Effects of quinolinic acid-induced lesions of the nucleus accumbens core on inter-temporal choice: a quantitative analysis

RATIONALE

There is evidence that lesions of the nucleus accumbens core (AcbC) promote preference for smaller earlier reinforcers over larger delayed reinforcers in inter-temporal choice paradigms. It is not known whether this reflects an effect of the lesion on the rate of delay discounting, on sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude, or both.

AIM

We examined the effect of AcbC lesions on inter-temporal choice using a quantitative method that allows effects on delay discounting to be distinguished from effects on sensitivity to reinforcer size.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen rats received bilateral quinolinic acid-induced lesions of the AcbC; 14 received sham lesions. They were trained under a discrete-trials progressive delay schedule to press two levers (A and B) for a sucrose solution. Responses on A delivered 50 microl of the solution after a delay d(A); responses on B delivered 100 microl after d(B). d(B) increased across blocks of trials, while d(A) was manipulated across phases of the experiment. Indifference delay d(B(50)) (value of d(B) corresponding to 50% choice of B) was estimated in each phase, and linear indifference functions (d(B(50)) vs d(A)) derived.

RESULTS

d(B(50)) increased linearly with d(A) (r(2) > 0.95 in each group). The intercept of the indifference function was lower in the lesioned than the sham-lesioned group; slope did not differ between groups. The lesioned rats had extensive neuronal loss in the AcbC.

CONCLUSIONS

The results confirm that lesions of the AcbC promote preference for smaller, earlier reinforcers and suggest that this reflects an effect of the lesion on the rate of delay discounting.

Effects of d-amphetamine and DOI (2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine) on timing behavior: interaction between D1 and 5-HT2A receptors

RATIONALE

The dopamine-releasing agent d-amphetamine and the 5-HT(2) receptor agonist 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine (DOI) have similar effects on free-operant timing behavior. The selective D(1) dopamine receptor antagonist 8-bromo-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepin-7-ol (SKF-83566), but not the D(2) dopamine receptor antagonist haloperidol, can antagonize the effect of d-amphetamine, and the selective 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist (+/-)2,3-dimethoxyphenyl-1-(2-(4-piperidine)-methanol (MDL-100907) can antagonize the effect of DOI. However, it is not known whether the effect of d-amphetamine can be reversed by MDL-100907 and the effect of DOI by dopamine receptor antagonists.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this work is to examine the interactions of d-amphetamine and DOI with MDL-100907, SKF-83566, and haloperidol on timing performance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Rats (n = 12-15 per experiment) were trained under the free-operant psychophysical procedure to press two levers (A and B) in 50-s trials in which reinforcement was provided intermittently for responding on A in the first half, and B in the second half of the trial. Percent responding on B (%B) was recorded in successive 5-s epochs of the trials; logistic functions were fitted to the data from each rat for the derivation of timing indices [T (50) (time corresponding to %B = 50); Weber fraction]. Rats were treated systemically with d-amphetamine or DOI, alone and in combination with haloperidol, SKF-83566, or MDL-100907.

RESULTS

d-Amphetamine (0.4 mg kg(-1)) reduced T (50) compared to vehicle; this effect was antagonized by SKF-83566 (0.03 mg kg(-1)) and MDL-100907 (0.5 mg kg(-1)), but not by haloperidol (0.05, 0.1 mg kg(-1)). DOI (0.25 mg kg(-1)) also reduced T (50); this effect was reversed by MDL-100907 (0.5 mg kg(-1)), but not by SKF-83566 (0.03 mg kg(-1)) or haloperidol (0.05 mg kg(-1)).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that both 5-HT(2A) and D(1) receptors, but not D(2) receptors, are involved in d-amphetamine's effect on timing behavior in the free-operant psychophysical procedure. DOI's effect on timing is mediated by 5-HT(2A) receptors, but neither D(1) nor D(2) receptors are involved in this effect.

Evidence for a role of D1 dopamine receptors in d-amphetamine's effect on timing behaviour in the free-operant psychophysical procedure

RATIONALE

Temporal differentiation of operant behaviour is sensitive to dopaminergic manipulations. Studies using the fixed-interval peak procedure implicated D2 dopamine receptors in these effects. Less is known about the effects of dopaminergic manipulations on temporal differentiation in other timing schedules.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effects of a D1 antagonist,8-bromo-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-3-methyl-5-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepin-7-ol (SKF-83566), and a D2 antagonist, haloperidol, on performance on the free-operant psychophysical procedure, and the ability of these antagonists to reverse the effects of the catecholamine-releasing agent, d-amphetamine on performance. The antagonists' ability to reverse d-amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion was also examined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Rats responded on two levers (A and B) under a free-operant psychophysical schedule, in which reinforcement was provided intermittently for responding on A during the first half, and B during the second half, of 50-s trials. Logistic functions were fitted to the relative response rate data (percent responding on B [%B] vs time [t]) in each treatment condition, and quantitative timing indices [T50 (value of t corresponding to %B=50) and Weber fraction] were compared among treatments. Effects of the treatments on locomotion were measured in a separate experiment.

RESULTS

SKF-83566 (0.015, 0.03, 0.06 mg kg(-1)) did not affect timing performance. Haloperidol (0.025, 0.05 mg kg(-1)) had no effect; a higher dose (0.1 mg kg(-1)) reduced T (50). d-Amphetamine (0.4 mg kg(-1)) reduced T50; this effect was antagonised by SKF-83566 but not by haloperidol. Both antagonists reduced d-amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that d-amphetamine's effect on performance in the free-operant psychophysical procedure is mediated by D1 rather than D2 receptors.

Effects of 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptor stimulation on temporal differentiation performance in the fixed-interval peak procedure

We examined the effects of the 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) and 5-HT(2A/2C) receptor agonist 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine (DOI) on performance on the fixed-interval peak procedure, and the sensitivity of these effects to 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptor antagonists (N-[2-(4-[2-methoxyphenyl]-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-2-pyridinylcyclohexanecarboxamide [WAY-100635] and ketanserin). Rats were trained to press a lever for food reinforcement in 50 min sessions consisting of 32 trials in which the lever was continuously available, separated by 10 s inter-trial intervals. In 16 trials, reinforcement was delivered following the first response after 30 s had elapsed since trial onset (fixed-interval 30 s). In 16 randomly interposed (peak/probe) trials, reinforcement was omitted, and the lever remained in the operant chamber for 120 s. Response rate in probe trials was plotted against time from trial onset. Time to peak response rate (t(peak)) and the Weber fraction were derived from modified Gaussian curves fitted to each rat's data. 8-OH-DPAT (0.05 mg kg(-1)) reduced t(peak) and increased the Weber fraction; the effect on t(peak) was antagonized by WAY-100635 (0.1 mg kg(-1)). DOI (0.25 mg kg(-1)) also reduced t(peak) and increased the Weber fraction; the reduction of t(peak) was antagonized by ketanserin (2 mg kg(-1)). Stimulation of 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors alters temporal differentiation in qualitatively similar ways.

Evidence that the effect of 5-HT2 receptor stimulation on temporal differentiation is not mediated by receptors in the dorsal striatum

5-HT2 receptor stimulation alters temporal differentiation in free-operant timing schedules. The anatomical location of the receptor population responsible for this effect is unknown. We examined the effect of a 5-HT2 receptor agonist and antagonists, injected systemically and into the dorsal striatum, a region that is believed to play a major role in interval timing. Rats were trained under the free-operant psychophysical procedure to press levers A and B in 50s trials in which reinforcement was provided intermittently for responding on A in the first half, and B in the second half of the trial. Percent responding on B (%B) was recorded in successive 5s epochs of the trials; logistic functions were fitted to the data from each rat to derive timing indices (T50: time corresponding to %B = 50; Weber fraction: [T75-T25]/2T50, where T75 and T25 are the times corresponding to %B = 75 and %B = 25). Systemic treatment with the 5-HT(2A/2C) receptor agonist 2,5,-dimethoxy-4-iodo-amphetamine (DOI) (0.25 mg/kg, s.c.) reduced T50; the 5-HT2A receptor antagonist MDL-100907 (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) did not affect performance, but completely blocked the effect of DOI. DOI (1 and 3 microg) injected bilaterally into the dorsal striatum did not alter T50. The effect of systemic treatment with DOI (0.25 mg/kg, s.c.) was not altered by intra-striatal injection of MDL-100907 (0.3 microg) or the 5-HT2C receptor antagonist RS-102221 (0.15 microg). The ability of systemically administered MDL-100907 to reverse DOI's effect on T50 confirms the sensitivity of temporal differentiation to 5-HT2A receptor stimulation. The failure of intra-striatal MDL-100907 to antagonize the effects of DOI suggests that 5-HT2A receptors in the dorsal striatum are unlikely to be primarily responsible for DOI's effects on timing. Furthermore, the results provide no evidence for a role of striatal 5-HT2C receptors in DOI's effect on timing.

Comparison of the effects of clozapine and 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) on progressive ratio schedule performance: evidence against the involvement of 5-HT1A receptors in the behavioural effects of clozapine

RATIONALE

Performance on progressive ratio schedules has been proposed as a means of assessing the effects of drugs on the efficacy of reinforcers. A mathematical model (Killeen PR (1994) Mathematical principles of reinforcement. Behav Brain Sci 17:105-172) affords a basis for quantifying the effects of drugs on progressive ratio schedule performance. The model postulates a bitonic function relating response rate and ratio size. One parameter of the function, a, expresses the motivational effect of the reinforcer, whereas another parameter, delta, expresses the minimum time needed to execute a response, and is regarded as an index of 'motor capacity'. Previously we found that the atypical antipsychotic clozapine increased a, indicating an increase in reinforcer efficacy; a similar effect was observed with the 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)(1A) receptor agonist 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT). It has been suggested that some of clozapine's behavioural effects are mediated by agonistic action at 5-HT(1A) receptors.

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to compare the effects of clozapine and 8-OH-DPAT on progressive ratio schedule performance.

METHODS

Rats were trained under a time-constrained progressive ratio schedule (50-min sessions). In experiment 1, they received acute doses of clozapine (4 mg kg(-1)) and 8-OH-DPAT (100 microg kg(-1)), alone and in combination with the 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist N-[2-(4-[2-methoxyphenyl]-1-piperazinyl)ethyl]-N-2-yridinylcyclohexanecarboxamide (WAY-100635; 30 microg kg(-1)). In experiment 2, the effects of clozapine (2, 4 and 8 mg kg(-1)) and 8-OH-DPAT (25, 50 and 100 microg kg(-1)) were compared between intact rats and rats whose 5-HTergic pathways had been ablated by 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine (5,7-DHT).

RESULTS

In both experiments, clozapine and 8-OH-DPAT increased a and delta. In experiment 1, WAY-100635 abolished the effect of 8-OH-DPAT on a and delta, but did not alter clozapine's effects on these parameters. In experiment 2, the effects of clozapine and 8-OH-DPAT did not differ between sham-lesioned and 5,7-DHT-lesioned rats.

CONCLUSIONS

The results confirm previous findings on the effects of clozapine and 8-OH-DPAT on progressive ratio schedule performance. 8-OH-DPAT's effects are probably mediated by post-synaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors; clozapine's effects are mediated by a different mechanism, which does not appear to involve 5-HT(1A) receptors and which does not depend upon an intact 5-HTergic pathway.

Effects of quipazine and m-chlorophenylbiguanide (m-CPBG) on temporal differentiation: evidence for the involvement of 5-HT2A but not 5-HT3 receptors in interval timing behaviour

RATIONALE

Temporal differentiation refers to animals' ability to regulate their behaviour during an ongoing interval. Striatal dopaminergic mechanisms are purported to be involved in temporal differentiation, and recent evidence also implicates 5-hydroxytryptaminergic (5-HTergic) mechanisms, possibly mediated by 5-HT(2A) receptors. There is evidence that 5-HT(3) receptors contribute to the regulation of dopamine release in the basal ganglia; however, it is not known whether 5-HT(3) receptor stimulation can influence temporal differentiation.

OBJECTIVE

We examined the effects of a selective 5-HT(3) receptor agonist m-CPBG, a mixed 5-HT(2A/3) receptor agonist quipazine, and selective 5-HT(3) and 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonists (MDL-72222 and ketanserin, respectively) on temporal differentiation in a free-operant psychophysical procedure.

METHODS

Twenty-four rats were trained to respond on two levers (A and B) under a free-operant psychophysical schedule, in which sucrose reinforcement (0.6 M: , 50 microl) was provided intermittently for responding on A during the first half and on B during the second half of 50-s trials. Logistic psychometric functions were fitted to the relative response rate data [percent responding on B (%B) vs time from trial onset (t)], and quantitative indices of timing performance [T (50) (value of t corresponding to %B=50), Weber fraction, and mean time of switching from A to B, S (50)] were derived.

RESULTS

Quipazine (0.5, 1, and 2 mg kg(-1)) altered timing performance, dose-dependently reducing T (50) and S (50); m-CPBG (2.5, 5, and 10 mg kg(-1)) had no significant effect. The effect of quipazine was antagonized by ketanserin (2 mg kg(-1)), but not by MDL-72222 (1 mg kg(-1)).

CONCLUSIONS

The present results provide no evidence for the involvement of 5-HT(3) receptors in temporal differentiation and indicate that the effect of quipazine on performance was mediated by 5-HT(2A) receptor stimulation. The results are consistent with previous evidence for the involvement of 5-HT(2A) receptors in interval timing behaviour.

Quantitative analysis of the effects of some "atypical" and "conventional" antipsychotics on progressive ratio schedule performance

RATIONALE

Performance on progressive ratio schedules has been proposed as a means of assessing the effects of drugs on the value or "efficacy" of reinforcers. A mathematical model affords a basis for quantifying the effects of drugs on progressive ratio schedule performance. According to this model, the relation between response rate and ratio size is described by a bitonic (inverted-U) function. One parameter of the function, alpha, expresses the motivational or "activating" effect of the reinforcer (duration of activation of responding produced by the reinforcer), whereas another parameter, delta, expresses the minimum time needed to execute a response, and is regarded as an index of "motor capacity". In a previous experiment we found that the "atypical" antipsychotic clozapine increased alpha, indicating an increase in the efficacy of a food reinforcer.

OBJECTIVE

We examined the effects of four "atypical" and four "conventional" antipsychotics on progressive ratio schedule performance.

METHODS

Rats responded for a sucrose reinforcer (0.6 M, 50 microl) on a time-constrained progressive ratio schedule (50-min sessions). After 90 preliminary training sessions, they received acute doses of antipsychotics (doses in mg kg(-1)): atypical: clozapine (2, 4, 8, IP; n=15), quetiapine (1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, SC; n=23), olanzapine (0.25, 0.5, 1, IP; n=15), ziprasidone (0.625, 1.25, 2.5, IP, n=15); conventional: haloperidol (0.025, 0.05, 0.1, IP, n=15), pimozide (0.125, 0.25, 0.5, IP; n=15), raclopride (0.25, 0.5, 1, SC; n=12), cis-flupenthixol (0.2, 0.4, 0.8, SC; n=15). Values of a and delta were estimated from the response rate functions obtained under each treatment condition, and were compared between drug and vehicle-alone treatments.

RESULTS

The atypical antipsychotics significantly increased alpha (indicating enhancement of reinforcer efficacy), and also increased delta (indicating reduction of motor capacity). Haloperidol, pimozide and raclopride significantly increased delta; none of the conventional antipsychotics significantly altered alpha.

CONCLUSIONS

The results extend previous findings with clozapine to other atypical antipsychotics and suggest that enhancement of the efficacy of reinforcers may be a common feature of atypical antipsychotics not shared by conventional antipsychotics.

Effects of quipazine and m-chlorophenylbiguanide (m-CPBG) on the discrimination of durations: evidence for the involvement of 5-HT2A but not 5-HT3 receptors

The ability of rats to discriminate durations of exteroceptive stimuli is disrupted by 5-HT(1A) receptor agonists; it is not known whether temporal discrimination is sensitive to stimulation of other 5-HT receptor subtypes. We examined the effect of quipazine, a 5-HT receptor agonist with nanomolar affinity for 5-HT(3) receptors and micromolar affinity for 5-HT(2A) receptors, and m-chlorophenylbiguanide (m-CPBG), a selective 5-HT(3) receptor agonist, on temporal discrimination. Twenty-four rats pressed levers for sucrose reinforcement under a discrete-trials psychophysical procedure. In each 50-s trial, a light was presented for t s, following which two levers (A and B) were presented. A response on A was reinforced if t < 25 s, and a response on B if t > 25 s. Logistic psychometric functions were fitted to the data, and timing parameters estimated (T(50): value of t corresponding to %B = 50; Weber fraction: [T(75)-T(25)]/2T(50), where T(75) and T(25) are values of t corresponding to %B = 75 and %B = 25). Quipazine (0.5-2 mg/kg) displaced the psychometric curve to the right and reduced its slope, reflected in increases in T50 and the Weber fraction; m-CPBG (2.5-10 mg/kg) had no effect. The effects of quipazine were reversed by the 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist ketanserin (2 mg/kg) but not by the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist topanyl 3,5-dichlorobenzoate (MDL-72222) (1 mg/kg). The results indicate that 5-HT(2A) but not 5-HT(3) receptor stimulation disrupts temporal discrimination.

Reversal of GSTP1 CpG island hypermethylation and reactivation of pi-class glutathione S-transferase (GSTP1) expression in human prostate cancer cells by treatment with procainamide

Among the many somatic genome alterations present in cancer cells, changes in DNA methylation may represent reversible "epigenetic" lesions, rather than irreversible "genetic" alterations. Cancer cell DNA is typically characterized by increases in the methylation of CpG dinucleotides clustered into CpG islands, near the transcriptional regulatory regions of critical genes, and by an overall reduction in CpG dinucleotide methylation. The transcriptional "silencing" of gene expression associated with such CpG island DNA hypermethylation presents an attractive therapeutic target: restoration of "silenced" gene expression may be possible via therapeutic reversal of CpG island hypermethylation. 5-Aza-cytidine (5-aza-C) and 5-aza-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC), nucleoside analogue inhibitors of DNA methyltransferases, have been widely used in attempts to reverse abnormal DNA hypermethylation in cancer cells and restore "silenced" gene expression. However, clinical utility of the nucleoside analogue DNA methyltransferase inhibitors has been limited somewhat by myelosuppression and other side effects. Many of these side effects are characteristic of nucleoside analogues that are not DNA methyltransferase inhibitors, offering the possibility that nonnucleoside analogue DNA methyltransferase inhibitors might not possess such side effects. Human prostate cancer (PCA) cells characteristically contain hypermethylated CpG island sequences encompassing the transcriptional regulatory region of GSTP1, the gene encoding the pi-class glutathione S-transferase (GSTP1), and fail to express GSTP1 as a consequence of transcriptional "silencing." Inactivation of GSTP1 by CpG island hypermethylation, the most common somatic genome alteration yet reported for human PCAs, occurs early during human prostatic carcinogenesis and results in a loss of GSTP1 "caretaker" function, leaving prostate cells with inadequate defenses against oxidant and electrophile carcinogens. We report here that the drug procainamide, a nonnucleoside inhibitor of DNA methyltransferases, reversed GSTP1 CpG island hypermethylation and restored GSTP1 expression in LNCaP human PCA cells propagated in vitro or in vivo as xenograft tumors in athymic nude mice.

GSTP1 CpG island hypermethylation is responsible for the absence of GSTP1 expression in human prostate cancer cells

GSTP1 CpG island hypermethylation is the most common somatic genome alteration described for human prostate cancer (PCA); lack of GSTP1 expression is characteristic of human PCA cells in vivo. We report here that loss of GSTP1 function may have been selected during the pathogenesis of human PCA. Using a variety of techniques to detect GSTP1 CpG island DNA hypermethylation in PCA DNA, we found only hypermethylated GSTP1 alleles in each PCA cell in all but two PCA cases studied. In these two cases, CpG island hypermethylation was present at only one of two GSTP1 alleles in PCA DNA. In one of the cases, DNA hypermethylation at one GSTP1 allele and deletion of the other GSTP1 allele were evident. In the other case, an unmethylated GSTP1 allele was detected, accompanied by abundant GSTP1 expression. GSTP1 CpG island DNA hypermethylation was responsible for lack of GSTP1 expression by LNCaP PCA cells: treatment of the cells with 5-azacytidine (5-aza-C), an inhibitor of DNA methyltransferases, reversed the GSTP1 promoter DNA hypermethylation, activated GSTP1 transcription, and restored GSTP1 expression. GSTP1 promoter activity, assessed via transfection of GSTP1 promoter-CAT reporter constructs in LNCaP cells, was inhibited by SssI-catalyzed CpG dinucleotide methylation. Remarkably, although selection for loss of GSTP1 function may be inferred for human PCA, GSTP1 did not act like a tumor suppressor gene, as LNCaP cells expressing GSTP1, either after 5-aza-C treatment or as a consequence of transfection with GSTP1 cDNA, grew well in vitro and in vivo. Perhaps, GSTP1 inactivation may render prostatic cells susceptible to additional genome alterations, caused by electrophilic or oxidant carcinogens, that provide a selective growth advantage.

Inhibition of the growth of pre-established subcutaneous tumor nodules of human prostate cancer cells by single injection of the recombinant adenovirus p53 expression vector

We have previously described potent growth-inhibitory effect of a recombinant adenovirus expressing wild type p53 (AdWTp53) in metastatic prostate cancer cells via activation of cellular p53 pathways. We have extended these observations to analyze the effects of AdWTp53 on primary cultures of radical prostatectomy specimens (RPS) and have also evaluated the gene therapeutic potential of the AdWTp53 in a nude mice model. Infection of primary cultures of prostate cancer specimens resulted in about 80% cell growth inhibition in comparison with cultures treated with control adenovirus dl312. Single injection of AdWTp53 into pre-established tumor nodules of DU145 prostate cancer cells suppressed tumor growth significantly (p = 0.0407) as determined by comparison of tumor volumes of the AdWTp53-treated vs. control vector (dl312) or PBS-treated groups. Moreover, there was no significant difference in tumor growth inhibition between single vs. multiple injections of AdWTp53. Our observations support the potential of AdWTp53 for gene therapy of prostate cancer.

Xenografts of human benign prostatic hyperplasia tissues in the nude mouse

Human benign hyperplastic prostate (BHP) tissues were implanted subcutaneously in male Beige nude mice for up to 16 weeks. The implants maintained the normal histological appearance of BPH without signs of atrophy for up to 6 weeks. Thereafter the tissues gradually became atrophic, with the tendency to undergo squamous cell metaplasia, but some tissues still maintained normal epithelium at 16 weeks. The epithelial linings of the implants consistently expressed prostate-specific antigen and prostate acid phosphatase, as demonstrated by immunohistochemistry, except in areas of severe atrophy and squamous metaplasia. Continued feeding of the mice with dihydrotestosterone or hydrocortisone did not change significantly the morphology or the proliferation index of the epithelial cells within implants or host prostates.

Maintenance of human benign prostatic hyperplasia tissues in the nude mouse

Human benign hyperplastic prostate (BHP) tissues were implanted subcutaneously in male Beige nude mice for up to 16 weeks. The implants maintained the normal histological appearance of BPH without signs of atrophy for up to 6 weeks. Their epithelium expressed proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), demonstrating that these cells actively underwent cell division. Thereafter the tissues gradually became atrophic, and some tissues maintained for 16 weeks completely lost recognizable prostatic epithelium. The glandular epithelium tended to undergo squamous cell metaplasia associated with atrophy. The epithelial linings of the implants consistently expressed prostate-specific antigen and prostate acid phosphatase as demonstrated by immunohistochemistry, except in areas of severe atrophy and squamous metaplasia. The nuclei of the implants hybridized with a human-specific DNA probe. Continuous feeding of the mice with dihydrotestosterone or hydrocortisone did not change significantly the morphology or the proliferation index of the epithelial cells within the glandular alveoli of implanted tissues or of normal mouse prostates.