1
|
Frisoni GB, Festari C, Massa F, Cotta Ramusino M, Orini S, Aarsland D, Agosta F, Babiloni C, Borroni B, Cappa SF, Frederiksen KS, Froelich L, Garibotto V, Haliassos A, Jessen F, Kamondi A, Kessels RP, Morbelli SD, O'Brien JT, Otto M, Perret-Liaudet A, Pizzini FB, Vandenbulcke M, Vanninen R, Verhey F, Vernooij MW, Yousry T, Boada Rovira M, Dubois B, Georges J, Hansson O, Ritchie CW, Scheltens P, van der Flier WM, Nobili F. European intersocietal recommendations for the biomarker-based diagnosis of neurocognitive disorders. Lancet Neurol 2024; 23:302-312. [PMID: 38365381 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(23)00447-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
The recent commercialisation of the first disease-modifying drugs for Alzheimer's disease emphasises the need for consensus recommendations on the rational use of biomarkers to diagnose people with suspected neurocognitive disorders in memory clinics. Most available recommendations and guidelines are either disease-centred or biomarker-centred. A European multidisciplinary taskforce consisting of 22 experts from 11 European scientific societies set out to define the first patient-centred diagnostic workflow that aims to prioritise testing for available biomarkers in individuals attending memory clinics. After an extensive literature review, we used a Delphi consensus procedure to identify 11 clinical syndromes, based on clinical history and examination, neuropsychology, blood tests, structural imaging, and, in some cases, EEG. We recommend first-line and, if needed, second-line testing for biomarkers according to the patient's clinical profile and the results of previous biomarker findings. This diagnostic workflow will promote consistency in the diagnosis of neurocognitive disorders across European countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni B Frisoni
- Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (LANVIE), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Geneva Memory Center, Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Cristina Festari
- Laboratory of Alzheimer's Neuroimaging and Epidemiology, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Federico Massa
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Matteo Cotta Ramusino
- Unit of Behavioral Neurology and Dementia Research Center (DRC), IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Stefania Orini
- Alzheimer's Unit-Memory Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Dag Aarsland
- Centre for Age-Related Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway; UK Dementia Research Institute, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Federica Agosta
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudio Babiloni
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology "V Erspamer", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Hospital San Raffaele of Cassino, Cassino, Italy
| | - Barbara Borroni
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy; Department of Continuity of Care and Frailty, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Stefano F Cappa
- Centro Ricerca sulle Demenze, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy; University Institute for Advanced Studies (IUSS), Pavia, Italy
| | - Kristian S Frederiksen
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lutz Froelich
- Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Valentina Garibotto
- Laboratory of Neuroimaging and Innovative Molecular Tracers (NIMTlab), Geneva University Neurocenter and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Frank Jessen
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany; Department of Psychiatry, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany; Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anita Kamondi
- National Institute of Mental Health, Neurology and Neurosurgery, Budapest, Hungary; Department of Neurology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Roy Pc Kessels
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Radboud UMC Alzheimer Center and Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Vincent van Gogh Institute for Psychiatry, Venray, Netherlands
| | - Silvia D Morbelli
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - John T O'Brien
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Markus Otto
- Department of Neurology, Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | | | - Francesca B Pizzini
- Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, Verona University Hospital, Verona University, Verona, Italy
| | - Mathieu Vandenbulcke
- Department of Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, University Psychiatric Centre KU Leuven, Leuven-Kortenberg, Belgium
| | - Ritva Vanninen
- University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Frans Verhey
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology-Alzheimer Centre Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Meike W Vernooij
- Department of Epidemiology and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Tarek Yousry
- Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology and the Neuroradiological Academic Unit, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Mercè Boada Rovira
- Fundació ACE, Institut Català de Neurociències Aplicades, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Bruno Dubois
- Institut de La Mémoire et de La Maladie d'Alzheimer, Neurology Department, Salpêtrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpital de Paris, Paris, France; Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | | | - Oskar Hansson
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Craig W Ritchie
- Edinburgh Dementia Prevention, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; Brain Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Neuroscience-Neurodegeneration, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Epidemiology and Data Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Flavio Nobili
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aleksovska K, Bassetti CLA, Berger T, Carvalho V, Costa J, Deuschl G, Frederiksen KS, Jaarsma J, Kobulashvili T, Leone M, Pavlakova L, Romoli M, Vignatelli L. Prioritization process for European Academy of Neurology clinical practice guidelines. Eur J Neurol 2023; 30:305-320. [PMID: 36263630 DOI: 10.1111/ene.15608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Revised: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The development of high-quality clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) takes substantial time, effort, and resources. During the past years, the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) guideline production was significantly increased, so the need to develop clear, transparent, and methodologically solid criteria for prioritizing guideline topics became apparent. With this paper, we aim to define a set of criteria to be applied for prioritizing topics for future EAN guidelines, as well as the procedure for their implementation. METHODS After review of the literature, we identified a recent systematic review that reported on the main prioritization criteria used by health organizations. Based on these, we developed a list of 20 preliminary criteria, which were voted on through a Delphi consensus procedure, including 160 stakeholders. Finally, we established a working procedure on how to submit and select new guideline topic proposals within the EAN. This procedure was reviewed by the EAN Scientific Committee and the Board. RESULTS The first round, 61.3% of the participants voted, and 86% of them participated in the second round. Seven criteria were approved with this procedure. After the selection of the criteria, a prioritization procedure was launched, and the first 30 topics are reported in this paper. This bottom-up process that involved the whole EAN community was followed by a top-down process, using additional criteria for further selection by the EAN board members. CONCLUSIONS We describe the development of prioritization criteria to be applied in the process of topic selection for future EAN CPGs. We will perform regular reviews and adjustments of the process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katina Aleksovska
- European Academy of Neurology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Neurology, Saints Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Macedonia
| | | | - Thomas Berger
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Vanessa Carvalho
- Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Neurology, Santa Maria Hospital, CHULN, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Joao Costa
- Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Günther Deuschl
- Department of Neurology, Christian Albrecht University, Kiel, Germany
| | - Kristian S Frederiksen
- Department of Neurology, Danish Dementia Research Center, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Joke Jaarsma
- European Federation of Neurological Associations, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Teia Kobulashvili
- Department of Neurology, Christian Doppler University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, affiliated partner of the European Reference Network EpiCARE, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Maurizio Leone
- SC Neurology, Department of Emergency and Critical Care, Home for the Relief of Suffering, Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care Foundation, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy
| | | | - Michele Romoli
- Neurology Unit, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
- Neurology Clinic, University of Perugia-Saint Mary of Mercy Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Luca Vignatelli
- Bologna Institute of Neurological Sciences, Scientific Institute for Research and Health Care, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Festari C, Massa F, Cotta Ramusino M, Gandolfo F, Nicolosi V, Orini S, Aarsland D, Agosta F, Babiloni C, Boada M, Borroni B, Cappa S, Dubois B, Frederiksen KS, Froelich L, Garibotto V, Georges J, Haliassos A, Hansson O, Jessen F, Kamondi A, Kessels RPC, Morbelli S, O'Brien JT, Otto M, Perret-Liaudet A, Pizzini FB, Ritchie CW, Scheltens P, Vandenbulcke M, Vanninen R, Verhey F, Vernooij MW, Yousry T, Van Der Flier WM, Nobili F, Frisoni GB. European consensus for the diagnosis of MCI and mild dementia: Preparatory phase. Alzheimers Dement 2022; 19:1729-1741. [PMID: 36209379 DOI: 10.1002/alz.12798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Etiological diagnosis of neurocognitive disorders of middle-old age relies on biomarkers, although evidence for their rational use is incomplete. A European task force is defining a diagnostic workflow where expert experience fills evidence gaps for biomarker validity and prioritization. We report methodology and preliminary results. METHODS Using a Delphi consensus method supported by a systematic literature review, 22 delegates from 11 relevant scientific societies defined workflow assumptions. RESULTS We extracted diagnostic accuracy figures from literature on the use of biomarkers in the diagnosis of main forms of neurocognitive disorders. Supported by this evidence, panelists defined clinical setting (specialist outpatient service), application stage (MCI-mild dementia), and detailed pre-assessment screening (clinical-neuropsychological evaluations, brain imaging, and blood tests). DISCUSSION The Delphi consensus on these assumptions set the stage for the development of the first pan-European workflow for biomarkers' use in the etiological diagnosis of middle-old age neurocognitive disorders at MCI-mild dementia stages. HIGHLIGHTS Rational use of biomarkers in neurocognitive disorders lacks consensus in Europe. A consensus of experts will define a workflow for the rational use of biomarkers. The diagnostic workflow will be patient-centered and based on clinical presentation. The workflow will be updated as new evidence accrues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Festari
- Laboratory of Alzheimer's Neuroimaging and Epidemiology, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Federico Massa
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Matteo Cotta Ramusino
- Unit of Behavioral Neurology, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Federica Gandolfo
- Department of Geriatric Care, Orthogeriatrics and Rehabilitation, E.O. Galliera Hospital, Genova, Italy
| | - Valentina Nicolosi
- UOC Neurologia, Ospedale Magalini (ULSS 9 - Veneto), Villafranca di Verona (VR), Italy
| | - Stefania Orini
- Alzheimer's Unit - Memory Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e Sperimentali, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Dag Aarsland
- Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
- Centre for Age-Related Diseases, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- European DLB Consortium
| | - Federica Agosta
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- European Academy of Neurology
| | - Claudio Babiloni
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology "V. Erspamer", Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Hospital San Raffaele of Cassino, Cassino (FR), Italy
- Europe, Middle East and Africa Chapter of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology
| | - Mercè Boada
- Ace Alzheimer Center Barcelona - Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
- Networking Research Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases (CIBERNED), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Barbara Borroni
- Centre for Neurodegenerative Disorders, Neurology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
- Neurology Unit, Department of Neurological and Vision Sciences, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
- European FTLD network
| | - Stefano Cappa
- Dementia Research Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
- Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Federation of the European Societies of Neuropsychology
| | - Bruno Dubois
- Institut de la Mémoire et de la Maladie d'Alzheimer (IM2A), ICM, Salpetriere Hospital, AP-HP, University Paris 6, Paris, France
| | - Kristian S Frederiksen
- European Academy of Neurology
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lutz Froelich
- Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- European Alzheimer Disease Consortium
| | - Valentina Garibotto
- NIMTLab, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Diagnostic Department, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
- Center for Biomedical Imaging, CIBM, Geneva, Switzerland
- European Association of Nuclear Medicine
| | | | - Alexander Haliassos
- ESEAP-Proficiency Testing Scheme for Clinical Laboratories, Athens, Greece
- International Federation of Clinical Chemistry
| | - Oskar Hansson
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Clinical Memory Research Unit, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Memory Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, Malmo, Sweden
| | - Frank Jessen
- European Alzheimer Disease Consortium
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty, Cologne, Germany
- Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anita Kamondi
- Europe, Middle East and Africa Chapter of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology
- Department of Neurology, National Institute of Mental Health, Neurology and Neurosurgery, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Roy P C Kessels
- Federation of the European Societies of Neuropsychology
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Vincent van Gogh Institute for Psychiatry, Venray, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Psychology and Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Silvia Morbelli
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Dept of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - John T O'Brien
- European DLB Consortium
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK
| | - Markus Otto
- European FTLD network
- Department of Neurology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Germany
| | - Armand Perret-Liaudet
- International Federation of Clinical Chemistry
- Laboratory of Neurobiology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Hospices civils de Lyon; Research and Resources Memory Centre, Lyon, France
- BioRan Team, Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, CNRS UMR5292, INSERM U1028, Lyon, France
| | - Francesca B Pizzini
- Verona University Hospital, Verona University, Dept. of Diagnostic and Public Health, Verona, Italy
- European Union of Medical Specialists
| | - Craig W Ritchie
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Brain Health Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mathieu Vandenbulcke
- Neuropsychiatry, Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Geriatric Psychiatry, University Psychiatric Centre KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- European Association of Geriatric Psychiatry
| | - Ritva Vanninen
- European Union of Medical Specialists
- University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Frans Verhey
- European Association of Geriatric Psychiatry
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology/Alzheimer Centre Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Meike W Vernooij
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- European Society of Neuroradiology
| | - Tarek Yousry
- European Society of Neuroradiology
- Lysholm Department of Neuroradiology and the Neuroradiological Academic Unit, Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Wiesje M Van Der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Flavio Nobili
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Giovanni B Frisoni
- Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (LANVIE), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Geneva Memory Center, Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jespersen J, Ahlberg G, Andreasen L, Ghouse J, Frederiksen KS, Haunsoe S, Svendsen JH, Frikke-Schmidt R, Olesen MS, Bundgaard H. Genome-wide association study on cerebral white-matter hyperintensities in 36,577 individuals. Eur Heart J 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.3019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background/Introduction
A quarter of all strokes are caused by cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD), which is also the most common pathology underlying vascular dementia. [1] White matter hyperintensities (WMH), a radiological marker detectable on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), can serve as a proxy for CSVD. WMH is associated with stroke, increased risk of dementia and functional decline in older age. [2,3]
Purpose
We aimed at investigating the genetic architecture of WMH using cerebral MRI data.
Methods
We used imaging data ∼40,000 individuals from the UK Biobank, a large population-based, prospective cohort study. We selected individuals with available total volume of WMH from T1 and T2_FLAIR images.
We performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) on autosomal genetic variants assuming an additive model based on genotype dosages with BOLT-LMM treating WMH as outcome.
We applied LD score regression (LDSC software) to estimate the genetic correlation between WMH traits and traits selected based on availability and relevance for cardiovascular disease.
Results
We included a total of 36,577 individuals with available quality controlled cerebral MRI data.
Genome-wide analysis identified 20 loci of statistical significance, six of which are not previously reported (Fig. 1). Within these novel loci, the following genes are located in proximity to lead variants: EHBP1, OTX1, WDPCP, VCAN, WNT16, FAM3C, ERI1, PRAG1, CACNB2, MTHFSD, FOXL1, FOXC2. Using BOLT, we found the heritability of WMH to be 37%.
We investigated genetic correlation between WMH and multiple phenotypes (Fig. 2). We observed the highest correlation with small vessel stroke (rg=0.56, P=3.9x10–4) Interestingly, WMH was genetically correlated with left atrial volume (rg=0.24, P=2.8x10–3).
Conclusion
In a GWAS on WMH acquired from cerebral MRI, we identified 20 significant loci, of which six are novel. This genetic study provides insights on the biological understanding and epidemiology of CSVD.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): John and Birthe Meyer FoundationThe Hallas-Møller Emerging Investigator Novo Nordisk
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Jespersen
- Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Cardiology , Copenhagen , Denmark
| | - G Ahlberg
- Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Cardiology , Copenhagen , Denmark
| | - L Andreasen
- Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Cardiology , Copenhagen , Denmark
| | - J Ghouse
- Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Cardiology , Copenhagen , Denmark
| | - K S Frederiksen
- Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology , Copenhagen , Denmark
| | - S Haunsoe
- Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Cardiology , Copenhagen , Denmark
| | - J H Svendsen
- Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Cardiology , Copenhagen , Denmark
| | - R Frikke-Schmidt
- Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Clinical Biochemistry , Copenhagen , Denmark
| | - M S Olesen
- University of Copenhagen, Department of Biomedical Sciences , Copenhagen , Denmark
| | - H Bundgaard
- Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Unit of Inherited Cardiac Diseases, Department of Cardiology , Copenhagen , Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bertelsen L, Diederichsen SZ, Frederiksen KS, Haugan KJ, Brandes A, Graff C, Krieger D, Hoejberg S, Olesen MS, Biering-Soerensen T, Koeber L, Vejlstrup N, Hasselbalch SG, Svendsen JH. Left atrial remodeling and cerebrovascular disease assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in patients undergoing continuous heart rhythm monitoring. Eur Heart J 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.0226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Atrial remodeling and atrial fibrillation (AF) have both been associated with cerebrovascular lesions. We wished to investigate the possible direct association between atrial remodeling and cerebrovascular disease including white matter lesions and lacunar infarcts in patients with and without atrial fibrillation (AF) as documented by implantable loop recorder (ILR).
Methods
Cardiac and cerebral MRI scans were acquired in a cross-sectional study including participants ≥70 years of age with stroke risk factors (history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure and/or previous stroke) but without known AF. Cerebrovascular disease was visually rated using the Fazekas scale and number of lacunar strokes. Left atrial (LA) (see figure) and ventricular volumes and function were analyzed, and associations between atrial remodeling and cerebrovascular disease were assessed with logistic regression models. Multivariable models were adjusted for sex, age, diabetes, hypertension, heart failure and history of stroke/transient ischemic attack. The analyses were stratified according to sinus rhythm or any AF during three months of continuous ILR monitoring to account for subclinical AF.
Results
Of 200 participants investigated, 87% had a Fazekas score≥1 and 45% had ≥1 lacunar infarct. Within three months of ILR implantation, AF was detected in 28 (14%) participants, while 172 (86%) had sinus rhythm only. Results are summarized in table. For participants with sinus rhythm, lower LA passive emptying fraction was associated with Fazekas score after multivariable adjustment, while LA total emptying fraction was borderline significant, and increased LA maximum and minimum volumes were associated with lacunar infarcts. There were no significant associations in patients with AF.
Sensitivity analyses showed similar results with longer screening periods for AF.
Conclusions
In patients free from AF as documented by ILR monitoring, we found an independent association between LA passive emptying and Fazekas score, and between atrial volumes and lacunar infarcts. This supports that atrial remodeling alone without AF is associated with an increased risk of cerebrovascular lesions.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): The Innovation Fund, DenmarkThe Research Foundation for the Capital Region of Denmark
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Bertelsen
- Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Heart Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - S Z Diederichsen
- Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Heart Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - K S Frederiksen
- Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - K J Haugan
- Zealand University Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - A Brandes
- Odense University Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Odense, Denmark
| | - C Graff
- Aalborg University, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - D Krieger
- University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - S Hoejberg
- Bispebjerg University Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M S Olesen
- Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Heart Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - L Koeber
- Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Heart Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - N Vejlstrup
- Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Heart Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - S G Hasselbalch
- Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - J H Svendsen
- Rigshospitalet - Copenhagen University Hospital, Heart Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Thorlacius-Ussing G, Bruun M, Gjerum L, Frederiksen KS, Rhodius-Meester HFM, van der Flier WM, Waldemar G, Hasselbalch SG. Comparing a Single Clinician Versus a Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference Approach for Dementia Diagnostics. J Alzheimers Dis 2021; 83:741-751. [PMID: 34366342 PMCID: PMC8543265 DOI: 10.3233/jad-210278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Background: Evidence-based recommendations on the optimal evaluation approach for dementia diagnostics are limited. This impedes a harmonized workup across clinics and nations. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a multidisciplinary consensus conference compared to a single clinician approach. Methods: In this prospective study, we enrolled 457 patients with suspected cognitive decline, from two European memory clinics. A diagnostic evaluation was performed at baseline independently in two ways: 1) by a single clinician and 2) at a multidisciplinary consensus conference. A syndrome diagnosis and an etiological diagnosis was made. The confidence in the diagnosis was recorded using a visual analogue scale. An expert panel re-evaluation diagnosis served as reference for the baseline syndrome diagnosis and a 12-24-month follow-up diagnosis for the etiological diagnosis. Results: 439 patients completed the study. We observed 12.5%discrepancy (k = 0.81) comparing the baseline syndrome diagnoses of the single clinician to the consensus conference, and 22.3%discrepancy (k = 0.68) for the baseline etiological diagnosis. The accuracy of the baseline etiological diagnosis was significantly higher at the consensus conference and was driven mainly by increased accuracy in the MCI group. Confidence in the etiological diagnosis at baseline was significantly higher at the consensus conference (p < 0.005), especially for the frontotemporal dementia diagnosis. Conclusion: The multidisciplinary consensus conference performed better on diagnostic accuracy of disease etiology and increased clinicians’ confidence. This highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary diagnostic evaluation approach for dementia diagnostics, especially when evaluating patients in the MCI stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gorm Thorlacius-Ussing
- Department of Neurology, Danish Dementia Research Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marie Bruun
- Department of Neurology, Danish Dementia Research Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Le Gjerum
- Department of Neurology, Danish Dementia Research Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kristian S Frederiksen
- Department of Neurology, Danish Dementia Research Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hanneke F M Rhodius-Meester
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gunhild Waldemar
- Department of Neurology, Danish Dementia Research Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Steen G Hasselbalch
- Department of Neurology, Danish Dementia Research Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pourhadi N, Ringkøbing SP, Waldemar G, Frederiksen KS. [Chronic traumatic encephalopathy]. Ugeskr Laeger 2021; 183:V12200919. [PMID: 34120678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) is associated with a history of repetitive head impacts, such as those sustained through contact sports. Post-mortem assessment has revealed specific neuropathological characteristics related to the condition. The symptoms of CTE typically present several years after exposure and can include mood/behavioural changes, cognitive dysfunction and motor symptoms. The course of CTE can potentially be progressive and debilitating. In this review, we argue, that there is a need for validated neuropathological and clinical criteria in order to detect CTE ante-mortem in the population.
Collapse
|
8
|
Muurling M, Rhodius-Meester HFM, Pärkkä J, van Gils M, Frederiksen KS, Bruun M, Hasselbalch SG, Soininen H, Herukka SK, Hallikainen M, Teunissen CE, Visser PJ, Scheltens P, van der Flier WM, Mattila J, Lötjönen J, de Boer C. Gait Disturbances are Associated with Increased Cognitive Impairment and Cerebrospinal Fluid Tau Levels in a Memory Clinic Cohort. J Alzheimers Dis 2021; 76:1061-1070. [PMID: 32597806 PMCID: PMC7505008 DOI: 10.3233/jad-200225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background: Gait analysis with accelerometers is a relatively inexpensive and easy to use method to potentially support clinical diagnoses of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. It is not clear, however, which gait features are most informative and how these measures relate to Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Objective: In this study, we tested if calculated features of gait 1) differ between cognitively normal subjects (CN), mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients, and dementia patients, 2) are correlated with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers related to Alzheimer’s disease, and 3) predict cognitive decline. Methods: Gait was measured using tri-axial accelerometers attached to the fifth lumbar vertebra (L5) in 58 CN, 58 MCI, and 26 dementia participants, while performing a walk and dual task. Ten gait features were calculated from the vertical L5 accelerations, following principal component analysis clustered in four domains, namely pace, rhythm, time variability, and length variability. Cognitive decline over time was measured using MMSE, and CSF biomarkers were available in a sub-group. Results: Linear mixed models showed that dementia patients had lower pace scores than MCI patients and CN subjects (p < 0.05). In addition, we found associations between the rhythm domain and CSF-tau, especially in the dual task. Gait was not associated with CSF Aβ42 levels and cognitive decline over time as measured with the MMSE. Conclusion: These findings suggest that gait — particularly measures related to pace and rhythm — are altered in dementia and have a direct link with measures of neurodegeneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marijn Muurling
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke F M Rhodius-Meester
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Geriatric Medicine section, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Juha Pärkkä
- VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., Tampere, Finland
| | - Mark van Gils
- VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., Tampere, Finland
| | - Kristian S Frederiksen
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marie Bruun
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Steen G Hasselbalch
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hilkka Soininen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Sanna-Kaisa Herukka
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Department of Neurology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Merja Hallikainen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Charlotte E Teunissen
- Neurochemistry Lab and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Casper de Boer
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Frederiksen KS, Nielsen TR, Appollonio I, Andersen BB, Riverol M, Boada M, Ceccaldi M, Dubois B, Engelborghs S, Frölich L, Hausner L, Gabelle A, Gabryelewicz T, Grimmer T, Hanseeuw B, Hort J, Hugon J, Jelic V, Koivisto A, Kramberger MG, Lebouvier T, Lleó A, de Mendonça A, Nobili F, Ousset PJ, Perneczky R, Olde Rikkert M, Robinson D, Rouaud O, Sánchez E, Santana I, Scarmeas N, Sheardova K, Sloan S, Spiru L, Stefanova E, Traykov L, Yener G, Waldemar G. Biomarker counseling, disclosure of diagnosis and follow-up in patients with mild cognitive impairment: A European Alzheimer's disease consortium survey. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2021; 36:324-333. [PMID: 32896040 DOI: 10.1002/gps.5427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is associated with an increased risk of further cognitive decline, partly depending on demographics and biomarker status. The aim of the present study was to survey the clinical practices of physicians in terms of biomarker counseling, management, and follow-up in European expert centers diagnosing patients with MCI. METHODS An online email survey was distributed to physicians affiliated with European Alzheimer's disease Consortium centers (Northern Europe: 10 centers; Eastern and Central Europe: 9 centers; and Southern Europe: 15 centers) with questions on attitudes toward biomarkers and biomarker counseling in MCI and dementia. This included postbiomarker counseling and the process of diagnostic disclosure of MCI, as well as treatment and follow-up in MCI. RESULTS The response rate for the survey was 80.9% (34 of 42 centers) across 20 countries. A large majority of physicians had access to biomarkers and found them useful. Pre- and postbiomarker counseling varied across centers, as did practices for referral to support groups and advice on preventive strategies. Less than half reported discussing driving and advance care planning with patients with MCI. CONCLUSIONS The variability in clinical practices across centers calls for better biomarker counseling and better training to improve communication skills. Future initiatives should address the importance of communicating preventive strategies and advance planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristian S Frederiksen
- Department of Neurology, Danish Dementia Research Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thomas R Nielsen
- Department of Neurology, Danish Dementia Research Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ildebrando Appollonio
- School of Medicine and Surgery and Milan Center for Neuroscience (NeuroMI), University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Birgitte Bo Andersen
- Department of Neurology, Danish Dementia Research Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mario Riverol
- Department of Neurology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mercè Boada
- Research Center and Memory Clinic, Fundació ACE, Institut Català de Neurociències Aplicades, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.,Networking Research Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases (CIBERNED), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mathieu Ceccaldi
- Department of Neurology and Neuropsychology, CHU Timone, APHM and Aix Marseille University, Inserm, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Marseille, France
| | - Bruno Dubois
- Alzheimer Research Center (IM2A) and Department of Neurology, Salpêtrière University Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Sebastiaan Engelborghs
- Reference Center of Biological Markers of Dementia (BIODEM), Institute Born-Bunge and University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,Department of Neurology and Center for Neurosciences, UZ Brussel and Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lutz Frölich
- Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Central Institute for Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Lucrezia Hausner
- Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Central Institute for Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Audrey Gabelle
- Department of Neurology, Memory Resources and Research Center, Gui de Chauliac Hospital, Montpellier University Hospital, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Tomasz Gabryelewicz
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disorders, Mossakowski Medical Research Centre PAN, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Timo Grimmer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernard Hanseeuw
- Department of Neurology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Institute of Neuroscience, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jakub Hort
- Department of Neurology, Memory Clinic, Charles University, Second Faculty of Medicine, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jacques Hugon
- Center of Cognitive Neurology, Lariboisière Hospital Paris, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Vesna Jelic
- Clinic for Cognitive Disorders, Theme Aging, Karolinska University Hospital - Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anne Koivisto
- Department of Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.,Department of Neurosciences and Geriatrics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Milica G Kramberger
- Center for Cognitive Impairments, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Thibaud Lebouvier
- Lille 2 University of Health and Law, Pôle de Neurologie, Lille, France
| | - Alberto Lleó
- Neurology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Flavio Nobili
- Department of Neuroscience (DINOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Pierre-Jean Ousset
- Memory Clinic, Clinical Research Center, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Robert Perneczky
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Center for Neurodegenerative Disorders (DZNE) Munich, Munich, Germany.,Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany.,Ageing Epidemiology (AGE) Research Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Marcel Olde Rikkert
- Department of Geriatrics, Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Olivier Rouaud
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Vaud University Hospital, Leenaards Memory Centre, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Elisabet Sánchez
- Servicio de geriatria, Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabel Santana
- Neurology Department, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Nikolaos Scarmeas
- 1st Department of Neurology, Aiginitio University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.,Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA
| | - Katerina Sheardova
- Memory Center ICRC, International Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Stephanie Sloan
- Neuroprogressive Disorders and Dementia Network, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, Scotland
| | - Luiza Spiru
- Geriatrics-Gerontology and Old Age Psychiatry (Alzheimer Unit) Clinical Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.,Excellence Memory Clinic and Longevity Medicine, Ana Aslan International Foundation, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Elka Stefanova
- Faculty of Medicine, Neurology Clinic, Clinical Center of Serbia, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | | | - Görsev Yener
- Department of Neurosciences, Dokuz Eylül University Medical School, Izmir, Turkey.,Department of Neurology, Dokuz Eylül University Medical School, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Gunhild Waldemar
- Department of Neurology, Danish Dementia Research Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Clemmensen FK, Hoffmann K, Siersma V, Sobol N, Beyer N, Andersen BB, Vogel A, Lolk A, Gottrup H, Høgh P, Waldemar G, Hasselbalch SG, Frederiksen KS. The role of physical and cognitive function in performance of activities of daily living in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease - a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr 2020; 20:513. [PMID: 33246408 PMCID: PMC7693499 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01926-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several factors may play a role in the ability of patients with Alzheimer's disease to perform activities of daily living (ADL). The aim of this study was to examine the impact of different aspects of physical performance and cognitive functions on ADL in patients suffering from mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. METHODS We conducted secondary analyses on cross-sectional baseline data from the randomized controlled multicentre study "Preserving quality of life, physical health and functional ability in Alzheimer's Disease: The effect of physical exercise" (ADEX). In total, 185 AD patients (76 women and 109 men), with a mean age on 70,4 years, were included. Data from physical performance tests (Astrand cycle test, Timed up & Go (TUG), Sit to Stand test (STS)) and cognitive tests (Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE), Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), Stroop Color and Word test (Stroop)) were used. Their associations with ADL, measured on the ADCS-ADL scale was assessed in multivariable regression analyses. RESULTS SDMT and MMSE had significant, moderate correlations with total ADL (SDMT: r = 0.33, MMSE: r = 0.42) and instrumental ADL (SDMT: r = 0.31, MMSE: r = 0.42), but not with basic ADL. Adjusting for age and sex, the associations between SDMT and MMSE to total ADL and instrumental ADL persisted. No significant associations were found between Astrand, TUG, STS or Stroop and total ADL, basic ADL or instrumental ADL. CONCLUSION Total ADL and instrumental ADL are associated with cognitive functions, including executive function. No significant association between examined physical performance parameters and ADL functions was observed, and consequently does not support an impact of physical function on ADL functions in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease and relatively well-preserved physical function. Strategies aimed to improve cognition may be better suited to improve ADL function in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT01681602 . Registered 10 September 2012, retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederikke K Clemmensen
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9 - section 8025, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kristine Hoffmann
- Regional Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Volkert Siersma
- Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of public health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nanna Sobol
- Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy and Institute of Sports Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nina Beyer
- Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy and Institute of Sports Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Birgitte B Andersen
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9 - section 8025, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Asmus Vogel
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9 - section 8025, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Annette Lolk
- Dementia Clinic, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Hanne Gottrup
- Dementia Clinic, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Peter Høgh
- Regional Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - Gunhild Waldemar
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9 - section 8025, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Steen G Hasselbalch
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9 - section 8025, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kristian S Frederiksen
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9 - section 8025, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bruun M, Frederiksen KS, Rhodius-Meester HFM, Baroni M, Gjerum L, Koikkalainen J, Urhemaa T, Tolonen A, van Gils M, Tong T, Guerrero R, Rueckert D, Dyremose N, Andersen BB, Simonsen AH, Lemstra A, Hallikainen M, Kurl S, Herukka SK, Remes AM, Waldemar G, Soininen H, Mecocci P, van der Flier WM, Lötjönen J, Hasselbalch SG. Impact of a Clinical Decision Support Tool on Dementia Diagnostics in Memory Clinics: The PredictND Validation Study. Curr Alzheimer Res 2020; 16:91-101. [PMID: 30605060 DOI: 10.2174/1567205016666190103152425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Revised: 12/04/2018] [Accepted: 12/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Determining the underlying etiology of dementia can be challenging. Computer- based Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) have the potential to provide an objective comparison of data and assist clinicians. OBJECTIVES To assess the diagnostic impact of a CDSS, the PredictND tool, for differential diagnosis of dementia in memory clinics. METHODS In this prospective multicenter study, we recruited 779 patients with either subjective cognitive decline (n=252), mild cognitive impairment (n=219) or any type of dementia (n=274) and followed them for minimum 12 months. Based on all available patient baseline data (demographics, neuropsychological tests, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, and MRI visual and computed ratings), the PredictND tool provides a comprehensive overview and analysis of the data with a likelihood index for five diagnostic groups; Alzheimer´s disease, vascular dementia, dementia with Lewy bodies, frontotemporal dementia and subjective cognitive decline. At baseline, a clinician defined an etiological diagnosis and confidence in the diagnosis, first without and subsequently with the PredictND tool. The follow-up diagnosis was used as the reference diagnosis. RESULTS In total, 747 patients completed the follow-up visits (53% female, 69±10 years). The etiological diagnosis changed in 13% of all cases when using the PredictND tool, but the diagnostic accuracy did not change significantly. Confidence in the diagnosis, measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS, 0-100%) increased (ΔVAS=3.0%, p<0.0001), especially in correctly changed diagnoses (ΔVAS=7.2%, p=0.0011). CONCLUSION Adding the PredictND tool to the diagnostic evaluation affected the diagnosis and increased clinicians' confidence in the diagnosis indicating that CDSSs could aid clinicians in the differential diagnosis of dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Bruun
- Department of Neurology, Danish Dementia Research Centre, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Kristian S Frederiksen
- Department of Neurology, Danish Dementia Research Centre, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | | | - Marta Baroni
- Institute of Gerontology and Geriatrics, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Le Gjerum
- Department of Neurology, Danish Dementia Research Centre, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | | | - Timo Urhemaa
- VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., Tampere, Finland
| | - Antti Tolonen
- VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., Tampere, Finland
| | - Mark van Gils
- VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., Tampere, Finland
| | - Tong Tong
- Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ricardo Guerrero
- Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Rueckert
- Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nadia Dyremose
- Department of Neurology, Danish Dementia Research Centre, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Birgitte Bo Andersen
- Department of Neurology, Danish Dementia Research Centre, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Anja H Simonsen
- Department of Neurology, Danish Dementia Research Centre, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Afina Lemstra
- Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Merja Hallikainen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Neurocenter, Neurology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Sudhir Kurl
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Neurocenter, Neurology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Sanna-Kaisa Herukka
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Neurocenter, Neurology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Anne M Remes
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Neurocenter, Neurology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.,Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland and Unit of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Gunhild Waldemar
- Department of Neurology, Danish Dementia Research Centre, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Hilkka Soininen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Neurocenter, Neurology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Patrizia Mecocci
- Institute of Gerontology and Geriatrics, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Steen G Hasselbalch
- Department of Neurology, Danish Dementia Research Centre, University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rhodius-Meester HFM, van Maurik IS, Koikkalainen J, Tolonen A, Frederiksen KS, Hasselbalch SG, Soininen H, Herukka SK, Remes AM, Teunissen CE, Barkhof F, Pijnenburg YAL, Scheltens P, Lötjönen J, van der Flier WM. Selection of memory clinic patients for CSF biomarker assessment can be restricted to a quarter of cases by using computerized decision support, without compromising diagnostic accuracy. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0226784. [PMID: 31940390 PMCID: PMC6961870 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION An accurate and timely diagnosis for Alzheimer's disease (AD) is important, both for care and research. The current diagnostic criteria allow the use of CSF biomarkers to provide pathophysiological support for the diagnosis of AD. How these criteria should be operationalized by clinicians is unclear. Tools that guide in selecting patients in which CSF biomarkers have clinical utility are needed. We evaluated computerized decision support to select patients for CSF biomarker determination. METHODS We included 535 subjects (139 controls, 286 Alzheimer's disease dementia, 82 frontotemporal dementia and 28 vascular dementia) from three clinical cohorts. Positive (AD like) and negative (normal) CSF biomarker profiles were simulated to estimate whether knowledge of CSF biomarkers would impact (confidence in) diagnosis. We applied these simulated CSF values and combined them with demographic, neuropsychology and MRI data to initiate CSF testing (computerized decision support approach). We compared proportion of CSF measurements and patients diagnosed with sufficient confidence (probability of correct class ≥0.80) based on an algorithm with scenarios without CSF (only neuropsychology, MRI and APOE), CSF according to the appropriate use criteria (AUC) and CSF for all patients. RESULTS The computerized decision support approach recommended CSF testing in 140 (26%) patients, which yielded a diagnosis with sufficient confidence in 379 (71%) of all patients. This approach was more efficient than CSF in none (0% CSF, 308 (58%) diagnosed), CSF selected based on AUC (295 (55%) CSF, 350 (65%) diagnosed) or CSF in all (100% CSF, 348 (65%) diagnosed). CONCLUSIONS We used a computerized decision support with simulated CSF results in controls and patients with different types of dementia. This approach can support clinicians in making a balanced decision in ordering additional biomarker testing. Computer-supported prediction restricts CSF testing to only 26% of cases, without compromising diagnostic accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanneke F M Rhodius-Meester
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Geriatric Medicine section, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ingrid S van Maurik
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Antti Tolonen
- VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., Tampere, Finland
| | - Kristian S Frederiksen
- Department of Neurology, Danish Dementia Research Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Steen G Hasselbalch
- Department of Neurology, Danish Dementia Research Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hilkka Soininen
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Sanna-Kaisa Herukka
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Anne M Remes
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Department of Research Neurology, Unit of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
- MRC Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Charlotte E Teunissen
- Neurochemistry Lab and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, UCL, London, England, United Kingdom
| | - Yolande A L Pijnenburg
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Frederiksen KS, Madsen K, Andersen BB, Beyer N, Garde E, Høgh P, Waldemar G, Hasselbalch SG, Law I. Moderate- to high-intensity exercise does not modify cortical β-amyloid in Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement (N Y) 2019; 5:208-215. [PMID: 31198839 PMCID: PMC6556817 DOI: 10.1016/j.trci.2019.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Animal models of Alzheimer's disease show that exercise may modify β-amyloid (Aβ) deposition. We examined the effect of a 16-week exercise intervention on cortical Aβ in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease. Methods Thirty-six patients with Alzheimer's disease were randomized to either one hour of aerobic exercise three times weekly for 16 weeks or usual care. Pre and post intervention, 11Carbon-Pittsburgh compound B positron emission tomography was carried out to assess cortical Aβ, and quantified using standardized uptake value rations (SUVRs). Results The intervention showed no effect on follow-up SUVRs in a covariance analysis with group allocation, baseline intervention SUVR, age, sex, and baseline Mini–Mental State Examination as predictors. Change in SUVRs did not correlate with changes in measures of physical or aerobic fitness. Discussion The present findings do not support an effect of exercise on Aβ. However, the relatively short intervention period may account for a lack of efficacy. Further studies should test earlier and longer interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristian S Frederiksen
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Karine Madsen
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Birgitte B Andersen
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nina Beyer
- Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Unit and Institute of Sports Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ellen Garde
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Department of Public Health and Center for Healthy Aging, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peter Høgh
- Zealand University Hospital, Department of Neurology, Roskilde, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gunhild Waldemar
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Steen G Hasselbalch
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bruun M, Frederiksen KS, Rhodius-Meester HFM, Baroni M, Gjerum L, Koikkalainen J, Urhemaa T, Tolonen A, van Gils M, Rueckert D, Dyremose N, Andersen BB, Lemstra AW, Hallikainen M, Kurl S, Herukka SK, Remes AM, Waldemar G, Soininen H, Mecocci P, van der Flier WM, Lötjönen J, Hasselbalch SG. Impact of a clinical decision support tool on prediction of progression in early-stage dementia: a prospective validation study. Alzheimers Res Ther 2019; 11:25. [PMID: 30894218 PMCID: PMC6425602 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-019-0482-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2018] [Accepted: 03/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Background In clinical practice, it is often difficult to predict which patients with cognitive complaints or impairment will progress or remain stable. We assessed the impact of using a clinical decision support system, the PredictND tool, to predict progression in patients with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in memory clinics. Methods In this prospective multicenter study, we included 429 patients with SCD (n = 230) and MCI (n = 199) (female 54%, age 67 ± 9, MMSE 28 ± 2) and followed them for at least 12 months. Based on all available patient baseline data (demographics, cognitive tests, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, and MRI), the PredictND tool provides a comprehensive overview of the data and a classification defining the likelihood of progression. At baseline, a clinician defined an expected follow-up diagnosis and estimated the level of confidence in their prediction using a visual analogue scale (VAS, 0–100%), first without and subsequently with the PredictND tool. As outcome measure, we defined clinical progression as progression from SCD to MCI or dementia, and from MCI to dementia. Correspondence between the expected and the actual clinical progression at follow-up defined the prognostic accuracy. Results After a mean follow-up time of 1.7 ± 0.4 years, 21 (9%) SCD and 63 (32%) MCI had progressed. When using the PredictND tool, the overall prognostic accuracy was unaffected (0.4%, 95%CI − 3.0%; + 3.9%; p = 0.79). However, restricting the analysis to patients with more certain classifications (n = 203), we found an increase of 3% in the accuracy (95%CI − 0.6%; + 6.5%; p = 0.11). Furthermore, for this subgroup, the tool alone showed a statistically significant increase in the prognostic accuracy compared to the evaluation without tool (6.4%, 95%CI 2.1%; 10.7%; p = 0.004). Specifically, the negative predictive value was high. Moreover, confidence in the prediction increased significantly (∆VAS = 4%, p < .0001). Conclusions Adding the PredictND tool to the clinical evaluation increased clinicians’ confidence. Furthermore, the results indicate that the tool has the potential to improve prediction of progression for patients with more certain classifications. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13195-019-0482-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Bruun
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Neuroscience Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Kristian S Frederiksen
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Neuroscience Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hanneke F M Rhodius-Meester
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marta Baroni
- Institute of Gerontology and Geriatrics, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Le Gjerum
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Neuroscience Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Timo Urhemaa
- VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd, Tampere, Finland
| | - Antti Tolonen
- VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd, Tampere, Finland
| | - Mark van Gils
- VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd, Tampere, Finland
| | - Daniel Rueckert
- Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Nadia Dyremose
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Neuroscience Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Birgitte B Andersen
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Neuroscience Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Afina W Lemstra
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Merja Hallikainen
- Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Sudhir Kurl
- Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Sanna-Kaisa Herukka
- Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Anne M Remes
- Neurology, Neuro Center, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.,Neurology, Unit of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Gunhild Waldemar
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Neuroscience Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hilkka Soininen
- Neurology, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.,Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Patrizia Mecocci
- Institute of Gerontology and Geriatrics, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Steen G Hasselbalch
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Neuroscience Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Koikkalainen JR, Rhodius-Meester HFM, Frederiksen KS, Bruun M, Hasselbalch SG, Baroni M, Mecocci P, Vanninen R, Remes A, Soininen H, van Gils M, van der Flier WM, Scheltens P, Barkhof F, Erkinjuntti T, Lötjönen JMP. Automatically computed rating scales from MRI for patients with cognitive disorders. Eur Radiol 2019; 29:4937-4947. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06067-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2018] [Revised: 01/09/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
16
|
Bruun M, Koikkalainen J, Rhodius-Meester HFM, Baroni M, Gjerum L, van Gils M, Soininen H, Remes AM, Hartikainen P, Waldemar G, Mecocci P, Barkhof F, Pijnenburg Y, van der Flier WM, Hasselbalch SG, Lötjönen J, Frederiksen KS. Detecting frontotemporal dementia syndromes using MRI biomarkers. Neuroimage Clin 2019; 22:101711. [PMID: 30743135 PMCID: PMC6369219 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2018] [Revised: 02/01/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Background Diagnosing frontotemporal dementia may be challenging. New methods for analysis of regional brain atrophy patterns on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could add to the diagnostic assessment. Therefore, we aimed to develop automated imaging biomarkers for differentiating frontotemporal dementia subtypes from other diagnostic groups, and from one another. Methods In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, we included 1213 patients (age 67 ± 9, 48% females) from two memory clinic cohorts: 116 frontotemporal dementia, 341 Alzheimer's disease, 66 Dementia with Lewy bodies, 40 vascular dementia, 104 other dementias, 229 mild cognitive impairment, and 317 subjective cognitive decline. Three MRI atrophy biomarkers were derived from the normalized volumes of automatically segmented cortical regions: 1) the anterior vs. posterior index, 2) the asymmetry index, and 3) the temporal pole left index. We used the following performance metrics: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. To account for the low prevalence of frontotemporal dementia we pursued a high specificity of 95%. Cross-validation was used in assessing the performance. The generalizability was assessed in an independent cohort (n = 200). Results The anterior vs. posterior index performed with an AUC of 83% for differentiation of frontotemporal dementia from all other diagnostic groups (Sensitivity = 59%, Specificity = 95%, positive likelihood ratio = 11.8, negative likelihood ratio = 0.4). The asymmetry index showed highest performance for separation of primary progressive aphasia and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (AUC = 85%, Sensitivity = 79%, Specificity = 92%, positive likelihood ratio = 9.9, negative likelihood ratio = 0.2), whereas the temporal pole left index was specific for detection of semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (AUC = 85%, Sensitivity = 82%, Specificity = 80%, positive likelihood ratio = 4.1, negative likelihood ratio = 0.2). The validation cohort provided corresponding results for the anterior vs. posterior index and temporal pole left index. Conclusion This study presents three quantitative MRI biomarkers, which could provide additional information to the diagnostic assessment and assist clinicians in diagnosing frontotemporal dementia. Quantitative MRI biomarkers (API, ASI, and TPL) for detection of FTD and its subtypes. API differentiated FTD from other diagnostic groups with AUC of 83%. ASI and TPL showed highest performance for PPA subtypes. A subcortical bvFTD subtype resembling AD atrophy pattern seems undetectable for MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Bruun
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | | | - Hanneke F M Rhodius-Meester
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marta Baroni
- Institute of Gerontology and Geriatrics, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Le Gjerum
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mark van Gils
- VTT Technical Research Center of Finland Ltd, Tampere, Finland
| | - Hilkka Soininen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland; Neurocenter, neurology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Anne M Remes
- Unit of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland; Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | | | - Gunhild Waldemar
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Patrizia Mecocci
- Institute of Gerontology and Geriatrics, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; UCL institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, London, UK
| | - Yolande Pijnenburg
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center Amsterdam, Department of Neurology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Steen G Hasselbalch
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Kristian S Frederiksen
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bruun M, Rhodius-Meester HFM, Koikkalainen J, Baroni M, Gjerum L, Lemstra AW, Barkhof F, Remes AM, Urhemaa T, Tolonen A, Rueckert D, van Gils M, Frederiksen KS, Waldemar G, Scheltens P, Mecocci P, Soininen H, Lötjönen J, Hasselbalch SG, van der Flier WM. Evaluating combinations of diagnostic tests to discriminate different dementia types. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 2018; 10:509-518. [PMID: 30320203 PMCID: PMC6180596 DOI: 10.1016/j.dadm.2018.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Introduction We studied, using a data-driven approach, how different combinations of diagnostic tests contribute to the differential diagnosis of dementia. Methods In this multicenter study, we included 356 patients with Alzheimer's disease, 87 frontotemporal dementia, 61 dementia with Lewy bodies, 38 vascular dementia, and 302 controls. We used a classifier to assess accuracy for individual performance and combinations of cognitive tests, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, and automated magnetic resonance imaging features for pairwise differentiation between dementia types. Results Cognitive tests had good performance in separating any type of dementia from controls. Cerebrospinal fluid optimally contributed to identifying Alzheimer's disease, whereas magnetic resonance imaging features aided in separating vascular dementia, dementia with Lewy bodies, and frontotemporal dementia. Combining diagnostic tests increased the accuracy, with balanced accuracies ranging from 78% to 97%. Discussion Different diagnostic tests have their distinct roles in differential diagnostics of dementias. Our results indicate that combining different diagnostic tests may increase the accuracy further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Bruun
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hanneke F M Rhodius-Meester
- Alzheimer Center, Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marta Baroni
- Institute of Gerontology and Geriatrics, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Le Gjerum
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Afina W Lemstra
- Alzheimer Center, Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,UCL Institutes of Neurology and Healthcare Engineering, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anne M Remes
- Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.,Unit of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Timo Urhemaa
- VTT Technical Research Center of Finland Ltd, Tampere, Finland
| | - Antti Tolonen
- VTT Technical Research Center of Finland Ltd, Tampere, Finland
| | - Daniel Rueckert
- Department of Computing, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark van Gils
- VTT Technical Research Center of Finland Ltd, Tampere, Finland
| | - Kristian S Frederiksen
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gunhild Waldemar
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Alzheimer Center, Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Patrizia Mecocci
- Institute of Gerontology and Geriatrics, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Hilkka Soininen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | | | - Steen G Hasselbalch
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Alzheimer Center, Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mattsson N, Groot C, Jansen WJ, Landau SM, Villemagne VL, Engelborghs S, Mintun MM, Lleo A, Molinuevo JL, Jagust WJ, Frisoni GB, Ivanoiu A, Chételat G, Resende de Oliveira C, Rodrigue KM, Kornhuber J, Wallin A, Klimkowicz-Mrowiec A, Kandimalla R, Popp J, Aalten PP, Aarsland D, Alcolea D, Almdahl IS, Baldeiras I, van Buchem MA, Cavedo E, Chen K, Cohen AD, Förster S, Fortea J, Frederiksen KS, Freund-Levi Y, Gill KD, Gkatzima O, Grimmer T, Hampel H, Herukka SK, Johannsen P, van Laere K, de Leon MJ, Maier W, Marcusson J, Meulenbroek O, Møllergård HM, Morris JC, Mroczko B, Nordlund A, Prabhakar S, Peters O, Rami L, Rodríguez-Rodríguez E, Roe CM, Rüther E, Santana I, Schröder J, Seo SW, Soininen H, Spiru L, Stomrud E, Struyfs H, Teunissen CE, Verhey FRJ, Vos SJB, van Waalwijk van Doorn LJC, Waldemar G, Wallin ÅK, Wiltfang J, Vandenberghe R, Brooks DJ, Fladby T, Rowe CC, Drzezga A, Verbeek MM, Sarazin M, Wolk DA, Fleisher AS, Klunk WE, Na DL, Sánchez-Juan P, Lee DY, Nordberg A, Tsolaki M, Camus V, Rinne JO, Fagan AM, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Rabinovici GD, Hansson O, van Berckel BNM, van der Flier WM, Scheltens P, Visser PJ, Ossenkoppele R. Prevalence of the apolipoprotein E ε4 allele in amyloid β positive subjects across the spectrum of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement 2018; 14:913-924. [PMID: 29601787 DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2017] [Revised: 12/28/2017] [Accepted: 02/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 is the major genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD), but its prevalence is unclear because earlier studies did not require biomarker evidence of amyloid β (Aβ) pathology. METHODS We included 3451 Aβ+ subjects (853 AD-type dementia, 1810 mild cognitive impairment, and 788 cognitively normal). Generalized estimating equation models were used to assess APOE ε4 prevalence in relation to age, sex, education, and geographical location. RESULTS The APOE ε4 prevalence was 66% in AD-type dementia, 64% in mild cognitive impairment, and 51% in cognitively normal, and it decreased with advancing age in Aβ+ cognitively normal and Aβ+ mild cognitive impairment (P < .05) but not in Aβ+ AD dementia (P = .66). The prevalence was highest in Northern Europe but did not vary by sex or education. DISCUSSION The APOE ε4 prevalence in AD was higher than that in previous studies, which did not require presence of Aβ pathology. Furthermore, our results highlight disease heterogeneity related to age and geographical location.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niklas Mattsson
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
| | - Colin Groot
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Willemijn J Jansen
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Susan M Landau
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Victor L Villemagne
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Centre for PET, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sebastiaan Engelborghs
- Reference Center for Biological Markers of Dementia (BIODEM), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - Alberto Lleo
- Neurology Department, Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - José Luis Molinuevo
- Alzheimer's Disease and Other Cognitive Disorders Unit, IDIBAPS, Clinic University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - William J Jagust
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Giovanni B Frisoni
- Memory Clinic and LANVIE- Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging, University Hospitals, and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Laboratory of Alzheimer's Neuroimaging and Epidemiology, IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Adrian Ivanoiu
- Memory Clinic and Neurochemistry Laboratory, Saint Luc University Hospital, Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gaël Chételat
- Inserm, Inserm UMR-S U1237, Université de Caen-Normandie, GIP Cyceron, Caen, France
| | - Catarina Resende de Oliveira
- Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Karen M Rodrigue
- Center for Vital Longevity, School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Johannes Kornhuber
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen- Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anders Wallin
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
| | | | - Ramesh Kandimalla
- Department of Biochemistry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Julius Popp
- Department of Psychiatry, Service of Old Age Psychiatry, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Pauline P Aalten
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Dag Aarsland
- Center for Age-Related Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Daniel Alcolea
- Neurology Department, Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ina S Almdahl
- Department of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Inês Baldeiras
- Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Mark A van Buchem
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Enrica Cavedo
- Laboratory of Alzheimer's Neuroimaging and Epidemiology, IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; AXA Research Fund & UPMC Chair, Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC) Paris 06, Inserm, CNRS, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière (ICM), Département de Neurologie, Institut de la Mémoire et de la Maladie d'Alzheimer (IM2A), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Kewei Chen
- Banner Alzheimer's Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Ann D Cohen
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Stefan Förster
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universitaet München, Munich, Germany
| | - Juan Fortea
- Neurology Department, Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Kristian S Frederiksen
- Danish Dementia Research Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Yvonne Freund-Levi
- Department of Geriatrics, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Section of Clinical Geriatrics, Institution of NVS, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kiran Dip Gill
- Department of Biochemistry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Olymbia Gkatzima
- Third Department of Neurology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Timo Grimmer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universitaet München, Munich, Germany
| | - Harald Hampel
- AXA Research Fund & UPMC Chair, Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie (UPMC) Paris 06, Inserm, CNRS, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière (ICM), Département de Neurologie, Institut de la Mémoire et de la Maladie d'Alzheimer (IM2A), Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Department of Psychiatry, Alzheimer Memorial Center and Geriatric Psychiatry Branch, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
| | - Sanna-Kaisa Herukka
- Department of Neurology, University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Peter Johannsen
- Memory Clinic, Danish Dementia Research Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Koen van Laere
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mony J de Leon
- School of Medicine, Center for Brain Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wolfgang Maier
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
| | - Jan Marcusson
- Geriatric Medicine, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Linköping, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Olga Meulenbroek
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Hanne M Møllergård
- Department of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - John C Morris
- Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Barbara Mroczko
- Department of Neurodegeneration Diagnostics, Leading National Research Centre in Białystok (KNOW), Medical University of Białystok, Białystok, Poland
| | - Arto Nordlund
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Sudesh Prabhakar
- Department of Neurology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India
| | - Oliver Peters
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité Berlin, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, Germany
| | - Lorena Rami
- Alzheimer's Disease and Other Cognitive Disorders Unit, IDIBAPS, Clinic University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eloy Rodríguez-Rodríguez
- Neurology Service, Universitary Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, CIBERNED, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Catherine M Roe
- Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Eckart Rüther
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Isabel Santana
- Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Johannes Schröder
- Sektion Gerontopsychiatrie, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sang W Seo
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hilkka Soininen
- Department of Neurology, University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Luiza Spiru
- Department of Geriatrics-Gerontology-Gerontopsychiatry, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Erik Stomrud
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Hanne Struyfs
- Reference Center for Biological Markers of Dementia (BIODEM), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Charlotte E Teunissen
- Neurochemistry Laboratory and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frans R J Verhey
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Stephanie J B Vos
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Linda J C van Waalwijk van Doorn
- Department of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Gunhild Waldemar
- Danish Dementia Research Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Åsa K Wallin
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jens Wiltfang
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Rik Vandenberghe
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer Research Centre KU Leuven, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - David J Brooks
- Division of Neuroscience, Medical Research Council Clinical Sciences Centre, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Tormod Fladby
- Department of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Christopher C Rowe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Centre for PET, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Alexander Drzezga
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Marcel M Verbeek
- Department of Neurology, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Marie Sarazin
- Neurologie de la Mémoire et du Langage, Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - David A Wolk
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Adam S Fleisher
- Banner Alzheimer's Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA; Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - William E Klunk
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Duk L Na
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Pascual Sánchez-Juan
- Neurology Service, Universitary Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, CIBERNED, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Dong Young Lee
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Agneta Nordberg
- Department NVS, Center for Alzheimer Research, Translational Alzheimer Neurobiology, Karolinska Institutet and Geriatric Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Magda Tsolaki
- Third Department of Neurology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Vincent Camus
- CHRU de Tours, CIC INSERM 1415, INSERM U930, Université François Rabelais de Tours, Tours, France
| | - Juha O Rinne
- Turku PET Centre and Division of Clinical Neurosciences Turku, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Anne M Fagan
- Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Department of Molecular Neuroscience, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, UK; UK Dementia Research Institute, London, UK; Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Sweden and Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden; Sweden and Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Gil D Rabinovici
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Oskar Hansson
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Jansen WJ, Ossenkoppele R, Tijms BM, Fagan AM, Hansson O, Klunk WE, van der Flier WM, Villemagne VL, Frisoni GB, Fleisher AS, Lleó A, Mintun MA, Wallin A, Engelborghs S, Na DL, Chételat G, Molinuevo JL, Landau SM, Mattsson N, Kornhuber J, Sabri O, Rowe CC, Parnetti L, Popp J, Fladby T, Jagust WJ, Aalten P, Lee DY, Vandenberghe R, Resende de Oliveira C, Kapaki E, Froelich L, Ivanoiu A, Gabryelewicz T, Verbeek MM, Sanchez-Juan P, Hildebrandt H, Camus V, Zboch M, Brooks DJ, Drzezga A, Rinne JO, Newberg A, de Mendonça A, Sarazin M, Rabinovici GD, Madsen K, Kramberger MG, Nordberg A, Mok V, Mroczko B, Wolk DA, Meyer PT, Tsolaki M, Scheltens P, Verhey FRJ, Visser PJ, Aarsland D, Alcolea D, Alexander M, Almdahl IS, Arnold SE, Baldeiras I, Barthel H, van Berckel BNM, Blennow K, van Buchem MA, Cavedo E, Chen K, Chipi E, Cohen AD, Förster S, Fortea J, Frederiksen KS, Freund-Levi Y, Gkatzima O, Gordon MF, Grimmer T, Hampel H, Hausner L, Hellwig S, Herukka SK, Johannsen P, Klimkowicz-Mrowiec A, Köhler S, Koglin N, van Laere K, de Leon M, Lisetti V, Maier W, Marcusson J, Meulenbroek O, Møllergård HM, Morris JC, Nordlund A, Novak GP, Paraskevas GP, Perera G, Peters O, Ramakers IHGB, Rami L, Rodríguez-Rodríguez E, Roe CM, Rot U, Rüther E, Santana I, Schröder J, Seo SW, Soininen H, Spiru L, Stomrud E, Struyfs H, Teunissen CE, Vos SJB, van Waalwijk van Doorn LJC, Waldemar G, Wallin ÅK, Wiltfang J, Zetterberg H. Association of Cerebral Amyloid-β Aggregation With Cognitive Functioning in Persons Without Dementia. JAMA Psychiatry 2018; 75:84-95. [PMID: 29188296 PMCID: PMC5786156 DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.3391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Cerebral amyloid-β aggregation is an early event in Alzheimer disease (AD). Understanding the association between amyloid aggregation and cognitive manifestation in persons without dementia is important for a better understanding of the course of AD and for the design of prevention trials. OBJECTIVE To investigate whether amyloid-β aggregation is associated with cognitive functioning in persons without dementia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional study included 2908 participants with normal cognition and 4133 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from 53 studies in the multicenter Amyloid Biomarker Study. Normal cognition was defined as having no cognitive concerns for which medical help was sought and scores within the normal range on cognitive tests. Mild cognitive impairment was diagnosed according to published criteria. Study inclusion began in 2013 and is ongoing. Data analysis was performed in January 2017. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Global cognitive performance as assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and episodic memory performance as assessed by a verbal word learning test. Amyloid aggregation was measured with positron emission tomography or cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and dichotomized as negative (normal) or positive (abnormal) according to study-specific cutoffs. Generalized estimating equations were used to examine the association between amyloid aggregation and low cognitive scores (MMSE score ≤27 or memory z score≤-1.28) and to assess whether this association was moderated by age, sex, educational level, or apolipoprotein E genotype. RESULTS Among 2908 persons with normal cognition (mean [SD] age, 67.4 [12.8] years), amyloid positivity was associated with low memory scores after age 70 years (mean difference in amyloid positive vs negative, 4% [95% CI, 0%-7%] at 72 years and 21% [95% CI, 10%-33%] at 90 years) but was not associated with low MMSE scores (mean difference, 3% [95% CI, -1% to 6%], P = .16). Among 4133 patients with MCI (mean [SD] age, 70.2 [8.5] years), amyloid positivity was associated with low memory (mean difference, 16% [95% CI, 12%-20%], P < .001) and low MMSE (mean difference, 14% [95% CI, 12%-17%], P < .001) scores, and this association decreased with age. Low cognitive scores had limited utility for screening of amyloid positivity in persons with normal cognition and those with MCI. In persons with normal cognition, the age-related increase in low memory score paralleled the age-related increase in amyloid positivity with an intervening period of 10 to 15 years. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Although low memory scores are an early marker of amyloid positivity, their value as a screening measure for early AD among persons without dementia is limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willemijn J. Jansen
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School
for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University,
Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU
University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU
University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands,Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center,
University of California, San Francisco,Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of
California, Berkeley
| | - Betty M. Tijms
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU
University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anne M. Fagan
- Knight Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center,
Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Oskar Hansson
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Clinical Sciences
Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - William E. Klunk
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh
School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Wiesje M. van der Flier
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU
University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU
University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Victor L. Villemagne
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Centre for PET,
Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Giovanni B. Frisoni
- Laboratory of Alzheimer's Neuroimaging and
Epidemiology, IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy,Memory Clinic and LANVIE–Laboratory of
Neuroimaging of Aging, University Hospitals, and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Adam S. Fleisher
- Banner Alzheimer’s Institute, Phoenix,
Arizona,Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana,Department of Neurosciences, University of
California, San Diego
| | - Alberto Lleó
- Neurology Department, Hospital de Sant Pau,
Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Anders Wallin
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology,
Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Sebastiaan Engelborghs
- Reference Center for Biological Markers of Dementia
(BIODEM), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Duk L. Na
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center,
Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gäel Chételat
- Institut National de la Santé et de la
Recherche Médicale (INSERM), CHU de Caen, Caen, France
| | - José Luis Molinuevo
- Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Cognitive
Disorders Unit, IDIBAPS, Clinic University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Susan M. Landau
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of
California, Berkeley
| | - Niklas Mattsson
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Clinical Sciences
Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Johannes Kornhuber
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy,
Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen–Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Osama Sabri
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of
Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Christopher C. Rowe
- Knight Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center,
Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri,Department of Nuclear Medicine and Centre for PET,
Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lucilla Parnetti
- Section of Neurology, Center for Memory
Disturbances, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Julius Popp
- Department of Psychiatry, Service of Old Age
Psychiatry, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Tormod Fladby
- Department of Neurology, Akershus University
Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - William J. Jagust
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of
California, Berkeley
| | - Pauline Aalten
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School
for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University,
Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Dong Young Lee
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National
University, College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Rik Vandenberghe
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer
Research Centre KU Leuven, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Catarina Resende de Oliveira
- Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Faculty of
Medicine, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Elisabeth Kapaki
- First Department of Neurology, Eginition Hospital,
Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Lutz Froelich
- Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Central
Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim,
Germany
| | - Adrian Ivanoiu
- Memory Clinic and Neurochemistry Laboratory, Saint
Luc University Hospital, Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain,
Brussels, Belgium
| | - Tomasz Gabryelewicz
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disorders,
Mossakowski Medical Research Centre Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Marcel M. Verbeek
- Departments of Neurology and Laboratory Medicine,
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud Alzheimer Center, Radboud
University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Páscual Sanchez-Juan
- Neurology Service, Universitary Hospital
Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | | | - Vincent Camus
- CHRU de Tours, CIC INSERM 1415, INSERM U930, and
Université François Rabelais de Tours, Tours, France
| | - Marzena Zboch
- Alzheimer Center, Wroclaw Medical University,
Scinawa, Poland
| | - David J. Brooks
- Division of Neuroscience, Medical Research Council
Clinical Sciences Centre, Imperial College London, London, England
| | - Alexander Drzezga
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of
Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Juha O. Rinne
- Turku PET Centre and Division of Clinical
Neurosciences Turku, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Andrew Newberg
- Myrna Brind Center of Integrative Medicine, Thomas
Jefferson University and Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Alexandre de Mendonça
- Institute of Molecular Medicine and Faculty of
Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Marie Sarazin
- Neurologie de la Mémoire et du Langage, Centre
Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, Université Paris 5, Paris, France
| | - Gil D. Rabinovici
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center,
University of California, San Francisco
| | - Karine Madsen
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University
Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Milica G. Kramberger
- Center for Cognitive Impairments, University Medical
Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Agneta Nordberg
- Department NVS, Center for Alzheimer Research,
Translational Alzheimer Neurobiology, Karolinska Institutet, and Geriatric Medicine,
Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Vincent Mok
- Lui Che Woo Institute of Innovative Medicine,
Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Therese Pei Fong Chow Research Centre for
Prevention of Dementia, Hong Kong
| | - Barbara Mroczko
- Department of Neurodegeneration Diagnostics, Leading
National Research Centre in Białystok (KNOW), Medical University of Białystok,
Białystok, Poland
| | - David A. Wolk
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia
| | - Philipp T. Meyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital
Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Magda Tsolaki
- Third Department of Neurology, Aristotle University
of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Philip Scheltens
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU
University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frans R. J. Verhey
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School
for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University,
Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School
for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University,
Maastricht, the Netherlands,Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU
University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dag Aarsland
- Center for Age-Related Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Daniel Alcolea
- Neurology Department, Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Ina S Almdahl
- Department of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Steven E Arnold
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Inês Baldeiras
- Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Henryk Barthel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.,Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Mark A van Buchem
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Enrica Cavedo
- Laboratory of Alzheimer's Neuroimaging and Epidemiology, IRCCS Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.,Département de Neurologie, Institut de la Mémoire et de la Maladie d'Alzheimer (IM2A), Hôpital Pitié-Stijmsalpêtrière, Boulevard de l'hôpital, F-75013, Paris, France.,AXA Research Fund & UPMC Chair, Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 06, Inserm, CNRS, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, Paris, France
| | - Kewei Chen
- Banner Alzheimer's Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Elena Chipi
- Section of Neurology, Center for Memory Disturbances, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Ann D Cohen
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Stefan Förster
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universitaet München, Munich, Germany
| | - Juan Fortea
- Neurology Department, Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Kristian S Frederiksen
- Danish Dementia Research Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Yvonne Freund-Levi
- Department of Geriatrics, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Section of Clinical Geriatrics, Institution of NVS, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Olymbia Gkatzima
- Third Department of Neurology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Timo Grimmer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universitaet München, Munich, Germany
| | - Harald Hampel
- Département de Neurologie, Institut de la Mémoire et de la Maladie d'Alzheimer (IM2A), Hôpital Pitié-Stijmsalpêtrière, Boulevard de l'hôpital, F-75013, Paris, France.,AXA Research Fund & UPMC Chair, Sorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 06, Inserm, CNRS, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, Paris, France.,Department of Psychiatry, Alzheimer Memorial Center and Geriatric Psychiatry Branch, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
| | - Lucrezia Hausner
- Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Sabine Hellwig
- Center of Geriatrics and Gerontology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sanna-Kaisa Herukka
- Department of Neurology, University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Peter Johannsen
- Memory Clinic, Danish Dementia Research Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Sebastian Köhler
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Koen van Laere
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mony de Leon
- School of Medicine, Center for Brain Health, New York University, New York
| | - Viviana Lisetti
- Section of Neurology, Center for Memory Disturbances, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Wolfgang Maier
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
| | - Jan Marcusson
- Geriatric Medicine, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Linköping, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Olga Meulenbroek
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Hanne M Møllergård
- Department of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - John C Morris
- Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Arto Nordlund
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Gerald P Novak
- Janssen Research and Development, Titusville, New Jersey
| | - George P Paraskevas
- First Department of Neurology, Eginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Gayan Perera
- Roche Products, Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom.,Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Oliver Peters
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité Berlin, German Center for Neurodegenrative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, Germany
| | - Inez H G B Ramakers
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Lorena Rami
- Alzheimer's Disease and Other Cognitive Disorders Unit, IDIBAPS, Clinic University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Catherine M Roe
- Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Uros Rot
- Center for Cognitive Impairments, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Eckart Rüther
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Isabel Santana
- Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Johannes Schröder
- Sektion Gerontopsychiatrie, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sang W Seo
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hilkka Soininen
- Department of Neurology, University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Luiza Spiru
- Department of Geriatrics-Gerontology-Gerontopsychiatry, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Erik Stomrud
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Hanne Struyfs
- Reference Center for Biological Markers of Dementia (BIODEM), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Charlotte E Teunissen
- Neurochemistry Laboratory and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Stephanie J B Vos
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Linda J C van Waalwijk van Doorn
- Departments of Neurology and Laboratory Medicine, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Gunhild Waldemar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universitaet München, Munich, Germany
| | - Åsa K Wallin
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jens Wiltfang
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden.,Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden.,UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hoffmann K, Sobol NA, Frederiksen KS, Beyer N, Vogel A, Vestergaard K, Brændgaard H, Gottrup H, Lolk A, Wermuth L, Jacobsen S, Laugesen LP, Gergelyffy RG, Høgh P, Bjerregaard E, Andersen BB, Siersma V, Johannsen P, Cotman CW, Waldemar G, Hasselbalch SG. Moderate-to-High Intensity Physical Exercise in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Alzheimers Dis 2015; 50:443-53. [DOI: 10.3233/jad-150817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 160] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kristine Hoffmann
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nanna A. Sobol
- Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Unit, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
- Institute of Sports Medicine Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kristian S. Frederiksen
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nina Beyer
- Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Unit, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
- Institute of Sports Medicine Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Asmus Vogel
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | - Hanne Gottrup
- Dementia Clinic, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Annette Lolk
- Dementia Clinic, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Lene Wermuth
- Dementia Clinic, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Søren Jacobsen
- Department of Geriatrics, Odense University Hospital, Svendborg Hospital, Denmark
| | | | | | - Peter Høgh
- Regional Dementia Research Center, Region Zealand, Roskilde Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Eva Bjerregaard
- Memory Clinic, Glostrup Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Birgitte B. Andersen
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Volkert Siersma
- Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peter Johannsen
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Carl W. Cotman
- Institute for Memory Impairments and Neurological Disorders, University of California-Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Gunhild Waldemar
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Steen G. Hasselbalch
- Danish Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Frederiksen KS, Hasselbalch S, Law I, Højgaard L, Waldemar G. [Biomarkers for early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease]. Ugeskr Laeger 2015; 177:V12140684. [PMID: 26058526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease is responsible for 40-50% of dementia cases. Future treatment may include disease-modifying compounds unlikely to be efficient if administered late in the course, thus necessitating early diagnosis. Furthermore, revised diagnostic research criteria that include biomarkers of pathological accumulation of cortical beta-amyloid (decreased beta-amyloid in cerebrospinal fluid and amyloid imaging) and neurodegeneration (structural MRI and 18F-FDG-PET), have been published. Future research is needed to determine specific evidence-based application of these biomarkers in the clinic as well as discovery of novel biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristian S Frederiksen
- Nationalt Videnscenter for Demens, Neurologisk Klinik, Neurocentret, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 København Ø.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ossenkoppele R, Jansen WJ, Rabinovici GD, Knol DL, van der Flier WM, van Berckel BNM, Scheltens P, Visser PJ, Verfaillie SCJ, Zwan MD, Adriaanse SM, Lammertsma AA, Barkhof F, Jagust WJ, Miller BL, Rosen HJ, Landau SM, Villemagne VL, Rowe CC, Lee DY, Na DL, Seo SW, Sarazin M, Roe CM, Sabri O, Barthel H, Koglin N, Hodges J, Leyton CE, Vandenberghe R, van Laere K, Drzezga A, Forster S, Grimmer T, Sánchez-Juan P, Carril JM, Mok V, Camus V, Klunk WE, Cohen AD, Meyer PT, Hellwig S, Newberg A, Frederiksen KS, Fleisher AS, Mintun MA, Wolk DA, Nordberg A, Rinne JO, Chételat G, Lleo A, Blesa R, Fortea J, Madsen K, Rodrigue KM, Brooks DJ. Prevalence of amyloid PET positivity in dementia syndromes: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2015; 313:1939-49. [PMID: 25988463 PMCID: PMC4517678 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.4669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 428] [Impact Index Per Article: 47.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Amyloid-β positron emission tomography (PET) imaging allows in vivo detection of fibrillar plaques, a core neuropathological feature of Alzheimer disease (AD). Its diagnostic utility is still unclear because amyloid plaques also occur in patients with non-AD dementia. OBJECTIVE To use individual participant data meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of amyloid positivity on PET in a wide variety of dementia syndromes. DATA SOURCES The MEDLINE and Web of Science databases were searched from January 2004 to April 2015 for amyloid PET studies. STUDY SELECTION Case reports and studies on neurological or psychiatric diseases other than dementia were excluded. Corresponding authors of eligible cohorts were invited to provide individual participant data. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Data were provided for 1359 participants with clinically diagnosed AD and 538 participants with non-AD dementia. The reference groups were 1849 healthy control participants (based on amyloid PET) and an independent sample of 1369 AD participants (based on autopsy). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Estimated prevalence of positive amyloid PET scans according to diagnosis, age, and apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 status, using the generalized estimating equations method. RESULTS The likelihood of amyloid positivity was associated with age and APOE ε4 status. In AD dementia, the prevalence of amyloid positivity decreased from age 50 to 90 years in APOE ε4 noncarriers (86% [95% CI, 73%-94%] at 50 years to 68% [95% CI, 57%-77%] at 90 years; n = 377) and to a lesser degree in APOE ε4 carriers (97% [95% CI, 92%-99%] at 50 years to 90% [95% CI, 83%-94%] at 90 years; n = 593; P < .01). Similar associations of age and APOE ε4 with amyloid positivity were observed in participants with AD dementia at autopsy. In most non-AD dementias, amyloid positivity increased with both age (from 60 to 80 years) and APOE ε4 carriership (dementia with Lewy bodies: carriers [n = 16], 63% [95% CI, 48%-80%] at 60 years to 83% [95% CI, 67%-92%] at 80 years; noncarriers [n = 18], 29% [95% CI, 15%-50%] at 60 years to 54% [95% CI, 30%-77%] at 80 years; frontotemporal dementia: carriers [n = 48], 19% [95% CI, 12%-28%] at 60 years to 43% [95% CI, 35%-50%] at 80 years; noncarriers [n = 160], 5% [95% CI, 3%-8%] at 60 years to 14% [95% CI, 11%-18%] at 80 years; vascular dementia: carriers [n = 30], 25% [95% CI, 9%-52%] at 60 years to 64% [95% CI, 49%-77%] at 80 years; noncarriers [n = 77], 7% [95% CI, 3%-18%] at 60 years to 29% [95% CI, 17%-43%] at 80 years. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among participants with dementia, the prevalence of amyloid positivity was associated with clinical diagnosis, age, and APOE genotype. These findings indicate the potential clinical utility of amyloid imaging for differential diagnosis in early-onset dementia and to support the clinical diagnosis of participants with AD dementia and noncarrier APOE ε4 status who are older than 70 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rik Ossenkoppele
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 2Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 3Memory and Aging Center, University of Californ
| | - Willemijn J Jansen
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, the Netherlands
| | - Gil D Rabinovici
- Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco4Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley
| | - Dirk L Knol
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 6Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 5Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, the Netherlan
| | | | - Sander C J Verfaillie
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 2Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marissa D Zwan
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 2Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sofie M Adriaanse
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 2Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Adriaan A Lammertsma
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - William J Jagust
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley7Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley
| | - Bruce L Miller
- Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Howard J Rosen
- Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Susan M Landau
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley7Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley
| | - Victor L Villemagne
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Centre for PET, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Christopher C Rowe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Centre for PET, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Dong Y Lee
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, South Korea
| | - Duk L Na
- Department of Neurology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sang W Seo
- Department of Neurology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Marie Sarazin
- Neurologie de la Mémoire et du Langage, Sorbonne Paris Cité, INSERM UMR S894, Centre Hospitalier Sainte Anne, Université Paris Descartes, France
| | - Catherine M Roe
- Department of Neurology, Knight Alzheimer Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Osama Sabri
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Germany
| | - Henryk Barthel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - John Hodges
- Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Rik Vandenberghe
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer Research Center, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium
| | - Koen van Laere
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer Research Center, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Catholic University Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Stefan Forster
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Munich, Germany
| | - Timo Grimmer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Munich, Germany
| | - Pascual Sánchez-Juan
- IFIMAV and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red sobre Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Cantabria, Spain
| | - Jose M Carril
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, University of Cantabria, Spain
| | - Vincent Mok
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, China
| | - Vincent Camus
- INSERM U930 and Université François Rabelais de Tours, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire Hôpitaux de Tours, France
| | - William E Klunk
- Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ann D Cohen
- Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Philipp T Meyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sabine Hellwig
- Centre for Geriatrics and Gerontology, University Hospital Freiburg, Germany
| | - Andrew Newberg
- Myrna Brind Center of Integrative Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University and Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Kristian S Frederiksen
- Danish Dementia Research Center, Department of Neurology, Righospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Mark A Mintun
- Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - David A Wolk
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Agneta Nordberg
- Center for Alzheimer Research, Translational Alzheimer Neurobiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Juha O Rinne
- Turku PET Centre and Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Finland
| | - Gaël Chételat
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Medicale, Caen, France
| | - Alberto Lleo
- Department of Neurology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rafael Blesa
- Department of Neurology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Fortea
- Department of Neurology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Karine Madsen
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark, Germany
| | | | - David J Brooks
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas39Division of Neuroscience and Medical Research Council Clinical Sciences Centre, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Jansen WJ, Ossenkoppele R, Knol DL, Tijms BM, Scheltens P, Verhey FRJ, Visser PJ, Aalten P, Aarsland D, Alcolea D, Alexander M, Almdahl IS, Arnold SE, Baldeiras I, Barthel H, van Berckel BNM, Bibeau K, Blennow K, Brooks DJ, van Buchem MA, Camus V, Cavedo E, Chen K, Chetelat G, Cohen AD, Drzezga A, Engelborghs S, Fagan AM, Fladby T, Fleisher AS, van der Flier WM, Ford L, Förster S, Fortea J, Foskett N, Frederiksen KS, Freund-Levi Y, Frisoni GB, Froelich L, Gabryelewicz T, Gill KD, Gkatzima O, Gómez-Tortosa E, Gordon MF, Grimmer T, Hampel H, Hausner L, Hellwig S, Herukka SK, Hildebrandt H, Ishihara L, Ivanoiu A, Jagust WJ, Johannsen P, Kandimalla R, Kapaki E, Klimkowicz-Mrowiec A, Klunk WE, Köhler S, Koglin N, Kornhuber J, Kramberger MG, Van Laere K, Landau SM, Lee DY, de Leon M, Lisetti V, Lleó A, Madsen K, Maier W, Marcusson J, Mattsson N, de Mendonça A, Meulenbroek O, Meyer PT, Mintun MA, Mok V, Molinuevo JL, Møllergård HM, Morris JC, Mroczko B, Van der Mussele S, Na DL, Newberg A, Nordberg A, Nordlund A, Novak GP, Paraskevas GP, Parnetti L, Perera G, Peters O, Popp J, Prabhakar S, Rabinovici GD, Ramakers IHGB, Rami L, Resende de Oliveira C, Rinne JO, Rodrigue KM, Rodríguez-Rodríguez E, Roe CM, Rot U, Rowe CC, Rüther E, Sabri O, Sanchez-Juan P, Santana I, Sarazin M, Schröder J, Schütte C, Seo SW, Soetewey F, Soininen H, Spiru L, Struyfs H, Teunissen CE, Tsolaki M, Vandenberghe R, Verbeek MM, Villemagne VL, Vos SJB, van Waalwijk van Doorn LJC, Waldemar G, Wallin A, Wallin ÅK, Wiltfang J, Wolk DA, Zboch M, Zetterberg H. Prevalence of cerebral amyloid pathology in persons without dementia: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2015; 313:1924-38. [PMID: 25988462 PMCID: PMC4486209 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.4668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1010] [Impact Index Per Article: 112.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Cerebral amyloid-β aggregation is an early pathological event in Alzheimer disease (AD), starting decades before dementia onset. Estimates of the prevalence of amyloid pathology in persons without dementia are needed to understand the development of AD and to design prevention studies. OBJECTIVE To use individual participant data meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of amyloid pathology as measured with biomarkers in participants with normal cognition, subjective cognitive impairment (SCI), or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). DATA SOURCES Relevant biomarker studies identified by searching studies published before April 2015 using the MEDLINE and Web of Science databases and through personal communication with investigators. STUDY SELECTION Studies were included if they provided individual participant data for participants without dementia and used an a priori defined cutoff for amyloid positivity. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Individual records were provided for 2914 participants with normal cognition, 697 with SCI, and 3972 with MCI aged 18 to 100 years from 55 studies. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Prevalence of amyloid pathology on positron emission tomography or in cerebrospinal fluid according to AD risk factors (age, apolipoprotein E [APOE] genotype, sex, and education) estimated by generalized estimating equations. RESULTS The prevalence of amyloid pathology increased from age 50 to 90 years from 10% (95% CI, 8%-13%) to 44% (95% CI, 37%-51%) among participants with normal cognition; from 12% (95% CI, 8%-18%) to 43% (95% CI, 32%-55%) among patients with SCI; and from 27% (95% CI, 23%-32%) to 71% (95% CI, 66%-76%) among patients with MCI. APOE-ε4 carriers had 2 to 3 times higher prevalence estimates than noncarriers. The age at which 15% of the participants with normal cognition were amyloid positive was approximately 40 years for APOE ε4ε4 carriers, 50 years for ε2ε4 carriers, 55 years for ε3ε4 carriers, 65 years for ε3ε3 carriers, and 95 years for ε2ε3 carriers. Amyloid positivity was more common in highly educated participants but not associated with sex or biomarker modality. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among persons without dementia, the prevalence of cerebral amyloid pathology as determined by positron emission tomography or cerebrospinal fluid findings was associated with age, APOE genotype, and presence of cognitive impairment. These findings suggest a 20- to 30-year interval between first development of amyloid positivity and onset of dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willemijn J Jansen
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Rik Ossenkoppele
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands3Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the
| | - Dirk L Knol
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Betty M Tijms
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Frans R J Verhey
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter Jelle Visser
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands2Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience
| | | | - Pauline Aalten
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Dag Aarsland
- Center for Age-Related Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Daniel Alcolea
- Neurology Department, Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Ina S Almdahl
- Department of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Steven E Arnold
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Inês Baldeiras
- Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Center University of Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Henryk Barthel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Bart N M van Berckel
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kristen Bibeau
- GlaxoSmithKline, Worldwide Epidemiology, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Kaj Blennow
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - David J Brooks
- Division of Neuroscience, Medical Research Council Clinical Sciences Centre, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark A van Buchem
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Vincent Camus
- CHRU de Tours, CIC INSERM 1415, INSERM U930, and Université François Rabelais de Tours, Tours, France
| | - Enrica Cavedo
- Laboratory of Epidemiology, Neuroimaging and Telemedicine, IRCCS San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy20Sorbonne University, University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris 06, Institut de la Mémoire et de la Maladie d'Alzheimer (IM2A) and Institut
| | - Kewei Chen
- Banner Alzheimer's Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Gael Chetelat
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (Inserm), U1077, Caen, France
| | - Ann D Cohen
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Alexander Drzezga
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sebastiaan Engelborghs
- Reference Center for Biological Markers of Dementia (BIODEM), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Anne M Fagan
- Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Tormod Fladby
- Department of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Adam S Fleisher
- Banner Alzheimer's Institute, Phoenix, Arizona27Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, Indiana28Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego
| | - Wiesje M van der Flier
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands6Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lisa Ford
- Janssen Research and Development, Titusville, New Jersey
| | - Stefan Förster
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technischen Universitaet München, Munich, Germany
| | - Juan Fortea
- Neurology Department, Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Kristian S Frederiksen
- Danish Dementia Research Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Yvonne Freund-Levi
- Department of Geriatrics, Institution of NVS, Section of Clinical Geriatrics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Giovanni B Frisoni
- Laboratory of Epidemiology, Neuroimaging and Telemedicine, IRCCS San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy88Memory Clinic and LANVIE-Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging, University Hospitals, and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Lutz Froelich
- Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Tomasz Gabryelewicz
- Department of Neurodegenerative Disorders, Mossakowski Medical Research Centre Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Kiran Dip Gill
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Department of Biochemistry, Research Block-A, Chandigarh, India
| | - Olymbia Gkatzima
- Third Department of Neurology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | | | - Timo Grimmer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universitaet München, Munich, Germany
| | - Harald Hampel
- AXA Research Fund and UPMC ChairSorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris 06, Institut de la Mémoire et de la Maladie d'Alzheimer and INSERM U1127, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM), Département de Neurologie, Hôpital
| | - Lucrezia Hausner
- Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Sabine Hellwig
- Center of Geriatrics and Gerontology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sanna-Kaisa Herukka
- Department of Neurology, University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | | | - Lianna Ishihara
- GlaxoSmithKline, Worldwide Epidemiology, Epidemiology, Genetic Epidemiology and Neurology, United Kingdom
| | - Adrian Ivanoiu
- Memory Clinic and Neurochemistry Laboratory, Saint Luc University Hospital, Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - William J Jagust
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley
| | - Peter Johannsen
- Memory Clinic, Danish Dementia Research Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ramesh Kandimalla
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Department of Biochemistry, Research Block-A, Chandigarh, India46Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Elisabeth Kapaki
- First Department of Neurology, Neurochemistry Unit and Cognitive and Movement Disorders Clinic, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - William E Klunk
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Sebastian Köhler
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Johannes Kornhuber
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Milica G Kramberger
- Center for Cognitive Impairments, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Koen Van Laere
- Department of Imaging and Pathology, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Susan M Landau
- Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley
| | - Dong Young Lee
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Mony de Leon
- School of Medicine, Center for Brain Health, New York University, New York
| | - Viviana Lisetti
- Section of Neurology, Center for Memory Disturbances, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Alberto Lleó
- Neurology Department, Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Karine Madsen
- Neurobiology Research Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Wolfgang Maier
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
| | - Jan Marcusson
- Geriatric Medicine, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Linköping, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Niklas Mattsson
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Alexandre de Mendonça
- Institute of Molecular Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Olga Meulenbroek
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Philipp T Meyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Mark A Mintun
- Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Vincent Mok
- Lui Che Woo Institute of Innovative Medicine, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - José Luis Molinuevo
- Alzheimer's Disease and Other Cognitive Disorders Unit, IDIBAPS, Clinic University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Hanne M Møllergård
- Department of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - John C Morris
- Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Barbara Mroczko
- Department of Neurodegeneration Diagnostics, Leading National Research Centre in Bialystok (KNOW), Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland
| | - Stefan Van der Mussele
- Reference Center for Biological Markers of Dementia (BIODEM), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Duk L Na
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Andrew Newberg
- Myrna Brind Center of Integrative Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University and Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Agneta Nordberg
- Dept NVS, Center for Alzheimer, Translational Alzheimer Neurobiology, Karolinska Institutet, and Geriatric Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Arto Nordlund
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Gerald P Novak
- Janssen Research and Development, Titusville, New Jersey
| | - George P Paraskevas
- First Department of Neurology, Neurochemistry Unit and Cognitive and Movement Disorders Clinic, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Eginition Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Lucilla Parnetti
- Section of Neurology, Center for Memory Disturbances, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Gayan Perera
- Roche Products, Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom69Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Oliver Peters
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité Berlin, German Center for Neurodegenrative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin, Germany
| | - Julius Popp
- Department of Psychiatry, Service of Old Age Psychiatry and Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Leenaards Memory Centre, University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Sudesh Prabhakar
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Department of Neurology, Nehru Hospital, Chandigarh, India
| | - Gil D Rabinovici
- Department of Neurology, Memory and Aging Center, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Inez H G B Ramakers
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Lorena Rami
- Alzheimer's Disease and Other Cognitive Disorders Unit, IDIBAPS, Clinic University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Juha O Rinne
- Turku PET Centre and Division of Clinical Neurosciences Turku, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | | | | | - Catherine M Roe
- Knight Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Uros Rot
- Center for Cognitive Impairments, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Christopher C Rowe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Centre for PET, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Eckart Rüther
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Osama Sabri
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Páscual Sanchez-Juan
- Neurology Service, Universitary Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Isabel Santana
- Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Center University of Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Marie Sarazin
- Neurologie de la Mémoire et du Langage, Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, Université Paris 5, Paris, France
| | - Johannes Schröder
- Sektion Gerontopsychiatrie, Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Sang W Seo
- Department of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Femke Soetewey
- Reference Center for Biological Markers of Dementia (BIODEM), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Hilkka Soininen
- Department of Neurology, University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Luiza Spiru
- Department of Geriatrics-Gerontology-Gerontopsychiatry, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Hanne Struyfs
- Reference Center for Biological Markers of Dementia (BIODEM), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Charlotte E Teunissen
- Neurochemistry Laboratory and Biobank, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Magda Tsolaki
- Third Department of Neurology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Rik Vandenberghe
- Laboratory for Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer Research Centre KU Leuven, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marcel M Verbeek
- Departments of Neurology and Laboratory Medicine, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Victor L Villemagne
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Centre for PET, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Stephanie J B Vos
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Alzheimer Center Limburg, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Linda J C van Waalwijk van Doorn
- Departments of Neurology and Laboratory Medicine, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud Alzheimer Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Gunhild Waldemar
- Danish Dementia Research Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anders Wallin
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - Åsa K Wallin
- Clinical Memory Research Unit, Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jens Wiltfang
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Georg-August University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - David A Wolk
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Marzena Zboch
- Alzheimer Center, Wroclaw Medical University, Scinawa, Poland
| | - Henrik Zetterberg
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden87UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Frederiksen KS, Sobol N, Beyer N, Hasselbalch S, Waldemar G. Moderate-to-high intensity aerobic exercise in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: a pilot study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2014; 29:1242-8. [PMID: 24733599 DOI: 10.1002/gps.4096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2013] [Revised: 12/11/2013] [Accepted: 02/03/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Physical exercise may modulate neuropathology and symptoms of Alzheimer's disease (AD). This pilot study assessed the feasibility of conducting a study of moderate-to-high intensity aerobic exercise in home-dwelling patients with mild AD. METHODS An uncontrolled preintervention-postintervention test design with a single group receiving the same intervention. A total of eight patients with mild to moderate AD from the Copenhagen Memory clinic were included in the study. The intervention lasted for 14 weeks and consisted of supervised, 1-h sessions of aerobic exercise three times per week (50-60% of heart rate reserve for a two-week adaptation period and 70-80 % of heart rate reserve for the remaining 12 weeks) Feasibility was assessed based on acceptability, including attendance and drop-out, safety, and patients' and caregivers' attitudes towards the intervention as well as other relevant parameters. RESULTS Attendance (mean, range: 90 %, 70-100 %) and retention (seven out of eight) rates were very high. No serious adverse events were observed. In general, patients and caregivers were positive towards the intervention. CONCLUSION This study shows that it is feasible to conduct moderate-to-high intensity aerobic exercise in community-dwelling patients with mild AD. Our findings indicate that aspects such as a longer adaptation period, information about injury prevention, and need for involvement and support from caregivers should be addressed when planning an exercise intervention in an AD population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristian S Frederiksen
- Memory Disorders Research Group, Danish Dementia Research Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Frisoni GB, Jack CR, Bocchetta M, Bauer C, Frederiksen KS, Liu Y, Preboske G, Swihart T, Blair M, Cavedo E, Grothe MJ, Lanfredi M, Martinez O, Nishikawa M, Portegies M, Stoub T, Ward C, Apostolova LG, Ganzola R, Wolf D, Barkhof F, Bartzokis G, DeCarli C, Csernansky JG, deToledo-Morrell L, Geerlings MI, Kaye J, Killiany RJ, Lehéricy S, Matsuda H, O'Brien J, Silbert LC, Scheltens P, Soininen H, Teipel S, Waldemar G, Fellgiebel A, Barnes J, Firbank M, Gerritsen L, Henneman W, Malykhin N, Pruessner JC, Wang L, Watson C, Wolf H, deLeon M, Pantel J, Ferrari C, Bosco P, Pasqualetti P, Duchesne S, Duvernoy H, Boccardi M. The EADC-ADNI Harmonized Protocol for manual hippocampal segmentation on magnetic resonance: evidence of validity. Alzheimers Dement 2014; 11:111-25. [PMID: 25267715 DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.05.1756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 134] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2013] [Revised: 05/05/2014] [Accepted: 05/29/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An international Delphi panel has defined a harmonized protocol (HarP) for the manual segmentation of the hippocampus on MR. The aim of this study is to study the concurrent validity of the HarP toward local protocols, and its major sources of variance. METHODS Fourteen tracers segmented 10 Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cases scanned at 1.5 T and 3T following local protocols, qualified for segmentation based on the HarP through a standard web-platform and resegmented following the HarP. The five most accurate tracers followed the HarP to segment 15 ADNI cases acquired at three time points on both 1.5 T and 3T. RESULTS The agreement among tracers was relatively low with the local protocols (absolute left/right ICC 0.44/0.43) and much higher with the HarP (absolute left/right ICC 0.88/0.89). On the larger set of 15 cases, the HarP agreement within (left/right ICC range: 0.94/0.95 to 0.99/0.99) and among tracers (left/right ICC range: 0.89/0.90) was very high. The volume variance due to different tracers was 0.9% of the total, comparing favorably to variance due to scanner manufacturer (1.2), atrophy rates (3.5), hemispheric asymmetry (3.7), field strength (4.4), and significantly smaller than the variance due to atrophy (33.5%, P < .001), and physiological variability (49.2%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS The HarP has high measurement stability compared with local segmentation protocols, and good reproducibility within and among human tracers. Hippocampi segmented with the HarP can be used as a reference for the qualification of human tracers and automated segmentation algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni B Frisoni
- LENITEM (Laboratory of Epidemiology, Neuroimaging and Telemedicine) IRCCS - Istituto Centro S. Giovanni di Dio - Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; Memory Clinic and LANVIE - Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging, University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Clifford R Jack
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Martina Bocchetta
- LENITEM (Laboratory of Epidemiology, Neuroimaging and Telemedicine) IRCCS - Istituto Centro S. Giovanni di Dio - Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy; Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Corinna Bauer
- Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kristian S Frederiksen
- Memory Disorders Research Group, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Yawu Liu
- Department of Neurology, University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Gregory Preboske
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Tim Swihart
- Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Melanie Blair
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Enrica Cavedo
- LENITEM (Laboratory of Epidemiology, Neuroimaging and Telemedicine) IRCCS - Istituto Centro S. Giovanni di Dio - Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Michel J Grothe
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock, Germany
| | - Mariangela Lanfredi
- Unit of Psychiatry, IRCCS - Centro S. Giovanni di Dio - Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Oliver Martinez
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | | | - Marileen Portegies
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Travis Stoub
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Chadwich Ward
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Liana G Apostolova
- Mary S. Easton Center for Alzheimer's Disease Research and Laboratory of NeuroImaging, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Rossana Ganzola
- Department of Radiology, Université Laval and Centre de Recherche de l'Institut universitaire de santé mentale de Québec, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Dominik Wolf
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Image Analysis Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - George Bartzokis
- Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Charles DeCarli
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Mirjam I Geerlings
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeffrey Kaye
- Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Ronald J Killiany
- Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephane Lehéricy
- Service de Neuroradiologie, Hopital de la Pitie-Salpetriere, Paris, France
| | | | - John O'Brien
- Institute for Ageing and Health, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Lisa C Silbert
- Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Philip Scheltens
- Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Cente and Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hilkka Soininen
- Department of Neurology, University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Stefan Teipel
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Rostock, Germany; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Gunhild Waldemar
- Memory Disorders Research Group, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Andreas Fellgiebel
- Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Josephine Barnes
- Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Institute of Neurology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
| | - Michael Firbank
- Institute for Ageing and Health, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Lotte Gerritsen
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Medical epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Wouter Henneman
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Image Analysis Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nikolai Malykhin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Centre for Neuroscience, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jens C Pruessner
- Department of Psychiatry, McGill Centre for Studies in Aging, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Lei Wang
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Craig Watson
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Henrike Wolf
- Department of Psychiatry Research and Geriatric Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Hospitals, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany
| | - Mony deLeon
- New York University School of Medicine, Center for Brain Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Johannes Pantel
- Institute of General Practice, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Clarissa Ferrari
- Unit of Psychiatry, IRCCS - Centro S. Giovanni di Dio - Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Paolo Bosco
- LENITEM (Laboratory of Epidemiology, Neuroimaging and Telemedicine) IRCCS - Istituto Centro S. Giovanni di Dio - Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Patrizio Pasqualetti
- SeSMIT (Service for Medical Statistics and Information Technology), AFaR (Fatebenefratelli Association for Research), Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Rome, Italy; Unit of Clinical and Molecular Epidemiology, IRCCS "San Raffaele Pisana", Rome, Italy
| | - Simon Duchesne
- Department of Radiology, Université Laval and Centre de Recherche de l'Institut universitaire de santé mentale de Québec, Quebec City, Canada
| | | | - Marina Boccardi
- LENITEM (Laboratory of Epidemiology, Neuroimaging and Telemedicine) IRCCS - Istituto Centro S. Giovanni di Dio - Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Simonsen AH, Mattila J, Hejl AM, Frederiksen KS, Herukka SK, Hallikainen M, van Gils M, Lötjönen J, Soininen H, Waldemar G. Application of the PredictAD software tool to predict progression in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2013; 34:344-50. [PMID: 23222123 DOI: 10.1159/000345554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/01/2012] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The PredictAD tool integrates heterogeneous data such as imaging, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and results from neuropsychological tests for compact visualization in an interactive user interface. This study investigated whether the software tool could assist physicians in the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. METHODS Baseline data from 140 patients with mild cognitive impairment were selected from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Study. Three clinical raters classified patients into 6 categories of confidence in the prediction of early Alzheimer's disease, in 4 phases of incremental data presentation using the software tool. A 5th phase was done with all available patient data presented on paper charts. Classifications by the clinical raters were compared to the clinical diagnoses made by the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative investigators. RESULTS A statistical significant trend (p < 0.05) towards better classification accuracy (from 62.6 to 70.0%) was found when using the PredictAD tool during the stepwise procedure. When the same data were presented on paper, classification accuracy of the raters dropped significantly from 70.0 to 63.2%. CONCLUSION Best classification accuracy was achieved by the clinical raters when using the tool for decision support, suggesting that the tool can add value in diagnostic classification when large amounts of heterogeneous data are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja H Simonsen
- Memory Disorders Research Group, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hoffmann K, Frederiksen KS, Sobol NA, Beyer N, Vogel A, Simonsen AH, Johannsen P, Lolk A, Terkelsen O, Cotman CW, Hasselbalch SG, Waldemar G. Preserving Cognition, Quality of Life, Physical Health and Functional Ability in Alzheimer's Disease: The Effect of Physical Exercise (ADEX Trial): Rationale and Design. Neuroepidemiology 2013; 41:198-207. [DOI: 10.1159/000354632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2013] [Accepted: 07/22/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
28
|
Frederiksen KS, Hasselbalch SG, Hejl AM, Law I, Højgaard L, Waldemar G. Added Diagnostic Value of (11)C-PiB-PET in Memory Clinic Patients with Uncertain Diagnosis. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra 2012; 2:610-21. [PMID: 23341826 PMCID: PMC3551383 DOI: 10.1159/000345783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The added diagnostic value of 11C-PiB-PET for the assessment of the accumulation of cortical beta-amyloid in memory clinic patients with uncertain diagnosis remains undetermined. Methods All patients who underwent PiB-PET at the Copenhagen Memory Clinic between March 2008 and November 2011 were included in this uncontrolled, retrospective study. The standard diagnostic evaluation program included physical and neurological examination, cognitive and functional assessment, a cranial CT or MRI, functional imaging and cerebrospinal fluid sampling. Based on anonymized case reports, three experienced clinicians reached a consensus diagnosis and rated their confidence in the diagnosis before and after disclosure of PiB-PET ratings. PiB-PET scans were rated as either positive or negative. Results A total of 57 patients (17 females, 30 males; age 65.7 years, range 44.2–82.6) were included in the study. Twenty-seven had a positive PiB-PET scan. At the first diagnostic evaluation, 16 patients were given a clinical Alheimer's disease diagnosis (14 PiB positive). Of the 57 patients, 13 (23%) were diagnostically reclassified after PiB-PET ratings were disclosed. The clinicians’ overall confidence in their diagnosis increased in 28 (49%) patients. Conclusion PiB-PET adds to the specialist clinical evaluation and other supplemental diagnostic investigations in the diagnostic classification of patients with uncertain diagnosis in a specialized memory clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K S Frederiksen
- Memory Disorders Research Group, Department of Neurology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Olferiev M, Huang WT, Kirou KA, Gkrouzman E, Lundsgaard D, Frederiksen KS, Fleckner J, Crow MK. Longitudinal analysis of mRNA transcripts and plasma proteins to define a biomarker associated with lupus disease activity. Arthritis Res Ther 2012. [PMCID: PMC3467480 DOI: 10.1186/ar3937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
30
|
Frederiksen KS, Garde E, Skimminge A, Barkhof F, Scheltens P, van Straaten ECW, Fazekas F, Baezner H, Verdelho A, Ferro JM, Erkinjuntti T, Jokinen H, Wahlund LO, O'Brien JT, Basile AM, Pantoni L, Inzitari D, Waldemar G. Corpus callosum tissue loss and development of motor and global cognitive impairment: the LADIS study. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2012; 32:279-86. [PMID: 22262017 DOI: 10.1159/000334949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/05/2011] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the impact of corpus callosum (CC) tissue loss on the development of global cognitive and motor impairment in the elderly. METHODS This study was based on the Leukoaraiosis and Disability (LADIS) study. Assessment of cognitive and motor functions and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were done at baseline and at a 3-year follow-up in nondemented elderly subjects. RESULTS 328 of 639 LADIS subjects had MRIs at baseline and at the 3-year follow-up, which allowed for assessment of CC. Logistic regression revealed differential tissue loss rates in posterior CC in subjects converting to dementia, compared to nonconverters (p < 0.05). Anterior and posterior CC tissue loss was significantly correlated with self-perceived memory impairment in nonconverters (p < 0.05). CC tissue loss was also significantly associated with impaired single leg stance time (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION The present longitudinal study on CC supports the role of callosal tissue loss in the development of global cognitive as well as motor impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristian S Frederiksen
- Memory Disorders Research Group, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Jokinen H, Frederiksen KS, Garde E, Skimminge A, Siebner H, Waldemar G, Ylikoski R, Madureira S, Verdelho A, van Straaten ECW, Barkhof F, Fazekas F, Schmidt R, Pantoni L, Inzitari D, Erkinjuntti T. Callosal tissue loss parallels subtle decline in psychomotor speed. a longitudinal quantitative MRI study. The LADIS Study. Neuropsychologia 2012; 50:1650-5. [PMID: 22497753 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2011] [Revised: 03/11/2012] [Accepted: 03/19/2012] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Cross-sectional studies have suggested that corpus callosum (CC) atrophy is related to impairment in global cognitive function, mental speed, and executive functions in the elderly. Longitudinal studies confirming these findings have been lacking. We investigated whether CC tissue loss is associated with change in cognitive performance over time in subjects with age-related white matter lesions (WML). Two-hundred-fifty-three subjects, aged 65-84 years, were evaluated by using repeated MRI and neuropsychological evaluation at baseline and after 3 years. The effect of overall and regional CC tissue loss on cognitive decline was analyzed with hierarchical linear regression models. After controlling for age, sex, education, and baseline cognitive performance, the rates of tissue loss in the total CC area, and in rostrum/genu and midbody subregions were significantly associated with decline in a compound measure of cognitive speed and motor control, but not in those of executive functions, memory, or global cognitive function. Total CC area and midbody remained significant predictors of speed also after adjusting for baseline WML volume, WML progression, and global brain atrophy. However, the relationship between anterior CC and speed performance was mediated by WML volume. In conclusion, the overall and regional rate of CC tissue loss parallels longitudinal slowing of psychomotor performance. The adverse effect of CC tissue loss on psychomotor function may be driven by altered interhemispheric information transfer between homologous cortical areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna Jokinen
- Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Central Hospital Helsinki, Finland.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Frederiksen KS, Wulf EM, Wassermann K, Sauerberg P, Fleckner J. Identification of hepatic transcriptional changes in insulin-resistant rats treated with peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-alpha agonists. J Mol Endocrinol 2003; 30:317-29. [PMID: 12790802 DOI: 10.1677/jme.0.0300317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR)-alpha controls the expression of multiple genes involved in lipid metabolism, and activators of PPAR-alpha, such as fibrates, are commonly used drugs in the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia and other dyslipidemic states. Recent data have also suggested a role for PPAR-alpha in insulin resistance and glucose homeostasis. In the present study, we have assessed the transcriptional and physiological responses to PPAR-alpha activation in a diet-induced rat model of insulin resistance. The two PPAR-alpha activators, fenofibrate and Wy-14643, were dosed at different concentrations in high-fat fed Sprague-Dawley rats, and the transcriptional responses were examined in liver using cDNA microarrays. In these analyses, 98 genes were identified as being regulated by both compounds. From this pool of genes, 27 correlated to the observed effect on plasma insulin, including PPAR-alpha itself and the leukocyte antigen-related protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP-LAR). PTP-LAR was downregulated by both compounds, and showed upregulation as a result of the high-fat feeding. This regulation was also observed at the protein level. Furthermore, downregulation of PTP-LAR by fenofibric acid was demonstrated in rat FaO hepatoma cells in vitro, indicating that the observed regulation of PTP-LAR by fenofibrate and Wy-14643 in vivo is mediated as a direct effect of the PPAR agonists on the hepatocytes. PTP-LAR is one of the first genes involved in insulin receptor signaling to be shown to be regulated by PPAR-alpha agonists. These data suggest that factors apart from skeletal muscle lipid supply may influence PPAR-alpha-mediated amelioration of insulin resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K S Frederiksen
- Novo Nordisk A/S, Department of Molecular Genetics, Novo Allé 6, DK-2880 Bagsvaerd, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Frederiksen KS, Abrahamsen N, Cristiano RJ, Damstrup L, Poulsen HS. Gene delivery by an epidermal growth factor/DNA polyplex to small cell lung cancer cell lines expressing low levels of epidermal growth factor receptor. Cancer Gene Ther 2000; 7:262-8. [PMID: 10770635 DOI: 10.1038/sj.cgt.7700098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
In the present study, we wanted to determine whether efficient gene delivery using an epidermal growth factor (EGF)/DNA polyplex could be accomplished in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cell lines expressing low EGF receptor (EGFR) levels. EGFR expression levels and transduction efficiencies with polyplexes were examined in five SCLC cell lines and two controls. EGFR expression was examined by binding assays and demonstrated low EGFR levels ranging from 3.6 to 87.4 fmol/mg protein. The SCLC cell lines exhibited high sensitivity to adenovirus infection, which was an important determinant for transduction efficiency when adenovirus was used as an endosomolytic agent. The transduction efficiencies with EGF/DNA polyplexes ranged from 41% +/- 3.5% to 73% +/- 4.6% in the EGFR-positive SCLC cell lines. In the controls lacking EGFRs, only 5% +/- 1.0% and 8% +/- 1.8% of the cells were transduced. Furthermore, the transduction efficiency could be reduced from 50% +/- 4.9% to 18% +/- 1.1% when excess EGF was added to compete with the EGF/DNA polyplexes. In the present study, receptor-targeted gene delivery to SCLC cell lines has been demonstrated for the first time. Our results indicate that even low receptor expression levels in the target cells are sufficient for efficient and specific in vitro gene delivery with EGF/DNA polyplexes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K S Frederiksen
- Section of Radiation Biology, National University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
In the pre-clinical research into the development of gene therapy for cancer, different strategies have evolved and shown promising results in the laboratory. However, most of these strategies will need further refinement to obtain clinical success. This is partly due to the lack of suitable vector systems which specifically can deliver the therapeutic gene to the target cells, and ensure expression of the therapeutic gene. In this review we will give an introduction to different strategies used in cancer gene therapy for neoplasms of the lung, and focus on how to target gene delivery to disseminated lung cancer cells. Tumor specific gene expression can be accomplished at different levels. One way to accomplish targeted gene delivery is by coupling of receptor specific ligands to the vector. Specific gene delivery to cells expressing the target receptor will occur by receptor mediated endocytosis of the vector. Further restriction of gene expression to cancer cells can be accomplished by utilizing promoters predominantly active in tumors. When gene therapy is targeted at different levels, efficient gene delivery to disseminated cancer cells by systemic vector administration will be an attractive future prospect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K S Frederiksen
- Section of Radiation Biology, Finsen Center 3993, National University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|