Patient blood management: A solution for South Africa

For more than 70 years the default therapy for anaemia and blood loss was mostly transfusion. Accumulating evidence demonstrates a significant dose-dependent relationship between transfusion and adverse outcomes. This and other transfusion-related challenges led the way to a new paradigm. Patient blood management (PBM) is the application of evidence-based practices to optimise patient outcomes by managing and preserving the patient's own blood. 'Real-world' studies have shown that PBM improves patient outcomes and saves money. The prevalence of anaemia in adult South Africans is 31% in females and 17% in males. Improving the management of anaemia will firstly improve public health, secondly relieve the pressure on the blood supply, and thirdly improve the productivity of the nation's workforce. While high-income countries are increasingly implementing PBM, many middle- and low-income countries are still trying to upscale their transfusion services. The implementation of PBM will improve South Africa's health status while saving costs.

Improved joint health in subjects with severe haemophilia A treated prophylactically with recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein

INTRODUCTION

Joint arthropathy is the long-term consequence of joint bleeding in people with severe haemophilia.

AIM

This study assessed change in joint health over time in subjects receiving recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) prophylaxis.

METHODS

ALONG is the phase 3 pivotal study in which the benefit of rFVIIIFc as a prophylactic treatment for bleeding control was shown in previously treated severe haemophilia patients ≥12 years of age (arm 1: 25-65 IU/kg every 3-5 days, arm 2: 65 IU/kg weekly and arm 3: episodic). After completing ALONG, subjects had the option to enrol into the extension study (ASPIRE). This interim, post hoc analysis assessed changes in joint health over ~2.8 years in these patients.

RESULTS

Forty-seven subjects had modified Haemophilia Joint Health Score (mHJHS) data at A-LONG baseline, ASPIRE baseline and ASPIRE Year 1 and Year 2. Compared with A-LONG baseline (23.4), mean improvement at ASPIRE Year 2 was -4.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], -6.5, -1.8; P = .001). Regardless of prestudy treatment regimen, subjects showed continuous improvement in mHJHS from A-LONG baseline through ASPIRE Year 2 (prestudy prophylaxis: -2.4, P = .09; prestudy episodic treatment: -7.2, P = .003). Benefits were seen in subjects with target joints (-5.6, P = .005) as well as those with severe arthropathy (-8.8, P = .02). The mHJHS components with the greatest improvement at ASPIRE Year 2 were swelling (-1.4, P = .008), range of motion (-1.1, P = .03) and strength (-0.8, P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylaxis with rFVIIIFc may improve joint health over time regardless of prestudy prophylaxis or episodic treatment regimens.

Treatment of bleeding episodes with recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein in A-LONG study subjects with severe haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

The Phase 3 A-LONG study demonstrated the safety and efficacy of rFVIIIFc for the control and prevention of bleeding episodes in severe haemophilia A.

AIM

To describe the treatment of bleeding episodes with rFVIIIFc in the A-LONG study.

METHODS

A-LONG subjects (<1 IU dL^-1 endogenous FVIII) were treated with individualized prophylaxis (Arm 1), weekly prophylaxis (Arm 2) or episodic treatment (Arm 3). Information recorded for each bleeding episode included type, location and dose to treat the episode.

RESULTS

During A-LONG, 757 bleeding episodes occurred during the efficacy period; the majority [456 (60%)] occurred in Arm 3 (episodic treatment). Of 93 subjects in the prophylaxis arms who entered the study with target joints, 43 (60%) in Arm 1 and 11 (52%) in Arm 2 did not experience a target joint bleed. Overall, 98% of bleeding episodes (and 98% of bleeds involving a target joint) resolved with one or two infusions; the median dose per infusion to treat a bleed was 27 IU kg^-1 (27 IU kg^-1 for target joints). Using population pharmacokinetic simulations, FVIII activity levels were predicted to be below the upper limit of normal (150 IU dL^-1 ) in most patients in the event that rFVIIIFc is used to treat a bleeding episode in close proximity to a prophylactic dose.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate the efficacy of rFVIIIFc for the treatment of acute bleeding episodes in subjects with severe haemophilia A, regardless of treatment regimen.

Extended half-life clotting factor concentrates: results from published clinical trials

Extended half-life clotting factor concentrates have been recently introduced into the armamentarium of treatments for patients with haemophilia A and B. In general, the data from published studies have demonstrated these products to be safe with no inhibitors reported in previously treated patients and efficacious with the advantage of a longer half-life allowing for less frequent intravenous infusions of factor. This enhanced convenience has led to some patients not previously on prophylaxis to begin prophylaxis while for others, especially children, has led to the ability to provide prophylaxis with reduced use of central venous catheters. The extended half-life factor IX products are now allowing patients to dose every 1-2 weeks while maintaining higher trough levels while the extended half-life factor VIII products have reduced the frequency of administration for patients on prophylaxis to as infrequent as once per week for some patients and to twice per week for all patients including younger children. It is important to note that data from previously untreated patients have not been published yet and the incidence for inhibitors in this patient population is as of yet unknown. The era of extended half-life clotting factor products has begun and the challenge for the haemophilia community will be how to best integrate these products into haemophilia clinical practice.

Changes in the amino acid sequence of the recombinant human factor VIIa analog, vatreptacog alfa, are associated with clinical immunogenicity

BACKGROUND

Vatreptacog alfa, a recombinant human factor VIIa (rFVIIa) analog developed to improve the treatment of bleeds in hemophilia patients with inhibitors, differs from native FVIIa by three amino acid substitutions. In a randomized, double-blind, crossover, confirmatory phase III trial (adept(™) 2), 8/72 (11%) hemophilia A or B patients with inhibitors treated for acute bleeds developed anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) to vatreptacog alfa.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the formation of anti-vatreptacog alfa ADAs in hemophilia patients with inhibitors.

METHODS/PATIENTS

This was a post hoc analysis of adept(™) 2. Immunoglobulin isotype determination, specificity analysis of rFVIIa cross-reactive antibodies, epitope mapping of rFVIIa single mutant analogs and pharmacokinetic (PK) profiling were performed to characterize the ADAs.

RESULTS

Immunoglobulin isotyping indicated that the ADAs were of the immunoglobulin G subtype. In epitope mapping, none of the rFVIIa single mutant analogs (V158D, E296V or M298Q) contained the complete antibody epitope, confirming that the antibodies were specific for vatreptacog alfa. In two patients, for whom PK profiling was performed both before and after the development of ADAs, vatreptacog alfa showed a prolonged elimination phase following ADA development. During the follow-up evaluation, the rFVIIa cross-reactivity disappeared after the last vatreptacog alfa exposure, despite continued exposure to rFVIIa as part of standard care.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from the vatreptacog alfa phase III trial demonstrate that the specific changes made, albeit relatively small, to the FVIIa molecule alter its clinical immunogenicity.

Recombinant factor VIIa analog in the management of hemophilia with inhibitors: results from a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of vatreptacog alfa

BACKGROUND

Vatreptacog alfa, a recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) analog with three amino acid substitutions and 99% identity to native FVIIa, was developed to improve the treatment of hemophilic patients with inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES

To confirm the safety and assess the efficacy of vatreptacog alfa in treating bleeding episodes in hemophilic patients with inhibitors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, crossover, confirmatory phase III trial (adept(™) 2) in patients with hemophilia A or B and inhibitors, bleeds were randomized 3 : 2 to treatment with vatreptacog alfa (one to three doses at 80 μg kg(-1) ) or rFVIIa (one to three doses at 90 μg kg(-1) ). Treatment failures after three doses of trial product (TP) were managed according to the local standard of care.

RESULTS

In the 72 patients enrolled, 567 bleeds were treated with TP. Both vatreptacog alfa and rFVIIa gave 93% effective bleeding control at 12 h. Vatreptacog alfa was superior to rFVIIa in secondary efficacy outcomes, including the number of doses used to treat a bleed and sustained bleeding control 24-48 h after the first dose. Eight patients (11%) developed antibodies against vatreptacog alfa, including four with cross-reactivity against rFVIIa and one with an in vitro neutralizing effect to vatreptacog alfa.

CONCLUSIONS

This large randomized controlled trial confirmed the well-established efficacy and safety profile of rFVIIa, and showed that vatreptacog alfa had similar or better efficacy than rFVIIa. However, because of the development of anti-drug antibodies, a positive benefit-risk profile is unlikely to be achieved with vatreptacog alfa.

Genetic factors influencing inhibitor development in a cohort of South African haemophilia A patients

A critical complication of factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy in Haemophilia A (HA) treatment is inhibitor development. Known genetic factors predisposing to inhibitor development include FVIII (F8) gene mutations, ethnicity, a family history of inhibitors and FVIII haplotype mismatch. The aim of this study was to characterize and correlate these genetic factors in a cohort of South African HA patients. This was a retrospective study that included 229 patients and involved the analysis of patient files, HA molecular and clinical databases and molecular analysis of the F8 gene haplotype. Of the 229 patients, 51% were of black ethnicity, 49% were white, 5% had mild HA, 4% were moderate and 91% were severe, 36% were int22 positive and 13% were inhibitor positive. Of the inhibitor positive patients, 72% were black patients. Inhibitors were reported in 27% of black int22 positive patients, 13% of black int22 negative patients, 9% of white int22 positive patients and 7% of white int22 negative. The H1 haplotype was more common in whites (75%) and H2 was more common in blacks (74%). H3 and H5 were only found in black patients and had a higher frequency of inhibitor development than H1 and H2. In this small HA cohort, black patients had a significantly higher frequency of inhibitor development and the results were indicative of an association between inhibitor development, ethnicity and haplotype.

Phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose escalation study of the recombinant factor VIIa variant BAY 86-6150 in hemophilia

BACKGROUND

BAY 86-6150 is a new human recombinant factor VIIa variant developed for high procoagulant activity and longer action in people with hemophilia with inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of BAY 86-6150 in non-bleeding hemophilia subjects.

METHODS

The study included non-bleeding men (18-65 years of age) with moderate or severe hemophilia A or B with or without inhibitors. Sixteen subjects were randomized 3 : 1 to four cohorts of escalating doses of BAY 86-6150 (6.5, 20, 50 or 90 μg kg(-1) [n = 3 per cohort]) or placebo (n = 1 per cohort); an independent data-monitoring committee reviewed previous cohort data before the next dose escalation. Blood sampling was performed predose and postdose; subjects were monitored for 50 days postdose.

RESULTS

At the tested doses, BAY 86-6150 was not associated with clinically significant adverse events or dose-limiting toxicities. BAY 86-6150 pharmacokinetics exhibited a linear dose response, with a half-life of 5-7 h. Subjects demonstrated consistent, dose-dependent thrombin generation ex vivo in platelet-poor plasma (PPP) (mean peak effect, 26-237 nm thrombin from 6.5 to 90 μg kg(-1)). Peak thrombin levels over time paralleled BAY 86-6150, with thrombin kinetics appearing to be slightly shorter; thus, circulating BAY 86-6150 retained activity. There were corresponding decreases in activated partial thromboplastin and prothrombin times. No subject developed de novo anti-BAY 86-6150 neutralizing antibodies during the 50-day follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first-in-human, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose escalation study, BAY 86-6150 was tolerated at the highest dose (90 μg kg(-1)), with no safety concerns. Safety and efficacy will be further evaluated in phase II/III studies.