Expectations for Endoscopic Training During Gynaecological Specialty Training - Results of a Germany-wide Survey

Question: Endoscopy is an integral part of surgical gynaecology and is playing an increasingly important role in ensuring adequate gynaecological training in the context of specialty training in general. At present, little is known about the expectations and notions of young junior doctors with respect to endoscopic training. For this reason, junior doctors throughout Germany were surveyed on this topic and asked to share their opinions. Methods: Using an anonymized standardized survey, the following information was elicited: importance of endoscopic training, willingness to take courses, expectations for instructors and the hospital, ideas about the number of required operations, both as a surgical assistant and as a surgeon, as well as satisfaction with the current status of training. The questionnaires were sent via the Young Forum (Junges Forum) of the German Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) and the newsletter of the Working Group for Gynaecological Endoscopy (AGE). Results: The evaluation of the study was based on 109 completed questionnaires. The resident junior doctors were 31 years old on average and were in their third to fourth year of their specialty training on average. The majority of the participants (87 %) considered the learning of endoscopic techniques to be very important and advocated regular participation in endoscopy training courses. Among the participants, 48 % were prepared to invest up to €1500 of their own funds to attend courses up to twice a year during the entire specialty training period. The expectations of the instructors and institutions focused on technical expertise, the willingness and time for teaching and on the number and range of surgical procedures, followed by being granted leave for the courses and having costs covered for the courses. Thirty-eight per cent stated that their expectations had been completely or mostly met and 62 % said they had been met in part or inadequately. Eighty-three per cent of the respondents reported that they would change specialty training institutions in order to achieve their own goals in the context of specialty training. Conclusions: This study presents data for the first time on the satisfaction of young junior doctors and their expectations for endoscopic specialty training. The residents exhibited a high level of interest in endoscopy and a high level of willingness to actively shape the specialty training, including course participation. However, there appears to be a great deal of room for improvement for endoscopic specialty training, independent of the current training institution, training year or sex of the junior doctors.

Osteopathy for Endometriosis and Chronic Pelvic Pain - a Pilot Study

Introduction: Pelvic pain is a common problem in gynaecological practice. It is often unclear whether definite causality exists between reported symptoms and objective clinical findings of the female genital tract, and medical or operative treatments do not always achieve long-term resolution of symptoms. Methods: This pilot study investigated 28 patients (age 20-65, median 36.5 years) from a gynaecology practice whose only clinical finding was painful pelvic floor muscle tightness. Following standardised gynaecological and physiotherapist examination, all patients received osteopathic treatment. Pain had been present for a median of 3 years (range 1 month to 20 years). 14 patients had previously confirmed endometriosis. Treatment success was evaluated on consultation with patients in person or in writing. Results: 22 of the 28 participants completed the treatment according to plan. Overall, 17 reported symptom improvement, while 10 of the 14 patients with endometriosis did. Conclusion: Osteopathy is well received by women with painful pelvic floor muscle tightness and appears to be an effective treatment option.

Indications and Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Diseases. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S3 Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/070, April 2015)

Background: Official guideline "indications and methods of hysterectomy" to assign indications for the different methods published and coordinated by the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG), the Austrian Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (OEGGG) and the Swiss Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (SGGG). Besides vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy, three additional techniques have been implemented due to the introduction of laparoscopy. Organ-sparing alternatives were also integrated. Methods: The guideline group consisted of 26 experts from Germany, Austria and Switzerland. Recommendations were developed using a structured consensus process and independent moderation. A systematic literature search and quality appraisal of benefits and harms of the therapeutic alternatives for symptomatic fibroids, dysfunctional bleeding and adenomyosis was done through MEDLINE up to 6/2014 focusing on systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Results: All types of hysterectomy led in studies to high rates of patient satisfaction. If possible, vaginal instead of abdominal hysterectomy should preferably be done. If a vaginal hysterectomy is not feasible, the possibility of a laparoscopic hysterectomy should be considered. An abdominal hysterectomy should only be done with a special indication. Organ-sparing interventions also led to high patient satisfaction rates, but contain the risk of symptom recurrence. Conclusion: As an aim, patients should be enabled to choose that therapeutic intervention for their benign disease of the uterus that convenes best to them and their personal life situation.

Abstract P2-08-08: Circulating tumor cells count-based nomograms to predict survival of metastatic breast cancer patients: Results from the European pooled analysis

Background: The European Pooled Analysis of CTC (EPAC) in metastatic breast cancer, based on 1,944 individual data from patients with various tumor types and clinical settings (Bidard et al, Lancet Oncol 2014), has established CTC count (CellSearch) at baseline and during therapy as a level of evidence 1 independent prognostic biomarker and demonstrated its superiority over serum blood markers. As part of the study pre-planned objectives, we sought to establish nomograms allowing accurate individual survival predictions.

Methods: Using individual data from 17 centers, we built simplified multivariate prognostic models taking into account the independent prognostic clinico-pathological (CP) characteristics including CTC count, dichotomized using the 5CTC/7.5ml threshold, at baseline and at 3-5 weeks after the start of a new treatment regimen, and derived nomograms for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) prediction at baseline and after 3-5 weeks of treatment. We report here the internal validation of these nomograms. Discrimination of the models was assessed using the c-index estimated by a jackknife procedure and the calibration was visually assessed through 10-fold crossvalidated calibration plots at 1,2,3 years for OS and 1,2 years for PFS.

Results: Multivariate models at baseline for PFS and OS were fitted on 1501 and 568 individual patient data with CTC count at baseline and CTC count at baseline and after 3-5 weeks, respectively. Models include tumor subtype, the number of previous chemotherapy lines (0/1/≥2), PS, age (<=50/>50-65/>65 years), metastasis-free intervals (0/>0-3/>3 years), metastatic sites (liver and CNS) and CTC count at baseline and eventually at 3-5 weeks of treatment. The C-index increased from 0.722 to 0.755 (increase in C-index:0.033, 95% CI [0.019;0.045]) when adding baseline CTC to the CP only model for OS (n=1501). For those patients with CTC values at 3-5 weeks (n=568), there was an additional increase in the C-index when adding CTC at 3-5 weeks to a model with already CP and baseline CTC from 0.731 to 0.743 (increase in C-index 0.013, 95% CI [-0.004;0.025]). The model with CP and baseline CTC counts showed a good calibration for OS at 1,2,3 years and the model with CP, baseline CTC and CTC count at 3-5 weeks a moderately good calibration. Similar results were obtained for PFS.

Conclusion: From the largest database with individual CTC data, we were able to build PFS and OS survival nomograms, with satisfactory discrimination and calibration. Our planned next step is to validate the nomogram in an additional cohort.

Citation Format: Bidard F-C, Peeters D, Fehm T, Nole F, Gisbert-Criado R, Mavroudis D, Grisanti S, Generali D, Garcia-Saenz JA, Stebbing J, Caldas C, Gazzaniga P, Manso L, Zamarchi R, Fernandez de Lascoiti A, de Mattos-Arruda L, Ignatiadis M, van Laere SJ, Meier-Stiegen F, Sandri M-T, Vidal-Martinez J, Politaki E, Consoli F, Bottini A, Diaz-Rubio E, Krell J, Dawson S-J, Raimondi C, Rutten A, Janni W, Munzone E, Carañana V, Agelaki S, Almici C, Dirix L, Solomayer E, Zorzino L, Reis-Filho JS, Squifflet P, Pantel K, Beije N, Sleijfers S, Pierga J-Y, Michiels S. Circulating tumor cells count-based nomograms to predict survival of metastatic breast cancer patients: Results from the European pooled analysis. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-08-08.

Correlation of the volume of ectopic pregnancy and MTX therapy outcome: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate a possible correlation between the volume of the tubal ectopic pregnancy (EP) measured by vaginal-ultrasound (VUS) and methotrexate (MTX) therapy outcome.

STUDY DESIGN

Data of EP volume measured by one expert-sonographer, viability, clinical symptoms, previous IVF/insemination, follow-up of β-hCG and progesterone levels, and treatment of EP was collected of 100 patients with sonographically diagnosed EP, who attended the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Medical University Vienna between March 2008 and September 2011.

RESULTS

The mean volume of EP (mVol.) in the group with successful MTX therapy (n = 38) was 5.11 ml, 95%CI [2.4; 7.8] with a median 3.2 ml, IQR [5.0], in the group with unsuccessful MTX treatment (n = 11) it was 15.24 ml, 95%CI [-2.6; 33.1], with a median 4.4 ml, IQR [11.4]. We could observe a trend towards a lower mVol. in the successful MTX group (5.11 ml vs. 15.24 ml). We could not show a significant correlation (u-test p = 0.208).

CONCLUSION

A clear tendency was observed towards a lower mVol. in the successful MTX therapy group, but we could not verify a statistically significant correlation of volume of EP and MTX therapy outcome most likely due to the small sample size. This was the first study investigating the correlation of volume of EP and MTX therapy outcome as principal question.

Current and Future Status of Laparoscopy in Gynecologic Oncology

Laparoscopy is playing an increasingly important role in gynecologic oncology. The benefits of minimally invasive surgery for oncology patients and the quality of this treatment are well documented. Outcomes and quality of minimally invasive surgical procedures to treat cervical cancer were evaluated based on retrospective and case-control studies; outcomes and quality after minimally invasive treatment für early-stage low-risk endometrial cancer were also assessed in prospective randomized studies. If indicated, laparoscopic lymphadenectomy is both technically feasible and oncologically safe. Adipose patients in particular benefit from minimally invasive procedures, where feasible. The potential role of laparoscopy in neoadjuvant therapy for ovarian cancer and in surgery for early-stage ovarian carcinoma is still controversially discussed and is currently being assessed in further studies. Using a minimally invasive approach in gynecologic oncology procedures demands strict adherence to oncological principles and requires considerable surgical skill.

Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab or everolimus for HER2-negative primary breast cancer (GBG 44-GeparQuinto)†

BACKGROUND

The GeparQuinto study showed that adding bevacizumab to 24 weeks of anthracycline-taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy increases pathological complete response (pCR) rates overall and specifically in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). No difference in pCR rate was observed for adding everolimus to paclitaxel in nonearly responding patients. Here, we present disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients (n = 1948) with HER2-negative tumors of a median tumor size of 4 cm were randomly assigned to neoadjuvant treatment with epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel (EC-T) with or without eight infusions of bevacizumab every 3 weeks before surgery. Patients without clinical response to EC ± Bevacizumab were randomized to 12 weekly cycles paclitaxel with or without everolimus 5 mg/day. To detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.75 (α = 0.05, β = 0.8) 379 events had to be observed in the bevacizumab arms.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 3.8 years, 3-year DFS was 80.8% and 3-year OS was 89.7%. Outcome was not different for patients receiving bevacizumab (HR 1.03; P = 0.784 for DFS and HR 0.974; P = 0.842 for OS) compared with patients receiving chemotherapy alone. Patients with TNBC similarly showed no improvement in DFS (HR = 0.99; P = 0.941) and OS (HR = 1.02; P = 0.891) when treated with bevacizumab. No other predefined subgroup (HR+/HER2-; locally advanced (cT4 or cN3) or not; cT1-3 or cT4; pCR or not) showed a significant benefit. No difference in DFS (HR 0.997; P = 0.987) and OS (HR 1.11; P = 0.658) was observed for nonearly responding patients receiving paclitaxel with or without everolimus overall as well as in subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term results, in opposite to the results of pCR, do not support the neoadjuvant use of bevacizumab in addition to an anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy or everolimus in addition to paclitaxel for nonearly responding patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

NCT 00567554, www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Abstract PD6-5: Pooled analysis of circulating tumor cells in metastatic breast cancer: Findings from 1944 individual patients data

Background: Clinical validity of CTCs (CellSearch®) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients has previously been assessed in studies with limited statistical power. We aimed to pool all European studies to obtain high-level evidence on the prognostic value of CTCs, to investigate their effects across different clinico-pathological characteristics and therapies and to further validate the MD Anderson/Institut Curie/Fox Chase CTC-based prognostic nomogram established in first-line treated MBC patients (Giordano et al, Clin Cancer Res 2013).

Material and methods: Methods were predefined in a written protocol. In December 2012, we searched for eligible studies that accrued patients in 2003-2012. We contacted all European laboratories using CellSearch®. We used likelihood ratio tests (LR) in Cox regression models stratified by study to assess the independent prognostic value of CTC when added to a clinicopathological (CP) model for progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Landmark analyses were used to assess the prognostic effect of early changes in CTC. The CTC-based nomogram (http://cancernomograms.com/CTCOnline.html) score was retrieved for every patient; we calculated C-indices, drew calibration plots and Kaplan-Meier curves according to quintiles of the nomogram score.

Results: We collected individual data of 1944 MBC patients, from 20 different studies (some unpublished), from 17 centers in 7 European countries. We observed 1507 PFS events and 929 deaths. Baseline CTC count was significantly associated with several patient characteristics, such as performance status (PS, p<10-4), synchronous metastasis (p<10- 2) tumor subtype (p<10-4), liver & bone metastases (p<10-4), CEA & CA15-3 levels (p<10-4). The CP model for OS included PS, MBC subtypes, number of previous lines of treatment, patient's age, metastasis-free interval, metastatic sites (p<0.01 for all). In a multivariate analysis containing the CP model parameters and CTC count at baseline, elevated CTC count (≥5) was a significant independent predictor of OS (n = 1444, HR = 2.7, 95%CI [2.2-3.2], LR p<10-4). Baseline serum markers added either no or marginal effect to the CP plus baseline CTC model for OS. In contrast, early changes in CTC status at week 3-5 significantly added prognostic information for OS to the model with CP factors and baseline CTC+ (n = 569, HR = 1.8 [2.2-3.2], LR p<0.001). In the population of interest (MBC treated by first line chemotherapy, n = 402 patients, 176 deaths), the CTC-based nomogram exhibited a good C-index for OS (0.69), was well calibrated and showed clear separation of the survival curves. Additional results, including subgroup analyses by tumor subtype and treatments will be presented at the meeting.

Conclusions: This pooled analysis is the largest study ever reported on CTC in MBC, with a previously unreached statistical power. It provides a clear level-of-evidence 1 on the independent prognostic value of CTCs before and during treatment in MBC. Also, the CTC-based prognostic nomogram is independently validated.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr PD6-5.

P4-07-13: Prognostic Impact of Circulating Tumor Cells Assessed with the Cell Search Assay and Adna Test Breast in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients – The DETECT Study

Background

Over the last decade circulating tumor cells (CTC) were established as a prognostic factor in breast cancer patients. However, there are very limited studies comparing different test methods, although several are available.The DETECT trial for metastatic breast cancer patients was designed to investiate the prognostic impact of CTC. Here, we report on the prognostic relevance of CTC testing with different detection methods.

Material and Methods: Patients with primary metastatic breast cancer or metastatic recurrence were prospectively enrolled in this multicenter trial. CTC were detected using the FDA-approved Cell Search® assay applying immunocytochemistry and the RNA-based Adna Test Breast Cancer™. After a median follow-up of 11 months the first survival data are now presented.

Results: Both methods could be performed in 221 patients. Using the CellSearch™ assay 116 of 221 patients were CTC-positive based on the cut-off level of 5 cells. Presence of CTC was associated with the site of metastatic disease. The OS was 15.4 months in CTC positive pts. (95%-CI: 13.5−17.1 mths) compared to 20.4 mths. in CTC negative pts. (19.1−21.9 mths.; p<0.001). In the multivariate analysis presence of CTC was the only independent predictor for overall survival (HR: 3.4, 95%-CI: 1.7−6.3) including tumorbiological factors, menopausal status, number and sites of metastatic disease. The progression-free survival was not correlated with CTC status in our cohort receiving different types of systemic treatment (p=0.197). When the AdnaTest Breast was performed, 88 of 221 (40%) patients were CTC positive. Except for HER2 status, no correlation could be observed between CTC positivity and any of the clinicopathological factors. CTC positivity assessed by the AdnaTest Breast has no impact on PFS and OS. A multivariate analysis was therefore not performed.

Conclusions: Currently, several different tests are available for CTC detection. Only a few tests have been approved by the FDA and been validated in large clinical trials. Therfore, it will be important to compare new techniques with the Cell Search assay.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-13.

ER and PR Expression Profile of Circulating Tumor Cells in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients in Comparison to the Primary Tumor

Background: Introduktion: Several studies have indicated that the expression of predictive markers including ER and PR can change during course of disease. Therefoore, reassesment of of the prediktive markers at the time of disease progression might help to optimize treatment decisions. Metastatic tissue may be difficult to obtain for repeated analysis. In this context, characterization of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) could be of relevance. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was: (1) to reevaluate the ER/PR expression by circulating tumor cells and (2) to compare the hormone receptor status expression profile of CTC with the primary tumor. Materials and Methods: We ecaluated, 166 blood samples from metastatic breast cancer patients at the time of first diagnosis of first metastatic disease or disease progression. All samples underwent immunomagnetic enrichment using the AdnaTest BreastCancerSelect (AdnaGen AG, Germany) within 4 hours after blood withdrawal followed by RNA isolation and subsequent gene expression analysis by reverse transcription and Multiplex-PCR in separated tumor cells using the AdnaTest BreastCancerDetect. CTC were analyzed for the three breast cancer associated markers: GA733-2, Muc-1, Her-2 and β-actin as an internal PCR control. Expression of the estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptor was assessed in an additional RT-PCR. The analysis of PCR products was performed by capillary electrophoresis on the Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100. Results: The overall detection rate for CTC was 38% (63/166 patients) with the expression rates of 79% for EpCAM (50/63 patients), 77% for MUC1 (49/63 patients), 49% for HER2 (31/63 patients), 23% for ER (15/65 patients) and 11% for PR (7/65 patients), respectively. Comparisons with the primary tumor were only performed in CTC+ patients (n=65). In 41 of 65 (63%) patients with ER+ tumors, CTC were ER- and 38/65 (58%) patients with PR+ tumors did not express PR on CTC. Primary tumors and CTC displayed a concordant ER and PR status in only 34% and 61% of cases, respectively. Conclusion: Most of the CTC were ER/PR-negative despite the presence of an ER/PR-positive primary tumor. The predictive value of hormone receptor status expression profile of CTC for palliative endocrine therapy has to be prospectively evaluated.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 3009.

Detect-Study: Comparison of Two Techniques for the Evaluation of the HER2 Expression on Circulating Tumor Cells in Metastatic Breast Cancer

Introduction:There is a growing body of evidence that the HER2 status can change during disease progression (Gancberg et al. 2003). However, the re-assessment of the HER2 status to evaluate the eligibility for HER2 targeted therapy by a tissue biopsy of the metastatic lesion may not always be feasible. In this context, determination of the HER2 status using CTCs might be a strategy with potential clinical application. So far, no large prospective studies were performed comparing different methods for CTCs detection and characterization. The aim of this trial was to determine the HER2 status of CTCs in metastatic breast cancer patients using the antibody based CellSearch©assay and the RT-PCR approach AdnaTest Breast Cancer and to assess the concordance rate between these two techniques. Both techniques are frequently used in clinical trials.Method:A total of 252 metastatic breast cancer patients from 9 different certified breast cancer centers (Düsseldorf, Erlangen, Essen, Freiburg, Hamburg, Heidelberg, Muenchen, Regensburg, Tuebingen) were enrolled in this prospective open trial from 01/2008 until 04/2009. HER2 status of CTCs was assessed using both the FDA approved CellSearch©Assay (Veridex, Warren, NJ, USA) and the AdnaTest Breast Cancer (Adnagen, Langenhagen, Germany) according to the manufacturers' instructions. A web based databank was designed for data management and online-documentation (www. detect-study.de). The study design was approved by the ethics' comittee (2007/B01).Results:Using the CellSearch©Assay, 133 of 252 (55%) metastatic patients had CTCs at the time of first diagnosis or disease progression. HER2 positivity was observed in 39% of CTC positive patients (52 of 133) but only 22 of these had initially a HER2 positive primary tumor. Eighty-eight of 225 (39%) patients were CTC positive using the AdnaTest Breast Cancer. The HER2 positivity rate was 47% (41 of 88). Eight of these patients had a HER2 positive primary tumor whereas 33 patients were initially HER2 negative or unknown. Summarizing the data, the rate of breast cancer patients with HER2 negative primary tumors but HER2 positive circulating tumor cells was 38% (32 of 61) and 48% (28 of 41) using the CellSearch Assay and the AdnaTest Breast Cancer, respectively. Considering only those patients who had CTCs on both tests (n=61), the concordance rate regarding HER2 expression was 51% (32 of 61).Conclusion:Based on CTCs the HER2 status can change during disease progression. However, using different techniques, disconcordant results were obtained. To prove the clinical value of these CTC assays and to implement the HER2 status of CTCs as a stratification parameter in future clinical trials, it will be mandatory to correlate clinical response to HER2 targetd therapy on each method in patients with HER2 positive CTCs.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 3004.

Prospective Evaluation of Serum HER2 and HER2 Expression on Circulating Tumor Cells in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer within the DETECT Study

Background: Assessment of HER2 status at the time of metastatic disease might help to optimize treatment decisions in patients with no HER2 status determined at first diagnosis and could also be helpful since HER2 status may change during disease progression. In this context, determination of serum HER2 or the evaluation of HER2 status on circulating tumor cells (CTC) is of potential relevance especially for optimizing HER2-directed therapy. The aim of this study was therefore to determine the serum HER2 status and the HER2 status of CTC from corresponding patients.Methods: Blood samples were obtained in a prospective multicenter setting from 251 patients with metastatic breast cancer at the time of disease progression. Serum HER2 was determined using the commercial HER2 ELISA-kit (Oncogene Science). CTC were detected and HER2 expression was assessed with the CellSearch™ system (Veridex).Results: 119 of 251 (47%) metastatic patients had elevated serum HER2 levels above 15 ng/mL. Serum HER2 was elevated in 49 (66%) of 74 patients with HER2 positive primary tumors, in 57 of 148 (39%) with HER2 negative primary tumors and in 13 of 29 (45%) patients with unknown HER2 primary tumor status. CTC were detected in 133 of 243 evaluable patients (5 or more cells), in these HER2 overexpression on CTC (strong overexpression in at least one cell) was detected in 52 cases (39%). Only 20 of these patients had a HER2 positive primary tumor. In patients with HER2 positive CTC, serum levels were above the cut off in 34 of 52 (65%), while in those with HER2 negative CTC 44 of 81 (54%) showed elevated HER2 serum levels. Concordance between HER2 status of circulating tumor cells and elevated serum HER2 was seen in 71 of 133 patients (53%).Conclusions: Our study demonstrates with a prospective design that also in patients with initially negative HER2 tumor status elevated serum HER2 levels and/or HER2 positive CTC can be detected at the time of metastatic disease. This is of clinical relevance since these patients in current practice do not have access to HER2 targeted therapy.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 3050.

Membrane-initiated effects of progesterone on proliferation and activation of VEGF in breast cancer cells

OBJECTIVE

Progesterone influences mammary gland development and probably breast cancer tumorigenesis and functions by regulating a broad spectrum of physiological processes. We investigated receptor membrane-initiated actions of progesterone in MCF-7 breast cancer cells via progesterone receptor membrane component 1 (PGRMC1).

DESIGN AND METHOD

The expression of PGRMC1 in breast cancer was verified by immune fluorescent analysis of paraffin sections. MCF-7 cells were transfected with PGRMC1 (wild type) or PGRMC1 variants. These cells were stimulated with a membrane-impermeable progesterone (P4) conjugate (P4-BSA-fluorescein isothiocyanate, P4-BSA-FITC, 10(-6) mol/l) or unconjugated progesterone (P4, 10(-6) mol/l) in the presence or absence of the progesterone receptor blocker RU-486 (10(-6) mol/l). Additionally, the effects on the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) were determined using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

PGRMC1 is perinuclearly localized in breast cancer cells. Western Blot analysis suggests that PGRMC1 is phosphorylated at serine 180. MCF-7-PGRMC1 (S180A) cells show an approximately 35% increase in proliferation after incubation with P4-BSA-FITC compared to MCF-7 control and MCF-7-PGRMC1 (wild type) cells. This effect cannot be blocked by RU-486. P4 reduced proliferation of MCF-7-PGRMC1 cells by approximately 10% compared to untreated controls. P4-BSA-FITC treatment led to a roughly three-fold activation of VEGF-A gene expression compared to MCF-7 cells.

CONCLUSION

PGRMC1 is expressed in breast cancer tissue and mediates an RU-486-independent proliferative signal. It might also contribute to VEGF-induced neovascularization in tumor tissue. Thus, screening for PGRMC1 expression might be of interest to identify women with a higher expression of PGRMC1 and who might thus be susceptible for breast cancer development under hormone replacement therapy.

Expression profile of CTC and corresponding tumors in primary breast cancer patients

538

Background: The target of adjuvant therapy in breast cancer is minimal residual disease (MRD). However, treatment decisions are based on expression of predictive markers (ER; PR, HER-2) of the primary tumor. Based on current studies, presence of MRD may be reflected by the detection of circulating tumor cells (CTC). Therefore, the aim of the study was to characterize CTC by multiplex-PCR for the expression of HER-2, ER, and PR and compare the expression profiles of CTCs with those of the corresponding primary tumors. Methods: CTC from blood of 431 patients with primary breast cancer were analyzed for EpCAM, MUC1, and HER-2 transcripts with the AdnaTest BreastCancer (AdnaGen AG, Germany). A blood samples was CTC positive when at least one of the markers was detected. Expression of the ER and PR receptor was assessed in an additional RT-PCR. The ER, PR and HER2 receptor status of the primary tumors was determined by immunohistochemistry. The DAKO-Score for the expression of HER-2 was determined with the HercepTest. Results: The overall detection rate for CTC was 13% (58/431 patients) with the expression rates of 38% for HER-2 (22/58 patients), 25% for ER (12/48) and 4% for PR (2/48), respectively. ER positivity of the primary tumor was demonstrated in 45/58 (78%) of these patients, PR positivity in 41/58 (71%) patients and HER-2 in 9/58 (16%) patients, respectively. The concordance rate between ER, PR, and HER-2 status of CTCs and the primary tumor was 29%, 25%, and 53%, respectively Interestingly, the spread of CTC was mostly found in triple negative tumors (p = 0.01) and CTC in general were mostly found to be triple-negative regardless of the ER, PR, and HER-2 status of the primary tumor. Conclusions: Since the expression profile between CTC and the primary tumor differs, the consequence for the selection of adjuvant treatment targeting minimal residual disease has to be further evaluated in clinical trials.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Interactions of breast cancer cells with the microenvironment of the human bone marrow

e22097

Background: Bone is one of the most favored sites for metastasis of breast cancer cells (BrCa) resulting in the formation of osteolytic and/or osteoblastic lesions. There is increasing evidence that the bone marrow (BM) microenvironment plays a pivotal role in modulating tumor cell homing to the bone, metastasis and progression. However, the molecular crosstalk between BrCa cells and the cellular and extracellular components of the bone marrow leading to osteotropism still remains a poorly characterized step in the metastatic process. Methods: Cell adhesion and migration assays using the invasive MDA-MB-231 and the noninvasive MCF7 BrCa cell lines were performed to investigate the impact of BM components on cellular functions of tumor cells. Results: Cell-matrix adhesion assays showed a strong and concentration-dependent attachment of BrCa cells to several extracellular matrix components present in the human bone marrow such as fibronectin, different laminin isoforms, collagens type I and IV or tenascin-C. Moreover, the BrCa cells attached avidly to the BM-derived primary osteoblasts, whereas the binding to stromal cells was significantly weaker. Notably, cell-cell adhesion experiments with primary osteoclasts revealed an anti-adhesive effect on tumor cell binding leading to no attachment activity of BrCa cells with the cell surface of primary osteoclasts. The influence of cellular components of the BM on tumor cell migration was analyzed by cell migration assays using conditioned media of osteoblasts, osteoclasts and stromal cells or a modified Transwell chamber technique. The migration assays with invasive MDA-MB-231 cells clearly showed that osteoblasts, but not osteoclasts or stromal cells released factors which led to a faster wound closure, suggesting an enhanced migratory ability of the metastatic tumor cells, whereas the migration of nonmetastatic MCF7 cells was unaffected. Conclusions: These data indicate that the crosstalk with osteoblasts affects both the adhesive and the migratory ability of BrCa cells favoring the bone colonization process. Furthermore, the presented experimental conditions may provide useful tools to study effects of antiresorptive drugs like bisphosphonates to improve therapeutic strategies for treatment metastatic bone disease.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Persistence of isolated tumor cells in the bone marrow of breast cancer patients predicts increased risk for relapse – a European pooled analysis

Abstract #304

Purpose:
 The prognostic significance of DTC in the BM of breast cancer pts at the time of primary diagnosis has already been confirmed by a large pooled analysis. In view of the lack of early indicators for secondary adjuvant treatment, we here evaluated whether the persistence of DTC after adjuvant therapy confers a risk for relapse and breast cancer-related death.
 Patients and Methods:
 We analyzed BM aspirates of 723 pts from academic breast cancer units in Oslo (n=356), Munich (n=228) and Tuebingen (n=139) during recurrence-free follow-up at a mean interval of 31.7 months (standard deviation [std] 19.4 months) after primary diagnosis of breast cancer pT1-4, pN0-3 pM0. Carcinoma cells were detected using a standardized immunoassay with the monoclonal antibodies A45-B/B3 (Munich, Tuebingen), or AE1 and AE3 (Oslo), directed against cytokeratin (CK). Pts were followed for a median of 54.5 months (SD 25.1 months) after primary diagnosis.
 Results:
 Persistent DTC in the BM was detected in 15.5% of the pts (n=112). The Kaplan-Meier estimate for mean distant relapse-free survival was 162.5 months (157.9 – 167.0 95%CI) in pts with negative and 102.4 months (94.2 – 110.6, 95% CI, p< .0001, log rank test) in pts with positive BM status. The mean overall survival was 170.1 months, (167.7 – 172.5 95% CI), compared to 113.4 months in patients with persistent DTC in BM (107.3 – 119.5, p < .0001). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, allowing for BM status, tumor size, nodal status and histopathological grading, presence of DTC was an independent prognostic factor for reduced breast cancer specific survival ((RR 3.42, 1.64 – 7.13 95% CI, p= .001).
 Conclusion:
 Persistent DTC significantly predicts an increased risk for subsequent relapse, and, therefore, might serve as a potent monitoring tool for the follow-up of breast cancer pts. Future therapeutic intervention trials are currently being initiated to assess the benefit of secondary adjuvant treatment based on DTC detection as stratification parameter.

Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 304.

Tumor cell dormancy: implications for the biology and treatment of breast cancer

Despite progress made in the therapy of solid tumors such as breast cancer, the prognosis of patients even with small primary tumors is still limited by metastatic relapse often long after removal of the primary tumor. Therefore, it has been hypothesized that primary tumors shed tumor cells already at an early stage into the blood circulation. A subset of these disseminated tumor cells may persist in a state of so-called "dormancy". Based on cell culture and animal models, dormancy can occur at two different stages. Single dormant cells are defined as cells with a lack of proliferation and apoptosis with the cells undergoing cell cycle arrest. The micrometastasis model defines tumor cell dormancy as a state of balanced apoptosis and proliferation of micrometastasis resulting in no net increase of tumor mass. Mechanisms leading to a growth activation of dormant tumor cells and the outgrowth of manifest metastases are not completely understood. Genetic predisposition of the dormant cells as well as immunological and angiogenetic influences of the surrounding environment may contribute to this phenomenon. In this review, we summarize findings on different factors for tumor cell dormancy and potential therapeutic implications that should help to reduce metastatic relapse in cancer patients.