Sympathy for the devil: a conservation strategy for devil and manta rays

BACKGROUND

International trade for luxury products, medicines, and tonics poses a threat to both terrestrial and marine wildlife. The demand for and consumption of gill plates (known as Peng Yu Sai, "Fish Gill of Mobulid Ray") from devil and manta rays (subfamily Mobulinae, collectively referred to as mobulids) poses a significant threat to these marine fishes because of their extremely low productivity. The demand for these gill plates has driven an international trade supplied by largely unmonitored and unregulated catches from target and incidental fisheries around the world. Scientific research, conservation campaigns, and legal protections for devil rays have lagged behind those for manta rays despite similar threats across all mobulids.

METHODS

To investigate the difference in attention given to devil rays and manta rays, we examined trends in the scientific literature and updated species distribution maps for all mobulids. Using available information on target and incidental fisheries, and gathering information on fishing and trade regulations (at international, national, and territorial levels), we examined how threats and protective measures overlap with species distribution. We then used a species conservation planning approach to develop the Global Devil and Manta Ray Conservation Strategy, specifying a vision, goals, objectives, and actions to advance the knowledge and protection of both devil and manta rays.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Our literature review revealed that there had been nearly 2.5-times more "manta"-titled publications, than "mobula" or "devil ray"-titled publications over the past 4.5 years (January 2012-June 2016). The majority of these recent publications were reports on occurrence of mobulid species. These publications contributed to updated Area of Occupancy and Extent of Occurrence maps which showed expanded distributions for most mobulid species and overlap between the two genera. While several international protections have recently expanded to include all mobulids, there remains a greater number of national, state, and territory-level protections for manta rays compared to devil rays. We hypothesize that there are fewer scientific publications and regulatory protections for devil rays due primarily to perceptions of charisma that favour manta rays. We suggest that the well-established species conservation framework used here offers an objective solution to close this gap. To advance the goals of the conservation strategy we highlight opportunities for parity in protection and suggest solutions to help reduce target and bycatch fisheries.

Long-term ethanol consumption selectively impairs ganglioside pathway in rat brain

Gangliosides are sialo-glycosphingolipids that play important roles in the interaction of cells with their environment and are thus involved in the regulation of many cellular events. Sialic acid residues are important for the conformation of a glycomolecule, their structural stability and their functions. Although decreased brain ganglioside sialic acid has been previously reported as a result of chronic ethanol treatment in rats, no reports are available on the sialylation of specific gangliosides and/or the mechanism leading to depletion of their sialic acid residues. Therefore, in this investigation, we have examined the effects of chronic ethanol treatment on (1) incorporation of [4,5-3H]N-acetylmannosamine (ManNAc) into specific rat brain gangliosides, GD3, GD1a, GT1a, and GT1b; and (2) enzymatic activities of brain sialyltransferase and sialidase at specific subcellular levels. The experiments were done in male Wistar rats pair-fed with either ethanol or control liquid diets for a period of 8 weeks. The rats were intracerebroventricularly injected with labeled ManNAc (30 microCi/rat) and killed after 90 min. Radioactivity was determined in respective ganglioside bands separated on a thin layer chromatography system. Specific activities of sialyltransferase and sialidase were assessed using GM3 and GD3 as substrates, respectively. The results showed significant decreases of 57.7% (p < 0.001) and 68.9% (p < 0.001), respectively, in the labeled ManNAc incorporation into GD3 and GD1a fractions in rats of the ethanol group, compared with rats of the control group. No significant changes were noted in the incorporation of labeled ManNAc into GT1a or GT1b ganglioside fractions between the ethanol and control groups. Concomitantly, compared with control rats, a decrease of 18.9% (p < 0.05), 20.6% (p < 0.05), and 15.8% (p < 0.001) was found in the sialyltransferase activity, respectively, at the whole brain, and brain Golgi and synaptosomal levels. However, dramatic increases of 32.4% (p < 0.05), 105% (p < 0.001), and 150% (p < 0.001) in sialidase activity were found, respectively, at the whole brain and brain cytosol and synaptosomal fractions of rat treated chronically with ethanol. Thus, we conclude that the deleterious actions of ethanol on the sialylation of rat brain gangliosides is specific, and the reduced sialic acid label found in GD3 and GD1a in this study is mainly due to increased activity of brain sialidase. Furthermore, the study reaffirms our tenet that, regardless of whether it is the liver or the brain, glycosylation cascade is one of the main target of the deleterious attacks of ethanol.