1
|
Cortes J, Martin M, Pernas S, Gomez Pardo P, Lopez-Tarruella S, Gil-Martin M, Manso L, Ciruelos E, Perez-Fidalgo JA, Hernando C, Ademuyiwa FO, Weilbaecher K, Mayer I, Pluard TJ, Martinez Garcia M, Vahdat L, Wach A, Barker D, Romagnoli B, Kaufman PA. Abstract PD1-02: Withdrawn. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-pd1-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
This abstract was withdrawn by the authors.
Citation Format: Cortes J, Martin M, Pernas S, Gomez Pardo P, Lopez-Tarruella S, Gil-Martin M, Manso L, Ciruelos E, Perez-Fidalgo JA, Hernando C, Ademuyiwa FO, Weilbaecher K, Mayer I, Pluard TJ, Martinez Garcia M, Vahdat L, Wach A, Barker D, Romagnoli B, Kaufman PA. Withdrawn [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD1-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Cortes
- Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Oncology IOB, QuironGroup, Madrid and Barcelona, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, CIBERONC Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO) L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, INCLIVA, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain; Washington University, St. Louis, MO; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; St Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Polyphor Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland; Darmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - M Martin
- Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Oncology IOB, QuironGroup, Madrid and Barcelona, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, CIBERONC Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO) L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, INCLIVA, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain; Washington University, St. Louis, MO; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; St Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Polyphor Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland; Darmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - S Pernas
- Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Oncology IOB, QuironGroup, Madrid and Barcelona, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, CIBERONC Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO) L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, INCLIVA, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain; Washington University, St. Louis, MO; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; St Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Polyphor Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland; Darmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - P Gomez Pardo
- Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Oncology IOB, QuironGroup, Madrid and Barcelona, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, CIBERONC Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO) L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, INCLIVA, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain; Washington University, St. Louis, MO; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; St Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Polyphor Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland; Darmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - S Lopez-Tarruella
- Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Oncology IOB, QuironGroup, Madrid and Barcelona, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, CIBERONC Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO) L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, INCLIVA, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain; Washington University, St. Louis, MO; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; St Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Polyphor Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland; Darmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - M Gil-Martin
- Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Oncology IOB, QuironGroup, Madrid and Barcelona, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, CIBERONC Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO) L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, INCLIVA, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain; Washington University, St. Louis, MO; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; St Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Polyphor Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland; Darmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - L Manso
- Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Oncology IOB, QuironGroup, Madrid and Barcelona, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, CIBERONC Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO) L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, INCLIVA, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain; Washington University, St. Louis, MO; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; St Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Polyphor Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland; Darmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - E Ciruelos
- Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Oncology IOB, QuironGroup, Madrid and Barcelona, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, CIBERONC Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO) L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, INCLIVA, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain; Washington University, St. Louis, MO; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; St Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Polyphor Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland; Darmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - JA Perez-Fidalgo
- Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Oncology IOB, QuironGroup, Madrid and Barcelona, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, CIBERONC Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO) L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, INCLIVA, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain; Washington University, St. Louis, MO; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; St Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Polyphor Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland; Darmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - C Hernando
- Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Oncology IOB, QuironGroup, Madrid and Barcelona, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, CIBERONC Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO) L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, INCLIVA, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain; Washington University, St. Louis, MO; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; St Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Polyphor Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland; Darmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - FO Ademuyiwa
- Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Oncology IOB, QuironGroup, Madrid and Barcelona, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, CIBERONC Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO) L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, INCLIVA, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain; Washington University, St. Louis, MO; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; St Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Polyphor Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland; Darmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - K Weilbaecher
- Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Oncology IOB, QuironGroup, Madrid and Barcelona, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, CIBERONC Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO) L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, INCLIVA, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain; Washington University, St. Louis, MO; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; St Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Polyphor Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland; Darmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - I Mayer
- Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Oncology IOB, QuironGroup, Madrid and Barcelona, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, CIBERONC Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO) L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, INCLIVA, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain; Washington University, St. Louis, MO; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; St Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Polyphor Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland; Darmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - TJ Pluard
- Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Oncology IOB, QuironGroup, Madrid and Barcelona, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, CIBERONC Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO) L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, INCLIVA, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain; Washington University, St. Louis, MO; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; St Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Polyphor Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland; Darmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - M Martinez Garcia
- Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Oncology IOB, QuironGroup, Madrid and Barcelona, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, CIBERONC Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO) L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, INCLIVA, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain; Washington University, St. Louis, MO; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; St Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Polyphor Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland; Darmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - L Vahdat
- Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Oncology IOB, QuironGroup, Madrid and Barcelona, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, CIBERONC Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO) L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, INCLIVA, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain; Washington University, St. Louis, MO; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; St Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Polyphor Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland; Darmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - A Wach
- Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Oncology IOB, QuironGroup, Madrid and Barcelona, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, CIBERONC Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO) L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, INCLIVA, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain; Washington University, St. Louis, MO; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; St Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Polyphor Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland; Darmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - D Barker
- Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Oncology IOB, QuironGroup, Madrid and Barcelona, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, CIBERONC Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO) L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, INCLIVA, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain; Washington University, St. Louis, MO; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; St Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Polyphor Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland; Darmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - B Romagnoli
- Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Oncology IOB, QuironGroup, Madrid and Barcelona, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, CIBERONC Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO) L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, INCLIVA, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain; Washington University, St. Louis, MO; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; St Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Polyphor Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland; Darmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - PA Kaufman
- Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain; Vall D'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain; Institute of Oncology IOB, QuironGroup, Madrid and Barcelona, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón, CIBERONC Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain; Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO) L'Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, INCLIVA, CIBERONC, Valencia, Spain; Washington University, St. Louis, MO; Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; St Luke's Cancer Institute, Kansas City, MO; Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Polyphor Ltd, Allschwil, Switzerland; Darmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kaufman PA, Pipas M, Finn GJ, Mathews SE, Zhang H, Richards J, Kudla AJ, Bloom T, Zalutskaya AA, Llorin-Sangalang J, Pinto AC, Ettl J. Abstract OT3-06-01: SHERBOC: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial of seribantumab (MM-121) plus fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, heregulin positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer whose disease progressed after prior systemic therapy. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-ot3-06-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The receptor tyrosine kinase, HER3 and its ligand, heregulin (HRG), have been implicated in the initiation and progression of multiple cancer types including: breast, lung, and head & neck cancers. Seribantumab is a fully human, monoclonal IgG2 antibody that binds to the ligand-binding domain of HER3 and inhibits HRG-mediated signaling. Previously, seribantumab was tested in combination with exemestane in a placebo-controlled, Phase 2 study in post-menopausal women with ER/PR+, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Although the trial failed to meet its primary efficacy objective of a 50% reduction in hazard ratio in the seribantumab/exemestane treatment vs. the placebo/exemestane control group, a positive trend in PFS and a statistically significant improvement in median OS was observed in patients in the seribantumab/exemestane treatment group. Seribantumab has also been tested in three randomized Phase 2 studies adding to standard of care (SOC) in non-small cell lung, ER/PR+ mBC, and platinum resistant/refractory ovarian cancer. These studies were retrospectively analyzed to determine correlation between HRG mRNA levels in tumor tissue and PFS. In each of these studies, the presence of tumor cell HRG mRNA was prognostic for shortened PFS with SOC treatment. Further, the addition of seribantumab to SOC therapy improved PFS for patients with HRG+ tumors. These data support the hypothesis that HRG expression may define a drug tolerant cancer cell phenotype characterized by poor response to multiple classes of cytotoxic and targeted therapies, including aromatase inhibitors and SERDs. Additionally, blockade of HRG-induced HER3 signaling by seribantumab may counter such protective effects of HRG on cancer cells, with the potential for improved outcomes in HRG+ patients. It is estimated that ˜45% of hormone-receptor positive, HER2 negative advanced breast cancers are HRG+ and that HRG expression may contribute to accelerated clinical progression observed in this subset of patients.
Trial design: In the upcoming randomized, double-blinded, multi-center, Phase 2 study, ER/PR receptor-positive, HER2 negative mBC patients with HRG+ tumors will be prospectively selected using a HRG RNA in situ hybridization assay. Approximately 200 women will be screened to enroll 80 HRG+ subjects. Eligible subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive seribantumab/fulvestrant or placebo/fulvestrant until investigator-assessed disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, whichever comes first. Subjects will have progressed on one or two prior hormonal therapies, one of which must have been a CDKi-containing regimen. The goal of this study is to determine if the combination of seribantumab + fulvestrant is more effective than placebo + fulvestrant based on PFS (primary end point) in HRG positive subjects. Secondary endpoints include OS, objective response rate, and time to progression. Safety will also be assessed. Enrollment is expected to begin in 2017 at approximately 80 sites globally.
Citation Format: Kaufman PA, Pipas M, Finn GJ, Mathews SE, Zhang H, Richards J, Kudla AJ, Bloom T, Zalutskaya AA, Llorin-Sangalang J, Pinto AC, Ettl J. SHERBOC: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial of seribantumab (MM-121) plus fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, heregulin positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer whose disease progressed after prior systemic therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-06-01.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- PA Kaufman
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA; PRA Health Sciences, Raleigh, NC; Frauenklinik der Technischen Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - M Pipas
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA; PRA Health Sciences, Raleigh, NC; Frauenklinik der Technischen Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - GJ Finn
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA; PRA Health Sciences, Raleigh, NC; Frauenklinik der Technischen Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - SE Mathews
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA; PRA Health Sciences, Raleigh, NC; Frauenklinik der Technischen Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - H Zhang
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA; PRA Health Sciences, Raleigh, NC; Frauenklinik der Technischen Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - J Richards
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA; PRA Health Sciences, Raleigh, NC; Frauenklinik der Technischen Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - AJ Kudla
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA; PRA Health Sciences, Raleigh, NC; Frauenklinik der Technischen Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - T Bloom
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA; PRA Health Sciences, Raleigh, NC; Frauenklinik der Technischen Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - AA Zalutskaya
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA; PRA Health Sciences, Raleigh, NC; Frauenklinik der Technischen Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - J Llorin-Sangalang
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA; PRA Health Sciences, Raleigh, NC; Frauenklinik der Technischen Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - AC Pinto
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA; PRA Health Sciences, Raleigh, NC; Frauenklinik der Technischen Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - J Ettl
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA; PRA Health Sciences, Raleigh, NC; Frauenklinik der Technischen Universität München, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jahanzeb M, Tripathy D, Rugo H, Swain S, Kaufman PA, Mayer M, Hurvitz S, O'Shaughnessy J, Mason G, Yardley DA, Brufsky A, Chu L, Antao V, Beattie M, Yoo B, Cobleigh M. Abstract P5-08-27: Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with hormone receptor (HR)+ HER2+ metastatic breast cancer and low vs high levels of HR positivity from the SystHERs Registry. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p5-08-27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction In 2010, the cutoff for HR positivity in breast cancer was established as ≥1% of cells staining HR+, previously having varied from 1% to 10%. The impact of this change on treatment patterns and outcomes is poorly understood. SystHERs is a prospective, observational cohort registry of patients (pts) with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) that commenced enrollment in 2012. To our knowledge, SystHERs is the largest registry to collect and analyze data for the HER2+ subgroup. We report baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, and early outcomes by %HR+ (1–9% vs 10–100%).
Methods SystHERs enrolled pts aged ≥18 years and within 6 months of HER2+ MBC diagnosis. For pts with locally-determined HR+ disease, defined as HR+ in primary or metastatic tissue, %HR+ is the highest percentage of ER+ or PR+ tissue in early breast cancer or MBC. The percentage of ER+ or PR+ cells was not reported for pts considered HR– by the investigator. Median overall survival (OS; Kaplan–Meier) and hazard ratios (Cox regression) were estimated.
Results As of Feb 1, 2016, data were available for 872 eligible pts with known HR status, of whom 608 (70%) had HR+ disease. Of the 608 pts, 53 (9%) had 1–9%HR+ and 496 (82%) had 10–100%HR+; %HR+ was not reported for 59 pts. Baseline characteristics were similar between %HR+ subgroups (Table 1).
As shown in Table 2, the 1–9%HR+ subgroup was less likely to receive first-line hormonal therapy (26%) than the 10–100%HR+ subgroup (56%). 87% and 79% of pts received chemotherapy, respectively.
Median time from MBC diagnosis was 16.5 months (range, 0.4–49.4 months). Median OS was not reached at the data cutoff. The number of deaths was 13 (25%) in the 1–9%HR+ subgroup, and 68 (14%) in the 10–100%HR+ subgroup (log-rank P=0.025). The OS hazard ratio (0.514, 95% CI 0.283–0.931) favored the 10–100%HR+ subgroup. OS did not differ significantly between pts with 1–9%HR+ vs HR– disease (log-rank P=0.582, hazard ratio 1.185, 95% CI 0.647–2.169).
Table 1. Baseline characteristics 1-9%HR+ (n=53)10-100%HR+ (n=496)HR– (n=264)Age at MBC diagnosis, median yrs (range)54 (30–86)57 (21–86)55 (28–88)Race, % White838372Black151320Premenopausal, %282522ECOG performance status, % 04654441463942≥2878MBC diagnosis type, % De novo404958Recurrent605142Visceral, %*686275*Non-hepatic abdominal, ascites, CNS, liver, lung, or pleural effusion sites of metastasis
Table 2. First-line treatment 1-9%HR+ (n=53)10-100%HR+ (n=496)HR– (n=264)HER2-targeted therapy, %969391Chemotherapy, %877989Hormonal therapy, %26564
Conclusions These preliminary observational data suggest potential differences in treatment patterns and survival outcomes in low vs moderate/high HR+ expressers, with the former being less likely to receive hormonal therapy (26% vs 56%). Furthermore, low HR positivity was associated with poorer OS and was similar to OS observed in pts with HR– disease.
Citation Format: Jahanzeb M, Tripathy D, Rugo H, Swain S, Kaufman PA, Mayer M, Hurvitz S, O'Shaughnessy J, Mason G, Yardley DA, Brufsky A, Chu L, Antao V, Beattie M, Yoo B, Cobleigh M. Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with hormone receptor (HR)+ HER2+ metastatic breast cancer and low vs high levels of HR positivity from the SystHERs Registry [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-08-27.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Jahanzeb
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| | - D Tripathy
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| | - H Rugo
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| | - S Swain
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| | - PA Kaufman
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| | - M Mayer
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| | - S Hurvitz
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| | - J O'Shaughnessy
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| | - G Mason
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| | - DA Yardley
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| | - A Brufsky
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| | - L Chu
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| | - V Antao
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| | - M Beattie
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| | - B Yoo
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| | - M Cobleigh
- University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; Washington Cancer Institute, MedStar Washington Hospital Center; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; AdvancedBC.org; UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Translational Research in Oncology; Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology; Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation; Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute; Genentech, Inc.; Rush University Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hosford SR, Kaufman PA, Miller TW. Abstract P3-05-03: Estrogen receptor alpha reactivation for the treatment of anti-estrogen-resistant breast cancer. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p3-05-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Adjuvant anti-estrogen therapies that antagonize ER transcriptional activity have improved outcome in many patients, yet resistance to anti-estrogen therapies is common, resulting in disease recurrence in 1/3 of patients within 15 years of follow-up. However, prior to the introduction of tamoxifen, estrogens were used for treatment of breast cancer with response rates similar to those obtained by anti-estrogens in the advanced setting. Similarly, withdrawal of anti-estrogen therapy has shown anti-tumor effects, indicating that reactivation of ER may elicit therapeutic benefit.
MCF-7 cells with long-term (>1 yr) acquired resistance to the selective ER downregulator fulvestrant (fulv; MCF-7/FR) retain ER expression and harbor ESR1 (ER) gene amplification. Upon withdrawal of fulv, these cells re-engage ER as demonstrated by increased luciferase transcriptional reporter activity and re-expression of proteins encoded by ER-inducible genes. Following fulv withdrawal, MCF-7/FR cells show drastically decreased proliferation and increased apoptosis that are temporally correlated with ER reactivation. Protein levels of the anti-senescence protein FoxM1 decline following ∼12 d of fulv withdrawal, paralleled by increased staining for senescence-associated β-galactosidase. Transcriptomic analyses confirmed that fulv withdrawal progressively induces gene expression patterns indicative of stress and senescence. Similar effects were observed in long-term estrogen-deprived (LTED) MCF-7 cells treated with 17b-estradiol. Prospective studies characterizing the development of acquired anti-estrogen resistance have demonstrated the MCF-7 cells at 9 months of fulv resistance do not respond to fulv withdrawal, contrasting the long-term (>1 yr) MCF-7/FR cells. Additionally, withdrawal of fulv from T47D/FR, ZR75-1/FR, or HCC-1428/FR cells did not induce cell death or re-engage ER activity, confirming that ER reactivation is required for anti-cancer effects. Ongoing studies are characterizing the temporal changes in ER transcriptional activity during 1) development of acquired anti-estrogen resistance, and 2) 17b-estradiol treatment of mice bearing WHIM16 patient-derived xenografts (regress in response to 17b-estradiol) to elucidate the mechanism underlying sensitivity of anti-estrogen resistant cells to ER reactivation.
While estrogen therapies have shown clinical efficacy for decades, biomarkers to identify patients with tumors likely to respond to estrogen remain undefined. We are conducting a Phase II clinical trial [Pre-emptive OsciLLation of ER activitY levels through alternation of estradiol/anti-estrogen therapies prior to disease progression in ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (POLLY); NCT02188745] that will use tumor biopsy tissues to identify baseline and pharmacodynamic biomarkers that predict response to 17b-estradiol therapy.
Citation Format: Hosford SR, Kaufman PA, Miller TW. Estrogen receptor alpha reactivation for the treatment of anti-estrogen-resistant breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-05-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SR Hosford
- Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - PA Kaufman
- Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - TW Miller
- Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kaufman PA, Arias-Pulido H, Colpaert C, Chaher N, Qualls C, Marotti JD, Vermeulen P, Dirix L, van Laere S, Kuppusamy P. Abstract P5-08-13: Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and pathological response are prognostic biomarkers in inflammatory and non-inflammatory breast cancer. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p5-08-13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have been associated with pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) as well as disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in certain breast cancer subtypes. pCR has been shown to be predictive of long-term outcome in several neoadjuvant studies and is therefore a potential surrogate marker for patient outcome. The aim of this study was to determine whether TILs and pCR can be used as a prognostic biomarker in inflammatory and non-inflammatory breast cancer.
Materials and Methods: Stromal lymphocytic infiltration (strTILs), defined as the percentage of tumor stroma containing infiltrating lymphocytes (lymphocyte predominant breast cancers (LPBC) cut-off: ≥50%), and pCR, defined as the absence of any residual invasive cancer on the resected breast specimen and all sampled ipsilateral lymph nodes following completion of NACT, were evaluated in 383 (221 Inflammatory (IBC) and 162 non-IBC Locally-advanced (LABC)) breast cancer patients. Tumors were categorised into molecular subtypes and Ki-67 status based on immunohistochemistry. Correlations with clinico-pathological variables, breast cancer-specific (BCSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were made.
Results: strTILs were present in all patients (median: 15%, IQR: 5% to 30%). There was no difference in the frequency of strTILs between IBC and LABC cases. Thirty three (15%) IBC and 18 (11%) LABC tumors were LPBC. strTILs were significantly more frequent in triple negative (TNBC) (median, 25%) than in HER2+, Ki-67-high (15% for both) and ER/PR+ (10%)(p<0.001; Kruskal-Wallis One Way Analysis of Variance on Ranks). There was a significant association of strTILs with pCR (p<0.001). strTILs median was 27.5%, 15% and 10% for pCR, partial response and no response, respectively (p<0.001). pCR was obtained in 4 (9.1%) of patients with strTILs <10%, in 25 (56.8%) of patients with strTILs between 10 and 40% and in 15 (34.1%) of patients with strTILs >40% (p=1.09E5). strTILs did not predict either DFS or BCSS in the overall breast cancer population. pCR was negatively associated with ER+ (p=0.002), positively with TN (p=0.02) and strongly associated with both DFS & BCSS (p<0.0001, for both). Multivariate analysis showed that, in IBC patients, pCR (p<0.0001) and lymph node rate (p=0.034) were independent predictors for DFS and pCR (p<0.0001), lymph node rate (p=0.034) and LPBC (p=0.024) were independent predictors for BCSS. In LABC, DFS was independently predicted by pCR (p<0.0001) and LPBC (p=0.042) and BCSS by pCR (p<0.0001), LPBC (p=0.005) and ER (p=0.029). LPBC was associated with negative outcome in both IBC and LABC cases.
Conclusion: strTILs showed a strong association with TNBC tumors and with pCR. pCR is a strong prognostic factor for both IBC and LABC. The negative association of LPBC with outcome is unexpected and warrants additional studies.
Citation Format: Kaufman PA, Arias-Pulido H, Colpaert C, Chaher N, Qualls C, Marotti JD, Vermeulen P, Dirix L, van Laere S, Kuppusamy P. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and pathological response are prognostic biomarkers in inflammatory and non-inflammatory breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-08-13.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- PA Kaufman
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College; 5Hematology/Oncology and 6Pathology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oncology Centre, GZA Hospitals, Iridium Cancer Net, Antwerp, Belgium; Centre Pierre et Marie Curie, Algiers, Algeria; University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
| | - H Arias-Pulido
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College; 5Hematology/Oncology and 6Pathology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oncology Centre, GZA Hospitals, Iridium Cancer Net, Antwerp, Belgium; Centre Pierre et Marie Curie, Algiers, Algeria; University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
| | - C Colpaert
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College; 5Hematology/Oncology and 6Pathology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oncology Centre, GZA Hospitals, Iridium Cancer Net, Antwerp, Belgium; Centre Pierre et Marie Curie, Algiers, Algeria; University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
| | - N Chaher
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College; 5Hematology/Oncology and 6Pathology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oncology Centre, GZA Hospitals, Iridium Cancer Net, Antwerp, Belgium; Centre Pierre et Marie Curie, Algiers, Algeria; University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
| | - C Qualls
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College; 5Hematology/Oncology and 6Pathology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oncology Centre, GZA Hospitals, Iridium Cancer Net, Antwerp, Belgium; Centre Pierre et Marie Curie, Algiers, Algeria; University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
| | - JD Marotti
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College; 5Hematology/Oncology and 6Pathology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oncology Centre, GZA Hospitals, Iridium Cancer Net, Antwerp, Belgium; Centre Pierre et Marie Curie, Algiers, Algeria; University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
| | - P Vermeulen
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College; 5Hematology/Oncology and 6Pathology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oncology Centre, GZA Hospitals, Iridium Cancer Net, Antwerp, Belgium; Centre Pierre et Marie Curie, Algiers, Algeria; University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
| | - L Dirix
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College; 5Hematology/Oncology and 6Pathology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oncology Centre, GZA Hospitals, Iridium Cancer Net, Antwerp, Belgium; Centre Pierre et Marie Curie, Algiers, Algeria; University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
| | - S van Laere
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College; 5Hematology/Oncology and 6Pathology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oncology Centre, GZA Hospitals, Iridium Cancer Net, Antwerp, Belgium; Centre Pierre et Marie Curie, Algiers, Algeria; University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
| | - P Kuppusamy
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College; 5Hematology/Oncology and 6Pathology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oncology Centre, GZA Hospitals, Iridium Cancer Net, Antwerp, Belgium; Centre Pierre et Marie Curie, Algiers, Algeria; University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cadoo K, Kaufman PA, Hudis C, Chang C, Berrak E, Song J, Seidman AD, Traina TA. Abstract P1-12-05: Phase 2 study of dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by eribulin mesylate with or without prophylactic growth factor for adjuvant treatment of early-stage breast cancer. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p1-12-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Eribulin has demonstrated antitumor activity and significantly improved overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with heavily pretreated locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer (BC). This trial assessed the feasibility of eribulin as adjuvant therapy following dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) for pts with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative early-stage BC.
Methods: Pts with HER2(-), stage I–III, invasive BC were enrolled. Pts received dose-dense AC (doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 IV and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 IV) on D1 of each 14-day cycle for 4 cycles with pegfilgrastim, followed by 4 cycles of eribulin (1.4 mg/m2 IV) on D1 and D8 every 21 days. Pts were divided into 2 cohorts: Cohort 1 did not receive any prophylactic growth factor (GF); Cohort 2 received a short course of prophylactic GF (filgrastim) on days 3, 4, 10, and 11 of each eribulin cycle. Primary endpoint of feasibility was determined as %pts who completed eribulin portion of the regimen without a dose delay (>2 days) or reduction due to eribulin-related adverse event (AE). Based on similar previous studies, the target for feasibility was 80%. Relative dose intensity of eribulin and toxicities were also summarized by cohort. Exploratory objectives include efficacy endpoints of 3-yr disease-free survival and OS.
Results: We report data from 81 pts (55 Cohort 1; 26 Cohort 2) enrolled in the study, of whom 88% completed study treatment. Pt characteristics include median age 49 yrs (range 26–69), ECOG status 0 (85%), BC stages 1/2/3 (21%/57%/22%). Of 90% (73/81) pts evaluable for feasibility, 27% and 40% of pts in Cohorts 1 and 2, respectively, had dose delay or reduction during eribulin treatment, indicating the primary endpoint was not met. Overall, results were similar between the 2 cohorts (Table). Median duration of treatment with eribulin was 10.14 weeks in both cohorts (vs 10 weeks planned). Most eribulin-related dose delays were due to grade 3 (n=18) or grade 4 (n=7) neutropenia. Non-fatal serious AEs were observed in 11% of pts in Cohort 1 and 15% in Cohort 2. Discontinuations due to AEs occurred in 6% of pts in Cohort 1 and 0 in Cohort 2. Neutropenia (all grades) was reported in 36% of pts in Cohort 1 and 42% in Cohort 2. Most common AEs (all grades) were fatigue (96%), nausea (75%), alopecia (73%), hot flush (63%), and constipation (57%).
ACEribulin Cohort 1*Cohort 2*Cohort 1 (without GCSF)Cohort 2 (with GCSF)Relative dose intensity, mean99.5%99.0%92.0%90.9%Completed all planned doses98.2%96.2%87.0%84.0%Dose modification†12.7%15.4%35.2%40.0%GCSF, granulocyte-colony simulating factor. *With pegfilgrastim 6 mg given subcutaneously on D2 of each AC cyle; † including dose delays (>2 days)/reduction/interruptions, missing, and permanent discontinuation due to AE.
Conclusions: The primary study endpoint of >80% feasibility of planned dose delivery without any dose delays or reduction was not met. However, adjuvant treatment with dose-dense AC-eribulin was given safely, with two-thirds (67%) of pts achieving full dosing with no dose delay or reduction. Investigation into alternative dosing schedules or GF support is recommended.
Citation Format: Cadoo K, Kaufman PA, Hudis C, Chang C, Berrak E, Song J, Seidman AD, Traina TA. Phase 2 study of dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by eribulin mesylate with or without prophylactic growth factor for adjuvant treatment of early-stage breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-12-05.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Cadoo
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Eisai inc, Woodcliff Lake, NJ
| | - PA Kaufman
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Eisai inc, Woodcliff Lake, NJ
| | - C Hudis
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Eisai inc, Woodcliff Lake, NJ
| | - C Chang
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Eisai inc, Woodcliff Lake, NJ
| | - E Berrak
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Eisai inc, Woodcliff Lake, NJ
| | - J Song
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Eisai inc, Woodcliff Lake, NJ
| | - AD Seidman
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Eisai inc, Woodcliff Lake, NJ
| | - TA Traina
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, NY; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Eisai inc, Woodcliff Lake, NJ
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Twelves C, Cortes J, Vahdat LT, Olivo MS, He Y, Kaufman PA, Awada A. Efficacy of eribulin in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC): A pooled analysis by HER2 and ER status. J Clin Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Twelves
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, and St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Yi He
- Eisai, Woodcliff Lake, NJ
| | | | - Ahmad Awada
- Institut Jules Bordet – Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kaufman PA, Freyer G, Kemeny M, Goncalves A, Jerusalem GHM, Stopeck A, Vrindavanam N, Dalenc F, Nanayakkara N, Wu B, Pickett-Gies CA, Wildiers H. A phase 1b study of trebananib plus paclitaxel (P) and trastuzumab (T) in patients (pts) with HER2+ locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (MBC). J Clin Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Benjamin Wu
- Amgen Inc., Department of Pharmacokinetics and Drug Metabolism, Thousand Oaks, CA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Traina TA, Kaufman PA, Cadoo KA, Hudis CA, Chang C, Berrak E, Song J, Cox D, Seidman AD. Phase 2 feasibility study of dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by eribulin mesylate with or without prophylactic growth factor (GF) for adjuvant treatment of early-stage breast cancer (EBC). J Clin Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.32.15_suppl.tps670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
10
|
Kaufman PA, Yelle L, Cortes J, Perez EA, Awada A, Wanders J, Olivo MS, He Y, Dutcus CE, Twelves C. Abstract P3-13-04: Effect of age on tolerability and efficacy of eribulin and capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated in study 301. Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs13-p3-13-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background:
The Phase III trial (NCT00337103) compared eribulin (E) with capecitabine (C) in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in the 1st-, 2nd-, and 3rd-line setting. Median overall survival (OS) was 15.9 and 14.5 months (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.77, 1.00; P = 0.056) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.1 and 4.2 months (HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.93, 1.25; P = 0.30) for E and C, respectively. This analysis compares toxicity and efficacy of E and C in relation to age.
Material and methods:
In this post-hoc exploratory analysis, the effect of age on the incidence of adverse events (AEs), OS, PFS, and objective response rate (ORR) with E and C were analyzed for two age groups: ≤65 years (E, n = 468; C, n = 491) and >65 years (E, n = 86; C, n = 57). For OS and PFS, analyses were stratified by HER2 and geographic region.
Results:
With increasing age, the proportion of pts with worse performance status (PS ≥1: 54.5% vs 69.2% for ≤65 and >65 years, respectively), ER+ (47.4% vs 57.3%), and PgR+ MBC (41.3% vs 45.5%) increased, and the proportion with triple-negative MBC decreased (26.6% vs 20.3%). With both treatments, AEs were reported in a higher proportion of pts in the older age group, this becoming more apparent for grade 3+ AEs (E: 64.6% vs 70.2%, and C: 45.0% vs 54.4% for ≤65 and >65 respectively). With E, there was a trend for increased incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia (45.0% vs 50.0%) and leukopenia (13.7% vs 22.6%) but, in contrast, decreased peripheral sensory neuropathy (3.9% vs 1.2%) with increasing age. For C, there was a trend for increased palmar-plantar erythrodysethesia syndrome (total: 44.4% vs 50.9%; grade 3/4: 14.1% vs 17.5%), and grade 3/4 fatigue (1.8% vs 7.0%) and diarrhea (4.7% vs 10.5%) with increasing age; emesis and nausea were similar for both age groups. Dose adjustments due to AEs with E were slightly higher in the older age group: withdrawals 7.4% vs 10.7%; dose reductions 31.1% vs 36.9%; and dose delays 30.9% vs 36.9%. With C, there was a trend for an increased incidence of withdrawals (9.2% vs 21.1%) and dose delays (34.2% vs 49.1%) due to AEs with increasing age: the incidence of dose reductions was slightly higher in the older age group (31.3% vs 36.8%). In an unadjusted analysis, a trend for improved OS with E vs C was observed in both subgroups (≤65 years: median 15.8 vs 14.5 months; HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.78, 1.04; P = 0.16, and >65 years: median 18.4 vs 14.1 months; HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.50, 1.12; P = 0.16). PFS and ORR for E and C were: median PFS: E, 4.0 and 5.4 months; C, 4.2 and 5.9 months; ORR: E, 10.9% and 11.6%; C, 11.6% and 10.5%, in the ≤65 and >65 groups respectively.
Conclusions:
This exploratory and unadjusted analysis suggests a trend for improved OS with E in both younger and older pts with MBC. With both treatments there was a suggestion that AEs were reported in a higher proportion of pts in the older age group, this becoming more apparent for grade 3+ events. Specifically, these data suggest an increased incidence of grade 3/4 diarrhea, dose delays, and study withdrawal due to AEs in pts treated with C, and potentially suggest that with E there may be less difference between the AE profile in younger vs older pts than with C.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P3-13-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- PA Kaufman
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Vall D'Hebron University Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Formerly of Eisai Ltd, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ; Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, and St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - L Yelle
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Vall D'Hebron University Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Formerly of Eisai Ltd, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ; Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, and St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - J Cortes
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Vall D'Hebron University Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Formerly of Eisai Ltd, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ; Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, and St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - EA Perez
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Vall D'Hebron University Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Formerly of Eisai Ltd, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ; Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, and St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - A Awada
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Vall D'Hebron University Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Formerly of Eisai Ltd, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ; Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, and St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - J Wanders
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Vall D'Hebron University Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Formerly of Eisai Ltd, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ; Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, and St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - MS Olivo
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Vall D'Hebron University Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Formerly of Eisai Ltd, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ; Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, and St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Y He
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Vall D'Hebron University Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Formerly of Eisai Ltd, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ; Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, and St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - CE Dutcus
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Vall D'Hebron University Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Formerly of Eisai Ltd, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ; Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, and St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - C Twelves
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Vall D'Hebron University Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Jules Bordet Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; Formerly of Eisai Ltd, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom; Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ; Leeds Institute of Cancer Studies and Pathology, and St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Twelves C, Awada A, Kaufman PA, Yelle L, Perez EA, Velikova G, Wanders J, Olivo MS, He Y, Dutcus C, Simons WR, Cortes J. Quality of life (QoL) and content validity in objective tumor response. J Clin Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.1055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
1055^ Background: Key properties of QoL instruments in a clinical trial setting are reliability, the ability to detect a change, and content validity. Using data from the Study 301 phase III breast cancer trial, we report here content validity and ability to detect a change for the EORTC QLQ-C30 and breast cancer-specific QLQ-BR23 questionnaires. Methods: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer were randomized to 21-day cycles of either eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m2 given on Days 1 and 8, or capecitabine 1.25 g/m2BID orally on Days 1-14. QoL questionnaires were completed at baseline and at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Objective tumor response was evaluated (complete response [CR]; partial response [PR]; stable disease [SD]; progressive disease [PD]). Univariate and multivariate longitudinal analyses using weighted generalized estimating equations were employed to assess the responsiveness of the QoL scales to objective tumor response. Results: 1,102 patients were randomized (554 eribulin, 548 capecitabine). Global health status (GHS)/QoL scores were low at baseline (55). GHS/QoL scores were highest for patients with CR (70.8), followed by those patients with PR (63.5), SD (60.5), and PD (58.1). Physical functioning followed the same pattern: CR (98.3); PR (79.1); SD (72.8); PD (71.0). Role and social functioning scores were also responsive. Pain increased, while fatigue and body image worsened, with poorer tumor responses. Using the weighted generalized estimating equations, there were improvements in physical (34.78; p<0.01), cognitive (27.29; p<0.01), and social (22.04; p<0.01) functioning, and future perspective 11.47 (p<0.01), in patients who responded (CR and PR) to treatment compared with non-responders. Pain decreased significantly by 28.62 (p<0.01) on a 0-100 scale. Patients who responded also gained appetite and had fewer breast symptoms. Conclusions: These results suggest content validity of the EORTC QLQ-30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires as they correlate with changes in objective tumor assessments. Clinical trial information: NCT00337103.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Twelves
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, and St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Ahmad Awada
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Galina Velikova
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, and St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Yi He
- Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Perez EA, Butler SM, Dueck AC, Baehner FL, Jamshidian F, Cherbavaz DB, Thompson EA, Shak S, Kaufman PA, Davidson NE, Gralow J, Asmann YW, Ballman KV. The relationship between quantitative HER2 gene expression by the 21-gene RT-PCR assay and adjuvant trastuzumab (H) benefit in NCCTG (Alliance) N9831. J Clin Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
520 Background: There is considerable interest in developing HER2 testing criteria for adjuvant H. We used the 21-gene assay to examine the relationship of HER2 mRNA to benefit from H. Methods: N9831 compared adjuvant chemotherapy AC-T to concurrent chemotherapy-trastuzumab AC-TH in stage I-III HER2+ breast cancer. Recurrence Score (RS) and HER2 mRNA expression were determined by Oncotype DX (neg<10.7, equiv 10.7 to <11.5, and pos ≥11.5 log2 expression units). Cox regression was used to assess the association of HER2 expression with H benefit for distant recurrence. Results: Median follow-up: 7.4 yrs. Of 1,940 total pts, 901 had consent and sufficient tissue. HER2 by RT-PCR was neg in 130 (14%), equiv in 85 (9%), and pos in 686 (76%) pts. Concordance between HER2 assessments was 95% for RT-PCR vs central IHC (>10% + cells = +), 91% for RT-PCR vs central FISH (≥2.0 = pos) and 94% for central IHC vs central FISH. In the primary analysis, the association of HER2 expression with H benefit was marginally non-significant (P=0.057). In hormone receptor pos pts (local IHC) the association was significant (P=0.002). The association was nonlinear with the greatest estimated benefit at lower and higher HER2 mRNA expression levels. The observed treatment benefit in low HER2 pts was not due to imbalance between arms in RS and individual gene expression values. Conclusions: Concordance among HER2 assessments by central IHC, FISH, and RT-PCR was high. Association of HER2 mRNA expression with H benefit was marginally non-significant. A consistent benefit of trastuzumab irrespective of mHER2 levels was observed in the pts with either IHC+ or FISH+ tumors. Benefit was observed in pts with high HER2 by RT-PCR but also observed for the small groups of pts with negative results by quantitative RT-PCR or FISH (Table). Plausible mechanisms for this observation will be discussed. [Table: see text]
Collapse
|
13
|
Kaufman PA, Cortes J, Awada A, Yelle L, Perez EA, Wanders J, Olivo MS, He Y, Dutcus C, Twelves C. A phase III, open-label, randomized study of eribulin mesylate versus capecitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes: Subgroup analyses. J Clin Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.1049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
1049^ Background: This phase III study, comparing eribulin versus capecitabine, showed a non-significant trend for superior overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR] 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77, 1.00]; p = 0.056) but not progression-free survival (PFS; HR 1.08 [95% CI 0.93, 1.25]; p = 0.31). Pre-specified exploratory subgroup analyses previously presented showed that patients with triple-negative, ER-negative or HER2-negative disease may have a greater benefit in OS with eribulin compared with capecitabine. Here we present further pre-specified exploratory analyses of OS and PFS. Methods: Patients (eribulin n=554; capecitabine n=548) with locally advanced or MBC had received ≤3 prior chemotherapy regimens (≤2 for advanced disease), including an anthracycline and a taxane. Patients were randomized (stratified for geographic region and HER2 status) 1:1 to 21-day cycles of eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 and 8 or capecitabine 1.25 g/m2BID orally on days 1-14. Further pre-specified exploratory subgroups included: age; receptor status; number and setting of prior chemotherapy regimen(s); sites of disease; number of organs involved; and time to progression after last chemotherapy. Results: From analyses for OS, patients with only non-visceral disease (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.33, 0.80), with >2 organs involved (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.62, 0.90), who had progressed >6 months after last chemotherapy (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.52, 0.95), or who had received an anthracycline and/or a taxane in the metastatic setting (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.72, 0.98), appeared to benefit more from treatment with eribulin compared with capecitabine. For OS, in no subgroup was a trend favoring capecitabine seen. Data for other pre-specified subgroups for both OS and PFS will be presented. Conclusions: In addition to patients with triple-, ER-, or HER2-negative disease, further pre-specified exploratory analyses suggest that other patient subgroups may particularly benefit from treatment with eribulin; further studies are warranted to address these hypotheses. Clinical trial information: NCT00337103.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ahmad Awada
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | - Yi He
- Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ
| | | | - Christopher Twelves
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, and St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cortes J, Awada A, Kaufman PA, Yelle L, Perez EA, Velikova G, Wanders J, Olivo MS, He Y, Dutcus C, Simons WR, Twelves C. Quality of life (QoL) in patients (pts) with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes who received eribulin mesylate or capecitabine: A phase III, open-label, randomized study. J Clin Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.1050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
1050^ Background: In a phase III trial comparing eribulin (E) vs. capecitabine (C) in pts with locally advanced or MBC, a trend for improved OS was observed but a statistically significant superiority was not demonstrated with E vs. C for OS or PFS. The AE profiles were consistent with known side effects. We now report QoL results from this trial. Methods: Pts received eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8, or C 1.25 g/m2 BID orally on Days 1-14, of a 21-day cycle. Eligible pts had received prior therapy including an anthracycline and taxane, and were receiving study drug as 1st-, 2nd-, or 3rd-line therapy for advanced disease. QoL, a secondary objective, was assessed using EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires at baseline, 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after starting treatment (or until progressive disease or treatment change), and at unscheduled visits. Longitudinal analyses were carried out using weighted generalized estimating equations adjusted for non-random attrition due to death within 12 months. Model covariates were time (visit), region, and baseline QoL. The primary endpoint was change from baseline for Global Health Status (GHS)/overall QoL; exploratory endpoints were change from baseline for each functional domain, and signs/symptoms. Results: 1,102 pts were randomized (E 554; C 548). GHS/QoL scores were low at baseline for E (56.3) and C (54.7) on a scale of 0 (worse) to 100 (best). GHS/QoL and cognitive functioning improved significantly more in pts receiving E vs. C, (6.5 [p=0.048] and 15.3 [p<0.001], respectively). Emotional functioning improved significantly for pts receiving C vs. E (3.3; p=0.033). Pain was comparable at baseline, and was lower at subsequent visits with both treatments. Patient-reported signs/symptoms in favor of E included nausea and vomiting (E1.9; p=0.043) and diarrhea (-3.7; p=0.001); systemic side effects (5.2; p<0.001) and upset by hair loss (9.3; p=0.023) favored C. Conclusions: GHS/QoL scores improved more in pts receiving E than C. E showed advantages in terms of gastrointestinal effects while C had advantages in relation to hair loss. Clinical trial information: NCT00337103.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ahmad Awada
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | | | | | - Galina Velikova
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, and St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Yi He
- Eisai Inc., Woodcliff Lake, NJ
| | | | | | - Christopher Twelves
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, and St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Brufsky A, Yardley DA, Kaufman PA, Ulcickas Yood M, Rugo HS, Mayer M, Quah CS, Yoo B, Tripathy D. Treatment (tx) patterns and clinical outcomes for patients (pts) with de novo versus recurrent HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC). J Clin Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
523 Background: Use of adjuvant trastuzumab (T) in pts with HER2+ early breast cancer is associated with decreased recurrence. As fewer patients relapse, the proportion of pts with de novo metastatic disease in the first-line (1L) setting will increase, which could have implications for the design/interpretation of results from HER2+ MBC trials. To date, little data exist on potential differences in prognosis and outcomes between pts with recurrent vs de novo HER2+ MBC. Methods: registHER is an observational cohort of pts with HER2+ MBC diagnosed ≤6 mo from enrollment and followed until death, disenrollment, or June 2009 (median follow-up: 27 mo). Demographics and 1L tx patterns (using descriptive analyses), as well as clinical outcomes (median PFS and OS estimated by Kaplan-Meier method) were examined for pts with de novo vs recurrent HER2+ MBC. De novo was defined as disease-free interval (DFI) between initial and metastatic diagnosis ≤90 days; recurrent was defined as DFI >90 days. Cox regression analyses were used to generate hazard ratios (HRs). Results: Pts with de novo HER2+ MBC (327 of 1001 enrolled) were more likely to be younger and non-white; have lymph, bone, and/or liver metastases and >4 sites of metastatic disease; less likely to have lung or CNS metastases; and have received 1L regimens of TCH or AC more frequently vs pts with recurrent disease (who received T + vinorelbine more frequently). PFS and OS were longer in the de novo vs recurrent group (Table). Conclusions: Despite presenting with more advanced-stage disease accompanied by higher tumor burdens, pts with de novo HER2+ MBC had more favorable clinical outcomes vs those with recurrent disease. Differences in disease characteristics and tx patterns resulting in more refractory disease (including acquired resistance from adjuvant tx) may account for these observations. Clinical trial information: NCT00105456. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Brufsky
- University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | | | | | - Hope S. Rugo
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | - Bongin Yoo
- Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
| | - Debu Tripathy
- Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, South San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yardley DA, Kaufman PA, Adams JW, Krekow L, Savin M, Lawler WE, Zrada S, Starr A, Einhorn H, Schwartzberg LS, Huang W, Weidler J, Lie Y, Paquet A, Haddad M, Anderson S, Brigino M, Bosserman L. Abstract P2-05-06: Quantitative measurement of HER2 expression in breast cancers: comparison with “real world” HER2 testing in a multi-center Collaborative Biomarker Study (CBS) and correlation with clinicopathological features. Cancer Res 2012. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs12-p2-05-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Accurate determination of HER2 status is critical in determining appropriate therapy for breast cancer patients. The HERmark® assay is a novel method to quantitatively measure HER2 total protein expression (H2T) in breast cancer. In this study, we compared HERmark H2T with central laboratory HER2 retesting and local (site reported) HER2 testing of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) breast cancer tissues. The quantitative total HER2 measurements (H2T) by HERmark and results of local HER2 tests were correlated with tumor pathohistological characteristics and overall survival of breast cancer patients.
Methods: 232 FFPE breast cancer tissues were provided by 11 CBS study sites for HER2 testing by the HERmark assay and central laboratory IHC re-testing performed in blinded fashion. Local HER2 immunohistochemistry and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results and valid HERmark H2T and central HER2 IHC results were obtained in 192 cases for analysis.
Results: H2T showed a significant correlation with central HER2 IHC staining intensity (P < 0.0001). The concordance rates of positive and negative HERmark status (excluding equivocal) with those of local HER2 status determined by the CBS sites, and with those of central HER2 IHC status were 84% (Kappa = 0.68) and 96% (Kappa = 0.91), respectively. Higher H2T levels significantly correlated with higher tumor grade (p = 0.007) and negative ER/PR status (p = 0.002). Twenty-six (14%) cases showed discordant (conversion of negative and positive) results between local HER2 status and HERmark status. Of the discordant cases, HERmark significantly agreed with H-score of central HER2 IHC retesting (p = 0.014), as compared with local HER2 status. The concordant negative group (local HER2 negative/H2T low) demonstrated better overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.198, p = 0.0001), compared to that of concordant positive group (local HER2 positive/H2T high). The concordant negative group also showed better OS than that of discordant local HER2 negative/H2T high group (HR = 0.065, p = 0.0003), but showed no significant difference in OS as compared to that of discordant local HER2 positive/H2T low group (HR = 1.774, p = 0.499).). In 24 cases (13%) considered to be “triple negative” by local HER2, ER and PR testing, HERmark re-classified 4 cases (17%) as HER2 positive.
Conclusions: H2T by HERmark yields a continuum of quantitative HER2 protein measurements that shows an excellent correlation with central HER2 IHC retesting and confirms the known correlations between HER2 expression with tumor grade and ER/PR status. OS results of concordant HER2 positive or negative groups (between local HER2 testing and HERmark H2T) confirmed that HER2 positive patients (excluding adjuvant trastuzumab therapy) have worse OS than patients with HER2 negative disease. However, in the HERmark and local HER2 discordant groups, OS appeared to track better with H2T by HERmark and not with the local HER2 status. Novel quantitative HER2 measurements may identify patients with false (+) and (−) HER2 status by local HER2 testing and may provide added clinical value to routine “real world” HER2 testing.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-05-06.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- DA Yardley
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Arlington Cancer Center, Arlington, TX; Texas Oncology Bedford, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology at Medical City Dallas 2, Dallas, TX; St. Jude Heritage Medical Group, Fullerton, CA; The Center for Cancer and Hematologic Disease, Cherry Hill, NJ; Monroe Medical Associates, Harvey, IL; Swedish American Regional Cancer Center, Rockford, IL; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Monogram Biosciences, Inc., So. San Francisco, CA; Center for Molecular Biology and Pathology, Laboratory Corporation of America, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; Wilshire Oncology Medical Group, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
| | - PA Kaufman
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Arlington Cancer Center, Arlington, TX; Texas Oncology Bedford, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology at Medical City Dallas 2, Dallas, TX; St. Jude Heritage Medical Group, Fullerton, CA; The Center for Cancer and Hematologic Disease, Cherry Hill, NJ; Monroe Medical Associates, Harvey, IL; Swedish American Regional Cancer Center, Rockford, IL; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Monogram Biosciences, Inc., So. San Francisco, CA; Center for Molecular Biology and Pathology, Laboratory Corporation of America, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; Wilshire Oncology Medical Group, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
| | - JW Adams
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Arlington Cancer Center, Arlington, TX; Texas Oncology Bedford, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology at Medical City Dallas 2, Dallas, TX; St. Jude Heritage Medical Group, Fullerton, CA; The Center for Cancer and Hematologic Disease, Cherry Hill, NJ; Monroe Medical Associates, Harvey, IL; Swedish American Regional Cancer Center, Rockford, IL; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Monogram Biosciences, Inc., So. San Francisco, CA; Center for Molecular Biology and Pathology, Laboratory Corporation of America, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; Wilshire Oncology Medical Group, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
| | - L Krekow
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Arlington Cancer Center, Arlington, TX; Texas Oncology Bedford, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology at Medical City Dallas 2, Dallas, TX; St. Jude Heritage Medical Group, Fullerton, CA; The Center for Cancer and Hematologic Disease, Cherry Hill, NJ; Monroe Medical Associates, Harvey, IL; Swedish American Regional Cancer Center, Rockford, IL; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Monogram Biosciences, Inc., So. San Francisco, CA; Center for Molecular Biology and Pathology, Laboratory Corporation of America, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; Wilshire Oncology Medical Group, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
| | - M Savin
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Arlington Cancer Center, Arlington, TX; Texas Oncology Bedford, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology at Medical City Dallas 2, Dallas, TX; St. Jude Heritage Medical Group, Fullerton, CA; The Center for Cancer and Hematologic Disease, Cherry Hill, NJ; Monroe Medical Associates, Harvey, IL; Swedish American Regional Cancer Center, Rockford, IL; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Monogram Biosciences, Inc., So. San Francisco, CA; Center for Molecular Biology and Pathology, Laboratory Corporation of America, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; Wilshire Oncology Medical Group, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
| | - WE Lawler
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Arlington Cancer Center, Arlington, TX; Texas Oncology Bedford, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology at Medical City Dallas 2, Dallas, TX; St. Jude Heritage Medical Group, Fullerton, CA; The Center for Cancer and Hematologic Disease, Cherry Hill, NJ; Monroe Medical Associates, Harvey, IL; Swedish American Regional Cancer Center, Rockford, IL; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Monogram Biosciences, Inc., So. San Francisco, CA; Center for Molecular Biology and Pathology, Laboratory Corporation of America, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; Wilshire Oncology Medical Group, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
| | - S Zrada
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Arlington Cancer Center, Arlington, TX; Texas Oncology Bedford, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology at Medical City Dallas 2, Dallas, TX; St. Jude Heritage Medical Group, Fullerton, CA; The Center for Cancer and Hematologic Disease, Cherry Hill, NJ; Monroe Medical Associates, Harvey, IL; Swedish American Regional Cancer Center, Rockford, IL; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Monogram Biosciences, Inc., So. San Francisco, CA; Center for Molecular Biology and Pathology, Laboratory Corporation of America, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; Wilshire Oncology Medical Group, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
| | - A Starr
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Arlington Cancer Center, Arlington, TX; Texas Oncology Bedford, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology at Medical City Dallas 2, Dallas, TX; St. Jude Heritage Medical Group, Fullerton, CA; The Center for Cancer and Hematologic Disease, Cherry Hill, NJ; Monroe Medical Associates, Harvey, IL; Swedish American Regional Cancer Center, Rockford, IL; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Monogram Biosciences, Inc., So. San Francisco, CA; Center for Molecular Biology and Pathology, Laboratory Corporation of America, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; Wilshire Oncology Medical Group, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
| | - H Einhorn
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Arlington Cancer Center, Arlington, TX; Texas Oncology Bedford, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology at Medical City Dallas 2, Dallas, TX; St. Jude Heritage Medical Group, Fullerton, CA; The Center for Cancer and Hematologic Disease, Cherry Hill, NJ; Monroe Medical Associates, Harvey, IL; Swedish American Regional Cancer Center, Rockford, IL; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Monogram Biosciences, Inc., So. San Francisco, CA; Center for Molecular Biology and Pathology, Laboratory Corporation of America, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; Wilshire Oncology Medical Group, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
| | - LS Schwartzberg
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Arlington Cancer Center, Arlington, TX; Texas Oncology Bedford, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology at Medical City Dallas 2, Dallas, TX; St. Jude Heritage Medical Group, Fullerton, CA; The Center for Cancer and Hematologic Disease, Cherry Hill, NJ; Monroe Medical Associates, Harvey, IL; Swedish American Regional Cancer Center, Rockford, IL; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Monogram Biosciences, Inc., So. San Francisco, CA; Center for Molecular Biology and Pathology, Laboratory Corporation of America, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; Wilshire Oncology Medical Group, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
| | - W Huang
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Arlington Cancer Center, Arlington, TX; Texas Oncology Bedford, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology at Medical City Dallas 2, Dallas, TX; St. Jude Heritage Medical Group, Fullerton, CA; The Center for Cancer and Hematologic Disease, Cherry Hill, NJ; Monroe Medical Associates, Harvey, IL; Swedish American Regional Cancer Center, Rockford, IL; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Monogram Biosciences, Inc., So. San Francisco, CA; Center for Molecular Biology and Pathology, Laboratory Corporation of America, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; Wilshire Oncology Medical Group, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
| | - J Weidler
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Arlington Cancer Center, Arlington, TX; Texas Oncology Bedford, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology at Medical City Dallas 2, Dallas, TX; St. Jude Heritage Medical Group, Fullerton, CA; The Center for Cancer and Hematologic Disease, Cherry Hill, NJ; Monroe Medical Associates, Harvey, IL; Swedish American Regional Cancer Center, Rockford, IL; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Monogram Biosciences, Inc., So. San Francisco, CA; Center for Molecular Biology and Pathology, Laboratory Corporation of America, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; Wilshire Oncology Medical Group, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
| | - Y Lie
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Arlington Cancer Center, Arlington, TX; Texas Oncology Bedford, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology at Medical City Dallas 2, Dallas, TX; St. Jude Heritage Medical Group, Fullerton, CA; The Center for Cancer and Hematologic Disease, Cherry Hill, NJ; Monroe Medical Associates, Harvey, IL; Swedish American Regional Cancer Center, Rockford, IL; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Monogram Biosciences, Inc., So. San Francisco, CA; Center for Molecular Biology and Pathology, Laboratory Corporation of America, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; Wilshire Oncology Medical Group, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
| | - A Paquet
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Arlington Cancer Center, Arlington, TX; Texas Oncology Bedford, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology at Medical City Dallas 2, Dallas, TX; St. Jude Heritage Medical Group, Fullerton, CA; The Center for Cancer and Hematologic Disease, Cherry Hill, NJ; Monroe Medical Associates, Harvey, IL; Swedish American Regional Cancer Center, Rockford, IL; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Monogram Biosciences, Inc., So. San Francisco, CA; Center for Molecular Biology and Pathology, Laboratory Corporation of America, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; Wilshire Oncology Medical Group, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
| | - M Haddad
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Arlington Cancer Center, Arlington, TX; Texas Oncology Bedford, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology at Medical City Dallas 2, Dallas, TX; St. Jude Heritage Medical Group, Fullerton, CA; The Center for Cancer and Hematologic Disease, Cherry Hill, NJ; Monroe Medical Associates, Harvey, IL; Swedish American Regional Cancer Center, Rockford, IL; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Monogram Biosciences, Inc., So. San Francisco, CA; Center for Molecular Biology and Pathology, Laboratory Corporation of America, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; Wilshire Oncology Medical Group, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
| | - S Anderson
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Arlington Cancer Center, Arlington, TX; Texas Oncology Bedford, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology at Medical City Dallas 2, Dallas, TX; St. Jude Heritage Medical Group, Fullerton, CA; The Center for Cancer and Hematologic Disease, Cherry Hill, NJ; Monroe Medical Associates, Harvey, IL; Swedish American Regional Cancer Center, Rockford, IL; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Monogram Biosciences, Inc., So. San Francisco, CA; Center for Molecular Biology and Pathology, Laboratory Corporation of America, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; Wilshire Oncology Medical Group, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
| | - M Brigino
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Arlington Cancer Center, Arlington, TX; Texas Oncology Bedford, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology at Medical City Dallas 2, Dallas, TX; St. Jude Heritage Medical Group, Fullerton, CA; The Center for Cancer and Hematologic Disease, Cherry Hill, NJ; Monroe Medical Associates, Harvey, IL; Swedish American Regional Cancer Center, Rockford, IL; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Monogram Biosciences, Inc., So. San Francisco, CA; Center for Molecular Biology and Pathology, Laboratory Corporation of America, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; Wilshire Oncology Medical Group, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
| | - L Bosserman
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Arlington Cancer Center, Arlington, TX; Texas Oncology Bedford, Bedford, TX; Texas Oncology at Medical City Dallas 2, Dallas, TX; St. Jude Heritage Medical Group, Fullerton, CA; The Center for Cancer and Hematologic Disease, Cherry Hill, NJ; Monroe Medical Associates, Harvey, IL; Swedish American Regional Cancer Center, Rockford, IL; The West Clinic, Memphis, TN; Monogram Biosciences, Inc., So. San Francisco, CA; Center for Molecular Biology and Pathology, Laboratory Corporation of America, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; Wilshire Oncology Medical Group, Rancho Cucamonga, CA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kaufman PA, Mayer M, Dreyer NA, Yim YM, Yu E, Su Z, Mun Y, Sloan JA, Cleeland CS. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) from the VIRGO observational cohort study (OCS). J Clin Oncol 2012. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.27_suppl.111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
111 Background: Limited data exist on patient (pt) experience and work productivity (WP) in MBC. VIRGO is a prospective OCS following >1,200 pts with locally advanced or MBC receiving 1st-line hormonal therapy (HT) or chemotherapy (CT) in a real-world setting. We report baseline characteristics of 277 pts from the VIRGO PRO substudy and correlations between health-related quality of life (HRQoL), symptoms, activities of daily living, and WP. Methods: Symptom severity and interference (M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory [MDASI]), functional status (Activity Level Scale [ALS] from the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist) and WP (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire) were assessed. Pts rated their HRQoL during the past week on a scale of 0–10. Results: See table. The five most severe symptoms at baseline were fatigue, decreased sexual interest, disturbed sleep, drowsiness, and emotional distress; these were reported with less severity in the HT cohort (24%-37% vs 42%-59%). Overall MDASI severity and interference correlated with WP measures in the CT (R=0.46 to 0.78) and HT cohorts (0.36 to 0.94). Mean of the 5 most severe symptoms also significantly correlated with WP indices (R=0.47 to 0.66). HRQoL correlated (p<0.05) with all WP measures (R=-0.46 to -0.56) in the CT cohort and with % impairment while working (R=-0.65) and % overall work impairment (R=-0.71) in the HT cohort. In univariate regression analysis, MDASI symptom interference score was the best predictor of reduced WP (R2=0.52 while working; R2=0.48 for non-work activities). Conclusions: MBC pts receiving CT and HT report significant work impairment. Results indicate moderate correlations between WP indices, HRQoL and symptom burden. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Zhaohui Su
- Outcome, a Quintiles Company, Cambridge, MA
| | - Yong Mun
- Genentech, South San Francisco, CA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Yardley DA, Tripathy D, Brufsky AM, Rugo HS, Kaufman PA, Mayer M, Feng S, Abidoye OO, Ulcickas Yood M. Long-term survivor (LTS) characteristics in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC). J Clin Oncol 2012. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.27_suppl.133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
133 Background: Data characterizing LTS with HER2+ MBC are limited. The objective of this analysis is to describe LTS in terms of demographics, disease characteristics, and treatment history. Methods: registHER is an observational cohort of patients (pts) (N=1,001) with HER2+ MBC diagnosed w/in 6 mos of enrollment and followed until death, disenrollment, or 6/09 (median follow-up 27 mos). LTS were defined as pts who survived ≥36 mos from metastatic diagnosis (dx) (n=404). Baseline characteristics were examined. Multivariate analyses assessed factors associated with overall survival (OS) in all registHER pts. Results: Median progression-free survival in LTS was 17.9 mos (95% confidence interval (CI) 15.5-20.2). Similar to all registHER pts, median age at enrollment for LTS was 52 y (range 22,82), the majority were white (85.4%), and initial dx in over half of pts was stage I-III, MBC >12 mos (57.4%). LTS, however, were more likely to have estrogen receptor (ER)+ or progesterone receptor (PR)+ disease (61.6% and 52.9%, respectively) and a lower rate of underlying cardiovascular disease (CVD) (12.4% and 17.2%, respectively). First-line taxane and first-line trastuzumab use was higher in LTS pts. Physician-assessed first-line complete response was 40% in LTS and 22.8% in all registHER pts. Factors associated with OS in all registHER pts are shown in the table. Conclusions: This descriptive study examines factors commonly associated with long-term survival in pts with HER2+ MBC. LTS were primarily white, with ER+ or PR+ disease, and low rates of underlying CVD. Further study is needed to quantify the contribution of these factors to prolonging survival. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Debu Tripathy
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Hope S. Rugo
- University of California, San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kaufman PA, Mayer M, Dreyer NA, Yim YM, Yu E, Su Z, Mun Y, Sloan JA, Cleeland CS. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) from the VIRGO observational cohort study (OCS). J Clin Oncol 2012. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.e11051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e11051 Background: Limited data exist on patient (pt) experience and work productivity (WP) in MBC. VIRGO is a prospective OCS following >1200 pts with locally advanced or MBC receiving 1st-line hormonal therapy (HT) or chemotherapy (CT) in a real-world setting. We report baseline characteristics of 277 pts from the VIRGO PRO substudy and correlations between health-related quality of life (HRQoL), symptoms, activities of daily living, and WP. Methods: Symptom severity and interference (MD Anderson Symptom Inventory [MDASI]), functional status (Activity Level Scale [ALS] from the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist) and WP (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire) were assessed. Pts rated their HRQoL during the past week on a scale of 0–10. Results: See table. The five most severe symptoms at baseline were fatigue, decreased sexual interest, disturbed sleep, drowsiness, and emotional distress; these were reported with less severity in the HT cohort (24%-37% vs 42%-59%). Overall MDASI severity and interference correlated with WP measures in the CT (R = 0.46 to 0.78) and HT cohorts (0.36 to 0.94). Mean of the five most severe symptoms also significantly correlated with WP indices (R = 0.47 to 0.66). HRQoL correlated (p < 0.05) with all WP measures (R = -0.46 to -0.56) in the CT cohort and with % impairment while working (R = -0.65) and % overall work impairment (R = -0.71) in the HT cohort. In univariate regression analysis, MDASI symptom interference score was the best predictor of reduced WP (R2 = 0.52 while working; R2 = 0.48 for nonwork activities). Conclusions: MBC pts receiving CT and HT report significant work impairment. Results indicate moderate correlations between WP indices, HRQoL and symptom burden. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Zhaohui Su
- Outcome, a Quintiles Company, Cambridge, MA
| | - Yong Mun
- Genentech, South San Francisco, CA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Wildiers H, Goncalves A, Kemeny M, Swart RE, Freyer G, Nanayakkara N, Wu B, Pickett-Gies CA, Kaufman PA. Phase Ib study of open-label AMG 386 plus paclitaxel (P) and trastuzumab (T) or capecitabine (C) and lapatinib (L) in patients (pts) with HER2+ locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (MBC). J Clin Oncol 2012. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
529 Background: AMG 386, an investigational peptibody, reduces tumor angiogenesis by blocking interaction of angiopoietins 1 and 2 with the Tie2 receptor. This interim analysis evaluates the tolerability and efficacy of AMG 386 + P/T or C/L in HER2+ MBC. Methods: In part 1, pts in cohorts A1 and A3 (no prior 1st-line MBC T or L ) received AMG 386 IV QW plus P 80 mg/m2 IV QW and T 8 mg/kg loading dose, then 6 mg/kg Q3W; pts in cohorts B1 and B3 (history of failed 1st-line MBC T treatment; no prior L or C) received AMG 386 IV QW plus C 1000 mg/m2 PO Q12 hrs, days 1-14 Q21D and L 1250 mg PO QD. A1 and B1 received AMG 386 at 10 mg/kg; A3 and B3 received AMG 386 at 30 mg/kg. In part 2, cohorts were expanded to n = 20 if ≤ 1 of 6 or ≤ 2 of 9 pts had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Primary endpoints were adverse events (AEs) and DLTs; secondary endpoints included efficacy and pharmacokinetics (PK). Interim results from A1, A3, and B1 will be presented. Results: 46 pts were enrolled at interim analysis; all received ≥ 1 dose of study treatment (A1, A3, B1; n = 20, 6, 20). The median follow-up for A1, A3, and B1 was 39.6, 22.7, and 31.3 wks. Across cohorts, there was 1 DLT in A1. AEs > 50% were peripheral edema, diarrhea, fatigue and alopecia in A1 and A3 combined, and diarrhea, nausea, palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome (PPES), and peripheral edema in B1. AEs grade ≥3 occurring in > 2 pts were peripheral neuropathy, peripheral sensory neuropathy, dyspnea (n = 5, 4, 3, respectively, in A1 and A3 combined); PPES, diarrhea, and neutropenia (n = 6, 5, 3, respectively, in B1). Objective response rates were 80% in A1, 50% in A3, and 50% in B1. Median (95% CI) progression-free survival was 14.5 mo (6.8-20.5) in A1 and 10.1 mo (3.7-14.7) in B1. Median duration of response (DOR) was 12.6 mo (4.3-20.2) in A1 and 8.5 mo (4.1-not evaluable) in B1. PFS and DOR were not yet evaluable in A3. No changes were apparent in any PK parameters in these combinations relative to within study or historical monotherapy PK data. Conclusions: In this ongoing phase 1b study of pts with HER2+ MBC, interim results suggest that adding AMG 386 to P/T or C/L is tolerable and has antitumor activity. Updated data will be presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Wildiers
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Gasthuisberg, Department of General Medical Oncology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anthony Goncalves
- Institut Paoli Calmettes, Department of Medical Oncology, Marseille, France
| | | | | | - Gilles Freyer
- Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Oncologie Médicale, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | | | - Benjamin Wu
- Amgen Inc., Department of Pharmacokinetics and Drug Metabolism, Thousand Oaks, CA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Brufsky A, Yardley DA, Ulcickas Yood M, Tripathy D, Kaufman PA, Mayer M, Feng S, Abidoye OO, Rugo HS. Racial disparities in treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients (pts) with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC). J Clin Oncol 2012. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.1526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
1526 Background: Data examining prognosis and treatment outcomes for black pts with HER2+ MBC are limited. Methods: registHER is a large, observational cohort of pts (N=1,001) with HER2+ MBC diagnosed w/in 6 mos of enrollment and followed until death, disenrollment, or 6/09 (median follow-up 27 mos). Demographics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes were described for black (n=126) and white pts (n=793). Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) were examined. Multivariate analyses adjusted for baseline and treatment factors. Results: Black pts were more likely to be obese (BMI ≥ 30), have diabetes, and a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) than white pts (Table). Black pts were less likely to have estrogen receptor (ER)/progesterone receptor (PR)+ disease and more likely to present with stage IV MBC. In trastuzumab (T)-treated pts, incidence of cardiac safety events (grade ≥3) was higher in black (13/119 [10.9%]) than white pts (59/746 [7.9%]). Unadjusted median OS (mos) was significantly lower (blacks: 27.1, 95%CI 23.2-32.1; whites: 37.3, 95%CI 34.6-41.1) and median PFS (mos) was lower (blacks: 7.0, 95%CI 5.7-9.7; whites: 10.2, 95%CI 9.3-11.2) in black than white pts. The adjusted OS hazard ratio (HR) for black vs. white was 1.32 (95%CI 1.04, 1.69); the adjusted PFS HR was 1.31 (95% CI 1.07, 1.61). Conclusions: These population-based data show poorer prognostic factors and independently worse clinical outcomes in black vs. white pts, and represent the largest database to date with black pts with HER2+ MBC. Further research is needed to explore the basis for the differences noted in this hypothesis-generating analysis. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Brufsky
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | | | - Debu Tripathy
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | | | | | - Hope S. Rugo
- University of California, San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Perez EA, Ballman KV, Reinholz MM, Dueck AC, Cheng H, Jenkins RB, McCullough AE, Chen B, Davidson NE, Martino S, Kaufman PA, Kutteh LA, Sledge GW, Geiger XJ, Ingle JN, Tenner KS, Harris LN, Gralow JR, Rimm DL. PD05-03: Impact of Quantitative Measurement of HER2, HER3, HER4, EGFR, ER and PTEN Protein Expression on Benefit to Adjuvant Trastuzumab in Early-Stage HER2+ Breast Cancer Patients in NCCTG N9831. Cancer Res 2011. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs11-pd05-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Prediction of benefit from trastuzumab in patients (pts) with HER2+ breast cancer remains an important goal. We sought to investigate the predictive value of quantitative measurement of HER2, HER3, HER4, EGFR, ER and PTEN protein expression on the benefit of trastuzumab in the phase III HER2+ adjuvant N9831 study for pts randomized to chemotherapy alone (Arm A) or chemotherapy with sequential (Arm B) or concurrent trastuzumab (Arm C).
Methods: For each marker, we evaluated quantitative expression, relationship with demographic data, and association with disease-free survival (DFS) of pts. Freshly cut tissue microarray slides with up to three-fold redundancy per specimen from the N9831 cohort were treated identically using the AQUA (Camp, et al; Nat Med 2002, JCO 2008) method of quantitative immunofluorescence for each marker. HER2 was tested with CB11 (mouse monoclonal, Biocare, Inc.) and preliminary results were available for 698 of nearly 1400 pt specimens to be tested. The minimum value per pt was used in statistical analysis. Specimens were classified with high versus low expression based on a median value cutpoint for each marker. Median follow-up was 7.0 yrs.
Results: Quantitative HER2 was compared with centrally performed HER2 testing by IHC and FISH. Median quantitative HER2 via AQUA was 10,017 units for the HER2 IHC 3+ group (n=607) versus 1058, 831, and 970 for the HER2 IHC 2+ (n=68), 1+ (n=11), and 0 (n=11) groups, respectively. The Spearman correlation between quantitative HER2 and FISH HER2/CEP17 ratio was 0.32 (p<0.001). High quantitative HER2 was associated with lower percentage of hormone receptor positivity (48% vs 59%, chi-sq p=0.003) but not associated with age, race, nodal positivity, tumor histology, grade, or size. High HER2 did not impact DFS in any arm of the study (See Table). Data for additional HER2 testing, HER3, HER4, EGFR, ER and PTEN are in process and will be ready by September, 2011.
Conclusions: Similar to results based on standard HER2 testing by IHC and FISH in N9831, quantitative HER2 did not impact benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab. Results for additional markers will be presented. Our complete quantitative results for a second epitope on HER2, HER3, HER4, ER and EGFR will be the first report of these markers in a large patient cohort in the adjuvant setting.
Disease Free Survival
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD05-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- EA Perez
- 1Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oncology Associates of Cedar Rapids, Cedar Rapids, IA; Indiana University Medical Center Cancer Pavillion, Indianapolis, IN; Yale University, New Haven, CT; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - KV Ballman
- 1Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oncology Associates of Cedar Rapids, Cedar Rapids, IA; Indiana University Medical Center Cancer Pavillion, Indianapolis, IN; Yale University, New Haven, CT; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - MM Reinholz
- 1Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oncology Associates of Cedar Rapids, Cedar Rapids, IA; Indiana University Medical Center Cancer Pavillion, Indianapolis, IN; Yale University, New Haven, CT; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - AC Dueck
- 1Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oncology Associates of Cedar Rapids, Cedar Rapids, IA; Indiana University Medical Center Cancer Pavillion, Indianapolis, IN; Yale University, New Haven, CT; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - H Cheng
- 1Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oncology Associates of Cedar Rapids, Cedar Rapids, IA; Indiana University Medical Center Cancer Pavillion, Indianapolis, IN; Yale University, New Haven, CT; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - RB Jenkins
- 1Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oncology Associates of Cedar Rapids, Cedar Rapids, IA; Indiana University Medical Center Cancer Pavillion, Indianapolis, IN; Yale University, New Haven, CT; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - AE McCullough
- 1Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oncology Associates of Cedar Rapids, Cedar Rapids, IA; Indiana University Medical Center Cancer Pavillion, Indianapolis, IN; Yale University, New Haven, CT; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - B Chen
- 1Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oncology Associates of Cedar Rapids, Cedar Rapids, IA; Indiana University Medical Center Cancer Pavillion, Indianapolis, IN; Yale University, New Haven, CT; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - NE Davidson
- 1Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oncology Associates of Cedar Rapids, Cedar Rapids, IA; Indiana University Medical Center Cancer Pavillion, Indianapolis, IN; Yale University, New Haven, CT; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - S Martino
- 1Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oncology Associates of Cedar Rapids, Cedar Rapids, IA; Indiana University Medical Center Cancer Pavillion, Indianapolis, IN; Yale University, New Haven, CT; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - PA Kaufman
- 1Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oncology Associates of Cedar Rapids, Cedar Rapids, IA; Indiana University Medical Center Cancer Pavillion, Indianapolis, IN; Yale University, New Haven, CT; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - LA Kutteh
- 1Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oncology Associates of Cedar Rapids, Cedar Rapids, IA; Indiana University Medical Center Cancer Pavillion, Indianapolis, IN; Yale University, New Haven, CT; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - GW Sledge
- 1Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oncology Associates of Cedar Rapids, Cedar Rapids, IA; Indiana University Medical Center Cancer Pavillion, Indianapolis, IN; Yale University, New Haven, CT; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - XJ Geiger
- 1Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oncology Associates of Cedar Rapids, Cedar Rapids, IA; Indiana University Medical Center Cancer Pavillion, Indianapolis, IN; Yale University, New Haven, CT; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - JN Ingle
- 1Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oncology Associates of Cedar Rapids, Cedar Rapids, IA; Indiana University Medical Center Cancer Pavillion, Indianapolis, IN; Yale University, New Haven, CT; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - KS Tenner
- 1Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oncology Associates of Cedar Rapids, Cedar Rapids, IA; Indiana University Medical Center Cancer Pavillion, Indianapolis, IN; Yale University, New Haven, CT; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - LN Harris
- 1Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oncology Associates of Cedar Rapids, Cedar Rapids, IA; Indiana University Medical Center Cancer Pavillion, Indianapolis, IN; Yale University, New Haven, CT; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - JR Gralow
- 1Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oncology Associates of Cedar Rapids, Cedar Rapids, IA; Indiana University Medical Center Cancer Pavillion, Indianapolis, IN; Yale University, New Haven, CT; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - DL Rimm
- 1Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; Oncology Associates of Cedar Rapids, Cedar Rapids, IA; Indiana University Medical Center Cancer Pavillion, Indianapolis, IN; Yale University, New Haven, CT; Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kaufman PA, Brufsky AM, Mayer M, Rugo HS, Tripathy D, Ulcickas YM, Feng S, Wang LI, Brammer MG, Yardley DA. P1-08-22: Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Elderly Patients with HER2−Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer from the registHER Observational Study. Cancer Res 2011. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs11-p1-08-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Data are lacking regarding treatment patterns and outcomes in elderly patients (pts) with HER2−positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC).
Methods: registHER is a large, observational cohort of pts with HER2+ MBC diagnosed within 6 months of enrollment. Pts (N=1,001) were followed until death, disenrollment, or June 2009 (median follow-up 27 months). In these analyses, pts were stratified into three groups based on age at MBC diagnosis: younger (<65 years), older (65-74 years), elderly (≥75 years). For Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) analyses of 1st-line trastuzumab (T) vs. no T, older and elderly pts were combined due to small number of events in elderly. Hierarchical multivariate analyses were adjusted for baseline characteristics and treatments.
Results: ER/PR status was similar across age groups (Table 1). Elderly pts with HER2+ MBC had higher rates of underlying cardiovascular disease (CVD) than younger or older pts. In pts receiving T-based 1st-line treatment, elderly pts were less likely to receive chemotherapy (C), and more likely to receive T alone or combined with hormone therapy (HT). Central nervous system (CNS) events decreased with increasing age. In T-treated pts, incidence of left ventricular dysfunction (grade ≥3) was higher in elderly pts (3/63 [4.8%]) than in younger (21/746 [2.8%]) or older pts (2/134 [1.5%]). Across age groups, unadjusted median PFS (months) was significantly higher for pts treated with T in 1st-line than those who were not (<65 years T: 11.0; <65 years no T: 3.4; ≥65 years T: 11.7; ≥65 years no T: 4.8). In pts <65 years, unadjusted median OS (months) was significantly higher in T-treated pts; in pts ≥65 years, median OS was similar (<65 years T: 40.4, <65 years no T: 25.9; ≥65 years T: 31.2, ≥65 years no T: 28.5). In multivariate analyses, T in 1st-line was associated with significant improvement in PFS across age (Table 2). In OS, significant improvement was observed for pts <65 years; results were suggestive for pts ≥65 years.
Conclusions: Elderly pts (≥75 years) with HER2+ MBC in registHER had higher rates of underlying CVD than younger counterparts and received less aggressive treatment, including less 1st-line T. These population-based, real-world data suggest improved PFS with T as 1st-line therapy across all age groups.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-08-22.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- PA Kaufman
- 1Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Patient Advocate, New York, NY; University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; EpiSource, LLC, Boston, MA; Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN
| | - AM Brufsky
- 1Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Patient Advocate, New York, NY; University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; EpiSource, LLC, Boston, MA; Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN
| | - M Mayer
- 1Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Patient Advocate, New York, NY; University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; EpiSource, LLC, Boston, MA; Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN
| | - HS Rugo
- 1Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Patient Advocate, New York, NY; University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; EpiSource, LLC, Boston, MA; Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN
| | - D Tripathy
- 1Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Patient Advocate, New York, NY; University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; EpiSource, LLC, Boston, MA; Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN
| | - Yood M Ulcickas
- 1Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Patient Advocate, New York, NY; University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; EpiSource, LLC, Boston, MA; Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN
| | - S Feng
- 1Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Patient Advocate, New York, NY; University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; EpiSource, LLC, Boston, MA; Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN
| | - LI Wang
- 1Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Patient Advocate, New York, NY; University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; EpiSource, LLC, Boston, MA; Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN
| | - MG Brammer
- 1Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Patient Advocate, New York, NY; University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; EpiSource, LLC, Boston, MA; Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN
| | - DA Yardley
- 1Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Patient Advocate, New York, NY; University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; EpiSource, LLC, Boston, MA; Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Crozier JA, Moreno-Aspitia A, Ballman KV, Martino S, Kutteh LA, Davidson NE, Kaufman PA, Perez EA. P2-12-02: Correlation between BMI and Clinical Outcome of Patients with Early Stage HER2+ Breast Cancer from the N9831 Clinical Trial. Cancer Res 2011. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs11-p2-12-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Obesity, as defined by body mass index (BMI), has been associated with increased recurrence rate, shorter DFS and increased death rates due to breast cancer (BC). Most of the studies to date have examined the relationship of BMI and DFS in patients with hormone receptor positive disease. To our knowledge, BMI and its relationship with outcome in early stage HER2 positive breast cancer has not previously been examined. The N9831 is a large phase III trial testing the role of trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting of high risk patients with early stage HER2+ BC. We hypothesized that the occurrence of overweight and obesity may correlate with outcome.
Methods: This analysis presents BMI and its relation to tumor characteristics and DFS in patients (pts) enrolled in the N9831 clinical trial. Pts were categorized as normal weight, overweight or obese using the WHO BMI classification parameters of < 25%, 25–29% and ≥ 30% respectively. For patient characteristics, patients were grouped into non-obese (BMI< 30) and obese (≥ 30) cohorts. DFS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparisons between arms A (chemotherapy alone), B (chemotherapy plus sequential trastuzumab) and C (chemotherapy plus concurrent trastuzumab) were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model, stratified by BMI.
Results: Analysis was completed on 3,017 eligible pts. Obese pts were more likely to be older and postmenopausal (p<0.0001 for both). There was no significant association between BMI and ER/PR status (p=0.07) or histologic tumor grade (p=0.33). Obese pts were found to have significantly larger tumors ≥ 2 cm (p=0.002) and more positive lymph nodes (p=0.02). There was no significant difference in DFS within each intrinsic arm (A, B and C) between the obese and non-obese pts at 3, 5 or 7 yrs of follow up. However, pts in the non-obese group had significantly improved DFS in arm B and C compared to arm A (p=0.001 and p<0.0001 respectively). Also obese pts in arm C had significantly improved DFS compared to obese pts in arm A (p=0.008). There was a trend of improved DFS in the obese group in arm B compared to arm A, but this was not statistically significant (p=0.09). Pts in the normal weight and overweight groups did significantly better in arm B (p=0.02 for both) and arm C (p=0.01 and p=0.002 respectively) compared to arm A.
Conclusions: This analysis of data from the N9831 study confirms that obese pts with early stage HER2+ tumors have worse clinical outcome than pts with BMI < 30%. Adjuvant trastuzumab improved clinical outcome regardless of BMI. This study supports weight loss intervention for obese women with early stage HER2+ BC.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-12-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JA Crozier
- 1Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Oncology Associates at Mercy Medical Center, Cedar Rapids, IA; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - A Moreno-Aspitia
- 1Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Oncology Associates at Mercy Medical Center, Cedar Rapids, IA; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - KV Ballman
- 1Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Oncology Associates at Mercy Medical Center, Cedar Rapids, IA; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - S Martino
- 1Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Oncology Associates at Mercy Medical Center, Cedar Rapids, IA; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - LA Kutteh
- 1Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Oncology Associates at Mercy Medical Center, Cedar Rapids, IA; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - NE Davidson
- 1Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Oncology Associates at Mercy Medical Center, Cedar Rapids, IA; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - PA Kaufman
- 1Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Oncology Associates at Mercy Medical Center, Cedar Rapids, IA; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - EA Perez
- 1Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, Santa Monica, CA; Oncology Associates at Mercy Medical Center, Cedar Rapids, IA; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA; Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Vogel CL, Bloom K, Burris H, Gralow JR, Mayer M, Pegram M, Rugo HS, Swain SM, Yardley DA, Chau M, Lalla D, Brammer MG, Kaufman PA. P1-07-02: Discordance between Central and Local Laboratory HER2 Testing from a Large HER2−Negative Population in VIRGO, a Metastatic Breast Cancer Registry. Cancer Res 2011. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs11-p1-07-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: HER2 overexpression is associated with unfavorable prognosis and is reported in 18–25% of breast cancers (BC). HER2 testing is often performed using immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Because of the significant benefit of HER2−directed therapies, it is critical to accurately identify women whose tumors are HER2+. Reports have noted discordance between HER2+ test results from local vs. large reference labs in patients with HER2+ BC evaluated for trastuzumab-based clinical studies. There are little published data on central testing of BC found to be negative locally.
Patients and Methods: VIRGO is an observational cohort of N=1,287 women with primarily HER2−negative metastatic BC. An optional tissue collection substudy was conducted, and 776 patient samples were received and centrally retested. Central testing was performed at 2 reference labs and tumors were deemed HER2+ if IHC 3+ and/or FISH positive (HER2:CEP17 ratio ≥2.0). Tumors with unknown/missing local HER2 status (n=68) were excluded from primary analyses. Number of patients potentially affected based on BC incidences from the American Cancer Society (ACS) 2011 estimates and the World Health Organization (WHO) 2008 report were calculated. Testing on the remainder of the HER2−negative cohort is in process.
Results: Central retesting has been performed on tumor samples from n=373 patients to date: HER2−negative locally evaluable tumors (n=301), n=4 HER2−negative locally with no evaluable tumor, and HER2 unknown (n=68). A total of 301 unique patient samples were included in the primary analysis. Of these, 15 (4.98% [95% CI (2.7%, 7.9%)] were found to be HER2+ by central testing (Table). Based on sensitivity analyses assuming all 68 tumors with unknown HER2 status to be negative locally, 4.07%(15 /369) would be centrally HER2+.
Of the 15 HER2+ tumors, 4 tumors tested positive centrally by both IHC and FISH; 6 IHC positive/FISH negative; and 5 FISH positive/IHC negative. 14/15 tumors were tested locally by only one testing methodology, and 11/15 were determined to be HER2+ centrally based on the testing methodology not performed locally. Investigators for all 15 patients have been notified of central HER2 testing results.
Conclusion: Based on ACS estimates of 232,620 new cases of invasive BC diagnosed in the US in 2011 (assuming 80% testing HER2−negative); a discordance rate of 4–5% equates to 7,444 - 9,305 patients’ tumors diagnosed as HER2+ by central testing. Based on WHO global BC incidence estimates, 44,274 - 55,342 patients could be impacted worldwide as reported in this study. Inaccurate HER2 testing has significant clinical impact, both in denying appropriate treatment or leading to inappropriate use of HER2−targeted therapies. This study suggests testing by both IHC and FISH may be of benefit to accurately identify HER2 status, consistent with the Herceptin® USPI.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-07-02.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- CL Vogel
- 1Sylvester Comprehensive Center at Deerfield, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL; Clarient, Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN; University of Washington Medical Oncology, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Patient Advocate, New York, NY; University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Washington Cancer Institute, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - K Bloom
- 1Sylvester Comprehensive Center at Deerfield, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL; Clarient, Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN; University of Washington Medical Oncology, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Patient Advocate, New York, NY; University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Washington Cancer Institute, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - H Burris
- 1Sylvester Comprehensive Center at Deerfield, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL; Clarient, Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN; University of Washington Medical Oncology, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Patient Advocate, New York, NY; University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Washington Cancer Institute, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - JR Gralow
- 1Sylvester Comprehensive Center at Deerfield, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL; Clarient, Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN; University of Washington Medical Oncology, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Patient Advocate, New York, NY; University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Washington Cancer Institute, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - M Mayer
- 1Sylvester Comprehensive Center at Deerfield, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL; Clarient, Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN; University of Washington Medical Oncology, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Patient Advocate, New York, NY; University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Washington Cancer Institute, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - M Pegram
- 1Sylvester Comprehensive Center at Deerfield, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL; Clarient, Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN; University of Washington Medical Oncology, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Patient Advocate, New York, NY; University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Washington Cancer Institute, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - HS Rugo
- 1Sylvester Comprehensive Center at Deerfield, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL; Clarient, Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN; University of Washington Medical Oncology, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Patient Advocate, New York, NY; University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Washington Cancer Institute, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - SM Swain
- 1Sylvester Comprehensive Center at Deerfield, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL; Clarient, Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN; University of Washington Medical Oncology, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Patient Advocate, New York, NY; University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Washington Cancer Institute, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - DA Yardley
- 1Sylvester Comprehensive Center at Deerfield, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL; Clarient, Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN; University of Washington Medical Oncology, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Patient Advocate, New York, NY; University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Washington Cancer Institute, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - M Chau
- 1Sylvester Comprehensive Center at Deerfield, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL; Clarient, Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN; University of Washington Medical Oncology, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Patient Advocate, New York, NY; University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Washington Cancer Institute, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - D Lalla
- 1Sylvester Comprehensive Center at Deerfield, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL; Clarient, Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN; University of Washington Medical Oncology, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Patient Advocate, New York, NY; University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Washington Cancer Institute, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - MG Brammer
- 1Sylvester Comprehensive Center at Deerfield, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL; Clarient, Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN; University of Washington Medical Oncology, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Patient Advocate, New York, NY; University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Washington Cancer Institute, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - PA Kaufman
- 1Sylvester Comprehensive Center at Deerfield, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL; Clarient, Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN; University of Washington Medical Oncology, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA; Patient Advocate, New York, NY; University of California San Francisco Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA; Washington Cancer Institute, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kaufman PA, de Boer R, White S, Mainwaring P, Koczwara B, Drury S, Ye Y, Sun Y, Sikorski R, Kotasek D. Phase 1b study of motesanib diphosphate (AMG 706) in combination with paclitaxel or docetaxel for the treatment of locally recurrent, unresectable or metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res 2009. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs-4117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Abstract #4117
Background: Motesanib is a novel oral angiogenesis inhibitor designed to selectively target the tyrosine kinase activity of VEGF 1, 2 and 3; PDGF and Kit receptors. Here we report safety, preliminary efficacy and pharmacokinetics (PK) from an ongoing phase 1b dose-finding study of motesanib plus either paclitaxel (P) or docetaxel (D) in patients (pts) with advanced breast cancer.
 Methods: Eligible pts with ECOG 0 or 1 and ≤1 prior chemotherapy regimen for metastatic breast cancer received (until toxicity or disease progression) escalating doses of motesanib (50 or 125mg) QD orally continuously from day 3 of cycle 1 plus either P (Arm A) at 90mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28-day cycle; or D (Arm B) at either 100mg/m2 on day 1 of every 21-day cycle or at 75mg/m2 with motesanib maximum tolerated dose (125mg QD). Objective response (OR) per RECIST was assessed every 8 (Arm A) or 6 wks (Arm B).
 Results: To date, 33 pts have received ≥1 dose of motesanib: Arm A, n=10; Arm B, n=23. Median age is 51 (range, 28-66) years. There were 5 DLTs (all grade 3) in 4 pts: abnormal liver function tests and deep vein thrombosis (Arm A, 125mg QD), fatigue (Arm A, 125mg QD), gallbladder enlargement (Arm B, 125mg QD+75mg/m2 D) and migraine (Arm B, 125mg QD). 28 pts (85%) had motesanib-related AEs; the most common were (worst grade): diarrhea, Arm A/B 60%/61% (grade 3, 0%/13%); fatigue, 30%/26% (grade 3, 10%/4%); hypertension, 20%/22% (grade 3, 10%/4%); and nausea, 10%/26% (no grade 3). Treatment-related AEs of interest in Arm A/B included epistaxis (10%/18%; all worst grade 1) and deep vein thrombosis (10%/0%; all worst grade 3). There were no grade 4 or 5 related AEs. Two deaths on study occurred (Arm B; 50 and 125mg QD n=1 each); both were not considered to be motesanib related. Motesanib PK parameters were generally within the range previously described for single-agent motesanib. PK profiles of P and D showed high interpatient variability, with AUC higher in some pts after motesanib coadministration. In pts with measurable disease at baseline (Arms A&B, n=7&18), best OR at time of last data cut-off was: confirmed PR in Arm A n=2 (29%), in Arm B n=5 (28%); SD in Arm A n=2 (29%), in Arm B n=9 (50%); durable SD ≥24 wks in Arm A n=0, in Arm B n=3 (17%). Median (range) duration of response currently is 169 (58-169) days in Arm A and 198 (96-337+) days in Arm B.
 Conclusions: Motesanib combined with P or D appears to be tolerable with evidence of antitumor activity in pts with advanced breast cancer. No marked effect on motesanib PK has been noted with coadministration of either P or D. Updated safety and efficacy data, including PFS, will be presented.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 4117.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- PA Kaufman
- 1 Dartmouth-Hitchcock Med Ctr, Lebanon, NH
| | - R de Boer
- 2 Royal Melbourne & Western Hosp, Parkville and Footscray, VIC, Australia
| | - S White
- 3 Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | | | - B Koczwara
- 5 Flinders Med Ctr, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - S Drury
- 1 Dartmouth-Hitchcock Med Ctr, Lebanon, NH
| | - Y Ye
- 6 Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA
| | - Y Sun
- 6 Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA
| | | | - D Kotasek
- 7 Ashford Cancer Ctr, Ashford, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
|
28
|
Lewis LD, Cole BF, Wallace PK, Fisher JL, Waugh M, Guyre PM, Fanger MW, Curnow RT, Kaufman PA, Ernstoff MS. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of the bispecific antibody MDX-H210 when administered in combination with interferon gamma: a multiple-dose phase-I study in patients with advanced cancer which overexpresses HER-2/neu. J Immunol Methods 2001; 248:149-65. [PMID: 11223076 DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1759(00)00355-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION MDX-H210 is a Fab'xFab' bispecific antibody (BsAb) constructed chemically by crosslinking Fab' mAb 520C9 (anti-HER-2/neu) and Fab' mAbH22 (anti-CD64). STUDY DESIGN AND OBJECTIVES This was a dose escalation study of intravenous MDX-H210 (1-70 mg/m(2)), preceded 24 h beforehand by subcutaneous IFNgamma (50 microg/m(2) to up-regulate FcgammaRI) administered three times a week for 3 weeks. We investigated the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships between MDX-H210 C(max) and AUC and (i) MDX-H210 binding to peripheral blood monocytes and neutrophils, (ii) the peak plasma G-CSF, IL-6, IL-8 and TNFalpha concentrations, and (iii) the observed clinical toxicity. RESULTS 23 patients (19F:4M; median age 51.5; range 25-72 y) with advanced HER-2/neu positive cancers (19 breast, three prostate and one lung) were studied. Plasma MDX-H210 concentrations over time, circulating numbers of monocytes and neutrophils, percent saturation of monocyte and neutrophil FcgammaRI, and plasma concentrations over time of G-CSF, IL-6, IL-8 and TNFalpha were measured and clinical toxicity monitored. The E(max) pharmacodynamic model best fitted the relationship of MDX-H210 C(max) and the maximum percent saturation of both monocytes (E(max)=74.6; EC(50)=0.9 microg/ml) and neutrophils (E(max)=66.2; EC(50)=2.3 microg/ml) on the first day of treatment. On the last day of treatment, day 19, these parameters were E(max)=57.0% and EC(50)=0.46 microg/ml for monocytes and E(max)=61.9% and EC(50)=0.26 microg/ml for neutrophils. No positive relationship was defined between the log MDX-H210 C(max) and the log peak plasma IL-6, G-CSF, TNF or IL-8 concentrations on day 1. On day 19 these plasma cytokine concentrations were undetectable post MDX-H210 therapy. There was no consistent relationship between MDX-H210 C(max) and the observed clinical toxicities. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that MDX-H210 C(max) and AUC could be related by the E(max) model to maximum percent FcgammaRI saturation on circulating monocytes and neutrophils in the patients studied. After day 1, the post MDX-H210 therapy cytokine response attenuated over time, consistent with desensitization. We did not find a relationship between log MDX-H210 C(max) and peak plasma cytokine concentrations or clinical toxicities.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Antibodies, Bispecific/administration & dosage
- Antibodies, Bispecific/immunology
- Antibodies, Bispecific/pharmacokinetics
- Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage
- Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology
- Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacokinetics
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
- Cytokines/blood
- Female
- Humans
- Interferon-gamma/administration & dosage
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Monocytes/physiology
- Neoplasms/therapy
- Neutrophils/physiology
- Receptor, ErbB-2/analysis
- Receptor, ErbB-2/immunology
- Receptors, IgG/immunology
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L D Lewis
- Department of Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School and The Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Wallace PK, Kaufman PA, Lewis LD, Keler T, Givan AL, Fisher JL, Waugh MG, Wahner AE, Guyre PM, Fanger MW, Ernstoff MS. Bispecific antibody-targeted phagocytosis of HER-2/neu expressing tumor cells by myeloid cells activated in vivo. J Immunol Methods 2001; 248:167-82. [PMID: 11223077 DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1759(00)00350-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Studies from our laboratory and others have established that both mononuclear phagocytes and neutrophils mediate very efficient cytotoxicity when targeted through Fc receptors using a suitable monoclonal or bispecific antibody (BsAb). Cross-linking an Fc receptor for IgG (FcgammaR) triggers multiple anti-tumor activities including superoxide generation, cytokine and enzyme release, phagocytosis and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). In this report, using unfractionated leukocytes and two color flow cytometric analysis, we describe the phagocytic capacity of peripheral blood polymorphonuclear cells (PMN) and monocytes isolated from patients enrolled in a phase I clinical trial of MDX-H210 given in combination with IFNgamma. MDX-H210 is a BsAb targeting the myeloid trigger molecule FcgammaRI and the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene product overexpressed on a variety of adenocarcinomas. In this trial, cohorts of patients received escalating doses of MDX-H210 3 times per week for 3 weeks. Interferon-gamma (IFNgamma) was given 24 h prior to each BsAb infusion. Our results demonstrate that monocytes from these patients were inherently capable of phagocytosing the HER-2/neu positive SK-BR-3 cell line and that addition of MDX-H210 into the assay significantly enhanced the number of targets phagocytosed. Two days after administration of an immunologically active dose of MDX-H210 (10 mg/m2), monocytes from these patients were able to phagocytose greater amounts of target cell material, indicating that these cells remained armed with functionally sufficient BsAb for at least 48 h. PMN from these patients very efficiently mediated phagocytosis through FcgammaRI after being treated with IFNgamma, but not before. We conclude that phagocytosis is not only an efficient mechanism of myeloid cell-mediated cytotoxicity, but may also be a mechanism by which antigens from phagocytosed cells can enter a professional antigen presenting cell for processing and presentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P K Wallace
- Department of Microbiology, HB7556, Dartmouth Medical School and the Immunology Immunotherapy Program of the Norris Cotton Cancer Center, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Schwaab T, Lewis LD, Cole BF, Deo Y, Fanger MW, Wallace P, Guyre PM, Kaufman PA, Heaney JA, Schned AR, Harris RD, Ernstoff MS. Phase I pilot trial of the bispecific antibody MDXH210 (anti-Fc gamma RI X anti-HER-2/neu) in patients whose prostate cancer overexpresses HER-2/neu. J Immunother 2001; 24:79-87. [PMID: 11211151 DOI: 10.1097/00002371-200101000-00009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The goal of this study was to evaluate, in patients with prostate cancer, the toxicity profile and biologic activity of the bispecific antibody MDXH210, which has specificity for the non-ligand-binding site of the high-affinity immunoglobulin G receptor (Fc gamma RI) and the extracellular domain of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene product. Patients with prostate cancer that expressed HER-2/neu were entered into a phase I dose-escalation trial of MDXH210. Patients received an intravenous infusion MDXH210 during a period of 2 h three times per week for 2 weeks and were monitored for toxicity. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were measured and included the biologic end points of monocyte-bound MDXH210, cytokine production, and clinical response. Seven patients were treated with MDXH210 doses ranging from 1 to 8 mg/m2. In general, MDXH210 was well tolerated, with only mild infusion-related malaise, fever, chills, and myalgias. No dose-limiting toxic effects were observed. Biologic effects included induction of low plasma concentrations of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-6 observed immediately after MDXH210 infusion and 70% saturation of circulating monocyte-associated Fc gamma RI with MDXH210 at a dose level of 4 to 8 mg/m2. Five of six patients had stable prostate-specific antigen levels during the course of 40 days or more. Circulating plasma HER-2/neu levels decreased by 80% at days 12 and 29 (p = 0.03 and 0.06, respectively, by the Wilcoxon signed rank test). MDXH210 can be given safely to patients with HER-2/neu-positive prostate cancer in doses of at least 8 mg/m2. At the doses studied, biologic activity was demonstrated and characterized by binding of MDXH210 to circulating monocytes, release of monocyte-derived cytokines, a decrease in circulating HER-2/neu, and short-term stabilization of prostate-specific antigen levels.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Antibodies, Bispecific
- Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects
- Antibodies, Monoclonal/blood
- Antibodies, Monoclonal/pharmacokinetics
- Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
- Cytokines/blood
- Humans
- Immunization, Passive
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Monocytes/immunology
- Monocytes/metabolism
- Pilot Projects
- Prostatic Neoplasms/immunology
- Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism
- Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy
- Proto-Oncogene Mas
- Receptor, ErbB-2/biosynthesis
- Receptor, ErbB-2/blood
- Receptor, ErbB-2/immunology
- Receptors, IgG/biosynthesis
- Receptors, IgG/immunology
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Schwaab
- Uro-Oncology Program, Norris Cotton Cancer Center and Section of Urology and Immunology and Immunotherapy Research Programs, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Kaufman PA. Paclitaxel and anthracycline combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Semin Oncol 1999; 26:39-46. [PMID: 10403473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/13/2023]
Abstract
Numerous clinical trials have demonstrated that the combination of paclitaxel and doxorubicin is extremely active in metastatic breast cancer. Overall response rates of 42% to 94% and complete response rates of 4% to 41% have been reported. However, several trials with the highest response rates were associated with the development of congestive heart failure (CHF) in approximately 20% of patients. These early findings resulted in reducing the maximum permitted cumulative dosages of doxorubicin in subsequent trials, with a corresponding decrease in cardiac toxicity being noted. Several subsequent series suggest that with cumulative dosing of 360 mg/m2 doxorubicin, the rate of CHF can be reduced to approximately 5%. A recently completed Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group phase III randomized trial comparing paclitaxel versus doxorubicin versus combination therapy with paclitaxel and doxorubicin noted an overall response rate of 33% and 34% in each single-agent arm, respectively, and a response rate of 46% with the combination therapy. There was an acceptable incidence of CHF. However, no difference in overall survival was noted with the combination therapy compared with the single-agent treatment. Losoxantrone, an anthrapyrazole in clinical development, has shown promising single-agent activity in metastatic breast cancer. An initial phase III randomized clinical trial comparing treatment with either paclitaxel alone versus losoxantrone and paclitaxel was recently completed. With no maximal cumulative dosage of losoxantrone incorporated into this trial design, an overall incidence of CHF of 4.9% was noted with combination therapy. Other hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were overall acceptable with this new regimen as well. Additionally, preliminary analyses of clinical efficacy suggest that this new combination is promising therapy for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P A Kaufman
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Based on previous data demonstrating a potentially synergistic interaction between tamoxifen and cisplatin in metastatic melanoma therapy, a Phase II study was performed to assess the activity of tamoxifen, etoposide, mitoxantrone, and cisplatin (TEMP) in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma. METHODS Forty-six patients with metastatic breast carcinoma were treated with tamoxifen, 10 mg orally, twice a day for 28 days; etoposide, 100 mg/m2, on Days 1-3; mitoxantrone, 10 mg/m2, on Day 1; and cisplatin, 30 mg/m2, on Days 1 and 2. Forty-four patients (7 with bone only disease) were evaluable for response and toxicity after at least 1 cycle of therapy. All patients had previously received doxorubicin-containing regimens in either the adjuvant or metastatic setting. RESULTS The overall objective response rate for the 37 patients with visceral and/ or soft tissue disease was 41% (95% confidence interval, 25-58%). The objective response rate among women previously treated with doxorubicin in the adjuvant setting was 56% (14 of 24). Only 1 of 13 patients with metastatic carcinoma who had failed doxorubicin responded. Five of seven patients with bone-only disease had subjective improvement of bone pain without worsening of bone scans. Approximately 59% of patients had Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia at some time in their therapy and 1 patient died of neuropenic sepsis. Logistic regression analysis (n = 37) revealed that response was not related to estrogen receptor (ER) status or to the presence of visceral metastases. CONCLUSIONS TEMP appears to be an active regimen for patients with either ER positive (tamoxifen-resistant) or ER negative metastatic breast carcinoma that progresses after adjuvant doxorubicin therapy. Moreover, among patients who developed metastatic disease either during or < 12 months after adjuvant doxorubicin therapy, TEMP had a higher response rate than would have been predicted from previous studies. Although the mechanism remains to be elucidated, these results suggest a potentially synergistic role for tamoxifen in etoposide/cisplatin-based chemotherapy of breast carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S D Conzen
- Department of Medicine, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Valone FH, Kaufman PA, Guyre PM, Lewis LD, Memoli V, Ernstoff MS, Wells W, Barth R, Deo Y, Fisher J. Clinical trials of bispecific antibody MDX-210 in women with advanced breast or ovarian cancer that overexpresses HER-2/neu. J Hematother 1995; 4:471-5. [PMID: 8581387 DOI: 10.1089/scd.1.1995.4.471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
MDX-210 is a bispecific antibody (BsAb) that recognizes Fc gamma R1 on monocytes and macrophages and the cell surface product of the HER-2/neu oncogene, which is overexpressed on some breast and ovarian cancers. Clinical trials have demonstrated that treatment with MDX-210 is well tolerated and that MDX-210 is both immunologically and clinically active. Optimization of the dose and schedule of MDX-210 and development of combination treatments with cytokines that modulate immune effector cells will greatly enhance the efficacy of this novel BsAb construct for treatment of tumours that overexpress HER-2/neu. We envision that MDX-210 will be effective for treating patients with tumors that overexpress HER-2/neu, especially in the minimal disease setting.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic/biosynthesis
- Antibodies, Bispecific/administration & dosage
- Antibodies, Bispecific/adverse effects
- Antibodies, Bispecific/immunology
- Antibodies, Bispecific/therapeutic use
- Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage
- Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects
- Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology
- Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use
- Antibodies, Neoplasm/administration & dosage
- Antibodies, Neoplasm/adverse effects
- Antibodies, Neoplasm/immunology
- Antibodies, Neoplasm/therapeutic use
- Antibody Specificity
- Antibody-Dependent Cell Cytotoxicity
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Breast Neoplasms/immunology
- Breast Neoplasms/therapy
- Cohort Studies
- Combined Modality Therapy
- Cytokines/metabolism
- Drug Administration Schedule
- Female
- Humans
- Hypotension/chemically induced
- Immunization, Passive
- Neoplasm Proteins/immunology
- Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Ovarian Neoplasms/immunology
- Ovarian Neoplasms/therapy
- Receptor, ErbB-2/immunology
- Receptors, Fc/immunology
- Receptors, IgG/immunology
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F H Valone
- Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Valone FH, Kaufman PA, Guyre PM, Lewis LD, Memoli V, Deo Y, Graziano R, Fisher JL, Meyer L, Mrozek-Orlowski M. Phase Ia/Ib trial of bispecific antibody MDX-210 in patients with advanced breast or ovarian cancer that overexpresses the proto-oncogene HER-2/neu. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13:2281-92. [PMID: 7545221 DOI: 10.1200/jco.1995.13.9.2281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE MDX-210 is a bispecific antibody that binds simultaneously to type I Fc receptors for immunoglobulin G (IgG) (Fc gamma RI) and to the HER-2/neu oncogene protein product. MDX-210 effectively directs Fc gamma RI-positive effector cells such as monocytes and macrophages to phagocytose or kill tumor cells that overexpress HER-2/neu. The goals of this phase Ia/Ib trial were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and/or the optimal biologic dose (OBD) of MDX-210. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced breast or ovarian cancer that overexpressed HER-2/neu were eligible for treatment. Cohorts of three patients received a single intravenous (IV) infusion of MDX-210 at increasing dose levels from 0.35 to 10.0 mg/m2. RESULTS Treatment was well tolerated, with most patients experiencing transient grade 1 to 2 fevers, malaise, and hypotension only. Two patients experienced transient grade 3 hypotension at 10.0 mg/m2. Transient monocytopenia and lymphopenia developed at 1 to 2 hours, but no other hematologic changes were observed. Doses of MDX-210 > or = 3.5 mg/m2 saturated > or = 80% of monocyte Fc gamma RI and produced peak plasma concentrations > or = 1 microgram/mL, which is greater than the concentration for optimal monocyte/macrophage activation in vitro. Elevated plasma levels of the monocyte products tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha), interleukin-6 (IL-6), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), and neopterin were observed with maximal levels at doses > or = 7.0 mg/m2. Localization of MDX-210 in tumor tissue was demonstrated in two patients. One partial and one mixed tumor response were observed among 10 assessable patients. CONCLUSION MDX-210 is immunologically active at well-tolerated doses. The MTD and OBD is 7 to 10 mg/m2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F H Valone
- Department of Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Walker WH, Stein B, Ganchi PA, Hoffman JA, Kaufman PA, Ballard DW, Hannink M, Greene WC. The v-rel oncogene: insights into the mechanism of transcriptional activation, repression, and transformation. J Virol 1992; 66:5018-29. [PMID: 1321284 PMCID: PMC241358 DOI: 10.1128/jvi.66.8.5018-5029.1992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The v-rel oncogene product from the avian reticuloendotheliosis virus strain T corresponds to a member of the Rel-related family of enhancer-binding proteins that includes both the mammalian 50- and 65-kDa subunits of the NF-kappa B transcription factor complex. However, in contrast to NF-kappa B, v-Rel has been shown to function as a dominant-negative repressor of kappa B-dependent transcription in many mature cell types. We now demonstrate that a highly conserved motif within the Rel homology domain of v-Rel containing a consensus protein kinase A phosphorylation site is required for DNA binding, transcriptional repression, and cellular transformation mediated by this oncoprotein. However, replacement of the serine phosphate acceptor within the protein kinase A site with an alanine did not alter any of these functions of v-Rel, suggesting that phosphorylation at this site is not central to the regulation of this oncogene product. Rather, the inactive mutations appear to identify a functional domain within v-Rel required for these various biological activities. It is notable that these same mutations do not impair the ability of v-Rel to heterodimerize with the 50-kDa subunit of NF-kappa B, suggesting that v-Rel-mediated transcriptional repression likely involves direct nuclear blockade of the kappa B enhancer rather than indirect alterations in the composition of preformed cytoplasmic NF-kappa B complexes. Paradoxically, when introduced into undifferentiated F9 cells, v-Rel functions as a kappa B-specific transcriptional activator rather than as a dominant-negative repressor. These stimulatory effects of v-Rel require both the conserved protein kinase A phosphorylation site and additional unique C-terminal sequences not needed for v-Rel-mediated repression in mature cells. Retinoic acid-induced differentiation of these F9 cells restores the repressor function of v-Rel. These opposing biological actions of v-Rel occurring in cells at distinct stages of differentiation may have important implications for the mechanism of v-Rel-mediated transformation occurring in avian splenocytes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W H Walker
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Kaufman PA, Weinberg JB, Greene WC. Nuclear expression of the 50- and 65-kD Rel-related subunits of nuclear factor-kappa B is differentially regulated in human monocytic cells. J Clin Invest 1992; 90:121-9. [PMID: 1634604 PMCID: PMC443070 DOI: 10.1172/jci115824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The nuclear factor (NF)-kappa B transcription factor system is composed of at least four inducible nucleoprotein adducts termed p50, p55 (NF-kappa B p50), p75 (NF-kappa B p65), and p85 (c-Rel). These proteins are expressed in the nuclei of activated T cells in a distinctly biphasic fashion, with p55 and p75 induction occurring within minutes whereas the induction of p50 and p85 occurs after several hours. In contrast, p50 and p55 are constitutively expressed in the nuclei of U937 and THP-1 monocytic cells. However, cellular activation is required for the nuclear expression of p75 in these cells. Additionally, activation of monocytic cells does not result in a significant induction of p85. Tumor necrosis factor alpha induces the nuclear expression of p55 and p75 in these monocytic cells within 20 min, presumably reflecting the liberation of these proteins from I kappa B. In contrast, phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) induces the expression of these proteins with delayed kinetics, raising the possibility that PMA is incapable of mediating the efficient release of p55 and p75 from I kappa B in these cells. These findings highlight important differences in the regulation of these proteins in monocytic cells versus T cells and suggest that the induced expression of NF-kappa B p65 in monocytes may play a central role in the activation of HIV-1 gene expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P A Kaufman
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Acchiardo SR, Kraus AP, LaHatte G, Kaufman PA, Adkins D, Moore LW. Urea kinetics evaluation of hemodialysis and CAPD patients. Adv Perit Dial 1992; 8:55-8. [PMID: 1361852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
Urea kinetics have been used to measure adequacy of hemodialysis. The role of urea kinetics in CAPD has not been clearly established. Using urea kinetics, we studied 71 hemodialysis and 71 CAPD patients. Age was 53 +/- 12 and 45.8 +/- 12 respectively. Urea kinetics in hemodialysis were studied in the standard manner. CAPD patients collected 24 hr, dialysate fluid to measure urea, creatinine, glucose and protein. Urine was collected for 24 hr. to measure urea and creatinine. Protein catabolic rate (pcr) was calculated from the total amount of urea cleared in 24 h. Both groups of patients had similar body weight. Kt/V in CAPD (0.65 +/- 0.1) was at a level considered underdialysis for hemodialysis. In both groups, pcr increased as Kt/V increased. However, CAPD patients had levels of pcr higher than hemodialysis patients at the same level of Kt/V. BUN, serum albumin and serum potassium were significantly lower in CAPD patients. Patients who dialyze more, eat more. Differences in protein intake may be due to a more liberal diet in CAPD, patient selection, removal of middle molecules, or better control of the acidosis.
Collapse
|
38
|
Kaufman PA, Jones RB, Greenberg CS, Peters WP. Autologous bone marrow transplantation and factor XII, factor VII, and protein C deficiencies. Report of a new association and its possible relationship to endothelial cell injury. Cancer 1990; 66:515-21. [PMID: 2114212 DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19900801)66:3<515::aid-cncr2820660319>3.0.co;2-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Four patients who underwent treatment with high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) and in whom posttreatment deficiencies of Factor XII and protein C subsequently developed are reported. Factor VII or Factor X deficiencies also developed in several of these patients. Three of these patients experienced chemotherapy-related cardiac, hepatic, or pulmonary toxicity. It is believed by many that endothelial cell injury may be the underlying lesion responsible for these various organ system toxicities seen in the setting of ABMT, although direct evidence of this is lacking. It is proposed that the factor deficiencies described in this report may be an additional consequence of endothelial cell injury or dysfunction. These coagulation factor deficiencies may therefore serve as both a marker to follow these organ system toxicities with and as a useful tool to better study and understand the mechanisms underlying these events. Additionally, deficiencies of either Factor VII or Factor X developed in several patients that were of a sufficient magnitude such that factor replacement therapy would be indicated before any invasive procedures or in the event of significant hemorrhage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P A Kaufman
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Brown RO, Vehe KL, Kaufman PA, Rogers R, Kudsk KA, Luther RW. Long-term enteral nutrition support in a pregnant patient following head trauma. Nutr Clin Pract 1989; 4:101-4. [PMID: 2499751 DOI: 10.1177/0115426589004003101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
|
40
|
Affiliation(s)
- P A Kaufman
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
The authors present a collaborative treatment model designed to help the closely merged, troubled lesbian relationship. Therapeutic techniques focus on change in territorial, temporal, monetary, cognitive, emotional, and environmental space. A case example illustrates the interventions, which include individual and conjoint work, collaboration between therapists, education, bibliotherapy, referral to gay community resources, and specific suggestions for behavior change. The therapeutic goal is to restore intimacy to the relationship by offering each partner increased distance, personal space, and individual autonomy.
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
Five hundred consecutive cases of breast carcinoma were studied to determine the incidence of multicentric lesions in the resected specimens. When residual tumor in juxtaposition to the primary tumor or biopsy cavity is excluded, 41.6 per cent of specimens exhibited multicentric foci of tumor; 31 per cent of such foci were in sectors or quadrants remote from the primary tumor. In more than half of these cases the lymph nodes were uninvolved and cure rate would have been maximal had these multicentric tumor foci been removed. These findings confirm previous similar studies and we consider tylectomy an inappropriate mode of therapy for breast cancer.
Collapse
|