1
|
Sherman ME, Vierkant RA, Winham SJ, Vachon CM, Carter JM, Pacheco-Spann L, Jensen MR, McCauley BM, Hoskin TL, Seymour L, Gehling D, Fischer J, Ghosh K, Radisky DC, Degnim AC. Benign Breast Disease and Breast Cancer Risk in the Percutaneous Biopsy Era. JAMA Surg 2024; 159:193-201. [PMID: 38091020 PMCID: PMC10719829 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.6382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
Importance Benign breast disease (BBD) comprises approximately 75% of breast biopsy diagnoses. Surgical biopsy specimens diagnosed as nonproliferative (NP), proliferative disease without atypia (PDWA), or atypical hyperplasia (AH) are associated with increasing breast cancer (BC) risk; however, knowledge is limited on risk associated with percutaneously diagnosed BBD. Objectives To estimate BC risk associated with BBD in the percutaneous biopsy era irrespective of surgical biopsy. Design, Setting, and Participants In this retrospective cohort study, BBD biopsy specimens collected from January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2013, from patients with BBD at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, were reviewed by 2 pathologists masked to outcomes. Women were followed up from 6 months after biopsy until censoring, BC diagnosis, or December 31, 2021. Exposure Benign breast disease classification and multiplicity by pathology panel review. Main Outcomes The main outcome was diagnosis of BC overall and stratified as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive BC. Risk for presence vs absence of BBD lesions was assessed by Cox proportional hazards regression. Risk in patients with BBD compared with female breast cancer incidence rates from the Iowa Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program were estimated. Results Among 4819 female participants, median age was 51 years (IQR, 43-62 years). Median follow-up was 10.9 years (IQR, 7.7-14.2 years) for control individuals without BC vs 6.6 years (IQR, 3.7-10.1 years) for patients with BC. Risk was higher in the cohort with BBD than in SEER data: BC overall (standard incidence ratio [SIR], 1.95; 95% CI, 1.76-2.17), invasive BC (SIR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.37-1.78), and DCIS (SIR, 3.10; 95% CI, 2.54-3.77). The SIRs increased with increasing BBD severity (1.42 [95% CI, 1.19-1.71] for NP, 2.19 [95% CI, 1.88-2.54] for PDWA, and 3.91 [95% CI, 2.97-5.14] for AH), comparable to surgical cohorts with BBD. Risk also increased with increasing lesion multiplicity (SIR: 2.40 [95% CI, 2.06-2.79] for ≥3 foci of NP, 3.72 [95% CI, 2.31-5.99] for ≥3 foci of PDWA, and 5.29 [95% CI, 3.37-8.29] for ≥3 foci of AH). Ten-year BC cumulative incidence was 4.3% for NP, 6.6% for PDWA, and 14.6% for AH vs an expected population cumulative incidence of 2.9%. Conclusions and Relevance In this contemporary cohort study of women diagnosed with BBD in the percutaneous biopsy era, overall risk of BC was increased vs the general population (DCIS and invasive cancer combined), similar to that in historical BBD cohorts. Development and validation of pathologic classifications including both BBD severity and multiplicity may enable improved BC risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark E. Sherman
- Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | | | | | | | - Jodi M. Carter
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Tanya L. Hoskin
- Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Lisa Seymour
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Denice Gehling
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Karthik Ghosh
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Amy C. Degnim
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
O'Cathail SM, Qiao M, Muirhead R, Adams R, Rao S, Fisher K, Seymour L, Brown R, Lille T, Ooms A, Maughan TS, Hawkins MA. A Phase 1 Trial of the Safety, Tolerability, and Biological Effects of Intravenous Enadenotucirev (EnAd), a Novel Oncolytic Virus, in Combination with Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (CEDAR). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e329-e330. [PMID: 37785164 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.2379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Novel treatment combinations are required to increase response rates in rectal cancer. EnAd is an intravenous, tumor selective, oncolytic adenovirus with high affinity for malignant colorectal epithelial cells. Pre-clinical evidence of synergy with radiation warranted further clinical evaluation and assessment of safety in combination with chemoradiation (CRT), 25 × 2Gy and concurrent capecitabine. MATERIALS/METHODS EnAd was escalated using 2 dose levels of viral particles (1 × 1012, 3 × 1012), given Monday, Wednesday, Friday over 3 schedules (pre-CRT, pre & post CRT). Toxicity and efficacy were used as dual end points in escalation decisions. A 2-parameter and 3-parameter logistic Time to Event Continual Reassessment Method (TiTE-CRM) were used estimate the dose-toxicity and dose-efficacy relationship, respectively. Results are shown as probability and 95% credible interval (Cr.I). The dose limiting toxicity (DLT) window was 13 weeks. Patients who had not completed their DLT window at the time of a dose decision were included in the safety analysis but down-weighted according to their follow-up time and amount of IMP received. Efficacy was assessed at 13 weeks using MRI Tumor Regression Grade (mrTRG), where mrTRG 1-2 equals response. The trial (NCT03916510) was conducted in 4 UK centers. RESULTS A total of 13 patients were enrolled, 12 of whom were evaluable. Median age was 57 (range 31-84), and 10/13 were male. One patient had two G3 adverse events (AE); diarrhea, acute kidney injury. All other adverse events (AEs) were G1 or 2, with no G4/5 events. The most common AE by organ system was gastrointestinal (20.8%, G1). There were two observed DLTs on Dose schedule 3; leg swelling and acute kidney injury. Responses and toxicities increased with escalating schedules of EnAd (Table 1). CONCLUSION CEDAR is the first trial to successfully combine an intravenous oncolytic adenovirus with radiation, demonstrating the feasibility and acceptability of this approach, and a new paradigm in radiosensitization in rectal cancer. Within this small Phase I study, EnAd demonstrated an acceptable safety profile with evidence of a higher-than-expected rate of response by mrTRG. Translation analysis of tissue, blood and microbiome for biological correlates of radiation synergy is underway. FUNDING PsiOxus, CRUK (A24474). SPONSOR University of Oxford.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S M O'Cathail
- School of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, NA, United Kingdom
| | - M Qiao
- University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - R Muirhead
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - R Adams
- Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - S Rao
- Royal Marsden Hospital, London, NA, United Kingdom
| | - K Fisher
- University of Oxford, Oxford, NA, United Kingdom
| | - L Seymour
- University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - R Brown
- PsiOxus therapeutics, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - T Lille
- Akamis Bio, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - A Ooms
- University of Oxford, Oxford, NA, United Kingdom
| | - T S Maughan
- MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - M A Hawkins
- Department of Radiotherapy, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Coghlan A, Partridge FA, Duque-Correa MA, Rinaldi G, Clare S, Seymour L, Brandt C, Mkandawire TT, McCarthy C, Holroyd N, Nick M, Brown AE, Tonitiwong S, Sattelle DB, Berriman M. A drug repurposing screen for whipworms informed by comparative genomics. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2023; 17:e0011205. [PMID: 37669291 PMCID: PMC10503962 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Hundreds of millions of people worldwide are infected with the whipworm Trichuris trichiura. Novel treatments are urgently needed as current drugs, such as albendazole, have relatively low efficacy. We have investigated whether drugs approved for other human diseases could be repurposed as novel anti-whipworm drugs. In a previous comparative genomics analysis, we identified 409 drugs approved for human use that we predicted to target parasitic worm proteins. Here we tested these ex vivo by assessing motility of adult worms of Trichuris muris, the murine whipworm, an established model for human whipworm research. We identified 14 compounds with EC50 values of ≤50 μM against T. muris ex vivo, and selected nine for testing in vivo. However, the best worm burden reduction seen in mice was just 19%. The high number of ex vivo hits against T. muris shows that we were successful at predicting parasite proteins that could be targeted by approved drugs. In contrast, the low efficacy of these compounds in mice suggest challenges due to their chemical properties (e.g. lipophilicity, polarity, molecular weight) and pharmacokinetics (e.g. absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion) that may (i) promote absorption by the host gastrointestinal tract, thereby reducing availability to the worms embedded in the large intestine, and/or (ii) restrict drug uptake by the worms. This indicates that identifying structural analogues that have reduced absorption by the host, and increased uptake by worms, may be necessary for successful drug development against whipworms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avril Coghlan
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Frederick A. Partridge
- University College London, London, United Kingdom
- School of Life Sciences, University of Westminster, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Simon Clare
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Lisa Seymour
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Nancy Holroyd
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Marina Nick
- University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Araujo D, Greystoke A, Bates S, Bayle A, Calvo E, Castelo-Branco L, de Bono J, Drilon A, Garralda E, Ivy P, Kholmanskikh O, Melero I, Pentheroudakis G, Petrie J, Plummer R, Ponce S, Postel-Vinay S, Siu L, Spreafico A, Stathis A, Steeghs N, Yap C, Yap TA, Ratain M, Seymour L. Oncology phase I trial design and conduct: time for a change - MDICT Guidelines 2022. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:48-60. [PMID: 36182023 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.09.158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
In 2021, the Food and Drug Administration Oncology Center of Excellence announced Project Optimus focusing on dose optimization for oncology drugs. The Methodology for the Development of Innovative Cancer Therapies (MDICT) Taskforce met to review and discuss the optimization of dosage for oncology trials and to develop a practical guide for oncology phase I trials. Defining a single recommended phase II dose based on toxicity may define doses that are neither the most effective nor the best tolerated. MDICT recommendations address the need for robust non-clinical data which are needed to inform trial design, as well as an expert team including statisticians and pharmacologists. The protocol must be flexible and adaptive, with clear definition of all endpoints. Health authorities should be consulted early and regularly. Strategies such as randomization, intrapatient dose escalation, and real-world eligibility criteria are encouraged whereas serial tumor sampling is discouraged in the absence of a strong rationale and appropriately validated assay. Endpoints should include consideration of all longitudinal toxicity. The phase I dose escalation trial should define the recommended dose range for later testing in randomized phase II trials, rather than a single recommended phase II dose, and consider scenarios where different populations may require different dosages. The adoption of these recommendations will improve dosage selection in early clinical trials of new anticancer treatments and ultimately, outcomes for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Araujo
- Hospital de Base, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Brazil
| | - A Greystoke
- Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Newcastle, UK
| | - S Bates
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, USA
| | - A Bayle
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Paris, France
| | - E Calvo
- START Madrid-CIOCC, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal, Madrid, Spain
| | - L Castelo-Branco
- European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - J de Bono
- Institute of Cancer Research, University of London, London; The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - A Drilon
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | - E Garralda
- Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - P Ivy
- National Cancer Institute, USA Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program Investigational Drug Branch (NCI/CTEP/IDB), Bethesda, USA
| | - O Kholmanskikh
- European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products, Brussels, Belgium
| | - I Melero
- CUN and CIMA, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - G Pentheroudakis
- European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - J Petrie
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston
| | - R Plummer
- Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Newcastle, UK
| | - S Ponce
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Paris, France
| | | | - L Siu
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - A Spreafico
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - A Stathis
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - N Steeghs
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C Yap
- Institute of Cancer Research, University of London, London
| | - T A Yap
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - M Ratain
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - L Seymour
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Smoragiewicz M, Bogaerts J, Calvo E, Marabelle A, Perrone A, Seymour L, Shalabi A, Siu LL, Tabernero J, Giaccone G. Design and conduct of early clinical studies of immunotherapy agent combinations: recommendations from the task force on Methodology for the Development of Innovative Cancer Therapies. Ann Oncol 2019; 29:2175-2182. [PMID: 30202892 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The Methodology for the Development of Innovative Cancer Therapies task force considered aspects of the design and conduct of early studies of combinations of immunotherapy agents during their 2018 meeting. The task force defined the relevant data to justify combination clinical trials, which includes a robust hypothesis for the combination, pre-clinical data with evidence of efficacy and an understanding of the pharmacodynamics effects of each agent, and ideally evidence of single agent activity. Evaluation of pharmacodynamic biomarkers is critical in early phase combination trials, and should be incorporated into trial objectives and go/no-go decisions. The task force also identified the need to develop assessment tools and end points that capture the unique patterns of tumour responses to immunotherapy, including pseudoprogression and hyperprogression. At least one additional tumour measurement before baseline and an early CT scan (at 4 weeks for example) would help define the incidence of hyperprogression, although a common definition is needed. Finally, the task force highlighted substantial redundancy and inefficiency in the combination immunotherapy space, and recommended the adoption of innovative trial designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Smoragiewicz
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | | | - E Calvo
- START Madrid-Centro Integral Oncologico Clara Campal Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - A Marabelle
- Drug Development Department (DITEP), Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, INSERM U1015, Villejuif, France
| | - A Perrone
- Translational Medicine, Merck & Co, Kenilworth
| | - L Seymour
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
| | - A Shalabi
- The Anna-Maria Kellen Clinical Accelerator Cancer, Research Institute, New York, USA
| | - L L Siu
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - J Tabernero
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - G Giaccone
- Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Juergens R, Ellis P, Tu D, Hao D, Laurie S, Mates M, Goss G, Goffin J, Bradbury P, Tehfe M, Kollmansberger C, Brown-Walker P, Smoragiewicz M, Tsao M, Seymour L. MA11.04 Platinum Doublet + Durvalumab +/- Tremelimumab in Patients with Advanced NSCLC: A CCTG Phase IB Study - IND.226. J Thorac Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2019.08.586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
7
|
Zhou H, Slominski R, Dave P, Wright W, Seymour L, Bell M, Spandau D, Turner M. LB1566 Investigation of inflammatory response mediators in ex vivo skin culture. J Invest Dermatol 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2018.06.102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
8
|
Seymour L, Giaccone G, Tabernero J. MDICT consensus report: Recommendations regarding response criteria, endpoints and study designs for the development of immunotherapy combinations. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy046.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
9
|
Hilton J, Cescon D, Bedard P, Ritter H, Tu D, Soong J, Gelmon K, Aparicio S, Seymour L. CCTG IND.231: A phase 1 trial evaluating CX-5461 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Ann Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy048.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
10
|
Juergens R, Hao D, Laurie S, Ellis P, Mates M, Bradbury P, Tehfe M, Kollmannsberger C, Arnold A, Goffin J, Wheatley-Price P, Hilton J, Robinson A, Tu D, Brown-Walker P, Seymour L. MA 10.01 Durvalumab ± Tremelimumab with Platinum-Doublets in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Canadian Cancer Trials Group Study IND.226. J Thorac Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.09.533] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
11
|
Hao D, Sengupta A, Ding K, Leighl N, Shepherd F, Seymour L, Weljie A. P2.01-055 Examining Metabolomics as a Prognostic Marker in Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing First-Line Chemotherapy. J Thorac Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.09.1157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
12
|
Bernstein V, Ellard SL, Dent SF, Tu D, Mates M, Dhesy-Thind SK, Panasci L, Gelmon KA, Salim M, Song X, Clemons M, Ksienski D, Verma S, Simmons C, Lui H, Chi K, Feilotter H, Hagerman LJ, Seymour L. A randomized phase II study of weekly paclitaxel with or without pelareorep in patients with metastatic breast cancer: final analysis of Canadian Cancer Trials Group IND.213. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 167:485-493. [PMID: 29027598 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4538-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2017] [Accepted: 10/10/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pelareorep, a serotype 3 reovirus, has demonstrated preclinical and early clinical activity in breast cancer and synergistic cytotoxic activity with microtubule targeting agents. This multicentre, randomized, phase II trial was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding pelareorep to paclitaxel for patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC). METHODS Following a safety run-in of 7 patients, 74 women with previously treated mBC were randomized either to paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks plus pelareorep 3 × 1010 TCID50 intravenously on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 every 4 weeks (Arm A) or to paclitaxel alone (Arm B). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were objective response rate, overall survival (OS), circulating tumour cell counts, safety, and exploratory correlative analyses. All comparisons used a two-sided test at an alpha level of 20%. Survival analyses were adjusted for prior paclitaxel. RESULTS Final analysis was performed after a median follow-up of 29.5 months. Pelareorep was well tolerated. Patients in Arm A had more favourable baseline prognostic variables. Median adjusted PFS (Arm A vs B) was 3.78 mo vs 3.38 mo (HR 1.04, 80% CI 0.76-1.43, P = 0.87). There was no difference in response rate between arms (P = 0.87). Median OS (Arm A vs B) was 17.4 mo vs 10.4 mo (HR 0.65, 80% CI 0.46-0.91, P = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS This first, phase II, randomized study of pelareorep and paclitaxel in previously treated mBC did not show a difference in PFS (the primary endpoint) or RR. However, there was a significantly longer OS for the combination. Further exploration of this regimen in mBC may be of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Bernstein
- BC Cancer Agency, Victoria, BC, V8R 6V5, Canada.
| | | | - S F Dent
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - D Tu
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - M Mates
- Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | | - L Panasci
- Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - M Salim
- Allan Blair Cancer Centre, Regina, SK, Canada
| | - X Song
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - M Clemons
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - D Ksienski
- BC Cancer Agency, Victoria, BC, V8R 6V5, Canada
| | - S Verma
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - C Simmons
- BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - H Lui
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - K Chi
- BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - L J Hagerman
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - L Seymour
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Karim S, Ding K, Bradbury P, Ellis P, Mittman N, Xiaoqun Sun X, Millward M, Liu G, Sun S, Stockler M, Cohen V, Blais N, Sangha R, Boyer M, Sasidharan R, Lee C, Shepherd F, Goss G, Seymour L, Leighl N. Costs of dacomitinib versus placebo in pretreated unselected patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC: CCTG BR.26. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx375.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
14
|
Garbutt M, Rudman A, Seymour L. Toward a Business Process Owner Competency Framework. SACJ 2017. [DOI: 10.18489/sacj.v29i1.454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Process owners are vital to the establishment and functioning of process oriented organizations. However, there is a paucity of understanding regarding the tasks process owners should undertake and what competencies they require. In this study, sets of process owner competencies and process owner tasks emerged from interviews with executives from three financial services organizations in South Africa. The findings were compared to the BPTrends report “State of the Business Process Management Market 2016”. Common themes were identified and validated against recent literature. Based on the validated themes a business process owner competency framework was developed and discussed. The framework shows that business process owners require competencies in core business process management, strategic alignment, determining organizational goals, governance, documentation, training, and systemic thinking. The competencies and tasks identified provide a practical contribution to practitioners and recruiters in the field, while the framework adds a theoretical contribution to the field of business process management.
Collapse
|
15
|
Tsao MS, Le Teuff G, Shepherd FA, Landais C, Hainaut P, Filipits M, Pirker R, Le Chevalier T, Graziano S, Kratze R, Soria JC, Pignon JP, Seymour L, Brambilla E. PD-L1 protein expression assessed by immunohistochemistry is neither prognostic nor predictive of benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in resected non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 2017; 28:882-889. [PMID: 28137741 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2016] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The expression of programmed death (PD) ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein expression assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been correlated with response and survival benefit from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies in advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The efficacy of several agents appears correlated with PD-L1 expression. It remains controversial whether PD-L1 is prognostic in NSCLC. We assessed the prognostic value of PD-L1 IHC and its predictive role for adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage NSCLC. Patients and methods Tumor sections from three pivotal adjuvant chemotherapy trials (IALT, JBR.10, CALGB 9633) using the E1L3N antibody were studied in this pooled analysis. PD-L1 staining intensity and percentage in both tumor cells (TCs) and immune cells (ICs) were scored by two pathologists. The average or consensus PD-L1 expression levels across intensities and/or percent cells stained were correlated with clinicopathological and molecular features, patient survivals and potential benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy. Results Results from 982 patients were available for analysis. Considering staining at any intensities for overall PD-L1 expression, 314 (32.0%), 204 (20.8%) and 141 (14.3%) tumor samples were positive for PD-L1 staining on TCs using cut-offs at ≥1%, ≥10% and ≥25%, respectively. For PD-L1 expressing ICs, 380 (38.7%), 308 (31.4%) and 148 (15.1%) were positive at ≥ 1%, ≥10% and 25% cut-offs, respectively. Positive PD-L1 was correlated with squamous histology, intense lymphocytic infiltrate, and KRAS but not with TP53 mutation. EGFR mutated tumors showed statistically non-significant lower PD-L1 expression. PD-L1 expression was neither prognostic with these cut-offs nor other exploratory cut-offs, nor were predictive for survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions PD-L1 IHC is not a prognostic factor in early stage NSCLC patients. It is also not predictive for adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M-S Tsao
- Department of Pathology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - G Le Teuff
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology and Ligue National Contre le Cancer Meta-analysis Platform, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- U1018 INSERM, CESP, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - F A Shepherd
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network, Princess, Margaret, Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - C Landais
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology and Ligue National Contre le Cancer Meta-analysis Platform, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - P Hainaut
- Institute of Advanced Biosciences, INSERM U1029, University Grenoble Alpes (UGA), Grenoble, France
| | - M Filipits
- Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - R Pirker
- Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - T Le Chevalier
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - S Graziano
- SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA
| | - R Kratze
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - J-C Soria
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - J-P Pignon
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology and Ligue National Contre le Cancer Meta-analysis Platform, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- U1018 INSERM, CESP, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - L Seymour
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group Queens University, Kingston, Canada
| | - E Brambilla
- Institute of Advanced Biosciences, INSERM U1029, University Grenoble Alpes (UGA), Grenoble, France
- Department of Pathology, DACP, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, CHUGA Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tinker A, Hirte H, Provencher D, Butler M, Ritter H, Tu D, Paralejas P, Grenier N, Hahn S, Ramsahai J, Seymour L. Dose ranging study of monalizumab (IPH2201) in patients with gynecologic malignancies: A trial of the Canadian Cancer Trials Group (CCTG): IND221. Eur J Cancer 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(16)32889-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
17
|
Hao D, Juergens R, Laurie S, Mates M, Tehfe M, Bradbury P, Kollmannsberger C, Ellis P, Hilton J, Brown-Walker P, Seymour L. A Canadian Cancer Trials Group phase IB study of durvalumab with or without tremelimumab + standard platinum-doublet chemotherapy in patients with advanced, incurable solid malignancies (IND.226). Eur J Cancer 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(16)32882-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
18
|
De Ruysscher D, Lueza B, Le Péchoux C, Johnson DH, O'Brien M, Murray N, Spiro S, Wang X, Takada M, Lebeau B, Blackstock W, Skarlos D, Baas P, Choy H, Price A, Seymour L, Arriagada R, Pignon JP. Impact of thoracic radiotherapy timing in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: usefulness of the individual patient data meta-analysis. Ann Oncol 2016; 27:1818-28. [PMID: 27436850 PMCID: PMC5035783 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2016] [Revised: 06/24/2016] [Accepted: 06/28/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemotherapy (CT) combined with radiotherapy is the standard treatment of 'limited-stage' small-cell lung cancer. However, controversy persists over the optimal timing of thoracic radiotherapy and CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS We carried out a meta-analysis of individual patient data in randomized trials comparing earlier versus later radiotherapy, or shorter versus longer radiotherapy duration, as defined in each trial. We combined the results from trials using the stratified log-rank test to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HRs). The primary outcome was overall survival. RESULTS Twelve trials with 2668 patients were eligible. Data from nine trials comprising 2305 patients were available for analysis. The median follow-up was 10 years. When all trials were analysed together, 'earlier or shorter' versus 'later or longer' thoracic radiotherapy did not affect overall survival. However, the HR for overall survival was significantly in favour of 'earlier or shorter' radiotherapy among trials with a similar proportion of patients who were compliant with CT (defined as having received 100% or more of the planned CT cycles) in both arms (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.91), and in favour of 'later or longer' radiotherapy among trials with different rates of CT compliance (HR 1.19, 1.05-1.34, interaction test, P < 0.0001). The absolute gain between 'earlier or shorter' versus 'later or longer' thoracic radiotherapy in 5-year overall survival for similar and for different CT compliance trials was 7.7% (95% CI 2.6-12.8%) and -2.2% (-5.8% to 1.4%), respectively. However, 'earlier or shorter' thoracic radiotherapy was associated with a higher incidence of severe acute oesophagitis than 'later or longer' radiotherapy. CONCLUSION 'Earlier or shorter' delivery of thoracic radiotherapy with planned CT significantly improves 5-year overall survival at the expense of more acute toxicity, especially oesophagitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D De Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO Clinic), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands Department of Oncology, Experimental Radiation Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - B Lueza
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology and "Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer" meta-analysis platform, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France CESP, INSERM U1018, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif
| | - C Le Péchoux
- Department of Oncology and radiation therapy, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - D H Johnson
- UT Southwestern University School of Medicine, Dallas, USA
| | - M O'Brien
- EORTC Data Center, Brussels, Belgium
| | - N Murray
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada
| | - S Spiro
- University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - X Wang
- Alliance Data and Statistical Center, Duke University, Durham, USA
| | - M Takada
- Osaka Prefectural Habikino Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - B Lebeau
- Hôpital St Antoine, Paris, France
| | - W Blackstock
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA
| | - D Skarlos
- Second Department of Medical Oncology, Metropolitan Hospital N. Faliro, Athens, Greece
| | - P Baas
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H Choy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA
| | - A Price
- NHS Lothian and University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - L Seymour
- NCIC Clinical Trials Group and Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - R Arriagada
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J-P Pignon
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology and "Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer" meta-analysis platform, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France CESP, INSERM U1018, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Vanderkerken S, Vanheede T, Toncheva V, Schacht E, Wolfert MA, Seymour L, Urtti A. Synthesis and Evaluation of Poly(Ethylene Glycol)-Polylysine Block Copolymers as Carriers for Gene Delivery. J BIOACT COMPAT POL 2016. [DOI: 10.1177/088391150001500202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Different types of poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(l-lysine) PEG-PLL block copolymers were examined for their ability to form polyelectrolyte complexes with DNA, their toxicity toward red blood cells and their in vitro transfection efficiency. The complexation of the polymers with DNA was studied using the ethidium bromide fluorescence technique. All polymers complexed DNA to form particles with sizes ranging from 80 nm to 150 nm. In most cases, smaller particles were also observed, and sometimes populations of even larger particles could be detected. In vitro toxicity toward red blood cells was low. Agglutination of red blood cells with some of the noncomplexed block copolymers was observed, but the aggregates were less dense than with polylysine. Transfection efficiency of 293 cells in vitro in the presence of chloroquine was dependent upon the charge ratio of polymer/DNA. Efficient transfection was achieved for the PEG-PLL block copolymers with linear PLL blocks. On the other hand, very low transfection efficiency was obtained from the PEG-PLL with a dendritic PLL block.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Vanderkerken
- Polymer Materials Research Group, Department of Organic Chemistry, University of Ghent, Krijgslaan 281 S-4bis, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - T. Vanheede
- Polymer Materials Research Group, Department of Organic Chemistry, University of Ghent, Krijgslaan 281 S-4bis, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - V. Toncheva
- Polymer Materials Research Group, Department of Organic Chemistry, University of Ghent, Krijgslaan 281 S-4bis, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - E. Schacht
- Polymer Materials Research Group, Department of Organic Chemistry, University of Ghent, Krijgslaan 281 S-4bis, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - M. A. Wolfert
- CRC Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham School of Medicine, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - L. Seymour
- CRC Institute for Cancer Studies, University of Birmingham School of Medicine, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - A. Urtti
- Department of Pharmaceutics, University of Kuopio, P.O. Box 1627, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Seymour L, Tinker A, Hirte H, Wagtmann N, Dodion P. Phase I and dose ranging, phase II studies with IPH2201, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting HLA-E receptor CD94/NKG2A. Ann Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv081.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
21
|
Litière S, De Vries EGE, Seymour L, Sargent D, Shankar L, Bogaerts J. Reply to Verlingue, Koscielny and Ferté. Eur J Cancer 2014; 50:2889-91. [PMID: 25219450 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2014] [Accepted: 08/01/2014] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S Litière
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | - E G E De Vries
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - L Seymour
- NCIC Clinical trials group, Queens University, Kingston, Canada
| | - D Sargent
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - L Shankar
- NCI Cancer Imaging Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MA, United States
| | - J Bogaerts
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Zer A, Ding K, Lee S, Goss G, Seymour L, Ellis P, Bradbury P, O'Callaghan C, Tsao M, Shepherd F. Pooled Analysis of the Prognostic and Predictive Value of Kras Mutation Status and Mutation Subtype in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (Nsclc) Treated with Egfr Tkis (E-Tki). Ann Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu326.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
23
|
Ellis P, Liu G, Millward M, Perrone F, Shepherd F, Seymour L, Sun S, Cho B, Morabito A, Stockler M, Leighl N, Lee C, Wierzbicki R, Favaretto A, Tsao M, Wilson C, Taylor I, Ding K, Goss G, Bradbury P. The Relationship Between Egfr and Kras Mutation Status and Overall Survival (Os) in the Ncic Ctg Br.26 Randomized Trial of Dacomitinib (D) Versus Placebo (P) in Patients with Previously Treated Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (Nsclc). Ann Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu349.91] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
24
|
Di Y, Seymour L, Fisher K. Activity of a group B oncolytic adenovirus (ColoAd1) in whole human blood. Gene Ther 2014; 21:440-3. [PMID: 24553347 DOI: 10.1038/gt.2014.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2013] [Revised: 11/11/2013] [Accepted: 11/28/2013] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Intravenous (i.v.) delivery of therapeutic viruses to human patients exposes virus particles to the potentially neutralising environment of the human bloodstream, where many components of the innate and adaptive immune system provide a formidable barrier to virus infection of target cells. Here we assess the haemocompatibility of ColoAd1, an oncolytic adenovirus currently undergoing clinical assessment for treatment of disseminated cancer by i.v. delivery. Compared with the commonly used serotype Ad5, ColoAd1 (which has a capsid derived from Ad11p) showed only minor inhibition of oncolytic activity by pooled human serum or washed human blood cells, with the amount of ColoAd1 required to kill cancer cells in vitro (the IC50) increasing <10-fold. However, some virus-blood interactions are concentration- and context-dependent, requiring study in whole, undiluted, human blood. ColoAd1 showed <50-fold increases in the IC50 in whole blood from most donors, whereas the activity of Ad5 was ablated. Extrapolating these findings to the clinical situation indicates that ColoAd1 would 'breakthrough' neutralisation in some patients receiving as few as 10(10) ColoAd1 particles i.v., and in most patients receiving doses of 10(12) or above, well within the achievable dose range.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Di
- Department of Oncology, ORCRB, Roosevelt Drive, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - L Seymour
- Department of Oncology, ORCRB, Roosevelt Drive, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - K Fisher
- Department of Oncology, ORCRB, Roosevelt Drive, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Henningham A, Yamaguchi M, Aziz R, Kuipers K, Dahesh S, Yamaguchi Y, Seymour L, Ben Zakour N, He L, Smith H, Grimwood K, Beatson S, Walker M, Nizet V, Cole J. Nonencapsulated group A
Streptococcus
associated with human invasive disease (790.1). FASEB J 2014. [DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.28.1_supplement.790.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Henningham
- UC San DiegoLA JollaCAUnited States
- University of QueenslandSt LuciaAustralia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lingjun He
- San Diego State UniversitySan DiegoCAUnited States
| | - Helen Smith
- Queensland Health Forensic and Scientific Services Coopers PlainsAustralia
| | | | | | | | | | - Jason Cole
- UC San DiegoLA JollaCAUnited States
- University of QueenslandSt LuciaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Laurie SA, Solomon BJ, Seymour L, Ellis PM, Goss GD, Shepherd FA, Boyer MJ, Arnold AM, Clingan P, Laberge F, Fenton D, Hirsh V, Zukin M, Stockler MR, Lee CW, Chen EX, Montenegro A, Ding K, Bradbury PA. Randomised, double-blind trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel with daily oral cediranib or placebo in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: NCIC Clinical Trials Group study BR29. Eur J Cancer 2013; 50:706-12. [PMID: 24360368 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.11.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2013] [Revised: 11/22/2013] [Accepted: 11/25/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study evaluated the addition of cediranib, an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1-3, to standard carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS Eligible patients received paclitaxel (200mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (area under the concentration time curve 6) intravenously every 3 weeks. Daily oral cediranib/placebo 20mg was commenced day 1 of cycle 1 and continued as monotherapy after completion of 4-6 cycles of chemotherapy. The primary end-point of the study was overall survival (OS). The trial would continue to full accrual if an interim analysis (IA) for progression-free survival (PFS), performed after 170 events of progression or death in the first 260 randomised patients, revealed a hazard ratio (HR) for PFS of ⩽ 0.70. RESULTS The trial was halted for futility at the IA (HR for PFS 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-1.20, p = 0.45). A final analysis was performed on all 306 enrolled patients. The addition of cediranib increased response rate ([RR] 52% versus 34%, p = 0.001) but did not significantly improve PFS (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.71-1.18, p = 0.49) or OS (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.69-1.30, p=0.72). Cediranib patients had more grade 3 hypertension, diarrhoea and anorexia. CONCLUSIONS The addition of cediranib 20mg daily to carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy increased RR and toxicity, but not survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S A Laurie
- The NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; The Australasian Lung Cancer Trials Group and the NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - B J Solomon
- The NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; The Australasian Lung Cancer Trials Group and the NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - L Seymour
- The NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; The Australasian Lung Cancer Trials Group and the NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - P M Ellis
- The NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; The Australasian Lung Cancer Trials Group and the NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - G D Goss
- The NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; The Australasian Lung Cancer Trials Group and the NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - F A Shepherd
- The NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; The Australasian Lung Cancer Trials Group and the NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - M J Boyer
- The NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; The Australasian Lung Cancer Trials Group and the NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - A M Arnold
- The NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; The Australasian Lung Cancer Trials Group and the NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - P Clingan
- The NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; The Australasian Lung Cancer Trials Group and the NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - F Laberge
- The NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; The Australasian Lung Cancer Trials Group and the NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - D Fenton
- The NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; The Australasian Lung Cancer Trials Group and the NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - V Hirsh
- The NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; The Australasian Lung Cancer Trials Group and the NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - M Zukin
- The NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; The Australasian Lung Cancer Trials Group and the NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - M R Stockler
- The NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; The Australasian Lung Cancer Trials Group and the NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - C W Lee
- The NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; The Australasian Lung Cancer Trials Group and the NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - E X Chen
- The NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; The Australasian Lung Cancer Trials Group and the NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - A Montenegro
- The NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; The Australasian Lung Cancer Trials Group and the NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - K Ding
- The NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; The Australasian Lung Cancer Trials Group and the NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - P A Bradbury
- The NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; The Australasian Lung Cancer Trials Group and the NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Dent SF, Gelmon KA, Chi KN, Jonker DJ, Wainman N, Capier CA, Chen EX, Lyons JF, Seymour L. NCIC CTG IND.181: phase I study of AT9283 given as a weekly 24 hour infusion in advanced malignancies. Invest New Drugs 2013; 31:1522-9. [PMID: 24072436 DOI: 10.1007/s10637-013-0018-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2013] [Accepted: 08/23/2013] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE AT9283 is a potent inhibitor of the mitotic regulators, Aurora-kinases A and B, and has shown anti-tumor activity in patients with solid and haematological malignancies. This phase I study assessed safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of AT9283. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced, incurable solid tumors or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma received AT9283 as a continuous 24-hour infusion on days 1, 8 of a 21-day cycle. A 3 + 3 dose escalation design was used with a starting dose of 1.5 mg/m(2)/day. Pharmacokinetic samples were collected from all patients on cycle one, and pharmacodynamic samples were collected from 4 patients at the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). RESULTS 35 patients were evaluable for toxicity and 32 were evaluable for response. AT9283 was well tolerated, with main toxicities being reversible dose-related fatigue, gastrointestinal disturbance, anemia, lymphocytopenia and neutropenia. The dose limiting toxicities were febrile neutropenia (two patients) and neutropenia with grade 3 infection (1 patient) at 47 mg/m(2)/day (established as the maximum tolerated dose). The RP2D was 40 mg/m(2)/day. Pharmacokinetic analyses showed AT9283 appeared to follow linear kinetics, with a mean elimination half-life of 8.2 h. Pharmacodynamic analyses showed no consistent or significant changes, but trends suggested evidence of AT9283 inhibition and anti-proliferative activity. One patient had partial response and four patients experienced RECIST stable disease (median 2.6 months). CONCLUSION In this study, AT9283 was well tolerated. The RP2D is 40 mg/m(2)/day on days 1, 8 of a 21-day cycle. Ongoing AT9283 trials will assess efficacy and safety in solid and haematological cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S F Dent
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON, Canada, K1H 8L6,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Litière S, Bogaerts J, Seymour L, Vries ED. 13 From warehouse to new RECIST criteria? Eur J Cancer 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(12)71812-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
29
|
Abstract
This article describes the synthesis of biodegradable polyphosphazenes. The rate of degradation can be varied in a controllable manner by the introduction of hydrolysis-sensitive amino acid ester side groups or by blending of polymers. Biodegradable polyphosphazenes can be used for the preparation of drug-containing implants and this is illustrated for devices containing the cytostatic agent mitomycin C. This article reviews data about the degradation characteristics of poly[(amino acid ester)phosphazene] derivatives that have been discussed previously. Some new data about MMC-containing poly[(organo)phosphazene] devices are discussed as well. (c) 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Schacht
- Department of Organic Chemistry, Biomaterial & Polymer Research Group, University of Ghent, Krijgslaan 281 S-4, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hainaut P, Ma X, Lacas B, Tsao M, Douillard J, Rousseau V, Dunant A, Seymour L, Filipits M, Graziano S. Lace-Bio Pooled Analysis of the Prognostic and Predictive Value of TP53 Mutations in Completely Resected Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Ann Oncol 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/s0923-7534(20)33753-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
31
|
Reiman T, Lai R, Veillard AS, Paris E, Soria JC, Rosell R, Taron M, Graziano S, Kratzke R, Seymour L, Shepherd FA, Pignon JP, Sève P. Cross-validation study of class III beta-tubulin as a predictive marker for benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in resected non-small-cell lung cancer: analysis of four randomized trials. Ann Oncol 2012; 23:86-93. [PMID: 21471564 PMCID: PMC3276322 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdr033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2010] [Revised: 01/19/2011] [Accepted: 01/20/2011] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The IALT, JBR.10, ANITA and Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9633 trials compared adjuvant chemotherapy with observation for patients with resected non-small-cell lung cancer (R-NSCLC). Data from the metastatic setting suggest high tumor class III beta-tubulin (TUBB3) expression is a determinant of insensitivity to tubulin-targeting agents (e.g. vinorelbine, paclitaxel). In 265 patients from JBR.10 (vinorelbine-cisplatin versus observation), high TUBB3 was an adverse prognostic factor and was associated (nonsignificantly) with 'greater' survival benefit from chemotherapy. We explored this further in additional patients from JBR.10 and the other three trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS TUBB3 immunohistochemical staining was scored for 1149 patients on the four trials. The original JBR.10 cut-off scores were used to classify tumors as TUBB3 high or low. The prognostic and predictive value of TUBB3 on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed by Cox models stratified by trial and adjusted for clinical factors. RESULTS High TUBB3 expression was prognostic for OS [hazard ratio (HR)=1.27 (1.07-1.51), P=0.008) and DFS [HR=1.30 (1.11-1.53), P=0.001). TUBB3 was not predictive of a differential treatment effect [interaction P=0.20 (OS), P=0.23 (DFS)]. Subset analysis (n=420) on vinorelbine-cisplatin gave similar results. CONCLUSIONS The prognostic effect of high TUBB3 expression in patients with R-NSCLC has been validated. We were unable to confirm a predictive effect for TUBB3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Reiman
- Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University and Department of Oncology, Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John.
| | - R Lai
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Cross Cancer Institute and University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada; Departments of
| | | | - E Paris
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology
| | - J C Soria
- Medicine, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Paris, France
| | - R Rosell
- Department of Medicine, Institut Catala d'Oncologia, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Taron
- Department of Medicine, Institut Catala d'Oncologia, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Graziano
- Department of Medicine, State University of New York, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse
| | - R Kratzke
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA
| | - L Seymour
- NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston
| | - F A Shepherd
- Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - P Sève
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hopital de la Croix Rousse
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Hilton JF, Seymour L, Le Maitre A, Tu D, Shepherd FA, Bradbury PA. An evaluation of the possible interaction of gastric acid suppressive medication and the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.7523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
33
|
Addison CL, Ding K, Zhao H, Le Maitre A, Laurie SA, Goss GD, Shepherd FA, Bradbury PA, Seymour L. Angiogenic factors and soluble receptors in NCIC CTG BR.24. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.15_suppl.3047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
34
|
Hotte S, Chen E, McIntosh L, Hirte H, Turner S, Jarvi A, Squires M, Seymour L. 491 NCIC CTG IND.177: Phase I study of AT7519M given as a short infusion twice weekly. EJC Suppl 2010. [DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6349(10)72198-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
35
|
Gelmon K, Dent S, Chi K, Jonker D, Wainman N, Simpson R, Capier K, Chen E, Squires M, Seymour L. 512 NCIC CTG IND.181: Phase I study of AT9283 given as a weekly 24 hour infusion. EJC Suppl 2010. [DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6349(10)72219-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
36
|
Goodwin R, Ding K, Seymour L, LeMaître A, Arnold A, Shepherd F, Dediu M, Ciuleanu T, Fenton D, Zukin M, Walde D, Laberge F, Vincent M, Ellis P, Laurie S. Treatment-emergent hypertension and outcomes in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy with or without the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor cediranib: NCIC Clinical Trials Group Study BR24. Ann Oncol 2010; 21:2220-2226. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdq221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
37
|
Liu G, Cheng D, Le Maitre A, Liu N, Chen Z, Seymour L, Ding K, Shepherd FA, Tsao MS. EGFR and ABCG2 polymorphisms as prognostic and predictive markers in the NCIC CTG BR.21 trial of single-agent erlotinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Clin Oncol 2010. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.28.15_suppl.7538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
38
|
Benlahrech A, Harris J, Meiser A, Papagatsias T, Hornig J, Hayes P, Lieber A, Athanasopoulos T, Bachy V, Daniels R, Fisher K, Gotch F, Klavinskis L, Seymour L, Logan K, Barbagallo R, Dickson G, Patterson S. OA07-02. Adenovirus vectors induce expansion of memory CD4 T cells with a mucosal homing phenotype that are readily susceptible to HIV-1 infection. Retrovirology 2009. [PMCID: PMC2767574 DOI: 10.1186/1742-4690-6-s3-o50] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
|
39
|
Papagatsias T, Athanasopoulos T, Meiser A, Benlahrech A, Li F, Self S, Harris J, Roesen N, Bachy V, Klavinskis L, Fisher K, Oh S, Kwong S, Daniels R, Seymour L, Dickson G, Patterson S. P17-21. Using ubiquitin fusion to augment CD8+ T cell immune responses against HIV-1 antigens. Retrovirology 2009. [PMCID: PMC2767808 DOI: 10.1186/1742-4690-6-s3-p303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
|
40
|
Bezwoda WR, Seymour L, Ariad S, Macphail P. Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia in Adults. Prognostic Factors and 10 Year Treatment Results. Leuk Lymphoma 2009; 5:347-55. [DOI: 10.3109/10428199109067628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
41
|
Goodwin RA, Seymour L, Ding K, Gauthier I, Le Maitre A, Frymire E, Arnold A, Shepherd FA, Goss GD, Laurie SA. Hypertension (HTN) in National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group study BR.24: A randomized, double-blind phase II trial of carboplatin (C) and paclitaxel (P) with either daily oral cediranib (CED), an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, or placebo, in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.3527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3527 Background: CED 30 mg/d with C+P increased response rate (RR: 38 vs 16% p < 0.0001) and median progression free survival (PFS: 5.6 vs 5 m, hazard ratio [HR] 0.77) over C+P alone. HTN is a known effect of angiogenesis inhibitors (AI). For BR.24, we describe the incidence of HTN, effects on drug delivery, predictors of its development/worsening, and assess the predictive effect of HTN on efficacy. Methods: Pts received C+P plus either placebo (n =146) or CED (n = 148). HTN as an adverse event (HTN AE: defined as either new onset HTN, or worsening grade HTN in a previously hypertensive pt), was managed with a protocol-defined algorithm. Exploratory analyses characterized the relationship between HTN AE and baseline characteristics and treatment arm. Kaplan Meier curves summarized time to event outcomes and Cox regression models with time dependent covariates correlated HTN AE to outcomes. Results: Rate of pts with a history of HTN were similar: CED 26 %, placebo 33 %. CED pts had significantly higher HTN AE (any: 38 vs 12%, p < 0.0001; grade 3 or 4: 19 vs 2 %). With the treatment algorithm, HTN AE had minimal impact on drug delivery (1 pt interrupted C+P, 11 pts [3.7%] reduced /discontinued CED / placebo). Headache was the only other AE that correlated with HTN AE. Predictors of HTN AE included: CED arm (p < 0.0001), good ECOG (p = 0.02), female (p = 0.006), history of HTN (p = 0.06). CED pts with HTN AE had significantly higher RR (51.8 vs 32.6%, p = 0.025) and PFS (8.5 vs 5.1 m; HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.72, p = 0.0007); similar but not significant findings were observed with placebo (RR 35.3 vs 17.2%, p= 0.098; PFS 5.6 vs 4.9 m; HR 0.84, 95 % CI 0.45–1.54); the interaction term by treatment arm was not significant. Conclusions: CED pts had greater HTN AE, but this did not impact drug delivery. Certain baseline characteristics predicted HTN AE in all pts. Unexpectedly, development of on-study HTN predicted improved outcome in all pts, although to a greater extent for those on CED. Additional evaluation of the role of HTN AE as a predictor of efficacy of both AI and cytotoxics is warranted. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R. A. Goodwin
- National Cancer Institute of Canada, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - L. Seymour
- National Cancer Institute of Canada, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - K. Ding
- National Cancer Institute of Canada, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - I. Gauthier
- National Cancer Institute of Canada, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - A. Le Maitre
- National Cancer Institute of Canada, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - E. Frymire
- National Cancer Institute of Canada, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - A. Arnold
- National Cancer Institute of Canada, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - F. A. Shepherd
- National Cancer Institute of Canada, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - G. D. Goss
- National Cancer Institute of Canada, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - S. A. Laurie
- National Cancer Institute of Canada, Kingston, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Vincent MD, Butts C, Seymour L, Ding K, Graham B, Twumasi-Ankrah P, Gandara D, Schiller J, Green M, Shepherd F. Updated survival analysis of JBR.10: A randomized phase III trial of vinorelbine/cisplatin versus observation in completely resected stage IB and II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Clin Oncol 2009. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.7501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
7501 Background: JBR.10 was one of a number of phase III trials that established adjuvant cisplatin based chemotherapy as a recommended treatment in completely resected NSCLC . Long-term follow-up of these trials is important to document persistent benefit and potential late toxicities of adjuvant therapy. We report the updated survival data for JBR.10 with more than 9 years median follow up. Methods: Patients with completely resected stage IB (T2N0) or II (T1–2N1) NSCLC were randomized to receive 4 cycles of vinorelbine/cisplatin or observation.. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for overall (OS) and disease specific survival (DSS). Log-rank test was used to compare survival distribution and to test cause specific hazard. For the competing risk analysis, the Gray test was used to test the difference in cause specific incidences. All efficacy analyses were done on an ITT basis. Results: 482 patients were randomized. Data cut-off for this update was July 2008. Median follow-up is 9.3 years (3.2–13.8 y). 12 patients were lost to follow up, a median 4.9 years from randomization (1.5–12 years). 271 deaths have occurred, 73% due to lung cancer or its treatment. Survival analysis continues to show a benefit for chemotherapy: HR .78 (CI .61-.99, p=.04). The benefit appears to be confined to N1 patients: median OS 6.8 y versus 3.6 y, HR .68 (CI .5-.92, p=.01). N0 patients did not appear to benefit: HR 1.03 (CI .7–1.52, p=.87). Chemotherapy significantly prolonged DSS, HR.73 (CI .55-.97, p=.03) Competing risk analysis showed observation to be associated with significantly higher risk of death from lung cancer (p=.02) with no difference in incidences of death from other causes between arms (p=.62). Conclusions: Prolonged follow-up of patients in the JBR.10 trial continues to show a benefit in survival for adjuvant chemotherapy. This benefit appears to be confined to N1 patients. There was no increase in death from other causes in the chemotherapy arm. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. D. Vincent
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada; Cross Cancer Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada; NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada; UC Davis Cancer Centre, Sacremento, CA; Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX; NMCR, Atlanta, GA; Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - C. Butts
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada; Cross Cancer Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada; NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada; UC Davis Cancer Centre, Sacremento, CA; Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX; NMCR, Atlanta, GA; Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - L. Seymour
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada; Cross Cancer Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada; NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada; UC Davis Cancer Centre, Sacremento, CA; Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX; NMCR, Atlanta, GA; Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - K. Ding
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada; Cross Cancer Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada; NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada; UC Davis Cancer Centre, Sacremento, CA; Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX; NMCR, Atlanta, GA; Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - B. Graham
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada; Cross Cancer Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada; NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada; UC Davis Cancer Centre, Sacremento, CA; Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX; NMCR, Atlanta, GA; Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - P. Twumasi-Ankrah
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada; Cross Cancer Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada; NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada; UC Davis Cancer Centre, Sacremento, CA; Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX; NMCR, Atlanta, GA; Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - D. Gandara
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada; Cross Cancer Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada; NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada; UC Davis Cancer Centre, Sacremento, CA; Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX; NMCR, Atlanta, GA; Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - J. Schiller
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada; Cross Cancer Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada; NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada; UC Davis Cancer Centre, Sacremento, CA; Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX; NMCR, Atlanta, GA; Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - M. Green
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada; Cross Cancer Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada; NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada; UC Davis Cancer Centre, Sacremento, CA; Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX; NMCR, Atlanta, GA; Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - F. Shepherd
- London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada; Cross Cancer Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada; NCIC Clinical Trials Group, Kingston, ON, Canada; UC Davis Cancer Centre, Sacremento, CA; Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX; NMCR, Atlanta, GA; Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Bradbury PA, Twumasi-Ankrah P, Ding K, Leighl NB, Goss GD, Laurie S, Shepherd FA, Seymour L. The impact of brain metastases on overall survival (OS) in National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) clinical trials (CT) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Clin Oncol 2009. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.8075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
8075 Background: NSCLC patients (pts) with brain metastases (BMet) commonly are excluded from participating in clinical trials (CTs), based on perceptions of inferior outcomes. We evaluated the validity of this exclusion criterion, by investigating the OS of stage IV NSCLC pts with (BMet) and without (non-BMet) a prior history of BMet recruited to NCIC CTG CTs. Methods: This pooled analysis utilized data from BR.18 (paclitaxel/ carboplatin [PC] ± MMPI [BMS275291]), BR.21 (erlotinib vs. placebo), BR.24 (PC± VEGFR TKI [AZD2171]). Each trial permitted entry of pts with neurologically stable BMet, provided they had been treated and off corticosteroids (BR.24), or either treated or not but without corticosteroids (BR.18), or on a stable corticosteroid dose (BR.21). The primary end-point of these analyses was OS, evaluated in the pooled pt cohorts stratified by treatment arm, and in each trial individually. Results: Of 1,349 stage IV pts, 131 had a history of BMet. Of these, 103 (78%) pts had cranial radiation prior to randomization and 15 (11%) prior craniotomy. The median age of the BMet cohort was 56yrs vs. 61yrs for non-BMet cohort. There was no difference in baseline PS (BMet: PS 0–1 vs. 2 vs. 3 =74% vs. 21% vs.5%; non-BMet: 81% vs. 16% vs. 4%, p=0.16), weight loss (p=0.73) or hemoglobin (p=0.80) between the two cohorts. Female gender (41% vs. 33%, p=0.04) and adenocarcinoma (66% vs. 51%, p=0.005) was more common in the BMet cohort. There was no OS difference between the BMet and non-BMet cohort in the pooled analysis, stratified by trial (HR 1.05, 95%CI 0.85–1.28, stratified log-rank p=0.67), or in multivariate analysis adjusted for baseline covariates (AHR 1.12, 95%CI 0.91–1.37, p=0.31). There was also no OS difference between BMet and non-BMet pts when evaluated in each individual trial separately. Conclusions: Pts with a prior history of BMet have a similar OS to those pts without BMet in NSCLC in NCIC CTG CTs. In neurologically stable pts, BMet, should not be an exclusion criterion, while discontinuation or stable dose of corticosteroids appears a reasonable eligibility requirement. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P. A. Bradbury
- NCIC CTG, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - P. Twumasi-Ankrah
- NCIC CTG, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - K. Ding
- NCIC CTG, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - N. B. Leighl
- NCIC CTG, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - G. D. Goss
- NCIC CTG, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - S. Laurie
- NCIC CTG, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - F. A. Shepherd
- NCIC CTG, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - L. Seymour
- NCIC CTG, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada; Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Dhani NC, Tu D, Parulekar W, Seymour L, Moore MJ. A retrospective analysis of tumor size (TS) as a continuous rather than discrete variable in advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.e15565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e15565 Background: Objective “response rate” (RR) dichotomizes patients into categories of “response” (complete or partial) and “non-response”. This ignores a lot of data captured within the trial on tumor size changes, and may miss clinically important effects on tumor growth may occur in the absence of a response. Analyzing TS as a continuous variable (TS-CV) has been suggested as a more robust indicator of efficacy. Methods: Tumor size data from 2 randomized controlled trials in advanced pancreatic cancer conducted by NCIC.CTG were analyzed; NCIC.PA1 randomized patients to BAY12–9566 (MMPI) or Gemcitabine (Gem) and demonstrated a large and significant survival (OS) benefit for Gem (6.7 vs 3.4 months), NCIC.PA.3 randomized patients to Gem ± Erlotinib and showed a modest OS benefit for the combination (HR =0.81). In PA1, an early interim analysis (IA) using absence of progression as the primary measure did not halt accrual. Measures of TS at baseline and 8 wks were transformed and represented as a logarithm of the sum of the longest diameters. The difference in logarithms (d-LTS) from baseline to 8 weeks was calculated to indicate change in tumor size. Groups were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Results: In PA1, TS was significantly decreased in the Gem arm (mean d-LTS 0.087 on MMPI vs. -0.066 on Gem; p<0.0001), in keeping with the OS benefit (p<0.001). The decrease was also significant in the interim analysis cohort (p=0.007) and this result would, if used, have halted accrual earlier. In PA3, for all patients, decrease in TS was significantly larger for the combination arm (mean d- LTS -0.148 on combination vs. -0.114 on Gem; p=0.04), consistent with the OS benefit (p=0.038). Analysis on the 1st 130 patients yielded similar results (p=0.02) Conclusions: Tumor size changes may be a reasonable endpoint for screening efficacy trials in advanced pancreatic cancer. These results support further assessment of this alternate efficacy endpoint. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N. C. Dhani
- University Health Network, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; National Cancer Institute of Canada, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - D. Tu
- University Health Network, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; National Cancer Institute of Canada, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - W. Parulekar
- University Health Network, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; National Cancer Institute of Canada, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - L. Seymour
- University Health Network, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; National Cancer Institute of Canada, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - M. J. Moore
- University Health Network, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; National Cancer Institute of Canada, Kingston, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Goss GD, Addison C, Shepherd F, Seymour L, LeMaitre A, Ding K. TGF-α and amphiregulin levels in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (pts) treated with erlotinib/placebo in the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) BR.21. J Clin Oncol 2009. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.11023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
11023 Background: In BR.21, erlotinib prolonged survival of previously treated NSCLC pts. We examined the predictive/ prognostic effects of the EGFR ligands, TGFa and amphiregulin(Am). Methods: Plasma was collected prior to treatment in consenting pts. TGFa and Am were analyzed by ELISA (R&D Systems). Samples were blinded, measured in duplicate and ligand concentrations determined following interpolation of a standard curve generated from known quantities of recombinant proteins. Sensitivity was ∼3pg/ml. Cutoff points for TGFa were <10 (low) and ≥10 (high); for Am <1.5 (low) vs 1.5–10 (intermediate) vs >10 (high). Standard statistical methods were used to correlate biomarker data with baseline characteristics and outcomes. Results: In 731 randomized pts, 539 were evaluable for both markers; there was a significant interaction (p=0.03) between the evaluable and inevaluable cohorts (erlotinib benefit favoring the evaluable cohort); evaluable pts were more likely to be male, > 60 and to have EGFR amplification. Baseline high TGFa was associated with poorer ECOG PS (p=0.03) while high Am was associated with worse PS (p<0.0001), anemia (p<0.0001), non response to prior therapies (p=0.01) and no-prior platinum therapy (p=0.02). Although TGFa was not prognostic for OS (HR=1.0, p=0.99), high Am was (HR: Middle vs low: 0.94, 95% C.I 0.49 -1.81; high vs.low: 2.04, 95% C.I 1.43 - 2.91; p=0.0002). High TGFa was a poor prognostic factor for PFS (HR 1.4, p=0.07) as was elevated Am (HR: Middle vs low: 1.02, 95% C.I 0.56 -1.85; high vs. low: 1.67, 95% C.I 1.19 - 2.35, p=0.01). In multivariate analyses including both ligands, high Am remained prognostic, but neither ligand was predictive. Conclusions: High levels of baseline Am appears to be a poor prognostic factor, while low levels of TGFa showed a trend to predict benefit from erlotinib in univariate analyses. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G. D. Goss
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada; The Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; National Cancer Institute of Canada, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - C. Addison
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada; The Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; National Cancer Institute of Canada, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - F. Shepherd
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada; The Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; National Cancer Institute of Canada, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - L. Seymour
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada; The Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; National Cancer Institute of Canada, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - A. LeMaitre
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada; The Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; National Cancer Institute of Canada, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - K. Ding
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada; The Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; National Cancer Institute of Canada, Kingston, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Bradbury P, Meyer R, Pater J, Tu D, Seymour L, Shepherd L, Eisenhauer E. Stopping a trial early in oncology: for patients or for industry? Ann Oncol 2009; 20:395-6. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdn753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
47
|
Chi K, Seymour L. Reply to the letter “About sorafenib in castration-resistant prostate cancer” by G. Colloca, F. Checcaglini and A. Venturino. Ann Oncol 2008; 19:1813-1814. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdn549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
48
|
Ding K, Pater J, Whitehead M, Seymour L, Shepherd F. Validation of treatment induced specific adverse effect as a predictor of treatment benefit: A case study of NCIC CTG BR21. Contemp Clin Trials 2008; 29:527-36. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2007] [Revised: 10/30/2007] [Accepted: 01/03/2008] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
49
|
Tsao MS, Zhu C, Ding K, Strumpf D, Pintilie M, Meyerson M, Seymour L, Jurisica I, Shepherd FA. A 15-gene expression signature prognostic for survival and predictive for adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in JBR.10 patients. J Clin Oncol 2008. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.7510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
50
|
Duran I, Siu LL, Jimeno A, Panisko D, Seymour L. Development of core competencies in drug development in medical oncology: An unexplored field. J Clin Oncol 2008. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.13516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|