Crosstalk between cannabinoid receptor 2 and lysophosphatidic acid receptor 5

Cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB₂) and lysophosphatidic acid receptor 5 (LPA₅) are both classified as G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) activated by bioactive lipids and are highly expressed in colon cancer cells. However, crosstalk between two receptors and its potential effects on cancer cell physiology have not been fully elucidated. In the present study, the results of bioluminescence resonance energy transfer analysis showed that, among the LPA receptors, CB₂ strongly and specifically interacted with LPA₅. Both receptors were co-localized in the plasma membrane in the absence of agonists, and the receptors were co-internalized upon activation of either receptor alone or both receptors together. We further investigated the effects of expression of both receptors on cell proliferation and migration, and the molecular mechanisms underlying these effects in HCT116 colon cancer cells. Co-expression of receptors significantly increased cell proliferation and migration by increasing Akt phosphorylation and tumor progression-related gene expression, whereas no such effect was seen upon expression of either receptor alone. These results suggest the possibility of physical and functional crosstalk between CB₂ and LPA₅.

Interactions between lysophosphatidylinositol receptor GPR55 and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor S1P5 in live cells

Lysophosphatidylinositol (LPI) and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) are bioactive lipids implicated in various cellular events including proliferation, migration, and cancer progression. LPI and S1P act as ligands for G-protein coupled GPR55 and S1P receptors, respectively, and activate specific signaling pathways. Both receptors are highly expressed in various cancer tissues and associated with tumor progression. However, physical and functional crosstalk between the two receptors has not been elucidated to date. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) experiments in the current study showed that S1P₅ strongly and specifically interacts with GPR55. We observed co-internalization of both receptors upon agonist stimulation. Notably, activation of one receptor induced co-internalization of the partner receptor. Next, we examined functional crosstalk of the two receptors. Interestingly, while activation of the individual receptors augmented cell proliferation, ERK phosphorylation and cancer-associated gene expression in HCT116 cells, co-activation of both receptors inhibited these stimulatory effects. Our collective findings indicate that GPR55 and S1P₅ form a heterodimer and their co-activation attenuates the stimulatory activity of each receptor on colon cancer progression.

BRET analysis reveals interaction between the lysophosphatidic acid receptor LPA2 and the lysophosphatidylinositol receptor GPR55 in live cells

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and lysophosphatidylinositol bind to the G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) LPA and GPR55, respectively. LPA₂ , a type 2 LPA receptor, and GPR55 are highly expressed in colon cancer and involved in cancer progression. However, crosstalk between the two receptors and potential effects on cellular physiology are not fully understood. Here, using BRET analysis, we found that LPA₂ and GPR55 interact in live cells. In the presence of both receptors, LPA₂ and/or GPR55 activation facilitated co-internalization, and activation of GPR55, uncoupled with Gα_i , induced reduction of intracellular cAMP. Notably, co-activation of receptors synergistically triggered further decline in the cAMP level, promoted cell proliferation, and increased the expression of cancer progression-related genes, suggesting that physical and functional crosstalk between LPA₂ and GRR55 is involved in cancer progression.

Regulators of G-protein signaling, RGS2 and RGS4, inhibit protease-activated receptor 4-mediated signaling by forming a complex with the receptor and Gα in live cells

BACKGROUND

Protease-activated receptor 4 (PAR4) is a seven transmembrane G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) activated by endogenous proteases, such as thrombin. PAR4 is involved in various pathophysiologies including cancer, inflammation, pain, and thrombosis. Although regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) are known to modulate GPCR/Gα-mediated pathways, their specific effects on PAR4 are not fully understood at present. We previously reported that RGS proteins attenuate PAR1- and PAR2-mediated signaling through interactions with these receptors in conjunction with distinct Gα subunits.

METHODS

We employed a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer technique and confocal microscopy to examine potential interactions among PAR4, RGS, and Gα subunits. The inhibitory effects of RGS proteins on PAR4-mediated downstream signaling and cancer progression were additionally investigated by using several assays including ERK phosphorylation, calcium mobilization, RhoA activity, cancer cell proliferation, and related gene expression.

RESULTS

In live cells, RGS2 interacts with PAR4 in the presence of Gα_q while RGS4 binding to PAR4 occurs in the presence of Gα_q and Gα_12/13. Co-expression of PAR4 and Gα_q induced a shift in the subcellular localization of RGS2 and RGS4 from the cytoplasm to plasma membrane. Combined PAR4 and Gα_12/13 expression additionally promoted translocation of RGS4 from the cytoplasm to the membrane. Both RGS2 and RGS4 abolished PAR4-activated ERK phosphorylation, calcium mobilization and RhoA activity, as well as PAR4-mediated colon cancer cell proliferation and related gene expression.

CONCLUSIONS

RGS2 and RGS4 forms ternary complex with PAR4 in Gα-dependent manner and inhibits its downstream signaling. Our findings support a novel physiological function of RGS2 and RGS4 as inhibitors of PAR4-mediated signaling through selective PAR4/RGS/Gα coupling. Video Abstract.

Identification of warm temperature acclimation-associated 65-kDa protein-2 in Kumgang fat minnow Rhynchocypris kumgangensis

Warm temperature acclimation-associated 65-kDa protein (Wap65) is known to respond to elevated water temperatures and the corresponding gene from several fish species has been cloned. Expression of Wap65 gene is induced by various physiological stresses, such as increase in water temperature, immune response and heavy metal exposure. Two isolated Wap65 genes, Wap65-1 and Wap65-2, display distinct tissue distribution and physiological functions despite high sequence homology. In a previous study, we identified the Wap65-1 gene (kmWap65-1) from Kumgang fat minnow, Rhynchocypris kumgangensis, a small freshwater fish endemic to Korea. The kmWap65-1 gene showed sequence homology with teleost Wap65-1 and mammalian hemopexin, and was highly expressed in response to increased water temperature and bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) exposure. Here, we isolated kmWap65-2 from liver tissue of Kumgang fat minnow and compared the expression profiles of both kmWap65 genes following exposure to various physiological stresses, including thermal changes, bacterial challenge, and environmental toxins. Notably, while kmWap65-1 expression was significantly increased in response to high water temperature, LPS, cadmium, and iron, kmWap65-2 displayed no alterations in expression at high water temperature. However, kmWap65-2 expression was upregulated slightly in response to LPS and highly in presence of copper, bisphenol A, and estradiol. Based on the collective findings, we propose that kmWap65-1 and kmWap65-2 are multifunctional proteins with distinct functions that could serve as useful biomarkers for assessing physiological stress and associated responses in Kumgang fat minnow.

Necdin modulates osteogenic cell differentiation by regulating Dlx5 and MAGE-D1

Osteoblasts originate from mesenchymal stem cells that also differentiate into adipocytes, myoblasts, chondrocytes and fibroblasts. Osteogenic differentiation involves diverse regulatory proteins, including transcription and growth factors. Neurally differentiated embryonal carcinoma-derived protein (Necdin) has been identified as a key regulator of cell differentiation in various tissues, including neuronal, adipose, and muscular tissues; although its role in bone tissue remains to be established. Here, we investigated the potential involvement of Necdin in osteogenic differentiation. Our experiments revealed high expression of Necdin during osteoblast differentiation. Moreover, both transient and stable expression of Necdin induced osteoblast-specific markers in an osteogenic cell line through formation of a complex with melanoma-associated antigen D1 (MAGE-D1) and distal-less Homeobox 5 (Dlx5) and Runx2 promoter activation. Necdin expression was further associated with suppression of both cell proliferation and death in osteoblasts. Our results suggest that Necdin plays roles in cellular differentiation, proliferation and death in bone tissue.

Identification of a warm-temperature acclimation-associated 65-kDa protein encoded by a temperature- and infection-responsive gene in the Kumgang fat minnow Rhynchocypris kumgangensis

Water temperature is one of the most important factors in fish physiology; thus, it is important to identify genes that respond to changes in water temperature. In this study, we identified a warm- temperature acclimation-associated 65-kDa protein (Wap65) in the Kumgang fat minnow Rhynchocypris kumgangensis, a small, cold-freshwater fish species endemic to Korea. Kumgang fat minnow Wap65-1 (kmWap65-1) was cloned using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based strategies, and was found to be highly homologous with teleost Wap65-1 and mammalian hemopexin, a heme-binding protein that transfers plasma heme into hepatocytes. kmWap65-1 mRNA was expressed mainly in the liver and its expression levels were significantly increased by both short- and long-term exposure to high temperature, which was evaluated by real-time quantitative PCR. Furthermore, the expression levels of kmWap65-1 were highly elevated by exposure to bacterial lipopolysaccharide. These results indicate that kmWap65-1 expression is associated with environmental stresses such as increases in water temperature and bacterial infection. J. Exp. Zool. 325A:65-74, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Primary cell culture method for the honeybee Apis mellifera

Honeybees are among the most important pollinators in nature, and honeybee-associated products are useful in various areas, including the food industry. However, honeybees may be infected by various types of pathogens. The study of honeybee-associated diseases would greatly benefit from a successful cell culture system, but although some honeybee cell culture techniques have been introduced, these methods have not yet been fully established. Here, we describe a primary cell culture method for the honeybee, Apis mellifera. We isolated, sterilized, and seeded egg cells into non-coated cell culture dishes to generate cell aggregates. After approximately 10 d, aggregates were dissociated and seeded to cell culture dishes. Cell passages were continuously performed, with sub-culturing every 3-4 d. The cells expressed non-adherent phenotypes. Their growth increased with the passage number when they were cultured in growth medium based on L-15 insect medium but not Schneider's insect medium. Finally, polymerase chain reaction confirmed that the cells originated from A. mellifera. Our results suggest that the culturing methods described herein are appropriate for isolating primary cells from honeybee eggs. These methods could thus facilitate the study of honeybee-associated pathogenesis, development, and toxicology.

Cannabinoid receptor activation inhibits cell cycle progression by modulating 14-3-3β

Cannabinoids display various pharmacological activities, including tumor regression, anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects. To investigate the molecular mechanisms underlying the pharmacological effects of cannabinoids, we used a yeast two-hybrid system to screen a mouse brain cDNA library for proteins interacting with type 1 cannabinoid receptor (CB1R). Using the intracellular loop 3 of CB1R as bait, we identified 14-3-3β as an interacting partner of CB1R and confirmed their interaction using affinity-binding assays. 14-3-3β has been reported to induce a cell cycle delay at the G2/M phase. We tested the effects of cannabinoids on cell cycle progression in HeLa cells synchronized using a double-thymidine block-and-release protocol and found an increase in the population of G2/M phase cells. We further found that CB1R activation augmented the interaction of 14-3-3β with Wee1 and Cdc25B, and promoted phosphorylation of Cdc2 at Tyr-15. These results suggest that cannabinoids induce cell cycle delay at the G2/M phase by activating 14-3-3β.

The alpha subunit of Go modulates cell proliferation and differentiation through interactions with Necdin

Background

Heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins (G-proteins) play an important role in mediating signal transduction generated by neurotransmitters or hormones. Go, a member of the Gi/Go subfamily, is the most abundant G-protein found in the brain. Recently, the alpha subunit of Go (Gαo) was characterized as an inducer of neuronal differentiation. However, its underlying molecular mechanisms have remained unclear to date, since the downstream effectors of Gαo are ambiguous.

Results

A neurally differentiated embryonal carcinoma-derived protein (Necdin) was isolated as an interacting partner for Gαo from a mouse brain cDNA library using yeast two-hybrid screening. Interactions between the proteins were confirmed with several affinity binding assays, both in vitro and in vivo. Necdin interacted directly and preferentially with activated Gαo, compared to wild-type protein. Interestingly, Gαo did not interact with Gαi, despite high sequence homology between the two proteins. We subsequently analyzed whether Gαo modulates the cellular activities of Necdin. Notably, expression of Gαo significantly augmented Necdin-mediated cellular responses, such as proliferation and differentiation. Moreover, activation of type 1 cannabinoid receptor (CB1R), a Gi/oα-coupled receptor, augmented cell growth suppression, which was mediated by Gαo and Necdin in U87MG cells containing CB1R, Gαo, and Necdin as normal components.

Conclusions

These results collectively suggest that Necdin is a candidate downstream effector for Gαo. Our findings provide novel insights into the cellular roles of Gαo and its coupled receptor.

Regulator of G protein signaling 2 (RGS2) and RGS4 form distinct G protein-dependent complexes with protease activated-receptor 1 (PAR1) in live cells

Protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) is a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) that is activated by natural proteases to regulate many physiological actions. We previously reported that PAR1 couples to G_i, G_q and G₁₂ to activate linked signaling pathways. Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins serve as GTPase activating proteins to inhibit GPCR/G protein signaling. Some RGS proteins interact directly with certain GPCRs to modulate their signals, though cellular mechanisms dictating selective RGS/GPCR coupling are poorly understood. Here, using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET), we tested whether RGS2 and RGS4 bind to PAR1 in live COS-7 cells to regulate PAR1/Gα-mediated signaling. We report that PAR1 selectively interacts with either RGS2 or RGS4 in a G protein-dependent manner. Very little BRET activity is observed between PAR1-Venus (PAR1-Ven) and either RGS2-Luciferase (RGS2-Luc) or RGS4-Luc in the absence of Gα. However, in the presence of specific Gα subunits, BRET activity was markedly enhanced between PAR1-RGS2 by Gα_q/11, and PAR1-RGS4 by Gα_o, but not by other Gα subunits. Gα_q/11-YFP/RGS2-Luc BRET activity is promoted by PAR1 and is markedly enhanced by agonist (TFLLR) stimulation. However, PAR1-Ven/RGS-Luc BRET activity was blocked by a PAR1 mutant (R205A) that eliminates PAR1-G_q/11 coupling. The purified intracellular third loop of PAR1 binds directly to purified His-RGS2 or His-RGS4. In cells, RGS2 and RGS4 inhibited PAR1/Gα-mediated calcium and MAPK/ERK signaling, respectively, but not RhoA signaling. Our findings indicate that RGS2 and RGS4 interact directly with PAR1 in Gα-dependent manner to modulate PAR1/Gα-mediated signaling, and highlight a cellular mechanism for selective GPCR/G protein/RGS coupling.

Compartmentalization of protein kinase A signaling by the heterotrimeric G protein Go

G(o), a member of the G(o/i) family, is the most abundant heterotrimeric G protein in brain. Most functions of G(o) are mediated by the G(betagamma) dimer; effector(s) for its alpha-subunit have not been clearly defined. Here we report that G(oalpha) interacts directly with cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) through its GTPase domain. This interaction did not inhibit the kinase function of PKA but interfered with nuclear translocation of PKA while sparing its cytosolic function. This regulatory mechanism by which G(o) bifurcates PKA signaling may provide insights into how G(o) regulates complex processes such as neuritogenesis, synaptic plasticity, and cell transformation.