Efficacy of pantoprazole in the prevention of peptic ulcers, induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of pantoprazole in preventing gastrointestinal lesions in patients with rheumatic diseases receiving continuous, long-term treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

MATERIAL

This was a prospective, randomised, double-blind, unbalanced, placebo-controlled, parallel group study. Outpatients (n= 104, age range 22-80 years, mean age 59.5) with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis, requiring chronic intake of NSAIDs (at least 8 weeks prior to the start of the study), were randomised and enrolled to receive either 40 mg pantoprazole (n=70) or placebo (n=34) once daily, for 12 weeks. Patients had endoscopically confirmed gastric and duodenal lesions grade 0, 1 or 2 (Lanza classification grade 0: normal to hyperaemic mucosa; grade 1: 1 to 3 erosions, submucosal haemorrhage or petechiae, grade 2: 4 to 10 erosions, submucosal haemorrhages or petechiae). Clinical and endoscopic evaluations were performed at baseline, after 4, and 12 weeks. The primary end-point of the study was the incidence of gastric or duodenal ulcers after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

Patients (n=95) were evaluated: 65 in the pantoprazole group and 30 in the placebo group. When considering all patients (those with Lanza score grade 0, 1, 2 at baseline), the overall proportion of patients in remission was 82% and 77% after 4 weeks, and 72% and 59% after 12 weeks in pantoprazole and placebo groups, respectively (cumulative survival analysis according to Kaplan-Meier). The difference between the treatment groups was even more marked when only those patients with normal mucosa at baseline (grade 0) were considered. After 12 weeks, the proportion of patients in remission was 82% (95% confidence limits 70% - 94% in the pantoprazole and 55% (95% confidence limits 33% - 77%) in the placebo treatment group, p=O.036. Adverse events were reported in 4% and 6% of patients in pantoprazole and placebo treatment groups, respectively

CONCLUSIONS

Pantoprazole 40 mg once daily was well tolerated and is more effective than placebo in the prevention of peptic ulcers in patients with rheumatic diseases who require continuous, long-term, treatment with NSAIDs.

Controlled-release theophylline inhibits early morning airway obstruction and hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic subjects

BACKGROUND

Nocturnal asthma reflects the severity of the disease, and thus its pharmacologic prevention represents one on the main goals of asthma management.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

To determine whether controlled-release theophylline inhibits the development of airway obstruction and/or airway hyperresponsiveness early in the morning, we examined 18 subjects reporting recurrent nocturnal asthma. In each subject, after five days' treatment with an 8 PM increasing dose of oral controlled-release theophylline, up to 10 +/- 1 mg/kg or placebo the night before the study day, we measured serum theophylline, FEV1 and PC20FEV1 at 6 AM, 2 PM and 10 PM.

RESULTS

At 6 AM, both FEV1 and PC20FEV1 were significantly higher on theophylline than on placebo (3.52 +/- 0.22 versus 3.17 +/- 0.25 L; P < .005 and 2.76 divided by 3.61 versus 1.55 divided by 3.73 mg/mL; P < .05, respectively). At 2 PM and 10 PM FEV1, but not PC20FEV1, was higher on theophylline than on placebo (3.73 +/- 0.21 versus 3.54 +/- 0.25 L; P < .05 and 3.40 +/- 0.22 versus 3.24 +/- 0.24 L; P < .05). Serum theophylline was 12.8 +/- 1.1 micrograms/ml, 8.9 +/- 0.77 and 9.5 +/- 0.85 at 6 AM, 2 PM and 10 PM, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that an evening dose of controlled-release theophyl line inhibits early morning airway obstruction and hyperresponsiveness, and that it may be helpful in the prevention of nocturnal asthma.

In vitro activity of macrolides on human phagocytic functions

The aim of this study was to examine the in vitro activity of erythromycin, josamycin, flurithromycin, miocamycin and roxithromycin on some leukocyte functional parameters. All tested macrolides did not interfere with the frequency and index of phagocytosis, nitroblue tetrazolium reduction to formazan deposits and candidacidal activity of human polymorphonuclear leukocytes (p greater than 0.05). Among macrolide antibiotics, only flurithromycin significantly inhibited neutrophil chemotaxis at a high concentration (greater than or equal to 50 micrograms/ml). All macrolides, at 10 and 50 micrograms/ml, reduced the survival of a susceptible strain of Staphylococcus aureus ingested by human monocytes.