1
|
Duan X, Ding XF, Li N, Wu FX, Chen X, Zhu N. Sparse2Noise: Low-dose synchrotron X-ray tomography without high-quality reference data. Comput Biol Med 2023; 165:107473. [PMID: 37690288 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Synchrotron radiation computed tomography (SR-CT) holds promise for high-resolution in vivo imaging. Notably, the reconstruction of SR-CT images necessitates a large set of data to be captured with sufficient photons from multiple angles, resulting in high radiation dose received by the object. Reducing the number of projections and/or photon flux is a straightforward means to lessen the radiation dose, however, compromises data completeness, thus introducing noises and artifacts. Deep learning (DL)-based supervised methods effectively denoise and remove artifacts, but they heavily depend on high-quality paired data acquired at high doses. Although algorithms exist for training without high-quality references, they struggle to effectively eliminate persistent artifacts present in real-world data. METHODS This work presents a novel low-dose imaging strategy namely Sparse2Noise, which combines the reconstruction data from paired sparse-view CT scan (normal-flux) and full-view CT scan (low-flux) using a convolutional neural network (CNN). Sparse2Noise does not require high-quality reconstructed data as references and allows for fresh training on data with very small size. Sparse2Noise was evaluated by both simulated and experimental data. RESULTS Sparse2Noise effectively reduces noise and ring artifacts while maintaining high image quality, outperforming state-of-the-art image denoising methods at same dose levels. Furthermore, Sparse2Noise produces impressive high image quality for ex vivo rat hindlimb imaging with the acceptable low radiation dose (i.e., 0.5 Gy with the isotropic voxel size of 26 μm). CONCLUSIONS This work represents a significant advance towards in vivo SR-CT imaging. It is noteworthy that Sparse2Noise can also be used for denoising in conventional CT and/or phase-contrast CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoman Duan
- Division of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada
| | - Xiao Fan Ding
- Division of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada
| | - Naitao Li
- Division of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada
| | - Fang-Xiang Wu
- Division of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada; Department of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada; Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada
| | - Xiongbiao Chen
- Division of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada; Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada.
| | - Ning Zhu
- Division of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada; Canadian Light Source, Saskatoon, S7N 2V3, SK, Canada; Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Duan X, Li N, Cooper DML, Ding XF, Chen X, Zhu N. Low-density tissue scaffold imaging by synchrotron radiation propagation-based imaging computed tomography with helical acquisition mode. J Synchrotron Radiat 2023; 30:417-429. [PMID: 36891855 PMCID: PMC10000810 DOI: 10.1107/s1600577523000772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Visualization of low-density tissue scaffolds made from hydrogels is important yet challenging in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine (TERM). For this, synchrotron radiation propagation-based imaging computed tomography (SR-PBI-CT) has great potential, but is limited due to the ring artifacts commonly observed in SR-PBI-CT images. To address this issue, this study focuses on the integration of SR-PBI-CT and helical acquisition mode (i.e. SR-PBI-HCT) to visualize hydrogel scaffolds. The influence of key imaging parameters on the image quality of hydrogel scaffolds was investigated, including the helical pitch (p), photon energy (E) and the number of acquisition projections per rotation/revolution (Np), and, on this basis, those parameters were optimized to improve image quality and to reduce noise level and artifacts. The results illustrate that SR-PBI-HCT imaging shows impressive advantages in avoiding ring artifacts with p = 1.5, E = 30 keV and Np = 500 for the visualization of hydrogel scaffolds in vitro. Furthermore, the results also demonstrate that hydrogel scaffolds can be visualized using SR-PBI-HCT with good contrast while at a low radiation dose, i.e. 342 mGy (voxel size of 26 µm, suitable for in vivo imaging). This paper presents a systematic study on hydrogel scaffold imaging using SR-PBI-HCT and the results reveal that SR-PBI-HCT is a powerful tool for visualizing and characterizing low-density scaffolds with a high image quality in vitro. This work represents a significant advance toward the non-invasive in vivo visualization and characterization of hydrogel scaffolds at a suitable radiation dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoman Duan
- Division of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada
| | - Naitao Li
- Division of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada
| | - David M. L. Cooper
- Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada
| | - Xiao Fan Ding
- Division of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada
| | - Xiongbiao Chen
- Division of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada
| | - Ning Zhu
- Division of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada
- Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5A9, Canada
- Canadian Light Source, Saskatoon, SK S7N 2V3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ding XF, Zeinali Danalou S, Zhang L, Zhu N. In situ wet pharmaceutical granulation captured using synchrotron radiation based dynamic micro-CT. J Synchrotron Radiat 2023; 30:430-439. [PMID: 36891856 PMCID: PMC10000808 DOI: 10.1107/s1600577523000826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Synchrotron radiation based dynamic micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) is a powerful technique available at synchrotron light sources for investigating evolving microstructures. Wet granulation is the most widely used method of producing pharmaceutical granules, precursors to products like capsules and tablets. Granule microstructures are known to influence product performance, so this is an area for potential application of dynamic CT. Here, lactose monohydrate (LMH) was used as a representative powder to demonstrate dynamic CT capabilities. Wet granulation of LMH has been observed to occur on the order of several seconds, which is too fast for lab-based CT scanners to capture the changing internal structures. The superior X-ray photon flux from synchrotron light sources makes sub-second data acquisition possible and well suited for analysis of the wet-granulation process. Moreover, synchrotron radiation based imaging is non-destructive, does not require altering the sample in any way, and can enhance image contrast with phase-retrieval algorithms. Dynamic CT can bring insights to wet granulation, an area of research previously only studied via 2D and/or ex situ techniques. Through efficient data-processing strategies, dynamic CT can provide quantitative analysis of how the internal microstructure of an LMH granule evolves during the earliest moments of wet granulation. Here, the results revealed granule consolidation, the evolving porosity, and the influence of aggregates on granule porosity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao Fan Ding
- Division of Biomedical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, 57 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A9, Canada
| | - Sima Zeinali Danalou
- Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, 57 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A9, Canada
| | - Lifeng Zhang
- Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, 57 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A9, Canada
| | - Ning Zhu
- Division of Biomedical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, 57 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A9, Canada
- Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, 57 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A9, Canada
- Canadian Light Source Inc., 44 Innovation Blvd, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 2V3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Appel S, Bagdasarian Z, Basilico D, Bellini G, Benziger J, Biondi R, Caccianiga B, Calaprice F, Caminata A, Cavalcante P, Chepurnov A, D'Angelo D, Derbin A, Di Giacinto A, Di Marcello V, Ding XF, Di Ludovico A, Di Noto L, Drachnev I, Franco D, Galbiati C, Ghiano C, Giammarchi M, Goretti A, Göttel AS, Gromov M, Guffanti D, Ianni A, Ianni A, Jany A, Kobychev V, Korga G, Kumaran S, Laubenstein M, Litvinovich E, Lombardi P, Lomskaya I, Ludhova L, Lukyanchenko G, Machulin I, Martyn J, Meroni E, Miramonti L, Misiaszek M, Muratova V, Nugmanov R, Oberauer L, Orekhov V, Ortica F, Pallavicini M, Papp L, Pelicci L, Penek Ö, Pietrofaccia L, Pilipenko N, Pocar A, Raikov G, Ranalli MT, Ranucci G, Razeto A, Re A, Redchuk M, Rossi N, Schönert S, Semenov D, Settanta G, Skorokhvatov M, Singhal A, Smirnov O, Sotnikov A, Tartaglia R, Testera G, Unzhakov E, Villante FL, Vishneva A, Vogelaar RB, von Feilitzsch F, Wojcik M, Wurm M, Zavatarelli S, Zuber K, Zuzel G. Improved Measurement of Solar Neutrinos from the Carbon-Nitrogen-Oxygen Cycle by Borexino and Its Implications for the Standard Solar Model. Phys Rev Lett 2022; 129:252701. [PMID: 36608219 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.129.252701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
We present an improved measurement of the carbon-nitrogen-oxygen (CNO) solar neutrino interaction rate at Earth obtained with the complete Borexino Phase-III dataset. The measured rate, R_{CNO}=6.7_{-0.8}^{+2.0} counts/(day×100 tonnes), allows us to exclude the absence of the CNO signal with about 7σ C.L. The correspondent CNO neutrino flux is 6.6_{-0.9}^{+2.0}×10^{8} cm^{-2} s^{-1}, taking into account the neutrino flavor conversion. We use the new CNO measurement to evaluate the C and N abundances in the Sun with respect to the H abundance for the first time with solar neutrinos. Our result of N_{CN}=(5.78_{-1.00}^{+1.86})×10^{-4} displays a ∼2σ tension with the "low-metallicity" spectroscopic photospheric measurements. Furthermore, our result used together with the ^{7}Be and ^{8}B solar neutrino fluxes, also measured by Borexino, permits us to disfavor at 3.1σ C.L. the "low-metallicity" standard solar model B16-AGSS09met as an alternative to the "high-metallicity" standard solar model B16-GS98.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Appel
- Physik-Department, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - Z Bagdasarian
- Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany
| | - D Basilico
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - G Bellini
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - J Benziger
- Chemical Engineering Department, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
| | - R Biondi
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, 67100 Assergi (AQ), Italy
| | - B Caccianiga
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - F Calaprice
- Physics Department, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
| | - A Caminata
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 16146 Genova, Italy
| | - P Cavalcante
- Physics Department, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
| | - A Chepurnov
- Lomonosov Moscow State University Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, 119234 Moscow, Russia
| | - D D'Angelo
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - A Derbin
- St. Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute NRC Kurchatov Institute, 188350 Gatchina, Russia
| | - A Di Giacinto
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, 67100 Assergi (AQ), Italy
| | - V Di Marcello
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, 67100 Assergi (AQ), Italy
| | - X F Ding
- Physics Department, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
| | - A Di Ludovico
- Physics Department, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
| | - L Di Noto
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 16146 Genova, Italy
| | - I Drachnev
- St. Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute NRC Kurchatov Institute, 188350 Gatchina, Russia
| | - D Franco
- AstroParticule et Cosmologie, Université Paris Diderot, CNRS/IN2P3, CEA/IRFU, Observatoire de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 75205 Paris Cedex 13, France
| | - C Galbiati
- Physics Department, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
- Gran Sasso Science Institute, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy
| | - C Ghiano
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, 67100 Assergi (AQ), Italy
| | - M Giammarchi
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - A Goretti
- Physics Department, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
| | - A S Göttel
- Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany
- III. Physikalisches Institut B, RWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, Germany
| | - M Gromov
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Russia
- Lomonosov Moscow State University Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, 119234 Moscow, Russia
| | - D Guffanti
- Institute of Physics and Excellence Cluster PRISMA+, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, 55099 Mainz, Germany
| | - Aldo Ianni
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, 67100 Assergi (AQ), Italy
| | - Andrea Ianni
- Physics Department, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
| | - A Jany
- M. Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, 30348 Krakow, Poland
| | - V Kobychev
- Kiev Institute for Nuclear Research, 03680 Kiev, Ukraine
| | - G Korga
- Department of Physics, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey,TW20 0EX, United Kingdom
- Institute of Nuclear Research (Atomki), Debrecen, Hungary
| | - S Kumaran
- Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany
- III. Physikalisches Institut B, RWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, Germany
| | - M Laubenstein
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, 67100 Assergi (AQ), Italy
| | - E Litvinovich
- National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute, 123182 Moscow, Russia
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), 115409 Moscow, Russia
| | - P Lombardi
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - I Lomskaya
- St. Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute NRC Kurchatov Institute, 188350 Gatchina, Russia
| | - L Ludhova
- Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany
- III. Physikalisches Institut B, RWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, Germany
| | - G Lukyanchenko
- National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute, 123182 Moscow, Russia
| | - I Machulin
- National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute, 123182 Moscow, Russia
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), 115409 Moscow, Russia
| | - J Martyn
- Institute of Physics and Excellence Cluster PRISMA+, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, 55099 Mainz, Germany
| | - E Meroni
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - L Miramonti
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - M Misiaszek
- M. Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, 30348 Krakow, Poland
| | - V Muratova
- St. Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute NRC Kurchatov Institute, 188350 Gatchina, Russia
| | - R Nugmanov
- National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute, 123182 Moscow, Russia
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), 115409 Moscow, Russia
| | - L Oberauer
- Physik-Department, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - V Orekhov
- Institute of Physics and Excellence Cluster PRISMA+, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, 55099 Mainz, Germany
| | - F Ortica
- Dipartimento di Chimica, Biologia e Biotecnologie, Università degli Studi e INFN, 06123 Perugia, Italy
| | - M Pallavicini
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 16146 Genova, Italy
| | - L Papp
- Physik-Department, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - L Pelicci
- Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany
- III. Physikalisches Institut B, RWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, Germany
| | - Ö Penek
- Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany
| | - L Pietrofaccia
- Physics Department, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
| | - N Pilipenko
- St. Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute NRC Kurchatov Institute, 188350 Gatchina, Russia
| | - A Pocar
- Amherst Center for Fundamental Interactions and Physics Department, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA
| | - G Raikov
- National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute, 123182 Moscow, Russia
| | - M T Ranalli
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, 67100 Assergi (AQ), Italy
| | - G Ranucci
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - A Razeto
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, 67100 Assergi (AQ), Italy
| | - A Re
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - M Redchuk
- Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany
- III. Physikalisches Institut B, RWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, Germany
| | - N Rossi
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, 67100 Assergi (AQ), Italy
| | - S Schönert
- Physik-Department, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - D Semenov
- St. Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute NRC Kurchatov Institute, 188350 Gatchina, Russia
| | - G Settanta
- Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany
| | - M Skorokhvatov
- National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute, 123182 Moscow, Russia
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), 115409 Moscow, Russia
| | - A Singhal
- Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany
- III. Physikalisches Institut B, RWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, Germany
| | - O Smirnov
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Russia
| | - A Sotnikov
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Russia
| | - R Tartaglia
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, 67100 Assergi (AQ), Italy
| | - G Testera
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 16146 Genova, Italy
| | - E Unzhakov
- St. Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute NRC Kurchatov Institute, 188350 Gatchina, Russia
| | - F L Villante
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, 67100 Assergi (AQ), Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiche e Chimiche, Università dell'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy
| | - A Vishneva
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Russia
| | - R B Vogelaar
- Physics Department, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
| | - F von Feilitzsch
- Physik-Department, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - M Wojcik
- M. Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, 30348 Krakow, Poland
| | - M Wurm
- Institute of Physics and Excellence Cluster PRISMA+, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, 55099 Mainz, Germany
| | - S Zavatarelli
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 16146 Genova, Italy
| | - K Zuber
- Department of Physics, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany
| | - G Zuzel
- M. Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, 30348 Krakow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Peng ZP, Li JM, Ding XF, Wang X. [Changes of thrombocytes and gut microbiota in a patient with sitosterolemia]. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi 2022; 61:1360-1362. [PMID: 36456518 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20211215-00886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Z P Peng
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| | - J M Li
- Department of Blood Transfusion, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| | - X F Ding
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| | - Xuefeng Wang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Danalou SZ, Ding XF, Zhu N, Emady HN, Zhang L. 4D study of liquid binder penetration dynamics in pharmaceutical powders using synchrotron X-ray micro computed tomography. Int J Pharm 2022; 627:122192. [PMID: 36116689 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.122192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 08/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
The properties of pharmaceutical powders, and the liquid binder, directly influence the penetration behavior in the wet granulation process of the pharmaceutical industry. Conventional methods encounter challenges in understanding this fast process. In this work, an emerging synchrotron-based X-ray imaging technique (having fast imaging capability) was employed to investigate the internal process from 2D and 3D to real-time (in-situ with ms time intervals) 3D (also considered 4D) perspectives. Two commonly used excipients (lactose monohydrate (LMH) and microcrystalline cellulose (MCC)) were used to make binary mixtures with acetaminophen (APAP) as the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). Isopropanol and water were employed as liquid binders in the single droplet impact method. Results showed that for most of the mixtures, the porosity increased at higher fractions of APAP. MCC mixtures experienced less agglomeration and more uniform pore distribution than LMH ones, resulting in a faster droplet penetration with isopropanol. Moreover, the imbibition-spreading studies showed that isopropanol penetration in MCC powders followed more unidirectional vertical movement than horizontal spreading. Our results also demonstrated that simultaneous granulation of LMH with water resulted in much slower penetration. This study revealed that synchrotron X-ray imaging can investigate 3D internal pore structures and how they affect the quantitively real-time internal penetration dynamics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sima Zeinali Danalou
- Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, SK, Canada
| | - Xiao Fan Ding
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, SK, Canada
| | - Ning Zhu
- Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, SK, Canada; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, SK, Canada; Canadian Light Source Inc., SK, Canada
| | - Heather N Emady
- School for Engineering of Matter, Transport and Energy, Arizona State University, AZ, USA
| | - Lifeng Zhang
- Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, SK, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tan X, Ding XF. [Research progress of anesthesia methods in prostate biopsy]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2022; 60:504-508. [PMID: 35359093 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20211125-00556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Prostate biopsy is the gold standard for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. In order to successfully and effectively complete the biopsy, clinicians should not only select the correct puncture method, but also pay attention to the pain control of patients undergoing puncture. It is necessary to select a reasonable anesthetic method for biopsy. The pain during biopsy comes from the skin, muscle and other structures in the puncture approach, and also comes from the prostate capsule. Therefore, the anesthesia emphasis of transperineal and transrectal biopsy approaches will also be different. The use of appropriate anesthesia is of great significance to improve the patient's cooperation and ensure the success rate of biopsy. With the continuous maturity of the technology and concept of prostate biopsy, a single anesthesia method has been unable to meet the actual anesthetic needs of biopsy, and the use of multi-site and multi-phase combined anesthesia for different sources of pain has become the mainstream anesthetic option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X Tan
- Graduate School of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, China
| | - X F Ding
- Department of Urology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou 225001, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Agostini M, Altenmüller K, Appel S, Atroshchenko V, Bagdasarian Z, Basilico D, Bellini G, Benziger J, Biondi R, Bravo D, Caccianiga B, Calaprice F, Caminata A, Cavalcante P, Chepurnov A, D'Angelo D, Davini S, Derbin A, Di Giacinto A, Di Marcello V, Ding XF, Di Ludovico A, Di Noto L, Drachnev I, Formozov A, Franco D, Galbiati C, Ghiano C, Giammarchi M, Goretti A, Göttel AS, Gromov M, Guffanti D, Ianni A, Ianni A, Jany A, Jeschke D, Kobychev V, Korga G, Kumaran S, Laubenstein M, Litvinovich E, Lombardi P, Lomskaya I, Ludhova L, Lukyanchenko G, Lukyanchenko L, Machulin I, Martyn J, Meroni E, Meyer M, Miramonti L, Misiaszek M, Muratova V, Neumair B, Nieslony M, Nugmanov R, Oberauer L, Orekhov V, Ortica F, Pallavicini M, Papp L, Pelicci L, Penek Ö, Pietrofaccia L, Pilipenko N, Pocar A, Raikov G, Ranalli MT, Ranucci G, Razeto A, Re A, Redchuk M, Romani A, Rossi N, Schönert S, Semenov D, Settanta G, Skorokhvatov M, Singhal A, Smirnov O, Sotnikov A, Suvorov Y, Tartaglia R, Testera G, Thurn J, Unzhakov E, Vishneva A, Vogelaar RB, von Feilitzsch F, Wessel A, Wojcik M, Wonsak B, Wurm M, Zavatarelli S, Zuber K, Zuzel G. First Directional Measurement of Sub-MeV Solar Neutrinos with Borexino. Phys Rev Lett 2022; 128:091803. [PMID: 35302807 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.128.091803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
We report the measurement of sub-MeV solar neutrinos through the use of their associated Cherenkov radiation, performed with the Borexino detector at the Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso. The measurement is achieved using a novel technique that correlates individual photon hits of events to the known position of the Sun. In an energy window between 0.54 to 0.74 MeV, selected using the dominant scintillation light, we have measured 10 887_{-2103}^{+2386}(stat)±947(syst) (68% confidence interval) solar neutrinos out of 19 904 total events. This corresponds to a ^{7}Be neutrino interaction rate of 51.6_{-12.5}^{+13.9} counts/(day·100 ton), which is in agreement with the standard solar model predictions and the previous spectroscopic results of Borexino. The no-neutrino hypothesis can be excluded with >5σ confidence level. For the first time, we have demonstrated the possibility of utilizing the directional Cherenkov information for sub-MeV solar neutrinos, in a large-scale, high light yield liquid scintillator detector. This measurement provides an experimental proof of principle for future hybrid event reconstruction using both Cherenkov and scintillation signatures simultaneously.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Agostini
- Physik-Department, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| | - K Altenmüller
- Physik-Department, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - S Appel
- Physik-Department, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - V Atroshchenko
- National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute, 123182 Moscow, Russia
| | - Z Bagdasarian
- Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany
| | - D Basilico
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - G Bellini
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - J Benziger
- Chemical Engineering Department, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
| | - R Biondi
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, 67010 Assergi (AQ), Italy
| | - D Bravo
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - B Caccianiga
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - F Calaprice
- Physics Department, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
| | - A Caminata
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 16146 Genova, Italy
| | - P Cavalcante
- Physics Department, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
| | - A Chepurnov
- Lomonosov Moscow State University Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, 119234 Moscow, Russia
| | - D D'Angelo
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - S Davini
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 16146 Genova, Italy
| | - A Derbin
- St. Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute NRC Kurchatov Institute, 188350 Gatchina, Russia
| | - A Di Giacinto
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, 67010 Assergi (AQ), Italy
| | - V Di Marcello
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, 67010 Assergi (AQ), Italy
| | - X F Ding
- Physics Department, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
| | - A Di Ludovico
- Physics Department, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
| | - L Di Noto
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 16146 Genova, Italy
| | - I Drachnev
- St. Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute NRC Kurchatov Institute, 188350 Gatchina, Russia
| | - A Formozov
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Russia
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - D Franco
- APC, Université de Paris, CNRS, Astroparticule et Cosmologie, Paris F-75013, France
| | - C Galbiati
- Physics Department, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
- Gran Sasso Science Institute, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy
| | - C Ghiano
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, 67010 Assergi (AQ), Italy
| | - M Giammarchi
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - A Goretti
- M. Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, 30348 Krakow, Poland
- Physics Department, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
| | - A S Göttel
- Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany
- III. Physikalisches Institut B, RWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, Germany
| | - M Gromov
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Russia
- Lomonosov Moscow State University Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, 119234 Moscow, Russia
| | - D Guffanti
- Institute of Physics and Cluster of Excellence PRISMA+, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, 55099 Mainz, Germany
| | - Aldo Ianni
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, 67010 Assergi (AQ), Italy
| | - Andrea Ianni
- Physics Department, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
| | - A Jany
- M. Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, 30348 Krakow, Poland
| | - D Jeschke
- Physik-Department, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - V Kobychev
- Institute for Nuclear Research of NAS Ukraine, 03028 Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - G Korga
- Department of Physics, School of Engineering, Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, TW20 OEX, United Kingdom
- Institute of Nuclear Research (Atomki), 4026, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - S Kumaran
- Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany
- III. Physikalisches Institut B, RWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, Germany
| | - M Laubenstein
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, 67010 Assergi (AQ), Italy
| | - E Litvinovich
- National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute, 123182 Moscow, Russia
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), 115409 Moscow, Russia
| | - P Lombardi
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - I Lomskaya
- St. Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute NRC Kurchatov Institute, 188350 Gatchina, Russia
| | - L Ludhova
- Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany
- III. Physikalisches Institut B, RWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, Germany
| | - G Lukyanchenko
- National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute, 123182 Moscow, Russia
| | - L Lukyanchenko
- National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute, 123182 Moscow, Russia
| | - I Machulin
- National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute, 123182 Moscow, Russia
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), 115409 Moscow, Russia
| | - J Martyn
- Institute of Physics and Cluster of Excellence PRISMA+, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, 55099 Mainz, Germany
| | - E Meroni
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - M Meyer
- Department of Physics, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany
| | - L Miramonti
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - M Misiaszek
- M. Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, 30348 Krakow, Poland
| | - V Muratova
- St. Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute NRC Kurchatov Institute, 188350 Gatchina, Russia
| | - B Neumair
- Physik-Department, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - M Nieslony
- Institute of Physics and Cluster of Excellence PRISMA+, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, 55099 Mainz, Germany
| | - R Nugmanov
- National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute, 123182 Moscow, Russia
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), 115409 Moscow, Russia
| | - L Oberauer
- Physik-Department, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - V Orekhov
- Institute of Physics and Cluster of Excellence PRISMA+, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, 55099 Mainz, Germany
| | - F Ortica
- Dipartimento di Chimica, Biologia e Biotecnologie, Università degli Studi e INFN, 06123 Perugia, Italy
| | - M Pallavicini
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 16146 Genova, Italy
| | - L Papp
- Physik-Department, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - L Pelicci
- Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany
- III. Physikalisches Institut B, RWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, Germany
| | - Ö Penek
- Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany
| | - L Pietrofaccia
- Physics Department, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
| | - N Pilipenko
- St. Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute NRC Kurchatov Institute, 188350 Gatchina, Russia
| | - A Pocar
- Amherst Center for Fundamental Interactions and Physics Department, UMass, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA
| | - G Raikov
- National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute, 123182 Moscow, Russia
| | - M T Ranalli
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, 67010 Assergi (AQ), Italy
| | - G Ranucci
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - A Razeto
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, 67010 Assergi (AQ), Italy
| | - A Re
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - M Redchuk
- Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany
- III. Physikalisches Institut B, RWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, Germany
| | - A Romani
- Dipartimento di Chimica, Biologia e Biotecnologie, Università degli Studi e INFN, 06123 Perugia, Italy
| | - N Rossi
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, 67010 Assergi (AQ), Italy
| | - S Schönert
- Physik-Department, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - D Semenov
- St. Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute NRC Kurchatov Institute, 188350 Gatchina, Russia
| | - G Settanta
- Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany
| | - M Skorokhvatov
- National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute, 123182 Moscow, Russia
- National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), 115409 Moscow, Russia
| | - A Singhal
- Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany
- III. Physikalisches Institut B, RWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, Germany
| | - O Smirnov
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Russia
| | - A Sotnikov
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Russia
| | - Y Suvorov
- National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute, 123182 Moscow, Russia
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, 67010 Assergi (AQ), Italy
| | - R Tartaglia
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, 67010 Assergi (AQ), Italy
| | - G Testera
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 16146 Genova, Italy
| | - J Thurn
- Department of Physics, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany
| | - E Unzhakov
- St. Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute NRC Kurchatov Institute, 188350 Gatchina, Russia
| | - A Vishneva
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Russia
| | - R B Vogelaar
- Physics Department, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
| | - F von Feilitzsch
- Physik-Department, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - A Wessel
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Planckstrasse 1, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany
- Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany
- III. Physikalisches Institut B, RWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, Germany
| | - M Wojcik
- M. Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, 30348 Krakow, Poland
| | - B Wonsak
- University of Hamburg, Institute of Experimental Physics, Luruper Chaussee 149, 22761 Hamburg, Germany
| | - M Wurm
- Institute of Physics and Cluster of Excellence PRISMA+, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, 55099 Mainz, Germany
| | - S Zavatarelli
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi e INFN, 16146 Genova, Italy
| | - K Zuber
- Department of Physics, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany
| | - G Zuzel
- M. Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, 30348 Krakow, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhu LY, Ding XF, Huang TB, Luan Y, Guo CH, Xu YZ, Wang F. [Correlation analysis between prostate imaging report and data system score and pathological results of prostate cancer]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2020; 100:2663-2668. [PMID: 32921014 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20200523-01626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To explore the correlation between prostate imaging report and data system (PI-RADS) score and international society of uological pathology (ISUP) grade of prostate cancer (PCa) and the role of PI-RADS score in predicting the pathological features of clinically significant PCa (csPCa), positive surgical margin and pathological upgrade. Methods: The pathologically positive patients with multi-parameter magnetic resonance image (mpMRI) were included in this study. The patients with prostate specific antigen (PSA)<100 μg/L were divided into two groups: biopsy group (n=523) and RP group (n=215). The correlation between PI-RADS score and ISUP grade and the accuracy of predicting csPCa in the two groups were evaluated. In the RP group, the correlation between PI-RADS score and postoperative pathological grade or degradation and positive incisal margin was further discussed. The patients with PSA≥100 μg/L (171cases in biopsy group and 6 cases in RP group) were not included in the statistical analysis, and the results were simply described. Results: The age, prostate volume, and PSA level of biopsy group and RP group was (72±8) years vs (68±7) years, 48.3 (32-57) cm(3) vs 47.2 (32-54) cm(3), and 26.3(10.2-34.2)μg/L vs 21.7 (9.24-23.95)μg/L, respectively. The PI-RADS scores ≤ 3,4, and 5 in the biopsy group were 109,97, and 317 respectively, and those in the RP group were 61,55, and 99 respectively. There were significant differences in the composition of ISUP grades of different PI-RADS scores between the two groups (P<0.001), and there was a positive correlation between the two groups (r=0.493 in the biopsy group, r=0.671 in the RP group, both P<0.001). Using PI-RADS score to predict csPCa, biopsy group (AUC=0.764, P<0.001, 95%CI:0.710-0.819) and RP group (AUC=0.807, P<0.001, 95%CI:0.735-0.879) had certain accuracy. The PI-RADS score combined with PSA could improve the accuracy of csPCa prediction in the biopsy group (AUC=0.795,P<0.001, 95% CI:0.746-0.843) and the RP group (AUC=0.852, P<0.001, 95%CI:0.789-0.915). Compared with the pathological results of biopsy in the RP group, 52.6% of the patients showed upgrade and degrade of ISUP, and there was insignificant difference in the composition of PI-RADS scores between upgraded and degraded patients (P>0.05). However, 41.7%(27/65) of the patients with ISUP grade 1 biopsies had pathological upgrades that the patients with PI-RADS ≤ 3 accounted for 33.3%, while the patients with PI-RADS>3 accounted for 66.7%, and there was significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). After RP, 43.3% of the patients had positive surgical margins, and the patients with PI-RADS score ≤ 3, 4 and 5 were 13 (14%), 24 (25.8%) and 56 (60.2%), respectively, while the PI-RADS scores of patients with negative surgical margin were 48 (39.3%), 31(25.4%) and 43(35.2%), respectively. There was significant difference between the two groups (P<0.001). The higher the PI-RADS score, the greater the possibility of the positive surgical margin. For the patients with PSA ≥ 100 μg/L, 98.8% (169/171) patients in the biopsy group had a PI-RADS score 5. The pathological results of all patients were csPCa, of which 85.4% (146/171) had ISUP grade ≥ 4. Among them, 6 cases underwent RP, 5 cases had ISUP grade ≥ 4, all surgical margin were positive, 5 cases had seminal vesicle invasion, 3 cases had capsule invasion and 3 cases had positive pelvic lymph nodes. Conclusion: ThePI-RADS score is correlated with the ISUP grade of PCa. Combined with PSA can accurately predict csPCa. At the same time, the higher PI-RADS score, the more likely the patients with positive incisal margin after RP and Gleason score of 3+3=6 at the time of puncture will be upgraded pathologically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Y Zhu
- Department of Urology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou 225001, China
| | - X F Ding
- Department of Urology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou 225001, China
| | - T B Huang
- Department of Urology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou 225001, China
| | - Y Luan
- Department of Urology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou 225001, China
| | - C H Guo
- Department of Urology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou 225001, China
| | - Y Z Xu
- Department of Urology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou 225001, China
| | - F Wang
- Department of Urology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou 225001, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chen H, Gao F, He M, Ding XF, Wong AM, Sze SC, Yu AC, Sun T, Chan AW, Wang X, Wong N. Long-Read RNA Sequencing Identifies Alternative Splice Variants in Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Tumor-Specific Isoforms. Hepatology 2019; 70:1011-1025. [PMID: 30637779 PMCID: PMC6766942 DOI: 10.1002/hep.30500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2018] [Accepted: 12/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Alternative splicing (AS) allows generation of cell type-specific mRNA transcripts and contributes to hallmarks of cancer. Genome-wide analysis for AS in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), however, is limited. We sought to obtain a comprehensive AS landscape in HCC and define tumor-associated variants. Single-molecule real-time long-read RNA sequencing was performed on patient-derived HCC cells, and presence of splice junctions was defined by SpliceMap-LSC-IDP algorithm. We obtained an all-inclusive map of annotated AS variants and further discovered 362 alternative spliced variants that are not previously reported in any database (neither RefSeq nor GENCODE). They were mostly derived from intron retention and early termination codon with an in-frame open reading frame in 81.5%. We corroborated many of these predicted unannotated and annotated variants to be tumor specific in an independent cohort of primary HCC tumors and matching nontumoral liver. Using the combined Sanger sequencing and TaqMan junction assays, unique and common expressions of spliced variants including enzyme regulators (ARHGEF2, SERPINH1), chromatin modifiers (DEK, CDK9, RBBP7), RNA-binding proteins (SRSF3, RBM27, MATR3, YBX1), and receptors (ADRM1, CD44v8-10, vitamin D receptor, ROR1) were determined in HCC tumors. We further focused functional investigations on ARHGEF2 variants (v1 and v3) that arise from the common amplified site chr.1q22 of HCC. Their biological significance underscores two major cancer hallmarks, namely cancer stemness and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition-mediated cell invasion and migration, although v3 is consistently more potent than v1. Conclusion: Alternative isoforms and tumor-specific isoforms that arise from aberrant splicing are common during the liver tumorigenesis. Our results highlight insights gained from the analysis of AS in HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Chen
- Department of Anatomical and Cellular PathologyThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatin Hong KongChina
| | - Feng Gao
- Department of Biomedical SciencesCity University of Hong KongKowloon TongHong KongChina
| | - Mian He
- Department of Anatomical and Cellular PathologyThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatin Hong KongChina
| | - Xiao Fan Ding
- Department of Anatomical and Cellular PathologyThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatin Hong KongChina
| | - Aikha M. Wong
- Department of Anatomical and Cellular PathologyThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatin Hong KongChina
| | - Siu Ching Sze
- Department of Anatomical and Cellular PathologyThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatin Hong KongChina
| | - Allen C. Yu
- School of Life SciencesThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatinHong KongChina
| | - Tingting Sun
- Department of Anatomical and Cellular PathologyThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatin Hong KongChina
| | - Anthony W‐H. Chan
- Department of Anatomical and Cellular PathologyThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatin Hong KongChina
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Biomedical SciencesCity University of Hong KongKowloon TongHong KongChina
| | - Nathalie Wong
- Department of Anatomical and Cellular PathologyThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatin Hong KongChina
- State Key Laboratory in Translational OncologyThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatin Hong KongChina
- State Key Laboratory of Digestive DiseaseSir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, The Chinese University of Hong KongShatin Hong KongChina
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ding XF, Luan Y, Lu SM, Huang TB, Yan F, Xu JN, Zhou YQ, Wang F, Xu YZ. [Effect of multimodal analgesia using periprostatic nerve block anesthesia combined with flurbiprofen in transperineal template-guided prostate biopsy]. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2019; 57:428-433. [PMID: 31142067 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2019.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effect of multimodal analgesia using periprostatic nerve block anesthesia (PNB) combined with flurbiprofen in patients undergoing transperineal template-guided prostate biopsy (TTPB). Methods: Totally 166 patients (aged (68.2±9.1) years, range: 47 to 81 years) who received TTPB from October 2017 to June 2018 at Department of Urology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University were enrolled prospectively. All the patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. The observation group (n=79) was given flurbiprofen axetil 1 mg/kg intravenously for half an hour before operation and lidocaine was used for PNB before the biopsy. The control group (n=87) was given normal saline combined with PNB. A visual analog scale (VAS) and visual numeric scale (VNS) were used to assess the patients' pain and quantify their satisfaction at two time points: VAS-1 and VNS-1: during biopsy procedure, VAS-2 and VNS-2: 30 min after the procedure. The date were compared by t test, χ(2) test, Fisher exact test and two-way repeated measures anova analysis between the 2 groups. Results: The age, total prostate volume, serum prostate-specific antigen and the number of cores were comparable among the 2 groups (P>0.05). The VAS-1 scores of the control group and the observation group were 2.8±1.7, 1.9±1.2, respectively, and the VNS-1 were 3.1±0.7, 3.4±0.3, respectively. The VAS-1 were significantly lower in observation group than in control group (F=3.904, P=0.000). Conversely, the VNS-1 were higher in observation group (F=3.526, P=0.000). At 30-minute postoperative, the VAS-2 and VNS-2 were 0.7±0.4 and 3.7±0.2 in the control group, respectively. The VAS-2 and VNS-2 were 0.6±0.5 and 3.8±0.1 in the observation group, respectively. There were no significant differences in the pain scores or the satisfaction scores between the 2 groups (F=1.429, 2.825; P=0.136, 0.083). The incidence of overall complications was 26.4% (23/87) in the control group and 25.3% (20/79) in the observation group, with no statistical difference between the 2 groups (χ(2)=0.027, P=0.869). And the complications had no statistically significant difference among the 2 groups including hematuria, urinary retention, infection, hematospermia, vascular and neurological reactions, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, headache, and respiratory depression (P>0.05). Conclusion: The multimodal analgesia induced by PNB and flurbiprofen could effectively relieve the pain for patients who received TTPB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X F Ding
- Department of Urology, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225001, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Liu H, Ding XF, Zhang SG, Wang HX, Luo YG, Duan XG, Liu SH, Zhang RF, Zhang XJ, Qin CH, Han B, Wang Y, Sun TW. [Effect of esmolol in septic shock patients with tachycardia: a randomized clinical trial]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2019; 99:1317-1322. [PMID: 31091579 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.17.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the effect of esmolol in septic shock patients with tachycardia. Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted. Screening septic shock patients that admitted to Department of General Intensive Care Unit of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from June 2016 to August 2017. After 24 h resuscitation therapy, 100 cases of septic shock patients with tachycardia (heart rate>100 bpm) were divided into esmolol group (n=50) and control group (n=50) with random number table. Patients in esmolol group accepted standard treatment plus esmolol injection with an initial dose of 25 mg/h. Heart rate target is 80 to 100 bpm. Patients in esmolol group continued to use esmolol for 7 days or to the day the patient left the ICU when the heart rate didn't achieve the target. Patients in control group were given standard treatment. Primary outcome was 28 d mortality. Secondary outcomes included heart rate, norepinephrine dosages, lactate level, inflammatory markers in per day during the trial; acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE Ⅱ) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) on day 1, 3, 5, 7; length of hospital stay, length of mechanical ventilation, medication time of vasoactive agent. The data were compared with t test or rank sum test between the two groups. Results: The 28 d mortality of esmolol group and control group was 62%, 68%, respectively(χ(2)=0.529, P=0.529). Logistic regression analysis showed that primary heart rate (increase of 10 bpm, OR=1.568, 95%CI: 1.039-1.238, P=0.027), primary APACHEⅡ (OR=1.134, 95%CI: 1.026-1.239, P=0.005), integral heart rate (per 10 bpm, OR=2.207, 95%CI: 1.400-3.479, P=0.001) were independent risk factors for 28 d mortality. Compared with control group, the esmolol group had a lower heart rate on day 1-7; but over all, there was no statistically significant difference in heart rate between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in total does of norepinephrine, lactate level, inflammatory markers, APACHE Ⅱ, SOFA, length of hospital stay between the two groups (all P>0.05). Conclusion: Tachycardia significantly increases the risk of death in patients with septic shock, esmolol may decrease the mortality by controlling heart rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Liu
- General ICU, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Xu G, Zheng F, Ma R, Zheng FQ, Zheng L, Ding XF, Xie CP. First Report of Curvularia lunata Causing Leaf Spot of Pennisetum hydridum in China. Plant Dis 2018; 102:PDIS04180598PDN. [PMID: 30102579 DOI: 10.1094/pdis-04-18-0598-pdn] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- G Xu
- Key Laboratory of Protection and Development Utilization of Tropical Crop Germplasm Resources, Ministry of Education, and College of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
| | - F Zheng
- Key Laboratory of Protection and Development Utilization of Tropical Crop Germplasm Resources, Ministry of Education, and College of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
| | - R Ma
- Key Laboratory of Protection and Development Utilization of Tropical Crop Germplasm Resources, Ministry of Education, and College of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
| | - F Q Zheng
- Key Laboratory of Protection and Development Utilization of Tropical Crop Germplasm Resources, Ministry of Education, and College of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
| | - L Zheng
- Key Laboratory of Protection and Development Utilization of Tropical Crop Germplasm Resources, Ministry of Education, and College of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
| | - X F Ding
- Key Laboratory of Protection and Development Utilization of Tropical Crop Germplasm Resources, Ministry of Education, and College of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
| | - C P Xie
- Key Laboratory of Protection and Development Utilization of Tropical Crop Germplasm Resources, Ministry of Education, and College of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zheng F, Ma R, Xu G, Zheng FQ, Ding XF, Xie CP. Leaf Blight on Curcuma wenyujin Caused by Phoma matteucciicola in China. Plant Dis 2018; 102:PDIS03180407PDN. [PMID: 30102578 DOI: 10.1094/pdis-03-18-0407-pdn] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- F Zheng
- Key Laboratory of Protection and Development Utilization of Tropical Crop Germplasm Resources, Ministry of Education / College of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
| | - R Ma
- Key Laboratory of Protection and Development Utilization of Tropical Crop Germplasm Resources, Ministry of Education / College of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
| | - G Xu
- Key Laboratory of Protection and Development Utilization of Tropical Crop Germplasm Resources, Ministry of Education / College of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
| | - F Q Zheng
- Key Laboratory of Protection and Development Utilization of Tropical Crop Germplasm Resources, Ministry of Education / College of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
| | - X F Ding
- Key Laboratory of Protection and Development Utilization of Tropical Crop Germplasm Resources, Ministry of Education / College of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
| | - C P Xie
- Key Laboratory of Protection and Development Utilization of Tropical Crop Germplasm Resources, Ministry of Education / College of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chen M, Zhong LL, Huang H, Lin L, Deng HY, Ding XF, Hu X. [Thoracoscopy in diagnosis and treatment of pleural diseases in children]. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi 2017; 55:695-699. [PMID: 28881517 DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0578-1310.2017.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the value of thoracoscopy in diagnosis and treatment of pleural diseases in children. Method: Clinical manifestations and treatment outcomes of 19 patients who had refractory pleural diseases treated with thoracosocy during May 2011 to August 2016 in Hunan Provincial People's Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. In 19 cases, 15 were male and 4 were female, with an average age of (4.8±2.0) years. Thirteen patients had left pleural lesion, while 5 patients had right lesion, and 1 had bilateral lesions. Result: All cases were successfully treated with thoracoscopy without emergent thoracotomy. Pre- and post operative diagnosis was compatible in 10 cases, including 8 cases of empyema (Streptococcus pneumoniae infection in 6 cases, and Staphylococcus Aureus infection in 2 cases), and 2 cases of tuberculous pleuritis. Nine patients who had not been clearly diagnosed before surgery were diagnosed to be empyema (4 case), tuberculous pleuritic (3 cases), mycoplasma infection (1 case), and foreign body with infection (1 case) by thoracoscopy. The average duration of post-op closed thoracic drainage was (4.7±2.3) days. The average time to get normal temperature was (2.4±2.6) days. And the average length of hospital stay was (6.7±1.8) days. No hemothorax, chylothorax, or need for analgesic occurred. Conclusion: Thoracoscopy can be recommended for diagnosis and treatment of refractory pleural lesions diseases in children, with minimal trauma and complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Chen
- Children's Medical Center of Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, Changsha 410009, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Adamson P, An FP, Anghel I, Aurisano A, Balantekin AB, Band HR, Barr G, Bishai M, Blake A, Blyth S, Bock GJ, Bogert D, Cao D, Cao GF, Cao J, Cao SV, Carroll TJ, Castromonte CM, Cen WR, Chan YL, Chang JF, Chang LC, Chang Y, Chen HS, Chen QY, Chen R, Chen SM, Chen Y, Chen YX, Cheng J, Cheng JH, Cheng YP, Cheng ZK, Cherwinka JJ, Childress S, Chu MC, Chukanov A, Coelho JAB, Corwin L, Cronin-Hennessy D, Cummings JP, de Arcos J, De Rijck S, Deng ZY, Devan AV, Devenish NE, Ding XF, Ding YY, Diwan MV, Dolgareva M, Dove J, Dwyer DA, Edwards WR, Escobar CO, Evans JJ, Falk E, Feldman GJ, Flanagan W, Frohne MV, Gabrielyan M, Gallagher HR, Germani S, Gill R, Gomes RA, Gonchar M, Gong GH, Gong H, Goodman MC, Gouffon P, Graf N, Gran R, Grassi M, Grzelak K, Gu WQ, Guan MY, Guo L, Guo RP, Guo XH, Guo Z, Habig A, Hackenburg RW, Hahn SR, Han R, Hans S, Hartnell J, Hatcher R, He M, Heeger KM, Heng YK, Higuera A, Holin A, Hor YK, Hsiung YB, Hu BZ, Hu T, Hu W, Huang EC, Huang HX, Huang J, Huang XT, Huber P, Huo W, Hussain G, Hylen J, Irwin GM, Isvan Z, Jaffe DE, Jaffke P, James C, Jen KL, Jensen D, Jetter S, Ji XL, Ji XP, Jiao JB, Johnson RA, de Jong JK, Joshi J, Kafka T, Kang L, Kasahara SMS, Kettell SH, Kohn S, Koizumi G, Kordosky M, Kramer M, Kreymer A, Kwan KK, Kwok MW, Kwok T, Lang K, Langford TJ, Lau K, Lebanowski L, Lee J, Lee JHC, Lei RT, Leitner R, Leung JKC, Li C, Li DJ, Li F, Li GS, Li QJ, Li S, Li SC, Li WD, Li XN, Li YF, Li ZB, Liang H, Lin CJ, Lin GL, Lin S, Lin SK, Lin YC, Ling JJ, Link JM, Litchfield PJ, Littenberg L, Littlejohn BR, Liu DW, Liu JC, Liu JL, Loh CW, Lu C, Lu HQ, Lu JS, Lucas P, Luk KB, Lv Z, Ma QM, Ma XB, Ma XY, Ma YQ, Malyshkin Y, Mann WA, Marshak ML, Martinez Caicedo DA, Mayer N, McDonald KT, McGivern C, McKeown RD, Medeiros MM, Mehdiyev R, Meier JR, Messier MD, Miller WH, Mishra SR, Mitchell I, Mooney M, Moore CD, Mualem L, Musser J, Nakajima Y, Naples D, Napolitano J, Naumov D, Naumova E, Nelson JK, Newman HB, Ngai HY, Nichol RJ, Ning Z, Nowak JA, O'Connor J, Ochoa-Ricoux JP, Olshevskiy A, Orchanian M, Pahlka RB, Paley J, Pan HR, Park J, Patterson RB, Patton S, Pawloski G, Pec V, Peng JC, Perch A, Pfützner MM, Phan DD, Phan-Budd S, Pinsky L, Plunkett RK, Poonthottathil N, Pun CSJ, Qi FZ, Qi M, Qian X, Qiu X, Radovic A, Raper N, Rebel B, Ren J, Rosenfeld C, Rosero R, Roskovec B, Ruan XC, Rubin HA, Sail P, Sanchez MC, Schneps J, Schreckenberger A, Schreiner P, Sharma R, Moed Sher S, Sousa A, Steiner H, Sun GX, Sun JL, Tagg N, Talaga RL, Tang W, Taychenachev D, Thomas J, Thomson MA, Tian X, Timmons A, Todd J, Tognini SC, Toner R, Torretta D, Treskov K, Tsang KV, Tull CE, Tzanakos G, Urheim J, Vahle P, Viaux N, Viren B, Vorobel V, Wang CH, Wang M, Wang NY, Wang RG, Wang W, Wang X, Wang YF, Wang Z, Wang ZM, Webb RC, Weber A, Wei HY, Wen LJ, Whisnant K, White C, Whitehead L, Whitehead LH, Wise T, Wojcicki SG, Wong HLH, Wong SCF, Worcester E, Wu CH, Wu Q, Wu WJ, Xia DM, Xia JK, Xing ZZ, Xu JL, Xu JY, Xu Y, Xue T, Yang CG, Yang H, Yang L, Yang MS, Yang MT, Ye M, Ye Z, Yeh M, Young BL, Yu ZY, Zeng S, Zhan L, Zhang C, Zhang HH, Zhang JW, Zhang QM, Zhang XT, Zhang YM, Zhang YX, Zhang ZJ, Zhang ZP, Zhang ZY, Zhao J, Zhao QW, Zhao YB, Zhong WL, Zhou L, Zhou N, Zhuang HL, Zou JH. Limits on Active to Sterile Neutrino Oscillations from Disappearance Searches in the MINOS, Daya Bay, and Bugey-3 Experiments. Phys Rev Lett 2016; 117:151801. [PMID: 27768356 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.117.151801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Searches for a light sterile neutrino have been performed independently by the MINOS and the Daya Bay experiments using the muon (anti)neutrino and electron antineutrino disappearance channels, respectively. In this Letter, results from both experiments are combined with those from the Bugey-3 reactor neutrino experiment to constrain oscillations into light sterile neutrinos. The three experiments are sensitive to complementary regions of parameter space, enabling the combined analysis to probe regions allowed by the Liquid Scintillator Neutrino Detector (LSND) and MiniBooNE experiments in a minimally extended four-neutrino flavor framework. Stringent limits on sin^{2}2θ_{μe} are set over 6 orders of magnitude in the sterile mass-squared splitting Δm_{41}^{2}. The sterile-neutrino mixing phase space allowed by the LSND and MiniBooNE experiments is excluded for Δm_{41}^{2}<0.8 eV^{2} at 95% CL_{s}.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Adamson
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
| | - F P An
- Institute of Modern Physics, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai
| | - I Anghel
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011 USA
- Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
| | - A Aurisano
- Department of Physics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA
| | - A B Balantekin
- Physics Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
| | - H R Band
- Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - G Barr
- Subdepartment of Particle Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RH, United Kingdom
| | - M Bishai
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - A Blake
- Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0HE, United Kingdom
- Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YB, United Kingdom
| | - S Blyth
- Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei
- National United University, Miao-Li
| | - G J Bock
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
| | - D Bogert
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
| | - D Cao
- Nanjing University, Nanjing
| | - G F Cao
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - J Cao
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - S V Cao
- Department of Physics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
| | - T J Carroll
- Department of Physics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
| | - C M Castromonte
- Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal de Goiás, 74690-900, Goiânia, GO, Brazil
| | - W R Cen
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Y L Chan
- Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - J F Chang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - L C Chang
- Institute of Physics, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu
| | - Y Chang
- National United University, Miao-Li
| | - H S Chen
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | | | - R Chen
- School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
| | - S M Chen
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - Y Chen
- Shenzhen University, Shenzhen
| | - Y X Chen
- North China Electric Power University, Beijing
| | | | - J-H Cheng
- Institute of Physics, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu
| | - Y P Cheng
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Z K Cheng
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - J J Cherwinka
- Physics Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
| | - S Childress
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
| | - M C Chu
- Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - A Chukanov
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region
| | - J A B Coelho
- Physics Department, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA
| | - L Corwin
- Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | | | | | - J de Arcos
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616, USA
| | - S De Rijck
- Department of Physics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
| | - Z Y Deng
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - A V Devan
- Department of Physics, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187, USA
| | - N E Devenish
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QH, United Kingdom
| | - X F Ding
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Y Y Ding
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - M V Diwan
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - M Dolgareva
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region
| | - J Dove
- Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA
| | - D A Dwyer
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, 94720 USA
| | - W R Edwards
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, 94720 USA
| | - C O Escobar
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas, IFGW, CP 6165, 13083-970, Campinas, SP, Brazil
| | - J J Evans
- School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
| | - E Falk
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QH, United Kingdom
| | - G J Feldman
- Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
| | - W Flanagan
- Department of Physics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
| | - M V Frohne
- Holy Cross College, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, USA
| | - M Gabrielyan
- University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
| | - H R Gallagher
- Physics Department, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA
| | - S Germani
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| | - R Gill
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - R A Gomes
- Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal de Goiás, 74690-900, Goiânia, GO, Brazil
| | - M Gonchar
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region
| | - G H Gong
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - H Gong
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - M C Goodman
- Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
| | - P Gouffon
- Instituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo, CP 66318, 05315-970, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - N Graf
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA
| | - R Gran
- Department of Physics, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, Minnesota 55812, USA
| | - M Grassi
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - K Grzelak
- Department of Physics, University of Warsaw, PL-02-093 Warsaw, Poland
| | - W Q Gu
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Shanghai
| | - M Y Guan
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - L Guo
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - R P Guo
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - X H Guo
- Beijing Normal University, Beijing
| | - Z Guo
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - A Habig
- Department of Physics, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, Minnesota 55812, USA
| | - R W Hackenburg
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - S R Hahn
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
| | - R Han
- North China Electric Power University, Beijing
| | - S Hans
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - J Hartnell
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QH, United Kingdom
| | - R Hatcher
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
| | - M He
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - K M Heeger
- Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - Y K Heng
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - A Higuera
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204, USA
| | - A Holin
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| | - Y K Hor
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
| | - Y B Hsiung
- Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei
| | - B Z Hu
- Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei
| | - T Hu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - W Hu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - E C Huang
- Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA
| | - H X Huang
- China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing
| | - J Huang
- Department of Physics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
| | | | - P Huber
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
| | - W Huo
- University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei
| | - G Hussain
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - J Hylen
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
| | - G M Irwin
- Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Z Isvan
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - D E Jaffe
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - P Jaffke
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
| | - C James
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
| | - K L Jen
- Institute of Physics, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu
| | - D Jensen
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
| | - S Jetter
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - X L Ji
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - X P Ji
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
- School of Physics, Nankai University, Tianjin
| | | | - R A Johnson
- Department of Physics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA
| | - J K de Jong
- Subdepartment of Particle Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RH, United Kingdom
| | - J Joshi
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - T Kafka
- Physics Department, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA
| | - L Kang
- Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan
| | - S M S Kasahara
- University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
| | - S H Kettell
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - S Kohn
- Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| | - G Koizumi
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
| | - M Kordosky
- Department of Physics, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187, USA
| | - M Kramer
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, 94720 USA
- Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| | - A Kreymer
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
| | - K K Kwan
- Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - M W Kwok
- Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - T Kwok
- Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - K Lang
- Department of Physics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
| | - T J Langford
- Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
| | - K Lau
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204, USA
| | - L Lebanowski
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - J Lee
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, 94720 USA
| | - J H C Lee
- Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - R T Lei
- Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan
| | - R Leitner
- Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - J K C Leung
- Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - C Li
- Shandong University, Jinan
| | - D J Li
- University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei
| | - F Li
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - G S Li
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Shanghai
| | - Q J Li
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - S Li
- Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan
| | - S C Li
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
- Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - W D Li
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - X N Li
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Y F Li
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Z B Li
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - H Liang
- University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei
| | - C J Lin
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, 94720 USA
| | - G L Lin
- Institute of Physics, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu
| | - S Lin
- Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan
| | - S K Lin
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204, USA
| | - Y-C Lin
- Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei
| | - J J Ling
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - J M Link
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
| | - P J Litchfield
- University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
- Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Science and Technology Facilities Council, Didcot, OX11 0QX, United Kingdom
| | - L Littenberg
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - B R Littlejohn
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616, USA
| | - D W Liu
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204, USA
| | - J C Liu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - J L Liu
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Shanghai
| | | | - C Lu
- Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
| | - H Q Lu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - J S Lu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - P Lucas
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
| | - K B Luk
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, 94720 USA
- Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| | - Z Lv
- Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an
| | - Q M Ma
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - X B Ma
- North China Electric Power University, Beijing
| | - X Y Ma
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Y Q Ma
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Y Malyshkin
- Instituto de Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - W A Mann
- Physics Department, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA
| | - M L Marshak
- University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
| | - D A Martinez Caicedo
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616, USA
| | - N Mayer
- Physics Department, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA
| | - K T McDonald
- Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
| | - C McGivern
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA
| | - R D McKeown
- Department of Physics, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187, USA
- Lauritsen Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
| | - M M Medeiros
- Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal de Goiás, 74690-900, Goiânia, GO, Brazil
| | - R Mehdiyev
- Department of Physics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
| | - J R Meier
- University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
| | - M D Messier
- Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | - W H Miller
- University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
| | - S R Mishra
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, USA
| | - I Mitchell
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204, USA
| | - M Mooney
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - C D Moore
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
| | - L Mualem
- Lauritsen Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
| | - J Musser
- Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | - Y Nakajima
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, 94720 USA
| | - D Naples
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, USA
| | - J Napolitano
- Department of Physics, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122, USA
| | - D Naumov
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region
| | - E Naumova
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region
| | - J K Nelson
- Department of Physics, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187, USA
| | - H B Newman
- Lauritsen Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
| | - H Y Ngai
- Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - R J Nichol
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| | - Z Ning
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - J A Nowak
- University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
| | - J O'Connor
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| | - J P Ochoa-Ricoux
- Instituto de Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - A Olshevskiy
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region
| | - M Orchanian
- Lauritsen Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
| | - R B Pahlka
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
| | - J Paley
- Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
| | - H-R Pan
- Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei
| | - J Park
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
| | - R B Patterson
- Lauritsen Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
| | - S Patton
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, 94720 USA
| | - G Pawloski
- University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA
| | - V Pec
- Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - J C Peng
- Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA
| | - A Perch
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| | - M M Pfützner
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| | - D D Phan
- Department of Physics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
| | - S Phan-Budd
- Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
| | - L Pinsky
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204, USA
| | - R K Plunkett
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
| | - N Poonthottathil
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
| | - C S J Pun
- Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - F Z Qi
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - M Qi
- Nanjing University, Nanjing
| | - X Qian
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - X Qiu
- Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - A Radovic
- Department of Physics, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187, USA
| | - N Raper
- Department of Physics, Applied Physics, and Astronomy, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180, USA
| | - B Rebel
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
| | - J Ren
- China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing
| | - C Rosenfeld
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, USA
| | - R Rosero
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - B Roskovec
- Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - X C Ruan
- China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing
| | - H A Rubin
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616, USA
| | - P Sail
- Department of Physics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
| | - M C Sanchez
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011 USA
- Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
| | - J Schneps
- Physics Department, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA
| | - A Schreckenberger
- Department of Physics, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA
| | - P Schreiner
- Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
| | - R Sharma
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
| | - S Moed Sher
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
| | - A Sousa
- Department of Physics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA
| | - H Steiner
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, 94720 USA
- Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| | - G X Sun
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - J L Sun
- China General Nuclear Power Group
| | - N Tagg
- Otterbein University, Westerville, Ohio 43081, USA
| | - R L Talaga
- Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
| | - W Tang
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - D Taychenachev
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region
| | - J Thomas
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| | - M A Thomson
- Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0HE, United Kingdom
| | - X Tian
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, USA
| | - A Timmons
- School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
| | - J Todd
- Department of Physics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA
| | - S C Tognini
- Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal de Goiás, 74690-900, Goiânia, GO, Brazil
| | - R Toner
- Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
| | - D Torretta
- Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 60510, USA
| | - K Treskov
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region
| | - K V Tsang
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, 94720 USA
| | - C E Tull
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, 94720 USA
| | - G Tzanakos
- Department of Physics, University of Athens, GR-15771 Athens, Greece
| | - J Urheim
- Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA
| | - P Vahle
- Department of Physics, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187, USA
| | - N Viaux
- Instituto de Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - B Viren
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - V Vorobel
- Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - C H Wang
- National United University, Miao-Li
| | - M Wang
- Shandong University, Jinan
| | - N Y Wang
- Beijing Normal University, Beijing
| | - R G Wang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - W Wang
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
- Department of Physics, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187, USA
| | - X Wang
- College of Electronic Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha
| | - Y F Wang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Z Wang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Z M Wang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - R C Webb
- Physics Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA
| | - A Weber
- Subdepartment of Particle Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3RH, United Kingdom
- Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Science and Technology Facilities Council, Didcot, OX11 0QX, United Kingdom
| | - H Y Wei
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - L J Wen
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - K Whisnant
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011 USA
| | - C White
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616, USA
| | - L Whitehead
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204, USA
| | - L H Whitehead
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| | - T Wise
- Physics Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
| | - S G Wojcicki
- Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - H L H Wong
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, 94720 USA
- Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| | - S C F Wong
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - E Worcester
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - C-H Wu
- Institute of Physics, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu
| | - Q Wu
- Shandong University, Jinan
| | - W J Wu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - D M Xia
- Chongqing University, Chongqing
| | - J K Xia
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Z Z Xing
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - J L Xu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - J Y Xu
- Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Y Xu
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - T Xue
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - C G Yang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - H Yang
- Nanjing University, Nanjing
| | - L Yang
- Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan
| | - M S Yang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | | | - M Ye
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Z Ye
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204, USA
| | - M Yeh
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - B L Young
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011 USA
| | - Z Y Yu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - S Zeng
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - L Zhan
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - C Zhang
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
| | - H H Zhang
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - J W Zhang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | | | - X T Zhang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Y M Zhang
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | | | - Z J Zhang
- Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan
| | - Z P Zhang
- University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei
| | - Z Y Zhang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - J Zhao
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Q W Zhao
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Y B Zhao
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - W L Zhong
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - L Zhou
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - N Zhou
- University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei
| | - H L Zhuang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - J H Zou
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
An FP, Balantekin AB, Band HR, Bishai M, Blyth S, Cao D, Cao GF, Cao J, Cen WR, Chan YL, Chang JF, Chang LC, Chang Y, Chen HS, Chen QY, Chen SM, Chen YX, Chen Y, Cheng JH, Cheng J, Cheng YP, Cheng ZK, Cherwinka JJ, Chu MC, Chukanov A, Cummings JP, de Arcos J, Deng ZY, Ding XF, Ding YY, Diwan MV, Dolgareva M, Dove J, Dwyer DA, Edwards WR, Gill R, Gonchar M, Gong GH, Gong H, Grassi M, Gu WQ, Guan MY, Guo L, Guo RP, Guo XH, Guo Z, Hackenburg RW, Han R, Hans S, He M, Heeger KM, Heng YK, Higuera A, Hor YK, Hsiung YB, Hu BZ, Hu T, Hu W, Huang EC, Huang HX, Huang XT, Huber P, Huo W, Hussain G, Jaffe DE, Jaffke P, Jen KL, Jetter S, Ji XP, Ji XL, Jiao JB, Johnson RA, Joshi J, Kang L, Kettell SH, Kohn S, Kramer M, Kwan KK, Kwok MW, Kwok T, Langford TJ, Lau K, Lebanowski L, Lee J, Lee JHC, Lei RT, Leitner R, Leung JKC, Li C, Li DJ, Li F, Li GS, Li QJ, Li S, Li SC, Li WD, Li XN, Li YF, Li ZB, Liang H, Lin CJ, Lin GL, Lin S, Lin SK, Lin YC, Ling JJ, Link JM, Littenberg L, Littlejohn BR, Liu DW, Liu JL, Liu JC, Loh CW, Lu C, Lu HQ, Lu JS, Luk KB, Lv Z, Ma QM, Ma XY, Ma XB, Ma YQ, Malyshkin Y, Martinez Caicedo DA, McDonald KT, McKeown RD, Mitchell I, Mooney M, Nakajima Y, Napolitano J, Naumov D, Naumova E, Ngai HY, Ning Z, Ochoa-Ricoux JP, Olshevskiy A, Pan HR, Park J, Patton S, Pec V, Peng JC, Pinsky L, Pun CSJ, Qi FZ, Qi M, Qian X, Raper N, Ren J, Rosero R, Roskovec B, Ruan XC, Steiner H, Sun GX, Sun JL, Tang W, Taychenachev D, Treskov K, Tsang KV, Tull CE, Viaux N, Viren B, Vorobel V, Wang CH, Wang M, Wang NY, Wang RG, Wang W, Wang X, Wang YF, Wang Z, Wang Z, Wang ZM, Wei HY, Wen LJ, Whisnant K, White CG, Whitehead L, Wise T, Wong HLH, Wong SCF, Worcester E, Wu CH, Wu Q, Wu WJ, Xia DM, Xia JK, Xing ZZ, Xu JY, Xu JL, Xu Y, Xue T, Yang CG, Yang H, Yang L, Yang MS, Yang MT, Ye M, Ye Z, Yeh M, Young BL, Yu ZY, Zeng S, Zhan L, Zhang C, Zhang HH, Zhang JW, Zhang QM, Zhang XT, Zhang YM, Zhang YX, Zhang YM, Zhang ZJ, Zhang ZY, Zhang ZP, Zhao J, Zhao QW, Zhao YB, Zhong WL, Zhou L, Zhou N, Zhuang HL, Zou JH. Improved Search for a Light Sterile Neutrino with the Full Configuration of the Daya Bay Experiment. Phys Rev Lett 2016; 117:151802. [PMID: 27768341 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.117.151802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
This Letter reports an improved search for light sterile neutrino mixing in the electron antineutrino disappearance channel with the full configuration of the Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment. With an additional 404 days of data collected in eight antineutrino detectors, this search benefits from 3.6 times the statistics available to the previous publication, as well as from improvements in energy calibration and background reduction. A relative comparison of the rate and energy spectrum of reactor antineutrinos in the three experimental halls yields no evidence of sterile neutrino mixing in the 2×10^{-4}≲|Δm_{41}^{2}|≲0.3 eV^{2} mass range. The resulting limits on sin^{2}2θ_{14} are improved by approx imately a factor of 2 over previous results and constitute the most stringent constraints to date in the |Δm_{41}^{2}|≲0.2 eV^{2} region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F P An
- Institute of Modern Physics, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai
| | | | - H R Band
- Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut USA
| | - M Bishai
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York USA
| | - S Blyth
- Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei
- National United University, Miao-Li
| | - D Cao
- Nanjing University, Nanjing
| | - G F Cao
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - J Cao
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - W R Cen
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Y L Chan
- Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - J F Chang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - L C Chang
- Institute of Physics, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu
| | - Y Chang
- National United University, Miao-Li
| | - H S Chen
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | | | - S M Chen
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - Y X Chen
- North China Electric Power University, Beijing
| | - Y Chen
- Shenzhen University, Shenzhen
| | - J-H Cheng
- Institute of Physics, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu
| | | | - Y P Cheng
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Z K Cheng
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | | | - M C Chu
- Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - A Chukanov
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region
| | | | - J de Arcos
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois USA
| | - Z Y Deng
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - X F Ding
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Y Y Ding
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - M V Diwan
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York USA
| | - M Dolgareva
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region
| | - J Dove
- Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois USA
| | - D A Dwyer
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California USA
| | - W R Edwards
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California USA
| | - R Gill
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York USA
| | - M Gonchar
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region
| | - G H Gong
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - H Gong
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - M Grassi
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - W Q Gu
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Shanghai
| | - M Y Guan
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - L Guo
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - R P Guo
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - X H Guo
- Beijing Normal University, Beijing
| | - Z Guo
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | | | - R Han
- North China Electric Power University, Beijing
| | - S Hans
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York USA
| | - M He
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - K M Heeger
- Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut USA
| | - Y K Heng
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - A Higuera
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas USA
| | - Y K Hor
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia USA
| | - Y B Hsiung
- Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei
| | - B Z Hu
- Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei
| | - T Hu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - W Hu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - E C Huang
- Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois USA
| | - H X Huang
- China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing
| | | | - P Huber
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia USA
| | - W Huo
- University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei
| | - G Hussain
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - D E Jaffe
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York USA
| | - P Jaffke
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia USA
| | - K L Jen
- Institute of Physics, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu
| | - S Jetter
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - X P Ji
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
- School of Physics, Nankai University, Tianjin
| | - X L Ji
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | | | - R A Johnson
- Department of Physics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio USA
| | - J Joshi
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York USA
| | - L Kang
- Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan
| | - S H Kettell
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York USA
| | - S Kohn
- Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California USA
| | - M Kramer
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California USA
- Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California USA
| | - K K Kwan
- Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - M W Kwok
- Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - T Kwok
- Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - T J Langford
- Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut USA
| | - K Lau
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas USA
| | - L Lebanowski
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - J Lee
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California USA
| | - J H C Lee
- Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - R T Lei
- Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan
| | - R Leitner
- Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - J K C Leung
- Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - C Li
- Shandong University, Jinan
| | - D J Li
- University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei
| | - F Li
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - G S Li
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Shanghai
| | - Q J Li
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - S Li
- Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan
| | - S C Li
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia USA
- Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - W D Li
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - X N Li
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Y F Li
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Z B Li
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - H Liang
- University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei
| | - C J Lin
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California USA
| | - G L Lin
- Institute of Physics, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu
| | - S Lin
- Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan
| | - S K Lin
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas USA
| | - Y-C Lin
- Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei
| | - J J Ling
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - J M Link
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia USA
| | - L Littenberg
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York USA
| | - B R Littlejohn
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois USA
| | - D W Liu
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas USA
| | - J L Liu
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Shanghai
| | - J C Liu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | | | - C Lu
- Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey USA
| | - H Q Lu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - J S Lu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - K B Luk
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California USA
- Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California USA
| | - Z Lv
- Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an
| | - Q M Ma
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - X Y Ma
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - X B Ma
- North China Electric Power University, Beijing
| | - Y Q Ma
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Y Malyshkin
- Instituto de Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | | | - K T McDonald
- Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey USA
| | - R D McKeown
- California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California USA
- College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia USA
| | - I Mitchell
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas USA
| | - M Mooney
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York USA
| | - Y Nakajima
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California USA
| | - J Napolitano
- Department of Physics, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA
| | - D Naumov
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region
| | - E Naumova
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region
| | - H Y Ngai
- Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - Z Ning
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - J P Ochoa-Ricoux
- Instituto de Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - A Olshevskiy
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region
| | - H-R Pan
- Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei
| | - J Park
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia USA
| | - S Patton
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California USA
| | - V Pec
- Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - J C Peng
- Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois USA
| | - L Pinsky
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas USA
| | - C S J Pun
- Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - F Z Qi
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - M Qi
- Nanjing University, Nanjing
| | - X Qian
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York USA
| | - N Raper
- Department of Physics, Applied Physics, and Astronomy, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York USA
| | - J Ren
- China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing
| | - R Rosero
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York USA
| | - B Roskovec
- Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - X C Ruan
- China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing
| | - H Steiner
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California USA
- Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California USA
| | - G X Sun
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - J L Sun
- China General Nuclear Power Group, Shenzhen
| | - W Tang
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York USA
| | - D Taychenachev
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region
| | - K Treskov
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region
| | - K V Tsang
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California USA
| | - C E Tull
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California USA
| | - N Viaux
- Instituto de Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - B Viren
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York USA
| | - V Vorobel
- Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - C H Wang
- National United University, Miao-Li
| | - M Wang
- Shandong University, Jinan
| | - N Y Wang
- Beijing Normal University, Beijing
| | - R G Wang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - W Wang
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
- College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia USA
| | - X Wang
- College of Electronic Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha
| | - Y F Wang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Z Wang
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - Z Wang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Z M Wang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - H Y Wei
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - L J Wen
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | | | - C G White
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois USA
| | - L Whitehead
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas USA
| | - T Wise
- University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin USA
| | - H L H Wong
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California USA
- Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California USA
| | - S C F Wong
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - E Worcester
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York USA
| | - C-H Wu
- Institute of Physics, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu
| | - Q Wu
- Shandong University, Jinan
| | - W J Wu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - D M Xia
- Chongqing University, Chongqing
| | - J K Xia
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Z Z Xing
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - J Y Xu
- Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - J L Xu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Y Xu
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - T Xue
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - C G Yang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - H Yang
- Nanjing University, Nanjing
| | - L Yang
- Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan
| | - M S Yang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | | | - M Ye
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Z Ye
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas USA
| | - M Yeh
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York USA
| | - B L Young
- Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa USA
| | - Z Y Yu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - S Zeng
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - L Zhan
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - C Zhang
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York USA
| | - H H Zhang
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - J W Zhang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | | | - X T Zhang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Y M Zhang
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - Y X Zhang
- China General Nuclear Power Group, Shenzhen
| | - Y M Zhang
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - Z J Zhang
- Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan
| | - Z Y Zhang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Z P Zhang
- University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei
| | - J Zhao
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Q W Zhao
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Y B Zhao
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - W L Zhong
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - L Zhou
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - N Zhou
- University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei
| | - H L Zhuang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - J H Zou
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
An FP, Balantekin AB, Band HR, Bishai M, Blyth S, Butorov I, Cao D, Cao GF, Cao J, Cen WR, Chan YL, Chang JF, Chang LC, Chang Y, Chen HS, Chen QY, Chen SM, Chen YX, Chen Y, Cheng JH, Cheng J, Cheng YP, Cherwinka JJ, Chu MC, Cummings JP, de Arcos J, Deng ZY, Ding XF, Ding YY, Diwan MV, Dove J, Draeger E, Dwyer DA, Edwards WR, Ely SR, Gill R, Gonchar M, Gong GH, Gong H, Grassi M, Gu WQ, Guan MY, Guo L, Guo XH, Hackenburg RW, Han R, Hans S, He M, Heeger KM, Heng YK, Higuera A, Hor YK, Hsiung YB, Hu BZ, Hu LM, Hu LJ, Hu T, Hu W, Huang EC, Huang HX, Huang XT, Huber P, Hussain G, Jaffe DE, Jaffke P, Jen KL, Jetter S, Ji XP, Ji XL, Jiao JB, Johnson RA, Kang L, Kettell SH, Kohn S, Kramer M, Kwan KK, Kwok MW, Kwok T, Langford TJ, Lau K, Lebanowski L, Lee J, Lei RT, Leitner R, Leung KY, Leung JKC, Lewis CA, Li DJ, Li F, Li GS, Li QJ, Li SC, Li WD, Li XN, Li XQ, Li YF, Li ZB, Liang H, Lin CJ, Lin GL, Lin PY, Lin SK, Ling JJ, Link JM, Littenberg L, Littlejohn BR, Liu DW, Liu H, Liu JL, Liu JC, Liu SS, Lu C, Lu HQ, Lu JS, Luk KB, Ma QM, Ma XY, Ma XB, Ma YQ, Martinez Caicedo DA, McDonald KT, McKeown RD, Meng Y, Mitchell I, Monari Kebwaro J, Nakajima Y, Napolitano J, Naumov D, Naumova E, Ngai HY, Ning Z, Ochoa-Ricoux JP, Olshevski A, Pan HR, Park J, Patton S, Pec V, Peng JC, Piilonen LE, Pinsky L, Pun CSJ, Qi FZ, Qi M, Qian X, Raper N, Ren B, Ren J, Rosero R, Roskovec B, Ruan XC, Shao BB, Steiner H, Sun GX, Sun JL, Tang W, Taychenachev D, Tsang KV, Tull CE, Tung YC, Viaux N, Viren B, Vorobel V, Wang CH, Wang M, Wang NY, Wang RG, Wang W, Wang WW, Wang X, Wang YF, Wang Z, Wang Z, Wang ZM, Wei HY, Wen LJ, Whisnant K, White CG, Whitehead L, Wise T, Wong HLH, Wong SCF, Worcester E, Wu Q, Xia DM, Xia JK, Xia X, Xing ZZ, Xu JY, Xu JL, Xu J, Xu Y, Xue T, Yan J, Yang CG, Yang L, Yang MS, Yang MT, Ye M, Yeh M, Young BL, Yu GY, Yu ZY, Zang SL, Zhan L, Zhang C, Zhang HH, Zhang JW, Zhang QM, Zhang YM, Zhang YX, Zhang YM, Zhang ZJ, Zhang ZY, Zhang ZP, Zhao J, Zhao QW, Zhao YF, Zhao YB, Zheng L, Zhong WL, Zhou L, Zhou N, Zhuang HL, Zou JH. Measurement of the Reactor Antineutrino Flux and Spectrum at Daya Bay. Phys Rev Lett 2016; 116:061801. [PMID: 26918980 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.116.061801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2015] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
This Letter reports a measurement of the flux and energy spectrum of electron antineutrinos from six 2.9 GWth nuclear reactors with six detectors deployed in two near (effective baselines 512 and 561 m) and one far (1579 m) underground experimental halls in the Daya Bay experiment. Using 217 days of data, 296 721 and 41 589 inverse β decay (IBD) candidates were detected in the near and far halls, respectively. The measured IBD yield is (1.55±0.04) ×10(-18) cm(2) GW(-1) day(-1) or (5.92±0.14) ×10(-43) cm(2) fission(-1). This flux measurement is consistent with previous short-baseline reactor antineutrino experiments and is 0.946±0.022 (0.991±0.023) relative to the flux predicted with the Huber-Mueller (ILL-Vogel) fissile antineutrino model. The measured IBD positron energy spectrum deviates from both spectral predictions by more than 2σ over the full energy range with a local significance of up to ∼4σ between 4-6 MeV. A reactor antineutrino spectrum of IBD reactions is extracted from the measured positron energy spectrum for model-independent predictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F P An
- Institute of Modern Physics, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
| | | | - H R Band
- Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - M Bishai
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - S Blyth
- Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- National United University, Miao-Li, Taiwan
| | - I Butorov
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia
| | - D Cao
- Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - G F Cao
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - J Cao
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - W R Cen
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - Y L Chan
- Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - J F Chang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - L C Chang
- Institute of Physics, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Y Chang
- National United University, Miao-Li, Taiwan
| | - H S Chen
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - Q Y Chen
- Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - S M Chen
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Y X Chen
- North China Electric Power University, Beijing, China
| | - Y Chen
- Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
| | - J H Cheng
- Institute of Physics, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - J Cheng
- Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Y P Cheng
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | | | - M C Chu
- Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | | | - J de Arcos
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Z Y Deng
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - X F Ding
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - Y Y Ding
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - M V Diwan
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - J Dove
- Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA
| | - E Draeger
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - D A Dwyer
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - W R Edwards
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - S R Ely
- Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA
| | - R Gill
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - M Gonchar
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia
| | - G H Gong
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - H Gong
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - M Grassi
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - W Q Gu
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - M Y Guan
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - L Guo
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - X H Guo
- Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| | | | - R Han
- North China Electric Power University, Beijing, China
| | - S Hans
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - M He
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - K M Heeger
- Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Y K Heng
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - A Higuera
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Y K Hor
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
| | - Y B Hsiung
- Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - B Z Hu
- Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - L M Hu
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - L J Hu
- Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| | - T Hu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - W Hu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - E C Huang
- Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA
| | - H X Huang
- China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing, China
| | | | - P Huber
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
| | - G Hussain
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - D E Jaffe
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - P Jaffke
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
| | - K L Jen
- Institute of Physics, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - S Jetter
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - X P Ji
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
- School of Physics, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| | - X L Ji
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - J B Jiao
- Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - R A Johnson
- Department of Physics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - L Kang
- Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan, China
| | - S H Kettell
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - S Kohn
- Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - M Kramer
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
- Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - K K Kwan
- Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - M W Kwok
- Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - T Kwok
- Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China
| | - T J Langford
- Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - K Lau
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - L Lebanowski
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - J Lee
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - R T Lei
- Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan, China
| | - R Leitner
- Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - K Y Leung
- Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China
| | - J K C Leung
- Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China
| | - C A Lewis
- University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - D J Li
- University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - F Li
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - G S Li
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Q J Li
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - S C Li
- Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China
| | - W D Li
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - X N Li
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - X Q Li
- School of Physics, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| | - Y F Li
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - Z B Li
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou, China
| | - H Liang
- University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - C J Lin
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - G L Lin
- Institute of Physics, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - P Y Lin
- Institute of Physics, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - S K Lin
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - J J Ling
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
- Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou, China
| | - J M Link
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
| | - L Littenberg
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - B R Littlejohn
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Physics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - D W Liu
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - H Liu
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - J L Liu
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - J C Liu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - S S Liu
- Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China
| | - C Lu
- Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | - H Q Lu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - J S Lu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - K B Luk
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
- Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - Q M Ma
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - X Y Ma
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - X B Ma
- North China Electric Power University, Beijing, China
| | - Y Q Ma
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | | | - K T McDonald
- Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | - R D McKeown
- California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
- College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, USA
| | - Y Meng
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
| | - I Mitchell
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Y Nakajima
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - J Napolitano
- Department of Physics, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - D Naumov
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia
| | - E Naumova
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia
| | - H Y Ngai
- Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China
| | - Z Ning
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - J P Ochoa-Ricoux
- Instituto de Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - A Olshevski
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia
| | - H-R Pan
- Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - J Park
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
| | - S Patton
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - V Pec
- Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - J C Peng
- Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA
| | - L E Piilonen
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
| | - L Pinsky
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - C S J Pun
- Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China
| | - F Z Qi
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - M Qi
- Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - X Qian
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - N Raper
- Department of Physics, Applied Physics, and Astronomy, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA
| | - B Ren
- Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan, China
| | - J Ren
- China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing, China
| | - R Rosero
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - B Roskovec
- Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - X C Ruan
- China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing, China
| | - B B Shao
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - H Steiner
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
- Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - G X Sun
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - J L Sun
- China General Nuclear Power Group, China
| | - W Tang
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - D Taychenachev
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia
| | - K V Tsang
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - C E Tull
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - Y C Tung
- Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - N Viaux
- Instituto de Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - B Viren
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - V Vorobel
- Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - C H Wang
- National United University, Miao-Li, Taiwan
| | - M Wang
- Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - N Y Wang
- Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| | - R G Wang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - W Wang
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou, China
- College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, USA
| | - W W Wang
- Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - X Wang
- College of Electronic Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha, China
| | - Y F Wang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - Z Wang
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Z Wang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - Z M Wang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - H Y Wei
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - L J Wen
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | | | - C G White
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - L Whitehead
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - T Wise
- University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - H L H Wong
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
- Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - S C F Wong
- Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou, China
| | - E Worcester
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - Q Wu
- Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - D M Xia
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
- Chongqing University, Chongqing, China
| | - J K Xia
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - X Xia
- Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Z Z Xing
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - J Y Xu
- Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - J L Xu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - J Xu
- Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
| | - Y Xu
- School of Physics, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
| | - T Xue
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - J Yan
- Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - C G Yang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - L Yang
- Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan, China
| | - M S Yang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - M T Yang
- Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - M Ye
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - M Yeh
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - B L Young
- Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
| | - G Y Yu
- Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Z Y Yu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - S L Zang
- Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - L Zhan
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - C Zhang
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - H H Zhang
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou, China
| | - J W Zhang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - Q M Zhang
- Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Y M Zhang
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Y X Zhang
- China General Nuclear Power Group, China
| | - Y M Zhang
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Z J Zhang
- Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan, China
| | - Z Y Zhang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - Z P Zhang
- University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - J Zhao
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - Q W Zhao
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - Y F Zhao
- North China Electric Power University, Beijing, China
| | - Y B Zhao
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - L Zheng
- University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - W L Zhong
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - L Zhou
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - N Zhou
- University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
| | - H L Zhuang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| | - J H Zou
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
An FP, Balantekin AB, Band HR, Bishai M, Blyth S, Butorov I, Cao GF, Cao J, Cen WR, Chan YL, Chang JF, Chang LC, Chang Y, Chen HS, Chen QY, Chen SM, Chen YX, Chen Y, Cheng JH, Cheng J, Cheng YP, Cherwinka JJ, Chu MC, Cummings JP, de Arcos J, Deng ZY, Ding XF, Ding YY, Diwan MV, Draeger E, Dwyer DA, Edwards WR, Ely SR, Gill R, Gonchar M, Gong GH, Gong H, Grassi M, Gu WQ, Guan MY, Guo L, Guo XH, Hackenburg RW, Han R, Hans S, He M, Heeger KM, Heng YK, Higuera A, Hor YK, Hsiung YB, Hu BZ, Hu LM, Hu LJ, Hu T, Hu W, Huang EC, Huang HX, Huang XT, Huber P, Hussain G, Jaffe DE, Jaffke P, Jen KL, Jetter S, Ji XP, Ji XL, Jiao JB, Johnson RA, Kang L, Kettell SH, Kramer M, Kwan KK, Kwok MW, Kwok T, Langford TJ, Lau K, Lebanowski L, Lee J, Lei RT, Leitner R, Leung KY, Leung JKC, Lewis CA, Li DJ, Li F, Li GS, Li QJ, Li SC, Li WD, Li XN, Li XQ, Li YF, Li ZB, Liang H, Lin CJ, Lin GL, Lin PY, Lin SK, Ling JJ, Link JM, Littenberg L, Littlejohn BR, Liu DW, Liu H, Liu JL, Liu JC, Liu SS, Lu C, Lu HQ, Lu JS, Luk KB, Ma QM, Ma XY, Ma XB, Ma YQ, Martinez Caicedo DA, McDonald KT, McKeown RD, Meng Y, Mitchell I, Monari Kebwaro J, Nakajima Y, Napolitano J, Naumov D, Naumova E, Ngai HY, Ning Z, Ochoa-Ricoux JP, Olshevski A, Park J, Patton S, Pec V, Peng JC, Piilonen LE, Pinsky L, Pun CSJ, Qi FZ, Qi M, Qian X, Raper N, Ren B, Ren J, Rosero R, Roskovec B, Ruan XC, Shao BB, Steiner H, Sun GX, Sun JL, Tang W, Taychenachev D, Themann H, Tsang KV, Tull CE, Tung YC, Viaux N, Viren B, Vorobel V, Wang CH, Wang M, Wang NY, Wang RG, Wang W, Wang WW, Wang X, Wang YF, Wang Z, Wang Z, Wang ZM, Wei HY, Wen LJ, Whisnant K, White CG, Whitehead L, Wise T, Wong HLH, Wong SCF, Worcester E, Wu Q, Xia DM, Xia JK, Xia X, Xing ZZ, Xu JY, Xu JL, Xu J, Xu Y, Xue T, Yan J, Yang CG, Yang L, Yang MS, Yang MT, Ye M, Yeh M, Yeh YS, Young BL, Yu GY, Yu ZY, Zang SL, Zhan L, Zhang C, Zhang HH, Zhang JW, Zhang QM, Zhang YM, Zhang YX, Zhang YM, Zhang ZJ, Zhang ZY, Zhang ZP, Zhao J, Zhao QW, Zhao YF, Zhao YB, Zheng L, Zhong WL, Zhou L, Zhou N, Zhuang HL, Zou JH. New measurement of antineutrino oscillation with the full detector configuration at Daya Bay. Phys Rev Lett 2015; 115:111802. [PMID: 26406819 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.115.111802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2015] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
We report a new measurement of electron antineutrino disappearance using the fully constructed Daya Bay Reactor Neutrino Experiment. The final two of eight antineutrino detectors were installed in the summer of 2012. Including the 404 days of data collected from October 2012 to November 2013 resulted in a total exposure of 6.9×10^{5} GW_{th} ton days, a 3.6 times increase over our previous results. Improvements in energy calibration limited variations between detectors to 0.2%. Removal of six ^{241}Am-^{13}C radioactive calibration sources reduced the background by a factor of 2 for the detectors in the experimental hall furthest from the reactors. Direct prediction of the antineutrino signal in the far detectors based on the measurements in the near detectors explicitly minimized the dependence of the measurement on models of reactor antineutrino emission. The uncertainties in our estimates of sin^{2}2θ_{13} and |Δm_{ee}^{2}| were halved as a result of these improvements. An analysis of the relative antineutrino rates and energy spectra between detectors gave sin^{2}2θ_{13}=0.084±0.005 and |Δm_{ee}^{2}|=(2.42±0.11)×10^{-3} eV^{2} in the three-neutrino framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F P An
- Institute of Modern Physics, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai
| | | | - H R Band
- Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - M Bishai
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - S Blyth
- Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei
- National United University, Miao-Li
| | - I Butorov
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region
| | - G F Cao
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - J Cao
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - W R Cen
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Y L Chan
- Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - J F Chang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - L C Chang
- Institute of Physics, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu
| | - Y Chang
- National United University, Miao-Li
| | - H S Chen
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | | | - S M Chen
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - Y X Chen
- North China Electric Power University, Beijing
| | - Y Chen
- Shenzhen University, Shenzhen
| | - J H Cheng
- Institute of Physics, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu
| | | | - Y P Cheng
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | | | - M C Chu
- Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | | | - J de Arcos
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Z Y Deng
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - X F Ding
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Y Y Ding
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - M V Diwan
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - E Draeger
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - D A Dwyer
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - W R Edwards
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
- Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - S R Ely
- Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA
| | - R Gill
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - M Gonchar
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region
| | - G H Gong
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - H Gong
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - M Grassi
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - W Q Gu
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai
| | - M Y Guan
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - L Guo
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - X H Guo
- Beijing Normal University, Beijing
| | | | - R Han
- North China Electric Power University, Beijing
| | - S Hans
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - M He
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - K M Heeger
- Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Y K Heng
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - A Higuera
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Y K Hor
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
| | - Y B Hsiung
- Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei
| | - B Z Hu
- Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei
| | - L M Hu
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - L J Hu
- Beijing Normal University, Beijing
| | - T Hu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - W Hu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - E C Huang
- Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA
| | - H X Huang
- China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing
| | | | - P Huber
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
| | - G Hussain
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - D E Jaffe
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - P Jaffke
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
| | - K L Jen
- Institute of Physics, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu
| | - S Jetter
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - X P Ji
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
- School of Physics, Nankai University, Tianjin
| | - X L Ji
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | | | - R A Johnson
- Department of Physics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - L Kang
- Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan
| | - S H Kettell
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - M Kramer
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
- Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - K K Kwan
- Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - M W Kwok
- Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - T Kwok
- Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - T J Langford
- Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - K Lau
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - L Lebanowski
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - J Lee
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - R T Lei
- Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan
| | - R Leitner
- Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - K Y Leung
- Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - J K C Leung
- Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - C A Lewis
- University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - D J Li
- University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei
| | - F Li
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - G S Li
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai
| | - Q J Li
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - S C Li
- Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - W D Li
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - X N Li
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - X Q Li
- School of Physics, Nankai University, Tianjin
| | - Y F Li
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Z B Li
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - H Liang
- University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei
| | - C J Lin
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - G L Lin
- Institute of Physics, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu
| | - P Y Lin
- Institute of Physics, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu
| | - S K Lin
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - J J Ling
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
- Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA
| | - J M Link
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
| | - L Littenberg
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - B R Littlejohn
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Physics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - D W Liu
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - H Liu
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - J L Liu
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai
| | - J C Liu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - S S Liu
- Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - C Lu
- Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | - H Q Lu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - J S Lu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - K B Luk
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
- Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - Q M Ma
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - X Y Ma
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - X B Ma
- North China Electric Power University, Beijing
| | - Y Q Ma
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | | | - K T McDonald
- Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
| | - R D McKeown
- California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
- College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia, USA
| | - Y Meng
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
| | - I Mitchell
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Y Nakajima
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - J Napolitano
- Department of Physics, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - D Naumov
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region
| | - E Naumova
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region
| | - H Y Ngai
- Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - Z Ning
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - J P Ochoa-Ricoux
- Instituto de Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - A Olshevski
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region
| | - J Park
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
| | - S Patton
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - V Pec
- Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - J C Peng
- Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA
| | - L E Piilonen
- Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
| | - L Pinsky
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - C S J Pun
- Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - F Z Qi
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - M Qi
- Nanjing University, Nanjing
| | - X Qian
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - N Raper
- Department of Physics, Applied Physics, and Astronomy, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA
| | - B Ren
- Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan
| | - J Ren
- China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing
| | - R Rosero
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - B Roskovec
- Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - X C Ruan
- China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing
| | - B B Shao
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - H Steiner
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
- Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - G X Sun
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - J L Sun
- China General Nuclear Power Group
| | - W Tang
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - D Taychenachev
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region
| | - H Themann
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - K V Tsang
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - C E Tull
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - Y C Tung
- Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei
| | - N Viaux
- Instituto de Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - B Viren
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - V Vorobel
- Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - C H Wang
- National United University, Miao-Li
| | - M Wang
- Shandong University, Jinan
| | - N Y Wang
- Beijing Normal University, Beijing
| | - R G Wang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - W Wang
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | | | - X Wang
- College of Electronic Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha
| | - Y F Wang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Z Wang
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - Z Wang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Z M Wang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - H Y Wei
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - L J Wen
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | | | - C G White
- Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - L Whitehead
- Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - T Wise
- University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - H L H Wong
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
- Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - S C F Wong
- Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - E Worcester
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - Q Wu
- Shandong University, Jinan
| | - D M Xia
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
- Chongqing University, Chongqing
| | - J K Xia
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - X Xia
- Shandong University, Jinan
| | - Z Z Xing
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - J Y Xu
- Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - J L Xu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - J Xu
- Beijing Normal University, Beijing
| | - Y Xu
- School of Physics, Nankai University, Tianjin
| | - T Xue
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | - J Yan
- Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an
| | - C G Yang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - L Yang
- Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan
| | - M S Yang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | | | - M Ye
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - M Yeh
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - Y S Yeh
- Institute of Physics, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu
| | - B L Young
- Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
| | - G Y Yu
- Nanjing University, Nanjing
| | - Z Y Yu
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | | | - L Zhan
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - C Zhang
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
| | - H H Zhang
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - J W Zhang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | | | - Y M Zhang
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing
| | | | - Y M Zhang
- Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou
| | - Z J Zhang
- Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan
| | - Z Y Zhang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Z P Zhang
- University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei
| | - J Zhao
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Q W Zhao
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - Y F Zhao
- North China Electric Power University, Beijing
| | - Y B Zhao
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - L Zheng
- University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei
| | - W L Zhong
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - L Zhou
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - N Zhou
- University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei
| | - H L Zhuang
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| | - J H Zou
- Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Yuan Y, Wang HF, Sun HF, Du HF, Xu LH, Liu YF, Ding XF, Fu DP, Liu KX. Adduction of DNA with MTBE and TBA in mice studied by accelerator mass spectrometry. Environ Toxicol 2007; 22:630-635. [PMID: 18000852 DOI: 10.1002/tox.20295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) is a currently worldwide used octane enhancer substituting for lead alkyls and gasoline oxygenate. Our previous study using doubly (14)C-labeled MTBE [(CH(3))(3) (14)CO(14)CH(3)] has shown that MTBE binds DNA to form DNA adducts at low dose levels in mice. To elucidate the mechanism of the binding reaction, in this study, the DNA adducts with singly (14)C-labeled MTBE, which was synthesized from (14)C-methanol and tert-butyl alcohol (TBA), or (14)C-labeled TBA in mice have been measured by ultra sensitive accelerator mass spectrometry. The results show that the methyl group of MTBE and tert-butyl alcohol definitely form adducts with DNA in mouse liver, lung, and kidney. The methyl group of MTBE is the predominant binding part in liver, while the methyl group and the tert-butyl group give comparable contributions to the adduct formation in lung and kidney.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Yuan
- Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Department of Chemical Biology, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ding XF, Anderson CM, Ma H, Hong H, Uht RM, Kushner PJ, Stallcup MR. Nuclear receptor-binding sites of coactivators glucocorticoid receptor interacting protein 1 (GRIP1) and steroid receptor coactivator 1 (SRC-1): multiple motifs with different binding specificities. Mol Endocrinol 1998; 12:302-13. [PMID: 9482670 DOI: 10.1210/mend.12.2.0065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 261] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The activity of the AF-2 transcriptional activation function of nuclear receptors (NR) is mediated by the partially homologous transcriptional coactivators, glucocorticoid receptor interacting protein 1 (GRIP1)/transcriptional intermediary factor 2 (TIF2) and steroid receptor coactivator 1 (SRC-1). GRIP1 and SRC-1 bound nine different NRs and exhibited similar, but not identical, NR binding preferences. The most striking difference was seen with the androgen receptor, which bound well to GRIP1 but poorly to SRC-1. GRIP1 and SRC-1 contain three copies of the NR binding motif LXXLL (called an NR Box) in their central regions. Mutation of both NR Box II and NR Box III in GRIP1 almost completely eliminated functional and binding interactions with NRs, indicating that these two sites are crucial for most of GRIP1's NR binding activity. Interactions of GRIP1 with the estrogen receptor were more strongly affected by mutations in NR Box II, whereas interactions with the androgen receptor and glucocorticoid receptor were more strongly affected by NR Box III mutations. One isoform of SRC-1 has an additional NR Box (NR Box IV) at its extreme C terminus with an NR-binding preference somewhat different from that of the central NR-binding domain of SRC-1. GRIP1 has no NR Box in its C-terminal region and therefore no C-terminal NR-binding function. In summary, GRIP1 and SRC-1 have overlapping NR-binding preferences, but specific NRs display both coactivator and NR Box preferences that may contribute to the specificity of hormonal responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X F Ding
- Department of Pathology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90033, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Dai GZ, Sun MS, Liu SQ, Ding XF, Chen YD, Wang LC, Du DP, Zhao G, Su Y, Li J. First report of an epidemic of diarrhoea in human neonates involving the new rotavirus and biological characteristics of the epidemic virus strain (KMB/R85). J Med Virol 1987; 22:365-73. [PMID: 3040899 DOI: 10.1002/jmv.1890220409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
An outbreak of diarrhoea in neonates occurred at the nurseries of the Department of Obstetrics of Zhao Tong Regional Hospital, Yunnan Province, from the middle of August to the end of November, 1985. Fifty-one percent of children were affected 2-8 days after birth. The clinical symptoms were mild; patients mainly had diarrhoea and did not vomit. Rotaviruses were detected in 66.7% by RNA PAGE and in 72.7% by EM. The virus strain designated as KMB/R85 had a typical morphology, which was indistinguishable from that of infantile rotaviruses by EM. The viral RNA genome was composed of 11 segments. The buoyant density in CsCl was 1.377 g/cm3. The KMB/R85 strain possessed a hemagglutinin for rhesus monkey erythrocytes. By ELISA, IEM, and HAI, it was found that KMB/R85 strain did not possess the common group antigen shared by group A rotaviruses and was antigenically similar to the Chinese adult diarrhoea rotavirus (serogroup B).
Collapse
|
23
|
Ding XF. [Strains and quality of zhiqiao in Jiangxi Province]. Zhong Yao Tong Bao 1986; 11:11-2. [PMID: 2944652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
|
24
|
Ding XF. [Pruning and trimming of Zhiqiao tree]. Zhong Yao Tong Bao 1984; 9:104-106. [PMID: 6237769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
|