1
|
Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Clifton RG, Tita ATN, Blackwell SC, Longo M, de Voest JA, O’Shea TM, Bousleiman SZ, Ortiz F, Rouse DJ, Metz TD, Saade GR, Rood KM, Heyborne KD, Thorp JM, Swamy GK, Grobman WA, Gibson KS, El-Sayed YY, Macones GA. Neurodevelopmental Outcomes After Late Preterm Antenatal Corticosteroids: The ALPS Follow-Up Study. JAMA 2024; 331:1629-1637. [PMID: 38656759 PMCID: PMC11044009 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.4303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
Importance The Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids (ALPS) trial changed clinical practice in the United States by finding that antenatal betamethasone at 34 to 36 weeks decreased short-term neonatal respiratory morbidity. However, the trial also found increased risk of neonatal hypoglycemia after betamethasone. This follow-up study focused on long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes after late preterm steroids. Objective To evaluate whether administration of late preterm (34-36 completed weeks) corticosteroids affected childhood neurodevelopmental outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants Prospective follow-up study of children aged 6 years or older whose birthing parent had enrolled in the multicenter randomized clinical trial, conducted at 13 centers that participated in the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network cycle from 2011-2016. Follow-up was from 2017-2022. Exposure Twelve milligrams of intramuscular betamethasone administered twice 24 hours apart. Main Outcome and Measures The primary outcome of this follow-up study was a General Conceptual Ability score less than 85 (-1 SD) on the Differential Ability Scales, 2nd Edition (DAS-II). Secondary outcomes included the Gross Motor Function Classification System level and Social Responsiveness Scale and Child Behavior Checklist scores. Multivariable analyses adjusted for prespecified variables known to be associated with the primary outcome. Sensitivity analyses used inverse probability weighting and also modeled the outcome for those lost to follow-up. Results Of 2831 children, 1026 enrolled and 949 (479 betamethasone, 470 placebo) completed the DAS-II at a median age of 7 years (IQR, 6.6-7.6 years). Maternal, neonatal, and childhood characteristics were similar between groups except that neonatal hypoglycemia was more common in the betamethasone group. There were no differences in the primary outcome, a general conceptual ability score less than 85, which occurred in 82 (17.1%) of the betamethasone vs 87 (18.5%) of the placebo group (adjusted relative risk, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.73-1.22). No differences in secondary outcomes were observed. Sensitivity analyses using inverse probability weighting or assigning outcomes to children lost to follow-up also found no differences between groups. Conclusion and Relevance In this follow-up study of a randomized clinical trial, administration of antenatal corticosteroids to persons at risk of late preterm delivery, originally shown to improve short-term neonatal respiratory outcomes but with an increased rate of hypoglycemia, was not associated with adverse childhood neurodevelopmental outcomes at age 6 years or older.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Sean C. Blackwell
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston–Children’s Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston
| | - Monica Longo
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | | | | | - Felecia Ortiz
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston–Children’s Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston
| | | | - Torri D. Metz
- University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City
| | - George R. Saade
- University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
- Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk
| | | | - Kent D. Heyborne
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - John M. Thorp
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
| | | | | | - Kelly S. Gibson
- MetroHealth Medical Center-Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Saucedo AM, Macones GA, Cahill AG, Harper LM. Elective Induction of Labor Following Prior Cesarean Delivery. Am J Perinatol 2024. [PMID: 38648851 DOI: 10.1055/a-2310-9817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Following the release of A Randomized Trial of Induction versus Expectant Management (ARRIVE) trial, the induction of labor at 39 weeks has increased in the United States. The risk of uterine rupture and optimal timing of elective induction in those patients with a prior cesarean delivery is not well-described, and they were not included in the original trial. We aimed to determine the risk of uterine rupture in those patients undergoing elective induction of labor with prior cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective cohort of participants with prior cesarean delivery from 1996 to 2000. Participants were included if they had two or more prior cesareans. Participants were excluded if they had a history of an unknown prior incision, a classical incision, gestational age <39 weeks, any diabetes, chronic hypertension, twin gestation, collagen or vascular disease, or HIV. Those undergoing expectant management were compared with those undergoing elective induction with no medical or obstetrical indications for delivery. Analysis was performed at three gestational age groups: 39 weeks, 40 weeks, and 41 weeks. The primary outcomes were uterine rupture, rates of successful vaginal delivery, and a composite major morbidity risk. Multivariable logistic regression was performed. RESULTS At 39 weeks, 618 (10.3%) elective inductions were compared with 5,365 (89.7%) undergoing expectant management; uterine rupture occurred more frequently (13 patients [2.1%] vs. 49 patients [0.9%]; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-4.6) with fewer successful vaginal birth after cesarean [VBAC; 66.8 vs. 75%; aOR, 0.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.5-0.7]. The risk of uterine rupture was similar between groups at 40 weeks (5 patients [0.8%] vs. 21 patients [1.2%]; p = 0.387) and 41 weeks (7 patients [1.4%] vs. 2 patients (0.8%); p = 0.448). CONCLUSION Patients undergoing elective induction of labor with a prior cesarean scar had an increased risk of uterine rupture when compared with expectant management at 39 weeks, with fewer successful VBAC. KEY POINTS · TOLAC elective induction at 39 weeks has an increased risk of uterine rupture.. · TOLAC elective induction at 39 weeks has a less successful chance of vaginal delivery.. · Awaiting spontaneous labor in this cohort does not increase the risk of uterine rupture..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander M Saucedo
- Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | - George A Macones
- Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | - Alison G Cahill
- Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | - Lorie M Harper
- Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Saucedo AM, Alvarez M, Macones GA, Cahill AG, Harper LM. Optimal misoprostol dosing among patients with a body mass index greater than 30: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024; 230:565.e1-565.e16. [PMID: 38367750 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with obesity experience an increased duration of labor with an increased risk for perinatal morbidity. When compared with parturients without obesity, they also experience fewer uterine contractions after administration of misoprostol. It is unclear if the same dose of misoprostol should be used for induction of labor in patients with obesity compared to non-obese patients. Therefore, we sought to investigate if a higher dose of misoprostol for patients with obesity is more effective. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine if 50 μg compared with 25 μg of vaginal misoprostol reduced the time from induction start to delivery among patients with obesity. STUDY DESIGN We performed a double-blinded, pragmatic randomized controlled trial, between June 1, 2022, and July 17, 2023. Patients with a body mass index ≥30 kg/m2 who underwent labor induction at ≥ 36 weeks' gestation, had a singleton gestation, and a cervical dilation ≤3 cm at admission were included. Patients were excluded if they had a contraindication to vaginal delivery or misoprostol administration. Patients were randomized to 25 or 50 μg of vaginal misoprostol, stratified by parity, body mass index <40 kg/m2 or ≥40 kg/m2, and provider intent to use mechanical dilation at the onset of labor induction. Usual labor management was followed at the discretion of the provider. The primary outcome was time from induction to delivery. A priori, we estimated that 90 subjects per group (N=180) were needed for an 85% power to detect a 3-hour difference between groups with a type I error of 5%. Analysis was by intention-to-treat. A 2-sample t test was used for the primary outcome, Cohen's d was used as a measure of effect, and P values were reported. RESULTS Of the 180 patients randomized, 88 were assigned to the 25 μg group and 92 were assigned to the 50 μg group. Of those, 96.1% of patients received the designated intervention. The baseline characteristics were similar between groups. No difference was found in the primary outcome of time to delivery (21.6 hours vs 18.6 hours; d=.28; 95% confidence interval, -0.02 to 0.57). In a planned subgroup analysis, multiparous patients delivered faster in the 50 μg group (15.2 hours vs 12.0 hours; d=.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.97). The risk for tachysystole associated with fetal heart tracing changes was rare overall (2.2%) and not significantly different between groups. No differences in maternal or neonatal adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSION Patients with obesity who underwent cervical ripening with 50 μg of vaginal misoprostol experienced a similar time to delivery when compared with those who received 25 μg of misoprostol. However, multiparous patients had a significantly reduced time to delivery when 50 μg was used. A higher dose of misoprostol may be a promising intervention for reducing time in labor, which warrants further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander M Saucedo
- Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
| | - Miriam Alvarez
- Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | - George A Macones
- Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | - Alison G Cahill
- Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | - Lorie M Harper
- Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cahill AG, Macones GA. Optimizing the length of the second stage and management of pushing. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024; 230:S876-S878. [PMID: 38462261 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Revised: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
Although the optimal length of the second stage of labor to minimize maternal and neonatal morbidities and optimize spontaneous vaginal delivery is not known, available evidence suggests that increasing length of the second stage is associated with increasing maternal and neonatal morbidity. Thus, evidence-based strategies to safely shorten the second stage, such as initiating pushing when complete dilation is reached among those with neuraxial anesthesia, is prudent. Many aspects of optimal management of the second stage of labor require future study to continue to guide clinical second-stage management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison G Cahill
- Department of Women's Health, The University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, TX.
| | - George A Macones
- Department of Women's Health, The University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, TX
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hughes BL, Clifton RG, Rouse DJ, Saade GR, Dinsmoor MJ, Reddy UM, Pass R, Allard D, Mallett G, MacPherson C, Wapner R, Metz T, Goodnight WH, Tita ATN, Costantine MM, Swamy GK, Heyborne KD, Chien EK, Chauhan SP, El-Sayed YY, Casey BM, Parry S, Simhan HN, Napolitano PG, Macones GA. Randomized Trial of Hyperimmune Globulin for Congenital CMV Infection - 2-Year Outcomes. N Engl J Med 2023; 389:1822-1824. [PMID: 37937785 PMCID: PMC10683876 DOI: 10.1056/nejmc2308286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Uma M Reddy
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD
| | - Robert Pass
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | | | | | | | | | - Torri Metz
- University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | | | | | | | - Kent D Heyborne
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO
| | | | - Suneet P Chauhan
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | | | - Brian M Casey
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Prasad M, Saade GR, Clifton RG, Sandoval GJ, Hughes BL, Reddy UM, Bartholomew A, Salazar A, Chien EK, Tita ATN, Thorp JM, Metz TD, Wapner RJ, Sabharwal V, Simhan HN, Swamy GK, Heyborne KD, Sibai BM, Grobman WA, El-Sayed YY, Casey BM, Parry S, Rathore M, Diaz-Velasco R, Puga AM, Wiznia A, Kovacs A, Garry DJ, Macones GA. Risk Factors for Perinatal Transmission of Hepatitis C Virus. Obstet Gynecol 2023; 142:449-456. [PMID: 37590978 PMCID: PMC10437102 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the rate of perinatal transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, to identify risk factors for perinatal transmission of HCV infection, and to determine the viremic threshold for perinatal transmission. METHODS This was a prospective, multicenter, observational study of pregnant individuals at less than 24 weeks of gestation screened for HCV infection from 2012 to 2018 in the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Individuals found to be HCV antibody-positive were followed throughout pregnancy. Children were followed for evidence of perinatal transmission at 2-6 months (HCV RNA testing) and at 18-24 months (HCV RNA and antibody testing) of life. The primary outcome was perinatal transmission, defined as positive test results at either follow-up time point. RESULTS A total of 109,379 individuals were screened for HCV infection. Of the 1,224 participants who screened positive, 772 (63.1%) enrolled and 432 of those 772 (56.0%) had data available to assess primary outcome. The overall rate of perinatal transmission was 6.0% (26/432, 95% CI 4.0-8.7%). All children with HCV infection were born to individuals with demonstrable viremia. In viremic participants (n=314), the perinatal transmission rate was 8.0% (95% CI 5.2-11.5%). Risk factors for perinatal transmission included HCV RNA greater than 106 international units/mL (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 8.22, 95% CI 3.16-21.4) and vaginal bleeding reported at any time before delivery (aOR 3.26, 95% CI 1.32-8.03). A viremic threshold for perinatal transmission could not be established. CONCLUSION Perinatal transmission of HCV infection was limited to viremic individuals. High viral loads and antepartum bleeding were associated with perinatal transmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Prasad
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, MetroHealth Medical Center-Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, Columbia University, New York, New York, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston-Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, Stanford University, Stanford, California, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, University of Florida Center for HIV/AIDS Research, Education and Service, Jacksonville, Florida, San Juan Hospital, San Juan, Puerto Rico, Children's Diagnostic and Treatment Center, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Jacobi Medical Center, Bronx, New York, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York, and Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri; and the George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC; and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hoffman MK, Clifton RG, Biggio JR, Saade GR, Ugwu LG, Longo M, Bousleiman SZ, Clark K, Grobman WA, Frey HA, Chauhan SP, Dugoff L, Manuck TA, Chien EK, Rouse DJ, Simhan HN, Esplin MS, Macones GA. Cervical Pessary for Prevention of Preterm Birth in Individuals With a Short Cervix: The TOPS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2023; 330:340-348. [PMID: 37490086 PMCID: PMC10369212 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.10812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
Importance A short cervix as assessed by transvaginal ultrasound is an established risk factor for preterm birth. Study findings for a cervical pessary to prevent preterm delivery in singleton pregnancies with transvaginal ultrasound evidence of a short cervix have been conflicting. Objective To determine if cervical pessary placement decreases the risk of preterm birth or fetal death prior to 37 weeks among individuals with a short cervix. Design, Setting, and Participants We performed a multicenter, randomized, unmasked trial comparing a cervical pessary vs usual care from February 2017 through November 5, 2021, at 12 centers in the US. Study participants were nonlaboring individuals with a singleton pregnancy and a transvaginal ultrasound cervical length of 20 mm or less at gestations of 16 weeks 0 days through 23 weeks 6 days. Individuals with a prior spontaneous preterm birth were excluded. Interventions Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive either a cervical pessary placed by a trained clinician (n = 280) or usual care (n = 264). Use of vaginal progesterone was at the discretion of treating clinicians. Main Outcome and Measures The primary outcome was delivery or fetal death prior to 37 weeks. Results A total of 544 participants (64%) of a planned sample size of 850 were enrolled in the study (mean age, 29.5 years [SD, 6 years]). Following the third interim analysis, study recruitment was stopped due to concern for fetal or neonatal/infant death as well as for futility. Baseline characteristics were balanced between participants randomized to pessary and those randomized to usual care; 98.9% received vaginal progesterone. In an as-randomized analysis, the primary outcome occurred in 127 participants (45.5%) randomized to pessary and 127 (45.6%) randomized to usual care (relative risk, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.83-1.20). Fetal or neonatal/infant death occurred in 13.3% of those randomized to receive a pessary and in 6.8% of those randomized to receive usual care (relative risk, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.13-3.32). Conclusions and Relevance Cervical pessary in nonlaboring individuals with a singleton gestation and with a cervical length of 20 mm or less did not decrease the risk of preterm birth and was associated with a higher rate of fetal or neonatal/infant mortality. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02901626.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew K. Hoffman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | - Lynda G. Ugwu
- George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC
| | - Monica Longo
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Sabine Z. Bousleiman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Kelly Clark
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill
| | | | | | - Suneet P. Chauhan
- University of Texas Health Science at Houston–Children’s Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston
| | | | | | - Edward K. Chien
- MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | | | - M. Sean Esplin
- University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mallett G, Hill K, Doherty L, Grobman WA, Reddy UM, Tita ATN, Silver RM, Rice MM, El-Sayed YY, Wapner RJ, Rouse DJ, Saade GR, Thorp JM, Chauhan SP, Costantine MM, Chien EK, Casey BM, Srinivas SK, Swamy GK, Simhan HN, Macones GA. Maternal and Delivery Characteristics and Self-Reported Perceived Control During Labor. Obstet Gynecol 2023; 142:117-124. [PMID: 37290106 PMCID: PMC10330140 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association between maternal and delivery characteristics and self-reported perceived control during childbirth. METHODS A secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial was conducted to compare labor induction at 39 weeks of gestation with expectant management in low-risk nulliparous people. Six to 96 hours after delivery, participants who experienced labor completed the Labor Agentry Scale, a validated self-administered questionnaire to ascertain perceived control during childbirth. Scores range from 29 to 203, with higher scores indicating a sense of greater control. Multivariable linear regression was used to determine which maternal and delivery characteristics were associated with the Labor Agentry Scale score. Eligible characteristics included age, self-reported race and ethnicity, marital status, employment status, type of insurance, previous pregnancy loss before 20 weeks of gestation, body mass index (BMI), smoking, alcohol use, mode of delivery, labor pain (0-10 points), and a composite of perinatal death or severe neonatal complications. Significant variables ( P <.05) were retained in the final multivariable model, and adjusted mean differences (95% CIs) between groups were estimated. RESULTS Of 6,106 people enrolled in the trial, 6,038 experienced labor, of whom 5,750 (95.2%) completed the Labor Agentry Scale and were included in this analysis. Mean [95% CI] adjusted Labor Agentry Scale scores were significantly lower among those who identified as Asian (-6.4 [-10.5 to -2.3]) or Hispanic (-3.7 [-5.7 to -1.7]) compared with White, smoked compared with did not smoke (-2.8 [-5.5 to -0.1]), had BMIs of 35 or higher compared with less than 30 (-2.0 [-3.8 to -0.2]), were unemployed (-3.15 [-4.76 to -1.55]), did not have private health insurance (-2.61 [-4.47 to -0.76]), underwent operative vaginal (-5.1 [-7.7 to -2.6]) or cesarean (-14.4 [-16.1 to -12.6]) delivery compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery, and reported greater labor pain score of 8 or higher compared with less than 8 (-11.9 [-13.4 to -10.4]). Mean [95% CI] adjusted Labor Agentry Scale scores were significantly higher among people who were employed compared with unemployed (3.2 [1.6-4.8]) and had private compared with nonprivate insurance (2.6 [0.76-4.5]). CONCLUSION In nulliparous people at low risk, unemployment, lack of private health insurance, Asian race, Hispanic ethnicity, smoking, operative delivery, and more labor pain were associated with lower perceived control during labor. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT01990612.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gail Mallett
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, Stanford University, Stanford, California, Columbia University, New York, New York, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston-Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, MetroHealth Medical Center-Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; the George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC; and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Grobman WA, Sandoval GJ, Metz TD, Manuck TA, Clifton RG, Hughes BL, Saade GR, Longo M, Sowles A, Clark K, Simhan HN, Rouse DJ, Mendez-Figueroa H, Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Bailit JL, Costantine MM, Sehdev HM, Tita ATN, Macones GA. The Temporal Relationship Between the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic and Preterm Birth. Obstet Gynecol 2023; 141:1171-1180. [PMID: 37141586 PMCID: PMC10440253 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether preterm birth rates changed in relation to the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and whether any change depended on socioeconomic status. METHODS This is an observational cohort study of pregnant individuals with a singleton gestation who delivered in the years 2019 and 2020 at 1 of 16 U.S. hospitals of the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. The frequency of preterm birth for those who delivered before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (ie, in 2019) was compared with that of those who delivered after its onset (ie, in 2020). Interaction analyses were performed for people of different individual- and community-level socioeconomic characteristics (ie, race and ethnicity, insurance status, Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) of a person's residence). RESULTS During 2019 and 2020, 18,526 individuals met inclusion criteria. The chance of preterm birth before the COVID-19 pandemic was similar to that after the onset of the pandemic (11.7% vs 12.5%, adjusted relative risk 0.94, 95% CI 0.86-1.03). In interaction analyses, race and ethnicity, insurance status, and the SVI did not modify the association between the epoch and the chance of preterm birth before 37 weeks of gestation (all interaction P >.05). CONCLUSION There was no statistically significant difference in preterm birth rates in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic onset. This lack of association was largely independent of socioeconomic indicators such as race and ethnicity, insurance status, or SVI of the residential community in which an individual lived.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William A Grobman
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas, Columbia University, New York, New York, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, and the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas; the George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC; and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang H, Wen Z, Wu W, Sun Z, Wang Q, Schwartz AL, Cuculich P, Cahill AG, Macones GA, Wang Y. Electromyometrial Imaging of Uterine Contractions in Pregnant Women. J Vis Exp 2023. [PMID: 37306431 DOI: 10.3791/65214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
During normal pregnancy, the uterine smooth muscle, the myometrium, begins to have weak, uncoordinated contractions at late gestation to help the cervix remodel. In labor, the myometrium has strong, coordinated contractions to deliver the fetus. Various methods have been developed to monitor uterine contraction patterns to predict labor onset. However, the current techniques have limited spatial coverage and specificity. We developed electromyometrial imaging (EMMI) to noninvasively map uterine electrical activity onto the three-dimensional uterine surface during contractions. The first step in EMMI is to use T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to acquire the subject-specific body-uterus geometry. Next, up to 192 pin-type electrodes placed on the body surface are used to collect electrical recordings from the myometrium. Finally, the EMMI data processing pipeline is performed to combine the body-uterus geometry with body surface electrical data to reconstruct and image uterine electrical activities on the uterine surface. EMMI can safely and noninvasively image, identify, and measure early activation regions and propagation patterns across the entire uterus in three dimensions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Wang
- Department of Physics, Washington University; Center for Reproductive Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine
| | - Zichao Wen
- Center for Reproductive Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine
| | - Wenjie Wu
- Center for Reproductive Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University
| | - Zhexian Sun
- Center for Reproductive Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University
| | - Qing Wang
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine
| | - Alan L Schwartz
- Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine
| | - Phillip Cuculich
- Department of Cardiology, Washington University School of Medicine
| | - Alison G Cahill
- Department of Women's Health, University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School
| | - George A Macones
- Department of Women's Health, University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School
| | - Yong Wang
- Center for Reproductive Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine;
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pacheco LD, Clifton RG, Saade GR, Weiner SJ, Parry S, Thorp JM, Longo M, Salazar A, Dalton W, Tita ATN, Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Chauhan SP, Metz TD, Rood K, Rouse DJ, Bailit JL, Grobman WA, Simhan HN, Macones GA. Tranexamic Acid to Prevent Obstetrical Hemorrhage after Cesarean Delivery. N Engl J Med 2023; 388:1365-1375. [PMID: 37043652 PMCID: PMC10200294 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa2207419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prophylactic use of tranexamic acid at the time of cesarean delivery has been shown to decrease the calculated blood loss, but the effect on the need for blood transfusions is unclear. METHODS We randomly assigned patients undergoing cesarean delivery at 31 U.S. hospitals to receive either tranexamic acid or placebo after umbilical-cord clamping. The primary outcome was a composite of maternal death or blood transfusion by hospital discharge or 7 days post partum, whichever came first. Key secondary outcomes were estimated intraoperative blood loss of more than 1 liter (prespecified as a major secondary outcome), interventions for bleeding and related complications, the preoperative-to-postoperative change in the hemoglobin level, and postpartum infectious complications. Adverse events were assessed. RESULTS A total of 11,000 participants underwent randomization (5529 to the tranexamic acid group and 5471 to the placebo group); scheduled cesarean delivery accounted for 50.1% and 49.2% of the deliveries in the respective groups. A primary-outcome event occurred in 201 of 5525 participants (3.6%) in the tranexamic acid group and in 233 of 5470 (4.3%) in the placebo group (adjusted relative risk, 0.89; 95.26% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 1.07; P = 0.19). Estimated intraoperative blood loss of more than 1 liter occurred in 7.3% of the participants in the tranexamic acid group and in 8.0% of those in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.05). Interventions for bleeding complications occurred in 16.1% of the participants in the tranexamic acid group and in 18.0% of those in the placebo group (relative risk, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82 to 0.97); the change in the hemoglobin level was -1.8 g per deciliter and -1.9 g per deciliter, respectively (mean difference, -0.1 g per deciliter; 95% CI, -0.2 to -0.1); and postpartum infectious complications occurred in 3.2% and 2.5% of the participants, respectively (relative risk, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.61). The frequencies of thromboembolic events and other adverse events were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Prophylactic use of tranexamic acid during cesarean delivery did not lead to a significantly lower risk of a composite outcome of maternal death or blood transfusion than placebo. (Funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03364491.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis D Pacheco
- From the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (L.D.P., G.R.S., A.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas at Austin, Austin (G.A.M.) - all in Texas; the George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., S.J.W.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (J.M.T.); the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (M.L.); MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (W.D., J.L.B.), and the Ohio State University, Columbus (K.R.) - both in Ohio; the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham (A.T.N.T.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (T.D.M.); Brown University, Providence, RI (D.J.R.); Northwestern University, Chicago (W.A.G.); and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.)
| | - Rebecca G Clifton
- From the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (L.D.P., G.R.S., A.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas at Austin, Austin (G.A.M.) - all in Texas; the George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., S.J.W.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (J.M.T.); the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (M.L.); MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (W.D., J.L.B.), and the Ohio State University, Columbus (K.R.) - both in Ohio; the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham (A.T.N.T.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (T.D.M.); Brown University, Providence, RI (D.J.R.); Northwestern University, Chicago (W.A.G.); and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.)
| | - George R Saade
- From the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (L.D.P., G.R.S., A.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas at Austin, Austin (G.A.M.) - all in Texas; the George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., S.J.W.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (J.M.T.); the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (M.L.); MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (W.D., J.L.B.), and the Ohio State University, Columbus (K.R.) - both in Ohio; the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham (A.T.N.T.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (T.D.M.); Brown University, Providence, RI (D.J.R.); Northwestern University, Chicago (W.A.G.); and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.)
| | - Steven J Weiner
- From the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (L.D.P., G.R.S., A.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas at Austin, Austin (G.A.M.) - all in Texas; the George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., S.J.W.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (J.M.T.); the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (M.L.); MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (W.D., J.L.B.), and the Ohio State University, Columbus (K.R.) - both in Ohio; the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham (A.T.N.T.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (T.D.M.); Brown University, Providence, RI (D.J.R.); Northwestern University, Chicago (W.A.G.); and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.)
| | - Samuel Parry
- From the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (L.D.P., G.R.S., A.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas at Austin, Austin (G.A.M.) - all in Texas; the George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., S.J.W.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (J.M.T.); the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (M.L.); MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (W.D., J.L.B.), and the Ohio State University, Columbus (K.R.) - both in Ohio; the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham (A.T.N.T.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (T.D.M.); Brown University, Providence, RI (D.J.R.); Northwestern University, Chicago (W.A.G.); and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.)
| | - John M Thorp
- From the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (L.D.P., G.R.S., A.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas at Austin, Austin (G.A.M.) - all in Texas; the George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., S.J.W.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (J.M.T.); the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (M.L.); MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (W.D., J.L.B.), and the Ohio State University, Columbus (K.R.) - both in Ohio; the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham (A.T.N.T.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (T.D.M.); Brown University, Providence, RI (D.J.R.); Northwestern University, Chicago (W.A.G.); and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.)
| | - Monica Longo
- From the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (L.D.P., G.R.S., A.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas at Austin, Austin (G.A.M.) - all in Texas; the George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., S.J.W.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (J.M.T.); the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (M.L.); MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (W.D., J.L.B.), and the Ohio State University, Columbus (K.R.) - both in Ohio; the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham (A.T.N.T.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (T.D.M.); Brown University, Providence, RI (D.J.R.); Northwestern University, Chicago (W.A.G.); and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.)
| | - Ashley Salazar
- From the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (L.D.P., G.R.S., A.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas at Austin, Austin (G.A.M.) - all in Texas; the George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., S.J.W.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (J.M.T.); the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (M.L.); MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (W.D., J.L.B.), and the Ohio State University, Columbus (K.R.) - both in Ohio; the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham (A.T.N.T.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (T.D.M.); Brown University, Providence, RI (D.J.R.); Northwestern University, Chicago (W.A.G.); and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.)
| | - Wendy Dalton
- From the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (L.D.P., G.R.S., A.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas at Austin, Austin (G.A.M.) - all in Texas; the George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., S.J.W.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (J.M.T.); the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (M.L.); MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (W.D., J.L.B.), and the Ohio State University, Columbus (K.R.) - both in Ohio; the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham (A.T.N.T.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (T.D.M.); Brown University, Providence, RI (D.J.R.); Northwestern University, Chicago (W.A.G.); and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.)
| | - Alan T N Tita
- From the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (L.D.P., G.R.S., A.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas at Austin, Austin (G.A.M.) - all in Texas; the George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., S.J.W.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (J.M.T.); the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (M.L.); MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (W.D., J.L.B.), and the Ohio State University, Columbus (K.R.) - both in Ohio; the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham (A.T.N.T.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (T.D.M.); Brown University, Providence, RI (D.J.R.); Northwestern University, Chicago (W.A.G.); and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.)
| | - Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman
- From the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (L.D.P., G.R.S., A.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas at Austin, Austin (G.A.M.) - all in Texas; the George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., S.J.W.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (J.M.T.); the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (M.L.); MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (W.D., J.L.B.), and the Ohio State University, Columbus (K.R.) - both in Ohio; the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham (A.T.N.T.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (T.D.M.); Brown University, Providence, RI (D.J.R.); Northwestern University, Chicago (W.A.G.); and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.)
| | - Suneet P Chauhan
- From the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (L.D.P., G.R.S., A.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas at Austin, Austin (G.A.M.) - all in Texas; the George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., S.J.W.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (J.M.T.); the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (M.L.); MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (W.D., J.L.B.), and the Ohio State University, Columbus (K.R.) - both in Ohio; the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham (A.T.N.T.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (T.D.M.); Brown University, Providence, RI (D.J.R.); Northwestern University, Chicago (W.A.G.); and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.)
| | - Torri D Metz
- From the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (L.D.P., G.R.S., A.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas at Austin, Austin (G.A.M.) - all in Texas; the George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., S.J.W.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (J.M.T.); the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (M.L.); MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (W.D., J.L.B.), and the Ohio State University, Columbus (K.R.) - both in Ohio; the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham (A.T.N.T.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (T.D.M.); Brown University, Providence, RI (D.J.R.); Northwestern University, Chicago (W.A.G.); and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.)
| | - Kara Rood
- From the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (L.D.P., G.R.S., A.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas at Austin, Austin (G.A.M.) - all in Texas; the George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., S.J.W.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (J.M.T.); the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (M.L.); MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (W.D., J.L.B.), and the Ohio State University, Columbus (K.R.) - both in Ohio; the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham (A.T.N.T.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (T.D.M.); Brown University, Providence, RI (D.J.R.); Northwestern University, Chicago (W.A.G.); and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.)
| | - Dwight J Rouse
- From the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (L.D.P., G.R.S., A.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas at Austin, Austin (G.A.M.) - all in Texas; the George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., S.J.W.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (J.M.T.); the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (M.L.); MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (W.D., J.L.B.), and the Ohio State University, Columbus (K.R.) - both in Ohio; the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham (A.T.N.T.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (T.D.M.); Brown University, Providence, RI (D.J.R.); Northwestern University, Chicago (W.A.G.); and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.)
| | - Jennifer L Bailit
- From the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (L.D.P., G.R.S., A.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas at Austin, Austin (G.A.M.) - all in Texas; the George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., S.J.W.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (J.M.T.); the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (M.L.); MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (W.D., J.L.B.), and the Ohio State University, Columbus (K.R.) - both in Ohio; the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham (A.T.N.T.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (T.D.M.); Brown University, Providence, RI (D.J.R.); Northwestern University, Chicago (W.A.G.); and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.)
| | - William A Grobman
- From the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (L.D.P., G.R.S., A.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas at Austin, Austin (G.A.M.) - all in Texas; the George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., S.J.W.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (J.M.T.); the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (M.L.); MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (W.D., J.L.B.), and the Ohio State University, Columbus (K.R.) - both in Ohio; the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham (A.T.N.T.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (T.D.M.); Brown University, Providence, RI (D.J.R.); Northwestern University, Chicago (W.A.G.); and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.)
| | - Hyagriv N Simhan
- From the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (L.D.P., G.R.S., A.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas at Austin, Austin (G.A.M.) - all in Texas; the George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., S.J.W.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (J.M.T.); the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (M.L.); MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (W.D., J.L.B.), and the Ohio State University, Columbus (K.R.) - both in Ohio; the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham (A.T.N.T.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (T.D.M.); Brown University, Providence, RI (D.J.R.); Northwestern University, Chicago (W.A.G.); and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.)
| | - George A Macones
- From the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (L.D.P., G.R.S., A.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas at Austin, Austin (G.A.M.) - all in Texas; the George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., S.J.W.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (J.M.T.); the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (M.L.); MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (W.D., J.L.B.), and the Ohio State University, Columbus (K.R.) - both in Ohio; the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham (A.T.N.T.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (T.D.M.); Brown University, Providence, RI (D.J.R.); Northwestern University, Chicago (W.A.G.); and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wang H, Wen Z, Wu W, Sun Z, Kisrieva-Ware Z, Lin Y, Wang S, Gao H, Xu H, Zhao P, Wang Q, Macones GA, Schwartz AL, Cuculich P, Cahill AG, Wang Y. Noninvasive electromyometrial imaging of human uterine maturation during term labor. Nat Commun 2023; 14:1198. [PMID: 36918533 PMCID: PMC10015052 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-36440-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Electromyometrial imaging (EMMI) was recently developed to image the three-dimensional (3D) uterine electrical activation during contractions noninvasively and accurately in sheep. Herein we describe the development and application of a human EMMI system to image and evaluate 3D uterine electrical activation patterns at high spatial and temporal resolution during human term labor. We demonstrate the successful integration of the human EMMI system during subjects' clinical visits to generate noninvasively the uterine surface electrical potential maps, electrograms, and activation sequence through an inverse solution using up to 192 electrodes distributed around the abdomen surface. Quantitative indices, including the uterine activation curve, are developed and defined to characterize uterine surface contraction patterns. We thus show that the human EMMI system can provide detailed 3D images and quantification of uterine contractions as well as novel insights into the role of human uterine maturation during labor progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Wang
- Department of Physics, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
- Center for Reproductive Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Zichao Wen
- Center for Reproductive Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Wenjie Wu
- Center for Reproductive Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
| | - Zhexian Sun
- Center for Reproductive Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
| | - Zulfia Kisrieva-Ware
- Center for Reproductive Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Yiqi Lin
- Center for Reproductive Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
- Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
| | - Sicheng Wang
- Center for Reproductive Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
- Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
| | - Hansong Gao
- Center for Reproductive Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
- Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
| | - Haonan Xu
- Center for Reproductive Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Peinan Zhao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Qing Wang
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - George A Macones
- Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA
| | - Alan L Schwartz
- Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Phillip Cuculich
- Department of Cardiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Alison G Cahill
- Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712, USA
| | - Yong Wang
- Center for Reproductive Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
- Department of Electrical and Systems Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Shivraj P, Chadha R, Novak AR, Dynis DN, Ramin SM, Macones GA, Wendel GD. Knowledge, Judgment, and Skills in Reproductive Health Care and Abortion Are Essential to the Practice of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Obstet Gynecol 2023; 141:676-680. [PMID: 36897126 PMCID: PMC10026965 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
A social contract exists between medicine and society. In fulfilling the social contract to our patients and society, physicians have an obligation to provide the evidence-based care that patients want and need. What do the data regarding knowledge, judgment, and skills required to practice obstetrics and gynecology show? Obstetrics and gynecology job task analyses assess the importance of knowledge, judgment, and skills through surveys asking practicing physicians about the criticality and frequency of a variety of task statements to create an importance score. Excerpts from a 2018 practice analysis survey clearly indicate that reproductive health care and abortion are important components of the knowledge, judgment, and skills to practice obstetrics and gynecology in the United States. These standards help to assure the knowledge, judgment, and skills of current and future generations of ob-gyns, so their patients and the public can be provided the comprehensive reproductive health care they want and need. It is sometimes important to restate principles and standards that have become ingrained in thoughts and practices that guide physicians and serve to protect our patients. This concept is important now, as our country, health care professionals, and patients examine the future of reproductive health care, including abortion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pooja Shivraj
- American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dallas, and the Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School-University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hughes BL, Sandoval GJ, Metz TD, Clifton RG, Grobman WA, Saade GR, Manuck TA, Longo M, Sowles A, Clark K, Simhan HN, Rouse DJ, Mendez-Figueroa H, Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Bailit J, Costantine MM, Sehdev HM, Tita ATN, Macones GA. First- or second-trimester SARS-CoV-2 infection and subsequent pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2023; 228:226.e1-226.e9. [PMID: 35970201 PMCID: PMC9374493 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2022] [Revised: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, including fetal death and preterm birth. It is not known whether that risk occurs only during the time of acute infection or whether the risk persists later in pregnancy. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate whether the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy persists after an acute maternal illness. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective cohort study of pregnant patients with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection delivering at 17 hospitals in the United States between March 2020 and December 2020. Patients experiencing a SARS-CoV-2-positive test at or before 28 weeks of gestation with a subsequent delivery hospitalization were compared with those without a positive SAR-CoV-2 test at the same hospitals with randomly selected delivery days during the same period. Deliveries occurring at <20 weeks of gestation in both groups were excluded. The study outcomes included fetal or neonatal death, preterm birth at <37 weeks of gestation and <34 weeks of gestation, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), any major congenital malformation, and size for gestational age of <5th or <10th percentiles at birth based on published standards. HDP that were collected included HDP and preeclampsia with severe features, both overall and with delivery at <37 weeks of gestation. RESULTS Of 2326 patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy and were at least 20 weeks of gestation at delivery from March 2020 to December 2020, 402 patients (delivering 414 fetuses or neonates) were SARS-CoV-2 positive before 28 weeks of gestation and before their admission for delivery; they were compared with 11,705 patients without a positive SARS-CoV-2 test. In adjusted analyses, those with SARS-CoV-2 before 28 weeks of gestation had a subsequent increased risk of fetal or neonatal death (2.9% vs 1.5%; adjusted relative risk, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-3.85), preterm birth at <37 weeks of gestation (19.6% vs 13.8%; adjusted relative risk, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.63), and HDP with delivery at <37 weeks of gestation (7.2% vs 4.1%; adjusted relative risk, 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-2.55). There was no difference in the rates of preterm birth at <34 weeks of gestation, any major congenital malformation, and size for gestational age of <5th or <10th percentiles. In addition, there was no significant difference in the rate of gestational hypertension overall or preeclampsia with severe features. CONCLUSION There was a modest increase in the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenna L Hughes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
| | - Grecio J Sandoval
- the George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC
| | | | - Rebecca G Clifton
- the George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC
| | | | | | - Tracy A Manuck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Monica Longo
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Kelly Clark
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | | | - Hector Mendez-Figueroa
- University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, TX
| | | | - Jennifer Bailit
- MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tuuli MG, Gregory WT, Arya LA, Lowder JL, Woolfolk C, Caughey AB, Srinivas SK, Tita ATN, Macones GA, Cahill AG, Richter HE. Effect of Second-Stage Pushing Timing on Postpartum Pelvic Floor Morbidity: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol 2023; 141:245-252. [PMID: 36603202 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess whether immediate or delayed pushing in the second-stage results in higher risk of pelvic floor morbidity. METHODS This study was a planned secondary aim of a multicenter randomized clinical trial that included nulliparous patients at 37 weeks of gestation or greater in labor with neuraxial analgesia. Participants were randomized in the second stage to initiate pushing immediately or wait 60 minutes before pushing. Participants had pelvic floor assessments at 1-5 days postpartum, 6 weeks postpartum, and 6 months postpartum. Rates of perineal lacerations, pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) measures, and scores on validated symptom-specific distress and quality-of-life questionnaires (PFDI-20 [Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory], PFIQ [Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire], FISI [Fecal Incontinence Severity Index], and MMHQ [Modified Manchester Health Questionnaire]) were compared. It was estimated that 630 participants would provide more than 80% power to detect a 40% difference in second-degree or greater perineal lacerations and approximately 80% power to detect a 40% difference in stage 2 or greater pelvic organ prolapse (POP). RESULTS Among 2,414 participants in the primary trial conducted between May 19, 2014, and December 16, 2017, 941 (39%) had pelvic floor assessments: 452 immediate pushing and 489 delayed pushing. The mean age was 24.8 years, and 93.4% had vaginal delivery. There were no significant differences in perineal lacerations at delivery and POP at 6 weeks and 6 months postpartum. Changes from baseline in total and subscale scores for the PFDI-20, the PFIQ, and the MMHQ were not significantly different at 6 weeks postpartum and 6 months postpartum. The change in FISI score was higher in the immediate pushing group at 6 months (2.9±5.7 vs 2.0±4.5, difference 0.9, P =.01), but less than the minimum important difference of 4. CONCLUSION Among nulliparous patients in the second stage with neuraxial analgesia, immediate pushing, compared with delayed pushing, did not increase perineal lacerations, POP-Q measures, or patient-reported pelvic floor symptoms at 6 weeks and 6 months postpartum. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02137200.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Methodius G Tuuli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, and Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, Rhode Island; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Maternal and Child Health Research Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri; the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; and the Department of Women's Health, Dell School of Medicine, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Metz TD, Clifton RG, Hughes BL, Sandoval GJ, Grobman WA, Saade GR, Manuck TA, Longo M, Sowles A, Clark K, Simhan HN, Rouse DJ, Mendez-Figueroa H, Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Bailit JL, Costantine MM, Sehdev HM, Tita ATN, Macones GA. Association Between Giving Birth During the Early Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic and Serious Maternal Morbidity. Obstet Gynecol 2023; 141:109-118. [PMID: 36357949 PMCID: PMC9892237 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000004982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether delivering during the early the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was associated with increased risk of maternal death or serious morbidity from common obstetric complications compared with a historical control period. METHODS This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study with manual medical-record abstraction performed by centrally trained and certified research personnel at 17 U.S. hospitals. Individuals who gave birth on randomly selected dates in 2019 (before the pandemic) and 2020 (during the pandemic) were compared. Hospital, health care system, and community risk-mitigation strategies for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in response to the early COVID-19 pandemic are described. The primary outcome was a composite of maternal death or serious morbidity from common obstetric complications, including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (eclampsia, end organ dysfunction, or need for acute antihypertensive therapy), postpartum hemorrhage (operative intervention or receipt of 4 or more units blood products), and infections other than SARS-CoV-2 (sepsis, pelvic abscess, prolonged intravenous antibiotics, bacteremia, deep surgical site infection). The major secondary outcome was cesarean birth. RESULTS Overall, 12,133 patients giving birth during and 9,709 before the pandemic were included. Hospital, health care system, and community SARS-CoV-2 mitigation strategies were employed at all sites for a portion of 2020, with a peak in modifications from March to June 2020. Of patients delivering during the pandemic, 3% had a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result during pregnancy through 42 days postpartum. Giving birth during the pandemic was not associated with a change in the frequency of the primary composite outcome (9.3% vs 8.9%, adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.02, 95% CI 0.93-1.11) or cesarean birth (32.4% vs 31.3%, aRR 1.02, 95% CI 0.97-1.07). No maternal deaths were observed. CONCLUSION Despite substantial hospital, health care, and community modifications, giving birth during the early COVID-19 pandemic was not associated with higher rates of serious maternal morbidity from common obstetric complications. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04519502.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torri D Metz
- Divisions of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, and University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, and University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, Columbia University, New York, New York, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, and The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, and University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama; the George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC; the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland; and the Department of Women's Health, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Saucedo AM, Richter HE, Gregory WT, Woolfolk C, Tuuli MG, Lowder JL, Caughey AB, Srinivas SK, Tita ATN, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Intrapartum risk factors associated with pelvic organ prolapse at 6 months postpartum. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2022; 4:100692. [PMID: 35853583 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pregnancy and childbirth are known risk factors associated with the development of pelvic organ prolapse; specific intrapartum risk factors are not well characterized. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine intrapartum factors associated with increased risk of pelvic organ prolapse identified after delivery. STUDY DESIGN A planned secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized clinical trial of delayed vs immediate pushing among nulliparous women at ≥37 weeks of gestation in labor with neuraxial analgesia was conducted at 6 academic and community hospitals in the United States. Intrapartum characteristics were identified, and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification assessments at 6 weeks and 6 months after delivery were performed. The primary outcome was pelvic organ prolapse, defined as stage 2 or greater prolapse using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification assessment at 6 months. Multivariable logistic regression was used to refine risk estimates while adjusting for randomization group, macrosomia, and maternal age. RESULTS Among the 941 women participating in the pelvic floor follow-up, 793 women had Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification assessments at 6 weeks with 91 of 793 women (11.5%) demonstrating stage 2 or greater prolapse. Of the 728 women followed up at 6 months, stage 2 or greater prolapse was identified in 58 of 728 women (8.0%). Prostaglandin use for induction of labor was associated with an increased risk at 6 months (adjusted odds ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-3.91; P<.01). The length and type (spontaneous vs induced) of the first stage of labor were not significantly associated with stage 2 or greater prolapse. Moreover, increased length of the second stage of labor and duration of pushing were not associated with stage 2 or greater prolapse. After adjusting for confounding factors, cesarean delivery was protective of pelvic organ prolapse at 6 months (adjusted odds ratio, 0.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.90). CONCLUSION The management of the first and second stages of labor, including time length, was not associated with stage 2 or greater prolapse at 6 months. The findings that prostaglandin exposure was associated with increased risk likely were not directly affecting the risk of prolapse but may be surrogates for other labor features that deserve exploration. Cesarean delivery was associated with protection from stage 2 or greater pelvic organ prolapse at 6 months, consistent with previous literature.
Collapse
|
18
|
Metz TD, Clifton RG, Hughes BL, Sandoval GJ, Grobman WA, Saade GR, Manuck TA, Longo M, Sowles A, Clark K, Simhan HN, Rouse DJ, Mendez-Figueroa H, Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Bailit JL, Costantine MM, Sehdev HM, Tita ATN, Macones GA. Association of SARS-CoV-2 Infection With Serious Maternal Morbidity and Mortality From Obstetric Complications. JAMA 2022; 327:748-759. [PMID: 35129581 PMCID: PMC8822445 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.1190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 135] [Impact Index Per Article: 67.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Importance It remains unknown whether SARS-CoV-2 infection specifically increases the risk of serious obstetric morbidity. Objective To evaluate the association of SARS-CoV-2 infection with serious maternal morbidity or mortality from common obstetric complications. Design, Setting, and Participants Retrospective cohort study of 14 104 pregnant and postpartum patients delivered between March 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020 (with final follow-up to February 11, 2021), at 17 US hospitals participating in the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development's Gestational Research Assessments of COVID-19 (GRAVID) Study. All patients with SARS-CoV-2 were included and compared with those without a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result who delivered on randomly selected dates over the same period. Exposures SARS-CoV-2 infection was based on a positive nucleic acid or antigen test result. Secondary analyses further stratified those with SARS-CoV-2 infection by disease severity. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was a composite of maternal death or serious morbidity related to hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, postpartum hemorrhage, or infection other than SARS-CoV-2. The main secondary outcome was cesarean birth. Results Of the 14 104 included patients (mean age, 29.7 years), 2352 patients had SARS-CoV-2 infection and 11 752 did not have a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result. Compared with those without a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result, SARS-CoV-2 infection was significantly associated with the primary outcome (13.4% vs 9.2%; difference, 4.2% [95% CI, 2.8%-5.6%]; adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.41 [95% CI, 1.23-1.61]). All 5 maternal deaths were in the SARS-CoV-2 group. SARS-CoV-2 infection was not significantly associated with cesarean birth (34.7% vs 32.4%; aRR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.99-1.11]). Compared with those without a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result, moderate or higher COVID-19 severity (n = 586) was significantly associated with the primary outcome (26.1% vs 9.2%; difference, 16.9% [95% CI, 13.3%-20.4%]; aRR, 2.06 [95% CI, 1.73-2.46]) and the major secondary outcome of cesarean birth (45.4% vs 32.4%; difference, 12.8% [95% CI, 8.7%-16.8%]; aRR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.07-1.28]), but mild or asymptomatic infection (n = 1766) was not significantly associated with the primary outcome (9.2% vs 9.2%; difference, 0% [95% CI, -1.4% to 1.4%]; aRR, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.94-1.32]) or cesarean birth (31.2% vs 32.4%; difference, -1.4% [95% CI, -3.6% to 0.8%]; aRR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.93-1.07]). Conclusions and Relevance Among pregnant and postpartum individuals at 17 US hospitals, SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with an increased risk for a composite outcome of maternal mortality or serious morbidity from obstetric complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torri D. Metz
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City
| | | | - Brenna L. Hughes
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | | | - William A. Grobman
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - George R. Saade
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
| | - Tracy A. Manuck
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Monica Longo
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Amber Sowles
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City
| | - Kelly Clark
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Hyagriv N. Simhan
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Dwight J. Rouse
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Hector Mendez-Figueroa
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children’s Memorial Hermann, Hospital, Houston
| | - Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Jennifer L. Bailit
- MetroHealth Medical Center, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Maged M. Costantine
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ohio State University, Columbus
| | - Harish M. Sehdev
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Alan T. N. Tita
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zahedi-Spung LD, Raghuraman N, Macones GA, Cahill AG, Rosenbloom JI. Neonatal morbidity and mortality by mode of delivery in very preterm neonates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 226:114.e1-114.e7. [PMID: 34331893 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The safest mode of delivery to use for very preterm infants is an ongoing topic of debate. There are many reasons to perform a cesarean delivery in cases of extremely preterm and very preterm infants, including indication for labor, fetal distress, maternal indications, and malpresentation. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine whether cesarean delivery is associated with a considerable improvement in neonatal morbidity. STUDY DESIGN This study is a retrospective cohort study of all singleton pregnancies, delivered from 22 to 29 weeks' gestation between 2010 and 2015, admitted for preterm labor or preterm premature rupture of membranes and excluded neonates with a delivery weight ≤500 g, multiple gestations, cases with intrauterine fetal demise, and induced terminations. The primary outcome for the study was a neonatal morbidity composite (Apgar score of <5 at 5 minutes, prolonged ventilation (>28 days), intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, coagulopathy, discharged on home ventilator support, or discharged with enteric feeding tube). Cesarean deliveries were performed for standard obstetrical indications. Regression models were used and adjusted for nulliparity, delivery year, and presentation at the time of delivery to determine whether cesarean delivery is associated with neonatal morbidity or neonatal death. RESULTS There were 271 eligible deliveries, which included 128 cesarean deliveries and 143 vaginal deliveries. The cesarean delivery group had fewer nulliparous patients and more fetuses presenting in breech position at the time of delivery. The overall composite neonatal morbidity occurred in 202 of the 271 (74.5%) deliveries and mortality occurred in 26 of the 271 (9.59%) deliveries. When adjusting for nulliparity, delivery year, and fetal presentation at the time of delivery, cesarean delivery was associated with a decreased risk for death in the delivery room or within 24 hours after delivery (adjusted risk ratio, 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.63; P=.03). Cesarean delivery was associated with an increased use of exogenous surfactant (adjusted risk ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.38; P=.01) and bag mask ventilation (adjusted risk ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.37; P=.03). In a secondary analysis that included only patients who received a complete course of steroids, there were no differences in the composite morbidity or mortality. CONCLUSION Cesarean delivery performed for standard obstetrical indications in cases of very preterm neonates is associated with a decreased risk for death in the delivery room or within 24 hours of delivery but is not associated with an improvement in the overall morbidity or mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leilah D Zahedi-Spung
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
| | - Nandini Raghuraman
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - George A Macones
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | - Alison G Cahill
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | - Joshua I Rosenbloom
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; Hadassah University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of Diabetes Group Prenatal Care to increase patient engagement in diabetes self-care activities. STUDY DESIGN A pilot randomized controlled trial was conducted at two sites. Inclusion criteria were English or Spanish speaking, type 2 or gestational diabetes, 22 to 34 weeks of gestational age at first study visit, ability to attend group care at specified times, and willingness to be randomized. Exclusion criteria included type 1 diabetes, multiple gestation, major fetal anomaly, serious medical comorbidity, and serious psychiatric illness. Women were randomized to Diabetes Group Prenatal Care or individual prenatal care. The primary outcome was completion of diabetes self-care activities, including diet, exercise, blood sugar testing, and medication adherence. Secondary outcomes included antenatal care characteristics, and maternal, neonatal, and diabetes management outcomes. Analysis followed the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS Of 159 eligible women, 84 (53%) consented to participate in the study and were randomized to group (n = 42) or individual (n = 42) prenatal care. Demographic characteristics were similar between study arms. Completion of diabetes self-care activities was similar overall, but women in group care ate the recommended amount of fruits and vegetables on more days per week (5.1 days/week ± 2.0 standard deviation [SD] in group care vs. 3.4 days ± 2.6 SD in individual care; p < 0.01) and gained less weight per week during the study period (0.2 lbs/week [interquartile range: 0-0.7] vs. 0.5 lbs/week [interquartile range: 0.2-0.9]; p = 0.03) than women in individual care. Women with gestational diabetes randomized to group care were 3.5 times more likely to have postpartum glucose tolerance testing than those in individual care (70 vs. 21%; relative risk: 3.5; 95% confidence interval: 1.4-8.8). Other maternal, neonatal, and pregnancy outcomes were similar between study arms. CONCLUSION Diabetes group care is feasible and shows promise for decreasing gestational weight gain, improving diet, and increasing postpartum diabetes testing among women with pregnancies complicated by diabetes. KEY POINTS · Women with gestational diabetes in group care were 3.5 times more likely to return for postpartum glucose tolerance testing.. · Women with gestational diabetes in group care had less gestational weight gain during the study period.. · Diabetes Group Prenatal Care is a promising intervention to improve outcomes for women with diabetes in pregnancy..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ebony B. Carter
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Kate Barbier
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Pamela K. Hill
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Denver Health and Hospital, Denver, Colorado
| | - Alison G. Cahill
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | - Graham A. Colditz
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine,, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - George A. Macones
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | - Methodius G. Tuuli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Sara E. Mazzoni
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Saucedo AM, Tuuli MG, Gregory T, Arya LA, Lowder JL, Woolfolk C, Caughey AB, Srinivas SK, Tita AT, Macones GA, Richter HE, Cahill AG. Intrapartum Risk Factors for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Postpartum. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.11.423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
|
22
|
Stout MJ, Chubiz J, Raghuraman N, Zhao P, Tuuli MG, Wang LV, Cahill AG, Cuculich PS, Wang Y, Jungheim ES, Herzog ED, Fay J, Schwartz AL, Macones GA, England SK. A multidisciplinary Prematurity Research Cohort Study. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0272155. [PMID: 36006907 PMCID: PMC9409532 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Worldwide, 10% of babies are born preterm, defined as a live birth before 37 weeks of gestation. Preterm birth is the leading cause of neonatal death, and survivors face lifelong risks of adverse outcomes. New approaches with large sample sizes are needed to identify strategies to predict and prevent preterm birth. The primary aims of the Washington University Prematurity Research Cohort Study were to conduct three prospective projects addressing possible causes of preterm birth and provide data and samples for future research. STUDY DESIGN Pregnant patients were recruited into the cohort between January 2017 and January 2020. Consenting patients were enrolled into the study before 20 weeks' gestation and followed through delivery. Participants completed demographic and lifestyle surveys; provided maternal blood, placenta samples, and cord blood; and participated in up to three projects focused on underlying physiology of preterm birth: cervical imaging (Project 1), circadian rhythms (Project 2), and uterine magnetic resonance imaging and electromyometrial imaging (Project 3). RESULTS A total of 1260 participants were enrolled and delivered during the study period. Of the participants, 706 (56%) were Black/African American, 494 (39%) were nulliparous, and 185 (15%) had a previous preterm birth. Of the 1260 participants, 1220 (97%) delivered a live infant. Of the 1220 with a live birth, 163 (14.1%) had preterm birth, of which 74 (6.1%) were spontaneous preterm birth. Of the 1220 participants with a live birth, 841 participated in cervical imaging, 1047 contributed data and/or samples on circadian rhythms, and 39 underwent uterine magnetic resonance imaging. Of the 39, 25 underwent electromyometrial imaging. CONCLUSION We demonstrate feasibility of recruiting and retaining a diverse cohort in a complex prospective, longitudinal study throughout pregnancy. The extensive clinical, imaging, survey, and biologic data obtained will be used to explore cervical, uterine, and endocrine physiology of preterm birth and can be used to develop novel approaches to predict and prevent preterm birth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly J. Stout
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Jessica Chubiz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America
| | - Nandini Raghuraman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America
| | - Peinan Zhao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America
| | - Methodius G. Tuuli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America
| | - Lihong V. Wang
- Department of Medical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, United States of America
| | - Alison G. Cahill
- Department of Women’s Health, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America
| | - Phillip S. Cuculich
- Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America
| | - Yong Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America
| | - Emily S. Jungheim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Erik D. Herzog
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America
| | - Justin Fay
- Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States of America
| | - Alan L. Schwartz
- Department of Pediatrics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America
| | - George A. Macones
- Department of Women’s Health, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, United States of America
| | - Sarah K. England
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Frey HA, Stout MJ, Abdelwahab M, Tuuli MG, Woolfolk C, Shamshirsaz AA, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Vaginal progesterone for preterm birth prevention in women with arrested preterm labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2021; 35:8160-8168. [PMID: 34407736 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1963705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We tested the hypothesis that administration of vaginal progesterone in women with arrested preterm labor would result in lower rates of preterm birth <37 weeks compared to placebo. STUDY DESIGN We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled trial comparing vaginal progesterone to placebo in women with arrested preterm labor. Our trial included women with a singleton or twin gestation at 240/7-336/7 weeks' gestation who presented with preterm labor with cervical dilation ≥1 centimeter but remained undelivered. Participants were randomized to receive vaginal progesterone 200 mg daily or an identical placebo. The primary outcome was preterm birth <37 weeks. We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials, including our results. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINHAL, Scopus, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and ClinicalTrials.gov using the key terms to identify relevant trials. The risk of bias was appraised using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Data were synthesized using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using Higgins I2. RESULTS The randomized trial was prematurely terminated due to slow recruitment. There were 18 women randomized to receive vaginal progesterone who had complete follow-up data and 18 women in the placebo group. The risk of preterm birth <37 weeks was not significantly different in the groups (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.63-1.19). Secondary outcomes were also similar. Thirteen trials with 1658 women (835 in the vaginal progesterone and 823 in the control groups) were included in the meta-analysis. Risk of preterm birth <37 weeks was similar in women who received progesterone and those in the control group (pooled RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.83-1.35). Latency was significantly longer among women with arrested preterm labor who received vaginal progesterone (weighted mean difference: 9.2 d, 95% CI 3.2-15.1), but further analysis showed that prolonged latency was only observed in the subgroup of studies that were not placebo-controlled. CONCLUSIONS This randomized controlled trial and meta-analysis do not support the use of vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in women who present in preterm labor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather A Frey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Molly J Stout
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Mahmoud Abdelwahab
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Methodius G Tuuli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Candice Woolfolk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Alireza A Shamshirsaz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - George A Macones
- Department of Women's Health, University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Alison G Cahill
- Department of Women's Health, University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Background: Low-income women are less likely to breastfeed than high-income women. Technology-based interventions demonstrate promise in decreasing health disparities. We assessed whether increased use of breastfeeding smartphone applications (apps) impacts breastfeeding rates for low-income women. Materials and Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized control trial (RCT), including nulliparous, low-income women. Women were randomized to one of two novel apps: control app containing digital breastfeeding handouts and BreastFeeding Friend (BFF), an interactive app containing on-demand breastfeeding educational and video content. App usage was securely tracked. The highest quartile of BFF and control app users were combined and compared to the lowest quartile of app users. The primary outcome was breastfeeding initiation. Secondary outcomes included breastfeeding outcomes and resource preferences through 6 months. Results: In the RCT, BFF and control app median uses were 15 (interquartile range [IQR] 4-24) and 9 (IQR 5-19) (p = 0.1), respectively. Breastfeeding initiation did not differ with app usage (84.1% in highest quartile versus 78.2% for lowest quartile; p = 0.5). Rates of sustained and exclusive breastfeeding through 6 months were similar between groups. Among both groups, smartphone apps were the most preferred breastfeeding resource at 6 weeks. Low quartile users also preferred alternative online breastfeeding resources: >50% of all users preferred technology-based breastfeeding resources. Conclusions: Increased usage of breastfeeding apps did not improve breastfeeding rates among low-income women. However, technology-based resources were the most preferred breastfeeding resource after hospital discharge, indicating ongoing development of technology-based interventions has potential to increase breastfeeding in this high-needs population. clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03167073).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurie B Griffin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Infants Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Julia D López
- Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Megan L Ranney
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - George A Macones
- Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Alison G Cahill
- Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Adam K Lewkowitz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Infants Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to determine the association between mild acidemia (umbilical artery [UA] pH: 7.11-7.19) and neonatal morbidity in neonates at term. STUDY DESIGN This is a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort of women admitted for labor at ≥37 weeks of gestation within a single institution from 2010 to 2015. Universal umbilical cord blood gas assessment was performed and validated. A composite neonatal morbidity index was created including respiratory distress, mechanical ventilation, meconium aspiration syndrome, suspected or confirmed sepsis, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, need for therapeutic hypothermia, seizures and death. The cohort was stratified by UA pH into normal (≥7.20), mild acidemia (7.11-7.19), acidemia (7.00-7.10), and severe acidemia (≤7.00). A subanalysis was also performed where neonates with UA pH between 7.11 and 7.19 were further stratified into two groups (7.11-7.14 and 7.15-7.19) to determine if mildly acidotic infants at the lower end of the pH range were at increased risk of morbidity. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the association between UA pH and neonatal morbidity. RESULTS Among 6,341 participants, 614 (9.7%) had mild acidemia. These infants were more likely to experience morbidity compared with those with normal UA pH (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.14; [1.68-2.73]). Among neonates with mild acidemia, UA pH 7.11 to 7.14 was associated with increased risk of composite neonatal morbidity (aOR: 3.02; [1.89-4.82]), as well as respiratory distress and suspected or confirmed sepsis when compared with UA pH 7.15 to 7.19. CONCLUSION These data demonstrate that term neonates with mild acidemia at birth are at higher odds for short-term morbidity compared with neonates with normal UA pH. Furthermore, among neonates with mild acidemia, those with lower UA pH had worse neonatal outcomes than those with higher UA pH. This suggests that closer evaluation of neonates with UA pH higher than traditionally used could allow for earlier detection of morbidity and possible intervention. KEY POINTS · Neonates with mild acidemia (umbilical artery [UA] pH: 7.11-7.19) demonstrated an increased risk of composite morbidity compared with those with normal UA pH (≥7.20).. · Among neonates with mild acidemia, those with lower UA pH (7.11-7.14) had a greater risk of morbidity compared with those with higher UA pH (7.15-7.19), suggesting a progression of risk of morbidity as UA pH decreases.. · The majority of prior research has focused on severe acidemia (UA pH ≤ 7.00) using outcomes of severe neurologic morbidity and mortality. These data suggest that an increased risk of morbidity exists at higher pH values when more proximal and less severe outcomes are included, such as respiratory distress and neonatal sepsis..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin J Bailey
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Antonina I Frolova
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Julia D López
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Nandini Raghuraman
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - George A Macones
- Department of Women's Health, The University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas
| | - Alison G Cahill
- Department of Women's Health, The University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hughes BL, Clifton RG, Rouse DJ, Saade GR, Dinsmoor MJ, Reddy UM, Pass R, Allard D, Mallett G, Fette LM, Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Varner MW, Goodnight WH, Tita ATN, Costantine MM, Swamy GK, Gibbs RS, Chien EK, Chauhan SP, El-Sayed YY, Casey BM, Parry S, Simhan HN, Napolitano PG, Macones GA. A Trial of Hyperimmune Globulin to Prevent Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:436-444. [PMID: 34320288 PMCID: PMC8363945 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1913569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection during pregnancy carries a risk of congenital infection and possible severe sequelae. There is no established intervention for preventing congenital CMV infection. METHODS In this multicenter, double-blind trial, pregnant women with primary CMV infection diagnosed before 24 weeks' gestation were randomly assigned to receive a monthly infusion of CMV hyperimmune globulin (at a dose of 100 mg per kilogram of body weight) or matching placebo until delivery. The primary outcome was a composite of congenital CMV infection or fetal or neonatal death if CMV testing of the fetus or neonate was not performed. RESULTS From 2012 to 2018, a total of 206,082 pregnant women were screened for primary CMV infection before 23 weeks of gestation; of the 712 participants (0.35%) who tested positive, 399 (56%) underwent randomization. The trial was stopped early for futility. Data on the primary outcome were available for 394 participants; a primary outcome event occurred in the fetus or neonate of 46 of 203 women (22.7%) in the group that received hyperimmune globulin and of 37 of 191 women (19.4%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80 to 1.72; P = 0.42). Death occurred in 4.9% of fetuses or neonates in the hyperimmune globulin group and in 2.6% in the placebo group (relative risk, 1.88; 95% CI, 0.66 to 5.41), preterm birth occurred in 12.2% and 8.3%, respectively (relative risk, 1.47; 95% CI, 0.81 to 2.67), and birth weight below the 5th percentile occurred in 10.3% and 5.4% (relative risk, 1.92; 95% CI, 0.92 to 3.99). One participant in the hyperimmune globulin group had a severe allergic reaction to the first infusion. Participants who received hyperimmune globulin had a higher incidence of headaches and shaking chills while receiving infusions than participants who received placebo. CONCLUSIONS Among pregnant women, administration of CMV hyperimmune globulin starting before 24 weeks' gestation did not result in a lower incidence of a composite of congenital CMV infection or perinatal death than placebo. (Funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01376778.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenna L Hughes
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, RI (B.L.H., D.J.R., D.A.); George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., L.M.F.); the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (G.R.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (B.M.C.); Northwestern University, Chicago (M.J.D., G.M.); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (U.M.R.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (M.W.V.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (W.H.G.), and Duke University, Durham (G.K.S.) - both in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics (R.P.), University of Alabama at Birmingham (A.T.N.T.), Birmingham; Ohio State University, Columbus (M.M.C.), the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.S.G.); Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (E.K.C.); Stanford University, Stanford, CA (Y.Y.E.-S.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.), and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.); Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA (P.G.N.); and Washington University, St. Louis (G.A.M.)
| | - Rebecca G Clifton
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, RI (B.L.H., D.J.R., D.A.); George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., L.M.F.); the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (G.R.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (B.M.C.); Northwestern University, Chicago (M.J.D., G.M.); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (U.M.R.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (M.W.V.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (W.H.G.), and Duke University, Durham (G.K.S.) - both in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics (R.P.), University of Alabama at Birmingham (A.T.N.T.), Birmingham; Ohio State University, Columbus (M.M.C.), the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.S.G.); Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (E.K.C.); Stanford University, Stanford, CA (Y.Y.E.-S.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.), and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.); Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA (P.G.N.); and Washington University, St. Louis (G.A.M.)
| | - Dwight J Rouse
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, RI (B.L.H., D.J.R., D.A.); George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., L.M.F.); the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (G.R.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (B.M.C.); Northwestern University, Chicago (M.J.D., G.M.); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (U.M.R.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (M.W.V.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (W.H.G.), and Duke University, Durham (G.K.S.) - both in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics (R.P.), University of Alabama at Birmingham (A.T.N.T.), Birmingham; Ohio State University, Columbus (M.M.C.), the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.S.G.); Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (E.K.C.); Stanford University, Stanford, CA (Y.Y.E.-S.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.), and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.); Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA (P.G.N.); and Washington University, St. Louis (G.A.M.)
| | - George R Saade
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, RI (B.L.H., D.J.R., D.A.); George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., L.M.F.); the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (G.R.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (B.M.C.); Northwestern University, Chicago (M.J.D., G.M.); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (U.M.R.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (M.W.V.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (W.H.G.), and Duke University, Durham (G.K.S.) - both in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics (R.P.), University of Alabama at Birmingham (A.T.N.T.), Birmingham; Ohio State University, Columbus (M.M.C.), the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.S.G.); Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (E.K.C.); Stanford University, Stanford, CA (Y.Y.E.-S.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.), and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.); Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA (P.G.N.); and Washington University, St. Louis (G.A.M.)
| | - Mara J Dinsmoor
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, RI (B.L.H., D.J.R., D.A.); George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., L.M.F.); the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (G.R.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (B.M.C.); Northwestern University, Chicago (M.J.D., G.M.); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (U.M.R.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (M.W.V.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (W.H.G.), and Duke University, Durham (G.K.S.) - both in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics (R.P.), University of Alabama at Birmingham (A.T.N.T.), Birmingham; Ohio State University, Columbus (M.M.C.), the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.S.G.); Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (E.K.C.); Stanford University, Stanford, CA (Y.Y.E.-S.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.), and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.); Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA (P.G.N.); and Washington University, St. Louis (G.A.M.)
| | - Uma M Reddy
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, RI (B.L.H., D.J.R., D.A.); George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., L.M.F.); the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (G.R.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (B.M.C.); Northwestern University, Chicago (M.J.D., G.M.); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (U.M.R.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (M.W.V.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (W.H.G.), and Duke University, Durham (G.K.S.) - both in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics (R.P.), University of Alabama at Birmingham (A.T.N.T.), Birmingham; Ohio State University, Columbus (M.M.C.), the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.S.G.); Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (E.K.C.); Stanford University, Stanford, CA (Y.Y.E.-S.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.), and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.); Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA (P.G.N.); and Washington University, St. Louis (G.A.M.)
| | - Robert Pass
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, RI (B.L.H., D.J.R., D.A.); George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., L.M.F.); the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (G.R.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (B.M.C.); Northwestern University, Chicago (M.J.D., G.M.); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (U.M.R.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (M.W.V.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (W.H.G.), and Duke University, Durham (G.K.S.) - both in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics (R.P.), University of Alabama at Birmingham (A.T.N.T.), Birmingham; Ohio State University, Columbus (M.M.C.), the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.S.G.); Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (E.K.C.); Stanford University, Stanford, CA (Y.Y.E.-S.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.), and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.); Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA (P.G.N.); and Washington University, St. Louis (G.A.M.)
| | - Donna Allard
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, RI (B.L.H., D.J.R., D.A.); George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., L.M.F.); the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (G.R.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (B.M.C.); Northwestern University, Chicago (M.J.D., G.M.); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (U.M.R.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (M.W.V.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (W.H.G.), and Duke University, Durham (G.K.S.) - both in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics (R.P.), University of Alabama at Birmingham (A.T.N.T.), Birmingham; Ohio State University, Columbus (M.M.C.), the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.S.G.); Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (E.K.C.); Stanford University, Stanford, CA (Y.Y.E.-S.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.), and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.); Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA (P.G.N.); and Washington University, St. Louis (G.A.M.)
| | - Gail Mallett
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, RI (B.L.H., D.J.R., D.A.); George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., L.M.F.); the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (G.R.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (B.M.C.); Northwestern University, Chicago (M.J.D., G.M.); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (U.M.R.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (M.W.V.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (W.H.G.), and Duke University, Durham (G.K.S.) - both in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics (R.P.), University of Alabama at Birmingham (A.T.N.T.), Birmingham; Ohio State University, Columbus (M.M.C.), the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.S.G.); Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (E.K.C.); Stanford University, Stanford, CA (Y.Y.E.-S.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.), and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.); Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA (P.G.N.); and Washington University, St. Louis (G.A.M.)
| | - Lida M Fette
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, RI (B.L.H., D.J.R., D.A.); George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., L.M.F.); the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (G.R.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (B.M.C.); Northwestern University, Chicago (M.J.D., G.M.); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (U.M.R.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (M.W.V.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (W.H.G.), and Duke University, Durham (G.K.S.) - both in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics (R.P.), University of Alabama at Birmingham (A.T.N.T.), Birmingham; Ohio State University, Columbus (M.M.C.), the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.S.G.); Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (E.K.C.); Stanford University, Stanford, CA (Y.Y.E.-S.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.), and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.); Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA (P.G.N.); and Washington University, St. Louis (G.A.M.)
| | - Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, RI (B.L.H., D.J.R., D.A.); George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., L.M.F.); the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (G.R.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (B.M.C.); Northwestern University, Chicago (M.J.D., G.M.); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (U.M.R.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (M.W.V.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (W.H.G.), and Duke University, Durham (G.K.S.) - both in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics (R.P.), University of Alabama at Birmingham (A.T.N.T.), Birmingham; Ohio State University, Columbus (M.M.C.), the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.S.G.); Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (E.K.C.); Stanford University, Stanford, CA (Y.Y.E.-S.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.), and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.); Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA (P.G.N.); and Washington University, St. Louis (G.A.M.)
| | - Michael W Varner
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, RI (B.L.H., D.J.R., D.A.); George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., L.M.F.); the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (G.R.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (B.M.C.); Northwestern University, Chicago (M.J.D., G.M.); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (U.M.R.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (M.W.V.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (W.H.G.), and Duke University, Durham (G.K.S.) - both in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics (R.P.), University of Alabama at Birmingham (A.T.N.T.), Birmingham; Ohio State University, Columbus (M.M.C.), the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.S.G.); Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (E.K.C.); Stanford University, Stanford, CA (Y.Y.E.-S.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.), and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.); Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA (P.G.N.); and Washington University, St. Louis (G.A.M.)
| | - William H Goodnight
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, RI (B.L.H., D.J.R., D.A.); George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., L.M.F.); the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (G.R.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (B.M.C.); Northwestern University, Chicago (M.J.D., G.M.); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (U.M.R.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (M.W.V.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (W.H.G.), and Duke University, Durham (G.K.S.) - both in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics (R.P.), University of Alabama at Birmingham (A.T.N.T.), Birmingham; Ohio State University, Columbus (M.M.C.), the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.S.G.); Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (E.K.C.); Stanford University, Stanford, CA (Y.Y.E.-S.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.), and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.); Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA (P.G.N.); and Washington University, St. Louis (G.A.M.)
| | - Alan T N Tita
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, RI (B.L.H., D.J.R., D.A.); George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., L.M.F.); the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (G.R.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (B.M.C.); Northwestern University, Chicago (M.J.D., G.M.); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (U.M.R.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (M.W.V.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (W.H.G.), and Duke University, Durham (G.K.S.) - both in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics (R.P.), University of Alabama at Birmingham (A.T.N.T.), Birmingham; Ohio State University, Columbus (M.M.C.), the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.S.G.); Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (E.K.C.); Stanford University, Stanford, CA (Y.Y.E.-S.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.), and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.); Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA (P.G.N.); and Washington University, St. Louis (G.A.M.)
| | - Maged M Costantine
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, RI (B.L.H., D.J.R., D.A.); George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., L.M.F.); the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (G.R.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (B.M.C.); Northwestern University, Chicago (M.J.D., G.M.); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (U.M.R.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (M.W.V.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (W.H.G.), and Duke University, Durham (G.K.S.) - both in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics (R.P.), University of Alabama at Birmingham (A.T.N.T.), Birmingham; Ohio State University, Columbus (M.M.C.), the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.S.G.); Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (E.K.C.); Stanford University, Stanford, CA (Y.Y.E.-S.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.), and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.); Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA (P.G.N.); and Washington University, St. Louis (G.A.M.)
| | - Geeta K Swamy
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, RI (B.L.H., D.J.R., D.A.); George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., L.M.F.); the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (G.R.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (B.M.C.); Northwestern University, Chicago (M.J.D., G.M.); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (U.M.R.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (M.W.V.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (W.H.G.), and Duke University, Durham (G.K.S.) - both in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics (R.P.), University of Alabama at Birmingham (A.T.N.T.), Birmingham; Ohio State University, Columbus (M.M.C.), the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.S.G.); Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (E.K.C.); Stanford University, Stanford, CA (Y.Y.E.-S.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.), and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.); Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA (P.G.N.); and Washington University, St. Louis (G.A.M.)
| | - Ronald S Gibbs
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, RI (B.L.H., D.J.R., D.A.); George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., L.M.F.); the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (G.R.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (B.M.C.); Northwestern University, Chicago (M.J.D., G.M.); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (U.M.R.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (M.W.V.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (W.H.G.), and Duke University, Durham (G.K.S.) - both in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics (R.P.), University of Alabama at Birmingham (A.T.N.T.), Birmingham; Ohio State University, Columbus (M.M.C.), the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.S.G.); Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (E.K.C.); Stanford University, Stanford, CA (Y.Y.E.-S.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.), and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.); Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA (P.G.N.); and Washington University, St. Louis (G.A.M.)
| | - Edward K Chien
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, RI (B.L.H., D.J.R., D.A.); George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., L.M.F.); the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (G.R.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (B.M.C.); Northwestern University, Chicago (M.J.D., G.M.); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (U.M.R.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (M.W.V.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (W.H.G.), and Duke University, Durham (G.K.S.) - both in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics (R.P.), University of Alabama at Birmingham (A.T.N.T.), Birmingham; Ohio State University, Columbus (M.M.C.), the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.S.G.); Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (E.K.C.); Stanford University, Stanford, CA (Y.Y.E.-S.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.), and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.); Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA (P.G.N.); and Washington University, St. Louis (G.A.M.)
| | - Suneet P Chauhan
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, RI (B.L.H., D.J.R., D.A.); George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., L.M.F.); the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (G.R.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (B.M.C.); Northwestern University, Chicago (M.J.D., G.M.); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (U.M.R.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (M.W.V.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (W.H.G.), and Duke University, Durham (G.K.S.) - both in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics (R.P.), University of Alabama at Birmingham (A.T.N.T.), Birmingham; Ohio State University, Columbus (M.M.C.), the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.S.G.); Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (E.K.C.); Stanford University, Stanford, CA (Y.Y.E.-S.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.), and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.); Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA (P.G.N.); and Washington University, St. Louis (G.A.M.)
| | - Yasser Y El-Sayed
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, RI (B.L.H., D.J.R., D.A.); George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., L.M.F.); the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (G.R.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (B.M.C.); Northwestern University, Chicago (M.J.D., G.M.); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (U.M.R.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (M.W.V.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (W.H.G.), and Duke University, Durham (G.K.S.) - both in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics (R.P.), University of Alabama at Birmingham (A.T.N.T.), Birmingham; Ohio State University, Columbus (M.M.C.), the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.S.G.); Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (E.K.C.); Stanford University, Stanford, CA (Y.Y.E.-S.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.), and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.); Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA (P.G.N.); and Washington University, St. Louis (G.A.M.)
| | - Brian M Casey
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, RI (B.L.H., D.J.R., D.A.); George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., L.M.F.); the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (G.R.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (B.M.C.); Northwestern University, Chicago (M.J.D., G.M.); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (U.M.R.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (M.W.V.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (W.H.G.), and Duke University, Durham (G.K.S.) - both in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics (R.P.), University of Alabama at Birmingham (A.T.N.T.), Birmingham; Ohio State University, Columbus (M.M.C.), the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.S.G.); Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (E.K.C.); Stanford University, Stanford, CA (Y.Y.E.-S.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.), and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.); Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA (P.G.N.); and Washington University, St. Louis (G.A.M.)
| | - Samuel Parry
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, RI (B.L.H., D.J.R., D.A.); George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., L.M.F.); the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (G.R.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (B.M.C.); Northwestern University, Chicago (M.J.D., G.M.); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (U.M.R.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (M.W.V.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (W.H.G.), and Duke University, Durham (G.K.S.) - both in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics (R.P.), University of Alabama at Birmingham (A.T.N.T.), Birmingham; Ohio State University, Columbus (M.M.C.), the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.S.G.); Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (E.K.C.); Stanford University, Stanford, CA (Y.Y.E.-S.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.), and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.); Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA (P.G.N.); and Washington University, St. Louis (G.A.M.)
| | - Hyagriv N Simhan
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, RI (B.L.H., D.J.R., D.A.); George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., L.M.F.); the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (G.R.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (B.M.C.); Northwestern University, Chicago (M.J.D., G.M.); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (U.M.R.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (M.W.V.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (W.H.G.), and Duke University, Durham (G.K.S.) - both in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics (R.P.), University of Alabama at Birmingham (A.T.N.T.), Birmingham; Ohio State University, Columbus (M.M.C.), the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.S.G.); Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (E.K.C.); Stanford University, Stanford, CA (Y.Y.E.-S.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.), and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.); Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA (P.G.N.); and Washington University, St. Louis (G.A.M.)
| | - Peter G Napolitano
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, RI (B.L.H., D.J.R., D.A.); George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., L.M.F.); the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (G.R.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (B.M.C.); Northwestern University, Chicago (M.J.D., G.M.); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (U.M.R.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (M.W.V.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (W.H.G.), and Duke University, Durham (G.K.S.) - both in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics (R.P.), University of Alabama at Birmingham (A.T.N.T.), Birmingham; Ohio State University, Columbus (M.M.C.), the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.S.G.); Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (E.K.C.); Stanford University, Stanford, CA (Y.Y.E.-S.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.), and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.); Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA (P.G.N.); and Washington University, St. Louis (G.A.M.)
| | - George A Macones
- From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brown University, Providence, RI (B.L.H., D.J.R., D.A.); George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, DC (R.G.C., L.M.F.); the University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (G.R.S.), the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston (S.P.C.), and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (B.M.C.); Northwestern University, Chicago (M.J.D., G.M.); Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD (U.M.R.); Columbia University, New York (C.G.-B.); the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City (M.W.V.); the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill (W.H.G.), and Duke University, Durham (G.K.S.) - both in North Carolina; the Department of Pediatrics (R.P.), University of Alabama at Birmingham (A.T.N.T.), Birmingham; Ohio State University, Columbus (M.M.C.), the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora (R.S.G.); Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland (E.K.C.); Stanford University, Stanford, CA (Y.Y.E.-S.); the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (S.P.), and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (H.N.S.); Madigan Army Medical Center, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA (P.G.N.); and Washington University, St. Louis (G.A.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Metz TD, Clifton RG, Hughes BL, Sandoval G, Saade GR, Grobman WA, Manuck TA, Miodovnik M, Sowles A, Clark K, Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Mendez-Figueroa H, Sehdev HM, Rouse DJ, Tita AT, Bailit J, Costantine MM, Simhan HN, Macones GA. Disease Severity and Perinatal Outcomes of Pregnant Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Obstet Gynecol 2021; 137:571-580. [PMID: 33560778 PMCID: PMC7984765 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000004339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 240] [Impact Index Per Article: 80.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity in pregnant patients and evaluate the association between disease severity and perinatal outcomes. METHODS We conducted an observational cohort study of all pregnant patients with a singleton gestation and a positive test result for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) who delivered at 1 of 33 U.S. hospitals in 14 states from March 1 to July 31, 2020. Disease severity was classified by National Institutes of Health criteria. Maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes were abstracted by centrally trained and certified perinatal research staff. We evaluated trends in maternal characteristics and outcomes across COVID-19 severity classes and associations between severity and outcomes by multivariable modeling. RESULTS A total of 1,219 patients were included: 47% asymptomatic, 27% mild, 14% moderate, 8% severe, 4% critical. Overall, 53% were Hispanic; there was no trend in race-ethnicity distribution by disease severity. Those with more severe illness had older mean age, higher median body mass index, and pre-existing medical comorbidities. Four maternal deaths (0.3%) were attributed to COVID-19. Frequency of perinatal death or a positive neonatal SARS-CoV-2 test result did not differ by severity. Adverse perinatal outcomes were more frequent among patients with more severe illness, including 6% (95% CI 2-11%) incidence of venous thromboembolism among those with severe-critical illness compared with 0.2% in mild-moderate and 0% in asymptomatic (P<.001 for trend across severity). In adjusted analyses, severe-critical COVID-19 was associated with increased risk of cesarean birth (59.6% vs 34.0%, adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.57, 95% CI 1.30-1.90), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (40.4% vs 18.8%, aRR 1.61, 95% CI 1.18-2.20), and preterm birth (41.8% vs 11.9%, aRR 3.53, 95% CI 2.42-5.14) compared with asymptomatic patients. Mild-moderate COVID-19 was not associated with adverse perinatal outcomes compared with asymptomatic patients. CONCLUSION Compared with pregnant patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection without symptoms, those with severe-critical COVID-19, but not those with mild-moderate COVID-19, were at increased risk of perinatal complications.
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to estimate second stage duration and its effects on labor outcomes in obese versus nonobese nulliparous women. STUDY DESIGN This was a secondary analysis of a cohort of nulliparous women who presented for labor at term and reached complete cervical dilation. Adjusted relative risks (aRR) were used to estimate the association between obesity and second stage characteristics, composite neonatal morbidity, and composite maternal morbidity. Effect modification of prolonged second stage on the association between obesity and morbidity was assessed by including an interaction term in the regression model. RESULTS Compared with nonobese, obese women were more likely to have a prolonged second stage (aRR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.18-1.85 for ≥3 hours; aRR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1.18-2.30 for ≥4 hours). Obesity was associated with a higher rate of second stage cesarean (aRR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.34-2.34) and cesarean delivery for fetal distress (aRR: 2.67, 95% CI: 1.18-3.58). Obesity was also associated with increased rates of neonatal (aRR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.05-1.80), but not maternal morbidity (aRR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.90-1.25). Neonatal morbidity risk was not modified by prolonged second stage. CONCLUSION Obesity is associated with increased risk of neonatal morbidity, which is not modified by prolonged second stage of labor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonina I. Frolova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Nandini Raghuraman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Molly J. Stout
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Methodius G. Tuuli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - George A. Macones
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Alison G. Cahill
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lewkowitz AK, Tuuli MG, Cahill AG, Macones GA, Dicke JM. Perinatal outcomes after intrauterine growth restriction and umbilical artery Doppler pulsatility index of less than the fifth percentile. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2021; 34:677-682. [PMID: 31032682 PMCID: PMC6856425 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1612871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2018] [Accepted: 04/25/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To analyze perinatal morbidity and stillbirth after intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) with an umbilical artery Doppler pulsatility index (UA PI) less than the fifth centile.Study design: This retrospective cohort study included nonanomalous singleton, IUGR pregnancies receiving UA PI testing at a tertiary-care prenatal diagnostic center. Women with persistently elevated UA PI, absent or reversed end-diastolic flow on UA PI, or who had only one UA PI result were excluded. Low UA PI was defined as having ≥1 UA PI <5%. Women with low UA PI were matched by gestational age at IUGR diagnosis in a random 1 case: 4 control computer-generated algorithm to those with normal UA PI (≤95% and ≥5%). The primary outcome was composite neonatal morbidity and mortality (stillbirth, mechanical ventilation, sepsis, intraventricular hemorrhage, and necrotizing enterocolitis). Secondary outcomes included 5-minute Apgar, umbilical artery pH, delivery type, and interval from IUGR diagnosis to delivery. We compared outcomes after low UA PI to those after normal UA PI with multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for gestational age at delivery, betamethasone use, infant gender, and maternal factors.Results: Of the 1893 IUGR pregnancies, 25 (1.3%) had low UA PI <5% and were randomly matched via computer algorithm to 100 controls. There were no stillbirths in either group; the odds of composite neonatal morbidity was similar among IUGR pregnancies with UA PI <5% versus normal (adjusted odds ratio 0.89 (95% confidence interval 0.27-2.75)). There was no difference in 5-minute Apgars, umbilical artery pH, rate of cesarean delivery for fetal distress, or interval from IUGR diagnosis to delivery between the two groups.Conclusion: Among IUGR pregnancies, UA PI <5% is uncommon and not associated with improved neonatal outcomes compared to normal UA PI. These findings suggest low UA PI can continue to be managed as normal UA PI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam K Lewkowitz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Methodius G Tuuli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Alison G Cahill
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - George A Macones
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jeffrey M Dicke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Watkins VY, Frolova AI, Stout MJ, Carter EB, Macones GA, Cahill AG, Raghuraman N. The relationship between maternal anemia and umbilical cord oxygen content at delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2021; 3:100270. [PMID: 33451626 PMCID: PMC7811574 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Revised: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anemia is one of the most commonly diagnosed comorbidities in pregnancy and is known to increase the risk of obstetrical complications. However, little is known about the effect of anemia on placental oxygen transfer and fetal oxygenation. OBJECTIVE This study examined the relationship between maternal anemia and fetal oxygenation status at delivery as measured by umbilical cord partial pressure of oxygen. STUDY DESIGN This is a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of singleton term deliveries with universal admission complete blood count and umbilical cord gases between 2010 and 2014. Maternal anemia was defined as hemoglobin of ≤10 g/dL on admission. The primary outcomes were umbilical artery and vein partial pressure of oxygen; the secondary outcomes were acidemia (umbilical artery pH of <7.1), hypoxemia (umbilical artery or umbilical vein partial pressure of oxygen at the <5th percentile), and hyperoxemia (umbilical artery/umbilical vein partial pressure of oxygen at the >90th percentile). Outcomes were compared between patients with and without anemia. RESULTS Maternal anemia was associated with a significantly higher umbilical artery partial pressure of oxygen (median [interquartile range], 20 [16-24] vs 19 [15-24] mm Hg; P=.01) and umbilical vein partial pressure of oxygen (median [interquartile range], 30 [25-36] vs 29 [23-34] mm Hg; P<.01). Neonates born to anemic mothers were more likely to have umbilical vein hyperoxemia (15.7% vs 10.9%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-1.81) with no difference in umbilical artery hyperoxemia. There was no difference in the rates of umbilical artery or umbilical vein hypoxemia. Although maternal anemia was associated with a significant difference in umbilical artery pH (7.28±0.060 vs 7.27±0.065; P<.01), there was no difference in the rate of neonatal acidemia between groups (1.6% vs 1.9%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-1.55). CONCLUSION Umbilical cord oxygen content is higher in anemic mothers. Maternal anemia may lead to adaptations in maternal, placental, and fetal physiology, allowing for easier unloading of oxygen to the placenta and increased oxygen transfer to the fetus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginia Y Watkins
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
| | - Antonina I Frolova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Molly J Stout
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Ebony B Carter
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - George A Macones
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | - Alison G Cahill
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | - Nandini Raghuraman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lewkowitz AK, López JD, Werner EF, Ranney ML, Macones GA, Rouse DJ, Savitz DA, Cahill AG. Effect of a Novel Smartphone Application on Breastfeeding Rates Among Low-Income, First-Time Mothers Intending to Exclusively Breastfeed: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Breastfeed Med 2021; 16:59-67. [PMID: 33085510 PMCID: PMC7826429 DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2020.0240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To examine the effect of a novel smartphone application (app)-BreastFeeding Friend (BFF)-on breastfeeding rates among low-income first-time mothers planning exclusive breastfeeding. Methods: A recent randomized controlled trial (RCT) randomized low-income first-time mothers to BFF or control app. BFF contained breastfeeding education and videos. The control app contained digital breastfeeding handouts. Outcomes included breastfeeding rates until 6 months postpartum and patient-reported best breastfeeding resource. After enrollment, nearly half the participants reported planning formula feeding after breastfeeding initiation, potentially confounding the RCT results. In this secondary analysis, women planning formula feeding were excluded. Outcomes between study groups were compared by intent-to-treat. Results: Of the original 170 participants, 41 in BFF and 46 in control group planned exclusively breastfeeding and were included. Exclusive breastfeeding rates were similar from 2 days postpartum (BFF: n = 19 [48.7%] versus control app: n = 21 [46.7%]; relative risk [RR] = 1.04, 95% confidence interval, CI = 0.67-1.63]) until 6 months postpartum. At 6 weeks postpartum, the majority of BFF users (n = 23 [62.2%]) believed an app provided the best breastfeeding support compared with 39% of control app users (n = 16; RR = 1.59 [95% CI = 1.01-2.52]). BFF users were 2.5 times more likely to deny having breastfeeding challenges compared with control app users (n = 12 [42.9%] versus n = 6 [16.7%]; RR = 2.57 [95% CI = 1.10-6.00]). Conclusion: BFF reduced self-reported breastfeeding challenges and was perceived as the best breastfeeding resource at home but did not increase breastfeeding rates among low-income first-time mothers desiring to exclusively breastfeed. BFF shows promise but must be further optimized to ultimately impact breastfeeding rates. Trial Identification Number: NCT03167073.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam K. Lewkowitz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Julia D. López
- Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Erika F. Werner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Megan L. Ranney
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - George A. Macones
- Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Dwight J. Rouse
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - David A. Savitz
- Department of Epidemiology, Brown School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Alison G. Cahill
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Bruno AM, Rosenbloom JI, Woolfolk C, Conner SN, Tuuli MG, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Neonatal outcomes after percutaneous umbilical cord blood sampling †. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2020; 33:3984-3989. [PMID: 30905236 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1593960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: While percutaneous umbilical cord blood sampling (PUBS) and intrauterine transfusion (IUT) are the standards of care for the management of significant fetal anemia, the neonatal complications resultant from these procedures remain poorly understood. Thus, we aimed to compare neonatal outcomes of the patients undergoing percutaneous umbilical cord blood sampling (PUBS) for intrauterine transfusion (IUT) to gestational age- and sex-matched controls with no indication for and not undergoing PUBS.Methods: This was a retrospective matched cohort study at a single institution from 2000 to 2017. Clinical and demographic data were abstracted from the medical record of patients undergoing PUBS. Neonatal outcomes from pregnancies undergoing PUBS for suspected fetal anemia and from randomly selected gestational age- and sex-matched controls were collected. Neonatal outcomes were compared using matched pairs analysis.Results: There were 64 patients who underwent a total of 178 PUBS with 157 IUT. The most common etiology of fetal anemia was anti-D alloimmunization. On an average, patients undergoing PUBS underwent two procedures (IQR 1,4). There were available neonatal outcomes in 40 patients. The median gestational age at delivery was 34 weeks in both neonates who underwent PUBS and controls. In matched pairs analysis, neonates who underwent PUBS were at higher risk for neonatal complications compared to control neonates (92.5 vs. 55%, OR 4.5, 95% CI 4.5, ∞) . Specifically, neonates who underwent PUBS were more likely to experience respiratory complications compared to controls despite a higher uptake of antenatal corticosteroids.Conclusions: We found that neonates who underwent PUBS experience a higher occurrence of complications which does not appear to be secondary to prematurity alone. Despite higher uptake of antenatal corticosteroids in neonates who underwent PUBS as compared to control neonates, neonates who underwent PUBS had a higher risk of respiratory complications. This study can help to inform patients undergoing PUBS/IUT on the anticipated neonatal outcomes and anticipate needed neonatology resources. While PUBS/IUT is the best treatment known to date for management of fetal anemia, our study highlights the need for further research into the subsequent neonatal complications and how to prevent them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann M Bruno
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Joshua I Rosenbloom
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Candice Woolfolk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Shayna N Conner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Methodius G Tuuli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - George A Macones
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Alison G Cahill
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Frolova AI, Stout MJ, Carter EB, Macones GA, Cahill AG, Raghuraman N. Internal fetal and uterine monitoring in obese patients and maternal obstetrical outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2020; 3:100282. [PMID: 33451595 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2020] [Revised: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The maternal habitus in the setting of obesity makes external monitoring of the fetal heart rate and contractions suboptimal, and internal monitors may be utilized more often in this population. Obesity is a risk factor for obstetrical infectious complications, but it is unknown whether the use of internal monitors in this population is associated with additional risks. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the association between the use of an intrauterine pressure catheter and a fetal scalp electrode and maternal infectious morbidity among women with obesity. STUDY DESIGN This secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study included women with singleton gestations admitted for labor at ≥37 weeks' gestation at a tertiary care institution from 2010 to 2014. Obesity was defined as a body mass index of ≥30 kg/m2. The primary outcome was a composite maternal infectious morbidity, which included peripartum maternal fever, chorioamnionitis, and endomyometritis. Secondary outcomes were cesarean delivery and individual components of the maternal infectious composite. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare the rates of infectious maternal morbidity, cesarean delivery, or operative vaginal delivery between patients with and without internal monitors, while adjusting for the confounders. An interaction term was included in the logistic regression models to test whether the relationship between the internal monitors and cesarean delivery or infectious morbidity was modified by the presence or absence of obesity. RESULTS Of the 8482 women who met the inclusion criteria for the study, 4727 (55.7%) had obesity and 3755 (44.3%) did not have obesity. The women with obesity were more likely to have internal monitors placed during labor than those without obesity (65.4% vs 50.5%; P<.001). The use of internal monitors was associated with an increased risk for the composite maternal infectious morbidity (9.9% vs 4.1%; P<.01 and adjusted odds ratio, 2.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.70-2.55). Women with obesity had a weaker association between the use of internal monitors and maternal infectious morbidity than women without obesity (P value for interaction of .02). The incidence of cesarean delivery was also significantly higher among women who had internal monitors placed during their labor course (adjusted odds ratio, 2.84; 95% confidence interval, 2.46-3.28), and this interaction was not modified by obesity. CONCLUSION Although a higher proportion of women with obesity have internal monitors placed during their labor course, they are not more susceptible to maternal infectious morbidity as a result of internal monitor use. Providers should not limit the necessary internal monitor use in women with obesity on the basis of concerns for maternal infectious morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonina I Frolova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
| | - Molly J Stout
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Ebony B Carter
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - George A Macones
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | - Alison G Cahill
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX
| | - Nandini Raghuraman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Paidas MJ, Tita ATN, Macones GA, Saade GA, Ehrenkranz RA, Triche EW, Streisand JB, Lam GK, Magann EF, Lewis DF, Dombrowski MP, Werner EF, Branch DW, Habli MA, Grotegut CA, Silver RM, Longo SA, Amon E, Cleary KL, How HY, Novotny SR, Grobman WA, Whiteman VE, Wing DA, Scifres CM, Sibai BM. Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of the Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Efficacy of Recombinant Antithrombin Versus Placebo in Preterm Preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 223:739.e1-739.e13. [PMID: 32780999 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Revised: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite expectant management, preeclampsia remote from term usually results in preterm delivery. Antithrombin, which displays antiinflammatory and anticoagulant properties, may have a therapeutic role in treating preterm preeclampsia, a disorder characterized by endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and activation of the coagulation system. OBJECTIVE This randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial aimed to evaluate whether intravenous recombinant human antithrombin could prolong gestation and therefore improve maternal and fetal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN We performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at 23 hospitals. Women were eligible if they had a singleton pregnancy, early-onset or superimposed preeclampsia at 23 0/7 to 30 0/7 weeks' gestation, and planned expectant management. In addition to standard therapy, patients were randomized to receive either recombinant human antithrombin 250 mg loading dose followed by a continuous infusion of 2000 mg per 24 hours or an identical saline infusion until delivery. The primary outcome was days gained from randomization until delivery. The secondary outcome was composite neonatal morbidity score. A total of 120 women were randomized. RESULTS There was no difference in median gestational age at enrollment (27.3 weeks' gestation for the recombinant human antithrombin group [range, 23.1-30.0] and 27.6 weeks' gestation for the placebo group [range, 23.0-30.0]; P=.67). There were no differences in median increase in days gained (5.0 in the recombinant human antithrombin group [range, 0-75] and 6.0 for the placebo group [range, 0-85]; P=.95). There were no differences between groups in composite neonatal morbidity scores or in maternal complications. No safety issues related to recombinant human antithrombin were noted in this study, despite the achievement of supraphysiological antithrombin concentrations. CONCLUSION The administration of recombinant human antithrombin in preterm preeclampsia neither prolonged pregnancy nor improved neonatal or maternal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Allan T N Tita
- University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Garrett K Lam
- University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Memphis, TN
| | | | - David F Lewis
- University of South Alabama Children's and Women's Hospital, Mobile, AL
| | | | - Erika F Werner
- Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Erol Amon
- St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Baha M Sibai
- University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Tuuli MG, Liu J, Tita ATN, Longo S, Trudell A, Carter EB, Shanks A, Woolfolk C, Caughey AB, Warren DK, Odibo AO, Colditz G, Macones GA, Harper L. Effect of Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Standard Wound Dressing on Surgical-Site Infection in Obese Women After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2020; 324:1180-1189. [PMID: 32960242 PMCID: PMC7509615 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.13361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Obesity increases the risk of both cesarean delivery and surgical-site infection. Despite widespread use, it is unclear whether prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy reduces surgical-site infection after cesarean delivery in obese women. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy, initiated immediately after cesarean delivery, lowers the risk of surgical-site infections compared with standard wound dressing in obese women. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Multicenter randomized trial conducted from February 8, 2017, through November 13, 2019, at 4 academic and 2 community hospitals across the United States. Obese women undergoing planned or unplanned cesarean delivery were eligible. The study was terminated after 1624 of 2850 participants were recruited when a planned interim analysis showed increased adverse events in the negative pressure group and futility for the primary outcome. Final follow-up was December 18, 2019. INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomly assigned to either undergo prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy, with application of the negative pressure device immediately after repair of the surgical incision (n = 816), or receive standard wound dressing (n = 808). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was superficial or deep surgical-site infection according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions. Secondary outcomes included other wound complications, composite of surgical-site infections and other wound complications, and adverse skin reactions. RESULTS Of the 1624 women randomized (mean age, 30.4 years, mean body mass index, 39.5), 1608 (99%) completed the study: 806 in the negative pressure group (median duration of negative pressure, 4 days) and 802 in the standard dressing group. Superficial or deep surgical-site infection was diagnosed in 29 participants (3.6%) in the negative pressure group and 27 (3.4%) in the standard dressing group (difference, 0.36%; 95% CI, -1.46% to 2.19%, P = .70). Of 30 prespecified secondary end points, 25 showed no significant differences, including other wound complications (2.6% vs 3.1%; difference, -0.53%; 95% CI, -1.93% to 0.88%; P = .46) and composite of surgical-site infections and other wound complications (6.5% vs 6.7%; difference, -0.27%; 95% CI, -2.71% to 2.25%; P = .83). Adverse skin reactions were significantly more frequent in the negative pressure group (7.0% vs 0.6%; difference, 6.95%; 95% CI, 1.86% to 12.03%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among obese women undergoing cesarean delivery, prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy, compared with standard wound dressing, did not significantly reduce the risk of surgical-site infection. These findings do not support routine use of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in obese women after cesarean delivery. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03009110.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Methodius G Tuuli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - Jingxia Liu
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, Missouri
| | - Alan T N Tita
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham
| | - Sherri Longo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ochsner Health, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Amanda Trudell
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, BJC Medical Group St Louis, Missouri
| | - Ebony B Carter
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Anthony Shanks
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - Candice Woolfolk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Aaron B Caughey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - David K Warren
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, Missouri
| | - Anthony O Odibo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Florida School of Medicine, Tampa
| | - Graham Colditz
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, Missouri
| | - George A Macones
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dell School of Medicine, University of Texas at Austin
| | - Lorie Harper
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Watkins VY, Martin S, Macones GA, Tuuli MG, Cahill AG, Raghuraman N. The duration of intrapartum supplemental oxygen administration and umbilical cord oxygen content. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 223:440.e1-440.e7. [PMID: 32497605 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Revised: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maternal oxygen (O2) administration is a commonly performed intrauterine resuscitation technique though to improve fetal oxygenation. However, hyperoxygenation is known to be harmful in both neonates and adults. Currently, there are no formal recommendations on whether a certain dose or duration of O2 may be most helpful in improving umbilical cord gases or neonatal outcomes. OBJECTIVE We tested the hypothesis that prolonged supplemental O2 exposure during labor is associated with increased umbilical cord O2 concentrations. STUDY DESIGN This was a planned secondary analysis of a randomized noninferiority trial comparing O2 with room air in laboring patients. Patients were randomized to receive either 10 L/min O2 or room air at any point during active labor when they developed a category II fetal heart tracing that would otherwise require resuscitation. The primary outcome variable for this analysis was partial pressure of O2 in the umbilical vein. The secondary outcome variable was partial pressure of O2 in the umbilical artery. These outcome variables were compared between patients with short durations of O2 exposure and those with long durations of O2 exposure, defined as <75th percentile and ≥75th percentile of duration, respectively. The outcomes were also compared among the groups that received room air, O2 for short durations, and O2 for long durations. RESULTS Among the 99 patients with paired and validated cord gases who were included in this analysis, the partial pressure of O2 in the umbilical vein was significantly lower in patients who received O2 supplementation for longer durations than in those who received O2 for shorter durations (median interquartile range 25.5 [21.5-33] vs 32.5 [26.5-37.5] mm Hg; P<.03). There was no difference in the partial pressure of O2 in the umbilical artery or other cord gases between the short and long duration O2 supplementation groups. Other methods of intrauterine resuscitation were similar between the short and long duration O2 supplementation groups. There was no difference in the partial pressure of O2 in the umbilical artery or in the umbilical vein when the room air, short duration O2 supplementation, and long duration O2 supplementation groups were compared. CONCLUSION Longer durations of O2 exposure are not associated with a higher partial pressure of O2 in the umbilical cord. In fact, patients with longer durations of O2 exposure had lower partial pressure of O2 in the umbilical vein, suggesting impaired placental O2 transfer with prolonged O2 exposure.
Collapse
|
37
|
Perez MJ, Chang JJ, Temming LA, Carter EB, López JD, Tuuli MG, Macones GA, Stout MJ. Driving Factors of Preterm Birth Risk in Adolescents. AJP Rep 2020; 10:e247-e252. [PMID: 33094012 PMCID: PMC7571551 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2019] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective We examined rates of spontaneous and indicated preterm births (S-PTB and I-PTB, respectively) and clinical risk factors for PTB in adolescents. Study Design This is a population-based, retrospective cohort using 2012 U.S. natality data of nulliparous women who delivered a nonanomalous singleton birth between 20 and 42 weeks' gestation. Maternal age included <16, 16 to 19.9, and ≥20 years. Rates of total, S-PTB, and I-PTB were compared across age groups. Multinomial logistic regression tested clinical risk factors for S-PTB. Results In 1,342,776 pregnancies, adolescents were at higher risk for PTB than adults. The rate of total PTB was highest in young adolescents at 10.6%, decreased to 8.3% in older adolescents, and 7.8% in adults. The proportion of S-PTB was highest in the youngest adolescents and decreased toward adulthood; the proportion of I-PTB remained stable across age groups. Risk factors for S-PTB in adolescents included Asian race, underweight body mass index (BMI), and poor gestational weight gain (GWG). In all age groups, carrying a male fetus showed a significant increased S-PTB, and Women, Infants, and Children's (WIC) participation was associated with a significantly decreased risk. Conclusion The higher risk for PTB in adolescents is driven by an increased risk for S-PTB. Low BMI and poor GWG may be potentially modifiable risk factors. Condensation Adolescents have a higher risk for spontaneous PTB than adult women, and risk factors for spontaneous PTB may differ in adolescents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta J. Perez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jen J. Chang
- Department of Epidemiology, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Lorene A. Temming
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Atrium Health Women's Institute, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Ebony B. Carter
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Julia D. López
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Methodius G. Tuuli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - George A. Macones
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Molly J. Stout
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) is intended to assess fetal well-being during labor. Our objective was to test the hypothesis that findings of a category I tracing at any time in the 60 minutes prior to delivery would rule out neonatal acidemia. STUDY DESIGN This was a planned secondary analysis of a single-center prospective cohort study of 8,580 singleton pregnancies undergoing labor with nonanomalous infants at term. Monitoring was reviewed by obstetric research nurses at 10-minute intervals in the 60 minutes prior to delivery. The primary outcome was acidemia, defined as an umbilical cord arterial pH of 7.10 or less. RESULTS Of the 4,274 patients included, 42 (0.98%) infants had acidemia at birth. Of the 42 infants with acidemia, 13 (31%) had category I tracings in the 30 minutes prior to delivery. Three (7%) infants had neonatal acidemia despite category I tracing for >40 minutes in the 60 minutes prior to delivery. CONCLUSION Even in the presence of category I tracing in the 60 minutes prior to delivery, neonatal acidemia can still occur. Periods of category I should be interpreted within the clinical context of a priori risk for acidemia, knowing that it does not completely rule out acidemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann M Bruno
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Julia D López
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Molly J Stout
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Methodius G Tuuli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - George A Macones
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Alison G Cahill
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Rosenbloom JI, Lewkowitz AK, Sondgeroth KE, Hudson JL, Macones GA, Cahill AG, Tuuli MG, Chang SH. Antenatal corticosteroid administration in late-preterm gestations: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2020; 33:2109-2115. [PMID: 30353764 PMCID: PMC6520203 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1540582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2018] [Revised: 10/13/2018] [Accepted: 10/22/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate whether administration of antenatal late-preterm betamethasone is cost-effective in the immediate neonatal period.Study design: Cost-effectiveness analysis of late-preterm betamethasone administration with a time horizon of 7.5 days was conducted using a health-system perspective. Data for neonatal outcomes, including respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN), and hypoglycemia, were from the Antenatal Betamethasone for Women at Risk for Late-Preterm Delivery trial. Cost data were derived from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project from the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality, and utilities of neonatal outcomes were from the literature. Outcomes were total costs in 2017 United States dollars and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for each individual infant as well as for a theoretical cohort of the 270 000 late-preterm infants born in 2015 in the USA.Results: For an individual patient, compared to withholding betamethasone, administering betamethasone incurred a higher total cost ($6592 versus $6265) and marginally lower QALYs (0.02002 QALYS versus 0.02006 QALYs) within the studied time horizon. For the theoretical cohort of 270 000 patients, administration of betamethasone was $88 million more expensive ($1780 million versus $1692 million) with lower QALYs (5402 QALYs versus 5416 QALYs), compared to withholding betamethasone. For administration of betamethasone to be cost-effective, the rate of hypoglycemia, RDS, or TTN among late-preterm infants receiving betamethasone would need to be less than 20.0, 4.5, and 2.4%, respectively.Conclusion: Administration of betamethasone in the late-preterm period is likely not cost-effective in the short-term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua I. Rosenbloom
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Adam K. Lewkowitz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Kristina E. Sondgeroth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Jessica L. Hudson
- Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - George A. Macones
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Alison G. Cahill
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Methodius G. Tuuli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Su-Hsin Chang
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Nelson G, Wilson RD, Macones GA. Guideline for perioperative obstetrical care highlights evidence gap related to timing of urinary catheter removal after elective cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 222:635. [PMID: 31981508 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
41
|
Affiliation(s)
- Jeny Ghartey
- Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas, Austin, TX
| | - George A Macones
- Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas, Austin, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Lewkowitz AK, López JD, Carter EB, Duckham H, Strickland T, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Impact of a novel smartphone application on low-income, first-time mothers' breastfeeding rates: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2020; 2:100143. [PMID: 33345878 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Revised: 05/09/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low-income women are less likely to exclusively breastfeed at postpartum day 2 compared with high-income women, but focus groups of low-income women have suggested that on-demand videos on breastfeeding and infant behavior would support exclusive breastfeeding beyond postpartum day 2. Smartphone applications provide on-demand video. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine whether a novel smartphone application-Breastfeeding Friend-increases breastfeeding rates for low-income, first-time mothers. STUDY DESIGN This double-blinded randomized trial recruited low-income, first-time mothers at 36 weeks' gestation. Consenting women received a complimentary Android smartphone and internet service before 1:1 randomization to Breastfeeding Friend or a control smartphone application. Breastfeeding Friend was created by a multidisciplinary team of perinatologists, neonatologists, lactation consultants, and a middle school teacher and was refined by end-user focus groups. Breastfeeding Friend contained on-demand education and videos on breastfeeding and newborn behavior, tailored to a fifth-grade reading level. The control smartphone application contained digital breastfeeding handouts. The primary outcome was exclusive breastfeeding at postpartum day 2; secondary outcomes were breastfeeding rates until 6 months postpartum and patient-reported best breastfeeding resource. Primary statistical analyses compared outcomes between study groups through intention-to-treat analysis; prespecified secondary analyses did so per protocol. A total of 170 women (85 per arm) were needed to determine whether Breastfeeding Friend increased exclusive breastfeeding at postpartum day 2 from 34% (known baseline) to 56%. RESULTS A total of 253 women were approached; 170 women enrolled. Most participants were black, with more than half reporting annual household incomes of less than $25,000. Exclusive breastfeeding rates at postpartum day 2 were low and similar among Breastfeeding Friend and control smartphone application users (n=30 [36.6%] vs n=30 [35.7%]; relative risk, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.068-1.53). Breastfeeding rates until 6 months postpartum were also similar between study groups: the rate of exclusive breastfeeding was 8.3% (n=5) and 10.4% (n=7) in the Breastfeeding Friend and control smartphone application groups, respectively (relative risk, 0.8; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-2.38). At 6 weeks postpartum, most Breastfeeding Friend smartphone application users (n=34 [52.3%]) rated their smartphone application as providing the best breastfeeding support. Excluding women who did not use their study smartphone application (Breastfeeding Friend, n=18 [21.4%]; control smartphone application, n=9 [10.6%]) did not affect outcomes. CONCLUSION Neither of the smartphone applications improved breastfeeding rates among low-income, first-time mothers above the known baseline rates, despite user perception that Breastfeeding Friend was the best breastfeeding resource at 6 weeks postpartum. By demonstrating the feasibility of smartphone application-based interventions within a particularly high-needs population, our research supports efforts in obstetrics to examine whether mobile health improves peripartum health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam K Lewkowitz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, RI.
| | - Julia D López
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Ebony B Carter
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Hillary Duckham
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Tianta Strickland
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - George A Macones
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO; Department of Women's Health, University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, TX
| | - Alison G Cahill
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Zahedi-Spung LD, Carter EB, López J, Woolfolk C, Macones GA, Stout M. What role should maternal-fetal medicine physicians play in the era of abortion restriction? Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2020; 2:100126. [PMID: 33345872 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Revised: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
In 2019, a total of 25 abortion bans were signed into law by states in the Southeast and Midwest. As of May 2019, 33 states have passed laws restricting or limiting abortion services, including "trigger laws" that make abortion illegal in the event that Roe v. Wade is overturned. In addition, 9 states have passed extreme abortion laws, such as making abortion illegal early in gestation (as early as 6-8 weeks' gestation), which are all currently enjoined and not in effect. The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and Society of Family Planning agree that access to abortion is essential to women's health and oppose legislation that directly affects the patient-physician relationship. It is time for maternal-fetal medicine physicians to play a more active role in the fight for abortion access. A 2012 study of maternal-fetal medicine physicians found only 31% of respondents performed dilation and evacuation for termination of pregnancies, predominantly based on whether the provider was trained in dilation and evacuation procedures during fellowship. We performed a 2018 survey of all maternal-fetal medicine fellows and program directors and found that more than two-thirds (62 of 90 [68.9%]) of fellows desire dilation and evacuation training; however, only 9 of 39 (23.1%) program directors believe dilation and evacuation training should be required. The maternal-fetal medicine community is well positioned to improve access to abortion services in the United States by prioritizing dilation and evacuation training for fellows and actively participating in reproductive health advocacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leilah D Zahedi-Spung
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
| | - Ebony B Carter
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Julia López
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Candice Woolfolk
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - George A Macones
- Dell School of Medicine, University of Texas in Austin, Austin, TX
| | - Molly Stout
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Rosenbloom JI, Woolfolk CL, Wan L, Stout MJ, Tuuli MG, Macones GA, Cahill AG. The Transition From Latent to Active Labor and Adverse Obstetrical Outcomes. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2020. [DOI: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000659592.26151.b6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
45
|
Grobman WA, Sandoval G, Reddy UM, Tita AT, Silver RM, Mallett G, Hill K, Rice MM, El-Sayed YY, Wapner RJ, Rouse DJ, Saade GR, Thorp JM, Chauhan SP, Iams JD, Chien EK, Casey BM, Gibbs RS, Srinivas SK, Swamy GK, Simhan HN, Macones GA, Peaceman A, Plunkett B, Paycheck K, Dinsmoor M, Harris S, Sheppard J, Biggio J, Harper L, Longo S, Servay C, Varner M, Sowles A, Coleman K, Atkinson D, Stratford J, Dellermann S, Meadows C, Esplin S, Martin C, Peterson K, Stradling S, Willson C, Lyell D, Girsen A, Knapp R, Gyamfi C, Bousleiman S, Perez-Delboy A, Talucci M, Carmona V, Plante L, Tocci C, Leopanto B, Hoffman M, Dill-Grant L, Palomares K, Otarola S, Skupski D, Chan R, Allard D, Gelsomino T, Rousseau J, Beati L, Milano J, Werner E, Salazar A, Costantine M, Chiossi G, Pacheco L, Saad A, Munn M, Jain S, Clark S, Clark K, Boggess K, Timlin S, Eichelberger K, Moore A, Beamon C, Byers H, Ortiz F, Garcia L, Sibai B, Bartholomew A, Buhimschi C, Landon M, Johnson F, Webb L, McKenna D, Fennig K, Snow K, Habli M, McClellan M, Lindeman C, Dalton W, Hackney D, Cozart H, Mayle A, Mercer B, Moseley L, Gerald J, Fay-Randall L, Garcia M, Sias A, Price J, Hale K, Phipers J, Heyborne K, Craig J, Parry S, Sehdev H, Bishop T, Ferrara J, Bickus M, Caritis S, Thom E, Doherty L, de Voest J. Health resource utilization of labor induction versus expectant management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 222:369.e1-369.e11. [PMID: 31930993 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2019] [Revised: 11/26/2019] [Accepted: 01/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although induction of labor of low-risk nulliparous women at 39 weeks reduces the risk of cesarean delivery compared with expectant management, concern regarding more frequent use of labor induction remains, given that this intervention historically has been thought to incur greater resource utilization. OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to determine whether planned elective labor induction at 39 weeks among low-risk nulliparous women, compared with expectant management, was associated with differences in health care resource utilization from the time of randomization through 8 weeks postpartum. STUDY DESIGN This is a planned secondary analysis of a multicenter randomized trial in which low-risk nulliparous women were assigned to induction of labor at 39 weeks or expectant management. We assessed resource utilization after randomization in 3 time periods: antepartum, delivery admission, and discharge through 8 weeks postpartum. RESULTS Of 6096 women with data available, those in the induction of labor group (n = 3059) were significantly less likely in the antepartum period after randomization to have at least 1 ambulatory visit for routine prenatal care (32.4% vs 68.4%), unanticipated care (0.5% vs 2.6%), or urgent care (16.2% vs 44.3%), or at least 1 antepartum hospitalization (0.8% vs 2.2%, P < .001 for all). They also had fewer tests (eg, sonograms, blood tests) and treatments (eg, antibiotics, intravenous hydration) prior to delivery. During the delivery admission, women in the induction of labor group spent a longer time in labor and delivery (median, 0.83 vs 0.57 days), but both women (P = .002) and their neonates (P < .001) had shorter postpartum stays. Women and neonates in both groups had similar frequencies of postpartum urgent care and hospital readmissions (P > .05 for all). CONCLUSION Women randomized to induction of labor had longer durations in labor and delivery but significantly fewer antepartum visits, tests, and treatments and shorter maternal and neonatal hospital durations after delivery. These results demonstrate that the health outcome advantages associated with induction of labor are gained without incurring uniformly greater health care resource use.
Collapse
|
46
|
Lewkowitz AK, Rosenbloom JI, López JD, Keller M, Macones GA, Olsen MA, Cahill AG. Association Between Stillbirth at 23 Weeks of Gestation or Greater and Severe Maternal Morbidity. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 134:964-973. [PMID: 31599829 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000003528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate whether stillbirth at 23 weeks of gestation or more is associated with increased risk of severe maternal morbidity compared with live birth, when stratified by maternal comorbidities. METHODS This retrospective cohort study used International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis and procedure codes within the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Florida State Inpatient Database. The first delivery of female Florida residents aged 13-54 years old from 2005 to 2014 was included. The exposure was an ICD-9-CM code of stillbirth at 23 weeks of gestation or more; the control was an ICD-9-CM code of singleton live birth. Deliveries were stratified by the presence of 1 or more conditions within a well-validated maternal morbidity composite using ICD-9-CM codes during delivery hospitalization. The primary outcome was an ICD-9-CM diagnosis or procedure code during delivery hospitalization of any indices within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's severe maternal morbidity composite. Multivariable analyses adjusted for maternal sociodemographic factors and delivery mode to compare outcomes after stillbirth with live-birth delivery. RESULTS Nine thousand five hundred twenty-three women who delivered stillborn fetuses and 1,353,044 with liveborn neonates were included. Among 6,590 stillbirths and 935,913 live births without maternal comorbidities, severe maternal morbidity was significantly more common during stillbirth delivery (n=345 [5.2%]), corresponding to a seven-fold increased risk compared with live birth (n=8,318 [0.9]; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 7.05 [95% CI 6.27-7.93]). Among 2,933 stillbirths and 417,131 live births with maternal comorbidities, severe maternal morbidity was significantly more common during stillbirth delivery (n=390 [13.3%]): the risk was more than six-fold higher comparatively (n=11,122 [2.7%]; aOR 6.21 [95% CI 5.54-6.96]). Most maternal comorbidities were individually associated with higher risk of severe maternal morbidity during stillbirth compared with live-birth delivery. CONCLUSION Though severe maternal morbidity is overall uncommon, delivering a stillborn fetus 23 weeks of gestation or greater is associated with increased likelihood of severe maternal morbidity, particularly among women with comorbidities, suggesting health care providers must be vigilant about severe maternal morbidity during stillbirth delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam K Lewkowitz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alpert Medical School at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; and the Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medicine, and Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Carter EB, Chu CS, Thompson Z, Tuuli MG, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Electronic Fetal Monitoring and Neonatal Outcomes when a Nuchal Cord Is Present at Delivery. Am J Perinatol 2020; 37:378-383. [PMID: 30818403 PMCID: PMC7472605 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1679866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine the association between nuchal cord, electronic fetal monitoring parameters, and adverse neonatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN This was a prospective cohort study of 8,580 singleton pregnancies. Electronic fetal monitoring was interpreted, and patients with a nuchal cord at delivery were compared with those without. The primary outcome was a composite neonatal morbidity index. Logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders. RESULT Of 8,580 patients, 2,071 (24.14%) had a nuchal cord. There was no difference in the risk of neonatal composite morbidity in patients with or without a nuchal cord (8.69 vs. 8.86%; p = 0.81). Nuchal cord was associated with category II fetal heart tracing and operative vaginal delivery (OVD) (6.4 vs. 4.3%; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION Nuchal cord is associated with category II electronic fetal monitoring parameters, which may drive increased rates of OVD. However, there is no significant association with neonatal morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ebony B. Carter
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Cheryl S. Chu
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Zach Thompson
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Methodius G. Tuuli
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - George A. Macones
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Alison G. Cahill
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Wu W, Wang H, Zhao P, Talcott M, Lai S, McKinstry RC, Woodard PK, Macones GA, Schwartz AL, Cahill AG, Cuculich PS, Wang Y. Noninvasive high-resolution electromyometrial imaging of uterine contractions in a translational sheep model. Sci Transl Med 2020; 11:11/483/eaau1428. [PMID: 30867320 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aau1428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2018] [Revised: 10/09/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
In current clinical practice, uterine contractions are monitored via a tocodynamometer or an intrauterine pressure catheter, both of which provide crude information about contractions. Although electrohysterography/electromyography can measure uterine electrical activity, this method lacks spatial specificity and thus cannot accurately measure the exact location of electrical initiation and location-specific propagation patterns of uterine contractions. To comprehensively evaluate three-dimensional uterine electrical activation patterns, we describe here the development of electromyometrial imaging (EMMI) to display the three-dimensional uterine contractions at high spatial and temporal resolution. EMMI combines detailed body surface electrical recording with body-uterus geometry derived from magnetic resonance images. We used a sheep model to show that EMMI can reconstruct uterine electrical activation patterns from electrodes placed on the abdomen. These patterns closely match those measured with electrodes placed directly on the uterine surface. In addition, modeling experiments showed that EMMI reconstructions are minimally affected by noise and geometrical deformation. Last, we show that EMMI can be used to noninvasively measure uterine contractions in sheep in the same setup as would be used in humans. Our results indicate that EMMI can noninvasively, safely, accurately, robustly, and feasibly image three-dimensional uterine electrical activation during contractions in sheep and suggest that similar results might be obtained in clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenjie Wu
- Center for Reproductive Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Hui Wang
- Center for Reproductive Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.,Department of Physics, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Peinan Zhao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Michael Talcott
- Division of Comparative Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Shengsheng Lai
- Department of Medical Devices, Guangdong Food and Drug Vocational College, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, P.R. China
| | - Robert C McKinstry
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Pamela K Woodard
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - George A Macones
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Alan L Schwartz
- Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Alison G Cahill
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| | - Phillip S Cuculich
- Department of Cardiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
| | - Yong Wang
- Center for Reproductive Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. .,Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.,Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Rosenbloom JI, Raghuraman N, Temming LA, Stout MJ, Tuuli MG, Dicke JM, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Predictive Value of Midtrimester Universal Cervical Length Screening Based on Parity. J Ultrasound Med 2020; 39:147-154. [PMID: 31283038 DOI: 10.1002/jum.15091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2019] [Accepted: 06/15/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effect of parity on performance characteristics of midtrimester cervical length (CL) in predicting spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) before 37 weeks. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of 13,508 women with no history of sPTB undergoing universal transvaginal CL screening at 17 to 23 weeks' gestation from 2011 to 2016. Patients who declined screening or with unknown delivery outcomes were excluded. Areas under the receiver operator characteristic curves were used to assess and compare the predictive ability of CL screening for sPTB. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were estimated for specific CL cutoffs for prediction of sPTB. RESULTS There were 20,100 patients, of whom 2087 (10%) declined screening and 4505 (22%) did not meet inclusion criteria. Of the remaining 13,508 patients, 43% were nulliparous. The incidence rates of sPTB were 6.5% in nulliparas and 4.9% in multiparas (P < .001). The mean CLs were 39.9 mm in nulliparas and 41.8 mm in multiparas (P < .001), and those of the first percentiles were 19.0 mm in nulliparas and 24.0 mm in multiparas. Cervical length was significantly more predictive of sPTB in nulliparas (area under the curve, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.70; versus 0.61, 95% confidence interval, 0.57-0.63; P = .008). At CL cutoffs of 10, 15, 20, and 25 mm or less, the sensitivity was lower in multiparas, and the specificity was comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS Midtrimester CL is less predictive of sPTB in multiparas compared to nulliparas. The poor predictive ability, especially in multiparas, calls into question the value of universal CL screening in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua I Rosenbloom
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Nandini Raghuraman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Lorene A Temming
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Molly J Stout
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Methodius G Tuuli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Jeffery M Dicke
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - George A Macones
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Alison G Cahill
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Oakes MC, Chubiz J, Passafiume O, Bedrick B, England SK, Macones GA, Tuuli MG, Jungheim E, Stout MJ. 1125: First trimester stress and depression as risk factors for preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|