1
|
Lin HJ, Lan YT, Silka MJ, Halnon NJ, Villa-Lopez E, Arenas N, Escobedo F, Montoya R, Valdez S, Rajabi Shishvan O, Sedano S, Marr EH, Lauzon M, Moosa AS, Ko KJ, Shoji EC, Clark AM, Smith LM, Criley JM, Grody WW, Chen YDI, Taylor KD, Guo X, Soyata T, Rotter JI, Chien T, Chou P, Chang RK. Home use of a compact, 12‑lead ECG recording system for newborns. J Electrocardiol 2019; 53:89-94. [PMID: 30716528 DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.01.086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2018] [Revised: 01/07/2019] [Accepted: 01/23/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An easy-to-operate ECG recorder should be useful for newborn screening for heart conditions, by health care workers - or parents. We developed a one-piece electrode strip and a compact, 12‑lead ECG recorder for newborns. METHOD We enrolled 2582 newborns in a trial to assess abilities of parents to record a 12‑lead ECG on their infants (2-4 weeks-old). Newborns were randomized to recordings by parents (1290) or our staff (1292 controls). Educational backgrounds of parents varied, including 64% with no more than a high school diploma. RESULTS For newborns randomized to parent recorded ECGs, 94% of parents completed a 10-minute recording. However, 42.6% asked for verbal help, and 12.7% needed physical help. ECG quality was the same for recordings by parents versus staff. CONCLUSIONS By use of a one-piece electrode strip and a compact recorder, 87% of parents recorded diagnostic quality ECGs on their newborn infants, with minimal assistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry J Lin
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA; Institute for Translational Genomics and Population Sciences, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Yueh-Tze Lan
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA, USA
| | - Michael J Silka
- Division of Cardiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nancy J Halnon
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Eva Villa-Lopez
- Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Nataly Arenas
- Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Fabian Escobedo
- Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Ryan Montoya
- Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Sarah Valdez
- Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Omid Rajabi Shishvan
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Sandra Sedano
- Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Emily H Marr
- Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Marie Lauzon
- Institute for Translational Genomics and Population Sciences, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - A S Moosa
- St. Francis Medical Center, Lynwood, CA, USA
| | - Kimberly J Ko
- Division of Hospitalist Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Elaine C Shoji
- Department of Pediatrics, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Providence Little Company of Mary Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA
| | - Alexandra M Clark
- Department of Pediatrics, Riverside University Health System - Medical Center, Moreno Valley, CA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Lynne M Smith
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, CA, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - John Michael Criley
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, CA, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Wayne W Grody
- Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Pediatrics, and Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Yii-Der Ida Chen
- Institute for Translational Genomics and Population Sciences, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA; Division of Genomic Outcomes, Department of Pediatrics, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA; Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kent D Taylor
- Institute for Translational Genomics and Population Sciences, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA; Division of Genomic Outcomes, Department of Pediatrics, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Xiuqing Guo
- Institute for Translational Genomics and Population Sciences, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA; Division of Genomic Outcomes, Department of Pediatrics, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Tolga Soyata
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Jerome I Rotter
- Institute for Translational Genomics and Population Sciences, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA; Division of Genomic Outcomes, Department of Pediatrics, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA; Departments of Human Genetics, Medicine, and Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Tingchou Chien
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The Henry Samueli School of Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Pai Chou
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The Henry Samueli School of Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Ruey-Kang Chang
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA; David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Phan DQ, Silka MJ, Lan YT, Chang RKR. Comparison of formulas for calculation of the corrected QT interval in infants and young children. J Pediatr 2015; 166:960-4.e1-2. [PMID: 25648293 PMCID: PMC4380641 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.12.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2014] [Revised: 10/27/2014] [Accepted: 12/15/2014] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare 4 heart rate correction formulas for calculation of the rate corrected QT (QTc) interval among infants and young children. STUDY DESIGN R-R and QT intervals were measured from digital electrocardiograms. QTc were calculated with the Bazett, Fridericia, Hodges, and Framingham formulas. QTc vs R-R graphs were plotted, and slopes of the regression lines compared. Slopes of QTc-R-R regression lines close to zero indicate consistent QT corrections over the range of heart rates. RESULTS We reviewed electrocardiograms from 702 children, with 233 (33%) <1 year of age and 567 (81%) <2 years. The average heart rate was 122 ± 20 bpm (median 121 bpm). The slopes of the QTc-R-R regression lines for the 4 correction formulas were -0.019 (Bazett); 0.1028 (Fridericia); -0.1241 (Hodges); and 0.2748 (Framingham). With the Bazett formula, a QTc >460 ms was 2 SDs above the mean, compared with "prolonged" QTc values of 414, 443, and 353 ms for the Fridericia, Hodges, and Framingham formulas, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The Bazett formula calculated the most consistent QTc; 460 ms is the best threshold for prolonged QTc. The study supports continued use of the Bazett formula for infants and children and differs from the use of the Fridericia correction during clinical trials of new medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek Q. Phan
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA
| | - Michael J. Silka
- Division of Cardiology, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Yueh-Tze Lan
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, CA
| | - Ruey-Kang R. Chang
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chang RKR, Lan YT, Silka MJ, Morrow H, Kwong A, Smith-Lang J, Wallerstein R, Lin HJ. Genetic variants for long QT syndrome among infants and children from a statewide newborn hearing screening program cohort. J Pediatr 2014; 164:590-5.e1-3. [PMID: 24388587 PMCID: PMC3943925 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2013] [Revised: 10/01/2013] [Accepted: 11/06/2013] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Autosomal recessive long QT syndrome (LQTS), or Jervell and Lange-Nielsen syndrome (JLNS), can be associated with sensorineural hearing loss. We aimed to explore newborn hearing screening combined with electrocardiograms (ECGs) for early JLNS detection. STUDY DESIGN In California, we conducted statewide, prospective ECG screening of children ≤ 6 years of age with unilateral or bilateral, severe or profound, sensorineural or mixed hearing loss. Families were identified through newborn hearing screening and interviewed about medical and family histories. Twelve-lead ECGs were obtained. Those with positive histories or heart rate corrected QT (QTc) intervals ≥ 450 ms had repeat ECGs. DNA sequencing of 12 LQTS genes was performed for repeat QTc intervals ≥ 450 ms. RESULTS We screened 707 subjects by ECGs (number screened/number of responses = 91%; number of responses/number of families who were mailed invitations = 54%). Of these, 73 had repeat ECGs, and 19 underwent gene testing. No subject had homozygous or compound heterozygous LQTS mutations, as in JLNS. However, 3 individuals (with QTc intervals of 472, 457, and 456 ms, respectively) were heterozygous for variants that cause truncation or missplicing: 2 in KCNQ1 (c.1343dupC or p.Glu449Argfs*14; c.1590+1G>A or p.Glu530sp) and 1 in SCN5A (c.5872C>T or p.Arg1958*). CONCLUSIONS In contrast to reports of JLNS in up to 4% of children with sensorineural hearing loss, we found no examples of JLNS. Because the 3 variants identified were unrelated to hearing, they likely represent the prevalence of potential LQTS mutations in the general population. Further studies are needed to define consequences of such mutations and assess the overall prevalence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruey-Kang R. Chang
- Department of Pediatrics, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center and Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, California
| | | | - Michael J. Silka
- Children’s Hospital Los Angeles – University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Hallie Morrow
- California Department of Health Care Services, Sacramento, CA
| | - Alan Kwong
- Department of Pediatrics, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center and Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, California
| | | | | | - Henry J. Lin
- Department of Pediatrics, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center and Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Torrance, California
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jiang JK, Lan YT, Lin TC, Chen WS, Yang SH, Wang HS, Chang SC, Lin JK. Primary vs. delayed resection for obstructive left-sided colorectal cancer: impact of surgery on patient outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51:306-11. [PMID: 18183462 DOI: 10.1007/s10350-007-9173-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2007] [Revised: 06/06/2007] [Accepted: 08/25/2007] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE By comparing surgical outcomes between primary and delayed resection, we addressed whether and how surgical strategies impacted prognosis of patients with left-sided colorectal cancer underwent emergency curative resection. METHODS Between January 1980 and December 2002, a total of 143 patients were identified who presented with obstructive left-sided colorectal cancer and received emergency curative resection in Taipei Veterans General Hospital. Patients were stratified according to the timing of tumor resection into two groups: primary resection and delayed resection. Demographic data of the patients, characteristics of the tumors, and short-term and long-term outcomes were analyzed and compared between the two groups. RESULTS The demographic data and tumor characteristics did not differ between the two groups except for more rectal cancers in the delayed resection group (P=0.021). Primary resection group had a higher anastomotic leakage rate (P=0.017) and a trend toward a higher mortality rate, which did not reach statistical significance (P=0.063). The median follow-up intervals were similar (60.4 vs. 58.3 months; P=0.79). The median survival tended to be longer in delayed resection group (66 vs. 105 months; P=0.088). Overall five-year and ten-year survival for primary resection were 43.7 and 31.9 percent, respectively, compared with 67.2 and 53.2 percent, respectively, for delayed resection. CONCLUSIONS Delayed resection seems to be a safer procedure and provided a better oncologic outcome compared with primary resection in obstructive left-sided colorectal cancer under emergency situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J K Jiang
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, and National Yang-Ming University, School of Medicine, No. 201, Sec. 2, Shih-Pai Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, 11217.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|