Rare SMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumor: Insights into molecular characterization and optimal therapeutics methods

INTRODUCTIONS

The 2021 WHO Classification of Thoracic Tumors recognized SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated thoracic tumors (SMARCA4-dUT) as a distinct entity that shows a striking overlap in demographic and molecular profiles with SMARCA4-deficient non-small lung cancer (SMARCA4-dNSCLC). The implications of SMARCA4 deficiency based on immunohistochemistry remain unclear. We aimed to investigate molecular characteristics of SMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumors (SDTT) and explore optimal therapeutics.

METHODS

From June.15, 2018, to Nov.15, 2023, a large cohort including patients diagnosed with SMARCA4-deficient (N = 196) and SMARCA4-intact (N = 438) thoracic tumors confirmed by immunohistochemistry at SYSUCC were screened. Clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics were identified and compared. External SRRSH cohort (N = 34) was combined into a pooled cohort to compare clinical outcome of first-line therapy efficacy.

RESULTS

SDTT is male predominance with smoking history, high tumor burden, and adrenal metastases. The relationship between SMARCA4 mutation and protein expression is not completely parallel. The majority of SMARCA4-deficient patients harbor truncating (Class-I) SMARCA4 mutations, whereas class-II alterations and wild-type also exist. Compared with SMARCA4-intact thoracic tumors, patients with SDTT displayed a higher tumor mutation burden (TMB) and associated with a shorter median OS (16.8 months vs. Not reached; P < 0.001). Notably, SMARCA4 protein deficiency, rather than genetic mutations, played a decisive role in these differences. SDTT is generally resistant to chemotherapy, while sensitive to chemoimmunotherapy (median PFS: 7.5 vs. 3.5 months, P < 0.001). In particular, patients with SMARCA4 deficient thoracic tumors treated with paclitaxel-based chemoimmunotherapy achieved a longer median PFS than those with pemetrexed-based chemoimmunotherapy (10.0 vs. 7.3 months, P = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

SMARCA4 protein deficiency, rather than genetic mutations, played a decisive role in its characteristics of higher TMB and poor prognosis. Chemoimmunotherapy serves as the optimal option in the current treatment regimen. Paclitaxel-based chemoimmunotherapy performed better than those with pemetrexed-based chemoimmunotherapy.

Phase 1b trial of anti-HER2 antibody inetetamab and pan-HER inhibitor pyrotinib in HER2-positive advanced lung cancer

There remains an unmet need for targeted therapies against advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with HER2 mutations. To improve the antitumor activity of single anti-HER2 agent, this prospective, single-arm clinical trial (NCT05016544) examined the safety profile and efficacy of anti-HER2 antibody inetetamab and pan-HER TKI pyrotinib in HER2-posivite advanced NSCLC patients. Enrolled patients received inetetamab every 3 weeks and pyrotinib once per day (pyrotinib, dose-escalation part, 240 mg, 320 mg; dose-expansion part, 320 mg). Primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) dosage and safety. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). A total of 48 patients were enrolled. During the dose-escalation period, no DLT occurred. Diarrhea was the most commonly reported treatment-related adverse event (TRAE). Grade 3 TRAEs occurred in seven patients. The median PFS (mPFS) was 5.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.4-8.6 months]. The confirmed ORR and DCR reached 25% (11/44) and 84.1% (37/44), respectively. Responses were shown in patients with distinct HER2 aberrations. In summary, inetetamab in combination with pyrotinib demonstrated acceptable safety and antitumor activity among patients with advanced HER2-mutant NSCLC.

Co-occurring EGFR p.E709X mutation Mediates Primary Resistance to the Third-generation EGFR-TKIs in EGFR p.G719X-mutant Patients with Advanced NSCLC

PURPOSE

Current NCCN guidelines recommend afatinib or osimertinib as the preferred first-line treatment strategy for patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR p.G719X mutation. However, in the absence of head-to-head trials comparing afatinib with osimertinib in EGFR p.G719X mutant patients, it is unclear which regimen is the preferred treatment option.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A large cohort of 4228 treatment-naïve patients with lung cancer who underwent targeted NGS testing was screened for EGFR p.G719X mutation. A multicenter cohort involving 68 EGFR p.G719X-mutant patients with advanced NSCLC and NGS profiling was retrospectively enrolled to evaluate clinical responses to afatinib(n=37) and the third-generation EGFR-TKIs(n=31). Ba/F3 cells stably expressing the EGFR p.G719A mutation were created to investigate the response to EGFR-TKIs in vitro.

RESULTS

Concurrent EGFR p.E709X mutations, being the most frequent co-occurring EGFR mutation in EGFR p.G719X-mutant NSCLC(~30%), exerted a detrimental effect on outcomes in patients treated with third-generation EGFR-TKI(G719X/E709X vs. G719X; ORR:0.00% vs. 47.62%, P<0.001; mPFS:7.18 vs. 14.2 months, P=0.04; respectively). Conversely, no significant difference was found in the treatment efficacy of afatinib between EGFR p.G719X/E709X and EGFR p.G719X patients(G719X/E709X vs. G719X; ORR:71.43% vs. 56.67%, P=0.99; mPFS:14.7 vs. 15.8 months, P=0.69; respectively). In vitro experiments elucidated a resistant drug sensitivity and poor inhibition of EGFR phosphorylation in Ba/F3 cells expressing EGFR p.G719A/E709K mutation upon the third-generation EGFR-TKIs treatment.

CONCLUSION

Co-occurring EGFR p.E709X mutation mediates primary resistance to the third-generation EGFR-TKIs in EGFR p.G719X-mutant patients but remained sensitive to afatinib. A personalized treatment strategy should be undertaken based on the co-existing EGFR p.E709X mutation status.

A bibliometric analysis of cerebral palsy from 2003 to 2022

Purpose

This bibliometric study explores cerebral palsy (CP) research from 2003 to 2022 to reveal the topic hotspots and collaborations.

Methods

We retrieved studies on CP from the Web of Science Core Collection from 2003 to 2022 and then used CiteSpace and Bibliometrix to perform a bibliometric analysis and attain knowledge mapping, including publication outputs, funding, journals, authors, institutions, countries/territories, keywords, collaborative relationships, and topic hotspots.

Results

In total, 8,223 articles were published from 2003 to 2022. During this period, the number of publications increased continuously. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology was the most productive and frequently co-cited journal. Boyd was the most productive and influential author, with 143 publications and 4,011 citations. The United States and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam were the most productive countries and institutions, respectively. Researchers and institutions from the USA, Australia, and Canada constituted the core research forces, with extensive collaborations worldwide. The most common keywords were gait (553), rehabilitation (440), spasticity (325), botulinum toxin (174), therapy (148), upper extremity (141), quality of life (140), disability (115), pain (98), electromyography (97), kinematics (90), balance (88), participation (85), and walking (79).

Conclusion

This study provides a systematic and comprehensive analysis of the CP-related literature. It reveals that Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology is the most active journal in this field. The USA, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, and Boyd are the top countries, institutions, and authors, respectively. Emerging treatment methods, complication management, and functional recovery comprise the future research directions and potential topic hotspots for CP.

Chidamide plus envafolimab as subsequent treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients resistant to anti-PD-1 therapy: A multicohort, open-label, phase II trial with biomarker analysis

BACKGROUND

Combination of chidamide and anti-PD-L1 inhibitor produce synergistic anti-tumor effect in advanced NSCLC patients resistant to anti-PD-1 treatment. However, the effect of chidamide plus envafolimab has not been reported.

AIMS

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of chidamide plus envafolimab in advanced NSCLC patients resistant toanti-PD-1 treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligible advanced NSCLC patients after resistant to anti-PD-1 therapy received chidamide and envafolimab. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). The secondary end points included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. The expression of histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2), PD-L1, and blood TMB (bTMB) was also analyzed.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 8.1 (range: 7.6-9.2) months, only two patients achieved partial response. The ORR was 6.7% (2/30), DCR was 50% (15/30), and median PFS (mPFS) was 3.5 (95% confidence interval: 1.9-5.5) months. Biomarker analysis revealed that patients with high-level HDAC2 expression had numerically superior ORR (4.3% vs. 0), DCR (52.2% vs. 0) and mPFS (3.7 vs. 1.4m). Patients with negative PD-L1 had numerically superior DCR (52.2% vs. 33.3%) and mPFS (3.7m vs. 1.8m), so were those with low-level bTMB (DCR: 59.1% vs. 16.7%, mPFS: 3.8 vs.1.9m). Overall safety was controllable.

DISCUSSION

High HDAC2patients showed better ORR, DCR, and PFS. In addition, patient with negative PD-L1 and low-level bTMB had better DCR and PFS. This may be related to the epigenetic function of chidamide. However, the sample size was not big enough, so it is necessary to increase sample size to confirm the conclusion.

CONCLUSION

Combination of chidamide and envafolimab showed efficacy signals in certain NSCLC patients. But further identification of beneficial population is necessary for precision treatment.

Germline USP36 Mutation Confers Resistance to EGFR-TKIs by Upregulating MLLT3 Expression in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Although somatic mutations were explored in depth, limited biomarkers were found to predict the resistance of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI). Previous studies reported N6-methyladenosine (m6A) levels regulated response of EGFR-TKIs; whether the germline variants located in m6A sites affected resistance of EGFR-TKIs is still unknown.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR-activating mutation were enrolled to investigate predictors for response of EGFR-TKIs using a genome-wide-variant-m6A analysis. Bioinformatics analysis and series of molecular biology assays were used to uncover the underlying mechanism.

RESULTS

We identified the germline mutation USP36 rs3744797 (C > A, K814N) was associated with survival of patients with NSCLC treated with gefitinib [median progression-free survival (PFS): CC vs. CA, 16.30 vs. 10.50 months, P < 0.0001, HR = 2.45] and erlotinib (median PFS: CC vs. CA, 14.13 vs. 9.47 months, P = 0.041, HR = 2.63). Functionally, the C > A change significantly upregulated USP36 expression by reducing its m6A level. Meanwhile, rs3744797_A (USP36 MUT) was found to facilitate proliferation, migration, and resistance to EGFR-TKIs via upregulating MLLT3 expression in vitro and in vivo. More importantly, MLLT3 and USP36 levels are tightly correlated in patients with NSCLC, which were associated with prognosis of patients. Mechanistically, USP36 MUT stabilized MLLT3 by deubiquitinating MLLT3 in nucleoli and consequently activating its downstream signaling (HIF1α and Snai). Furthermore, inhibition of MLLT3 alleviated USP36 variant-induced EGFR-TKIs resistance in EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings characterized rs3744797 as an oncogenic variant in mediating EGFR-TKI resistance and tumor aggressiveness through deubiquitinating MLLT3, highlighting the variant as a predictive biomarker for EGFR-TKI response in NSCLC.

Remodeling the tumor-immune microenvironment by anti-CTLA4 blockade enhanced subsequent anti-PD-1 efficacy in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Sequential immunotherapy has shown certain advantages in malignancy. Here, we aim to evaluate the efficacy of sequential anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients (R/M NPC). We retrospectively analysis 2 phase I trial of ipilimumab and camrelizumab in Chinese R/M NPC patients. These patients were initially treated with ipilimumab, a CTLA4 blockade, followed by anti-PD-1 treatment. We observed a durable tumor remission in these patients (mPFS: 12.3 months; mDoR: 20.9 months). Multimodal investigations of biopsy samples disclosed remodeling of tumor-immune microenvironment triggered by ipilimumab. In responders, we found increased tumoral PD-L1/PD-L2 expression and T-cell infiltration after ipilimumab treatment, accompanied by reduced stroma and malignant cell components. In contrast, non-responders exhibited increased B-cell infiltration and increased peripheral CD19 + B cells, suggesting a defective transition from memory B cells to plasma cells. This study proposes that sequential therapy can potentially enhance treatment efficacy in chemotherapy-resistant NPC patients and provides insights into how preexisting anti-CTLA4 blockade can influence subsequent anti-PD-1 efficacy by remodeling the TME. Additionally, our results highlight the need for therapeutic strategies targeting naïve/memory B cells.

Trends in pain undertreatment among lung cancer patients at the EOL: Analysis of urban city medical insurance data in China

BACKGROUND

Cancer-related pain is one of the common priority symptoms in advanced lung cancer patients at the end-of-life (EOL). Alleviating pain is undoubtedly a critical component of palliative care in lung cancer. Our study was initiated to examined trends in opioid prescription-level outcomes as potential indicators of undertreated pain in China.

METHODS

This study used data on 1330 patients diagnosed with lung cancer of urban city medical insurance in China who died between 2014 and 2017. Opioid prescription-level outcomes were determined by annual trends of the proportion of patients filling an opioid prescription, the total dose of opioids filled by decedents, and morphine milligram equivalents per day (MMED) at the EOL (defined as the 60 days before death). We further analyzed monthly changes in the number of opioid prescriptions filled, MMED, and mean daily dose of opioids per prescription (MDDP) of the last 60 days of life by year at death and age, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 959 patients with exact dates of death were included, with 432 cases (45.06%; 95% CI: 44.36%-45.77%) receiving at least one opioid prescription at the EOL. The declining trends were shown in the proportion of patients filling any opioid prescription, the total dose of opioids filled by decedents and MMED, with an annual decrease of 0.341% (p = 0.01), 104.23 mg (p = 0.011) and 2.84 mg (p = 0.014), respectively. Within the 31-60 days to the 0-30 days of life, the MMED declined 6.08 mg (95% CI: -7.14 to -5.03; p = 0.000351), while the number of opioid prescriptions rose 0.66 (95% CI: 0.160-1.16; p = 0.025). Like the MMED, the MDDP fell 4.11 mg (95% CI: -5.86 to -2.37; p = 0.005) within the last month before death compared to the previous month.

CONCLUSION

Terminal lung cancer populations in urban China have experienced reduced access to opioids at the EOL. The clinicians did not prescribe a satisfactory dose of opioids per prescription, while the patients suffered increasing pain in the last 30 days of life. Sufficient opioid analgesic administration should be advocated for lung cancer patients during the EOL period.

Preclinical characterization and phase 1 results of ADG106 in patients with advanced solid tumors and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

ADG106, a ligand-blocking agonistic antibody targeting CD137 (4-1BB), exhibits promising results in preclinical studies, demonstrating tumor suppression in various animal models and showing a balanced profile between safety and efficacy. This phase 1 study enrolls 62 patients with advanced malignancies, revealing favorable tolerability up to the 5.0 mg/kg dose level. Dose-limiting toxicity occurs in only one patient (6.3%) at 10.0 mg/kg, resulting in grade 4 neutropenia. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events include leukopenia (22.6%), neutropenia (22.6%), elevated alanine aminotransferase (22.6%), rash (21.0%), itching (17.7%), and elevated aspartate aminotransferase (17.7%). The overall disease control rates are 47.1% for advanced solid tumors and 54.5% for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Circulating biomarkers suggest target engagement by ADG106 and immune modulation of circulating T, B, and natural killer cells and cytokines interferon γ and interleukin-6, which may affect the probability of clinical efficacy. ADG106 has a manageable safety profile and preliminary anti-tumor efficacy in patients with advanced cancers (this study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03802955).

QL1706 (anti-PD-1 IgG4/CTLA-4 antibody) plus chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multi-cohort, phase II study

First-line chemoimmunotherapy (with or without bevacizumab) has improved outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, this open-label, multi-cohort phase II study (NCT05329025) was done to investigate the safety and efficacy of QL1706 (a single bifunctional MabPair product against PD-1 and CTLA-4) and chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab in this population. Patients were enrolled into five different cohorts based on genotype (cohorts 1-4, epidermal growth factor receptor [EGFR] wild-type; cohort 5, EGFR-mutant and progressed on EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors [TKIs]). Between June 11, 2021 and December 29, 2021, 91 patients were enrolled. Most frequent treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) included decreased appetite (60 [65.9%]), anemia (60 [65.9%]), infusion-related reactions (48 [52.7%]), and pruritus (44 [48.4%]). Grade ≥ 3 TRAEs occurred in 30 (33.0%) patients. Twenty-seven (45%) patients with wild-type EGFR achieved partial response (PR) (objective response rate [ORR] = 45%) and had a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 6.8 months (95% CI: 5.2-9.7). For 31 patients harboring mutated EGFR, 17 (54.8%) achieved PR (ORR = 54.8%), with an mPFS of 8.5 months (95% CI: 5.72-not evaluable). Overall, QL1706 plus chemotherapy, regardless of having bevacizumab, was generally tolerable and had promising antitumor activity for EGFR wild-type advanced NSCLC in first-line setting. Moreover, QL1706 plus chemotherapy and bevacizumab showed favorable antitumor activity for patients who had EGFR mutated NSCLC but failed in TKI therapy, demonstrating a potential for treating this population.

Expert Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of NRG1/2 Gene Fusion Solid Tumors

The fusion genes NRG1 and NRG2 , members of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor family, have emerged as key drivers in cancer. Upon fusion, NRG1 retains its EGF-like active domain, binds to the ERBB ligand family, and triggers intracellular signaling cascades, promoting uncontrolled cell proliferation. The incidence of NRG1 gene fusion varies across cancer types, with lung cancer being the most prevalent at 0.19 to 0.27%. CD74 and SLC3A2 are the most frequently observed fusion partners. RNA-based next-generation sequencing is the primary method for detecting NRG1 and NRG2 gene fusions, whereas pERBB3 immunohistochemistry can serve as a rapid prescreening tool for identifying NRG1 -positive patients. Currently, there are no approved targeted drugs for NRG1 and NRG2 . Common treatment approaches involve pan-ERBB inhibitors, small molecule inhibitors targeting ERBB2 or ERBB3, and monoclonal antibodies. Given the current landscape of NRG1 and NRG2 in solid tumors, a consensus among diagnostic and treatment experts is proposed, and clinical trials hold promise for benefiting more patients with NRG1 and NRG2 gene fusion solid tumors.

STK11/LKB1-Deficient Phenotype Rather Than Mutation Diminishes Immunotherapy Efficacy and Represents STING/Type I Interferon/CD8+ T-Cell Dysfunction in NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

Conflicting findings have been reported regarding the association between STK11/LKB1 mutations and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICB) efficacy in NSCLC. It has been reported that tumors could exhibit impaired STK11/LKB1 function even without STK11 mutations. We hypothesized that STK11 phenotype rather than mutation may better stratify ICB outcomes.

METHODS

Selected functional STK11 events and LKB1 protein data were leveraged to establish a transcriptomics-based classifier of STK11 phenotype (STK11-deficient [-def] or -proficient [-prof]). We analyzed in-house and Genentech/Roche's data of three randomized trials of programmed cell death protein-1 or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibition in NSCLC (ORIENT-11, n = 171; OAK, n = 699; POPLAR, n = 192) and The Cancer Genome Atlas-NSCLC cohort.

RESULTS

Tissue STK11 mutation did not affect ICB outcomes. However, the survival benefit of ICB versus chemotherapy were lost or reversed in STK11-def tumors (hazard ratios for death, 95% confidence interval: OAK [0.97, 0.69-1.35]; POPLAR [1.61, 0.88-2.97]; ORIENT-11 [1.07, 0.50-2.29]), while remaining in STK11-prof tumors (hazard ratios for death, 95% confidence interval: OAK [0.81, 0.66-0.99]; POPLAR [0.66, 0.46-0.95]; ORIENT-11 [0.59, 0.37-0.92]). In tumors differentially classified by phenotype and mutation status, STK11-wild-type/def tumors had significantly worse ICB outcomes than STK11-mutated (STK11-MUT)/prof tumors (p < 0.05). The deleterious impact of STK11 deficiency was independent of STK11/KRAS/KEAP1 status or PD-L1 expression. The STING/interferon-I signaling, which was previously shown to be suppressed in STK11-MUT models, was perturbed in patients with STK11-def tumors rather than those with STK11-MUT tumors. Surprisingly, whereas high CD8+ T-cell infiltration was significantly associated with prolonged survival with ICB in STK11-prof tumors (p < 0.05 for 3 trials), it predicted an opposite trend toward worse ICB outcomes in STK11-def tumors across three trials. This suggested an association between STK11 deficiency and CD8+ T-cell dysfunction, which might not be reversed by programmed cell death protein 1 or PD-L1 blockade.

CONCLUSIONS

STK11 phenotype rather than mutation status can accurately identify patients with ICB-refractory NSCLC and reflect immune suppression. It can help refine stratification algorithms for future clinical research and also provide a reliable resource aiding basic and translational studies in identifying therapeutic targets.

Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of RET gene fusion non-small cell lung cancer in China

The rearranged during transfection (RET) gene is one of the receptor tyrosine kinases and cell-surface molecules responsible for transmitting signals that regulate cell growth and differentiation. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), RET fusion is a rare driver gene alteration associated with a poor prognosis. Fortunately, two selective RET inhibitors (sRETi), namely pralsetinib and selpercatinib, have been approved for treating RET fusion NSCLC due to their remarkable efficacy and safety profiles. These inhibitors have shown the ability to overcome resistance to multikinase inhibitors (MKIs). Furthermore, ongoing clinical trials are investigating several second-generation sRETis that are specifically designed to target solvent front mutations, which pose a challenge for first-generation sRETis. The effective screening of patients is the first crucial step in the clinical application of RET-targeted therapy. Currently, four methods are widely used for detecting gene rearrangements: next-generation sequencing (NGS), reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Each of these methods has its advantages and limitations. To streamline the clinical workflow and improve diagnostic and treatment strategies for RET fusion NSCLC, our expert group has reached a consensus. Our objective is to maximize the clinical benefit for patients and promote standardized approaches to RET fusion screening and therapy.

Pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability, and feasibility of apatinib in combination with gefitinib in stage IIIB-IV EGFR-mutated non-squamous NSCLC: a drug-drug interaction study

PURPOSE

Apatinib combined with gefitinib was proven to benefit advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients in first-line treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the drug-drug interaction of gefitinib and apatinib when coadministered in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients.

METHODS

In this phase 1b, multi-center, open-label, fixed-sequence study, the drug-drug interaction of gefitinib and apatinib was evaluated when coadministered in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients. Patients received single-agent apatinib 500 mg QD on days 1-4. Gefitinib 250 mg QD was given on days 5-15 and combined with apatinib 500 mg QD on days 12-15. Serial blood samples were drawn on days 4 and 15. The plasma concentrations and other pharmacokinetics parameters were measured for apatinib with and without gefitinib.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 22 patients and 20 were analyzed for pharmacokinetics. There were no distinct differences in apatinib Cmax and AUC0-τ with versus without gefitinib (geometric LSM ratio, 0.96 [90% CI 0.84-1.10] for Cmax and 1.12 [90% CI 0.96-1.30] for AUC0-τ). Similar PFS and grade of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were found between different Cmax and AUC0-τ of apatinib and gefitinib at 500 mg apatinib and 250 mg gefitinib dose levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Apatinib pharmacokinetics parameters were not significantly changed when coadministered with gefitinib. All TEAEs were manageable, and there was no need to change the dose level when combining apatinib and gefitinib (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04390984, May 18, 2020).

Design and Rationale for a Phase II/III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Sugemalimab as Consolidation Therapy in Patients With Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Not Progressed Following Concurrent or Sequential Chemoradiotherapy: The SURPASS Study

BACKGROUND

There is still a substantial need of more treatment options for patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). The standard therapy for LS-SCLC is platinum-based doublet chemotherapy administered concurrently with thoracic radiotherapy (cCRT). In China, sequential chemoradiotherapy (sCRT) is also a common practice. However, the disease inevitably progresses in most patients despite the curative intent and initial response.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sugemalimab is an anti-programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) antibody that improved clinical outcomes for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer after cCRT or sCRT. The SUPPASS study is a phase II/III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study (NCT05623267) that aims to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of sugemalimab as consolidation therapy in patients with LS-SCLC who have no progression following cCRT or sCRT. Approximately 346 patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive sugemalimab 1200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks for up to 12 months. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). Key secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), landmark PFS rate, landmark OS rate, objective response rate and safety. Longitudinal molecular residual disease (MRD) testing will be performed as preplanned exploratory analysis.

CONCLUSION

Study results will help demonstrate the efficacy and tolerability of anti-PD-L1 antibody consolidation therapy in LS-SCLC patients who have not progressed following cCRT or sCRT, and help determine the clinical implications of MRD in LS-SCLC.

Tumor response assessment by measuring the single largest lesion per organ in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor

Background

For Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST1.1), measuring up to two target lesions per organ is an arbitrary criterion.

Objectives

We sought to compare response assessment using RECIST1.1 and modified RECIST1.1 (mRECIST1.1, measuring the single largest lesion per organ) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients undergoing anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy.

Methods

Concordance of radiologic response categorization between RECIST1.1 and mRECIST1.1 was compared using the Kappa statistics. C-index was calculated to evaluate prognostic accuracy of radiologic response by the two criteria. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis were conducted for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

Eighty-seven patients who had at least two target lesions in any organ per the RECIST1.1 were eligible for comparison analysis. Tumor response showed excellent concordance when measured using the RECIST1.1 and mRECIST1.1 (Kappa = 0.961). C-index by these two criteria was similar for PFS (0.784 versus 0.785) and OS (0.649 versus 0.652). Responders had significantly longer PFS and OS versus non-responders (p < 0.05), whichever criterion adopted. Radiologic response remained a significant predictor of PFS and OS in multivariate analysis (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The mRECIST1.1 was comparable to RECIST1.1 in response assessment among aNSCLC patients who received single-agent PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor. The mRECIST1.1, with reduced number of lesions to be measured, may be sufficient and more convenient to assess antitumor activity in clinical practice.

Deciphering transcriptomic determinants of the divergent link between PD-L1 and immunotherapy efficacy

Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression remains the most widely used biomarker for predicting response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), but its predictiveness varies considerably. Identification of factors accounting for the varying PD-L1 performance is urgently needed. Here, using data from three independent trials comprising 1239 patients, we have identified subsets of cancer with distinct PD-L1 predictiveness based on tumor transcriptome. In the Predictiveness-High (PH) group, PD-L1+ tumors show better overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate with ICI than PD-L1- tumors across three trials. However, the Predictiveness-Low (PL) group demonstrates an opposite trend towards better outcomes for PD-L1- tumors. PD-L1+ tumors from the PH group demonstrate the superiority of ICI over chemotherapy, whereas PD-L1+ tumors from the PL group show comparable efficacy between two treatments or exhibit an opposite trend favoring chemotherapy. This observation of context-dependent predictiveness remains strong regardless of immune subtype (Immune-Enriched or Non-Immune), PD-L1 regulation mechanism (adaptative or constitutive), tumor mutation burden, or neoantigen load. This work illuminates avenues for optimizing the use of PD-L1 expression in clinical decision-making and trial design, although this exploratory concept should be further confirmed in large trials.

Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a malignant tumor originating from the pleura, and its incidence has been increasing in recent years. Due to the insidious onset and strong local invasiveness of MPM, most patients are diagnosed in the late stage and early screening and treatment for high-risk populations are crucial. The treatment of MPM mainly includes surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Immunotherapy and electric field therapy have also been applied, leading to further improvements in patient survival. The Mesothelioma Group of the Yangtze River Delta Lung Cancer Cooperation Group (East China LUng caNcer Group, ECLUNG; Youth Committee) developed a national consensus on the clinical diagnosis and treatment of MPM based on existing clinical research evidence and the opinions of national experts. This consensus aims to promote the homogenization and standardization of MPM diagnosis and treatment in China, covering epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up.

International expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer complicated by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Background

Lung cancer combined by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (LC-COPD) is a common comorbidity and their interaction with each other poses significant clinical challenges. However, there is a lack of well-established consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of LC-COPD.

Methods

A panel of experts, comprising specialists in oncology, respiratory medicine, radiology, interventional medicine, and thoracic surgery, was convened. The panel was presented with a comprehensive review of the current evidence pertaining to LC-COPD. After thorough discussions, the panel reached a consensus on 17 recommendations with over 70% agreement in voting to enhance the management of LC-COPD and optimize the care of these patients.

Results

The 17 statements focused on pathogenic mechanisms (n=2), general strategies (n=4), and clinical application in COPD (n=2) and lung cancer (n=9) were developed and modified. These statements provide guidance on early screening and treatment selection of LC-COPD, the interplay of lung cancer and COPD on treatment, and considerations during treatment. This consensus also emphasizes patient-centered and personalized treatment in the management of LC-COPD.

Conclusions

The consensus highlights the need for concurrent treatment for both lung cancer and COPD in LC-COPD patients, while being mindful of the mutual influence of the two conditions on treatment and monitoring for adverse reactions.

Envonalkib versus crizotinib for treatment-naive ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III trial

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements are present in about 5-6% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases and associated with increased risks of central nervous system (CNS) involvement. Envonalkib, a novel ALK inhibitor, demonstrated promising anti-tumor activity and safety in advanced ALK-positive NSCLC in the first-in-human phase I study. This phase III trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04009317) investigated the efficacy and safety of first-line envonalkib in advanced ALK-positive NSCLC cases. Totally 264 participants were randomized 1:1 to receive envonalkib (n = 131) or crizotinib (n = 133). Median independent review committee (IRC)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) times were 24.87 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.64-30.36) and 11.60 (95% CI: 8.28-13.73) months in the envonalkib and crizotinib groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.34-0.64, p < 0.0001). IRC-assessed confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was higher (81.68% vs. 70.68%, p = 0.056) and duration of response was longer (median, 25.79 [95% CI, 16.53-29.47] vs. 11.14 [95% CI, 9.23-16.59] months, p = 0.0003) in the envonalkib group compared with the crizotinib group. In participants with baseline brain target lesions, IRC-assessed CNS-ORR was improved with envonalkib compared with crizotinib (78.95% vs. 23.81%). Overall survival (OS) data were immature, and median OS was not reached in either group (HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.48-1.47, p = 0.5741). The 12-month OS rates were 90.6% (95% CI, 84.0%-94.5%) and 89.4% (95% CI, 82.8%-93.6%) in the envonalkib and crizotinib groups, respectively. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 55.73% and 42.86% of participants in the envonalkib and crizotinib groups, respectively. Envonalkib significantly improved PFS and delayed brain metastasis progression in advanced ALK-positive NSCLC.

AK112, a novel PD-1/VEGF bispecific antibody, in combination with chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): an open-label, multicenter, phase II trial

Background

Inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) function can improve the efficacy of immunotherapy by modulating the tumor immune microenvironment. AK112 is the first-in-class humanized IgG1 bispecific antibody targeting programmed death-1 (PD-1) and VEGF. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AK112 combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

This open-label, multicenter, phase II clinical trial was conducted in 11 hospitals in China. Eligible participants were adults aged 18-75 years with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, at least one measurable lesion, and an estimated life expectancy of at least 3 months. The participants were categorized into three cohorts based on prior therapy and functional genomic alterations. Patients in cohort 1 were previously untreated advanced NSCLC, had no epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene modifications, and received AK112 combined with pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) for non-squamous (non-sq)-NSCLC or paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) for sq-NSCLC plus carboplatin (area under the curve of 5 mg/mL per min) for four cycles, followed by AK112 with pemetrexed for non-sq-NSCLC and AK112 alone for sq-NSCLC as maintenance therapy. The participants in cohort 2 had advanced NSCLC with EGFR-sensitive mutations, failed previous EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy, and received pemetrexed plus AK112 and carboplatin for four cycles, followed by pemetrexed plus AK112 as maintenance therapy. The participants in cohort 3 had advanced NSCLC who failed systemic platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-PD-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) treatments and received AK112 plus docetaxel (75 mg/m2). Two dosages of AK112 (10 or 20 mg/kg) were examined in each cohort, and the drug was administered intravenously on day 1 of each 3-week treatment cycle. The primary endpoints were the investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) and safety. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04736823).

Findings

Eighty-three patients were enrolled from February 2021 to August 2022 and received the study treatment. Cohorts 1, 2, and 3 had 44, 19, and 20 patients, respectively. The confirmed ORR was 53.5% (23/43) [95% CI, 36.9-67.1], 68.4% (13/19) [95% CI, 43.4-87.4], and 40.0% (8/20) [95% CI, 19.1-63.9] in cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In cohort 1, the median PFS was not reached, and the 12-month PFS rate was 59.1%. In cohorts 2 and 3, the median PFS were 8.5 [95% CI, 5.5-NE] and 7.5 [95% CI, 2.3-NE] months, and the 12-month PFS rates were 35.5% and 44.5%, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were decreased white blood cell count [7 (8.4%)], neutropenia [5 (6.0%)], thrombocytopenia [2 (2.4%)], anemia [4 (4.8%)], and myelosuppression [2 (2.4%)].

Interpretation

AK112 plus platinum-doublet showed promising antitumor activity and safety not only in first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC patients without driver mutation but also in patients with EGFR-functional mutation who failed previous EGFR-TKI therapy and advanced NSCLC patients who failed prior systemic platinum-based chemotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatments, suggesting a valuable potential new treatment option for this patient population.

Funding

Akeso Biopharma, Inc., Zhongshan, China, and National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Machine learning-based risk model incorporating tumor immune and stromal contexture predicts cancer prognosis and immunotherapy efficacy

The immune and stromal contexture within the tumor microenvironment (TME) interact with cancer cells and jointly determine disease process and therapeutic response. We aimed at developing a risk scoring model based on TME-related genes of squamous cell lung cancer to predict patient prognosis and immunotherapeutic response. TME-related genes were identified through exploring genes that correlated with immune scores and stromal scores. LASSO-Cox regression model was used to establish the TME-related risk scoring (TMErisk) model. A TMErisk model containing six genes was established. High TMErisk correlated with unfavorable OS in LUSC patients and this association was validated in multiple NSCLC datasets. Genes involved in pathways associated with immunosuppressive microenvironment were enriched in the high TMErisk group. Tumors with high TMErisk showed elevated infiltration of immunosuppressive cells. High TMErisk predicted worse immunotherapeutic response and prognosis across multiple carcinomas. TMErisk model could serve as a robust biomarker for predicting OS and immunotherapeutic response.

Classification of Tumor Immune Microenvironment According to Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression and Immune Infiltration Predicts Response to Immunotherapy Plus Chemotherapy in Advanced Patients With NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

According to mechanisms of adaptive immune resistance, tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) is classified into four types: (1) programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-negative and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL)-negative (type I); (2) PD-L1-positive and TIL-positive (type II); (3) PD-L1-negative and TIL-positive (type III); and (4) PD-L1-positive and TIL-negative (type IV). However, the relationship between the TIME classification model and immunotherapy efficacy has not been validated by any large-scale randomized controlled clinical trial among patients with advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

On the basis of RNA-sequencing and immunohistochemistry data from the ORIENT-11 study, we optimized the TIME classification model and evaluated its predictive value for the efficacy of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy.

RESULTS

PD-L1 mRNA expression and immune score calculated by the ESTIMATE method were the strongest predictors for the efficacy of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy. Therefore, they were determined as the optimized definition of the TIME classification system. When compared between combination therapy and chemotherapy alone, only the type II subpopulation with high immune score and high PD-L1 mRNA expression was significantly associated with improved progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio = 0.12, 95% confidence interval: 0.06-0.25, p < 0.001) and overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.27, 95% confidence interval: 0.13-0.55, p < 0.001). In the combination group, the type II subpopulation had a much longer survival time, not even reaching the median PFS or overall survival, but the other three subpopulations were susceptible to having similar PFS. In the chemotherapy group, there was no marked association between survival outcomes and TIME subtypes.

CONCLUSIONS

Only patients with both high PD-L1 expression and high immune infiltration could benefit from chemotherapy plus immunotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. For patients lacking either PD-L1 expression or immune infiltration, chemotherapy alone might be a better treatment option to avoid unnecessary toxicities and financial burdens.

Phase 1b trial of anti-EGFR antibody JMT101 and Osimertinib in EGFR exon 20 insertion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer

EGFR exon 20 insertion (20ins)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an uncommon disease with limited therapeutic options and dismal prognosis. Here we report the activity, tolerability, potential mechanisms of response and resistance for dual targeting EGFR 20ins with JMT101 (anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody) plus osimertinib from preclinical models and an open label, multi-center phase 1b trial (NCT04448379). Primary endpoint of the trial is tolerability. Secondary endpoints include objective response rate, duration of response, disease control rate, progression free survival, overall survival, the pharmacokinetic profile of JMT101, occurrence of anti-drug antibodies and correlation between biomarkers and clinical outcomes. A total of 121 patients are enrolled to receive JMT101 plus osimertinib 160 mg. The most common adverse events are rash (76.9%) and diarrhea (63.6%). The confirmed objective response rate is 36.4%. Median progression-free survival is 8.2 months. Median duration of response is unreached. Subgroup analyses were performed by clinicopathological features and prior treatments. In patients with platinum-refractory diseases (n = 53), confirmed objective response rate is 34.0%, median progression-free survival is 9.2 months and median duration of response is 13.3 months. Responses are observed in distinct 20ins variants and intracranial lesions. Intracranial disease control rate is 87.5%. Confirmed intracranial objective response rate is 25%.

Phase I trial of KN046, a novel bispecific antibody targeting PD-L1 and CTLA-4 in patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

KN046 is a novel bispecific antibody targeting programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4). This multicenter phase I trial investigated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of KN046 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

METHODS

Patients who failed standard treatment were included. KN046 was administered at doses of 1, 3, and 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks (Q2W), 5 mg/kg every 3 weeks (Q3W), and 300 mg Q3W based on the modified toxicity probability interval method in the dose-escalation phase; the recommended dose was used in the expansion phase. Primary objectives were maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) in escalation and preliminary efficacy in expansion. Secondary objectives included PK, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of KN046. We also explored biomarkers based on PD-L1 expression, multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) staining, and RNAseq-derived nCounter platform.

RESULTS

Totally, 100 eligible patients were enrolled, including 59 with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), 36 with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and those with other advanced solid tumors. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were rash (33.0%), pruritus (31.0%), and fatigue (20.0%). Grade ≥3 TRAEs were observed in 14.0% of participants. No dose-limiting toxicity occurred in the dose-escalation phase, and the MTD was not reached. The RP2D was determined as 5 mg/kg Q2W according to the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model, the preliminary exposure-response analysis, and the overall safety profile. Among 88 efficacy-evaluable participants, the objective response rate (ORR) was 12.5%, and the median duration of response was 16.6 months. In the NPC subgroup, the ORR was 15.4%, and the median overall survival (OS) was 24.7 (95% CI 16.3 to not estimable) months. In the EGFR-mutant NSCLC subgroup, the ORR was 6.3%. mIF analysis results showed patients with high CD8 expression showed longer median OS (27.1 vs 9.2 months, p=0.02); better prognosis was observed in patients with high CD8 and PD-L1 expression.

CONCLUSIONS

KN046 was well tolerated and showed promising antitumor efficacy in advanced solid tumors, especially in patients with NPC. The combination of both CD8 and PD-L1 expression improved the prediction of KN046 response.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

NCT03733951 .

Continuation of anti-PD-1 therapy plus physician-choice treatment beyond first progression is not associated with clinical benefit in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Objective

Few data are available on the optimal treatment options after disease progression from first-line treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy. This study aimed to describe the safety and efficacy of continuing ICIs beyond first progress disease (PD) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Patients with NSCLC previously treated with first-line anti-PD-1 antibody plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy and hence had PD as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 were enrolled. For the subsequent line, patients received physician's choice (PsC) with or without an anti-PD-1 antibody. The primary outcome was progression-free survival after second-line treatment (PFS2). Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) from the initiation of first-line treatment, post-second-progression survival (P2PS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety during second-line treatment.

Results

Between July 2018 and January 2021, 59 patients were included. A total of 33 patients received a physician-decided second-line regimen plus ICIs (PsC plus ICIs group), and 26 patients did not continue ICIs (PsC group). There was no significant difference in PFS2 between the PsC plus ICIs group and the PsC group (median, 6.5 vs. 5.7 months, p = 0.46). median OS (28.8 vs. 29.2 months), P2PS (13.4 vs. 18.7 months), ORR (18.2% vs. 19.2%), and DCR (78.8% vs, 84.6%) were also similar between the two groups. No new safety signals were observed.

Conclusion

In this real-world setting, patients treated with continued ICIs beyond their first disease progression did not experience clinical benefit but without compromising safety.

Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer: A multicenter phase 3 trial (RATIONALE-309)

Checkpoint inhibitors are effective in recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer (R/M NPC). RATIONALE-309 (NCT03924986) randomized 263 treatment-naive R/M NPC patients to tislelizumab or placebo every 3 weeks (Q3W), plus chemotherapy (Q3W for 4-6 cycles). At interim analysis, progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer with tislelizumab-chemotherapy versus placebo-chemotherapy (hazard ratio: 0.52; 95% confidence interval: 0.38, 0.73; p < 0.0001). PFS benefit for tislelizumab-chemotherapy versus placebo-chemotherapy was observed regardless of programmed death-ligand 1 expression. PFS after next line of treatment and overall survival showed favorable trends for tislelizumab-chemotherapy versus placebo-chemotherapy. The safety profile was similar between arms. Gene expression profiling (GEP) identified immunologically "hot" tumors, and showed an activated dendritic cell (DC) signature was associated with tislelizumab-chemotherapy PFS benefit. Our results support that tislelizumab-chemotherapy should be considered as first-line treatment for R/M NPC, and GEP and activated DC signature results may help identify patients who might benefit most from immunochemotherapy treatment. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

TMBserval: a statistical explainable learning model reveals weighted tumor mutation burden better categorizing therapeutic benefits

A high tumor mutation burden (TMB) is known to drive the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and is associated with favorable prognoses. However, because it is a one-dimensional numerical representation of non-synonymous genetic alterations, TMB suffers from clinical challenges due to its equal quantification. Since not all mutations elicit the same antitumor rejection, the effect on immunity of neoantigens encoded by different types or locations of somatic mutations may vary. In addition, other typical genomic features, including complex structural variants, are not captured by the conventional TMB metric. Given the diversity of cancer subtypes and the complexity of treatment regimens, this paper proposes that tumor mutations capable of causing various degrees of immunogenicity should be calculated separately. TMB should therefore, be segmented into more exact, higher dimensional feature vectors to exhaustively measure the foreignness of tumors. We systematically reviewed patients' multifaceted efficacy based on a refined TMB metric, investigated the association between multidimensional mutations and integrative immunotherapy outcomes, and developed a convergent categorical decision-making framework, TMBserval (Statistical Explainable machine learning with Regression-based VALidation). TMBserval integrates a multiple-instance learning concept with statistics to create a statistically interpretable model that addresses the broad interdependencies between multidimensional mutation burdens and decision endpoints. TMBserval is a pan-cancer-oriented many-to-many nonlinear regression model with discrimination and calibration power. Simulations and experimental analyses using data from 137 actual patients both demonstrated that our method could discriminate between patient groups in a high-dimensional feature space, thereby rationally expanding the beneficiary population of immunotherapy.

Retraction Note: p300 promotes proliferation, migration, and invasion via inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition in non-small cell lung cancer cells

This article has been retracted. Please see the Retraction Notice for more detail: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4559-3.

Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of thymic epithelial tumors

Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are a relatively rare type of thoracic tumor, accounting for less than 1% of all tumors. The incidence of TETs is about 3.93/10000 in China, slightly higher than that of European and American countries. For resectable TETs, complete surgical resection is recommended. Radiotherapy or chemotherapy may be used as postoperative adjuvant treatment. Treatment for advanced, unresectable TETs consist mainly of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, but there is a lack of standard first- and second-line treatment regimens. Recently, targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown promising outcomes in TETs. Based on the currently available clinical evidences and the opinions of the national experts, the Thymic Oncology Group of Yangtze River Delta Lung Cancer Cooperation Group (East China LUng caNcer Group, ECLUNG; Youth Committee) established this Chinese expert consensus on the clinical diagnosis and treatment of TETs, covering the epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis and follow-up of TETs.

The maximum tumor growth rate predicts clinical outcomes of patients with small-cell lung cancer undergoing first-line chemotherapy plus immune-checkpoint inhibitor therapy

BACKGROUND

Currently, no biomarkers can accurately predict survival outcomes in patients with SCLC undergoing treatment. Tumor growth rate (TGR; percent size change per month [%/m]) is suggested as an imaging predictor of response to anti-cancer treatment. We aimed to evaluate the predictive role of the maximum TGR (TGRmax) for outcomes of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients undergoing first-line chemotherapy plus immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment.

METHODS

Patients with SCLC receiving first-line chemotherapy plus immunotherapy were analyzed within this retrospective study. The X-tile program was used to identify the cut-off value of TGRmax based on maximum progression-free survival (PFS) stratification. The Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression models were used to evaluate the effect of the presence of TGRmax on PFS and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

In total, 104 patients were evaluated. Median (range) TGRmax was -33.9 (-65.2 to 21.6) %/m and the optimal cut-off value of TGRmax was -34.3%/m. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that patients with TGRmax > -34.3%/m was associated with shorter PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.81; 95% CI, 1.71-4.63; p < 0.001) and OS (HR, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.41-7.08; p = 0.005). In patients who received partial response (PR), Kaplan-Meier survival analyses showed that superior PFS and OS (p = 0.005 and p = 0.009, respectively) benefit was observed when TGRmax ≤-34.3%/m.

CONCLUSIONS

SCLC patients with TGRmax > -34.3%/m had worse PFS and OS in first-line ICI plus platin-based chemotherapy. TGRmax could independently serve as an early biomarker to predict the benefit from chemoimmunotherapy.

Pretreatment Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase and Metastases Numbers as Potential Determinants of Anti-PD-1 Therapy Outcome in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

We aimed to investigate the determinant factors of anti-PD-1 therapy outcome in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we included 64 patients with recurrent/metastatic NPC. The association of patients' characteristics, C-reactive protein (CRP), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) with survival benefit of anti-PD-1 therapy were analyzed using Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier analyses. Patients were divided based on the median value of CRP, NLR or LDH into different subgroups.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up time of 11.4 months (range: 1-28 months), median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 1.9 months (95% CI, .18-3.6) and 15 months (95% CI, 10.9-19.1) months, respectively. Pretreatment metastases numbers was significant predictor of PFS (HR = 1.99; 95% CI 1.10-3.63; P = .024) and OS (HR = 2.77; 95% CI 1.36-5.61; P = .005). Baseline LDH level was independent predictor of OS (HR = 7.01; 95% CI 3.09-15.88; P < .001). Patients with LDH level >435 U/L at the baseline had significantly shorter PFS and OS compared to patients with LDH level ≤435 U/L (median PFS: 1.7 vs 3.5 months, P = .040; median OS: 3.7 vs 18.5 months, P < .001). Patients with non-durable clinical benefit (NDB) had significantly higher LDH level at the baseline compared to patients who achieved durable clinical benefit (DCB) (P = .025). Post-treatment levels of CRP, LDH, and NLR were decreased compared to baseline in patients with DCB (P = .030, P = .088, and P = .066, respectively), whereas, there was a significant increase in post-treatment level of LDH compared with baseline in patients with NDB (P = .024).

CONCLUSIONS

LDH level at the baseline was an independent predictor of OS and pretreatment metastases numbers was a significant predictor of PFS and OS.

Chinese expert consensus on the multidisciplinary management of pneumonitis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have successfully treated a number of different types of cancer, which is of great significance for cancer treatment. With the widespread use of ICIs in clinical practice, the increasing checkpoint inhibitor pneumonia (CIP) will be a challenge to clinicians. To guide the diagnosis and treatment of CIP, we conducted in-depth discussions based on the latest evidence, forming a consensus among Chinese experts on the multidisciplinary management of CIP.

Ensartinib in advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter, open-label, two-staged, phase 1 trial

Background

Ensartinib, a potent second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that targets anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), MET and ROS1, was evaluated in a phase I clinical trial in patients with advanced, ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Patients with advanced, ALK or ROS1-positive NSCLC were recruited from 2 centers in China. This study consisted of dose escalation and expansion stages. Patients were treated with oral ensartinib [dosage of escalation stage was from 150, 200, 225 to 250 mg per day, expansion stage was recommended phase II dose (RP2D)] in continuous 28-day cycles. The primary objectives were safety, dose limited toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and RP2D based on tolerability. Key secondary objectives included pharmacokinetic (PK) and anti-tumor activity.

Results

Forty-eight patients were enrolled, 37 (77.1%) were ALK TKI-naïve, 11 (22.9%) patients had previously received crizotinib, ceritinib or alectinib. Ensartinib was well tolerated and common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) included rash (87.5%), transaminase elevation (60.4%), pruritus (45.8%) and creatinine elevation (35.4%). The top 3 grade 3-5 TRAEs were rash (14.6%), elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (12.5%) and aspartate transaminase (AST) (4.2%). Two DLTs were observed in 250 mg, so MTD and RP2D was 225 mg per day. Ensartinib was moderately absorbed (median Tmax: 3.00-4.00 h) and slowly eliminated (mean T1/2: 21.0-30.2 h). The area under the curve (AUC) of ensartinib reached saturation at 200 to 225 mg and no major accumulation after daily administration. For all patients, the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rates (DCR) were 64.6 % and 81.3%, median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 16.79 months. In subgroup analysis, the ORR and mPFS was 81.3% and 45.5%, 25.73 and 4.14 months in TKI-naïve and -treated ALK+ patients, respectively. The intra-cranial ORR and mPFS for patients with measurable brain metastases were 66.7% and 22.90 months. ALK abundance may predict the efficacy of ensartinib. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis showed specific signaling pathways enrichment in long and short progression-free survival (PFS) groups.

Conclusions

Ensartinib was well tolerated under 225 mg (MTD) and demonstrated promising anti-tumor activity in ALK+ NSCLC patients, including those with CNS metastases and those previously TKI-treated.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02959619.

Chinese expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of HER2-altered non-small cell lung cancer

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) possesses tyrosine kinase activity and participates in cell growth, differentiation and migration, and survival. Its alterations, mainly including mutations, amplifications, and overexpression are associated with poor prognosis and are one of the major drivers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several clinical trials had been investigating on the treatments of HER2-altered NSCLC, including conventional chemotherapy, programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), however, the results were either disappointing or encouraging, but inconsistent. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration as the first targeted agent for treating HER2-mutant NSCLC. Effective screening of patients is the key to the clinical application of HER2-targeted agents such as TKIs and ADCs. Various testing methods are nowadays available, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR), next-generation sequencing (NGS), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), etc. Each method has its pros and cons and should be reasonably assigned to appropriate patients for diagnosis and guiding treatment decisions. To help standardize the clinical workflow, our expert group reached a consensus on the clinical management of HER2-altered NSCLC, focusing on the diagnosis and treatment strategies.

Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of NTRK gene fusion solid tumors in China

Gene fusions can drive tumor development for multiple types of cancer. Currently, many drugs targeting gene fusions are being approved for clinical application. At present, tyrosine receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors targeting neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions are among the first "tumor agnostic" drugs approved for pan-cancer use. Representative TRK inhibitors, including larotrectinib and entrectinib, have shown high efficacy for many types of cancer. At the same time, several second-generation drugs designed to overcome first-generation drug resistance are undergoing clinical development. Due to the rarity of NTRK gene fusions in common cancer types and technical issues regarding the complexity of fusion patterns, effectively screening patients for TRK inhibitor treatment in routine clinical practice is challenging. Different detection methods including immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, and (DNA and/or RNA-based) next-generation sequencing have pros and cons. As such, recommending suitable tests for individual patients and ensuring the quality of tests is essential. Moreover, at present, there is a lack of systematic review for the clinical efficacy and development status of first- and second-generation TRK inhibitors. To resolve the above issues, our expert group has reached a consensus regarding the diagnosis and treatment of NTRK gene fusion solid tumors, aiming to standardize clinical practice with the goal of benefiting patients with NTRK gene fusions treated with TRK inhibitors.

TMBcat: A multi-endpoint p-value criterion on different discrepancy metrics for superiorly inferring tumor mutation burden thresholds

Tumor mutation burden (TMB) is a widely recognized stratification biomarker for predicting the efficacy of immunotherapy; however, the number and universal definition of the categorizing thresholds remain debatable due to the multifaceted nature of efficacy and the imprecision of TMB measurements. We proposed a minimal joint p-value criterion from the perspective of differentiating the comprehensive therapeutic advantages, termed TMBcat, optimized TMB categorization across distinct cancer cohorts and surpassed known benchmarks. The statistical framework applies to multidimensional endpoints and is fault-tolerant to TMB measurement errors. To explore the association between TMB and various immunotherapy outcomes, we performed a retrospective analysis on 78 patients with non-small cell lung cancer and 64 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinomas who underwent anti-PD-(L)1 therapy. The stratification results of TMBcat confirmed that the relationship between TMB and immunotherapy is non-linear, i.e., treatment gains do not inherently increase with higher TMB, and the pattern varies across carcinomas. Thus, multiple TMB classification thresholds could distinguish patient prognosis flexibly. These findings were further validated in an assembled cohort of 943 patients obtained from 11 published studies. In conclusion, our work presents a general criterion and an accessible software package; together, they enable optimal TMB subgrouping. Our study has the potential to yield innovative insights into therapeutic selection and treatment strategies for patients.

First-in-human phase I study of TQ-B3139 (CT-711) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with ALK and ROS1 rearrangements

BACKGROUND

TQ-B3139 is a novel ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) against a broad range of ALK mutations. The aim of this first-in-human phase I trial was to investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and clinical efficacy of TQ-B3139 in ALK or ROS1 positive advanced NSCLC patients.

METHODS

Following a 3 + 3 design, patients received escalating daily dose of TQ-B3139 (50-800 mg) continuously in 28-day cycles. Expansion stage started at dose of 200 mg twice daily (BID). The primary objectives were the safety, dose-limited toxicities (DLT) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D); secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity. Non-obligatory tumor samples at baseline were collected and sequenced.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 63 patients. Fifty-nine (93.4%) patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), mostly grade 1-2 vomiting (79.3%), diarrhea (76.1%) or nausea (68.2%). 1 (1/6) DLT occurred at 600 mg BID and 1 (1/3) at 800 mg BID. Based on safety and pharmacokinetics data, the RP2D was selected as 600 mg BID. At a dose level ≥200 mg BID, the overall response rate (ORR) was 76.7% (33/43), and the median progression free survival (mPFS) was 25.2 months (95%CI 11.9-NR) for TKI-naive patients. For TKI-treated patients, the ORR was 37.5% (6/16), and the mPFS was 5.4 months (95%CI 3.6-9.1). The ORR was 66.7% (2/3) in patients with ROS1 fusion at dose level ≥200 mg BID. In patients with measurable brain metastases, the intracranial ORR was 70% (7/10), with median intracranial PFS of 15.9 months. In TKI-treated patients, variant 3 and TP53 alteration were associated with poor PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

TQ-B3139 was well-tolerated and exhibited promising anti-tumor activities in patients with ALK and ROS1 positive advanced NSCLC.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

NCT03099330.

Genomic and microbial factors affect the prognosis of anti-pd-1 immunotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Antibodies targeting the programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) molecule have been reported to hold promising antitumor activities in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, only a small subset of NPC patients benefits from the anti-PD-1 monotherapy and factors that affect the treatment response need further investigation. This study aimed to examine the impact of multiple genetic and environmental factors on outcome of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy by identifying tumor size, tumor mutation burden (TMB) based on whole exon sequencing, human leukocyte antigen class I (HLA-I) homo-/heterozygosity and supertypes, blood Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA load, T cell proportions, and interferon-γ(IFN-γ) levels in a cohort of 57 NPC patients that received Nivolumab or Camrelizumab treatment. Moreover, we profiled the longitudinal changes in gut microbiota composition using shotgun metagenomics sequencing. We observed that high TMB combined with HLA-I heterozygosity was associated with improved clinical outcomes. In agreement with previous studies, we found that patients with higher plasma EBV DNA load showed worse progression-free survival. We found no evidence for an effect of gut bacterial diversity on the treatment response, but identified a higher abundance of seven specific gut bacteria at baseline of non-responders, including Blautia wexlera and Blautia obeum, as well as four other bacteria belonging to the Clostridiales order, and one Erysipelatoclostridium. Combined, this study provides insight into the influence of several genetic and environmental factors on anti-PD-1 immunotherapy responses in NPC patients.

A Joint Model Considering Measurement Errors for Optimally Identifying Tumor Mutation Burden Threshold

Tumor mutation burden (TMB) is a recognized stratification biomarker for immunotherapy. Nevertheless, the general TMB-high threshold is unstandardized due to severe clinical controversies, with the underlying cause being inconsistency between multiple assessment criteria and imprecision of the TMB value. The existing methods for determining TMB thresholds all consider only a single dimension of clinical benefit and ignore the interference of the TMB error. Our research aims to determine the TMB threshold optimally based on multifaceted clinical efficacies accounting for measurement errors. We report a multi-endpoint joint model as a generalized method for inferring the TMB thresholds, facilitating consistent statistical inference using an iterative numerical estimation procedure considering mis-specified covariates. The model optimizes the division by combining objective response rate and time-to-event outcomes, which may be interrelated due to some shared traits. We augment previous works by enabling subject-specific random effects to govern the communication among distinct endpoints. Our simulations show that the proposed model has advantages over the standard model in terms of precision and stability in parameter estimation and threshold determination. To validate the feasibility of the proposed thresholds, we pool a cohort of 73 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and 64 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma who underwent anti-PD-(L)1 treatment, as well as validation cohorts of 943 patients. Analyses revealed that our approach could grant clinicians a holistic efficacy assessment, culminating in a robust determination of the TMB screening threshold for superior patients. Our methodology has the potential to yield innovative insights into therapeutic selection and support precision immuno-oncology.

LY2874455 and Abemaciclib Reverse FGF3/4/19/CCND1 Amplification Mediated Gefitinib Resistance in NSCLC

Non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients who initially received tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy often acquired resistance via multiple complex mechanisms. The amplification of FGF3/4/19/CCND1 on chromosome 11q13 was found in many cancers with TKI resistance. However, the role of these amplifications in TKI-resistant NSCLC remains uncovered. Here, we generated the FGF3/4/19/CCND1 amplification model in the NSCLC cell lines PC-9 and HCC827. Upregulation of FGF3/4/19/CCND1 strongly promoted cell proliferation and gefitinib resistance in NSCLC cells. To find out the potential therapeutic strategies, we screened the combination of inhibitors against the FGF/FGFR signaling pathway and the CCND1/CDK4 complex and revealed that gefitinib combined with LY2874455 and abemaciclib exhibited the most effective inhibition of resistance in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, FGFs/CCND1 activated the MAPK pathway, which was abolished by the combination drugs. Our study provides a rationale for clinical testing of dual targeting FGFR and CCND1 with LY2874455 and abemaciclib in NSCLC patients who harbored FGF3/4/19/CCND1 amplification.

Abstract CT520: The safety summary of the phase 1a/b trial of QL1706, a novel dual immune checkpoint blockade containing a mixture of anti-PD1 IgG4 and anti-CTLA4 IgG1 antibodies, for advanced malignant tumors

Background: Anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) antibody may enhance the efficacy of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor. QL1706 is a novel dual immune checkpoint blockade containing a mixture of anti-PD-1 IgG4 and anti-CTLA4 IgG1 antibodies produced by a single cell line. Here we reported the pooled data of the phase 1a/b trial.

Methods: In the phase 1a dose escalation and expansion study (NCT04296994), dose escalation involved six levels (0.3, 1.0, 3.0, 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0 mg/kg, intravenously q3w) using an accelerated 3+3 design. The dose expansion cohorts received selected doses. In phase 1b (NCT05171790), patients with advanced solid tumors were given intravenous QL1706 5.0 mg/kg q3w according to the data in phase 1a. The primary objectives were to define the safety, tolerability, and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of QL1706 in phase 1a, and to evaluate the preliminary efficacy in phase 1b.

Results: As of Sept 30, 2021, totally 518 patients with multiple types of advanced cancer (99 in phase 1a and 419 in phase 1b) were enrolled, including lung cancer (175 [33.8%]), nasopharyngeal cancer (134 [25.9%]), cervical cancer (58 [11.2%]), liver cancer (34 [6.6%]), colorectal cancer (27 [5.2%]), and kidney cancer (18 [3.5%]), etc. 494 [95.4%] were previously treated, and 182 (35.1%) received previous immunotherapy. Two patients at 10 mg/kg suffered dose-limiting toxicity. The RP2D of QL1706 was defined as 5.0 mg/kg. After a median follow-up of 6.7 months, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were observed in 374 patients (72.2%). 70 (13.5%) experienced grade ≥3 TRAEs. The most common TRAEs were rash (91 [17.6%]), pruritus (65 [12.5%]), hypothyroidism (60 [11.6%]), AST increased (48 [9.3%]), and hyperthyroidism (46 [8.9%]). The TRAEs that led to drug interruption and drug discontinuation were observed in 67 (12.9%) and 31 patients (6.0%), respectively. The immune-related TRAEs and treatment-related serious adverse events were observed in 223 (43.1%) and 59 patients (11.4%), respectively. 79 (16.9%) patients had a confirmed objective response, 237 (50.6%) patients had a confirmed disease control.

Conclusion: QL1706 had a manageable safety profile. QL1706 still showed promising anti-tumor activity although over one-third of the patients received prior immunotherapy. These results supported further investigation of QL1706 for advanced solid tumors.

Citation Format: Li Zhang, Hongyun Zhao, Yan Huang, Wenfeng Fang, Yuxiang Ma, Yang Zhang, Xiaoli Wei, Yanhua Yang, Wei Yang, Furong Liu, Zuan Lin, Jianing Li, Qianwen Liu, Benyan Zou, Kunlun Liao, qun Liu. The safety summary of the phase 1a/b trial of QL1706, a novel dual immune checkpoint blockade containing a mixture of anti-PD1 IgG4 and anti-CTLA4 IgG1 antibodies, for advanced malignant tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT520.

Tumor-induced erythroid precursor-differentiated myeloid cells mediate immunosuppression and curtail anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment efficacy

Despite the unprecedented success of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as anti-cancer therapy, it remains a prevailing clinical need to identify additional mechanisms underlying ICI therapeutic efficacy and potential drug resistance. Here, using lineage tracking in cancer patients and tumor-bearing mice, we demonstrate that erythroid progenitor cells lose their developmental potential and switch to the myeloid lineage. Single-cell transcriptome analyses reveal that, notwithstanding quantitative differences in erythroid gene expression, erythroid differentiated myeloid cells (EDMCs) are transcriptionally indistinguishable from their myeloid-originated counterparts. EDMCs possess multifaceted machinery to curtail T cell-mediated anti-tumor responses. Consequently, EDMC content within tumor tissues is negatively associated with T cell inflammation for the majority of solid cancers; moreover, EDMC enrichment, in accordance with anemia manifestation, is predictive of poor prognosis in various cohorts of patients undergoing ICI therapy. Together, our findings reveal a feedforward mechanism by which tumors exploit anemia-triggered erythropoiesis for myeloid transdifferentiation and immunosuppression.

FOXM1 variant contributes to gefitinib resistance via activating wnt/β-catenin signal pathway in non-small cell lung cancer patients

PURPOSE

Although gefitinib prolonged the progression-free survival (PFS) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, unpredictable resistance limited its clinical efficacy. Novel predictive biomarkers with explicit mechanisms are urgently needed.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A total of 282 NSCLC patients with gefitinib treatment were randomly assigned in a 7:3 ratio to exploratory (n=192) and validation (n=90) cohorts. The candidate polymorphisms were selected with Haploview4.2 in Hapmap and genotyped by a MassARRAY system, and the feature variables were identified through Randomforest Survival analysis. Tans-well and clonogenic assays, base editing and cell-derived tumor xenograft model were performed to uncover the underlying mechanism.

RESULTS

We found that the germline missense polymorphism rs3742076 (A>G, S628P), located in transactivation domain of FOXM1, was associated with PFS in exploratory (median PFS: GG vs. GA&AA, 9.20 vs. 13.37 months, P=0.00039, HR=2.399) and validation (median PFS: GG vs. GA&AA, 8.13 vs. 13.80 months, P=0.048, HR=2.628) cohorts. We elucidated that rs3742076_G conferred resistance to gefitinib by increasing protein stability of FOXM1 and facilitating an aggressive phenotype in vitro and in vivo through activating wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Meanwhile, FOXM1 level was highly associated with prognosis in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. Mechanistically, FOXM1 rs3742076_G upregulated wnt/β-catenin activity by directly binding to β-catenin in cytoplasm and promoting transcription of β-catenin in nucleus. Remarkably, inhibition of β-catenin markedly reversed rs3742076_G-induced gefitinib resistance and aggressive phenotypes.

CONCLUSION

These findings characterized rs3742076_G as a gain-of-function polymorphism in mediating gefitinib resistance and tumor aggressiveness, and highlighted the variant as a predictive biomarker in guiding gefitinib treatment.

A phase II study of AK112 (PD-1/VEGF bispecific) in combination with chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

9019

Background: Based on IMPOWER 150, atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy has been the first-line treatment for advanced non-squamous NSCLC with negative driver genes. AK112 is a global first-in-class anti-PD-1/VEGF bi-specific antibody developed by Akesobio. Preclinical and clinical studies have indicated that AK112 possess potential anti-tumor efficacy in solid tumors. Therefore, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of AK112 in combination with chemotherapy for patients with advanced NSCLC. Methods: This was an open-label, multi-center phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of AK112 in combination with chemotherapy in pts with advanced NSCLC. Enrolled pts were divided into three cohorts: Previously untreated advanced NSCLC pts with wide-type EGFR/ALK (Cohort 1), pts with EGFR mutations who had failed prior EGFR-TKI therapies without T790M mutation or failed osimertinib treatment (Cohort 2), and pts who progressed after anti-PD-1/L1 and platinum-based chemotherapy (Cohort 3). Pts were treated with 10mg/kg or 20mg/kg AK112 once every 3 weeks in combination with carboplatin and pemetrexed or carboplatin and paclitaxel for Cohort 1/2, and docetaxel for Cohort 3. Primary endpoint was ORR as assessed by investigator per RECIST v1.1. Results: 133 pts were enrolled from Feb 03, 2021 to Dec 31, 2021 and received AK112 plus chemotherapy (44 received AK112 10 mg/kg and 89 received AK112 20 mg/kg). As of Dec 31, 2021, in cohort-1, among 26 evaluable pts with squamous cell carcinoma, 20 partial response and 6 stable disease were observed for a 76.9% ORR and a 100.0% DCR, median DOR and median PFS was not reached while 6-month PFS rate was 86.2%. In Cohort-2, among 19 evaluable pts, 13 partial response and 5 stable disease were observed for a 68.4% ORR and a 94.7% DCR while median DOR was 5.5 months, and median PFS was 8.3 months. In Cohort-3, among 20 evaluable pts, 8 partial response and 8 stable disease were observed for a 40.0% ORR and a 80.0% DCR, median DOR and median PFS was not reached while 6-month PFS rate was 71.1%. Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE) occurred in 86.5% (115/133) of the pts, and grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 28.6% (38/133) of pts including two deaths. Most common AE (incidence ≥ 5%) included alanine/aspartate aminotransferase increased, epistaxis, anemia, vomiting, nausea, rash, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia. Treatment discontinuation due to AE occurred in 3.0% (4/133) of the pts. Conclusions: AK112 plus chemotherapy has shown a promising anti-tumor efficacy in each cohort and warrants potentially superior safety in comparison to anti-PD-(L)1 and anti-VEGF combination therapies in advanced NSCLC. PFS and ORR were also significantly improved with AK112 plus chemotherapy. Therefore, phase III registration studies of AK112 plus chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC will be initiated in 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT04736823.

The expression of aryl hydrocarbon receptor predicts responses to anti-PD-1 antibodies in non-small cell lung cancer

2628

Background: Blockade of programmed cell death receptor 1 (PD-1) by antibodies such as pembrolizumab has revolutionized treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, a significant number of patients achieve only marginal benefit. The predictive abilities of the frequently used biomarkers, including programmed cell death 1 ligand (PD-L1) and tumor mutation burden (TMB), are yet limited, highlighting the urgent need for more reliable biomarkers. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a ligand-dependent transcription factor that controls the transcription of its targets including PD-L1. Whether AhR could be used as a predictive biomarker for response to PD-1 blockade immunotherapy in NSCLC warrants further investigation. Methods: We collected formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) slides from 104 NSCLC patients before PD-1 blockade immunotherapy treatment, who had sufficient follow-up data for progression-free survival (PFS), and detected the expression of nuclear localized AhR (AhRN) and membrane localized PD-L1 (PD-L1M) with multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC). H-score was applied to characterize the specific value with the following formula [1 × (% cells intensity =1) + 2 × (% cells intensity = 2) + 3 × (% cells intensity = 3)]. Survival curve for each group was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test. The diagnostic performance was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), which was calculated based on the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. All statistical tests were two-sided and P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Both AhRN and PD-L1M could distinguish responders from non-responders, and patients with higher H-score had longer PFS than those with lower H score. The AUC of AhRN was 0.804 (95 % CI: 0.721-0.881), higher than that of PD-L1M (0.714; 95 % CI: 0.618-0.811) and AhRN+PD-L1M (0.743; 95 % CI: 0.649-0.837), indicating AhRN might show better predictive capacity to the efficacy of PD-1 blockade immunotherapy than PD-L1M. Besides, AhRN exhibited the most significant accuracy in prognosis prediction, since the hazard ratio (HR) of AhRN was 0.1529 (95 % CI: 0.07704-0.3033, P<0.0001), significantly higher than that of PD-L1M [HR:0.283 (95 % CI: 0.1525-0.525, P<0.0001)] and AhRN+PD-L1M [HR: 0.2456 (95 % CI: 0.1309-0.4607, P<0.0001)]. Yet, among the 54 smokers, AhRN+PD-L1M was the best classifier for the efficacy of immunotherapy, of which the AUC was 0.8937 (95 % CI: 0.816-0.971) and HR was infinitely approaching 0 ( P<0.0001). Conclusions: AhR might be a reliable predictive biomarker for PD-1 blockade immunotherapy in NSCLCs.

Distinct Functional Metagenomic Markers Predict the Responsiveness to Anti-PD-1 Therapy in Chinese Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Background

Programmed death 1 (PD-1) and the ligand of PD-1 (PD-L1) are central targets for immune-checkpoint therapy (ICT) blocking immune evasion-related pathways elicited by tumor cells. A number of PD-1 inhibitors have been developed, but the efficacy of these inhibitors varies considerably and is typically below 50%. The efficacy of ICT has been shown to be dependent on the gut microbiota, and experiments using mouse models have even demonstrated that modulation of the gut microbiota may improve efficacy of ICT.

Methods

We followed a Han Chinese cohort of 85 advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, who received anti-PD-1 antibodies. Tumor biopsies were collected before treatment initiation for whole exon sequencing and variant detection. Fecal samples collected biweekly during the period of anti-PD-1 antibody administration were used for metagenomic sequencing. We established gut microbiome abundance profiles for identification of significant associations between specific microbial taxa, potential functionality, and treatment responses. A prediction model based on random forest was trained using selected markers discriminating between the different response groups.

Results

NSCLC patients treated with antibiotics exhibited the shortest survival time. Low level of tumor-mutation burden and high expression level of HLA-E significantly reduced progression-free survival. We identified metagenomic species and functional pathways that differed in abundance in relation to responses to ICT. Data on differential enrichment of taxa and predicted microbial functions in NSCLC patients responding or non-responding to ICT allowed the establishment of random forest algorithm-adopted models robustly predicting the probability of whether or not a given patient would benefit from ICT.

Conclusions

Overall, our results identified links between gut microbial composition and immunotherapy efficacy in Chinese NSCLC patients indicating the potential for such analyses to predict outcome prior to ICT.

RATIONALE-309: Updated progression-free survival (PFS), PFS after next line of treatment, and overall survival from a phase 3 double-blind trial of tislelizumab versus placebo, plus chemotherapy, as first-line treatment for recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer

384950

Background: Tislelizumab is a humanized immunoglobulin G4 anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody (mAb). At the interim analysis (median follow-up, 10.0 months), RATIONALE-309 met its primary endpoint, as first-line tislelizumab + chemotherapy significantly improved PFS, as assessed by an independent review committee (IRC), in patients with recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer (RM NPC) compared with placebo + chemotherapy. Tislelizumab + chemotherapy had an acceptable safety profile, comparable to placebo + chemotherapy (Yang Y, et al. ESMO-IO Virtual Congress, 2021. Oral presentation 121O). Here, we report an updated analysis of PFS, PFS after next line of treatment (PFS2), and overall survival (OS) with an extended median follow-up of 15.5 months. Methods: A total of 263 eligible patients with RM NPC were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive tislelizumab 200 mg intravenously (IV) or placebo on day 1, plus gemcitabine (1 g/m2 IV day 1, day 8), plus cisplatin (80 mg/m2 day 1) every 3 weeks for 4–6 cycles, followed by tislelizumab or placebo every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. After IRC-confirmed disease progression, patients in the placebo arm could crossover to receive tislelizumab monotherapy. The primary endpoint was IRC-assessed PFS. Secondary endpoints included IRC-assessed objective response rate and duration of response, investigator-assessed PFS and PFS2, and OS. Biomarker analysis was an exploratory endpoint. Results: At an updated data cut-off (September 30, 2021), IRC-assessed PFS was consistent with the interim data analysis and demonstrated significant improvement for tislelizumab + chemotherapy versus placebo + chemotherapy (median PFS, 9.6 vs. 7.4 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.37, 0.68). Median PFS2 and OS were not reached for the tislelizumab + chemotherapy arm and were 13.9 months and 23.0 months for the placebo + chemotherapy arm, respectively. The HRs were 0.38 (95% CI, 0.25, 0.58) for PFS2 and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.35, 1.01) for OS. The association of tumor microenvironment features by gene-expression analysis with clinical benefit will be presented. Conclusions: Tislelizumab + chemotherapy showed consistent, clinically meaningful improvement in PFS compared with placebo + chemotherapy in this updated analysis. Clinically meaningful improvements in PFS2 and OS were also observed for the tislelizumab + chemotherapy arm. This is the first report of PFS2 benefit for an anti–PD-1 mAb in combination with chemotherapy in the first-line treatment setting of RM NPC. These results support the use of tislelizumab + chemotherapy as first-line therapy for RM NPC. Clinical trial information: NCT03924986.

A CT-based radiomics model to predict subsequent brain metastasis in patients with ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer undergoing crizotinib treatment

Background

Brain metastasis (BM) comprises the most common reason for crizotinib failure in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)‐rearranged non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We hypothesize that its occurrence could be predicted by a computed tomography (CT)‐based radiomics model, therefore, allowing for selection of enriched patient populations for prevention therapies.

Methods

A total of 75 eligible patients were enrolled from Sun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center between June 2014 and September 2019. The primary endpoint was brain metastasis‐free survival (BMFS), estimated from the initiation of crizotinib to the date of the occurrence of BM. Patients were randomly divided into two cohorts for model training (n = 51) and validation (n = 24), respectively. A radiomics signature was constructed based on features extracted from chest CT before crizotinib treatment. Clinical model was developed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Log‐rank test was performed to describe the difference of BMFS risk.

Results

Patients with low radiomics score had significantly longer BMFS than those with higher, both in the training cohort (p = 0.019) and validation cohort (p = 0.048). The nomogram combining smoking history and the radiomics signature showed good performance for the estimation of BMFS, both in the training (concordance index [C‐index], 0.762; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.663–0.861) and validation cohort (C‐index, 0.724; 95% CI, 0.601–0.847).

Conclusion

We have developed a CT‐based radiomics model to predict subsequent BM in patients with non‐brain metastatic NSCLC undergoing crizotinib treatment. Selection of an enriched patient population at high BM risk will facilitate the design of clinical trials or strategies to prevent BM.