology restricts the comparison of findings across studies. Standardized guidelines for conducting and reporting future studies of transmission on aircraft should be developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena C Rosca
- Department of Neurology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Piata Eftimie Murgu 2, Timisoara 300041, Romania
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Elizabeth A Spencer
- Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Jon Brassey
- Trip Database Ltd, Glasllwch Lane, Newport NP20 3PS, UK
| | - Annette Plüddemann
- Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Igho J Onakpoya
- Department of Continuing Education, University of Oxford, Rewley House, 1 Wellington Square, Oxford OX1 2JA, UK
| | - David H Evans
- Li Ka Shing Institute of Virology, Edmonton Alberta T6G 2E1, Canada
- Department of Medical Microbiology & Immunology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E1, Canada
| | - John M Conly
- Departments of Medicine, Microbiology, Immunology & Infectious Diseases, and Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Synder Institute for Chronic Diseases and O’Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, Calgary T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - Tom Jefferson
- Department of Continuing Education, University of Oxford, Rewley House, 1 Wellington Square, Oxford OX1 2JA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Richards GC, Sitkowski K, Heneghan C, Aronson JK. The Oxford Catalogue of Opioids: A systematic synthesis of opioid drug names and their pharmacology. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2021; 87:3790-3812. [PMID: 33608948 PMCID: PMC8518704 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Revised: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM The growing demand for analgesia, coupled with an increasing need to treat opioid dependence and overdose, has escalated the development of novel opioids. We aimed to quantify the number of opioid drugs developed and to catalogue them based on their pharmacology. METHODS We conducted a systematic search of seven sources in November 2020, including the WHO's Anatomical Therapeutic Classification index, the British National Formulary, the IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology, the International Narcotics Control Board Index of Names of Narcotic Drugs, the WHO's International Nonproprietary Names MedNet service, Martindale's Extra Pharmacopoeia and the Merck Index, to include opioid drugs that targeted or had an effect or coeffect at one or more opioid receptors. We extracted chemical and nonproprietary names, drug stems, molecular formulas, molecular weights, receptor targets, actions at opioid receptors and classes based on their origins. We used descriptive statistics and calculated medians and interquartile ranges where appropriate. RESULTS We identified 233 opioid drugs and created an online resource (https://www.catalogueofopioids.net/). There were 10 unique drug stems, and "-fentanil" accounted for one-fifth (20%) of all opioids. Most of the drugs (n = 133) targeted mu-opioid receptors and the majority (n = 191) were agonists at one or more receptors. Most (82%) were synthetic opioids, followed by semisynthetic opioids (16%) and alkaloids (3%). CONCLUSION This catalogue centralizes and disseminates information that could assist researchers, prescribers and the public to improve the safe use of opioids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgia C. Richards
- Centre for Evidence‐Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health SciencesUniversity of OxfordRadcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock RoadOxfordOX2 6GGUK
| | - Konrad Sitkowski
- Oxford Medical School, John Radcliffe HospitalUniversity of OxfordOxfordOX3 9DUUK
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Centre for Evidence‐Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health SciencesUniversity of OxfordRadcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock RoadOxfordOX2 6GGUK
| | - Jeffrey K. Aronson
- Centre for Evidence‐Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health SciencesUniversity of OxfordRadcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock RoadOxfordOX2 6GGUK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
McCall MC, Fanshawe TR, McCartney D, Young D, Nunan D, Heneghan C. Online supplementation for teaching evidence-based medicine: feasibility of a randomised-controlled trial. BMJ Evid Based Med 2021; 26:254. [PMID: 32719050 PMCID: PMC8479740 DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES As teaching technology advances, medical education is increasingly using digital mediums and exploring instructional models such as the flipped classroom and blended learning courses, where the in-class taught sessions are more groups on content delivered before class. Early evidence suggests lectures and foundational material can be equally provided online, but we have low-quality research to be convinced. We aim to test and develop an online evidence-based teaching resource that seeks to improve the availability and scalability of evidence-based medicine (EBM) learning tools. We evaluate the feasibility of a study design that could test for changes in academic performance in EBM skills using an online supplement. METHODS Mixed-methods feasibility study of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in an undergraduate medical student cohort. RESULTS Of a small cohort (n=34), eight participants agreed to randomisation and completed the study. No study participant completed the EBM supplementary course in full. Students report time-management as a significant barrier in participation, and all aspects of the study and communications should be delivered with efficiency a key consideration. CONCLUSION Randomising students to an online EBM supplement within a medical school programme presents challenges of recruitment and student motivation, but the study design is potentially feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcy C McCall
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Thomas R Fanshawe
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - David McCartney
- Medical Sciences Division, Oxford University, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Damion Young
- Medical Sciences Division, Oxford University, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - David Nunan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Wynne-Jones G, Myers H, Hall A, Littlewood C, Hennings S, Saunders B, Bucknall M, Jowett S, Riley R, Wathall S, Heneghan C, Cook J, Pincus T, Mallen C, Roddy E, Foster N, Beard D, Lewis J, Rees JL, Higginbottom A, van der Windt D. Predicting pain and function outcomes in people consulting with shoulder pain: the PANDA-S clinical cohort and qualitative study protocol. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e052758. [PMID: 34535486 PMCID: PMC8451291 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION People presenting with shoulder pain considered to be of musculoskeletal origin is common in primary care but diagnosing the cause of the pain is contentious, leading to uncertainty in management. To inform optimal primary care for patients with shoulder pain, the study aims to (1) to investigate the short-term and long-term outcomes (overall prognosis) of shoulder pain, (2) estimate costs of care, (3) develop a prognostic model for predicting individuals' level and risk of pain and disability at 6 months and (4) investigate experiences and opinions of patients and healthcare professionals regarding diagnosis, prognosis and management of shoulder pain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The Prognostic And Diagnostic Assessment of the Shoulder (PANDA-S) study is a longitudinal clinical cohort with linked qualitative study. At least 400 people presenting to general practice and physiotherapy services in the UK will be recruited. Participants will complete questionnaires at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. Short-term data will be collected weekly between baseline and 12 weeks via Short Message Serevice (SMS) text or software application. Participants will be offered clinical (physiotherapist) and ultrasound (sonographer) assessments at baseline. Qualitative interviews with ≈15 dyads of patients and their healthcare professional (general practitioner or physiotherapist).Short-term and long-term trajectories of Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (using SPADI) will be described, using latent class growth analysis. Health economic analysis will estimate direct costs of care and indirect costs related to work absence and productivity losses. Multivariable regression analysis will be used to develop a prognostic model predicting future levels of pain and disability at 6 months using penalisation methods to adjust for overfitting. The added predictive value of prespecified physical examination tests and ultrasound findings will be examined. For the qualitative interviews an inductive, exploratory framework will be adopted using thematic analysis to investigate decision making, perspectives of patients and clinicians on the importance of diagnostic and prognostic information when negotiating treatment and referral options. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The PANDA-S study has ethical approval from Yorkshire and The Humber-Sheffield Research Ethics Committee, UK (18/YH/0346, IRAS Number: 242750). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, social and mainstream media, professional conferences, and the patient and public involvement and engagement group supporting this study, and through newsletters, leaflets and posters in participating sites. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN46948079.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Helen Myers
- Clinical Trials Unit, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Alison Hall
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | - Chris Littlewood
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
- Department of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| | - S Hennings
- Clinical Trials Unit, Keele University, Keele, UK
| | | | | | - Sue Jowett
- Health Economics Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | - Carl Heneghan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Johanna Cook
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - Tamar Pincus
- Psychology, Royal Hollaway University of London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Nadine Foster
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK
- STARS Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - David Beard
- Nuffield Dept of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jeremy Lewis
- School of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
- Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - J L Rees
- Nuffield Dept of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Hodkinson A, Heneghan C, Mahtani KR, Kontopantelis E, Panagioti M. Benefits and harms of Risperidone and Paliperidone for treatment of patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder: a meta-analysis involving individual participant data and clinical study reports. BMC Med 2021; 19:195. [PMID: 34429113 PMCID: PMC8386072 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-021-02062-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder are severe mental illnesses which are highly prevalent worldwide. Risperidone and Paliperidone are treatments for either illnesses, but their efficacy compared to other antipsychotics and growing reports of hormonal imbalances continue to raise concerns. As existing evidence on both antipsychotics are solely based on aggregate data, we aimed to assess the benefits and harms of Risperidone and Paliperidone in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, using individual participant data (IPD), clinical study reports (CSRs) and publicly available sources (journal publications and trial registries). METHODS We searched MEDLINE, Central, EMBASE and PsycINFO until December 2020 for randomised placebo-controlled trials of Risperidone, Paliperidone or Paliperidone palmitate in patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. We obtained IPD and CSRs from the Yale University Open Data Access project. The primary outcome Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) score was analysed using one-stage IPD meta-analysis. Random-effect meta-analysis of harm outcomes involved methods for coping with rare events. Effect-sizes were compared across all available data sources using the ratio of means or relative risk. We registered our review on PROSPERO, CRD42019140556. RESULTS Of the 35 studies, IPD meta-analysis involving 22 (63%) studies showed a significant clinical reduction in the PANSS in patients receiving Risperidone (mean difference - 5.83, 95% CI - 10.79 to - 0.87, I2 = 8.5%, n = 4 studies, 1131 participants), Paliperidone (- 6.01, 95% CI - 8.7 to - 3.32, I2 = 4.3%, n = 13, 3821) and Paliperidone palmitate (- 7.89, 95% CI - 12.1 to - 3.69, I2 = 2.9%, n = 5, 2209). CSRs reported nearly two times more adverse events (4434 vs. 2296 publication, relative difference (RD) = 1.93, 95% CI 1.86 to 2.00) and almost 8 times more serious adverse events (650 vs. 82; RD = 7.93, 95% CI 6.32 to 9.95) than the journal publications. Meta-analyses of individual harms from CSRs revealed a significant increased risk among several outcomes including extrapyramidal disorder, tardive dyskinesia and increased weight. But the ratio of relative risk between the different data sources was not significant. Three treatment-related gynecomastia events occurred, and these were considered mild to moderate in severity. CONCLUSION IPD meta-analysis conclude that Risperidone and Paliperidone antipsychotics had a small beneficial effect on reducing PANSS score over 9 weeks, which is more conservative than estimates from reviews based on journal publications. CSRs also contained significantly more data on harms that were unavailable in journal publications or trial registries. Sharing of IPD and CSRs are necessary when performing meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of antipsychotics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Hodkinson
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
- National Institute for Health Research Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kamal R Mahtani
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Evangelos Kontopantelis
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
- Division of Informatics, Imaging & Data Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Maria Panagioti
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Perera R, Stevens R, Aronson JK, Banerjee A, Evans J, Feakins BG, Fleming S, Glasziou P, Heneghan C, Hobbs FDR, Jones L, Kurtinecz M, Lasserson DS, Locock L, McLellan J, Mihaylova B, O’Callaghan CA, Oke JL, Pidduck N, Plüddemann A, Roberts N, Schlackow I, Shine B, Simons CL, Taylor CJ, Taylor KS, Verbakel JY, Bankhead C. Long-term monitoring in primary care for chronic kidney disease and chronic heart failure: a multi-method research programme. Programme Grants Appl Res 2021. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar09100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background
Long-term monitoring is important in chronic condition management. Despite considerable costs of monitoring, there is no or poor evidence on how, what and when to monitor. The aim of this study was to improve understanding, methods, evidence base and practice of clinical monitoring in primary care, focusing on two areas: chronic kidney disease and chronic heart failure.
Objectives
The research questions were as follows: does the choice of test affect better care while being affordable to the NHS? Can the number of tests used to manage individuals with early-stage kidney disease, and hence the costs, be reduced? Is it possible to monitor heart failure using a simple blood test? Can this be done using a rapid test in a general practitioner consultation? Would changes in the management of these conditions be acceptable to patients and carers?
Design
Various study designs were employed, including cohort, feasibility study, Clinical Practice Research Datalink analysis, seven systematic reviews, two qualitative studies, one cost-effectiveness analysis and one cost recommendation.
Setting
This study was set in UK primary care.
Data sources
Data were collected from study participants and sourced from UK general practice and hospital electronic health records, and worldwide literature.
Participants
The participants were NHS patients (Clinical Practice Research Datalink: 4.5 million patients), chronic kidney disease and chronic heart failure patients managed in primary care (including 750 participants in the cohort study) and primary care health professionals.
Interventions
The interventions were monitoring with blood and urine tests (for chronic kidney disease) and monitoring with blood tests and weight measurement (for chronic heart failure).
Main outcome measures
The main outcomes were the frequency, accuracy, utility, acceptability, costs and cost-effectiveness of monitoring.
Results
Chronic kidney disease: serum creatinine testing has increased steadily since 1997, with most results being normal (83% in 2013). Increases in tests of creatinine and proteinuria correspond to their introduction as indicators in the Quality and Outcomes Framework. The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation had 2.7% greater accuracy (95% confidence interval 1.6% to 3.8%) than the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate. Estimated annual transition rates to the next chronic kidney disease stage are ≈ 2% for people with normal urine albumin, 3–5% for people with microalbuminuria (3–30 mg/mmol) and 3–12% for people with macroalbuminuria (> 30 mg/mmol). Variability in estimated glomerular filtration rate-creatinine leads to misclassification of chronic kidney disease stage in 12–15% of tests in primary care. Glycaemic-control and lipid-modifying drugs are associated with a 6% (95% confidence interval 2% to 10%) and 4% (95% confidence interval 0% to 8%) improvement in renal function, respectively. Neither estimated glomerular filtration rate-creatinine nor estimated glomerular filtration rate-Cystatin C have utility in predicting rate of kidney function change. Patients viewed phrases such as ‘kidney damage’ or ‘kidney failure’ as frightening, and the term ‘chronic’ was misinterpreted as serious. Diagnosis of asymptomatic conditions (chronic kidney disease) was difficult to understand, and primary care professionals often did not use ‘chronic kidney disease’ when managing patients at early stages. General practitioners relied on Clinical Commissioning Group or Quality and Outcomes Framework alerts rather than National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance for information. Cost-effectiveness modelling did not demonstrate a tangible benefit of monitoring kidney function to guide preventative treatments, except for individuals with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 60–90 ml/minute/1.73 m2, aged < 70 years and without cardiovascular disease, where monitoring every 3–4 years to guide cardiovascular prevention may be cost-effective. Chronic heart failure: natriuretic peptide-guided treatment could reduce all-cause mortality by 13% and heart failure admission by 20%. Implementing natriuretic peptide-guided treatment is likely to require predefined protocols, stringent natriuretic peptide targets, relative targets and being located in a specialist heart failure setting. Remote monitoring can reduce all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalisation, and could improve quality of life. Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care N-terminal prohormone of B-type natriuretic peptide (sensitivity, 0.99; specificity, 0.60) was better than point-of-care B-type natriuretic peptide (sensitivity, 0.95; specificity, 0.57). Within-person variation estimates for B-type natriuretic peptide and weight were as follows: coefficient of variation, 46% and coefficient of variation, 1.2%, respectively. Point-of-care N-terminal prohormone of B-type natriuretic peptide within-person variability over 12 months was 881 pg/ml (95% confidence interval 380 to 1382 pg/ml), whereas between-person variability was 1972 pg/ml (95% confidence interval 1525 to 2791 pg/ml). For individuals, monitoring provided reassurance; future changes, such as increased testing, would be acceptable. Point-of-care testing in general practice surgeries was perceived positively, reducing waiting time and anxiety. Community heart failure nurses had greater knowledge of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance than general practitioners and practice nurses. Health-care professionals believed that the cost of natriuretic peptide tests in routine monitoring would outweigh potential benefits. The review of cost-effectiveness studies suggests that natriuretic peptide-guided treatment is cost-effective in specialist settings, but with no evidence for its value in primary care settings.
Limitations
No randomised controlled trial evidence was generated. The pathways to the benefit of monitoring chronic kidney disease were unclear.
Conclusions
It is difficult to ascribe quantifiable benefits to monitoring chronic kidney disease, because monitoring is unlikely to change treatment, especially in chronic kidney disease stages G3 and G4. New approaches to monitoring chronic heart failure, such as point-of-care natriuretic peptide tests in general practice, show promise if high within-test variability can be overcome.
Future work
The following future work is recommended: improve general practitioner–patient communication of early-stage renal function decline, and identify strategies to reduce the variability of natriuretic peptide.
Study registration
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42015017501, CRD42019134922 and CRD42016046902.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full in Programme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 9, No. 10. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Perera
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard Stevens
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jeffrey K Aronson
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Amitava Banerjee
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
| | - Julie Evans
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Benjamin G Feakins
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Susannah Fleming
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Paul Glasziou
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - FD Richard Hobbs
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Louise Jones
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Milena Kurtinecz
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Daniel S Lasserson
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Louise Locock
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Julie McLellan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Borislava Mihaylova
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Jason L Oke
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nicola Pidduck
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Annette Plüddemann
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nia Roberts
- Bodleian Health Care Libraries, Knowledge Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Iryna Schlackow
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Brian Shine
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Claire L Simons
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Clare J Taylor
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kathryn S Taylor
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jan Y Verbakel
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Community Healthcare MedTech and In Vitro Diagnostics Co-operative (MIC), Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Clare Bankhead
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Giubilini A, Gupta S, Heneghan C. A focused protection vaccination strategy: why we should not target children with COVID-19 vaccination policies. J Med Ethics 2021; 47:565-566. [PMID: 34233955 PMCID: PMC8266426 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Giubilini
- Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sunetra Gupta
- Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Curtis HJ, Bacon S, Croker R, Walker AJ, Perera R, Hallsworth M, Harper H, Mahtani KR, Heneghan C, Goldacre B. Evaluating the impact of a very low-cost intervention to increase practices' engagement with data and change prescribing behaviour: a randomized trial in English primary care. Fam Pract 2021; 38:373-380. [PMID: 33783497 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmaa128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unsolicited feedback can solicit changes in prescribing. OBJECTIVES Determine whether a low-cost intervention increases clinicians' engagement with data, and changes prescribing; with or without behavioural science techniques. METHODS Randomized trial (ISRCTN86418238). The highest prescribing practices in England for broad-spectrum antibiotics were allocated to: feedback with behavioural impact optimization; plain feedback; or no intervention. Feedback was sent monthly for 3 months by letter, fax and email. Each included a link to a prescribing dashboard. The primary outcomes were dashboard usage and change in prescribing. RESULTS A total of 1401 practices were randomized: 356 behavioural optimization, 347 plain feedback, and 698 control. For the primary engagement outcome, more intervention practices had their dashboards viewed compared with controls [65.7% versus 55.9%; RD 9.8%, 95% confidence intervals (CIs): 4.76% to 14.9%, P < 0.001]. More plain feedback practices had their dashboard viewed than behavioural feedback practices (69.1% versus 62.4%); but not meeting the P < 0.05 threshold (6.8%, 95% CI: -0.19% to 13.8%, P = 0.069). For the primary prescribing outcome, intervention practices possibly reduced broad-spectrum prescribing to a greater extent than controls (1.42% versus 1.12%); but again not meeting the P < 0.05 threshold (coefficient -0.31%, CI: -0.7% to 0.1%, P = 0.104). The behavioural impact group reduced broad-spectrum prescribing to a greater extent than plain feedback practices (1.63% versus 1.20%; coefficient 0.41%, CI: 0.007% to 0.8%, P = 0.046). No harms were detected. CONCLUSIONS Unsolicited feedback increased practices' engagement with data, with possible slightly reduced antibiotic prescribing (P = 0.104). Behavioural science techniques gave greater prescribing effects. The modest effects on prescribing may reflect saturation from similar initiatives on antibiotic prescribing. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN86418238.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen J Curtis
- The DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Seb Bacon
- The DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard Croker
- The DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Alex J Walker
- The DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Rafael Perera
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Kamal R Mahtani
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ben Goldacre
- The DataLab, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with end-stage renal disease may require arteriovenous (AV) access in the form of arteriovenous fistulae (AVFs) or arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) for haemodialysis. AV access dysfunction requires intervention such as plain balloon angioplasty or covered stents to regain patency. AIM To systematically review and meta-analyse the patency outcomes of covered stents in failing haemodialysis AV access, compared with balloon angioplasty. METHODS The review was first registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42018069955) before data collection. We searched six electronic databases to identify relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) up until August 2020, without language restriction. Two reviewers assessed the suitability and quality of studies for inclusion using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines. We meta-analysed data using a random-effects model. RESULTS We included seven studies including 1147 patients in the systematic review, of which 867 had AVGs and 280 had AVFs. One study was an ongoing RCT. In the meta-analyses, we assessed patients with failing AVGs only. Overall risk of bias was moderate. Covered stents were associated with lower loss of patency versus angioplasty alone at 6, 12 and 24 months (OR 4.48, 95% CI 1.98 to 10.14, p<0.001; OR 4.07, 95% CI 1.74 to 9.54, p=0.001; OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.17 to 4.29, p=0.01, respectively). Covered stents afforded superior access circuit primary patency compared with angioplasty alone at 6 and 12 months (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.31 to 2.80, p<0.001; OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.14 to 3.41, p=0.02, respectively). This was not significant at 24 months. There was no significant difference in loss of secondary patency between groups at 12 or 24 months (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.23, p=0.25; OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.154, p=0.34, respectively). CONCLUSION Our results support use of covered stents over angioplasty alone, at 6, 12 and 24 months in failing AVGs. Further clinical trials are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Ng
- Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Magnus Fugger
- Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Igho Jovwoke Onakpoya
- Department of Continuing Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrew Macdonald
- Department of Radiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Pluddemann A, Heneghan C. Short course penicillin for treating patients with pharyngotonsillitis. BMJ Evid Based Med 2021; 26:137-138. [PMID: 32098760 DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Annette Pluddemann
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Affiliation(s)
- Carl Heneghan
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jeffrey Aronson
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Richards GC, Aronson JK, Heneghan C. Coroners' concerns to prevent harms: a series of coroners' case reports to serve patient safety and educate the public, clinicians and policy-makers. BMJ Evid Based Med 2021; 26:37-38. [PMID: 33262123 DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Georgia C Richards
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jeffrey K Aronson
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Lay-Flurrie SL, Sheppard JP, Stevens RJ, Mallen C, Heneghan C, Hobbs FR, Williams B, Mant J, McManus RJ. Impact of changes to national guidelines on hypertension-related workload: an interrupted time series analysis in English primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2021; 71:e296-e302. [PMID: 33753350 PMCID: PMC7997675 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp21x714281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 10/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2011, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommended the routine use of out-of-office blood pressure (BP) monitoring for the diagnosis of hypertension. These changes were predicted to reduce unnecessary treatment costs and workload associated with misdiagnosis. AIM To assess the impact of guideline change on rates of hypertension-related consultation in general practice. DESIGN AND SETTING A retrospective open cohort study in adults registered with English general practices contributing to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink between 1 April 2006 and 31 March 2017. METHOD The primary outcome was the rate of face-to-face, telephone, and home visit consultations related to hypertension with a GP or nurse. Age- and sex-standardised rates were analysed using interrupted time-series analysis. RESULTS In 3 937 191 adults (median follow-up 4.2 years) there were 12 253 836 hypertension-related consultations. The rate of hypertension-related consultation was 71.0 per 100 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI] = 67.8 to 74.2) in April 2006, which remained flat before 2011. The introduction of the NICE hypertension guideline in 2011 was associated with a change in yearly trend (change in trend -3.60 per 100 person-years, 95% CI = -5.12 to -2.09). The rate of consultation subsequently decreased to 59.2 per 100 person-years (95% CI = 56.5 to 61.8) in March 2017. These changes occurred around the time of diagnosis, and persisted when accounting for wider trends in all consultations. CONCLUSION Hypertension-related workload has declined in the last decade, in association with guideline changes. This is due to changes in workload at the time of diagnosis, rather than reductions in misdiagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah L Lay-Flurrie
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford
| | - James P Sheppard
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford
| | - Richard J Stevens
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford
| | - Christian Mallen
- School for Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Staffordshire
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford
| | - Fd Richard Hobbs
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford
| | - Bryan Williams
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London
| | - Jonathan Mant
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
| | - Richard J McManus
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Gbinigie O, Allen J, Williams N, Moore M, Hay AD, Heneghan C, Boylan AM, Butler CC. Does cranberry extract reduce antibiotic use for symptoms of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infections (CUTI)? A feasibility randomised trial. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e046791. [PMID: 33619202 PMCID: PMC7903114 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the feasibility of conducting a randomised trial of the effectiveness of cranberry extract in reducing antibiotic use by women with symptoms of acute, uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI). DESIGN Open-label feasibility randomised parallel group trial. SETTING Four general practices in Oxfordshire. PARTICIPANTS Women aged 18 years and above presenting to general practice with symptoms of acute, uncomplicated UTI. INTERVENTIONS Women were randomly assigned using Research Electronic Data Capture in a 1:1:1 ratio to: (1) immediate antibiotics alone (n=15); (2) immediate antibiotics and immediate cranberry capsules for up to 7 days (n=15); or (3) immediate cranberry capsules and delayed antibiotics for self-initiation in case of non-improvement or worsening of symptoms (n=16). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measures were: rate of recruitment of participants; numbers lost to follow-up; proportion of electronic diaries completed by participants; and acceptability of the intervention and study procedures to participants and recruiters. Secondary outcomes included an exploration of differences in symptom burden and antibiotic use between groups. RESULTS Four general practitioner practices (100%) were opened and recruited participants between 1 July and 2 December 2019, with nine study participants recruited per month on average. 68.7% (46/67) of eligible participants were randomised (target 45) with a mean age of 48.4 years (SD 19.9, range 18-81). 89.1% (41/46) of diaries contained some participant entered data and 69.6% (32/46) were fully complete. Three participants (6.5%) were lost to follow-up and two (4.4%) withdrew. Of women randomly assigned to take antibiotics alone (controls), one-third of respondents reported consuming cranberry products (33.3%, 4/12). There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS It appears feasible to conduct a randomised trial of the use of cranberry extract in the treatment of acute, uncomplicated UTI in general practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN Registry (ID: 10399299).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oghenekome Gbinigie
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Julie Allen
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Nicola Williams
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Michael Moore
- Primary Care Medical Group, University of Southampton Medical School, Southampton, UK
| | - Alastair D Hay
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Carl Heneghan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Anne-Marie Boylan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Christopher C Butler
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Wade T, Heneghan C, Roberts N, Curtis D, Williams V, Onakpoya I. Healthcare-associated infections and the prescribing of antibiotics in hospitalized patients of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) states: a mixed-methods systematic review. J Hosp Infect 2021; 110:122-132. [PMID: 33524426 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Revised: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) and variation in antibiotic prescribing pose a significant public health challenge in hospitals of low-resource countries. AIM To critically appraise and synthesize the evidence on HCAI and the prescribing of antibiotics in Caribbean Community (CARICOM) states. METHODS All primary qualitative and quantitative studies that addressed HCAI, and the prescribing of antibiotics in hospitalized patients of CARICOM states were included. Ovid Medline, Embase, Global Health, and regional databases were searched. Risk of bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Findings were presented in narrative and table formats. FINDINGS Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria for this mixed-methods systematic review (MMSR). Studies were from four different CARICOM states: Trinidad and Tobago, Jamaica, Haiti, and Antigua and Barbuda. Intensive care units (ICUs) had the highest rate of infections (67% over four years). Surgical site infections were discussed by seven studies and ranged from 1.5% to 7.3%. For inpatients with contaminated or infected wounds, rates ranged from 29% to 83%. Empiric and prophylactic therapies were common and inappropriately prescribed. Resources and training for healthcare workers in infection control and antimicrobial stewardship were insufficient. Few qualitative studies existed, so it was not possible to integrate evidence from qualitative and quantitative paradigms. CONCLUSION Evidence from CARICOM states shows high rates of HCAI and inappropriately prescribed antibiotics, primarily in ICUs. Disease surveillance, infection control, and antimicrobial stewardship programmes require urgent evidence-based improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Wade
- Department for Continuing Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - C Heneghan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - N Roberts
- Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - D Curtis
- Usha Kundu, MD College of Health, University of West Florida, Pensacola, FL, USA
| | - V Williams
- School of Nursing, Nipissing University, North Bay, ON, Canada
| | - I Onakpoya
- Department for Continuing Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Affiliation(s)
- Carl Heneghan
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Kamal R Mahtani
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Heneghan C, O'Sullivan J. Antipsychotics for preventing and treating delirium: not recommended. BMJ Evid Based Med 2021; 26:32-33. [PMID: 32015074 DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2019-111293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Carl Heneghan
- Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, Nuffield Dept of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jack O'Sullivan
- School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Jefferson T, Spencer EA, Brassey J, Heneghan C. Viral cultures for COVID-19 infectious potential assessment - a systematic review. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 73:e3884-e3899. [PMID: 33270107 PMCID: PMC7799320 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 160] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE to review the evidence from studies relating SARS-CoV-2 culture with the results of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and other variables which may influence the interpretation of the test, such as time from symptom onset. METHODS We searched LitCovid, medRxiv, Google Scholar and the WHO Covid-19 database for Covid-19 to 10 September 2020. We included studies attempting to culture or observe SARS-CoV-2 in specimens with RT-PCR positivity. Studies were dual extracted and the data summarised narratively by specimen type. Where necessary we contacted corresponding authors of included papers for additional information. We assessed quality using a modified QUADAS 2 risk of bias tool. RESULTS We included 29 studies reporting attempts at culturing, or observing tissue infection by, SARS-CoV-2 in sputum, nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal, urine, stool, blood and environmental specimens. The quality of the studies was moderate with lack of standardised reporting. The data suggest a relationship between the time from onset of symptom to the timing of the specimen test, cycle threshold (Ct) and symptom severity. Twelve studies reported that Ct values were significantly lower and log copies higher in specimens producing live virus culture. Two studies reported the odds of live virus culture reduced by approximately 33% for every one unit increase in Ct. Six of eight studies reported detectable RNA for longer than 14 days but infectious potential declined after day 8 even among cases with ongoing high viral loads. Four studies reported viral culture from stool specimens. CONCLUSION Complete live viruses are necessary for transmission, not the fragments identified by PCR. Prospective routine testing of reference and culture specimens and their relationship to symptoms, signs and patient co-factors should be used to define the reliability of PCR for assessing infectious potential. Those with high cycle threshold are unlikely to have infectious potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Jefferson
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford
| | - E A Spencer
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford
| | | | - C Heneghan
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford
| |
Collapse
|