1
|
Masutti S, Falivena C, Purba FD, Jommi C, Mukuria C, Finch AP. Content validity of the EQ-HWB and EQ-HWB-S in a sample of Italian patients, informal caregivers and members of the general public. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2024; 8:36. [PMID: 38519577 PMCID: PMC10959916 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-024-00706-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The EuroQol Group recently developed two new instruments, the EQ Health and Wellbeing (EQ-HWB) and the EQ Health and Wellbeing short version (EQ-HWB-S). The EQ-HWB and EQ-HWB-S are intended to capture a broad range of health and broader quality of life aspects, which may be relevant to general public members, patients, their families, social care users and informal carers. This study assesses the content validity of the Italian version of the two instruments in a sample of Italian patients, social care users and informal carers. METHODS Participants were recruited using a convenience sampling approach. One-on-one interviews were carried out using video-conferencing interviews. A semi-structured topic guide was used to guide the interview procedures, with open-ended questions supplemented by probes. Participants were asked to explain important aspects of their health and quality of life, to complete the questionnaires and verbalize their thoughts. RESULTS Twenty participants comprising of patients (n = 9), informal carers (n = 6), and members of the general public (n = 5) participated to the study. Content validity was summarized into six main themes: comprehension, interpretation, acceptability, relevance, response options and recall period. All participants found the instruments easy or quite easy to understand and to respond to. Items were relevant for all three groups of participants, and response options appropriate. CONCLUSIONS The Italian version of the EQ-HWB showed content validity in measuring health and wellbeing in a mixed Italian population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Camilla Falivena
- Centre for Research on Health and Social Care Management (CERGAS), SDA Bocconi School of Management, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Claudio Jommi
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| | - Clara Mukuria
- Sheffiled Centre of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Aureliano Paolo Finch
- EuroQol Office, EuroQol Research Foundation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Health Values Research and Consultancy, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kuharić M, Pickard AS, Mukuria C, Finch AP. The Measurement Properties of the EQ Health and Well-being and EQ Health and Well-Being Short Form in Italian Population: A Comparative Study With EQ-5D-5L. Value Health 2024:S1098-3015(24)00116-5. [PMID: 38490471 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The EQ Health and Well-being, EQ-HWB (25-item) and the EQ-HWB-S (9-item), are new generic measures of health and well-being. The purpose of this study was to examine the measurement properties of the EQ-HWB and EQ-HWB-S measures in relation to the EQ-5D-5L among the Italian general population. METHODS A cross-sectional survey was conducted from October 2020 to February 2021, followed by secondary analysis of collected data from Italian adults. This analysis included response pattern distributions, correlation strength, and known-group comparison. Known-group comparison was assessed using effect sizes (ES) across health conditions, caregiver status, and social care usage. The EQ-HWB-S index-based score was based on the UK pilot value set, whereas the Italian value set was used for scoring the EQ-5D-5L index. RESULTS Out of the 1182 participants, 461 reported having a chronic condition, 185 identified as caregivers, and 42 were social care users. EQ-HWB items (7.5%) showed fewer ceiling effects than EQ-5D-5L items (34.7%). Strong correlations (rs > 0.5) were found between overlapping EQ-HWB and EQ-5D-5L items. EQ-HWB-S and EQ-5D-5L index scores demonstrated similar discrimination based on symptomatic chronic conditions (ES d = 0.68 vs d = 0.71), but EQ-HWB-S had slightly higher ES for social care users (ES d = 0.84 vs d = 0.74). CONCLUSIONS Initial evidence supports the validity of EQ-HWB/EQ-HWB-S because outcome measures in the Italian population. EQ-HWB-S performed comparably to EQ-5D-5L among patients and was better in differentiating social care users. A slight decrease in discriminative properties for caregivers was observed when transitioning from EQ-HWB to EQ-HWB-S.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja Kuharić
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - A Simon Pickard
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; Maths in Health BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Clara Mukuria
- Division of Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mukuria C, Rowen D, Acaster S, McGarry LJ, Lou Y, Sosnay PR, Quittner AL. Psychometric performance of the CFQ-R-8D compared to the EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D in people with cystic fibrosis. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2024; 8:24. [PMID: 38416239 PMCID: PMC10900011 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-024-00697-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare the psychometric performance of the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised-8 Dimensions (CFQ-R-8D), a new, condition-specific, preference-based measure, with that of generic preference-based measures EQ-5D-3L and Short Form 6 dimensions (SF-6D). METHODS Data from three trials of participants with CF aged ≥ 14 years who completed the CFQ-R and EQ-5D-3L or SF-6D were used. Analyses were undertaken to evaluate convergent validity based on correlations with CFQ-R domain scores. Known-group validity was assessed based on percent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second and pulmonary exacerbations. Responsiveness was based on correlation of change and sensitivity to change based on change in symptom severity. Effect sizes and standardized response means were estimated. RESULTS CFQ-R-8D utilities and dimensions were strongly correlated with most of the overlapping CFQ-R domain scores (ρ > 0.5); EQ-5D-3L and SF-6D utilities and dimensions had moderate (ρ > 0.3) to strong correlations in dimensions capturing similar concepts. All measures showed evidence of known-group validity (P < 0.05). Change correlations were strong for CFQ-R-8D utilities and dimensions and CFQ-R, but they were moderate for SF-6D and mostly weak ((ρ > 0.1) for EQ-5D-3L. The SF-6D had the largest mean change over time and effect sizes, followed by CFQ-R-8D and then EQ-5D-3L. Neither CFQ-R-8D or SF-6D utility scores had ceiling effects (< 9% responses in full health) compared with those of EQ-5D-3L (61-62%). In participants classified as being in full health by EQ-5D-3L, CFQ-R-8D captured CF-specific health problems, particularly cough, abdominal pain, and breathing difficulty. CONCLUSIONS The CFQ-R-8D reflected known-group differences and changes over time with stronger evidence of good psychometric performance than EQ-5D-3L and similar evidence as SF-6D. Additionally, the CFQ-R-8D captured more condition-specific symptoms than EQ-5D-3L or SF-6D, which are important determinants of health-related quality of life for people with CF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| | - Donna Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | | | - Yiyue Lou
- Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kharroubi SA, Mukuria C, Dawoud D, Rowen D. Estimating the SF-6Dv1 Value Set for a Population-Based Sample in Lebanon. Value Health Reg Issues 2024; 42:1-10. [PMID: 38340672 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2023.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The SF-6Dv1 is a preference-based measure derived from the SF-36 for use in quality-adjusted life-year estimation for cost-utility analysis. Country-specific value sets for SF-6Dv1 are needed to reflect societal preferences but none are available for Lebanon and other Arabic countries. This study aimed to generate a value set for SF-6Dv1 for Lebanon and to compare results with the UK set. METHODS A sample of 249 health states defined by the SF-6Dv1 were valued by a representative sample of 577 members of the Lebanon general population, using standard gamble. Several multivariate regression models at mean and individual level were fitted to estimate utilities for all SF-6Dv1 states with selection of best fitting models based on predictive ability, consistency, and model fit. The best fitting models were compared with those fitted in the UK study. RESULTS Data from 553 eligible respondents providing 3308 valuations were used for the analysis. Lebanese values were consistently higher than UK values, indicating differences in preferences, and there were no negative values. The random effects model using only main effects was the best performing model. There were inconsistencies in 2 dimensions, thereby consistent models were estimated with values ranging from 0.367 to 1. The results are consistent with the UK results. CONCLUSIONS This study provides the first population-based value set for SF-6Dv1 health states for Lebanon, making it possible to generate quality-adjusted life-years for cost-utility analysis studies. The potential for applications of a standardized utility measure is enormous both in Lebanon and all Arab countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samer A Kharroubi
- Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon; Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Sheffield, England, UK.
| | - Clara Mukuria
- Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Dalia Dawoud
- Clinical Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt; Science Policy and Research Programme, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, England, UK
| | - Donna Rowen
- Population Health, School of Medicine and Population Health, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Sheffield, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Powell PA, Rowen D, Keetharuth A, Mukuria C. Understanding UK public views on normative decisions made to value health-related quality of life in children: A qualitative study. Soc Sci Med 2024; 340:116506. [PMID: 38104438 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
Developing methodology for measuring and valuing child health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a priority for health technology agencies. One aspect of this is normative decisions that are made in child HRQoL valuation. This qualitative study aimed to better understand adult public opinion on the normative questions of whose preferences to elicit (adults, children, or both) and from which perspective (who should be imagined living in impaired health), when valuing child HRQoL. Opinions of the adult UK public (N = 32) were solicited using online semi-structured focus groups, featuring a breadth of age, sex, ethnicities, and responsibility for children under 18 years. Participants were provided with bespoke informational material on health state valuation and were probed for their views. Arguments for and against different positions were discussed. Data was analysed using framework analysis. Participants demonstrated near-to-universal agreement that children should be involved in valuation in some form, yet this should differ depending on age or maturity. There was strong support for approaches combining involvement from children and adults (e.g., their parents), especially for younger children. There was little intuitive support for the 'taxpayer argument' for asking taxpaying adults. In the context of greater involvement of children in valuation, most participants supported using an 'own' perspective. Most participants thought that valuation study participants should know the exercise is about valuing child health states for ethical reasons. Informed views from the UK public on who should be asked and with what perspective when valuing child HRQoL appear to differ from normative positions previously advocated by some health economists, such as prioritising the preferences of taxpaying adults. In contrast, the results suggest including adults and children in valuation, with the proviso that the children are of an appropriate age and level of maturity, and that an own perspective is used wherever possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip A Powell
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK.
| | - Donna Rowen
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Anju Keetharuth
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Clara Mukuria
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rowen D, Mukuria C, Bray N, Carlton J, Cooper S, Longworth L, Meads D, O'Neill C, Yang Y. UK Valuation of EQ-5D-5L, a Generic Measure of Health-Related Quality of Life: A Study Protocol. Value Health 2023; 26:1625-1635. [PMID: 37722593 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A high-quality and widely accepted UK EQ-5D-5L value set is urgently required to enable the latest version of EQ-5D scored using recent UK public preferences to inform policy including health technology assessments submitted to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. This article outlines the study protocol for the generation of a new EQ-5D-5L UK value set. METHODS Twelve hundred interviews will be undertaken using the composite time trade-off elicitation technique for 102 health states (86 from the international EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol, plus 16 with best predictive performance in an extended design used in the Native American EQ-5D-5L valuation). The sample will be UK adults (age ≥18 years) proportionately representative across England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland, representative for age, sex, ethnicity, and socioeconomic group, with inclusion of participants with/without health problems. Participants will choose to be interviewed via videoconference (by Zoom) or in-person in a central venue. Data quality will be rigorously assessed. RESULTS The value set will be generated using tobit random effects and heteroscedastic tobit models (with censoring at -1) using all data, excluding time trade-off values highlighted by participants as ones they would reconsider and data from interviewers failing protocol compliance. Quality and acceptance will be achieved by public involvement, regular Steering Group meetings, independent assessment of data quality at 4 time points, and final endorsement of data and analyses. CONCLUSION This study will produce a UK value set for the EQ-5D-5L for use in prospective and retrospective data sets containing EQ-5D-5L data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna Rowen
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.
| | - Clara Mukuria
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Nathan Bray
- Academy for Health Equity, Prevention and Wellbeing, Bangor University, Bangor, Wales, UK
| | - Jill Carlton
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Sophie Cooper
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, England, UK
| | | | - David Meads
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, UK
| | - Ciaran O'Neill
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland; National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - Yaling Yang
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mukuria C, Peasgood T, McDool E, Norman R, Rowen D, Brazier J. Valuing the EQ Health and Wellbeing Short Using Time Trade-Off and a Discrete Choice Experiment: A Feasibility Study. Value Health 2023; 26:1073-1084. [PMID: 36805577 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The EQ Health and Wellbeing Short (EQ-HWB-S) is a new generic measure that covers health and wellbeing developed for use in economic evaluation in health and social care. The aim was to test the feasibility of using composite time trade-off (cTTO) and a discrete choice experiment (DCE) based on an international protocol to derive utilities for the EQ-HWB-S and to generate a pilot value set. METHODS A representative UK general population was recruited. Online videoconference interviews were undertaken where cTTO and DCE tasks were administered using EuroQol Portable Valuation Technology. Quality control (QC) was used to assess interviewers' performance. Data were modeled using Tobit, probit, and hybrid models. Feasibility was assessed based on the distribution of data, participants, and reports of understanding from the interviewer, QC and modeling results. RESULTS cTTO and DCE data were available for 520 participants. Demographic characteristics were broadly representative of the UK general population. Interviewers met QC requirements. cTTO values ranged between -1 to 1 with increasing disutility associated with more severe states. Participants understood the tasks and the EQ-HWB-S states; and the interviewers reported high levels of understanding and engagement. The hybrid Tobit heteroscedastic model was selected for the pilot value set with values ranging from -0.384 to 1. Pain, mobility, daily activities, and sad/depressed had the largest disutilities, followed by loneliness, anxiety, exhaustion, control, and cognition in the selected model. CONCLUSIONS EQ-HWB-S can be valued using cTTO and DCE. Further methodological work is recommended to develop a valuation protocol specific to the EQ-HWB-S.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.
| | - Tessa Peasgood
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Emily McDool
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Richard Norman
- Curtin School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Donna Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - John Brazier
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Acaster S, Mukuria C, Rowen D, Brazier JE, Wainwright CE, Quon BS, Duckers J, Quittner AL, Lou Y, Sosnay PR, McGarry LJ. Development of the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised-8 Dimensions: Estimating Utilities From the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised. Value Health 2023; 26:567-578. [PMID: 36509366 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cystic fibrosis (CF) limits survival and negatively affects health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) may be used to make reimbursement decisions for new CF treatments; nevertheless, generic utility measures used in CEA, such as EQ-5D, are insensitive to meaningful changes in lung function and HRQOL in CF. Here we develop a new, CF disease-specific, preference-based utility measure based on the adolescent/adult version of the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R), a widely used, CF-specific, patient-reported measure of HRQOL. METHODS Blinded CFQ-R data from 4 clinical trials (NCT02347657, NCT02392234, NCT01807923, and NCT01807949) were used to identify discriminating items for a classification system using psychometric (eg, factor and Rasch) analyses. Thirty-two health states were selected for a time trade-off (TTO) exercise with a representative sample of the UK general population. TTO utilities were used to estimate a preference-based scoring algorithm by regression analysis (tobit models with robust standard errors clustered on participants with censoring at -1). RESULTS A classification system with 8 dimensions (CFQ-R-8 dimensions; physical functioning, vitality, emotion, role functioning, breathing difficulty, cough, abdominal pain, and body image) was generated. TTO was completed by 400 participants (mean age, 47.3 years; 49.8% female). Among the regression models evaluated, the tobit heteroscedastic-ordered model was preferred, with a predicted utility range from 0.236 to 1, no logical inconsistencies, and a mean absolute error of 0.032. CONCLUSION The CFQ-R-8 dimensions is the first disease-specific, preference-based scoring algorithm for CF, enabling estimation of disease-specific utilities for CEA based on the well-validated and widely used CFQ-R.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Donna Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - John E Brazier
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Claire E Wainwright
- Child Health Research Centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Bradley S Quon
- Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul's Hospital, and Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jamie Duckers
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, NHS Wales, Cardiff, Wales, UK
| | | | - Yiyue Lou
- Biostatistics, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Patrick R Sosnay
- Clincal Development, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lisa J McGarry
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Weng G, Hong Y, Luo N, Mukuria C, Jiang J, Yang Z, Li S. Comparing EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in measuring the HRQoL burden of 4 health conditions in China. Eur J Health Econ 2023; 24:197-207. [PMID: 35538178 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-022-01465-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND EQ-5D-3L has been used in the National Health Services Survey of China since 2008 to monitor population health. The five-level version of EQ-5D was developed, but there lacks evidence to support the use of five-level version of EQ-5D in China. This study was conducted to compare the measurement properties of both the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in quantifying health-related quality of life (HRQoL) burden for 4 different health conditions in China. METHODS Participants from China were recruited to complete the 3L and 5L questionnaire via Internet. Quota was set to recruit five groups of individuals, with one group of individuals without any health condition and one group of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), HIV/AIDS, chronic Hepatitis B (CHB), or depression, respectively. The 3L and 5L were compared in terms of response distributions, percentages of reporting 'no problems', index value distributions, known-group validity and their relative efficiency. RESULTS In total, 500 individuals completed the online survey, including 140 healthy individuals, 122 individuals with hepatitis B, 107 with depression, 90 individuals with GAD and 101 with HIV/AIDS. 5L also had smoother and less clustered index value distributions. Healthy group showed different response distributions to the four condition groups. The percentage of reporting 'no problems' decreased significantly in the 5L in all domains (P < 0.01), especially in the pain/discomfort dimension (relative difference: 43.10%). Relative efficiency suggested that 5L had a higher absolute discriminatory power than the 3L version between healthy participant and the other 4 condition groups, especially for the HIV/AIDS group when the 3L results was not significant. CONCLUSIONS The 5L version may be preferable to the 3L, as it demonstrated superior performance with respect to higher sensitivity to mild health problems, better relative efficiency and responses and index value distributions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guizhi Weng
- College of Pharmacy, Jinan University, 601 West Huangpu avenue, 510632, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Yanming Hong
- College of Pharmacy, Jinan University, 601 West Huangpu avenue, 510632, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Nan Luo
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jie Jiang
- College of Pharmacy, Jinan University, 601 West Huangpu avenue, 510632, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
- Dongguan Institute of Jinan University, Dongguan, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhihao Yang
- College of Pharmacy, Jinan University, 601 West Huangpu avenue, 510632, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
- Health Services Management Department, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, People's Republic of China.
| | - Sha Li
- College of Pharmacy, Jinan University, 601 West Huangpu avenue, 510632, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Brazier J, Peasgood T, Mukuria C, Luo N, Mulhern B, Pickard AS, Augustovski F, Greiner W, Engel L. Author Reply. Value Health 2023; 26:437-440. [PMID: 36372299 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- John Brazier
- University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.
| | | | | | - Nan Luo
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Brendan Mulhern
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rowen D, Mukuria C, McDool E. A Systematic Review of the Methodologies and Modelling Approaches Used to Generate International EQ-5D-5L Value Sets. Pharmacoeconomics 2022; 40:863-882. [PMID: 35829931 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01159-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The international protocol for valuing EQ-5D-5L focuses upon prescribed preference elicitation methods and design. However, there are no recommendations around sampling, recruitment, data analysis or modelling to generate the EQ-5D-5L value set. This review examines methods used to generate international EQ-5D-5L values sets, across sampling, recruitment, data analysis, modelling, assessing model performance and selection of the recommended value set. METHODS All published EQ-5D-5L value sets were identified by a systematic search and confirmed by the EuroQol Group. Data were extracted to assess sampling, recruitment, preference elicitation techniques and design, data analysis, modelling, assessing model performance, and vale set selection. These are summarised in tables. RESULTS The review included 29 studies with 27 value sets generated using time-trade-off (TTO) data (n = 10) only or using a hybrid model that combines TTO and discrete choice experiment data (n = 17). TTO data were most commonly estimated using a heteroscedastic Tobit model with censoring at - 1, and the hybrid model using a specially created program. Model performance was generally assessed using goodness of fit, logical consistency and significance of coefficients, suitability of the model for the data characteristics and parsimony, though not all selected models account for the specific characteristics of the data. DISCUSSION Different assessments of model performance and reasoning are provided for the selection of the recommended value set for a country. This raises the question of valid criteria for selecting a recommended value set and whether this should rely upon researchers' recommendations when value sets are often used to inform public policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Emily McDool
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Welie AG, Stolk E, Mukuria C, Belay YB, Krahn MD, Sander B, Gebretekle GB. Reliability and validity of using EQ-5D-5L among healthy and adolescents with major mental health disorders in Ethiopia. Eur J Health Econ 2022; 23:1105-1119. [PMID: 35013918 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-021-01412-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The EQ-5D is a validated and widely used generic measure of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in both healthy individuals and those with various medical conditions. The objective of this study was to test whether EQ-5D-5L is reliable and valid for use among school sample adolescents and those with major mental health disorders in Ethiopia. METHODS Participants were recruited from ten sub-districts comprising the Butajira Rural Health Programme (BRHP) and Butajira major mental health disorders center. Data were collected using an Amharic (Ethiopia) EQ-5D-5L self-complete-paper and the questionnaire was administered 10 days after the first completion for test-retest procedures. Two-way mixed-effects models absolute intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to test reliability of the instrument while Kruskal-Wallis rank test with pairwise comparison was used to assess the known group validity of the instrument. RESULTS There were 501 (201 school sample and 300 adolescents with major mental health disorders) participants recruited and 497 were included in the sample for analysis. The ICC was high (ICC > 0.7, p < 0.001) for all EQ-5D-5L dimensions, EQ-5D-5L utility index and EQ-VAS scores. The findings revealed that the Amharic EQ-5D-5L has significant known group validity as shown by the difference in scores among various disease group (depression, schizophrenia, and bipolar) and experience of chronic illness. CONCLUSIONS The results shows that the Amharic EQ-5D-5L is reliable and valid instrument for the measurement of HRQoL among adolescent populations in Ethiopia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abraham G Welie
- School of Pharmacy, College of Health Science, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia.
| | - Elly Stolk
- Executive Office, EuroQol Research Foundation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Clara Mukuria
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Yared Belete Belay
- School of Pharmacy, College of Health Science, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia
| | - Murray D Krahn
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Beate Sander
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Peasgood T, Mukuria C, Rowen D, Tsuchiya A, Wailoo A. Should We Consider Including a Value for "Hope" as an Additional Benefit Within Health Technology Assessment? Value Health 2022; 25:1619-1623. [PMID: 35490086 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2021] [Revised: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Health technology assessment (HTA) typically uses average health-related quality of life gain as its main measure of benefit used in economic evaluation. Nevertheless, there have been calls to consider novel aspects of benefit including the "value of hope," defined as a patients' potential preferences for a wider distribution of treatment benefit with a positive skew, in the hope that they will be one of the lucky ones. The value of hope may also derive from feeling hopeful as a positive mental state, which may be missing from current measures of health-related quality of life. The value attributed to feeling hopeful could be related to, or additional to, the value derived from possible risk-seeking preferences. Here, we reflect upon the strength of the case for the inclusion of the "value of hope" taking a critical look at the commonly referenced evidence for including the "value of hope" as risk-seeking preferences. We also draw attention to other conceptions of hope-as an emotion, a cognitive process, or a combination of both-and reflect upon the potential of including these broader notions of hope into HTA. The case for the inclusion of the "value of hope" based on risk-seeking preferences is weak. We suggest research questions that could give further evidence on whether hope is an important missing value from HTA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Peasgood
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.
| | - Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Donna Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Aki Tsuchiya
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK; Department of Economics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Allan Wailoo
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rowen D, Mukuria C, Bray N, Carlton J, Longworth L, Meads D, O'Neill C, Shah K, Yang Y. Assessing the comparative feasibility, acceptability and equivalence of videoconference interviews and face-to-face interviews using the time trade-off technique. Soc Sci Med 2022; 309:115227. [DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
15
|
Mayland CR, Keetharuth AD, Mukuria C, Haugen DF. Validation of 'Care Of the Dying Evaluation' (CODE TM) within an international study exploring bereaved relatives' perceptions about quality of care in the last days of life. J Pain Symptom Manage 2022; 64:e23-e33. [PMID: 35257928 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.02.340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Assessing quality of care provided during the dying phase using validated tools aids quality assurance and recognizes unmet need. OBJECTIVE To assess construct validity and internal consistency of 'Care Of the Dying Evaluation' (CODETM) within an international context. METHODS Post-bereavement survey (August 2017 to September 2018) using CODETM. Respondents were next-of-kin to adult patients (≥ 18 years old) with cancer who had an 'expected' death within 22 study site hospitals in 7 countries: Argentina, Brazil, Germany, Norway, Poland, United Kingdom, Uruguay. Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (EFA and CFA) were conducted, and internal reliability was assessed using Cronbach alpha (α). Known group validity was assessed by ability to discriminate quality of care based in place (Palliative Care Units (PCUs)) and country (Poland, where most deaths were in PCUs) of care. Differences were quantified using effect sizes (ES). RESULTS A 914 CODETM questionnaires completed (54% response rate). 527 (58%) male deceased patients; 610 (67%) next-of-kin female who were most commonly the 'spouse/partner' (411, 45%). EFA identified 4 factors: 'Overall care,' 'Communication and support,' 'Trust, respect and dignity,' and 'Symptom management' with good reliability scores (α = 0.628 - 0.862). CFA confirmed the 4-factor model; these were highly correlated and a bifactor model showed acceptable fit. The ES for quality of care in PCU's was 0.727; ES for Poland was 0.657, supporting the sensitivity of CODETM to detect differences. CONCLUSION Within an international context, good evidence supports the validity and reliability of CODETM for assessing the quality of care provided in the last days of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catriona R Mayland
- Yorkshire Cancer Research Senior Clinical Research Fellow and Honorary Consultant in Palliative Medicine (C.R.M.), University of Sheffield, Honorary Clinical Fellow, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
| | - Anju D Keetharuth
- School of Health and Related Research (A.D.K., C.M.), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research (A.D.K., C.M.), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Dagny Faksvåg Haugen
- Regional Centre of Excellence for Palliative Care, Western Norway (D.F.H.), Haukeland University Hospital, and Department of Clinical Medicine K1, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rowen D, Mukuria C, Powell PA, Wailoo A. Exploring the Issues of Valuing Child and Adolescent Health States Using a Mixed Sample of Adolescents and Adults. Pharmacoeconomics 2022; 40:479-488. [PMID: 35292942 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01133-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Preferences for child and adolescent health states used to generate health state utility values can be elicited from adults, young adults, adolescents, or combinations of these. This commentary paper provides a critical overview of issues and implications arising from valuing child and adolescent health states using a novel approach of a mixed sample of adolescents and adults. The commentary is informed by critical analysis of normative, ethical, practical and theoretical arguments in the health state valuation literature. Discussion focusses upon adolescent empowerment, understanding and psychosocial maturity; ethical concerns; elicitation tasks; perspective; and selection of sample proportions across adolescents and adults. It is argued that valuation of child and adolescent health states by both adolescents and adults could involve all participants completing the same preference elicitation task using the same perspective (e.g. time trade-off imagining they are living in the health state), and all preferences being modelled to generate a combined value set that reflects both adolescent and adult preferences. It is concluded that the valuation of child and adolescent health states by a mixed adolescent and adult sample appears feasible and has the advantage that it includes some of the population who can potentially experience the health states, thus enabling adolescents to express their views around matters that may affect them, and the population that are taxpayers and voters. However, both the relative proportion of adults and adolescents to include in a valuation sample and the elicitation technique require careful consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent St, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent St, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Philip A Powell
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent St, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Allan Wailoo
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent St, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rencz F, Mukuria C, Bató A, Poór AK, Finch AP. A qualitative investigation of the relevance of skin irritation and self-confidence bolt-ons and their conceptual overlap with the EQ-5D in patients with psoriasis. Qual Life Res 2022; 31:3049-3060. [PMID: 35471487 PMCID: PMC9039271 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03141-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Objectives A number of bolt-ons have been proposed for the EQ-5D, including two psoriasis-specific bolt-ons, skin irritation and self-confidence. The study investigates and compares the relevance and comprehensiveness of these psoriasis-specific bolt-ons and the EQ-5D-5L and explores the potential conceptual overlaps between the existing five dimensions and the two bolt-ons. Methods Psoriasis patients were purposively sampled according to age and gender. Semi-structured interviews, where participants were asked to complete the EQ-5D-5L and the bolt-ons while thinking aloud, were conducted. Probes were used to investigate the thought processes of patients regarding the dimensions, wording, recall period and relevant concepts not captured by the EQ-5D-5L and bolt-ons. Data were analysed thematically. A focus group was used to confirm the findings. Results Overall, 16 patients completed the interviews. Sixteen and fifteen patients considered skin irritation and self-confidence relevant areas to describe psoriasis problems. Three patients considered itching a form of discomfort, and thus, pointed out a potential overlap between pain/discomfort and skin irritation. Twelve patients reported overall 10 general health- or psoriasis-related concepts that are not captured by the EQ-5D-5L, including itching, social relationships and sex life. Eleven patients reported that the recall period of the EQ-5D-5L might be subject to bias because of the daily or within-day fluctuations of their symptoms. Conclusions The skin irritation and self-confidence bolt-ons contribute to improve content validity of the EQ-5D-5L in patients with psoriasis. The qualitative approach taken in this study expands the existing methodological framework for the development and testing validity of bolt-ons for the EQ-5D. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-022-03141-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fanni Rencz
- Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, 8 Fővám tér, 1093, Budapest, Hungary.
| | - Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Alex Bató
- Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, 8 Fővám tér, 1093, Budapest, Hungary
- Károly Rácz Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Adrienn Katalin Poór
- Department of Dermatology, Dermatooncology and Venereology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Carlton J, Peasgood T, Mukuria C, Johnson J, Ogden M, Tovey W. The role of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) within the development of the EQ Health and Wellbeing (EQ-HWB). J Patient Rep Outcomes 2022; 6:35. [PMID: 35394269 PMCID: PMC8993969 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-022-00437-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The value of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) within the development and refinement of outcome measures is becoming increasingly recognized. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of how PPIE was integrated within the development of a new measure designed for use in economic evaluations across health and social care, the EQ Health and Wellbeing (EQ-HWB™). Methods Four PPIE sessions were held at key stages. Discussions from each session and the outcome of any tasks were shared with the wider research team and used to help inform decision-making. Results and discussion PPIE covered several components of outcome measure development including; review of conceptual model; discussion on sub-domain inclusion; item refinement and reduction; pre-testing of items; selection of items for the measure; and design of the measure. Key learning points for future projects were highlighted including; consideration of practicalities, resources and logistics of PPIE activities; how sessions and activities are managed effectively; and how to managing expectations and communication from both researcher and PPIE perspectives. Conclusions The PPIE group provided invaluable insight into perspectives of future patients and carers. Their input was fed into a number of developmental stages. The formal involvement from the PPIE group meant that the voice of the general public was heard. This helped ensure the appropriateness of the design of the final measure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill Carlton
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Tessa Peasgood
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Julie Johnson
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | | | - Wade Tovey
- On Behalf of the EQ-HWB PPIE Group, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Augustovski F, Argento F, Rodríguez RB, Gibbons L, Mukuria C, Belizán M. The Development of a New International Generic Measure (EQ-HWB): Face Validity and Psychometric Stages in Argentina. Value Health 2022; 25:544-557. [PMID: 35148961 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Revised: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to present the face validity and psychometric stages performed in Spanish in Argentina, the only Spanish-speaking country of an international collaboration that undertook the construction of a new measure that can be used in economic evaluation across health, social care, and public health, the EQ EQ-HWB (EQ Health and Wellbeing). We also explored the relationship among 3-level version EQ-5D (EQ-5D-3L), 5-level version EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L), and EQ-HWB. METHODS Face validity was based on semistructured face to face interviews of a purposive sample to explore translatability of language and concepts of 97 candidate items, translated into Argentina Spanish. The psychometric evaluation using an online panel assessed the psychometric properties of 64 items that were carried forward (floor and ceiling effects, item correlations, known-group differences in relevant prespecified subgroups by the international and local teams, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and item response theory). EQ-5D-3L, EQ-5D-5L, and EQ-HWB correlations were explored. RESULTS In the face validity stage, 24 interviews with carers, general public, patients, and users of social services were included. Most items showed adequate face validity. In the psychometric assessment, 497 participants were recruited (64% reporting a long-term health condition). Most of the items showed adequate psychometrics in an Argentinian context. EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L had strong correlations, and EQ-HWB was moderately correlated to EQ visual analog scale. The Argentina team recommended 23 of the final 25 items. CONCLUSIONS The assessment of Spanish items contributed to the overall development of EQ-HWB and helped inform the design of an internationally relevant 25-item and a short 9-item measure intended to be used in economic evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Augustovski
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - Fernando Argento
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Rocío B Rodríguez
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Luz Gibbons
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - María Belizán
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Peasgood T, Mukuria C, Brazier J, Marten O, Kreimeier S, Luo N, Mulhern B, Greiner W, Pickard AS, Augustovski F, Engel L, Gibbons L, Yang Z, Monteiro AL, Kuharic M, Belizan M, Bjørner J. Developing a New Generic Health and Wellbeing Measure: Psychometric Survey Results for the EQ-HWB. Value Health 2022; 25:525-533. [PMID: 35365299 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The development of measures such as the EQ-HWB (EQ Health and Wellbeing) requires selection of items. This study explored the psychometric performance of candidate items, testing their validity in patients, social carer users, and carers. METHODS Article and online surveys that included candidate items (N = 64) were conducted in Argentina, Australia, China, Germany, United Kingdom, and the United States. Psychometric assessment on missing data, response distributions, and known group differences was undertaken. Dimensionality was explored using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Poorly fitting items were identified using information functions, and the function of each response category was assessed using category characteristic curves from item response theory (IRT) models. Differential item functioning was tested across key subgroups. RESULTS There were 4879 respondents (Argentina = 508, Australia = 514, China = 497, Germany = 502, United Kingdom = 1955, United States = 903). Where missing data were allowed, it was low (UK article survey 2.3%; US survey 0.6%). Most items had responses distributed across all levels. Most items could discriminate between groups with known health conditions with moderate to large effect sizes. Items were less able to discriminate across carers. Factor analysis found positive and negative measurement factors alongside the constructs of interest. For most of the countries apart from China, the confirmatory factor analysis model had good fit with some minor modifications. IRT indicated that most items had well-functioning response categories but there was some evidence of differential item functioning in many items. CONCLUSIONS Items performed well in classical psychometric testing and IRT. This large 6-country collaboration provided evidence to inform item selection for the EQ-HWB measure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Peasgood
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.
| | - Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - John Brazier
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Ole Marten
- Department of Health Economics and Health Care Management, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Simone Kreimeier
- Department of Health Economics and Health Care Management, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Nan Luo
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Brendan Mulhern
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Wolfgang Greiner
- Department of Health Economics and Health Care Management, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - A Simon Pickard
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Lidia Engel
- Deakin Health Economics, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Luz Gibbons
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Zhihao Yang
- Health Services Management Department, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China
| | - Andrea L Monteiro
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Maja Kuharic
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Maria Belizan
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mukuria C, Connell J, Carlton J, Peasgood T, Scope A, Clowes M, Rand S, Jones K, Brazier J. Qualitative Review on Domains of Quality of Life Important for Patients, Social Care Users, and Informal Carers to Inform the Development of the EQ-HWB. Value Health 2022; 25:492-511. [PMID: 35365298 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Revised: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify the themes to inform the content of a new generic measure, the EQ-HWB (EQ Health and Wellbeing), that can be used in economic evaluation across health, social care, and public health, based on the views of users and beneficiaries of these services including informal carers. METHODS A qualitative review was undertaken. Systematic and citation searches were undertaken focusing on qualitative evidence of the impact on quality of life from reviews for selected health conditions, informal carers, social care users, and primary qualitative work used in the development of selected measures. A subset of studies was included in the review. Framework analysis and synthesis were undertaken based on a conceptual model. RESULTS A total of 42 reviews and 24 primary studies were selected for inclusion in the review. Extraction and synthesis resulted in 7 high-level themes (with subthemes): (1) feelings and emotions (sadness, anxiety, hope, frustration, safety, guilt/shame); (2) cognition (concentration, memory, confusion, thinking clearly); (3) self-identity (dignity/respect, self-esteem); (4) "coping, autonomy, and control" relationships; (5) social connections (loneliness, social engagement, stigma, support, friendship, belonging, burden); (6) physical sensations (pain, discomfort, sleep, fatigue); and (7) activity (self-care, meaningful activities, mobility, communication, hearing, vision). Apart from physical sensations, most of the other themes and subthemes were relevant across both health and social care, including for informal carers. CONCLUSIONS The findings from this broad review identified themes that go beyond health and that are relevant to patients, informal carers, and social care users. The themes and subthemes informed the domains for the EQ-HWB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.
| | - Janice Connell
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Jill Carlton
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Tessa Peasgood
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Alison Scope
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Mark Clowes
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Stacey Rand
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Canterbury, England, UK
| | - Karen Jones
- Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU), University of Kent, Canterbury, England, UK
| | - John Brazier
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Brazier J, Peasgood T, Mukuria C, Marten O, Kreimeier S, Luo N, Mulhern B, Pickard AS, Augustovski F, Greiner W, Engel L, Belizan M, Yang Z, Monteiro A, Kuharic M, Gibbons L, Ludwig K, Carlton J, Connell J, Rand S, Devlin N, Jones K, Tsuchiya A, Lovett R, Naidoo B, Rowen D, Rejon-Parrilla JC. The EQ-HWB: Overview of the Development of a Measure of Health and Wellbeing and Key Results. Value Health 2022; 25:482-491. [PMID: 35277337 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Existing measures for estimating quality-adjusted life-years are mostly limited to health-related quality of life. This article presents an overview of the development the EQ-HWB (EQ Health and Wellbeing), which is a measure that encompasses health and wellbeing. METHODS Stages: (1) Establishing domains through reviews of the qualitative literature informed by a conceptual framework. (2) Generation and selection of items to cover the domains. (3) Face validation of these items through qualitative interviews with 168 patients, social care users, general population, and carers across 6 countries (Argentina, Australia, China, Germany, United Kingdom, United States). (4) Extensive psychometric testing of candidate items (using classical, factor analysis, and item response theory methods) on > 4000 respondents in the 6 countries. Stakeholders were consulted throughout. RESULTS A total of 32 subdomains grouped into 7 high-level domains were identified from the qualitative literature and 97 items generated to cover them. Face validation eliminated 36 items, modified 14, and added 3. Psychometric testing of 64 items found little difference in missing data or problems with response distribution, the conceptual model was confirmed except in China, and most items performed well in the item response theory in all countries. Evidence was presented to stakeholders in 2 rounds of consultation to inform the final selection of items for the EQ-HWB (25-item) and the short version of EQ-HWB (9-items). CONCLUSIONS EQ-HWB measures have been developed internationally for evaluating interventions in health, public health, and social care including the impact on patients, social care users, and carers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Brazier
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Tessa Peasgood
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Ole Marten
- Department of Health Economics and Health Care Management, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Simone Kreimeier
- Department of Health Economics and Health Care Management, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Nan Luo
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Brendan Mulhern
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Australia
| | - A Simon Pickard
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Federico Augustovski
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Wolfgang Greiner
- Department of Health Economics and Health Care Management, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Lidia Engel
- Deakin Health Economics, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Australia
| | - Maria Belizan
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Zhihao Yang
- Health Services Management Department, Guizhou Medical University, Guizhou, China
| | - Andrea Monteiro
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Maja Kuharic
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Luz Gibbons
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Kristina Ludwig
- Department of Health Economics and Health Care Management, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Jill Carlton
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Janice Connell
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Stacey Rand
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, England, UK
| | - Nancy Devlin
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Karen Jones
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, England, UK
| | - Aki Tsuchiya
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Rosemary Lovett
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK; National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, England, UK
| | - Bhash Naidoo
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, England, UK
| | - Donna Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Juan Carlos Rejon-Parrilla
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, England, UK; Andalusian Agency for Health Technology Assessment, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Carlton J, Peasgood T, Mukuria C, Connell J, Brazier J, Ludwig K, Marten O, Kreimeier S, Engel L, Belizán M, Yang Z, Monteiro A, Kuharic M, Luo N, Mulhern B, Greiner W, Pickard S, Augustovski F. Generation, Selection, and Face Validation of Items for a New Generic Measure of Quality of Life: The EQ-HWB. Value Health 2022; 25:512-524. [PMID: 35227597 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This article aims to describe the generation and selection of items (stage 2) and face validation (stage 3) of a large international (multilingual) project to develop a new generic measure, the EQ-HWB (EQ Health and Wellbeing), for use in economic evaluation across health, social care, and public health to estimate quality-adjusted life-years. METHODS Items from commonly used generic, carer, social care, and mental health quality of life measures were mapped onto domains or subdomains identified from a literature review. Potential terms and items were reviewed and refined to ensure coverage of the construct of the domains/subdomain (stage 2). Input on the potential item pool, response options, and recall period was sought from 3 key stakeholder groups. The pool of candidate items was tested in qualitative interviews with potential future users in an international face validation study (stage 3). RESULTS Stage 2 resulted in the generation of 687 items. Predetermined selection criteria were applied by the research team resulting in 598 items being dropped, leaving 89 items that were reviewed by key stakeholder groups. Face validation (stage 3) tested 97 draft items and 4 response scales. A total of 47 items were retained and 14 were modified, whereas 3 were added to the candidate pool of items. This resulted in a 64-item set. CONCLUSIONS This international multiculture, multilingual study with a common methodology identified many items that performed well across all countries. These were taken to the psychometric testing along with modified and new items for the EQ-HWB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill Carlton
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK.
| | - Tessa Peasgood
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Janice Connell
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - John Brazier
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Kristina Ludwig
- Department of Health Economics and Health Care Management, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Ole Marten
- Department of Health Economics and Health Care Management, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Simone Kreimeier
- Department of Health Economics and Health Care Management, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Lidia Engel
- Deakin Health Economics, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Maria Belizán
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Zhihao Yang
- Health Services Management Department, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China
| | - Andrea Monteiro
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Maja Kuharic
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Nan Luo
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Brendan Mulhern
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Wolfgang Greiner
- Department of Health Economics and Health Care Management, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Simon Pickard
- Department of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Federico Augustovski
- Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS-CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
McDool E, Mukuria C, Brazier J. Correction to: A Comparison of the SF-6Dv2 and SF-6D UK Utility Values in a Mixed Patient and Healthy Population. Pharmacoeconomics 2022; 40:139. [PMID: 34820774 PMCID: PMC8738353 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-021-01114-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Emily McDool
- The School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| | - Clara Mukuria
- The School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - John Brazier
- The School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kularatna S, Chen G, Senanayake S, Hettiarachchi R, Parsonage W, Norman R, Mulhern B, Mukuria C, Rowen D, McPhail S. Australian Health Utility Value Set for MacNew-7D Heart Disease-Specific Measure. Heart Lung Circ 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2022.06.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
|
26
|
Rowen D, Powell P, Mukuria C, Carlton J, Norman R, Brazier J. Deriving a Preference-Based Measure for People With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy From the DMD-QoL. Value Health 2021; 24:1499-1510. [PMID: 34593174 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Revised: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study generates a preference-based measure for capturing the quality of life of people with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) from a new measure of quality of life, DMD-QoL. METHODS A health state classification system was derived from the DMD-QoL based on psychometric performance of items, factor analysis, and item response theory analysis. Preferences for health states described by the classification system were elicited using an online discrete choice experiment survey with life years as an additional attribute, from members of the UK general population (n = 1043). Discrete choice experiment data was modeled using a conditional fixed-effects logit model and utility estimates were directly anchored on the 1 to 0 full health-dead scale. RESULTS The health state classification system has 8 dimensions: mobility, difficulty using hands, difficulty breathing, pain, tiredness, worry, participation, and feeling good about yourself. The standard model had mostly statistically significant coefficients and reflected the instrument's monotonic structure. However, 2 dimensions had inconsistent coefficients (where utility increased as health worsened) and a consistent model was estimated that merged adjacent inconsistent severity levels. The best state defined by the classification system has a value of 1 and the worst state has a value of -0.559. CONCLUSION The modeled results enable DMD-QoL-8D utility values to be generated using DMD-QoL or DMD-QoL-8D data to generate QALYs for people with DMD. QALYs can then be used to inform economic models of the cost-effectiveness of interventions in DMD. Future research comparing the psychometric performance of DMD-QoL-8D to existing generic preference-based measures, including EQ-5D-5L, is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, England, UK.
| | - Philip Powell
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Jill Carlton
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Richard Norman
- School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - John Brazier
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Foster A, Thompson J, Holding E, Ariss S, Mukuria C, Jacques R, Akparido R, Haywood A. Impact of social prescribing to address loneliness: A mixed methods evaluation of a national social prescribing programme. Health Soc Care Community 2021; 29:1439-1449. [PMID: 33084083 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Revised: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Loneliness is considered a global public health issue because of its detrimental impact on physical and mental health but little is known about which interventions can reduce loneliness. One potential intervention is social prescribing, where a link worker helps service-users to access appropriate support such as community activities and social groups. Some qualitative studies have identified that social prescribing may help to reduce service-users' loneliness. Given this, the British Red Cross (a third sector organisation) developed and delivered a national social prescribing service in the United Kingdom to support people who were experiencing, or at risk of, loneliness. Service-users could receive up to 12 weeks of support from a link worker. A mixed methods study was conducted to understand the impact of the support on loneliness, and to identify the facilitators and barriers to service delivery. The study included: (a) analysis of quantitative data collected routinely between May 2017 and December 2019 (n = 10,643) including pre-post analysis of UCLA data (n = 2,250) and matched comparator work to measure changes in loneliness; (b) semi-structured interviews with service-users, link workers and volunteers (n = 60) and (c) a Social Return on Investment Analysis. The majority of the service-users (72.6%, n = 1634/2250) felt less lonely after receiving support. The mean change in UCLA score was -1.84 (95% CI -1.91 to -1.77) of a maximum change of 6.00 (decrease indicates an improvement). Additional benefits included improved wellbeing, increased confidence and life having more purpose. The base case analysis estimated a social return on investment of £3.42 per £1 invested in the service. Having skilled link workers and support tailored to individual needs appeared key. However, challenges included utilising volunteers, meeting some service-users' needs in relation to signposting and sustaining improvements in loneliness. Nonetheless, the service appeared successful in supporting service-users experiencing loneliness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexis Foster
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jill Thompson
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Eleanor Holding
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Steve Ariss
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Richard Jacques
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Robert Akparido
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Annette Haywood
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Peasgood T, Mukuria C, Carlton J, Connell J, Devlin N, Jones K, Lovett R, Naidoo B, Rand S, Rejon-Parrilla JC, Rowen D, Tsuchiya A, Brazier J. What is the best approach to adopt for identifying the domains for a new measure of health, social care and carer-related quality of life to measure quality-adjusted life years? Application to the development of the EQ-HWB? Eur J Health Econ 2021; 22:1067-1081. [PMID: 33909157 PMCID: PMC8318935 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-021-01306-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Economic evaluation combines costs and benefits to support decision-making when assessing new interventions using preference-based measures to measure and value benefits in health or health-related quality of life. These health-focused instruments have limited ability to capture wider impacts on informal carers or outcomes in other sectors such as social care. Sector-specific instruments can be used but this is problematic when the impact of an intervention straddles different sectors.An alternative approach is to develop a generic preference-based measure that is sufficiently broad to capture important cross-sector outcomes. We consider the options for the selection of domains for a cross-sector generic measure including how to identify domains, who should provide information on the domains and how this should be framed. Beyond domain identification, considerations of criteria and stakeholder needs are also identified.This paper sets out the case for an approach that relies on the voice of patients, social care users and informal carers as the main source of domains and describes how the approach was operationalised in the 'Extending the QALY' project which developed the new measure, the EQ-HWB (EQ health and wellbeing instrument). We conclude by discussing the strengths and limitations of this approach. The new measure should be sufficiently generic to be used to consistently evaluate health and social care interventions, yet also sensitive enough to pick up important changes in quality of life in patients, social care users and carers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Peasgood
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
- School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jill Carlton
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Janice Connell
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Nancy Devlin
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Karen Jones
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | - Rosemary Lovett
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), London, UK
| | - Bhash Naidoo
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), London, UK
| | - Stacey Rand
- Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
| | | | - Donna Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Aki Tsuchiya
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Department of Economics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - John Brazier
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
McDool E, Mukuria C, Brazier J. A Comparison of the SF-6Dv2 and SF-6D UK Utility Values in a Mixed Patient and Healthy Population. Pharmacoeconomics 2021; 39:929-940. [PMID: 34043147 PMCID: PMC8613095 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-021-01033-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/17/2021] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This paper describes the first evaluation of the construct validity and performance of the newly developed preference-based measure of health, the SF-6D version 2 (SF-6Dv2). METHOD Utilising data from the Multi-Instrument Comparison (MIC) project (n = 7932), we explored the descriptive differences in utility values between the SF-6Dv2 and the SF-6D and evaluated the known group validity of both measures by testing the statistical significance of differences in utility values and calculating the effect sizes across known groups. The convergent validity of the SF-6Dv2 was explored by examining whether the SF-6Dv2 is related to alternative validated measures, including the EQ-5D-5L and AQoL-8D. RESULTS Differences between the utility values of the SF-6Dv2 and SF-6D were evident; utilities were generally lower for the SF-6Dv2, with larger standard deviations resulting in larger absolute differences between groups. The SF-6Dv2 performed well in terms of known-group validity and successfully distinguished disease severity and between the disease and healthy groups, outperforming the SF-6D in some but not all groups. Convergent validity analyses indicated strong associations between the SF-6Dv2 and the SF-6D, EQ-5D-5L and AQoL-8D utilities. CONCLUSIONS The psychometric performance of the SF-6Dv2 is favourable with respect to known group validity and convergent validity, but does not seem to have improved, compared with the SF-6D. However, the new method of valuation has had a substantial impact on the size of absolute differences in utility values, which could impact quality-adjusted life-year results. The economic evaluation of health interventions may therefore be influenced by the choice of the SF-6Dv2 over the SF-6D.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily McDool
- The School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| | - Clara Mukuria
- The School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - John Brazier
- The School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Finch AP, Brazier J, Mukuria C. Selecting Bolt-on Dimensions for the EQ-5D: Testing the Impact of Hearing, Sleep, Cognition, Energy, and Relationships on Preferences Using Pairwise Choices. Med Decis Making 2021; 41:89-99. [PMID: 33256502 PMCID: PMC7780267 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x20969686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Generic preference-based measures (GPBMs) such as the EQ-5D are valid across many conditions, but in some cases, "bolting on" additional dimensions may improve validity. The selection of "bolt-ons" has been based on the psychometric impact of individual dimensions, but preferences provide another important way to select them. This study aims to test the potential of using pairwise choices to inform the selection of bolt-ons for the EQ-5D-5L. METHODS General population preferences were collected using an online survey of 1040 UK residents. Three EQ-5D-5L health state pairs were selected based on pairs that had a 50:50 split in respondent preferences from a previous pairwise survey. Participants were presented with pairwise choices of EQ-5D-5L health states without and with bolt-ons of hearing, sleep, cognition, energy, and relationships, each added individually. Logistic models were used to assess the impact of bolt-ons, as well as bolt-ons at different severity levels, on the log odds of responders choosing between health states. RESULTS Preferences varied according to the bolt-ons and their severity level (only levels 1, 3, and 5 were used). Additions of bolt-ons at level 1 generally resulted in nonstatistically significant differences while additions of bolt-ons at level 3 and level 5 produced a negative and statistically significant impact on preferences for the health state with the bolt-on. At level 5, hearing had the largest impact, followed by cognition, relationships, energy, and sleep. At level 3, cognition produced the largest impact, followed by hearing and sleep with similar impacts, energy, and relationships. This ordering offers information for bolt-on selection, with hearing and cognition appearing as the most important. The weight placed on the different health problems is not constant across severity levels between bolt-ons. CONCLUSIONS Pairwise choices provide a cost-effective approach of generating information on preferences to support bolt-on selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aureliano Paolo Finch
- />School of Health and Related Research,
University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- />EuroQol Research Foundation, Rotterdam, the
Netherlands
| | - John Brazier
- School of Health and Related Research,
University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research,
University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Welie AG, Gebretekle GB, Stolk E, Mukuria C, Krahn MD, Enquoselassie F, Fenta TG. Valuing Health State: An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for Ethiopians. Value Health Reg Issues 2019; 22:7-14. [PMID: 31683254 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.08.475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2019] [Revised: 07/30/2019] [Accepted: 08/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There is a growing interest in health technology assessment and economic evaluations in developing countries such as Ethiopia. The objective of this study was to derive an EQ-5D-5L value set from the Ethiopian general population to facilitate cost utility analysis. METHODS A nationally representative sample (N = 1050) was recruited using a stratified multistage quota sampling technique. Face-to-face, computer-assisted interviews using the EuroQol Portable Valuation Technology (EQ-PVT) protocol of composite time trade-off (c-TTO) and discrete choice experiments (DCEs) were undertaken to elicit preference scores. The feasibility of the EQ-PVT protocol was pilot tested in a sample of the population (n = 110). A hybrid regression model combining c-TTO and DCE data was used to estimate the final value set. RESULTS In the pilot study, the acceptability of the tasks was good, and there were no special concerns with undertaking the c-TTO and DCE tasks. The coefficients generated from a hybrid model were logically consistent. The predicted values for the EQ-5D-5L ranged from -0.718 to 1. Level 5 anxiety/depression had the largest impact on utility decrement (-0.458), whereas level 5 self-care had the least impact (-0.222). The maximum predicted value beyond full health was 0.974 for the 11112 health state. CONCLUSIONS This is the first EQ-5D-5L valuation study in Africa using international valuation methods (c-TTO and DCE) and also the first using the EQ-PVT protocol to derive a value set. We expect that the availability of this value set will facilitate health technology assessment and health-related quality-of-life research and inform policy decision making in Ethiopia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abraham G Welie
- School of Pharmacy, College of Health Science, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia.
| | | | - Elly Stolk
- Executive Office, EuroQol Research Foundation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Clara Mukuria
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England, UK
| | - Murray D Krahn
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Fikre Enquoselassie
- School of Public Health, College of Health Science, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Teferi Gedif Fenta
- School of Pharmacy, College of Health Science, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Mukuria C, Rowen D, Harnan S, Rawdin A, Wong R, Ara R, Brazier J. An Updated Systematic Review of Studies Mapping (or Cross-Walking) Measures of Health-Related Quality of Life to Generic Preference-Based Measures to Generate Utility Values. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2019; 17:295-313. [PMID: 30945127 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-019-00467-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mapping is an increasingly common method used to predict instrument-specific preference-based health-state utility values (HSUVs) from data obtained from another health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure. There have been several methodological developments in this area since a previous review up to 2007. OBJECTIVE To provide an updated review of all mapping studies that map from HRQoL measures to target generic preference-based measures (EQ-5D measures, SF-6D, HUI measures, QWB, AQoL measures, 15D/16D/17D, CHU-9D) published from January 2007 to October 2018. DATA SOURCES A systematic review of English language articles using a variety of approaches: searching electronic and utilities databases, citation searching, targeted journal and website searches. STUDY SELECTION Full papers of studies that mapped from one health measure to a target preference-based measure using formal statistical regression techniques. DATA EXTRACTION Undertaken by four authors using predefined data fields including measures, data used, econometric models and assessment of predictive ability. RESULTS There were 180 papers with 233 mapping functions in total. Mapping functions were generated to obtain EQ-5D-3L/EQ-5D-5L-EQ-5D-Y (n = 147), SF-6D (n = 45), AQoL-4D/AQoL-8D (n = 12), HUI2/HUI3 (n = 13), 15D (n = 8) CHU-9D (n = 4) and QWB-SA (n = 4) HSUVs. A large number of different regression methods were used with ordinary least squares (OLS) still being the most common approach (used ≥ 75% times within each preference-based measure). The majority of studies assessed the predictive ability of the mapping functions using mean absolute or root mean squared errors (n = 192, 82%), but this was lower when considering errors across different categories of severity (n = 92, 39%) and plots of predictions (n = 120, 52%). CONCLUSIONS The last 10 years has seen a substantial increase in the number of mapping studies and some evidence of advancement in methods with consideration of models beyond OLS and greater reporting of predictive ability of mapping functions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Donna Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Sue Harnan
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Andrew Rawdin
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Ruth Wong
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Roberta Ara
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - John Brazier
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Finch AP, Brazier JE, Mukuria C. Selecting Bolt-On Dimensions for the EQ-5D: Examining Their Contribution to Health-Related Quality of Life. Value Health 2019; 22:50-61. [PMID: 30661634 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2018] [Revised: 06/18/2018] [Accepted: 07/01/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Generic preference-based measures may miss dimensions important for the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients. When this happens, a possible solution is to add bolt-ons. Finch et al. (Finch AP, Brazier JE, Mukuria C, Bjorner JB. An exploratory study on using principal component analysis and confirmatory factor analysis to identify bolt-on dimensions: the EQ-5D case study. Value Health 2017;10:1362-75) have recently shown that bolt-ons can be systematically identified using factor analysis. Nevertheless, because for each bolt-on option a complete re-evaluation may be required, methods to select between them are needed. OBJECTIVES To investigate the possibility of selecting bolt-ons using their ability to predict differences in HRQOL. It tests six factors (energy/vitality, satisfaction, relationships, hearing, vision, and speech), and 37 items loading on them, using the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire as a case study. METHODS Data were obtained from the Multi-Instrument Comparison study, an online survey on health and well-being measures carried out in six countries. Two tests were performed. In the first test, linear regressions were fitted to determine whether different bolt-ons helped explain variations in HRQOL as measured by the Health visual analogue scale. The upper anchor (100) of this scale represents excellent physical, mental, and social health, and the lower anchor (0) represents death. Bolt-on relevance was judged comparing the strength, direction, and statistical significance of unadjusted β coefficients. In the second test, linear regressions were fitted to further investigate whether different factors and items helped explain the negative effect of six chronic conditions on HRQOL. A reduction in the coefficients for the chronic condition dummies meant that the factor or item detected the effect. RESULTS Energy/vitality, relationships, and satisfaction reported substantially larger coefficients than did speech, vision, and hearing. Also, items loading on energy/vitality, relationships, and satisfaction generally presented larger coefficients than did those loading on speech, vision, and hearing. The second test did not detect consistent decrements in the coefficients for chronic conditions when testing factors, but it generally did detect consistent decrements when testing items. CONCLUSIONS The first test appeared useful for bolt-on selection. Further research is needed before using the second test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aureliano Paolo Finch
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| | - John Edward Brazier
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Clara Mukuria
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Finch AP, Brazier JE, Mukuria C. What is the evidence for the performance of generic preference-based measures? A systematic overview of reviews. Eur J Health Econ 2018; 19:557-570. [PMID: 28560520 PMCID: PMC5913394 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-017-0902-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2016] [Accepted: 05/18/2017] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the evidence on the validity and responsiveness of five commonly used preference-based instruments, the EQ-5D, SF-6D, HUI3, 15D and AQoL, by undertaking a review of reviews. METHODS Four databases were investigated using a strategy refined through a highly sensitive filter for systematic reviews. References were screened and a search for grey literature was performed. Identified citations were scrutinized against pre-defined eligibility criteria and data were extracted using a customized extraction template. Evidence on known group validity, convergent validity and responsiveness was extracted and reviewed by narrative synthesis. Quality of the included reviews was assessed using a modified version of the AMSTAR checklist. RESULTS Thirty reviews were included, sixteen of which were of excellent or good quality. The body of evidence, covering more than 180 studies, was heavily skewed towards EQ-5D, with significantly fewer studies investigating HUI3 and SF-6D, and very few the 15D and AQoL. There was also lack of head-to-head comparisons between GPBMs and the tests reported by the reviews were often weak. Where there was evidence, EQ-5D, SF-6D, HUI3, 15D and AQoL seemed generally valid and responsive instruments, although not for all conditions. Evidence was not consistently reported across reviews. CONCLUSIONS Although generally valid, EQ-5D, SF-6D and HUI3 suffer from some problems and perform inconsistently in some populations. The lack of head-to-head comparisons and the poor reporting impedes the comparative assessment of the performance of GPBMs. This highlights the need for large comparative studies designed to test instruments' performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aureliano Paolo Finch
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, West Court, 1 Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 4DT, UK.
| | - John Edward Brazier
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, West Court, 1 Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 4DT, UK
| | - Clara Mukuria
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, West Court, 1 Mappin Street, Sheffield, S1 4DT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Finch AP, Brazier JE, Mukuria C, Bjorner JB. An Exploratory Study on Using Principal-Component Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis to Identify Bolt-On Dimensions: The EQ-5D Case Study. Value Health 2017; 20:1362-1375. [PMID: 29241896 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2017] [Revised: 05/03/2017] [Accepted: 06/02/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Generic preference-based measures such as the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D) are used in economic evaluation, but may not be appropriate for all conditions. When this happens, a possible solution is adding bolt-ons to expand their descriptive systems. Using review-based methods, studies published to date claimed the relevance of bolt-ons in the presence of poor psychometric results. This approach does not identify the specific dimensions missing from the Generic preference-based measure core descriptive system, and is inappropriate for identifying dimensions that might improve the measure generically. This study explores the use of principal-component analysis (PCA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for bolt-on identification in the EQ-5D. METHODS Data were drawn from the international Multi-Instrument Comparison study, which is an online survey on health and well-being measures in five countries. Analysis was based on a pool of 92 items from nine instruments. Initial content analysis provided a theoretical framework for PCA results interpretation and CFA model development. PCA was used to investigate the underlining dimensional structure and whether EQ-5D items were represented in the identified constructs. CFA was used to confirm the structure. CFA was cross-validated in random halves of the sample. RESULTS PCA suggested a nine-component solution, which was confirmed by CFA. This included psychological symptoms, physical functioning, and pain, which were covered by the EQ-5D, and satisfaction, speech/cognition,relationships, hearing, vision, and energy/sleep which were not. These latter factors may represent relevant candidate bolt-ons. CONCLUSIONS PCA and CFA appear useful methods for identifying potential bolt-ons dimensions for an instrument such as the EQ-5D.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aureliano Paolo Finch
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| | - John Edward Brazier
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Clara Mukuria
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jakob Bue Bjorner
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK; Optum Insight, Eden Prairie, Minnesota, USA; Faculty of Health and Medical Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ara R, Peasgood T, Mukuria C, Chevrou-Severac H, Rowen D, Azzabi-Zouraq I, Paisley S, Young T, van Hout B, Brazier J. Sourcing and Using Appropriate Health State Utility Values in Economic Models in Health Care. Pharmacoeconomics 2017; 35:7-9. [PMID: 29052161 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-017-0543-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Ara
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, UK.
| | - Tessa Peasgood
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, UK
| | - Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, UK
| | - Helene Chevrou-Severac
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG, Thurgauerstrasse 130, 8152, Glattpark-Opfikon (Zurich), Switzerland
| | - Donna Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ismail Azzabi-Zouraq
- Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG, Thurgauerstrasse 130, 8152, Glattpark-Opfikon (Zurich), Switzerland
| | - Suzy Paisley
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, UK
| | - Tracey Young
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ben van Hout
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, UK
| | - John Brazier
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
Mapping functions are estimated using regression analyses and are frequently used to predict health state utility values (HSUVs) in decision analytic models. Mapping functions are used when evidence on the required preference-based measure (PBM) is not available, or where modelled values are required for a decision analytic model, for example to control for important sociodemographic variables (such as age or gender). This article provides an overview of the latest recommendations including pre-mapping considerations, the mapping process including data requirements for undertaking the estimation of mapping functions, regression models for estimating mapping functions, assessing performance and reporting standards for mapping studies. Examples in rheumatoid arthritis are used for illustration. When reporting the results of mapping standards the following should be reported: a description of the dataset used (including distributions of variables used) and any analysis used to inform the selection of the model type and model specification. The regression method and specification should be justified, and as summary statistics may mask systematic bias in errors, plots comparing observed and predicted HSUVs. The final model (coefficients, error term(s), variance and covariance) should be reported together with a worked example. It is important to ensure that good practice is followed as any mapping functions will only be as appropriate and accurate as the method used to obtain them; for example, mapping should not be used if there is no overlap between the explanatory and target variables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Ara
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, UK
| | - Donna Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, UK.
| | - Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Velikova G, Valderas JM, Potter C, Batchelder L, A’Court C, Baker M, Bostock J, Coulter A, Fitzpatrick R, Forder J, Fox D, Geneen L, Gibbons E, Jenkinson C, Jones K, Kelly L, Peters M, Mulhern B, Labeit A, Rowen D, Meadows K, Elliott J, Brazier J, Knowles E, Keetharuth A, Brazier J, Connell J, Carlton J, Buck LT, Ricketts T, Barkham M, Goswami P, Salek S, Ionova T, Oliva E, Fielding AK, Karakantza M, Al-Ismail S, Collins GP, McConnell S, Langton C, Jennings DM, Else R, Kell J, Ward H, Day S, Lumley E, Phillips P, Duncan R, Buckley-Woods H, Aber A, Jones G, Michaels J, Porter I, Gangannagaripalli J, Davey A, Ricci-Cabello I, Haywood K, Hansen ST, Valderas J, Roberts D, Gumber A, Podmore B, Hutchings A, van der Meulen J, Aggarwal A, Konan S, Price A, Jackson W, Bottomley N, Philiips M, Knightley-Day T, Beard D, Gibbons E, Fitzpatrick R, Greenhalgh J, Gooding K, Gibbons E, Valderas C, Wright J, Dalkin S, Meads D, Black N, Fawkes C, Froud R, Carnes D, Price A, Cook J, Dakin H, Smith J, Kang S, Beard D, Griffiths C, Guest E, Harcourt D, Murphy M, Hollinghurst S, Salisbury C, Carlton J, Elliott J, Rowen D, Gao A, Price A, Beard D, Lemanska A, Chen T, Dearnaley DP, Jena R, Sydes M, Faithfull S, Ades AE, Kounali D, Lu G, Rombach I, Gray A, Jenkinson C, Rivero-Arias O, Holch P, Holmes M, Rodgers Z, Dickinson S, Clayton B, Davidson S, Routledge J, Glennon J, Henry AM, Franks K, Velikova G, Maguire R, McCann L, Young T, Armes J, Harris J, Miaskowski C, Kotronoulas G, Miller M, Ream E, Patiraki E, Geiger A, Berg GV, Flowerday A, Donnan P, McCrone P, Apostolidis K, Fox P, Furlong E, Kearney N, Gibbons C, Fischer F, Gibbons C, Coste J, Martinez JV, Rose M, Leplege A, Shingler S, Aldhouse N, Al-Zubeidi T, Trigg A, Kitchen H, Davey A, Porter I, Green C, Valderas JM, Coast J, Smith S, Hendriks J, Black N, Shah K, Rivero-Arias O, Ramos-Goni JM, Kreimeier S, Herdman M, Devlin N, Finch AP, Brazier JE, Mukuria C, Zamora B, Parkin D, Feng Y, Bateman A, Herdman M, Devlin N, Patton T, Gutacker N, Shah K. Proceedings of Patient Reported Outcome Measure's (PROMs) Conference Oxford 2017: Advances in Patient Reported Outcomes Research : Oxford, UK. 8th June 2017. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2017; 15:185. [PMID: 29035171 PMCID: PMC5667589 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-017-0757-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
|
39
|
Mukuria C, Rowen D, Hernández-Alava M, Dixon S, Ara R. Predicting Productivity Losses from Health-Related Quality of Life Using Patient Data. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2017; 15:597-614. [PMID: 28364369 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-017-0326-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This paper estimates productivity loss using the health of the patient in order to allow indirect estimation of these costs for inclusion in economic evaluation. METHODS Data from two surveys of inpatients [Health outcomes data repository (HODaR) sample (n = 42,442) and health improvement and patient outcomes (HIPO) sample (n = 6046)] were used. The number of days off paid employment or normal activities (excluding paid employment) was modelled using the health of the patients measured by the EQ-5D, international classification of diseases (ICD) chapters, and other health and sociodemographic data. Two-part models (TPMs) and zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) models were identified as the most appropriate specifications, given large spikes at the minimum and maximum days for the dependent variable. Analysis was undertaken separately for the two datasets to account for differences in recall period and identification of those who were employed. RESULTS Models were able to reflect the large spike at the minimum (zero days) but not the maximum, with TPMs doing slightly better than the ZINB model. The EQ-5D was negatively associated with days off employment and normal activities in both datasets, but ICD chapters only had statistically significant coefficients for some chapters in the HODaR. CONCLUSIONS TPMs can be used to predict productivity loss associated with the health of the patient to inform economic evaluation. Limitations include recall and response bias and identification of who is employed in the HODaR, while the HIPO suffers from a small sample size. Both samples exclude some patient groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
- Health Economics and Decision Science, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Donna Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Health Economics and Decision Science, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Mónica Hernández-Alava
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Health Economics and Decision Science, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Simon Dixon
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Health Economics and Decision Science, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Roberta Ara
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
- Health Economics and Decision Science, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Saxon D, Ashley K, Bishop-Edwards L, Connell J, Harrison P, Ohlsen S, Hardy GE, Kellett S, Mukuria C, Mank T, Bower P, Bradburn M, Brazier J, Elliott R, Gabriel L, King M, Pilling S, Shaw S, Waller G, Barkham M. A pragmatic randomised controlled trial assessing the non-inferiority of counselling for depression versus cognitive-behaviour therapy for patients in primary care meeting a diagnosis of moderate or severe depression (PRaCTICED): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2017; 18:93. [PMID: 28249592 PMCID: PMC5333411 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-1834-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2016] [Accepted: 02/09/2017] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND NICE guidelines state cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is a front-line psychological treatment for people presenting with depression in primary care. Counselling for Depression (CfD), a form of Person-Centred Experiential therapy, is also offered within Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) services for moderate depression but its effectiveness for severe depression has not been investigated. A full-scale randomised controlled trial to determine the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of CfD is required. METHODS PRaCTICED is a two-arm, parallel group, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial comparing CfD against CBT. It is embedded within the local IAPT service using a stepped care service delivery model where CBT and CfD are routinely offered at step 3. Trial inclusion criteria comprise patients aged 18 years or over, wishing to work on their depression, judged to require a step 3 intervention, and meeting an ICD-10 diagnosis of moderate or severe depression. Patients are randomised using a centralised, web-based system to CfD or CBT with each treatment being delivered up to a maximum 20 sessions. Both interventions are manualised with treatment fidelity tested via supervision and random sampling of sessions using adherence/competency scales. The primary outcome measure is the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 collected at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Secondary outcome measures tap depression, generic psychological distress, anxiety, functioning and quality of life. Cost-effectiveness is determined by a patient service receipt questionnaire. Exit interviews are conducted with patients by research assessors blind to treatment allocation. The trial requires 500 patients (250 per arm) to test the non-inferiority hypothesis of -2 PHQ-9 points at the one-sided, 2.5% significance level with 90% power, assuming no underlying difference and a standard deviation of 6.9. The primary analysis will be undertaken on all patients randomised (intent to treat) alongside per-protocol and complier-average causal effect analyses as recommended by the extension to the CONSORT statement for non-inferiority trials. DISCUSSION This large-scale trial utilises routinely collected outcome data as well as specific trial data to provide evidence of the comparative efficacy and cost-effectiveness of Counselling for Depression compared with Cognitive Behaviour Therapy as delivered within the UK government's Improving Access to Psychological Therapies initiative. TRIAL REGISTRATION Controlled Trials ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN06461651 . Registered on 14 September 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Saxon
- Health Services Research, Centre for Psychological Services Research, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, 30 Regent St, Sheffield, S1 2DA UK
| | - Kate Ashley
- Health Services Research, Centre for Psychological Services Research, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, 30 Regent St, Sheffield, S1 2DA UK
- Sheffield IAPT (Sheffield Health & Social Care NHS Foundation Trust), St George’s Community Health Centre, Winter Street, Sheffield, S3 7ND UK
| | - Lindsey Bishop-Edwards
- Health Services Research, Centre for Psychological Services Research, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, 30 Regent St, Sheffield, S1 2DA UK
| | - Janice Connell
- Health Services Research, Centre for Psychological Services Research, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, 30 Regent St, Sheffield, S1 2DA UK
| | - Phillippa Harrison
- Clinical Psychology Unit, Centre for Psychological Services Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN UK
- Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN UK
| | - Sally Ohlsen
- Health Services Research, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, 30 Regent St, Sheffield, S1 4DA UK
| | - Gillian E. Hardy
- Clinical Psychology Unit, Centre for Psychological Services Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN UK
- Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN UK
| | - Stephen Kellett
- Clinical Psychology Unit, Centre for Psychological Services Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN UK
- Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN UK
- Sheffield IAPT (Sheffield Health & Social Care NHS Foundation Trust), St George’s Community Health Centre, Winter Street, Sheffield, S3 7ND UK
| | - Clara Mukuria
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, 30 Regent St, Sheffield, S1 2DA UK
| | - Toni Mank
- Sheffield IAPT (Sheffield Health & Social Care NHS Foundation Trust), St George’s Community Health Centre, Winter Street, Sheffield, S3 7ND UK
| | - Peter Bower
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL UK
| | - Mike Bradburn
- Clinical Trial Research Unit, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, 30 Regent St, Sheffield, S1 2DA UK
| | - John Brazier
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, 30 Regent St, Sheffield, S1 2DA UK
| | - Robert Elliott
- Counselling Unit, School of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, Room 507, Graham Hills Building, 40 George Street, Glasgow, G1 1QE UK
| | - Lynne Gabriel
- School of Psychological and Social Sciences, York St John University, Lord Mayor’s Walk, York, YO31 7EX UK
| | - Michael King
- Division of Psychiatry, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, Sixth Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Rd, London, W1T 7NF UK
| | - Stephen Pilling
- Research Department of Clinical Health and Educational Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB UK
| | - Sue Shaw
- c/o Mental Health Group, Health Services Research, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, 30 Regent St, Sheffield, S1 2DA UK
| | - Glenn Waller
- Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN UK
- Department of Psychology, Clinical Psychology Unit, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN UK
| | - Michael Barkham
- Clinical Psychology Unit, Centre for Psychological Services Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN UK
- Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Tappenden P, Harnan S, Ren S, Thokala P, Wong R, Mukuria C, Green C, Pledge S, Tidy J. Olaparib for Maintenance Treatment of BRCA 1 or 2 Mutated, Relapsed, Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian, Fallopian Tube and Peritoneal Cancer in People Whose Relapsed Disease has Responded to Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal. Pharmacoeconomics 2017; 35:97-109. [PMID: 27506954 DOI: 10.1007/s40273-016-0440-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
As part of its Single Technology Appraisal process, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) invited the manufacturer of olaparib (AstraZeneca) to submit evidence on the clinical and cost effectiveness of olaparib for the maintenance treatment of BRCA1/2 mutated (BRCAm), platinum-sensitive relapsed (PSR) ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal cancer in people whose relapsed disease has responded to platinum-based chemotherapy. The Evidence Review Group (ERG) produced a critical review of the evidence contained within the company's submission (CS) to NICE. The clinical evidence related to one phase II, double-blind randomised controlled trial that recruited 265 patients with PSR serous ovarian cancer (OC) regardless of BRCAm status. Patients received olaparib 400 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) or matched placebo. In the whole population, the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) was met (hazard ratio [HR] 0.35; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.49, p < 0.01) for olaparib versus placebo. The BRCAm subgroup analysis (added after the study commenced but 1 month before the primary analysis was undertaken) reported an HR for PFS of 0.18 (95 % CI 0.10-0.31, p < 0.0001) for olaparib versus placebo, though interaction tests appeared inconclusive. Overall survival was not statistically significant in the whole group (HR 0.88; 95 % CI 0.64-1.21; p = 0.44) or the BRCAm subgroup (0.73; 95 % CI 0.45-1.17; p = 0.19), though treatment switching may have confounded results. The exclusion of data from sites allowing crossover resulted in an HR for overall survival (OS) of 0.52 (95 % CI 0.28-0.97, p = 0.039) in the BRCAm group. Health-related quality-of-life measures were not significantly different between groups. All post hoc exploratory outcomes (time to treatment discontinuation/death, time to first subsequent therapy/death, and time to second subsequent therapy/death) were statistically significantly better in the olaparib arm in the whole population and the BRCAm subgroup analyses. Adverse events were more frequent for olaparib but were largely minor or manageable. The company's semi-Markov model assessed the cost effectiveness of olaparib versus routine surveillance in patients with BRCAm PSR OC from a National Health Service (NHS) and Personal Social Services (PSS) perspective over a lifetime horizon. The model suggests that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for olaparib versus routine surveillance is expected to be approximately £49,146 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. The ERG did not consider the company's cost-effectiveness estimates to be credible. Additional ERG analyses suggested that the ICER is likely to be more than £92,214 per QALY gained. Additional analyses provided by the company in patients who received three or more lines of chemotherapy suggested a more favourable cost-effectiveness profile for olaparib. The NICE Appraisal Committee recommended olaparib for this subgroup provided the cost of olaparib for people who continue to receive treatment after 15 months will be met by the company.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Tappenden
- ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, England, UK.
| | - Sue Harnan
- ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, England, UK
| | - Shijie Ren
- ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, England, UK
| | - Praveen Thokala
- ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, England, UK
| | - Ruth Wong
- ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, England, UK
| | - Clara Mukuria
- ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, England, UK
| | - Clare Green
- Southampton General Hospital and Hampshire Hospitals Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Simon Pledge
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - John Tidy
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Mukuria C, Young T, Keetharuth A, Borghs S, Brazier J. Sensitivity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L in patients with uncontrolled focal seizures: an analysis of Phase III trials of adjunctive brivaracetam. Qual Life Res 2016; 26:749-759. [PMID: 28004320 PMCID: PMC5309305 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-016-1483-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/08/2016] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Preference-based measures are required to measure the impact of interventions for cost-effectiveness analysis. This study assessed the psychometric performance of the EQ-5D-3L in adults with uncontrolled focal (partial-onset) seizures. Methods Data from three Phase III studies of an antiepileptic drug (adjunctive brivaracetam; n = 1095) were used. Analysis included correlations between EQ-5D-3L and Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31P) and seizure frequency. Known group validity was based on ability of the EQ-5D-3L to discriminate between baseline QOLIE-31P total scores, seizure type and number of antiepileptic drugs using effect sizes (ES). Responsiveness assessed proportions reporting highest or lowest scores, overall change using standardized response means (SRM) and change by responder and clinician/patient evaluation groups using ES. Results Correlations were weak to moderate (ρ = 0.2–0.4) between EQ-5D-3L dimensions and QOLIE-31P subscales, apart from medication effects (ρ < 0.1); seizure frequency was not associated with either measure. Known group analysis had small ES. A quarter (24.9%) of patients had a baseline EQ-5D-3L utility score of 1 (full health) but lower average QOLIE-31P scores. SRMs were small (<0.1) in EQ-5D-3L compared with 0.1–0.4 for QOLIE-31P subscales. Results across the studies were mixed for responder status and clinician/patient evaluation of improvement for EQ-5D-3L. Conclusions EQ-5D-3L had weak-to-moderate correlations with QOLIE-31P and varied with QOLIE-31P severity groups, but showed less responsiveness than QOLIE-31P. Given this lack of sensitivity, EQ-5D-3L may not be appropriate for measuring the impact of interventions in cost-effectiveness analysis in this population and disease-specific preference-based measures may be more appropriate. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11136-016-1483-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Tracey Young
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Anju Keetharuth
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | | | - John Brazier
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Rowen D, Dixon S, Hernández-Alava M, Mukuria C. Estimating informal care inputs associated with EQ-5D for use in economic evaluation. Eur J Health Econ 2016; 17:733-744. [PMID: 26276521 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-015-0718-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2014] [Accepted: 07/22/2015] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This paper estimates informal care need using the health of the patient. The results can be used to predict changes in informal care associated with changes in the health of the patient measured using EQ-5D. METHODS Data was used from a prospective survey of inpatients containing 59,512 complete responses across 44,494 individuals. The number of days a friend or relative has needed to provide care or help with normal activities in the last 6 weeks was estimated using the health of the patient measured by EQ-5D, ICD chapter and other health and sociodemographic data. A variety of different regression models were estimated that are appropriate for the distribution of the informal care dependent variable, which has large spikes at 0 (zero informal care) and 42 days (informal care every day). RESULTS The preferred model that most accurately predicts the distribution of the data is the zero-inflated negative binomial with variable inflation. The results indicate that improving the health of the patient reduces informal care need. The relationship between ICD chapter and informal care need is not as clear. CONCLUSIONS The preferred zero-inflated negative binomial with variable inflation model can be used to predict changes in informal care associated with changes in the health of the patient measured using EQ-5D and these results can be applied to existing datasets to inform economic evaluation. Limitations include recall bias and response bias of the informal care data, and restrictions of the dataset to exclude some patient groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna Rowen
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Simon Dixon
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Mónica Hernández-Alava
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Clara Mukuria
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Rowen D, Brazier J, Keetharuth A, Tsuchiya A, Mukuria C. Comparison of Modes of Administration and Alternative Formats for Eliciting Societal Preferences for Burden of Illness. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2016; 14:89-104. [PMID: 26445967 PMCID: PMC4740557 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-015-0197-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proposals for value-based assessment, made by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the UK, recommended that burden of illness (BOI) should be used to weight QALY gain. This paper explores some of the methodological issues in eliciting societal preferences for BOI. AIMS This study explores the impact of mode of administration and framing in a survey for eliciting societal preferences for BOI. METHODS A pairwise comparison survey with six arms was conducted online and via face-to-face interviews, involving two different wordings of questions and the inclusion/exclusion of pictures. Respondents were asked which of two patient groups they thought a publically funded health service should treat, where the groups varied by life expectancy without treatment, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) without treatment, survival gain from treatment, and HRQOL gain from treatment. Responses across different modes of administration, wording and use of pictures were compared using chi-squared tests and probit regression analysis controlling for respondent socio-demographic characteristics. RESULTS The sample contained 371 respondents: 69 were interviewed and 302 completed the questionnaire online. There were some differences in socio-demographic characteristics across the online and interview samples. Online respondents were less likely to choose the group with higher BOI and more likely to treat those with a higher QALY gain, but there were no statistically significant differences by wording or the inclusion of pictures for the majority of questions. Regression analysis confirmed these results. Respondents chose to treat the group with larger treatment gain, but there was little support for treating the group with higher BOI. Respondents also preferred to treat the group with treatment gains in life expectancy rather than HRQOL. CONCLUSIONS Mode of administration did impact on responses, whereas question wording and pictures did not impact on responses, even after controlling for the socio-demographic characteristics of respondents in the regression analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna Rowen
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - John Brazier
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | - Anju Keetharuth
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Aki Tsuchiya
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
- Department of Economics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Clara Mukuria
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Rowen D, Brazier J, Mukuria C, Keetharuth A, Risa Hole A, Tsuchiya A, Whyte S, Shackley P. Eliciting Societal Preferences for Weighting QALYs for Burden of Illness and End of Life. Med Decis Making 2015; 36:210-22. [PMID: 26670663 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x15619389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2014] [Accepted: 08/03/2015] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES . Recent proposals for value-based assessment, made by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the United Kingdom, recommended that burden of illness (BOI) should replace end of life (EOL) as a factor for consideration when deciding on new health technologies. This article reports on a study eliciting societal preferences for 1) BOI from a medical condition, defined as quality-adjusted life year (QALY) loss due to premature mortality and prospective morbidity, and 2) EOL, defined as expected life expectancy of less than 2 years and expected life expectancy gain from new treatment of 3 months or more. METHODS . A discrete choice experiment survey was conducted with an online UK general population sample. Respondents chose whether they thought the health service should treat patient group A or B: life expectancy and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) with current treatment or life expectancy and HRQOL gains from new treatment, respectively. These attributes were used to derive BOI, QALY gain, and EOL. The respondents' choices were analyzed using conditional logistic regression with a range of specifications examined, including BOI or EOL, QALY gain and QALY gain squared, and robustness. QALY weights were estimated. RESULTS . The sample of 3669 respondents was representative of the UK population for age and sex. QALY gain had a positive and significant coefficient across all models. QALY gain squared term was negative and significant across all models, indicating a diminishing marginal social value from QALY gains. When included, the BOI coefficient was generally small, positive, and significant, but this was not consistent across the different life expectancy variants. EOL was always positive and significant. CONCLUSIONS . The social value of a QALY gain is not equal between recipients but depends on whether they are end of life, and it may depend on the prospective burden of illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donna Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) (DR, JB, CM, AK, AT, SW, PS)
| | - John Brazier
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) (DR, JB, CM, AK, AT, SW, PS)
| | - Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) (DR, JB, CM, AK, AT, SW, PS)
| | - Anju Keetharuth
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) (DR, JB, CM, AK, AT, SW, PS)
| | - Arne Risa Hole
- Department of Economics (ARH, AT), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Aki Tsuchiya
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) (DR, JB, CM, AK, AT, SW, PS),Department of Economics (ARH, AT), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Sophie Whyte
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) (DR, JB, CM, AK, AT, SW, PS)
| | - Phil Shackley
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR) (DR, JB, CM, AK, AT, SW, PS)
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Mukuria C, Rowen D, Brazier JE, Young TA, Nafees B. Deriving a Preference-Based Measure for Myelofibrosis from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the MF-SAF. Value Health 2015; 18:846-55. [PMID: 26409613 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2014] [Revised: 04/17/2015] [Accepted: 07/01/2015] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Utility values are required for economic evaluation using cost-utility analyses. Often, generic measures such as the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire are used, but this may not appropriately reflect the health-related quality of life of patients with cancer including myelofibrosis. OBJECTIVE To derive a condition-specific preference-based measure for myelofibrosis using appropriate existing measures, the Myelofibrosis-Symptom Assessment Form and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life 30 Questionnaire. METHODS Data from the Controlled Myelofibrosis Study with Oral JAK Inhibitor Treatment trial (n = 309) were used to derive the health state classification system. Psychometric and factor analyses were used to determine the dimensions of the classification system. Psychometric and Rasch analyses were then used to select an item to represent each dimension. Item selection was validated with experts. A selection of health states was valued by members of the general population using time trade-off. Finally, health state values were modeled using regression analysis to produce utility values for every state. RESULTS The Myelofibrosis 8 dimensions has eight dimensions: physical functioning, emotional functioning, fatigue, itchiness, pain under ribs on the left side, abdominal discomfort, bone or muscle pain, and night sweats. Regression models were estimated using time trade-off data from 246 members of the general population valuing a total of 33 states. The best performing model was a random effects maximum likelihood model producing utility values ranging from 0.089 to 1. CONCLUSIONS The Myelofibrosis 8 dimensions is a condition-specific preference-based measure for myelofibrosis. This measure can be used to generate utility values for myelofibrosis for any data set containing the Myelofibrosis-Symptom Assessment Form and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life 30 Questionnaire data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Mukuria
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| | - Donna Rowen
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - John E Brazier
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Tracey A Young
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Young TA, Mukuria C, Rowen D, Brazier JE, Longworth L. Mapping Functions in Health-Related Quality of Life: Mapping from Two Cancer-Specific Health-Related Quality-of-Life Instruments to EQ-5D-3L. Med Decis Making 2015; 35:912-26. [PMID: 25997920 PMCID: PMC4574084 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x15587497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2014] [Accepted: 04/13/2015] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Background. Clinical trials in cancer frequently include cancer-specific measures of health but not preference-based measures such as the EQ-5D that are suitable for economic evaluation. Mapping functions have been developed to predict EQ-5D values from these measures, but there is considerable uncertainty about the most appropriate model to use, and many existing models are poor at predicting EQ-5D values. This study aims to investigate a range of potential models to develop mapping functions from 2 widely used cancer-specific measures (FACT-G and EORTC-QLQ-C30) and to identify the best model. Methods. Mapping models are fitted to predict EQ-5D-3L values using ordinary least squares (OLS), tobit, 2-part models, splining, and to EQ-5D item-level responses using response mapping from the FACT-G and QLQ-C30. A variety of model specifications are estimated. Model performance and predictive ability are compared. Analysis is based on 530 patients with various cancers for the FACT-G and 771 patients with multiple myeloma, breast cancer, and lung cancer for the QLQ-C30. Results. For FACT-G, OLS models most accurately predict mean EQ-5D values with the best predicting model using FACT-G items with similar results using tobit. Response mapping has low predictive ability. In contrast, for the QLQ-C30, response mapping has the most accurate predictions using QLQ-C30 dimensions. The QLQ-C30 has better predicted EQ-5D values across the range of possible values; however, few respondents in the FACT-G data set have low EQ-5D values, which reduces the accuracy at the severe end. Conclusions. OLS and tobit mapping functions perform well for both instruments. Response mapping gives the best model predictions for QLQ-C30. The generalizability of the FACT-G mapping function is limited to populations in moderate to good health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracey A Young
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK (TAY, CM, DR, JEB)
| | - Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK (TAY, CM, DR, JEB)
| | - Donna Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK (TAY, CM, DR, JEB)
| | - John E Brazier
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK (TAY, CM, DR, JEB)
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Brazier J, Connell J, Papaioannou D, Mukuria C, Mulhern B, Peasgood T, Jones ML, Paisley S, O'Cathain A, Barkham M, Knapp M, Byford S, Gilbody S, Parry G. A systematic review, psychometric analysis and qualitative assessment of generic preference-based measures of health in mental health populations and the estimation of mapping functions from widely used specific measures. Health Technol Assess 2015; 18:vii-viii, xiii-xxv, 1-188. [PMID: 24857402 DOI: 10.3310/hta18340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 170] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Generic preference-based measures of health like the EQ-5D and SF-6D(®) are increasingly being used in economic evaluation and outcome assessment. However, there are concerns as to whether or not these generic measures are appropriate for use in people with mental health problems. OBJECTIVES The EQ-5D and SF-36(®) (including its derivatives the SF-12(®) and SF-6D) were assessed using the psychometric criteria of validity and responsiveness using quantitative and qualitative methods. Another aim was to estimate mapping functions between the EQ-5D and SF-6D and condition-specific measures, where appropriate. DESIGN Four studies were undertaken to examine the appropriateness of the measures: (1) a systematic review of quantitative evidence on validity and responsiveness; (2) a further quantitative assessment of these criteria using existing data sets; (3) a review of qualitative research on the quality of life of people with mental health problems; and (4) qualitative semistructured interviews of people with a full range of problems. A fifth study estimated mapping functions between mental health-specific measures and the EQ-5D and SF-6D. SETTING A choice of venue was offered for the interviews including the participant's own home, a room at the university or a centre frequently used by mental health services. PARTICIPANTS The interviews were undertaken with 19 people with a broad range of mental health problems at varying levels of severity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The reviews included the EQ-5D and SF-36 (and the SF-12 and SF-6D). The psychometric analysis included the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measure (CORE-OM), Generalised Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD-7), General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). RESULTS (1) and (2) The EQ-5D and SF-36 achieved an adequate level of performance in depression, and to some extent in anxiety and personality disorder. Results from the psychometric analyses in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder have been more mixed. (3) A framework analysis of 13 studies identified six major themes. (4) The interview data fitted the themes from the review well and resulted in minor modifications to the themes. The final set of themes comprised: well-being and ill-being; control, autonomy and choice; self-perception; belonging; activity; hope and hopelessness; and physical health. CONCLUSIONS The EQ-5D and SF-36 achieved mixed results in the quantitative testing against psychometric criteria. The qualitative analysis suggests this is because they provide a very limited coverage of themes identified by people with mental health problems. Recommendations for future work include the development of new preference-based measures in mental health that are based on, or substantially revise, an existing measure. FUNDING The Medical Research Council.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Brazier
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Janice Connell
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Diana Papaioannou
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Clara Mukuria
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Brendan Mulhern
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Tessa Peasgood
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Myfawnwy Lloyd Jones
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Suzy Paisley
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Alicia O'Cathain
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Michael Barkham
- Centre for Psychological Services Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Martin Knapp
- Centre for the Economics of Mental and Physical Health, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Byford
- Centre for the Economics of Mental and Physical Health, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Simon Gilbody
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Glenys Parry
- Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Longworth L, Yang Y, Young T, Mulhern B, Hernández Alava M, Mukuria C, Rowen D, Tosh J, Tsuchiya A, Evans P, Devianee Keetharuth A, Brazier J. Use of generic and condition-specific measures of health-related quality of life in NICE decision-making: a systematic review, statistical modelling and survey. Health Technol Assess 2014; 18:1-224. [PMID: 24524660 DOI: 10.3310/hta18090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 259] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommends the use of generic preference-based measures (GPBMs) of health for its Health Technology Assessments (HTAs). However, these data may not be available or appropriate for all health conditions. OBJECTIVES To determine whether GPBMs are appropriate for some key conditions and to explore alternative methods of utility estimation when data from GPBMs are unavailable or inappropriate. DESIGN The project was conducted in three stages: (1) A systematic review of the psychometric properties of three commonly used GPBMs [EQ-5D, SF-6D and Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3)] in four broadly defined conditions: visual impairment, hearing impairment, cancer and skin conditions. (2) Potential modelling approaches to 'map' EQ-5D values from condition-specific and clinical measures of health [European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General Scale (FACT-G)] are compared for predictive ability and goodness of fit using two separate data sets. (3) Three potential extensions to the EQ-5D are developed as 'bolt-on' items relating to hearing, tiredness and vision. They are valued using the time trade-off method. A second valuation study is conducted to fully value the EQ-5D with and without the vision bolt-on item in an additional sample of 300 people. SETTING The valuation surveys were conducted using face-to-face interviews in the respondents' homes. PARTICIPANTS Two representative samples of the UK general population from Yorkshire (n=600). INTERVENTIONS None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Comparisons of EQ-5D, SF-6D and HUI3 in four conditions with various generic and condition-specific measures. Mapping functions were estimated between EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-G with EQ-5D. Three bolt-ons to the EQ-5D were developed: EQ + hearing/vision/tiredness. A full valuation study was conducted for the EQ + vision. RESULTS (1) EQ-5D was valid and responsive for skin conditions and most cancers; in vision, its performance varied according to aetiology; and performance was poor for hearing impairments. The HUI3 performed well for hearing and vision disorders. It also performed well in cancers although evidence was limited and there was no evidence in skin conditions. There were limited data for SF-6D in all four conditions and limited evidence on reliability of all instruments. (2) Mapping algorithms were estimated to predict EQ-5D values from alternative cancer-specific measures of health. Response mapping using all the domain scores was the best performing model for the EORTC QLQ-C30. In an exploratory analysis, a limited dependent variable mixture model performed better than an equivalent linear model. In the full analysis for the FACT-G, linear regression using ordinary least squares gave the best predictions followed by the tobit model. (3) The exploratory valuation study found that bolt-on items for vision, hearing and tiredness had a significant impact on values of the health states, but the direction and magnitude of differences depended on the severity of the health state. The vision bolt-on item had a statistically significant impact on EQ-5D health state values and a full valuation model was estimated. CONCLUSIONS EQ-5D performs well in studies of cancer and skin conditions. Mapping techniques provide a solution to predict EQ-5D values where EQ-5D has not been administered. For conditions where EQ-5D was found to be inappropriate, including some vision disorders and for hearing, bolt-ons provide a promising solution. More primary research into the psychometric properties of the generic preference-based measures is required, particularly in cancer and for the assessment of reliability. Further research is needed for the development and valuation of bolt-ons to EQ-5D. FUNDING This project was funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) as part of the MRC-NIHR methodology research programme (reference G0901486) and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 18, No. 9. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Longworth
- Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK
| | - Yaling Yang
- Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK
| | - Tracey Young
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Brendan Mulhern
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Donna Rowen
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Jonathan Tosh
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Aki Tsuchiya
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Pippa Evans
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - John Brazier
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Mulhern B, Mukuria C, Barkham M, Knapp M, Byford S, Soeteman D, Brazier J. Using generic preference-based measures in mental health: psychometric validity of the EQ-5D and SF-6D. Br J Psychiatry 2014; 205:236-43. [PMID: 24855127 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.122283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Generic preference-based measures (EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D) and SF-6D) are used in the economic evaluation of mental health interventions. However, there are inconsistent findings regarding their psychometric properties. AIMS To investigate the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D and SF-6D in different mental health conditions, using seven existing data-sets. METHOD The construct validity and responsiveness of the measures were assessed in comparison with condition-specific indicators. RESULTS Evidence for construct validity and responsiveness in common mental health and personality disorders was found (correlations 0.22-0.64; effect sizes 0.37-1.24; standardised response means 0.45-1.31). There was some evidence for validity in schizophrenia (correlations 0.05-0.43), but responsiveness was unclear. CONCLUSIONS EQ-5D and SF-6D can be used in the economic evaluation of interventions for common mental health problems with some confidence. In schizophrenia, a preference-based measure focused on the impact of mental health should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan Mulhern
- Brendan Mulhern, MRes, Clara Mukuria, PhD, Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK; Michael Barkham, PhD, Centre for Psychological Services Research, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, UK; Martin Knapp, PhD, Centre for the Economics of Mental and Physical Health, King's College London, and Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK; Sarah Byford, PhD, Centre for the Economics of Mental and Physical Health, King's College London, UK; Djøra Soeteman, PhD, Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; John Brazier, PhD, Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Clara Mukuria
- Brendan Mulhern, MRes, Clara Mukuria, PhD, Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK; Michael Barkham, PhD, Centre for Psychological Services Research, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, UK; Martin Knapp, PhD, Centre for the Economics of Mental and Physical Health, King's College London, and Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK; Sarah Byford, PhD, Centre for the Economics of Mental and Physical Health, King's College London, UK; Djøra Soeteman, PhD, Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; John Brazier, PhD, Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Michael Barkham
- Brendan Mulhern, MRes, Clara Mukuria, PhD, Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK; Michael Barkham, PhD, Centre for Psychological Services Research, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, UK; Martin Knapp, PhD, Centre for the Economics of Mental and Physical Health, King's College London, and Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK; Sarah Byford, PhD, Centre for the Economics of Mental and Physical Health, King's College London, UK; Djøra Soeteman, PhD, Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; John Brazier, PhD, Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Martin Knapp
- Brendan Mulhern, MRes, Clara Mukuria, PhD, Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK; Michael Barkham, PhD, Centre for Psychological Services Research, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, UK; Martin Knapp, PhD, Centre for the Economics of Mental and Physical Health, King's College London, and Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK; Sarah Byford, PhD, Centre for the Economics of Mental and Physical Health, King's College London, UK; Djøra Soeteman, PhD, Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; John Brazier, PhD, Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Sarah Byford
- Brendan Mulhern, MRes, Clara Mukuria, PhD, Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK; Michael Barkham, PhD, Centre for Psychological Services Research, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, UK; Martin Knapp, PhD, Centre for the Economics of Mental and Physical Health, King's College London, and Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK; Sarah Byford, PhD, Centre for the Economics of Mental and Physical Health, King's College London, UK; Djøra Soeteman, PhD, Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; John Brazier, PhD, Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Djøra Soeteman
- Brendan Mulhern, MRes, Clara Mukuria, PhD, Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK; Michael Barkham, PhD, Centre for Psychological Services Research, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, UK; Martin Knapp, PhD, Centre for the Economics of Mental and Physical Health, King's College London, and Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK; Sarah Byford, PhD, Centre for the Economics of Mental and Physical Health, King's College London, UK; Djøra Soeteman, PhD, Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; John Brazier, PhD, Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - John Brazier
- Brendan Mulhern, MRes, Clara Mukuria, PhD, Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK; Michael Barkham, PhD, Centre for Psychological Services Research, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, UK; Martin Knapp, PhD, Centre for the Economics of Mental and Physical Health, King's College London, and Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science, UK; Sarah Byford, PhD, Centre for the Economics of Mental and Physical Health, King's College London, UK; Djøra Soeteman, PhD, Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; John Brazier, PhD, Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|