Trm112p is a 15-kDa zinc finger protein essential for the activity of two tRNA and one protein methyltransferases in yeast

The degenerate base at position 34 of the tRNA anticodon is the target of numerous modification enzymes. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, five tRNAs exhibit a complex modification of uridine 34 (mcm(5)U(34) and mcm(5)s(2)U(34)), the formation of which requires at least 25 different proteins. The addition of the last methyl group is catalyzed by the methyltransferase Trm9p. Trm9p interacts with Trm112p, a 15-kDa protein with a zinc finger domain. Trm112p is essential for the activity of Trm11p, another tRNA methyltransferase, and for Mtq2p, an enzyme that methylates the translation termination factor eRF1/Sup45. Here, we report that Trm112p is required in vivo for the formation of mcm(5)U(34) and mcm(5)s(2)U(34). When produced in Escherichia coli, Trm112p forms a complex with Trm9p, which renders the latter soluble. This recombinant complex catalyzes the formation of mcm(5)U(34) on tRNA in vitro but not mcm(5)s(2)U(34). An mtq2-0 trm9-0 strain exhibits a synthetic growth defect, thus revealing the existence of an unexpected link between tRNA anticodon modification and termination of translation. Trm112p is associated with other partners involved in ribosome biogenesis and chromatin remodeling, suggesting that it has additional roles in the cell.

Interaction of the HIV-1 frameshift signal with the ribosome

Ribosomal frameshifting on viral RNAs relies on the mechanical properties of structural elements, often pseudoknots and more rarely stem-loops, that are unfolded by the ribosome during translation. In human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 type B a long hairpin containing a three-nucleotide bulge is responsible for efficient frameshifting. This three-nucleotide bulge separates the hairpin in two domains: an unstable lower stem followed by a GC-rich upper stem. Toeprinting and chemical probing assays suggest that a hairpin-like structure is retained when ribosomes, initially bound at the slippery sequence, were allowed multiple EF-G catalyzed translocation cycles. However, while the upper stem remains intact the lower stem readily melts. After the first, and single step of translocation of deacylated tRNA to the 30 S P site, movement of the mRNA stem-loop in the 5′ direction is halted, which is consistent with the notion that the downstream secondary structure resists unfolding. Mechanical stretching of the hairpin using optical tweezers only allows clear identification of unfolding of the upper stem at a force of 12.8 ± 1.0 pN. This suggests that the lower stem is unstable and may indeed readily unfold in the presence of a translocating ribosome.

Footprinting analysis of BWYV pseudoknot-ribosome complexes

Many viruses regulate translation of polycistronic mRNA using a -1 ribosomal frameshift induced by an RNA pseudoknot. When the ribosome encounters the pseudoknot barrier that resists unraveling, transient mRNA-tRNA dissociation at the decoding site, results in a shift of the reading frame. The eukaryotic frameshifting pseudoknot from the beet western yellow virus (BWYV) has been well characterized, both structurally and functionally. Here, we show that in order to obtain eukaryotic levels of frameshifting efficiencies using prokaryotic Escherichia coli ribosomes, which depend upon the structural integrity of the BWYV pseudoknot, it is necessary to shorten the mRNA spacer between the slippery sequence and the pseudoknot by 1 or 2 nucleotides (nt). Shortening of the spacer is likely to re-establish tension and/or ribosomal contacts that were otherwise lost with the smaller E. coli ribosomes. Chemical probing experiments for frameshifting and nonframeshifting BWYV constructs were performed to investigate the structural integrity of the pseudoknot confined locally at the mRNA entry site. These data, obtained in the pretranslocation state, show a compact overall pseudoknot structure, with changes in the conformation of nucleotides (i.e., increase in reactivity to chemical probes) that are first "hit" by the ribosomal helicase center. Interestingly, with the 1-nt shortened spacer, this increase of reactivity extends to a downstream nucleotide in the first base pair (bp) of stem 1, consistent with melting of this base pair. Thus, the 3 bp that will unfold upon translocation are different in both constructs with likely consequences on unfolding kinetics.

Apical loop-internal loop RNA pseudoknots: a new type of stimulator of -1 translational frameshifting in bacteria

Nearly all members of a widespread family of bacterial transposable elements related to insertion sequence 3 (IS3), therefore called the IS3 family, very likely use programmed -1 ribosomal frameshifting to produce their transposase, a protein required for mobility. Comparative analysis of the potential frameshift signals in this family suggested that most of the insertion sequences from the IS51 group contain in their mRNA an elaborate pseudoknot that could act as a recoding stimulator. It results from a specific intramolecular interaction between an apical loop and an internal loop from two stem-loop structures. Directed mutagenesis, chemical probing, and gel mobility assays of the frameshift region of one element from the IS51 group, IS3411, provided clear evidences of the existence of the predicted structure. Modeling was used to generate a three-dimensional molecular representation of the apical loop-internal loop complex. We could demonstrate that mutations affecting the stability of the structure reduce both frameshifting and transposition, thus establishing the biological importance of this new type of RNA structure for the control of transposition level.

Structural elements defining elongation factor Tu mediated suppression of codon ambiguity

In most prokaryotes Asn-tRNA^Asn and Gln-tRNA^Gln are formed by amidation of aspartate and glutamate mischarged onto tRNA^Asn and tRNA^Gln, respectively. Coexistence in the organism of mischarged Asp-tRNA^Asn and Glu-tRNA^Gln and the homologous Asn-tRNA^Asn and Gln-tRNA^Gln does not, however, lead to erroneous incorporation of Asp and Glu into proteins, since EF-Tu discriminates the misacylated tRNAs from the correctly charged ones. This property contrasts with the canonical function of EF-Tu, which is to non-specifically bind the homologous aa-tRNAs, as well as heterologous species formed in vitro by aminoacylation of non-cognate tRNAs. In Thermus thermophilus that forms the Asp-tRNA^Asn intermediate by the indirect pathway of tRNA asparaginylation, EF-Tu must discriminate the mischarged aminoacyl-tRNAs (aa-tRNA). We show that two base pairs in the tRNA T-arm and a single residue in the amino acid binding pocket of EF-Tu promote discrimination of Asp-tRNA^Asn from Asn-tRNA^Asn and Asp-tRNA^Asp by the protein. Our analysis suggests that these structural elements might also contribute to rejection of other mischarged aa-tRNAs formed in vivo that are not involved in peptide elongation. Additionally, these structural features might be involved in maintaining a delicate balance of weak and strong binding affinities between EF-Tu and the amino acid and tRNA moieties of other elongator aa-tRNAs.

Structure of the RNA signal essential for translational frameshifting in HIV-1

Many pathogenic viruses use a programmed -1 translational frameshifting mechanism to regulate synthesis of their structural and enzymatic proteins. Frameshifting is vital for viral replication. A slippery sequence bound at the ribosomal A and P sites as well as a downstream stimulatory RNA structure are essential for frameshifting. Conflicting data have been reported concerning the structure of the downstream RNA signal in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). Here, the solution structure of the HIV-1 frameshifting RNA signal was solved by heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy. This structure reveals a long hairpin fold with an internal three-nucleotide bulge. The internal loop introduces a bend between the lower and upper helical regions, a structural feature often seen in frameshifting pseudoknots. The NMR structure correlates with chemical probing data. The upper stem rich in conserved G-C Watson-Crick base-pairs is highly stable, whereas the bulge region and the lower stem are more flexible.

Thermus thermophilus contains an eubacterial and an archaebacterial aspartyl-tRNA synthetase

Thermus thermophilus possesses two aspartyl-tRNA synthetases (AspRSs), AspRS1 and AspRS2, encoded by distinct genes. Alignment of the protein sequences with AspRSs of other origins reveals that AspRS1 possesses the structural features of eubacterial AspRSs, whereas AspRS2 is structurally related to the archaebacterial AspRSs. The structural dissimilarity between the two thermophilic AspRSs is correlated with functional divergences. AspRS1 aspartylates tRNA(Asp) whereas AspRS2 aspartylates tRNA(Asp), and tRNA(Asn) with similar efficiencies. Since Asp bound on tRNA(Asn) is converted into Asn by a tRNA-dependent aspartate amidotransferase, AspRS2 is involved in Asn-tRNA(Asn) formation. These properties relate functionally AspRS2 to archaebacterial AspRSs. The structural basis of the dual specificity of T. thermophilus tRNA(Asn) was investigated by comparing its sequence with those of tRNA(Asp) and tRNA(Asn) of strict specificity. It is shown that the thermophilic tRNA(Asn) contains the elements defining asparagine identity in Escherichia coli, part of which being also the major elements of aspartate identity, whereas minor elements of this identity are missing. The structural context that permits expression of aspartate and asparagine identities by tRNA(Asn) and how AspRS2 accommodates tRNA(Asp) and tRNA(Asn) will be discussed. This work establishes a distinct structure-function relationship of eubacterial and archaebacterial AspRSs. The structural and functional properties of the two thermophilic AspRSs will be discussed in the context of the modern and primitive pathways of tRNA aspartylation and asparaginylation and related to the phylogenetic connexion of T. thermophilus to eubacteria and archaebacteria.

tRNA glycylation system from Thermus thermophilus. tRNAGly identity and functional interrelation with the glycylation systems from other phylae

The systems of tRNA glycylation belong to the most complex aminoacylation systems since neither the oligomeric structure of glycyl-tRNA synthetases (GlyRS) nor the discriminator bases in tRNAGly are conserved in the phylae. To better understand the structure-function relationship in glycylation systems of various origins and the functional peculiarities related to their structural divergences, the elements in tRNA conferring its glycine identity in Thermus thermophilus were characterized and compared to those of other systems. Thermophilic identity is conferred by the G1-C72, C2-G71, G3-C70, and C50-G64 pairs together with the G10, U16, C35, and C36 single residues. In contrast to most other aminoacylation systems, the discriminator base is not directly involved in identity. Transplantation of these elements in tRNAAsp and tRNAPhe converts specificity toward glycine albeit conservation of nucleotide 73. Analysis of the functional interrelation of the identity elements shows coupling in synthetase recognition of the elements from anticodon and G10 whereas those from acceptor arm are recognized independently. Despite nondirect implication in identity, the discriminator base contributes cooperatively with C36 in specificity of glycylation. The link between the structural heterogeneity and the functional divergence of the glycylation systems and the phylogenic interrelation of these systems were approached by comparing the ability of GlyRSs of various phylae to glycylate heterologous tRNAGly. Dimeric GlyRSs from mammalian and archaebacteria acylate efficiently only eukaryotic and archaebacterial tRNAGly with a discriminatory A73, whereas tetrameric Escherichia coli GlyRS acylates only eubacterial tRNAGly with a discriminatory U73. In contrast, dimeric yeast GlyRS acylates efficiently both eukaryotic and archaebacterial tRNAGly as well as peculiar prokaryotic isoacceptors. Species specificity is lost with the dimeric GlyRS from Thermus thermophilus that acylates efficiently eubacterial, archaebacterial, and eukaryotic tRNAGly. These features are discussed in the context of the evolution of the glycylation systems and the phylogenic interrelation of the organisms.

Glycyl-tRNA synthetase from Thermus thermophilus--wide structural divergence with other prokaryotic glycyl-tRNA synthetases and functional inter-relation with prokaryotic and eukaryotic glycylation systems

The tRNA glycylation system is amongst the most complex aminoacylation systems since neither the oligomeric structure of the enzymes nor the discriminator base in tRNAs are conserved in the phylae. To understand better this structural diversity and its functional consequences, the prokaryotic glycylation system from Thermus thermophilus, an extreme thermophile, was investigated and its structural and functional inter-relations with those of other origins analyzed. Alignments of the protein sequence of the dimeric thermophilic glycyl-tRNA synthetase (Gly-tRNA synthetase) derived from its gene with sequences of other dimeric Gly-tRNA synthetases revealed an atypical character of motif 1 in all these class 2 synthetases. Interestingly, the sequence of the prokaryotic thermophilic enzyme resembles eukaryotic and archaebacterial Gly-tRNA synthetases, which are all dimeric, and diverges drastically from the tetrameric enzymes from other prokaryotes. Cross aminoacylations with tRNAs and synthetases of different origins provided information about functional interrelations between the glycylation systems. Efficient glycylations involving partners from T. thermophilus and Escherichia coli showed conservation of the recognition process in prokaryotes despite strong structural variations of the synthetases. However, Gly-tRNA synthetase from T. thermophilus acylates eukaryotic tRNA(Gly) while the charging ability of the E. coli enzyme is restricted to prokaryotic tRNA(Gly). A similar behaviour is found in eukaryotic systems where the restricted species specificity for tRNA glycylation of mammalian Gly-tRNA synthetase contrasts with the relaxed specificity of the yeast enzyme. The consensus sequence of the tRNAs charged by the various Gly-tRNA synthetases reveals conservation of only G1-C72 in the acceptor arm, C35 and C36 in the anticodon, and the (G10-Y25)-G45 triplet involved in tRNA folding. Conservation of these nucleotides indicates their key role in glycylation and suggests that they were part of the ancestral glycine identity set. These features are discussed in the context of the phylogenic connections between prokaryotes, eukaryotes, and archaebacteria, and of the particular place of T. thermophilus in this phylogeny.

An example of non-conservation of oligomeric structure in prokaryotic aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Biochemical and structural properties of glycyl-tRNA synthetase from Thermus thermophilus

Glycyl-tRNA synthetase (Gly-tRNA synthetase) from Thermus thermophilus was purified to homogeneity and with high yield using a five-step purification procedure in amounts sufficient to solve its crystallographic structure [Logan, D.T., Mazauric, M.-H., Kern, D. & Moras, D. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 4156-4167]. Molecular-mass determinations of the native and denatured protein indicate an oligomeric structure of the alpha 2 type consistent with that found for eukaryotic Gly-tRNA synthetases (yeast and Bombyx mori), but different from that of Gly-tRNA synthetases from mesophilic prokaryotes (Escherichia coli and Bacillus brevis) which are alpha 2 beta 2 tetramers. N-terminal sequencing of the polypeptide chain reveals significant identity, reaching 50% with those of the eukaryotic enzymes (B. mori, Homo sapiens, yeast and Caenorhabditis elegans) but no significant identity was found with both alpha and beta chains of the prokaryotic enzymes (E. coli, Haemophilus influenzae and Coxiella burnetii) albeit the enzyme is deprived of the N-terminal extension characterizing eukaryotic synthetases. Thus, the thermophilic Gly-tRNA synthetase combines strong structural homologies of eukaryotic Gly-tRNA synthetases with a feature of prokaryotic synthetases. Heat-stability measurements show that this synthetase keeps its ATP-PPi exchange and aminoacylation activities up to 70 degrees C. Glycyladenylate strongly protects the enzyme against thermal inactivation at higher temperatures. Unexpectedly, tRNA(Gly) does not induce protection. Cross-aminoacylations reveal that the thermophilic Gly-tRNA synthetase charges heterologous E. coli tRNA(gly(GCC)) and tRNA(Gly(GCC)) and yeast tRNA(Gly(GCC)) as efficiently as T. thermophilus tRNA(Gly). All these aminoacylation reactions are characterized by similar activation energies as deduced from Arrhenius plots. Therefore, contrary to the E. coli and H. sapiens Gly-tRNA synthetases, the prokaryotic thermophilic enzyme does not possess a strict species specificity. The results are discussed in the context of the three-dimensional structure of the synthetase and in the view of the particular evolution of the glycinylation systems.

Crystal structure of glycyl-tRNA synthetase from Thermus thermophilus

The sequence and crystal structure at 2.75 A resolution of the homodimeric glycyl-tRNA synthetase from Thermus thermophilus, the first representative of the last unknown class II synthetase subgroup, have been determined. The three class II synthetase sequence motifs are present but the structure was essential for identification of motif 1, which does not possess the proline previously believed to be an essential class II invariant. Nevertheless, crucial contacts with the active site of the other monomer involving motif 1 are conserved and a more comprehensive description of class II now becomes possible. Each monomer consists of an active site strongly resembling that of the aspartyl and seryl enzymes, a C-terminal anticodon recognition domain of 100 residues and a third domain unusually inserted between motifs 1 and 2 almost certainly interacting with the acceptor arm of tRNA(Gly). The C-terminal domain has a novel five-stranded parallel-antiparallel beta-sheet structure with three surrounding helices. The active site residues most probably responsible for substrate recognition, in particular in the Gly binding pocket, can be identified by inference from aspartyl-tRNA synthetase due to the conserved nature of the class II active site.

Sequence, overproduction and crystallization of aspartyl-tRNA synthetase from Thermus thermophilus. Implications for the structure of prokaryotic aspartyl-tRNA synthetases

The genes of aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (AspRS) from two Thermus thermophilus strain VK-1 and HB8, have been cloned and sequenced. Their nucleotidic sequences code for the same protein which displays the three characteristic motifs of class II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. This enzyme shows 50% identity with Escherichia coli AspRS, over the totality of the chain (580 amino acids). A comparison with the eukaryotic yeast cytoplasmic AspRS indicates the presence in the prokaryotic AspRS of an extra domain between motifs 2 and 3 much larger than in the eukaryotic ones. When its gene is under the control of the tac promoter of the expression vector pKK223-3, the protein is efficiently overexpressed as a thermostable protein in E. coli. It can be further purified to homogeneity using a heat treatment followed by a single anion exchange chromatography. Single crystals of the pure protein, diffracting at least to 2.2 A resolution (space group P2(1)2(1)2(1), a = 61.4 A, b = 156.1 A, c = 177.3 A) are routinely obtained. The same crystals have previously been described as crystals of threonyl-tRNA synthetase [1].