1
|
Wang SJH, Sinclair DAR, Kim HY, Kinsey SD, Yoo B, Shih CRY, Wong KKL, Krieger C, Harden N, Verheyen EM. Homeodomain-interacting protein kinase (Hipk) plays roles in nervous system and muscle structure and function. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0221006. [PMID: 32187190 PMCID: PMC7080231 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2019] [Accepted: 02/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Homeodomain-interacting protein kinases (Hipks) have been previously associated with cell proliferation and cancer, however, their effects in the nervous system are less well understood. We have used Drosophila melanogaster to evaluate the effects of altered Hipk expression on the nervous system and muscle. Using genetic manipulation of Hipk expression we demonstrate that knockdown and over-expression of Hipk produces early adult lethality, possibly due to the effects on the nervous system and muscle involvement. We find that optimal levels of Hipk are critical for the function of dopaminergic neurons and glial cells in the nervous system, as well as muscle. Furthermore, manipulation of Hipk affects the structure of the larval neuromuscular junction (NMJ) by promoting its growth. Hipk regulates the phosphorylation of the synapse-associated cytoskeletal protein Hu-li tai shao (Hts; adducin in mammals) and modulates the expression of two important protein kinases, Calcium-calmodulin protein kinase II (CaMKII) and Partitioning-defective 1 (PAR-1), all of which may alter neuromuscular structure/function and influence lethality. Hipk also modifies the levels of an important nuclear protein, TBPH, the fly orthologue of TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43), which may have relevance for understanding motor neuron diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon J. H. Wang
- Centre for Cell Biology, Development and Disease, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
- Department of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
| | - Donald A. R. Sinclair
- Centre for Cell Biology, Development and Disease, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
| | - Hae-Yoon Kim
- Centre for Cell Biology, Development and Disease, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
| | - Stephen D. Kinsey
- Centre for Cell Biology, Development and Disease, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
| | - Byoungjoo Yoo
- Centre for Cell Biology, Development and Disease, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
| | - Claire R. Y. Shih
- Centre for Cell Biology, Development and Disease, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
| | - Kenneth K. L. Wong
- Centre for Cell Biology, Development and Disease, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
| | - Charles Krieger
- Centre for Cell Biology, Development and Disease, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
- Department of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
| | - Nicholas Harden
- Centre for Cell Biology, Development and Disease, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
| | - Esther M. Verheyen
- Centre for Cell Biology, Development and Disease, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hallson G, Hollebakken RE, Li T, Syrzycka M, Kim I, Cotsworth S, Fitzpatrick KA, Sinclair DAR, Honda BM. dSet1 is the main H3K4 di- and tri-methyltransferase throughout Drosophila development. Genetics 2012; 190:91-100. [PMID: 22048023 PMCID: PMC3249358 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.111.135863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2011] [Accepted: 10/22/2011] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
In eukaryotes, the post-translational addition of methyl groups to histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) plays key roles in maintenance and establishment of appropriate gene expression patterns and chromatin states. We report here that an essential locus within chromosome 3L centric heterochromatin encodes the previously uncharacterized Drosophila melanogaster ortholog (dSet1, CG40351) of the Set1 H3K4 histone methyltransferase (HMT). Our results suggest that dSet1 acts as a "global" or general H3K4 di- and trimethyl HMT in Drosophila. Levels of H3K4 di- and trimethylation are significantly reduced in dSet1 mutants during late larval and post-larval stages, but not in animals carrying mutations in genes encoding other well-characterized H3K4 HMTs such as trr, trx, and ash1. The latter results suggest that Trr, Trx, and Ash1 may play more specific roles in regulating key cellular targets and pathways and/or act as global H3K4 HMTs earlier in development. In yeast and mammalian cells, the HMT activity of Set1 proteins is mediated through an evolutionarily conserved protein complex known as Complex of Proteins Associated with Set1 (COMPASS). We present biochemical evidence that dSet1 interacts with members of a putative Drosophila COMPASS complex and genetic evidence that these members are functionally required for H3K4 methylation. Taken together, our results suggest that dSet1 is responsible for the bulk of H3K4 di- and trimethylation throughout Drosophila development, thus providing a model system for better understanding the requirements for and functions of these modifications in metazoans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graham Hallson
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada
| | | | | | - Monika Syrzycka
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada
| | - Inho Kim
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada
| | - Shawn Cotsworth
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada
| | - Kathleen A. Fitzpatrick
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada
| | - Donald A. R. Sinclair
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada
| | - Barry M. Honda
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hallson G, Syrzycka M, Beck SA, Kennison JA, Dorsett D, Page SL, Hunter SM, Keall R, Warren WD, Brock HW, Sinclair DAR, Honda BM. The Drosophila cohesin subunit Rad21 is a trithorax group (trxG) protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105:12405-10. [PMID: 18713858 PMCID: PMC2527924 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0801698105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2008] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The cohesin complex is a key player in regulating cell division. Cohesin proteins SMC1, SMC3, Rad21, and stromalin (SA), along with associated proteins Nipped-B, Pds5, and EcoI, maintain sister chromatid cohesion before segregation to daughter cells during anaphase. Recent chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) data reveal extensive overlap of Nipped-B and cohesin components with RNA polymerase II binding at active genes in Drosophila. These and other data strongly suggest a role for cohesion in transcription; however, there is no clear evidence for any specific mechanisms by which cohesin and associated proteins regulate transcription. We report here a link between cohesin components and trithorax group (trxG) function, thus implicating these proteins in transcription activation and/or elongation. We show that the Drosophila Rad21 protein is encoded by verthandi (vtd), a member of the trxG gene family that is also involved in regulating the hedgehog (hh) gene. In addition, mutations in the associated protein Nipped-B show similar trxG activity i.e., like vtd, they act as dominant suppressors of Pc and hh(Mrt) without impairing cell division. Our results provide a framework to further investigate how cohesin and associated components might regulate transcription.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graham Hallson
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada V5A 1S6
| | - Monika Syrzycka
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada V5A 1S6
| | - Samantha A. Beck
- Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4
| | - James A. Kennison
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-2785
| | - Dale Dorsett
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, St. Louis University, St. Louis, MO 63104; and
| | - Scott L. Page
- Comparative Genomics Centre, James Cook University, Townsville 4811, Queensland, Australia
| | - Sally M. Hunter
- Comparative Genomics Centre, James Cook University, Townsville 4811, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rebecca Keall
- Comparative Genomics Centre, James Cook University, Townsville 4811, Queensland, Australia
| | - William D. Warren
- Comparative Genomics Centre, James Cook University, Townsville 4811, Queensland, Australia
| | - Hugh W. Brock
- Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4
| | - Donald A. R. Sinclair
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada V5A 1S6
| | - Barry M. Honda
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada V5A 1S6
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Syrzycka M, McEachern LA, Kinneard J, Prabhu K, Fitzpatrick K, Schulze S, Rawls JM, Lloyd VK, Sinclair DAR, Honda BM. Thepinkgene encodes theDrosophilaorthologue of the human Hermansky–Pudlak syndrome 5 (HPS5) gene. Genome 2007; 50:548-56. [PMID: 17632576 DOI: 10.1139/g07-032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Hermansky–Pudlak syndrome (HPS) consists of a set of human autosomal recessive disorders, with symptoms resulting from defects in genes required for protein trafficking in lysosome-related organelles such as melanosomes and platelet dense granules. A number of human HPS genes and rodent orthologues have been identified whose protein products are key components of 1 of 4 different protein complexes (AP-3 or BLOC-1, -2, and -3) that are key participants in the process. Drosophila melanogaster has been a key model organism in demonstrating the in vivo significance of many genes involved in protein trafficking pathways; for example, mutations in the “granule group” genes lead to changes in eye colour arising from improper protein trafficking to pigment granules in the developing eye. An examination of the chromosomal positioning of Drosophila HPS gene orthologues suggested that CG9770, the Drosophila HPS5 orthologue, might correspond to the pink locus. Here we confirm this gene assignment, making pink the first eye colour gene in flies to be identified as a BLOC complex gene.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Syrzycka
- Simon Fraser University, Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schulze SR, McAllister BF, Sinclair DAR, Fitzpatrick KA, Marchetti M, Pimpinelli S, Honda BM. Heterochromatic genes in Drosophila: a comparative analysis of two genes. Genetics 2006; 173:1433-45. [PMID: 16648646 PMCID: PMC1526689 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.056069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2006] [Accepted: 04/29/2006] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Centromeric heterochromatin comprises approximately 30% of the Drosophila melanogaster genome, forming a transcriptionally repressive environment that silences euchromatic genes juxtaposed nearby. Surprisingly, there are genes naturally resident in heterochromatin, which appear to require this environment for optimal activity. Here we report an evolutionary analysis of two genes, Dbp80 and RpL15, which are adjacent in proximal 3L heterochromatin of D. melanogaster. DmDbp80 is typical of previously described heterochromatic genes: large, with repetitive sequences in its many introns. In contrast, DmRpL15 is uncharacteristically small. The orthologs of these genes were examined in D. pseudoobscura and D. virilis. In situ hybridization and whole-genome assembly analysis show that these genes are adjacent, but not centromeric in the genome of D. pseudoobscura, while they are located on different chromosomal elements in D. virilis. Dbp80 gene organization differs dramatically among these species, while RpL15 structure is conserved. A bioinformatic analysis in five additional Drosophila species demonstrates active repositioning of these genes both within and between chromosomal elements. This study shows that Dbp80 and RpL15 can function in contrasting chromatin contexts on an evolutionary timescale. The complex history of these genes also provides unique insight into the dynamic nature of genome evolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra R Schulze
- Department of Molecular Biology snd Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schulze SR, Sinclair DAR, Fitzpatrick KA, Honda BM. A genetic and molecular characterization of two proximal heterochromatic genes on chromosome 3 of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 2005; 169:2165-77. [PMID: 15687284 PMCID: PMC1449577 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.103.023341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Heterochromatin comprises a transcriptionally repressive chromosome compartment in the eukaryotic nucleus; this is exemplified by the silencing effect it has on euchromatic genes that have been relocated nearby, a phenomenon known as position-effect variegation (PEV), first demonstrated in Drosophila melanogaster. However, the expression of essential heterochromatic genes within these apparently repressive regions of the genome presents a paradox, an understanding of which could provide key insights into the effects of chromatin structure on gene expression. To date, very few of these resident heterochromatic genes have been characterized to any extent, and their expression and regulation remain poorly understood. Here we report the cloning and characterization of two proximal heterochromatic genes in D. melanogaster, located deep within the centric heterochromatin of the left arm of chromosome 3. One of these genes, RpL15, is uncharacteristically small, is highly expressed, and encodes an essential ribosomal protein. Its expression appears to be compromised in a genetic background deficient for heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1), a protein associated with gene silencing in these regions. The second gene in this study, Dbp80, is very large and also appears to show a transcriptional dependence upon HP1; however, it does not correspond to any known lethal complementation group and is likely to be a nonessential gene.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Alleles
- Animals
- Base Sequence
- Binding Sites
- Blotting, Northern
- Blotting, Southern
- Cell Survival
- Chromatin/genetics
- Chromosome Mapping
- Cloning, Molecular
- Crosses, Genetic
- DNA, Complementary/metabolism
- Drosophila Proteins/biosynthesis
- Drosophila Proteins/genetics
- Drosophila melanogaster/genetics
- Exons
- Female
- Gene Silencing
- Genetic Complementation Test
- Germ-Line Mutation
- Heterochromatin/chemistry
- Heterochromatin/genetics
- Heterozygote
- Introns
- Male
- Models, Genetic
- Molecular Sequence Data
- Mutation
- Phenotype
- Polymerase Chain Reaction
- Ribosomal Proteins/biosynthesis
- Ribosomal Proteins/genetics
- Sequence Analysis, DNA
- Sex Factors
- Transcription Factors/biosynthesis
- Transcription Factors/genetics
- Transcription, Genetic
- Transgenes
- Wings, Animal/embryology
- Wings, Animal/pathology
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra R Schulze
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Position-effect variegation (PEV) results when a fully functional gene is moved from its normal position to a position near to a broken heterochromatic-euchromatic boundary. In this new position, the gene, while remaining unaltered at the DNA level, is transcriptionally silenced in some cells but active in others, producing a diagnostic mosaic phenotype. Many variegating stocks show phenotypic instability, in that the level of variegation is dramatically different in different isolates or when out crossed. To test if this phenotypic instability was due to segregation of spontaneously accumulated mutations that suppress variegation, four different and well-characterized strains showing PEV for the white+gene (wm4, wmMc, wm51b, and wmJ) and representing both large and small spot variegators were repeatedly out crossed to a strain free of modifiers, and the phenotypes of these variegators were monitored for 30 generations. Once free of modifiers, these variegating strains were then allowed to reaccumulate modifiers. The spontaneous suppressors of variegation were found to include both dominant and recessive, autosomal and X-linked alleles selected to reduce the detrimental effects of silencing white+and adjacent genes. The time of peak sensitivity to temperature during development was also determined for these four variegators. Although large and small spot variegators have previously been attributed to early and late silencing events, respectively, the variegators we examined all shared a common early period of peak sensitivity to temperature. Once free of their variegation suppressors, the different variegating strains showed considerable differences in the frequency of inactivation at a cellular level (the number of cells showing silencing of a given gene) and the extent of variegation within the cell (the number of silenced genes). These results suggest that large and small spot variegation may be a superficial consequence of spontaneous variegation suppressors. The nature and number of these spontaneous variegation suppressors depends on the number of genes silenced in a given variegating rearrangement. These results are interpreted in the context of a model that proposes that the different underlying patterns of gene silencing seen in PEV can be attributed directly to the formation of heterochromatin domains possessing different properties of propagation during cell division.Key words: Drosophila melanogaster, position-effect variegation, spontaneous suppressors of variegation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vett K Lloyd
- Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Canada.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lloyd VK, Sinclair DAR, Alperyn M, Grigliatti TA. Enhancer of garnet/deltaAP-3 is a cryptic allele of the white gene and identifies the intracellular transport system for the white protein. Genome 2002; 45:296-312. [PMID: 11962627 DOI: 10.1139/g01-139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The white gene encodes an ABC-type transmembrane transporter that has a role in normal eye pigment deposition. In addition, overexpression in Drosophila leads to homosexual male courtship. Its human homologue has been implicated in cholesterol transport in macrophages and in mood disorders in human males. The garnet gene is a member of a group of other Drosophila eye colour genes that have been shown, or proposed, to function in intracellular protein transport. Recent molecular analysis indicates that it encodes the delta subunit of the AP-3 adaptin complex involved in vesicle transport from the trans-Golgi network to lysosomes and related organelles, such as pigment granules. This identification revealed a novel role for intracellular vesicular transport in Drosophila pigmentation. To further analyze this intracellular transport system, we examined the genetic interactions between garnet and a second site enhancer mutation, enhancer of garnet (e(g)). We show here that e(g) is a cryptic allele of the white gene. The white-garnet interaction is highly sensitive to the levels of both gene products but also shows some allele specificity for the white gene. The additive effect on pigmentation and the predicted protein products of these genes suggest that the garnet/AP-3 transport system ensures the correct intracellular localization of the white gene product. This model is further supported by the observation of homosexual male courtship behavior in garnet mutants, similar to that seen in flies overexpressing, and presumably mis-sorting, the white gene product. The w(e(g)) allele also enhances mutations in the subset of other eye-color genes with phenotypes similar to garnet. This observation supports a role for these genes in intracellular transport and leads to a model whereby incorrect sorting of the white gene product can explain the pigmentation phenotypes of an entire group of eye-color genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vett K Lloyd
- Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Clegg NJ, Honda BM, Whitehead IP, Grigliatti TA, Wakimoto B, Brock HW, Lloyd VK, Sinclair DAR. Suppressors of position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster affect expression of the heterochromatic gene light in the absence of a chromosome rearrangement. Genome 1998. [DOI: 10.1139/g98-041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Suppressors of position-effect variegation (Su(var)s) in Drosophila melanogaster are usually studied in the presence of chromosomal rearrangements, which exhibit variegated expression of euchromatic genes moved near to, or heterochromatic genes moved away from, centromeric heterochromatin. However, the effects of Su(var) mutations on heterochromatic gene expression in the absence of a variegating re-arrangement have not yet been defined. Here we present a number of results which suggest that Su(var) gene products can interact to affect the expression of the light gene in its normal heterochromatic location. We initially observed that eye pigment was reduced in several Su(var) double mutants; the phenotype resembled that of light mutations and was more severe when only one copy of the light gene was present. This reduced pigmentation could be alleviated by a duplication for the light gene or by a reduction in the amount of cellular heterochromatin. In addition, the viability of most Su(var) double mutant combinations tested was greatly reduced in a genetic background of reduced light gene dosage, when extra heterochromatin is present. We conclude that Su(var) gene products can affect expression of the heterochromatic light gene in the absence of any chromosomal rearrangements. However, it is noteworthy that mutations in any single Su(var) gene have little effect on light expression; we observe instead that different pairings of Su(var) mutations are required to show an effect on light expression. Interestingly, we have obtained evidence that at least two of the second chromosome Su(var) mutations are gain-of-function lesions, which also suggests that there may be different modes of interaction among these genes. It may therefore be possible to use this more sensitive assay of Su(var) effects on heterochromatic genes to infer functional relationships among the products of the 50 or more known Su(var) loci.Key words: heterochromatin, chromatin, gene interactions.
Collapse
|
10
|
Warner TS, Sinclair DAR, Fitzpatrick KA, Singh M, Devlin RH, Honda BM. Thelightgene ofDrosophila melanogasterencodes a homologue ofVPS41, a yeast gene involved in cellular-protein trafficking. Genome 1998. [DOI: 10.1139/g98-017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Mutations in a number of genes affect eye colour in Drosophila melanogaster; some of these "eye-colour" genes have been shown to be involved in various aspects of cellular transport processes. In addition, combinations of viable mutant alleles of some of these genes, such as carnation (car) combined with eitherlight (lt) or deep-orange (dor) mutants, show lethal interactions. Recently, dor was shown to be homologous to the yeast gene PEP3 (VPS18), which is known to be involved in intracellular trafficking. We have undertaken to extend our earlier work on the lt gene, in order to examine in more detail its expression pattern and to characterize its gene product via sequencing of a cloned cDNA. The gene appears to be expressed at relatively high levels in all stages and tissues examined, and shows strong homology to VPS41, a gene involved in cellular-protein trafficking in yeast and higher eukaryotes. Further genetic experiments also point to a role for lt in transport processes: we describe lethal interactions between viable alleles of lt and dor, as well as phenotypic interactions (reductions in eye pigment) between alleles of lt and another eye-colour gene, garnet (g),whose gene product has close homology to a subunit of the human adaptor complex, AP-3.Key words: vesicle transport, eye-colour gene, heterochromatin.
Collapse
|
11
|
Sinclair DAR, Mottus RC, Grigliatti TA. Genes which suppress position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster are clustered. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1983. [DOI: 10.1007/bf00334834] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|