The Global Vaccine Action Plan - insights into its utility, application, and ways to strengthen future plans

BACKGROUND

The pace of global progress must increase if the Global Vaccine Action Plan (GVAP) goals are to be achieved by 2020. We administered a two-phase survey to key immunization stakeholders to assess the utility and application of GVAP, including how it has impacted country immunization programs, and to find ways to strengthen the next 10-year plan.

METHODS

For the Phase I survey, an online questionnaire was sent to global immunization stakeholders in summer 2017. The Phase II survey was sent to regional and national immunization stakeholders in summer 2018, including WHO Regional Advisors on Immunization, Expanded Programme on Immunization managers, and WHO and UNICEF country representatives from 20 countries. Countries were selected based on improvements (10) versus decreases (10) in DTP3 coverage from 2010 to 2016.

RESULTS

Global immunization stakeholders (n = 38) cite global progress in improving vaccine delivery (88%) and engaging civil society organizations as advocates for vaccines (83%). Among regional and national immunization stakeholders (n = 58), 70% indicated reaching mobile and underserved populations with vaccination activities as a major challenge. The top ranked activities for helping country programs achieve progress toward GVAP goals include improved monitoring of vaccination coverage and upgrading disease surveillance systems. Most respondents (96%) indicated GVAP as useful for determining immunization priorities and 95% were supportive of a post-2020 GVAP strategy.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunization stakeholders see GVAP as a useful tool, and there is cause for excitement as the global immunization community looks toward the next decade of vaccines. The next 10-year plan should attempt to increase political will, align immunization activities with other health system agendas, and address important issues like reaching mobile/migrant populations and improving data reporting systems.

Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Seroprevalence among Prevaccine and Vaccine Era Children in Bangladesh

Bangladesh introduced hepatitis B vaccine in a phased manner during 2003-2005 into the routine childhood vaccination schedule. This study was designed to evaluate the impact of the introduction of hepatitis B vaccine in Bangladesh by comparing hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) prevalence among children born before and after vaccine introduction and to estimate the risk of vertical transmission of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection from mother to infant. We also evaluated the field sensitivity and specificity of an HBsAg point-of-care test strip. We selected a nationally representative sample of 2,100 prevaccine era and 2,100 vaccine era children. We collected a 5-mL blood sample from each child. One drop of blood was used to perform rapid HBsAg testing. If a child had a positive HBsAg test result with the rapid test, a blood sample was collected from the mother of the HBsAg-positive child and from the mothers of two subsequently enrolled HBsAg-negative children. All samples were tested for serologic markers of HBV infection using standard enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. One (0.05%) child in the vaccine era group and 27 (1.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.8-1.7%) children in the prevaccine era group were HBsAg positive. Mothers of HBsAg-positive children were more likely to be HBsAg positive than mothers of HBsAg-negative children (odds ratios = 4.7; 95% CI: 1.0-21.7%). Sensitivity of the HBsAg rapid test was 91.2% (95% CI: 76.6-98.1%) and specificity was 100% (95% CI: 99.9-100%). The study results suggest that even without a birth dose, the hepatitis B vaccine program in Bangladesh was highly effective in preventing chronic HBV infection among children.

Recommendations for identification and public health management of persons with chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Early identification of persons with chronic HBV infection enables infected persons to receive necessary care to prevent or delay onset of liver disease, and enables the identification and vaccination of susceptible household contacts and sex partners, interrupting ongoing transmission. Testing has been recommended previously to enable primary prevention of HBV infection among close contacts for pregnant women, household contacts and sex partners of HBV-infected persons, persons born in countries with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) prevalence of more than 8%, persons who are the source of blood or body fluid exposures that might warrant postexposure prophylaxis (e.g., needlestick injury to a healthcare worker or sexual assault), and to enable appropriate treatment for infants born to HBsAg-positive mothers and persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Recently, with the increasing availability of efficacious hepatitis B treatment, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published new recommendations for public health evaluation and management for chronically infected persons and their contacts and extended testing recommendations to include persons born in geographic regions with HBsAg prevalence of greater than 2%, men who have sex with men, and injection drug users. Patient and provider education, developing partnerships between health departments and community organizations, and other resources will be needed to assure appropriate populations are tested and care provided for persons newly identified as HBsAg-positive.

Recommendations for identification and public health management of persons with chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Serologic testing for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is the primary way to identify persons with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Testing has been recommended previously for pregnant women, infants born to HBsAg-positive mothers, household contacts and sex partners of HBV-infected persons, persons born in countries with HBsAg prevalence of >/=8%, persons who are the source of blood or body fluid exposures that might warrant postexposure prophylaxis (e.g., needlestick injury to a health-care worker or sexual assault), and persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus. This report updates and expands previous CDC guidelines for HBsAg testing and includes new recommendations for public health evaluation and management for chronically infected persons and their contacts. Routine testing for HBsAg now is recommended for additional populations with HBsAg prevalence of >/=2%: persons born in geographic regions with HBsAg prevalence of >/=2%, men who have sex with men, and injection-drug users. Implementation of these recommendations will require expertise and resources to integrate HBsAg screening in prevention and care settings serving populations recommended for HBsAg testing. This report is intended to serve as a resource for public health officials, organizations, and health-care professionals involved in the development, delivery, and evaluation of prevention and clinical services.

Ischemic cardiac events during the Department of Health and Human Services Smallpox Vaccination Program, 2003

Ten ischemic cardiac events (ICEs) were reported among 37,901 initial US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) smallpox vaccinees. Symptoms developed a median of 10 days after vaccination (range, 0-28 days). The median age of case patients was 56 years (range, 42-65 years), and 60% were male. Seven (70%) of the case patients had >/=3 cardiac risk factors or probable coronary artery disease before vaccination. Two women, 55 and 57 years of age, experienced acute myocardial infarction and fatal cardiac arrests. Background rates of ICEs during a 3-week period for civilian populations that were age and sex matched to DHHS vaccinees were estimated. The observed number of myocardial infarctions exceeded estimated expectations (5 vs. 2) but remained within the 95% predictive interval (PI) (0.6-5.4). New onset angina was observed significantly less frequently than estimated expectations (1 vs. 10; 95% PI, 3.5-15.7). After persons with >/=3 cardiac risk factors or known heart disease were deferred from vaccination, no ICEs were reported among an additional 6638 vaccinees.

A comprehensive immunization strategy to eliminate transmission of hepatitis B virus infection in the United States: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Part II: immunization of adults

Hepatitis B vaccination is the most effective measure to prevent hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and its consequences, including cirrhosis of the liver, liver cancer, liver failure, and death. In adults, ongoing HBV transmission occurs primarily among unvaccinated persons with behavioral risks for HBV transmission (e.g., heterosexuals with multiple sex partners, injection-drug users [IDUs], and men who have sex with men [MSM]) and among household contacts and sex partners of persons with chronic HBV infection. This report, the second of a two-part statement from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), provides updated recommendations to increase hepatitis B vaccination of adults at risk for HBV infection. The first part of the ACIP statement, which provided recommendations for immunization of infants, children, and adolescents, was published previously (CDC. A comprehensive immunization strategy to eliminate transmission of hepatitis B virus infection in the United States: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices [ACIP]. Part 1: immunization of infants, children, and adolescents. MMWR 2005;54[No. RR-16]:1-33). In settings in which a high proportion of adults have risks for HBV infection (e.g., sexually transmitted disease/human immunodeficiency virus testing and treatment facilities, drug-abuse treatment and prevention settings, health-care settings targeting services to IDUs, health-care settings targeting services to MSM, and correctional facilities), ACIP recommends universal hepatitis B vaccination for all unvaccinated adults. In other primary care and specialty medical settings in which adults at risk for HBV infection receive care, health-care providers should inform all patients about the health benefits of vaccination, including risks for HBV infection and persons for whom vaccination is recommended, and vaccinate adults who report risks for HBV infection and any adults requesting protection from HBV infection. To promote vaccination in all settings, health-care providers should implement standing orders to identify adults recommended for hepatitis B vaccination and administer vaccination as part of routine clinical services, not require acknowledgment of an HBV infection risk factor for adults to receive vaccine, and use available reimbursement mechanisms to remove financial barriers to hepatitis B vaccination.

A comprehensive immunization strategy to eliminate transmission of hepatitis B virus infection in the United States: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) part 1: immunization of infants, children, and adolescents

This report is the first of a two-part statement from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) that updates the strategy to eliminate hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission in the United States. The report provides updated recommendations to improve prevention of perinatal and early childhood HBV transmission, including implementation of universal infant vaccination beginning at birth, and to increase vaccine coverage among previously unvaccinated children and adolescents. Strategies to enhance implementation of the recommendations include 1) establishing standing orders for administration of hepatitis B vaccination beginning at birth; 2) instituting delivery hospital policies and procedures and case management programs to improve identification of and administration of immunoprophylaxis to infants born to mothers who are hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive and to mothers with unknown HBsAg status at the time of delivery; and 3) implementing vaccination record reviews for all children aged 11-12 years and children and adolescents aged <19 years who were born in countries with intermediate and high levels of HBV endemicity, adopting hepatitis B vaccine requirements for school entry, and integrating hepatitis B vaccination services into settings that serve adolescents. The second part of the ACIP statement, which will include updated recommendations and strategies to increase hepatitis B vaccination of adults, will be published separately.

A comprehensive immunization strategy to eliminate transmission of hepatitis B virus infection in the United States: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) part 1: immunization of infants, children, and adolescents

This report is the first of a two-part statement from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) that updates the strategy to eliminate hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission in the United States. The report provides updated recommendations to improve prevention of perinatal and early childhood HBV transmission, including implementation of universal infant vaccination beginning at birth, and to increase vaccine coverage among previously unvaccinated children and adolescents. Strategies to enhance implementation of the recommendations include 1) establishing standing orders for administration of hepatitis B vaccination beginning at birth; 2) instituting delivery hospital policies and procedures and case management programs to improve identification of and administration of immunoprophylaxis to infants born to mothers who are hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive and to mothers with unknown HBsAg status at the time of delivery; and 3) implementing vaccination record reviews for all children aged 11-12 years and children and adolescents aged <19 years who were born in countries with intermediate and high levels of HBV endemicity, adopting hepatitis B vaccine requirements for school entry, and integrating hepatitis B vaccination services into settings that serve adolescents. The second part of the ACIP statement, which will include updated recommendations and strategies to increase hepatitis B vaccination of adults, will be published separately.

Adverse events associated with smallpox vaccination in the United States, January-October 2003

CONTEXT

On January 24, 2003, the US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) implemented a preparedness program in which smallpox (vaccinia) vaccine was administered to federal, state, and local volunteers who might be first responders during a bioterrorism event.

OBJECTIVE

To describe results from the comprehensive DHHS smallpox vaccine safety monitoring and response system.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Descriptive study of adverse event reports from the DHHS smallpox vaccine safety monitoring and response system received between January 24 and October 31, 2003, through the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A total of 37,901 volunteers in 55 jurisdictions received at least 1 dose of smallpox vaccine.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Number of vaccinations administered and description of adverse events and reporting rates.

RESULTS

A total of 38,885 smallpox vaccinations were administered, with a take rate of 92%. VAERS received 822 reports of adverse events following smallpox vaccination (overall reporting rate, 217 per 10,000 vaccinees). A total of 590 adverse events (72%) were reported within 14 days of vaccination. Nonserious adverse events (n = 722) included multiple signs and symptoms of mild and self-limited local reactions. One hundred adverse events (12%) were designated as serious, resulting in 85 hospitalizations, 2 permanent disabilities, 10 life-threatening illnesses, and 3 deaths. Among the serious adverse events, 21 cases were classified as myocarditis and/or pericarditis and 10 as ischemic cardiac events that were not anticipated based on historical data. Two cases of generalized vaccinia and 1 case of postvaccinial encephalitis were detected. No preventable life-threatening adverse reactions, contact transmissions, or adverse reactions that required treatment with vaccinia immune globulin were identified. Serious adverse events were more common among older revaccinees than younger first-time vaccinees.

CONCLUSIONS

Rigorous smallpox vaccine safety screening, educational programs, and older vaccinees may have contributed to low rates of preventable life-threatening adverse reactions. Other rare, clinically significant, or unexpected cardiac adverse events were detected by timely review of VAERS data and intensive clinical case investigation.

Risk factors for perinatal transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and the natural history of HCV infection acquired in infancy

BACKGROUND

The goal of the present study was to assess risk factors for perinatal hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission and the natural history of infection among HCV-infected infants.

METHODS

In a cohort study, 244 infants born to HCV-positive mothers were followed from birth until age > or =12 months. Maternal serum was collected at enrollment and delivery; infant serum was collected at birth and at 8 well-child visits. Testing included detection of antibody to HCV, detection of HCV RNA (qualitative and quantitative), and genotyping. HCV-infected infants were followed annually until age 5 years.

RESULTS

Overall, 9 of 190 (4.7% [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.3%-9.1%]) infants born to mothers who were HCV RNA positive at delivery became infected, compared with 0 of 54 infants born to HCV RNA-negative mothers (P=.10). Among HCV RNA-positive mothers, the rate of transmission was 3.8% (95% CI, 1.7%-8.1%) from the 182 who were human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) negative, compared with 25.0% (95% CI, 4.5%-64.4%) from the 8 who were HIV positive (P<.05). Three infected infants resolved their infection (i.e., became HCV RNA negative). In multivariate analysis restricted to HCV RNA-positive mothers, membrane rupture > or =6 h (odds ratio [OR], 9.3 [95% CI, 1.5-179.7]) and internal fetal monitoring (OR, 6.7 [95% CI, 1.1-35.9]) were associated with transmission of HCV to infants.

CONCLUSION

If duration of membrane rupture and internal fetal monitoring are confirmed to be associated with transmission, interventions may be possible to decrease the risk of transmission.

A mathematical model to estimate global hepatitis B disease burden and vaccination impact

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available regarding global hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related morbidity and mortality and potential reduction in disease burden from hepatitis B vaccination.

METHODS

A model was developed to calculate the age-specific risk of acquiring HBV infection, acute hepatitis B (illness and death), and progression to chronic HBV infection. HBV-related deaths among chronically infected persons were determined from HBV-related cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) mortality curves, adjusted for background mortality. The effect of hepatitis B vaccination was calculated from vaccine efficacy and vaccination series coverage, with and without administration of the first dose of vaccine within 24 h of birth (i.e. birth dose) to prevent perinatal HBV infection.

RESULTS

For the year 2000, the model estimated 620,000 persons died worldwide from HBV-related causes: 580,000 (94%) from chronic infection-related cirrhosis and HCC and 40,000 (6%) from acute hepatitis B. In the surviving birth cohort for the year 2000, the model estimated that without vaccination, 64.8 million would become HBV-infected and 1.4 million would die from HBV-related disease. Infections acquired during the perinatal period, in early childhood (<5 years old), and > or = 5 years of age accounted for 21, 48, and 31% of deaths, respectively. Routine infant hepatitis B vaccination, with 90% coverage and the first dose administered at birth would prevent 84% of global HBV-related deaths.

CONCLUSION

Globally, most HBV-related deaths result from the chronic sequelae of infection acquired in the perinatal and early childhood periods. Inclusion of hepatitis B vaccine into national infant immunization programs could prevent >80% of HBV-related deaths.

Mother-to-infant hepatitis C virus transmission and breastfeeding

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a blood-borne virus that is transmitted most efficiently by irect percutaneous exposures to blood. Infants are at risk of HCV infection primarily as a result of transmission from their infected mothers. However, there is no evidence of mother-to-infant transmission from breastfeeding. According to guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Academy of Pediatrics, maternal HCV infection is not a contraindication to breastfeeding. It may be prudent for mothers who are HCV-infected and who choose to breastfeed to consider abstaining from breastfeeding if their nipples are cracked and bleeding.

Injection practices in Romania: progress and challenges

OBJECTIVE

To identify breaks in infection control practices that might put Romanians at risk for transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV) from injections.

METHODS

A standardized questionnaire was administered to a systematic sample of the 1,906 nurses in Vâlcea District, Romania, to collect information on their knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding injection administration and universal precautions.

RESULTS

Of the 180 nurses interviewed, 91% (95% confidence interval [CI95], 86% to 95%) reported having attended training for universal precautions; 58% (CI95, 49% to 67%) accurately reported that HBV remains infectious for at least 1 week in the environment; and 4% (CI95, 2% to 8%) knew that HBV is transmitted more efficiently than HIV through percutaneous exposures. No nurses reported reusing syringes or needles on different patients, but 4 (2%; CI, 1% to 6%) would reuse a syringe and 3 (2%; CI95, 0% to 5%) would reuse a needle on the same patient in an emergency. Fifty-three percent (CI95, 44% to 61%) of nurses reported having a dedicated area for the preparation of injectable medications separate from where blood-contaminated items were handled. Shortages of infection control supplies were common.

CONCLUSIONS

Although nurses in Vâlcea do not report reusing injection equipment without sterilization, other unsafe practices occur that may facilitate HBV transmission through injections, including preparing injectable medications in areas potentially contaminated with blood. Inadequate knowledge of blood-borne pathogen transmission and shortages of infection control supplies may contribute to these unsafe practices. Addressing these deficits could improve injection safety in Romania.

Bioterrorism-related inhalational anthrax in an elderly woman, Connecticut, 2001

On November 20, 2001, inhalational anthrax was confirmed in an elderly woman from rural Connecticut. To determine her exposure source, we conducted an extensive epidemiologic, environmental, and laboratory investigation. Molecular subtyping showed that her isolate was indistinguishable from isolates associated with intentionally contaminated letters. No samples from her home or community yielded Bacillus anthracis, and she received no first-class letters from facilities known to have processed intentionally contaminated letters. Environmental sampling in the regional Connecticut postal facility yielded B. anthracis spores from 4 (31%) of 13 sorting machines. One extensively contaminated machine primarily processes bulk mail. A second machine that does final sorting of bulk mail for her zip code yielded B. anthracis on the column of bins for her carrier route. The evidence suggests she was exposed through a cross-contaminated bulk mail letter. Such cross-contamination of letters and postal facilities has implications for managing the response to future B. anthracis-contaminated mailings.

Bioterrorism-related anthrax surveillance, Connecticut, September-December, 2001

On November 19, 2001, a case of inhalational anthrax was identified in a 94-year-old Connecticut woman, who later died. We conducted intensive surveillance for additional anthrax cases, which included collecting data from hospitals, emergency departments, private practitioners, death certificates, postal facilities, veterinarians, and the state medical examiner. No additional cases of anthrax were identified. The absence of additional anthrax cases argued against an intentional environmental release of Bacillus anthracis in Connecticut and suggested that, if the source of anthrax had been cross-contaminated mail, the risk for anthrax in this setting was very low. This surveillance system provides a model that can be adapted for use in similar emergency settings.

Fatal inhalational anthrax in a 94-year-old Connecticut woman

We describe the 11th case of bioterrorism-related inhalational anthrax reported in the United States. The presenting clinical features of this 94-year-old woman were subtle and nondistinctive. The diagnosis was recognized because blood cultures were obtained prior to administration of antibiotics, emphasizing the importance of this diagnostic test in evaluating ill patients who have been exposed to Bacillus anthracis. The patient's clinical course was characterized by progression of respiratory insufficiency, pleural effusions and pulmonary edema, and, ultimately, death. Although her B anthracis bacteremia was rapidly sterilized after initiation of antibiotic therapy, viable B anthracis was present in postmortem mediastinal lymph node specimens. The source of exposure to B anthracis in this patient is not known. Exposure to mail that was cross-contaminated as it passed through postal facilities contaminated with B anthracis spores is one hypothesis under investigation.

Hepatitis E virus antibody prevalence among persons who work with swine

Prevalence of antibody and risk factors to hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection were determined in a cross-sectional study of 2 group-matched populations: swine farmers (n=264) and persons without occupational exposure to swine (n=255) in Moldova, a country without reported cases of hepatitis E. The prevalence of HEV infection was higher among swine farmers than among the comparison group (51.1% vs. 24.7%; prevalence ratio, 2.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.62-2.64). In multivariate analysis, HEV infection was associated with an occupational history of cleaning barns or assisting sows at birth (odds ratio [OR], 2.46; 95% CI, 1.52-4.01), years of occupational exposure (OR, 1.04 per year; 95% CI, 1.01-1.07), and a history of drinking raw milk (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.08-2.40). HEV infection was not associated with civilian travel abroad or having piped water in the household. The increased prevalence of HEV infection among persons with occupational exposure to swine suggests animal-to-human transmission of this infection.

Hepatitis B vaccination coverage among United States children

BACKGROUND

In 1991 the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended vaccination of all infants with three doses of hepatitis B virus vaccine (HepB) by 18 months of age as a key component of a comprehensive strategy to eliminate hepatitis B virus transmission in the United States. The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Physicians published similar recommendations soon afterward.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the National Immunization Survey, a survey that began in 1994 and is conducted quarterly by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to estimate vaccination coverage among noninstitutionalized US children 19 to 35 months of age.

RESULTS

The 1999 National Immunization Survey data indicate that approximately 88.1% (95% confidence interval, 87.4, 88.8) of children 19 to 35 months of age had received at least three doses of HepB (HepB3). There has been a consistent increase in HepB3 coverage since 1994. However, the rate of increase has slowed in recent years and HepB3 coverage remains lower than coverage attained with three doses of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis and Haemophilus influenzae vaccines. HepB3 coverage varied slightly by race/ethnicity and was highest among white and Asian children (89%). Coverage also varied by state; 26 states had levels of at least 90%.

CONCLUSIONS

Since the 1991 recommendations for universal hepatitis B vaccination, there has been a dramatic increase in coverage levels among children 19 to 35 months of age. However, the Childhood Immunization Initiative goal of 90% coverage has not been reached. Therefore continued efforts are needed to protect US children against this serious but preventable infection.

Childhood hepatitis B virus infections in the United States before hepatitis B immunization

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the number of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections among US children younger than 10 years before implementation of routine childhood hepatitis B immunization.

METHODS

Incidence of HBV infection in children was modeled from existing prevalence data by means of regression analysis. Sources of data for the models included published and unpublished surveys that determined the prevalence of HBV infection in US-born children. The number of nonperinatal HBV infections in children younger than 10 years was estimated by applying these infection rates to 1991 population data according to maternal race, ethnicity, and birthplace.

RESULTS

Estimated annual rates of infection ranged from 24 per 100 000 in non-Asian children to 2580 per 100 000 in children of Southeast Asian immigrant mothers. These rates indicate that by the early 1990s, HBV was infecting 16 000 children who were younger than 10 years (8700 non-Asian children and 7300 Asian-American children) annually. The total estimate, not including perinatal infections, ranged from 12 000 (95% confidence interval: 5500-27 700) to 24 900 (95% confidence interval: 16 700-42 300) infections and depended on how the estimated rates were applied to the population data.

CONCLUSION

Thousands of US children were infected each year with HBV before routine infant hepatitis B immunization, placing them at high risk of death from cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma later in life.

Preventing transmission of hepatitis B virus from people with chronic infection

BACKGROUND

People with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection are the major source of HBV transmission in the United States. The Public Health Service recommends prevention counseling for HBV-infected people and vaccination of their household contacts and sexual partners.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the implementation of these recommendations by community physicians.

METHODS

Telephone survey of 69 people with chronic HBV infection and their healthcare providers, October 1997 through November 1997, in San Diego, California.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Counseling of people with chronic HBV infection and vaccination of their household contacts and sexual partners.

RESULTS

Forty-three percent of providers reported providing prevention counseling to their HBV-infected patients to reduce transmission; 16% of patients reported receiving counseling. For the 32 pairs for which both the patient and provider could be reached and the patients were aware of their HBV infection, 20 (63%) providers reported counseling patients, and 10 (50%) of these providers' patients reported receiving counseling. Fifty-five percent of providers recommended vaccination of contacts; 13% of eligible adult household contacts and sexual partners and 20% of eligible child household contacts had begun hepatitis B vaccination.

CONCLUSIONS

Prevention counseling of people with chronic HBV infection and vaccination of their contacts occur infrequently despite guidelines and an effective vaccine. Collaborative efforts between providers and people involved in public health are needed to improve delivery of these preventive health services.

The economics of vaccinating restaurant workers against hepatitis A

The economics of vaccinating restaurant workers against hepatitis A were studied using Monte Carlo simulation models, one with a restaurant-owner perspective, and one with a societal perspective. The restaurant model allowed for a different size, number of employees and employee turnover rate. Benefits were the avoidance of loss of business (including the possibility of bankruptcy) after publicity linking the restaurant to an outbreak associated with a case of hepatitis A in a food handler. Additional benefits in the societal model included reductions in costs of food handler-associated cases of hepatitis A. The outcome used was Net Present Value (NPV), allowing comparison between models. Regardless of the cost of vaccination ($50-140/employee), for a restauranteur to ensure that all employees were vaccinated at all times substantial costs were involved (i.e. negative NPV). Even a 75% probability of bankruptcy still resulted in negative NPVs at the 95th percentiles. For society, vaccination was only cost-saving (i.e. positive NPV) if done only during epidemics and if it cost < $20/employee. Vaccinating restaurant employees is unlikely to be economical from either the restaurant owner or the societal perspective, even during hepatitis A epidemics.

Empty virus-like particle-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for antibodies to hepatitis E virus

Hepatitis E, an enterically transmitted non-A, non-B hepatitis, is a serious viral infection that occasionally causes large epidemics in developing countries. In developed countries, the disease only appears sporadically due to the transmission routes, and it is considered to be less important. The hepatitis E virus (HEV) cannot grow in cultured cells and no reliable assay system has ever been developed. In addition, the present diagnostic are not perfect, and actual rates of HEV infection may be underestimated. Highly purified empty virus-like particles (VLPs) of HEV have been produced by the use of a recombinant baculovirus vector in insect cells. Using these VLPs as an antigen, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for antibodies to HEV was developed. A panel of 164 sera that were randomized and coded, and sera collected periodically from three patients with hepatitis E were used for the evaluation. The sensitivity of the assay was shown to be equal to or better than that obtained in previous research that used the same serum panel. The ELISA demonstrated that the serum IgM level of the patients was highest at the onset of the clinical illness and then rapidly decreased. In contrast, a high level of circulating IgG antibody titers lasted for more than 4 years. In Japan, a non-endemic country, the prevalence of the IgG class antibody to HEV in healthy individuals was found to range from 1.9% to 14.1%, depending on the geographical area. Only one out of 900 (0.1%) serum samples was IgM-positive. The IgM class antibody to HEV was detected in 10.8% of non-A, non-B, and non-C acute hepatitis patients in northeast China, whereas none of the patients in Korea had the IgM antibody. The ELISA utilizing the VLPs is sensitive and specific in its detection of the IgM and IgG antibodies to HEV. The ELISA is therefore useful for diagnosing HEV infection and for seroepidemiological study of hepatitis E.

Empty virus-like particle-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for antibodies to hepatitis E virus

Hepatitis E, an enterically transmitted non-A, non-B hepatitis, is a serious viral infection that occasionally causes large epidemics in developing countries. In developed countries, the disease only appears sporadically due to the transmission routes, and it is considered to be less important. The hepatitis E virus (HEV) cannot grow in cultured cells and no reliable assay system has ever been developed. In addition, the present diagnostic are not perfect, and actual rates of HEV infection may be underestimated. Highly purified empty virus-like particles (VLPs) of HEV have been produced by the use of a recombinant baculovirus vector in insect cells. Using these VLPs as an antigen, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for antibodies to HEV was developed. A panel of 164 sera that were randomized and coded, and sera collected periodically from three patients with hepatitis E were used for the evaluation. The sensitivity of the assay was shown to be equal to or better than that obtained in previous research that used the same serum panel. The ELISA demonstrated that the serum IgM level of the patients was highest at the onset of the clinical illness and then rapidly decreased. In contrast, a high level of circulating IgG antibody titers lasted for more than 4 years. In Japan, a non-endemic country, the prevalence of the IgG class antibody to HEV in healthy individuals was found to range from 1.9% to 14.1%, depending on the geographical area. Only one out of 900 (0.1%) serum samples was IgM-positive. The IgM class antibody to HEV was detected in 10.8% of non-A, non-B, and non-C acute hepatitis patients in northeast China, whereas none of the patients in Korea had the IgM antibody. The ELISA utilizing the VLPs is sensitive and specific in its detection of the IgM and IgG antibodies to HEV. The ELISA is therefore useful for diagnosing HEV infection and for seroepidemiological study of hepatitis E.

Empty virus-like particle-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for antibodies to hepatitis E virus

Hepatitis E, an enterically transmitted non-A, non-B hepatitis, is a serious viral infection that occasionally causes large epidemics in developing countries. In developed countries, the disease only appears sporadically due to the transmission routes, and it is considered to be less important. The hepatitis E virus (HEV) cannot grow in cultured cells and no reliable assay system has ever been developed. In addition, the present diagnostic are not perfect, and actual rates of HEV infection may be underestimated. Highly purified empty virus-like particles (VLPs) of HEV have been produced by the use of a recombinant baculovirus vector in insect cells. Using these VLPs as an antigen, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for antibodies to HEV was developed. A panel of 164 sera that were randomized and coded, and sera collected periodically from three patients with hepatitis E were used for the evaluation. The sensitivity of the assay was shown to be equal to or better than that obtained in previous research that used the same serum panel. The ELISA demonstrated that the serum IgM level of the patients was highest at the onset of the clinical illness and then rapidly decreased. In contrast, a high level of circulating IgG antibody titers lasted for more than 4 years. In Japan, a non-endemic country, the prevalence of the IgG class antibody to HEV in healthy individuals was found to range from 1.9% to 14.1%, depending on the geographical area. Only one out of 900 (0.1%) serum samples was IgM-positive. The IgM class antibody to HEV was detected in 10.8% of non-A, non-B, and non-C acute hepatitis patients in northeast China, whereas none of the patients in Korea had the IgM antibody. The ELISA utilizing the VLPs is sensitive and specific in its detection of the IgM and IgG antibodies to HEV. The ELISA is therefore useful for diagnosing HEV infection and for seroepidemiological study of hepatitis E.

Hepatitis C virus infection as an opportunistic disease in persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an RNA virus of the Flaviviridae family and is a major cause of chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Owing to shared routes of transmission, HCV and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection are common, affecting approximately one-third of all HIV-infected persons in the United States. In addition, HIV coinfection is associated with higher HCV RNA level and a more rapid progression of HCV-related liver disease, which leads to an increased risk of cirrhosis. HCV infection may also impact the course and management of HIV disease, particularly by increasing the risk of antiretroviral drug-induced hepatotoxicity. Thus, chronic HCV infection acts as an opportunistic disease in HIV-infected persons, because the incidence of infection is increased and the natural history of HCV infection is accelerated in coinfected persons. Strategies to prevent primary HCV infection and to modify the progression of HCV-related liver disease are urgently needed for HIV-HCV-coinfected individuals.

An outbreak of hospital-acquired hepatitis B virus infection among patients receiving chronic hemodialysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate a cluster of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections between December 1995 and May 1996 among chronic hemodialysis patients in one county.

SETTING

Two dialysis centers (A and B) and a hospital (C) in one county.

PATIENTS

Six case-patients who were dialyzed in one of two centers, A and B, and had all been hospitalized between January and February 1996 at hospital C.

METHODS

Patient 1, usually dialyzed in center A, sero-converted to hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in December 1995 and could have been the source of infection for the others, who seroconverted between March and April 1996. Two cohort studies were conducted: one among patients dialyzed in center A, to determine where transmission had occurred, and one among patients dialyzed at hospital C at the time patient 1 was hospitalized, to identify factors associated with infection.

RESULTS

Four (15%) of the 26 susceptible patients dialyzed at center A became infected with HBV. Hospitalization at hospital C when patient 1 was hospitalized was associated with infection (P = .002). A cohort study of the 10 susceptible patients dialyzed at hospital C during the time patient 1 was hospitalized did not identify specific risk factors for infection. However, supplies and multidose vials were shared routinely among patients, providing opportunities for transmission.

CONCLUSION

When chronic hemodialysis patients require dialysis while hospitalized, their HBsAg status should be reviewed, and no instrument, supplies, or medications should be shared among them.

Hepatitis E: an overview

Hepatitis E is an enterically transmitted, acute, self-limited, icteric viral disease that occurs in large numbers in countries of the Indian subcontinent, Asia, and Africa. The frequency of epidemics and the high mortality rate among infected pregnant women are strong indicators that hepatitis E is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in humans. Several isolates of hepatitis E virus (HEV) derived from infected humans and experimental animals have recently been cloned and sequenced, allowing investigators to determine the molecular structure of the HEV genome. Laboratory diagnosis of HEV infection is done by detection of HEV antibodies, HEV RNA in stool and serum samples, HEV particles in stool specimens, and HEV antigen in hepatocytes and stool specimens. The detection of anti-HEV by enzyme immunoassay, with the use of several recombinant HEV proteins or synthetic peptides, is the most frequently applied method for the diagnosis of the infection and characterization of its epidemiologic features. Laboratory determination of HEV replication, immune response, and liver pathologic features in patients with hepatitis E and in infected primates has facilitated studies of the disease. Preventive measures against HEV infection include the passive transfer of protective antibodies or active immunization. In efforts to develop HEV vaccines, various recombinant proteins have been used. Although a range of protective immune responses have been induced in primates, further modifications of immunogen, adjuvant, and immunization schedules are necessary to prevent HEV infection. Much remains to be learned about epidemiology of HEV infection, reservoir(s) of the virus, and protective immunity in order to develop effective strategies to prevent hepatitis E.

Strategies to prevent and control hepatitis B and C virus infections: a global perspective

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are major causes of acute and chronic liver disease worldwide. Chronic infection with these viruses often leads to chronic liver disease, including cirrhosis or primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Both HBV and HCV are bloodborne viruses; however, HBV is transmitted efficiently by both percutaneous and mucosal exposures, and HCV is transmitted predominantly by percutaneous exposures. Because the relative importance of various modes of transmission of these viruses differs by country, the choice of specific prevention and control strategies depends primarily on the epidemiology of infection in a particular country. Comprehensive hepatitis B prevention strategies should include (1) prevention of perinatal HBV transmission, (2) hepatitis B vaccination at critical ages to interrupt transmission and (3) prevention of nosocomial HBV transmission. The prevention of hepatitis C is problematic because a vaccine to prevent HCV infection is not expected to be developed in the foreseeable future. From a global perspective, the greatest impact on the disease burden associated with HCV infection will most likely be achieved by focusing efforts on primary prevention strategies to reduce or eliminate the risk for transmission from nosocomial exposures (e.g. blood transfusion, unsafe injection practices) and high-risk practices (e.g. injecting drug use).

Hepatitis C: Part II. Prevention counseling and medical evaluation

An estimated 3.9 million Americans are infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV), and most do not know that they are infected. This group includes persons who are at risk for HCV-associated chronic liver disease and who also serve as reservoirs for transmission of HCV to others. Because there is no vaccine to prevent HCV infection and immune globulin is not effective for postexposure prophylaxis, prevention of HCV infection is paramount. Patients who are at risk of exposure to HCV should be advised on steps they might take to minimize their risk of infection. Patients who are infected with HCV should be counseled on ways to prevent transmission of HCV to others and to avoid hepatotoxins. They should also be examined for liver disease and referred for treatment, if indicated.

Hepatitis C: Part I. Routine serologic testing and diagnosis

Hepatitis C, which is caused by the hepatitis C virus (HCV), is a major public health problem in the United States. HCV is most efficiently transmitted through large or repeated percutaneous exposures to blood. Most patients with acute HCV infection develop persistent infection, and 70 percent of patients develop chronic hepatitis. HCV-associated chronic liver disease results in 8,000 to 10,000 deaths per year, and the annual costs of acute and chronic hepatitis C exceed $600 million. An estimated 3.9 million Americans are currently infected with HCV, but most of these persons are asymptomatic and do not know they are infected. To identify them, primary health care professionals should obtain a history of high-risk practices associated with the transmission of HCV and other bloodborne pathogens from all patients. Routine testing is currently recommended only in patients who are most likely to be infected with HCV.

Progress toward elimination of hepatitis B virus transmission in the United States

The strategy to eliminate hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission in the United States is comprised of the following components: (1) preventing perinatal transmission, (2) routine infant vaccination, (3) catch-up vaccination of children in high-risk groups at any age, (4) catch-up vaccination of all children at 11-12 years of age and (5) vaccination of adolescents and adults in high-risk groups. According to recent surveys, > 85% of pregnant women are screened for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Of infants born to HBsAg-positive women identified in 1995, 93% received appropriate immunoprophylaxis at birth; however, only 69% were fully vaccinated by 6-8 months of age. From 1991 (when routine infant hepatitis B vaccination was first recommended) to 1996, the proportion of 19-35-month-old children who have received three doses of hepatitis B vaccine has increased from < 10 to 83%. During this time, rates of acute hepatitis B in children 7-10 years of age have declined by 27% and rates among children 3-6 years of age have declined by 62%. Implementation of programmes for catch-up vaccination of all adolescents at 11-12 years of age and for vaccination of adolescents and adults in high-risk groups have only recently begun and no data are available to assess the progress of these programmes. However, 26% (13/50) of states now have laws requiring adolescents to be vaccinated in order to enter school. Current data indicate that substantial progress has been made in implementing a strategy to eliminate HBV transmission in the United States. Future efforts need to be focused on improving complete immunoprophylaxis of infants of HBsAg-positive mothers, increasing vaccine coverage among 11-12 year old children and implementing programmes to vaccine adolescents and adults in high-risk groups.

Hepatitis B vaccination of adolescent and adult high-risk groups in the United States

Substantial progress has been made in implementing routine infant hepatitis B vaccination in the United States. However, in 1996, an estimated 65,000 acute hepatitis B cases occurred, the majority of which were among young adults in high-risk groups. Recent surveys have found very low vaccination coverage among several high-risk groups, including men who have sex with men and patients with sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Targeted vaccination of persons with risk factors for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection can be provided in a variety of settings including family planning clinics, STD clinics, drug treatment centres, detention centres, jails and prisons. However, vaccination programmes have been infrequently implemented in these settings and the majority of persons with acute hepatitis B cases have had a missed opportunity for vaccination in the past. Thus, in order to accelerate elimination of HBV transmission in the United States, increased efforts are needed to implement effective hepatitis B vaccination programmes targeted to adolescents and adults in high-risk groups.

Hepatitis A through E

Viral hepatitis is a term commonly used for several clinically similar, yet etiologically and epidemiologically distinct, diseases. Five human hepatitis viruses have been identified. Hepatitis A, B, C, and D are endemic in the United States; hepatitis E is rarely reported in the United States, and most U.S. cases are seen in persons who have traveled to areas where hepatitis E. is endemic. Hepatitis A and E are transmitted by the fecal-oral route; hepatitis B, C, and D are blood-borne diseases. Hepatitis A and B have been recognized as separate entities since the early 1940s and can be diagnosed by serologic tests. Tests are available to detect the antibody to hepatitis C and D virus; no commercial test is available to diagnose hepatitis E. Hepatitis A, B, and D can be prevented by vaccine, but no vaccines are available for hepatitis C or E.

Hepatitis C

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) has emerged as a major cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. The widespread endemicity of HCV infection is the result of a combination of factors, including those related to the genetic diversity of the virus and the host response and those related to the specific settings and behaviors that have facilitated transmission. Most people who contract HCV infection become persistently infected, and the mechanism by which persistent infection is established seems to be related to the lack of development of an effective neutralizing immune response. The magnitude of the spread of HCV infection primarily is related to specific risk factors for transmission. The most important human behavior related to the transmission of HCV has been injection drug use, which in many developed countries has been the leading source of HCV infection during the past 20 to 30 years. The recognition of the clinical importance of HCV infection has resulted in a substantial amount of attention and resources rapidly directed toward developing new and improved therapies. The perception, however, of the public health importance of HCV infection is still limited. Despite the knowledge that injection drug use is the major source of HCV infection in the United States, this message has not been included in prevention and treatment programs, and the resources needed to support strong public health programs have yet to be identified.

Evaluation of assays for antibody to hepatitis E virus by a serum panel. Hepatitis E Virus Antibody Serum Panel Evaluation Group

Few data are available to evaluate the performance of existing assays for antibody to the hepatitis E virus (anti-HEV). A panel of 164 randomized and coded sera was tested for anti-HEV by 12 different assays. The panel included a dilution series of an early convalescent human serum, known-positive sera (undiluted human sera obtained 2 months to 13 years after acute hepatitis E, and postinoculation chimpanzee sera), known-negative sera (preinoculation chimpanzee sera; sera from chimpanzees with hepatitis A virus, hepatitis B virus, or hepatitis C virus infection; and normal human sera), and sera obtained from previously tested U.S. blood donors without a history of hepatitis. Six tests detected anti-HEV in > or =90% of undiluted known-positive sera. The sensitivity of all of the assays with known-positive sera ranged from 17% to 100%, and the limit of detection by endpoint dilution ranged from 1:5 to 1:160. Ten tests were nonreactive for all of the 22 known-negative sera, one test was reactive for one serum, and one test was reactive for 5 sera. In pairwise comparisons of different tests in blood donor sera, the overall concordance ranged from 49% to 94% (median, 69%) and the concordance among reactive sera ranged from 0% to 89% (median, 32%). Several of these tests performed well in detecting anti-HEV in known positive sera. However, highly discrepant results among U.S. blood donor sera indicate that anti-HEV seroprevalence data in non-HEV-endemic countries may be unreliable and should be interpreted with caution.

Acute hepatitis E by a new isolate acquired in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To report the first case of acute hepatitis E by a novel isolate acquired in the United States and confirmed by nucleotide sequencing.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We describe the clinical manifestations and the results of associated laboratory studies in a man who was found to have acute hepatitis E infection.

RESULTS

A 62-year-old man was hospitalized because of fever, abdominal pain, and jaundice. After an initial evaluation did not provide a cause, his serum was found to be positive for IgG anti-hepatitis E virus (HEV) by three antibody assays. Serum was also positive for HEV RNA by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Sequencing results from the PCR products demonstrated substantial differences at the nucleotide level between this strain and the known Mexican and Burmese strains.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of this initial report, HEV should be considered an etiologic agent in patients with acute non-ABC hepatitis in the United States.

Prevention of infectious disease transmission in sports

A variety of infectious diseases can be transmitted during competitive sports. Modes of transmission in athletic settings include person-to-person contact, common-source exposures and airborne/droplet spread. This paper reviews the most commonly reported infectious diseases among athletes and discusses the potential for transmission of bloodborne diseases in sports. Guidelines are provided regarding measures to prevent transmission of infectious diseases in athletic settings, including hygiene and infection control practices, vaccination, and education of officials, coaches, trainers and sports participants.

Prevalence of and risk factors for antibody to hepatitis E virus seroreactivity among blood donors in Northern California

To evaluate antibody to hepatitis E virus (anti-HEV) seroreactivity, 5000 US blood donors were tested for anti-HEV by two EIAs: a mosaic protein assay (MPr-EIA) and a recombinant protein assay (RPr-EIA). Overall, 59 (1.2%) were seroreactive by MPr-EIA and 70 (1.4%) were seroreactive by RPr-EIA. The overall concordance between tests was 98.5% (4925/5000); the concordance among reactive sera by either test was only 27% (27/102). In a case-control study, seroreactive persons were more likely than seronegative persons to have traveled to countries in which HEV is endemic (odds ratio [OR] for MPr-EIA = 4.3, P < .001; OR for RPr-EIA = 2.5, P = .005), but 31% of MPr-EIA anti-HEV-reactive persons and 38% of RPr-EIA anti-HEV-reactive persons had no history of international travel. These findings suggest that travelers to regions in which HEV is endemic can acquire subclinical HEV infection. The significance of anti-HEV seroreactivity among persons without an international travel history needs to be determined.

Hepatitis C virus infection associated with administration of intravenous immune globulin. A cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk of and risk factors for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among persons with immune deficiencies who had received intravenous immune globulin (IGIV) between March 1993 and February 1994.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

An immunology program in a tertiary care hospital.

PATIENTS

Of 341 persons who had received IGIV between March 1, 1993, and February 22, 1994, 278 (82%) were enrolled. The mean age for the enrolled persons was 9 years, and 99% had primary immune deficiencies.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Evidence of HCV infection by detection in sera of antibody to HCV and/or HCV RNA by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

Twenty-three (11%) of 210 persons who received the IGIV Gammagard (Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Deerfield, Ill) became infected compared with none of 52 persons who received exclusively other IGIV products (P=.01). In a multivariate analysis, HCV infection was associated only with Gammagard produced from plasma screened by second-generation (multiantigen) anti-HCV tests (P=.03). Hepatitis C virus RNA was detected in Gammagard, and the risk of transmission to recipients increased with increasing quantity of HCV RNA infused, from 0 for those who received no HCV RNA-positive lots to 29% for the quartile of patients receiving the greatest amount (P<.001). At least 9 different lots of Gammagard were required to account for all cases.

CONCLUSION

Gammagard was the only IGIV product implicated in the transmission of HCV. Infection was associated with higher quantities of HCV RNA in Gammagard produced from second-generation anti-HCV-screened plasma. Further studies are needed to determine reasons for the infectivity of Gammagard, and viral inactivation and removal steps are needed to ensure the safety of IGIV products.

IgM and IgG antibodies to hepatitis E virus (HEV) detected by an enzyme immunoassay based on an HEV-specific artificial recombinant mosaic protein

To develop an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for IgM antibody to hepatitis E virus (HEV) (IgM anti-HEV) and IgG antibody to HEV (IgG anti-HEV), a synthetic gene encoding several liner immunodominant antigenic epitopes from HEV structural proteins was assembled as a chimeric recombinant mosaic protein (Mpr) with glutathione S-transferase and used as an immunodiagnostic target. In addition, a neutralization confirmation test was developed using individual synthetic peptides. Among 614 patients with acute hepatitis from 10 geographically distinct outbreaks, IgG anti-HEV was found in 546 (88.9%), with a range of 77-100% depending on the outbreak. Of 130 patients tested for IgM anti-HEV, 126 (96.9%) were positive. Among patients tested within 4 months of onset of jaundice, 37/37 (100%) were IgG anti-HEV positive. For patients from whom sera were collected 1-16 days after onset of jaundice, the geometric mean IgG titer (GMT) was 1:47,000; the GMT increased to 1:70,710 30-40 days after onset of jaundice and decreased to 1:1,778 3-4 months after the onset of jaundice. For patients tested 6-8 months after onset of jaundice, 11/12 (92%) were IgG anti-HEV positive, and the GMT was 1:2,908. IgM anti-HEV was detected in 43/43 (100%) sera collected 1-40 days after onset of jaundice, and the GMT for IgM anti-HEV was 1:10,000 at that time. For sera collected 3-4 and 6-12 months after onset of jaundice, 7/14 (50%) and 5/12 (40%) respectively, were IgM anti-HEV positive. In conclusion, an artificial mosaic protein composed of linear antigenic epitopes from open reading frame 2 (ORF2) and ORF3 of HEV has been successfully applied to the development of a sensitive and specific EIA for the detection of IgG and IgM anti-HEV activity. These assays were used for the verification of HEV infection in outbreak settings and for the diagnosis of HEV infection in sporadic cases.

Hepatitis E

Hepatitis E has a world-wide distribution and causes substantial morbidity and mortality in some developing countries, particularly among pregnant women. Hepatitis E virus (HEV) has recently been cloned and sequenced, and new diagnostic tests have been developed. These tests have been used to begin to characterize the natural history and epidemiological features of HEV infection. Experimental vaccines have also been developed that offer the potential to prevent hepatitis E. However, much remains to be learned about HEV, including the mechanisms of transmission, the reservoir(s) of the virus, and the natural history of protective immunity in order to develop effective strategies to prevent this disease.

Hospital-based evaluation of programs to prevent perinatal hepatitis B virus transmission

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the frequency of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) screening of pregnant women in the United States and factors associated with the lack of screening.

DESIGN

A random sample of 200 hospitals with 100 or more births per year was surveyed with regard to policy and practices. Each hospital was also asked to provide maternal screening and infant follow-up data for the first 25 infants who were born on or after March 1, 1993.

RESULTS

Of 183 participating hospitals, 137 (75%) had maternal HBsAg screening policies, and 102 (56%) had standing orders for HBsAg testing of pregnant women who were admitted without prior screening. Hospitals that were located in states with laws that required maternal HBsAg screening were more likely to have a written screening policy (prevalence ratio [PR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.4) and a standing order (PR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.4-2.2). A lack of screening was related to delivery in hospitals without screening policies (PR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.3-8.9) or standing orders (PR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.2-6.2), and to the infant's provider being a family practitioner (PR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.7). Among the 3982 infants for whom data were available, 3342 (84%) were born to mothers who had undergone screening for HBsAg.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that hospitals should develop specific policies for HBsAg screening, states should enact laws that require maternal screening, and additional education of health care providers is needed with regard to the screening of all pregnant women for HBsAg.