Analysis of on-treatment cancer safety events with daprodustat versus conventional erythropoiesis-stimulating agents-post hoc analyses of the ASCEND-ND and ASCEND-D trials

BACKGROUND

The prespecified on-treatment analysis of ASCEND-ND (NCT02876835) raised concerns about a higher relative risk of cancer-related adverse events (AEs) with daprodustat vs darbepoetin in patients with anaemia of CKD. This concern was not observed in dialysis patients in ASCEND-D (NCT02879305).

METHODS

ASCEND-ND randomized 3872 patients to daprodustat or darbepoetin. ASCEND-D randomized 2964 patients to daprodustat or conventional erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). In both studies ESA comparators used different dosing intervals (3/week, 1/week, every 2 or every 4 weeks). The prespecified on-treatment approach examined relative risks for cancer AEs up to the last dose date + 1 day. In these analyses, owing to different dosing intervals between arms, Cox models were used to estimate the daprodustat effect by various follow-up periods (censoring at last dose date, last dose date + dosing intervals, or end of study).

RESULTS

In ASCEND-ND, the safety of daprodustat vs darbepoetin on cancer-related AEs depended on the duration of follow-up after last dose date: hazard ratio (HR) 1.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77, 1.40] at end of study [HR 1.12 (95% CI 0.81, 1.56) for last dose date + dosing interval; HR 1.50 (95% CI 1.04, 2.15) for last dose date + 1 day]. In ASCEND-D, no excess risk of cancer-related AEs was observed with any model examined.

CONCLUSIONS

Prespecified on-treatment analyses for cancer-related AEs appeared to result in biased risk estimates in ASCEND-ND by preferentially under-counting events from patients assigned to darbepoetin. Analyses accounting for longer darbepoetin dosing intervals, or extending follow-up, resulted in attenuation of effect estimates towards neutrality, similar to ASCEND-D, where ESA comparator dosing intervals are closer to daprodustat.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The ASCEND-ND trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02876835); the ASCEND-D trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02879305).

The ASCEND-NHQ trial found positive effects of daprodustat on hemoglobin and quality of life in patients with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease

The ASCEND-NHQ trial evaluated the effects of daprodustat on hemoglobin and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36) Vitality score (fatigue) in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD) Stages 3-5, hemoglobin 8.5-10.0 g/dl, transferrin saturation 15% or more, and ferritin 50 ng/ml or more without recent erythropoiesis-stimulating agent use were randomized (1:1) to oral daprodustat or placebo to achieve and maintain target hemoglobin of 11-12 g/dl over 28 weeks. The primary endpoint was the mean change in hemoglobin between baseline and the evaluation period (Weeks 24-28). Principal secondary endpoints were proportion of participants with a 1 g/dl or more increase in hemoglobin and mean change in the vitality score between baseline and Week 28. Outcome superiority was tested (one-sided alpha level of 0.025) among 614 randomized participants. The adjusted mean change in hemoglobin from baseline to the evaluation period was greater with daprodustat (1.58 vs 0.19 g/dl). The adjusted mean treatment difference (AMD) was significant at 1.40 g/dl (95% confidence interval 1.23, 1.56). A greater proportion of participants receiving daprodustat showed a significant 1 g/dl or more increase in hemoglobin from baseline (77% vs 18%). The mean SF-36 Vitality score increased by 7.3 and 1.9 points with daprodustat and placebo, respectively; a significant 5.4 point Week 28 ADM increase. Adverse event rates were similar (69% vs 71%); relative risk 0.98, (95% confidence interval 0.88, 1.09). Thus, in participants with CKD Stages 3-5, daprodustat resulted in a significant increase in hemoglobin and improvement in fatigue without an increase in the overall frequency of adverse events.

Regional Variation of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent Hyporesponsiveness in the Global Daprodustat Dialysis Study (ASCEND-D)

INTRODUCTION

Hyporesponsiveness to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) affects 10-15% of the chronic dialysis population. We explored baseline characteristics and predictors of ESA hyporesponsiveness in a global randomized cardiovascular outcomes study comparing an investigational hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor (HIF-PHI), daprodustat, with conventional ESA treatment.

METHODS

ASCEND-D (NCT02879305) recruited 2964 chronic dialysis patients receiving ESA treatment (standardized to weekly intravenous [IV] epoetin) who were iron replete at baseline. The primary ESA hyporesponsiveness definition was an ESA Resistance Index (ERI, ESA Units/kg/week/hemoglobin g/l) ≥2 or IV standardized ESA dose ≥450 Units/kg/week. Predictors of ESA hyporesponsiveness were determined using a multivariable regression model. Alternative hyporesponder definitions were explored.

RESULTS

Using the primary definition, 354 (12%) patients were ESA hyporesponsive. Geographic region, notably Latin America, lower baseline body mass index and transferrin saturation, younger age, lower albumin concentration, and a higher baseline IV iron dose were identified as strongly associated (P < 0.001) with ESA hyporesponsiveness. Additional predictors of ESA hyporesponsiveness included female sex (P = 0.010), history of heart failure (P = 0.035), longer dialysis vintage (P = 0.077), smoking status (P = 0.247), aspirin use (P = 0.121), and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/ angiotensin receptor blocker use (P = 0.214).

CONCLUSION

This is the first global HIF-PHI study to report pre-specified definitions and predictors of ESA hyporesponsiveness. While most of the predictors identified in our study have been previously reported, geographic region stands out as an unexpected finding, meriting further investigation.

Causes of death in patients with chronic kidney disease: insights from the ASCEND-D and ASCEND-ND cardiovascular outcomes trials

Background

There are limited contemporary data available regarding adjudicated causes of death in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Prior studies have indicated that cardiovascular (CV) events are one of the most common causes of death among patients with CKD, with previous reports stating approximately 30% of patients died from CV causes [1]. Here, we report the adjudicated causes of death in two recently completed large-scale randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with ∼14,200 person years of follow-up: ASCEND-D [2] (median follow-up: 2.5 years; NCT02879305) and ASCEND-ND [3] (median follow-up: 1.9 years; NCT02876835). These trials investigated the safety and efficacy of daprodustat, a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor (HIF-PHI), in correcting anaemia in patients with CKD.

Purpose

This study assessed the causes of death in patients with CKD in the ASCEND-D and ASCEND-ND trials.

Methods

ASCEND-D and ASCEND-ND were global, randomised, open-label, CV outcome trials in adult patients with CKD-related anaemia undergoing maintenance dialysis (ASCEND-D) or with pre-dialysis CKD (ASCEND-ND) who received daily oral daprodustat or conventional erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). Cause of death was systematically and centrally adjudicated in a blinded fashion to the study treatment assignment by an independent committee.

Results

In ASCEND-D and ASCEND-ND, respectively, 2964 and 3872 patients were randomised, of which 92% and 97% completed the study. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced across treatment groups within each trial. Adjudicated causes of death for the ASCEND-D and -ND trials are shown in the Table. All-cause mortality was similar in patients treated with daprodustat as compared with those treated with conventional ESA in both the ASCEND-D and -ND trials. Overall mortality in the ASCEND-D and -ND trials was 20.0% and 15.5%, respectively, and CV causes accounted for approximately 30–40% of all deaths and infection accounted for 25–30% of all deaths in both trials.

Conclusion

Although CV events were the most common cause of death in the ASCEND-D and ASCEND-ND trials (30–40% of cases), the risk of death due to infection was also high, accounting for approximately 25–30% of all deaths across all study arms. Sudden death accounted for most CV deaths, particularly in the ASCEND-D trial. Infection as a cause of death was more frequent than previously reported in other RCTs or disease registries. Causes of death did not differ significantly between ASCEND-D and ASCEND-ND, or between treatments. However, as this is a selected population for a CV trial, it may not be representative of a real-life CKD population. Our results provide important data to inform the design of future studies in this population.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): This study was funded by GlaxoSmithKline. Medical writing support was provided Natasha Tracey, PhD (Ashfield MedComms, Macclesfield, UK) and was funded by GlaxoSmithKline.

Three Times Weekly Dosing of Daprodustat versus Conventional Epoetin for Treatment of Anemia in Hemodialysis Patients: ASCEND-TD: A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Noninferiority Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Daprodustat is a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor (HIF-PHI) being investigated for the treatment of anemia of CKD. In this noninferiority trial, we compared daprodustat administered three times weekly with epoetin alfa (epoetin) in patients on prevalent hemodialysis switching from a prior erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA).

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Patients on hemodialysis with a baseline hemoglobin of 8-11.5 g/dl receiving an ESA were randomized 2:1 to daprodustat three times weekly (n=270) or conventional epoetin (n=137) for 52 weeks. Dosing algorithms aimed to maintain hemoglobin between 10 and 11 g/dl. The primary end point was mean change in hemoglobin from baseline to the average during the evaluation period (weeks 28-52). The principal secondary end point was average monthly intravenous iron dose. Other secondary end points included BP and hemoglobin variability.

RESULTS

Daprodustat three times weekly was noninferior to epoetin for mean change in hemoglobin (model-adjusted mean treatment difference [daprodustat-epoetin], -0.05; 95% confidence interval, -0.21 to 0.10). During the evaluation period, mean (SD) hemoglobin values were 10.45 (0.55) and 10.51 (0.85) g/dl for daprodustat and epoetin groups, respectively. Responders (defined as mean hemoglobin during the evaluation period in the analysis range of 10 to 11.5 g/dl) were 80% in the daprodustat group versus 64% in the epoetin group. Proportionately fewer participants in the daprodustat group versus the epoetin group had hemoglobin values either below 10 g/dl or above 11.5 g/dl during the evaluation period. Mean monthly intravenous iron use was not significantly lower with daprodustat versus epoetin. The effect on BP was similar between groups. The percentage of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between daprodustat (75%) and epoetin (79%).

CONCLUSIONS

Daprodustat was noninferior to epoetin in hemoglobin response and was generally well tolerated.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER

Anemia Studies in Chronic Kidney Disease: Erythropoiesis via a Novel Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitor Daprodustat-Three Times Weekly Dosing in Dialysis (ASCEND-TD), NCT03400033.

Efficacy and Safety of Daprodustat for Treatment of Anemia of Chronic Kidney Disease in Incident Dialysis Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Daprodustat, a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, is being evaluated as an oral alternative to conventional erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) therapy. Few studies of anemia treatment in an incident dialysis (ID) population have been reported.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of daprodustat vs darbepoetin alfa in treating anemia of chronic kidney disease in ID patients.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This prospective, randomized, open-label clinical trial was conducted from May 11, 2017, through September 24, 2020, in 90 centers across 14 countries. Patients with advanced CKD were eligible if they planned to start dialysis within 6 weeks from screening or had started and received hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) within 90 days before randomization, had a screening hemoglobin (Hb) concentration of 8.0 to 10.5 g/dL (to convert to grams per liter, multiply by 10) and a randomization Hb of 8.0 to 11.0 g/dL, were ESA-naive or had received limited ESA treatment, and were iron-replete.

INTERVENTIONS

Randomized 1:1 to daprodustat or darbepoetin alfa.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary analysis in the intent-to-treat population evaluated the mean change in Hb concentration from baseline to evaluation period (weeks 28-52) to assess noninferiority of daprodustat vs darbepoetin alfa (noninferiority margin, -0.75 g/dL). The mean monthly intravenous (IV) iron dose from baseline to week 52 was the principal secondary end point. Rates of treatment-emergent and serious adverse events (AEs) were also compared between treatment groups to assess safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

A total of 312 patients (median [IQR] age, 55 [45-65] years; 194 [62%] male) were randomized to either daprodustat (157 patients; median [IQR] age, 52.0 [45-63] years; 96 [61%] male) or darbepoetin alfa (155 patients; median [IQR] age, 56.0 [45-67] years; 98 [63%] male); 306 patients (98%) completed the trial. The mean (SD) Hb concentration during the evaluation period was 10.5 (1.0) g/dL for the daprodustat and 10.6 (0.9) g/dL for the darbepoetin alfa group, with an adjusted mean treatment difference of -0.10 g/dL (95% CI, -0.34 to 0.14 g/dL), indicating noninferiority. There was a reduction in mean monthly IV iron use from baseline to week 52 in both treatment groups; however, daprodustat was not superior compared with darbepoetin alfa in reducing monthly IV iron use (adjusted mean treatment difference, 19.4 mg [95% CI, -11.0 to 49.9 mg]). Adverse event rates were 76% for daprodustat vs 72% for darbepoetin alfa.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This randomized clinical trial found that daprodustat was noninferior to darbepoetin alfa in treating anemia of CKD and may represent a potential oral alternative to a conventional ESA in the ID population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03029208.

Challenges of Conducting Clinical Trials during the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: The ASCEND Global Program Experience

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has had an unprecedented effect on health and health care and posed challenges to the conduct of clinical trials.Targeted mitigating strategies, on the basis of early and continued data collection from site surveys, limited disruption to the ASCEND trials.Flexibly allowing hemoglobin assessment at local laboratories to inform randomized treatment dosing was key to limiting the discontinuation of treatment.

Pharmacokinetics of Daprodustat and Metabolites in Individuals with Normal and Impaired Hepatic Function

Daprodustat is a hypoxia‐inducible factor‐prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor in development for treatment of anemia of chronic kidney disease. We evaluated the role of hepatic impairment on daprodustat pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability. Participants with mild (Child‐Pugh Class A, score 5‒6) and moderate (Child‐Pugh Class B, score 7‒9) hepatic impairment and matched healthy controls were administered single 6‐mg doses of daprodustat. Exposure parameters were determined for daprodustat and its six metabolites. Comparisons resulted in 1.5‐ and 2.0‐fold higher daprodustat C_max and area under the curve (AUC) exposures in participants with mild and moderate hepatic impairment, respectively, versus controls; C_max in mild hepatic impairment was comparable to controls. Similarly, aligned with parent drug, unbound daprodustat C_max and AUC exposures increased 1.6‐ to 2.3‐fold in hepatic‐impaired participants versus controls, and metabolite exposures were 1.2‐ to 2.0‐fold higher in participants with hepatic impairment. Erythropoeitin (EPO) baseline‐corrected AUC exposures were between 0.3‐fold lower and 2.2‐fold higher in matched controls versus hepatic‐impaired participants. No serious or study drug‐related adverse events were reported. Daprodustat exposure was increased in participants with moderate and mild hepatic impairment compared with matched controls; however, no meaningful differences in EPO were observed and no new safety concerns were identified (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03223337).

Daprodustat for the Treatment of Anemia in Patients Not Undergoing Dialysis

BACKGROUND

Daprodustat is an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor. In patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) who are not undergoing dialysis, the efficacy and safety of daprodustat, as compared with the conventional erythropoiesis-stimulating agent darbepoetin alfa, are unknown.

METHODS

In this randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial with blinded adjudication of cardiovascular outcomes, we compared daprodustat with darbepoetin alfa for the treatment of anemia in patients with CKD who were not undergoing dialysis. The primary outcomes were the mean change in the hemoglobin level from baseline to weeks 28 through 52 and the first occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE; a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke).

RESULTS

Overall, 3872 patients were randomly assigned to receive daprodustat or darbepoetin alfa. The mean (±SD) baseline hemoglobin levels were similar in the two groups. The mean (±SE) change in the hemoglobin level from baseline to weeks 28 through 52 was 0.74±0.02 g per deciliter in the daprodustat group and 0.66±0.02 g per deciliter in the darbepoetin alfa group (difference, 0.08 g per deciliter; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03 to 0.13), which met the prespecified noninferiority margin of -0.75 g per deciliter. During a median follow-up of 1.9 years, a first MACE occurred in 378 of 1937 patients (19.5%) in the daprodustat group and in 371 of 1935 patients (19.2%) in the darbepoetin alfa group (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.19), which met the prespecified noninferiority margin of 1.25. The percentages of patients with adverse events were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with CKD and anemia who were not undergoing dialysis, daprodustat was noninferior to darbepoetin alfa with respect to the change in the hemoglobin level from baseline and with respect to cardiovascular outcomes. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; ASCEND-ND ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02876835.).

Daprodustat for the Treatment of Anemia in Patients Undergoing Dialysis

BACKGROUND

Among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), the use of recombinant human erythropoietin and its derivatives for the treatment of anemia has been linked to a possibly increased risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, and other adverse events. Several trials have suggested that hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (PHIs) are as effective as erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in increasing hemoglobin levels.

METHODS

In this randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, we assigned patients with CKD who were undergoing dialysis and who had a hemoglobin level of 8.0 to 11.5 g per deciliter to receive an oral HIF-PHI (daprodustat) or an injectable ESA (epoetin alfa if they were receiving hemodialysis or darbepoetin alfa if they were receiving peritoneal dialysis). The two primary outcomes were the mean change in the hemoglobin level from baseline to weeks 28 through 52 (noninferiority margin, -0.75 g per deciliter) and the first occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular event (a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke), with a noninferiority margin of 1.25.

RESULTS

A total of 2964 patients underwent randomization. The mean (±SD) baseline hemoglobin level was 10.4±1.0 g per deciliter overall. The mean (±SE) change in the hemoglobin level from baseline to weeks 28 through 52 was 0.28±0.02 g per deciliter in the daprodustat group and 0.10±0.02 g per deciliter in the ESA group (difference, 0.18 g per deciliter; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12 to 0.24), which met the prespecified noninferiority margin of -0.75 g per deciliter. During a median follow-up of 2.5 years, a major adverse cardiovascular event occurred in 374 of 1487 patients (25.2%) in the daprodustat group and in 394 of 1477 (26.7%) in the ESA group (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.07), which also met the prespecified noninferiority margin for daprodustat. The percentages of patients with other adverse events were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with CKD undergoing dialysis, daprodustat was noninferior to ESAs regarding the change in the hemoglobin level from baseline and cardiovascular outcomes. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; ASCEND-D ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02879305.).

The ASCEND-ND trial: Study design and participant characteristics

Background

Anaemia is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and assessment of the risks and benefits of new therapies is important.

Methods

The Anaemia Study in CKD: Erythropoiesis via a Novel prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor Daprodustat-Non-Dialysis (ASCEND-ND) trial includes adult patients with CKD Stages 3–5, not using erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) with screening haemoglobin (Hb) 8–10 g/dL or receiving ESAs with screening Hb of 8–12 g/dL. Participants were randomized to daprodustat or darbepoetin alfa (1:1) in an open-label trial (steering committee- and sponsor-blinded), with blinded endpoint assessment. The co-primary endpoints are mean change in Hb between baseline and evaluation period (average over Weeks 28–52) and time to first adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular (CV) event. Baseline characteristics were compared with those of participants in similar anaemia trials.

Results

Overall, 3872 patients were randomized from 39 countries (median age 67 years, 56% female, 56% White, 27% Asian and 10% Black). The median baseline Hb was 9.9 g/dL, blood pressure was 135/74 mmHg and estimated glomerular filtration rate was 18 mL/min/1.73 m². Among randomized patients, 53% were ESA non-users, 57% had diabetes and 37% had a history of CV disease. At baseline, 61% of participants were using renin–angiotensin system blockers, 55% were taking statins and 49% were taking oral iron. Baseline demographics were similar to those in other large non-dialysis anaemia trials.

Conclusion

ASCEND-ND will define the efficacy and safety of daprodustat compared with darbepoetin alfa in the treatment of patients with anaemia associated with CKD not on dialysis.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Daprodustat: Results of an Absorption, Distribution, and Excretion Study With Intravenous Microtracer and Concomitant Oral Doses for Bioavailability Determination

Daprodustat, an oral hypoxia‐inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, is being investigated for treatment of anemia in chronic kidney disease. This phase 1, nonrandomized, 2‐period, crossover study in 6 healthy men characterized the absorption, distribution, and excretion of daprodustat when administered as oral and intravenous (IV) doses of unlabeled and radiolabeled daprodustat ([¹⁴C]‐GSK1278863). Tolerability and pharmacokinetic properties of daprodustat, and its 6 metabolites in the systemic circulation, were also evaluated. The mean recovery of radiolabeled daprodustat was ≈95% by day 5, with the majority in feces and minor renal elimination, indicating that daprodustat and metabolites are primarily eliminated via hepatobiliary and fecal routes. Approximately 40% of total circulating radioactivity in plasma following both IV and oral administration was daprodustat; thus, 60% was attributed to metabolites. It was estimated that ≈80% of daprodustat was absorbed across the gastrointestinal tract, and ≈18% cleared by hepatic extraction. Pharmacokinetics were essentially dose proportional, with moderate (≈66%) oral tablet bioavailability. Following IV administration, daprodustat plasma clearance (19.3 L/h) and volume of distribution (14.6 L) were low, suggesting low tissue distribution outside systemic circulation with likely low penetration into tissues. Daprodustat was generally well tolerated, with no deaths or serious or significant adverse events reported.

Study design and baseline characteristics of patients on dialysis in the ASCEND-D trial

Background

The Anemia Studies in chronic kidney disease (CKD): Erythropoiesis via a Novel prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor Daprodustat-Dialysis (ASCEND-D) trial will test the hypothesis that daprodustat is noninferior to comparator epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa for two co-primary endpoints: hemoglobin (Hb) efficacy and cardiovascular (CV) safety.

Methods

We report the trial design, key demographic, clinical and laboratory findings, and baseline therapies of 2964 patients randomized in the open-label (sponsor-blinded) active-controlled, parallel-group, randomized ASCEND-D clinical trial. We also compare baseline characteristics of ASCEND-D patients with patients who are on dialysis (CKD G5D) enrolled in other large CV outcome trials (CVOTs) and in the most relevant registries.

Results

The median age of patients was 58 years, 43% were female; 67% were White and 16% were Black. The median Hb at baseline was 10.4 g/dL. Among randomized patients, 89% were receiving hemodialysis and 11% peritoneal dialysis. Among key comorbidities, 42% reported a history of diabetes mellitus and 45% a history of CV disease. Median blood pressure was 134/74 mmHg. The median weekly dose of epoetin was 5751 units. Intravenous and oral iron uses were noted in 64 and 11% of patients, respectively. Baseline demographics were similar to patients with CKD G5D enrolled in other CVOTs and renal patient registries.

Conclusions

ASCEND-D will evaluate the efficacy and safety of daprodustat compared with epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa in the treatment of patients with anemia with CKD G5D.

This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02879305. EudraCT Number: 2016-000541-31; Sponsor Protocol Number: 200807.

Daprodustat Compared with Epoetin Beta Pegol for Anemia in Japanese Patients Not on Dialysis: A 52-Week Randomized Open-Label Phase 3 Trial

BACKGROUND

Daprodustat is an oral agent that stimulates erythropoiesis by inhibiting the prolyl hydroxylases which mark hypoxia-inducible factor for degradation through hydroxylation. Its safety and efficacy (noninferiority) were assessed in this 52-week, open-label study.

METHODS

Japanese patients not on dialysis (ND) (N = 299) with anemia of CKD (stages G3, G4, and G5) with iron parameters of ferritin >100 ng/mL or transferrin saturation >20% at screening were randomized to daprodustat or epoetin beta pegol (continuous erythropoietin receptor activator [CERA], also known as methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta). After initiation of the study, the daprodustat starting dose for erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)-naïve participants was revised, and daprodustat was started at 2 or 4 mg once daily depending on baseline hemoglobin. ESA users switched to daprodustat 4 mg once daily. CERA was started at 25 μg every 2 weeks for ESA-naïve patients and 25-250 μg every 4 weeks for ESA users based on previous ESA dose. In both treatment groups, dose was adjusted every 4 weeks based on hemoglobin level and changed according to a prespecified algorithm. The primary endpoint was mean hemoglobin level during weeks 40-52 in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. ESA-naïve patients who entered before the protocol amendment revising the daprodustat starting dose were excluded from the ITT population.

RESULTS

Mean hemoglobin levels during weeks 40-52 were 12.0 g/dL in the daprodustat group (n = 108; 95% confidence interval [CI], 11.8-12.1) and 11.9 g/dL for CERA (n = 109; 95% CI 11.7-12.0); the difference between the groups was 0.1 g/dL (95% CI -0.1 to 0.3 g/dL). The lower limit of the 95% CI of the difference was greater than the prespecified margin of -1.0 g/dL. The mean hemoglobin level was within the target range (11.0-13.0 g/dL) during weeks 40-52 for 92% of participants in both groups. There was no meaningful difference in the frequencies of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral daprodustat was noninferior to CERA in achieving and maintaining target hemoglobin levels in Japanese ND patients. Daprodustat was well tolerated, with no new safety concerns identified.

Efficacy and Safety of Daprodustat Compared with Darbepoetin Alfa in Japanese Hemodialysis Patients with Anemia: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Daprodustat is an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor that stimulates erythropoiesis and regulates genes related to iron metabolism. The efficacy (noninferiority) and safety of daprodustat compared with standard therapy (darbepoetin alfa) was evaluated.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

This was a randomized, phase 3, double-blind, active-control study in Japanese patients receiving hemodialysis with anemia of CKD. Participants' treatment was switched from current erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) to daprodustat 4 mg once daily or darbepoetin alfa 10-60 μg once weekly (on the basis of the prestudy ESA dose). Dose was adjusted every 4 weeks for daprodustat or every 2 weeks for darbepoetin alfa, according to a protocol-specified algorithm. The primary end point was mean hemoglobin during weeks 40-52 in the intent-to-treat population.

RESULTS

Of 332 participants screened, 271 participants were randomized (safety evaluation: 271 participants; efficacy evaluation: 267 intent-to-treat population). The mean hemoglobin during weeks 40-52 were maintained within the target range in both groups (10.9 g/dl [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 10.8 to 11.0] for daprodustat, and 10.8 g/dl [95% CI, 10.7 to 11.0] for darbepoetin alfa). Daprodustat was noninferior to darbepoetin alfa, as the lower bound of the confidence interval for the treatment difference (0.1 g/dl; 95% CI, -0.1 to 0.2 g/dl) was greater than the noninferiority criterion of -1.0 g/dl. For most participants, hemoglobin was maintained within the target range (10.0-12.0 g/dl) during weeks 40-52 (88% daprodustat; 90% darbepoetin alfa). Geometric mean hepcidin levels decreased more at week 52 with daprodustat (-37%; 95% CI, -49 to -23) than with darbepoetin alfa (-20%; 95% CI, -36 to -1), and an increase in total iron-binding capacity was observed in the daprodustat group. Frequency of adverse events were generally similar between daprodustat and darbepoetin alfa.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral daprodustat was noninferior to darbepoetin alfa as measured by mean hemoglobin over weeks 40-52 in Japanese patients receiving hemodialysis switched from ESAs.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER

201754, Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02969655.

A randomized, 29-day, dose-ranging, efficacy and safety study of daprodustat, administered three times weekly in patients with anemia on hemodialysis

Background

Daprodustat is a hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor currently being investigated as a treatment for anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in both dialysis and nondialysis patients. In clinical studies to date, daprodustat has been administered orally as a once-daily regimen. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study characterized the initial dose-hemoglobin response as well as the efficacy and safety of three times weekly (TIW) daprodustat in hemodialysis patients switched from stable recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO), in accordance with a TIW hemodialysis schedule.

Methods

103 patients on hemodialysis with baseline hemoglobin of 9.0 to 11.5 g/dL and previously receiving a stable dose of rhEPO or its analogs were randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to receive daprodustat 10, 15, 25, or 30 mg or placebo TIW over 29 days.

Results

Mean baseline hemoglobin was 10.6 g/dL for the placebo group and each daprodustat cohort. Daprodustat produced dose-dependent changes in mean hemoglobin from baseline to day 29. Using a Bayesian approach, the estimated dose conversion ratio between once-daily and TIW daprodustat was ~ 2.0 across the evaluated dose range using an E_max model. Daprodustat was generally well tolerated, with an adverse event (AE) profile consistent with the hemodialysis population.

Conclusions

These data help inform the appropriate dose conversion ratio to be applied to daily doses to obtain equivalent daprodustat TIW doses and suggest TIW treatment with daprodustat can treat anemia of CKD safely, supporting future long-term studies for this indication using a TIW dosing regimen.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02689206; date registered: 02/11/2016.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12882-019-1547-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Cardiovascular Event Rates Among Hemodialysis Patients Across Geographical Regions-A Snapshot From The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS)

Introduction

Cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality are excessively high among hemodialysis (HD) patients. Anemia is a common complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and a known risk factor for CV events. To understand the impact of the recent regulatory and guideline changes in anemia management, we examined regional CV event rates in high-risk and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA)-hyporesponsive HD patients.

Methods

A prospective cohort study including 16,560 HD patients, 8660 CV high-risk, and 884 hyporesponsive to ESAs, from the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) phase 4 (2009-2011) and phase 5 (2012-2015) was conducted to quantify all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and MACE plus heart failure and thromboembolic events (MACE+).

Results

The MACE+ rates (per 100 patient-years) were highest in North America (NA) (19.4; 95% CI = 18.2-20.7), followed by Europe (EU) (17.4; 95% CI = 16.6-18.1) and lowest in Japan (7.5; 95% CI = 6.9-8.1). When restricted to the high CV risk population, rates increased by 36% in NA, 45% in EU, and 72% in Japan. Mortality accounted for >74% of MACE+ events. MACE+ rates in ESA-hyporesponsive patients and high CV risk patients were similar in NA and EU cohorts. There were minimal differences in outcomes between the DOPPS phases 4 and 5.

Conclusion

Cardiovascular event rates are high in the HD population, vary by geographic region, and are substantially higher in high CV risk patients and ESA-hyporesponsive patients; however, the rates appear not to be affected by anemia guideline changes. The findings from this study will be essential to contextualize the design of future CV anemia-related outcome studies and clinical trials.

Effect of renal function and dialysis modality on daprodustat and predominant metabolite exposure

Background

Current therapies for anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD) include administration of supplemental iron (intravenous and/or oral), blood transfusions and replacement of erythropoietin through the administration of recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) and rhEPO analogs, each with limitations. Daprodustat is an orally active, small molecule hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor that is currently in Phase 3 clinical studies. As it is well appreciated that the kidney represents a major route of elimination of many drugs, and daprodustat will be administered to patients with advanced CKD as well as patients with end-stage kidney disease, it is important to characterize the pharmacokinetic profile in these patient populations to safely dose this potential new medicine.

Methods

The primary objective of these studies, conducted under two separate protocols and with identical assessments and procedures, was to characterize the steady-state pharmacokinetics of daprodustat and the six predominant metabolites (i.e. metabolites present in the highest concentration in circulation) in subjects with normal renal function, anemic non-dialysis (ND)-dependent CKD subjects (CKD Stage 3/4) and anemic subjects on either hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD). All enrolled subjects were administered daprodustat 5 mg once daily for 14 days (all except HD subjects) or 15 days (for HD subjects). Blood, urine and peritoneal dialysate were collected at various times for measurement of daprodustat, predominant metabolite, erythropoietin and hepcidin levels.

Results

The pharmacokinetic properties of steady-state daprodustat peak plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the plasma daprodustat concentration-time curve (AUC) and the time of Cmax (tmax) were comparable between all cohorts in this study. In addition, there was no clinically relevant difference in these properties in the HD subjects between a dialysis and ND day. For CKD Stage 3/4, HD (dialysis day) and PD subjects, the AUC of all daprodustat metabolites assessed was higher, while the C_max was slightly higher than that in subjects with normal renal function. Over the course of the 14 or 15 days of daprodustat administration, hemoglobin levels were seen to be relatively stable in the subjects with normal renal function, CKD Stage 3/4 and PD subjects, while HD subjects had a decrease of 1.9 gm/dL. All renally impaired subjects appeared to have similar erythropoietin responses to daprodustat, with approximately a 3-fold increase in these levels. In subjects with minimal to no change in hemoglobin levels, hepcidin levels remained relatively stable. Daprodustat, administered 5 mg once daily for 14–15 days, was generally well tolerated with a safety profile consistent with this patient population.

Conclusion

These studies demonstrated no clinically meaningful change in the pharmacokinetic properties of daprodustat when administered to subjects with various degrees of renal impairment, while for CKD Stage 3/4, HD (dialysis day) and PD subjects, the C_max and AUC of all daprodustat metabolites assessed were higher than in subjects with normal renal function. Administration of daprodustat in this study appeared to be generally safe and well tolerated.

An Exploratory Study of Daprodustat in Erythropoietin-Hyporesponsive Subjects

INTRODUCTION

Hyporesponsiveness to recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) is a major problem affecting some patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), predominantly those on hemodialysis (HD). Daprodustat (GSK1278863) is a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor that is being investigated as a treatment for anemia of CKD.

METHODS

This phase 2a, exploratory, multicenter, single-arm study assessed the ability of daprodustat to increase or maintain hemoglobin concentrations within the target range (10.0-11.5 g/dl) over 16 weeks in subjects with anemia who were on HD and who had a high erythropoietin resistance index (ERI). All included subjects met the criteria for chronic rhEPO hyporesponsiveness (i.e., an ERI based on a series of contiguous strata of patients' hemoglobin-by-epoetin alfa for a minimum of 12 weeks). Eligible adults were on a stable HD regimen 3 to 4 times per week. Markers of iron utilization and safety were also assessed. All subjects initially received oral daprodustat 12 mg once daily.

RESULTS

Of the 60 participants screened, 15 were enrolled, and 7 (47%) completed 16 weeks of treatment. At week 16, 2 of 7 subjects (29%) had >1 g/dl increases in hemoglobin from baseline. Daprodustat had minimal effects on markers of iron metabolism and utilization. Fourteen subjects (93%) experienced ≥1 adverse event (AE). The most common AEs included nausea, pneumonia, pleural effusion, and urinary tract infection. The majority of on-therapy AEs were mild or moderate in intensity.

CONCLUSION

Daprodustat increased hemoglobin concentrations within the target range in 29% of chronic rhEPO-hyporesponsive subjects. No new safety concerns were identified in this short exploratory study.

Anemia and mortality in patients with nondialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

A combination of safety concerns and labeling changes impacted use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in renal anemia. Data regarding contemporary utilization in pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) are lacking.

METHODS

Electronic healthcare records and medical claims data of pre-dialysis CKD patients were aggregated from a large US managed care provider (2011-13). ESA use patterns, characteristics, and outcomes of ESA-treated/untreated patients were quantified.

RESULTS

At baseline, 109/32,308 patients (0.3%) were ESA users. Treated patients were older, had more advanced CKD (58.8% vs 5.4% with stage 4/5 vs 3) and greater prevalence of comorbid diabetes, hypertension, heart failure, and peripheral vascular disease. An additional 266 patients initiated ESA: hemoglobin at initiation was 8-10 g/dL in 193 of these and >10 g/dL in the remainder; 61.7% had stage 4/5 CKD; prevalence of cardiovascular disease was high (50.8% heart failure; 25.2% prior myocardial infarction; 24.1% prior stroke). During follow-up, rates of death and cardiovascular events were higher in baseline ESA users and ESA naives versus non-users.

CONCLUSIONS

ESA use in pre-dialysis CKD patients was exceedingly rare and directed disproportionately to older, sicker patients; these patients had high rates of death and cardiovascular events. These data provide context for contemporary use of ESA in pre-dialysis CKD.

Daprodustat for anemia: a 24-week, open-label, randomized controlled trial in participants on hemodialysis

Background

This study evaluated the hemoglobin dose response, other efficacy measures and safety of daprodustat, an orally administered, hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor in development for anemia of chronic kidney disease.

Methods

Participants (n = 216) with baseline hemoglobin levels of 9–11.5 g/dL on hemodialysis (HD) previously receiving stable doses of recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) were randomized in a 24-week dose-range, efficacy and safety study. Participants discontinued rhEPO and then were randomized to receive daily daprodustat (4, 6, 8, 10 or 12 mg) or control (placebo for 4 weeks then open-label rhEPO as required). After 4 weeks, doses were titrated to achieve a hemoglobin target of 10–11.5 g/dL. The primary outcome was characterization of the dose–response relationship between daprodustat and hemoglobin at 4 weeks; additionally, the efficacy and safety of daprodustat were assessed over 24 weeks.

Results

Over the first 4 weeks, the mean hemoglobin change from baseline increased dose-dependently from −0.29  (daprodustat 4 mg) to 0.69 g/dL (daprodustat 10 and 12 mg). The mean change from baseline hemoglobin (10.4 g/dL) at 24 weeks was 0.03 and −0.11 g/dL for the combined daprodustat and control groups, respectively. The median maximum observed plasma EPO levels in the control group were ∼14-fold higher than in the combined daprodustat group. Daprodustat demonstrated an adverse event profile consistent with the HD population.

Conclusions

Daprodustat produced dose-dependent changes in hemoglobin over the first 4 weeks after switching from a stable dose of rhEPO as well as maintained hemoglobin target levels over 24 weeks.

The drug interaction potential of daprodustat when coadministered with pioglitazone, rosuvastatin, or trimethoprim in healthy subjects

This study was conducted to evaluate the likelihood of daprodustat to act as a perpetrator in drug–drug interactions (DDI) with the CYP2C8 enzyme and OATP1B1 transporter using the probe substrates pioglitazone and rosuvastatin as potential victims, respectively. Additionally, this study assessed the effect of a weak CYP2C8 inhibitor, trimethoprim, as a perpetrator of a DDI with daprodustat.

This was a two‐part study: Part A assessed the effect of coadministration of daprodustat on the pharmacokinetics of pioglitazone and rosuvastatin in 20 subjects; Part B assessed the coadministration of trimethoprim on the pharmacokinetics of daprodustat in 20 subjects.

Coadministration of 100 mg of daprodustat with pioglitazone or rosuvastatin had no effect on the plasma exposures of either probe substrate. When trimethoprim was coadministered with 25‐mg daprodustat plasma daprodustat AUC and C_max increased by 48% and 28%, respectively. Additionally, AUC and C_max for the metabolite GSK2531401 were decreased by 32% and 40%, respectively. C_max for the other metabolites was slightly decreased (~8–15%) but no changes in AUC were observed.

As 100‐mg daprodustat exceeds the planned top therapeutic dose, interaction potential of daprodustat as a perpetrator with substrates of the CYP2C8 enzyme and OATP1B1 transporters is very low. Conversely, daprodustat exposure (AUC and C_max) is likely to increase moderately with coadministration of weak CYP2C8 inhibitors.

Daprodustat for anemia: a 24-week, open-label, randomized controlled trial in participants with chronic kidney disease

Background

This study assessed the short-term safety and efficacy of daprodustat (an oral hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor) to achieve a target hemoglobin in patients with anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Methods

Patients (n = 252) with Stages 3–5 CKD not receiving dialysis were enrolled in this 24-week, multicenter trial [hemoglobin entry criteria: 8–10 g/dL (Cohort 1) or 8–11 g/dL (Cohort 2) for recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO)-naïve participants; 9–10.5 g/dL (Cohort 1) or 9–11.5 g/dL (Cohort 2) for rhEPO users]. rhEPO-naïve participants were randomized 3:1 to daprodustat (1, 2 or 4 mg) or control (rhEPO per standard of care). rhEPO users were randomized 1:1 to daprodustat 2 mg or control. Study medication was titrated to maintain hemoglobin 9–10.5 g/dL (Cohort 1) or 10–11.5 g/dL (Cohort 2). Hemoglobin, iron metabolism markers and safety parameters were measured every 4 weeks.

Results

Mean hemoglobin levels at Week 24 were 10.2 g/dL (Cohort 1) and 10.9 g/dL (Cohort 2) in the daprodustat group and 10.7 g/dL (Cohort 1) and 11.0 g/dL (Cohort 2) in the control group. Participants had hemoglobin levels within the target range a median of 82% and 66% of the time between Weeks 12 and 24 in the daprodustat and control groups, respectively. The adverse event profile was consistent with clinical events in the CKD population.

Conclusions

Daprodustat effectively maintained target hemoglobin over 24 weeks in CKD patients with anemia who were rhEPO naïve or had switched from existing rhEPO therapy.

Evaluation of Quantitative Computed Tomography Cortical Hip Quadrant in a Clinical Trial With Rosiglitazone: A Potential New Study Endpoint

Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) measurements have been used extensively to ascertain information about bone quality and density due to the 3-dimensional information provided and the ability to segment out trabecular and cortical bones. QCT imaging helps to improve our understanding of the role that each bone compartment plays in the pathogenesis and prognosis of fracture. This study was conducted to explore longitudinal changes in femoral neck (FN) cortical bone structure using both volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and cortical shell thickness assessments via QCT in a double-blind, randomized, multicenter clinical trial in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus. This study also examined whether treatment-associated changes in the cortical bone vBMD and thickness in femoral neck quadrants could be evaluated. Subjects were randomized to rosiglitazone (RSG) or metformin (MET) for 52 wk followed by 24 wk of open-label MET. A subset of 87 subjects underwent QCT scans of the hip at baseline, after 52 wk of double-blind treatment, and after 24 wk of treatment with MET using standard full-body computed tomography scanners. All scans were evaluated and analyzed centrally. Cortical vBMD at the FN was precisely segmented from trabecular bone and used to assess a possible therapeutic effect on this bone compartment. QCT analysis showed reductions in adjusted mean percentage change in vBMD and in absolute cortical thickness occurred with RSG treatment from baseline to week 52, whereas changes with MET were generally minimal. The reductions observed during RSG treatment for 1 yr appeared to partially reverse during the open-label MET phase from weeks 52 to 76. The femoral neck quadrant may provide utility as a potential endpoint in clinical trials for the understanding of the therapeutic effect of new entities on cortical bone vs trabecular bone; however, further clinical validation is needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The protocol (GSK study number AVD111179) was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT00679939.

Four-Week Studies of Oral Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitor GSK1278863 for Treatment of Anemia

Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors stabilize levels of hypoxia-inducible factor that upregulate transcription of multiple genes associated with the response to hypoxia, including production of erythropoietin. We conducted two phase 2a studies to explore the relationship between the dose of the hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor GSK1278863 and hemoglobin response in patients with anemia of CKD (baseline hemoglobin 8.5-11.0 g/dl) not undergoing dialysis and not receiving recombinant human erythropoietin (nondialysis study) and in patients with anemia of CKD (baseline hemoglobin 9.5-12.0 g/dl) on hemodialysis and being treated with stable doses of recombinant human erythropoietin (hemodialysis study). Participants were randomized 1:1:1:1 to a once-daily oral dose of GSK1278863 (0.5 mg, 2 mg, or 5 mg) or control (placebo for the nondialysis study; continuing on recombinant human erythropoietin for the hemodialysis study) for 4 weeks, with a 2-week follow-up. In the nondialysis study, GSK1278863 produced dose-dependent effects on hemoglobin, with the highest dose resulting in a mean increase of 1 g/dl at week 4. In the hemodialysis study, treatment with GSK1278863 in the 5-mg arm maintained mean hemoglobin concentrations after the switch from recombinant human erythropoietin, whereas mean hemoglobin decreased in the lower-dose arms. In both studies, the effects on hemoglobin occurred with elevations in endogenous erythropoietin within the range usually observed in the respective populations and markedly lower than those in the recombinant human erythropoietin control arm in the hemodialysis study, and without clinically significant elevations in plasma vascular endothelial growth factor concentrations. GSK1278863 was generally safe and well tolerated at the doses and duration studied. GSK1278863 may prove an effective alternative for managing anemia of CKD.

Characterization of chronic and acute ESA hyporesponse: a retrospective cohort study of hemodialysis patients

Background

Some patients with chronic kidney disease do not respond adequately to erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) treatment; these patients are referred to as ESA hyporesponders. There is no widely accepted contemporary definition for chronic ESA hyporesponse. The study objective was to propose and validate an operational definition for chronic ESA hyporesponse.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study using electronic health care records. Participants were anemic hemodialysis patients treated during February 2012 and were followed for 15 months. Patients’ ESA response (responders) or lack of response (chronic and acute hyporesponders) based on longitudinal patterns of ESA dose and hemoglobin level was assessed. Persistence of hyporesponse, longitudinal iron measures, transfusion rates, and mortality rates were analyzed. Frequency of blood transfusions (monthly) and death rates (quarterly) were calculated. Log normalized serum ferritin concentration was analyzed.

Results

Of 97,677 eligible patients, 6632 had acute hyporesponsiveness (ESA responsiveness restituted in ≤ 4 months) and 3086 had chronic hyporesponsiveness (lack of ESA response for > 4 months). Over months 1–4 among chronic hyporesponders, mean serum ferritin (722–785 ng/mL) and transferrin saturation (TSAT; 26.76 %-27.08 %) were constant, while acute hyporesponsive patients experienced increased ferritin (654-760 ng/mL) and TSAT (25.71–30.88 %) levels. Compared to ESA responders (0.19–0.30 %), chronic hyporesponders were transfused 7-times (1.20–2.17 %) more frequently over follow-up. Quarterly mortality was greatest in chronic ESA hyporesponders (2.98–5.48 %), followed by acute ESA hyporesponders (2.17–3.30 %) and ESA responders (1.43–2.49 %). With consistence over the study, chronic hyporesponders died more frequently than patients in the other study cohorts.

Conclusions

Findings indicate that 4 months of continuous ESA hyporesponsiveness can be used to differentiate acute from chronic hyporesponsiveness. This definition of chronic hyporesponsiveness is supported by outcome data showing higher mortality and transfusion rates in chronic hyporesponders compared to acute hyporesponders.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12882-015-0138-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Rosiglitazone decreases bone mineral density and increases bone turnover in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus

CONTEXT

Postmenopausal status and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are independent risk factors for fractures. An increased fracture risk has been observed with rosiglitazone (RSG), a thiazolidinedione, in patients with T2DM.

DESIGN AND SETTING

This was a randomized, double-blind study in postmenopausal women with T2DM. A 52-week double-blind phase (RSG or metformin [MET]) was followed by a 24-week open-label phase, during which time all patients received MET.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary endpoint was to assess the mean percentage change in bone mineral density (BMD) at the femoral neck (FN) by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry from baseline to week 52 in the RSG treatment group. Key secondary objectives included assessment of changes in BMD at the total hip, trochanter, and lumbar spine and to evaluate RSG effects on bone turnover markers.

RESULTS

From baseline to week 52, RSG was associated with a reduction in FN BMD by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (-1.47%). During the open-label phase (weeks 52-76), no further loss in FN BMD was observed. A decrease in BMD occurred at the total hip during RSG or MET treatment at 52 weeks (-1.62 and -0.72%, respectively). Total hip BMD loss by RSG was attenuated after switching to MET and was similar between treatment groups at the end of the open-label phase. From baseline to week 52, bone turnover markers significantly increased with RSG compared with MET, but decreased significantly during the open-label phase.

CONCLUSIONS

RSG for 52 weeks in postmenopausal women with T2DM was associated with small reductions in FN, total hip, and lumbar spine BMD and increased bone turnover markers. These effects are attenuated after cessation of RSG treatment.

Mechanism of action study to evaluate the effect of rosiglitazone on bone in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus: rationale, study design and baseline characteristics

Objectives

Post-hoc analyses have shown an increase incidence of fractures among type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients treated with thiazolidinediones (TZDs). The mechanisms by which TZDs may be associated with increased fracture risk is not well understood.

This article describes the study design and baseline characteristics for a prospective, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial to evaluate the effects of rosiglitazone on changes in measures of skeletal structure, surrogates of bone strength and metabolism.

Methods

Postmenopausal women without osteoporosis and diagnosed with T2DM were randomized in a double-blind design to either rosiglitazone or metformin for 52 weeks, then all subjects received open-label metformin for 24 weeks. Study endpoints included changes in bone mineral density (BMD), quantitative computed tomography (QCT), digitized hip radiography (HXR) and high resolution magnetic resonance imaging (hrMRI). Serum markers of bone metabolism and indices of glycemic control were assessed within and between treatment groups.

Results

A total of 226 subjects were randomized. Baseline characteristics included: age 63.8 ± 6.5 years; years postmenopausal 16.9 ± 8.4; duration of diabetes 3.5 (1.8–7.8) years; body mass index (BMI) 31.4 ± 5.9 kg/m²; and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) 6.4 ± 0.65%. At baseline, mean T-scores were −0.95 ± 0.91 at the femoral neck, −0.02 ± 0.97 at the total hip and −0.55 ± 1.25 at the total spine.

Since there are no well recognized techniques to determine bone mass and structure at the distal limbs (cortical bone sites where fractures were reported in RSG subjects), using the femoral neck as a surrogate for these areas may be a potential limitation of the study.

Conclusion

This is the first randomized trial utilizing multiple techniques to evaluate bone mass, structure, serum markers of bone remodeling, and potential reversibility of changes after discontinuation of rosiglitazone. This study will provide information about RSG bone effects in a population of postmenopausal women at risk for bone loss and subsequent fracture.

ClinicalTrials.gov number

NCT00679939

A randomized, parallel group, double-blind, multicentre study comparing the efficacy and safety of Avandamet (rosiglitazone/metformin) and metformin on long-term glycaemic control and bone mineral density after 80 weeks of treatment in drug-naïve type 2 diabetes mellitus patients

AIM

The purpose of this study was to evaluate if superior glycaemic control could be achieved with Avandamet® (rosiglitazone/metformin/AVM) compared with metformin (MET) monotherapy, and if glycaemic effects attained with AVM are durable over 18 months of treatment. Bone mineral density (BMD) and bone biomarkers were evaluated in a subgroup of patients.

METHODS

This was a phase IV, randomized, double-blind, multi-centre study in 688, drug naÏve, male and female patients who had an established clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Patients were randomized in a 1 : 1 ratio either to AVM or MET.

RESULTS

As initial therapy in patients with T2DM, AVM was superior to MET in achieving statistically significant reductions in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (p < 0.0001) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (p < 0.001), with more patients reaching recommended HbA1c and FPG targets for intensive glycaemic control. The glycaemic effects attained with AVM compared to MET monotherapy were durable over 18 months of treatment. In the bone substudy, AVM was associated with a significantly lower BMD in comparison with MET at week 80 in the lumbar spine and total hip (p < 0.0012 and p = 0.0005, respectively). Between-treatment differences were not statistically significant for distal one-third of radius BMD, femoral neck BMD or total BMD.

CONCLUSION

Superior glycaemic control was achieved with AVM compared with MET monotherapy. The superior glycaemic effects were shown to be durable over 18 months of treatment. AVM was associated with a significantly reduced BMD in comparison with MET at week 80 in the lumbar spine and total hip.

Reductions in biomarkers of cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes with rosiglitazone added to metformin compared with dose escalation of metformin: an EMPIRE trial sub-study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of rosiglitazone added to metformin with dose escalation of metformin on cardiovascular risk biomarkers in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Cardiovascular biomarkers were assessed in a sub-population of 122 subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (mean age 54.6 and 56.0 years, BMI 34.7 and 32.1 kg/m2; for the rosiglitazone plus metformin and metformin groups, respectively) from the multicenter (63 centers in the USA), double-blind, randomized parallel-group Escalation of Metformin theraPy vs. Initiation of Rosiglitazone Early (EMPIRE) study. Treatment group sizes were slightly imbalanced owing to central, rather than local, randomization. Subjects receiving metformin 1000 mg/day at baseline were randomized to rosiglitazone 4 mg/day plus metformin 1000 mg/day (RSG + MET) or metformin 1500 mg/day (up-titrated MET) for 24 weeks. At 8-weeks, rosiglitazone was increased to 8 mg/day in RSG + MET recipients and metformin to 2000 mg/day in up-titrated MET recipients.

RESULTS

Reductions from baseline in HbA1c at week 24 (mean +/- SD) occurred in both groups (RSG + MET: -0.61% +/- 1.16%; up-titrated MET: -0.65% +/- 1.18%). Post-prandial glucose levels (AUC(0-3h)) decreased with RSG + MET (-3.5 mmol/L.h; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -5.2 to -1.8) and up-titrated MET (-1.3 mmol/L.h; 95% CI: -3.8 to 1.1). Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA)-estimated insulin sensitivity increased by 37.7% (95% CI: 22.8 to 54.5) in RSG + MET and 6.9% (95% CI: -6.2 to 21.9) in up-titrated MET recipients. RSG + MET reduced C-reactive protein (CRP; -23.9%; 95% CI: -40.4 to -2.8), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) activity (-30.1%; 95% CI: -44.5 to -11.9), PAI-1 antigen (-15.5%; 95% CI: -28.3 to -0.3) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9; -13.8%; 95% CI: -25.1 to -0.9), but increased tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha; 27.0%; 95% CI: 6.8 to 50.9). Corresponding values for up-titrated MET were CRP -9.3% (95% CI: -36.9 to 30.2), PAI-1 activity -7.2% (95% CI: -28.2 to 20.0), PAI-1 antigen -1.5% (95% CI: -17.4 to 17.5), MMP-9 29.0% (95% CI: -1.3 to 68.6) and TNF-alpha -6.0% (95% CI: -22.0 to 13.2).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that rosiglitazone plus metformin has positive cardiovascular effects against a background of similar glycemic improvements.

Improving metabolic control leads to better working memory in adults with type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

The goals of this study were to determine whether improvements in metabolic control can ameliorate the cognitive dysfunction associated with type 2 diabetes and evaluate the possibility that such improvements are mediated by changes in circulating insulin or insulin resistance.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This randomized double-blind trial enrolled 145 subjects at 18 centers in the U.S. Older adults with type 2 diabetes receiving metformin monotherapy received add-on therapy with either rosiglitazone, a thiazolidinedione insulin sensitizer, or glyburide. Cognitive function was assessed at baseline and week 24 using the Digit Symbol Substitution Test, the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, and the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery.

RESULTS

Pretreatment fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in both groups was similar, and after 24 weeks both treatment groups showed similar significant reductions in FPG (2.1-2.3 mmol/l). Working memory improved with both rosiglitazone (P < 0.001) and glyburide (P = 0.017). Improvement (25-31% reduction in errors) was most evident on the Paired Associates Learning Test and was significantly correlated (r = 0.30) with improved glycemic control as measured by FPG.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar and statistically significant cognitive improvement was observed with both rosiglitazone and glyburide therapy, and the magnitude of this effect was correlated with the degree to which FPG improved. These results suggest that a cognitive benefit is achievable with pharmacological interventions targeting glycemic control.

Effects of rosiglitazone added to submaximal doses of metformin compared with dose escalation of metformin in type 2 diabetes: the EMPIRE Study

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of rosiglitazone (RSG) added to submaximal doses of metformin (MET) with dose escalation to the maximal effective dose of MET monotherapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In this multi-center, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study, 766 subjects with a baseline MET dose of 1000 mg/day were randomized to receive either RSG 4 mg/day (4 mg/1000 mg) or MET 500 mg/day (1500 mg/day total dose) for 8 weeks. Only the RSG dose was increased in the combination group - to 8 mg/day (8 mg/1000 mg) - and only the MET dose was increased in the MET monotherapy group - to 2000 mg/day for the remaining 16 weeks.

RESULTS

After 24 weeks, RSG added to MET (8 mg/1000 mg/day) was at least as effective as 2000 mg/day of MET in improving HbA(1c), with mean reductions of -0.93% (95% CI: -1.06%, -0.80%) and -0.71% (95% CI: -0.83%, -0.60%), respectively, from baseline in subjects that completed the study according to the investigator (mean treatment effect/difference of -0.20% [95% CI: -0.36%, -0.04%]). In addition, a higher percentage of subjects in the RSG + MET group achieved American Diabetes Association target levels of HbA(1c) < 7% (58.1% versus 48.4%) and American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists target levels of HbA(1c) <or= 6.5% (40.9% versus 28.2%). This combination provided significantly greater reductions from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG; -2.29 mmol/L [+/- 2.37 mmol/L] and -1.12 mmol/L [+/- 2.41 mmol/L], respectively), with a treatment difference of -0.85 mmol/L (95% Cl: -1.23 mmol/L, -0.47 mmol/L). For the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, the percentage of subjects experiencing a gastrointestinal side-effect was 27.9% and 38.7% for the RSG + MET and MET groups, respectively (OR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.19, 2.24). Mean body weight (+/- SD) increased in all randomized subjects treated with the combination therapy (+ 1.79 +/- 4.15 kg) compared with a mean weight loss in the up-titrated MET group (-1.78 +/- 3.50 kg).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that addition of RSG to submaximal doses of MET may be a suitable alternative to the maximal effective dose of MET monotherapy.

Reduction of intramyocellular lipid following short-term rosiglitazone treatment in Zucker fatty rats: an in vivo nuclear magnetic resonance study

The aim of the study was to characterize the effects of rosiglitazone, an oral insulin sensitizer, on intramyocellular lipid (IMCL) content in tibialis anterior muscle and whole body lipid deposition in Zucker fatty rats using in vivo (1)H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The IMCL/EMCL (extramyocellular) ratio was significantly lower in the rosiglitazone (FRSG) group at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days of treatment at 3 mg/kg/d (0.04 +/- 0.01, 0.09 +/- 0.03, 0.11 +/- 0.02, and 0.07 +/- 0.02, respectively) versus baseline (0.43 +/- 0.12, P <.01 v all time points), whereas there was no difference in the control (FC) group at these time points (0.31 +/- 0.08, 0.36 +/- 0.08, 0.40 +/- 0.14, and 0.49 +/- 0.18, respectively) versus baseline (0.37 +/- 0.07). Absolute IMCL content was also lower at 28 days in the FRSG (0.41 +/- 0.09 micromol/g) versus FC (2.13 +/- 0.40 micromol/g, P <.005) group. To further characterize the temporal nature of this change, the IMCL/EMCL ratio was examined in the FRSG group on each of the first 4 days of treatment, and a steady decline was observed (0.38 +/- 0.12, 0.21 +/- 0.08, 0.12 +/- 0.04, 0.09 +/- 0.04, 0.05 +/- 0.03 at baseline and days 1, 2, 3, and 4 respectively, P <.05 baseline v all time points). To examine the relationship between IMCL and insulin sensitivity, a euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp and IMCL measurement was performed on 7-day treated FRSG and FC groups. There was a negative correlation between absolute IMCL content and glucose infusion rate (r = -0.47, P <.04). The FRSG and the FC groups had similar whole body lipid content (expressed as a percentage of whole body water content) at baseline (48% +/- 5% and 44% +/- 2%, respectively), but the value was greater in the FRSG group following 28 days of treatment (103% +/- 4 v 84% +/- 6%, respectively, P <.02). In summary, there was a rapid (days) and pronounced reduction ( downward arrow approximately 70%) in IMCL content in tibialis anterior muscle following rosiglitazone treatment. Additionally, the increase in whole body lipid in the FRSG group suggests that there was increased adipocyte lipid storage following long-term rosiglitazone treatment. These results support the hypothesis that rosiglitazone indirectly increases peripheral insulin sensitivity by decreasing adipocyte lipolysis, thereby lowering IMCL content.

Are the metabolic effects of rosiglitazone influenced by baseline glycaemic control?

OBJECTIVE

To compare the metabolic effects of rosiglitazone, an antidiabetic agent of the thiazolidinedione class, in patients with type 2 diabetes with fair to moderate glycaemic control (glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(lc)) < 9%) and poor glycaemic control (HbA(lc) > or = 9%).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Data were pooled from two 26-week, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies of rosiglitazone (4 and 8 mg/day).

RESULTS

After 26 weeks of treatment, HbA(lc) was significantly reduced (p < 0.05) compared with baseline and placebo in patients taking rosiglitazone 8 mg/day for both HbA(lc) stratifications, with greater reductions in patients with baseline HbA(lc) > or = 9%. After 26 weeks of treatment, reductions in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) were significant (p < 0.05) compared with baseline and placebo in both rosiglitazone treatment groups for both HbA(lc) stratifications, with greater reductions in the group with poor glycaemic control. Rosiglitazone significantly improved insulin sensitivity (p < 0.05) compared with baseline in patients with baseline HbA(lc) < 9%. Rosiglitazone significantly improved beta-cell function (p < 0.05) compared with baseline with more improvement in the group with baseline HbA(lc) > or = 9%. These improvements were statistically significant compared with placebo, regardless of HbA(lc) stratification.

CONCLUSION

Rosiglitazone significantly improved HbA(lc) and FPG levels in patients with type 2 diabetes, with the greatest improvements observed in patients with baseline HbA(lc) levels > or =9%.

Normalization of skeletal muscle glycogen synthesis and glycolysis in rosiglitazone-treated Zucker fatty rats: an in vivo nuclear magnetic resonance study

The aim of this study was to characterize insulin-stimulated skeletal muscle glucose metabolism in Zucker fatty rats and to provide insight into the therapeutic mechanism by which rosiglitazone increases insulin-stimulated glucose disposal in these rats. Metabolic parameters were measured using combined in vivo (13)C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to measure skeletal muscle glucose uptake and its distributed fluxes (glycogen synthesis and glycolysis), and (31)P NMR was used to measure simultaneous changes in glucose-6-phosphate (G-6-P) during a euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp in awake Zucker fatty rats. Three groups of Zucker fatty rats (fatty rosiglitazone [FRSG], fatty control [FC], lean control [LC]) were treated for 7 days before the experiment (3 mg/kg rosiglitazone or vehicle via oral gavage). Rates of glycolysis and glycogen synthesis were assessed after treatment by monitoring 1,6-(13)C(2) glucose label incorporation into 1-(13)C glycogen, 3-(13)C lactate, and 3-(13)C alanine during a euglycemic ( approximately 7-8 mmol/l)-hyperinsulinemic (10 mU. kg(-1). min(-1)) clamp. The FRSG group exhibited a significant increase in insulin sensitivity, reflected by an increased whole-body glucose disposal rate during the clamp (24.4 +/- 1.9 vs. 17.6 +/- 1.4 and 33.2 +/- 2.0 mg. kg(-1). min(-1) in FRSG vs. FC [P < 0.05] and LC [P < 0.01] groups, respectively). The increased insulin-stimulated glucose disposal in the FRSG group was associated with a normalization of the glycolytic flux (52.9 +/- 9.1) to LC (56.2 +/- 16.6) versus FC (18.8 +/- 8.6 nmol. g(-1). min(-1), P < 0.02) and glycogen synthesis flux (56.3 +/- 11.5) to LC (75.2 +/- 15.3) versus FC (16.6 +/- 12.8 nmol. g(-1). min(-1), P < 0.05). [G-6-P] increased in the FRSG and LC groups versus baseline during the clamp (13.0 +/- 11.1 and 16.9 +/- 5.8%, respectively), whereas [G-6-P] in the FC group decreased (-23.3 +/- 13.4%, P < 0.05). There were no differences between groups in intramyocellular glucose, as measured by biochemical assay. These data suggest that the increased insulin-stimulated glucose disposal in muscle after rosiglitazone treatment can be attributed to a normalization of glucose transport and metabolism.

Phosphorylation of RAS1 and RAS2 proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

RAS1 and RAS2 proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are guanine nucleotide-binding proteins involved in the regulation of adenylate cyclase. In this paper, we report that these proteins are phosphorylated. The phosphorylation of RAS1 protein is demonstrated by treating with alkaline phosphatase as well as by labeling with [32P]orthophosphate. The phosphorylation occurs exclusively on serine residues and phosphorylated RAS1 protein is predominantly membrane localized. The phosphorylation of RAS2 protein is demonstrated by similar 32P-labeling experiments. The phosphorylation occurs exclusively on serine residues and phosphopeptide analyses suggest that only two major phosphorylated tryptic peptides are generated from the RAS2 protein. These results provide evidence for the phosphorylation of RAS proteins in vivo. Furthermore, our demonstration that the phosphorylation occurs exclusively on serine residues and that the RAS2 protein contains only two major phosphorylated tryptic peptides argues that the phosphorylation may be physiologically significant.

Posttranslational modification of ras proteins: detection of a modification prior to fatty acid acylation and cloning of a gene responsible for the modification

Products of ras genes are synthesized as precursors in the cytosol and transported to the plasma membrane by a process which involves posttraslational modification by fatty acid. In this paper, we present evidence for the occurrence in the cytosol of an intermediate modification of ras proteins prior to the fatty acid acylation. The modification is detected by a slight shift in the mobility of the protein on SDS polyacrylamide gel. The fatty acid acylation does not contribute to this mobility shift. This modification is affected by the dprl mutation which has recently been shown to affect the processing of yeast RAS proteins. To further characterize the nature of the modification event, we have cloned DPR1 gene from the DNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The gene is actively transcribed in yeast cells producing mRNA of approximately 1.6 kb. Genes related to the DRP1 appear to be present in a distantly related yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe as well as in guinea pig and human cells.