An eHealth App (CAPABLE) Providing Symptom Monitoring, Well-Being Interventions, and Educational Material for Patients With Melanoma Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Protocol for an Exploratory Intervention Trial

BACKGROUND

Since treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is becoming standard therapy for patients with high-risk and advanced melanoma, an increasing number of patients experience treatment-related adverse events such as fatigue. Until now, studies have demonstrated the benefits of using eHealth tools to provide either symptom monitoring or interventions to reduce treatment-related symptoms such as fatigue. However, an eHealth tool that facilitates the combination of both symptom monitoring and symptom management in patients with melanoma treated with ICIs is still needed.

OBJECTIVE

In this pilot study, we will explore the use of the CAPABLE (Cancer Patients Better Life Experience) app in providing symptom monitoring, education, and well-being interventions on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes such as fatigue and physical functioning, as well as patients' acceptance and usability of using CAPABLE.

METHODS

This prospective, exploratory pilot study will examine changes in fatigue over time in 36 patients with stage III or IV melanoma during treatment with ICI using CAPABLE (a smartphone app and multisensory smartwatch). This cohort will be compared to a prospectively collected cohort of patients with melanoma treated with standard ICI therapy. CAPABLE will be used for a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 6 months. The primary endpoint in this study is the change in fatigue between baseline and 3 and 6 months after the start of treatment. Secondary end points include HRQoL outcomes, usability, and feasibility parameters.

RESULTS

Study inclusion started in April 2023 and is currently ongoing.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study will explore the effect, usability, and feasibility of CAPABLE in patients with melanoma during treatment with ICI. Adding the CAPABLE system to active treatment is hypothesized to decrease fatigue in patients with high-risk and advanced melanoma during treatment with ICIs compared to a control group receiving standard care. The Medical Ethics Committee NedMec (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) granted ethical approval for this study (reference number 22-981/NL81970.000.22).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05827289; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05827289.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/49252.

Survival update of neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab in macroscopic stage III melanoma in the OpACIN and OpACIN-neo trials

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab has yielded high response rates in patients with macroscopic stage III melanoma. These response rates translated to high short-term survival rates. However, data on long-term survival and disease recurrence are lacking.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In OpACIN, 20 patients with macroscopic stage III melanoma were randomized to ipilimumab 3 mg/kg plus nivolumab 1 mg/kg q3w four cycles of adjuvant or split two cycles of neoadjuvant and two adjuvant. In OpACIN-neo, 86 patients with macroscopic stage III melanoma were randomized to arm A (2× ipilimumab 3 mg/kg plus nivolumab 1 mg/kg q3w; n = 30), arm B (2× ipilimumab 1 mg/kg plus nivolumab 3 mg/kg q3w; n = 30), or arm C (2× ipilimumab 3 mg/kg q3w plus 2× nivolumab 3 mg/kg q2w; n = 26) followed by surgery.

RESULTS

The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached in either trial. After a median follow-up of 69 months for OpACIN, 1/7 patients with a pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy had disease recurrence. The estimated 5-year RFS and OS rates for the neoadjuvant arm were 70% and 90% versus 60% and 70% for the adjuvant arm. After a median follow-up of 47 months for OpACIN-neo, the estimated 3-year RFS and OS rates were 82% and 92%, respectively. The estimated 3-year RFS rate for OpACIN-neo was 95% for patients with a pathologic response versus 37% for patients without a pathologic response (P < 0.001). In multiple regression analyses, pathologic response was the strongest predictor of disease recurrence. Of the 12 patients with distant disease recurrence after neoadjuvant therapy, 5 responded to subsequent anti-PD-1 and 8 to targeted therapy, although 7 patients showed progression after the initial response.

CONCLUSIONS

Updated data confirm the high survival rates after neoadjuvant combination checkpoint inhibition in macroscopic stage III melanoma, especially for patients with a pathologic response. Pathologic response is the strongest surrogate marker for long-term outcome.

Survival update of neoadjuvant ipilimumab + nivolumab in macroscopic stage III melanoma: The OpACIN and OpACIN-neo trials

9572

Background: OpACIN was the first trial testing neoadjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) + nivolumab (NIVO) versus the same combination given adjuvant. An unexpected high pathologic responses of 78% was observed in the neoadjuvant arm with a 2-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate of 80%. The subsequent OpACIN-neo trial tested 3 different dosing schedules of neoadjuvant IPI + NIVO and identified 2 cycles IPI 1 mg/kg + NIVO 3 mg/kg q3w as most favorable schedule with a pathologic response rate of 77% and 20% grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events. Long-term data on the durability of the pathologic (path) responses upon neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibition are lacking so far. Therefore, we present here the updated RFS and overall survival (OS) data of both trials. Methods: In OpACIN 20 macroscopic stage III melanoma pts were randomized to receive either IPI 3 mg/kg + NIVO 1 mg/kg q3w 4 cycles adjuvant after lymph node dissection or split 2 cycles neoadjuvant and 2 adjuvant. In OpACIN-neo 86 macroscopic stage III melanoma pts were randomized to arm A (2x IPI 3 mg/kg + NIVO 1 mg/kg q3w, n=30), arm B (2x IPI 1 mg/kg + NIVO 3 mg/kg q3w, n=30), or arm C (2x IPI 3 mg/kg q3w followed by 2x NIVO 3 mg/kg q2w, n=26) followed by lymph node dissection in week 6. RFS and OS were estimated using Kaplan Meier method. All comparative efficacy endpoints are descriptive for OpACIN, since the trial was not powered for comparison of the arms. Results: After a median follow-up (FU) of 68.6 months for OpACIN (minimum FU of 59.8 months), median RFS and OS were not reached. Only 1/7 patients (pts) with a pathologic response on neoadjuvant therapy has relapsed. Estimated 5-year RFS and OS rates for the neoadjuvant arm were 70.0% (95%CI: 46.7-100.0) and 90.0% (95%CI: 73.2-100.0) versus 60.0% (95%CI 36.2-99.5) and 70.0% (95%CI: 46.7-100.0) for the adjuvant arm. After a median FU of 46.8 months for OpACIN-neo (minimum FU of 38.2 months), median RFS and OS were not reached. Of pts with path response on neoadjuvant therapy, 3/64 (4.7%) had an event (2 pts relapsed, 1 pt died due to toxicity), versus 14/21 (66.7%) without path response. This resulted in a 3-year RFS rate of 95.3% (95%CI: 90.3-100.0) for responding versus 36.8% (95%CI: 20.4-66.4) for non-responding pts (p<0.001). Of the pts who relapsed after response, 1 had major path response (<10% vital tumor) and 1 a partial response (10-15% vital tumor). Estimated 3-year RFS and OS rates are presented in the Table. Conclusions: Updated data from OpACIN and OpaCIN-neo trials confirm the durability of responses upon neoadjuvant combination checkpoint inhibition in high risk stage III melanoma. Pathologic response remains a reliable surrogate marker for RFS and OS. Clinical trial information: NCT02437279, NCT02977052. [Table: see text]

Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) therapy in metastatic melanoma: boosting of neoantigen-specific T cell reactivity and long-term follow-up

Treatment of metastatic melanoma with autologous tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is currently applied in several centers. Robust and remarkably consistent overall response rates, of around 50% of treated patients, have been observed across hospitals, including a substantial fraction of durable, complete responses.

PURPOSE

Execute a phase I/II feasibility study with TIL therapy in metastatic melanoma at the Netherlands Cancer Institute, with the goal to assess feasibility and potential value of a randomized phase III trial.

EXPERIMENTAL

Ten patients were treated with TIL therapy. Infusion products and peripheral blood samples were phenotypically characterized and neoantigen reactivity was assessed. Here, we present long-term clinical outcome and translational data on neoantigen reactivity of the T cell products.

RESULTS

Five out of 10 patients, who were all anti-PD-1 naïve at time of treatment, showed an objective clinical response, including two patients with a complete response that are both ongoing for more than 7 years. Immune monitoring demonstrated that neoantigen-specific T cells were detectable in TIL infusion products from three out of three patients analyzed. For six out of the nine neoantigen-specific T cell responses detected in these TIL products, T cell response magnitude increased significantly in the peripheral blood compartment after therapy, and neoantigen-specific T cells were detectable for up to 3 years after TIL infusion.

CONCLUSION

The clinical results from this study confirm the robustness of TIL therapy in metastatic melanoma and the potential role of neoantigen-specific T cell reactivity. In addition, the data from this study supported the rationale to initiate an ongoing multicenter phase III TIL trial.

The effect of seasonal variation and secretion of sunitinib in sweat on the development of hand-foot syndrome

BACKGROUND

Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a side effect of sunitinib with considerable impact on quality of life. Seasonal variation and hyperhydrosis are possibly correlated to occurrence of HFS. Therefore, we proposed to study the prevalence of HFS in different seasons retrospectively and to study the relationship between sunitinib sweat secretion and HFS prospectively.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 19 patients treated with sunitinib was used to determine seasonal prevalence of HFS. In a prospective study, sunitinib and N-desethyl sunitinib levels in sweat patches of 25 patients treated with sunitinib were quantified and correlated to severity of HFS.

RESULTS

In the retrospective cohort, the patients suffered from more severe HFS during summertime compared with the rest of the year. In the prospective study, the cumulative amounts of sunitinib plus metabolite measured in the patches of the on-treatment phase (median 129.4 ng/patch) were higher than the off-treatment phase (median 39.5 ng/patch). A tendency was observed towards increasing amounts of drug per patch with increasing severity of HFS.

CONCLUSION

Patients experienced more HFS in summer time compared to other seasons. However, no statistically significant correlation between sunitinib sweat secretion and severity of HFS could be demonstrated within our patient cohort.

Extended Continuous Oral Temozolomide in Patients with Progressive Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Not Responding to Interferon Alpha 2b

The aim of the study was to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of oral extended continuous temozolomide in patients with progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) not responding to immunotherapy after removal of the primary tumor. Patients with progressive metastatic RCC received protracted temozolomide 100 mg/m2 orally on days 1-21 every 28 days. Response was assessed after 2 cycles to be followed by another 2 cycles in the absence of progression. After 4 cycles only patients with further remission and acceptable toxicity were to continue. No objective responses were observed in 12 patients and the trial was stopped prematurely in stage 1. Six patients remained stable during 4 cycles of temozolomide (4 months), only one of these remained stable for another 2 months after having stopped treatment. Five patients progressed after the initial 2 cycles and one after the first cycle. Overall survival was 15.5 months (range 1-36 months). Repeated cycles of 3 weeks oral temozolomide 100 mg/m2 followed by one week rest proved tolerable though this regimen may only have limited activity against metastatic RCC.

Determination of sunitinib and its active metabolite N-desethylsunitinib in sweat of a patient

Skin reactions are side effects of sunitinib therapy with an adverse impact on quality of life often necessitating dose reductions. For conventional antineoplastic agents, such as doxorubicin, previous studies have indicated a possible relationship between sweat excretion and the development of skin toxicity. However, the determination of sunitinib and its active metabolite in sweat has not yet been reported. A sensitive and accurate method for the determination of sunitinib and its active metabolite N-desethylsunitinib in human sweat was developed using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry detection (LC-MS-MS). Sweat samples of a patient treated with sunitinib were collected using Pharmchek™ Drugs of Abuse patches to determine cumulative amounts of sunitinib and metabolite. Validation of the LC-MS-MS method was performed over a range from 1.0 to 200 ng/patch with good intra- and interassay accuracies for sunitinib and N-desethylsunitinib. Ranges of 76-119 and 7.9-10.5 ng/patch for cumulative secretion of sunitinib and metabolite, respectively, were found in patient samples. To our knowledge, this is the first method for determination of cumulative secretion of sunitinib and N-desethylsunitinib in human sweat samples. Sunitinib and its metabolite were easily detectable in sweat patches of a patient treated with sunitinib.

Predictive factors for severe toxicity of sunitinib in unselected patients with advanced renal cell cancer

Sunitinib has been registered for the treatment of advanced renal cell cancer (RCC). As patient inclusion was highly selective in previous studies, experience with sunitinib in general oncological practice remains to be reported. We determined the efficacy and safety of sunitinib in patients with advanced RCC included in an expanded access programme. ECOG performance status >1, histology other than clear cell and presence of brain metastases were no exclusion criteria. Eighty-two patients were treated: 23% reached a partial response, 50% had stable disease, 20% progressed and six patients were not evaluable. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9 months and median overall survival (OS) was 15 months. Importantly, 47 patients (57%) needed a dose reduction, 35 (43%) because of treatment-related adverse events, 10 (12%) because of continuous dosing, and two because of both. Stomatitis, fatigue, hand-foot syndrome and a combination of grade 1-2 adverse events were the most frequent reasons for dose reduction. In 40 patients (49%), there was severe toxicity, defined as dose reduction or permanent discontinuation, which was highly correlated with low body surface area, high age and female gender. On the basis of age and gender, a model was developed that could predict the probability of severe toxicity.

Phase I Clinical Study With Multiple Peptide Vaccines in Combination With Tetanus Toxoid and GM-CSF in Advanced-stage HLA-A*0201-positive Melanoma Patients

Successful induction of functional tumor-specific T cells by peptide vaccination in animal models has resulted in many clinical trials to test this approach in advanced-stage melanoma patients. In this phase I clinical trial, 11 end-stage melanoma patients were vaccinated intradermally with 3 peptides: MART-1(26-35) E27L (ELAGIGILTV), tyrosinase(368-376) N375Q (YMDGTMSQV), and gp100(209-217) T210M (IMQVPFSV), admixed with tetanus toxoid and granulocyte-monocyte colony stimulating factor. The peptide vaccine was well tolerated at all tested doses, and led to grade 1-2 toxicity only. Although all patients did show a rise in antitetanus IgG titers, in only 3 patients peptide-specific CD8 T-cells were induced. In 2 cases, the response was directed against MART-1(26-35) and consisted of 0.2% and 3.3% of the CD8 population; however, in both instances these cells did not produce interferon-gamma on stimulation with the unmodified peptide. The third patient mounted a small (0.1%) response against gp100. In a fourth patient, a nonfunctional tyrosinase-specific response (0.6%) was found that was present before vaccination, but was not affected in size nor in function by the vaccine. None of the 11 patients responded clinically according to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria. Although this study is a small scale phase I clinical trial, the efficacy that was observed was disappointingly low. In accordance with previously published peptide vaccination studies, these results add to the increasing evidence that peptide vaccination in itself is not potent enough as an effective melanoma immunotherapy in advanced-stage patients.

Interferon alpha 2b as medical selection for nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a consecutive study

OBJECTIVE

Up to 25% of the patients with synchronous metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with nephrectomy and interferon alpha-2b (IFN-alpha) will progress rapidly at metastatic sites and undergo needless surgery for an asymptomatic primary. We reversed the timing of surgery and immunotherapy and evaluated the role of initial IFN-alpha as selection for nephrectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixteen patients with mRCC and the primary in-situ received initial IFN-alpha for 8 weeks (2 weeks 5x3x10(6)IU/wk; 2 weeks 5x6x10(6)IU/wk; 2 weeks 5x9x10(6)IU/wk and 2 weeks 3x9x10(6)IU/wk). Patients with either partial remission (PR) or stable disease (SD) underwent nephrectomy followed by IFN-alpha maintenance at 3x9x10(6)IU/wk. Patients were evaluated with regard to age, sex, metastatic sites, morbidity, response, nephrectomy rate, time to progression and survival.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients received 2 months of preoperative IFN-alpha; 3 stopped during the 2 months period due to progressive disease (PD). Eight patients developed either a PR (n=3) or SD (n=5) at metastatic sites and underwent nephrectomy. Survival at 1 year is 50% (4/8 patients). Median progression-free survival was 6 months (3-17 months). Two of the 3 patients with PR developed a CR after 2 months maintenance following surgery. Eight patients with PD did not undergo surgery and had a median survival of 4 months (range 1-8 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Absence of progression at metastatic sites following IFN-alpha with the primary tumor in place may be used as selection for nephrectomy in patients with an intermediate prognosis. Currently, a randomized study is underway to assess the role of initial versus delayed nephrectomy in combination with IFN-alpha with regard to morbidity and survival.

Prolonged low dose IL-2 and thalidomide in progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma with concurrent radiotherapy to bone and/or soft tissue metastasis: a phase II study

Metastatic renal cell cancer is one of the immuno-sensitive tumors. Apart from the immuno-modulating agents IFNalpha and IL-2, thalidomide has been reported to be effective in this type of cancer. However, bone metastases and bulky metastases, show limited response to immunotherapy, are often site of recurrent disease and are therefore often treated later with radiotherapy. In this phase II study, we evaluated toxicity and efficacy of the combination of continuous low dose (1 mIU/m2) s.c. IL-2 and thalidomide (200 mg once daily) in 22 patients with progressive metastatic renal cell cancer. In addition, 13 soft tissue lesions and two bone metastases in 13 patients were concurrently treated with fractionated radiotherapy. T cell number and activation in blood was measured by immunoflowcytometry. Nearly all patients developed grade 1-2 toxicity consisting of fatigue, sensory neuropathy, constipation and dizziness. Five patients had a grade 3-4 toxic event: four patients with deep venous thrombosis requiring anticoagulant therapy, and one patient who developed radiation myelopathy. On systemic response evaluation ten patients showed ongoing SD with a mean progression free survival of 9 months. One patient showed a PR (at an irradiated site). Regarding local response to irradiation, seven lesions showed a PR for a mean time period of 8.7 months, whereas seven were stable for 6 months. The radiation response of one lesion was not evaluable. Immunoflowcytometry showed an increase in number and activation of lymphocytes (mainly Natural Killer--NK-cells), which was absent or even decreased in irradiated patients. The combination of sc. low dose IL-2, thalidomide and radiotherapy is feasible, but relatively toxic and does not lead to higher responses at non-irradiated sites. The combination of immunotherapy and concurrent radiotherapy is effective at 60% of the relatively large evaluable sites. Progressive myelopathy developed in one patient, possibly due to radiotherapy in combination with thalidomide.

A phase-II study of pegylated interferon alfa-2b for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and removal of the primary tumor

Twenty-two patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and removal of the primary tumor were treated with subcutaneous pegylated interferon alfa-2b (PEG-Intron) to evaluate toxicity and efficacy. Start dose was 3.0 microg/kg/week, escalated to 6.0 microg/kg/week. After 2 months, therapy was extended in case of response or stable disease (SD) until progressive disease (PD) or relapse for a maximum of 2 years. National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria (NCI-CTC) were monitored every 2-4 weeks. After 2 months, nine patients did not continue (8 PD, 1 SD with grade 4 CTC) and 13 extended treatment [three partial response (PR), 10 SD], of these, 11 progressed. One patient with PR developed a durable complete response later. Overall response rate was 13.6% (3/22). Median overall survival is 13 months (range 3-35 months). Dosage was escalated to 6 microg/kg/week in three patients. NCI-CTC grade 2 and 3 required dose attenuation in 12 patients during escalation, and reduction in 10 during the trial. Three patients discontinued because of grade 4 CTC (two fatigue, one hyperglycemia). Fatigue was the major dose-limiting toxicity. These results suggest an efficacy and toxicity of PEG-Intron comparable to standard interferon alfa-2b in patients with mRCC and removal of the primary tumor.

On the Role of Melanoma-Specific CD8+ T-Cell Immunity in Disease Progression of Advanced-Stage Melanoma Patients

Cytotoxic T-cell immunity directed against melanosomal differentiation antigens is arguably the best-studied and most prevalent form of tumor-specific T-cell immunity in humans. Despite this, the role of T-cell responses directed against melanosomal antigens in disease progression has not been elucidated. To address this issue, we have related the presence of circulating melanoma-specific T cells with disease progression and survival in a large cohort of patients with advanced-stage melanoma who had not received prior treatment. In 42 (68%) of 62 patients, melanoma-specific T cells were detected, sometimes in surprisingly large numbers. Disease progression during treatment was more frequent in patients with circulating melanoma-specific T cells, and mean survival of patients with circulating melanoma-specific T cells was equal to the survival of patients without melanoma-specific T cells. These data suggest that the induction of melanosomal differentiation antigen-specific T-cell reactivity in advanced stage melanoma is a late event most likely due to antigen load and spreading and is not accompanied by a clinically significant antitumor effect. These melanoma-specific T cells may be functionally distinct from T cells raised during spontaneous regression or up vaccination.

Immunotherapy with concurrent subcutaneous GM-CSF, low-dose IL-2 and IFN-alpha in patients with progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma

The purpose of the study was to determine toxicity, efficacy and immunologic effects of concurrent subcutaneous injections of low-dose interleukin-2 (LD-IL-2), granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and interferon-alpha 2b (IFNalpha) in progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma. In a multicentre phase II study, 59 evaluable patients received two to six cycles of subcutaneous IL-2 (4 mIU m(-2)), GM-CSF (2.5 microg kg(-1)) and IFNalpha (5 mIU flat(-1)) for 12 days per 3 weeks with evaluation after every two cycles. Cycles were repeated in responding or stable patients. Data were analysed after a median of 30 months follow-up (range 16-48 months). In 42 patients, the immunologic response was studied and related to response and survival. The main toxicity were flu-like symptoms, malaise and transient liver enzyme elevations, necessitating IL-2 reduction to 2 mIU m(-2) in 29 patients, which should be considered the maximal tolerable dose. The response was 24% (eight out of 34, three complete response (CR), five partial response (PR)) in patients with metachronic metastases and 12% (three out of 25, 2CR, 1PR) in patients with synchronic metastases. Overall response was 19% (11 out of 59). Median survival was 9.5 months. All tested patients showed expansion and/or activation of lymphocytes, T cells and subsets, NK cells, eosinophils and monocytes. Pretreatment HLA-DR levels on monocytes and number of CD4(+)HLA-DR(+) cells correlated with response. Pretreatment number of CD4(+)HLA-DR(+) cells and postimmunotherapy levels of lymphocytes, CD3(+), CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells, but not of NK or B cells, correlated with prolonged survival. Immunotherapy with concurrent subcutaneous GM-CSF, LD-IL-2 and IFNalpha has limited toxicity, can be given as outpatient treatment and can induce durable CR. Response and survival with this form of immunotherapy seem to be more dependent on expansion/activation of T cells than of NK cells.