Oral decitabine-cedazuridine versus intravenous decitabine for myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia (ASCERTAIN): a registrational, randomised, crossover, pharmacokinetics, phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

The DNA methyltransferase inhibitors azacitidine and decitabine for individuals with myelodysplastic syndromes or chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia are available in parenteral form. Oral therapy with similar exposure for these diseases would offer potential treatment benefits. We aimed to compare the safety and pharmacokinetics of oral decitabine plus the cytidine deaminase inhibitor cedazuridine versus intravenous decitabine.

METHODS

We did a registrational, multicentre, open-label, crossover, phase 3 trial of individuals with myelodysplastic syndromes or chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia and individuals with acute myeloid leukaemia, enrolled as separate cohorts; results for only participants with myelodysplastic syndromes or chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia are reported here. In 37 academic and community-based clinics in Canada and the USA, we enrolled individuals aged 18 years or older who were candidates to receive intravenous decitabine, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1 and a life expectancy of at least 3 months. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 5 days of oral decitabine-cedazuridine (one tablet once daily containing 35 mg decitabine and 100 mg cedazuridine as a fixed-dose combination) or intravenous decitabine (20 mg/m2 per day by continuous 1-h intravenous infusion) in a 28-day treatment cycle, followed by 5 days of the other formulation in the next treatment cycle. Thereafter, all participants received oral decitabine-cedazuridine from the third cycle on until treatment discontinuation. The primary endpoint was total decitabine exposure over 5 days with oral decitabine-cedazuridine versus intravenous decitabine for cycles 1 and 2, measured as area under the curve in participants who received the full treatment dose in cycles 1 and 2 and had decitabine daily AUC0-24 for both oral decitabine-cedazuridine and intravenous decitabine (ie, paired cycles). On completion of the study, all patients were rolled over to a maintenance study. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03306264.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 8, 2018, and June 7, 2021, 173 individuals were screened, 138 (80%) participants were randomly assigned to a treatment sequence, and 133 (96%) participants (87 [65%] men and 46 [35%] women; 121 [91%] White, four [3%] Black or African-American, three [2%] Asian, and five [4%] not reported) received treatment. Median follow-up was 966 days (IQR 917-1050). Primary endpoint of total exposure of oral decitabine-cedazuridine versus intravenous decitabine was 98·93% (90% CI 92·66-105·60), indicating equivalent pharmacokinetic exposure on the basis of area under the curve. The safety profiles of oral decitabine-cedazuridine and intravenous decitabine were similar. The most frequent adverse events of grade 3 or worse were thrombocytopenia (81 [61%] of 133 participants), neutropenia (76 [57%] participants), and anaemia (67 [50%] participants). The incidence of serious adverse events in cycles 1-2 was 31% (40 of 130 participants) with oral decitabine-cedazuridine and 18% (24 of 132 participants) with intravenous decitabine. There were five treatment-related deaths; two deemed related to oral therapy (sepsis and pneumonia) and three to intravenous treatment (septic shock [n=2] and pneumonia [n=1]).

INTERPRETATION

Oral decitabine-cedazuridine was pharmacologically and pharmacodynamically equivalent to intravenous decitabine. The results support use of oral decitabine-cedazuridine as a safe and effective alternative to intravenous decitabine for treatment of individuals with myelodysplastic syndromes or chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia.

FUNDING

Astex Pharmaceuticals.

Open-label, Phase 2 study of roxadustat for the treatment of anemia in patients receiving chemotherapy for non-myeloid malignancies

Anemia is a common side effect of myelosuppressive chemotherapy; however, chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) management options are suboptimal. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of roxadustat in this setting. This open-label Phase 2 study included patients with non-myeloid malignancies and CIA (hemoglobin [Hb] ≤10 g/dL) who had planned concurrent myelosuppressive chemotherapy for ≥8 additional weeks. Oral roxadustat was administered for ≤16 weeks (starting dose 2.0 or 2.5 mg/kg, then titrated every 4 weeks). The primary efficacy endpoint was mean maximum change in Hb within 16 weeks of baseline without red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. Patients were assigned to roxadustat 2.0 (n = 31) or 2.5 mg/kg (n = 61) starting doses, and 89 were assessed for efficacy. The mean (standard deviation) maximum Hb change from baseline without RBC transfusion was 2.4 (1.5) and 2.5 (1.5) g/dL in the roxadustat 2.0 and 2.5 mg/kg groups, respectively. Median (range) time to Hb increase of ≥2 g/dL was 71 (57-92) days. Twelve patients (14.5%) had RBC transfusions (Week 5 to the end of treatment). Roxadustat was efficacious regardless of tumor type and chemotherapy regimen. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) occurred in 14 (15.2%) and nine (9.8%) patients, respectively, and three had serious adverse events attributed to roxadustat in the opinion of the investigators (PE: n = 2 [2.2%]; DVT: n = 1 [1.1%]). Roxadustat increased Hb in patients with CIA regardless of tumor type and chemotherapy regimen. Adverse events were consistent with observations in patients with advanced-stage malignancies.

IL believe: A phase 1/2, open-label, dose escalation and dose expansion study of TransCon IL-2 β/γ alone or in combination with pembrolizumab or standard-of-care chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors

TPS2695

Background: Advances in immunotherapy have led to significantly improved survival and quality of life in some cancer patients, but many with less immunogenic tumor types derive suboptimal clinical benefit. Recombinant human interleukin-2 (IL-2, aldesleukin) can induce a response rate of ̃15% in metastatic renal cell carcinoma and metastatic melanoma, yet toxicities (vascular leak syndrome, cytokine storm) have limited its use. TransCon IL-2 β/γ, a novel prodrug with sustained release of a receptor-selective IL-2 (IL-2 β/γ), was designed to optimally address drawbacks of aldesleukin: potent activation of undesired IL-2Rα+ cell types and high Cmax with rapid clearance. TransCon IL-2 β/γ comprises 3 main components: IL-2 β/γ, a methoxy polyethylene glycol (mPEG) carrier molecule, and a linker connecting the two. Under physiological conditions, TransCon IL-2 β/γ releases active IL-2 β/γ from the mPEG carrier through cleavage of the TransCon Linker. This results in a lower Cmax and much longer effective t½ of free IL-2 β/γ compared to aldesleukin. PD-1 expression at the cell surface of activated cytotoxic T cells and natural killer cells provides a clear rationale to study TransCon IL-2 β/γ alone or in combination with pembrolizumab. Methods: IL Believe is a multicenter, first-in-human, Phase 1/2 study in 3 parts in adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. All patients need ≥1 measurable lesion per RECIST 1.1 and an ECOG score of ≤ 2. The primary objectives are to evaluate safety and tolerability, and to define the maximum tolerated dose and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of TransCon IL-2 β/γ alone or in combination with pembrolizumab. Parts 1 and 2 Dose Escalation (Phase 1) use a standard 3+3 design with increasing doses of intravenous (IV) TransCon IL-2 b/g alone (Part 1) or with 200 mg IV pembrolizumab in solid tumors where pembrolizumab monotherapy may have clinical activity (Part 2). Each part will enroll ̃15 patients. Part 3, Combination Dose Expansion (Phase 2) will evaluate preliminary clinical efficacy of TransCon IL-2 β/γ at the RP2D determined in Part 2, combined with chemotherapy. Platinum Resistant Ovarian Cancer is currently planned for dose expansion with other indication specific cohorts to be included in a subsequent amendment. Each cohort will be analyzed using a Simon 2-stage design and will enroll ̃56 patients. Other key objectives include the evaluation of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamic biomarkers, and antitumor activity according to RECIST 1.1. Recruitment started in January 2022 and is ongoing (NCT05081609). Clinical trial information: NCT05081609.

Open-label, phase 2 study of roxadustat for treatment of anemia in patients receiving chemotherapy for non-myeloid malignancies

12085

Background: Anemia is prevalent in patients (pts) receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy (> 60%) and exacerbated by repeated treatment cycles due to cytotoxic agent accumulation. Chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) management options are suboptimal. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of roxadustat in pts with anemia receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Methods: This open-label, single-arm, proof-of-concept Phase 2 study included pts with mostly advanced, non-myeloid malignancies and CIA (hemoglobin [Hb] ≤10 g/dL) who had not received red blood cell (RBC) transfusion or erythropoietin-stimulating agents within 4 weeks of enrollment. Patients were treated with oral roxadustat for ≤16 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was maximum mean change in Hb within 16 weeks of baseline without RBC transfusion in pts who had received ≥1 dose of roxadustat and who had a baseline and ≥1 post-dose Hb assessment. Hb response and safety data were preliminarily assessed in pts receiving a starting dose of 2.0 mg/kg thrice weekly (TIW) for 4 weeks: doses of 100, 150, and 200 mg were given to pts weighing < 70, 70–100, and > 100 kg, respectively. Following a review of data from these pts, dose was increased to 2.5 mg/kg—150, 200, and 250 mg TIW to pts weighing < 70, 70–100, and > 100 kg, respectively—and adjusted every 4 weeks from Week 5 based on Hb response. Results: Patients were assigned to 2.0 mg/kg (n = 31) and 2.5 mg/kg (n = 61) starting doses, and 89 were assessed for efficacy. The maximum mean Hb change from baseline without RBC transfusion was 2.47±1.51 g/dL and 2.52±1.54 g/dL in the 2.0 mg/kg and 2.5 mg/kg cohorts, respectively. Hb increased by ≥1.5 g/dL in 73% of pts and ≥2.0 g/dL in 61% of pts. Median time to ≥2.0 g/dL Hb increase was 71.0 days. Both cohorts had higher proportions of pts with a Hb increase of ≥1, ≥1.5, or ≥2 g/dL at Week 16 compared with baseline. Median time to ≥1 and ≥2 g/dL Hb increase was shorter in pts who started on 2.5 mg/kg compared with 2.0 mg/kg doses (≥1 g/dL: 30 vs 44; ≥2 g/dL 57 vs 105, respectively). Fewer pts required an RBC transfusion (Week 5 to end of treatment) when starting on 2.5 mg/kg compared with 2.0 mg/kg doses (10.2% vs 20.0%). Subgroup analyses based on major tumor and baseline chemotherapy types demonstrated efficacy of roxadustat at both starting doses. The overall safety profile observed was consistent with the patient population under study. Overall, 92% of pts experienced an adverse event (AE). Most AEs were consistent with the underlying malignancies and chemotherapy regimens used. The incidence of deep vein thrombosis was 15.2% (n = 14) and pulmonary embolism was 9.8% (n = 9). There were 17 deaths (18.5%) during the study; none were attributed to roxadustat, and most were associated with disease progression. Conclusions: Roxadustat increased Hb in CIA regardless of tumor type and chemotherapy regimen. These data support additional clinical study. Clinical trial information: NCT04076943.

A phase I clinical trial to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of TST001 in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors

TPS375

Background: In normal conditions, Claudin (CLDN)18.2 is a tight junction protein with expression strictly confined to differentiated epithelial cells in gastric mucosa. CLDN18.2 has been found to be upregulated, and involved in tumor development and progression in a variety of tumor types such as gastric, pancreatic, and bile duct cancer (BTC). The biological characteristics of CLDN18.2 suggest it is an ideal therapeutic target for cancer drug development. IMAB362 is the first anti-CLDN18.2 monoclonal antibody (mAb) of high potency to have been tested in humans and it revealed clinical efficacy in gastric cancer in a phase II study. TST001, a humanized IgG1 mAb, binds to a distinct epitope of CLDN18.2 with higher affinity and mediates CLDN18.2 expressing cancer cell death through antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) in comparison with IMAB362; Furthermore, TST001 is produced using an optimized glycoengineering process to increase affinity to FcR. The enhanced binding to CLDN18.2 on tumor cells and FcR on NK cells results in more efficient engagement of the tumor cells with NK cells and antibody mediated cellular cytotoxicity. In preclinical xenograft studies, TST001 displayed potent anti-tumor activities in the tumor models with medium to high level of CLDN18.2 expression and synergy anti-cancer effect with checkpoint inhibitor. A mAb specific for CLDN18.2 was also developed as an IHC based biomarker for patient enrollment in the clinical trials. Methods: This is an open-label, multi-center, phase I clinical trial to evaluate the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics (PK) profile and preliminary anti-cancer effect of TST001 in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. (NCT04396821) The study consists of two parts: Part A is a 3+3 dose escalation design with sequential dose cohorts of 1, 3, 6, 10mg/kg in Q2W and Q3W schedules. Based on the emerging safety data, higher doses may be proposed for testing. About 27-54 patients will be enrolled. Dose expansion (Part B) will utilize doses of TST001 based on the emerging data from Part A. In Part B, up to 20 patients with CLDN18.2 overexpression per tumor specific cohort will be enrolled to 3 cohorts: A: TST001 single agent in gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer; B: TST001 + nivolumab in G/GEJ cancer; C: TST001 single agent in pancreatic cancer or BTC. All patients in Part B will be selected by CLDN18.2 expression by central lab testing. The safety, anti-tumor activity, and PK will be further assessed in Part B. Enrolment began in July 2020 in the USA and is ongoing in multiple sites. As of 20 September, 2021, 23 subjects were dosed in Part A and the dose of 10mg/kg is being tested. Another phase I study of TST001 single agent and in combination with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic solid tumor is also ongoing in China (NCT04495296).

A Phase Ib/II Study of Pepinemab in Combination with Avelumab in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

The CLASSICAL-Lung clinical trial tested the combination of pepinemab, an IgG4 humanized mAb targeting semaphorin 4D, with the PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab to assess the effects of coupling increased T-cell infiltration and reversal of immune suppression via pepinemab with sustained T-cell activation via checkpoint inhibition.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This phase Ib/II, single-arm study was designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of pepinemab in combination with avelumab in 62 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including immunotherapy-naïve (ION) patients and patients whose tumors progressed following anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy (IOF). The main objectives were to evaluate safety/tolerability, establish a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), obtain a preliminary evaluation of antitumor activity, and investigate candidate biomarker activity.

RESULTS

The combination was well tolerated with no major safety signals identified. Pepinemab, 10 mg/kg with avelumab, 10 mg/kg, every 2 weeks, was selected as the RP2D. Among 21 evaluable ION patients, 5 patients experienced partial responses (PR), 4 patients evidenced clinical benefit ≥1 year, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 81%. Notably, overall response rate with the combination therapy was higher than previously reported for single-agent avelumab in the PD-L1-negative/low population. Among 29 evaluable IOF patients, the combination resulted in a DCR of 59%, including 2 PR and 7 patients with durable clinical benefit of ≥23 weeks. Biomarker analysis of biopsies demonstrated increased CD8 T-cell density correlating with RECIST response criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of pepinemab with avelumab was well tolerated in NSCLC and showed signs of antitumor activity in immunotherapy-resistant and PD-L1-negative/low tumors.

A phase 1/2 trial of ORIN1001, a first-in-class IRE1 inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors

3080

Background: ORIN1001 is a first-in-class small molecule with a novel, unique enzyme and mode of inhibition that selectively inhibits Inositol Requiring Enzyme 1α (IRE1) RNAse and blocks X-Box Binding Protein 1 (XBP1) activation in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). IRE1α/XBP1 has been implicated in a host of pathologies, and molecules that modulate it are under intense investigation for the treatment of oncologic, metabolic, neurodegenerative and other diseases. ORIN1001 has demonstrated preclinical anti-tumor activity alone and in combination with standard of care across multiple animal models including breast, prostate, lung, liver, pancreatic, brain, colon, ovarian, esophageal, and hematologic cancers and is now undergoing first-in-human testing. Methods: A phase 1, open label, 3+3 dose escalation trial is testing ORIN1001 administered PO daily to patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors (single agent) or relapsed refractory breast cancer (in combination with Abraxane). The phase 1 dose escalation part of the trial evaluates the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of ORIN1001. After identification of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for the single agent, the dose expansion part of the trial will test ORIN1001 in combination with Abraxane. Results: As of Jan 25, 2021, 22 patients with advanced cancer have received ORIN1001 dosed at 100mg, 200mg or 300mg per day in 21-day continuous cycles with a median age of 61 (range 42-77). The pts had received a median of 4 prior line of treatments. Two DLTs were observed at 200 mg with thrombocytopenia and rash. MTD has not been reached. Common (>15%) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included nausea, vomiting, rash, fatigue, and hypokalaemia. The vast majority of these events were Grade 1-2 in severity. Seven (32%) pts had at least 1 TRAE grade≥ 3, the most frequent of which were thrombocytopenia (N=3) and rash (N=3). Preliminary pharmacokinetic analysis showed ORIN1001 exposure to increase in a dose proportional manner. Mean t1/2 at steady state was 18 hrs. Thirteen pts were evaluated for preliminary efficacy. Best response, per RECIST 1.1, was stable disease (SD) in 8 pts while 5 pts had progressive disease (PD). For 2 ongoing patients with advanced liver or colorectal cancer, duration of treatment has exceeded 300 days and 570 days, respectively. Conclusions: To date, the phase 1 part of the first-in-human trial has demonstrated a reasonable safety and pharmacokinetic profile for ORIN1001 at 100mg and 200mg dose levels. While efficacy data have yet to mature, chronic dosing achieved in pts with heavily treated advanced solid tumors, suggests clinical potential for in the setting of advanced solid cancers. The phase 2 part of the trial testing ORIN1001 in combination with Abraxane is currently enrolling pts with advanced breast cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT03950570.

Phase 1 first-in-human study of ABBV-184 monotherapy in adult patients with previously treated acute myeloid leukemia or non-small cell lung cancer

TPS2674

Background: Survivin, a member of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein family, is an attractive therapeutic target in cancer, due to its broad expression in solid tumors and hematologic malignancies but limited expression in normal tissues. Elevated survivin expression is associated with an increased invasive phenotype and worse clinical outcomes. ABBV-184 is a first-in-class T-cell receptor (TCR)/anti-cluster of differentiation 3 (CD3) bispecific molecule. It is composed of a soluble TCR that binds to a survivin-derived peptide bound to the class I MHC allele HLA-A2:01 expressed on tumor cells and to the CD3 receptor on T cells. Preclinical data have demonstrated that treatment with ABBV-184 results in T-cell activation, proliferation, and redirected cytotoxicity of HLA-A2:01–positive target cell lines. This first-in-human trial evaluates ABBV-184 monotherapy in patients with previously treated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Patients (≥18 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2, HLA-A2:01 restricted genotype) with relapsed or refractory AML or NSCLC are currently enrolling in this phase 1 multicenter, open-label trial (NCT04272203), which includes parallel dose-escalation and dose-expansion phases for both diseases. Primary objectives are to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of ABBV-184 (dose escalation) and to assess its preliminary efficacy (dose expansion). Secondary objectives include safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and immunogenicity assessments (dose escalation and dose expansion) and duration of response (dose expansion). Patients will receive intravenous infusion of ABBV-184 once weekly. Dose escalation of ABBV-184 is guided by a Bayesian optimal interval design and the RP2D will be determined on the basis of clinical safety, PK, and pharmacodynamic data. For patients with AML, disease assessment is performed according to modified European LeukemiaNet-International Working Group criteria. For patients with NSCLC, response will be assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 and immune RECIST. Treatment can continue until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Biomarker assessments will include longitudinal profiling of peripheral blood immune cells and cytokines, analysis of HLA-A2 and survivin levels on AML bone marrow blasts and NSCLC tumor biopsies, and retrospective correlations of biomarker data with antitumor activity. Enrollment initiated in Sep 2020, with 7 patients enrolled as of Jan 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT04272203.

Preliminary analysis of a U.S. phase II study of the safety and tolerability of proxalutamide (GT0918) in subjects with mCRPC who had progressed on either abiraterone (Abi) or enzalutamide (Enza)

99

Background: GT0918, an androgen receptor (AR) antagonist, is a new chemical entity with reduced drug accumulation in the CNS. In a phase I dose escalation trial (NCT02826772), GT0918 was well tolerated with some durable responses in mCRPC patients (pts) who had progressed on ≥2 lines of standard and experimental therapies. This Phase 2 was designed to study the safety and efficacy of GT0918 400 mg vs. 500 mg oral daily in mCRPC pts who had progressed on either Abi or Enza with or without prior docetaxel. Methods: Pts with histologically confirmed mCRPC who had progressed on either Abi or Enza with or without prior docetaxel were eligible and randomized to 400 mg or 500 mg of GT0918 administered once daily orally. Pts continued treatment with GT0918 at their assigned dose until disease progression, intolerable toxicities or withdrawal of consent. PSA and labs were checked monthly. Imaging scans (CT/MRI and bone scan), circulating tumor cells and cf-DNA/RNA were performed every 3 months. Results: 61 pts were enrolled at 9 US sites and randomized 1:1 to 400 mg (n = 31) or 500 mg (n = 30) daily dose. All pts had progressed on either Abi (n = 34) or Enza (n = 27). Most of the reported AEs related to GT0918 were grade 1 or 2 as per CTCAE v4.03, but 22 AEs (5.3%) were reported as grade ≥ 3, such as fatigue, increase ALT/AST, rhabdomyolysis, or muscle weakness. Some AEs were due to drug-drug interaction with lipid-lowering medications leading to early discontinuation (26.2%). As of 5 October 2020, twelve pts finished 6 cycles. Among them, three finished 12 cycles and remained on the treatment. Treatment duration showed more pts in the 400 mg cohort with stable disease (SD) on imaging (9/31 finished 6 cycles) compared to the 500 mg cohort (3/30 finished 6 cycles). Further, all three pts who finished 12 cycles had progressed on Abi indicating that GT0918 might be a good treatment option for pts who had progressed on Abi. Conclusions: Proxalutamide (GT0918) administrated orally once a day is well tolerated and resulted in SD in pts who had progressed on either Abi or Enza. The 400 mg/day will be considered as the recommended phase II dose for further clinical trials. GT0918 is warranted for pts failed either Abi or Enza. Clinical trial information: NCT03899467.

Open-label, phase II study of ladiratuzumab vedotin (LV) for castration-resistant prostate cancer (SGNLVA-005, trial-in-progress)

TPS185

Background: LIV-1 is a transmembrane protein expressed in a variety of cancer types. SGN-LIV1A, or ladiratuzumab vedotin (LV), is a novel investigational humanized IgG1 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) directed against LIV-1. LV mediates delivery of monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), which drives antitumor activity through cytotoxic cell killing and induces immunogenic cell death. In a phase 1 study, LV was tolerable and active in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer (Modi 2017). This study is currently evaluating the safety and efficacy of LV in different advanced solid tumors with various LIV-1 expression, including metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, small cell lung cancer (SCLC), non-small cell lung cancer (squamous and nonsquamous), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma. Methods: SGNLVA-005 (NCT04032704) is an open-label, phase 2 study evaluating LV monotherapy in patients with previously treated, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic advanced solid tumors, including mCRPC. Patients with mCRPC will receive LV administered as a 30 minute intravenous infusion (IV) at 1.25 mg/kg every 1 week. Up to 30 patients with mCRPC will be enrolled. Patients in the mCRPC cohort must have metastatic castration-resistant disease, have received no more than 1 prior line of androgen receptor-targeted therapy, have ≥28 days between androgen receptor-targeted therapy and start of study treatment, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. In addition, mCRPC patients with measurable and non-measurable disease are eligible if the protocol-defined criteria are met. mCRPC patients must not have BRCA gene mutations, prior cytotoxic chemotherapy in the metastatic mCRPC setting, prior radioisotope therapy, or radiotherapy to ≥30% of bone marrow. Patients are not preselected based on tumor LIV-1 expression. Their tumor samples will be analyzed for correlation between LIV-1 expression and response. Safety and efficacy will be monitored throughout the study. Study objectives include objective tumor response rate per RECIST 1.1 and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate per Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 (both primary); safety and tolerability, disease control rate, duration of response, progression-free and overall survival, and pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity (all secondary); and pharmacodynamics. Study accrual is ongoing in the USA, Italy, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, and the UK. Clinical trial information: NCT04032704.

Open-label, phase II study of ladiratuzumab vedotin (LV) for advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (SGNLVA-005, Trial-in-Progress)

TPS256

Background: LIV-1 is a transmembrane protein expressed in a variety of cancer types. SGN-LIV1A, or ladiratuzumab vedotin (LV), is a novel investigational humanized IgG1 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) directed against LIV-1. LV mediates delivery of monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), which drives antitumor activity through cytotoxic cell killing and induces immunogenic cell death. In a phase 1 study, LV was tolerable and active in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer at a recommended dose of 2.5 mg/kg every 21 days (Modi 2017). More frequent, fractionated dosing has improved the activity and/or safety of other ADCs. Thus, this study is currently evaluating the safety and efficacy of weekly LV dosing (Days 1, 8, and 15 of every 3-week cycle) in different advanced solid tumors with various LIV-1 expression, including advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, small cell lung cancer (SCLC), non-small cell lung cancer (squamous and nonsquamous), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, castration resistant prostate cancer, and melanoma. Methods: SGNLVA-005 (NCT04032704) is an open-label, phase 2 study evaluating LV monotherapy in patients with 8 different advanced solid tumors in two parts (administered as a 30 minute intravenous infusion [IV]: Part A LV 2.5 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks [up to n = 72 total]; Part B LV 1.0 or 1.25 mg/kg every 1 week [up to n = 252 total]). The study is enrolling previously treated patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic disease. Patients must have measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0 or 1, and adequate organ function. Cohort specific inclusion criteria require that patients in the gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cohorts must have received and progressed during or after no more than 1 prior line of platinum based cytotoxic chemotherapy. Patients in the gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma cohort may have received prior anti-programmed cell death (ligand) 1 (anti-PD[L]1) therapy (unless contraindicated), and patients with known human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression must have received prior HER2-targeted therapy. Patients are not preselected based on tumor LIV-1 expression. Tumor samples will be analyzed for correlation between LIV-1 expression and tumor response. Safety and efficacy will be monitored throughout the study. Study objectives include objective response rate (primary); safety and tolerability, disease control rate, duration of response, progression-free and overall survival, and pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity (all secondary); and pharmacodynamics. Study accrual is ongoing in the USA, Italy, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, and the UK. Clinical trial information: NCT04032704.

Randomized multicenter open-label trial of GT0918 (proxalutamide) in patients with mCRPC that progressed on abiraterone or enzalutamide

e17578

Background: Both abiraterone and enzalutamide have been approved for the treatment of mCRPC. GT0918 (proxalutamide) is a novel second-generation androgen receptor (AR) antagonist binding directly to the androgen receptor, impairing nuclear translocation and decreasing AR protein expression. This phase II portion of the Ph I/II study is being conducted to further evaluate safety and tolerability of GT0918 at 400 mg or 500 mg daily dosing. Methods: All eligible mCRPC pts with progressive disease based on rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or/and imaging while on either abiraterone or enzalutamide, but not both. One line of prior chemotherapy was allowed. Pts (n = 60) will be randomized to GT0918 either 400 mg or 500 mg po once daily for 6 months. The primary endpoint is safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints are PSA reduction at 12 weeks, % radiographic progression at 6-month, time to imaging progression, and exploratory biomarker CTC & cf-DNA/RNA. PSA is assessed every 4 wks and tumor imaging is done every 12 wks. Results: 56 pts were screened June 2019 to January 15, 2020 and 40 pts were randomized to receive GT0918 either 400 mg or 500 mg po daily. 22 pts (55%) had enzalutamide as prior therapy and 18 pts (45%) had abiraterone as prior therapy. 17 pts (43%) had one or more lines of chemotherapy. The median age was 72 years (range 53-89) and median baseline PSA was 162 ng/mL (0.3-4195). 10 pts had 1 cycle or less of study drug due to rapid PSA progression, AEs and/or withdrawal of consent. The most common treatment-related AEs were fatigue (48%), loss of appetite/anorexia (25%), nausea (20%), lower leg extremity edema (18%), constipation (15%), weight loss (13%), vomiting (10%), and headache (8%). 8 pts (6 in 500 mg vs. 2 in 400 mg) required dose reduction due to AE. No seizures have been observed. As Jan 30, 2020, 3 pts (8%) and 8 pts (20%) had PSA reduction at 12 weeks and 4 weeks, respectively, but no 50% PSA reduction was observed. 2 pts (5%) received study drug treatment over 24 weeks and 10 pts (25%) received study drug over 16 weeks based on stable disease (SD) on imaging. Conclusions: GT0918 administrated orally once a day is well tolerated and first 40-pts taking GT0918 show some anti-tumor activities. Dose of 400 mg po daily is recommended for GT 0918 for further clinical trials. Clinical trial information: NCT03899467 .

TRIDENT-1: A global, multicenter, open-label Phase II study investigating the activity of repotrectinib in advanced solid tumors harboring ROS1 or NTRK1-3 rearrangements

TPS9637

Background: Repotrectinib is a next-generation ROS1/TRK inhibitor with > 90-fold greater potency than crizotinib against ROS1 and > 100-fold greater potency than larotrectinib against TRK. Preclinical studies demonstrated inhibitory activity of repotrectinib against ROS1 resistance mutations, including the solvent-front mutation (SFM) G2032R. In the phase 1 portion of the study, repotrectinib was found to be well tolerated with encouraging antitumor activity including a 91% confirmed overall response (cORR) in TKI-naïve ROS1+ NSCLC pts. In ROS1+ NSCLC pts who received 1 prior chemo and 1 prior TKI, the cORR was 57% at the clinical dose of 160 mg QD or above. Intra-cranial (IC) activity was observed in ROS1+ NSCLC pts with measurable CNS disease (100% IC-ORR in TKI-naïve and 75% IC-ORR in patients with 1 prior TKI). Encouraging antitumor activity was observed in pts with NTRK+ solid tumors. Methods: A global phase 2 study was initiated and is actively enrolling. The primary endpoint for the Phase 2 study is cORR assessed by BICR (Blinded Independent Central Review) using RECIST v1.1, in each expansion cohort in pts with advanced solid tumors that harbor a ROS1 or NTRK1/2/3 gene fusion. Secondary endpoints include duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), IC-ORR, IC-PFS, and quality of life assessments. All pts need to have RECIST 1.1 measurable disease confirmed by BICR and ECOG performance score ≤1. Repotrectinib is administered at 160 mg QD for 14 days and, if tolerated, the dose can be increased to 160 mg BID. Approximately 320 pts (≥12 years old) will be enrolled into 6 defined expansion cohorts, depending on the status of previous treatment with TKIs and cancer types (see table below). Clinical trial information: NCT03093116 . [Table: see text]

Interim subgroup analysis for response by PD-L1 status of CLASSICAL-Lung, a phase Ib/II study of pepinemab (VX15/2503) in combination with avelumab in advanced NSCLC

3011

Background: Antibody blockade of semaphorin 4D (SEMA4D, CD100) promotes tumoral dendritic cell and CD8+ T cell infiltration and reduces function and recruitment of immunosuppressive myeloid cells. Importantly, these mechanisms to overcome immune exclusion and suppression have been shown to complement immune checkpoint therapies in preclinical models. Pepinemab is an IgG4 humanized monoclonal antibody targeting semaphorin 4D. The CLASSICAL-Lung clinical trial tests the combination of pepinemab with avelumab to couple T cell activation via checkpoint inhibition with beneficial modifications of the immune microenvironment via pepinemab. Methods: This phase 1b/2, single arm, first-in-human study is designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of pepinemab with avelumab in 62 patients (pts) with advanced (stage IIIB/IV) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including immunotherapy-naïve (ION) pts and pts whose tumors progressed following immunotherapy (IOF). Results: Among 21 evaluable ION pts, 5 experienced partial response (PR), 3 pts had clinical benefit ≥ 1 year, and the disease control rate (DCR) is 81%. Pts enrolled in this study were observed to have lower PD-L1 expression relative to prior single agent studies (likely due to approval of pembrolizumab for first line therapy). We, therefore, performed subgroup analysis for response by PD-L1 status. The objective tumor response (ORR) in the PD-L1 negative and low population ( < 80% TPS by Dako 73-10 assay) appears to be approximately 2-2.5 fold greater with combination therapy than with historical single agent immune checkpoint controls. Notably, 97% of pts who experienced PR or SD were reported to have tumors with negative or low PD-L1 expression. Among 29 evaluable IOF pts, the combination resulted in 59% DCR, including 2 PR and 7 patients with durable clinical benefit of ≥ 23 weeks. Biomarker analysis of pre- and on-treatment biopsies confirmed increased CD8+ T cell density correlating with response. Surprisingly, analysis of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) revealed a relative paucity of these cells in pretreatment NSCLC biopsies as compared to other cancer indications such as HNSCC. Conclusions: This trial is nearing completion with only 5 of 62 subjects remaining on study. Preliminary data suggest the combination is well tolerated and shows signs of increased antitumor activity, particularly in PD-L1 negative or low tumors. Updated clinical response data and immunophenotypic analyses will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03268057 .

Interim results from a phase Ib/II study of pepinemab in combination with avelumab in advanced NSCLC patients following progression on prior systemic and/or anti-PDx therapies

75

Background: Despite progress of immune checkpoint therapies, many cases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are refractory or acquire resistance to current therapies. Antibody blockade of semaphorin 4D (SEMA4D, CD100) can overcome resistance mechanisms of immune exclusion and myeloid suppression. Importantly, combinations of anti-SEMA4D with various immunotherapies enhanced T cell infiltration and activity, as well as durable tumor regression in preclinical models. Pepinemab (VX15/2503) is a first-in-class humanized monoclonal antibody targeting SEMA4D. Methods: The CLASSICAL-Lung clinical trial (NCT03268057) evaluates the combination of pepinemab with anti-PD-L1 antibody avelumab to couple beneficial modifications of the immune microenvironment via pepinemab with immune activation via checkpoint inhibition. This ongoing study evaluates the safety, tolerability and efficacy of the combination in patients with advanced (stage IIIB/IV) NSCLC, including immunotherapy-naïve (ION) patients and patients whose tumors progressed during or following immunotherapy (IOF). Results: The combination was well tolerated with no major safety signals identified. Among 29 evaluable IOF patients, two experienced confirmed partial response (PR) with 63% and 52% tumor reduction on study following acquired resistance to prior treatment with pembrolizumab, 15 additional patients experienced stable disease, and at least 5 patients with durable clinical benefit of ≥ 23 weeks. Among 21 evaluable ION patients, 5 experienced PR, clinical benefit ≥ 1 year was observed in 3 patients, and Disease Control Rate was 81%. Analysis of pre- and on-treatment biopsies demonstrated increased CD8+ T cell density correlating with response, reduction or elimination of tumor in 11/13 biopsies from subjects with PR or SD. Conclusions: Interim analysis suggests the combination of pepinemab plus avelumab is well tolerated and shows initial clinical signals of antitumor activity. Updated clinical response data (minimum of 6 mo. follow-up), as well as additional immunophenotyping of both inflammatory and suppressive myeloid cells will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03268057.

Abstract LB-194: First-in-human Phase I study of the CD40 agonist mAb CDX-1140 and in combination with CDX-301 (rhFLT3L) in patients with advanced cancers: Interim results

CDX-1140 is an agonist CD40 mAb intended to promote priming of CD8+ effector T cells through activation of dendritic cells (DC), enhance macrophage tumoricidal activity, and mediate direct killing of CD40-expressing tumor cells. CDX-1140 is a human IgG2 mAb with Fc receptor independent activity and is synergistic with sCD40L, suggesting a potential to enhance CD40L-mediated immune activation. CDX-1140 has a broad dose-dependent activity that may achieve maximal agonist activity at doses that provide significant tumor penetration with minimal toxicities from systemic CD40 activation. CDX-301 (rhFLT3L) is a DC growth factor that markedly increases CD141+ DCs, including in the tumor microenvironment (TME). CD141+ DCs are critical for initiating anti-tumor immune responses and are often depleted within the TME. Preclinical studies have shown that treatment with CDX-301 synergizes with CD40 signaling to enhance anti-tumor immune responses, suggesting that combining CDX-1140 and CDX-301 could result in enhanced clinical benefit.

CDX1140-01(NCT03329950) is a Phase I dose-escalation study of CDX-1140 as monotherapy or in combination with CDX-301 evaluating safety, PK, PD, and preliminary clinical activity in patients (pts) with refractory solid tumors and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. CDX-1140 is given iv q 4 weeks at doses from 0.01 to 3 mg/kg utilizing a 3+3 design (first 2 cohorts are single-pts). In combination cohorts (solid tumors only), CDX-301 at 75 μg/kg daily x 5 is administered sc prior to cycles 1 and 2 of escalating doses of CDX-1140 starting at 0.09 mg/kg. Tumor-specific expansion cohorts are planned to further explore the activity of monotherapy or combination treatment.

To date, 18 pts across 10 tumor types have been dosed in CDX-1140 monotherapy cohorts with doses ranging from 0.01 to 0.72 mg/kg and without identification of an MTD. There has been one DLT (0.18 mg/kg): grade 3 pneumonitis and hypoxia. One pt (0.72 mg/kg) experienced grade 3 fatigue requiring hospitalization 48 hrs after the first infusion. There have been 3 additional grade 3 treatment-related adverse events: dyspnea (0.18 mg/kg), nausea (0.36 mg/kg), and vomiting (0.36 mg/kg). The first combination cohort (n=5) has been completed. In monotherapy and combination cohorts there have been no significant drug-related changes in liver function tests to date. CDX-1140 PK is quantifiable at doses ≥ 0.09 mg/kg and exposure appears dose proportional. Expected dose-dependent PD effects have shown activation of peripheral blood lymphocytes and increases in pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Combination with CDX-301 has shown enhanced cytokine responses. The data suggest that CDX-1140 has the expected biologic and safety profile predicted from preclinical studies and may achieve dose levels optimal for systemic exposure. The addition of CDX-301 may enhance the activity of CDX-1140.

Citation Format: Rachel E. Sanborn, Nashat Y. Gabrail, Nina Bhardwaj, Michael S. Gordon, Mark O'Hara, Danny Khalil, Thomas Hawthorne, Richard Gedrich, Laura Vitale, Mark Rogalski, Tianshu Li, Tracey Rawls, Tibor Keler, Michael Yellin. First-in-human Phase I study of the CD40 agonist mAb CDX-1140 and in combination with CDX-301 (rhFLT3L) in patients with advanced cancers: Interim results [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-194.

IOLite: Multipart, phase 1b, dose-finding study of the PD-1 inhibitor dostarlimab in combination with the PARP inhibitor niraparib ± bevacizumab (bev), or with platinum-based chemotherapy ± bev for advanced cancer

2560

Background: Novel combinations of drugs may overcome resistance in patients (pts) with solid tumors who had progressed on standard therapy. Methods: IOLite (NCT03307785) is a multicenter, open label, multipart study to determine dosing and evaluate safety and efficacy of dostarlimab in combination with approved therapies in pts with advanced solid tumors. Pts were enrolled in each part based on tumor histology, prior treatment (tx) history, and physician preference. Primary endpoint is dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) deemed as tx-related per investigator, and safety and tolerability of the combination. Tumor responses were assessed per RECIST v1.1. Results: Parts A-D (see Table) are fully enrolled. One complete response was reported in part B (endometrial); confirmed partial responses in part A (ovarian, small cell lung [SCLC], gastrointestinal stromal [GIST]); part B (breast [2], bladder, SCLC); part C (prostate, fallopian tube), and part D (endometrial, non-SCLC). Stable disease was reported in part A (colorectal, prostate [2], breast, GIST, gastric); part B (SCLC, squamous cell, head and neck, prostate); part C (pancreatic, ovarian, GIST, breast [2], liver, endometrial); part D (ovarian, head & neck, cholangiocarcinoma). At data cutoff, 24 pts remain on treatment. PK’s of dostarlimab and niraparib (nir) were not altered by any of the combination agents tested. Conclusions: Dostarlimab is well tolerated in combination with nir ± bev, or carbo-pac ± bev. Preliminary efficacy data show responses in various histologies. No new safety signals were identified. Clinical trial information: NCT03307785. [Table: see text]

Safety and clinical outcomes of GT0918 (Proxalutamide), a potent androgen receptor (AR) blocker, in patients with mCRPC progressing on standard (SoC) and experimental therapies: Phase I/II trial

e16527

Background: GT0918 is a new chemical entity of AR blocker. A phase I dose escalation study was planned for 6 dose cohorts in pts with mCRPC who have progressed on SoC and experimental therapies. No DLT or major toxicity was found in planned doses, therefore a cohort of 600 mg daily was added in December 2018. Methods: Patients (pts) with histologically confirmed mCRPC who progressed on enzalutamide +/- abiraterone and docetaxel were eligible. GT0918 was administered once daily orally for 28 consecutive days for DLT assessment. Pts could continue on GT0918 until they experienced intolerable toxicity, disease progression or withdrew consent. All pts consented for exploratory biomarker studies of CTC and cf-DNA/RNA. Results: 40 pts were treated with GT0918 in 7 cohorts. Pts had metastatic disease to bone only (44%), and lymph node +/-visceral +/- bone (56%), who progressed on multiple lines of therapies including but not limited to abiraterone, enzalutamide, docetaxel, cabazitaxel. GT0918 related adverse events (AEs) were grade 1 or 2 as per CTCAE v4.03. including fatigue, anemia, nausea, loss of appetite, hot flushing, depression, etc. The most common TEAE is fatigue and all pts at 500 mg dose reported having fatigue and one pt required dose reduction. Toxicity at the 600mg is still being analyzed but at least 2 pts had tremor. Treatment duration showed more pts in the treatment of 400 mg and 500 mg with SD in this heavily pretreated group (see Table). Exploratory biomarkers of CTCs also suggested higher dose of GT0918 resulted in better clinical outcomes. Conclusions: GT0918 administrated orally once daily was well tolerated. Better clinical outcomes were shown in dose cohorts of 400 mg and 500 mg without major toxicities. Thus these 2 doses were selected for dose expansion. Table. Clinical outcomes of GT0918 in heavily pretreated mCRPC pts Clinical trial information: NCT02826772. [Table: see text]

Real-world effectiveness of palonosetron-based antiemetic regimens: preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting

Aim: To evaluate real-world effectiveness of guideline-recommended palonosetron-containing antiemetic regimens in patients receiving highly (HEC) or moderately emetogenic (MEC) chemotherapy. Patients & methods: This retrospective analysis used records of adults receiving first-line chemotherapy and a three-drug palonosetron-containing antiemetic regimen for HEC or palonosetron-containing antiemetic regimen for MEC (carboplatin). Results: A total of 1587 records were evaluated. For HEC and MEC, respectively, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) occurred in 40 versus 44% of patient cycles (p = 0.01), and unscheduled iv. antiemetics in 41 versus 35% (p < 0.05). A total of 48% of HEC patients versus 42% of MEC patients had CINV-related clinic visits (p = 0.05). Conclusion: Palonosetron-containing antiemetic regimens may provide insufficient CINV control. Alternative regimens may improve patient quality of life and reduce healthcare resource utilization.

A Phase 2 Study of PCI-27483, a Factor VIIa Inhibitor in Combination with Gemcitabine for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

OBJECTIVES

Tissue factor overexpression is associated with tumor progression, venous thromboembolism, and worsened survival in patients with cancer. Tissue factor and activated factor VII (FVIIa) complex may contribute to tumor invasiveness by promoting cell migration and angiogenesis. The study objective was to evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of PCI-27483, a selective FVIIa inhibitor.

METHODS

This was an open-label, multicenter phase 2 trial of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Part A of the study was an intrapatient dose escalation lead-in portion in patients concurrently receiving gemcitabine, and in part B, patients were randomized 1: 1 to the recommended phase 2 dose combination PCI-27483-gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone.

RESULTS

Target international normalized ratio (between 2.0-3.0) was achieved following PCI-27483 treatment. Overall safety of PCI-27483-gemcitabine (n = 26) was similar to gemcitabine alone (n = 16), with a higher incidence of mostly low-grade bleeding events (65% vs. 19%). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not significantly different between patients treated with PCI-27483-gemcitabine (PFS: 3.7 months, OS: 5.7 months) and those treated with gemcitabine alone (PFS: 1.9 months, OS: 5.6 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Targeted inhibition of the coagulation cascade was achieved by administering PCI-27483. PCI-27483-gemcitabine was well tolerated, but superiority to single agent gemcitabine was not demonstrated.

A phase I/II study of proxalutamide (GT0918), a potent androgen receptor blocker, in patients with mCRPC progressed after both hormonal therapy and chemotherapy

169

Background: GT0918 is a new chemical entity of androgen receptor (AR) blocker. A phase I/II study was conducted to identify dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and to assess safety, tolerability, and PK of GT0918 in pts with mCRPC who have progressed on standard of care (SoC) and experimental therapies in the United States. Methods: Patients (pts) with histologically confirmed mCRPC who had progressed after both hormonal therapy (abiraterone or/and enzalutamide) and chemotherapy (e.g., docetaxel) were eligible. GT0918 was administered once daily orally for 28 consecutive days, followed by a 7-day off-treatment period for PK analysis. The first 28-days on treatment (cycle 1) was defined as DLT period. Pts continued on receiving GT0918 thereafter until they experienced one of following events of intolerable toxicities, disease progression or withdrew consent. Results: 35 pts were enrolled to GT0918-US-1001 trial with 6 dose escalations of study drug defined in protocol: 50 mg (n = 3), 100 mg (n = 6), 200 mg (n = 6), 300 mg (n = 7), 400 mg (n = 7) and 500 mg (n = 6). All pts progressed on multiple lines of therapies including but limited to bicalutamide, abiraterone, enzalutamide, docetaxel, cabazitaxel, radium 223, sipuleucel T and pembrolizumab. No DLT was observed and MTD has not been reached. GT0918 related adverse events (AEs) were less than 10% and grade 1 or 2 as per CTCAE v4.03, including fatigue, nausea, dizziness, loss of appetite, back pain, hot flush, hypercholesterolemia, anemia, constipation, etc. Two events of grade 3 fatigue and one event of grade 4 elevated creatine kinase (CK) were reported. Stable disease by imaging scans at 24 weeks by dose group were; 1/50 mg, 1/100mg, and 4/400mg. Three pts on 500mg finished 3 cycles and continue on the treatment (as 10/15/18). PSA decreases were also seen among pts at 500mg dose level for 4 cycles. Conclusions: GT0918 administrated orally once a day is well tolerated and resulted in SD in late-stage pts. No DLT has occurred to date (at 500 mg) and dose escalation is planned to 600 mg or higher. Extended/Ph II trial will further evaluate safety and efficacy of GT0918 in mCRPC pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02826772.

A phase II, multicenter, single-arm trial of CV301 plus atezolizumab (Atezo) in locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic urothelial cancer (UC)

TPS494

Background: Anti-PD1/PD-L1 can achieve durable responses in advanced UC but most patients (pts) do not respond. Combination strategies with agents that “prime” the immune system may improve outcomes. CV301 comprises two recombinant poxviruses, Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) and Fowlpox (FPV), encoding the human transgenes for CEA, MUC-1, and a Triad of Co-stimulatory Molecules (TRICOM: ICAM-1, LFA-3, and B7-1). MVA-CV301 is used for priming doses and FPV-CV301 is used for booster doses to achieve a heterologous prime boost regimen. In preclinical studies, BN-platform vaccine plus PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors exhibited synergistic anti-tumor efficacy, T-cell infiltration, and PD-L1 upregulation in tumors. CEA and MUC-1 are expressed, in 41-90% and 55-91% of any stage UC, respectively, and in ~100% of metastatic UC. An ongoing Phase Ib trial of CV301 plus anti-PD-1 agent has demonstrated a similar safety profile to anti-PD-1 monotherapy with only mild vaccine-related adverse events (AEs). Methods: This is a Phase 2, single-arm, multi-institutional trial designed to study CV301 plus atezo as 1st-line treatment in pts with advanced UC ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy regardless of PD-L1 (Cohort 1) and as salvage treatment in pts with UC progressing after platinum-based chemotherapy (Cohort 2). MVA-CV301 is given subcutaneously (SC) on Days 1 and 22 and FPV-CV301 SC every 21 days for 4 doses, then every 6 weeks until 6 months, then every 12 weeks until 2 years. Atezo 1200mg is given every 21 days. Primary endpoint is objective response rate (ORR; RECIST 1.1). Secondary endpoints: immune response, OS, PFS, response duration, AEs. Tumor and serial blood samples will be collected for biomarker analyses; 1-sided α is 0.025/cohort in this design. With a 2-stage design, success criteria are based on historic ORR (H0) and alternative ORR (H1) with ≥70% power. For Cohort 1, assuming H0 = 0.23, H1 = 0.43, then Cohort 1 sample size N1= 14, responders required at stage 1 to continue R1≥3, total accrual goal N = 33, total responders to reject H0, R≥13. For Cohort 2, assuming H0 = 0.15, H1 = 0.33, then N1= 13, R1≥2, N = 35, R≥10. Accrual has begun; completion is expected within 1 year. Clinical trial information: NCT03628716.

Real-world efficacy: intravenous palonosetron three-drug regimen for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting with highly emetogenic chemotherapy

AIM

Real-world palonosetron effectiveness was evaluated in an antiemetic regimen with highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC).

PATIENTS & METHODS

In this Phase IV, prospective, multicenter observational study, HEC-treated cancer patients received palonosetron, a neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist, and dexamethasone. Primary objective was to assess complete response (CR) for acute (≤24 h), delayed and overall (≤120 h) chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

RESULTS

Of 159 patients, 65.4% had breast cancer, 64.8% received anthracycline (doxorubicin)-plus-cyclophosphamide-containing chemotherapy; 155 completed one HEC cycle. CR was 60.0% acute, 39.4% delayed and 34.8% overall, and then increased (all phases) in 69 patients completing four HEC cycles. Anthracycline (doxorubicin) plus cyclophosphamide-receiving patients had especially low CR.

CONCLUSION

Even within a recommended three-drug antiemetic regimen, palonosetron may provide suboptimal chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting control with HEC in real-world settings.

Voxtalisib (XL765) in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: an open-label, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukaemia have a poor prognosis. Therapies targeting more than one isoform of PI3K, as well as mTOR, might increase antitumour activity. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of voxtalisib (also known as XL765 or SAR245409), a pan-PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma, or chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma.

METHODS

We did a non-randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial at 30 oncology clinics in the USA, Belgium, Germany, France, the Netherlands, and Australia. Patients aged 18 years or older with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (EGOG) performance status score of 2 or lower and relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, or chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma were enrolled and treated with voxtalisib 50 mg orally twice daily in 28-day continuous dosing cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients in each disease-specific cohort who achieved an overall response, defined as a complete response or partial response. All patients who received more than 4 weeks of treatment and who completed a baseline and at least one post-baseline tumour assessment were analysed for efficacy and all patients were analysed for safety. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01403636, and has been completed.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 19, 2011, and July 24, 2013, 167 patients were enrolled (42 with mantle cell lymphoma, 47 with follicular lymphoma, 42 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and 36 with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma. The median number of previous anticancer regimens was three (IQR 2-4) for patients with lymphoma and four (2-5) for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma. Of 164 patients evaluable for efficacy, 30 (18·3%) achieved an overall response (partial, n=22; complete, n=8); 19 (41·3%) of 46 with follicular lymphoma, five (11·9%) of 42 with mantle cell lymphoma, two (4·9%) of 41 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and four (11·4%) of 35 with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma. The safety profile was consistent with that of previous studies of voxtalisib. The most frequently reported adverse events were diarrhoea (in 59 [35%] of 167 patients), fatigue (in 53 [32%]), nausea (in 45 [27%]), pyrexia (in 44 [26%,]), cough (in 40 [24%]), and decreased appetite (in 35 [21%]). The most frequently reported grade 3 or worse adverse events were anaemia (in 20 [12%] of 167 patients), pneumonia (in 14 [8%]), and thrombocytopenia (in 13 [8%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 97 (58·1%) of 167 patients.

INTERPRETATION

Voxtalisib 50 mg given orally twice daily had an acceptable safety profile, with promising efficacy in patients with follicular lymphoma but limited efficacy in patients with mantle cell lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, or chronic lymphocytic leukaemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma.

FUNDING

Sanofi.

Phase I/II study of mocetinostat in combination with gemcitabine for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and other advanced solid tumors

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of mocetinostat (a Class I/IV HDAC inhibitor) in combination with gemcitabine in patients with solid tumors, including pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

In this open-label, non-randomized Phase I/II study (NCT00372437) sequential cohorts of patients with solid tumors received gemcitabine (1000 mg/m², day 1 of three consecutive weeks, 4-week cycles) and oral mocetinostat [50-110 mg, three times per week (TIW)]. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) was determined based on dose-limiting toxicities in Cycle 1 (Phase I study). The MTD/RP2D was further evaluated in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (Phase II study) using a two-stage design. The Phase II primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were enrolled into the Phase I (n = 25) and Phase II (n = 23) studies. In the Phase I study, the MTD/RP2D was mocetinostat 90 mg TIW + gemcitabine 1000 mg/m². Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were reported by 81% of all patients, the most frequent being fatigue (38%) and thrombocytopenia (19%). The ORR was 11% in the Phase I study (n = 2 patients with pancreatic cancer, responses lasting for 16.8 and 4.0 months, respectively). As no responses were seen in the Phase II cohort, the study was terminated.

CONCLUSIONS

Mocetinostat TIW in combination with gemcitabine was associated with significant toxicities in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The level of clinical activity of this treatment combination was not considered high enough to merit further testing in this setting.

Phase (Ph) 2 stage 1 clinical activity of seviteronel, a selective CYP17-lyase and androgen receptor (AR) inhibitor, in women with advanced AR+ triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) or estrogen receptor (ER)+ BC: CLARITY-01

1102

Background: Seviteronel (Sevi), an oral selective CYP17-lyase and AR inhibitor that blocks testosterone and estradiol production and competitively antagonizes the AR, is in Ph 2 clinical development for BC and prostate cancer. The primary objective of this ongoing Ph 2 study (NCT02580448) is to estimate the activity of once daily Sevi in women with AR+ TNBC and ER+ BC as measured by clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 16 and 24 weeks (wk), respectively. Methods: Patients (pts) with ER+/HER2-normal metastatic BC following progression of ≥1 prior line of endocrine therapy or TNBC were enrolled with no limit of prior therapies in either cohort. Evaluable pts had AR ≥10% via central IHC staining (TNBC only) and 1 post-baseline scan. Sevi was administered at 450 mg oral daily. Scans were performed every 8 wk. Circulating tumor cell (CTC) enumeration was performed by EPIC CTC analysis. A Simon’s 2-stage design was employed to determine activity (≥2 of 13 CBR16 in TNBC and ≥2 of 12 CBR24 in ER+ BC allow for accrual to Stage 2). Results: As of 4 Oct, 2016, 16 pts with AR+ TNBC (6 evaluable) and 14 pts with ER+ BC (11 evaluable) were enrolled. 67% had visceral metastases; 10% had stable brain metastases. 60% had ≥2 lines of prior therapy for advanced disease. 13 of 14 (93%) TNBC pts who underwent central AR testing had AR ≥10%. Four pts in the TNBC cohort and 8 pts in the ER+ cohort remain on therapy. CBR16 (TNBC) and CBR24 (ER+) was 2 of 6 (33%) and 2 of 11 (18%) allowing Stage 2 accrual in both cohorts. 7 of 10 evaluable pts with CTCs present at baseline had a CTC decline at C2D1, including all that met CBR (-94.3% [-27.5, -100] median [range]). The most common adverse events (≥ 25%) were fatigue (50%), nausea (43%) and decreased appetite (33%); all Grade 1/2. Updated CBR data will be presented at the time of presentation. Conclusions: Sevi Stage 1 activity is suggested by CBRs, along with associated CTC declines in heavily pre-treated pts with high disease burden. The observed safety profile is consistent with on-target pharmacology. Stage 2 enrollment is ongoing. Sevi may provide a novel treatment option for women with AR+ TNBC or ER+ BC. Clinical trial information: NCT02580448.

Analysis of efficacy and safety of POM as a replacement therapy for lenalidomide for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma pts refractory to a lenalidomide-containing combination regimen

e19528

Background: Pomalidomide (POM) is a third –generation immunomodulatory drug shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) for patients (pts) previously treated with bortezomib and lenalidomide (LEN) and in combination with dexamethasone it has been shown to overcome resistance in RRMM. In this phase 2 trial, we are evaluating the efficacy, safety and tolerability of POM as a replacement therapy for LEN for pts who have progressed receiving a LEN combination regimen. Methods: This is a phase 2, multicenter, open-label and non-randomized study. Pts who have failed a combination regimen containing LEN were treated with POM along with all of the other drugs previously used in the regimen. POM administered orally (dose is determined based on the previous regimen) on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle, whereas other drugs are administered using the same schedule(s), dose(s) and drug combination as the last LEN-containing regimen that the patient received and failed. The planned enrollment on the study will be 45 pts. Results: To date, a total of 29 pts have been enrolled, 25 pts are evaluable and 12 pts have discontinued treatment. Of the evaluable pts, 9 (36%) and 16 (64%) received 3mg and 4mg of POM, respectively. The median age of all pts was 72 years (range, 52-81), and 17 (68%) were males. Pts have received a median of 3 prior treatments (range, 1-7). The median follow-up time for all pts is 3.1 months (range, 0.2-8.1). Amongst evaluable pts, 5 (23.8%) pts achieved at least a minimal response, 10 (47.6%) pts showed stable disease while 6 (28.6%) pts exhibited disease progression. At the time of data cutoff, only 17 pts have completed more than 1 full cycle of treatment; and, thus, the overall response and clinical benefit rates are fairly low (14.3% and 23.8%, respectively) but expected to improve with further follow up. The median PFS for the cohort was 7.6 months. Common ≥ Gr3 adverse events were neutropenia (8%), hypomania (4%) and leukopenia (4%). Conclusions: We show thatPOM appears to be promising replacement therapy for LEN in RRMM pts who have progressed within receiving a LEN combination regimen.

Phase 1/2 study of veliparib (V) combined with carboplatin (Cb) and etoposide (E) in patients (pts) with extensive-stage disease (ED) small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and other solid tumors: Phase 1 results

8530

Background: The majority of SCLC cases are diagnosed as ED, for which there is a poor prognosis and no curative treatment (Tx). V, a potent PARP inhibitor, has been shown in preclinical studies to enhance the antitumor activity of platinum-based agents and E against SCLC. The presented phase 1 dose-escalation (NCT02289690) evaluated V combined with Cb/E. Methods: Pts (≥18 years) with ED SCLC or other advanced/metastatic solid tumors with ≤1 line of prior cytotoxic therapy and ECOG performance score 0/1 were included. This study followed a 3+3 design. V starting dose and schedule were 80 mg BID PO administered on days (D) –2 to 5 in combination with Cb AUC 5 mg/mL•min administered on D 1 and E 100 mg/m2 administered on D 1 to 3 via intravenous infusion in 21-D cycles. V schedules of D –2 to 12 and continuous dosing were also explored. Primary objectives were to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for V combined with Cb/E, and to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction between V and E. Results: Thirty-nine pts (n = 24 ED SCLC; n = 15 other solid tumors) with median age of 62 years (range 43–79) received study Tx. Most common adverse events (AEs; ≥40%) were nausea (54%), fatigue (51%), alopecia (46%), and anemia (44%); grade 3/4 AEs (≥30%) were decreased neutrophil count, neutropenia (31% each), and anemia (26%). Dose-limiting toxicity occurred in 1 pt (n = 1 grade 3 fatigue) at V 240 mg BID D –2 to 5. The MTD was not reached; RP2D for V was set at 240 mg BID on D –2 to 12 based on long-term tolerability. Continuous dosing of V 240 mg BID with Cb/E resulted in unacceptable Cb/E dose delays due to hematologic toxicity. Coadministration of V (80 to 240 mg BID) with Cb/E exhibited dose-proportional kinetics with no impact on the E PK. Confirmed responses: ED SCLC 63% (15/24 pts) across all dose levels and in 83% (5/6) at RP2D; other tumor types: 13% (2/15) across all dose levels. Conclusions: V + Cb/E had an acceptable safety profile in pts with ED SCLC, with an RP2D of 240 mg BID D –2 to 12. Coadministration of V with Cb/E had no effect on E PK. Responses were seen across all dose levels. A phase 2 study of V with Cb/E in ED SCLC is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02289690.

Efficacy, safety, and immune activation with pegylated human IL-10 (AM0010) in combination with an anti-PD1 in advanced NSCLC

9091

Background: Although IL-10 has anti-inflammatory properties, it stimulates cytotoxicity and proliferation of intratumoral antigen activated CD8+ T cell at higher concentrations. AM0010 is anticipated to activate antigen stimulated, intratumoral CD8 T cells while PD-1 inhibits them, providing the rationale for combining AM0010 and anti-PD-1 antibody. Methods: We treated a cohort of 34 NSCLC pts with AM0010 (10-20mg/kg QD, SC) and a PD-1 inhibitor [pembrolizumab (2mg/kg, q3wk IV; n=5) or nivolumab (3mg/kg, q2wk IV; n=29)]. Tumor responses were assessed by irRC every 8 weeks. Immune responses were measured by analysis of serum cytokines (Luminex), activation of blood derived T cells (FACS) and peripheral T cell clonality (TCR sequencing). Tumor PD-L1 expression was confirmed by IHC (22C3). Results: Pts had a median of 2 prior therapies. Median follow-up is 9.6 mo (range 0.5-77.3) in this fully enrolled cohort. AM0010 plus anti-PD-1 was well-tolerated. TrAEs were reversible and transient, with most being low grade, most commonly fatigue and pyrexia. G3/4 TrAEs were thrombocytopenia (7), anemia (6), fatigue (4), rash (3), pyrexia (2), hypertriglyceridemia (1) and pneumonitis (1). As of Jan. 31 2017, 22 pts had at least 1 tumor assessment. Partial responses (PRs) were observed in 8 pts (36.4%). 17 of these 22 pts had tissue for analysis of percent of tumor cells with PD-L1 expression (22C3): 58.8% had <1%, 17.7% had 1-49% and 23.5% had >50%. Best response data stratified for PD-L1 are shown in the table. Median PFS and OS for the entire cohort have not been reached. Updated outcome data that includes all enrolled pts will be available at the meeting. AM0010 plus anti-PD1 increased serum Th1 cytokines (IL-18, IFNγ), the number and proliferation of PD1+ Lag3+ activated CD8+ T cells and a de-novo oligoclonal expansion of T cell clones in the blood while decreasing TGFβ. Conclusions: AM0010 in combination with anti-PD1 is well-tolerated in advanced NSCLC pts. The efficacy and the observed CD8+ T cell activation is promising. Clinical trial information: NCT02009449. [Table: see text]

Inhibition of the Nuclear Export Receptor XPO1 as a Therapeutic Target for Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

Purpose: The high fatality-to-case ratio of ovarian cancer is directly related to platinum resistance. Exportin-1 (XPO1) is a nuclear exporter that mediates nuclear export of multiple tumor suppressors. We investigated possible clinicopathologic correlations of XPO1 expression levels and evaluated the efficacy of XPO1 inhibition as a therapeutic strategy in platinum-sensitive and -resistant ovarian cancer.Experimental Design: XPO1 expression levels were analyzed to define clinicopathologic correlates using both TCGA/GEO datasets and tissue microarrays (TMA). The effect of XPO1 inhibition, using the small-molecule inhibitors KPT-185 and KPT-330 (selinexor) alone or in combination with a platinum agent on cell viability, apoptosis, and the transcriptome was tested in immortalized and patient-derived ovarian cancer cell lines (PDCL) and platinum-resistant mice (PDX). Seven patients with late-stage, recurrent, and heavily pretreated ovarian cancer were treated with an oral XPO1 inhibitor.Results: XPO1 RNA overexpression and protein nuclear localization were correlated with decreased survival and platinum resistance in ovarian cancer. Targeted XPO1 inhibition decreased cell viability and synergistically restored platinum sensitivity in both immortalized ovarian cancer cells and PDCL. The XPO1 inhibitor-mediated apoptosis occurred through both p53-dependent and p53-independent signaling pathways. Selinexor treatment, alone and in combination with platinum, markedly decreased tumor growth and prolonged survival in platinum-resistant PDX and mice. In selinexor-treated patients, tumor growth was halted in 3 of 5 patients, including one with a partial response, and was safely tolerated by all.Conclusions: Taken together, these results provide evidence that XPO1 inhibition represents a new therapeutic strategy for overcoming platinum resistance in women with ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 23(6); 1552-63. ©2016 AACR.

First-in-Class, First-in-Human Phase I Study of Selinexor, a Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

Purpose This trial evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of selinexor (KPT-330), a novel, oral small-molecule inhibitor of exportin 1 (XPO1/CRM1), and determined the recommended phase II dose. Patients and Methods In total, 189 patients with advanced solid tumors received selinexor (3 to 85 mg/m2) in 21- or 28-day cycles. Pre- and post-treatment levels of XPO1 mRNA in patient-derived leukocytes were determined by reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and tumor biopsies were examined by immunohistochemistry for changes in markers consistent with XPO1 inhibition. Antitumor response was assessed according Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 guidelines. Results The most common treatment-related adverse events included fatigue (70%), nausea (70%), anorexia (66%), and vomiting (49%), which were generally grade 1 or 2. Most commonly reported grade 3 or 4 toxicities were thrombocytopenia (16%), fatigue (15%), and hyponatremia (13%). Clinically significant major organ or cumulative toxicities were rare. The maximum-tolerated dose was defined at 65 mg/m2 using a twice-a-week (days 1 and 3) dosing schedule. The recommended phase II dose of 35 mg/m2 given twice a week was chosen based on better patient tolerability and no demonstrable improvement in radiologic response or disease stabilization compared with higher doses. Pharmacokinetics were dose proportional, with no evidence of drug accumulation. Dose-dependent elevations in XPO1 mRNA in leukocytes were demonstrated up to a dose level of 28 mg/m2 before plateauing, and paired tumor biopsies showed nuclear accumulation of key tumor-suppressor proteins, reduction of cell proliferation, and induction of apoptosis. Among 157 patients evaluable for response, one complete and six partial responses were observed (n = 7, 4%), with 27 patients (17%) achieving stable disease for ≥ 4 months. Conclusion Selinexor is a novel and safe therapeutic with broad antitumor activity. Further interrogation into this class of therapy is warranted.

A randomized Phase II trial of the tumor vascular disrupting agent CA4P (fosbretabulin tromethamine) with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer

Introduction

Combretastatin A4-phosphate, fosbretabulin tromethamine (CA4P) is a vascular disrupting agent that targets tumor vasculature. This study evaluated the safety of CA4P when combined with carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab in chemotherapy-naïve subjects with advanced nonsquamous, non-small-cell lung cancer.

Methods

Adult subjects with confirmed American Joint Committee on Cancer six stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0 or 1 were randomized to receive six cycles (treatment phase) of paclitaxel (200 mg/m²), carboplatin (area under the concentration versus time curve 6), and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) on day 1 and repeated every 21 days, or this regimen plus CA4P (60 mg/m²) on days 7, 14, and 21 of each cycle. Subjects could then receive additional maintenance treatment (excluding carboplatin and paclitaxel) for up to 1 year.

Results

Sixty-three subjects were randomized, 31 to control and 32 to CA4P, and 19 (61.3%) and 17 (53.1%), respectively, completed the treatment phase. Exposure to study treatment and dose modifications were comparable between the randomized groups. The overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between groups, with increased neutropenia, leukopenia, and hypertension in the CA4P group. Deaths, serious adverse events, and early discontinuations from treatment were comparable between the randomized treatment groups. The overall tumor response rate with CA4P was 50% versus 32% in controls. Overall and progression-free survival rates were comparable between the groups.

Conclusion

CA4P plus carboplatin, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab appears to be a tolerable regimen with an acceptable toxicity profile in subjects with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

APF530 (granisetron injection extended-release) in a three-drug regimen for delayed CINV in highly emetogenic chemotherapy

Aim: APF530, extended-release granisetron, provides sustained release for ≥5 days for acute- and delayed-phase chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). We compared efficacy and safety of APF530 versus ondansetron for delayed CINV after highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC), following a guideline-recommended three-drug regimen. Methods: HEC patients received APF530 500 mg subcutaneously or ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg intravenously, with dexamethasone and fosaprepitant. Primary end point was delayed-phase complete response (no emesis or rescue medication). Results: A higher percentage of APF530 versus ondansetron patients had delayed-phase complete response (p = 0.014). APF530 was generally well tolerated; treatment-emergent adverse event incidence was similar across arms, mostly mild-to-moderate injection-site reactions. Conclusion: APF530 versus the standard three-drug regimen provided superior control of delayed-phase CINV following HEC. ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT02106494.

Phase III study of APF530 versus ondansetron with a neurokinin 1 antagonist + corticosteroid in preventing highly emetogenic chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: MAGIC trial

68

Background: Managing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) associated with delayed ( > 24-120 h) highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) is an unmet need. APF530, extended-release granisetron, provides sustained release over ≥ 5 days to prevent acute (0-24 h) and delayed CINV. This trial compared the efficacy and safety of APF530 in preventing CINV after HEC in a 3-drug regimen vs a standard 3-drug regimen with ondansetron (Ond). Methods: In this double-blind, multicenter study (NCT02106494), patients (pts) receiving single-day HEC (2011 ASCO guidelines) were randomized 1:1 to APF530 500 mg SC (10 mg granisetron) or Ond 0.15 mg/kg IV and stratified by cisplatin ( ≥ 50 mg/m2, yes/no). Pts were scheduled to receive concomitant dexamethasone (Dex) 12 mg IV + fosaprepitant (Fos) 150 mg IV on day 1 + PO Dex on days 2-4. The primary end point was delayed-phase complete response (CR) (no emesis, no rescue medication). Secondary end points included CR in acute and overall phases and complete control (CC; CR and no more than mild nausea) in acute, delayed, and overall phases. Treatment (tx) comparisons used chi-square test controlling for cisplatin. Adverse events (AEs) and injection-site reactions (ISRs) were assessed. Results: Modified intent-to-treat analysis included 902 pts (APF530, n = 450; Ond, n = 452) with baseline demographics balanced between tx groups. A significantly higher % of APF530 (65%) vs Ond (57%) pts had delayed-phase CR (P= .014). A significantly higher % of APF530 (61%) vs Ond (53%) pts had delayed-phase CC (P= .022, Table). CR and CC rates in acute and overall phases were numerically higher with APF530 vs Ond, but not statistically significant. APF530 was well tolerated. Most common AEs were ISRs, mostly mild or moderate. Conclusions: APF530 with Fos+Dex led to statistically higher CR and CC rates in delayed-phase CINV with HEC vs a standard 3-drug regimen of Ond with Fos+Dex. Clinical trial information: NCT02106494. [Table: see text]

A phase 2 randomized dose-ranging study of the JAK2-selective inhibitor fedratinib (SAR302503) in patients with myelofibrosis

In this phase 2 open-label randomized study, 31 patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis received fedratinib 300, 400 or 500 mg once daily in consecutive 4-week cycles. Mean spleen volume reductions at 12 weeks (primary end point) were 30.3% (300 mg), 33.1% (400 mg) and 43.3% (500 mg). Spleen response rates (patients achieving ⩾35% spleen reduction) at 12/24 weeks were 30%/30% (300 mg), 50%/60% (400 mg) and 64%/55% (500 mg), respectively. By 4 weeks, improvements in myelofibrosis (MF)-associated symptoms were observed. At 48 weeks, 68% of patients remained on fedratinib and 16% had discontinued because of adverse events (AEs). Common grade 3/4 AEs were anemia (58%), fatigue (13%), diarrhea (13%), vomiting (10%) and nausea (6%). Serious AEs included one case of reversible hepatic failure and one case of Wernicke's encephalopathy (after analysis cutoff). Fedratinib treatment led to reduced STAT3 phosphorylation but no meaningful change in JAK2V617F allele burden. Significant modulation (P<0.05, adjusted for multiple comparisons) of 28 cytokines was observed, many of which correlated with spleen reduction. These data confirm the clinical activity of fedratinib in MF. After the analysis cutoff date, additional reports of Wernicke's encephalopathy in other fedratinib trials led to discontinuation of the sponsored clinical development program.

A phase I study in patients with solid or hematologic malignancies of the dose proportionality of subcutaneous Azacitidine and its pharmacokinetics in patients with severe renal impairment

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess the dose proportionality of azacitidine pharmacokinetics (PK) after single subcutaneous (SC) doses of 25-100 mg/m2, and determine the effect of renal impairment on PK after single and multiple 75 mg/m2 SC azacitidine doses.

DESIGN

Multicenter, phase I, open-label, parallel group study.

SETTING

Community clinics and major academic centers.

PATIENTS

Twenty-seven patients with solid or hematologic malignancies.

INTERVENTIONS

Part 1 evaluated azacitidine dose proportionality in patients with normal renal function randomized to single 25, 50, 75, or 100 mg/m2 SC doses. The 75 mg/m2 dosing group received 4 additional days of SC azacitidine. In Part 2, patients with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 Cockcroft-Gault adjusted) received azacitidine 75 mg/m2 for 5 consecutive days.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

PK parameters were determined using noncompartmental methods. In patients with normal renal function (n=21), azacitidine area under the plasma-time curve (AUC0-∞) and maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) were dose proportional within the 25-100 mg/m2 range. Concentration versus time profiles after single and multiple azacitidine 75 mg/m2 doses were similar in shape for patients with normal (n=6) or impaired renal function (n=6), with higher mean concentrations in the latter group. Higher mean exposures (AUC0-∞ and Cmax) in renally impaired patients were observed; however, individual exposure values were, with few exceptions, within the same range in both groups. No drug accumulation after multiple doses was observed in either group. Terminal half-life and time to maximum plasma concentration were comparable between groups. Azacitidine tolerability was similar in patients with normal or impaired renal function.

CONCLUSION

Azacitidine is dose proportional over the 25-100 mg/m2 dosing range. Overall, renal impairment had no important effect on azacitidine PK. Therefore, no initial azacitidine dose adjustment in patients with renal impairment is required.