Characterization of tubular functional capacity in humans using para-aminohippurate and famotidine

BACKGROUND

Renal drug excretion by glomerular filtration and active tubular secretion may be altered by factors such as acute and chronic renal disease, nephrotoxins, and drug interactions. Thus, accurate and reproducible methods for quantitation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and tubular functional capacity are critical.

METHODS

We utilized a four-step sequential infusion method to characterize anionic [para-aminohippurate (PAH)] and cationic (famotidine) tubular functional capacity in healthy volunteers. Filtration and secretion rates were quantitated from renal clearance and iothalamate-derived GFR determinations.

RESULTS

Concentration-dependent renal clearance of PAH was observed at plasma concentrations> 100 mg/L; renal clearances were 442 +/- 131 (mean +/- SD), 423 +/- 94, 233 +/- 45, and 152 +/- 18 mL/min/1.73 m2 at plasma concentrations of 18 +/- 2, 92 +/- 5, 291 +/- 47 and 789 +/- 28 mg/L, respectively. The apparent affinity (Km) and maximum secretory capacity (TmPAH) were 141 +/- 70 mg/L and 71 +/- 16 mg/min/1.73 m2, respectively. The unbound renal clearance and tubular secretory clearance of famotidine were 384 +/- 70 and 329 +/- 78 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively, and were not significantly correlated with the unbound plasma concentrations, which ranged from 126 to 2659 ng/mL. The rate of tubular secretion was linear at unbound plasma concentrations up to 2659 ng/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that a sequential infusion method using PAH may be used to characterize the anionic secretory component of proximal tubular function. The tubular clearance of famotidine may be a suitable index of the cationic secretory capacity of the proximal tubule in humans. Saturation of the cationic secretory pathway was not observed, and further investigation into parallel pathways of cationic secretion, such as p-glycoprotein, may be warranted.

Effect of ceftazidime on systemic cytokine concentrations in rats

The effect of a single dose of ceftazidime on circulating concentrations of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) in a rat model of sepsis was studied. IL-6 concentrations were significantly elevated (100 to 200 times the baseline) 6 h after ceftazidime administration in both septic and nonseptic (control) rats. TNF-alpha concentrations increased significantly in nonseptic (approximately 40 times the baseline) rats but not septic (approximately 2 to 3 times the baseline) rats. Ceftazidime administration was not associated with an increase in endotoxin concentrations. These findings suggest that ceftazidime modulation of proinflammatory cytokine concentrations may be independent of its antimicrobial properties.

Determinants of ceftriaxone clearance by continuous venovenous hemofiltration and hemodialysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To guide individual ceftriaxone dosages in patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy.

DESIGN

Prospective, outpatient study.

SETTING

University-affiliated general clinical research center.

PATIENTS

Eight patients receiving hemodialysis.

INTERVENTION

We performed controlled clearance studies with three hemofilters: an acrylonitrile copolymer 0.6 m2 (AN69), polymethylmethacrylate 2.1 m2 (PMMA), and polysulfone 0.65 m2 (PS).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Subjects received ceftriaxone 1000 mg intravenously before the start of a clearance study. The concentration of ceftriaxone in multiple plasma and dialysate-ultrafiltrate samples was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. The diffusional clearances (Cl(diffusion)) and sieving coefficients (SC) of ceftriaxone, urea, and creatinine were compared by a mixed-model repeated-measures analysis of variance with filter and blood, dialysate inflow, or ultrafiltration rate as the main effect and patient as a random effect. The fraction of ceftriaxone bound to plasma proteins was 43 +/- 15% (range 13-92%). Concentration dependence was evident in all three groups. The fraction unbound to plasma proteins (f(up)) at the time that SCs were determined was significantly lower in the PS group (0.16 +/- 0.07) than the AN69 group (0.30 +/- 0.17, p<0.01), but similar to that in the PMMA group (0.27 +/- 0.12). Despite the higher f(up), the SC of unbound ceftriaxone with the AN69 filter (0.48 +/- 0.13) was significantly lower than values for the PMMA (0.86 +/- 0.33) and PS (0.82 +/- 0.22) groups (p<0.05). Continuous venovenous hemofiltration clearance of urea and unbound ceftriaxone increased significantly only for the PMMA (p=0.006) and PS (p=0.015) filters when the ultrafiltration rate was increased. Significant linear relationships (p<0.0001) were observed between Cl(diffusion) of unbound ceftriaxone and clearance of urea for all three filters: AN69 slope = 0.57, PMMA slope = 0.90, and PS slope = 1.02. The slope of this relationship for the AN69 filter was significantly lower than for the other two filters.

CONCLUSION

Ceftriaxone clearance was significantly increased and membrane dependent during continuous venovenous hemofiltration and continuous venovenous hemodialysis. Thus individual ceftriaxone dosages for patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapies should incorporate extracorporeal clearance.

Determinants of ceftazidime clearance by continuous venovenous hemofiltration and continuous venovenous hemodialysis

Although several dosage adjustment regimens have been proposed, there is little quantitative information to guide the initiation of ceftazidime therapy in patients who are receiving continuous renal replacement therapy. To determine the clearance of ceftazidime by continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) and continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD), we performed controlled clearance studies with stable hemodialysis patients with three hemofilters: a 0.6-m(2) acrylonitrile copolymer (AN69; Hospal) filter, a 2.1-m(2) polymethylmethacrylate filter (PMMA; Toray) filter and a 0.65-m(2) polysulfone (PS; Fresenius) filter. Subjects received 1,000 mg of ceftazidime intravenously prior to the start of a clearance study. The concentration of ceftazidime in multiple plasma and dialysate or ultrafiltrate samples was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. The diffusional clearances (CI(diffusion)) and sieving coefficients of ceftazidime were compared by a mixed-model repeated-measures analysis of variance with filter and blood, dialysate inflow, or ultrafiltration rate as the main effect and the patient as a random effect. The fraction of ceftazidime bound to plasma proteins was 17%+/-7% (range, 10 to 25%). The clearances of ceftazidime, urea, and creatinine by CVVHD were essentially constant at blood flow rates of 75 to 250 ml/min for all three filters. Significant linear relationships (P<0.0001) were observed between CI(diffusion) of ceftazidime and clearance of urea for all three filters: AN69 (slope = 0.83), PMMA (slope = 0.89), and PS (slope = 1.03). Ceftazidime clearance was membrane independent during CVVH and CVVHD. CVVH and CVVHD can significantly augment the clearance of ceftazidime. Dosing strategies for initiation of ceftazidime therapy in patients receiving CVVH and CVVHD are proposed.

Unintended immunomodulation: part II. Effects of pharmacological agents on cytokine activity

Cytokines are proteins that are produced by immune and non-immune cells, and they function as mediators to facilitate cellular communication. Their production is regulated by a complex network of co-stimulatory and feedback loops that responds to a variety of stimuli. Several pharmacological agents have been found to alter systemic concentrations and/or the activity of different cytokines via a variety of mechanisms, including changes in biosynthesis, secretion, and/or stability. Many of the agents that modulate cytokine levels commonly are used in the management of critically ill patients. Catecholamines for example, have been found to promote the secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines, and, therefore, may alter acute inflammatory processes such as sepsis. Antimicrobials have multiple effects on cytokine production, either secondary to the release of endotoxins from gram-negative bacteria or via direct activity on cytokine expression at the transcriptional and/or post-transcriptional level. Pentoxifylline has multiple effects on the immune system, but inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokine release predominates. The reminder of the known drug-cytokine interactions and their effect on the inflammatory process are discussed. Information on the pharmacodynamic effect of drugs is limited, and our understanding of the clinical significance of these observations awaits further investigation. This review was designed to provide intensivists and other clinicians with useful information regarding the effect of medications on cytokine activity. It is also intended to help researchers and clinicians to optimize the design of studies of pharmacotherapeutic modulation of cytokines and to avoid the use of some agents in clinical circumstances in which cytokine manipulation is undesirable.

Unintended immunomodulation: part I. Effects of common clinical conditions on cytokine biosynthesis

Cytokines are low molecular weight proteins that act in an autocrine, paracrine and endocrine fashion to regulate and integrate immune effector cell function. Cytokine production is tightly controlled by a complex network of co-stimulatory and feedback loops. The systemic concentrations of some cytokines, most notably tumor necrosis factor and various interleukins, correlate with the extent of inflammation, and the severity of critical illness and patient outcome. Thus, cytokine expression is often monitored and/or manipulated as a therapeutic target in studies of sepsis and other inflammatory conditions. Unfortunately, some therapies designed to modify cytokine response have failed to improve outcomes in sepsis, and some of these therapies have actually been harmful. Several common clinical conditions, as well as, therapeutic interventions significantly influence cytokine expression. Furthermore, the magnitude and extent of these effects may be greater than those produced by immunomodulating therapies. In contrast, other conditions may not produce clinically significant changes in cytokine expression, and must simply be considered when interpreting studies designed to determine the effects of immunomodulation. Some conditions may even result in changes in the inflammatory response and may thus add to the inflammatory burden of a critically ill patient. This review provides intensivists and other clinicians with an overview of the effects of altered physiologic conditions on cytokine expression. This information is important so that studies measuring cytokines can be correctly interpreted and clinical circumstances in which cytokine manipulation is undesirable can perhaps be avoided.

Nephrology pharmaceutical care preceptorship: a programmatic and clinical outcomes assessment

OBJECTIVE

The University of Pittsburgh Nephrology Pharmaceutical Care Preceptorship (NPCP) program was conceived to acquaint health system pharmacists with the pharmacotherapeutic management of dialysis patients, enhance the delivery of pharmaceutical care, and improve clinical outcomes through the development of specialized professional skills. A survey designed to determine the impact of the NPCP program was sent to all 145 participants of the program.

METHODS

The survey, designed to collect demographic information and data about the participants' practice sites, professional activities prior to and after the completion of the program, and markers of disease status, was mailed to all participants in September 1997. The 96 respondents (66.2%) were involved in a wide variety of clinical practices; inpatient management of peritoneal dialysis, hemodialysis, or renal transplant patients were most commonly reported.

RESULTS

More than 80% of the participants believed that the educational content of the NPCP program was sufficient to allow them to establish a specialized service for the management of dialysis patients. However, two-thirds would have preferred to have more contact time (an additional 1-2 d) with the preceptorship faculty. The percentage of the pharmacists' time devoted to the provision of pharmaceutical care for dialysis patients almost doubled, from 13.1% to 25.2% (p < 0.001). The components of pharmaceutical care performed by these pharmacists also changed as a result of their completion of the NPCP program. Time devoted to clinical services and the provision of educational programs (inservices) increased significantly, while the time allocated to distributive activities decreased from a mean of 32.4% to 26.4% (almost 20% from baseline). The number of pharmacists who provided some component of pharmaceutical care for ambulatory dialysis patients increased significantly, from 10 to 33, after completion of the program. In the survey given after the preceptorship, almost 70% of these 33 pharmacists self-reported that the mean hematocrit of their ambulatory dialysis patients increased; 45% reported that the epoetin dose was lower. Parenteral iron use was also reported to have increased in 78.8% of the dialysis units, and an increase in serum ferritin and transferrin saturation was observed in 54.5% and 60.6% of the units. respectively. Although far fewer pharmacists (n = 15) initiated a renal osteodystrophy management program, 73.3% of those who did so reported an increase in their patients' compliance with phosphate binder therapy, which was reflected in a drop in serum phosphorous in 40% of the units.

CONCLUSIONS

The NPCP program resulted in changes in the professional activities of the participants: fewer distributive activities and increased clinical and educational activities. These significant changes were noted in all areas of outpatient care. Participation in the NPCP program enhanced the delivery of pharmaceutical care to dialysis patients and improved the markers of disease status.

Evaluation of the influence of diabetes mellitus on antipyrine metabolism and CYP1A2 and CYP2D6 activity

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the metabolism of antipyrine, a general metabolic probe, caffeine, a probe for cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 and N-acetyltransferase activity, and dextromethorphan, a specific probe for CYP2D6 activity in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus.

DESIGN

Prospective, controlled study.

SETTING

Research facility. Patients. Fifteen patients with type 1 and 16 with type 2 diabetes, and 16 healthy controls.

INTERVENTION

Each subject simultaneously received antipyrine 10 mg/kg, caffeine 100 mg, and dextromethorphan 30 mg.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The pharmacokinetics of antipyrine and its primary metabolites were determined from saliva and urine samples. Type 1 diabetes had marked effects on antipyrine metabolism whereas type 2 disease did not alter the metabolism of any of the probe drugs. The apparent oral clearance of antipyrine was increased 72% in patients with type 1 disease compared with controls (p=0.0001). In addition, formation clearances of 4-hydroxyantipyrine and 3-hydroxymethylantipyrine were increased by 74% and 137% in those patients relative to controls. The caffeine metabolic index (paraxanthine/caffeine) was increased 34% (p=0.11), and N-acetylation and CYP2D6 phenotype were not altered.

CONCLUSION

The metabolism of antipyrine is increased in patients with type 1 diabetes. Based on in vitro reports of antipyrine metabolism and current caffeine metabolic index data, the predominant effect of type 1 diabetes appears to be an increase in CYP1A2 activity. Assessment of the effect of the disease on other specific CYP metabolic pathways is warranted.

Comparison of iothalamate clearance methods for measuring GFR

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the bias and precision of three methods of measuring glomerular filtration rate (GFR) relative to a standard method.

DESIGN

Prospective, outpatient study.

SETTING

University-affiliated general clinical research center.

PATIENTS

Twenty-six patients with various degrees of renal function (GFR range 25-151 ml/min/1.73 m2).

INTERVENTIONS

Each patient received iothalamate twice during the study visit, first as a bolus injection and then as a priming dose followed by a constant-rate infusion for 2.5 hours.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Plasma (ClpIVB) and renal clearances (ClrIVB) after bolus injection and plasma clearance during constant-rate infusion (ClpINF) were compared with standard renal clearance during constant-rate infusion (ClrINF). All three measures were highly correlated with ClrINF (r>0.90, p<0.001). The mean ClrIVB was not significantly different from ClrINF (106.3+/-30.4 vs 104.2+/-28.5 ml/min/1.73 m2) and provided a precise (8.8%, 95% CI 6.5-11.1%) and unbiased measure of GFR. Both ClpIVB and ClpINF were positively biased; values exceeded ClrINF by 11.8+/-11.1 (p=0.0001) and 10.5+/-12.5 ml/min/1.73 m2 (p=0.0003), respectively. Use of a nonrenal correction factor of 9.8 and 10.5 ml/min/1.73 m2 for infusion and bolus plasma clearance values, respectively, eliminated bias and improved the precision of these methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Iothalamate renal clearance after bolus injection is a simple, accurate, and precise measurement of GFR and may be a useful alternative to the standard infusion method in clinical investigations. The corrected plasma clearance provides a simple index of GFR for clinical practice.

Cefazolin as empiric therapy in hemodialysis-related infections: efficacy and blood concentrations

Concern about the increasing incidence of vancomycin-resistant organisms has tempered the enthusiasm for indiscriminate vancomycin use. Cefazolin has an antibacterial activity profile similar to vancomycin against most pathogens encountered in the hemodialysis (HD) population. We evaluated the clinical efficacy and serum concentrations that were achieved during empiric cefazolin use. Fifteen consecutive HD patients (five, conventional HD; five, high-efficiency HD; and five, high-flux HD) with suspected or documented infections warranting antibiotic intervention, including access-related, respiratory tract, urinary tract, or wound infections, were enrolled. Each patient received intravenous cefazolin (20 mg/kg actual body weight rounded to the nearest 500-mg increment [range, 1 to 2 g]) after each dialysis treatment for at least three doses. Cefazolin concentrations were obtained before and immediately after the next three consecutive dialysis treatments. Thirteen patients were evaluated for efficacy and all 15 were evaluated for toxicity and cefazolin blood concentrations. All patients showed at least a short-term (3-week) clinical resolution of infection with cefazolin treatment. No central nervous system toxicities were noted and no other adverse events were expressed by the patients during the course of cefazolin treatment. Predialysis cefazolin concentrations, as determined by high-performance liquid chromatography, were 70.2 +/- 42.7 (conventional HD), 45.6 +/- 18.9 (high-efficiency HD), and 41.6 +/- 23.9 mg/L (high-flux HD) over the three dialysis sessions. Cefazolin at doses of approximately 20 mg/kg administered post-HD appears to be a safe and effective empiric therapy and yields predialysis cefazolin concentrations of 2.5 times or greater than those considered to be the minimum inhibitory concentration breakpoint (16 mg/L) for susceptible organisms. These data support the broader use of cefazolin for empiric treatment in the HD population, allowing vancomycin to be reserved for confirmed resistant organisms.

Determinants of vancomycin clearance by continuous venovenous hemofiltration and continuous venovenous hemodialysis

The clearance of vancomycin is significantly reduced in patients with acute, as well as, chronic renal failure. Although multiple-dosage regimen adjustment techniques have been proposed for these patients, there is little quantitative data to guide the individualization of vancomycin therapy in acute renal failure patients who are receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). To determine appropriate vancomycin dosing strategies for patients receiving continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) and continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD), we performed controlled clearance studies in five stable hemodialysis patients with three hemofilters: an acrylonitrile copolymer 0.6 m2 (AN69), polymethylmethacrylate 2.1 m2 (PMMA), and polysulfone 0.65 m2 (PS). Patients received 500 mg of vancomycin intravenously at least 12 hours before the start of the clearance study. The concentration of vancomycin in multiple plasma and dialysate/ultrafiltrate samples was determined by EMIT (Syva, Palo Alto, CA). The diffusional clearance and sieving coefficient (SC) of vancomycin were compared by a mixed-model repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with filter and blood (Q(B)), dialysate inflow (Q(DI)), or ultrafiltration rate (Q(UF)) as the main effects and patient as a random effect. Vancomycin was moderately protein bound in these patients; free fraction ranged from 49% to 83%. The SCs of the three filters were similar and significantly correlated with the free fraction of vancomycin (P = 0.01; r2 = 0.465). Significant linear relationships were observed between the diffusional clearance of vancomycin and Q(DI) for all three filters: AN69 (slope = 0.482; r2 = 0.880); PMMA (slope = 0.853; r2 = 0.966); and PS (slope = 0.658; r2 = 0.887). The slope of this relationship for the PMMA filter was significantly greater than that of the AN69 and PS filters. The clearance of vancomycin, urea, and creatinine, however, was essentially constant at all Q(B)s for all three filters. Thus, the clearance of vancomycin was not membrane dependent during CVVH. However, during CVVHD, membrane dependence of vancomycin clearance was noted at a Q(DI) greater than 16.7 mL/min; vancomycin clearance with PMMA at a Q(DI) of 25 mL/min was 66% and 43% greater than that with the AN69 and PS filters, respectively. CVVH (62% to 262%) and CVVHD (90% to 540%) can significantly augment the clearance of vancomycin in acute renal failure patients. Dosing strategies for individualization of vancomycin therapy in patients receiving CVVH and CVVHD are proposed.

A primer on continuous renal replacement therapy for critically ill patients

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the multiple continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) techniques available for the management of critically ill adults, and to review the indications for and complications of use, principles of drug removal during CRRT, drug dosage individualization guidelines, and the influence of CRRT on patient outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (January 1981-December 1996) was searched for appropriate publications by using terms such as hemofiltration, ultrafiltration, hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, medications, and pharmacokinetics; selected articles were cross-referenced.

STUDY SELECTION

References selected were those considered to enhance the reader's knowledge of the principles of CRRT, and to provide adequate therapies on drug disposition.

DATA SYNTHESIS

CRRTs use filtration/convection and in some cases diffusion to treat hemodynamically unstable patients with fluid overload and/or acute renal failure. Recent data suggest that positive outcomes may also be attained in patients with other medical conditions such as septic shock, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, and hepatic failure. Age, ventilator support, inotropic support, reduced urine volume, and elevated serum bilirubin concentrations have been associated with poor outcomes. Complications associated with CRRT include bleeding due to excessive anticoagulation and line disconnections, fluid and electrolyte imbalance, and filter and venous clotting. CRRT can complicate the medication regimens of patients for whom it is important to maintain drug plasma concentrations within a narrow therapeutic range. Since the physicochemical characteristics of a drug and procedure-specific factors can alter drug removal, a thorough assessment of all factors needs to be considered before dosage regimens are revised. In addition, an algorithm for drug dosing considerations based on drug and CRRT characteristics, as well as standard pharmacokinetic equations, is proposed.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of CRRT has expanded to encompass the treatment of disease states other than just acute renal failure. Since there is great variability among treatment centers, it is premature to conclude that there is enhanced survival in CRRT-treated patients compared with those who received conventional hemodialysis. This primer may help clinicians understand the need to individualize these therapies and to prospectively optimize the pharmacotherapy of their patients receiving CRRT.

Use of chlorzoxazone as an in vivo probe of cytochrome P450 2E1: choice of dose and phenotypic trait measure

Chlorzoxazone is being developed and proposed for use as a probe to measure in vivo cytochrome P4502E1 activity, but the phenotypic trait measures that are used vary. Although the doses proposed for phenotyping range from 250 mg to 750 mg, the effect of dose on chlorzoxazone hydroxylation has not previously been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of chlorzoxazone in normal healthy volunteers (N = 6) after single randomized oral doses of 250 mg and 750 mg. An additional 10 volunteers underwent a detailed pharmacokinetic study using the 250-mg dose to further evaluate proposed phenotypic trait measures (N = 16). Timed blood and urine samples were obtained for 10 hours for chlorzoxazone and 6-hydroxychlorzoxazone determination by HPLC. Pharmacokinetic parameter estimates were estimated using noncompartmental methods. Evaluation of phenotypic trait measures show that 6-hydroxychlorzoxazone to chlorzoxazone plasma concentration ratios at 2 to 4 hours after drug administration demonstrated the highest correlations with metabolite formation clearance (r = 0.9; P < 0.001). Urine-based parameters (e.g., total recovery) were not significantly related to formation clearance (r = 0.5; P > 0.05). Dose dependency in chlorzoxazone metabolism was shown by a 30% increase (P < 0.05) in the dose-normalized area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of chlorzoxazone and lower incremental dose-normalized urinary recovery of 6-hydroxychlorzoxazone at early timepoints after the 750-mg dose. In addition, the plasma ratio of 6-hydroxychlorzoxazone to chlorzoxazone at 4 hours was reduced by 48% in 5 of 6 subjects after the 750-mg dose (P > 0.05). These data suggest that 6-hydroxylation was saturated at the higher dose and illustrate the importance of dose selection in phenotyping. The results of this study indicate that a chlorzoxazone dose of 250 mg should be used and that a single plasma ratio obtained 2 to 4 hours after dosing is reflective of chlorzoxazone 6-hydroxylation and thus may serve as a cytochrome P4502E1 phenotypic trait measure.

Validation of the five-drug "Pittsburgh cocktail" approach for assessment of selective regulation of drug-metabolizing enzymes

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the probe drugs caffeine, chlorzoxazone, dapsone, debrisoquin (INN, debrisoquine), and mephenytoin can be simultaneously administered as a metabolic cocktail to estimate in vivo cytochrome P450 (CYP) and N-acetyltransferase enzyme activities.

METHODS

Fourteen healthy nonsmoking male volunteers (mean age +/- SD, 21.6 +/- 2.2 years) received 100 mg caffeine, 250 mg chlorzoxazone, 100 mg dapsone, 10 mg debrisoquin, and 100 mg mephenytoin individually and in four and five-drug combinations in a randomized manner using a 7 x 7 Latin square. Each drug or drug combination was given orally after an overnight fast, with a minimum 1-week washout between administrations. In each session, urine was collected from 0 to 8 hours and plasma was obtained at 4 and 8 hours after drug administration. Plasma and metabolite concentrations were used to estimate phenotypic trait measures for the efficiency of each drug's metabolism.

RESULTS

The phenotypic indexes determined for caffeine, chlorzoxazone, dapsone, debrisoquin, and mephenytoin were not significantly different when given alone than when given in combination. The median percentage change of the trait measures observed during administration of all five compounds compared with individual administration ranged from -10.7% for the 6-hydroxychlorzoxazone to chlorzoxazone plasma ratio to +2.2% for the debrisoquin recovery ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study show that caffeine, chlorzoxazone, dapsone, debrisoquin, and mephenytoin in low doses can be simultaneously administered without metabolic interaction. This cocktail approach can thus simultaneously provide independent in vivo phenotypic measures for multiple CYP enzymes and N-acetyltransferase.

Drug administration in patients with renal insufficiency. Minimising renal and extrarenal toxicity

Renal insufficiency has been associated with an increased risk of adverse effects with many classes of medications. The risk of some, but not all, adverse effects has been linked to the patient's degree of residual renal function. This may be the result of inappropriate individualisation of those agents that are primarily eliminated by the kidney, or an alteration in the pharmacodynamic response as a result of renal insufficiency. The pathophysiological mechanism responsible for alterations in drug disposition, especially metabolism and renal excretion, is the accumulation of uraemic toxins that may modulate cytochrome P450 enzyme activity and decrease glomerular filtration as well as tubular secretion. The general principles to enhance the safety of drug therapy in patients with renal insufficiency include knowledge of the potential toxicities and interactions of the therapeutic agent, consideration of possible alternatives therapies and individualisation of drug therapy based on patient level of renal function. Although optimisation of the desired therapeutic outcomes are of paramount importance, additional pharmacotherapeutic issues for patients with reduced renal function are the prevention or minimisation of future acute or chronic nephrotoxic insults, as well as the severity and occurrence of adverse effects on other organ systems. Risk factors for the development of nephrotoxicity for selected high-risk therapies (e.g. aminoglycosides, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, ACE inhibitors and radiographic contrast media) are quite similar and include pre-existing renal insufficiency, concomitant administration of other nephrotoxins, volume depletion and concomitant hepatic disease or congestive heart failure. Investigations of prophylactic approaches to enhance the safety of these agents in patients with renal insufficiency have yielded inconsistent outcomes. Hydration with saline prior to drug exposure has given the most consistent benefit, while sodium loading and use of pharmacological interventions [e.g. furosemide (frusemide) dopomine/dobutamine, calcium antagonists and mannitol] have resulted in limited success. The mechanisms responsible for altered dynamic responses of some agents (benzodiazepines, theophylline, digoxin and loop diuretics) in renally compromised patients include enhanced receptor sensitivity secondary to the accumulation of endogenous uraemic toxins and competition for secretion to the renal tubular site of action. Application of the pharmacotherapeutic principles discussed into clinical practice will hopefully enhance the safety of these agents and optimise patient outcomes.

Clinical consequences of nonnarcotic analgesic use

The accuracy of the economic analysis of the selected adverse events evaluated by McGoldrick and Bailie is questionable. The quantitative perspective on the economics of the adverse events associated with nonnarcotic analgesic use proposed by these authors is limited by the fact that they have combined data on over 30 different NSAIDs into a single value for comparison with two single-entity agents: acetaminophen and aspirin. The relative prevalence of major organ system toxicities varies markedly among the NSAIDs, and this variance invalidates the use of a class conclusion approach. Their conservative incidence estimates, the lack of data in some areas (i.e., hepatic injury), and the exclusion of combination analgesics further limit the utility of their conclusions. However, it is difficult to argue authoritatively that the relative costs of toxicities associated with the three analgesic classes they reviewed are not representative. The ultimate question is, "What is the optimal analgesic for a given patient?" This question can be addressed only if one considers the underlying cause of pain, its chronicity/acuity, the patient's concurrent disease states, if any, and the potential for drug interactions with the patient's concomitant medications. McGoldrick and Bailie concluded on an economic basis that acetaminophen is the analgesic of choice for most patients, including those with impaired renal function. This recommendation is in agreement with those of the Analgesics and the Kidney Ad Hoc Committee of the National Kidney Foundation. It also would seem prudent to use acetaminophen as the first-line agent for those patients in whom aspirin and NSAID use should be avoided or used only with caution along with frequent monitoring of renal function, blood pressure, electrolytes, and/or coagulation status. Thus, there is little to no controversy in their recommendation to initiate treatment with acetaminophen. The authors, however, also suggested that switching patients from an NSAID to acetaminophen would result in significantly decreased costs and morbidity. These authors, however, did not address one key issue that impacts their economic analysis: the relative efficacy of acetaminophen and NSAIDs. If efficacy is similar, then the risk/benefit ratio and economic consequences would favor the use of acetaminophen. However, if many patients are receiving NSAIDs because they did not obtain pain relief with the use of acetaminophen, there would be neither rationale or likely benefit with a change in therapy to acetaminophen. Finally, McGoldrick and Bailie did not evaluate an issue that has perhaps the most far-reaching consequence. Many OTC analgesics are currently marketed as combinations of aspirin, acetaminophen, salicylamide, or caffeine (Table 2). Although the intent of these combinations was [Table: see text] to enhance efficacy while minimizing adverse events, it is now apparent that at least concerning adverse events, the goal was not achieved. Therefore, in light of the markedly higher risk for renal injury with combination analgesics, these agents should be withdrawn from the marketplace. While some might argue that patient education is the key and that addition of an explicit warning on the label of OTC combination products should be an adequate intervention, this agreement is not supported by the Belgium experience. The removal of combination analgesics from the OTC marketplace could be accomplished by governmental action, such as the ban on phenacetin over 10 years ago. Alternatively, pharmacists could no longer sell these products and counsel patients on the rational use of OTC analgesics. The choice among single-entity agents could then be individualized on the basis of patient's current medical status and the adverse event profile of the available agents.

Effects of liver disease on the disposition of the opioid antagonist nalmefene

OBJECTIVES

The pharmacokinetics of nalmefene and its glucuronide metabolite were investigated in 12 patients with liver disease (four patients with mild, five patients with moderate, and three patients with severe liver disease) and 12 age-, weight-, and gender-matched control subjects.

METHODS

Subjects received a single intravenous bolus 2.0 mg dose of nalmefene. Multiple blood and urine samples were collected for 48 hours. Within 1 week of nalmefene administration, antipyrine and galactose clearances were determined as general markers of hepatic metabolism and effective liver plasma flow, respectively. Plasma concentrations of nalmefene were determined by radioimmunoassay.

RESULTS

The antipyrine and galactose clearance values were 56% and 33% lower, respectively, in the patients with liver disease compared with the normal healthy control subjects. The systemic clearance of nalmefene was reduced by 32% (0.61 +/- 0.21 versus 0.90 +/- 0.27 L/hr/kg [mean +/- SD]) and the terminal elimination half-life was increased by 31% (10.5 +/- 1.9 versus 8.0 +/- 2.2 hours) in the patients with liver disease. This was primarily the result of a 31% reduction (0.181 +/- 0.067 versus 0.263 +/- 0.072 L/hr/kg) in nalmefene glucuronide formation clearance. There were no significant differences in nalmefene volumes of distribution or protein binding. There was a significant inverse relationship between nalmefene clearance and Pugh score (r = -0.57; p = 0.004), indicating decreasing nalmefene clearance with increasing severity of liver disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The clearance of nalmefene was significantly reduced in the presence of liver disease. However, because nalmefene will be primarily used in the acute care setting for reversal of opioid-induced effects, it is not likely that these alterations will necessitate a dosage modification.

Disposition of foscarnet during peritoneal dialysis

OBJECTIVE

To report the disposition of foscarnet in a patient undergoing peritoneal dialysis.

CASE SUMMARY

A 34-year-old man with AIDS received foscarnet for the treatment of esophageal cytomegalovirus. We characterized the clearance of foscarnet in this patient during continuous cyclic peritoneal dialysis (CCPD) and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD).

DISCUSSION

The foscarnet half-lives during CCPD and CAPD were 41.4 and 45.8 hours, respectively. These values are significantly greater than the half-life of 4.5 hours observed in patients with normal renal function and about half that reported in anuric patients undergoing hemodialysis during the interdialytic period. The CCPD and CAPD clearances of foscarnet were 5.8 and 4.5 mL/min, respectively; the CAPD clearances of creatinine and urea nitrogen were 4.1 and 6.0 mL/min, respectively. The patient's estimated total body clearance values of foscarnet during CCPD and CAPD were 9.8 and 8.8 mL/min, respectively. Thus, CCPD and CAPD augmented the patient's residual clearance of foscarnet by 145% and 105%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Since incremental increases in residual clearance of 30% or more generally will result in clinically significant changes in a drug's serum concentration, foscarnet dosage needs to be individualized for patients receiving peritoneal dialysis.

The effect of age on the pharmacokinetics of the opioid antagonist nalmefene

1. The disposition of nalmefene was evaluated in young and elderly normal healthy volunteers. Subjects received either a single 1 mg (n = 18 young; n = 11 elderly) or 2 mg (n = 8 young; n = 15 elderly) intravenous bolus dose of nalmefene. 2. Following the administration of nalmefene, the initial plasma concentrations were significantly higher in elderly vs young subjects. The higher concentrations were the result of the 30 to 40% smaller central compartment apparent volume of distribution that was observed in the elderly subjects as compared with the young volunteers (2.8 +/- 1.1 vs 3.9 +/- 1.11 kg-1 for 1 mg dose). The elderly volunteers also had a significantly shorter distributional half-life (t1/2 lambda 1) than young volunteers (0.7 +/- 0.7 vs 1.3 +/- 0.8 h for 1 mg dose). No significant differences between groups were observed for the elimination half-life, clearance or steady-state apparent volume of distribution. 3. Although transiently higher nalmefene plasma concentrations were observed in the elderly immediately following drug administration, there was no association between this observation and adverse events. We conclude that no dosage alteration is warranted in elderly patients.

Nonrenal toxicities of acetaminophen, aspirin, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents

Approximately 2% of the United States population consumes an analgesic, antipyretic, or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) each day. Aspirin and acetaminophen have been available to the public without a prescription (over-the-counter) for decades, while most NSAIDs are still only available with a prescription from a physician. The recent trend of switching NSAIDs from prescription to over-the-counter status may be perceived by some as an indication of their inherent safety. However, all these agents have been associated with a unique but overlapping safety profile. In fact, significant adverse events (AEs) on multiple organ systems, including the kidney and gastrointestinal tract, have been reported with most of these agents. In this review, the incidence of the nonrenal AEs of aspirin, acetaminophen, and selected NSAIDs are tabulated. The strengths of the causative associations are highlighted, the relative risks for the gastrointestinal and cardiovascular AEs are discussed, and the relationship to patient risk factors and drug characteristics, such as dose and half-life, are reviewed. The selection of the optimal agent for an individual patient depends on the balance between the desired pharmacodynamic response, the patient's pharmacotherapy history, and the degree of AE risk one is willing to accept. Therapy should be initiated in all settings with the lowest possible dosage since the incidence of the major AEs is dose related.

Pharmacokinetics of abecarnil in patients with renal insufficiency

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the pharmacokinetics of a single 5 mg oral dose of abecarnil in subjects with varying degrees of renal impairment.

METHODS

Twenty-six subjects were enrolled in this open-label parallel-group study. Ten subjects had normal renal function (NRF; creatinine clearance [CLCR] > or = 85 ml/min/1.73 m2), six subjects had mild to moderate renal insufficiency (MMRI; CLCR between 25 and 73 ml/min/1.73 m2), and 10 subjects had severe renal insufficiency (SRI; CLCR < or = 10 ml/min/1.73 m2). Abecarnil plasma concentrations were determined by means of HPLC, and plasma protein binding was determined by use of ultracentrifugation. Pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained with use of model-independent and model-dependent methods.

RESULTS

In subjects with SRI, area under the concentration-time curve and maximum plasma concentration were reduced by 36% and 31%, respectively, compared with demographically matched subjects with NRF. The apparent total body clearance in the NRF, MMRI, and SRI groups was 13.0 +/- 6.89, 12.9 +/- 3.64, and 25.0 +/- 13 ml/min/kg, and the apparent volume of distribution was 14.0 +/- 3.78, 12.8 +/- 2.4, and 19.4 +/- 5.76 L/kg, respectively (mean +/- SD). The patients with SRI had a significantly lower protein bound fraction than subjects with NRF (0.850 +/- 0.077 versus 0.948 +/- 0.023). Despite an increase in the free fraction of abecarnil (f(u)), there was no significant change in the apparent unbound total body clearance and unbound volume of distribution between the SRI and NRF groups. The anticipated full effect of the increase in f(u) among the patients with SRI was not realized and suggests that the f(u) in tissue may be increased in patients with SRI.

CONCLUSION

Dose adjustment will need to be made on the basis of titration to the desired clinical response and tolerability in patients with SRI just as in subjects with NRF.

The effect of renal insufficiency and hemodialysis on the pharmacokinetics of nalmefene

The disposition of nalmefene, an opioid antagonist intended for the reversal of opioid-induced respiratory depression, and its primary metabolite nalmefene glucuronide, were characterized in adult volunteers with normal renal function and in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The effect of hemodialysis on the elimination of nalmefene and nalmefene glucuronide also was assessed. Participants with normal renal function received a single intravenous dose of 2 mg, and patients with ESRD received two separate doses of 1 mg nalmefene hydrochloride. Terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) of both nalmefene and nalmefene glucuronide was prolonged in patients with ESRD compared with that in participants with normal renal function. The steady-state volume of distribution (Vdss) of nalmefene was significantly higher and total body clearance lower in patients with ESRD than in participants with normal renal function. Hemodialysis clearance of nalmefene was approximately 3.3% of total body clearance. Although the hemodialysis clearance of nalmefene glucuronide was 179.3 +/- 24.1 mL/min and its t1/2 was significantly reduced during dialysis to 5.2 +/- 2.3 hours, a dramatic rebound of nalmefene glucuronide concentrations of 75.7% was observed 7.7 +/- 5.4 hours after the end of hemodialysis. Thus, hemodialysis does not result in clinically significant alterations in the disposition of nalmefene or its primary metabolite, nalmefene glucuronide. These data suggest that there is no pharmacokinetic basis for modification of the initial dosage, but maintenance doses, if needed, should be administered less frequently due to the prolonged elimination of the active moiety, nalmefene.

Medication knowledge and compliance among patients receiving long-term dialysis

The extent to which patients receiving longterm dialysis understood and complied with their drug therapy regimens was studied. Patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) in a university-affiliated outpatient dialysis center were surveyed to determine their knowledge about and compliance with prescribed regimens for antihypertensives, phosphate binders, and calcitriol. They were asked to list their prescribed medications and state the medications' indications, the frequency with which they missed doses, and the actions they took after missing a dose. The patients were also asked where they obtained their medications and who their primary source of drug information was. Seventy-two patients (51 receiving hemodialysis and 21 receiving CAPD) were surveyed. Although 80% of the patients could recall the three target medications, only 39% of the hemodialysis patients and 57% of CAPD patients could recall all of their medications. Significantly more patients knew the indication for their antihypertensive medication and calcitriol than for their phosphate binder. The hemodialysis and CAPD patients reported they missed an average of 13.0 and 4.7 phosphate binder doses, 2.6 and 5.6 antihypertensive doses, and 6.7 and 7.0 calcitriol doses, respectively, per month. Despite the fact that 70% of the patients received their medications from a community pharmacy, less than 15% identified the pharmacist as their primary source of drug information. Patients receiving long-term hemodialysis or CAPD were more knowledgeable about and compliant with their antihypertensive and calcitriol regimens than their phosphate binder regimens.

Pharmacokinetics of bepridil and two of its metabolites in patients with end-stage renal disease

The pharmacokinetics of bepridil and 2 of its major metabolites (McN-A-2600 and McN-6303) were studied in 6 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) before and after hemodialysis. Patients underwent dialysis 1 day after a single oral 200-mg dose of bepridil hydrochloride; blood was sampled for up to 7 days. The mean (+/- SD) peak plasma concentration, time of peak concentration, and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (0-168 hours) for each agent were as follows: bepridil, 806 +/- 321 ng/mL, 2.6 +/- 1.6 hours, 4.87 +/- 1.21 micrograms.h/mL; McN-A-2600, 57 +/- 16 ng/mL, 4.2 +/- 2.0 hours, 0.53 +/- 0.29 microgram.h/mL; McN-6303, 284 +/- 120 ng/mL, 4.7 +/- 1.5 hours, 4.06 +/- 1.11 micrograms.h/mL. The bepridil area under the curve corrected for dose was similar to that in healthy volunteers, suggesting that plasma clearance was unaffected by severe renal impairment. None of the compounds were removed by dialysis, and no rebound in plasma concentrations was observed after the end of dialysis. The disposition of bepridil appears to be unchanged in patients with ESRD; and is unaffected by hemodialysis. Thus, no dosage adjustment will be required for ESRD patients and those receiving hemodialysis with cuprophane filters.

Effects of hemodialysis on plasma protein binding of bepridil

The effects of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and hemodialysis on the in vitro plasma protein binding of bepridil hydrochloride were investigated. The possible influence of bepridil metabolites on bepridil-protein binding in ESRD patients was also examined. Plasma samples were obtained from six patients with ESRD. Bepridil-plasma protein binding was measured by microequilibrium dialysis after addition of freshly prepared bepridil-14C (239 microCi/mg) at a final concentration of 2 micrograms/mL. The percentage of free bepridil in peripheral venous samples drawn on a nondialysis day was lower (i.e., binding was greater) in the patients with ESRD relative to previous observations in healthy subjects (0.15% +/- 0.04% versus 0.31% +/- 0.05% (mean +/- SD). The plasma concentrations of alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (AAG), the principal bepridil binding protein, were also higher in ESRD patients (110 +/- 32 mg/dL) than previously reported in healthy subjects. Although hemodialysis resulted in significant increases in AAG, total protein, and albumin concentrations, no significant difference in bepridil-plasma protein binding was detected between predialysis and postdialysis peripheral venous samples in the presence (0.16 versus 0.18) or absence (0.20 versus 0.17) of bepridil metabolites. The percentage of free bepridil in plasma from both the arterial and venous limbs of the dialyzer during hemodialysis (means of free bepridil ranged from 0.24-0.28%) was higher than in samples drawn from a peripheral vein. This displacement of bepridil from its binding sites as blood passes through the dialyzer may have been owing to the presence of high local concentrations of plasticizers. Confirmation of this hypothesis will require further investigation.

The pharmacodynamics of intravenous and oral torsemide in patients with chronic renal insufficiency

The pharmacodynamics of intravenous and oral torsemide were determined in two randomized cross-over clinical trials in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. There was no significant difference in the rate or magnitude of the diuretic response between oral and intravenous administration. As has been shown with other loop diuretics, patients with chronic renal insufficiency have a reduced diuretic response compared with healthy subjects. This diuretic resistance is primarily related to a diminished delivery of drug to the urinary site of action. The response of torsemide at the tubular level is not different from that seen in subjects with normal renal function. Metabolites of torsemide do not appear to contribute to the diuretic response. A dose of 50 to 100 mg dependent on renal function is required to obtain a maximal response. A ceiling dose of approximately 100 mg in patients with chronic renal insufficiency is therefore recommended.

The pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral torsemide in patients with chronic renal insufficiency

Torsemide is a diuretic that acts in the thick ascending limb of the loop of Henle. Unlike furosemide, it undergoes substantial hepatic elimination and should not accumulate in patients with renal insufficiency. Therefore the pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral torsemide and its metabolites were investigated in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. Two groups of 24 patients stratified by creatinine clearance (30 to 60 ml/min and < 30 ml/min) were studied in two separate randomized dose escalating crossover studies, one using intravenous torsemide and the other using oral torsemide. The pharmacokinetics of both intravenous and oral torsemide were linear over the dosage range studied. Absolute bioavailability was essentially 100%. Renal clearance was greatly diminished and correlated with renal function. Total plasma clearance and half-life were not related to renal function and were found to be similar to those of healthy subjects. The substantial nonrenal clearance of torsemide prevents accumulation in patients with chronic renal insufficiency.

Evaluation of two intravenous single-bolus methods for measuring effective renal plasma flow

This open-label, three-way crossover study examined the feasibility of measuring effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) using a single intravenous (IV) bolus method. Eight healthy young adults (four women aged 28 +/- 5 years [mean +/- SD] and four men aged 30 +/- 7 years) received on separate days an IV bolus of p-aminohippurate (PAH) 10 mg/kg, an IV bolus of phenolsulfonphthalein (PSP) 1 mg/kg, and the standard constant-rate IV infusion of PAH. The renal clearance (CLR) and plasma clearance (CLP) of PAH after constant infusion were 623.7 +/- 62.9 and 869.0 +/- 58.8 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. After PAH bolus injection, CLR and CLP were 538.9 +/- 110.8 and 677.6 +/- 122.4 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. After PSP bolus injection, CLR and CLP were 252.8 +/- 57.9 and 350.0 +/- 41.3 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. The ERPF measured by PSP bolus injection was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than by PAH infusion. The CLP of PAH after IV bolus injection was significantly lower than after IV infusion when men and women were analyzed together (P < 0.05). However, there appeared to be a greater magnitude of difference between the CLR after IV bolus and infusion of PAH for women than for men. In summary, PSP administered as an IV bolus injection does not appear to be a reliable marker of ERPF. The difference in ERPF determined by the PAH infusion and bolus methods may require further evaluation.

Bioavailability of labetalol in patients with end-stage renal disease

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of labetalol were assessed after a single oral and intravenous dose in eight patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) maintained on chronic hemodialysis, and in eight age-and sex-matched normal volunteers. The mean area under the serum concentration-time curve, volume of distribution, clearance, and terminal elimination half-life values after a single intravenous dose of 0.5 mg/kg of labetalol were not significantly different between ESRD patients and normal volunteers. Similarly, the absolute bioavailability of an oral dose of 200 mg of labetalol was 0.33 in ESRD patients and was not significantly different from that of normal volunteers (0.26). However, a significant decrease in the area under the mean blood pressure-time curve was found after a single oral dose in ESRD patients, which was not observed in normal volunteers. The pharmacokinetics of labetalol were not associated with changes in blood pressure. Thus, when given orally to the ESRD patient, labetalol should be slowly titrated and the blood pressure closely monitored.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of multiple doses of intravenous ofloxacin in healthy volunteers

The safety and pharmacokinetics of ofloxacin in 48 healthy male volunteers were studied in a two-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Ofloxacin (200 or 400 mg) or placebo was administered as 1-h infusions every 12 h for 7 days. Plasma ofloxacin concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Mean harmonic half-lives ranged from 4.28 to 4.98 h in the 200-mg dosing group and from 5.06 to 6.67 h in the 400-mg dosing group. Intragroup comparisons of trough plasma concentration-versus-time data from study days 2 through 7 revealed that steady state was achieved by day 2 of both multiple-dose regimens. Intergroup comparisons of mean harmonic half-lives, the areas under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 and 0 to 60 h, clearance, and apparent volume of distribution (area method) revealed that the pharmacokinetics of ofloxacin are dose independent. Both ofloxacin dosage regimens appeared to be reasonably well tolerated. The two dosage regimens of ofloxacin, 200 or 400 mg every 12 h, appear to be safe and provide serum drug concentrations in excess of the MICs for most susceptible pathogens over the entire dosing interval.

Teicoplanin measurement in patients with renal failure: comparison of fluorescence polarization immunoassay, microbiological assay, and high-performance liquid chromatographic assay

Characterization of antibiotic pharmacokinetics in patients with renal insufficiency may be complicated by interfering substances within the assay. We compared three different assays for teicoplanin in serum and dialysate of 10 hemodialysis and six continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. The microbiological assay (micro) had a within-run and between-run coefficient of variation (% CV) of less than 7.5% for concentrations ranging from 0.2 to 96 micrograms/ml. The high-performance liquid chromatographic assay (HPLC) within- and between-run %CV was less than 8% for concentrations ranging from 1 to 80 micrograms/ml. The fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) within- and between-run %CV was less than 7% for concentrations ranging from 5 to 100 micrograms/ml. In serum of hemodialysis patients FPIA results were slightly higher than HPLC results: FPIA = 1.11 HPLC + 2.37 (r = 0.975, n = 202), and FPIA concentrations in serum were also slightly higher than those measured by micro (FPIA = 1.21 micro - 1.57, r = 0.972, n = 161). The HPLC and micro serum results were also comparable in hemodialysis patients: micro = 0.92 HPLC + 2.89, r = 0.953, n = 160. However, in CAPD patients micro results were lower than HPLC results in serum (micro = 0.82 HPLC + 0.49, r = 0.981, n = 262). In peritoneal dialysate, HPLC values were approximately 60% of the micro values. Thus, FPIA may be the optimal technique for therapeutic monitoring of teicoplanin in the clinical setting due to its simplicity, specificity, and good correlation to HPLC and micro.

Pharmacokinetics of ceftibuten-cis and its trans metabolite in healthy volunteers and in patients with chronic renal insufficiency

The impact of renal insufficiency on the dispositions of 300 mg of orally administered ceftibuten-cis, a new broad-spectrum oral cephalosporin, and its primary metabolite ceftibuten-trans was characterized in 30 adult subjects. Subjects were divided into five groups of six subjects each on the basis of their 24-h ambulatory creatinine clearances (CLCR). The apparent total body clearance (CLP/F; where F is absolute bioavailability) and renal clearance of ceftibuten-cis were significantly lower in subjects with end-stage renal disease (on maintenance hemodialysis; group V) and in those with severe (CLCR, 5 to 29 ml/min; group IV) and moderate (CLCR, 30 to 49 ml/min; group III) renal insufficiency than in those with mild renal insufficiency (CLCR, 50 to 80 ml/min; group II) or normal renal function (CLCR, greater than 80 ml/min; group I). A significant correlation was observed between CLCR and ceftibuten-cis CLP/F. The mean apparent steady-state volume of distribution (V beta/F) of ceftibuten-cis ranged from 0.21 to 0.24 liter/kg in subjects in group I, II, III, and IV. V beta/F was significantly greater in the group V subjects with end-stage renal disease (V beta/F, 0.39 +/- 0.27 liters/kg). These changes in V beta/F cannot be separated from possible changes in bioavailability. The maximum concentration of ceftibuten-trans in plasma was significantly higher and occurred significantly later in group IV subjects than it did in subjects in the other groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Pharmacokinetics of cefprozil in healthy subjects and patients with renal impairment

Cefprozil, a new broad-spectrum oral cephalosporin, is composed of cis and trans isomers in an approximate 90:10 ratio. The pharmacokinetics of a single oral 1000-mg dose of cefprozil were evaluated in 6 healthy subjects and 24 patients with various degrees of renal impairment. Six of these subjects were studied both while receiving hemodialysis and during an interdialytic period. Plasma, urine, and hemodialysate that were collected at predetermined times were analyzed for concentrations of the cis and trans isomers of cefprozil using reverse-phase HPLC assay with UV detection. The maximum plasma concentration of the cis isomer ranged from 12.3 micrograms/mL in subjects with normal renal function to 36.7 micrograms/mL in hemodialysis patients. Similarly the area under the plasma concentration-time curve and the elimination half-life increased from 46 micrograms.h/mL to 373 micrograms.h/mL and from 1.72 hours to 5.94 hours, respectively. Renal clearance of the cis isomer decreased from 198 mL/min in normal subjects to 19 mL/min in volunteers with creatinine clearances of less than or equal to 30 mL/min; there was a strong correlation (r2 greater than or equal to .93) between the renal clearance of the cis isomer and creatinine clearance. Urinary recovery of the cis isomer decreased from 57% in those with normal renal function to 24% in the group with a creatinine clearance of less than or equal to 30 mL/min. Hemodialysis decreased the half-life of the cis isomer to 2 hours and removed approximately 55% of it from the body during a 3-hour dialysis period (hemodialysis clearance equaled approximately 87 mL/min). The pharmacokinetics of the trans isomer were similar to those observed for the cis isomer and were affected similarly by declining renal function. A reduction in dosage is recommended in patients with a creatinine clearance of 30 mL/min or less. It may be necessary to administer a dose after hemodialysis to maintain therapeutic plasma concentrations.

Disposition of the cephalosporin cefepime in normal and renally impaired subjects

The metabolism and disposition of an iv-administered, 1000 mg (100 microCi) single dose of the 14C-labeled cephalosporin cefepime was studied in healthy and renally impaired male volunteers. The 14C-label was located in the methyl group of the N-methyl pyrrolidine (NMP) moiety at the 3'-position of cefepime. Concentrations of cefepime and its metabolites were determined in plasma and urine as a function of time after drug administration. Cefepime comprised 95 and 76% of the total plasma radioactivity in subjects with normal and impaired renal functions, respectively. The elimination half-life of cefepime was 2 hr in normal volunteers and increased to 4 and 12 hr in subjects with moderate and severe renal impairment, respectively. Steady-state volume of distribution was about 18 liters and was independent of the degree of renal impairment. Cefepime was primarily excreted unchanged in the urine of normal subjects, as 87.9% of the total recovered radioactivity. The major cefepime metabolites, NMP N-oxide, the 7-epimer of cefepime and NMP, constituted 6.8, 2.5, and less than 1% of the total radioactivity excreted in urine, respectively. As the severity of renal impairment increased, the proportion of radioactivity recovered in urine as cefepime decreased and that of NMP-N-oxide increased. Our results indicate that cefepime undergoes minimal metabolism and is excreted primarily as unchanged drug in urine in humans with normal kidney functions.

Effects of magnesium-aluminum hydroxide and calcium carbonate antacids on bioavailability of ofloxacin

The effects of 15- and 5-ml doses of magnesium-aluminum hydroxide (MAH) and calcium carbonate (CC) antacids, respectively, on the bioavailability of ofloxacin after single oral 400-mg doses of ofloxacin were investigated in a 32-subject, randomized, crossover, open-label study. On four separate occasions, subjects received ofloxacin alone or antacid 24 h before, 2 h before, or 2 h after ofloxacin administration (n = 16 for each antacid). CC administration had no significant effect on the rate and extent of ofloxacin absorption regardless of the timing of antacid administration. A small but significant negative effect of MAH administration 2 h before ofloxacin administration was noted as evidenced by area under the curve and peak concentration in plasma data. Simultaneous administration of ofloxacin with either antacid was not investigated in this study. It appears that MAH and CC antacids in the doses used in this study generally do not interfere in a clinically significant manner with the bioavailability of ofloxacin, provided that an interval of at least 2 h separates the administration of these products.

Validity of creatinine clearance estimates in the assessment of renal function

In clinical practice, estimations of renal function are commonly used to calculate the appropriate dose for drugs that are renally cleared. Continuous-infusion inulin clearance (CLIN), 4-hour creatinine clearance (CLCR,m), and 24-hour creatinine clearance (CLCR,a) were measured in 109 subjects (86 men and 23 women) with varying degrees of stable renal function (CLIN, 6 to 209 ml/min) and compared with CLCR values as predicted by five equations on the basis of plasma creatinine concentrations, age, weight, and/or height. The CLCR,m was positively correlated with CLIN (r = 0.92; p less than 0.0001) but exceeded CLIN by 15% between the range of 30 and 209 ml/min (CLIN). Similarly, CLCR,a correlated well with both CLCR,m (r = 0.84; p less than 0.0005) and CLIN (r = 0.84; p less than 0.0001). The relative role of tubular secretion in the overall clearance of creatinine increased with declining CLIN and exceeded 40% when CLIN was below 30 ml/min. CLCR estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault and Mawer methods did not significantly differ from either CLCR,m or CLCR,m, whereas the other equations generally underestimated CLCR. Among the numerous mathematical equations, CLCR as estimated by the method proposed either by Mawer or Cockcroft and Gault was the best predictor of CLIN (CLIN = 1.05CLRCR - 18.38 or CLIN = 1.12CLCR - 20.60, respectively; r = 0.81; p less than 0.0001). The present data support the use of estimator equations proposed by Cockcroft and Gault or Mawer for rapid estimation of renal function in the clinical setting.

Ceftazidime/clindamycin versus tobramycin/clindamycin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections

In order to assess the efficacy and toxicity of ceftazidime as a substitute for aminoglycosides in the treatment of intra-abdominal sepsis, a prospective randomized trial was conducted. Ninety-four patients (49% trauma) were randomized to receive ceftazidime/clindamycin (CAZ/C) (n = 47) or tobramycin/clindamycin (T/C) (n = 47). CAZ (2.0 gm) and C (0.9 gm) were administered intravenously every 8 hours while T dosage was adjusted to maintain peak (5-8 mg/L) and trough (less than 2 mg/L) concentrations. Age, sex, baseline serum creatinine, and etiology of infection were comparable in the two groups. Clinical cure was similar in culture-positive and culture-negative patients who received CAZ/C (94% vs 88%). The clinical cure rate however was significantly lower in the T/C culture positive (73%) than in the culture negative patients (100%) (P = 0.016). Pathogenic organisms were eradicated in 100% (30/30) and 76% (13/17) of CAZ/C and T/C patients, respectively (P = 0.0006). Nephrotoxicity Nephrotoxicity or ototoxicity was observed in none of the CAZ/C patients and in one and two T/C patients, respectively. CAZ/C more effectively eradicated the bacteria isolated from these patients and no significant difference in clinical response was observed in culture-positive patients. These findings plus the lack of toxicity suggest that CAZ/C is an effective alternative for treatment of IAI.

Pharmacokinetics of cefepime in patients with respiratory tract infections

The steady-state pharmacokinetics of cefepime were evaluated in 10 middle-aged and elderly patients with acute lower respiratory tract infections who were receiving 1 g intravenously every 12 h. One preinfusion and 15 postinfusion serum samples and total urine output were collected over one dosing interval between days 3 and 8 of therapy. Cefepime concentrations in serum over time exhibited a multicompartmental profile. Peak and trough concentrations in serum determined by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method were 71.2 +/- 17.2 (mean +/- standard deviation) and 6.0 +/- 4.9 mg/liter, respectively. The steady-state volume of distribution was 0.22 +/- 0.05 liter/kg. Elimination half-lives ranged from 1.93 to 6.04 h (3.92 +/- 1.28 h), and total body clearances ranged from 36.9 to 102 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (73.0 +/- 19.7 ml/min per 1.73 m2). The disposition of cefepime at steady state in patients was comparable to previous observations in healthy elderly volunteers. The predictive performance of regression equations derived from single-dose studies in volunteers relating creatinine clearance with total body and renal clearances of cefepime exhibited slight biases (mean predictive errors, -9.7 and 2.1 ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively) and similar precisions. Predicted and observed total body clearances (63.3 +/- 25.1 versus 73.0 +/- 19.7 ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively) and renal clearances (51.3 +/- 24.4 versus 49.3 +/- 19.6 ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively) were not significantly different. The pharmacokinetics of cefepime in infected patients appeared to be unaltered by illness, and the steady-state disposition of cefepime was predictable from data derived from single-dose studies in volunteers.

Pharmacokinetics of cefepime in subjects with renal insufficiency

The pharmacokinetics of intravenously administered cefepime (1000 mg over 30 minutes) were studied in 5 healthy volunteers and 20 patients with various degrees of renal impairment. Cefepime concentrations in plasma, urine, and hemodialysate were assayed using reverse-phase HPLC with ultraviolet detection. Mean peak plasma concentrations of cefepime at the end of 30-minute infusion ranges from 63.5 to 73.9 micrograms/ml and were not affected by the degree of renal impairment. The half-life of cefepime was approximately 2.3 hours in subjects with normal kidney function; it increased proportionately as renal function decreased. Significant linear relationships between total body clearance and creatinine clearance, as well as renal clearance and creatinine clearance, were observed. The mean volume of distribution at steady state in healthy volunteers was 20.5 liters and was not significantly altered in subjects with renal insufficiency. The mean cumulative urinary recovery of cefepime in healthy volunteers was 82.9% of the administered dose and significantly decreased in subjects with creatinine clearance less than 30 ml/min. Hemodialysis significantly shortened the elimination half-life from 13.5 hours during the predialysis period to 2.3 hours during the dialysis period. Cefepime dosage should be reduced in proportion to the decline in creatinine clearance.

Ceftriaxone therapy of chronic inflammatory arthritis. A double-blind placebo controlled trial

To determine whether chronic inflammatory arthritis may respond to antibiotic therapy (implying a bacterial origin), we conducted a placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Sixty patients with inflammatory arthritis and antibody titers to Borrelia burgdorferi 1:64 or more were randomized to receive placebo (n = 20) or 2 g/d of ceftriaxone intravenously (n = 40) for 2 weeks. Two of 20 placebo- and 19 of 40 antibiotic-treated patients improved. At 1 month, the placebo-treated patients could elect to receive ceftriaxone. Altogether, 58 patients were treated with ceftriaxone and followed up for 13 to 24 months. Improvement was noted in 27 of the 58 antibiotic-treated patients. Patients with a wide diversity of inflammatory arthritis were studied. Response to ceftriaxone was seen in all groups, including 5 of 12 with rheumatoid arthritis, 5 of 8 with psoriatic arthritis, 3 of 5 with vasculitis, and 14 of 33 with less well-differentiated chronic inflammatory arthritis. In 16 of the 27 who responded to the antibiotic, the arthritis worsened 6 to 18 months after the initial response to ceftriaxone. Previous improvement of arthritis after oral antibiotic was a better predictor of response to ceftriaxone than either duration of disease or Lyme antibody titer. Side effects to ceftriaxone were frequent and included diarrhea (29/60) and acute allergic reactions (9/58). We conclude that some patients may have an occult bacterial infection underlying their chronic inflammatory arthritis, and may respond to antibiotic therapy. The response to ceftriaxone in patients with even weakly reactive Lyme titers encourages further prospective placebo-controlled studies of antibiotics in various subsets of chronic arthritis.

Apparent biliary pseudolithiasis during ceftriaxone therapy

Biliary pseudolithiasis has been reported in patients who received ceftriaxone therapy. To examine this phenomenon further, serial gallbladder sonograms were evaluated in 44 adult patients who received intravenous ceftriaxone at 2 g or a placebo daily for 14 days in a double-blind controlled study. Ultrasound examinations of gallbladders were performed on days 1 and 14 of therapy and 2 weeks posttherapy if abnormalities were observed on day 14. Eight patients were unevaluable because of abnormal base-line gallbladder sonograms. Thirty-six patients (ceftriaxone, n = 28; placebo, n = 8) demonstrated normal baseline gallbladder sonograms and were evaluated for the development of change. A total of 6 of 28 (21.4%) ceftriaxone-treated patients and 1 of 8 (12.5%) patients who received the placebo demonstrated abnormal gallbladder sonograms on day 14 (P = 0.491). Four of the six ceftriaxone-treated patients demonstrating abnormal sonograms were clinically asymptomatic, while two patients reported vomiting. The abnormal sonograms of gallbladders of patients treated with ceftriaxone returned to normal between 9 and 26 days posttherapy. These data suggest an association between ceftriaxone treatment and the development of gallbladder abnormalities on ultrasound examination which resolve spontaneously on discontinuation of ceftriaxone therapy.

Disposition of cefmetazole in healthy volunteers and patients with impaired renal function

The disposition of cefmetazole was studied in 25 subjects with various degrees of renal function after a 1,000-mg, constant-rate, 30-min intravenous infusion of cefmetazole sodium. In six subjects with creatinine clearance (CLCR) of greater than 90 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (group 1), the terminal elimination half-life (t1/2 beta) was 1.31 +/- 0.54 h (mean +/- standard deviation), cefmetazole total body clearance (CLP) was 132.8 +/- 25.1 ml/min per 1.73 m2, and volume of distribution at steady state was 0.165 +/- 0.025 liter/kg. The fraction of dose excreted unchanged in the urine was 84.0% +/- 26.1%. Subjects with CLCRS of 40 to 69 (group 2, n = 6) and 10 to 39 (group 3, n = 6) ml/min per 1.73 m2 demonstrated prolongation of the t1/2 beta (3.62 +/- 1.06 and 5.93 +/- 1.81 h, respectively) and significant reductions in cefmetazole CLP (52.8 +/- 14.3 and 30.2 +/- 10.2 ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively), compared with group 1. In seven subjects on chronic hemodialysis (group 4) studied during an interdialytic period, the cefmetazole t1/2 beta was increased to 24.10 +/- 8.12 h and the CLP was reduced to 6.8 +/- 2.1 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Cefmetazole CLP correlated positively with CLCR (r = 0.951, P less than 0.001): CLP = (1.181 . CLCR) -- 0.287. The disposition of cefmetazole was also assessed in six group 4 subjects during an intradialytic period. The t1/2 beta during hemodialysis (2.09 +/- 0.69 h) was significantly shorter than that observed during the interdialytic period. The hemodialysis clearance of cefmetazole was 86.1 +/- 20.1 ml/min, and the fraction of cefmetazole removed during hemodialysis was 59.8% +/- 5.9%. It is recommended that patients with renal insufficiency received standard doses of cefmetazole at extended intervals and patients on maintenance hemodialysis received standard doses after hemodialysis.

Pharmacokinetics of loratadine in patients with renal insufficiency

The disposition of loratadine, a new orally active histamine H1 receptor antagonist and its primary metabolite descarboethoxyloratadine were characterized in adult volunteers with normal renal function (group I), patients with chronic renal failure, i.e., creatinine clearance less than 30 mL/min (group II), as well as chronic hemodialysis patients (group III). The effect of hemodialysis on the disposition of loratadine and descarboethoxyloratadine was also assessed. Subjects in groups I and II were given a single oral 40 mg dose of loratadine while the patients in Group III received two single 40 mg doses of loratadine (during an interdialytic period and just prior to hemodialysis). Loratadine was rapidly absorbed and the decline of plasma concentrations after attainment of the Cmax was biexponential in all subjects. No significant differences in t1/2 beta were observed between the three groups (8.7 +/- 5.9, 7.6 +/- 6.9, 8.6 +/- 1.6 hrs: in groups I, II, and III, respectively). The apparent total body clearance and apparent volume of distribution of loratadine also did not differ significantly among the three groups. No significant differences in the Cmax or tmax of the metabolite were observed. The metabolite AUC infinity 0 however was significantly greater in group II subjects: (212.4 +/- 37.8, 469.5 +/- 95.4, 325.2 +/- 114.6 ng.hr/mL; groups I, II, and III, respectively). No significant relationship was observed between the terminal elimination half-life of loratadine or descarboethoxyloratadine and creatinine clearance. Hemodialysis augmented endogenous clearance by less than 1%. The disposition of loratadine is not significantly altered in patients with severe renal insufficiency nor is hemodialysis an effective means of removing loratadine or descarboethoxyloratadine from the body.

Disposition of roxithromycin in patients with normal and severely impaired renal function

The disposition of roxithromycin, an investigational macrolide antibiotic, was evaluated in 20 subjects, 10 with normal renal function (creatinine clearance [CLCR] of 116 +/- 17 ml/min [mean +/- standard deviation]) and 10 with severely impaired renal function (CLCR of 10.2 +/- 2.6 ml/min) after a single 300-mg oral dose. Plasma concentration-time data were analyzed in terms of a one- or two-compartment oral absorption model utilizing nonlinear regression analysis. The terminal elimination half-life was significantly prolonged in the group with severely impaired renal function (15.5 +/- 4.7 h) compared with that of the group with normal renal function (7.9 +/- 2.5 h). Apparent total body clearance was significantly reduced in the renally impaired (25.3 +/- 10.5 ml/min) in relation to the group with normal renal function (48.8 +/- 11.1 ml/min). The first-order absorption rate constants and apparent volumes of distribution did not differ between the two groups. These data indicate that the disposition of roxithromycin is significantly delayed in subjects with CLCRs of less than 15 ml/min and suggest that the roxithromycin dosing interval be doubled for these patients.

Effect of concomitant administration of piperacillin on the dispositions of netilmicin and tobramycin in patients with end-stage renal disease

The effect of piperacillin administration on the dispositions of netilmicin and tobramycin was assessed in 12 chronic hemodialysis patients. Six subjects each received netilmicin (2 mg/kg) or tobramycin (2 mg/kg) alone and in combination with piperacillin (4 g every 12 h for four doses). Subjects also received a single dose of piperacillin (4 g) on a separate occasion. The serum concentration-versus-time profiles of netilmicin and tobramycin were biexponential. The terminal elimination half-life (t1/2 beta) of tobramycin was markedly reduced (59.62 +/- 25.18 [mean +/- standard deviation] versus 24.71 +/- 5.41 h) and total body clearance (CLP) was significantly increased in the presence of piperacillin (3.45 +/- 1.61 versus 7.16 +/- 1.64 ml/min). In contrast, the t1/2 beta (41.80 +/- 13.24 versus 40.07 +/- 10.37 h) and CLP (5.11 +/- 2.15 versus 5.55 +/- 2.32 ml/min) of netilmicin were not significantly altered when netilmicin was administered in combination with piperacillin. No change in the central or steady-state volume of distribution of netilmicin or tobramycin was observed. The disposition of piperacillin in hemodialysis patients was not altered in the presence of either aminoglycoside antibiotic. Although no adjustment in netilmicin dosing is required, tobramycin should be administered more frequently when given concomitantly with piperacillin to hemodialysis patients to avoid prolonged periods of subtherapeutic concentrations.

Effect of haemodialysis on the pharmacokinetics of cetirizine

The pharmacokinetics of Cetirizine, a histamine H1-receptor antagonist, were investigated in five renal failure patients undergoing chronic haemodialysis therapy. The patients received one 10 mg cetirizine dihydrochloride capsule 3 h before haemodialysis. Concentrations of cetirizine in serum and dialysate were determined by HPLC. The maximum serum cetirizine concentration and the time to reach that maximum were 285 micrograms.l-1 and 2.0 h, respectively. The terminal disposition half-life of cetirizine in these patients was 19.3 h. The haemodialysis clearance of cetirizine was 14.0 ml. min-1. Although this is approximately 33% of the apparent total body clearance of cetirizine in subjects with normal renal function, the fraction of the dose removed by dialysis was only 9.4%. Thus, since haemodialysis does not produce a clinically significantly alteration in cetirizine elimination, no supplemental dose should be necessary after dialysis.