[Significance of molecular diagnostics in allergen immunotherapy : Practical tips for the application in various groups of allergens with exemplary cases]

The basis of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the diagnosis of the eliciting allergen sources, which is a challenge, especially in the case of multiple sensitizations. Molecular allergy diagnostics can be of special help, since detection of "marker allergens", usually important major allergens, allows to distinguish between primary sensitization and cross-reactions. Thus, the indication and extract selection for AIT can be facilitated. While molecular diagnosis is particularly useful for double-sensitized hymenoptera venom and polysensitized pollen allergic patients, the benefit is probably lower in case of house dust mite allergy.

Clinical trials in allergen immunotherapy: current concepts and future needs

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is a safe, effective treatment for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and allergic asthma. However, AIT's clinical effect is still contested—primarily due to heterogeneity in clinical trial designs, study populations, therapeutic formulations, and efficacy criteria. After discussing current concepts and unmet needs, an international panel of experts made several recommendations: (i) explore and validate definitions for (clinical) responders in AIT trials; (ii) use of well‐documented, standardized provocation tests prior to inclusion of subjects with relevant diseases in AIT trials; (iii) monitoring neo‐sensitizations and occurrence of new allergy in extended AIT trials, and exclusion of polyallergic participants; (iv) validation of allergen exposure chambers with regard to natural exposure; (v) in studies of seasonal allergies, focus on peak exposure but also consider organizing two parallel, geographically distinct but otherwise identical trials; (vi) discuss adaptive trial designs with the regulatory authorities; (vii) use e‐health and m‐health technologies to capture more information on individual exposure to allergens; (viii) initiate research on potential psychological, biochemical, immune, neural, and even genomic markers of the placebo response; (ix) identify trial designs and primary endpoints that will give children with allergies easier, faster access to AIT formulations; and (x) promote and apply standardized methods for reporting systemic and local adverse events. The latest technologies and trial designs may provide novel, ethical ways of reducing bias and heterogeneity in AIT clinical trials. There is scope for physicians, patient organizations, companies, and regulators to improve clinical trials in AIT and, ultimately, to provide patients with better treatments.

Pigeon tick bite: A neglected cause of idiopathic nocturnal anaphylaxis

Anaphylaxis is a serious systemic allergic reaction with rapid onset and potentially life-threatening. We report in detail a case of severe nocturnal anaphylaxis due to pigeon tick bite showing the diagnostic value of the extract and the recombinant allergen in the diagnostic procedures (basophil activation test, IgE immunoblot, and experimental ImmunoCAP). Apart from the presented case, we describe that during the last 10 years, we have collected 28 cases of allergy to Argas reflexus from several European countries. We suspect that this allergy is underdiagnosed because of the lack of diagnostic reagents. Because of the growing number of pigeons in Middle and Southern Europe cities, some cases of idiopathic anaphylaxis could potentially be caused by A. reflexus in those countries. The identification of pigeon ticks as a trigger of anaphylaxis would greatly improve medical care and advice for these patients as the parasite can be exterminated by eradication measures to avoid further incidents.

Perspectives in allergen immunotherapy: 2017 and beyond

The Future of the Allergists and Specific Immunotherapy (FASIT) workshop provides a regular platform for global experts from academia, allergy clinics, regulatory authorities and industry to review developments in the field of allergen immunotherapy (AIT). The most recent meeting, held in February 2017, had two main themes: advances in AIT and hot topics in AIT from the regulatory point of view. The first theme covered opportunities for personalized AIT, advances in adjuvants and delivery systems, and the development of new molecules and future vaccines for AIT. Key topics in the second part of the meeting were the effects of the enactment of European Directive 2001/83 on the availability of allergens for therapy and diagnosis across the EU, the challenges of conducting Phase 3 studies in the field, the future role of allergen exposure chambers in AIT studies and specific considerations in performing AIT studies in the paediatric population. Finally, the group highlighted the forthcoming EAACI guidelines and their particular importance for the standardization of practice in the treatment of allergies. This review presents a comprehensive insight into those panel discussions and highlights unmet needs and also possible solutions to them for the future.

Clinical benefits of treatment with SQ house dust mite sublingual tablet in house dust mite allergic rhinitis

Treatment with SQ (standardised quality) house dust mite sublingual tablet for 1 year resulted in a decreased probability of having an allergic rhinitis (AR) exacerbation day (from 11% [placebo] to 5% [SQ house dust mite sublingual tablet]) and an increased probability of having a mild AR day (from 16% [placebo] to 34% [SQ house dust mite sublingual tablet]).

Molecular allergy diagnostic tests: development and relevance in clinical practice

Molecular allergy is based on identification, characterization and subsequent use of single allergens, being components of complex allergen sources like pollen, mites, furred animals, foods or insect venoms. Only few protein families contain relevant allergens of similar sequence and structure, carrying common IgE epitopes as the basis of cross reactivity. Used as purified or recombinant (glyco)proteins single allergens can potentially improve in-vitro diagnostics, particularly allergen-specific IgE assays through a) increased sensitivity, b) use of risk and marker allergens, c) component-resolved diagnostics (CRD). CRD can differentiate primary, species-specific from secondary, cross-reactive sensitizations to single allergens. Allergen components facilitate an increased analytical sensitivity, particularly if they are underrepresented or missing in conventional allergen extracts. They are mainly used in single assays (singleplex) for the detection of IgE, but also in a microarray format (multiplex) with 112 components from 50 allergen sources with slightly decreased analytical sensitivity. Concepts of molecular allergy can only be separately defined and utilized for each allergen source (pollen, mites, foods or insect venoms). As soon as essential singe allergens are available, their specific role in diagnostics should be defined. This requires well characterized patient cohorts from various countries, since exposure, allergic immune response and clinical relevance can vary substantially between individual subjects and geographical regions. The patient's clinical information is essential for proper interpretation of molecular allergology results. The history and/or challenge test results will finally provide evidence, in how far a sensitization to single allergens might be clinically relevant or not.

Biomarkers for monitoring clinical efficacy of allergen immunotherapy for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and allergic asthma: an EAACI Position Paper

BACKGROUND

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is an effective treatment for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (AR) with or without asthma. It is important to note that due to the complex interaction between patient, allergy triggers, symptomatology and vaccines used for AIT, some patients do not respond optimally to the treatment. Furthermore, there are no validated or generally accepted candidate biomarkers that are predictive of the clinical response to AIT. Clinical management of patients receiving AIT and efficacy in randomised controlled trials for drug development could be enhanced by predictive biomarkers.

METHOD

The EAACI taskforce reviewed all candidate biomarkers used in clinical trials of AR patients with/without asthma in a literature review. Biomarkers were grouped into seven domains: (i) IgE (total IgE, specific IgE and sIgE/Total IgE ratio), (ii) IgG-subclasses (sIgG1, sIgG4 including SIgE/IgG4 ratio), (iii) Serum inhibitory activity for IgE (IgE-FAB and IgE-BF), (iv) Basophil activation, (v) Cytokines and Chemokines, (vi) Cellular markers (T regulatory cells, B regulatory cells and dendritic cells) and (vii) In vivo biomarkers (including provocation tests?).

RESULTS

All biomarkers were reviewed in the light of their potential advantages as well as their respective drawbacks. Unmet needs and specific recommendations on all seven domains were addressed.

CONCLUSIONS

It is recommended to explore the use of allergen-specific IgG4 as a biomarker for compliance. sIgE/tIgE and IgE-FAB are considered as potential surrogate candidate biomarkers. Cytokine/chemokines and cellular reponses provided insight into the mechanisms of AIT. More studies for confirmation and interpretation of the possible association with the clinical response to AIT are needed.

BASALIT trial: double-blind placebo-controlled allergen immunotherapy with rBet v 1-FV in birch-related soya allergy

BACKGROUND

Conflicting results exist on the effect of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) on pollen-related food allergy. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of one-year AIT with the folding variant (FV) of recombinant (r) Bet v 1 on birch-related soya allergy.

METHODS

Of 138 subjects with Bet v 1 sensitization, 82 were positive at double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) with soya. A total of 56 of 82 were randomized in the ratio of 2:1 (active: placebo). Per-protocol population (PPP) had received ≥150 μg of allergen or placebo preparation.

OUTCOME MEASURES

lowest observed adverse effect levels (LOAEL), postinterventional occurrence of objective signs (objS) at any dose level, sIgE/IgG4 against Bet v 1 and Gly m 4. Between-group changes were investigated (ancova, Mann-Whitney U-test, Fisher exact test).

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics including LOAELs were comparable in both groups with objS and subjS occurring in 82% and 95% of active (n = 38) vs 78% and 83% of placebo group (n = 18). After AIT, objS occurred in 24% and 47%, respectively. LOAEL group differences showed a beneficial tendency (P = 0.081) for LOAELobjective in PPP (30 active, 15 placebo). sIgG4 raised only in active group (Bet v 1: P = 0.054, Gly m 4: P = 0.037), and no relevant changes occurred for sIgE. Only 56% of the intended sample size was recruited.

CONCLUSION

For the first time, we present data on the effect of rBet v 1-FV on birch-related soya allergy. rBet v 1-FV AIT induced significant immunogenic effects. Clinical assessment showed a tendency in favour of the active group but did not reach statistical significance.

Allergy immunotherapy across the life cycle to promote active and healthy ageing: from research to policies: An AIRWAYS Integrated Care Pathways (ICPs) programme item (Action Plan B3 of the European Innovation Partnership on active and healthy ageing) and the Global Alliance against Chronic Respiratory Diseases (GARD), a World Health Organization GARD research demonstration project

Allergic diseases often occur early in life and persist throughout life. This life-course perspective should be considered in allergen immunotherapy. In particular it is essential to understand whether this al treatment may be used in old age adults. The current paper was developed by a working group of AIRWAYS integrated care pathways for airways diseases, the model of chronic respiratory diseases of the European Innovation Partnership on active and healthy ageing (DG CONNECT and DG Santé). It considered (1) the political background, (2) the rationale for allergen immunotherapy across the life cycle, (3) the unmet needs for the treatment, in particular in preschool children and old age adults, (4) the strategic framework and the practical approach to synergize current initiatives in allergen immunotherapy, its mechanisms and the concept of active and healthy ageing.

Standardization of double blind placebo controlled food challenge with soy within a multicentre trial

Background

Multicentre trials investigating food allergies by double blind placebo controlled food challenges (DBPCFC) need standardized procedures, challenge meals and evaluation criteria. We aimed at developing a standardized approach for identifying patients with birch related soy allergy by means of DBPCFC to soy, including determination of threshold levels, in a multicentre setting.

Methods

Microbiologically stable soy challenge meals were composed of protein isolate with consistent Gly m 4 levels. Patients sensitized to main birch allergen Bet v 1 and concomitant sensitization to its soy homologue Gly m 4 underwent DBPCFC. Outcome was defined according to presence and/or absence of ten objective signs and intensity of eight subjective symptoms as measured by visual analogue scale (VAS).

Results

138 adult subjects (63.8% female, mean age 38 years) underwent DBPCFC. Challenge meals and defined evaluation criteria showed good applicability in all centres involved. 45.7% presented with objective signs and 65.2% with subjective symptoms at soy challenge. Placebo challenge meals elicited non-cardiovascular objective signs in 11.6%. In 82 (59.4%) subjects DBPCFC was judged as positive. 70.7% of DPBCFC+ showed objective signs and 85.4% subjective symptoms at soy challenge. Subjective symptoms to soy challenge meal in DBPCFC+ subjects started at significantly lower dose levels than objective signs (p < 0.001). Median cumulative eliciting doses for first objective signs in DBPCFC+ subjects were 4.7 g [0.7–24.7] and 0.7 g [0.2–4.7] total soy protein for first subjective symptoms (p = 0.01).

Conclusions

We present the hitherto largest group of adults with Bet v 1 and Gly m 4 sensitization being investigated by DBPCFC. In this type of food allergy evaluation of DBPCFC outcome should not only include monitoring of objective signs but also scoring of subjective symptoms. Our data may contribute to standardize DBPCFC in pollen-related food allergy in multicentre settings.

Trial registration

EudraCT: 2009-011737-27.

The conformational IgE epitope profile of soya bean allergen Gly m 4

BACKGROUND

Birch pollen-related soya allergy is mediated by Gly m 4. Conformational IgE epitopes of Gly m 4 are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the IgE epitope profile of Gly m 4 in subjects with birch pollen-related soya allergy utilizing an epitope library presented by Gly m 4-type model proteins.

METHODS

Sera from patients with (n = 26) and without (n = 19) allergy to soya as determined by oral provocation tests were studied. Specific IgE (Bet v 1/Gly m 4) was determined by ImmunoCAP. A library of 59 non-allergenic Gly m 4-type model proteins harbouring individual and multiple putative epitopes for IgE was tested in IgE binding assays. Primary, secondary and tertiary protein structures were assessed by mass spectrometry, circular dichroism and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

RESULTS

All subjects were sensitized to Gly m 4 and Bet v 1. Allergen-specific serum IgE levels ranged from 0.94 to > 100 kU_A /L. The avidities of serum IgE were 5.06 ng (allergic) and 1.8 ng (tolerant) as determined by EC₅₀ for IgE binding to Gly m 4. 96% (46/48) of the protein variants bound IgE. Model proteins had Gly m 4-type conformation and individual IgE binding clustered in six major surface areas. Gly m 4-specific IgE binding could be inhibited to up to 80% by model proteins harbouring individual IgE binding sites in an epitope-wise equimolar fashion. Receiver operating curve analysis revealed an area under fitted curve of up to 0.88 for model proteins and 0.66 for Gly m 4.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Serum levels and avidity of Gly m 4-specific IgE do not correlate with clinical reactivity to soya. Six IgE-binding areas, represented by 23 amino acids, account for more than 80% of total IgE binding capacity of Gly m 4. Model proteins may be used for epitope-resolved diagnosis to differentiate birch-soya allergy from clinical tolerance.

EAACI Molecular Allergology User's Guide

The availability of allergen molecules ('components') from several protein families has advanced our understanding of immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated responses and enabled 'component-resolved diagnosis' (CRD). The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Molecular Allergology User's Guide (MAUG) provides comprehensive information on important allergens and describes the diagnostic options using CRD. Part A of the EAACI MAUG introduces allergen molecules, families, composition of extracts, databases, and diagnostic IgE, skin, and basophil tests. Singleplex and multiplex IgE assays with components improve both sensitivity for low-abundance allergens and analytical specificity; IgE to individual allergens can yield information on clinical risks and distinguish cross-reactivity from true primary sensitization. Part B discusses the clinical and molecular aspects of IgE-mediated allergies to foods (including nuts, seeds, legumes, fruits, vegetables, cereal grains, milk, egg, meat, fish, and shellfish), inhalants (pollen, mold spores, mites, and animal dander), and Hymenoptera venom. Diagnostic algorithms and short case histories provide useful information for the clinical workup of allergic individuals targeted for CRD. Part C covers protein families containing ubiquitous, highly cross-reactive panallergens from plant (lipid transfer proteins, polcalcins, PR-10, profilins) and animal sources (lipocalins, parvalbumins, serum albumins, tropomyosins) and explains their diagnostic and clinical utility. Part D lists 100 important allergen molecules. In conclusion, IgE-mediated reactions and allergic diseases, including allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, asthma, food reactions, and insect sting reactions, are discussed from a novel molecular perspective. The EAACI MAUG documents the rapid progression of molecular allergology from basic research to its integration into clinical practice, a quantum leap in the management of allergic patients.

[Role of allergen-specific immunotherapy (desensitization) for the treatment of allergies in Germany. Current situation]

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT, desensitization) is applied monthly with subcutaneous injections (SCIT) or sublingually (SLIT) with droplets or tablets on a daily basis. Numerous immunological changes during SIT induce long-lasting tolerance. Efficacy has been demonstrated by a number of controlled studies for insect venom hypersensitivity (SCIT), allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (SCIT, SLIT particularly in grass pollen allergy), and allergic asthma (SCIT > SLIT). SIT is indicated in children and adults with severe allergic reactions from insect venoms (e.g., bee, wasp) or cumbersome symptoms from pollen, house dust mites or mold allergens and proven immediated-type allergy. Contraindications must be considered individually. SIT is performed for 3 years, in case of venom allergy 3-5 years. Severe systemic reactions are rare after SCIT. After SLIT rather local allergic symptoms of short duration occur in the mouth and throat. At present, the number prescriptions for SIT has decreased due to inadequate reimbursement of allergy-related services (diagnostics, therapies, monitoring). In the future, inferior medical care of allergic patients in Germany is expected, who until now have benefited from the preventive effects of SIT (reduced risk of developing asthma and new allergic sensitizations).

Immunological effects and tolerability of a new fast updosed immunologically enhanced subcutaneous immunotherapy formulation with optimized allergen/adjuvant ratio

BACKGROUND

Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) traditionally includes an updosing phase injecting increasing doses of allergen over a period of several weeks, followed by a maintenance phase. To establish shorter and more convenient updosing schedules, a fast updosed immunologically enhanced SCIT formulation has been developed by optimizing the allergen/adjuvant (aluminium hydroxide) ratio.

METHODS

In a randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial, patients with grass pollen induced rhinoconjunctivitis with/without asthma were treated with an immunologically enhanced SCIT formulation (AVANZ, ALK, Denmark). The trial included updosing with five injections (300, 600, 3000, 6000 and 15,000 SQ+) injected either in weekly interval (Group 1) or in 3-4 days interval (Group 2) followed by two maintenance injections (15,000 SQ+), approximately 10 weeks treatment. The immunological effects (primary endpoint) and tolerability (secondary endpoint) of the updosing schedules were evaluated.

RESULTS

Four hundred patients were treated (Group 1: 201, Group 2: 199). In both groups, an immunological response with statistically significant increases in levels of IgE-blocking factor, IgG(4) and IgE (P < 0.001), was induced from baseline to end of trial. Most frequently reported adverse events were local injection site reactions such as injection site swellings (Group 1: 30% of patients, Group 2: 41% of patients). Other frequently reported adverse events included systemic reactions (Group 1: 21% of patients, Group 2: 33% of patients), primarily mild to moderate allergic rhinitis and urticaria.

CONCLUSIONS

Fast updosed immunologically enhanced SCIT with an optimized allergen/adjuvant ratio induced significant immunological effects and had an acceptable safety profile. Clinical efficacy will be investigated in future clinical trials.

European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology task force report on 'dose-response relationship in allergen-specific immunotherapy'

BACKGROUND

For a century, allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT) has proven to be an effective treatment for allergic rhinitis, asthma, and insect sting allergy. However, as allergen doses are frequently adapted to the individual patient, there are few data on dose-response relationship in SIT. Allergen products for SIT are being increasingly required to conform to regulatory requirements for human medicines, which include the need to demonstrate dose-dependent effects.

METHODS

This report, produced by a Task Force of the EAACI Immunotherapy Interest Group, evaluates the currently available data on dose-response relationships in SIT and aims to provide recommendations for the design of future studies.

RESULTS

Fifteen dose-ranging studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and twelve reported a dose-response relationship for clinical efficacy. Several studies also reported a dose-response relationship for immunological and safety endpoints. Due to the use of different reference materials and methodologies for the determination of allergen content, variations in study design, and choice of endpoints, no comparisons could be made between studies and, as a consequence, no general dosing recommendations can be made.

CONCLUSION

Despite recently introduced guidelines on the standardization of allergen preparations and study design, the Task Force identified a need for universally accepted standards for the measurement of allergen content in SIT preparations, dosing protocols, and selection of clinical endpoints to enable dose-response effects to be compared across studies.

Allergen-specific immunotherapy: which outcome measures are useful in monitoring clinical trials?

Various clinical outcome measures are commonly applied in clinical trials on specific immunotherapy for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis with or without asthma to provide evidence of its clinical efficacy. These "primary endpoints" measure clinical symptoms as well as the use for concomitant medication. "Secondary outcome endpoints" are represented by health-related quality of life (HRQoL), "well-days," provocation-tests, in vitro tests and others. This article reviews different methods assessing the clinical outcome of trials on both subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy, and highlights potential advantages and drawbacks of each method.

Immunological measures as potential markers of dose

Specific immunotherapy (SIT) induces immunological changes leading to a decrease in allergen-driven symptoms and medication use. However, the use of arbitrary and variable assay formats and units hampers comparisons between SIT studies. The magnitude of IgG response induced by SIT is not directly linked to clinical improvement, so an increase in allergen-specific IgG(4) should be considered a necessary but not sufficient marker of clinical efficacy. Dose-dependent IgG(4) immune responses should be demonstrated by the manufacturer, not by doctors. Symptom and medication scores are essential end-points for immunotherapy studies, but are subjective, so close association with objective assay measurements will be difficult. Nonetheless, blocking antibody assays combining serology and cellular function may provide a solution for relating immunological assay measurements to clinical outcomes.

Testing for IgG4 against foods is not recommended as a diagnostic tool: EAACI Task Force Report

Serological tests for immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) against foods are persistently promoted for the diagnosis of food-induced hypersensitivity. Since many patients believe that their symptoms are related to food ingestion without diagnostic confirmation of a causal relationship, tests for food-specific IgG4 represent a growing market. Testing for blood IgG4 against different foods is performed with large-scale screening for hundreds of food items by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-type and radioallergosorbent-type assays in young children, adolescents and adults. However, many serum samples show positive IgG4 results without corresponding clinical symptoms. These findings, combined with the lack of convincing evidence for histamine-releasing properties of IgG4 in humans, and lack of any controlled studies on the diagnostic value of IgG4 testing in food allergy, do not provide any basis for the hypothesis that food-specific IgG4 should be attributed with an effector role in food hypersensitivity. In contrast to the disputed beliefs, IgG4 against foods indicates that the organism has been repeatedly exposed to food components, recognized as foreign proteins by the immune system. Its presence should not be considered as a factor which induces hypersensitivity, but rather as an indicator for immunological tolerance, linked to the activity of regulatory T cells. In conclusion, food-specific IgG4 does not indicate (imminent) food allergy or intolerance, but rather a physiological response of the immune system after exposition to food components. Therefore, testing of IgG4 to foods is considered as irrelevant for the laboratory work-up of food allergy or intolerance and should not be performed in case of food-related complaints.

Aktuelle Empfehlungen zur praktischen Durchführung von SCIT und SLIT

Allergen specific immunotherapy (SIT) is the only potentially curative treatment of IgE mediated allergic diseases. To ensure its effective use, many requirements must be met before and during therapy. Before starting immunotherapy, informed consent should be obtained, along with the consideration of the indications and contraindications. SIT should be prescribed and administered only by physicians with experience in allergic disease who are qualified to manage severe anaphylactic reactions. The clinical symptoms and the age of the patients determine the route of application, choice of allergen extracts and the duration of treatment. Numerous products and protocols facilitate an individualised therapy.

Omalizumab decreased IgE-release and induced changes in cellular immunity in patients with allergic asthma

BACKGROUND

Omalizumab, a recombinant monoclonal anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody, shows proven efficacy in the treatment of allergic diseases. A little is known about the immunological pathways affected by the decrease of circulating free IgE during omalizumab treatment.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To investigate the immunological consequence of IgE withdrawal, we studied the influence of omalizumab on stimulated IgE-release of cultured peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and on the relative number of lymphocytes in the peripheral blood (cellular immune status) in patients with allergic asthma.

METHODS

Nineteen patients were enrolled and received omalizumab at a dose of at least 0.016 mg/kg/IgE (IU/ml) every 4 weeks. PBMC were isolated from peripheral blood. Cells were cultured and stimulated with IL-4 (5 ng/ml) and CD40 ligand (1 microg/ml) for 10 days. IgE release was detected in cell culture supernatants by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Cellular immune status was investigated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting.

RESULTS

Omalizumab treatment induced significant inhibition of stimulated IgE release (median 1.38-0 ng/ml vs. 1.64-2.0 ng/ml in placebo group, P<0.05). B-lymphocyte counts were also significantly lower in the omalizumab group compared with placebo after 12 weeks of treatment (median 18.2-15.6% lymphocytes vs 12.7-13.7% lymphocytes after placebo, P<0.01). There were no significant differences in the other lymphocyte subpopulations between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide evidence of immunological influences of omalizumab treatment, leading to a downregulation of IgE secretion and decrease of lymphocyte subpopulations (B-cells) indicating their anti-inflammatory potency.

Safety of a SQ-standardised grass allergen tablet for sublingual immunotherapy: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Sublingual treatment of grass pollen induced rhinoconjunctivitis might provide easier access to specific immunotherapy (SIT) and minimize the risk of serious adverse events (AEs) compared to subcutaneous SIT.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To identify a safe dose range for once-daily administration of a grass allergen tablet in participants with grass pollen induced seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis.

METHODS

A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled Phase I trial was conducted outside the grass pollen season. Seven dosage groups [25,000, 75,000, 150,000, 300,000, 500,000, 750,000, or 1,000,000 standardized quality tablet (SQ-T)], consisting of 12 participants randomized either to active treatment or placebo (3 : 1) daily for 28 days, commenced treatment in a staggered manner at intervals of approximately 1 week to allow for intermittent safety reviews.

RESULTS

The grass allergen tablet did not cause any serious, systemic or significant (leading to withdrawal) AEs. The overall incidence of AEs was 74% (1,013 events); all of mild or moderate intensity and most considered treatment-related. The most frequently reported treatment-related AEs, including irritation of the throat, and itching sensations in the mouth and ears, increased with dose. These were primarily mild in intensity, started shortly after medication intake and lasted for minutes to a few hours maximum. Objective oral findings were also dose-dependent. No clinically significant observations were found in safety laboratory, vital signs and 12-lead ECG.

CONCLUSIONS

A sublingual grass allergen tablet in doses up to 1,000,000 SQ-T daily caused no serious or systemic AEs displaying a safety profile that allows further investigation as once-daily self-medication.

[Cross-reactive allergen clusters in pollen-associated food allergy]

Immediate symptoms caused by allergens without previous primary sensitization are commonly based on cross-reactive IgE antibodies. They are responsible for pollen-associated food allergies, i.e., fruit allergy in cases of birch pollen allergy or allergy to celery and spices in cases of mugwort pollen allergy. Similar structures between the major allergen of birch pollen (Bet v 1) and a variety of pathogenesis-related proteins from the same family (PR-10), abundant in hazelnuts, fruits, and vegetables, have been well established. Other candidates are profilins, ubiquitous panallergens with little clinical relevance, and stable lipid transfer proteins, responsible for systemic reactions predominantly in Mediterranean countries. Depending on stability, dose, and resorption of these proteins, clinical symptoms are limited to the oro-pharyngeal cavity or develop systemically far from the site of allergen exposure. Clinical diagnosis is based on a positive case history with corresponding allergic sensitization to pollen allergens. Targeted skin testing with native products (i.e., prick to prick test with fresh fruits) appears to be superior for unstable allergens compared to commercial extracts. Individuals should be familiar with cross-reactive patterns; however, allergen avoidance is only recommended in cases of clinical symptoms.

Immunoblot studies in birch pollen-allergic patients with and without fruit hypersensitivity: part I: antibody pattern for birch pollen extract

About 40-70% of birch pollen allergic patients show allergic symptoms after ingesting or handling raw fruits. Several investigations have indicated a partial immunological identity between birch pollen and stone fruit. To further clarify this association, we investigated 59 patients with allergic symptoms (conjunctivitis, rhinitis, and asthma during the birch pollen season) and 18 nonatopic controls by skin prick test (SPT) and RAST with birch pollen, fresh apple, cherry, and peach as well as freshly prepared fruit extracts. According to a questionnaire dealing with symptoms after ingestion of raw fruits, the subjects were divided into groups with (35 FH+) and without (24 FH-) fruit hypersensitivity. IgE, IgG, IgG1, IgG4, IgA, and IgM binding patterns to birch pollen extracts were performed with 33 sera (12 FH+, 11 FH-, and 10 nonatopic controls) using the immunoblot-technique. Patients with FH+ expressed a significantly stronger sensitization to birch pollen than patients without FH-, as measured by RAST and SPT. Native fruits induced stronger SPT reactions than fruit extracts, and patients with FH+ showed a significantly higher skin index with all fruits and fruit extracts tested. Specific IgE, IgG, IgG1, IgG4, IgM and IgA to birch pollen extracts could be detected by immunoblot in all groups, albeit with different frequencies and intensities. From this data we conclude that fruit hypersensitivity is related more to the 17 kd and 67-85 kd than to the 26-28 kd or 36 kd protein bands of the birch pollen extract. The relationship of specific IgE > IgG > IgM to a single protein band seems to be associated with the development of symptomatic type I allergy.

Immunoblot studies in birch pollen-allergic patients with and without fruit hypersensitivity: part II: antibody pattern for fruit extracts

Patients allergic to birch pollen also exhibit more hypersensitivity reactions to fresh fruits and vegetables than do patients allergic to other pollens. Several investigations have indicated a possible partial immunological identity between birch pollen and fruits. To study this, 23 birch pollen-allergic patients 12 with (FH+) and 11 without (FH-) fruit hypersensitivity and 10 nonatopic controls were examined with self-prepared apple-peel, cherry, and peach extracts by immunoblotting. The self-prepared extracts were characterized by histamine release studies with 20 FH+ birch pollen-allergic patients. Specific IgE, IgG, IgG1, IgG4, IgA, and IgM binding patterns of the fruit extracts presented an individual distribution with at least 1-3 IgE bands at varying molecular weight locations. The FH+ group expressed intense IgE binding to the different extracts compared to the FH- group, and even the control group showed all immunoglobulin classes, though different frequencies and intensities compared to the allergic groups. It seemed that the specific IgE > IgG > IgM relation to a single antigen is important for distinguishing between symptomatic and asymptomatic persons. With this hypothesis we found most IgE with less IgG binding to apple-peel in the region of 22-28 kd and 43-56 kd, cherry: 15-25 kd and 72- > 90 kd and peach 35-41 kd and 66-76 kd, suggesting that these proteins might be important for cross-reactivity with birch pollen and developing fruit hypersensitivity.

[Allergen immunotherapy - a position paper of the German society for allergology and clinical immunology]

Mechanisms of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) are complex inducing numerous immunological effects. Successful AIT is most likely based on a functional switch of and tolerance induction in specific T cells downregulating allergic hypersensitivity and inflammation. Subcutaneous AIT for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and allergic asthma has been successfully assessed in controlled studies with several clinically important allergens (i. e. birch-, grass- and mugwortpollen, dust mites, animal dander) and has shown convincing clinical efficacy. Considered as the only causal treatment besides allergen avoidance at present, AIT can alter the natural course of allergic diseases. Hymenopteravenom hypersensitivity (to bee- and wasp venom) treated with AIT gives the best results compared to AIT with other allergens. AIT is indicated in patients with IgE-mediated sensitizations and corresponding clinical symptoms to allergens, which do not or hardly permit allergen avoidance and which are available as suitable extracts. Decisions about indication and allergen selection should only be made by a physician with certified training or qualified knowledge and skills in allergology. AIT is administered by physicians experienced in this therapy. After addressing tolerability and present status of health the recommended or individually adjusted does is injected and precisely documented, followed by a mandatory waiting period of 30 minutes. Indication for and application of AIT in children are quite similar compared to the treatment of adults. Children tolerate AIT very well and benefit especially from its immunomodulatory effects. Risk factors for and results of unwanted systemic effects can effectively be minimized by training of the staff members involved, adhering to safety standards and immediate emergency treatment. Modified allergens, recombinant proteins and immunomodulatory adjuvants created by basic research are promises for an improved efficacy of AIT with reduced unwanted effects in the future.

Multiple IgE-mediated sensitizations to enzymes after occupational exposure: evaluation by skin prick test, RAST, and immunoblot

We investigated 10 sensitized and 10 nonsensitized workers from a pharmaceutic factory who had been exposed to powdered trypsin, chymotrypsin, bromelain, papain, amylase, and lipase. Ten nonallergic subjects served as a control group. Titrated skin prick tests (SPT), RAST, and immunoblot studies were performed with all six enzymes. SPT reactivity revealed multiple sensitizations to proteolytic enzymes, i.e., papain (specifically sensitized/total number of sensitizations: 9/10), trypsin (8/10), chymotrypsin (8/10), and bromelain (7/10) and appeared to be more frequent and more pronounced than sensitizations to amylase (3/10) or lipase (3/10). The low molecular weight of proteolytic enzymes (20-30 kDa) and their biologic activity might facilitate mucosal penetration more easily and thus-compared to amylase and lipase-permit an immune response and induction of allergic hypersensitivity. Immunoblot studies demonstrated IgG-binding bands in both SPT-positive and -negative workers, indicating exposure to the enzymes, but not in 10 unexposed control subjects. IgE-binding bands of the enzymes were detected only in workers with a positive SPT reaction and/or a positive RAST result. IgG bands were more frequent and the IgG/IgE ratio was increased in workers without allergic complaints compared to symptomatic workers. This might indicate that high levels of specific IgG antibodies to enzymes are associated with an immune response lacking allergic manifestations in spite of IgE-mediated sensitizations to the enzymes. Atopic subjects were at greater risk of developing IgE-mediated sensitization (7/10) and allergic symptoms to enzymes (5/7). However, even without risk of atopy, IgE-mediated hypersensitivity occurred in a few subjects (3/13) exposed to enzymes by inhalation for prolonged periods of time.