1
|
Gilmore N, Tseng CEJ, Maffei C, Tromly SL, Deary KB, McKinney IR, Kelemen JN, Healy BC, Hu CG, Ramos-Llordén G, Masood M, Cali RJ, Guo J, Belanger HG, Yao EF, Baxter T, Fischl B, Foulkes AS, Polimeni JR, Rosen BR, Perl DP, Hooker JM, Zürcher NR, Huang SY, Kimberly WT, Greve DN, Mac Donald CL, Dams-O'Connor K, Bodien YG, Edlow BL. Impact of repeated blast exposure on active-duty United States Special Operations Forces. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2024; 121:e2313568121. [PMID: 38648470 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2313568121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
United States (US) Special Operations Forces (SOF) are frequently exposed to explosive blasts in training and combat, but the effects of repeated blast exposure (RBE) on SOF brain health are incompletely understood. Furthermore, there is no diagnostic test to detect brain injury from RBE. As a result, SOF personnel may experience cognitive, physical, and psychological symptoms for which the cause is never identified, and they may return to training or combat during a period of brain vulnerability. In 30 active-duty US SOF, we assessed the relationship between cumulative blast exposure and cognitive performance, psychological health, physical symptoms, blood proteomics, and neuroimaging measures (Connectome structural and diffusion MRI, 7 Tesla functional MRI, [11C]PBR28 translocator protein [TSPO] positron emission tomography [PET]-MRI, and [18F]MK6240 tau PET-MRI), adjusting for age, combat exposure, and blunt head trauma. Higher blast exposure was associated with increased cortical thickness in the left rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC), a finding that remained significant after multiple comparison correction. In uncorrected analyses, higher blast exposure was associated with worse health-related quality of life, decreased functional connectivity in the executive control network, decreased TSPO signal in the right rACC, and increased cortical thickness in the right rACC, right insula, and right medial orbitofrontal cortex-nodes of the executive control, salience, and default mode networks. These observations suggest that the rACC may be susceptible to blast overpressure and that a multimodal, network-based diagnostic approach has the potential to detect brain injury associated with RBE in active-duty SOF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Gilmore
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Chieh-En J Tseng
- Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129
| | - Chiara Maffei
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114
- Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129
| | - Samantha L Tromly
- Institute of Applied Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612
| | | | - Isabella R McKinney
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Jessica N Kelemen
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Brian C Healy
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Collin G Hu
- United States Army Special Operations Aviation Command, Fort Liberty, NC 28307
- Department of Family Medicine, F. Edward Hebert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814
| | - Gabriel Ramos-Llordén
- Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129
| | - Maryam Masood
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Ryan J Cali
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Jennifer Guo
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Heather G Belanger
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33613
| | - Eveline F Yao
- Office of the Air Force Surgeon General, Falls Church, VA 22042
| | - Timothy Baxter
- Institute of Applied Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612
| | - Bruce Fischl
- Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129
| | | | - Jonathan R Polimeni
- Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129
| | - Bruce R Rosen
- Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129
| | - Daniel P Perl
- Department of Pathology, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814
| | - Jacob M Hooker
- Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129
| | - Nicole R Zürcher
- Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129
| | - Susie Y Huang
- Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129
| | - W Taylor Kimberly
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Douglas N Greve
- Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129
| | | | - Kristen Dams-O'Connor
- Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029
- Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129
| | - Brian L Edlow
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114
- Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Edlow BL, Olchanyi M, Freeman HJ, Li J, Maffei C, Snider SB, Zöllei L, Iglesias JE, Augustinack J, Bodien YG, Haynes RL, Greve DN, Diamond BR, Stevens A, Giacino JT, Destrieux C, van der Kouwe A, Brown EN, Folkerth RD, Fischl B, Kinney HC. Multimodal MRI reveals brainstem connections that sustain wakefulness in human consciousness. Sci Transl Med 2024; 16:eadj4303. [PMID: 38691619 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adj4303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
Consciousness is composed of arousal (i.e., wakefulness) and awareness. Substantial progress has been made in mapping the cortical networks that underlie awareness in the human brain, but knowledge about the subcortical networks that sustain arousal in humans is incomplete. Here, we aimed to map the connectivity of a proposed subcortical arousal network that sustains wakefulness in the human brain, analogous to the cortical default mode network (DMN) that has been shown to contribute to awareness. We integrated data from ex vivo diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of three human brains, obtained at autopsy from neurologically normal individuals, with immunohistochemical staining of subcortical brain sections. We identified nodes of the proposed default ascending arousal network (dAAN) in the brainstem, hypothalamus, thalamus, and basal forebrain. Deterministic and probabilistic tractography analyses of the ex vivo diffusion MRI data revealed projection, association, and commissural pathways linking dAAN nodes with one another and with DMN nodes. Complementary analyses of in vivo 7-tesla resting-state functional MRI data from the Human Connectome Project identified the dopaminergic ventral tegmental area in the midbrain as a widely connected hub node at the nexus of the subcortical arousal and cortical awareness networks. Our network-based autopsy methods and connectivity data provide a putative neuroanatomic architecture for the integration of arousal and awareness in human consciousness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian L Edlow
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Mark Olchanyi
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | - Holly J Freeman
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Jian Li
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Chiara Maffei
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Samuel B Snider
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Lilla Zöllei
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - J Eugenio Iglesias
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Jean Augustinack
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Robin L Haynes
- Department of Pathology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Douglas N Greve
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Bram R Diamond
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Allison Stevens
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Joseph T Giacino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Christophe Destrieux
- UMR 1253, iBrain, Université de Tours, Inserm, 10 Boulevard Tonnellé, 37032, Tours, France
- CHRU de Tours, 2 Boulevard Tonnellé, Tours, France
| | - Andre van der Kouwe
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Emery N Brown
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA
| | | | - Bruce Fischl
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Hannah C Kinney
- Department of Pathology, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Weaver JA, Cogan A, Kozlowski A, Grady-Dominguez P, O'Brien KA, Bodien YG, Graham J, Aichele S, Ford P, Kot T, Bender Pape TL, Mallinson T, Giacino J. Interpreting Change in Disorders of Consciousness using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised. J Neurotrauma 2024. [PMID: 38613812 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2023.0567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/15/2024] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to differentiate clinically meaningful improvement or deterioration from normal fluctuations in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) following severe brain injury. We computed indices of responsiveness for the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) using data from a clinical trial of 180 participants with DoC. We used CRS-R scores from baseline (enrollment in a clinical trial) and a four-week follow-up assessment period for these calculations. To improve precision, we transformed ordinal CRS-R total scores (0 to 23 points) to equal-interval measures on a 0-to-100-unit scale using Rasch Measurement theory. Using the 0-to-100 unit total Rasch measures, we calculated distribution-based 0.5 standard deviation (SD) minimal clinically important difference, minimal detectable change using 95% confidence intervals, and conditional minimal detectable change using 95% confidence intervals. The distribution-based minimal clinically important difference evaluates group-level changes, whereas the minimal detectable change values evaluate individual-level changes. The minimal clinically important difference and minimal detectable change are derived using the overall variability across total measures at baseline and four weeks. The conditional minimal detectable change is generated for each possible pair of CRS-R Rasch person measures and accounts for variation in standard error across the scale. We applied these indices to determine the proportions of participants who made a change beyond measurement error within each of the two sub-groups, based on treatment arm (amantadine hydrochloride or placebo) or categorization of baseline Rasch person measure to states of consciousness (i.e., unresponsive wakefulness syndrome and minimally conscious state). We compared the proportion of participants in each treatment arm who made a change according to the minimal detectable change and determined whether they also changed to another state of consciousness. CRS-R indices of responsiveness (using the 0-100 transformed scale) were as follows: 0.5SD minimal clinically important difference = 9 units, minimal detectable change = 11 units, and the conditional minimal detectable change ranged from 11 to 42 units. For the amantadine and placebo groups, 67% and 58% of participants showed change beyond measurement error using the minimal detectable change, respectively. For the unresponsive wakefulness syndrome and minimally conscious state groups, 52% and 67% of participants changed beyond measurement error using the minimal detectable change, respectively. Among 115 participants (64% of the total sample) who made a change beyond measurement error, 29 participants (25%) did not change state of consciousness. CRS-R indices of responsiveness can support clinicians and researchers in discerning when behavioral changes in patients with DoC exceed measurement error. Notably, the minimal detectable change can support the detection of patients who make a 'true' change within or across states of consciousness. Our findings highlight that continued use of ordinal scores may result in incorrect inferences about the degree and relevance of a change score.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A Weaver
- Colorado State University, 3447, Department of Occupational Therapy, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States;
| | - Alison Cogan
- University of Southern California, 5116, Mrs. T. H. Chan Division of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, Los Angeles, California, United States;
| | - Allan Kozlowski
- Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital, 143308, 235 Wealthy Street SE, Grand Rapids, Michigan, United States, 49503;
| | - Patricia Grady-Dominguez
- Colorado State University, 3447, Department of Occupational Therapy, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States;
| | | | - Yelena G Bodien
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 2348, Department of Neurology, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Boston, 24498, Department of Physical medicine and Rehabilitation, Boston, Massachusetts, United States;
| | - James Graham
- Colorado State University, 3447, Department of Occupational Therapy, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States;
| | - Stephen Aichele
- Colorado State University, 3447, Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States
- Colorado School of Public Health, 144805, Faculty of Epidemiology, Aurora, Colorado, United States;
| | - Paige Ford
- Colorado State University, 3447, Department of Occupational Therapy, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States;
| | - Trisha Kot
- Colorado State University, 3447, Department of Occupational Therapy, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States;
| | - Theresa L Bender Pape
- Northwestern University, 3270, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Evanston, Illinois, United States;
| | - Trudy Mallinson
- The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 43989, Department of Clinical Research and Leadership, Washington, District of Columbia, United States;
| | - Joseph Giacino
- Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, 24498, PM&R, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States
- Harvard Medical School, 1811, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Boston, Massachusetts, United States;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yue JK, Lee YM, Sun X, van Essen TA, Elguindy MM, Belton PJ, Pisică D, Mikolic A, Deng H, Kanter JH, McCrea MA, Bodien YG, Satris GG, Wong JC, Ambati VS, Grandhi R, Puccio AM, Mukherjee P, Valadka AB, Tarapore PE, Huang MC, DiGiorgio AM, Markowitz AJ, Yuh EL, Okonkwo DO, Steyerberg EW, Lingsma HF, Menon DK, Maas AIR, Jain S, Manley GT. Performance of the IMPACT and CRASH prognostic models for traumatic brain injury in a contemporary multicenter cohort: a TRACK-TBI study. J Neurosurg 2024:1-13. [PMID: 38489823 PMCID: PMC11010725 DOI: 10.3171/2023.11.jns231425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The International Mission on Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in Traumatic Brain Injury (IMPACT) and Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury (CRASH) prognostic models for mortality and outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI) were developed using data from 1984 to 2004. This study examined IMPACT and CRASH model performances in a contemporary cohort of US patients. METHODS The prospective 18-center Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI) study (enrollment years 2014-2018) enrolled subjects aged ≥ 17 years who presented to level I trauma centers and received head CT within 24 hours of TBI. Data were extracted from the subjects who met the model criteria (for IMPACT, Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score 3-12 with 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended [GOSE] data [n = 441]; for CRASH, GCS score 3-14 with 2-week mortality data and 6-month GOSE data [n = 831]). Analyses were conducted in the overall cohort and stratified on the basis of TBI severity (severe/moderate/mild TBI defined as GCS score 3-8/9-12/13-14), age (17-64 years or ≥ 65 years), and the 5 top enrolling sites. Unfavorable outcome was defined as GOSE score 1-4. Original IMPACT and CRASH model coefficients were applied, and model performances were assessed by calibration (intercept [< 0 indicated overprediction; > 0 indicated underprediction] and slope) and discrimination (c-statistic). RESULTS Overall, the IMPACT models overpredicted mortality (intercept -0.79 [95% CI -1.05 to -0.53], slope 1.37 [1.05-1.69]) and acceptably predicted unfavorable outcome (intercept 0.07 [-0.14 to 0.29], slope 1.19 [0.96-1.42]), with good discrimination (c-statistics 0.84 and 0.83, respectively). The CRASH models overpredicted mortality (intercept -1.06 [-1.36 to -0.75], slope 0.96 [0.79-1.14]) and unfavorable outcome (intercept -0.60 [-0.78 to -0.41], slope 1.20 [1.03-1.37]), with good discrimination (c-statistics 0.92 and 0.88, respectively). IMPACT overpredicted mortality and acceptably predicted unfavorable outcome in the severe and moderate TBI subgroups, with good discrimination (c-statistic ≥ 0.81). CRASH overpredicted mortality in the severe and moderate TBI subgroups and acceptably predicted mortality in the mild TBI subgroup, with good discrimination (c-statistic ≥ 0.86); unfavorable outcome was overpredicted in the severe and mild TBI subgroups with adequate discrimination (c-statistic ≥ 0.78), whereas calibration was nonlinear in the moderate TBI subgroup. In subjects ≥ 65 years of age, the models performed variably (IMPACT-mortality, intercept 0.28, slope 0.68, and c-statistic 0.68; CRASH-unfavorable outcome, intercept -0.97, slope 1.32, and c-statistic 0.88; nonlinear calibration for IMPACT-unfavorable outcome and CRASH-mortality). Model performance differences were observed across the top enrolling sites for mortality and unfavorable outcome. CONCLUSIONS The IMPACT and CRASH models adequately discriminated mortality and unfavorable outcome. Observed overestimations of mortality and unfavorable outcome underscore the need to update prognostic models to incorporate contemporary changes in TBI management and case-mix. Investigations to elucidate the relationships between increased survival, outcome, treatment intensity, and site-specific practices will be relevant to improve models in specific TBI subpopulations (e.g., older adults), which may benefit from the inclusion of blood-based biomarkers, neuroimaging features, and treatment data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John K Yue
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
- 2Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California
| | - Young M Lee
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
- 2Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California
| | - Xiaoying Sun
- 3Biostatistics Research Center, Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, California
| | - Thomas A van Essen
- 4University Neurosurgical Center Holland, Leiden University Medical Center, Haaglanden Medical Center, Leiden, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Mahmoud M Elguindy
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
- 2Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California
| | - Patrick J Belton
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
- 2Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California
| | - Dana Pisică
- 5Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ana Mikolic
- 5Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- 6Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Hansen Deng
- 7Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - John H Kanter
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
- 2Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California
| | - Michael A McCrea
- 8Department of Neurological Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- 9Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Utah Health Center, Salt Lake City, Utah
- 10Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Gabriela G Satris
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
- 2Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California
| | - Justin C Wong
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
- 2Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California
| | - Vardhaan S Ambati
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
- 2Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California
| | - Ramesh Grandhi
- 11Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ava M Puccio
- 7Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Pratik Mukherjee
- 2Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California
- 12Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Alex B Valadka
- 13Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Phiroz E Tarapore
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
- 2Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California
| | - Michael C Huang
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
- 2Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California
| | - Anthony M DiGiorgio
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
- 2Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California
- 14Institute of Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Amy J Markowitz
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
- 2Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California
| | - Esther L Yuh
- 2Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California
- 12Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - David O Okonkwo
- 7Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ewout W Steyerberg
- 15Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Hester F Lingsma
- 5Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David K Menon
- 16Division of Anesthesia, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom; and
| | - Andrew I R Maas
- 17Department of Neurological Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sonia Jain
- 3Biostatistics Research Center, Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, California
| | - Geoffrey T Manley
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
- 2Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Young MJ, Fecchio M, Bodien YG, Edlow BL. Covert cortical processing: a diagnosis in search of a definition. Neurosci Conscious 2024; 2024:niad026. [PMID: 38327828 PMCID: PMC10849751 DOI: 10.1093/nc/niad026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 10/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Historically, clinical evaluation of unresponsive patients following brain injury has relied principally on serial behavioral examination to search for emerging signs of consciousness and track recovery. Advances in neuroimaging and electrophysiologic techniques now enable clinicians to peer into residual brain functions even in the absence of overt behavioral signs. These advances have expanded clinicians' ability to sub-stratify behaviorally unresponsive and seemingly unaware patients following brain injury by querying and classifying covert brain activity made evident through active or passive neuroimaging or electrophysiologic techniques, including functional MRI, electroencephalography (EEG), transcranial magnetic stimulation-EEG, and positron emission tomography. Clinical research has thus reciprocally influenced clinical practice, giving rise to new diagnostic categories including cognitive-motor dissociation (i.e. 'covert consciousness') and covert cortical processing (CCP). While covert consciousness has received extensive attention and study, CCP is relatively less understood. We describe that CCP is an emerging and clinically relevant state of consciousness marked by the presence of intact association cortex responses to environmental stimuli in the absence of behavioral evidence of stimulus processing. CCP is not a monotonic state but rather encapsulates a spectrum of possible association cortex responses from rudimentary to complex and to a range of possible stimuli. In constructing a roadmap for this evolving field, we emphasize that efforts to inform clinicians, philosophers, and researchers of this condition are crucial. Along with strategies to sensitize diagnostic criteria and disorders of consciousness nosology to these vital discoveries, democratizing access to the resources necessary for clinical identification of CCP is an emerging clinical and ethical imperative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Young
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 101 Merrimac Street, Suite 310, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Matteo Fecchio
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 101 Merrimac Street, Suite 310, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 101 Merrimac Street, Suite 310, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 300 1st Ave, Charlestown, Boston, MA 02129, USA
| | - Brian L Edlow
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 101 Merrimac Street, Suite 310, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 149 13th St, Charlestown, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Golden K, Bodien YG, Giacino JT. Disorders of Consciousness: Classification and Taxonomy. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2024; 35:15-33. [PMID: 37993185 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmr.2023.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2023]
Abstract
In this article, we discuss the taxonomy associated with the four major disorders of consciousness (DoC): coma, vegetative state or unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, minimally conscious state, and post-traumatic confusional state. We briefly review the history of each disorder and then provide operational definitions and diagnostic criteria for each one. We rely heavily on recently released practice guidelines and, where appropriate, identify knowledge gaps and discuss future directions to advance DoC research and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Golden
- School of Health & Rehabilitation Sciences, MGH Institute of Health Professions, 36 1st Avenue, Boston, MA 02129, USA
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, 300 1st Avenue, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA; Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joseph T Giacino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, 300 1st Avenue, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA; Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
de Souza NL, Kumar RG, Pruyser A, Blunt EE, Sanders W, Meydan A, Lawrence P, Venkatesan UM, Mac Donald CL, Hoffman JM, Bodien YG, Edlow BL, Dams-O'Connor K. Intimate Partner Violence and Other Trauma Exposures in Females With Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma 2024; 41:529-536. [PMID: 37974411 PMCID: PMC10837032 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2023.0225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
We examined whether females with a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and intimate partner violence (IPV) have greater exposure to lifetime trauma relative to females with TBI but no IPV history. Further, we assessed the effects of lifetime trauma on psychological outcomes after TBI. Female participants (n = 70; age M [standard deviation-SD] = 50.5 [15.2] years) with TBI (time since injury median [interquartile range -IQR] = 10.2 [5.3-17.8] years) completed a structured assessment of lifetime history of TBI, including an IPV module to query head injuries from physical violence by an intimate partner. We characterized lifetime trauma exposure with the Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) questionnaire and Survey of Exposure to Community Violence (CV). We evaluated psychological functioning with self-report questionnaires of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety symptoms. Compared with those with no IPV history (n = 51), participants reporting IPV-related head injuries (n = 19; 27.1%) reported more ACEs (M[SD] IPV: 4.5[2.9]; No IPV: 1.6[1.8], p < 0.001, d = 1.08) and greater CV (IPV: 17.5[8.4]; No IPV: 7.6[6.1], p < .0001, d = 1.26). Within the full sample, ACEs (β = 0.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.04-0.39) and CV (β = 0.07, 95% CI = 0.01-0.13) predicted worse PTSD symptoms, while IPV alone did not. Exposure to all three sources of trauma (ACEs, CV, and IPV) was associated with worse PTSD symptoms relative to fewer traumas. The results highlight the scope of traumatic exposures among TBI survivors and the importance of considering IPV and other lifetime trauma exposure in assessing and managing TBI. Trauma-informed interventions that are modified for TBI-related impairment may offer improved outcomes in managing psychological symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola L. de Souza
- Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Raj G. Kumar
- Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ariel Pruyser
- Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Emily E. Blunt
- Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - William Sanders
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Anogue Meydan
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Phoebe Lawrence
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Umesh M. Venkatesan
- Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania USA
| | - Christine L. Mac Donald
- Department of Neurological Surgery and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jeanne M. Hoffman
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Yelena G. Bodien
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brian L. Edlow
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kristen Dams-O'Connor
- Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tinti L, Lawson T, Molteni E, Kondziella D, Rass V, Sharshar T, Bodien YG, Giacino JT, Mayer SA, Amiri M, Muehlschlegel S, Venkatasubba Rao CP, Vespa PM, Menon DK, Citerio G, Helbok R, McNett M. Research considerations for prospective studies of patients with coma and disorders of consciousness. Brain Commun 2024; 6:fcae022. [PMID: 38344653 PMCID: PMC10853976 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Disorders of consciousness are neurological conditions characterized by impaired arousal and awareness of self and environment. Behavioural responses are absent or are present but fluctuate. Disorders of consciousness are commonly encountered as a consequence of both acute and chronic brain injuries, yet reliable epidemiological estimates would require inclusive, operational definitions of the concept, as well as wider knowledge dissemination among involved professionals. Whereas several manifestations have been described, including coma, vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome and minimally conscious state, a comprehensive neurobiological definition for disorders of consciousness is still lacking. The scientific literature is primarily observational, and studies-specific aetiologies lead to disorders of consciousness. Despite advances in these disease-related forms, there remains uncertainty about whether disorders of consciousness are a disease-agnostic unitary entity with a common mechanism, prognosis or treatment response paradigm. Our knowledge of disorders of consciousness has also been hampered by heterogeneity of study designs, variables, and outcomes, leading to results that are not comparable for evidence synthesis. The different backgrounds of professionals caring for patients with disorders of consciousness and the different goals at different stages of care could partly explain this variability. The Prospective Studies working group of the Neurocritical Care Society Curing Coma Campaign was established to create a platform for observational studies and future clinical trials on disorders of consciousness and coma across the continuum of care. In this narrative review, the author panel presents limitations of prior observational clinical research and outlines practical considerations for future investigations. A narrative review format was selected to ensure that the full breadth of study design considerations could be addressed and to facilitate a future consensus-based statement (e.g. via a modified Delphi) and series of recommendations. The panel convened weekly online meetings from October 2021 to December 2022. Research considerations addressed the nosographic status of disorders of consciousness, case ascertainment and verification, selection of dependent variables, choice of covariates and measurement and analysis of outcomes and covariates, aiming to promote more homogeneous designs and practices in future observational studies. The goal of this review is to inform a broad community of professionals with different backgrounds and clinical interests to address the methodological challenges imposed by the transition of care from acute to chronic stages and to streamline data gathering for patients with disorders of consciousness. A coordinated effort will be a key to allow reliable observational data synthesis and epidemiological estimates and ultimately inform condition-modifying clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Tinti
- Department of Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan 20156, Italy
| | - Thomas Lawson
- Critical Care, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Erika Molteni
- Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EU, UK
| | - Daniel Kondziella
- Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark
| | - Verena Rass
- Department of Neurology, Neuro-Intensive Care Unit, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck 6020, Austria
| | - Tarek Sharshar
- Neuro-Intensive Care Medicine, Anaesthesiology and ICU Department, GHU-Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Pole Neuro, Sainte-Anne Hospital, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurosciences of Paris, INSERM U1266, Université Paris Cité, Paris 75006, France
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Joseph T Giacino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Stephan A Mayer
- Department of Neurology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
| | - Moshgan Amiri
- Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark
| | - Susanne Muehlschlegel
- Department of Neurology and Anesthesiology/Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Chethan P Venkatasubba Rao
- Division of Vascular Neurology and Neurocritical Care, Baylor College of Medicine and CHI Baylor St Luke’s Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Paul M Vespa
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - David K Menon
- Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK
| | - Giuseppe Citerio
- NeuroIntensive Care, IRCSS Fondazione San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza 20900, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, Università Milano Bicocca, Milan 20854, Italy
| | - Raimund Helbok
- Department of Neurology, Neuro-Intensive Care Unit, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck 6020, Austria
- Department of Neurology, Johannes Kepler University, Linz 4040, Austria
| | - Molly McNett
- College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Young MJ, Kazazian K, Fischer D, Lissak IA, Bodien YG, Edlow BL. Disclosing Results of Tests for Covert Consciousness: A Framework for Ethical Translation. Neurocrit Care 2024:10.1007/s12028-023-01899-8. [PMID: 38243150 DOI: 10.1007/s12028-023-01899-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2024]
Abstract
The advent of neurotechnologies including advanced functional magnetic resonance imaging and electroencephalography to detect states of awareness not detectable by traditional bedside neurobehavioral techniques (i.e., covert consciousness) promises to transform neuroscience research and clinical practice for patients with brain injury. As these interventions progress from research tools into actionable, guideline-endorsed clinical tests, ethical guidance for clinicians on how to responsibly communicate the sensitive results they yield is crucial yet remains underdeveloped. Drawing on insights from empirical and theoretical neuroethics research and our clinical experience with advanced neurotechnologies to detect consciousness in behaviorally unresponsive patients, we critically evaluate ethical promises and perils associated with disclosing the results of clinical covert consciousness assessments and describe a semistructured approach to responsible data sharing to mitigate potential risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Young
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 101 Merrimac Street, Suite 310, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| | - Karnig Kazazian
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 101 Merrimac Street, Suite 310, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Western Institute of Neuroscience, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - David Fischer
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - India A Lissak
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 101 Merrimac Street, Suite 310, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 101 Merrimac Street, Suite 310, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Brian L Edlow
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 101 Merrimac Street, Suite 310, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Covert consciousness is a state of residual awareness following severe brain injury or neurological disorder that evades routine bedside behavioral detection. Patients with covert consciousness have preserved awareness but are incapable of self-expression through ordinary means of behavior or communication. Growing recognition of the limitations of bedside neurobehavioral examination in reliably detecting consciousness, along with advances in neurotechnologies capable of detecting brain states or subtle signs indicative of consciousness not discernible by routine examination, carry promise to transform approaches to classifying, diagnosing, prognosticating and treating disorders of consciousness. Here we describe and critically evaluate the evolving clinical category of covert consciousness, including approaches to its diagnosis through neuroimaging, electrophysiology, and novel behavioral tools, its prognostic relevance, and open questions pertaining to optimal clinical management of patients with covert consciousness recovering from severe brain injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Young
- Department of Neurology, Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brian L Edlow
- Department of Neurology, Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- Department of Neurology, Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Edlow BL, Gilmore N, Tromly SL, Deary KB, McKinney IR, Hu CG, Kelemen JN, Maffei C, Tseng CEJ, Llorden GR, Healy BC, Masood M, Cali RJ, Baxter T, Yao EF, Belanger HG, Benjamini D, Basser PJ, Priemer DS, Kimberly WT, Polimeni JR, Rosen BR, Fischl B, Zurcher NR, Greve DN, Hooker JM, Huang SY, Caruso A, Smith GA, Szymanski TG, Perl DP, Dams-O'Connor K, Mac Donald CL, Bodien YG. Optimizing Brain Health of United States Special Operations Forces. J Spec Oper Med 2023; 23:47-56. [PMID: 37851859 DOI: 10.55460/99qw-k0hg] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
United States Special Operations Forces (SOF) personnel are frequently exposed to explosive blasts in training and combat. However, the effects of repeated blast exposure on the human brain are incompletely understood. Moreover, there is currently no diagnostic test to detect repeated blast brain injury (rBBI). In this "Human Performance Optimization" article, we discuss how the development and implementation of a reliable diagnostic test for rBBI has the potential to promote SOF brain health, combat readiness, and quality of life.
Collapse
|
12
|
Snider SB, Temkin NR, Barber J, Edlow BL, Giacino JT, Hammond FM, Izzy S, Kowalski RG, Markowitz AJ, Rovito CA, Shih SL, Zafonte RD, Manley GT, Bodien YG. Predicting Functional Dependency in Patients with Disorders of Consciousness: A TBI-Model Systems and TRACK-TBI Study. Ann Neurol 2023; 94:1008-1023. [PMID: 37470289 PMCID: PMC10799195 DOI: 10.1002/ana.26741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE It is not currently possible to predict long-term functional dependency in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Our objective was to fit and externally validate a prediction model for 1-year dependency in patients with DoC ≥ 2 weeks after TBI. METHODS We included adults with TBI enrolled in TBI Model Systems (TBI-MS) or Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) studies who were not following commands at rehabilitation admission or 2 weeks post-injury, respectively. We fit a logistic regression model in TBI-MS and validated it in TRACK-TBI. The primary outcome was death or dependency at 1 year post-injury, defined using the Disability Rating Scale. RESULTS In the TBI-MS Discovery Sample, 1,960 participants (mean age 40 [18] years, 76% male, 68% white) met inclusion criteria, and 406 (27%) were dependent 1 year post-injury. In a TBI-MS held out cohort, the dependency prediction model's area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.79 (95% CI 0.74-0.85), positive predictive value was 53% and negative predictive value was 86%. In the TRACK-TBI external validation (n = 124, age 40 [16] years, 77% male, 81% white), the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.66 (0.53, 0.79), equivalent to the standard IMPACTcore + CT score (p = 0.8). INTERPRETATION We developed a 1-year dependency prediction model using the largest existing cohort of patients with DoC after TBI. The sensitivity and negative predictive values were greater than specificity and positive predictive values. Accuracy was diminished in an external sample, but equivalent to the IMPACT model. Further research is needed to improve dependency prediction in patients with DoC after TBI. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:1008-1023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel B. Snider
- Division of Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nancy R. Temkin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jason Barber
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Brian L. Edlow
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery and Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Joseph T. Giacino
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Flora M. Hammond
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Saef Izzy
- Division of Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert G. Kowalski
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora CO, USA
| | | | - Craig A. Rovito
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Shirley L. Shih
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Ross D. Zafonte
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Geoffrey T. Manley
- Department of Neurological Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, CA USA
- Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Yelena G. Bodien
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery and Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yakhkind A, Niznick N, Bodien YG, Hammond FM, Katz D, Luaute J, McNett M, Naccache L, O'Brien K, Schnakers C, Sharshar T, Slomine BS, Giacino JT. Correction: Common Data Elements for Disorders of Consciousness: Recommendations from the Working Group on Behavioral Phenotyping. Neurocrit Care 2023:10.1007/s12028-023-01874-3. [PMID: 37923969 DOI: 10.1007/s12028-023-01874-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandra Yakhkind
- Department of Neurology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Naomi Niznick
- Department of Medicine (Critical Care), The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Flora M Hammond
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Douglas Katz
- Department of Neurology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, and Brain Injury Program, Encompass Health Braintree Rehabilitation Hospital, Braintree, MA, USA
| | - Jacques Luaute
- Department of Neuro-Rehabilitation, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Molly McNett
- College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Lionel Naccache
- Sorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute - Institut du Cerveau, ICM, INSERM, CNRS, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Katherine O'Brien
- TIRR Disorders of Consciousness Program, TIRR Memorial Hermann Hospital, H. Ben Taub Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Caroline Schnakers
- Research Institute, Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare, Pomona, CA, USA
| | - Tarek Sharshar
- Neurosciences, Pole Neuro, Sainte-Anne Hospital, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurosciences of Paris, INSERM U1266, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Beth S Slomine
- Department of Neuropsychology, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Joseph T Giacino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bodien YG, Beaulieu CL, Giacino JT, Weintraub A, Whyte J, Williams MW. How Severe Is Severe Disability After Traumatic Brain Injury? Response to Sarigul B et al., Prognostication and goals of care decisions in Severe traumatic brain injury: A survey of the Seattle International Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus Conference Working Group (DOI: 10.1089/neu.2022.0414). J Neurotrauma 2023; 40:2449-2451. [PMID: 37476969 PMCID: PMC10649169 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2023.0275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yelena G. Bodien
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Cynthia L. Beaulieu
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Joseph T. Giacino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alan Weintraub
- Neurotrauma Rehabilitation Associates LLC, Englewood, Colorado, USA
| | - John Whyte
- Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michael W. Williams
- TIRR Memorial Hermann, Brain Injury Research Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bodien YG, Vora I, Barra A, Chiang K, Chatelle C, Goostrey K, Martens G, Malone C, Mello J, Parlman K, Ranford J, Sterling A, Waters AB, Hirschberg R, Katz DI, Mazwi N, Ni P, Velmahos G, Waak K, Edlow BL, Giacino JT. Feasibility and Validity of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised for Accelerated Standardized Testing: A Practical Assessment Tool for Detecting Consciousness in the Intensive Care Unit. Ann Neurol 2023; 94:919-924. [PMID: 37488068 DOI: 10.1002/ana.26740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
We developed and validated an abbreviated version of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R), the CRS-R For Accelerated Standardized Testing (CRSR-FAST), to detect conscious awareness in patients with severe traumatic brain injury in the intensive care unit. In 45 consecutively enrolled patients, CRSR-FAST administration time was approximately one-third of the full-length CRS-R (mean [SD] 6.5 [3.3] vs 20.1 [7.2] minutes, p < 0.0001). Concurrent validity (simple kappa 0.68), test-retest (Mak's ρ = 0.76), and interrater (Mak's ρ = 0.91) reliability were substantial. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting consciousness were 81%, 89%, and 84%, respectively. The CRSR-FAST facilitates serial assessment of consciousness, which is essential for diagnostic and prognostic accuracy. ANN NEUROL 2023;94:919-924.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yelena G Bodien
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Isha Vora
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alice Barra
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Coma GIGA Science Group, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium
| | - Kevin Chiang
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Camille Chatelle
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Coma GIGA Science Group, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium
| | - Kelsey Goostrey
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Geraldine Martens
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Coma GIGA Science Group, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium
- Department of Surgery, University of Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Christopher Malone
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer Mello
- Department of Speech-language and Swallowing, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kristin Parlman
- Department of Physical Therapy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jessica Ranford
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ally Sterling
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Abigail B Waters
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Ronald Hirschberg
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Douglas I Katz
- Department of Neurology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Encompass Health Braintree Rehabilitation, Braintree, MA, USA
| | - Nicole Mazwi
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Pengsheng Ni
- Biostatistics & Epidemiology Data Analytic Center, Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - George Velmahos
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Karen Waak
- Department of Physical Therapy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brian L Edlow
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Joseph T Giacino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yakhkind A, Niznick N, Bodien YG, Hammond FM, Katz D, Luaute J, McNett M, Naccache L, O'Brien K, Schnakers C, Sharshar T, Slomine BS, Giacino JT. Common Data Elements for Disorders of Consciousness: Recommendations from the Working Group on Behavioral Phenotyping. Neurocrit Care 2023:10.1007/s12028-023-01844-9. [PMID: 37726548 DOI: 10.1007/s12028-023-01844-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The recent publication of practice guidelines for management of patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) in the United States and Europe was a major step forward in improving the accuracy and consistency of terminology, diagnostic criteria, and prognostication in this population. There remains a pressing need for a more precise brain injury classification system that combines clinical semiology with neuroimaging, electrophysiologic, and other biomarker data. To address this need, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke launched the Common Data Elements (CDEs) initiative to facilitate systematic collection of high-quality research data in studies involving patients with neurological disease. The Neurocritical Care Society's Curing Coma Campaign expanded this effort in 2018 to develop CDEs for DoC. Herein, we present CDE recommendations for behavioral phenotyping of patients with DoC. METHODS The Behavioral Phenotyping Workgroup used a preestablished, five-step process to identify and select candidate CDEs that included review of existing National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke CDEs, nomination and systematic vetting of new CDEs, CDE classification, iterative review, and approval of panel recommendations and development of corresponding case review forms. RESULTS We identified a slate of existing and newly proposed basic, supplemental, and exploratory CDEs that can be used for behavioral phenotyping of adult and pediatric patients with DoC. CONCLUSIONS The proposed behavioral phenotyping CDEs will assist with international harmonization of DoC studies and allow for more precise characterization of study cohorts, favorably impacting observational studies and clinical trials aimed at improving outcome in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandra Yakhkind
- Department of Neurology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Naomi Niznick
- Department of Medicine (Critical Care), The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Flora M Hammond
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Douglas Katz
- Department of Neurology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, and Brain Injury Program, Encompass Health Braintree Rehabilitation Hospital, Braintree, MA, USA
| | - Jacques Luaute
- Department of Neuro-Rehabilitation, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Molly McNett
- College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Lionel Naccache
- Sorbonne Université, Paris Brain Institute - Institut du Cerveau, ICM, INSERM, CNRS, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Katherine O'Brien
- TIRR Disorders of Consciousness Program, TIRR Memorial Hermann Hospital, H. Ben Taub Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Caroline Schnakers
- Research Institute, Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare, Pomona, CA, USA
| | - Tarek Sharshar
- Neurosciences, Pole Neuro, Sainte-Anne Hospital, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurosciences of Paris, INSERM U1266, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Beth S Slomine
- Department of Neuropsychology, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Joseph T Giacino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Etemad LL, Yue JK, Barber J, Nelson LD, Bodien YG, Satris GG, Belton PJ, Madhok DY, Huie JR, Hamidi S, Tracey JX, Coskun BC, Wong JC, Yuh EL, Mukherjee P, Markowitz AJ, Huang MC, Tarapore PE, Robertson CS, Diaz-Arrastia R, Stein MB, Ferguson AR, Puccio AM, Okonkwo DO, Giacino JT, McCrea MA, Manley GT, Temkin NR, DiGiorgio AM. Longitudinal Recovery Following Repetitive Traumatic Brain Injury. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2335804. [PMID: 37751204 PMCID: PMC10523170 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.35804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance One traumatic brain injury (TBI) increases the risk of subsequent TBIs. Research on longitudinal outcomes of civilian repetitive TBIs is limited. Objective To investigate associations between sustaining 1 or more TBIs (ie, postindex TBIs) after study enrollment (ie, index TBIs) and multidimensional outcomes at 1 year and 3 to 7 years. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study included participants presenting to emergency departments enrolled within 24 hours of TBI in the prospective, 18-center Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI) study (enrollment years, February 2014 to July 2020). Participants who completed outcome assessments at 1 year and 3 to 7 years were included. Data were analyzed from September 2022 to August 2023. Exposures Postindex TBI(s). Main Outcomes and Measures Demographic and clinical factors, prior TBI (ie, preindex TBI), and functional (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended [GOSE]), postconcussive (Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire [RPQ]), psychological distress (Brief Symptom Inventory-18 [BSI-18]), depressive (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD; PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 [PCL-5]), and health-related quality-of-life (Quality of Life After Brain Injury-Overall Scale [QOLIBRI-OS]) outcomes were assessed. Adjusted mean differences (aMDs) and adjusted relative risks are reported with 95% CIs. Results Of 2417 TRACK-TBI participants, 1572 completed the outcomes assessment at 1 year (1049 [66.7%] male; mean [SD] age, 41.6 [17.5] years) and 1084 completed the outcomes assessment at 3 to 7 years (714 [65.9%] male; mean [SD] age, 40.6 [17.0] years). At 1 year, a total of 60 participants (4%) were Asian, 255 (16%) were Black, 1213 (77%) were White, 39 (2%) were another race, and 5 (0.3%) had unknown race. At 3 to 7 years, 39 (4%) were Asian, 149 (14%) were Black, 868 (80%) were White, 26 (2%) had another race, and 2 (0.2%) had unknown race. A total of 50 (3.2%) and 132 (12.2%) reported 1 or more postindex TBIs at 1 year and 3 to 7 years, respectively. Risk factors for postindex TBI were psychiatric history, preindex TBI, and extracranial injury severity. At 1 year, compared with those without postindex TBI, participants with postindex TBI had worse functional recovery (GOSE score of 8: adjusted relative risk, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34-0.96) and health-related quality of life (QOLIBRI-OS: aMD, -15.9; 95% CI, -22.6 to -9.1), and greater postconcussive symptoms (RPQ: aMD, 8.1; 95% CI, 4.2-11.9), psychological distress symptoms (BSI-18: aMD, 5.3; 95% CI, 2.1-8.6), depression symptoms (PHQ-9: aMD, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.5-4.4), and PTSD symptoms (PCL-5: aMD, 7.8; 95% CI, 3.2-12.4). At 3 to 7 years, these associations remained statistically significant. Multiple (2 or more) postindex TBIs were associated with poorer outcomes across all domains. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of patients with acute TBI, postindex TBI was associated with worse symptomatology across outcome domains at 1 year and 3 to 7 years postinjury, and there was a dose-dependent response with multiple postindex TBIs. These results underscore the critical need to provide TBI prevention, education, counseling, and follow-up care to at-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila L. Etemad
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, California
| | - John K. Yue
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Jason Barber
- Departments of Neurological Surgery and Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Lindsay D. Nelson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
- Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
| | - Yelena G. Bodien
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts
| | - Gabriela G. Satris
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Patrick J. Belton
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Debbie Y. Madhok
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - J. Russell Huie
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Sabah Hamidi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Joye X. Tracey
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Bukre C. Coskun
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Justin C. Wong
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Esther L. Yuh
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, California
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Pratik Mukherjee
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, California
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Amy J. Markowitz
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Michael C. Huang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Phiroz E. Tarapore
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, California
| | | | | | - Murray B. Stein
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego
| | - Adam R. Ferguson
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, California
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Francisco, California
| | - Ava M. Puccio
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - David O. Okonkwo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Joseph T. Giacino
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts
| | - Michael A. McCrea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
- Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
| | - Geoffrey T. Manley
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Nancy R. Temkin
- Departments of Neurological Surgery and Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Anthony M. DiGiorgio
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, California
- Institute of Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Monti MM, Spivak NM, Edlow BL, Bodien YG. What is a minimal clinically important difference for clinical trials in patients with disorders of consciousness? a novel probabilistic approach. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0290290. [PMID: 37616196 PMCID: PMC10449161 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the last 30 years, there has been a growing trend in clinical trials towards assessing novel interventions not only against the benchmark of statistical significance, but also with respect to whether they lead to clinically meaningful changes for patients. In the context of Disorders of Consciousness (DOC), despite a growing landscape of experimental interventions, there is no agreed standard as to what counts as a minimal clinically important difference (MCID). In part, this issue springs from the fact that, by definition, DOC patients are either unresponsive (i.e., in a Vegetative State; VS) or non-communicative (i.e., in a Minimally Conscious State; MCS), which renders it impossible to assess any subjective perception of benefit, one of the two core aspects of MCIDs. Here, we develop a novel approach that leverages published, international diagnostic guidelines to establish a probability-based minimal clinically important difference (pMCID), and we apply it to the most validated and frequently used scale in DOC: the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). This novel method is objective (i.e., based on published criteria for patient diagnosis) and easy to recalculate as the field refines its agreed-upon criteria for diagnosis. We believe this new approach can help clinicians determine whether observed changes in patients' behavior are clinically important, even when patients cannot communicate their experiences, and can align the landscape of clinical trials in DOC with the practices in other medical fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin M. Monti
- Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Injury Research Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Norman M. Spivak
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brain Injury Research Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- UCLA-Caltech Medical Scientist Training Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Brian L. Edlow
- Department of Neurology, Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Yelena G. Bodien
- Department of Neurology, Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Harvard Medical School Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Brett BL, Temkin N, Barber JK, Okonkwo DO, Stein M, Bodien YG, Corrigan J, Diaz-Arrastia R, Giacino JT, McCrea MA, Manley GT, Nelson LD. Long-term Multidomain Patterns of Change After Traumatic Brain Injury: A TRACK-TBI LONG Study. Neurology 2023; 101:e740-e753. [PMID: 37344231 PMCID: PMC10437015 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000207501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Traumatic brain injury (TBI) may be a chronic condition carrying risk of future sequelae; few prospective studies examine long-term postinjury outcomes. We examined the prevalence of functional, cognitive, and psychiatric change outcomes from 1 to 7 years postinjury. METHODS Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI LONG (TRACK-TBI LONG) participants were prospectively enrolled within 24 hours of injury and followed up to 1 year postinjury; a subset participated in long-term follow-up from 2 to 7 years postinjury. Reliable change thresholds for the Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone General Composite (cognition) and Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI)-18 (psychiatric) were derived from orthopedic trauma controls (OTCs). Multiple assessments were completed (postinjury baseline assessment and 2 or 3 visits 2-7 years postinjury) within a sample subset. Change was assessed for functional outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended [GOSE]) and self-report/informant report of decline. Prevalence ratios for outcomes classified as stable, improved, and declined were reported individually and collectively. The Fisher exact test and log-binomial regression models examined factors associated with decline and improvement. RESULTS Of the sample (N = 1,264; mild TBI [mTBI], Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] 13-15, n = 917; moderate-to-severe TBI [msTBI], GCS 3-12, n = 193; or OTC n = 154), "stable" was the most prevalent outcome. Functional outcome showed the highest rates of decline, regardless of TBI severity (mild = 29%; moderate/severe = 23%). When measures were collectively considered, rates of decline included mTBI (21%), msTBI (26%), and OTC (15%). Age and preinjury employment status were associated with functional decline (per 10 years; relative risk [RR] 1.16, 95% CI 1.07-1.25, p < 0.001; higher in retired/disabled/not working vs full-time/part-time; RR 1.81, 95% CI 1.33-2.45, respectively) in the mTBI group. Improvement in functional recovery 2-7 years postinjury was associated with higher BSI scores (per 5 points; RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.04-1.18, p = 0.002) and GOSE score of 5-7 (GOSE = 8 as reference; RR 2.64, 95% CI 1.75-3.97, p < 0.001). Higher BSI scores and identifying as Black (RR 2.28, 95% CI 1.59-3.25, p < 0.001) were associated with a greater likelihood of improved psychiatric symptoms in mTBI (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.14-1.29, p < 0.001). A greater likelihood of cognitive improvement was observed among those with higher educational attainment in msTBI (per 4 years; RR 2.61, 95% CI 1.43-4.79, p = 0.002). DISCUSSION Function across domains at 1-year postinjury, a common recovery benchmark, undergoes change across the subsequent 6 years. Results support consideration of TBI as a chronic evolving condition and suggest continued monitoring, rehabilitation, and support is required to optimize long-term independence and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin L Brett
- From the Medical College of Wisconsin (B.L.B., M.A.M., L.D.N.), Milwaukee; University of Washington (N.T., J.K.B.), Seattle; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (D.O.O.), PA; University of California San Diego (M.S.), La Jolla; Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School (Y.G.B., J.T.G.), Boston; The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (J.C.), Columbus; University of Pennsylvania (R.D.-A.), Philadelphia; and University of California, San Francisco (G.T.M.).
| | - Nancy Temkin
- From the Medical College of Wisconsin (B.L.B., M.A.M., L.D.N.), Milwaukee; University of Washington (N.T., J.K.B.), Seattle; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (D.O.O.), PA; University of California San Diego (M.S.), La Jolla; Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School (Y.G.B., J.T.G.), Boston; The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (J.C.), Columbus; University of Pennsylvania (R.D.-A.), Philadelphia; and University of California, San Francisco (G.T.M.)
| | - Jason K Barber
- From the Medical College of Wisconsin (B.L.B., M.A.M., L.D.N.), Milwaukee; University of Washington (N.T., J.K.B.), Seattle; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (D.O.O.), PA; University of California San Diego (M.S.), La Jolla; Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School (Y.G.B., J.T.G.), Boston; The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (J.C.), Columbus; University of Pennsylvania (R.D.-A.), Philadelphia; and University of California, San Francisco (G.T.M.)
| | - David O Okonkwo
- From the Medical College of Wisconsin (B.L.B., M.A.M., L.D.N.), Milwaukee; University of Washington (N.T., J.K.B.), Seattle; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (D.O.O.), PA; University of California San Diego (M.S.), La Jolla; Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School (Y.G.B., J.T.G.), Boston; The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (J.C.), Columbus; University of Pennsylvania (R.D.-A.), Philadelphia; and University of California, San Francisco (G.T.M.)
| | - Murray Stein
- From the Medical College of Wisconsin (B.L.B., M.A.M., L.D.N.), Milwaukee; University of Washington (N.T., J.K.B.), Seattle; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (D.O.O.), PA; University of California San Diego (M.S.), La Jolla; Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School (Y.G.B., J.T.G.), Boston; The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (J.C.), Columbus; University of Pennsylvania (R.D.-A.), Philadelphia; and University of California, San Francisco (G.T.M.)
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- From the Medical College of Wisconsin (B.L.B., M.A.M., L.D.N.), Milwaukee; University of Washington (N.T., J.K.B.), Seattle; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (D.O.O.), PA; University of California San Diego (M.S.), La Jolla; Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School (Y.G.B., J.T.G.), Boston; The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (J.C.), Columbus; University of Pennsylvania (R.D.-A.), Philadelphia; and University of California, San Francisco (G.T.M.)
| | - John Corrigan
- From the Medical College of Wisconsin (B.L.B., M.A.M., L.D.N.), Milwaukee; University of Washington (N.T., J.K.B.), Seattle; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (D.O.O.), PA; University of California San Diego (M.S.), La Jolla; Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School (Y.G.B., J.T.G.), Boston; The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (J.C.), Columbus; University of Pennsylvania (R.D.-A.), Philadelphia; and University of California, San Francisco (G.T.M.)
| | - Ramon Diaz-Arrastia
- From the Medical College of Wisconsin (B.L.B., M.A.M., L.D.N.), Milwaukee; University of Washington (N.T., J.K.B.), Seattle; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (D.O.O.), PA; University of California San Diego (M.S.), La Jolla; Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School (Y.G.B., J.T.G.), Boston; The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (J.C.), Columbus; University of Pennsylvania (R.D.-A.), Philadelphia; and University of California, San Francisco (G.T.M.)
| | - Joseph T Giacino
- From the Medical College of Wisconsin (B.L.B., M.A.M., L.D.N.), Milwaukee; University of Washington (N.T., J.K.B.), Seattle; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (D.O.O.), PA; University of California San Diego (M.S.), La Jolla; Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School (Y.G.B., J.T.G.), Boston; The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (J.C.), Columbus; University of Pennsylvania (R.D.-A.), Philadelphia; and University of California, San Francisco (G.T.M.)
| | - Michael A McCrea
- From the Medical College of Wisconsin (B.L.B., M.A.M., L.D.N.), Milwaukee; University of Washington (N.T., J.K.B.), Seattle; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (D.O.O.), PA; University of California San Diego (M.S.), La Jolla; Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School (Y.G.B., J.T.G.), Boston; The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (J.C.), Columbus; University of Pennsylvania (R.D.-A.), Philadelphia; and University of California, San Francisco (G.T.M.)
| | - Geoffrey T Manley
- From the Medical College of Wisconsin (B.L.B., M.A.M., L.D.N.), Milwaukee; University of Washington (N.T., J.K.B.), Seattle; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (D.O.O.), PA; University of California San Diego (M.S.), La Jolla; Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School (Y.G.B., J.T.G.), Boston; The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (J.C.), Columbus; University of Pennsylvania (R.D.-A.), Philadelphia; and University of California, San Francisco (G.T.M.)
| | - Lindsay D Nelson
- From the Medical College of Wisconsin (B.L.B., M.A.M., L.D.N.), Milwaukee; University of Washington (N.T., J.K.B.), Seattle; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (D.O.O.), PA; University of California San Diego (M.S.), La Jolla; Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School (Y.G.B., J.T.G.), Boston; The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (J.C.), Columbus; University of Pennsylvania (R.D.-A.), Philadelphia; and University of California, San Francisco (G.T.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Edlow BL, Olchanyi M, Freeman HJ, Li J, Maffei C, Snider SB, Zöllei L, Iglesias JE, Augustinack J, Bodien YG, Haynes RL, Greve DN, Diamond BR, Stevens A, Giacino JT, Destrieux C, van der Kouwe A, Brown EN, Folkerth RD, Fischl B, Kinney HC. Sustaining wakefulness: Brainstem connectivity in human consciousness. bioRxiv 2023:2023.07.13.548265. [PMID: 37502983 PMCID: PMC10369992 DOI: 10.1101/2023.07.13.548265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
Consciousness is comprised of arousal (i.e., wakefulness) and awareness. Substantial progress has been made in mapping the cortical networks that modulate awareness in the human brain, but knowledge about the subcortical networks that sustain arousal is lacking. We integrated data from ex vivo diffusion MRI, immunohistochemistry, and in vivo 7 Tesla functional MRI to map the connectivity of a subcortical arousal network that we postulate sustains wakefulness in the resting, conscious human brain, analogous to the cortical default mode network (DMN) that is believed to sustain self-awareness. We identified nodes of the proposed default ascending arousal network (dAAN) in the brainstem, hypothalamus, thalamus, and basal forebrain by correlating ex vivo diffusion MRI with immunohistochemistry in three human brain specimens from neurologically normal individuals scanned at 600-750 μm resolution. We performed deterministic and probabilistic tractography analyses of the diffusion MRI data to map dAAN intra-network connections and dAAN-DMN internetwork connections. Using a newly developed network-based autopsy of the human brain that integrates ex vivo MRI and histopathology, we identified projection, association, and commissural pathways linking dAAN nodes with one another and with cortical DMN nodes, providing a structural architecture for the integration of arousal and awareness in human consciousness. We release the ex vivo diffusion MRI data, corresponding immunohistochemistry data, network-based autopsy methods, and a new brainstem dAAN atlas to support efforts to map the connectivity of human consciousness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian L. Edlow
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown MA 02129, USA
| | - Mark Olchanyi
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Holly J. Freeman
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown MA 02129, USA
| | - Jian Li
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown MA 02129, USA
| | - Chiara Maffei
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown MA 02129, USA
| | - Samuel B. Snider
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Lilla Zöllei
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown MA 02129, USA
| | - J. Eugenio Iglesias
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown MA 02129, USA
| | - Jean Augustinack
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown MA 02129, USA
| | - Yelena G. Bodien
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129 USA
| | - Robin L. Haynes
- Department of Pathology, Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Douglas N. Greve
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown MA 02129, USA
| | - Bram R. Diamond
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown MA 02129, USA
| | - Allison Stevens
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown MA 02129, USA
| | - Joseph T. Giacino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129 USA
| | - Christophe Destrieux
- UMR 1253, iBrain, Université de Tours, Inserm, 10 Boulevard Tonnellé, 37032, Tours, France
- CHRU de Tours, 2 Boulevard Tonnellé, Tours, France
| | - Andre van der Kouwe
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown MA 02129, USA
| | - Emery N. Brown
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | - Bruce Fischl
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown MA 02129, USA
- Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Hannah C. Kinney
- Department of Pathology, Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) now promises to improve diagnostic and prognostic accuracy for patients with disorders of consciousness, and accordingly has been endorsed by professional society guidelines, including those of the American Academy of Neurology, American College of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research, and the European Academy of Neurology. Despite multiple professional society endorsements of fMRI in evaluating patients with disorders of consciousness following severe brain injury, insurers have yet to issue clear guidance regarding coverage of fMRI for this indication. Lack of insurer coverage may be a rate-limiting barrier to accessing this technique, which could uncover essential diagnostic and prognostic information for patients and their families. The emerging clinical and ethical case for harmonized insurer recognition and reimbursement of fMRI for vulnerable persons following severe brain injury with disorders of consciousness is explained and critically evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Young
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Edlow BL, Fecchio M, Bodien YG, Comanducci A, Rosanova M, Casarotto S, Young MJ, Li J, Dougherty DD, Koch C, Tononi G, Massimini M, Boly M. Measuring Consciousness in the Intensive Care Unit. Neurocrit Care 2023; 38:584-590. [PMID: 37029315 DOI: 10.1007/s12028-023-01706-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023]
Abstract
Early reemergence of consciousness predicts long-term functional recovery for patients with severe brain injury. However, tools to reliably detect consciousness in the intensive care unit are lacking. Transcranial magnetic stimulation electroencephalography has the potential to detect consciousness in the intensive care unit, predict recovery, and prevent premature withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian L Edlow
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.
| | - Matteo Fecchio
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Angela Comanducci
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus, Milan, Italy
- Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Mario Rosanova
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Casarotto
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Michael J Young
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jian Li
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Darin D Dougherty
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christof Koch
- MindScope Program, Allen Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
- Tiny Blue Dot Foundation, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Giulio Tononi
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Marcello Massimini
- IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Melanie Boly
- Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Totman AA, Lamm AG, Goldstein R, Giacino JT, Bodien YG, Ryan CM, Schneider JC, Zafonte R. Longitudinal Trends in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Inpatient Rehabilitation. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2023; 38:E186-E194. [PMID: 36730991 PMCID: PMC10102246 DOI: 10.1097/htr.0000000000000814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The goal of this study is to describe national trends in inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) discharges for the most severely disabled cohort of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS Data from the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation for patients discharged from an IRF between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2017, with a diagnosis of TBI and an admission Functional Independence Measure of 18, the lowest possible score, were obtained and analyzed. RESULTS Of the 252 112 patients with TBI discharged during the study period, 10 098 met the study criteria. From 2002 to 2017, the number of patients with an IRF admission Functional Independence Measure of 18 following TBI discharged from IRFs annually decreased from 649 to 488, modeled by a negative regression (coefficient = -2.97; P = .001), and the mean age (SD) increased from 43.0 (21.0) to 53.7 (21.3) years (coefficient = 0.70; P < .001). During the study period, the number of patients with the most severe disability on admission to IRF who were discharged annually as a proportion of total patients with TBI decreased from 5.5% to 2.5% (odds ratio = 0.95; P < .001) and their mean length of stay decreased from 41.5 (36.2) to 29.3 (24.9) days (coefficient = -0.83; P < .001]. CONCLUSION The number and proportion of patients with the most severe disability on IRF admission following TBI who are discharged from IRFs is decreasing over time. This may represent a combination of primary prevention, early mortality due to withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment, alternative discharge dispositions, or changes in admitting and reimbursement practices. Furthermore, there has been a decrease in the duration of IRF level care for these individuals, which could ultimately lead to poorer functional outcomes, particularly given the importance of specialized rehabilitative care in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alissa A Totman
- Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts (Drs Totman, Goldstein, Giacino, Bodien, Ryan, Schneider, and Zafonte); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Drs Totman, Goldstein, Giacino, Bodien, Ryan, Schneider, and Zafonte); Mary Free Bed Rehabilitation Hospital, Grand Rapids, Michigan (Dr Lamm); Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (Drs Giacino, Ryan, and Zafonte); Shriners Hospitals for Children, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Ryan); and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Zafonte)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Snider SB, Temkin NR, Barber J, Edlow BL, Giacino JT, Hammond FM, Izzy S, Kowalski RG, Markowitz AJ, Rovito CA, Shih SL, Zafonte RD, Manley GT, Bodien YG. Predicting Functional Dependency in Patients with Disorders of Consciousness: A TBI-Model Systems and TRACK-TBI Study. medRxiv 2023:2023.03.14.23287249. [PMID: 36993195 PMCID: PMC10055467 DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.14.23287249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Importance There are currently no models that predict long-term functional dependency in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Objective Fit, test, and externally validate a prediction model for 1-year dependency in patients with DoC 2 or more weeks after TBI. Design Secondary analysis of patients enrolled in TBI Model Systems (TBI-MS, 1988-2020, Discovery Sample) or Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI, 2013-2018, Validation Sample) and followed 1-year post-injury. Setting Multi-center study at USA rehabilitation hospitals (TBI-MS) and acute care hospitals (TRACK-TBI). Participants Adults with TBI who were not following commands at rehabilitation admission (TBI-MS; days post-injury vary) or 2-weeks post-injury (TRACK-TBI). Exposures In the TBI-MS database (model fitting and testing), we screened demographic, radiological, clinical variables, and Disability Rating Scale (DRS) item scores for association with the primary outcome. Main Outcome The primary outcome was death or complete functional dependency at 1-year post-injury, defined using a DRS-based binary measure (DRS Depend ), indicating need for assistance with all activities and concomitant cognitive impairment. Results In the TBI-MS Discovery Sample, 1,960 subjects (mean age 40 [18] years, 76% male, 68% white) met inclusion criteria and 406 (27%) were dependent at 1-year post-injury. A dependency prediction model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.79 [0.74, 0.85], positive predictive value of 53%, and negative predictive value of 86% for dependency in a held-out TBI-MS Testing cohort. Within the TRACK-TBI external validation sample (N=124, age 40 [16], 77% male, 81% white), a model modified to remove variables not collected in TRACK-TBI, had an AUROC of 0.66 [0.53, 0.79], equivalent to the gold-standard IMPACT core+CT score (0.68; 95% AUROC difference CI: -0.2 to 0.2, p=0.8). Conclusions and Relevance We used the largest existing cohort of patients with DoC after TBI to develop, test and externally validate a prediction model of 1-year dependency. The model’s sensitivity and negative predictive value were greater than specificity and positive predictive value. Accuracy was diminished in an external sample, but equivalent to the best-available models. Further research is needed to improve dependency prediction in patients with DoC after TBI.
Collapse
|
25
|
Threlkeld ZD, Bodien YG, Rosenthal ES, Giacino JT, Nieto-Castanon A, Wu O, Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Edlow BL. Corrigendum to 'functional networks reemerge during recovery of consciousness after acute severe traumatic brain injury' Cortex 106 (2018) 299-308. Cortex 2023; 162:136-139. [PMID: 36948917 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary D Threlkeld
- Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Eric S Rosenthal
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joseph T Giacino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Alfonso Nieto-Castanon
- Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ona Wu
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli
- Martinos Imaging Center at McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Brian L Edlow
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Nelson LD, Temkin NR, Barber J, Brett BL, Okonkwo DO, McCrea MA, Giacino JT, Bodien YG, Robertson C, Corrigan JD, Diaz-Arrastia R, Markowitz AJ, Manley GT. Functional Recovery, Symptoms, and Quality of Life 1 to 5 Years After Traumatic Brain Injury. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e233660. [PMID: 36939699 PMCID: PMC10028488 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.3660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Many level I trauma center patients experience clinical sequelae at 1 year following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Longer-term outcome data are needed to develop better monitoring and rehabilitation services. Objective To examine functional recovery, TBI-related symptoms, and quality of life from 1 to 5 years postinjury. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study enrolled trauma patients across 18 US level I trauma centers between 2014 and 2018. Eligible participants were enrolled within 24 hours of injury and followed up to 5 years postinjury. Data were analyzed January 2023. Exposures Mild TBI (mTBI), moderate-severe TBI (msTBI), or orthopedic traumatic controls (OTC). Main Outcomes and Measures Functional independence (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended [GOSE] score 5 or higher), complete functional recovery (GOSE score, 8), better (ie, lower) TBI-related symptom burden (Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire score of 15 or lower), and better (ie, higher) health-related quality of life (Quality of Life After Brain Injury Scale-Overall Scale score 52 or higher); mortality was analyzed as a secondary outcome. Results A total 1196 patients were included in analysis (mean [SD] age, 40.8 [16.9] years; 781 [65%] male; 158 [13%] Black, 965 [81%] White). mTBI and OTC groups demonstrated stable, high rates of functional independence (98% to 100% across time). While odds of independence were lower among msTBI survivors, the majority were independent at 1 year (72%), and this proportion increased over time (80% at 5 years; group × year, P = .005; independence per year: odds ratio [OR] for msTBI, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.03-1.58; OR for mTBI, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.64-1.03). For other outcomes, group differences at 1 year remained stable over time (group × year, P ≥ .44). Odds of complete functional recovery remained lower for persons with mTBI vs OTC (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.28-0.56) and lower for msTBI vs mTBI (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.24-0.48). Odds of better TBI-related symptom burden and quality of life were similar for both TBI subgroups and lower than OTCs. Mortality between 1 and 5 years was higher for msTBI (5.5%) than mTBI (1.5%) and OTC (0.7%; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, patients with previous msTBI displayed increased independence over 5 years; msTBI was also associated with increased mortality. These findings, in combination with the persistently elevated rates of unfavorable outcomes in mTBI vs controls imply that more monitoring and rehabilitation are needed for TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - David O. Okonkwo
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Joseph T. Giacino
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston
- Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts
| | - Yelena G. Bodien
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston
- Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bodien YG, Barber J, Taylor SR, Boase K, Corrigan JD, Dikmen S, Gardner RC, Kramer JH, Levin H, Machamer J, McAllister T, Nelson LD, Ngwenya LB, Sherer M, Stein MB, Vassar M, Whyte J, Yue JK, Markowitz A, McCrea MA, Manley GT, Temkin N, Giacino JT. Feasibility and Utility of a Flexible Outcome Assessment Battery for Longitudinal Traumatic Brain Injury Research: A TRACK-TBI Study. J Neurotrauma 2023; 40:337-348. [PMID: 36097759 PMCID: PMC9902043 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2022.0141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The effects of traumatic brain injury (TBI) are difficult to measure in longitudinal cohort studies, because disparate pre-injury characteristics and injury mechanisms produce variable impairment profiles and recovery trajectories. In preparation for the Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) study, which followed patients with injuries ranging from uncomplicated mild TBI to coma, we designed a multi-dimensional Flexible outcome Assessment Battery (FAB). The FAB relies on a decision-making algorithm that assigns participants to a Comprehensive (CAB) or Abbreviated Assessment Battery (AAB) and guides test selection across all phases of recovery. To assess feasibility of the FAB, we calculated the proportion of participants followed at 2 weeks (2w) and at 3, 6, and 12 months (3m, 6m, 12m) post-injury who completed the FAB and received valid scores. We evaluated utility of the FAB by examining differences in 6m and 12m Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) scores between participant subgroups derived from the FAB-enabled versus traditional approach to outcome assessment applied at 2w. Among participants followed at 2w (n = 2094), 3m (n = 1871), 6m (n = 1736), and 12m (n = 1607) post-injury, 95-99% received valid completion scores on the FAB, in full or in part, either in person or by telephone. Level of function assessed by the FAB-enabled approach at 2w was associated with 6m and 12m GOSE scores (proportional odds p < 0.001). These findings suggest that the participant classification methodology afforded by the FAB may enable more effective data collection to improve detection of natural history changes and TBI treatment effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yelena G. Bodien
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jason Barber
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Sabrina R. Taylor
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Kim Boase
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | | | - Raquel C. Gardner
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Joel H. Kramer
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | | | - Thomas McAllister
- University of Indiana School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | | | | | - Mark Sherer
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
- TIRR Memorial Hermann, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Murray B. Stein
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Mary Vassar
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - John Whyte
- Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - John K. Yue
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Amy Markowitz
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | | | - Nancy Temkin
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Joseph T. Giacino
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Fecchio M, Cambareri MK, Kelemen JN, Marujo RM, Masood M, Sanders WR, Lawrence PK, Meydan A, Bodien YG, Edlow BL. Electroencephalographic responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation are sensitive to fluctuations in level of consciousness in patients with severe brain injuries. Brain Stimul 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.01.742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
|
29
|
Maffei C, Gilmore N, Snider SB, Foulkes AS, Bodien YG, Yendiki A, Edlow BL. Automated detection of axonal damage along white matter tracts in acute severe traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage Clin 2022; 37:103294. [PMID: 36529035 PMCID: PMC9792957 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
New techniques for individualized assessment of white matter integrity are needed to detect traumatic axonal injury (TAI) and predict outcomes in critically ill patients with acute severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Diffusion MRI tractography has the potential to quantify white matter microstructure in vivo and has been used to characterize tract-specific changes following TBI. However, tractography is not routinely used in the clinical setting to assess the extent of TAI, in part because focal lesions reduce the robustness of automated methods. Here, we propose a pipeline that combines automated tractography reconstructions of 40 white matter tracts with multivariate analysis of along-tract diffusion metrics to assess the presence of TAI in individual patients with acute severe TBI. We used the Mahalanobis distance to identify abnormal white matter tracts in each of 18 patients with acute severe TBI as compared to 33 healthy subjects. In all patients for which a FreeSurfer anatomical segmentation could be obtained (17 of 18 patients), including 13 with focal lesions, the automated pipeline successfully reconstructed a mean of 37.5 ± 2.1 white matter tracts without the need for manual intervention. A mean of 2.5 ± 2.1 tracts resulted in partial or failed reconstructions and needed to be reinitialized upon visual inspection. The pipeline detected at least one abnormal tract in all patients (mean: 9.1 ± 7.9) and accurately discriminated between patients and controls (AUC: 0.91). The number and neuroanatomic location of abnormal tracts varied across patients and levels of consciousness. The premotor, temporal, and parietal sections of the corpus callosum were the most commonly damaged tracts (in 10, 9, and 8 patients, respectively), consistent with prior histopathological studies of TAI. TAI measures were not associated with concurrent behavioral measures of consciousness. In summary, we provide proof-of-principle evidence that an automated tractography pipeline has translational potential to detect and quantify TAI in individual patients with acute severe TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Maffei
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA; Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Natalie Gilmore
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Samuel B Snider
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrea S Foulkes
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Anastasia Yendiki
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Brian L Edlow
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA; Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Maas AIR, Menon DK, Manley GT, Abrams M, Åkerlund C, Andelic N, Aries M, Bashford T, Bell MJ, Bodien YG, Brett BL, Büki A, Chesnut RM, Citerio G, Clark D, Clasby B, Cooper DJ, Czeiter E, Czosnyka M, Dams-O’Connor K, De Keyser V, Diaz-Arrastia R, Ercole A, van Essen TA, Falvey É, Ferguson AR, Figaji A, Fitzgerald M, Foreman B, Gantner D, Gao G, Giacino J, Gravesteijn B, Guiza F, Gupta D, Gurnell M, Haagsma JA, Hammond FM, Hawryluk G, Hutchinson P, van der Jagt M, Jain S, Jain S, Jiang JY, Kent H, Kolias A, Kompanje EJO, Lecky F, Lingsma HF, Maegele M, Majdan M, Markowitz A, McCrea M, Meyfroidt G, Mikolić A, Mondello S, Mukherjee P, Nelson D, Nelson LD, Newcombe V, Okonkwo D, Orešič M, Peul W, Pisică D, Polinder S, Ponsford J, Puybasset L, Raj R, Robba C, Røe C, Rosand J, Schueler P, Sharp DJ, Smielewski P, Stein MB, von Steinbüchel N, Stewart W, Steyerberg EW, Stocchetti N, Temkin N, Tenovuo O, Theadom A, Thomas I, Espin AT, Turgeon AF, Unterberg A, Van Praag D, van Veen E, Verheyden J, Vyvere TV, Wang KKW, Wiegers EJA, Williams WH, Wilson L, Wisniewski SR, Younsi A, Yue JK, Yuh EL, Zeiler FA, Zeldovich M, Zemek R. Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol 2022; 21:1004-1060. [PMID: 36183712 PMCID: PMC10427240 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(22)00309-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 168] [Impact Index Per Article: 84.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) has the highest incidence of all common neurological disorders, and poses a substantial public health burden. TBI is increasingly documented not only as an acute condition but also as a chronic disease with long-term consequences, including an increased risk of late-onset neurodegeneration. The first Lancet Neurology Commission on TBI, published in 2017, called for a concerted effort to tackle the global health problem posed by TBI. Since then, funding agencies have supported research both in high-income countries (HICs) and in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). In November 2020, the World Health Assembly, the decision-making body of WHO, passed resolution WHA73.10 for global actions on epilepsy and other neurological disorders, and WHO launched the Decade for Action on Road Safety plan in 2021. New knowledge has been generated by large observational studies, including those conducted under the umbrella of the International Traumatic Brain Injury Research (InTBIR) initiative, established as a collaboration of funding agencies in 2011. InTBIR has also provided a huge stimulus to collaborative research in TBI and has facilitated participation of global partners. The return on investment has been high, but many needs of patients with TBI remain unaddressed. This update to the 2017 Commission presents advances and discusses persisting and new challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research. In LMICs, the occurrence of TBI is driven by road traffic incidents, often involving vulnerable road users such as motorcyclists and pedestrians. In HICs, most TBI is caused by falls, particularly in older people (aged ≥65 years), who often have comorbidities. Risk factors such as frailty and alcohol misuse provide opportunities for targeted prevention actions. Little evidence exists to inform treatment of older patients, who have been commonly excluded from past clinical trials—consequently, appropriate evidence is urgently required. Although increasing age is associated with worse outcomes from TBI, age should not dictate limitations in therapy. However, patients injured by low-energy falls (who are mostly older people) are about 50% less likely to receive critical care or emergency interventions, compared with those injured by high-energy mechanisms, such as road traffic incidents. Mild TBI, defined as a Glasgow Coma sum score of 13–15, comprises most of the TBI cases (over 90%) presenting to hospital. Around 50% of adult patients with mild TBI presenting to hospital do not recover to pre-TBI levels of health by 6 months after their injury. Fewer than 10% of patients discharged after presenting to an emergency department for TBI in Europe currently receive follow-up. Structured follow-up after mild TBI should be considered good practice, and urgent research is needed to identify which patients with mild TBI are at risk for incomplete recovery. The selection of patients for CT is an important triage decision in mild TBI since it allows early identification of lesions that can trigger hospital admission or life-saving surgery. Current decision making for deciding on CT is inefficient, with 90–95% of scanned patients showing no intracranial injury but being subjected to radiation risks. InTBIR studies have shown that measurement of blood-based biomarkers adds value to previously proposed clinical decision rules, holding the potential to improve efficiency while reducing radiation exposure. Increased concentrations of biomarkers in the blood of patients with a normal presentation CT scan suggest structural brain damage, which is seen on MR scanning in up to 30% of patients with mild TBI. Advanced MRI, including diffusion tensor imaging and volumetric analyses, can identify additional injuries not detectable by visual inspection of standard clinical MR images. Thus, the absence of CT abnormalities does not exclude structural damage—an observation relevant to litigation procedures, to management of mild TBI, and when CT scans are insufficient to explain the severity of the clinical condition. Although blood-based protein biomarkers have been shown to have important roles in the evaluation of TBI, most available assays are for research use only. To date, there is only one vendor of such assays with regulatory clearance in Europe and the USA with an indication to rule out the need for CT imaging for patients with suspected TBI. Regulatory clearance is provided for a combination of biomarkers, although evidence is accumulating that a single biomarker can perform as well as a combination. Additional biomarkers and more clinical-use platforms are on the horizon, but cross-platform harmonisation of results is needed. Health-care efficiency would benefit from diversity in providers. In the intensive care setting, automated analysis of blood pressure and intracranial pressure with calculation of derived parameters can help individualise management of TBI. Interest in the identification of subgroups of patients who might benefit more from some specific therapeutic approaches than others represents a welcome shift towards precision medicine. Comparative-effectiveness research to identify best practice has delivered on expectations for providing evidence in support of best practices, both in adult and paediatric patients with TBI. Progress has also been made in improving outcome assessment after TBI. Key instruments have been translated into up to 20 languages and linguistically validated, and are now internationally available for clinical and research use. TBI affects multiple domains of functioning, and outcomes are affected by personal characteristics and life-course events, consistent with a multifactorial bio-psycho-socio-ecological model of TBI, as presented in the US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) 2022 report. Multidimensional assessment is desirable and might be best based on measurement of global functional impairment. More work is required to develop and implement recommendations for multidimensional assessment. Prediction of outcome is relevant to patients and their families, and can facilitate the benchmarking of quality of care. InTBIR studies have identified new building blocks (eg, blood biomarkers and quantitative CT analysis) to refine existing prognostic models. Further improvement in prognostication could come from MRI, genetics, and the integration of dynamic changes in patient status after presentation. Neurotrauma researchers traditionally seek translation of their research findings through publications, clinical guidelines, and industry collaborations. However, to effectively impact clinical care and outcome, interactions are also needed with research funders, regulators, and policy makers, and partnership with patient organisations. Such interactions are increasingly taking place, with exemplars including interactions with the All Party Parliamentary Group on Acquired Brain Injury in the UK, the production of the NASEM report in the USA, and interactions with the US Food and Drug Administration. More interactions should be encouraged, and future discussions with regulators should include debates around consent from patients with acute mental incapacity and data sharing. Data sharing is strongly advocated by funding agencies. From January 2023, the US National Institutes of Health will require upload of research data into public repositories, but the EU requires data controllers to safeguard data security and privacy regulation. The tension between open data-sharing and adherence to privacy regulation could be resolved by cross-dataset analyses on federated platforms, with the data remaining at their original safe location. Tools already exist for conventional statistical analyses on federated platforms, however federated machine learning requires further development. Support for further development of federated platforms, and neuroinformatics more generally, should be a priority. This update to the 2017 Commission presents new insights and challenges across a range of topics around TBI: epidemiology and prevention (section 1 ); system of care (section 2 ); clinical management (section 3 ); characterisation of TBI (section 4 ); outcome assessment (section 5 ); prognosis (Section 6 ); and new directions for acquiring and implementing evidence (section 7 ). Table 1 summarises key messages from this Commission and proposes recommendations for the way forward to advance research and clinical management of TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew I R Maas
- Department of Neurosurgery, Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | - David K Menon
- Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Geoffrey T Manley
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mathew Abrams
- International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Cecilia Åkerlund
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Section of Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Nada Andelic
- Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marcel Aries
- Department of Intensive Care, Maastricht UMC, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Tom Bashford
- Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Michael J Bell
- Critical Care Medicine, Neurological Surgery and Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- Department of Neurology and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Benjamin L Brett
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - András Büki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical School; ELKH-PTE Clinical Neuroscience MR Research Group; and Neurotrauma Research Group, Janos Szentagothai Research Centre, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Randall M Chesnut
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Giuseppe Citerio
- School of Medicine and Surgery, Universita Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- NeuroIntensive Care, San Gerardo Hospital, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Monza, Monza, Italy
| | - David Clark
- Brain Physics Lab, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Betony Clasby
- Department of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - D Jamie Cooper
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University and The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Endre Czeiter
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical School; ELKH-PTE Clinical Neuroscience MR Research Group; and Neurotrauma Research Group, Janos Szentagothai Research Centre, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Marek Czosnyka
- Brain Physics Lab, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kristen Dams-O’Connor
- Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance and Department of Neurology, Brain Injury Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Véronique De Keyser
- Department of Neurosurgery, Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Ramon Diaz-Arrastia
- Department of Neurology and Center for Brain Injury and Repair, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ari Ercole
- Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Thomas A van Essen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, Netherlands
| | - Éanna Falvey
- College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Adam R Ferguson
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Anthony Figaji
- Division of Neurosurgery and Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Melinda Fitzgerald
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Sciences, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Brandon Foreman
- Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati Gardner Neuroscience Institute, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Dashiell Gantner
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University and The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Guoyi Gao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
| | - Joseph Giacino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School and Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Benjamin Gravesteijn
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Fabian Guiza
- Department and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Deepak Gupta
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurosciences Centre and JPN Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Mark Gurnell
- Metabolic Research Laboratories, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Juanita A Haagsma
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Flora M Hammond
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Gregory Hawryluk
- Section of Neurosurgery, GB1, Health Sciences Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Peter Hutchinson
- Brain Physics Lab, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mathieu van der Jagt
- Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sonia Jain
- Biostatistics Research Center, Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Swati Jain
- Brain Physics Lab, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ji-yao Jiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shanghai Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Hope Kent
- Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Angelos Kolias
- Brain Physics Lab, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Erwin J O Kompanje
- Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Fiona Lecky
- Centre for Urgent and Emergency Care Research, Health Services Research Section, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Hester F Lingsma
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marc Maegele
- Cologne-Merheim Medical Center, Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany
| | - Marek Majdan
- Institute for Global Health and Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Work, Trnava University, Trnava, Slovakia
| | - Amy Markowitz
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Michael McCrea
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Geert Meyfroidt
- Department and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ana Mikolić
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Stefania Mondello
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Pratik Mukherjee
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - David Nelson
- Section for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lindsay D Nelson
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Virginia Newcombe
- Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - David Okonkwo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Matej Orešič
- School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Wilco Peul
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Dana Pisică
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Suzanne Polinder
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jennie Ponsford
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Louis Puybasset
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, APHP, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Rahul Raj
- Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Chiara Robba
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Policlinico San Martino IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, Genova, Italy, and Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche, University of Genoa, Italy
| | - Cecilie Røe
- Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jonathan Rosand
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - David J Sharp
- Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Peter Smielewski
- Brain Physics Lab, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Murray B Stein
- Department of Psychiatry and Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, UCSD School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Nicole von Steinbüchel
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - William Stewart
- Department of Neuropathology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital and University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Ewout W Steyerberg
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Nino Stocchetti
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Milan University, and Neuroscience ICU, Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Nancy Temkin
- Departments of Neurological Surgery, and Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Olli Tenovuo
- Department of Rehabilitation and Brain Trauma, Turku University Hospital, and Department of Neurology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Alice Theadom
- National Institute for Stroke and Applied Neurosciences, Faculty of Health and Environmental Studies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Ilias Thomas
- School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Abel Torres Espin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alexis F Turgeon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Université Laval, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - Andreas Unterberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dominique Van Praag
- Departments of Clinical Psychology and Neurosurgery, Antwerp University Hospital, and University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Ernest van Veen
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Thijs Vande Vyvere
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences (MOVANT), Antwerp University Hospital, and University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Kevin K W Wang
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Eveline J A Wiegers
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - W Huw Williams
- Centre for Clinical Neuropsychology Research, Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Lindsay Wilson
- Division of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Stephen R Wisniewski
- University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alexander Younsi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - John K Yue
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Esther L Yuh
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Frederick A Zeiler
- Departments of Surgery, Human Anatomy and Cell Science, and Biomedical Engineering, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences and Price Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Marina Zeldovich
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Roger Zemek
- Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Chan ST, Sanders WR, Fischer D, Kirsch JE, Napadow V, Bodien YG, Edlow BL. Correcting cardiorespiratory noise in resting-state functional MRI data acquired in critically ill patients. Brain Commun 2022; 4:fcac280. [PMID: 36382222 PMCID: PMC9665273 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Resting-state functional MRI is being used to develop diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic biomarkers for critically ill patients with severe brain injuries. In studies of healthy volunteers and non-critically ill patients, prospective cardiorespiratory data are routinely collected to remove non-neuronal fluctuations in the resting-state functional MRI signal during analysis. However, the feasibility and utility of collecting cardiorespiratory data in critically ill patients on a clinical MRI scanner are unknown. We concurrently acquired resting-state functional MRI (repetition time = 1250 ms) and cardiac and respiratory data in 23 critically ill patients with acute severe traumatic brain injury and in 12 healthy control subjects. We compared the functional connectivity results from two approaches that are commonly used to correct cardiorespiratory noise: (i) denoising with cardiorespiratory data (i.e. image-based method for retrospective correction of physiological motion effects in functional MRI) and (ii) standard bandpass filtering. Resting-state functional MRI data in 7 patients could not be analysed due to imaging artefacts. In 6 of the remaining 16 patients (37.5%), cardiorespiratory data were either incomplete or corrupted. In patients (n = 10) and control subjects (n = 10), the functional connectivity results corrected with the image-based method for retrospective correction of physiological motion effects in functional MRI did not significantly differ from those corrected with bandpass filtering of 0.008-0.125 Hz. Collectively, these findings suggest that, in critically ill patients with severe traumatic brain injury, there is limited feasibility and utility to denoising the resting-state functional MRI signal with prospectively acquired cardiorespiratory data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suk-Tak Chan
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - William R Sanders
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - David Fischer
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - John E Kirsch
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Vitaly Napadow
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02129, USA
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02129, USA
| | - Brian L Edlow
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Bodien YG, Edlow BL, Giacino JT. Response to Teasdale et al. on Bodien et al., "Diagnosing Level of Consciousness: The Limits of the Glasgow Coma Scale Total Score". J Neurotrauma 2022; 39:1275-1276. [PMID: 35699082 PMCID: PMC9422788 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2022.0268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yelena G. Bodien
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brian L. Edlow
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts. USA
| | - Joseph T. Giacino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Snider SB, Kowalski RG, Hammond FM, Izzy S, Shih SL, Rovito C, Edlow BL, Zafonte RD, Giacino JT, Bodien YG. Comparison of Common Outcome Measures for Assessing Independence in Patients Diagnosed with Disorders of Consciousness: A Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study. J Neurotrauma 2022; 39:1222-1230. [PMID: 35531895 PMCID: PMC9422782 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2022.0076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) after traumatic brain injury (TBI) recover to varying degrees of functional dependency. Dependency is difficult to measure but critical for interpreting clinical trial outcomes and prognostic counseling. In participants with DoC (i.e., not following commands) enrolled in the TBI Model Systems National Database (TBIMS NDB), we used the Functional Independence Measure (FIM®) as the reference to evaluate how accurately the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) and Disability Rating Scale (DRS) assess dependency. Using the established FIM-dependency cut-point of <80, we measured the classification performance of literature-derived GOSE and DRS cut-points at 1-year post-injury. We compared the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) between the DRSDepend, a DRS-derived marker of dependency, and the data-derived optimal GOSE and DRS cut-points. Of 18,486 TBIMS participants, 1483 met inclusion criteria (mean [standard deviation (SD)] age = 38 [18] years; 76% male). The sensitivity of GOSE cut-points of ≤3 and ≤4 (Lower Severe and Upper Severe Disability, respectively) for identifying FIM-dependency were 97% and 98%, but specificities were 73% and 51%, respectively. The sensitivity of the DRS cut-point of ≥12 (Severe Disability) for identifying FIM-dependency was 60%, but specificity was 100%. The DRSDepend had a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 94% for classifying FIM-dependency, with a greater AUROC than the data-derived optimal GOSE (≤3, p = 0.01) and DRS (≥10, p = 0.008) cut-points. Commonly used GOSE and DRS cut-points have limited specificity or sensitivity for identifying functional dependency. The DRSDepend identifies FIM-dependency more accurately than the GOSE and DRS cut-points, but requires further validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel B. Snider
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neurocritical Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Address correspondence to: Samuel B. Snider, MD, Department of Neurology, Division of Neurocritical Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 60 Fenwood Road, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Robert G. Kowalski
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Flora M. Hammond
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Saef Izzy
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neurocritical Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Shirley L. Shih
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Craig Rovito
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brian L. Edlow
- Department of Neurology, Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ross D. Zafonte
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joseph T. Giacino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Yelena G. Bodien
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Neurology, Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Kondziella D, Amiri M, Othman MH, Beghi E, Bodien YG, Citerio G, Giacino JT, Mayer SA, Lawson TN, Menon DK, Rass V, Sharshar T, Stevens RD, Tinti L, Vespa P, McNett M, Venkatasubba Rao CP, Helbok R, Akbari Y, Boly M, Dangayach N, Edlow B, Foreman B, Gilmore E, Hammond FM, Hemphill JC, Human T, Madden LK, Mainali S, Meyfroidt G, Monti M, Nakase-Richardson R, Nyquist P, Olson D, Park S, Provencio JJ, Puybasset L, Sarwal A, Shutter L, Witherspoon B, Whyte J, Ziai W. Incidence and prevalence of coma in the UK and the USA. Brain Commun 2022; 4:fcac188. [PMID: 36132425 PMCID: PMC9486895 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcac188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The epidemiology of coma is unknown because case ascertainment with traditional methods is difficult. Here, we used crowdsourcing methodology to estimate the incidence and prevalence of coma in the UK and the USA. We recruited UK and US laypeople (aged ≥18 years) who were nationally representative (i.e. matched for age, gender and ethnicity according to census data) of the UK and the USA, respectively, utilizing a crowdsourcing platform. We provided a description of coma and asked survey participants if they—‘right now’ or ‘within the last year’—had a family member in coma. These participants (UK n = 994, USA n = 977) provided data on 30 387 family members (UK n = 14 124, USA n = 16 263). We found more coma cases in the USA (n = 47) than in the UK (n = 20; P = 0.009). We identified one coma case in the UK (0.007%, 95% confidence interval 0.00–0.04%) on the day of the survey and 19 new coma cases (0.13%, 95% confidence interval 0.08–0.21%) within the preceding year, resulting in an annual incidence of 135/100 000 (95% confidence interval 81–210) and a point prevalence of 7 cases per 100 000 population (95% confidence interval 0.18–39.44) in the UK. We identified five cases in the USA (0.031%, 95% confidence interval 0.01–0.07%) on the day of the survey and 42 new cases (0.26%, 95% confidence interval 0.19–0.35%) within the preceding year, resulting in an annual incidence of 258/100 000 (95% confidence interval 186–349) and a point prevalence of 31 cases per 100 000 population (95% confidence interval 9.98–71.73) in the USA. The five most common causes were stroke, medically induced coma, COVID-19, traumatic brain injury and cardiac arrest. To summarize, for the first time, we report incidence and prevalence estimates for coma across diagnosis types and settings in the UK and the USA using crowdsourcing methods. Coma may be more prevalent in the USA than in the UK, which requires further investigation. These data are urgently needed to expand the public health perspective on coma and disorders of consciousness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Kondziella
- Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital , Blegdamsvej 9 , DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen 2100 , Denmark
| | - Moshgan Amiri
- Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital , Blegdamsvej 9 , DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marwan H Othman
- Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital , Blegdamsvej 9 , DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ettore Beghi
- Department of Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS , Milan 20156 , Italy
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA 02115 , USA
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA 02114 , USA
| | - Giuseppe Citerio
- NeuroIntensive Care, ASST di Monza , Monza 20900 , Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, Università Milano Bicocca , Milan 20100 , Italy
| | - Joseph T Giacino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA 02115 , USA
| | - Stephan A Mayer
- Department of Neurology, New York Medical College , Valhalla, NY 10595 , USA
| | - Thomas N Lawson
- College of Nursing, The Ohio State University , Columbus, OH 43210 , USA
| | - David K Menon
- Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge , Cambridge CB2 2QQ , UK
| | - Verena Rass
- Department of Neurology, Neuro-Intensive Care Unit, Medical University of Innsbruck , Innsbruck 6020 , Austria
| | - Tarek Sharshar
- Neuro-anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Sainte-Anne Hospital, Paris-Descartes University , Paris 75006 , France
- Experimental Neuropathology, Infection and Epidemiology Department, Institut Pasteur , Paris 75015 , France
| | - Robert D Stevens
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD 21287 , USA
- Department of Neurology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD 21218 , USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore 21287, MD , USA
| | - Lorenzo Tinti
- Department of Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS , Milan 20156 , Italy
| | - Paul Vespa
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA , Los Angeles, CA 90095 , USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA , Los Angeles, CA 90095 , USA
| | - Molly McNett
- College of Nursing, The Ohio State University , Columbus, OH 43210 , USA
| | - Chethan P Venkatasubba Rao
- Division of Vascular Neurology and Neurocritical Care, Baylor College of Medicine and CHI Baylor St Luke's Medical Center , Houston, TX 77030 , USA
| | - Raimund Helbok
- Department of Neurology, Neuro-Intensive Care Unit, Medical University of Innsbruck , Innsbruck 6020 , Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bodien YG, Katz D, Schiff N, Giacino JT. Behavioral Assessment of Patients with Disorders of Consciousness. Semin Neurol 2022. [PMID: 35793706 DOI: 10.1055/a-1893-2875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yelena G Bodien
- Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States
- Harvard Medical Scool, Boston, United States
| | - Douglas Katz
- Neurology, Boston University, Newton Center, United States
- Boston University / Braintree Rehab, Encompass Health Hospital of Braintree, Braintree, United States
| | - Niko Schiff
- Neurology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, United States
| | - Joseph T Giacino
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, United States
- Harvard Medical Scool, Boston, United States
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Curley WH, Bodien YG, Zhou DW, Conte MM, Foulkes AS, Giacino JT, Victor JD, Schiff ND, Edlow BL. Electrophysiological correlates of thalamocortical function in acute severe traumatic brain injury. Cortex 2022; 152:136-152. [PMID: 35569326 PMCID: PMC9759728 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Tools assaying the neural networks that modulate consciousness may facilitate tracking of recovery after acute severe brain injury. The ABCD framework classifies resting-state EEG into categories reflecting levels of thalamocortical network function that correlate with outcome in post-cardiac arrest coma. In this longitudinal cohort study, we applied the ABCD framework to 20 patients with acute severe traumatic brain injury requiring intensive care (12 of whom were also studied at ≥6-months post-injury) and 16 healthy controls. We tested four hypotheses: 1) EEG ABCD classifications are spatially heterogeneous and temporally variable; 2) ABCD classifications improve longitudinally, commensurate with the degree of behavioral recovery; 3) ABCD classifications correlate with behavioral level of consciousness; and 4) the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised arousal facilitation protocol yields improved ABCD classifications. Channel-level EEG power spectra were classified based on spectral peaks within pre-defined frequency bands: 'A' = no peaks above delta (<4 Hz) range (complete thalamocortical disruption); 'B' = theta (4-8 Hz) peak (severe thalamocortical disruption); 'C' = theta and beta (13-24 Hz) peaks (moderate thalamocortical disruption); or 'D' = alpha (8-13 Hz) and beta peaks (normal thalamocortical function). Acutely, 95% of patients demonstrated 'D' signals in at least one channel but exhibited within-session temporal variability and spatial heterogeneity in the proportion of different channel-level ABCD classifications. By contrast, healthy participants and patients at follow-up consistently demonstrated signals corresponding to intact thalamocortical network function. Patients demonstrated longitudinal improvement in ABCD classifications (p < .05) and ABCD classification distinguished patients with and without command-following in the subacute-to-chronic phase of recovery (p < .01). In patients studied acutely, ABCD classifications improved after the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised arousal facilitation protocol (p < .05) but did not correspond with behavioral level of consciousness. These findings support the use of the ABCD framework to characterize channel-level EEG dynamics and track fluctuations in functional thalamocortical network integrity in spatial detail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H Curley
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - David W Zhou
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Mary M Conte
- Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrea S Foulkes
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Joseph T Giacino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jonathan D Victor
- Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Neurology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicholas D Schiff
- Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Neurology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brian L Edlow
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
Severe brain injury is associated with a period of impaired level of consciousness that can last from days to months and results in chronic impairment. Systematic assessment of level of function in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) is critical for diagnosis, prognostication, and evaluation of treatment efficacy. Approximately 40% of patients who are thought to be unconscious based on clinical bedside behavioral assessment demonstrate some signs of consciousness on standardized behavioral assessment. This finding, in addition to a growing body of literature demonstrating the advantages of standardized behavioral assessment of DoC, has led multiple professional societies and clinical guidelines to recommend standardized assessment over routine clinical evaluation of consciousness. Nevertheless, even standardized assessment is susceptible to biases and misdiagnosis, and examiners should consider factors, such as fluctuating arousal and aphasia, that may confound evaluation. We review approaches to behavioral assessment of consciousness, recent clinical guideline recommendations for use of specific measures to evaluate patients with DoC, and strategies for mitigating common biases that may confound the examination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yelena G Bodien
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts
| | - Douglas I Katz
- Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
- Brain Injury Program, Encompass Health Braintree Rehabilitation Hospital, Braintree, Massachusetts
| | - Nicholas D Schiff
- Feil Family Brain and Mind Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Brain and Spine Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Joseph T Giacino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Bodien YG, Katz DI, Schiff ND, Giacino JT. Erratum: Behavioral Assessment of Patients with Disorders of Consciousness. Semin Neurol 2022; 42:e1. [PMID: 37903645 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1775572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Yelena G Bodien
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts
| | - Douglas I Katz
- Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
- Brain Injury Program, Encompass Health Braintree Rehabilitation Hospital, Braintree, Massachusetts
| | - Nicholas D Schiff
- Feil Family Brain and Mind Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Brain and Spine Institute, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Joseph T Giacino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Edlow BL, Bodien YG, Baxter T, Belanger H, Cali R, Deary K, Fischl B, Foulkes AS, Gilmore N, Greve DN, Hooker JM, Huang SY, Kelemen JN, Kimberly WT, Maffei C, Masood M, Perl D, Polimeni JR, Rosen BR, Tromly S, Tseng CEJ, Yao EF, Zurcher NR, Mac Donald CL, Dams-O'Connor K. Long-Term Effects of Repeated Blast Exposure in United States Special Operations Forces Personnel: A Pilot Study Protocol. J Neurotrauma 2022; 39:1391-1407. [PMID: 35620901 PMCID: PMC9529318 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2022.0030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Emerging evidence suggests that repeated blast exposure (RBE) is associated with brain injury in military personnel. United States (U.S.) Special Operations Forces (SOF) personnel experience high rates of blast exposure during training and combat, but the effects of low-level RBE on brain structure and function in SOF have not been comprehensively characterized. Further, the pathophysiological link between RBE-related brain injuries and cognitive, behavioral, and physical symptoms has not been fully elucidated. We present a protocol for an observational pilot study, Long-Term Effects of Repeated Blast Exposure in U.S. SOF Personnel (ReBlast). In this exploratory study, 30 active-duty SOF personnel with RBE will participate in a comprehensive evaluation of: 1) brain network structure and function using Connectome magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 7 Tesla MRI; 2) neuroinflammation and tau deposition using positron emission tomography; 3) blood proteomics and metabolomics; 4) behavioral and physical symptoms using self-report measures; and 5) cognition using a battery of conventional and digitized assessments designed to detect subtle deficits in otherwise high-performing individuals. We will identify clinical, neuroimaging, and blood-based phenotypes that are associated with level of RBE, as measured by the Generalized Blast Exposure Value. Candidate biomarkers of RBE-related brain injury will inform the design of a subsequent study that will test a diagnostic assessment battery for detecting RBE-related brain injury. Ultimately, we anticipate that the ReBlast study will facilitate the development of interventions to optimize the brain health, quality of life, and battle readiness of U.S. SOF personnel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian L Edlow
- Harvard Medical School, 1811, 175 Cambridge Street - Suite 300, Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115.,Massachusetts General Hospital, 2348, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Boston, Massachusetts, United States;
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 2348, Department of Neurology, 101 Merrimac, Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114;
| | - Timothy Baxter
- University of South Florida, 7831, Institute for Applied Engineering, Tampa, Florida, United States;
| | - Heather Belanger
- University of South Florida, 7831, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Tampa, Florida, United States;
| | - Ryan Cali
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 2348, Boston, Massachusetts, United States;
| | - Katryna Deary
- Navy SEAL Foundation, Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States;
| | - Bruce Fischl
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 2348, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Room 2301, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States, 02129-2020.,Massachusetts General Hospital;
| | - Andrea S Foulkes
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 2348, Boston, Massachusetts, United States;
| | - Natalie Gilmore
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 2348, Boston, Massachusetts, United States;
| | - Douglas N Greve
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 2348, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Boston, Massachusetts, United States;
| | - Jacob M Hooker
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 2348, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Boston, Massachusetts, United States;
| | - Susie Y Huang
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 2348, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Boston, Massachusetts, United States;
| | - Jessica N Kelemen
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 2348, Boston, Massachusetts, United States;
| | - W Taylor Kimberly
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 2348, Boston, Massachusetts, United States;
| | - Chiara Maffei
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 2348, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Boston, Massachusetts, United States;
| | - Maryam Masood
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 2348, Boston, Massachusetts, United States;
| | - Daniel Perl
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 1685, Pathology, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Room B3138, Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20814;
| | - Jonathan R Polimeni
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 2348, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Boston, Massachusetts, United States;
| | - Bruce R Rosen
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 2348, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States;
| | - Samantha Tromly
- University of South Florida, 7831, Institute for Applied Engineering, Tampa, Florida, United States;
| | - Chieh-En J Tseng
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 2348, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Boston, Massachusetts, United States;
| | - Eveline F Yao
- United States Special Operations Command, Office of the Surgeon General, MacDill Air Force Base, United States;
| | - Nicole R Zurcher
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 2348, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Boston, Massachusetts, United States;
| | - Christine L Mac Donald
- University of Washington, 7284, Department of Neurological Surgery, Seattle, Washington, United States;
| | - Kristen Dams-O'Connor
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 5925, Rehabilitation Medicine, One Gustave Levy Place, Box 1163, New York, New York, United States, 10029; kristen.dams-o'
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Barra A, Rosenfelder M, Mortaheb S, Carrière M, Martens G, Bodien YG, Morales-Quezada L, Bender A, Laureys S, Thibaut A, Fregni F. Transcranial Pulsed-Current Stimulation versus Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Disorders of Consciousness: A Pilot, Sham-Controlled Cross-Over Double-Blind Study. Brain Sci 2022; 12:429. [PMID: 35447961 PMCID: PMC9031379 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12040429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Revised: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) over the prefrontal cortex can improve signs of consciousness in patients in a minimally conscious state. Transcranial pulsed-current stimulation (tPCS) over the mastoids can modulate brain activity and connectivity in healthy controls. This study investigated the feasibility of tPCS as a therapeutic tool in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) and compared its neurophysiological and behavioral effects with prefrontal tDCS. This pilot study was a randomized, double-blind sham-controlled clinical trial with three sessions: bi-mastoid tPCS, prefrontal tDCS, and sham. Electroencephalography (EEG) and behavioral assessments were collected before and after each stimulation session. Post minus pre differences were compared using Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Twelve patients with DoC were included in the study (eight females, four traumatic brain injury, 50.3 ± 14 y.o., 8.8 ± 10.5 months post-injury). We did not observe any side-effects following tPCS, nor tDCS, and confirmed their feasibility and safety. We did not find a significant effect of the stimulation on EEG nor behavioral outcomes for tPCS. However, consistent with prior findings, our exploratory analyses suggest that tDCS induces behavioral improvements and an increase in theta frontal functional connectivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Barra
- Coma Science Group, GIGA Consciousness-GIGA Research, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium; (A.B.); (S.M.); (M.C.); (G.M.); (S.L.)
- Centre du Cerveau, University Hospital of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (Y.G.B.); (L.M.-Q.)
| | - Martin Rosenfelder
- Department of Neurology, Therapiezentrum Burgau, Kapuzinerstrasse 34, 89331 Burgau, Germany; (M.R.); (A.B.)
- Clinical and Biological Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Sepehr Mortaheb
- Coma Science Group, GIGA Consciousness-GIGA Research, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium; (A.B.); (S.M.); (M.C.); (G.M.); (S.L.)
- Physiology of Cognition Lab, GIGA-Consciousness, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium
| | - Manon Carrière
- Coma Science Group, GIGA Consciousness-GIGA Research, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium; (A.B.); (S.M.); (M.C.); (G.M.); (S.L.)
- Centre du Cerveau, University Hospital of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium
| | - Geraldine Martens
- Coma Science Group, GIGA Consciousness-GIGA Research, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium; (A.B.); (S.M.); (M.C.); (G.M.); (S.L.)
- Centre du Cerveau, University Hospital of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (Y.G.B.); (L.M.-Q.)
| | - Yelena G. Bodien
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (Y.G.B.); (L.M.-Q.)
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Leon Morales-Quezada
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (Y.G.B.); (L.M.-Q.)
- Neuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA;
| | - Andreas Bender
- Department of Neurology, Therapiezentrum Burgau, Kapuzinerstrasse 34, 89331 Burgau, Germany; (M.R.); (A.B.)
- Department of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians University (LMU), 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Steven Laureys
- Coma Science Group, GIGA Consciousness-GIGA Research, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium; (A.B.); (S.M.); (M.C.); (G.M.); (S.L.)
- Centre du Cerveau, University Hospital of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium
- Joint International Research Unit on Consciousness, CERVO Brain Research Centre CIUSS, University Laval, Quebec, QC G1E1T2, Canada
| | - Aurore Thibaut
- Coma Science Group, GIGA Consciousness-GIGA Research, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium; (A.B.); (S.M.); (M.C.); (G.M.); (S.L.)
- Centre du Cerveau, University Hospital of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium
- Neuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA;
| | - Felipe Fregni
- Neuromodulation Center, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Helbok R, Rass V, Beghi E, Bodien YG, Citerio G, Giacino JT, Kondziella D, Mayer SA, Menon D, Sharshar T, Stevens RD, Ulmer H, Venkatasubba Rao CP, Vespa P, McNett M, Frontera J. The Curing Coma Campaign International Survey on Coma Epidemiology, Evaluation, and Therapy (COME TOGETHER). Neurocrit Care 2022; 37:47-59. [PMID: 35141860 PMCID: PMC9283177 DOI: 10.1007/s12028-021-01425-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background Although coma is commonly encountered in critical care, worldwide variability exists in diagnosis and management practices. We aimed to assess variability in coma definitions, etiologies, treatment strategies, and attitudes toward prognosis. Methods As part of the Neurocritical Care Society Curing Coma Campaign, between September 2020 and January 2021, we conducted an anonymous, international, cross-sectional global survey of health care professionals caring for patients with coma and disorders of consciousness in the acute, subacute, or chronic setting. Survey responses were solicited by sequential emails distributed by international neuroscience societies and social media. Fleiss κ values were calculated to assess agreement among respondents. Results The survey was completed by 258 health care professionals from 41 countries. Respondents predominantly were physicians (n = 213, 83%), were from the United States (n = 141, 55%), and represented academic centers (n = 231, 90%). Among eight predefined items, respondents identified the following cardinal features, in various combinations, that must be present to define coma: absence of wakefulness (81%, κ = 0.764); Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) ≤ 8 (64%, κ = 0.588); failure to respond purposefully to visual, verbal, or tactile stimuli (60%, κ = 0.552); and inability to follow commands (58%, κ = 0.529). Reported etiologies of coma encountered included medically induced coma (24%), traumatic brain injury (24%), intracerebral hemorrhage (21%), and cardiac arrest/hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (11%). The most common clinical assessment tools used for coma included the GCS (94%) and neurological examination (78%). Sixty-six percent of respondents routinely performed sedation interruption, in the absence of contraindications, for clinical coma assessments in the intensive care unit. Advanced neurological assessment techniques in comatose patients included quantitative electroencephalography (EEG)/connectivity analysis (16%), functional magnetic resonance imaging (7%), single-photon emission computerized tomography (6%), positron emission tomography (4%), invasive EEG (4%), and cerebral microdialysis (4%). The most commonly used neurostimulants included amantadine (51%), modafinil (37%), and methylphenidate (28%). The leading determinants for prognostication included etiology of coma, neurological examination findings, and neuroimaging. Fewer than 20% of respondents reported routine follow-up of coma survivors after hospital discharge; however, 86% indicated interest in future research initiatives that include postdischarge outcomes at six (85%) and 12 months (65%). Conclusions There is wide heterogeneity among health care professionals regarding the clinical definition of coma and limited routine use of advanced coma assessment techniques in acute care settings. Coma management practices vary across sites, and mechanisms for coordinated and sustained follow-up after acute treatment are inconsistent. There is an urgent need for the development of evidence-based guidelines and a collaborative, coordinated approach to advance both the science and the practice of coma management globally. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12028-021-01425-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raimund Helbok
- Department of Neurology, Neuro-Intensive Care Unit, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Verena Rass
- Department of Neurology, Neuro-Intensive Care Unit, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Ettore Beghi
- Department of Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.,Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Giuseppe Citerio
- Neuro-Intensive Care, ASST Di Monza, Monza, Italy.,School of Medicine and Surgery, Università Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Joseph T Giacino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel Kondziella
- Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital and Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Stephan A Mayer
- Department of Neurology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - David Menon
- Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tarek Sharshar
- Neuro-Intensive Care Medicine, Sainte-Anne Hospital, University of Paris, GHU-Psychiatry & Neurosciences, Paris, France
| | - Robert D Stevens
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Neurology, and Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hanno Ulmer
- Director Department of Medical Statistic, Informatics and Health Economics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Chethan P Venkatasubba Rao
- Division of Vascular Neurology and Neurocritical Care, Baylor College of Medicine and CHI Baylor St Luke's Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paul Vespa
- Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Molly McNett
- College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jennifer Frontera
- Department of Neurology, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Young MJ, Bodien YG, Edlow BL. Ethical Considerations in Clinical Trials for Disorders of Consciousness. Brain Sci 2022; 12:211. [PMID: 35203974 PMCID: PMC8870384 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12020211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
As the clinical trial landscape for patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) expands, consideration of associated ethical challenges and opportunities is of ever-increasing importance. Responsible conduct of research in the vulnerable population of persons with DoC, including those with coma, vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (VS/UWS), minimally conscious state (MCS), covert cortical processing (CCP), and cognitive motor dissociation (CMD), demands proactive deliberation of unique ethical issues that may arise and the adoption of robust protections to safeguard patients, surrogates, and other key stakeholders. Here we identify and critically evaluate four central categories of ethical considerations in clinical trials involving participants with DoC: (1) autonomy, respect for persons and informed consent of individuals with liminal consciousness; (2) balancing unknown benefits and risks, especially considering the epistemological gap between behavior and consciousness that complicates ordinary ascription of subjective states; (3) disclosure to surrogates and clinical teams of investigational results pertaining to consciousness; and (4) justice considerations, including equitable access to clinical trial enrollment across communities and geographies. We outline guiding principles and research opportunities for clinicians, neuroethicists, and researchers engaged in DoC clinical trials to advance ethical study design and deployment in this complex yet crucial area of investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J. Young
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (Y.G.B.); (B.L.E.)
| | - Yelena G. Bodien
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (Y.G.B.); (B.L.E.)
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02114, USA
| | - Brian L. Edlow
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; (Y.G.B.); (B.L.E.)
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Young MJ, Sanders WR, Marujo R, Bodien YG, Edlow BL. Return to Work Within Four Months of Grade 3 Diffuse Axonal Injury. Neurohospitalist 2022; 12:280-284. [PMID: 35419140 PMCID: PMC8995586 DOI: 10.1177/19418744211051459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Neuroprognostication following diffuse axonal injury (DAI) has historically relied on neuroimaging techniques with lower spatial resolution and contrast than techniques currently available in clinical practice. Since the initial studies of DAI classification and prognosis in the 1980s and 1990s, advances in neuroimaging have improved detection of brainstem microbleeds, a hallmark feature of Grade 3 DAI that has traditionally been associated with poor neurologic outcome. Here, we report clinical and radiologic data from two patients with severe traumatic brain injury and grade 3 DAI who recovered functional independence and returned to work within 4 months of injury. Importantly, both patients were scanned using 3 Tesla MRI protocols that included susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), a technique that provides enhanced sensitivity for detecting brainstem microbleeds. These observations highlight the importance of developing approaches to DAI classification and prognosis that better align with contemporary neuroimaging capabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J. Young
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - William R. Sanders
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rose Marujo
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yelena G. Bodien
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Brian L. Edlow
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) results in disparate outcomes ranging from persistent disorders of consciousness to symptom resolution. Despite the breadth and complexity of TBI recovery, most clinical trials dichotomize outcome by establishing an arbitrary cut-point, above and below which recovery is described as "favorable" and "unfavorable," respectively. For example, the widely used eight-level Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) is typically collapsed into these two categories. Dichotomizing the GOSE into "favorable" and "unfavorable" outcome may limit detection of treatment effects in TBI clinical trials, contribute to imprecise prognostic counseling, and unduly influence decision-making with regard to withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. We illustrate the lack of standardization in defining "unfavorable" and "favorable" TBI outcome on the GOSE by identifying the broad range of cut-points, from a score of 3 (part-time supervision in the home required) to 7 (presence of some residual of symptoms), that have been used to dichotomize the GOSE. We also highlight the ethical concerns related to characterizing TBI outcomes solely from the perspective of investigators and clinicians, rather than patients and caregivers. Finally, we suggest that a pragmatic, immediate solution to GOSE dichotomization is to report the likelihood of achieving each of the eight GOSE outcome levels and propose a study design for a new patient- and caregiver-centered TBI outcome metric.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Zuckerman
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joseph T Giacino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Fischer D, Snider SB, Barra ME, Sanders WR, Rapalino O, Schaefer P, Foulkes AS, Bodien YG, Edlow BL. Disorders of Consciousness Associated With COVID-19: A Prospective, Multimodal Study of Recovery and Brain Connectivity. Neurology 2021; 98:e315-e325. [PMID: 34862317 PMCID: PMC8792809 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000013067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES In patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), disorders of consciousness (COVID-DoC) have emerged as a serious complication. The prognosis and pathophysiology of COVID-DoC remain unclear, complicating decisions about continuing life-sustaining treatment. We describe the natural history of COVID-DoC and investigate its associated brain connectivity profile. METHODS In a prospective, longitudinal study, we screened consecutive patients with COVID-19 at our institution. We enrolled critically ill adult patients with a DoC unexplained by sedation or structural brain injury, and who were planned to undergo a brain MRI. We performed resting state functional MRI and diffusion MRI to evaluate functional and structural connectivity, as compared to healthy controls and patients with DoC resulting from severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). We assessed the recovery of consciousness (command-following) and functional outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended [GOSE] and the Disability Rating Scale [DRS]) at hospital discharge, three months post-discharge, and six months post-discharge. We also explored whether clinical variables were associated with recovery from COVID-DoC. RESULTS After screening 1,105 patients with COVID-19, we enrolled twelve with COVID-DoC. The median age was 63.5 years [interquartile range 55-76.3]. Excluding one who died shortly after enrollment, all of the remaining eleven patients recovered consciousness, after 0-25 days (median 7 [5-14.5]) following the cessation of continuous intravenous sedation. At discharge, all surviving patients remained dependent - median GOSE 3 [1-3], median DRS 23 [16-30]. However ultimately, except for two patients with severe polyneuropathy, all returned home with normal cognition and minimal disability - at three months, median GOSE 3 [3-3], median DRS 7 [5-13]; at six months, median GOSE 4 [4-5], median DRS 3 [3-5]. Ten patients with COVID-DoC underwent advanced neuroimaging; functional and structural brain connectivity in COVID-DoC was diminished compared to healthy controls, and structural connectivity was comparable to patients with severe TBI. DISCUSSION Patients who survived invariably recovered consciousness after COVID-DoC. Though disability was common following hospitalization, functional status improved over the ensuing months. While future research is necessary, these prospective findings inform the prognosis and pathophysiology of COVID-DoC. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04476589, submitted 7/2020, first enrolled 7/20/2020, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04476589.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Fischer
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA .,Division of Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology, Brigham & Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Samuel B Snider
- Division of Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology, Brigham & Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Megan E Barra
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.,Department of Pharmacy, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - William R Sanders
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Otto Rapalino
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Pamela Schaefer
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Andrea S Foulkes
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, MA
| | - Brian L Edlow
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.,Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Barra ME, Edlow BL, Lund JT, DeSanctis KS, Vetrano J, Reilly-Tremblay C, Zhang ER, Bodien YG, Brown EN, Solt K. Stability of extemporaneously prepared preservative-free methylphenidate 5 mg/mL intravenous solution. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2021; 79:359-363. [PMID: 34788364 DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxab420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
DISCLAIMER In an effort to expedite the publication of articles , AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. PURPOSE To advance the implementation of consciousness-promoting therapies in patients with acute disorders of consciousness, the availability of potential therapeutic agents in formulations suitable for administration in hospitalized patients in the presence of complex comorbid conditions is paramount. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term stability of extemporaneously prepared preservative-free methylphenidate hydrochloride (HCl) 5 mg/mL intravenous solution for experimental use. METHODS A methylphenidate 5 mg/mL solution was prepared under proper aseptic techniques with Methylphenidate Hydrochloride, USP, powder mixed in sterile water for solution. Methylphenidate HCl 5 mg/mL solution was sterilized by filtration technique under USP <797>-compliant conditions. Samples were stored refrigerated (2-8°C) and analyzed at approximately days 1, 30, 60, 90, 180, and 365. At each time point, chemical and physical stability were evaluated by visual inspection, pH measurement, membrane filtration procedure, turbidometric or photometric technique, and high-performance liquid chromatography analysis. RESULTS Over the 1-year study period, the samples retained 96.76% to 102.04% of the initial methylphenidate concentration. There was no significant change in the visual appearance, pH level, or particulate matter during the study period. The sterility of samples was maintained and endotoxin levels were undetectable throughout the 1-year stability period. CONCLUSION Extemporaneously prepared preservative-free methylphenidate 5 mg/mL intravenous solution was physically and chemically stable at 32, 61, 95, 186, and 365 days when stored in amber glass vials at refrigerated temperatures (2-8°C).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan E Barra
- Department of Pharmacy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brian L Edlow
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - James T Lund
- Department of Pharmacy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - John Vetrano
- Department of Pharmacy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Edlyn R Zhang
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emery N Brown
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
- The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ken Solt
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Coffey BJ, Threlkeld ZD, Foulkes AS, Bodien YG, Edlow BL. Reemergence of the language network during recovery from severe traumatic brain injury: A pilot functional MRI study. Brain Inj 2021; 35:1552-1562. [PMID: 34546806 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2021.1972455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE We hypothesized that, in patients with acute severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) who recover basic language function, speech-evoked blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) functional MRI (fMRI) responses within the canonical language network increase over the first 6 months post-injury. RESEARCH DESIGN We conducted a prospective, longitudinal fMRI pilot study of adults with acute severe TBI admitted to the intensive care unit. We also enrolled age- and sex-matched healthy subjects. METHODS AND PROCEDURES We evaluated BOLD signal in bilateral superior temporal gyrus (STG) and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) regions of interest acutely and approximately 6 months post-injury. Given evidence that regions outside the canonical language network contribute to language processing, we also performed exploratory whole-brain analyses. MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS Of the 16 patients enrolled, eight returned for follow-up fMRI, all of whom recovered basic language function. We observed speech-evoked longitudinal BOLD increases in the left STG, but not in the right STG, right IFG, or left IFG. Whole-brain analysis revealed increases in the right supramarginal and middle temporal gyri but no differences between patients and healthy subjects (n = 16). CONCLUSION This pilot study suggests that, in patients with severe TBI who recover llanguage function, speech-evoked responses in bihemispheric language-processing cortex reemerge by 6 months post-injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian J Coffey
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Neurology, University of Florida Health, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Zachary D Threlkeld
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Neurology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Andrea S Foulkes
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brian L Edlow
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Boase K, Machamer J, Temkin NR, Dikmen S, Wilson L, Nelson LD, Barber J, Bodien YG, Giacino JT, Markowitz AJ, McCrea MA, Satris G, Stein MB, Taylor SR, Manley GT. Central Curation of Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended Data: Lessons Learned from TRACK-TBI. J Neurotrauma 2021; 38:2419-2434. [PMID: 33832330 PMCID: PMC8390785 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2020.7528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) in its original or extended (GOSE) form is the most widely used assessment of global disability in traumatic brain injury (TBI) research. Several publications have reported concerns about assessor scoring inconsistencies, but without documentation of contributing factors. We reviewed 6801 GOSE assessments collected longitudinally, across 18 sites in the 5-year, observational Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) study. We recorded error rates (i.e., corrections to a section or an overall rating) based on site assessor documentation and categorized scoring issues, which then informed further training. In cohort 1 (n = 1261; February 2014 to May 2016), 24% of GOSEs had errors identified by central review. In cohort 2 (n = 1130; June 2016 to July 2018), acquired after curation of cohort 1 data, feedback, and further training of site assessors, the error rate was reduced to 10%. GOSE sections associated with the most frequent interpretation and scoring difficulties included whether current functioning represented a change from pre-injury (466 corrected ratings in cohort 1; 62 in cohort 2), defining dependency in the home and community (163 corrections in cohort 1; three in cohort 2) and return to work/school (72 corrections in cohort 1; 35 in cohort 2). These results highlight the importance of central review in improving consistency across sites and over time. Establishing clear scoring criteria, coupled with ongoing guidance and feedback to data collectors, is essential to avoid scoring errors and resultant misclassification, which carry potential to result in "failure" of clinical trials that rely on the GOSE as their primary outcome measure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim Boase
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Joan Machamer
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Nancy R. Temkin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Sureyya Dikmen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Lindsay Wilson
- Division of Psychology, School of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom
| | - Lindsay D. Nelson
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Jason Barber
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Yelena G. Bodien
- Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joseph T. Giacino
- Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Amy J. Markowitz
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Michael A. McCrea
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Gabriela Satris
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Murray B. Stein
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Sabrina R. Taylor
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Geoffrey T. Manley
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Young MJ, Bodien YG, Giacino JT, Fins JJ, Truog RD, Hochberg LR, Edlow BL. The neuroethics of disorders of consciousness: a brief history of evolving ideas. Brain 2021; 144:3291-3310. [PMID: 34347037 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awab290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Neuroethical questions raised by recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of disorders of consciousness are rapidly expanding, increasingly relevant, and yet underexplored. The aim of this thematic review is to provide a clinically applicable framework for understanding the current taxonomy of disorders of consciousness and to propose an approach to identifying and critically evaluating actionable neuroethical issues that are frequently encountered in research and clinical care for this vulnerable population. Increased awareness of these issues and clarity about opportunities for optimizing ethically-responsible care in this domain are especially timely given recent surges in critically ill patients with unusually prolonged disorders of consciousness associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) around the world. We begin with an overview of the field of neuroethics: what it is, its history and evolution in the context of biomedical ethics at large. We then explore nomenclature used in disorders of consciousness, covering categories proposed by the American Academy of Neurology, the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research, including definitions of terms such as coma, the vegetative state, unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, minimally conscious state, covert consciousness, and the confusional state. We discuss why these definitions matter, and why there has been such evolution in this nosology over the years, from Jennett and Plum in 1972 to the Multi-Society Task Force in 1994, the Aspen Working Group in 2002 and up until the 2018 American and 2020 European Disorders of Consciousness guidelines. We then move to a discussion of clinical aspects of disorders of consciousness, the natural history of recovery, and ethical issues that arise within the context of caring for persons with disorders of consciousness. We conclude with a discussion of key challenges associated with assessing residual consciousness in disorders of consciousness, potential solutions and future directions, including integration of crucial disability rights perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Young
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114,USA.,Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114,USA.,Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | | | - Joseph J Fins
- Division of Medical Ethics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Robert D Truog
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Leigh R Hochberg
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114,USA.,School of Engineering and Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI 02906, USA.,VA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI 02908, USA
| | - Brian L Edlow
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114,USA.,Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
McCrea MA, Giacino JT, Barber J, Temkin NR, Nelson LD, Levin HS, Dikmen S, Stein M, Bodien YG, Boase K, Taylor SR, Vassar M, Mukherjee P, Robertson C, Diaz-Arrastia R, Okonkwo DO, Markowitz AJ, Manley GT, Adeoye O, Badjatia N, Bullock MR, Chesnut R, Corrigan JD, Crawford K, Duhaime AC, Ellenbogen R, Feeser VR, Ferguson AR, Foreman B, Gardner R, Gaudette E, Goldman D, Gonzalez L, Gopinath S, Gullapalli R, Hemphill JC, Hotz G, Jain S, Keene CD, Korley FK, Kramer J, Kreitzer N, Lindsell C, Machamer J, Madden C, Martin A, McAllister T, Merchant R, Ngwenya LB, Noel F, Nolan A, Palacios E, Perl D, Puccio A, Rabinowitz M, Rosand J, Sander A, Satris G, Schnyer D, Seabury S, Sherer M, Toga A, Valadka A, Wang K, Yue JK, Yuh E, Zafonte R. Functional Outcomes Over the First Year After Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the Prospective, Longitudinal TRACK-TBI Study. JAMA Neurol 2021; 78:982-992. [PMID: 34228047 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.2043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Importance Moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (msTBI) is a major cause of death and disability in the US and worldwide. Few studies have enabled prospective, longitudinal outcome data collection from the acute to chronic phases of recovery after msTBI. Objective To prospectively assess outcomes in major areas of life function at 2 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months after msTBI. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study, as part of the Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) study, was conducted at 18 level 1 trauma centers in the US from February 2014 to August 2018 and prospectively assessed longitudinal outcomes, with follow-up to 12 months postinjury. Participants were patients with msTBI (Glasgow Coma Scale scores 3-12) extracted from a larger group of patients with mild, moderate, or severe TBI who were enrolled in TRACK-TBI. Data analysis took place from October 2019 to April 2021. Exposures Moderate or severe TBI. Main Outcomes and Measures The Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) and Disability Rating Scale (DRS) were used to assess global functional status 2 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months postinjury. Scores on the GOSE were dichotomized to determine favorable (scores 4-8) vs unfavorable (scores 1-3) outcomes. Neurocognitive testing and patient reported outcomes at 12 months postinjury were analyzed. Results A total of 484 eligible patients were included from the 2679 individuals in the TRACK-TBI study. Participants with severe TBI (n = 362; 283 men [78.2%]; median [interquartile range] age, 35.5 [25-53] years) and moderate TBI (n = 122; 98 men [80.3%]; median [interquartile range] age, 38 [25-53] years) were comparable on demographic and premorbid variables. At 2 weeks postinjury, 36 of 290 participants with severe TBI (12.4%) and 38 of 93 participants with moderate TBI (41%) had favorable outcomes (GOSE scores 4-8); 301 of 322 in the severe TBI group (93.5%) and 81 of 103 in the moderate TBI group (78.6%) had moderate disability or worse on the DRS (total score ≥4). By 12 months postinjury, 142 of 271 with severe TBI (52.4%) and 54 of 72 with moderate TBI (75%) achieved favorable outcomes. Nearly 1 in 5 participants with severe TBI (52 of 270 [19.3%]) and 1 in 3 with moderate TBI (23 of 71 [32%]) reported no disability (DRS score 0) at 12 months. Among participants in a vegetative state at 2 weeks, 62 of 79 (78%) regained consciousness and 14 of 56 with available data (25%) regained orientation by 12 months. Conclusions and Relevance In this study, patients with msTBI frequently demonstrated major functional gains, including recovery of independence, between 2 weeks and 12 months postinjury. Severe impairment in the short term did not portend poor outcomes in a substantial minority of patients with msTBI. When discussing prognosis during the first 2 weeks after injury, clinicians should be particularly cautious about making early, definitive prognostic statements suggesting poor outcomes and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in patients with msTBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A McCrea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
| | - Joseph T Giacino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jason Barber
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Nancy R Temkin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Lindsay D Nelson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
| | - Harvey S Levin
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Sureyya Dikmen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Murray Stein
- Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, San Diego
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kim Boase
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Sabrina R Taylor
- Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Mary Vassar
- Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Pratik Mukherjee
- Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Claudia Robertson
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | | | - David O Okonkwo
- Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Amy J Markowitz
- Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Geoffrey T Manley
- Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Sonia Jain
- University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
| | | | | | - Joel Kramer
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Amber Nolan
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Eva Palacios
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Daniel Perl
- Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Ava Puccio
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Arthur Toga
- University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | | | | | - John K Yue
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
| | - Esther Yuh
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
| | | |
Collapse
|