1
|
Vickery CE, Quinn JE. Forest, climate, and policy literature lacks acknowledgement of environmental justice, diversity, equity, and inclusion. J Environ Manage 2024; 358:120804. [PMID: 38593736 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/30/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
Forests boast essential resources and potential to mitigate climate change, meriting the development of conservation policies on all governmental scales. Ecosystem services provided by forests, including biodiversity, air quality, and food and fuel production, make forests valuable assets for climate-vulnerable communities that often lack the means to cope with ecosystem service degradation resulting from climate change. Historically, these vulnerable communities are previously marginalized and socio-economically limited, and climate change augments already-existing injustices. Policy discussions around managing forests and carbon, therefore, must consider environmental justice as well as diversity, equity, and inclusion to better meet the needs of all constituents. Using R, we perform a review of forest, climate, and policy peer-reviewed literature published between 2018 and 2021 for prevalence of topics related to diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice (DEIJ). We select DEIJ terms a priori and a posteriori based on our understanding of DEIJ and common considerations of the literature. Out of 2891 unique articles, 15.7% of literature mentioned at least one DEIJ term in the title, keyword list, or abstract. We identify which journals have published DEIJ literature more often in the context of forest, climate, and policy, and we perform a co-occurrence analysis of additional common themes. Concepts such as ecosystem services and economics appeared often in the literature, as well as REDD+ as a specifically mentioned policy. We call for increased consideration of DEIJ in forest, climate, and policy discussions and literature, as vulnerable communities historically have been excluded from and victimized by the conversations held among large, economically motivated entities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline E Vickery
- Department of Earth, Environmental, and Sustainability Sciences, Furman University, Greenville, SC, USA.
| | - John E Quinn
- Department of Biology, Furman University, Greenville, SC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gupta P, Rouffy-Ly B, Rohrer-Herold K, Koch K, Rao N, Poulussen C, Brearley L, Abou-Taleb H, Rajan D. Assessing the interactions of people and policy-makers in social participation for health: an inventory of participatory governance measures from a rapid systematic literature review. Int J Equity Health 2023; 22:240. [PMID: 37978389 PMCID: PMC10657134 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-023-01918-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Social participation, also termed stakeholder voice, is an important component of health system governance. Increased interactions between the community and policy makers could facilitate a more responsive health system that targets the needs of the community better. Recently, the World Health Organization (WHO) published a handbook on social participation that identified five key themes for ministries of health to consider when engaging the input of the community. In this rapid systematic literature review, we aimed to identify quantitative and qualitative measures that have been used to assess aspects of social participation involving people and policy makers. We identified 172 measures from 48 studies from countries in all six WHO regions. These measures were categorized by all five themes from the handbook on social participation and these measures are linked to 27 concepts. This rapid review found that the focus of measures is largely on the existence of participation-be it by the general population or specific vulnerable groups-rather than on the quality of their participation. The measures in this inventory may be useful for ministries of health and other key stakeholders to use when developing methods to assess and encourage social participation in their context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prateek Gupta
- Special Programme On Primary Health Care, World Health Organization, Av. Appia 20, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.
- Universal Health Coverage/Health Systems Department, World Health Organization, Magless El Shaab, PO Box No. 146, Cairo, 11516, Egypt.
| | - Benjamin Rouffy-Ly
- Special Programme On Primary Health Care, World Health Organization, Av. Appia 20, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Katja Rohrer-Herold
- Special Programme On Primary Health Care, World Health Organization, Av. Appia 20, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Kira Koch
- Special Programme On Primary Health Care, World Health Organization, Av. Appia 20, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Neethi Rao
- Special Programme On Primary Health Care, World Health Organization, Av. Appia 20, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Charlotte Poulussen
- Special Programme On Primary Health Care, World Health Organization, Av. Appia 20, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Lara Brearley
- Special Programme On Primary Health Care, World Health Organization, Av. Appia 20, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Hala Abou-Taleb
- Universal Health Coverage/Health Systems Department, World Health Organization, Magless El Shaab, PO Box No. 146, Cairo, 11516, Egypt
| | - Dheepa Rajan
- European Observatory On Health Systems and Policies, Place Victor Horta/Victor Hortaplein, 40/10, 1060, Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Newig J, Jager NW, Challies E, Kochskämper E. Does stakeholder participation improve environmental governance? Evidence from a meta-analysis of 305 case studies. Glob Environ Change 2023; 82:102705. [PMID: 37829149 PMCID: PMC10565671 DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
Participation and collaboration of citizens and organized stakeholders in public decision-making is widely believed to improve environmental governance outputs. However, empirical evidence on the benefits of participatory governance is largely scattered across small-N case studies. To synthesize the available case-based evidence, we conducted a broad case-based meta-analysis across 22 Western democracies, including 305 individual cases of public environmental decision-making. We asked: How do 'more' participatory decision-making processes compare against 'less' participatory ones in fostering - or hindering - strong environmental governance outputs, (i.e. environmental provisions in plans, agreements or permits)? Which design features make a difference? What role does the decision-making context play? How do results change if we control for the intentions of the leading governmental agency? To capture the central design features of decision-making processes, we distinguish three dimensions of participation: the intensity of communication among participants and process organizers; the extent to which participants can shape decisions ("power delegation"); and the extent to which different stakeholder groups are represented. Our regression analysis yields robust evidence that these three design features of participation impact upon the environmental standard of governance outputs, even when controlling for the goals of governmental agencies. Power delegation is shown to be the most stable predictor of strong environmental outputs. However, communication intensity only predicts the conservation-related standard of outputs, but not the environmental health-related standard of outputs. Participants' environmental stance was another strong predictor, with considerable variation across different contexts. While our results remain broadly stable across a wide range of contexts, certain contextual conditions stood out in shaping the relation between participation and environmental outputs. Overall, our findings can inform the design of participatory processes that deliver governance outputs of a high environmental standard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Newig
- Leuphana University Lüneburg, Institute of Sustainability Governance, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Nicolas W. Jager
- University of Bremen, SOCIUM – Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy, Bremen, Germany
- Hanse Wissenschaftskolleg – Institute for Advanced Study, Hanse Wissenschaftskolleg – Institute for Advanced Study, Delmenhorst, Germany
- Public Administration and Policy Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Edward Challies
- University of Canterbury, School of Earth and Environment, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Elisa Kochskämper
- Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space, Research Group Urban Sustainability Transformations, Erkner, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ben Mesmia H, Rajan D, Bouhafa Chtioui R, Koch K, Jaouadi I, Aboutaleb H, De Courcelles S, Atmani L, Pujos B, Mtiraoui A. The Tunisian experience of participatory health governance: the Societal Dialogue for Health (a qualitative study). Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:84. [PMID: 37641114 PMCID: PMC10463380 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-00996-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tunisia has been engaged in the Societal Dialogue (SD) for Health process since 2012, a participatory health governance process aimed at bringing in people's voice into health policy-making. Its first success was the recently released National Health Policy 2030. This paper aims to document the SD process and to bring out the lessons learned to inspire other countries. METHODS This study was based essentially on a qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with citizen jury members and health experts that took place from May to September 2018. The qualitative analysis adopted an inductive-deductive approach according to a cross-matrix between the themes of the interview of the two groups of interviewees. RESULTS The qualitative analysis of the data highlighted that the Societal Dialogue created a health democracy dynamic with inclusive dialogue spaces for the population, communities, and civil society to participate in health system design. It constituted a multi-actor and multidisciplinary coordination platform to increase consensus building among actors. Initial government support and high levels of volunteer commitment allowed the process to achieve a certain level of sustainability. However, this process faced and still faces many challenges such as overreliance on volunteers; a crisis of trust; political instability and the lack of an effective communication strategy. These challenges negatively influence the policy uptake of recommendations made by the Societal Dialogue for Health. CONCLUSION The Tunisian societal dialogue experience highlights both the successes and challenges of a structured participatory platform, as well as the effort and perseverance it takes to keep such a process functional and relevant. A key lesson from this study is that this model of participatory health governance eventually reaches a stage where population, community, and civil society participation needs to be more institutionalized within the government routine so that it can credibly feed into health policy review processes and inform decision-makers on a regular basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hela Ben Mesmia
- Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Research Laboratory "Quality of Care and Management of Health LR12ES03", Doctoral Commission "Health Sciences", University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia.
| | - Dheepa Rajan
- World Health Organization European Centre for Health Policy/European Observatory for Health Systems and Policies, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Kira Koch
- World Health Organization Headquarters, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Imen Jaouadi
- High School of Business, Manouba University (ESCT), Manouba, Tunisia
| | - Hala Aboutaleb
- World Health Organization Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, Cairo, Egypt
| | | | - Louisa Atmani
- Paris Institute of Political Science (Sciences Po), Paris, France
| | - Blanche Pujos
- Paris Institute of Political Science (Sciences Po), Paris, France
| | - Ali Mtiraoui
- Faculty of Medicine of Sousse, Research Laboratory "Quality of Care and Management of Health LR12ES03", Doctoral Commission "Health Sciences", University of Sousse, Sousse, Tunisia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Janssen C, Kover I, Kyratsis Y, Kop M, Boland M, Boersma FK, Cremers AL. The corona pandemic and participatory governance: Responding to the vulnerabilities of secondary school students in Europe. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2023; 88:103608. [PMID: 36945362 PMCID: PMC10002677 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Adolescents in secondary schools have limited susceptibility to the SARS-COV-2 virus, but paradoxically are considered to be carrying the highest psychosocial burden during this pandemic. The aim of our European multi-country qualitative research was to investigate the COVID-19 crisis response in secondary schools and the role of national, regional, and local stakeholders in contributing to a participatory governance approach. We carried out 11 months of qualitative fieldwork, which included 90 respondents from the Netherlands, Ireland, and Finland for in-depth interviews and/or group discussions. Participant observation was conducted in four secondary schools to explore the interplay of day-to-day formal and informal practices of crisis governance. Our findings contribute to a better understanding of what efforts were made to facilitate participatory governance and where a bottom-up approach would have served useful in successfully implementing the COVID-19 mitigation strategies. Moreover, we show how these mitigation strategies have led to unintended consequences, such as students' difficulties with isolation and associated mental health problems, and the struggles of socialization when returning to a physical school environment. Our findings highlight the importance of the school environment in the socio-emotional developments of adolescents. We introduce the TAPIC-R model to analyze good governance, advancing the existing TAPIC model with an emphasis on the role of resilience in shaping participatory governance. We argue this is urgently needed during crises to strengthen engagement of the community, including vulnerable groups and achieve positive outcomes within and across policy structures and action domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Janssen
- Faculty of Social Science, Department of Organization Sciences, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - I Kover
- Faculty of Social Science, Department of Organization Sciences, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Y Kyratsis
- Faculty of Social Science, Department of Organization Sciences, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Kop
- Faculty of Social Science, Department of Organization Sciences, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Boland
- National Health Protection Service, Dublin, Ireland
| | - F K Boersma
- Faculty of Social Science, Department of Organization Sciences, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A L Cremers
- Faculty of Social Science, Department of Organization Sciences, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ortiz-Riomalo JF, Koessler AK, Engel S. Fostering collective action through participation in natural resource and environmental management: An integrative and interpretative narrative review using the IAD, NAS and SES frameworks. J Environ Manage 2023; 331:117184. [PMID: 36738636 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2022] [Revised: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Solving humanity's social-environmental challenges calls for collective action by relevant actors. Hence, involving these actors in the policy process has been deemed both necessary and promising. But how and to what extent can participatory policy interventions (PIs) foster collective action for sustainable environmental and natural resource management? Lab and lab-in-the-field experiments on co-operation in the context of collective action challenges (i.e. social dilemmas) and case study research on participatory processes both offer insights into this question but have hitherto mainly remained unconnected. This article reviews insights from these two streams of literature in tandem, synthesising and analysing them using the institutional analysis and development (IAD) framework in combination with the network of action situations (NAS) framework and the social-ecological systems (SES) framework. We thus perform an integrative and interpretative narrative review to draw a richer and more nuanced picture of PIs: their potential impacts, their (institutional and behavioural) mechanisms and challenges, and caveats and recommendations for their design and implementation. Our review shows that PIs can indeed foster collective action by (a) helping the relevant actors craft suitable and legitimate institutional arrangements and (b) addressing and/or influencing actors' attributes of relevance to collective action, namely their individual and shared understandings, beliefs and preferences. To fulfil this potential, the organisers and sponsors of PIs must address and link to the broader context through soundly designed and implemented processes. Complementary follow-up, enforcement and conflict resolution mechanisms are necessary to nurture, reassure and sustain understandings, beliefs and preferences that undergird trust-building and collective action. The conceptual framework developed for the review can help researchers and practitioners further assess these insights, disentangle PIs' mechanisms and impacts, and integrate the research and practice of participatory governance and collective action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Felipe Ortiz-Riomalo
- Department of Environmental Economics, School of Business Administration and Economics and Institute of Environmental Systems Research (IUSF Research Centre), Osnabrück University, Germany.
| | | | - Stefanie Engel
- Department of Environmental Economics, School of Business Administration and Economics and Institute of Environmental Systems Research (IUSF Research Centre), Osnabrück University, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rochford F. 'Mind-forg'd Manacles': Virtual Experience and Innocent Publication. Int J Semiot Law 2023; 36:1-14. [PMID: 36843873 PMCID: PMC9942057 DOI: 10.1007/s11196-023-09971-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
In Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Voller ('Voller') the Australian High Court held that media companies maintaining Facebook comment pages could be liable for the defamatory posts of commenters on those sites. The decision focussed entirely on whether, by maintaining the Facebook page, the companies had 'published' the statements of commenters. Hearings on other aspects of the tort litigation continue. This paper considers the implications of the tort of defamation on public participation on political will formation where, as is increasingly the case, the participation occurs virtually. Australian law has already tackled the law of defamation as a threat to freedom of political communication; Voller continues the jurisprudence by considering whether hosting an online forum for debate amounts to publication. The more recent High Court judgment in Google LLC v Defteros demonstrated the necessity of the law to align the 'acts' necessary to found legal action with the new environment of automated search engines. The troubled intersection of dematerialised practices of political and cultural discourse and jurisdictionally bound laws of defamation challenges participatory governance as tribes form and dissolve and shift between geographical interests. Defamation in Australia is a tort of strict liability; and, absenting applicable defences, any participation in communication is sufficient to make that participant a publisher and a party to the defamation. The online environment stretches words across geographical and jurisdictional boundaries, but it also stretches and contorts concepts of fault and responsibility. Participatory digital cultural practices integrating users in the creation of cultural heritage simultaneously draw participants into transgressions, both cultural and legal, which are amplified by the medium. Questions of collective guilt, 'shades' of moral responsibility and disproportionality between blameworthiness and legal liability challenge laws formulated for the printing press but now deployed in the online environment. In this way the digitized participatory environment presents deep challenges to law and legal systems, which are chained to geography. This paper considers the concept of innocent publication in the context of the digitized participatory environment and the way in which the virtual experience is dissolving concepts of geographically defined jurisdictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francine Rochford
- School of Law, La Trobe University Bundoora, Melbourne, Vic Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Calderon JS, Perry KE, Thi SS, Stevens LL. Innovating tuberculosis prevention to achieve universal health coverage in the Philippines. Lancet Reg Health West Pac 2022; 29:100609. [PMID: 36605879 PMCID: PMC9808427 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
To contribute to tuberculosis (TB) elimination, TB preventive treatment (TPT) should integrate innovative approaches including tele-contact investigation (TCI), mathematical modelling, and participatory governance. Aligning with the World Health Organisation's primary health care framework, supply is provided by the provincial health system, demand is cultivated by the community, while governance is represented by the governor, who oversees the health leadership structure, local policies, and allocation of resources. A healthy dynamic between these three components is required to achieve universal health coverage (UHC). Because of their potential to integrate health systems and engage communities, primary health care principles underpin an effective approach to TB prevention. First, the provincial health system should connect with the community through TCI to transform the status quo of passive service delivery. Second, community participation should strengthen the linkage between the health system and governance, which ensures that community action plans are aligned with provincial TPT targets. Third, governance should leverage mathematical modelling to allocate resources to those with greatest need. Central to this is a reliable TB information system that should validate a robust mathematical model to measure cost-effectiveness of the intervention. Collectively, this holistic approach to TB prevention could provide a proof-of-concept that investing in primary health care is the key to UHC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sein Sein Thi
- FHI 360 Asia Pacific Regional Office, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bailey A, Mujune V. Multi-level change strategies for health: learning from people-centered advocacy in Uganda. Int J Equity Health 2022; 21:143. [PMID: 36171604 PMCID: PMC9520791 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-022-01717-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The paper analyzes how the Accountability Can Transform Health (ACT Health) program activated bottom-up citizen action to secure government responses and more accountable health services in Uganda. The ACT Health program had two phases-Phase 1 focused on a community-level intervention studied with a randomized control trial, and Phase 2 supported citizen-led advocacy targeting government officials across multiple levels. The focus of this paper is an analysis of Phase 2, when the "people-centered advocacy" approach supported almost 400 community advocates representing 98 health facilities to organize, identify joint advocacy priorities, directly monitor health services, and collaborate on health advocacy campaigns in 18 districts. Most district campaigns focused on the complex, power-laden issue of health worker absenteeism. With a few notable exceptions, iterative cycles of engagement between citizens and the state across multiple levels are infrequently discussed in the formal literature on health accountability. METHODS This paper is based on a comparative, inductive, practitioner-led analysis of program monitoring data from 18 multi-level health advocacy campaigns. The findings emerge from analysis of a "Heat Map," capturing grounded accounts of government responses to community-led advocacy. RESULTS Officials in eight out of 18 districts fulfilled or surpassed commitments made to community advocates. Government responses included: increased monitoring, more downward accountability, countering backlash against advocates, applying sanctions for absent health workers, and increased budget allocations. Advocates' bottom-up advocacy worked in part through triggering top-down responses and activating governmental checks and balances. CONCLUSIONS Methodologically, this article demonstrates the value of analyzing process monitoring and program data to understand outcomes from direct engagement between citizens and the state to improve health services. Survey-based research methods and quantitative analysis may fail to capture signs of government responsiveness and relational outcomes (such as subtle signs of shifting power dynamics) many hope to see from citizen-led accountability efforts. Practitioners' perspectives on how accountability for health emerges in practice are important correctives to much positivist research on accountability, which has a tendency to ignore the complex dynamics and processes of building citizen power.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Bailey
- Accountability Research Center, American University School of International Service, Washington, D.C., USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zaratin P, Bertorello D, Guglielmino R, Devigili D, Brichetto G, Tageo V, Dati G, Kramer S, Battaglia MA, Di Luca M. The MULTI-ACT model: the path forward for participatory and anticipatory governance in health research and care. Health Res Policy Syst 2022; 20:22. [PMID: 35177080 PMCID: PMC8853400 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-022-00825-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has unmasked even more clearly the need for research and care to form a unique and interdependent ecosystem, a concept which has emerged in recent years. In fact, to address urgent and unexpected missions such as “fighting all together the COVID-19 pandemic”, the importance of multi-stakeholder collaboration, mission-oriented governance and flexibility has been demonstrated with great efficacy. This calls for a policy integration strategy and implementation of responsible research and innovation principles in health, promoting an effective cooperation between science and society towards a shared mission. This article describes the MULTI-ACT framework and discusses how its innovative approach, encompassing governance criteria, patient engagement and multidisciplinary impact assessment, represents a holistic management model for structuring responsible research and innovation participatory governance in brain conditions research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Zaratin
- Italian Multiple Sclerosis Society Foundation, Genova, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Gabriele Dati
- Italian Multiple Sclerosis Society Foundation, Genova, Italy
| | | | - Mario Alberto Battaglia
- Italian Multiple Sclerosis Society Foundation, Genova, Italy.,Department of Life Sciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Monica Di Luca
- European Brain Council, Brussels, Belgium.,Laboratory of Pharmacology of Neurodegeneration-DiSFeB at the University of Milano, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sanchez-Youngman S, Boursaw B, Oetzel J, Kastellic S, Devia C, Scarpetta M, Belone L, Wallerstein N. Structural Community Governance: Importance for Community-Academic Research Partnerships. Am J Community Psychol 2021; 67:271-283. [PMID: 33890308 DOI: 10.1002/ajcp.12505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Community based participatory research (CBPR) emphasizes democratic knowledge production and joint action between academics and communities to promote health equity through multilevel interventions. While much scholarship has expressed a commitment to collaboration between researchers and communities, effective methods of structural governance between community and academic stakeholders is under explored. We fill this gap by presenting a conceptual and empirical analysis describing multiple dimensions of structural governance in CBPR partnerships. First, we integrate public policy evidence on effective collaborative governance designs with the emerging literature in CBPR to create a conceptual model. Next, we utilize internet surveys of 179 federally funded community engaged research projects to construct and assess a measure of structural governance across multiple dimensions using confirmatory factor analysis. We explore whether antecedent factors such as the stage of the partnership and ethnic composition are associated with these dimensions and we examine associations for each of these components on positive perceptions of community involvement of research and collective empowerment. We develop a robust multidimensional measure of structural governance that is positively associated with perceptions of increased community involvement in research and collective empowerment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - John Oetzel
- University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Sara Kastellic
- National Indian Child Welfare Association, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mahmood Q, Muntaner C. State-society nexus in Brazil and Venezuela and its effect on participatory governance efforts in health and other sectors. Int J Equity Health 2020; 19:173. [PMID: 33100221 PMCID: PMC7586663 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-020-01278-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Participatory governance is about state and society jointly responsible for political decisions and services. The origins and trajectory of participatory governance initiatives are determined by the socio-political context and specifically the nature of state-society relations. Participation by communities in health interventions has been promoted globally as a strategy to involve citizens in health decision-making but with little success. Such participatory governance in health should be seen not as a strategy alone but as a political project in which organized communities challenge the status-quo in health. Methods This paper deals with the wider socio-political context of participatory governance initiatives. It uses comparative politics literature to analyze socio-political context in Brazil and Venezuela, historically spanning half century prior to 2015, to assess whether it was conducive to participatory governance. The focus of this paper’s analysis particularly is on the socio-political changes that were taking place in Brazil and Venezuela in the decades of the 1980s and 1990s. Those decades formed the bedrock on which the two countries experienced democratization and a socialist transformation that has lasted well into the first decade of the twenty-first century. The situation in the health sector is also described for the two countries showing a parallel trajectory to the wider political context and that reflected the political ideology. For this assessment, we use a contemporary framework called the ‘socialist compass’ which links dynamics of power relations in various ways among three domains of power, namely, state power, economic power, and social power. Socialist compass can be used to assess whether such reforms are moving towards or against social empowerment. Conclusion Our analysis reveals that both Brazil and Venezuela were moving in the direction of social empowerment until at least the year 2015, just before the political turmoil started engulfing the left-leaning regimes in both the countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qamar Mahmood
- International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada.
| | - Carles Muntaner
- Collaborative Program in Global Health, Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hall T, Kakuma R, Palmer L, Minas H, Martins J, Armstrong G. Service user and family participation in mental health policy making in Timor-Leste: a qualitative study with multiple stakeholders. BMC Psychiatry 2020; 20:117. [PMID: 32164633 PMCID: PMC7069011 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-020-02521-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Participation in mental health system strengthening by people with mental health problems and their families is a cornerstone of people-centred mental health care, yet there is a dearth of research about participation from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), particularly from the Asia Pacific region. Hence, this study aimed to assess the current situation, challenges, enabling factors and future actions for service user and family participation in mental health policy making in Timor-Leste. METHODS In-depth interviews were conducted with 85 adults (≥18 years) who were: (1) mental health service users (n = 20) and their families (n = 10); (2) government decision makers (n = 10); (3) mental health and social service providers (n = 23); (4) civil society (n = 9); and (5) other groups (n = 13). Interview data was analysed using framework analysis. RESULTS There was limited service user, family and community participation in mental health policy making in Timor-Leste. Perceptions that policy making is a technical exercise and that people with mental health problems lack cognitive capacity, and a lack of supportive mechanisms challenged participation. Enabling factors were a strong focus on human rights within the social sector, and existing mechanisms for advocacy and representation of people with disabilities in social policy making. Participants suggested bolstering civil society representation of people with mental health problems, and increasing mental health awareness and literacy, including government competencies to facilitate service user participation. CONCLUSION The findings highlight the need for theoretical and practical focus on the role of family within mental health system development in LMICs. Global mental health research and practice should adopt a critical approach to mental health service user and family participation to ensure that the concept and strategies to achieve this are embedded in LMIC knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Hall
- Nossal Institute for Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Exhibition Street, Melbourne, 3004, Australia.
| | - Ritsuko Kakuma
- grid.8991.90000 0004 0425 469XLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK ,grid.1008.90000 0001 2179 088XCentre for Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lisa Palmer
- grid.1008.90000 0001 2179 088XSchool of Geography, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Harry Minas
- grid.1008.90000 0001 2179 088XCentre for Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - João Martins
- grid.449369.5Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, National University of Timor-Leste, Dili, Timor-Leste
| | - Greg Armstrong
- grid.1008.90000 0001 2179 088XNossal Institute for Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Martinez MG, Kohler JC. Civil society participation in the health system: the case of Brazil's Health Councils. Global Health 2016; 12:64. [PMID: 27782831 PMCID: PMC5080747 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-016-0197-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2016] [Accepted: 09/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Brazil created Health Councils to bring together civil society groups, heath professionals, and government officials in the discussion of health policies and health system resource allocation. However, several studies have concluded that Health Councils are not very influential on healthcare policy. This study probes this issue further by providing a descriptive account of some of the challenges civil society face within Brazil’s Health Councils. Methods Forty semi-structured interviews with Health Council Members at the municipal, state and national levels were conducted in June and July of 2013 and May of 2014. The geographical location of the interviewees covered all five regions of Brazil (North, Northeast, Midwest, Southeast, South) for a total of 5 different municipal Health Councils, 8 different state Health Councils, and the national Health Council in Brasilia. Interview data was analyzed using a thematic approach. Results Health Councils are limited by a lack of legal authority, which limits their ability to hold the government accountable for its health service performance, and thus hinders their ability to fulfill their mandate. Equally important, their membership guidelines create a limited level of inclusivity that seems to benefit only well-organized civil society groups. There is a reported lack of support and recognition from the relevant government that negatively affects the degree to which Health Council deliberations are implemented. Other deficiencies include an insufficient amount of resources for Health Council operations, and a lack of training for Health Council members. Lastly, strong individual interests among Health Council members tend to influence how members participate in Health Council discussions. Conclusions Brazil’s Health Councils fall short in providing an effective forum through which civil society can actively participate in health policy and resource allocation decision-making processes. Restrictive membership guidelines, a lack of autonomy from the government, vulnerability to government manipulation, a lack of support and recognition from the government and insufficient training and operational budgets have made Health Council largely a forum for consultation. Our conclusions highlight, that among other issues, Health Councils need to have the legal authority to act independently to promote government accountability, membership guidelines need to be revised in order include members of marginalized groups, and better training of civil society representatives is required to help them make more informed decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha Gabriela Martinez
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 144 College Street, Toronto, ON, M4R 1V5, Canada.
| | - Jillian Clare Kohler
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 144 College Street, Toronto, ON, M4R 1V5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|