1
|
Adnan HS, Venticich PM, Prevo L, Schneider F, Kremers S. The Comprehensive Community Engagement Framework for Health and Well-being. Eur J Public Health 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz186.441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Community engagement (CE) and empowerment are required to support the sustainability and effectiveness of actions to reach Agenda 2030. There is a need to guide CE for health and well-being to take action on important societal challenges such as the growing burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and health inequities. The framework proposed in this study has been designed to assist professionals, practitioners and communities to effectively engage.
Methods
A narrative review of existing grey literature, policy papers and models related to CE was performed. This guided the development of a systematic search strategy, performed by two researchers, which reviewed CE approaches and key influencing factors. The search strategy captured different terms used for CE.
Results
A total of 27 studies of different types, from around the world, were identified for inclusion into the review. The study compiled a set of widely-used theories and approaches to CE. Key factors such as governance, trust, accessibility and sociocultural contextualisation were also identified as important for the success of CE initiatives. Subsequently, the Comprehensive Community Engagement Framework (CCEF) was developed. It combines theoretical and empirical principles, proven participatory actions and key factors to produce evidence-based health and well-being outcomes across different sectors and levels of society.
Conclusions
This study has formed the basis of a forthcoming WHO report on CE. The CCEF enables the operationalisation of CE to guide for possible practical approaches to planning, initiating, sustaining and evaluating CE processes alongside the community. It can be used by the health sector as well as the non-health sectors to address health, well-being and broader societal challenges.
Key messages
The CCEF can be used to engage health and non-health stakeholders to tailor CE processes, increase impact of interventions and policies, building capacity and empowering communities. The proposed framework provides the first comprehensive guidance to conduct community engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H S Adnan
- Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - P M Venticich
- Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - L Prevo
- Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Department of Health Promotion, NUTRIM, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - F Schneider
- Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Department of Health Promotion, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - S Kremers
- Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Department of Health Promotion, NUTRIM, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schlenk RF, Weber D, Herr W, Wulf G, Salih HR, Derigs HG, Kuendgen A, Ringhoffer M, Hertenstein B, Martens UM, Grießhammer M, Bernhard H, Krauter J, Girschikofsky M, Wolf D, Lange E, Westermann J, Koller E, Kremers S, Wattad M, Heuser M, Thol F, Göhring G, Haase D, Teleanu V, Gaidzik V, Benner A, Döhner K, Ganser A, Paschka P, Döhner H. Randomized phase-II trial evaluating induction therapy with idarubicin and etoposide plus sequential or concurrent azacitidine and maintenance therapy with azacitidine. Leukemia 2019; 33:1923-1933. [PMID: 30728457 PMCID: PMC6756041 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-019-0395-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2018] [Revised: 01/04/2019] [Accepted: 01/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this randomized phase-II study was to evaluate the effect of substituting cytarabine by azacitidine in intensive induction therapy of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients were randomized to four induction schedules for two cycles: STANDARD (idarubicin, cytarabine, etoposide); and azacitidine given prior (PRIOR), concurrently (CONCURRENT), or after (AFTER) therapy with idarubicin and etoposide. Consolidation therapy consisted of allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation or three courses of high-dose cytarabine followed by 2-year maintenance therapy with azacitidine in the azacitidine-arms. AML with CBFB-MYH11, RUNX1-RUNX1T1, mutated NPM1, and FLT3-ITD were excluded and accrued to genotype-specific trials. The primary end point was response to induction therapy. The statistical design was based on an optimal two-stage design applied for each arm separately. During the first stage, 104 patients (median age 62.6, range 18-82 years) were randomized; the study arms PRIOR and CONCURRENT were terminated early due to inefficacy. After randomization of 268 patients, all azacitidine-containing arms showed inferior response rates compared to STANDARD. Event-free and overall survival were significantly inferior in the azacitidine-containing arms compared to the standard arm (p < 0.001 and p = 0.03, respectively). The data from this trial do not support the substitution of cytarabine by azacitidine in intensive induction therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R F Schlenk
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
- NCT-Trial Center, National Center of Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - D Weber
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - W Herr
- Department of Hematology, Medical Oncology and Pneumology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - G Wulf
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - H R Salih
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Eberhard-Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - H G Derigs
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Hospital Frankfurt-Hoechst, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - A Kuendgen
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Clinical Immunology, University of Duesseldorf, Medical Faculty, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - M Ringhoffer
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - B Hertenstein
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Klinikum Bremen Mitte, Bremen, Germany
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Klinikum am Gesundbrunnen, Heilbronn, Germany
| | - U M Martens
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Minden, Minden, Germany
| | - M Grießhammer
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Minden, Minden, Germany
| | - H Bernhard
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Darmstadt, Municipal Hospital, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - J Krauter
- Department Hematology and Oncology, Braunschweig Municipal Hospital, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - M Girschikofsky
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Hospital Elisabethinen Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - D Wolf
- Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - E Lange
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Hamm, Hamm, Germany
| | - J Westermann
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité - Campus Virchow Clinic, Berlin, Germany
| | - E Koller
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Hanuschkrankenhaus Wien, Wien, Austria
| | - S Kremers
- Department of Internal Medicine, Caritas-Krankenhaus Lebach, Lebach, Germany
| | - M Wattad
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Hospital Essen-Werden, Essen, Germany
| | - M Heuser
- Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - F Thol
- Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - G Göhring
- Institute of Human Genetics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - D Haase
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - V Teleanu
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - V Gaidzik
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - A Benner
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - K Döhner
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - A Ganser
- Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - P Paschka
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - H Döhner
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Beers M, van de Bool C, van Helvoort A, Kremers S, Franssen F, Wouters E, Schols A. OR13: Long-Term Efficacy of a Nutritional Intervention Strategy to Optimize and Maintain Efficacy of Pulmonary Rehabilitation in COPD: The Nutrain Trial. Clin Nutr 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/s0261-5614(17)30774-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
4
|
Häcker L, Tassara M, Brossart P, Held G, Horst H, Ringhoffer M, Köhne CH, Kremers S, Raghavachar A, Wulf G, Kirchen H, Nachbaur D, Wattad M, Benner A, Weber D, Gaidzik V, Paschka P, Döhner K, Döhner H, Schlenk R. Evaluation of dose intensification of cytarabine in postremission therapy in older AML patients within the prospective phase II AMLSG 06-04 study. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx373.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
5
|
Hehlmann R, Lauseker M, Saußele S, Pfirrmann M, Krause S, Kolb HJ, Neubauer A, Hossfeld DK, Nerl C, Gratwohl A, Baerlocher GM, Heim D, Brümmendorf TH, Fabarius A, Haferlach C, Schlegelberger B, Müller MC, Jeromin S, Proetel U, Kohlbrenner K, Voskanyan A, Rinaldetti S, Seifarth W, Spieß B, Balleisen L, Goebeler MC, Hänel M, Ho A, Dengler J, Falge C, Kanz L, Kremers S, Burchert A, Kneba M, Stegelmann F, Köhne CA, Lindemann HW, Waller CF, Pfreundschuh M, Spiekermann K, Berdel WE, Müller L, Edinger M, Mayer J, Beelen DW, Bentz M, Link H, Hertenstein B, Fuchs R, Wernli M, Schlegel F, Schlag R, de Wit M, Trümper L, Hebart H, Hahn M, Thomalla J, Scheid C, Schafhausen P, Verbeek W, Eckart MJ, Gassmann W, Pezzutto A, Schenk M, Brossart P, Geer T, Bildat S, Schäfer E, Hochhaus A, Hasford J. Assessment of imatinib as first-line treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia: 10-year survival results of the randomized CML study IV and impact of non-CML determinants. Leukemia 2017; 31:2398-2406. [PMID: 28804124 PMCID: PMC5668495 DOI: 10.1038/leu.2017.253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 185] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2017] [Accepted: 07/04/2017] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML)-study IV was designed to explore whether treatment with imatinib (IM) at 400 mg/day (n=400) could be optimized by doubling the dose (n=420), adding interferon (IFN) (n=430) or cytarabine (n=158) or using IM after IFN-failure (n=128). From July 2002 to March 2012, 1551 newly diagnosed patients in chronic phase were randomized into a 5-arm study. The study was powered to detect a survival difference of 5% at 5 years. After a median observation time of 9.5 years, 10-year overall survival was 82%, 10-year progression-free survival was 80% and 10-year relative survival was 92%. Survival between IM400 mg and any experimental arm was not different. In a multivariate analysis, risk group, major-route chromosomal aberrations, comorbidities, smoking and treatment center (academic vs other) influenced survival significantly, but not any form of treatment optimization. Patients reaching the molecular response milestones at 3, 6 and 12 months had a significant survival advantage. For responders, monotherapy with IM400 mg provides a close to normal life expectancy independent of the time to response. Survival is more determined by patients' and disease factors than by initial treatment selection. Although improvements are also needed for refractory disease, more life-time can currently be gained by carefully addressing non-CML determinants of survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Hehlmann
- III. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - M Lauseker
- IBE, Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - S Saußele
- III. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | - S Krause
- Medizinische Klinik 5, Universitätsklinikum, Erlangen, Germany
| | - H J Kolb
- Medizinische Klinik III, Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - A Neubauer
- Klinik für innere Medizin, Universitätsklinikum, Marburg, Germany
| | - D K Hossfeld
- 2. Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - C Nerl
- Klinikum Schwabing, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - D Heim
- Universitätsspital, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - A Fabarius
- III. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | | | - M C Müller
- III. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | - U Proetel
- III. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - K Kohlbrenner
- III. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - A Voskanyan
- III. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - S Rinaldetti
- III. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - W Seifarth
- III. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - B Spieß
- III. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | - M C Goebeler
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum, Würzburg, Germany
| | - M Hänel
- Klinik für innere Medizin 3, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - A Ho
- Medizinische Klinik V, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Dengler
- Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Heilbronn, Germany
| | - C Falge
- Medizinische Klinik 5, Klinikum Nürnberg-Nord, Nürnberg, Germany
| | - L Kanz
- Medizinische Abteilung 2, Universitätsklinikum, Tübingen, Germany
| | - S Kremers
- Caritas Krankenhaus, Lebach, Germany
| | - A Burchert
- Klinik für innere Medizin, Universitätsklinikum, Marburg, Germany
| | - M Kneba
- 2. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - F Stegelmann
- Klinik für Innere Medizin 3, Universitätsklinikum, Ulm, Germany
| | - C A Köhne
- Klinik für Onkologie und Hämatologie, Oldenburg, Germany
| | | | - C F Waller
- Innere Medizin 1, Universitätsklinikum, Freiburg, Germany
| | - M Pfreundschuh
- Klinik für Innere Medizin 1, Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany
| | - K Spiekermann
- Medizinische Klinik III, Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - W E Berdel
- Medizinische Klinik A, Universitätsklinikum, Münster, Germany
| | - L Müller
- Onkologie Leer UnterEms, Leer, Germany
| | - M Edinger
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin 3, Universitätsklinikum, Regensburg, Germany
| | - J Mayer
- Masaryk University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - D W Beelen
- Klinik für Knochenmarktransplantation, Essen, Germany
| | - M Bentz
- Medizinische Klinik 3, Städtisches Klinikum, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - H Link
- Klinik für Innere Medizin 3, Westpfalz-Klinikum, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - B Hertenstein
- 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Bremen Mitte, Bremen, Germany
| | | | - M Wernli
- Kantonsspital, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - F Schlegel
- St Antonius-Hospital, Eschweiler, Germany
| | - R Schlag
- Hämatologische-Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Würzburg, Germany
| | - M de Wit
- Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| | - L Trümper
- Klinik für Hämatologie und medizinische Onkologie, Universitätsmedizin, Göttingen, Germany
| | - H Hebart
- Stauferklinikum Schwäbisch Gmünd, Mutlangen, Germany
| | - M Hahn
- Onkologie Zentrum, Ansbach, Germany
| | - J Thomalla
- Praxisklinik für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Koblenz, Germany
| | - C Scheid
- Klinik 1 für Innere Medizin, Universitätsklinikum, Köln, Germany
| | - P Schafhausen
- 2. Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - W Verbeek
- Ambulante Hämatologie und Onkologie, Bonn, Germany
| | - M J Eckart
- Internistische Schwerpunktpraxis, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | - M Schenk
- Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg, Germany
| | - P Brossart
- Medizinische Klinik 3, Universität, Bonn, Germany
| | - T Geer
- Diakonie, Schwäbisch Hall, Germany
| | - S Bildat
- Medizinische Klinik 2, Herford, Germany
| | - E Schäfer
- Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - A Hochhaus
- Klinik für Innere Medizin 2, Universitätsklinikum, Jena, Germany
| | - J Hasford
- IBE, Universität München, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gevers D, Kremers S, de Vries N, van Assema P. Clusters of food parenting practices and their association with children's intake of energy-dense foods. Appetite 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.02.077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
7
|
Sleddens E, Mâsse L, Kremers S, O'Connor T, Thijs C, Sioen I, Michels N, Power T. Validation of the Comprehensive General Parenting Questionnaire and associations with children's eating behavior and BMI. Appetite 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.02.079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
8
|
van der Wurff ISM, Bakker EC, Hornstra G, Kirschner PA, Gielen M, Godschalk RWL, Kremers S, Zeegers MP, de Groot RHM. Association between prenatal and current exposure to selected LCPUFAs and school performance at age 7. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 2016; 108:22-9. [PMID: 27154361 DOI: 10.1016/j.plefa.2016.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2015] [Revised: 03/04/2016] [Accepted: 03/04/2016] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCPUFAs) are important for brain functioning and might, thus, influence cognition and school performance. However, research investigating LCPUFAs relationships with school performance is limited. The objective of this study was to determine the association between levels of the LCPUFAs docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), arachidonic acid (AA), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and n-6 docosapentaenoic acid (Osbond acid, ObA) at study entry, 22 weeks of pregnancy, 32 weeks of pregnancy, at partus, in umbilical cord plasma and child's plasma at age 7 and school performance scores at age 7. METHODS Data from the Maastricht Essential Fatty Acid Birth cohort (MEFAB) were used for this study. Fatty acid levels of plasma phospholipids were measured in maternal blood plasma at study entry, 22 weeks of pregnancy, 32 weeks of pregnancy and partus. Childs fatty acid levels of plasma phospholipids were measured a in umbilical cord blood plasma, and in blood plasma of the child at age 7. Scores on national standardised tests for spelling, reading and arithmetic at age 7 were obtained via the school (scores were available for 149, 159 and 155 children, respectively). Associations between LCPUFA levels and school performance scores were analysed with categorical regression analyses with correction for covariates (smoking, maternal education, sex, breastfeeding, maternal intelligence, birth weight and BMI at age 7). RESULTS Significant (p<0.001) associations between DHA level at age 7 and both reading (β=0.158) and spelling (β=0.146) were found. Consistent significant negative associations were observed between all maternal DHA plasma levels and arithmetic scores at age 7 (all p<0.001, all β<-0.019). Additional significant negative associations were observed between maternal LCPUFA plasma levels at study entry and both reading and spelling scores at age 7; these associations were less consistent. CONCLUSION Plasma DHA levels at age 7 were positively associated with reading and spelling scores at age 7. Consistent significant negative associations between maternal plasma DHA levels and arithmetic scores of the child at age 7 were found. Although this is an observational study, which cannot proof causality, the consistent negative associations observed between maternal plasma DHA levels and the arithmetic scores of the children at age 7 calls upon prudence when considering DHA supplementation during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I S M van der Wurff
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Welten Institute, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
| | - E C Bakker
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - G Hornstra
- Maastricht University (retired) and Nutrisearch, Gronsveld, The Netherlands
| | - P A Kirschner
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Welten Institute, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - M Gielen
- NUTRIM School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - R W L Godschalk
- NUTRIM School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - S Kremers
- NUTRIM School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - M P Zeegers
- NUTRIM School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - R H M de Groot
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Welten Institute, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands; NUTRIM School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
von Minckwitz G, Loibl S, Untch M, Eidtmann H, Rezai M, Fasching PA, Tesch H, Eggemann H, Schrader I, Kittel K, Hanusch C, Huober J, Solbach C, Jackisch C, Kunz G, Blohmer JU, Hauschild M, Fehm T, Nekljudova V, Gerber B, Gnauert K, Heinrich B, Prätz T, Groh U, Tanzer H, Villena C, Tulusan A, Liedtke B, Blohmer JU, Kittel K, Mau C, Potenberg J, Schilling J, Just M, Weiss E, Bückner U, Wolfgarten M, Lorenz R, Doering G, Feidicker S, Krabisch P, Deichert U, Augustin D, Kunz G, Kast K, von Minckwitz G, Nestle-Krämling C, Rezai M, Höß C, Terhaag J, Fasching P, Staib P, Aktas B, Kühn T, Khandan F, Möbus V, Solbach C, Tesch H, Stickeler E, Heinrich G, Wagner H, Abdallah A, Dewitz T, Emons G, Belau A, Rethwisch V, Lantzsch T, Thomssen C, Mattner U, Nugent A, Müller V, Noesselt T, Holms F, Müller T, Deuker JU, Schrader I, Strumberg D, Uleer C, Solomayer E, Runnebaum I, Link H, Tomé O, Ulmer HU, Conrad B, Feisel-Schwickardi G, Eidtmann H, Schumacher C, Steinmetz T, Bauerfeind I, Kremers S, Langanke D, Kullmer U, Ober A, Fischer D, Kohls A, Weikel W, Bischoff J, Freese K, Schmidt M, Wiest W, Sütterlin M, Dietrich M, Grießhammer M, Burgmann DM, Hanusch C, Rack B, Salat C, Sattler D, Tio J, von Abel E, Christensen B, Burkamp U, Köhne CH, Meinerz W, Graßhoff ST, Decker T, Overkamp F, Thalmann I, Sallmann A, Beck T, Reimer T, Bartzke G, Deryal M, Weigel M, Huober J, Weder P, Steffens CC, Lemster S, Stefek A, Ruhland F, Hofmann M, Schuster J, Simon W, Kronawitter U, Clemens M, Fehm T, Janni W, Latos K, Bauer W, Roßmann A, Bauer L, Lampe D, Heyl V, Hoffmann G, Lorenz-Salehi F, Hackmann J, Schlag R. Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab or everolimus for HER2-negative primary breast cancer (GBG 44-GeparQuinto)†. Ann Oncol 2014; 25:2363-2372. [PMID: 25223482 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The GeparQuinto study showed that adding bevacizumab to 24 weeks of anthracycline-taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy increases pathological complete response (pCR) rates overall and specifically in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). No difference in pCR rate was observed for adding everolimus to paclitaxel in nonearly responding patients. Here, we present disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients (n = 1948) with HER2-negative tumors of a median tumor size of 4 cm were randomly assigned to neoadjuvant treatment with epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel (EC-T) with or without eight infusions of bevacizumab every 3 weeks before surgery. Patients without clinical response to EC ± Bevacizumab were randomized to 12 weekly cycles paclitaxel with or without everolimus 5 mg/day. To detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.75 (α = 0.05, β = 0.8) 379 events had to be observed in the bevacizumab arms. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 3.8 years, 3-year DFS was 80.8% and 3-year OS was 89.7%. Outcome was not different for patients receiving bevacizumab (HR 1.03; P = 0.784 for DFS and HR 0.974; P = 0.842 for OS) compared with patients receiving chemotherapy alone. Patients with TNBC similarly showed no improvement in DFS (HR = 0.99; P = 0.941) and OS (HR = 1.02; P = 0.891) when treated with bevacizumab. No other predefined subgroup (HR+/HER2-; locally advanced (cT4 or cN3) or not; cT1-3 or cT4; pCR or not) showed a significant benefit. No difference in DFS (HR 0.997; P = 0.987) and OS (HR 1.11; P = 0.658) was observed for nonearly responding patients receiving paclitaxel with or without everolimus overall as well as in subgroups. CONCLUSIONS Long-term results, in opposite to the results of pCR, do not support the neoadjuvant use of bevacizumab in addition to an anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy or everolimus in addition to paclitaxel for nonearly responding patients. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER NCT 00567554, www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G von Minckwitz
- Headquarter, German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg; Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Frankfurt.
| | - S Loibl
- Headquarter, German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg
| | - M Untch
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin
| | - H Eidtmann
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Kiel
| | - M Rezai
- Breast Center, Luisenkrankenhaus, Düsseldorf
| | - P A Fasching
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Erlangen
| | - H Tesch
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chop GmbH, Frankfurt
| | - H Eggemann
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Magdeburg
| | - I Schrader
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Henriettenstiftung, Hannover
| | - K Kittel
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Praxisklinik, Berlin
| | - C Hanusch
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Rot-Kreuz-Klinikum, München
| | - J Huober
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Ulm
| | - C Solbach
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Frankfurt
| | - C Jackisch
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Sana-Klinikum, Offenbach
| | - G Kunz
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, St Johannes Hospital, Dortmund
| | - J U Blohmer
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, St Gertrauden-Hospital, Berlin
| | - M Hauschild
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hospital, Rheinfelden
| | - T Fehm
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Tübingen
| | | | - B Gerber
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Rostock, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kluin-Nelemans HC, Hoster E, Hermine O, Walewski J, Trneny M, Geisler CH, Stilgenbauer S, Thieblemont C, Vehling-Kaiser U, Doorduijn JK, Coiffier B, Forstpointner R, Tilly H, Kanz L, Feugier P, Szymczyk M, Hallek M, Kremers S, Lepeu G, Sanhes L, Zijlstra JM, Bouabdallah R, Lugtenburg PJ, Macro M, Pfreundschuh M, Procházka V, Di Raimondo F, Ribrag V, Uppenkamp M, André M, Klapper W, Hiddemann W, Unterhalt M, Dreyling MH. Treatment of older patients with mantle-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:520-31. [PMID: 22873532 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1200920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 361] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The long-term prognosis for older patients with mantle-cell lymphoma is poor. Chemoimmunotherapy results in low rates of complete remission, and most patients have a relapse. We investigated whether a fludarabine-containing induction regimen improved the complete-remission rate and whether maintenance therapy with rituximab prolonged remission. METHODS We randomly assigned patients 60 years of age or older with mantle-cell lymphoma, stage II to IV, who were not eligible for high-dose therapy to six cycles of rituximab, fludarabine, and cyclophosphamide (R-FC) every 28 days or to eight cycles of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) every 21 days. Patients who had a response underwent a second randomization to maintenance therapy with rituximab or interferon alfa, each given until progression. RESULTS Of the 560 patients enrolled, 532 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis for response, and 485 in the primary analysis for response. The median age was 70 years. Although complete-remission rates were similar with R-FC and R-CHOP (40% and 34%, respectively; P=0.10), progressive disease was more frequent with R-FC (14%, vs. 5% with R-CHOP). Overall survival was significantly shorter with R-FC than with R-CHOP (4-year survival rate, 47% vs. 62%; P=0.005), and more patients in the R-FC group died during the first remission (10% vs. 4%). Hematologic toxic effects occurred more frequently in the R-FC group than in the R-CHOP group, but the frequency of grade 3 or 4 infections was balanced (17% and 14%, respectively). In 274 of the 316 patients who were randomly assigned to maintenance therapy, rituximab reduced the risk of progression or death by 45% (in remission after 4 years, 58%, vs. 29% with interferon alfa; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.87; P=0.01). Among patients who had a response to R-CHOP, maintenance therapy with rituximab significantly improved overall survival (4-year survival rate, 87%, vs. 63% with interferon alfa; P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS R-CHOP induction followed by maintenance therapy with rituximab is effective for older patients with mantle-cell lymphoma. (Funded by the European Commission and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00209209.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H C Kluin-Nelemans
- Department of Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hofheinz R, Wenz FK, Post S, Matzdorff A, Laechelt S, Hartmann JT, Müller L, Link H, Moehler MH, Kettner E, Fritz E, Hieber U, Lindemann HW, Grunewald M, Kremers S, Constantin C, Hipp M, Gencer D, Burkholder I, Hochhaus A. Capecitabine (Cape) versus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)–based (neo)adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): Long-term results of a randomized, phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.3504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
12
|
Kremers S, Reubsaet A, Martens M, Gerards S, Jonkers R, Candel M, de Weerdt I, de Vries N. Systematic prevention of overweight and obesity in adults: a qualitative and quantitative literature analysis. Obes Rev 2010; 11:371-9. [PMID: 19538441 DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-789x.2009.00598.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
To date, most interventions aimed at preventing obesity have underemphasized the application of systematic intervention development, implementation and evaluation. The present review provides a thorough insight in factors promoting implementation and/or effectiveness in interventions aimed at preventing overweight/obesity among adults. A total of 46 studies evaluating interventions aimed at preventing obesity were reviewed, followed by both qualitative and quantitative analyses. The Intervention Mapping protocol and the Environmental Research framework for weight Gain prevention (EnRG) were applied to analyse and classify the included studies. The interventions were categorized by setting (workplace, community, health care) and target group (ethnic minorities, pregnant women, [pre]menopausal women, smokers, people with intellectual disabilities). Generally, interventions were found to have potential in changing energy balance-related behaviours and anthropometric outcomes. Effect sizes for changes in body mass index ranged between -0.09 and 0.45. When the programme goal specifically aimed at weight management, the intervention was found to be more successful than interventions with programme goals that were aimed at preventing cardiovascular disease or improving general health status. Although a considerable part of studies included motivational interventions, only some actually assessed the effects on potential cognitive mediators. A general lack of reporting underlying theoretical models for behaviour change was observed as well as the inclusion of linkage groups and strategies to promote empowerment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Kremers
- Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lotrean LM, Kremers S, Ionut C, de Vries H. Gender differences regarding the alcohol-tobacco relationship among Romanian adolescents--a longitudinal study. Eur J Public Health 2009; 19:285-9. [DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
14
|
Hahn SG, Jacobs G, Heck H, Kremers S, Brase H, Jüngling B, Zeuzem S, Matzdorff A, Lutz MP. Cost analysis of non-medical vs. treatment-related costs in patients with chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.6619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
15
|
Abstract
The objective of this systematic review of observational studies was to gain insight into potential determinants of various types and intensities of physical activity among adult men and women. Studies were retrieved from Medline, PsycInfo, Embase and Social scisearch. The ANGELO framework was used to classify environmental factors. In total, 47 publications were identified. Social support and having a companion for physical activity were found to be convincingly associated with different types of physical activity [(neighbourhood) walking, bicycling, vigorous physical activity/sports, active commuting, leisure-time physical activity in general, sedentary lifestyle, moderately intense physical activity and a combination of moderately intense and vigorous activity]. Availability of physical activity equipment was convincingly associated with vigorous physical activity/sports and connectivity of trails with active commuting. Other possible, but less consistent correlates of physical activity were availability, accessibility and convenience of recreational facilities. No evidence was found for differences between men and women. In conclusion, supportive evidence was found for only very few presumed environmental determinants. However, most studies used cross-sectional designs and non-validated measures of environments and/or behaviour. Therefore, no strong conclusions can be drawn and more research of better quality is clearly needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Wendel-Vos
- Centre for Prevention and Health Services Research, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Obesogenic environments are thought to underlie the increased obesity prevalence observed in youth during the past decades. Understanding the environmental factors that are associated with physical activity (PA) in youth is needed to better inform the development of effective intervention strategies attempting to halt the obesity epidemic. We conducted a systematic semi-quantitative review of 150 studies on environmental correlates of youth PA published in the past 25 years. The ANalysis Grid for Environments Linked to Obesity (ANGELO) framework was used to classify the environmental correlates studied. Most studies retrieved used cross-sectional designs and subjective measures of environmental factors and PA. Variables of the home and school environments were especially associated with children's PA. Most consistent positive correlates of PA were father's PA, time spent outdoors and school PA-related policies (in children), and support from significant others, mother's education level, family income, and non-vocational school attendance (in adolescents). Low crime incidence (in adolescents) was characteristic of the neighbourhood environment associated with higher PA. Convincing evidence of an important role for many other environmental factors was, however, not found. Further research should aim at longitudinal and intervention studies, and use more objective measures of PA and its potential (environmental) determinants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Ferreira
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Brug J, Wammes B, Kremers S, Giskes K, Oenema A. Underestimation and overestimation of personal weight status: associations with socio-demographic characteristics and weight maintenance intentions. J Hum Nutr Diet 2006; 19:253-62. [PMID: 16911237 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-277x.2006.00707.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Unwarranted underestimation and overestimation of personal weight status may prevent weight maintenance behaviour. The present study reports on correlates of under- and overestimation of personal weight status and the association with weight maintenance intentions and self-reported action. DESIGN Comparison of three cross-sectional surveys, representing different population groups. SUBJECTS Survey 1: 1694 adolescents 13-19 years of age; survey 2: 979 nonobese adults 25-35 years of age; survey 3: 617 adults 21-62 years of age. MEASUREMENTS Self-administered written questionnaires (surveys 1 and 3) and telephone-administered questionnaires (survey 2); self-reported BMI, self-rated weight status, intentions and self-reported actions to avoid weight gain or to lose weight, sex, age, education and ethnic background. Respondents were classified as people who are realistic about personal body weight status or people who under- and overestimate their body weight status, based on BMI and self-rated weight status. RESULTS Most respondents in the three survey populations were realistic about their weight status. Overestimation of weight status was consistently more likely among women, whereas underestimation was more likely among men, older respondents and respondents from ethnic minorities. Self-rated weight status was a stronger correlate of intentions and self-report actions to avoid weight gain than weight status based on Body Mass Index. CONCLUSIONS Relevant proportions of the study populations underestimated or overestimated their bodyweight status. Overestimation of personal weight status may lead to unwarranted weight maintenance actions, whereas underestimation may result in lack of motivation to avoid further weight gain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Brug
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Schlenk RF, Fröhling S, Hartmann F, Fischer JT, Glasmacher A, Del Valle F, Götze K, Nerl C, Schoch R, Pralle H, Mergenthaler HG, Hensel M, Koller E, Kirchen H, Matzdorff A, Salwender H, Biedermann HG, Kremers S, Haase D, Benner A, Döhner K, Döhner H. Intensive consolidation versus oral maintenance therapy in patients 61 years or older with acute myeloid leukemia in first remission: results of second randomization of the AML HD98-B treatment Trial. Leukemia 2006; 20:748-50. [PMID: 16437135 DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
19
|
Hehlmann R, Berger U, Pfirrmann M, Hochhaus A, Metzgeroth G, Maywald O, Hasford J, Reiter A, Hossfeld DK, Kolb HJ, Löffler H, Pralle H, Queisser W, Griesshammer M, Nerl C, Kuse R, Tobler A, Eimermacher H, Tichelli A, Aul C, Wilhelm M, Fischer JT, Perker M, Scheid C, Schenk M, Weiss J, Meier CR, Kremers S, Labedzki L, Schmeiser T, Lohrmann HP, Heimpel H. Randomized comparison of interferon alpha and hydroxyurea with hydroxyurea monotherapy in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-study II): prolongation of survival by the combination of interferon alpha and hydroxyurea. Leukemia 2003; 17:1529-37. [PMID: 12886239 DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The optimum treatment conditions of interferon (IFN) alpha therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are still controversial. To evaluate the role of hydroxyurea (HU) for the outcome of IFN therapy, we conducted a randomized trial to compare the combination of IFN and HU vs HU monotherapy (CML-study II). From February 1991 to December 1994, 376 patients with newly diagnosed CML in chronic phase were randomized. In all, 340 patients were Ph/BCR-ABL positive and evaluable. Randomization was unbalanced 1:2 in favor of the combination therapy, since study conditions were identical to the previous CML-study I and it had been planned in advance to add the HU patients of study I (n=194) to the HU control group. Therefore, a total of 534 patients were evaluable (226 patients with IFN/HU and 308 patients with HU). Analyses were according to intention-to-treat. Median observation time of nontransplanted living patients was 7.6 years (7.9 years for IFN/HU and 7.3 years for HU). The risk profile (new CML score) was available for 532 patients: 200 patients (38%) were low, 239 patients (45%) intermediate, and 93 patients (17%) high risk. Complete hematologic response rates were higher in IFN/HU-treated patients (59 vs 32%). Of 169 evaluable IFN/HU-treated patients (75%), 104 patients (62%) achieved a cytogenetic response that was complete in 12% (n=21), major in 14% (n=24), and at least minimal in 35% (n=59). Of the 534 patients, 105 (20%) underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation in first chronic phase. In the low-risk group, 65 of 200 patients were transplanted (33%), 30 (13%) in the intermediate-risk group, and nine (10%) in the high-risk group. Duration of chronic phase was 55 months for IFN/HU and 41 months for HU (P<0.0001). Median survival was 64 months for IFN/HU and 53 months for HU-treated patients (P=0.0063). We conclude that IFN in combination with HU achieves a significant long-term survival advantage over HU monotherapy. In view of the data of CML-study I, these results suggest that IFN/HU is also superior to IFN alone. HU should be combined with IFN in IFN-based therapies and for comparisons with new therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Hehlmann
- Klinikum Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|