1
|
von Minckwitz G, Loibl S, Untch M, Eidtmann H, Rezai M, Fasching PA, Tesch H, Eggemann H, Schrader I, Kittel K, Hanusch C, Huober J, Solbach C, Jackisch C, Kunz G, Blohmer JU, Hauschild M, Fehm T, Nekljudova V, Gerber B, Gnauert K, Heinrich B, Prätz T, Groh U, Tanzer H, Villena C, Tulusan A, Liedtke B, Blohmer JU, Kittel K, Mau C, Potenberg J, Schilling J, Just M, Weiss E, Bückner U, Wolfgarten M, Lorenz R, Doering G, Feidicker S, Krabisch P, Deichert U, Augustin D, Kunz G, Kast K, von Minckwitz G, Nestle-Krämling C, Rezai M, Höß C, Terhaag J, Fasching P, Staib P, Aktas B, Kühn T, Khandan F, Möbus V, Solbach C, Tesch H, Stickeler E, Heinrich G, Wagner H, Abdallah A, Dewitz T, Emons G, Belau A, Rethwisch V, Lantzsch T, Thomssen C, Mattner U, Nugent A, Müller V, Noesselt T, Holms F, Müller T, Deuker JU, Schrader I, Strumberg D, Uleer C, Solomayer E, Runnebaum I, Link H, Tomé O, Ulmer HU, Conrad B, Feisel-Schwickardi G, Eidtmann H, Schumacher C, Steinmetz T, Bauerfeind I, Kremers S, Langanke D, Kullmer U, Ober A, Fischer D, Kohls A, Weikel W, Bischoff J, Freese K, Schmidt M, Wiest W, Sütterlin M, Dietrich M, Grießhammer M, Burgmann DM, Hanusch C, Rack B, Salat C, Sattler D, Tio J, von Abel E, Christensen B, Burkamp U, Köhne CH, Meinerz W, Graßhoff ST, Decker T, Overkamp F, Thalmann I, Sallmann A, Beck T, Reimer T, Bartzke G, Deryal M, Weigel M, Huober J, Weder P, Steffens CC, Lemster S, Stefek A, Ruhland F, Hofmann M, Schuster J, Simon W, Kronawitter U, Clemens M, Fehm T, Janni W, Latos K, Bauer W, Roßmann A, Bauer L, Lampe D, Heyl V, Hoffmann G, Lorenz-Salehi F, Hackmann J, Schlag R. Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab or everolimus for HER2-negative primary breast cancer (GBG 44-GeparQuinto)†. Ann Oncol 2014; 25:2363-2372. [PMID: 25223482 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The GeparQuinto study showed that adding bevacizumab to 24 weeks of anthracycline-taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy increases pathological complete response (pCR) rates overall and specifically in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). No difference in pCR rate was observed for adding everolimus to paclitaxel in nonearly responding patients. Here, we present disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) analyses. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients (n = 1948) with HER2-negative tumors of a median tumor size of 4 cm were randomly assigned to neoadjuvant treatment with epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel (EC-T) with or without eight infusions of bevacizumab every 3 weeks before surgery. Patients without clinical response to EC ± Bevacizumab were randomized to 12 weekly cycles paclitaxel with or without everolimus 5 mg/day. To detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.75 (α = 0.05, β = 0.8) 379 events had to be observed in the bevacizumab arms. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 3.8 years, 3-year DFS was 80.8% and 3-year OS was 89.7%. Outcome was not different for patients receiving bevacizumab (HR 1.03; P = 0.784 for DFS and HR 0.974; P = 0.842 for OS) compared with patients receiving chemotherapy alone. Patients with TNBC similarly showed no improvement in DFS (HR = 0.99; P = 0.941) and OS (HR = 1.02; P = 0.891) when treated with bevacizumab. No other predefined subgroup (HR+/HER2-; locally advanced (cT4 or cN3) or not; cT1-3 or cT4; pCR or not) showed a significant benefit. No difference in DFS (HR 0.997; P = 0.987) and OS (HR 1.11; P = 0.658) was observed for nonearly responding patients receiving paclitaxel with or without everolimus overall as well as in subgroups. CONCLUSIONS Long-term results, in opposite to the results of pCR, do not support the neoadjuvant use of bevacizumab in addition to an anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy or everolimus in addition to paclitaxel for nonearly responding patients. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER NCT 00567554, www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G von Minckwitz
- Headquarter, German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg; Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Frankfurt.
| | - S Loibl
- Headquarter, German Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg
| | - M Untch
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin
| | - H Eidtmann
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Kiel
| | - M Rezai
- Breast Center, Luisenkrankenhaus, Düsseldorf
| | - P A Fasching
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Erlangen
| | - H Tesch
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chop GmbH, Frankfurt
| | - H Eggemann
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Magdeburg
| | - I Schrader
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Henriettenstiftung, Hannover
| | - K Kittel
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Praxisklinik, Berlin
| | - C Hanusch
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Rot-Kreuz-Klinikum, München
| | - J Huober
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Ulm
| | - C Solbach
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Frankfurt
| | - C Jackisch
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Sana-Klinikum, Offenbach
| | - G Kunz
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, St Johannes Hospital, Dortmund
| | - J U Blohmer
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, St Gertrauden-Hospital, Berlin
| | - M Hauschild
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hospital, Rheinfelden
| | - T Fehm
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Tübingen
| | | | - B Gerber
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Rostock, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Baumann KH, du Bois A, Meier W, Rau J, Wimberger P, Sehouli J, Kurzeder C, Hilpert F, Hasenburg A, Canzler U, Hanker LC, Hillemanns P, Richter B, Wollschlaeger K, Dewitz T, Bauerschlag D, Wagner U. A phase II trial (AGO 2.11) in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: a randomized multicenter trial with sunitinib (SU11248) to evaluate dosage, schedule, tolerability, toxicity and effectiveness of a multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor monotherapy. Ann Oncol 2012; 23:2265-2271. [PMID: 22377563 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer usually has a poor outcome with conventional chemotherapeutic therapy and new treatment modalities are warranted. This phase II study was conducted to evaluate sunitinib, an oral antiangiogenic multitargeted tyrosin kinase inhibitor, in this setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS The primary end point of this randomized phase II trial was the objective response rate according to RECIST criteria and/or Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup CA125 response criteria to sunitinib in patients with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer who were pretreated with up to three chemotherapies. A selection design was employed to compare two schedules of sunitinib (arm 1: 50 mg sunitinib daily orally for 28 days followed by 14 days off drug; and arm 2: 37.5 mg sunitinib administered daily continuously). RESULTS Of 73 patients enrolled, 36 patients were randomly allocated to the noncontinuous treatment arm (arm 1) and 37 patients were randomly allocated to the continuous treatment arm (arm 2). The mean age was 58.8 and 58.5 years, respectively. We observed six responders (complete response + partial response) in arm 1 (16.7%) and 2 responders in arm 2 (5.4%). The median progression-free survival (arm 1: 4.8 [2.9-8.1] months; arm 2: 2.9 [2.9-5.1] months) and the median overall survival (arm 1: 13.6 [7.0-23.2] months; arm 2: 13.7 [8.4-25.6] months) revealed no significant difference. Adverse events included fatigue as well as cardiovascular, gastrointestinal and abdominal symptoms, hematologic and hepatic laboratory abnormalities. Pattern and frequency of adverse events revealed no substantial differences between both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS Sunitinib treatment is feasible and moderately active in relapsed platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. The noncontinuous treatment schedule should be chosen for further studies in ovarian cancer.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Angiogenesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage
- Angiogenesis Inhibitors/adverse effects
- Disease-Free Survival
- Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
- Drug Administration Schedule
- Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
- Female
- Humans
- Indoles/administration & dosage
- Indoles/adverse effects
- Kaplan-Meier Estimate
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality
- Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous/drug therapy
- Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous/mortality
- Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Ovarian Neoplasms/mortality
- Platinum Compounds/pharmacology
- Proportional Hazards Models
- Pyrroles/administration & dosage
- Pyrroles/adverse effects
- Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors
- Sunitinib
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K H Baumann
- Department of Gynaecology, University of Marburg, Marburg.
| | - A du Bois
- Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecological Oncology, HSK Wiesbaden and Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen
| | - W Meier
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Evangelic Hospital, Duesseldorf
| | - J Rau
- Coordinating Centre for Clinical Trials, University of Marburg, Marburg
| | - P Wimberger
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen
| | - J Sehouli
- Department of Gynaecology, Charité, Berlin
| | - C Kurzeder
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University of Ulm, Ulm
| | - F Hilpert
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University of Kiel, Kiel
| | - A Hasenburg
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg
| | - U Canzler
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University of Dresden, Dresden
| | - L C Hanker
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University of Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main
| | - P Hillemanns
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Medical School Hannover, Hannover
| | - B Richter
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Elbland Hospital, Radebeul
| | - K Wollschlaeger
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg
| | - T Dewitz
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hospital of Gifhorn, Gifhorn
| | - D Bauerschlag
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center Aachen RWTH, Aachen, Germany
| | - U Wagner
- Department of Gynaecology, University of Marburg, Marburg
| |
Collapse
|