1
|
Pucher PH, Maynard N, Body S, Bowling K, Chaudry MA, Forshaw M, Hornby S, Markar SR, Mercer SJ, Preston SR, Sgromo B, van Boxel GI, Gossage JA. Association of Upper GI Surgery of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS) Delphi consensus recommendations on the adoption of robotic upper GI surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2024. [PMID: 38445587 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The adoption of robotic platforms in upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgery is expanding rapidly. The absence of centralised guidance and governance in adoption of new surgical technologies may lead to an increased risk of patient harm. METHODS Surgeon stakeholders participated in a Delphi consensus process following a national open-invitation in-person meeting on the adoption of robotic upper GI surgery. Consensus agreement was deemed met if >80% agreement was achieved. RESULTS Following two rounds of Delphi voting, 25 statements were agreed on covering the training process, governance and good practice for surgeons' adoption in upper GI surgery. One statement failed to achieve consensus. CONCLUSIONS These recommendations are intended to support surgeons, patients and health systems in the adoption of robotics in upper GI surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - N Maynard
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - S Body
- University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - K Bowling
- Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | | | | | - S Hornby
- Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - S R Markar
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
- University of Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - B Sgromo
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | | | - J A Gossage
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
May-Miller P, Markar SR, Blencowe N, Gossage JA, Botros A, Pucher PH. Opinion, uptake and current practice of robot-assisted upper gastrointestinal and oesophagogastric surgery in the UK: AUGIS national survey results. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2024. [PMID: 38445600 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The uptake of upper gastrointestinal (GI) robotic surgery in the United Kingdom (UK), and Europe more widely, is expanding rapidly. This study aims to present a current snapshot of the practice and opinions of the upper GI community with reference to robotic surgery, with an emphasis on tertiary cancer (oesophagogastric) resection centres. METHODS An electronic survey was circulated to the UK upper GI surgical community via national mailing lists, social media and at an open-invitation conference on robotic upper GI surgery in January 2023. The survey included questions on surgeons' current practice or planned adoption (if any) of robotics at individual and unit level, and their opinions on robotic upper GI surgery in general. Priority ranking and Likert-scale response options were used. RESULTS In total, 81 respondents from 43 hospitals were included. Thirty-four resectional centres responded, including 30 of 31 (97%) recognised upper GI cancer centres in England. Respondents reported performing robotic surgery in 21 of 34 (61.8%) resectional centres, with a median of 65 procedures per centre performed at the time of the survey (range 0-500, interquartile range 93.75). Every centre without a robotic programme expressed a desire or had active plans to implement one. Respondents ranked surgeon ergonomics as the most important reason for pursuing robotics, followed by improvements in patient outcomes and oncological efficacy. CONCLUSIONS Robotic upper GI practice is nascent but rapidly growing in the UK with plans for uptake in almost all tertiary centres. There is growing opinion that this is likely to become the predominant surgical approach in future with benefits to both patients and surgeons. This snapshot offers a point of reference to all stakeholders in upper GI surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - S R Markar
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | | | - J A Gossage
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - A Botros
- Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, UK
| | - P H Pucher
- Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ubels S, Verstegen M, Klarenbeek B, Bouwense S, van Berge Henegouwen M, Daams F, van Det MJ, Griffiths EA, Haveman JW, Heisterkamp J, Koshy R, Nieuwenhuijzen G, Polat F, Siersema PD, Singh P, Wijnhoven B, Hannink G, van Workum F, Rosman C, Matthée E, Slootmans CAM, Ultee G, Schouten J, Gisbertz SS, Eshuis WJ, Kalff MC, Feenstra ML, van der Peet DL, Stam WT, van Etten B, Poelmann F, Vuurberg N, van den Berg JW, Martijnse IS, Matthijsen RM, Luyer M, Curvers W, Nieuwenhuijzen T, Taselaar AE, Kouwenhoven EA, Lubbers M, Sosef M, Lecot F, Geraedts TCM, van Esser S, Dekker JWT, van den Wildenberg F, Kelder W, Lubbers M, Baas PC, de Haas JWA, Hartgrink HH, Bahadoer RR, van Sandick JW, Hartemink KJ, Veenhof X, Stockmann H, Gorgec B, Weeder P, Wiezer MJ, Genders CMS, Belt E, Blomberg B, van Duijvendijk P, Claassen L, Reetz D, Steenvoorde P, Mastboom W, Klein Ganseij HJ, van Dalsen AD, Joldersma A, Zwakman M, Groenendijk RPR, Montazeri M, Mercer S, Knight B, van Boxel G, McGregor RJ, Skipworth RJE, Frattini C, Bradley A, Nilsson M, Hayami M, Huang B, Bundred J, Evans R, Grimminger PP, van der Sluis PC, Eren U, Saunders J, Theophilidou E, Khanzada Z, Elliott JA, Ponten J, King S, Reynolds JV, Sgromo B, Akbari K, Shalaby S, Gutschow CA, Schmidt H, Vetter D, Moorthy K, Ibrahim MAH, Christodoulidis G, Räsänen JV, Kauppi J, Söderström H, Manatakis DK, Korkolis DP, Balalis D, Rompu A, Alkhaffaf B, Alasmar M, Arebi M, Piessen G, Nuytens F, Degisors S, Ahmed A, Boddy A, Gandhi S, Fashina O, Van Daele E, Pattyn P, Robb WB, Arumugasamy M, Al Azzawi M, Whooley J, Colak E, Aybar E, Sari AC, Uyanik MS, Ciftci AB, Sayyed R, Ayub B, Murtaza G, Saeed A, Ramesh P, Charalabopoulos A, Liakakos T, Schizas D, Baili E, Kapelouzou A, Valmasoni M, Pierobon ES, Capovilla G, Merigliano S, Silviu C, Rodica B, Florin A, Cristian Gelu R, Petre H, Guevara Castro R, Salcedo AF, Negoi I, Negoita VM, Ciubotaru C, Stoica B, Hostiuc S, Colucci N, Mönig SP, Wassmer CH, Meyer J, Takeda FR, Aissar Sallum RA, Ribeiro U, Cecconello I, Toledo E, Trugeda MS, Fernández MJ, Gil C, Castanedo S, Isik A, Kurnaz E, Videira JF, Peyroteo M, Canotilho R, Weindelmayer J, Giacopuzzi S, De Pasqual CA, Bruna M, Mingol F, Vaque J, Pérez C, Phillips AW, Chmelo J, Brown J, Han LE, Gossage JA, Davies AR, Baker CR, Kelly M, Saad M, Bernardi D, Bonavina L, Asti E, Riva C, Scaramuzzo R, Elhadi M, Abdelkarem Ahmed H, Elhadi A, Elnagar FA, Msherghi AAA, Wills V, Campbell C, Perez Cerdeira M, Whiting S, Merrett N, Das A, Apostolou C, Lorenzo A, Sousa F, Adelino Barbosa J, Devezas V, Barbosa E, Fernandes C, Smith G, Li EY, Bhimani N, Chan P, Kotecha K, Hii MW, Ward SM, Johnson M, Read M, Chong L, Hollands MJ, Allaway M, Richardson A, Johnston E, Chen AZL, Kanhere H, Prasad S, McQuillan P, Surman T, Trochsler MI, Schofield WA, Ahmed SK, Reid JL, Harris MC, Gananadha S, Farrant J, Rodrigues N, Fergusson J, Hindmarsh A, Afzal Z, Safranek P, Sujendran V, Rooney S, Loureiro C, Leturio Fernández S, Díez del Val I, Jaunoo S, Kennedy L, Hussain A, Theodorou D, Triantafyllou T, Theodoropoulos C, Palyvou T, Elhadi M, Abdullah Ben Taher F, Ekheel M, Msherghi AAA. Severity of oEsophageal Anastomotic Leak in patients after oesophagectomy: the SEAL score. Br J Surg 2022. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Anastomotic leak (AL) is a common but severe complication after oesophagectomy. It is unknown how to determine the severity of AL objectively at diagnosis. Determining leak severity may guide treatment decisions and improve future research. This study aimed to identify leak-related prognostic factors for mortality, and to develop a Severity of oEsophageal Anastomotic Leak (SEAL) score.
Methods
This international, retrospective cohort study in 71 centres worldwide included patients with AL after oesophagectomy between 2011 and 2019. The primary endpoint was 90-day mortality. Leak-related prognostic factors were identified after adjusting for confounders and were included in multivariable logistic regression to develop the SEAL score. Four classes of leak severity (mild, moderate, severe, and critical) were defined based on the risk of 90-day mortality, and the score was validated internally.
Results
Some 1509 patients with AL were included and the 90-day mortality rate was 11.7 per cent. Twelve leak-related prognostic factors were included in the SEAL score. The score showed good calibration and discrimination (c-index 0.77, 95 per cent c.i. 0.73 to 0.81). Higher classes of leak severity graded by the SEAL score were associated with a significant increase in duration of ICU stay, healing time, Comprehensive Complication Index score, and Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group classification.
Conclusion
The SEAL score grades leak severity into four classes by combining 12 leak-related predictors and can be used to the assess severity of AL after oesophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sander Ubels
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
| | - Moniek Verstegen
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
| | - Bastiaan Klarenbeek
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
| | - Stefan Bouwense
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ , Maastricht , the Netherlands
| | - Mark van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , the Netherlands
| | - Freek Daams
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , the Netherlands
| | - Marc J van Det
- Department of Surgery, ZGT hospital group , Almelo , the Netherlands
| | - Ewen A Griffiths
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham , Birmingham , UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham , Birmingham , UK
| | - Jan W Haveman
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen , Groningen , the Netherlands
| | - Joos Heisterkamp
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital , Tilburg , the Netherlands
| | - Renol Koshy
- Department of Surgery, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospital NHS Trust , Newcastle upon Tyne , UK
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust , Coventry , UK
| | | | - Fatih Polat
- Department of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen , The Netherlands
| | - Pritam Singh
- Department of Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust , Nottingham , UK
- Department of Surgery, Regional Oesophago-Gastric Unit, Royal Surrey County Hospital , Guildford , UK
| | - Bas Wijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre , Rotterdam , the Netherlands
| | - Gerjon Hannink
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen , The Netherlands
| | - Frans van Workum
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre , Nijmegen , the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kamarajah SK, Evans RPT, Nepogodiev D, Hodson J, Bundred JR, Gockel I, Gossage JA, Isik A, Kidane B, Mahendran HA, Negoi I, Okonta KE, Sayyed R, van Hillegersberg R, Vohra RS, Wijnhoven BPL, Singh P, Griffiths EA, Kamarajah SK, Hodson J, Griffiths EA, Alderson D, Bundred J, Evans RPT, Gossage J, Griffiths EA, Jefferies B, Kamarajah SK, McKay S, Mohamed I, Nepogodiev D, Siaw-Acheampong K, Singh P, van Hillegersberg R, Vohra R, Wanigasooriya K, Whitehouse T, Gjata A, Moreno JI, Takeda FR, Kidane B, Guevara Castro R, Harustiak T, Bekele A, Kechagias A, Gockel I, Kennedy A, Da Roit A, Bagajevas A, Azagra JS, Mahendran HA, Mejía-Fernández L, Wijnhoven BPL, El Kafsi J, Sayyed RH, Sousa M M, Sampaio AS, Negoi I, Blanco R, Wallner B, Schneider PM, Hsu PK, Isik A, Gananadha S, Wills V, Devadas M, Duong C, Talbot M, Hii MW, Jacobs R, Andreollo NA, Johnston B, Darling G, Isaza-Restrepo A, Rosero G, Arias-Amézquita F, Raptis D, Gaedcke J, Reim D, Izbicki J, Egberts JH, Dikinis S, Kjaer DW, Larsen MH, Achiam MP, Saarnio J, Theodorou D, Liakakos T, Korkolis DP, Robb WB, Collins C, Murphy T, Reynolds J, Tonini V, Migliore M, Bonavina L, Valmasoni M, Bardini R, Weindelmayer J, Terashima M, White RE, Alghunaim E, Elhadi M, Leon-Takahashi AM, Medina-Franco H, Lau PC, Okonta KE, Heisterkamp J, Rosman C, van Hillegersberg R, Beban G, Babor R, Gordon A, Rossaak JI, Pal KMI, Qureshi AU, Naqi SA, Syed AA, Barbosa J, Vicente CS, Leite J, Freire J, Casaca R, Costa RCT, Scurtu RR, Mogoanta SS, Bolca C, Constantinoiu S, Sekhniaidze D, Bjelović M, So JBY, Gačevski G, Loureiro C, Pera M, Bianchi A, Moreno Gijón M, Martín Fernández J, Trugeda Carrera MS, Vallve-Bernal M, Cítores Pascual MA, Elmahi S, Halldestam I, Hedberg J, Mönig S, Gutknecht S, Tez M, Guner A, Tirnaksiz MB, Colak E, Sevinç B, Hindmarsh A, Khan I, Khoo D, Byrom R, Gokhale J, Wilkerson P, Jain P, Chan D, Robertson K, Iftikhar S, Skipworth R, Forshaw M, Higgs S, Gossage J, Nijjar R, Viswanath YKS, Turner P, Dexter S, Boddy A, Allum WH, Oglesby S, Cheong E, Beardsmore D, Vohra R, Maynard N, Berrisford R, Mercer S, Puig S, Melhado R, Kelty C, Underwood T, Dawas K, Lewis W, Bryce G, Thomas M, Arndt AT, Palazzo F, Meguid RA, Fergusson J, Beenen E, Mosse C, Salim J, Cheah S, Wright T, Cerdeira MP, McQuillan P, Richardson M, Liem H, Spillane J, Yacob M, Albadawi F, Thorpe T, Dingle A, Cabalag C, Loi K, Fisher OM, Ward S, Read M, Johnson M, Bassari R, Bui H, Cecconello I, Sallum RAA, da Rocha JRM, Lopes LR, Tercioti Jr V, Coelho JDS, Ferrer JAP, Buduhan G, Tan L, Srinathan S, Shea P, Yeung J, Allison F, Carroll P, Vargas-Barato F, Gonzalez F, Ortega J, Nino-Torres L, Beltrán-García TC, Castilla L, Pineda M, Bastidas A, Gómez-Mayorga J, Cortés N, Cetares C, Caceres S, Duarte S, Pazdro A, Snajdauf M, Faltova H, Sevcikova M, Mortensen PB, Katballe N, Ingemann T, Morten B, Kruhlikava I, Ainswort AP, Stilling NM, Eckardt J, Holm J, Thorsteinsson M, Siemsen M, Brandt B, Nega B, Teferra E, Tizazu A, Kauppila JH, Koivukangas V, Meriläinen S, Gruetzmann R, Krautz C, Weber G, Golcher H, Emons G, Azizian A, Ebeling M, Niebisch S, Kreuser N, Albanese G, Hesse J, Volovnik L, Boecher U, Reeh M, Triantafyllou S, Schizas D, Michalinos A, Balli E, Mpoura M, Charalabopoulos A, Manatakis DK, Balalis D, Bolger J, Baban C, Mastrosimone A, McAnena O, Quinn A, Ó Súilleabháin CB, Hennessy MM, Ivanovski I, Khizer H, Ravi N, Donlon N, Cervellera M, Vaccari S, Bianchini S, Asti E, Bernardi D, Merigliano S, Provenzano L, Scarpa M, Saadeh L, Salmaso B, De Manzoni G, Giacopuzzi S, La Mendola R, De Pasqual CA, Tsubosa Y, Niihara M, Irino T, Makuuchi R, Ishii K K, Mwachiro M, Fekadu A, Odera A, Mwachiro E, AlShehab D, Ahmed HA, Shebani AO, Elhadi A, Elnagar FA, Elnagar HF, Makkai-Popa ST, Wong LF, Tan YR, Thannimalai S, Ho CA, Pang WS, Tan JH, Basave HNL, Cortés-González R, Lagarde SM, van Lanschot JJB, Cords C, Jansen WA, Martijnse I, Matthijsen R, Bouwense S, Klarenbeek B, Verstegen M, van Workum F, Ruurda JP, van der Sluis PC, de Maat M, Evenett N, Johnston P, Patel R, MacCormick A, Smith B, Ekwunife C, Memon AH, Shaikh K, Wajid A, Khalil N, Haris M, Mirza ZU, Qudus SBA, Sarwar MZ, Shehzadi A, Raza A, Jhanzaib MH, Farmanali J, Zakir Z, Shakeel O, Nasir I, Khattak S, Baig M, Noor MA, Ahmed HH, Naeem A, Pinho AC, da Silva R, Bernardes A, Campos JC, Matos H, Braga T, Monteiro C, Ramos P, Cabral F, Gomes MP, Martins PC, Correia AM, Videira JF, Ciuce C, Drasovean R, Apostu R, Ciuce C, Paitici S, Racu AE, Obleaga CV, Beuran M, Stoica B, Ciubotaru C, Negoita V, Cordos I, Birla RD, Predescu D, Hoara PA, Tomsa R, Shneider V, Agasiev M, Ganjara I, Gunjić D, Veselinović M, Babič T, Chin TS, Shabbir A, Kim G, Crnjac A, Samo H, Díez del Val I, Leturio S, Ramón JM, Dal Cero M, Rifá S, Rico M, Pagan Pomar A, Martinez Corcoles JA, Rodicio Miravalles JL, Pais SA, Turienzo SA, Alvarez LS, Campos PV, Rendo AG, García SS, Santos EPG, Martínez ET, Fernández Díaz MJ, Magadán Álvarez C, Concepción Martín V, Díaz López C, Rosat Rodrigo A, Pérez Sánchez LE, Bailón Cuadrado M, Tinoco Carrasco C, Choolani Bhojwani E, Sánchez DP, Ahmed ME, Dzhendov T, Lindberg F, Rutegård M, Sundbom M, Mickael C, Colucci N, Schnider A, Er S, Kurnaz E, Turkyilmaz S, Turkyilmaz A, Yildirim R, Baki BE, Akkapulu N, Karahan O, Damburaci N, Hardwick R, Safranek P, Sujendran V, Bennett J, Afzal Z, Shrotri M, Chan B, Exarchou K, Gilbert T, Amalesh T, Mukherjee D, Mukherjee S, Wiggins TH, Kennedy R, McCain S, Harris A, Dobson G, Davies N, Wilson I, Mayo D, Bennett D, Young R, Manby P, Blencowe N, Schiller M, Byrne B, Mitton D, Wong V, Elshaer A, Cowen M, Menon V, Tan LC, McLaughlin E, Koshy R, Sharp C, Brewer H, Das N, Cox M, Al Khyatt W, Worku D, Iqbal R, Walls L, McGregor R, Fullarton G, Macdonald A, MacKay C, Craig C, Dwerryhouse S, Hornby S, Jaunoo S, Wadley M, Baker C, Saad M, Kelly M, Davies A, Di Maggio F, McKay S, Mistry P, Singhal R, Tucker O, Kapoulas S, Powell-Brett S, Davis P, Bromley G, Watson L, Verma R, Ward J, Shetty V, Ball C, Pursnani K, Sarela A, Sue Ling H, Mehta S, Hayden J, To N, Palser T, Hunter D, Supramaniam K, Butt Z, Ahmed A, Kumar S, Chaudry A, Moussa O, Kordzadeh A, Lorenzi B, Wilson M, Patil P, Noaman I, Bouras G, Evans R, Singh M, Warrilow H, Ahmad A, Tewari N, Yanni F, Couch J, Theophilidou E, Reilly JJ, Singh P, van Boxel G, Akbari K, Zanotti D, Sanders G, Wheatley T, Ariyarathenam A, Reece-Smith A, Humphreys L, Choh C, Carter N, Knight B, Pucher P, Athanasiou A, Mohamed I, Tan B, Abdulrahman M, Vickers J, Akhtar K, Chaparala R, Brown R, Alasmar MMA, Ackroyd R, Patel K, Tamhankar A, Wyman A, Walker R, Grace B, Abbassi N, Slim N, Ioannidi L, Blackshaw G, Havard T, Escofet X, Powell A, Owera A, Rashid F, Jambulingam P, Padickakudi J, Ben-Younes H, Mccormack K, Makey IA, Karush MK, Seder CW, Liptay MJ, Chmielewski G, Rosato EL, Berger AC, Zheng R, Okolo E, Singh A, Scott CD, Weyant MJ, Mitchell JD. Textbook outcome following oesophagectomy for cancer: international cohort study. Br J Surg 2022. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Textbook outcome has been proposed as a tool for the assessment of oncological surgical care. However, an international assessment in patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer has not been reported. This study aimed to assess textbook outcome in an international setting.
Methods
Patients undergoing curative resection for oesophageal cancer were identified from the international Oesophagogastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA) from April 2018 to December 2018. Textbook outcome was defined as the percentage of patients who underwent a complete tumour resection with at least 15 lymph nodes in the resected specimen and an uneventful postoperative course, without hospital readmission. A multivariable binary logistic regression model was used to identify factors independently associated with textbook outcome, and results are presented as odds ratio (OR) and 95 per cent confidence intervals (95 per cent c.i.).
Results
Of 2159 patients with oesophageal cancer, 39.7 per cent achieved a textbook outcome. The outcome parameter ‘no major postoperative complication’ had the greatest negative impact on a textbook outcome for patients with oesophageal cancer, compared to other textbook outcome parameters. Multivariable analysis identified male gender and increasing Charlson comorbidity index with a significantly lower likelihood of textbook outcome. Presence of 24-hour on-call rota for oesophageal surgeons (OR 2.05, 95 per cent c.i. 1.30 to 3.22; P = 0.002) and radiology (OR 1.54, 95 per cent c.i. 1.05 to 2.24; P = 0.027), total minimally invasive oesophagectomies (OR 1.63, 95 per cent c.i. 1.27 to 2.08; P < 0.001), and chest anastomosis above azygous (OR 2.17, 95 per cent c.i. 1.58 to 2.98; P < 0.001) were independently associated with a significantly increased likelihood of textbook outcome.
Conclusion
Textbook outcome is achieved in less than 40 per cent of patients having oesophagectomy for cancer. Improvements in centralization, hospital resources, access to minimal access surgery, and adoption of newer techniques for improving lymph node yield could improve textbook outcome.
Collapse
|
5
|
Kamarajah SK, Evans RPT, Nepogodiev D, Hodson J, Bundred JR, Gockel I, Gossage JA, Isik A, Kidane B, Mahendran HA, Negoi I, Okonta KE, Sayyed R, van Hillegersberg R, Vohra RS, Wijnhoven BPL, Singh P, Griffiths EA, Kamarajah SK, Hodson J, Griffiths EA, Alderson D, Bundred J, Evans RPT, Gossage J, Griffiths EA, Jefferies B, Kamarajah SK, McKay S, Mohamed I, Nepogodiev D, Siaw-Acheampong K, Singh P, van Hillegersberg R, Vohra R, Wanigasooriya K, Whitehouse T, Gjata A, Moreno JI, Takeda FR, Kidane B, Guevara Castro R, Harustiak T, Bekele A, Kechagias A, Gockel I, Kennedy A, Da Roit A, Bagajevas A, Azagra JS, Mahendran HA, Mejía-Fernández L, Wijnhoven BPL, El Kafsi J, Sayyed RH, Sousa M M, Sampaio AS, Negoi I, Blanco R, Wallner B, Schneider PM, Hsu PK, Isik A, Gananadha S, Wills V, Devadas M, Duong C, Talbot M, Hii MW, Jacobs R, Andreollo NA, Johnston B, Darling G, Isaza-Restrepo A, Rosero G, Arias-Amézquita F, Raptis D, Gaedcke J, Reim D, Izbicki J, Egberts JH, Dikinis S, Kjaer DW, Larsen MH, Achiam MP, Saarnio J, Theodorou D, Liakakos T, Korkolis DP, Robb WB, Collins C, Murphy T, Reynolds J, Tonini V, Migliore M, Bonavina L, Valmasoni M, Bardini R, Weindelmayer J, Terashima M, White RE, Alghunaim E, Elhadi M, Leon-Takahashi AM, Medina-Franco H, Lau PC, Okonta KE, Heisterkamp J, Rosman C, van Hillegersberg R, Beban G, Babor R, Gordon A, Rossaak JI, Pal KMI, Qureshi AU, Naqi SA, Syed AA, Barbosa J, Vicente CS, Leite J, Freire J, Casaca R, Costa RCT, Scurtu RR, Mogoanta SS, Bolca C, Constantinoiu S, Sekhniaidze D, Bjelović M, So JBY, Gačevski G, Loureiro C, Pera M, Bianchi A, Moreno Gijón M, Martín Fernández J, Trugeda Carrera MS, Vallve-Bernal M, Cítores Pascual MA, Elmahi S, Halldestam I, Hedberg J, Mönig S, Gutknecht S, Tez M, Guner A, Tirnaksiz MB, Colak E, Sevinç B, Hindmarsh A, Khan I, Khoo D, Byrom R, Gokhale J, Wilkerson P, Jain P, Chan D, Robertson K, Iftikhar S, Skipworth R, Forshaw M, Higgs S, Gossage J, Nijjar R, Viswanath YKS, Turner P, Dexter S, Boddy A, Allum WH, Oglesby S, Cheong E, Beardsmore D, Vohra R, Maynard N, Berrisford R, Mercer S, Puig S, Melhado R, Kelty C, Underwood T, Dawas K, Lewis W, Bryce G, Thomas M, Arndt AT, Palazzo F, Meguid RA, Fergusson J, Beenen E, Mosse C, Salim J, Cheah S, Wright T, Cerdeira MP, McQuillan P, Richardson M, Liem H, Spillane J, Yacob M, Albadawi F, Thorpe T, Dingle A, Cabalag C, Loi K, Fisher OM, Ward S, Read M, Johnson M, Bassari R, Bui H, Cecconello I, Sallum RAA, da Rocha JRM, Lopes LR, Tercioti Jr V, Coelho JDS, Ferrer JAP, Buduhan G, Tan L, Srinathan S, Shea P, Yeung J, Allison F, Carroll P, Vargas-Barato F, Gonzalez F, Ortega J, Nino-Torres L, Beltrán-García TC, Castilla L, Pineda M, Bastidas A, Gómez-Mayorga J, Cortés N, Cetares C, Caceres S, Duarte S, Pazdro A, Snajdauf M, Faltova H, Sevcikova M, Mortensen PB, Katballe N, Ingemann T, Morten B, Kruhlikava I, Ainswort AP, Stilling NM, Eckardt J, Holm J, Thorsteinsson M, Siemsen M, Brandt B, Nega B, Teferra E, Tizazu A, Kauppila JH, Koivukangas V, Meriläinen S, Gruetzmann R, Krautz C, Weber G, Golcher H, Emons G, Azizian A, Ebeling M, Niebisch S, Kreuser N, Albanese G, Hesse J, Volovnik L, Boecher U, Reeh M, Triantafyllou S, Schizas D, Michalinos A, Balli E, Mpoura M, Charalabopoulos A, Manatakis DK, Balalis D, Bolger J, Baban C, Mastrosimone A, McAnena O, Quinn A, Ó Súilleabháin CB, Hennessy MM, Ivanovski I, Khizer H, Ravi N, Donlon N, Cervellera M, Vaccari S, Bianchini S, Asti E, Bernardi D, Merigliano S, Provenzano L, Scarpa M, Saadeh L, Salmaso B, De Manzoni G, Giacopuzzi S, La Mendola R, De Pasqual CA, Tsubosa Y, Niihara M, Irino T, Makuuchi R, Ishii K K, Mwachiro M, Fekadu A, Odera A, Mwachiro E, AlShehab D, Ahmed HA, Shebani AO, Elhadi A, Elnagar FA, Elnagar HF, Makkai-Popa ST, Wong LF, Tan YR, Thannimalai S, Ho CA, Pang WS, Tan JH, Basave HNL, Cortés-González R, Lagarde SM, van Lanschot JJB, Cords C, Jansen WA, Martijnse I, Matthijsen R, Bouwense S, Klarenbeek B, Verstegen M, van Workum F, Ruurda JP, van der Sluis PC, de Maat M, Evenett N, Johnston P, Patel R, MacCormick A, Smith B, Ekwunife C, Memon AH, Shaikh K, Wajid A, Khalil N, Haris M, Mirza ZU, Qudus SBA, Sarwar MZ, Shehzadi A, Raza A, Jhanzaib MH, Farmanali J, Zakir Z, Shakeel O, Nasir I, Khattak S, Baig M, Noor MA, Ahmed HH, Naeem A, Pinho AC, da Silva R, Bernardes A, Campos JC, Matos H, Braga T, Monteiro C, Ramos P, Cabral F, Gomes MP, Martins PC, Correia AM, Videira JF, Ciuce C, Drasovean R, Apostu R, Ciuce C, Paitici S, Racu AE, Obleaga CV, Beuran M, Stoica B, Ciubotaru C, Negoita V, Cordos I, Birla RD, Predescu D, Hoara PA, Tomsa R, Shneider V, Agasiev M, Ganjara I, Gunjić D, Veselinović M, Babič T, Chin TS, Shabbir A, Kim G, Crnjac A, Samo H, Díez del Val I, Leturio S, Ramón JM, Dal Cero M, Rifá S, Rico M, Pagan Pomar A, Martinez Corcoles JA, Rodicio Miravalles JL, Pais SA, Turienzo SA, Alvarez LS, Campos PV, Rendo AG, García SS, Santos EPG, Martínez ET, Fernández Díaz MJ, Magadán Álvarez C, Concepción Martín V, Díaz López C, Rosat Rodrigo A, Pérez Sánchez LE, Bailón Cuadrado M, Tinoco Carrasco C, Choolani Bhojwani E, Sánchez DP, Ahmed ME, Dzhendov T, Lindberg F, Rutegård M, Sundbom M, Mickael C, Colucci N, Schnider A, Er S, Kurnaz E, Turkyilmaz S, Turkyilmaz A, Yildirim R, Baki BE, Akkapulu N, Karahan O, Damburaci N, Hardwick R, Safranek P, Sujendran V, Bennett J, Afzal Z, Shrotri M, Chan B, Exarchou K, Gilbert T, Amalesh T, Mukherjee D, Mukherjee S, Wiggins TH, Kennedy R, McCain S, Harris A, Dobson G, Davies N, Wilson I, Mayo D, Bennett D, Young R, Manby P, Blencowe N, Schiller M, Byrne B, Mitton D, Wong V, Elshaer A, Cowen M, Menon V, Tan LC, McLaughlin E, Koshy R, Sharp C, Brewer H, Das N, Cox M, Al Khyatt W, Worku D, Iqbal R, Walls L, McGregor R, Fullarton G, Macdonald A, MacKay C, Craig C, Dwerryhouse S, Hornby S, Jaunoo S, Wadley M, Baker C, Saad M, Kelly M, Davies A, Di Maggio F, McKay S, Mistry P, Singhal R, Tucker O, Kapoulas S, Powell-Brett S, Davis P, Bromley G, Watson L, Verma R, Ward J, Shetty V, Ball C, Pursnani K, Sarela A, Sue Ling H, Mehta S, Hayden J, To N, Palser T, Hunter D, Supramaniam K, Butt Z, Ahmed A, Kumar S, Chaudry A, Moussa O, Kordzadeh A, Lorenzi B, Wilson M, Patil P, Noaman I, Bouras G, Evans R, Singh M, Warrilow H, Ahmad A, Tewari N, Yanni F, Couch J, Theophilidou E, Reilly JJ, Singh P, van Boxel G, Akbari K, Zanotti D, Sanders G, Wheatley T, Ariyarathenam A, Reece-Smith A, Humphreys L, Choh C, Carter N, Knight B, Pucher P, Athanasiou A, Mohamed I, Tan B, Abdulrahman M, Vickers J, Akhtar K, Chaparala R, Brown R, Alasmar MMA, Ackroyd R, Patel K, Tamhankar A, Wyman A, Walker R, Grace B, Abbassi N, Slim N, Ioannidi L, Blackshaw G, Havard T, Escofet X, Powell A, Owera A, Rashid F, Jambulingam P, Padickakudi J, Ben-Younes H, Mccormack K, Makey IA, Karush MK, Seder CW, Liptay MJ, Chmielewski G, Rosato EL, Berger AC, Zheng R, Okolo E, Singh A, Scott CD, Weyant MJ, Mitchell JD. Textbook outcome following oesophagectomy for cancer: international cohort study. Br J Surg 2022; 109:439-449. [PMID: 35194634 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Textbook outcome has been proposed as a tool for the assessment of oncological surgical care. However, an international assessment in patients undergoing oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer has not been reported. This study aimed to assess textbook outcome in an international setting. METHODS Patients undergoing curative resection for oesophageal cancer were identified from the international Oesophagogastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA) from April 2018 to December 2018. Textbook outcome was defined as the percentage of patients who underwent a complete tumour resection with at least 15 lymph nodes in the resected specimen and an uneventful postoperative course, without hospital readmission. A multivariable binary logistic regression model was used to identify factors independently associated with textbook outcome, and results are presented as odds ratio (OR) and 95 per cent confidence intervals (95 per cent c.i.). RESULTS Of 2159 patients with oesophageal cancer, 39.7 per cent achieved a textbook outcome. The outcome parameter 'no major postoperative complication' had the greatest negative impact on a textbook outcome for patients with oesophageal cancer, compared to other textbook outcome parameters. Multivariable analysis identified male gender and increasing Charlson comorbidity index with a significantly lower likelihood of textbook outcome. Presence of 24-hour on-call rota for oesophageal surgeons (OR 2.05, 95 per cent c.i. 1.30 to 3.22; P = 0.002) and radiology (OR 1.54, 95 per cent c.i. 1.05 to 2.24; P = 0.027), total minimally invasive oesophagectomies (OR 1.63, 95 per cent c.i. 1.27 to 2.08; P < 0.001), and chest anastomosis above azygous (OR 2.17, 95 per cent c.i. 1.58 to 2.98; P < 0.001) were independently associated with a significantly increased likelihood of textbook outcome. CONCLUSION Textbook outcome is achieved in less than 40 per cent of patients having oesophagectomy for cancer. Improvements in centralization, hospital resources, access to minimal access surgery, and adoption of newer techniques for improving lymph node yield could improve textbook outcome.
Collapse
|
6
|
Moore JL, Davies AR, Santaolalla A, Van Hemelrijck M, Maisey N, Lagergren J, Gossage JA, Kelly M, Baker CR. Clinical Relevance of the Tumor Location-Modified Laurén Classification System for Gastric Cancer in a Western Population. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:3911-3920. [PMID: 35041098 PMCID: PMC9072452 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11252-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background The Tumor Location-Modified Laurén Classification (MLC) system combines Laurén histologic subtype and anatomic tumor location. It divides gastric tumors into proximal non-diffuse (PND), distal non-diffuse (DND), and diffuse (D) types. The optimum classification of patients with Laurén mixed tumors in this system is not clear due to its grouping with both diffuse and non-diffuse types in previous studies. The clinical relevance of the MLC in a Western population has not been examined. Methods A cohort study investigated 404 patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma between 2005 and 2020. The classification of Laurén mixed tumors was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics (chi-square). Survival analysis was performed using multivariable Cox regression. Results The ROC curve analysis demonstrated a slightly higher area under the curve value for predicting survival when Laurén mixed tumors were grouped with intestinal-type rather than diffuse-type tumors (0.58 vs 0.57). Survival, tumor recurrence, and resection margin positivity in mixed tumors also was more similar to intestinal type. Distal non-diffuse tumors had the best 5-year survival (DND 64.7 % vs PND 56.1 % vs diffuse 45.1 %; p = 0.006) and were least likely to have recurrence (DND 27.0 % vs PND 34.3 % vs diffuse 48.3 %; p = 0.001). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that MLC was an independent prognostic factor for survival (PND: hazard ratio [HR], 1.64; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.16–2.32 vs diffuse: HR, 2.20; 95 % CI, 1.56–3.09) Conclusions The MLC was an independent prognostic marker in this Western cohort of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. The patients with PND and D tumors had worse survival than those with DND tumors.
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-11252-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J L Moore
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK. .,School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College, London, UK.
| | - A R Davies
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.,School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College, London, UK
| | - A Santaolalla
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College, London, UK.,Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College, London, UK
| | - M Van Hemelrijck
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College, London, UK.,Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR), School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College, London, UK
| | - N Maisey
- Department of Medical Oncology, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - J Lagergren
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.,School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College, London, UK.,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J A Gossage
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.,School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College, London, UK
| | - M Kelly
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.,School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College, London, UK
| | - C R Baker
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.,School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pucher PH, Green M, Bateman AC, Underwood TJ, Maynard N, Allum WH, Novelli M, Gossage JA. Variation in histopathological assessment and association with surgical quality indicators following oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 2021; 108:74-79. [PMID: 33640940 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaa038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2020] [Revised: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Histopathological outcomes, such as lymph node yield and margin positivity, are used to benchmark and assess surgical centre quality, and are reported annually by the National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Audit (NOGCA) in England and Wales. The variation in pathological specimen assessment and how this affects these outcomes is not known. METHODS A survey of practice was circulated to all tertiary oesophagogastric cancer centres across England and Wales. Questions captured demographic data, and information on how specimens were prepared and analysed. National performance data were retrieved from the NOGCA. Survey results were compared for tertiles of lymph node yield, and circumferential and longitudinal margins. RESULTS Survey responses were received from 32 of 37 units (86 per cent response rate), accounting for 93.1 per cent of the total oesophagectomy volume in England and Wales. Only 5 of 32 units met or exceeded current guidelines on specimen preparation according to the Royal College of Pathologists guidelines. There was wide variation in how centres defined positive (R1) margins, and how margins and lymph nodes were assessed. Centres with the highest nodal yield were more likely to use systematic fat blocking, and to re-examine specimens when the initial load was low. Systematic blocking of lesser curve fat resulted in significantly higher rates of patients with at least 15 lymph nodes examined (91.4 versus 86.5 per cent; P = 0.027). CONCLUSION Preparation and histopathological assessment of specimens varies significantly across institutions. This challenges the validity of currently used surgical quality metrics for oesophageal and other tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P H Pucher
- Department of General Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M Green
- Department of Histopathology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A C Bateman
- Department of Histopathology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - T J Underwood
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- School of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - N Maynard
- Department of General Surgery, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - W H Allum
- Department of General Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M Novelli
- Department of Histopathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J A Gossage
- Department of General Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gossage JA. Minimally invasive left-sided esophagectomy (MILO): a novel approach for locally advanced tumors of the gastroesophageal junction. Dis Esophagus 2021; 34:5863450. [PMID: 32591785 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doaa059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2020] [Revised: 05/10/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Recent national audit has shown that levels of minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer have increased to around 45% in the UK. The hybrid approach is the most common, with a laparoscopic abdominal phase and an open thoracic dissection. A number of centers have now adopted a two-phase Ivor-Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy using a laparoscopic abdominal phase, followed by a thoracoscopic chest phase with a mini-thoracotomy to extract the specimen. The two-phase nature of the procedure lengthens the operative time and makes returning to the abdominal cavity difficult. The thoracotomy incision can also be painful and may reduce respiratory function post operatively. This report describes a novel single-phase minimally invasive left-sided technique with a mini-laparotomy for specimen extraction. This method offers excellent hiatal exposure, avoids a thoracotomy, and shortens the procedure time. Minimally invasive left-sided esophagectomy is a new useful approach for tumors located at the gastroesophageal junction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Gossage
- Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, London, UK.,King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Reyhani A, Zylstra J, Davies AR, Gossage JA. Laparoscopic-assisted left thoracoabdominal esophagectomy (LLTA): an innovative approach for locally advanced tumors of the gastroesophageal junction. Dis Esophagus 2020; 33:5780066. [PMID: 32129450 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doaa014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2020] [Revised: 02/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report a novel approach for locally advanced tumors located at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) using a laparoscopic abdominal phase and open left thoracotomy with the patient in a single right lateral decubitus position. BACKGROUND The standard open left thoracoabdominal approach offers excellent exposure and access to the GEJ and lower esophagus. It also involves a single position for the procedure, shortening the operation time. The disadvantages are a large incision, division of the costochondral junction, and a low-level thoracotomy. The laparoscopic-assisted left thoracoabdominal esophagectomy (LLTA) is performed with the patient in the same right lateral decubitus position, but initially rolled away from the operator at 45° allowing laparoscopic gastric mobilization and lymphadenectomy. The patient is then tilted back to the lateral position for the thoracic phase. An anterolateral left thoracotomy is performed through the higher fifth intercostal space allowing a high intrathoracic anastomosis, just below the aortic arch. No disruption of the costochondral junction is made. METHODS Consecutive patients selectively treated for locally advanced GEJ tumors with an LLTA approach between 2013 and 2019 were analyzed and compared to national standards (NOGCA). RESULTS This series of 74 consecutive patients had a mean age of 63 years. The median operation time was 235 minutes. The median inpatient stay was 10 days (NOGCA 9 [11-17]). The tumors were predominantly adenocarcinoma (95%) and located at the GEJ (92%). The majority were locally advanced T3 or T4 tumors. Postoperative morbidity was low, Clavien-Dindo (C-D) 0 in 52.7% patients, C-D1 (1.4%), C-D2 (31.1%), C-D3a (5.4%), C-D4a (9.5%), and C-D5 (1.4%). The median number of total lymph nodes (LN) excised was 28 (NOGCA >15); LN % yield ≥18 was 90% (NOGCA 82.5%). Positive nodes were located at the lesser-curve (40%), paraesophageal (32.4%), and subcarinal regions (2.7%). Positive circumferential resection margins (<1 mm) were present in 28.4% of resected specimens (NOGCA 25.1%). This is reflective of the high proportion T3/T4 tumors selected for this approach. Hospital and 30-day mortality was 1.4% (NOGCA 2.7%). Recurrence after LLTA was 25.7% (local 5.4%, systemic 17.6%, mixed 2.7%) at a median of 311 days (62-1,158). CONCLUSION This series demonstrates a novel, safe, and reproducible approach for locally advanced cancer of the GEJ. It offers a better exposure of the hiatus than the right-sided approach and avoids division of the costochondral junction and low thoracotomy seen with the open left thoracoabdominal approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Reyhani
- Guy's and St Thomas' Esophago-Gastric Research Group, London, UK.,Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - J Zylstra
- Guy's and St Thomas' Esophago-Gastric Research Group, London, UK
| | - A R Davies
- Guy's and St Thomas' Esophago-Gastric Research Group, London, UK.,Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - J A Gossage
- Guy's and St Thomas' Esophago-Gastric Research Group, London, UK.,Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bott RK, Beckmann K, Zylstra J, Wilkinson MJ, Knight WRC, Baker CR, Kelly M, Maisey N, Qureshi A, Sevitt T, Van Hemelrijck M, Smyth EC, Allum WH, Lagergren J, Gossage JA, Cunningham D, Davies AR. Adjuvant therapy following oesophagectomy for adenocarcinoma in patients with a positive resection margin. Br J Surg 2020; 107:1801-1810. [PMID: 32990343 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Revised: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The role of adjuvant therapy in patients with oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy is contentious. In UK practice, surgical resection margin status is often used to classify patients for receiving adjuvant treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the survival benefit of adjuvant therapy in patients with positive (R1) resection margins. METHODS Two prospectively collected UK institutional databases were combined to identify eligible patients. Adjusted Cox regression analyses were used to compare overall and recurrence-free survival according to adjuvant treatment. Recurrence patterns were assessed as a secondary outcome. Propensity score-matched analysis was also performed. RESULTS Of 616 patients included in the combined database, 242 patients who had an R1 resection were included in the study. Of these, 112 patients (46·3 per cent) received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, 46 (19·0 per cent) were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and 84 (34·7 per cent) had no adjuvant treatment. In adjusted analysis, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy improved recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0·59, 95 per cent c.i. 0·38 to 0·94; P = 0·026), with a benefit in terms of both local (HR 0·48, 0·24 to 0·99; P = 0·047) and systemic (HR 0·56, 0·33 to 0·94; P = 0·027) recurrence. In analyses stratified by tumour response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, non-responders (Mandard tumour regression grade 4-5) treated with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy had an overall survival benefit (HR 0·61, 0·38 to 0·97; P = 0·037). In propensity score-matched analysis, an overall survival benefit (HR 0·62, 0·39 to 0·98; P = 0·042) and recurrence-free survival benefit (HR 0·51, 0·30 to 0·87; P = 0·004) were observed for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus no adjuvant treatment. CONCLUSION Adjuvant therapy may improve overall survival and recurrence-free survival after margin-positive resection. This pattern seems most pronounced with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in non-responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R K Bott
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St Thomas' Hospital.,School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences
| | - K Beckmann
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Translational Oncology and Urology Research, King's College London, London, UK.,University of South Australia Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - J Zylstra
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St Thomas' Hospital
| | - M J Wilkinson
- Departments of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, London, UK
| | - W R C Knight
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St Thomas' Hospital
| | - C R Baker
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St Thomas' Hospital.,School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences
| | - M Kelly
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St Thomas' Hospital.,School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences
| | - N Maisey
- Departments of Medical Oncology, London, UK
| | - A Qureshi
- Clinical Oncology, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - T Sevitt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Maidstone Hospital, Maidstone, UK
| | - M Van Hemelrijck
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Translational Oncology and Urology Research, King's College London, London, UK
| | - E C Smyth
- Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - W H Allum
- Departments of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, London, UK
| | - J Lagergren
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences.,Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J A Gossage
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St Thomas' Hospital.,School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences
| | - D Cunningham
- Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - A R Davies
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St Thomas' Hospital.,School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dellaportas D, Laliotis A, Zylstra J, Davies A, Gossage JA. Clinical significance of pulmonary nodules in decision-making and management of patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 2020; 33:5606686. [PMID: 31650165 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doz086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2019] [Revised: 07/24/2019] [Accepted: 08/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
In esophageal cancer, metastatic spread to the lungs is detected in 4-9.7% of cases. During staging investigations, 22% of patients have pulmonary nodules detected on cross-sectional imaging. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the clinical importance of these incidentally found pulmonary nodules, in patients with clinically localized esophageal cancer. A retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2008 to December 2012 in a tertiary esophagogastric referral center. One-hundred and forty-nine patients were included in the study. All patients underwent dedicated staging followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery as indicated. Thirty-three (22.1%) patients had pulmonary nodules found in their preoperative staging. Only three (9%) patients proved to develop metastatic pulmonary disease on follow-up. Interestingly, in all three patients, the nodules were negative on initial 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Incidentally found pulmonary nodules in newly diagnosed patients with esophageal cancer during staging investigations are rarely metastases. Such nodules, in isolation, should not preclude patients from radical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Dellaportas
- Department of Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Center, London, UK
| | - A Laliotis
- Department of Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Center, London, UK
| | - J Zylstra
- Department of Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Center, London, UK
| | - A Davies
- Department of Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Center, London, UK
| | - J A Gossage
- Department of Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Center, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Knight WRC, Yip C, Wulaningsih W, Jacques A, Griffin N, Zylstra J, Van Hemelrijck M, Maisey N, Gaya A, Baker CR, Kelly M, Gossage JA, Lagergren J, Landau D, Goh V, Davies AR, Ngan S, Qureshi A, Deere H, Green M, Chang F, Mahadeva U, Gill‐Barman B, George S, Dunn J, Zeki S, Meenan J, Hynes O, Tham G, Iezzi C. Prediction of a positive circumferential resection margin at surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus. BJS Open 2019; 3:767-776. [PMID: 31832583 PMCID: PMC6887675 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background A positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) has been associated with higher rates of locoregional recurrence and worse survival in oesophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to establish if clinicopathological and radiological variables might predict CRM positivity in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery for oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Methods Multivariable analysis of clinicopathological and CT imaging characteristics considered potentially predictive of CRM was performed at initial staging and following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Prediction models were constructed. The area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (c.i.) from 1000 bootstrapping was assessed. Results A total of 223 patients were included in the study. Poor differentiation (odds ratio (OR) 2·84, 95 per cent c.i. 1·39 to 6·01) and advanced clinical tumour status (T3-4) (OR 2·93, 1·03 to 9·48) were independently associated with an increased CRM risk at diagnosis. CT-assessed lack of response (stable or progressive disease) following chemotherapy independently corresponded with an increased risk of CRM positivity (OR 3·38, 1·43 to 8·50). Additional CT evidence of local invasion and higher CT tumour volume (14 cm3) improved the performance of a prediction model, including all the above parameters, with an AUC (c-index) of 0·76 (0·67 to 0·83). Variables associated with significantly higher rates of locoregional recurrence were pN status (P = 0·020), lymphovascular invasion (P = 0·007) and poor response to chemotherapy (Mandard score 4-5) (P = 0·006). CRM positivity was associated with a higher locoregional recurrence rate, but this was not statistically significant (P = 0·092). Conclusion The presence of advanced cT status, poor tumour differentiation, and CT-assessed lack of response to chemotherapy, higher tumour volume and local invasion can be used to identify patients at risk of a positive CRM following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W. R. C. Knight
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago‐Gastric Centre, King's College London
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London
| | - C. Yip
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London
| | - W. Wulaningsih
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Associated Research Group, King's College London
| | - A. Jacques
- Department of Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - N. Griffin
- Department of Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - J. Zylstra
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago‐Gastric Centre, King's College London
| | - M. Van Hemelrijck
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Associated Research Group, King's College London
| | - N. Maisey
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - A. Gaya
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - C. R. Baker
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago‐Gastric Centre, King's College London
| | - M. Kelly
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago‐Gastric Centre, King's College London
| | - J. A. Gossage
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago‐Gastric Centre, King's College London
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J. Lagergren
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago‐Gastric Centre, King's College London
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - D. Landau
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - V. Goh
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Associated Research Group, King's College London
| | - A. R. Davies
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago‐Gastric Centre, King's College London
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Smyth EC, Nyamundanda G, Cunningham D, Fontana E, Ragulan C, Tan IB, Lin SJ, Wotherspoon A, Nankivell M, Fassan M, Lampis A, Hahne JC, Davies AR, Lagergren J, Gossage JA, Maisey N, Green M, Zylstra JL, Allum WH, Langley RE, Tan P, Valeri N, Sadanandam A. A seven-Gene Signature assay improves prognostic risk stratification of perioperative chemotherapy treated gastroesophageal cancer patients from the MAGIC trial. Ann Oncol 2018; 29:2356-2362. [PMID: 30481267 PMCID: PMC6311954 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable gastroesophageal cancer, lymph node metastasis is the only validated prognostic variable; however, within lymph node groups there is still heterogeneity with risk of relapse. We hypothesized that gene profiles from neoadjuvant chemotherapy treated resection specimens from gastroesophageal cancer patients can be used to define prognostic risk groups to identify patients at risk for relapse. Patients and methods The Medical Research Council Adjuvant Gastric Infusional Chemotherapy (MAGIC) trial (n = 202 with high quality RNA) samples treated with perioperative chemotherapy were profiled for a custom gastric cancer gene panel using the NanoString platform. Genes associated with overall survival (OS) were identified using penalized and standard Cox regression, followed by generation of risk scores and development of a NanoString biomarker assay to stratify patients into risk groups associated with OS. An independent dataset served as a validation cohort. Results Regression and clustering analysis of MAGIC patients defined a seven-Gene Signature and two risk groups with different OS [hazard ratio (HR) 5.1; P < 0.0001]. The median OS of high- and low-risk groups were 10.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) of 6.5 and 13.2 months] and 80.9 months (CI: 43.0 months and not assessable), respectively. Risk groups were independently prognostic of lymph node metastasis by multivariate analysis (HR 3.6 in node positive group, P = 0.02; HR 3.6 in high-risk group, P = 0.0002), and not prognostic in surgery only patients (n = 118; log rank P = 0.2). A validation cohort independently confirmed these findings. Conclusions These results suggest that gene-based risk groups can independently predict prognosis in gastroesophageal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This signature and associated assay may help risk stratify these patients for post-surgery chemotherapy in future perioperative chemotherapy-based clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - G Nyamundanda
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Centre for Molecular Pathology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - D Cunningham
- Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; Centre for Molecular Pathology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - E Fontana
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Centre for Molecular Pathology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - C Ragulan
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Centre for Molecular Pathology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - I B Tan
- Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - S J Lin
- Bioinformatics Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Victoria, Australia; Division of Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - M Nankivell
- Clinical Trials Unit, Medical Research Council, University College London, London, UK
| | - M Fassan
- Department of Pathology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - A Lampis
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Centre for Molecular Pathology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - J C Hahne
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Centre for Molecular Pathology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - J Lagergren
- Guys & St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK; Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - N Maisey
- Guys & St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - M Green
- Guys & St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - J L Zylstra
- Department of Pathology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | | | - R E Langley
- Clinical Trials Unit, Medical Research Council, University College London, London, UK
| | - P Tan
- Cancer and Stem Cell Biology, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - N Valeri
- Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; Division of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Centre for Molecular Pathology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - A Sadanandam
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Centre for Molecular Pathology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Davies AR, Myoteri D, Zylstra J, Baker CR, Wulaningsih W, Van Hemelrijck M, Maisey N, Allum WH, Smyth E, Gossage JA, Lagergren J, Cunningham D, Green M. Lymph node regression and survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg 2018; 105:1639-1649. [PMID: 30047556 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Revised: 04/12/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim was to define the pathological response in lymph nodes following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for oesophageal adenocarcinoma and to quantify any associated survival benefit. METHODS Lymph nodes retrieved at oesophagectomy were examined retrospectively by two pathologists for evidence of a response to chemotherapy. Patients were classified as lymph node-negative (either negative nodes with no evidence of previous tumour involvement or negative with evidence of complete regression) or positive (allocated a lymph node regression score based on the proportion of fibrosis to residual tumour). Lymph node responders (score 1, complete response; 2, less than 10 per cent remaining tumour; 3, 10-50 per cent remaining tumour) and non-responders (score 4, more than 50 per cent viable tumour; 5, no response) were compared in survival analyses using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. RESULTS Among 377 patients, 256 had neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Overall, 68 of 256 patients (26·6 per cent) had a lymph node response and 115 (44·9 per cent) did not. The remaining 73 patients (28·5 per cent) had negative lymph nodes with no evidence of regression. Some patients had a lymph node response in the absence of a response in the primary tumour (27 of 99, 27 per cent). Lymph node responders had a significant survival benefit (P < 0·001), even when stratified by patients with or without a response in the primary tumour. On multivariable analysis, lymph node responders had decreased overall (hazard ratio 0·53, 95 per cent c.i. 0·36 to 0·78) and disease-specific (HR 0·42, 0·27 to 0·66) mortality, and experienced reduced local and systemic recurrence. CONCLUSION Lymph node regression is a strong prognostic factor and may be more important than response in the primary tumour.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R Davies
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre, London, UK
- Gastrointestinal Cancer, King's College London, London, UK
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - D Myoteri
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre, London, UK
| | - J Zylstra
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre, London, UK
- Gastrointestinal Cancer, King's College London, London, UK
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - C R Baker
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre, London, UK
- Gastrointestinal Cancer, King's College London, London, UK
| | - W Wulaningsih
- Translational Oncology and Urology Research, School of Cancer Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - M Van Hemelrijck
- Translational Oncology and Urology Research, School of Cancer Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - N Maisey
- Department of Oncology, Guy's Cancer Centre, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - W H Allum
- Department of Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - E Smyth
- Department of Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | - J A Gossage
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre, London, UK
- Gastrointestinal Cancer, King's College London, London, UK
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Lagergren
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre, London, UK
- Gastrointestinal Cancer, King's College London, London, UK
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - D Cunningham
- Department of Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - M Green
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Knight WRC, Zylstra J, Wulaningsih W, Van Hemelrijck M, Landau D, Maisey N, Gaya A, Baker CR, Gossage JA, Largergren J, Davies AR. Impact of incremental circumferential resection margin distance on overall survival and recurrence in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. BJS Open 2018; 2:229-237. [PMID: 30079392 PMCID: PMC6069345 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.65] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2018] [Accepted: 03/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Previous analyses of the oesophageal circumferential resection margin (CRM) have focused on the prognostic validity of two different definitions of a positive CRM, that of the College of American Pathologists (tumour at margin) and that of the Royal College of Pathologists (tumour within 1 mm). This study aimed to analyse the validity of these definitions and explore the risk of recurrence and survival with incremental tumour distances from the CRM. Methods This cohort study included patients who underwent resection for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus between 2000 and 2014. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the hazard ratio (HR) with 95 per cent confidence intervals for recurrence and mortality in CRM increments: tumour at the cut margin, extending to within 0·1-0·9, 1·0-1·9, 2·0-4·9 mm, and 5·0 mm or more from the margin. Results A total of 444 patients were included in the study. Kaplan-Meier and unadjusted analyses showed a significant incremental improvement in overall survival (P < 0·001) and recurrence (P for trend < 0·001) rates with increasing distance from the CRM. Tumour distance of 2·0 mm or more remained a significant predictor of survival on multivariable analysis (HR for risk of death 0·66, 95 per cent c.i. 0·44 to 1·00). Multivariable analysis of overall survival demonstrated a significant difference between a positive and negative CRM with the Royal College of Pathologists' definition (HR 1·37, 1·01 to 1·85), but not with the College of American Pathologists' definition (HR 1·22, 0·90 to 1·65). Conclusion This study demonstrated an incremental improvement in survival and recurrence rates with increasing tumour distance from the CRM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W R C Knight
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre, London, UK.,Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK
| | - J Zylstra
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre, London, UK
| | - W Wulaningsih
- Medical Research Council Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, University College London, London, UK
| | - M Van Hemelrijck
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Associated Research Group, King's College London, London, UK
| | - D Landau
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - N Maisey
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - A Gaya
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - C R Baker
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre, London, UK
| | - J A Gossage
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre, London, UK.,Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK.,Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Largergren
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre, London, UK.,Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK.,Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A R Davies
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre, London, UK.,Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK.,Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Knight WRC, Zylstra J, Van Hemelrijck M, Griffin N, Jacques AET, Maisey N, Baker CR, Gossage JA, Largergren J, Davies AR. Patterns of recurrence in oesophageal cancer following oesophagectomy in the era of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. BJS Open 2018; 1:182-190. [PMID: 29951621 PMCID: PMC5989962 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.30] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2017] [Accepted: 10/30/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Tumour recurrence following oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer is common despite neoadjuvant treatment. Understanding patterns of recurrence and risk factors associated with locoregional and systemic recurrence might influence future treatment strategies. Methods This was a cohort study involving patients undergoing resection for adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus between 2000 and 2014. Clinicopathological factors associated with locoregional and systemic recurrence were analysed using multivariable logistic regression to determine odds ratios (ORs) and 95 per cent confidence intervals. Results Some 698 patients were identified. Lymphovascular invasion (OR 2·09, 95 per cent c.i. 1·18 to 3·71) and preoperative stenting (OR 3·70, 1·34 to 10·23) were independent risk factors for isolated locoregional recurrence. Pathological nodal disease in patients with pT1–2 (pN1: OR 2·72, 1·35 to 5·48; pN2–3: OR 5·00, 2·35 to 10·66) or pT3–4 (pN1: OR 3·03, 1·51 to 6·07; pN2–3: OR 5·75, 3·15 to 10·49) disease predisposed to systemic recurrence. Poor or no response to chemotherapy was also an independent risk factor for isolated systemic recurrence (OR 1·85, 1·05 to 3·26). A positive resection margin (R1 resection) was not associated with a significantly increased risk of isolated locoregional recurrence (OR 1·37, 0·81 to 2·33). Conclusion These findings confirm that oesophageal adenocarcinoma is frequently a systemic disease. Understanding the key predictors of local and systemic recurrence may facilitate the tailoring of oncological therapies to the individual patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W R C Knight
- Department of Surgery Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre London UK.,Division of Cancer Studies Division of Cancer Studies King's College London London UK
| | - J Zylstra
- Department of Surgery Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre London UK
| | - M Van Hemelrijck
- Translational Oncology and Urology Research (TOUR) Division of Cancer Studies King's College London London UK
| | - N Griffin
- Department of Radiology Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital London UK
| | - A E T Jacques
- Department of Radiology Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital London UK
| | - N Maisey
- Department of Oncology Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital London UK
| | - C R Baker
- Department of Surgery Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre London UK
| | - J A Gossage
- Department of Surgery Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre London UK.,Division of Cancer Studies Division of Cancer Studies King's College London London UK.,Gastrointestinal Research Unit, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, on behalf of the Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Research Group
| | - J Largergren
- Department of Surgery Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre London UK.,Division of Cancer Studies Division of Cancer Studies King's College London London UK.,Gastrointestinal Research Unit, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, on behalf of the Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Research Group
| | - A R Davies
- Department of Surgery Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre London UK.,Division of Cancer Studies Division of Cancer Studies King's College London London UK.,Gastrointestinal Research Unit, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, on behalf of the Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Research Group
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Davies AR, Zylstra J, Baker CR, Gossage JA, Dellaportas D, Lagergren J, Findlay JM, Puccetti F, El Lakis M, Drummond RJ, Dutta S, Mera A, Van Hemelrijck M, Forshaw MJ, Maynard ND, Allum WH, Low D, Mason RC. A comparison of the left thoracoabdominal and Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus 2018; 31:4566196. [PMID: 29087474 DOI: 10.1093/dote/dox129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2017] [Accepted: 10/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the oncological outcomes of a large multicenter series of left thoracoabdominal esophagectomies, and compare these to the more widely utilized Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. With ethics approval and an established study protocol, anonymized data from five centers were merged into a structured database. The study exposure was operative approach (ILE or LTE). The primary outcome measure was time to death. Secondary outcome measures included time to tumor recurrence, positive surgical resection margins, lymph node yield, postoperative death, and hospital length of stay. Cox proportional hazards models provided hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) adjusting for age, pathological tumor stage, tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion, and neoadjuvant treatment. Among 1228 patients (598 ILE; 630 LTE), most (86%) had adenocarcinoma (AC) and were male (81%). Comparing ILE and LTE for AC patients, no difference was seen in terms of time to death (HR 0.904 95%CI 0.749-1.1090) or time to recurrence (HR 0.973 95%CI 0.768-1.232). The risk of a positive resection margin was also similar (OR 1.022 95%CI 0.731-1.429). Median lymph node yield did not differ between approaches (LTE 21; ILE 21; P = 0.426). In-hospital mortality was 2.4%, significantly lower in the LTE group (LTE 1.3%; ILE 3.6%; P = 0.004). Median hospital stay was 11 days in the LTE group and 14 days in the ILE group (P < 0.0001). In conclusion, this is the largest series of left thoracoabdominal esophagectomies to be submitted for publication and the only one to compare two different transthoracic esophagectomy strategies. It demonstrates oncological equivalence between operative approaches but possible short- term advantages to the left thoracoabdominal esophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R Davies
- Department of Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' Esophago-Gastric Centre.,Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London.,Upper GI Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J Zylstra
- Department of Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' Esophago-Gastric Centre.,Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London.,Upper GI Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - C R Baker
- Department of Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' Esophago-Gastric Centre.,Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London.,Upper GI Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J A Gossage
- Department of Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' Esophago-Gastric Centre.,Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London.,Upper GI Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - D Dellaportas
- Department of Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' Esophago-Gastric Centre
| | - J Lagergren
- Department of Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' Esophago-Gastric Centre.,Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London.,Upper GI Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J M Findlay
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oxford Esophago-Gastric Centre, Oxford University Hospitals.,NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford
| | - F Puccetti
- Department of Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London
| | - M El Lakis
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Centre, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - R J Drummond
- Department of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - S Dutta
- Department of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - A Mera
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London
| | - M Van Hemelrijck
- Cancer Epidemiology Group, Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London
| | - M J Forshaw
- Department of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - N D Maynard
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Oxford Esophago-Gastric Centre, Oxford University Hospitals
| | - W H Allum
- Department of Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, London
| | - D Low
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Centre, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - R C Mason
- Department of Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' Esophago-Gastric Centre.,Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London.,Upper GI Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kauppila JH, Johar A, Gossage JA, Davies AR, Zylstra J, Lagergren J, Lagergren P. Health-related quality of life after open transhiatal and transthoracic oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg 2018; 105:230-236. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2017] [Revised: 09/11/2017] [Accepted: 10/02/2017] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Transhiatal and transthoracic oesophagectomy in patients with oesophageal cancer have similar survival rates. Whether these approaches differ in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is uncertain and was examined in this study.
Methods
Patients undergoing transhiatal or transthoracic surgery for lower-third oesophageal or gastro-oesophageal junctional cancer between 2011 and 2015 were selected from an institutional database. HRQoL outcomes were measured at 6 and 12 months after surgery using validated written questionnaires (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OG25). Linear mixed models provided mean score differences (MSDs) with 95 per cent confidence intervals, adjusted for preoperative HRQoL, age, physical status (ASA fitness grade), tumour location, tumour stage, neoadjuvant therapy, adjuvant therapy and postoperative complications. MSD values of 10 or more were regarded as clinically relevant.
Results
Some 146 patients underwent transhiatal (86, 58·9 per cent) or transthoracic (60, 41·1 per cent) oesophagectomy. The HRQoL questionnaires were returned by 111 patients at 6 months and 74 at 12 months. At 6 months, transthoracic oesophagectomy was associated with worse role function (MSD –12, 95 per cent c.i. –23 to 0; P = 0·046). At 12 months, patients in the transthoracic group had more nausea and vomiting (MSD 11, 0 to 22; P = 0·045), dyspnoea (MSD 13, 1 to 25; P = 0·029) and constipation (MSD 20, 7 to 33; P = 0·003) than those in the transhiatal group.
Conclusion
Transhiatal oesophagectomy seems to offer better HRQoL than transthoracic oesophagectomy 6 and 12 months after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J H Kauppila
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, Medical Research Centre, University of Oulu and Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - A Johar
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - J A Gossage
- Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre, London, UK
| | - A R Davies
- Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre, London, UK
| | - J Zylstra
- Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre, London, UK
| | - J Lagergren
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK
- Department of Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' Oesophago-Gastric Centre, London, UK
| | - P Lagergren
- Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fisher RA, Griffiths EA, Evison F, Mason RC, Zylstra J, Davies AR, Alderson D, Gossage JA. A national audit of colonic interposition for esophageal replacement. Dis Esophagus 2017; 30:1-10. [PMID: 28375436 DOI: 10.1093/dote/dow003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2016] [Accepted: 10/12/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Esophageal replacement by colonic interposition is an uncommon procedure. This study sought to identify the frequency of this operation in England, identify techniques and associated problems, and also assess health-related quality of life (HR QOL) from the two largest centers performing this procedure. Hospital Episode Statistics were used to identify patients and centers undertaking colon interposition between March 2001 and March 2015. An online survey of UK consultants discussed methods and experience. HR QOL was assessed using the Short Form 36(SF-36v2) with additional gastrointestinal questions. Hospital Episode Statistics identified 328 interpositions (22 in pediatric hospitals). The two highest volume units did 42 and 45 operations, respectively. Thirty-four surgeons (79% response rate) replied to the survey. Fifty-two percent preferred to use the left colon with 81% preferring a substernal placement. The HR QOL survey was performed on 24 patients with a median of 3 years after surgery (ranging from 9 months to 10 years) from the two largest centers and a 56% response rate. Five patients had physical QOL scores above population average and 10 had mental scores above population average. All patients had early satiety, 20 described dysphagia, and 18 regularly took antireflux medication. There was an estimated mean loss of 13.1% body weight (10.6 kg) postoperatively and three patients still relied on a feeding tube for nutrition after an average of 3 years. Colon interposition results in an acceptable long-term QOL. Few centers regularly perform this operation, and centralizing to high-volume centers may lead to better outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R A Fisher
- GKT School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, UK.,Edinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - E A Griffiths
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - F Evison
- Department of Informatics, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - R C Mason
- GKT School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, UK.,Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J Zylstra
- GKT School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, UK.,Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A R Davies
- GKT School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, UK.,Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - D Alderson
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - J A Gossage
- GKT School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, UK.,Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Vohra RS, Pasquali S, Kirkham AJ, Marriott P, Johnstone M, Spreadborough P, Alderson D, Griffiths EA, Fenwick S, Elmasry M, Nunes Q, Kennedy D, Basit Khan R, Khan MAS, Magee CJ, Jones SM, Mason D, Parappally CP, Mathur P, Saunders M, Jamel S, Ul Haque S, Zafar S, Shiwani MH, Samuel N, Dar F, Jackson A, Lovett B, Dindyal S, Winter H, Fletcher T, Rahman S, Wheatley K, Nieto T, Ayaani S, Youssef H, Nijjar RS, Watkin H, Naumann D, Emeshi S, Sarmah PB, Lee K, Joji N, Heath J, Teasdale RL, Weerasinghe C, Needham PJ, Welbourn H, Forster L, Finch D, Blazeby JM, Robb W, McNair AGK, Hrycaiczuk A, Charalabopoulos A, Kadirkamanathan S, Tang CB, Jayanthi NVG, Noor N, Dobbins B, Cockbain AJ, Nilsen-Nunn A, Siqueira J, Pellen M, Cowley JB, Ho WM, Miu V, White TJ, Hodgkins KA, Kinghorn A, Tutton MG, Al-Abed YA, Menzies D, Ahmad A, Reed J, Khan S, Monk D, Vitone LJ, Murtaza G, Joel A, Brennan S, Shier D, Zhang C, Yoganathan T, Robinson SJ, McCallum IJD, Jones MJ, Elsayed M, Tuck L, Wayman J, Carney K, Aroori S, Hosie KB, Kimble A, Bunting DM, Fawole AS, Basheer M, Dave RV, Sarveswaran J, Jones E, Kendal C, Tilston MP, Gough M, Wallace T, Singh S, Downing J, Mockford KA, Issa E, Shah N, Chauhan N, Wilson TR, Forouzanfar A, Wild JRL, Nofal E, Bunnell C, Madbak K, Rao STV, Devoto L, Siddiqi N, Khawaja Z, Hewes JC, Gould L, Chambers A, Urriza Rodriguez D, Sen G, Robinson S, Carney K, Bartlett F, Rae DM, Stevenson TEJ, Sarvananthan K, Dwerryhouse SJ, Higgs SM, Old OJ, Hardy TJ, Shah R, Hornby ST, Keogh K, Frank L, Al-Akash M, Upchurch EA, Frame RJ, Hughes M, Jelley C, Weaver S, Roy S, Sillo TO, Galanopoulos G, Cuming T, Cunha P, Tayeh S, Kaptanis S, Heshaishi M, Eisawi A, Abayomi M, Ngu WS, Fleming K, Singh Bajwa D, Chitre V, Aryal K, Ferris P, Silva M, Lammy S, Mohamed S, Khawaja A, Hussain A, Ghazanfar MA, Bellini MI, Ebdewi H, Elshaer M, Gravante G, Drake B, Ogedegbe A, Mukherjee D, Arhi C, Giwa Nusrat Iqbal L, Watson NF, Kumar Aggarwal S, Orchard P, Villatoro E, Willson PD, Wa K, Mok J, Woodman T, Deguara J, Garcea G, Babu BI, Dennison AR, Malde D, Lloyd D, Satheesan S, Al-Taan O, Boddy A, Slavin JP, Jones RP, Ballance L, Gerakopoulos S, Jambulingam P, Mansour S, Sakai N, Acharya V, Sadat MM, Karim L, Larkin D, Amin K, Khan A, Law J, Jamdar S, Smith SR, Sampat K, M O'shea K, Manu M, Asprou FM, Malik NS, Chang J, Johnstone M, Lewis M, Roberts GP, Karavadra B, Photi E, Hewes J, Gould L, Chambers A, Rodriguez D, O'Reilly DA, Rate AJ, Sekhar H, Henderson LT, Starmer BZ, Coe PO, Tolofari S, Barrie J, Bashir G, Sloane J, Madanipour S, Halkias C, Trevatt AEJ, Borowski DW, Hornsby J, Courtney MJ, Virupaksha S, Seymour K, Robinson S, Hawkins H, Bawa S, Gallagher PV, Reid A, Wood P, Finch JG, Parmar J, Stirland E, Gardner-Thorpe J, Al-Muhktar A, Peterson M, Majeed A, Bajwa FM, Martin J, Choy A, Tsang A, Pore N, Andrew DR, Al-Khyatt W, Taylor C, Bhandari S, Chambers A, Subramanium D, Toh SKC, Carter NC, Mercer SJ, Knight B, Tate S, Pearce B, Wainwright D, Vijay V, Alagaratnam S, Sinha S, Khan S, El-Hasani SS, Hussain AA, Bhattacharya V, Kansal N, Fasih T, Jackson C, Siddiqui MN, Chishti IA, Fordham IJ, Siddiqui Z, Bausbacher H, Geogloma I, Gurung K, Tsavellas G, Basynat P, Kiran Shrestha A, Basu S, Chhabra Mohan Harilingam A, Rabie M, Akhtar M, Kumar P, Jafferbhoy SF, Hussain N, Raza S, Haque M, Alam I, Aseem R, Patel S, Asad M, Booth MI, Ball WR, Wood CPJ, Pinho-Gomes AC, Kausar A, Rami Obeidallah M, Varghase J, Lodhia J, Bradley D, Rengifo C, Lindsay D, Gopalswamy S, Finlay I, Wardle S, Bullen N, Iftikhar SY, Awan A, Ahmed J, Leeder P, Fusai G, Bond-Smith G, Psica A, Puri Y, Hou D, Noble F, Szentpali K, Broadhurst J, Date R, Hossack MR, Li Goh Y, Turner P, Shetty V, Riera M, Macano CAW, Sukha A, Preston SR, Hoban JR, Puntis DJ, Williams SV, Krysztopik R, Kynaston J, Batt J, Doe M, Goscimski A, Jones GH, Smith SR, Hall C, Carty N, Ahmed J, Panteleimonitis S, Gunasekera RT, Sheel ARG, Lennon H, Hindley C, Reddy M, Kenny R, Elkheir N, McGlone ER, Rajaganeshan R, Hancorn K, Hargreaves A, Prasad R, Longbotham DA, Vijayanand D, Wijetunga I, Ziprin P, Nicolay CR, Yeldham G, Read E, Gossage JA, Rolph RC, Ebied H, Phull M, Khan MA, Popplewell M, Kyriakidis D, Hussain A, Henley N, Packer JR, Derbyshire L, Porter J, Appleton S, Farouk M, Basra M, Jennings NA, Ali S, Kanakala V, Ali H, Lane R, Dickson-Lowe R, Zarsadias P, Mirza D, Puig S, Al Amari K, Vijayan D, Sutcliffe R, Marudanayagam R, Hamady Z, Prasad AR, Patel A, Durkin D, Kaur P, Bowen L, Byrne JP, Pearson KL, Delisle TG, Davies J, Tomlinson MA, Johnpulle MA, Slawinski C, Macdonald A, Nicholson J, Newton K, Mbuvi J, Farooq A, Sidhartha Mothe B, Zafrani Z, Brett D, Francombe J, Spreadborough P, Barnes J, Cheung M, Al-Bahrani AZ, Preziosi G, Urbonas T, Alberts J, Mallik M, Patel K, Segaran A, Doulias T, Sufi PA, Yao C, Pollock S, Manzelli A, Wajed S, Kourkulos M, Pezzuto R, Wadley M, Hamilton E, Jaunoo S, Padwick R, Sayegh M, Newton RC, Hebbar M, Farag SF, Spearman J, Hamdan MF, D'Costa C, Blane C, Giles M, Peter MB, Hirst NA, Hossain T, Pannu A, El-Dhuwaib Y, Morrison TEM, Taylor GW, Thompson RLE, McCune K, Loughlin P, Lawther R, Byrnes CK, Simpson DJ, Mawhinney A, Warren C, McKay D, McIlmunn C, Martin S, MacArtney M, Diamond T, Davey P, Jones C, Clements JM, Digney R, Chan WM, McCain S, Gull S, Janeczko A, Dorrian E, Harris A, Dawson S, Johnston D, McAree B, Ghareeb E, Thomas G, Connelly M, McKenzie S, Cieplucha K, Spence G, Campbell W, Hooks G, Bradley N, Hill ADK, Cassidy JT, Boland M, Burke P, Nally DM, Hill ADK, Khogali E, Shabo W, Iskandar E, McEntee GP, O'Neill MA, Peirce C, Lyons EM, O'Sullivan AW, Thakkar R, Carroll P, Ivanovski I, Balfe P, Lee M, Winter DC, Kelly ME, Hoti E, Maguire D, Karunakaran P, Geoghegan JG, Martin ST, McDermott F, Cross KS, Cooke F, Zeeshan S, Murphy JO, Mealy K, Mohan HM, Nedujchelyn Y, Fahad Ullah M, Ahmed I, Giovinazzo F, Milburn J, Prince S, Brooke E, Buchan J, Khalil AM, Vaughan EM, Ramage MI, Aldridge RC, Gibson S, Nicholson GA, Vass DG, Grant AJ, Holroyd DJ, Jones MA, Sutton CMLR, O'Dwyer P, Nilsson F, Weber B, Williamson TK, Lalla K, Bryant A, Carter CR, Forrest CR, Hunter DI, Nassar AH, Orizu MN, Knight K, Qandeel H, Suttie S, Belding R, McClarey A, Boyd AT, Guthrie GJK, Lim PJ, Luhmann A, Watson AJM, Richards CH, Nicol L, Madurska M, Harrison E, Boyce KM, Roebuck A, Ferguson G, Pati P, Wilson MSJ, Dalgaty F, Fothergill L, Driscoll PJ, Mozolowski KL, Banwell V, Bennett SP, Rogers PN, Skelly BL, Rutherford CL, Mirza AK, Lazim T, Lim HCC, Duke D, Ahmed T, Beasley WD, Wilkinson MD, Maharaj G, Malcolm C, Brown TH, Shingler GM, Mowbray N, Radwan R, Morcous P, Wood S, Kadhim A, Stewart DJ, Baker AL, Tanner N, Shenoy H, Hafiz S, Marchi JA, Singh-Ranger D, Hisham E, Ainley P, O'Neill S, Terrace J, Napetti S, Hopwood B, Rhys T, Downing J, Kanavati O, Coats M, Aleksandrov D, Kallaway C, Yahya S, Weber B, Templeton A, Trotter M, Lo C, Dhillon A, Heywood N, Aawsaj Y, Hamdan A, Reece-Bolton O, McGuigan A, Shahin Y, Ali A, Luther A, Nicholson JA, Rajendran I, Boal M, Ritchie J. Population-based cohort study of variation in the use of emergency cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder diseases. Br J Surg 2016; 103:1716-1726. [PMID: 27748962 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2016] [Revised: 06/21/2016] [Accepted: 07/06/2016] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The aims of this prospective population-based cohort study were to identify the patient and hospital characteristics associated with emergency cholecystectomy, and the influences of these in determining variations between hospitals.
Methods
Data were collected for consecutive patients undergoing cholecystectomy in acute UK and Irish hospitals between 1 March and 1 May 2014. Potential explanatory variables influencing the performance of emergency cholecystectomy were analysed by means of multilevel, multivariable logistic regression modelling using a two-level hierarchical structure with patients (level 1) nested within hospitals (level 2).
Results
Data were collected on 4744 cholecystectomies from 165 hospitals. Increasing age, lower ASA fitness grade, biliary colic, the need for further imaging (magnetic retrograde cholangiopancreatography), endoscopic interventions (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography) and admission to a non-biliary centre significantly reduced the likelihood of an emergency cholecystectomy being performed. The multilevel model was used to calculate the probability of receiving an emergency cholecystectomy for a woman aged 40 years or over with an ASA grade of I or II and a BMI of at least 25·0 kg/m2, who presented with acute cholecystitis with an ultrasound scan showing a thick-walled gallbladder and a normal common bile duct. The mean predicted probability of receiving an emergency cholecystectomy was 0·52 (95 per cent c.i. 0·45 to 0·57). The predicted probabilities ranged from 0·02 to 0·95 across the 165 hospitals, demonstrating significant variation between hospitals.
Conclusion
Patients with similar characteristics presenting to different hospitals with acute gallbladder pathology do not receive comparable care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - R S Vohra
- Trent Oesophago-Gastric Unit, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - S Pasquali
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - A J Kirkham
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - P Marriott
- West Midlands Research Collaborative, Academic Department of Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - M Johnstone
- West Midlands Research Collaborative, Academic Department of Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - P Spreadborough
- West Midlands Research Collaborative, Academic Department of Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - D Alderson
- Academic Department of Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - E A Griffiths
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - S Fenwick
- Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - M Elmasry
- Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Q Nunes
- Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - D Kennedy
- Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | | - D Mason
- Wirral University Teaching Hospital
| | | | | | | | - S Jamel
- Barnet and Chase Farm Hospital
| | | | - S Zafar
- Barnet and Chase Farm Hospital
| | | | - N Samuel
- Barnsley District General Hospital
| | - F Dar
- Barnsley District General Hospital
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - K Wheatley
- Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - T Nieto
- Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - S Ayaani
- Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - H Youssef
- Heart of England Foundation NHS Trust
| | | | - H Watkin
- Heart of England Foundation NHS Trust
| | - D Naumann
- Heart of England Foundation NHS Trust
| | - S Emeshi
- Heart of England Foundation NHS Trust
| | | | - K Lee
- Heart of England Foundation NHS Trust
| | - N Joji
- Heart of England Foundation NHS Trust
| | - J Heath
- Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - R L Teasdale
- Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - P J Needham
- Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - H Welbourn
- Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - L Forster
- Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - D Finch
- Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - W Robb
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Trust
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - B Dobbins
- Calderdale and Huddersfield NHS Trust
| | | | | | | | - M Pellen
- Hull and East Yorkshire NHS Trust
| | | | - W-M Ho
- Hull and East Yorkshire NHS Trust
| | - V Miu
- Hull and East Yorkshire NHS Trust
| | - T J White
- Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - K A Hodgkins
- Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - A Kinghorn
- Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - M G Tutton
- Colchester Hospital University NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Y A Al-Abed
- Colchester Hospital University NHS Foundation Trust
| | - D Menzies
- Colchester Hospital University NHS Foundation Trust
| | - A Ahmad
- Colchester Hospital University NHS Foundation Trust
| | - J Reed
- Colchester Hospital University NHS Foundation Trust
| | - S Khan
- Colchester Hospital University NHS Foundation Trust
| | - D Monk
- Countess of Chester NHS Foundation Trust
| | - L J Vitone
- Countess of Chester NHS Foundation Trust
| | - G Murtaza
- Countess of Chester NHS Foundation Trust
| | - A Joel
- Countess of Chester NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - D Shier
- Croydon Health Services NHS Trust
| | - C Zhang
- Croydon Health Services NHS Trust
| | | | | | | | - M J Jones
- North Cumbria University Hospitals Trust
| | - M Elsayed
- North Cumbria University Hospitals Trust
| | - L Tuck
- North Cumbria University Hospitals Trust
| | - J Wayman
- North Cumbria University Hospitals Trust
| | - K Carney
- North Cumbria University Hospitals Trust
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - M P Tilston
- Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust
| | - M Gough
- Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust
| | - T Wallace
- Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust
| | - S Singh
- Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust
| | - J Downing
- Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust
| | - K A Mockford
- Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust
| | - E Issa
- Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust
| | - N Shah
- Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust
| | - N Chauhan
- Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust
| | - T R Wilson
- Doncaster and Bassetlaw Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - A Forouzanfar
- Doncaster and Bassetlaw Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - J R L Wild
- Doncaster and Bassetlaw Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - E Nofal
- Doncaster and Bassetlaw Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - C Bunnell
- Doncaster and Bassetlaw Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - K Madbak
- Doncaster and Bassetlaw Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - S T V Rao
- Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - L Devoto
- Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - N Siddiqi
- Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Z Khawaja
- Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - D M Rae
- Frimley Park Hospital NHS Trust
| | | | | | | | | | - O J Old
- Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust
| | | | - R Shah
- Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust
| | | | - K Keogh
- Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - L Frank
- Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - M Al-Akash
- Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - R J Frame
- Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust
| | - M Hughes
- Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust
| | - C Jelley
- Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | | - T Cuming
- Homerton University Hospital NHS Trust
| | - P Cunha
- Homerton University Hospital NHS Trust
| | - S Tayeh
- Homerton University Hospital NHS Trust
| | | | | | - A Eisawi
- Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - W S Ngu
- Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | - V Chitre
- Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - K Aryal
- Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - P Ferris
- Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - H Ebdewi
- Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - M Elshaer
- Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - G Gravante
- Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - B Drake
- Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - A Ogedegbe
- Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - D Mukherjee
- Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - C Arhi
- Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - K Wa
- Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - J Mok
- Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - T Woodman
- Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - J Deguara
- Kingston Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - G Garcea
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
| | - B I Babu
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
| | | | - D Malde
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
| | - D Lloyd
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
| | | | - O Al-Taan
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
| | - A Boddy
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
| | - J P Slavin
- Leighton Hospital, Mid Cheshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - R P Jones
- Leighton Hospital, Mid Cheshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - L Ballance
- Leighton Hospital, Mid Cheshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - S Gerakopoulos
- Leighton Hospital, Mid Cheshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - P Jambulingam
- Luton and Dunstable University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - S Mansour
- Luton and Dunstable University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - N Sakai
- Luton and Dunstable University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - V Acharya
- Luton and Dunstable University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - M M Sadat
- Macclesfield District General Hospital
| | - L Karim
- Macclesfield District General Hospital
| | - D Larkin
- Macclesfield District General Hospital
| | - K Amin
- Macclesfield District General Hospital
| | - A Khan
- Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust
| | - J Law
- Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust
| | - S Jamdar
- Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust
| | - S R Smith
- Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust
| | - K Sampat
- Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - M Manu
- Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust
| | | | - N S Malik
- Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - J Chang
- Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust
| | | | - M Lewis
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - G P Roberts
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - B Karavadra
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - E Photi
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - J Hornsby
- North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | - K Seymour
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
| | - S Robinson
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
| | - H Hawkins
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
| | - S Bawa
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - A Reid
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
| | - P Wood
- Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
| | - J G Finch
- Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust
| | - J Parmar
- Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust
| | | | | | - A Al-Muhktar
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - M Peterson
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - A Majeed
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | - A Choy
- Peterborough City Hospital
| | | | - N Pore
- United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust
| | | | | | - C Taylor
- United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - S Tate
- Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust
| | | | | | - V Vijay
- The Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust
| | | | - S Sinha
- The Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust
| | - S Khan
- The Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust
| | | | - A A Hussain
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - N Kansal
- Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust
| | - T Fasih
- Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust
| | - C Jackson
- Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - K Gurung
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital NHS Trust
| | - G Tsavellas
- East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust
| | - P Basynat
- East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - S Basu
- East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - M Rabie
- East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust
| | - M Akhtar
- East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust
| | - P Kumar
- Burton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - N Hussain
- Burton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - S Raza
- Burton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - M Haque
- Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, Wigan Wrightington and Leigh NHS Trust
| | - I Alam
- Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, Wigan Wrightington and Leigh NHS Trust
| | - R Aseem
- Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, Wigan Wrightington and Leigh NHS Trust
| | - S Patel
- Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, Wigan Wrightington and Leigh NHS Trust
| | - M Asad
- Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, Wigan Wrightington and Leigh NHS Trust
| | - M I Booth
- Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust
| | - W R Ball
- Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | | - J Varghase
- Royal Bolton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - J Lodhia
- Royal Bolton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - D Bradley
- Royal Bolton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - C Rengifo
- Royal Bolton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - D Lindsay
- Royal Bolton Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | | | | - A Awan
- Royal Derby NHS Foundation Trust
| | - J Ahmed
- Royal Derby NHS Foundation Trust
| | - P Leeder
- Royal Derby NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | | - D Hou
- Hampshire Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - F Noble
- Hampshire Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | - R Date
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - M R Hossack
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Y Li Goh
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - P Turner
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - V Shetty
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | - S R Preston
- Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - J R Hoban
- Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - D J Puntis
- Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - S V Williams
- Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | - J Batt
- Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust
| | - M Doe
- Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust
| | | | | | | | - C Hall
- Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust
| | - N Carty
- Salisbury Hospital Foundation Trust
| | - J Ahmed
- Salisbury Hospital Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | - H Lennon
- Southport and Ormskirk Hospital NHS Trust
| | - C Hindley
- Southport and Ormskirk Hospital NHS Trust
| | - M Reddy
- St George's Healthcare NHS Trust
| | - R Kenny
- St George's Healthcare NHS Trust
| | | | | | | | - K Hancorn
- St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - A Hargreaves
- St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
| | | | | | | | | | - P Ziprin
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
| | | | - G Yeldham
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
| | - E Read
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
| | | | | | | | | | - M A Khan
- Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | - A Hussain
- Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - S Ali
- City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust
| | - V Kanakala
- City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust
| | - H Ali
- Tunbridge Wells and Maidstone NHS Trust
| | - R Lane
- Tunbridge Wells and Maidstone NHS Trust
| | | | | | - D Mirza
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
| | - S Puig
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
| | - K Al Amari
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
| | - D Vijayan
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
| | - R Sutcliffe
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | - Z Hamady
- University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
| | - A R Prasad
- University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
| | - A Patel
- University Hospital Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
| | - D Durkin
- University Hospital of North Staffordshire NHS Trust
| | - P Kaur
- University Hospital of North Staffordshire NHS Trust
| | - L Bowen
- University Hospital of North Staffordshire NHS Trust
| | - J P Byrne
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
| | - K L Pearson
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
| | - T G Delisle
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
| | - J Davies
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | - A Macdonald
- University Hospital South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust
| | - J Nicholson
- University Hospital South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust
| | - K Newton
- University Hospital South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust
| | - J Mbuvi
- University Hospital South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust
| | - A Farooq
- Warrington and Halton Hospitals NHS Trust
| | | | - Z Zafrani
- Warrington and Halton Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - D Brett
- Warrington and Halton Hospitals NHS Trust
| | | | | | - J Barnes
- South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust
| | - M Cheung
- South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - M Wadley
- Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - E Hamilton
- Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - S Jaunoo
- Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - R Padwick
- Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - M Sayegh
- Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - R C Newton
- Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - M Hebbar
- Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | - S F Farag
- Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | - C Blane
- Yeovil District Hospital NHS Trust
| | - M Giles
- York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - M B Peter
- York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - N A Hirst
- York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - T Hossain
- York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - A Pannu
- York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | - G W Taylor
- York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - T Diamond
- Belfast City Hospital, Mater Infirmorum Hospital Belfast and Royal Victoria Hospital
| | - P Davey
- Belfast City Hospital, Mater Infirmorum Hospital Belfast and Royal Victoria Hospital
| | - C Jones
- Belfast City Hospital, Mater Infirmorum Hospital Belfast and Royal Victoria Hospital
| | - J M Clements
- Belfast City Hospital, Mater Infirmorum Hospital Belfast and Royal Victoria Hospital
| | - R Digney
- Belfast City Hospital, Mater Infirmorum Hospital Belfast and Royal Victoria Hospital
| | - W M Chan
- Belfast City Hospital, Mater Infirmorum Hospital Belfast and Royal Victoria Hospital
| | - S McCain
- Belfast City Hospital, Mater Infirmorum Hospital Belfast and Royal Victoria Hospital
| | - S Gull
- Belfast City Hospital, Mater Infirmorum Hospital Belfast and Royal Victoria Hospital
| | - A Janeczko
- Belfast City Hospital, Mater Infirmorum Hospital Belfast and Royal Victoria Hospital
| | - E Dorrian
- Belfast City Hospital, Mater Infirmorum Hospital Belfast and Royal Victoria Hospital
| | - A Harris
- Belfast City Hospital, Mater Infirmorum Hospital Belfast and Royal Victoria Hospital
| | - S Dawson
- Belfast City Hospital, Mater Infirmorum Hospital Belfast and Royal Victoria Hospital
| | - D Johnston
- Belfast City Hospital, Mater Infirmorum Hospital Belfast and Royal Victoria Hospital
| | - B McAree
- Belfast City Hospital, Mater Infirmorum Hospital Belfast and Royal Victoria Hospital
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - P Burke
- University Hospital Limerick
| | | | - A D K Hill
- Louth County Hospital and Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital
| | - E Khogali
- Louth County Hospital and Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital
| | - W Shabo
- Louth County Hospital and Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital
| | - E Iskandar
- Louth County Hospital and Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - P Balfe
- St Luke's General Hospital Kilkenny
| | - M Lee
- St Luke's General Hospital Kilkenny
| | - D C Winter
- St Vincent's University and Private Hospitals, Dublin
| | - M E Kelly
- St Vincent's University and Private Hospitals, Dublin
| | - E Hoti
- St Vincent's University and Private Hospitals, Dublin
| | - D Maguire
- St Vincent's University and Private Hospitals, Dublin
| | - P Karunakaran
- St Vincent's University and Private Hospitals, Dublin
| | - J G Geoghegan
- St Vincent's University and Private Hospitals, Dublin
| | - S T Martin
- St Vincent's University and Private Hospitals, Dublin
| | - F McDermott
- St Vincent's University and Private Hospitals, Dublin
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - S Gibson
- Crosshouse Hospital, Ayrshire and Arran
| | | | - D G Vass
- Crosshouse Hospital, Ayrshire and Arran
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - H C C Lim
- Glangwili General and Prince Philip Hospital
| | - D Duke
- Glangwili General and Prince Philip Hospital
| | - T Ahmed
- Glangwili General and Prince Philip Hospital
| | - W D Beasley
- Glangwili General and Prince Philip Hospital
| | | | - G Maharaj
- Glangwili General and Prince Philip Hospital
| | - C Malcolm
- Glangwili General and Prince Philip Hospital
| | | | | | | | - R Radwan
- Morriston and Singleton Hospitals
| | | | - S Wood
- Princess of Wales Hospital
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gossage JA, Ali T, Chambers J, Burnand KG. Peripheral Arterial Embolism: Prevalence, Outcome, and the Role of Echocardiography in Management. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2016; 40:280-6. [PMID: 16959721 DOI: 10.1177/1538574406291820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The aims of this study were to review the prevalence and outcome of all surgically treated upper and lower limb emboli presenting to one vascular unit in the last 3 years and to compare transthoracic with transesophageal echocardiography for defining the source of the embolus. All patients who underwent surgical embolectomy for acute limb ischemia from January 2001 to June 2004 were reviewed. Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography were carried out on a subset of consecutive unselected patients. Forty-two patients, with a mean age of 80 years, underwent surgical embolectomy from January 2001 to June 2004 (M/F 1:1.8): 27 for lower limb ischemia and 15 for upper limb ischemia. Two thirds of these patients were found to be in atrial fibrillation at presentation (n=28), of whom less than a third were receiving anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents (n=8). The mean hospital stay was 15 days with 36 patients (86%) being fully anticoagulated before discharge from hospital. The 30-day mortality rate was 11% (n=3/27) with 5 patients requiring fasciotomies (12%) and 3 patients requiring an amputation of the lower limb (11%). Postoperatively, 34 patients (81%) had transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), which demonstrated a source or potential source for thrombus in 19 (56%). Fifteen patients (36%) had transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), which changed the subsequent management in 3 patients. All patients in whom TEE altered clinical management would have required this investigation if standard clinical guidelines were followed. TEE did not identify any additional patients with cardiac embolic sources that were not detected by TTE. Arterial limb emboli are still prevalent, but limb salvage and mortality rates appear to be improving. Despite clear guidelines on anticoagulation for patients in atrial fibrillation, many are not receiving appropriate treatment. Transthoracic echocardiography is a good screening tool for detecting a potential cardiac source for peripheral embolism, with transesophageal echocardiography being reserved for specific indications.
Collapse
|
22
|
Shipway DJH, Partridge JSL, Foxton CR, Modarai B, Gossage JA, Challacombe BJ, Marx C, Dhesi JK. Do surgical trainees believe they are adequately trained to manage the ageing population? A UK survey of knowledge and beliefs in surgical trainees. J Surg Educ 2015; 72:641-647. [PMID: 25887505 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2014] [Revised: 01/27/2015] [Accepted: 01/28/2015] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Increasing numbers of older patients are undergoing surgery. Older surgical patients are at a higher risk of perioperative complications and mortality. Multimorbidity, frailty, and physiological changes of ageing contribute to adverse outcomes. These complications are predominantly medical, rather than directly surgical. Guidelines recommend preoperative assessment of comorbidity, disability, and frailty in older patients undergoing surgery and closer perioperative collaboration between surgeons and geriatricians. We conducted a survey to assess knowledge and beliefs of surgical trainees toward common perioperative problems encountered in older surgical patients. DESIGN Paper-based survey. SETTING Unselected UK surgical training-grade physicians (CT1-ST8) attending the 2013 Congress of The Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, Glasgow, UK, May 1-3, 2013. PARTICIPANTS A total of 160 eligible UK surgical trainees attending the conference were invited to participate in the survey. Of them, 157 participated. RESULTS Of the trainees, 68% (n = 107) reported inadequate training and 89.2% (n = 140) supported the inclusion of geriatric medicine issues in surgical curricula. Of the respondents, 77.2% (n = 122) were unable to correctly identify the key features required to demonstrate mental capacity, and only 3 of 157 respondents were familiar with the diagnostic criteria for delirium. Support from geriatric medicine was deemed necessary (84.7%, n = 133) but often inadequate (68.2%, n = 107). Surgical trainees support closer collaboration with geriatric medicine and shared care of complex, older patients (93.6%, n = 147). CONCLUSIONS UK surgical trainees believe that they receive inadequate training in the perioperative management of complex, older surgical patients and are inadequately supported by geriatric medicine physicians. In this survey sample, trainee knowledge of geriatric issues such as delirium and mental capacity was poor. Surgical trainees support the concept of closer liaison and shared care of complex, older patients with geriatric medicine physicians. Changes to surgical training and service development are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D J H Shipway
- Department of Ageing and Health, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, United Kingdom.
| | - J S L Partridge
- Department of Ageing and Health, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, United Kingdom; Division of Health and Social Care Research, Kings College, London, United Kingdom
| | - C R Foxton
- Department of Ear, Nose and Throat Surgery, Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust, Combe Park Bath, Somerset, United Kingdom
| | - B Modarai
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - J A Gossage
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - B J Challacombe
- Department of Urology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, United Kingdom
| | - C Marx
- Royal College of Surgeons of England, London, United Kingdom; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust, Ipswich, Suffolk, United Kingdom
| | - J K Dhesi
- Department of Ageing and Health, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Davies AR, Sandhu H, Pillai A, Sinha P, Mattsson F, Forshaw MJ, Gossage JA, Lagergren J, Allum WH, Mason RC. Surgical resection strategy and the influence of radicality on outcomes in oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 2014; 101:511-7. [PMID: 24615656 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/14/2014] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal surgical approach to tumours of the oesophagus and oesophagogastric junction remains controversial. The principal randomized trial comparing transhiatal (THO) and transthoracic (TTO) oesophagectomy showed no survival difference, but suggested that some subgroups of patients may benefit from the more extended lymphadenectomy typically conducted with TTO. METHODS This was a cohort study based on two prospectively created databases. Short- and long-term outcomes for patients undergoing THO and TTO were compared. The primary outcome measure was overall survival, with secondary outcomes including time to recurrence and patterns of disease relapse. A Cox proportional hazards model provided hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 per cent confidence intervals (c.i.), with adjustments for age, tumour stage, tumour grade, response to chemotherapy and lymphovascular invasion. RESULTS Of 664 included patients (263 THO, 401 TTO), the distributions of age, sex and histological subtype were similar between the groups. In-hospital mortality (1·1 versus 3·2 per cent for THO and TTO respectively; P = 0·110) and in-hospital stay (14 versus 17 days respectively; P < 0·001) favoured THO. In the adjusted model, there was no difference in overall survival (HR 1·07, 95 per cent c.i. 0·84 to 1·36) or time to tumour recurrence (HR 0·99, 0·76 to 1·29) between the two operations. Local tumour recurrence patterns were similar (22·8 versus 24·4 per cent for THO and TTO respectively). No subgroup could be identified of patients who had benefited from more radical surgery on the basis of tumour location or stage. CONCLUSION There was no difference in survival or tumour recurrence for TTO and THO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R Davies
- Department of Surgery, St Thomas' Hospital, King's College London, London, UK; Department of Surgery, Royal Marsden Hospital, King's College London, London, UK; Gastrointestinal Cancer, Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK; Unit of Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Chemoradiotherapy is a widely used alternative treatment to surgical resection in certain patient groups with early esophageal cancer. The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess toxicity and outcome of patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy for early esophageal cancer at one institution. A retrospective analysis of all patients treated with chemoradiotherapy between February 2000 and December 2008 at a single tertiary center was performed with documentation of treatment given, toxicities recorded, and follow-up and outcome data. Sixty-two patients received chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. There were 20 males and 42 female patients with an average age of 68 years. Histology revealed adenocarcinoma in 28 patients and squamous cell carcinoma in 34 patients. All patients were staged with a computerized tomography scan, endoscopic ultrasound and positron emission tomography scan. Selection criteria for chemoradiotherapy were unfit for surgery, upper esophageal squamous carcinoma, unresectable primary tumor, or patient choice. The majority of the patients received a combination of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy with 55 Gy in 25 fractions of radiotherapy. Grade 3 toxicities were recorded in 11% of the patients. Eleven patients suffered from local recurrence and a stent was required in nine patients. Radiation strictures occurred in 10 patients requiring dilation in four. Five patients required a radiologically inserted feeding gastrostomy. The median overall survival was 21 months. Patients with adenocarcinomas and those with squamous cell carcinoma had a similar median survival. Overall survival was 70% at 1 year, 48% at 2 years, and 26% at 3 years. This case series of patients treated with chemoradiation for localized esophageal cancer suggest a generally well-tolerated treatment with survival rates after chemoradiotherapy comparable with those seen with surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Z Pantling
- Digestive Diseases, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately, 50,000 cholecystectomies are performed annually in the United Kingdom resulting in a number of negligence claims referred to the NHS Litigation Authority (NHSLA). The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and outcomes of claims reported to the NHSLA after laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed in England between 1995 and 2008. METHODS Data were requested from the NHSLA on all claims related to laparoscopic cholecystectomy which occurred in England between 1995 and 2008. RESULTS A review of the data provided by the NHSLA data identified over 300 claims in this time period. Of the claims identified, 244 have been completed. Common bile duct injury (41%), bile leak (12%), bowel injury (9%), haemorrhage (9%) and fatality (9%) were the most frequent types of claim. Common bile duct injury resulted in the highest proportion of successful claims (86%) and the largest sums paid to the claimant (average £65,000). DISCUSSION Common bile duct injury is the most common claim to the NHSLA after laparoscopic cholecystectomy and results in the highest proportion of successful claims and the largest sums paid to the claimant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Gossage
- Specialist Registrar General Surgery, South-East Thames, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
AIMS The National Health Service (NHS) Cancer Plan aims to eliminate economic inequalities in healthcare provision and cancer outcomes. This study examined the influence of economic status upon the incidence, access to treatment and survival from oesophageal and gastric cancer in a single UK cancer network. METHODOLOGY A total of 3619 patients diagnosed with either oesophageal or gastric cancer in a London Cancer Network (population = 1.48 million) were identified from the Thames Cancer Registry (1993-2002). Patients were ranked into economic quintiles using the income domain of the Multiple Index of Deprivation. Statistical analysis was performed using a chi(2) test. Survival analysis was performed using a Cox's proportional hazards model. RESULTS Between 1993-1995 and 2000-2002, the incidence of oesophageal cancer in the most affluent males rose by 51% compared with a 2% rise in the least affluent males. The incidence of gastric cancer in most affluent males between 1993-1995 and 2000-2002 fell by 32% compared with a 7% fall in the least affluent males. These changes were less marked in females. Economic deprivation had no effect on the proportion of patients undergoing either resectional surgery or chemotherapy; the least affluent oesophageal cancer patients with a higher incidence of squamous cell carcinoma received significantly more radiotherapy. Economic deprivation had no effect upon survival for either oesophageal or gastric cancer. CONCLUSIONS There has been an increase in oesophageal cancer and a decrease in gastric cancer incidence among more affluent males in the last 10 years. Economic status did not appear to influence access to treatment or survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Gossage
- Department of General Surgery, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Gossage JA, Frith DP, Carrell TWG, Damiani M, Terris J, Burnand KG. Mobile phones, in combination with a computer locator system, improve the response times of emergency medical services in central London. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2008; 90:113-6. [PMID: 18325208 DOI: 10.1308/003588408x242079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to determine whether mobile phones and mobile phone locating devices are associated with improved ambulance response times in central London. PATIENTS AND METHODS All calls from the London Ambulance Service database since 1999 were analysed. In addition, 100 consecutive patients completed a questionnaire on mobile phone use whilst attending the St Thomas's Hospital Emergency Department in central London. RESULTS Mobile phone use for emergencies in central London has increased from 4007 (5% of total) calls in January 1999 to 21,585 (29%) in August 2004. Ambulance response times for mobile phone calls were reduced after the introduction of the mobile phone locating system (mean 469 s versus 444 s; P = 0.0195). The proportion of mobile phone calls made from mobile phones for life-threatening emergencies was higher after injury than for medical emergencies (41% versus 16%, P = 0.0063). Of patients transported to the accident and emergency department by ambulance, 44% contacted the ambulance service by mobile phone. Three-quarters of calls made from outside the home or work-place were by mobile phone and 72% of patients indicated that it would have taken longer to contact the emergency services if they had not used a mobile. CONCLUSIONS Since the introduction of the mobile phone locating system, there has been an improvement in ambulance response times. Mobile locating systems in urban areas across the UK may lead to faster response times and, potentially, improved patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Gossage
- Department of Surgery, St Thomas's Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Klass B, Forshaw MJ, Gossage JA, Sabharwal T, Mason RC. Spontaneous haemoperitoneum caused by inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery aneurysm rupture: case report. Int J Clin Pract 2007; 61:1047-9. [PMID: 17355255 DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01045.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
|
29
|
Forshaw MJ, Gossage JA, Stephens J, Strauss D, Botha AJ, Atkinson S, Mason RC. Centralisation of oesophagogastric cancer services: can specialist units deliver? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2007; 88:566-70. [PMID: 17059719 PMCID: PMC1963761 DOI: 10.1308/003588406x130624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Oesophagogastric cancer surgery is increasingly being performed in only centralised units. The aim of the study was to examine surgical outcomes and service delivery within a specialist unit. PATIENTS AND METHODS The case notes of all patients undergoing attempted oesophagogastrectomy between January 2000 and May 2003 were identified from a prospective consultant database. RESULTS A total of 187 patients (median age, 63 years; range, 29-83 years; M:F ratio, 3.9:1) underwent attempted oesophago-gastrectomy. Of these, 91% were seen within 2 weeks of referral and treatment was instituted after a mean of 31 days (range, 1-109 days). More patients underwent surgery (63%) than neoadjuvant therapy (56%) within 1 month of referral. The main indication for surgery was invasive malignancy in 166 patients (89%). The 30-day mortality was 0.5% (1 death) and in-hospital mortality was 1.1% (2 deaths). The median length of hospital stay was 14 days (range, 7-69 days). Significant postoperative morbidity included: pulmonary complications (36%), cardiovascular complications (16%), wound infection (13%) and clinically significant anastomotic leaks (7%). Of the study group, 28 patients (15%) were admitted to ICU with a median stay of 10 days (range, 1-44 days); this accounted for 0.9% of ICU bed availability. Twelve patients (6.4%) were returned to theatre, most commonly for bleeding. The 1-year survival rates were 78%. During 2002-2003, national waiting list targets for both hernia repair and cholecystectomy were achieved. CONCLUSIONS Despite recent increases in workload, high volume specialist units can deliver an efficient and timely service with both good treatment outcomes and minimal impact upon elective surgical waiting lists and ICU provision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Forshaw
- Department of General Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Trust, St Thomas's Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Forshaw MJ, Gossage JA, Ockrim J, Atkinson SW, Mason RC. Left thoracoabdominal esophagogastrectomy: still a valid operation for carcinoma of the distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction. Dis Esophagus 2006; 19:340-5. [PMID: 16984529 DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2006.00593.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The left thoraco-abdominal (LTA) esophago-gastrectomy is rarely performed and yet provides excellent exposure of the esophageal hiatus. The aim of this study was to review the outcome of LTA esophago-gastrectomy within a single unit. Patients were selected for an LTA esophago-gastrectomy (January 2000 - June 2003) based upon the presence of locally advanced tumors of the distal esophagus and cardia. These patients were identified from a prospective consultant database. LTA esophagogastrectomy was technically possible in all 38 patients (34 males; median age = 63 years). In-hospital mortality was 2.6% (1 patient). Four patients (10.5%) were admitted to the intensive care unit and three (7.9%) returned to theatre. Two patients developed clinically apparent anastomotic leaks (5.3%). A potentially curative resection was performed in 34 patients (89%) but 22 (57.8%) of these patients were subsequently found to have tumor cells at or within 2 mm from the circumferential resection margin. The 1-year and 2-year overall survival rates were 70% and 52%, respectively. Long-term complications included benign anastomotic stricture (24%), delayed gastric emptying (26%) and a persistent thoracic wound sinus (15%). LTA esophagogastrectomy remains a viable approach with an acceptably low incidence of short and long-term complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Forshaw
- Department of General Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Forshaw MJ, Gossage JA, Chrystal K, Cheong K, Harper PG, Mason RC. Symptomatic Responses to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Carcinoma of the Oesophagus and Oesophagogastric Junction: Are They Worth Measuring? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2006; 18:345-50. [PMID: 16703754 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2006.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is used to downstage locally advanced oesophagogastric cancer. This study assessed whether changes in dysphagia and weight correlated with radiological and pathological assessment of response and surgical decision-making. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the lower oesophagus or oesophagogastric junction treated with neoadjuvant ECF (epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil) chemotherapy from January 2000 to January 2003 were included in this study. Patients were considered to be operable depending upon their chemotherapy response. Weight and swallowing were assessed before and after chemotherapy. Statistical analysis was carried out using ANOVA, unpaired t test and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS Seventy-eight patients (male-female ratio: 6.8: 1; median age: 62.2 years; range: 44.1-78.0 years) underwent a median of three cycles (range: 1-7) of neoadjuvant ECF chemotherapy. Forty patients (51%) gained weight, and swallowing improved in 53 patients (68%). Radiological changes (based on computed tomography) were assessed according to WHO criteria: complete response (5%), partial response (27%), stable disease (46%) and progressive disease (15%). Patients whose swallowing improved gained significantly more weight (P < 0.0001). Swallowing (P = 0.0009) was significantly improved in radiological responders but not weight (P = 0.06); when radiological non-responders were separated into stable and progressive disease, patients with progressive disease were identified as failing to gain weight (P = 0.005). Both swallowing (P < 0.0001) and weight gain (P < 0.0001) were better in patients undergoing surgery. The use of changes of weight (P = 0.42) and swallowing (P = 0.61) failed to separate pathological responders from nonresponders in the subset of patients undergoing surgery. CONCLUSIONS Weight gain and improved swallowing are good but not absolute indicators of radiological response to chemotherapy and patient selection for surgery. However, changes in these variables are not sufficiently sensitive to identify pathological responders from non-responders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Forshaw
- Department of General Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Forshaw MJ, Gossage JA, Chrystal K, Cheong K, Atkinson S, Botha A, Harper PG, Mason RC. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced carcinoma of the lower oesophagus and oesophago-gastric junction. Eur J Surg Oncol 2006; 32:1114-8. [PMID: 16621430 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.02.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2005] [Revised: 02/01/2006] [Accepted: 02/08/2006] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS To evaluate a single unit's experience with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for treating locally advanced non-metastatic initially resectable and unresectable oesophago-gastric cancer. METHODS The medical records of all patients with either locally advanced carcinoma of the lower oesophagus or cardia treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy between August 1999 and January 2003 were reviewed. RESULTS Sixty-four patients with initially resectable tumours (T2-3 or N+) and 38 patients with initially unresectable tumours (T4 or M1a) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (83% combination Epirubicin, Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil). Symptomatic grade III/IV toxicity was observed in 33% of patients. Chemotherapy was not completed in 20 patients because of death (5.9%) and inadequate tumour response/toxicity (13.7%). Forty-three patients (67.3%) with initially resectable tumours and 19 patients (50%) with initially unresectable tumours underwent surgery. CONCLUSIONS Chemotherapy in this study was associated with appreciable toxicity. Patients with initially unresectable locally advanced disease can be downstaged with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Forshaw
- Department of General Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There have been considerable changes in the junior doctors' hours and working patterns over the last 4 years. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of these changes on the house officers' surgical experience and to obtain their opinions on the 'Hospital at Night' system, which has recently been introduced at our large teaching hospital. METHODS A questionnaire was filled out by surgical house officers at the end of their surgical posts in 2001. The same questionnaire was then repeated for house officers completing the same posts in 2005. RESULTS Pre-registration house officers now see less acute surgical admissions (mean 5 patients in 3 months in 2005 compared with 35 in 2001; P < 0.0001) and spend less time attending theatre than four years ago (mean 12 sessions in 3 months in 2001 compared with 6 in 2005). Despite the reduction in hours, they are still managing to attend educational sessions. Nine out of ten house officers felt that the 'Hospital at Night' system was unsatisfactory. They were unable to see and clerk acute surgical admissions or go to theatre because they were providing cross cover for other specialties. CONCLUSIONS The full shift system and the introduction of the 'Hospital at Night' team have led to a reduction in acute surgical experience for surgical house officers. The General Medical Council recommendations for reducing non-educational tasks have not been fulfilled despite the evolving role of nurse practitioners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Gossage
- Cardiovascular Division, Academic Department of Surgery, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
Primary surgical resection for locally advanced oesophageal cancer is associated with systemic failure and poor survival due to presence of micrometastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to surgical resection aims to downstage these locally advanced tumours. A review of reported randomised controlled trials has shown only one sufficiently powered trial with a survival advantage for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Published meta-analyses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy trials have shown little or no overall survival benefit. A subgroup of patients with biologically favourable tumours who respond to this treatment have been consistently shown to have a survival advantage. These patients need to be differentiated from non-responders preferably at an early stage of this potentially toxic treatment. Current clinical, endoscopic and radiological methods of response evaluation are all unreliable. Response evaluation with 18FDG-PET has been shown to accurately assess the pathological response and also to predict the risk of local recurrence and overall survival. The development of integrated PET/CT imaging may enhance the accuracy of this response evaluation. In the future, molecular markers of response prediction prior to initiation of treatment may allow the development of individualised treatment strategies. New emerging chemotherapeutic agents may prove to be more effective in eradicating micrometastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Forshaw
- Department of General Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
|
36
|
Abstract
A 38-year-old man underwent an Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy for a squamous carcinoma at the lower third of his esophagus. On the fifth postoperative day one liter of turbid fluid appeared from the intercostal drain and there was a right-sided pleural effusion on the chest radiograph. A contrast swallow demonstrated a leak at the distal part of the gastric staple line. This leak was managed conservatively and subsequent contrast swallows failed to show any leakage despite the persistent drainage from the drain. At gastroscopy, the intercostal drain was seen to have eroded through the stomach wall. The drain was repositioned and the patient was discharged from hospital 5 days later. We believe this to be the first report of an intercostal drain migration into the stomach after an elective esophagectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Gossage
- Cardiothoracic Department, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|