1
|
Balmaceno-Criss M, Lafage R, Alsoof D, Daher M, Hamilton DK, Smith JS, Eastlack RK, Fessler RG, Gum JL, Gupta MC, Hostin R, Kebaish KM, Klineberg EO, Lewis SJ, Line BG, Nunley PD, Mundis GM, Passias PG, Protopsaltis TS, Buell T, Scheer JK, Mullin JP, Soroceanu A, Ames CP, Lenke LG, Bess S, Shaffrey CI, Schwab FJ, Lafage V, Burton DC, Diebo BG, Daniels AH. Impact of Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis on Full Body Sagittal Alignment and Compensation for Sagittal Spinal Deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:743-751. [PMID: 38375611 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE To investigate the effect of lower extremity osteoarthritis on sagittal alignment and compensatory mechanisms in adult spinal deformity (ASD). BACKGROUND Spine, hip, and knee pathologies often overlap in ASD patients. Limited data exists on how lower extremity osteoarthritis impacts sagittal alignment and compensatory mechanisms in ASD. PATIENTS AND METHODS In total, 527 preoperative ASD patients with full body radiographs were included. Patients were grouped by Kellgren-Lawrence grade of bilateral hips and knees and stratified by quartile of T1-Pelvic Angle (T1PA) severity into low-, mid-, high-, and severe-T1PA. Full-body alignment and compensation were compared across quartiles. Regression analysis examined the incremental impact of hip and knee osteoarthritis severity on compensation. RESULTS The mean T1PA for low-, mid-, high-, and severe-T1PA groups was 7.3°, 19.5°, 27.8°, and 41.6°, respectively. Mid-T1PA patients with severe hip osteoarthritis had an increased sagittal vertical axis and global sagittal alignment ( P <0.001). Increasing hip osteoarthritis severity resulted in decreased pelvic tilt ( P =0.001) and sacrofemoral angle ( P <0.001), but increased knee flexion ( P =0.012). Regression analysis revealed that with increasing T1PA, pelvic tilt correlated inversely with hip osteoarthritis and positively with knee osteoarthritis ( r2 =0.812). Hip osteoarthritis decreased compensation through sacrofemoral angle (β-coefficient=-0.206). Knee and hip osteoarthritis contributed to greater knee flexion (β-coefficients=0.215, 0.101; respectively). For pelvic shift, only hip osteoarthritis significantly contributed to the model (β-coefficient=0.100). CONCLUSIONS For the same magnitude of spinal deformity, increased hip osteoarthritis severity was associated with worse truncal and full body alignment with posterior translation of the pelvis. Patients with severe hip and knee osteoarthritis exhibited decreased hip extension and pelvic tilt but increased knee flexion. This examines sagittal alignment and compensation in ASD patients with hip and knee arthritis and may help delineate whether hip and knee flexion is due to spinal deformity compensation or lower extremity osteoarthritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariah Balmaceno-Criss
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Northwell, New York, NY
| | - Daniel Alsoof
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI
| | - Mohammad Daher
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI
| | - David Kojo Hamilton
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Justin S Smith
- University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA
| | | | - Richard G Fessler
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Rush University Medical School, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | - Richard Hostin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor Scoliosis Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | - Eric O Klineberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Health, Houston, TX
| | - Stephen J Lewis
- Division of Orthopaedics, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Peter G Passias
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY
| | | | - Thomas Buell
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Justin K Scheer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Alex Soroceanu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | | | - Lawrence G Lenke
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, The Spine Hospital at New York Presbyterian, New York, NY
| | - Shay Bess
- Denver International Spine Center, Denver, CO
| | | | - Frank J Schwab
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Northwell, New York, NY
| | | | - Douglas C Burton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
| | - Bassel G Diebo
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI
| | - Alan H Daniels
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mohanty S, Hassan FM, Lenke LG, Lewerenz E, Passias PG, Klineberg EO, Lafage V, Smith JS, Hamilton DK, Gum JL, Lafage R, Mullin J, Diebo B, Buell TJ, Kim HJ, Kebaish K, Eastlack R, Daniels AH, Mundis G, Hostin R, Protopsaltis TS, Hart RA, Gupta M, Schwab FJ, Shaffrey CI, Ames CP, Burton D, Bess S. Machine learning clustering of adult spinal deformity patients identifies four prognostic phenotypes: a multicenter prospective cohort analysis with single surgeon external validation. Spine J 2024; 24:1095-1108. [PMID: 38365004 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Among adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients, heterogeneity in patient pathology, surgical expectations, baseline impairments, and frailty complicates comparisons in clinical outcomes and research. This study aims to qualitatively segment ASD patients using machine learning-based clustering on a large, multicenter, prospectively gathered ASD cohort. PURPOSE To qualitatively segment adult spinal deformity patients using machine learning-based clustering on a large, multicenter, prospectively gathered cohort. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Machine learning algorithm using patients from a prospective multicenter study and a validation cohort from a retrospective single center, single surgeon cohort with complete 2-year follow up. PATIENT SAMPLE About 805 ASD patients; 563 patients from a prospective multicenter study and 242 from a single center to be used as a validation cohort. OUTCOME MEASURES To validate and extend the Ames-ISSG/ESSG classification using machine learning-based clustering analysis on a large, complex, multicenter, prospectively gathered ASD cohort. METHODS We analyzed a training cohort of 563 ASD patients from a prospective multicenter study and a validation cohort of 242 ASD patients from a retrospective single center/surgeon cohort with complete two-year patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinical/radiographic follow-up. Using k-means clustering, a machine learning algorithm, we clustered patients based on baseline PROs, Edmonton frailty, age, surgical history, and overall health. Baseline differences in clusters identified using the training cohort were assessed using Chi-Squared and ANOVA with pairwise comparisons. To evaluate the classification system's ability to discern postoperative trajectories, a second machine learning algorithm assigned the single-center/surgeon patients to the same 4 clusters, and we compared the clusters' two-year PROs and clinical outcomes. RESULTS K-means clustering revealed four distinct phenotypes from the multicenter training cohort based on age, frailty, and mental health: Old/Frail/Content (OFC, 27.7%), Old/Frail/Distressed (OFD, 33.2%), Old/Resilient/Content (ORC, 27.2%), and Young/Resilient/Content (YRC, 11.9%). OFC and OFD clusters had the highest frailty scores (OFC: 3.76, OFD: 4.72) and a higher proportion of patients with prior thoracolumbar fusion (OFC: 47.4%, OFD: 49.2%). ORC and YRC clusters exhibited lower frailty scores and fewest patients with prior thoracolumbar procedures (ORC: 2.10, 36.6%; YRC: 0.84, 19.4%). OFC had 69.9% of patients with global sagittal deformity and the highest T1PA (29.0), while YRC had 70.2% exhibiting coronal deformity, the highest mean coronal Cobb Angle (54.0), and the lowest T1PA (11.9). OFD and ORC had similar alignment phenotypes with intermediate values for Coronal Cobb Angle (OFD: 33.7; ORC: 40.0) and T1PA (OFD: 24.9; ORC: 24.6) between OFC (worst sagittal alignment) and YRC (worst coronal alignment). In the single surgeon validation cohort, the OFC cluster experienced the greatest increase in SRS Function scores (1.34 points, 95%CI 1.01-1.67) compared to OFD (0.5 points, 95%CI 0.245-0.755), ORC (0.7 points, 95%CI 0.415-0.985), and YRC (0.24 points, 95%CI -0.024-0.504) clusters. OFD cluster patients improved the least over 2 years. Multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated that the OFD cohort had significantly worse reoperation outcomes compared to other clusters (HR: 3.303, 95%CI: 1.085-8.390). CONCLUSION Machine-learning clustering found four different ASD patient qualitative phenotypes, defined by their age, frailty, physical functioning, and mental health upon presentation, which primarily determines their ability to improve their PROs following surgery. This reaffirms that these qualitative measures must be assessed in addition to the radiographic variables when counseling ASD patients regarding their expected surgical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarthak Mohanty
- Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Fthimnir M Hassan
- Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Lawrence G Lenke
- Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Erik Lewerenz
- Department of Orthopaedics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter G Passias
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric O Klineberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell Health Lenox Hill, New York, NY, USA
| | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - D Kojo Hamilton
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Gum
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell Health Lenox Hill, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey Mullin
- Department of Neurosurgery, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Bassel Diebo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Orthopedics, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Thomas J Buell
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Han Jo Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Khalid Kebaish
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, John Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Robert Eastlack
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Alan H Daniels
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Orthopedics, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Gregory Mundis
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Richard Hostin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southwest Scoliosis and Spine Institute, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Robert A Hart
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Munish Gupta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Frank J Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell Health Lenox Hill, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Christopher P Ames
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco Spine Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Douglas Burton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Shay Bess
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Denver International Spine Center, Denver, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pierce KE, Mir JM, Dave P, Lafage R, Lafage V, Park P, Nunley P, Mundis G, Gum J, Tretiakov P, Uribe J, Hostin R, Eastlack R, Diebo B, Kim HJ, Smith JS, Ames CP, Shaffrey C, Burton D, Hart R, Bess S, Klineberg E, Schwab F, Gupta M, Hamilton DK, Passias PG. The Incremental Clinical Benefit of Adding Layers of Complexity to the Planning and Execution of Adult Spinal Deformity Corrective Surgery. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2024:01787389-990000000-01169. [PMID: 38771063 DOI: 10.1227/ons.0000000000001192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES For patients with surgical adult spinal deformity (ASD), our understanding of alignment has evolved, especially in the last 20 years. Determination of optimal restoration of alignment and spinal shape has been increasingly studied, yet the assessment of how these alignment schematics have incrementally added benefit to outcomes remains to be evaluated. METHODS Patients with ASD with baseline and 2-year were included, classified by 4 alignment measures: Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab, Age-Adjusted, Roussouly, and Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP). The incremental benefits of alignment schemas were assessed in chronological order as our understanding of optimal alignment progressed. Alignment was considered improved from baseline based on SRS-Schwab 0 or decrease in severity, Age-Adjusted ideal match, Roussouly current (based on sacral slope) matching theoretical (pelvic incidence-based), and decrease in proportion. Patients separated into 4 first improving in SRS-Schwab at 2-year, second Schwab improvement and matching Age-Adjusted, third two prior with Roussouly, and fourth improvement in all four. Comparison was accomplished with means comparison tests and χ2 analyses. RESULTS Sevenhundredthirty-two. patients met inclusion. SRS-Schwab BL: pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (++:32.9%), sagittal vertical axis (++: 23%), pelvic tilt (++:24.6%). 640 (87.4%) met criteria for first, 517 (70.6%) second, 176 (24%) third, and 55 (7.5%) fourth. The addition of Roussouly (third) resulted in lower rates of mechanical complications and proximal junctional kyphosis (48.3%) and higher rates of meeting minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for physical component summary and SRS-Mental (P < .05) compared with the second. Fourth compared with the third had higher rates of MCID for ODI (44.2% vs third: 28.3%, P = .011) and SRS-Appearance (70.6% vs 44.8%, P < .001). Mechanical complications and proximal junctional kyphosis were lower with the addition of Roussouly (P = .024), while the addition of GAP had higher rates of meeting MCID for SRS-22 Appearance (P = .002) and Oswestry Disability Index (P = .085). CONCLUSION Our evaluation of the incremental benefit that alignment schemas have provided in ASD corrective surgery suggests that the addition of Roussouly provided the greatest reduction in mechanical complications, while the incorporation of GAP provided the most significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine E Pierce
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jamshaid M Mir
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Pooja Dave
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopedic, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell, New York, New York, USA
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopedic, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell, New York, New York, USA
| | - Paul Park
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Pierce Nunley
- Spine Institute of Louisiana, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
| | - Gregory Mundis
- San Diego Center for Spinal Disorders, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Jeffrey Gum
- Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - Peter Tretiakov
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Juan Uribe
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Richard Hostin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor Scoliosis Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Robert Eastlack
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Bassel Diebo
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Downstate, New York, New York, USA
| | - Han Jo Kim
- Department of Orthopedic, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell, New York, New York, USA
| | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Christopher P Ames
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Christopher Shaffrey
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Douglas Burton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Robert Hart
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Shay Bess
- Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Eric Klineberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA
| | - Frank Schwab
- Department of Orthopedic, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell, New York, New York, USA
| | - Munish Gupta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - D Kojo Hamilton
- Departments of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Peter G Passias
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tretiakov PS, Onafowokan OO, Lorentz N, Galetta M, Mir JM, Das A, Dave P, Yee T, Buell TJ, Jankowski PP, Eastlack R, Hockley A, Schoenfeld AJ, Passias PG. Assessing the Economic Benefits of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in Adult Cervical Deformity Patients: Is the Initial Additive Cost of Protocols Offset by Clinical Gains? Clin Spine Surg 2024; 37:164-169. [PMID: 38637936 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the financial impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols and cost-effectiveness in cervical deformity corrective surgery. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of prospective CD database. BACKGROUND Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) can help accelerate patient recovery and assist hospitals in maximizing the incentives of bundled payment models while maintaining high-quality patient care. However, the economic benefit of ERAS protocols, nor the heterogeneous components that make up such protocols, has not been established. METHODS Operative CD patients ≥18 y with complete pre-(BL) and up to 2-year(2Y) postop radiographic/HRQL data were stratified by enrollment in Standard-of-Care ERAS beginning in 2020. Differences in demographics, clinical outcomes, radiographic alignment targets, perioperative factors, and complication rates were assessed through means comparison analysis. Costs were calculated using PearlDiver database estimates from Medicare pay scales. QALY was calculated using NDI mapped to SF6D using validated methodology with a 3% discount rate to account for a residual decline in life expectancy. RESULTS In all, 127 patients were included (59.07±11.16 y, 54% female, 29.08±6.43 kg/m 2 ) in the analysis. Of these patients, 54 (20.0%) received the ERAS protocol. Per cost analysis, ERAS+ patients reported a lower mean total 2Y cost of 35049 USD compared with ERAS- patients at 37553 ( P <0.001). Furthermore, ERAS+ patients demonstrated lower cost of reoperation by 2Y ( P <0.001). Controlling for age, surgical invasiveness, and deformity per BL TS-CL, ERAS+ patients below 70 years old were significantly more likely to achieve a cost-effective outcome by 2Y compared with their ERAS- counterparts (OR: 1.011 [1.001-1.999, P =0.048]. CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing ERAS protocols experience improved cost-effectiveness and reduced total cost by 2Y post-operatively. Due to the potential economic benefit of ERAS for patients incorporation of ERAS into practice for eligible patients should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter S Tretiakov
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Oluwatobi O Onafowokan
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Nathan Lorentz
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Matthew Galetta
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Jamshaid M Mir
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Ankita Das
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Pooja Dave
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Timothy Yee
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco, CA
| | - Thomas J Buell
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburg, PA
| | - Pawel P Jankowski
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hoag Neurosciences Institute, Irvine, CA
| | - Robert Eastlack
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Health, San Diego, CA
| | - Aaron Hockley
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Peter G Passias
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tretiakov PS, Thomas Z, Krol O, Joujon-Roche R, Williamson T, Imbo B, Dave P, McFarland K, Mir J, Vira S, Diebo B, Schoenfeld AJ, Passias PG. The Predictive Potential of Nutritional and Metabolic Burden: Development of a Novel Validated Metric Predicting Increased Postoperative Complications in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:609-614. [PMID: 37573568 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A retrospective cohort review. OBJECTIVE To develop a scoring system for predicting increased risk of postoperative complications in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery based on baseline nutritional and metabolic factors. BACKGROUND Endocrine and metabolic conditions have been shown to adversely influence patient outcomes and may increase the likelihood of postoperative complications. The impact of these conditions has not been effectively evaluated in patients undergoing ASD surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS ASD patients 18 years or above with baseline and two-year data were included. An internally cross-validated weighted equation using preoperative laboratory and comorbidity data correlating to increased perioperative complications was developed via Poisson regression. Body mass index (BMI) categorization (normal, over/underweight, and obese) and diabetes classification (normal, prediabetic, and diabetic) were used per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Diabetes Associates parameters. A novel ASD-specific nutritional and metabolic burden score (ASD-NMBS) was calculated via Beta-Sullivan adjustment, and Conditional Inference Tree determined the score threshold for experiencing ≥1 complication. Cohorts were stratified into low-risk and high-risk groups for comparison. Logistic regression assessed correlations between increasing burden score and complications. RESULTS Two hundred one ASD patients were included (mean age: 58.60±15.4, sex: 48% female, BMI: 29.95±14.31, Charlson Comorbidity Index: 3.75±2.40). Significant factors were determined to be age (+1/yr), hypertension (+18), peripheral vascular disease (+37), smoking status (+21), anemia (+1), VitD hydroxyl (+1/ng/mL), BMI (+13/cat), and diabetes (+4/cat) (model: P <0.001, area under the curve: 92.9%). Conditional Inference Tree determined scores above 175 correlated with ≥1 post-op complication ( P <0.001). Furthermore, HIGH patients reported higher rates of postoperative cardiac complications ( P =0.045) and were more likely to require reoperation ( P =0.024) compared with low patients. CONCLUSIONS The development of a validated novel nutritional and metabolic burden score (ASD-NMBS) demonstrated that patients with higher scores are at greater risk of increased postoperative complications and course. As such, surgeons should consider the reduction of nutritional and metabolic burden preoperatively to enhance outcomes and reduce complications in ASD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter S Tretiakov
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Zach Thomas
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York Medical College, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY
| | - Oscar Krol
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Rachel Joujon-Roche
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Tyler Williamson
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Bailey Imbo
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Pooja Dave
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Kimberly McFarland
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Jamshaid Mir
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Shaleen Vira
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Bassel Diebo
- Department of Orthopaedics, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Peter G Passias
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Passias PG, Tretiakov PS, Onafowokan OO, Galetta M, Lorentz N, Mir JM, Das A, Dave P, Lafage R, Yee T, Diebo B, Vira S, Jankowski PP, Hockley A, Daniels A, Schoenfeld AJ, Mummaneni P, Paulino CB, Lafage V. The Evolution of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: Assessing the Clinical Benefits of Developments Within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols in Adult Cervical Deformity Surgery. Clin Spine Surg 2024; 37:182-187. [PMID: 38637915 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE To investigate the impact of evolving Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols on outcomes after cervical deformity (CD) surgery. BACKGROUND ERAS can help accelerate patient recovery and assist hospitals in maximizing the incentives of bundled payment models while maintaining high-quality patient care. However, there remains a paucity of literature assessing how developments have impacted outcomes after adult CD surgery. METHODS Patients with operative CD 18 years or older with pre-baseline and 2 years (2Y) postoperative data, who underwent ERAS protocols, were stratified by increasing implantation of ERAS components: (1) early (multimodal pain program), (2) intermediate (early protocol + paraspinal blocks, early ambulation), and (3) late (early/intermediate protocols + comprehensive prehabilitation). Differences in demographics, clinical outcomes, radiographic alignment targets, perioperative factors, and complication rates were assessed through Bonferroni-adjusted means comparison analysis. RESULTS A total of 131 patients were included (59.4 ± 11.7 y, 45% females, 28.8 ± 6.0 kg/m 2 ). Of these patients, 38.9% were considered "early," 36.6% were "intermediate," and 24.4% were "late." Perioperatively, rates of intraoperative complications were lower in the late group ( P = 0.036). Postoperatively, discharge disposition differed significantly between cohorts, with late patients more likely to be discharged to home versus early or intermediate cohorts [χ 2 (2) = 37.973, P < 0.001]. In terms of postoperative disability recovery, intermediate and late patients demonstrated incrementally improved 6 W modified Japanese Orthopedic Association scores ( P = 0.004), and late patients maintained significantly higher mean Euro-QOL 5-Dimension Questionnaire and modified Japanese Orthopedic Association scores by 1 year ( P < 0.001, P = 0.026). By 2Y, cohorts demonstrated incrementally increasing SWAL-QOL scores (all domains P < 0.028) domain scores versus early or intermediate cohorts. By 2Y, incrementally decreasing reoperation was observed in early versus intermediate versus late cohorts ( P = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS The present study demonstrates that patients enrolled in an evolving ERAS program demonstrate incremental improvement in preoperative optimization and candidate selection, greater likelihood of discharge to home, decreased postoperative disability and dysphasia burden, and decreased likelihood of intraoperative complications and reoperation rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, Division of Spinal Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute
| | - Peter S Tretiakov
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, Division of Spinal Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute
| | - Oluwatobi O Onafowokan
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, Division of Spinal Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute
| | - Matthew Galetta
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, Division of Spinal Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute
| | - Nathan Lorentz
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, Division of Spinal Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute
| | - Jamshaid M Mir
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, Division of Spinal Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute
| | - Ankita Das
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, Division of Spinal Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute
| | - Pooja Dave
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, Division of Spinal Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Timothy Yee
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco, CA
| | - Bassel Diebo
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, RI
| | - Shaleen Vira
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurosurgery, Banner Health, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Pawel P Jankowski
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hoag Neurosciences Institute, Irvine, CA
| | - Aaron Hockley
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Alan Daniels
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, RI
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Praveen Mummaneni
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco, CA
| | - Carl B Paulino
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Agarwal N, Letchuman V, Lavadi RS, Le VP, Aabedi AA, Shabani S, Chan AK, Park P, Uribe JS, Turner JD, Eastlack RK, Fessler RG, Fu KM, Wang MY, Kanter AS, Okonkwo DO, Nunley PD, Anand N, Mundis GM, Passias PG, Bess S, Shaffrey CI, Chou D, Mummaneni PV. What is the effect of preoperative depression on outcomes after minimally invasive surgery for adult spinal deformity? A prospective cohort analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 2024; 40:602-610. [PMID: 38364229 DOI: 10.3171/2023.12.spine221330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Depression has been implicated with worse immediate postoperative outcomes in adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction, yet the specific impact of depression on those patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) requires further clarity. This study aimed to evaluate the role of depression in the recovery of patients with ASD after undergoing MIS. METHODS Patients who underwent MIS for ASD with a minimum postoperative follow-up of 1 year were included from a prospectively collected, multicenter registry. Two cohorts of patients were identified that consisted of either those affirming or denying depression on preoperative assessment. The patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) compared included scores on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), numeric rating scale (NRS) for back and leg pain, Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Questionnaire (SRS-22), SF-36 physical component summary, SF-36 mental component summary (MCS), EQ-5D, and EQ-5D visual analog scale. RESULTS Twenty-seven of 147 (18.4%) patients screened positive for preoperative depression. The nondepressed cohort had an average of 4.83 levels fused, and the depressed cohort had 5.56 levels fused per patient (p = 0.267). At 1-year follow-up, 10 patients still reported depression, representing a 63% decrease. Postoperatively, both cohorts demonstrated improvement in their PROMs; however, at 1-year follow-up, those without depression had statistically better outcomes based on the EQ-5D, MCS, and SRS-22 scores (p < 0.05). Patients with depression continued to experience higher NRS leg scores at 1-year follow-up (3.63 vs 2.22, p = 0.018). After controlling for covariates, the authors found that depression significantly impacted only 1-year follow-up MCS scores (β = 8.490, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Depressed and nondepressed patients reported similar improvements after MIS surgery, except MCS scores were more likely to improve in nondepressed patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nitin Agarwal
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- 2Division of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- 3Neurological Surgery, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Vijay Letchuman
- 4Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Raj Swaroop Lavadi
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Vivian P Le
- 5Department of Neurosurgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Alexander A Aabedi
- 4Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Saman Shabani
- 6Department of Neurological Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Andrew K Chan
- 5Department of Neurosurgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Paul Park
- 7Department of Neurosurgery, Semmes Murphey Clinic, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Juan S Uribe
- 8Department of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Jay D Turner
- 8Department of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Robert K Eastlack
- 9Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California
| | - Richard G Fessler
- 10Department of Neurological Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Kai-Ming Fu
- 11Department of Neurosurgery, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Michael Y Wang
- 12Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami, Florida
| | - Adam S Kanter
- 13Division of Neurosurgery, Hoag Neurosciences Institute, Newport Beach, California
| | - David O Okonkwo
- 2Division of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Neel Anand
- 15Department of Orthopaedics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Gregory M Mundis
- 9Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California
| | - Peter G Passias
- 16Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Shay Bess
- 17Denver International Spine Center, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, Colorado; and
| | | | - Dean Chou
- 5Department of Neurosurgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Praveen V Mummaneni
- 4Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Passias PG, Pierce KE, Mir JM, Krol O, Lafage R, Lafage V, Line B, Uribe JS, Hostin R, Daniels A, Hart R, Burton D, Shaffrey C, Schwab F, Diebo BG, Ames CP, Smith JS, Schoenfeld AJ, Bess S, Klineberg EO. Development of a modified frailty index for adult spinal deformities independent of functional changes following surgical correction: a true baseline risk assessment tool. Spine Deform 2024; 12:811-817. [PMID: 38305990 DOI: 10.1007/s43390-023-00808-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a simplified, modified frailty index for adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients dependent on objective clinical factors. METHODS ASD patients with baseline (BL) and 2-year (2Y) follow-up were included. Factors with the largest R2 value derived from multivariate forward stepwise regression were including in the modified ASD-FI (clin-ASD-FI). Factors included in the clin-ASD-FI were regressed against mortality, extended length of hospital stay (LOS, > 8 days), revisions, major complications and weights for the clin-ASD-FI were calculated via Beta/Sullivan. Total clin-ASD-FI score was created with a score from 0 to 1. Linear regression correlated clin-ASD-FI with ASD-FI scores and published cutoffs for the ASD-FI were used to create the new frailty cutoffs: not frail (NF: < 0.11), frail (F: 0.11-0.21) and severely frail (SF: > 0.21). Binary logistic regression assessed odds of complication or reop for frail patients. RESULTS Five hundred thirty-one ASD patients (59.5 yrs, 79.5% F) were included. The final model had a R2 of 0.681, and significant factors were: < 18.5 or > 30 BMI (weight: 0.0625 out of 1), cardiac disease (0.125), disability employment status (0.3125), diabetes mellitus (0.0625), hypertension (0.0625), osteoporosis (0.125), blood clot (0.1875), and bowel incontinence (0.0625). These factors calculated the score from 0 to 1, with a mean cohort score of 0.13 ± 0.14. Breakdown by clin-ASD-FI score: 51.8% NF, 28.1% F, 20.2% SF. Increasing frailty severity was associated with longer LOS (NF: 7.0, F: 8.3, SF: 9.2 days; P < 0.001). Frailty independently predicted occurrence of any complication (OR: 9.357 [2.20-39.76], P = 0.002) and reop (OR: 2.79 [0.662-11.72], P = 0.162). CONCLUSIONS Utilizing an existing ASD frailty index, we proposed a modified version eliminating the patient-reported components. This index is a true assessment of physiologic status, and represents a superior risk factor assessment compared to other tools for both primary and revision spinal deformity surgery as a result of its immutability with surgery, lack of subjectivity, and ease of use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- Division of Spinal Surgery, Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, Orthopaedic Hospital - NYU School of Medicine, New York Spine Institute, 301 East 17th St, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
| | - Katherine E Pierce
- Division of Spinal Surgery, Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, Orthopaedic Hospital - NYU School of Medicine, New York Spine Institute, 301 East 17th St, New York, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Jamshaid M Mir
- Division of Spinal Surgery, Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, Orthopaedic Hospital - NYU School of Medicine, New York Spine Institute, 301 East 17th St, New York, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Oscar Krol
- Division of Spinal Surgery, Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, Orthopaedic Hospital - NYU School of Medicine, New York Spine Institute, 301 East 17th St, New York, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Breton Line
- Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Juan S Uribe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Richard Hostin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor Scoliosis Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Alan Daniels
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Robert Hart
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Douglas Burton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | | | - Frank Schwab
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bassel G Diebo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Christopher P Ames
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Center for Surgery and Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shay Bess
- Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Eric O Klineberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ani F, Sissman E, Woo D, Soroceanu A, Mundis G, Eastlack RK, Smith JS, Hamilton DK, Kim HJ, Daniels AH, Klineberg EO, Neuman B, Sciubba DM, Gupta MC, Kebaish KM, Passias PG, Hart RA, Bess S, Shaffrey CI, Schwab FJ, Lafage V, Ames CP, Protopsaltis TS. Are insufficient corrections a major factor in distal junctional kyphosis? A simulated analysis of cervical deformity correction using in-construct measurements. J Neurosurg Spine 2024; 40:622-629. [PMID: 38364226 DOI: 10.3171/2023.12.spine23481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The present study utilized recently developed in-construct measurements in simulations of cervical deformity surgery in order to assess undercorrection and predict distal junctional kyphosis (DJK). METHODS A retrospective review of a database of operative cervical deformity patients was analyzed for severe DJK and mild DJK. C2-lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) sagittal angle (SA) was measured postoperatively, and the correction was simulated in the preoperative radiograph in order to match the C2-LIV by using the planning software. Linear regression analysis that used C2 pelvic angle (CPA) and pelvic tilt (PT) determined the simulated PT that matched the virtual CPA. Linear regression analysis was used to determine the C2-T1 SA, C2-T4 SA, and C2-T10 SA that corresponded to DJK of 20° and cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) of 40 mm. RESULTS Sixty-nine cervical deformity patients were included. Severe and mild DJK occurred in 11 (16%) and 22 (32%) patients, respectively; 3 (4%) required DJK revision. Simulated corrections demonstrated that severe and mild DJK patients had worse alignment compared to non-DJK patients in terms of cSVA (42.5 mm vs 33.0 mm vs 23.4 mm, p < 0.001) and C2-LIV SVA (68.9 mm vs 57.3 mm vs 36.8 mm, p < 0.001). Linear regression revealed the relationships between in-construct measures (C2-T1 SA, C2-T4 SA, and C2-T10 SA), cSVA, and change in DJK (all R > 0.57, p < 0.001). A cSVA of 40 mm corresponded to C2-T4 SA of 10.4° and C2-T10 SA of 28.0°. A DJK angle change of 10° corresponded to C2-T4 SA of 5.8° and C2-T10 SA of 20.1°. CONCLUSIONS Simulated cervical deformity corrections demonstrated that severe DJK patients have insufficient corrections compared to patients without DJK. In-construct measures assess sagittal alignment within the fusion separate from DJK and subjacent compensation. They can be useful as intraoperative tools to gauge the adequacy of cervical deformity correction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fares Ani
- 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Ethan Sissman
- 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chaim Sheba Medical Center Hospital, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Dainn Woo
- 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Alex Soroceanu
- 4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Robert K Eastlack
- 6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Spine Center, La Jolla, California
| | - Justin S Smith
- 7Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - D Kojo Hamilton
- 8The Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Han Jo Kim
- 9Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Alan H Daniels
- 10Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | | | - Brian Neuman
- 12Department of Orthopaedics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Munish C Gupta
- 14Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Khaled M Kebaish
- 12Department of Orthopaedics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Peter G Passias
- 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York
| | - Robert A Hart
- 15Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Shay Bess
- 16Denver International Spine Center, Denver, Colorado
| | - Christopher I Shaffrey
- 17Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia; and
| | | | | | - Christopher P Ames
- 18Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tretiakov PS, Onafowokan OO, Mir JM, Lorentz N, Galetta M, Das A, Shin J, Sciubba D, Krol O, Joujon-Roche R, Williamson T, Imbo B, Yee T, Jankowski PP, Hockley A, Schoenfeld AJ, Passias PG. The Impact of Peri-operative Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols on Outcomes Following Adult Cervical Deformity Surgery. Global Spine J 2024:21925682241249105. [PMID: 38647538 DOI: 10.1177/21925682241249105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES To assess the impact of Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols on peri-operative course in adult cervical deformity (ACD) corrective surgery. METHODS Patients ≥18 yrs with complete pre-(BL) and up to 2-year (2Y) radiographic and clinical outcome data were stratified by enrollment in an ERAS protocol that commenced in 2020. Differences in demographics, clinical outcomes, radiographic alignment targets, peri-operative factors and complication rates were assessed via means comparison analysis. Logistic regression analysed differences while controlling for baseline disability and deformity. RESULTS We included 220 patients (average age 58.1 ± 11.9 years, 48% female). 20% were treated using the ERAS protocol (ERAS+). Disability was similar between both groups at baseline. When controlling for baseline disability and myelopathy, ERAS- patients were more likely to utilize opioids than ERAS+ (OR 1.79, 95% CI: 1.45-2.50, P = .016). Peri-operatively, ERAS+ had significantly lower operative time (P < .021), lower EBL (583.48 vs 246.51, P < .001), and required significantly lower doses of propofol intra-operatively than ERAS- patients (P = .020). ERAS+ patients also reported lower mean LOS overall (4.33 vs 5.84, P = .393), and were more likely to be discharged directly to home (χ2(1) = 4.974, P = .028). ERAS+ patients were less likely to require steroids after surgery (P = .045), were less likely to develop neuromuscular complications overall (P = .025), and less likely experience venous complications or be diagnosed with venous disease post-operatively (P = .025). CONCLUSIONS Enhanced recovery after surgery programs in ACD surgery demonstrate significant benefit in terms of peri-operative outcomes for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter S Tretiakov
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oluwatobi O Onafowokan
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jamshaid M Mir
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nathan Lorentz
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew Galetta
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ankita Das
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - John Shin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospitals, Boston MA, USA
| | - Daniel Sciubba
- Department of Neurosurgery, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oscar Krol
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachel Joujon-Roche
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tyler Williamson
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bailey Imbo
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Timothy Yee
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Pawel P Jankowski
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hoag Neurosciences Institute, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Aaron Hockley
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AL, Canada
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Peter G Passias
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Diebo BG, Alsoof D, Lafage R, Daher M, Balmaceno-Criss M, Passias PG, Ames CP, Shaffrey CI, Burton DC, Deviren V, Line BG, Soroceanu A, Hamilton DK, Klineberg EO, Mundis GM, Kim HJ, Gum JL, Smith JS, Uribe JS, Kebaish KM, Gupta MC, Nunley PD, Eastlack RK, Hostin R, Protopsaltis TS, Lenke LG, Hart RA, Schwab FJ, Bess S, Lafage V, Daniels AH. Impact of Self-Reported Loss of Balance and Gait Disturbance on Outcomes following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2202. [PMID: 38673475 PMCID: PMC11051140 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Revised: 04/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate if imbalance influences complication rates, radiological outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Methods: ASD patients with baseline and 2-year radiographic and PROMs were included. Patients were grouped according to whether they answered yes or no to a recent history of pre-operative loss of balance. The groups were propensity-matched by age, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), and surgical invasiveness score. Results: In total, 212 patients were examined (106 in each group). Patients with gait imbalance had worse baseline PROM measures, including Oswestry disability index (45.2 vs. 36.6), SF-36 mental component score (44 vs. 51.8), and SF-36 physical component score (p < 0.001 for all). After 2 years, patients with gait imbalance had less pelvic tilt correction (-1.2 vs. -3.6°, p = 0.039) for a comparable PI-LL correction (-11.9 vs. -15.1°, p = 0.144). Gait imbalance patients had higher rates of radiographic proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) (26.4% vs. 14.2%) and implant-related complications (47.2% vs. 34.0%). After controlling for age, baseline sagittal parameters, PI-LL correction, and comorbidities, patients with imbalance had 2.2-times-increased odds of PJK after 2 years. Conclusions: Patients with a self-reported loss of balance/unsteady gait have significantly worse PROMs and higher risk of PJK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bassel G. Diebo
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI 02914, USA; (B.G.D.); (D.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.-C.)
| | - Daniel Alsoof
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI 02914, USA; (B.G.D.); (D.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.-C.)
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Northwell, New York, NY 10075, USA; (R.L.); (F.J.S.); (V.L.)
| | - Mohammad Daher
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI 02914, USA; (B.G.D.); (D.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.-C.)
| | - Mariah Balmaceno-Criss
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI 02914, USA; (B.G.D.); (D.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.-C.)
| | - Peter G. Passias
- Department of Orthopedics, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY 10016, USA; (P.G.P.); (T.S.P.)
| | - Christopher P. Ames
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA; (C.P.A.); (V.D.)
| | | | - Douglas C. Burton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd., Kansas City, KS 66160, USA;
| | - Vedat Deviren
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA; (C.P.A.); (V.D.)
| | - Breton G. Line
- Denver International Spine Center, Denver, CO 80218, USA; (B.G.L.); (S.B.)
| | - Alex Soroceanu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada;
| | - David Kojo Hamilton
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA;
| | - Eric O. Klineberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, 1 Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616, USA;
| | | | - Han Jo Kim
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY 10021, USA;
| | | | - Justin S. Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22903, USA;
| | - Juan S. Uribe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USA;
| | - Khaled M. Kebaish
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA;
| | - Munish C. Gupta
- Department of Orthopedics, Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA;
| | | | | | - Richard Hostin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor Scoliosis Center, 4708 Alliance Blvd #800, Plano, TX 75093, USA;
| | | | - Lawrence G. Lenke
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, The Spine Hospital at New York Presbyterian, New York, NY 10032, USA;
| | | | - Frank J. Schwab
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Northwell, New York, NY 10075, USA; (R.L.); (F.J.S.); (V.L.)
| | - Shay Bess
- Denver International Spine Center, Denver, CO 80218, USA; (B.G.L.); (S.B.)
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Northwell, New York, NY 10075, USA; (R.L.); (F.J.S.); (V.L.)
| | - Alan H. Daniels
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI 02914, USA; (B.G.D.); (D.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.-C.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Passias PG, Onafowokan OO, Tretiakov P, Williamson T, Kummer N, Mir J, Das A, Krol O, Passfall L, Joujon-Roche R, Imbo B, Yee T, Sciubba D, Paulino CB, Schoenfeld AJ, Smith JS, Lafage R, Lafage V. Highest Achievable Outcomes for Adult Spinal Deformity Corrective Surgery: Does Frailty Severity Exert a Ceiling Effect? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024:00007632-990000000-00633. [PMID: 38595092 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective Single-Center Study. OBJECTIVE To assess the influence of frailty on optimal outcome following ASD corrective surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Frailty is a determining factor in outcomes after ASD surgery and may exert a ceiling effect on best possible outcome. METHODS ASD patients with frailty measures, baseline and 2-year ODI included. Frailty was classified as Not Frail (NF), Frail (F) and Severely Frail (SF) based on the modified Frailty Index, then stratified into quartiles based on 2-year ODI improvement (most improved designated "Highest"). Logistic regression analyzed relationships between frailty and ODI score and improvement, maintenance, or deterioration. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to analyze differences in time to complication or reoperation. RESULTS 393 ASD patients were isolated (55.2% NF, 31.0% F, and 13.7% SF), then classified as 12.5% NF-Highest, 17.8% F-Highest, and 3.1% SF-Highest. The SF-group had the highest rate of deterioration (16.7%, P=0.025) at the second postoperative year but the groups were similar in improvement (NF: 10.1%, F: 11.5%, SF: 9.3%, P=0.886). Improvement of SF patients was greatest at 6 months (ΔODI of -22.6±18.0, P<0.001) but NF and F patients reached maximal ODI at 2 years (ΔODI of -15.7±17.9 and -20.5±18.4, respectively). SF patients initially showed the greatest improvement in ODI (NF: -4.8±19.0, F: -12.4±19.3, SF: -22.6±18.0 at 6 months, P<0.001). A Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed a trend of less time to major complication or reoperation by 2 years with increasing frailty (NF: 7.5±0.381 years, F: 6.7±0.511 years, SF: 5.8±0.757 years; P=0.113). CONCLUSIONS Increasing frailty had a negative effect on maximal improvement, where severely frail patients exhibited a parabolic effect with greater initial improvement due to higher baseline disability, but reached a ceiling effect with less overall maximal improvement. Severe frailty may exert a ceiling effect on improvement and impair maintenance of improvement following surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oluwatobi O Onafowokan
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter Tretiakov
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tyler Williamson
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicholas Kummer
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jamshaid Mir
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ankita Das
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oscar Krol
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lara Passfall
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachel Joujon-Roche
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bailey Imbo
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Timothy Yee
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Sciubba
- Department of Neurosurgery, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carl B Paulino
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Downstate-University Hospital of Brooklyn, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Center for Surgery and Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Passias PG, Onafowokan OO, Tretiakov P, Dave P, Mir JM, Janjua MB. Current concepts in adult cervical spine deformity surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 2024; 40:439-452. [PMID: 38181500 DOI: 10.3171/2023.10.spine22878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
Cervical spine deformity surgery has significantly evolved over recent decades. There has been substantial work performed, which has furthered the true understanding of alignment and advancements in surgical technique and instrumentation. Concomitantly, understanding of cervical spine pathology and the contributing drivers have also improved, which have influenced the development of classification systems for cervical spine deformity and the development of treatment-guiding algorithms. This article aims to provide a synopsis of the current knowledge surrounding cervical spine deformity to date, with particular focus on preoperative expected alignment targets, perioperative optimization, and the whole operative strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- 1Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, Division of Spinal Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York; and
| | - Oluwatobi O Onafowokan
- 1Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, Division of Spinal Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York; and
| | - Peter Tretiakov
- 1Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, Division of Spinal Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York; and
| | - Pooja Dave
- 1Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, Division of Spinal Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York; and
| | - Jamshaid M Mir
- 1Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, Division of Spinal Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York; and
| | - Muhammad B Janjua
- 2Department of Neurotrauma, Neuro-oncology, and Spine, Mercy Health, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dave P, Lafage R, Smith JS, Line BG, Tretiakov PS, Mir J, Diebo B, Daniels AH, Gum JL, Hamilton DK, Buell T, Than KD, Fu KM, Scheer JK, Eastlack R, Mullin JP, Mundis G, Hosogane N, Yagi M, Nunley P, Chou D, Mummaneni PV, Klineberg EO, Kebaish KM, Lewis S, Hostin RA, Gupta MC, Kim HJ, Ames CP, Hart RA, Lenke LG, Shaffrey CI, Bess S, Schwab FJ, Lafage V, Burton DC, Passias PG. Predictors of pelvic tilt normalization: a multicenter study on the impact of regional and lower-extremity compensation on pelvic alignment after complex adult spinal deformity surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 2024; 40:505-512. [PMID: 38215449 DOI: 10.3171/2023.11.spine23766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective was to determine the degree of regional decompensation to pelvic tilt (PT) normalization after complex adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. METHODS Operative ASD patients with 1 year of PT measurements were included. Patients with normalized PT at baseline were excluded. Predicted PT was compared to actual PT, tested for change from baseline, and then compared against age-adjusted, Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab, and global alignment and proportion (GAP) scores. Lower-extremity (LE) parameters included the cranial-hip-sacrum angle, cranial-knee-sacrum angle, and cranial-ankle-sacrum angle. LE compensation was set as the 1-year upper tertile compared with intraoperative baseline. Univariate analyses were used to compare normalized and nonnormalized data against alignment outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to develop a model consisting of significant predictors for normalization related to regional compensation. RESULTS In total, 156 patients met the inclusion criteria (mean ± SD age 64.6 ± 9.1 years, BMI 27.9 ± 5.6 kg/m2, Charlson Comorbidity Index 1.9 ± 1.6). Patients with normalized PT were more likely to have overcorrected pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis and sagittal vertical axis at 6 weeks (p < 0.05). GAP score at 6 weeks was greater for patients with nonnormalized PT (0.6 vs 1.3, p = 0.08). At baseline, 58.5% of patients had compensation in the thoracic and cervical regions. Postoperatively, compensation was maintained by 42% with no change after matching in age-adjusted or GAP score. The patients with nonnormalized PT had increased rates of thoracic and cervical compensation (p < 0.05). Compensation in thoracic kyphosis differed between patients with normalized PT at 6 weeks and those with normalized PT at 1 year (69% vs 35%, p < 0.05). Those who compensated had increased rates of implant complications by 1 year (OR [95% CI] 2.08 [1.32-6.56], p < 0.05). Cervical compensation was maintained at 6 weeks and 1 year (56% vs 43%, p = 0.12), with no difference in implant complications (OR 1.31 [95% CI -2.34 to 1.03], p = 0.09). For the lower extremities at baseline, 61% were compensating. Matching age-adjusted alignment did not eliminate compensation at any joint (all p > 0.05). Patients with nonnormalized PT had higher rates of LE compensation across joints (all p < 0.01). Overall, patients with normalized PT at 1 year had the greatest odds of resolving LE compensation (OR 9.6, p < 0.001). Patients with normalized PT at 1 year had lower rates of implant failure (8.9% vs 19.5%, p < 0.05), rod breakage (1.3% vs 13.8%, p < 0.05), and pseudarthrosis (0% vs 4.6%, p < 0.05) compared with patients with nonnormalized PT. The complication rate was significantly lower for patients with normalized PT at 1 year (56.7% vs 66.1%, p = 0.02), despite comparable health-related quality of life scores. CONCLUSIONS Patients with PT normalization had greater rates of resolution in thoracic and LE compensation, leading to lower rates of complications by 1 year. Thus, consideration of both the lower extremities and thoracic regions in surgical planning is vital to preventing adverse outcomes and maintaining pelvic alignment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pooja Dave
- 1Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, Division of Spinal Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, New York
| | - Renaud Lafage
- 24Northwell Health, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Justin S Smith
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Breton G Line
- 4Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, Colorado
| | - Peter S Tretiakov
- 1Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, Division of Spinal Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, New York
| | - Jamshaid Mir
- 1Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, Division of Spinal Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, New York
| | - Bassel Diebo
- 5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Alan H Daniels
- 5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Jeffrey L Gum
- 6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - D Kojo Hamilton
- 7Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Thomas Buell
- 7Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Khoi D Than
- 8Departments of Neurosurgery and Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Division, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Kai-Ming Fu
- 9Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine Brain and Spine Center/NewYork-Presbyterian Lower Manhattan Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Justin K Scheer
- 10Department of Neurosurgery, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Robert Eastlack
- 11Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California
| | - Jeffrey P Mullin
- 12Department of Neurosurgery at University at Buffalo Medical School, Buffalo, New York
| | - Gregory Mundis
- 11Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California
| | - Naobumi Hosogane
- 13Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Yagi
- 14Department of Orthopedic surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjyuku, Tokyo, Japan
- 26Department of Orthopedic Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare School of Medicine, Chiba, Narita, Japan
| | - Pierce Nunley
- 15Spine Institute of Louisiana, Shreveport, Louisiana
| | - Dean Chou
- 10Department of Neurosurgery, Columbia University, New York, New York
| | - Praveen V Mummaneni
- 16Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Eric O Klineberg
- 17Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California
| | - Khaled M Kebaish
- 18Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Stephen Lewis
- 19Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Richard A Hostin
- 20Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor Scoliosis Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Munish C Gupta
- 21Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University of St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Han Jo Kim
- 2Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Christopher P Ames
- 16Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Robert A Hart
- 22Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Lawrence G Lenke
- 23Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
| | - Christopher I Shaffrey
- 8Departments of Neurosurgery and Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Division, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Shay Bess
- 4Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, Colorado
| | - Frank J Schwab
- 24Northwell Health, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Virginie Lafage
- 24Northwell Health, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Douglas C Burton
- 25Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Peter G Passias
- 1Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, Division of Spinal Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Williamson TK, Owusu-Sarpong S, Imbo B, Krol O, Tretiakov P, Joujon-Roche R, Ahmad S, Bennett-Caso C, Schoenfeld AJ, Lebovic J, Vira S, Diebo B, Lafage R, Lafage V, Passias PG. An Economic Analysis of Early and Late Complications After Adult Spinal Deformity Correction. Global Spine J 2024; 14:789-795. [PMID: 36134677 DOI: 10.1177/21925682221122762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE Adult spinal deformity (ASD) corrective surgery is often a highly invasive procedure portending patients to both immediate and long-term complications. Therefore, we sought to compare the economic impact of certain complications before and after 2 years. METHODS ASD patients with minimum 3-year data included. Complication groups were defined as follows: any complication, major, medical, mechanical, radiographic, and reoperation. Complications stratified by occurrence before or after 2 years postoperatively. Published methods converted ODI to SF-6D to QALYs. Cost was calculated using CMS.gov definitions. Marginalized means for utility gained and cost-per-QALY were calculated via ANCOVA controlling for significant confounders. RESULTS 244 patients included. Before 2Y, complication rates: 76% ≥1 complication, 18% major, 26% required reoperation. After 2Y, complication rates: 32% ≥1 complication, 4% major, 2.5% required reoperation. Major complications after 2 years had worse cost-utility (.320 vs .441, P = .1). Patients suffering mechanical complications accrued the highest overall cost ($130,482.22), followed by infection and PJF for complications before 2 years. Patients suffering a mechanical complication after 2 years had lower cost-utility ($109,197.71 vs $130,482.22, P = .041). Patients developing PJF after 2 years accrued a better cost-utility ($77,227.84 vs $96,873.57; P = .038), compared to PJF before 2 years. CONCLUSION Mechanical complications had the single greatest impact on cost-utility after adult spinal deformity surgery, but less so after 2 years. Understanding the cost-utility of specific interventions at certain timepoints may mitigate economic burden and prophylactic efforts should strategically be made against early mechanical complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler K Williamson
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Bailey Imbo
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oscar Krol
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter Tretiakov
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachel Joujon-Roche
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Salman Ahmad
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Claudia Bennett-Caso
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jordan Lebovic
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shaleen Vira
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Bassel Diebo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedics, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedics, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter G Passias
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Passias PG, Joujon-Roche R, Mir JM, Tretiakov P, Dave P, Williamson TK, Imbo B, Krol O, Schoenfeld AJ. Can Baseline Disability Predict Outcomes in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:398-404. [PMID: 37593949 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective Cohort Study. OBJECTIVE To assess if there is a threshold of baseline disability beyond which the patient-reported outcomes after surgical correction of adult spinal deformity (ASD) are adversely impacted. BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcomes vary after correction of adult spinal deformity, even when patients are optimally realigned. There is a paucity of literature examining the impact of baseline disability on patient-reported outcomes in ASD. METHODS Patients with baseline (BL) and two-year data were included. Disability was ranked according to BL Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) into quintiles: Q1 (lowest ODI score) to Q5 (highest ODI score). Adjusted logistic regression analyses evaluated the likelihood of reaching ≥1 MCID in Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Questionnaire (SRS-22) Pain, SRS-22 Activity, and Short Form-36 physical component summary at two years across disability groups Q1-Q4 with respect to Q5. Sensitivity tests were performed, excluding patients with any "0" Schwab modifiers at BL. RESULTS Compared with patients in Q5, the odds of reaching MCID in SRS-22 Pain at 2Y were significantly higher for those in Q1 (OR: 3.771), Q2 (OR: 3.006), and Q3 (OR: 2.897), all P <0.021. Similarly, compared with patients in Q5, the odds of reaching MCID in SRS-22 Activity at two years were significantly higher for those in Q2 (OR: 3.454) and Q3 (OR: 2.801), both P <0.02. Lastly, compared with patients in Q5, odds of reaching MCID in Short Form-36 physical component summary at two years were significantly higher for patients in Q1 (OR: 5.350), Q2 (OR: 4.795), and Q3 (OR: 6.229), all P <0.004. CONCLUSIONS This study found that patients presenting with moderate disability at BL (ODI<40) consistently surpassed health-related quality of life outcomes as compared with those presenting with greater levels of disability. We propose that a baseline ODI of 40 represents a disability threshold within which operative inte rvention maximizes patient-reported outcomes. Furthermore, delaying the intervention until patients progress to severe disability may limit the benefits of surgical correction in ASD patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- Department of Orthopaedics, NYU Langone Medical Center-Orthopaedic Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Rachel Joujon-Roche
- Department of Orthopaedics, NYU Langone Medical Center-Orthopaedic Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Jamshaid M Mir
- Department of Orthopaedics, NYU Langone Medical Center-Orthopaedic Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Peter Tretiakov
- Department of Orthopaedics, NYU Langone Medical Center-Orthopaedic Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Pooja Dave
- Department of Orthopaedics, NYU Langone Medical Center-Orthopaedic Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Tyler K Williamson
- Department of Orthopaedics, NYU Langone Medical Center-Orthopaedic Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Bailey Imbo
- Department of Orthopaedics, NYU Langone Medical Center-Orthopaedic Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Oscar Krol
- Department of Orthopaedics, NYU Langone Medical Center-Orthopaedic Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Passias PG, Williamson TK, Mir JM, Lebovic JA, Dave P, Tretiakov PS, Joujon-Roche R, Imbo B, Krol O, Owusu-Sarpong S, Vira S, Schoenfeld AJ, Daniels AH, Diebo BG, Lafage R, Lafage V. Comparison of multilevel low-grade techniques versus three-column osteotomies in adult spinal deformity surgery: does harmonious correction matter? J Neurosurg Spine 2024:1-7. [PMID: 38489818 DOI: 10.3171/2024.1.spine23802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Recent debate has arisen between whether to use a three-column osteotomy (3CO) or multilevel low-grade (MLG) techniques to treat severe sagittal malalignment in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. The goal of this study was to compare the outcomes of 3CO and MLG techniques performed in corrective surgeries for ASD. METHODS ASD patients who had a baseline PI-LL > 30° and 2-year follow-up data were included. Patients underwent either 3CO or MLG (thoracolumbar posterior column osteotomies at ≥ 3 levels or anterior lumbar interbody fusion at ≥ 3 levels with no 3CO). The segmental utility ratio was used to assess relative segmental correction (segmental correction divided by overall correction in lordosis divided by the number of thoracolumbar interventions [interbody fusion, thoracolumbar posterior column osteotomies, and 3CO]). The paired t-test was used to assess lordotic distribution by differences in lordosis between adjacent lumbar disc spaces (e.g., L1-2 to L2-3). Multivariate analysis, controlling for age, sex, BMI, osteoporosis, baseline pelvic incidence, and T1 pelvic angle, was used to evaluate the complication rates and radiographic and patient-reported outcomes between the groups. RESULTS A total of 93 patients were included, 53% of whom underwent MLG and 47% of whom underwent 3CO. The MLG group had a lower BMI (p < 0.05). MLG patients received fewer previous fusions than 3CO patients (31% vs 80%, p < 0.001). MLG patients had 24% less blood loss but a 22% longer operative time (565 vs 419 minutes, p = 0.008). Using adjusted analysis, the 3CO group had greater segmental and relative correction at each level (segmental utility ratio mean 69% for 3CO vs 23% for MLG, p < 0.001). However, the 3CO group had lordotic differences between two adjacent lumbar disc pairs (range -0.5° to 9.0°, p = 0.009), while MLG was more harmonious (range 2.2°-6.5°, p > 0.4). MLG patients were more likely to undergo realignment to age-adjusted standards (OR 5.6, 95% CI 1.2-46.4; p = 0.033). MLG patients were less likely to develop neurological complications or undergo reoperation (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.1-0.9; p = 0.041). Adjusted analysis revealed that MLG patients more often met a substantial clinical benefit in the Oswestry Disability Index score (OR 5.3, 95% CI 1.1-26.8; p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS MLG techniques showed better utility in lumbar distribution and age-adjusted global correction while minimizing neurological complications and reoperation rates by 2 years postoperatively. In selected instances, these techniques may offer the spine deformity surgeon a safer alternative when correcting severe adult spinal deformity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- 1Division of Spinal Surgery, Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, New York
| | - Tyler K Williamson
- 1Division of Spinal Surgery, Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, New York
- 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Health San Antonio, Texas
| | - Jamshaid M Mir
- 1Division of Spinal Surgery, Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, New York
| | - Jordan A Lebovic
- 3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Pooja Dave
- 1Division of Spinal Surgery, Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, New York
| | - Peter S Tretiakov
- 1Division of Spinal Surgery, Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, New York
| | - Rachel Joujon-Roche
- 1Division of Spinal Surgery, Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, New York
| | - Bailey Imbo
- 1Division of Spinal Surgery, Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, New York
| | - Oscar Krol
- 1Division of Spinal Surgery, Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, New York
| | | | - Shaleen Vira
- 4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Banner University/University of Arizona Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- 5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alan H Daniels
- 6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island; and
| | - Bassel G Diebo
- 6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island; and
| | - Renaud Lafage
- 7Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York
| | - Virginie Lafage
- 7Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Passias PG, Williamson TK, Joujon-Roche R, Krol O, Tretiakov P, Imbo B, Schoenfeld AJ, Owusu-Sarpong S, Lebovic J, Mir J, Dave P, McFarland K, Vira S, Diebo BG, Park P, Chou D, Smith JS, Lafage R, Lafage V. The Impact of Lumbopelvic Realignment Versus Prevention Strategies at the Upper-instrumented Vertebra on the Rates of Junctional Failure Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:E72-E78. [PMID: 37235802 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective. OBJECTIVE Evaluate the surgical technique that has the greatest influence on the rate of junctional failure following ASD surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Differing presentations of adult spinal deformity(ASD) may influence the extent of surgical intervention and the use of prophylaxis at the base or the summit of a fusion construct to influence junctional failure rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS ASD patients with two-year(2Y) data and at least 5-level fusion to the pelvis were included. Patients were divided based on UIV: [Longer Construct: T1-T4; Shorter Construct: T8-T12]. Parameters assessed included matching in age-adjusted PI-LL or PT, aligning in GAP-relative pelvic version or Lordosis Distribution Index. After assessing all lumbopelvic radiographic parameters, the combination of realigning the two parameters with the greatest minimizing effect of PJF constituted a good base. Good s was defined as having: (1) prophylaxis at UIV (tethers, hooks, cement), (2) no lordotic change(under-contouring) greater than 10° of the UIV, (3) preoperative UIV inclination angle<30°. Multivariable regression analysis assessed the effects of junction characteristics and radiographic correction individually and collectively on the development of PJK and PJF in differing construct lengths, adjusting for confounders. RESULTS In all, 261 patients were included. The cohort had lower odds of PJK(OR: 0.5,[0.2-0.9]; P =0.044) and PJF was less likely (OR: 0.1,[0.0-0.7]; P =0.014) in the presence of a good summit. Normalizing pelvic compensation had the greatest radiographic effect on preventing PJF overall (OR: 0.6,[0.3-1.0]; P =0.044). In shorter constructs, realignment had a greater effect on decreasing the odds of PJF(OR: 0.2,[0.02-0.9]; P =0.036). With longer constructs, a good summit lowered the likelihood of PJK(OR: 0.3,[0.1-0.9]; P =0.027). A good base led to zero occurrences of PJF. In patients with severe frailty/osteoporosis, a good summit lowered the incidence of PJK(OR: 0.4,[0.2-0.9]; P =0.041) and PJF (OR: 0.1,[0.01-0.99]; P =0.049). CONCLUSION To mitigate junctional failure, our study demonstrated the utility of individualizing surgical approaches to emphasize an optimal basal construct. Achievement of tailored goals at the cranial end of the surgical construct may be equally important, especially for higher-risk patients with longer fusions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- Division of Spinal Surgery,/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Tyler K Williamson
- Division of Spinal Surgery,/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Rachel Joujon-Roche
- Division of Spinal Surgery,/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Oscar Krol
- Division of Spinal Surgery,/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Peter Tretiakov
- Division of Spinal Surgery,/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Bailey Imbo
- Division of Spinal Surgery,/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Jordan Lebovic
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Jamshaid Mir
- Division of Spinal Surgery,/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Pooja Dave
- Division of Spinal Surgery,/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Kimberly McFarland
- Division of Spinal Surgery,/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Shaleen Vira
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Bassel G Diebo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Paul Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, Semmes-Murphey Clinic, Memphis, TN
| | - Dean Chou
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Passias PG, Mir JM, Dave P, Smith JS, Lafage R, Gum J, Line BG, Diebo B, Daniels AH, Hamilton DK, Buell TJ, Scheer JK, Eastlack RK, Mullin JP, Mundis GM, Hosogane N, Yagi M, Schoenfeld AJ, Uribe JS, Anand N, Mummaneni PV, Chou D, Klineberg EO, Kebaish KM, Lewis SJ, Gupta MC, Kim HJ, Hart RA, Lenke LG, Ames CP, Shaffrey CI, Schwab FJ, Lafage V, Hostin RA, Bess S, Burton DC. Factors Associated with the Maintenance of Cost-Effectiveness at 5 Years in Adult Spinal Deformity Corrective Surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024:00007632-990000000-00613. [PMID: 38462731 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE To evaluate factors associated with the long-term durability of cost-effectiveness (CE) in ASD patients. BACKGROUND A substantial increase in costs associated with the surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity (ASD) has given precedence to scrutinize the value and utility it provides. METHODS We included 327 operative ASD patients with 5-year (5 Y) follow-up. Published methods were used to determine costs based on CMS.gov definitions and were based on the average DRG reimbursement rates. Utility was calculated using quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) utilizing the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) converted to Short-Form Six-Dimension (SF-6D), with a 3% discount applied for its decline with life expectancy. The CE threshold of $150,000 was used for primary analysis. RESULTS Major and minor complication rates were 11% and 47% respectively, with 26% undergoing reoperation by 5 Y. The mean cost associated with surgery was $91,095±$47,003, with a utility gain of 0.091±0.086 at 1Y, QALY gained at 2 Y of 0.171±0.183, and at 5 Y of 0.42±0.43. The cost per QALY at 2 Y was $414,885, which decreased to $142,058 at 5 Y.With the threshold of $150,000 for CE, 19% met CE at 2 Y and 56% at 5 Y. In those in which revision was avoided, 87% met cumulative CE till life expectancy. Controlling analysis depicted higher baseline CCI and pelvic tilt (PT) to be the strongest predictors for not maintaining durable CE to 5 Y (CCI OR: 1.821 [1.159-2.862], P=0.009) (PT OR: 1.079 [1.007-1.155], P=0.030). CONCLUSIONS Most patients achieved cost-effectiveness after four years postoperatively, with 56% meeting at five years postoperatively. When revision was avoided, 87% of patients met cumulative cost-effectiveness till life expectancy. Mechanical complications were predictive of failure to achieve cost-effectiveness at 2 Y, while comorbidity burden and medical complications were at 5 Y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- Division of Spine Surgery, Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jamshaid M Mir
- Division of Spine Surgery, Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Pooja Dave
- Division of Spine Surgery, Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeffrey Gum
- Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Breton G Line
- Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Bassel Diebo
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Alan H Daniels
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - David Kojo Hamilton
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Thomas J Buell
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Justin K Scheer
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey P Mullin
- Department of Neurosurgery, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Gregory M Mundis
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Naobumi Hosogane
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Yagi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Chiba, Japan
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Juan S Uribe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Neel Anand
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Praveen V Mummaneni
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Dean Chou
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Eric O Klineberg
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Khaled M Kebaish
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Stephen J Lewis
- Division of Orthopedics, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Munish C Gupta
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Han Jo Kim
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert A Hart
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lawrence G Lenke
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Och Spine Hospital/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Christopher P Ames
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Christopher I Shaffrey
- Spine Division, Departments of Neurosurgery and Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Frank J Schwab
- Department of Orthopedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Richard A Hostin
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Southwest Scoliosis Institute, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Shay Bess
- Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Douglas C Burton
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Azad TD, Schwab FJ, Lafage V, Soroceanu A, Eastlack RK, Lafage R, Kebaish KM, Hart RA, Diebo B, Kelly MP, Smith JS, Daniels AH, Hamilton DK, Gupta M, Klineberg EO, Protopsaltis TS, Passias PG, Bess S, Gum JL, Hostin R, Lewis SJ, Shaffrey CI, Burton D, Lenke LG, Ames CP, Scheer JK. Stronger association of objective physical metrics with baseline patient-reported outcome measures than preoperative standing sagittal parameters for adult spinal deformity patients. J Neurosurg Spine 2024:1-8. [PMID: 38457811 DOI: 10.3171/2024.1.spine231030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Sagittal alignment measured on standing radiography remains a fundamental component of surgical planning for adult spinal deformity (ASD). However, the relationship between classic sagittal alignment parameters and objective metrics, such as walking time (WT) and grip strength (GS), remains unknown. The objective of this work was to determine if ASD patients with worse baseline sagittal malalignment have worse objective physical metrics and if those metrics have a stronger relationship to patient-reported outcome metrics (PROMs) than standing alignment. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective review of a multicenter ASD cohort. ASD patients underwent baseline testing with the timed up-and-go 6-m walk test (seconds) and for GS (pounds). Baseline PROMs were surveyed, including Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22r, and Veterans RAND 12 (VR-12) scores. Standard spinopelvic measurements were obtained (sagittal vertical axis [SVA], pelvic tilt [PT], and mismatch between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis [PI-LL], and SRS-Schwab ASD classification). Univariate and multivariable linear regression modeling was performed to interrogate associations between objective physical metrics, sagittal parameters, and PROMs. RESULTS In total, 494 patients were included, with mean ± SD age 61 ± 14 years, and 68% were female. Average WT was 11.2 ± 6.1 seconds and average GS was 56.6 ± 24.9 lbs. With increasing PT, PI-LL, and SVA quartiles, WT significantly increased (p < 0.05). SRS-Schwab type N patients demonstrated a significantly longer average WT (12.5 ± 6.2 seconds), and type T patients had a significantly shorter WT time (7.9 ± 2.7 seconds, p = 0.03). With increasing PT quartiles, GS significantly decreased (p < 0.05). SRS-Schwab type T patients had a significantly higher average GS (68.8 ± 27.8 lbs), and type L patients had a significantly lower average GS (51.6 ± 20.4 lbs, p = 0.03). In the frailty-adjusted multivariable linear regression analyses, WT was more strongly associated with PROMs than sagittal parameters. GS was more strongly associated with ODI and PROMIS Physical Function scores. CONCLUSIONS The authors observed that increasing baseline sagittal malalignment is associated with slower WT, and possibly weaker GS, in ASD patients. WT has a stronger relationship to PROMs than standing alignment parameters. Objective physical metrics likely offer added value to standard spinopelvic measurements in ASD evaluation and surgical planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tej D Azad
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Frank J Schwab
- 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lennox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Virginie Lafage
- 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lennox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Alex Soroceanu
- 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Robert K Eastlack
- 4Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, California
| | - Renaud Lafage
- 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lennox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Khaled M Kebaish
- 5Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Robert A Hart
- 6Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Bassel Diebo
- 7Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Michael P Kelly
- 8Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California
| | - Justin S Smith
- 9Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Alan H Daniels
- 7Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - D Kojo Hamilton
- 10Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Munish Gupta
- 11Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Eric O Klineberg
- 12Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Houston, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Peter G Passias
- 13Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York
| | - Shay Bess
- 14Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center, Denver, Colorado
| | | | - Richard Hostin
- 16Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Baylor Scoliosis Center, Plano, Texas
| | - Stephen J Lewis
- 17Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Toronto, and Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Douglas Burton
- 19Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Lawrence G Lenke
- 20Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York; and
| | - Christopher P Ames
- 21Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Justin K Scheer
- 21Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mullin JP, Soliman MAR, Smith JS, Kelly MP, Buell TJ, Diebo B, Scheer JK, Line B, Lafage V, Lafage R, Klineberg E, Kim HJ, Passias PG, Gum JL, Kebaish K, Eastlack RK, Daniels AH, Soroceanu A, Mundis G, Hostin R, Protopsaltis TS, Hamilton DK, Gupta MC, Lewis SJ, Schwab FJ, Lenke LG, Shaffrey CI, Bess S, Ames CP, Burton D. Analysis of tranexamic acid usage in adult spinal deformity patients with relative contraindications: does it increase the risk of complications? J Neurosurg Spine 2024:1-8. [PMID: 38457792 DOI: 10.3171/2024.1.spine231098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Complex spinal deformity surgeries may involve significant blood loss. The use of antifibrinolytic agents such as tranexamic acid (TXA) has been proven to reduce perioperative blood loss. However, for patients with a history of thromboembolic events, there is concern of increased risk when TXA is used during these surgeries. This study aimed to assess whether TXA use in patients undergoing complex spinal deformity correction surgeries increases the risk of thromboembolic complications based on preexisting thromboembolic risk factors. METHODS Data were analyzed for adult patients who received TXA during surgical correction for spinal deformity at 21 North American centers between August 2018 and October 2022. Patients with preexisting thromboembolic events and other risk factors (history of deep venous thrombosis [DVT], pulmonary embolism [PE], myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, peripheral vascular disease, or cancer) were identified. Thromboembolic complication rates were assessed during the postoperative 90 days. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess thromboembolic outcomes in high-risk and low-risk patients who received intravenous TXA. RESULTS Among 411 consecutive patients who underwent complex spinal deformity surgery and received TXA intraoperatively, 130 (31.6%) were considered high-risk patients. There was no significant difference in thromboembolic complications between patients with and those without preexisting thromboembolic risk factors in univariate analysis (high-risk group vs low-risk group: 8.5% vs 2.8%, p = 0.45). Specifically, there were no significant differences between groups regarding the 90-day postoperative rates of DVT (high-risk group vs low-risk group: 1.5% vs 1.4%, p = 0.98), PE (2.3% vs 1.8%, p = 0.71), acute MI (1.5% vs 0%, p = 0.19), or stroke (0.8% vs 1.1%, p > 0.99). On multivariate analysis, high-risk status was not a significant independent predictor for any of the thromboembolic complications. CONCLUSIONS Administration of intravenous TXA during the correction procedure did not change rates of thromboembolic events, acute MI, or stroke in this cohort of adult spinal deformity surgery patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey P Mullin
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Buffalo General Medical Center, Kaleida Health, Buffalo, New York
| | - Mohamed A R Soliman
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Justin S Smith
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Michael P Kelly
- 5Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California
| | - Thomas J Buell
- 6Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Bassel Diebo
- 7Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Justin K Scheer
- 8Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Breton Line
- 9Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center, Denver, Colorado
| | - Virginie Lafage
- 10Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lennox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Renaud Lafage
- 10Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lennox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Eric Klineberg
- 11Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Han Jo Kim
- 12Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Peter G Passias
- 13Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, New York
| | | | - Khaled Kebaish
- 15Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Robert K Eastlack
- 16Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, California
| | - Alan H Daniels
- 7Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Alex Soroceanu
- 17Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Gregory Mundis
- 16Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, California
| | - Richard Hostin
- 18Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor Scoliosis Center, Plano, Texas
| | | | - D Kojo Hamilton
- 6Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Munish C Gupta
- 19Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Stephen J Lewis
- 20Department of Surgery, Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Toronto and Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Frank J Schwab
- 10Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lennox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Lawrence G Lenke
- 21Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Christopher I Shaffrey
- 22Departments of Neurosurgery and Orthopedic Surgery, Spine Division, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina; and
| | - Shay Bess
- 9Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center, Denver, Colorado
| | - Christopher P Ames
- 8Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Douglas Burton
- 23Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Daniels AH, Daher M, Singh M, Balmaceno-Criss M, Lafage R, Diebo BG, Hamilton DK, Smith JS, Eastlack RK, Fessler RG, Gum JL, Gupta MC, Hostin R, Kebaish KM, Klineberg EO, Lewis SJ, Line BG, Nunley PD, Mundis GM, Passias PG, Protopsaltis TS, Buell T, Scheer JK, Mullin JP, Soroceanu A, Ames CP, Lenke LG, Bess S, Shaffrey CI, Burton DC, Lafage V, Schwab FJ. The Case for Operative Efficiency in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Impact of Operative Time on Complications, Length of Stay, Alignment, Fusion Rates, and Patient-Reported Outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:313-320. [PMID: 37942794 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE To analyze the impact of operative room (OR) time in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery on patient outcomes. BACKGROUND It is currently unknown if OR time in ASD patients matched for deformity severity and surgical invasiveness is associated with patient outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS ASD patients with baseline and two-year postoperative radiographic and patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) data, undergoing a posterior-only approach for long fusion (>L1-Ilium) were included. Patients were grouped into short OR time (<40th percentile: <359 min) and long OR time (>60th percentile: >421 min). Groups were matched by age, baseline deformity severity, and surgical invasiveness. Demographics, radiographic, PROM data, fusion rate, and complications were compared between groups at baseline and two years follow-up. RESULTS In total, 270 patients were included for analysis: the mean OR time was 286 minutes in the short OR group versus 510 minutes in the long OR group ( P <0.001). Age, gender, percent of revision cases, surgical invasiveness, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertical axis, and pelvic tilt were comparable between groups ( P >0.05). Short OR had a slightly lower body mass index than the short OR group ( P <0.001) and decompression was more prevalent in the long OR time ( P =0.042). Patients in the long group had greater hospital length of stay ( P =0.02); blood loss ( P <0.001); proportion requiring intensive care unit ( P =0.003); higher minor complication rate ( P =0.001); with no significant differences for major complications or revision procedures ( P >0.5). Both groups had comparable radiographic fusion rates ( P =0.152) and achieved improvement in sagittal alignment measures, Oswestry disability index, and Short Form-36 ( P <0.001). CONCLUSION Shorter OR time for ASD correction is associated with a lower minor complication rate, a lower estimated blood loss, fewer intensive care unit admissions, and a shorter hospital length of stay without sacrificing alignment correction or PROMs. Maximizing operative efficiency by minimizing OR time in ASD surgery has the potential to benefit patients, surgeons, and hospital systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan H Daniels
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI
| | - Mohammad Daher
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI
| | - Manjot Singh
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI
| | - Mariah Balmaceno-Criss
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Northwell, New York, NY
| | - Bassel G Diebo
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, East Providence, RI
| | - David K Hamilton
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Justin S Smith
- University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA
| | | | - Richard G Fessler
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Rush University Medical School, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | - Richard Hostin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor Scoliosis Center, Plano, TX
| | | | - Eric O Klineberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, CA
| | - Stephen J Lewis
- Division of Orthopaedics, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Peter G Passias
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY
| | | | - Thomas Buell
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Justin K Scheer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Alex Soroceanu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | | | - Lawrence G Lenke
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, The Spine Hospital at New York Presbyterian, New York, NY
| | - Shay Bess
- Denver International Spine Center, Denver, CO
| | | | - Douglas C Burton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
| | | | - Frank J Schwab
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Northwell, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Chen AL, Sagoo NS, Vannabouathong C, Reddy Y, Deme S, Patibandla S, Passias PG, Vira S. Combination radiofrequency ablation and vertebral cement augmentation for spinal metastatic tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and treatment outcomes. N Am Spine Soc J 2024; 17:100317. [PMID: 38510810 PMCID: PMC10950794 DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
Background The treatment of spine metastases continues to pose a significant clinical challenge, requiring the integration of multiple therapeutic modalities to address the multifactorial aspects of this disease process. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and vertebral cement augmentation (VCA) are 2 less invasive modalities compared to open surgery that have emerged as promising strategies, offering the potential for both pain relief and preservation of vertebral stability. The utility of these approaches, however, remains uncertain and subject to ongoing investigation.This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the available evidence and synthesize the results of studies that have investigated the combination of RFA and VCA for the treatment of spinal metastases, with the goal of providing a comprehensive and up-to-date assessment of the efficacy and safety of this therapeutic approach. Methods A literature search was conducted using the electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Scopus from their inception to May 4th, 2022 in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: 1) spine metastases treated with RFA in combination with VCA, 2) available data on at least one outcome (i.e., pain palliation, complications, local tumor control), 3) prospective or retrospective studies with at least 10 patients, and 4) English language. Meta-analyses were conducted in R (R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria), using the meta package. Results In the 25 included studies, a total of 947 patients (females=53.9%) underwent RFA + VCA for spinal metastatic tumors. Out of 1,163 metastatic lesions, the majority were located in the lumbar region (585/1,163 [50.3%]) followed by thoracic (519/1,163 [44.6%]), sacrum (39/1,163 [3.4%]), and cervical (2/1,163 [0.2%]). 48/72 [66.7%] metastatic lesions expanded into the posterior elements. Preoperative pathologic vertebral fractures were identified in 115/176 [65.3%] patients. Between pre-procedure pain scores and postprocedure pain scores, average follow-up (FU) was 4.41±2.87 months. Pain scores improved significantly at a short-term FU (1-6 months), with a pooled mean difference (MD) from baseline of 4.82 (95% CI, 4.48-5.16). The overall local tumor progression (LTP) rate at short-term FU (1-6 months) was 5% (95% CI, 1%-8%), at mid-term FU (6-12 months) was 22% (95% CI, 0%-48%), and at long-term FU (>12 months) was 5% (95% CI, 0%-11%). The pooled incidence of total complications was 1% (95% CI, 0%-1%), the most frequent of which were transient radicular pain and asymptomatic cement extravasation. Conclusions The findings of this meta-analysis reveal that the implementation of RFA in conjunction with VCA for the treatment of spinal metastatic tumors resulted in a significant short-term reduction of pain, with minimal total complications. The LTP rate was additionally low. The clinical efficacy and safety of this technique are established, although further exploration of the long-term outcomes of RFA+VCA is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew L. Chen
- Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine, 3601 4th St, Lubbock, TX, United States
| | - Navraj S. Sagoo
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, United States
| | - Christopher Vannabouathong
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, United States
| | - Yashas Reddy
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut St #100, Philadelphia, PA 19107, United States
| | - Sathvik Deme
- Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center School of Medicine, 3601 4th St, Lubbock, TX, United States
| | - Sahiti Patibandla
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, United States
| | - Peter G. Passias
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, 301 E 17th St, New York, NY 10010, United States
| | - Shaleen Vira
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine – Phoenix, 475 N 5th St, Phoenix, AZ 85004, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Passias PG, Tretiakov PS, Das A, Thomas Z, Krol O, Joujon-Roche R, Williamson T, Imbo B, Owusu-Sarpong S, Lebovic J, Diebo B, Vira S, Lafage V, Schoenfeld AJ. Outcomes and survival analysis of adult cervical deformity patients with 10-year follow-up. Spine J 2024; 24:488-495. [PMID: 37918570 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have demonstrated that adult cervical deformity patients may be at increased risk of death in conjunction with increased frailty or a weakened physiologic state. However, such studies have often been limited by follow-up duration, and longer-term studies are needed to better assess temporal changes in ACD patients and associated mortality risk. PURPOSE To assess if patients with decreased comorbidities and physiologic burden will be at lessened risk of death for a greater length of time after undergoing adult cervical deformity surgery. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective review. PATIENT SAMPLE Two hundred ninety ACD patients. OUTCOME MEASURES Morbidity and mortality data. METHODS Operative ACD patients ≥18 years with pre-(BL) and 10-year (10Y) data were included. Patients were stratified as expired versus living, as well as temporally grouped by Expiration prior to 5Y or between 5Y and 10Y. Group differences were assessed via means comparison analysis. Backstep logistic regression identified mortality predictors. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed survivorship of expired patients. Log rank analysis determined differences in survival distribution groups. RESULTS Sixty-six total patients were included (60.97±10.19 years, 48% female, 28.03±7.28 kg/m2). Within 10Y, 12 (18.2% of ACD cohort) expired. At baseline, patients were comparable in age, gender, BMI, and CCI total on average (all p>.05). Furthermore, patients were comparable in BL HRQLs (all p>.05). However, patients who expired between 5Y and 10Y demonstrated higher BL EQ5D and mJOA scores than their earlier expired counterparts at 2Y (p<.021). Furthermore, patients who presented with no CCI markers at BL were significantly more likely to survive until the 5Y-10Y follow-up window. Surgically, the only differences observed between patients who survived until 5Y was in undergoing osteotomy, with longer survival seen in those who did not require it (p=.003). Logistic regression revealed independent predictors of death prior to 5Y to be increased BMI, increased frailty, and increased levels fused (model p<.001). KM analysis found that by Passias et al frailty, not frail patients had mean survival time of 170.56 weeks, versus 158.00 in frail patients (p=.949). CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates that long-term survival after cervical deformity surgery may be predicted by baseline surgical factors. By optimizing BMI, frailty status, and minimizing fusion length when appropriate, surgeons may be able to further assist ACD patients in increasing their survivability postoperatively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, 301 East 17th St, New York, NY 10003, USA.
| | - Peter S Tretiakov
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, 301 East 17th St, New York, NY 10003, USA
| | - Ankita Das
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, 301 East 17th St, New York, NY 10003, USA
| | - Zach Thomas
- New York Medical College, Westchester Medical Center, 40 Sunshine Cottage Road, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
| | - Oscar Krol
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, 301 East 17th St, New York, NY 10003, USA
| | - Rachel Joujon-Roche
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, 301 East 17th St, New York, NY 10003, USA
| | - Tyler Williamson
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, 301 East 17th St, New York, NY 10003, USA
| | - Bailey Imbo
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, 301 East 17th St, New York, NY 10003, USA
| | - Stephane Owusu-Sarpong
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, 301 East 17th St, New York, NY 10003, USA
| | - Jordan Lebovic
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, 301 East 17th St, New York, NY 10003, USA
| | - Bassel Diebo
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, 222 Richmond St, Providence, RI 02903, USA
| | - Shaleen Vira
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, Department of Orthopaedics, 130 E 77th St 7th Floor, New York, NY 10075, USA
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Center for Surgery and Public Health, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lafage R, Bass RD, Klineberg E, Smith JS, Bess S, Shaffrey C, Burton DC, Kim HJ, Eastlack R, Mundis G, Ames CP, Passias PG, Gupta M, Hostin R, Hamilton K, Schwab F, Lafage V. Complication Rates Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Evaluation of the Category of Complication and Chronology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024:00007632-990000000-00600. [PMID: 38375636 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Provide benchmarks for the rates of complications by type and timing. STUDY DESIGN Prospective multicenter database. BACKGROUND Complication rates following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery have been previously reported. However, the interplay between timing and complication type warrants further analysis. METHODS The data for this study were sourced from a prospective, multicenter ASD database. Date and type of complication were collected and classified into three severity groups (minor, major, major leading to reoperation). Only complications occurring before the 2-year visit were retained for analysis. RESULTS Of the 1260 patients eligible for 2-year follow-up, 997 (79.1%) achieved 2-year follow-up. The overall complication rate was 67.4% (N=672). 247 patients (24.8%) experienced at least one complication on the day of surgery (including intra-operatively), 359 (36.0%) between post-op day 1 and 6 weeks post-op, 271 (27.2%) between 6 weeks and 1 one -year post-op, and finally 162 (16.3%) between 1 year and 2 years post-op. Using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the rate of remaining complication-free was estimated at different time points for different severities and types of complications. Stratification by type of complication demonstrated that most of the medical complications occurred within the first 60 days. Surgical complications presented over two distinct timeframes. Operative complications, incision-related complications, and infections occurred early (within 60 d), while implant-related and radiographic complications occurred at a constant rate over the 2-year follow-up period. Neurologic complications had the highest occurrence within the first 60 days but continued to increase up to the 2-year visit. CONCLUSION Only one-third of ASD patients remained complication-free by 2 years, and 2 out of 10 patients had a complication requiring a reoperation or revision. Estimation of timing and type of complication associated with surgical treatment may prove useful for more meaningful patient counseling and aid in assessing the cost-effectiveness of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY
| | - R Daniel Bass
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Eric Klineberg
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA
| | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Shay Bess
- Denver International Spine Center, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO
| | | | - Douglas C Burton
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
| | - Han Jo Kim
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Robert Eastlack
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic Torrey Pines, La Jolla, CA
| | - Gregory Mundis
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic Torrey Pines, La Jolla, CA
| | - Christopher P Ames
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA
| | - Peter G Passias
- Departments of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone, New York, NY
| | - Munish Gupta
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, MO
| | | | - Kojo Hamilton
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Frank Schwab
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Joujon-Roche R, Dave P, Tretiakov P, Mcfarland K, Mir J, Williamson TK, Imbo B, Krol O, Lebovic J, Schoenfeld AJ, Vira S, Lafage R, Lafage V, Passias PG. Costs of Surgery in Adult Spinal Deformity: Do Higher Cost Surgeries Lead to Better Outcomes? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:255-260. [PMID: 37163657 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective study. OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of surgical costs on patient-reported outcomes in adult spinal deformity (ASD). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA With increased focus on delivering cost-effective health care, interventions with high-resource utilization, such as ASD surgery, have received greater scrutiny. MATERIALS AND METHODS ASD patients aged 18 years and older with BL and 2-year data were included. Surgical costs were calculated using the 2021 average Medicare reimbursement by Current Procedural Terminology code. Costs of complications and reoperations were intentionally excluded. Patients were ranked into tertiles by surgical cost: highest surgical costs (HC) and lowest surgical costs (LC). They were propensity score matched to account for differences in baseline age and deformity. Bivariate logistic regressions assessed odds of achieving outcomes. RESULTS Four hundred twenty-one patients met inclusion (60.7 yr, 81.8% female, Charlson Comorbidity Index: 1.6, 27.1 kg/m 2 ), 139 LC and 127 HC patients. After propensity score matching, 102 patients remained in each cost group with an average reimbursement of LC: $12,494 versus HC: $29,248. Matched cohorts had similar demographics and baseline health-related quality of life. Matched groups had similar baseline sagittal vertical axis (HC: 59.0 vs. LC: 56.7 mm), pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis (HC: 13.1 vs. LC: 13.4°), and pelvic tilt (HC: 25.3 vs. LC: 22.4°). Rates of complications were not significantly different between the cost groups. Compared with the LC group, by 2 years, HC patients had higher odds of reaching substantial clinical benefit in Oswestry Disability Index [odds ratio (OR): 2.356 (1.220, 4.551), P =0.011], in Scoliosis Research Society-Total [OR: 2.988 (1.515, 5.895), P =0.002], and in Numerical Rating Scale Back [OR: 2.739 (1.105, 6.788), P =0.030]. Similar findings were appreciated for HC patients in the setting of Schwab deformity outcome criteria. CONCLUSIONS Although added cost did not guarantee an ideal outcome, HC patients experienced superior patient-reported outcomes compared with LC patients. Although cost efficiency remains an important priority for health policy, isolating cost reduction may compromise outcomes and add to future costs of reintervention, particularly with more severe baseline deformity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Joujon-Roche
- Department of Orthopaedics, NYU Langone Medical Center-Orthopaedic Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Pooja Dave
- Department of Orthopaedics, NYU Langone Medical Center-Orthopaedic Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Peter Tretiakov
- Department of Orthopaedics, NYU Langone Medical Center-Orthopaedic Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Kimberly Mcfarland
- Department of Orthopaedics, NYU Langone Medical Center-Orthopaedic Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Jamshaid Mir
- Department of Orthopaedics, NYU Langone Medical Center-Orthopaedic Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Tyler K Williamson
- Department of Orthopaedics, NYU Langone Medical Center-Orthopaedic Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Bailey Imbo
- Department of Orthopaedics, NYU Langone Medical Center-Orthopaedic Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Oscar Krol
- Department of Orthopaedics, NYU Langone Medical Center-Orthopaedic Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Jordan Lebovic
- Department of Orthopaedics, NYU Langone Medical Center-Orthopaedic Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Shaleen Vira
- Department of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital of Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Peter G Passias
- Department of Orthopaedics, NYU Langone Medical Center-Orthopaedic Hospital, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Williamson TK, Dave P, Mir JM, Smith JS, Lafage R, Line B, Diebo BG, Daniels AH, Gum JL, Protopsaltis TS, Hamilton DK, Soroceanu A, Scheer JK, Eastlack R, Kelly MP, Nunley P, Kebaish KM, Lewis S, Lenke LG, Hostin RA, Gupta MC, Kim HJ, Ames CP, Hart RA, Burton DC, Shaffrey CI, Klineberg EO, Schwab FJ, Lafage V, Chou D, Fu KM, Bess S, Passias PG. Persistent Lower Extremity Compensation for Sagittal Imbalance After Surgical Correction of Complex Adult Spinal Deformity: A Radiographic Analysis of Early Impact. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2024; 26:156-164. [PMID: 38227826 DOI: 10.1227/ons.0000000000000901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Achieving spinopelvic realignment during adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery does not always produce ideal outcomes. Little is known whether compensation in lower extremities (LEs) plays a role in this disassociation. The objective is to analyze lower extremity compensation after complex ASD surgery, its effect on outcomes, and whether correction can alleviate these mechanisms. METHODS We included patients with complex ASD with 6-week data. LE parameters were as follows: sacrofemoral angle, knee flexion angle, and ankle flexion angle. Each parameter was ranked, and upper tertile was deemed compensation. Patients compensating and not compensating postoperatively were propensity score matched for body mass index, frailty, and T1 pelvic angle. Linear regression assessed correlation between LE parameters and baseline deformity, demographics, and surgical details. Multivariate analysis controlling for baseline deformity and history of total knee/hip arthroplasty evaluated outcomes. RESULTS Two hundred and ten patients (age: 61.3 ± 14.1 years, body mass index: 27.4 ± 5.8 kg/m2, Charlson Comorbidity Index: 1.1 ± 1.6, 72% female, 22% previous total joint arthroplasty, 24% osteoporosis, levels fused: 13.1 ± 3.8) were included. At baseline, 59% were compensating in LE: 32% at hips, 39% knees, and 36% ankles. After correction, 61% were compensating at least one joint. Patients undercorrected postoperatively were less likely to relieve LE compensation (odds ratio: 0.2, P = .037). Patients compensating in LE were more often undercorrected in age-adjusted pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis, and T1 pelvic angle and disproportioned in Global Alignment and Proportion (P < .05). Patients matched in sagittal age-adjusted score at 6 weeks but compensating in LE were more likely to develop proximal junctional kyphosis (odds ratio: 4.1, P = .009) and proximal junctional failure (8% vs 0%, P = .035) than those sagittal age-adjusted score-matched and not compensating in LE. CONCLUSION Perioperative lower extremity compensation was a product of undercorrecting complex ASD. Even in age-adjusted realignment, compensation was associated with global undercorrection and junctional failure. Consideration of lower extremities during planning is vital to avoid adverse outcomes in perioperative course after complex ASD surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler K Williamson
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopaedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Pooja Dave
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopaedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jamshaid M Mir
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopaedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Breton Line
- Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Bassel G Diebo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Alan H Daniels
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Gum
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | | | - D Kojo Hamilton
- Departments of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alex Soroceanu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Justin K Scheer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Robert Eastlack
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Michael P Kelly
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Pierce Nunley
- Spine Institute of Louisiana, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
| | - Khaled M Kebaish
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Stephen Lewis
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lawrence G Lenke
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| | - Richard A Hostin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor Scoliosis Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Munish C Gupta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University of St Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Han Jo Kim
- Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Christopher P Ames
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Robert A Hart
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Douglas C Burton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Christopher I Shaffrey
- Spine Division, Departments of Neurosurgery and Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Eric O Klineberg
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California, USA
| | - Frank J Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dean Chou
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Kai-Ming Fu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine Brain and Spine Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shay Bess
- Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Peter G Passias
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopaedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
- Rocky Mountain Scoliosis and Spine, Denver, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Passias PG, Williamson TK, Krol O, Joujon-Roche R, Imbo B, Tretiakov P, Ahmad S, Bennett-Caso C, Lebovic J, Owusu-Sarpong S, Park P, Chou D, Vira S, Diebo BG, Schoenfeld AJ. Patient-Centered Outcomes Following Prone Lateral Single-Position Approach to Same-Day Circumferential Spine Surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:174-180. [PMID: 36972128 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE Evaluate surgical characteristics and postoperative 2-year results of the PL approach to spinal fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Prone-lateral(PL) single positioning has recently gained popularity in spine surgery due to lower blood loss and operative time but has yet to be examined for other notable outcomes, including realignment and patient-reported measures. MATERIALS AND METHODS We included circumferential spine fusion patients with a minimum one-year follow-up. Patients were stratified into groups based on undergoing PL approach versus same-day staged (Staged). Mean comparison tests identified differences in baseline parameters. Multivariable logistic regression, controlling for age, levels fused, and Charlson Comorbidity Index were used to determine the influence of the approach on complication rates, radiographic and patient-reported outcomes up to two years. RESULTS One hundred twenty-two patients were included of which 72(59%) were same-day staged and 50(41%) were PL. PL patients were older with lower body mass index (both P <0.05). Patients undergoing PL procedures had lower estimated blood loss and operative time (both P <0.001), along with fewer osteotomies (63% vs. 91%, P <0.001). This translated to a shorter length of stay (3.8 d vs. 4.9, P =0.041). PL procedures demonstrated better correction in both PT (4.0 vs. -0.2, P =0.033 and pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis (-3.7 vs. 3.1, P =0.012). PL procedures were more likely to improve in GAP relative pelvic version (OR: 2.3, [1.5-8.8]; P =0.003]. PL patients suffered lesser complications during the perioperative period and greater improvement in NRS-Back (-6.0 vs. -3.3, P =0.031), with less reoperations (0.0% vs. 4.8%, P =0.040) by two years. CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing PL single-position procedures received less invasive procedures with better correction of pelvic compensation, as well as earlier discharge. The prone lateral cohort also demonstrated greater clinical improvement and a lower rate of reoperations by two years following spinal corrective surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level-III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Tyler K Williamson
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Oscar Krol
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Rachel Joujon-Roche
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Bailey Imbo
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Peter Tretiakov
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Salman Ahmad
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Claudia Bennett-Caso
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Jordan Lebovic
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Stephane Owusu-Sarpong
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Paul Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Dean Chou
- Department of Neurosurgery, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Shaleen Vira
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Bassel G Diebo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hamouda WO, Veranis S, Krol O, Sagoo NS, Passias PG, Buser Z, Meisel HJ, Yoon T. Dosing Strategy for Osteobiologics Used in ACDF Surgery: Influence on Fusion Rates and Associated Complications. A Systematic Literature Review. Global Spine J 2024; 14:129S-140S. [PMID: 38421331 PMCID: PMC10913908 DOI: 10.1177/21925682231195766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Systematic review. OBJECTIVE To assess the available evidence related to dose-dependent effectiveness (i.e., bone fusion) and morbidity of osteobiologics used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS Studies with more than 9 adult patients with degenerated/herniated cervical discs operated for one-to four-levels ACDF reporting used osteobiologics doses, fusion rates at six months or later, and related comorbidities were included. PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials, and Cochrane were searched through September 2021. Data extracted in spread sheet and risk of bias assessed using MINORS and Rob-2. RESULTS Sixteen studies were selected and sub-grouped into BMP and non-BMP osteobiologics. For the 10 BMP studies, doses varied from 0.26 to 2.1 mg in 649 patients with fusion rates of 95.3 to 100% at 12 months. For other osteobiologics, each of six studies reported one type of osteobiologic in certain dose/concentration/volume in a total of 580 patients with fusion rates of 6.8 to 96.9% at 12 months. Risk of bias was low in three of the 13 non-randomized (18.75%) and in all the three randomized studies (100%). CONCLUSIONS Taking into account the inconsistent reporting within available literature, for BMP usage in ACDF, doses lower than 0.7 mg per level can achieve equal successful fusion rates as higher doses, and there is no complication-free dose proved yet. It seems that the lower the dose the lower the incidence of serious complications. As for non-BMP osteobiologics the studies are very limited for each osteobiologic and thus conclusions must be drawn individually and with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waeel O Hamouda
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kasr Alainy Faculty of Medicine, Research, and Teaching Hospitals, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
- Neurological & Spinal surgery service, Security Forces Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Oscar Krol
- Spine Research Institute, Department of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Peter G Passias
- Division of Spinal Surgery/ Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zorica Buser
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Director of Regenerative Medicine (Spine Restoration), Gerling Institute Formerly SpineCare, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hans Jörg Meisel
- Department of Neurosurgery, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle, Halle, Germany
| | - Tim Yoon
- Department of Orthopaedics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Passias PG, Pierce KE, Williamson TK, Lebovic J, Schoenfeld AJ, Lafage R, Lafage V, Gum JL, Eastlack R, Kim HJ, Klineberg EO, Daniels AH, Protopsaltis TS, Mundis GM, Scheer JK, Park P, Chou D, Line B, Hart RA, Burton DC, Bess S, Schwab FJ, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Ames CP. Patient-specific Cervical Deformity Corrections With Consideration of Associated Risk: Establishment of Risk Benefit Thresholds for Invasiveness Based on Deformity and Frailty Severity. Clin Spine Surg 2024; 37:E43-E51. [PMID: 37798829 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING This was a retrospective cohort study. BACKGROUND Little is known of the intersection between surgical invasiveness, cervical deformity (CD) severity, and frailty. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of CD surgery by invasiveness, frailty status, and baseline magnitude of deformity. METHODS This study included CD patients with 1-year follow-up. Patients stratified in high deformity if severe in the following criteria: T1 slope minus cervical lordosis, McGregor's slope, C2-C7, C2-T3, and C2 slope. Frailty scores categorized patients into not frail and frail. Patients are categorized by frailty and deformity (not frail/low deformity; not frail/high deformity; frail/low deformity; frail/high deformity). Logistic regression assessed increasing invasiveness and outcomes [distal junctional failure (DJF), reoperation]. Within frailty/deformity groups, decision tree analysis assessed thresholds for an invasiveness cutoff above which experiencing a reoperation, DJF or not achieving Good Clinical Outcome was more likely. RESULTS A total of 115 patients were included. Frailty/deformity groups: 27% not frail/low deformity, 27% not frail/high deformity, 23.5% frail/low deformity, and 22.5% frail/high deformity. Logistic regression analysis found increasing invasiveness and occurrence of DJF [odds ratio (OR): 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05, P =0.002], and invasiveness increased with deformity severity ( P <0.05). Not frail/low deformity patients more often met Optimal Outcome with an invasiveness index <63 (OR: 27.2, 95% CI: 2.7-272.8, P =0.005). An invasiveness index <54 for the frail/low deformity group led to a higher likelihood of meeting the Optimal Outcome (OR: 9.6, 95% CI: 1.5-62.2, P =0.018). For the frail/high deformity group, patients with a score <63 had a higher likelihood of achieving Optimal Outcome (OR: 4.8, 95% CI: 1.1-25.8, P =0.033). There was no significant cutoff of invasiveness for the not frail/high deformity group. CONCLUSIONS Our study correlated increased invasiveness in CD surgery to the risk of DJF, reoperation, and poor clinical success. The thresholds derived for deformity severity and frailty may enable surgeons to individualize the invasiveness of their procedures during surgical planning to account for the heightened risk of adverse events and minimize unfavorable outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Department of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center; NY Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Katherine E Pierce
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Department of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center; NY Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Tyler K Williamson
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Department of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center; NY Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Jordan Lebovic
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Department of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center; NY Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Jeffrey L Gum
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, KY
| | - Robert Eastlack
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, San Diego
| | - Han Jo Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery
| | - Eric O Klineberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA
| | - Alan H Daniels
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | | | - Justin K Scheer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Paul Park
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Dean Chou
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Breton Line
- Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO
| | - Robert A Hart
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Douglas C Burton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
| | - Shay Bess
- Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO
| | - Frank J Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | | | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Christopher P Ames
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Diebo BG, Balmaceno-Criss M, Lafage R, Daher M, Singh M, Hamilton DK, Smith JS, Eastlack RK, Fessler R, Gum JL, Gupta MC, Hostin R, Kebaish KM, Lewis S, Line BG, Nunley PD, Mundis GM, Passias PG, Protopsaltis TS, Turner J, Buell T, Scheer JK, Mullin J, Soroceanu A, Ames CP, Bess S, Shaffrey CI, Lenke LG, Schwab FJ, Lafage V, Burton DC, Daniels AH. Lumbar Lordosis Redistribution and Segmental Correction in Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD): Does it Matter? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024:00007632-990000000-00569. [PMID: 38270393 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE Evaluate the impact of correcting to normative segmental lordosis values on post-operative outcomes. BACKGROUND Restoring lumbar lordosis magnitude is crucial in adult spinal deformity surgery, but the optimal location and segmental distribution remains unclear. METHODS Patients were grouped based on offset to normative segmental lordosis values, extracted from recent publications. Matched patients were within 10% of the cohort's mean offset, less than or over 10% were under- and over-corrected. Surgical technique, PROMs, and surgical complications were compared across groups at baseline and 2-year. RESULTS 510 patients with an average age of 64.6, mean CCI 2.08, and average follow-up of 25 months. L4-5 was least likely to be matched (19.1%), while L4-S1 was the most likely (24.3%). More patients were overcorrected at proximal levels (T10-L2; Undercorrected, U: 32.2% vs. Matched, M: 21.7% vs. Overcorrected, O: 46.1%) and undercorrected at distal levels (L4-S1: U: 39.0% vs. M: 24.3% vs. O: 36.8%). Postoperative ODI was comparable across correction groups at all spinal levels except at L4-S1 and T10-L2/L4-S1, where overcorrected patients and matched were better than undercorrected (U: 32.1 vs. M: 25.4 vs. O: 26.5, P=0.005; U: 36.2 vs. M: 24.2 vs. O: 26.8, P=0.001; respectively). Patients overcorrected at T10-L2 experienced higher rates of proximal junctional failure (PJF) (U: 16.0% vs. M: 15.6% vs. O: 32.8%, P<0.001) and had greater posterior inclination of the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) (U: -9.2±9.4° vs. M: -9.6±9.1° vs. O: -12.2±10.0°, P<0.001), whereas undercorrection at these levels led to higher rates of revision for implant failure (U: 14.2% vs. M: 7.3% vs. O: 6.4%, P=0.025). CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing fusion for adult spinal deformity suffer higher rates of PJF with overcorrection and increased rates of implant failure with undercorrection based on normative segmental lordosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bassel G Diebo
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Mariah Balmaceno-Criss
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York
| | - Mohammad Daher
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Manjot Singh
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - D Kojo Hamilton
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh
| | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Robert K Eastlack
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California
| | | | - Jeffrey L Gum
- Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Munish C Gupta
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Richard Hostin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southwest Scoliosis Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Khaled M Kebaish
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Stephen Lewis
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Breton G Line
- Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Center, Denver, Colorado
| | | | - Gregory M Mundis
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California
| | - Peter G Passias
- Department of Orthopedics, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, New York
| | | | - Jay Turner
- Barrow Brain and Spine, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Thomas Buell
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh
| | - Justin K Scheer
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Jeffery Mullin
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Buffalo, Amherst, New York, New York
| | - Alex Soroceanu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Canada
| | - Christopher P Ames
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Shay Bess
- Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Center, Denver, Colorado
| | | | - Lawrence G Lenke
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Frank J Schwab
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York
| | - Douglas C Burton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Alan H Daniels
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Passias PG, Williamson TK, Pierce KE, Schoenfeld AJ, Krol O, Imbo B, Joujon-Roche R, Tretiakov P, Ahmad S, Bennett-Caso C, Mir J, Dave P, McFarland K, Owusu-Sarpong S, Lebovic JA, Janjua MB, de la Garza-Ramos R, Vira S, Diebo B, Koller H, Protopsaltis TS, Lafage R, Lafage V. The Importance of Incorporating Proportional Alignment in Adult Cervical Deformity Corrections Relative to Regional and Global Alignment: Steps Toward Development of a Cervical-Specific Score. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:116-127. [PMID: 37796161 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective single-center study. BACKGROUND The global alignment and proportion score is widely used in adult spinal deformity surgery. However, it is not specific to the parameters used in adult cervical deformity (ACD). PURPOSE Create a cervicothoracic alignment and proportion (CAP) score in patients with operative ACD. METHODS Patients with ACD with 2-year data were included. Parameters consisted of relative McGregor's Slope [RMGS = (MGS × 1.5)/0.9], relative cervical lordosis [RCL = CL - thoracic kyphosis (TK)], Cervical Lordosis Distribution Index (CLDI = C2 - Apex × 100/C2 - T2), relative pelvic version (RPV = sacral slope - pelvic incidence × 0.59 + 9), and a frailty factor (greater than 0.33). Cutoff points were chosen where the cross-tabulation of parameter subgroups reached a maximal rate of meeting the Optimal Outcome. The optimal outcome was defined as meeting Good Clinical Outcome criteria without the occurrence of distal junctional failure (DJF) or reoperation. CAP was scored between 0 and 13 and categorized accordingly: ≤3 (proportioned), 4-6 (moderately disproportioned), >6 (severely disproportioned). Multivariable logistic regression analysis determined the relationship between CAP categories, overall score, and development of distal junctional kyphosis (DJK), DJF, reoperation, and Optimal Outcome by 2 years. RESULTS One hundred five patients with operative ACD were included. Assessment of the 3-month CAP score found a mean of 5.2/13 possible points. 22.7% of patients were proportioned, 49.5% moderately disproportioned, and 27.8% severely disproportioned. DJK occurred in 34.5% and DJF in 8.7%, 20.0% underwent reoperation, and 55.7% achieved Optimal Outcome. Patients severely disproportioned in CAP had higher odds of DJK [OR: 6.0 (2.1-17.7); P =0.001], DJF [OR: 9.7 (1.8-51.8); P =0.008], reoperation [OR: 3.3 (1.9-10.6); P =0.011], and lower odds of meeting the optimal outcome [OR: 0.3 (0.1-0.7); P =0.007] by 2 years, while proportioned patients suffered zero occurrences of DJK or DJF. CONCLUSION The regional alignment and proportion score is a method of analyzing the cervical spine relative to global alignment and demonstrates the importance of maintaining horizontal gaze, while also matching overall cervical and thoracolumbar alignment to limit complications and maximize clinical improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Tyler K Williamson
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Katherine E Pierce
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Center for Surgery and Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Oscar Krol
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Bailey Imbo
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Rachel Joujon-Roche
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Peter Tretiakov
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Salman Ahmad
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Claudia Bennett-Caso
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Jamshaid Mir
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Pooja Dave
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Kimberly McFarland
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
- New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | | | - Jordan A Lebovic
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
| | | | - Rafael de la Garza-Ramos
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Shaleen Vira
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Bassel Diebo
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY
| | - Heiko Koller
- International Center for Spinal Disorders and Deformity, Orthopedic Department II, Asklepios Clinics Bad Abbach, Bad Tölz, Germany
| | | | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Passias PG, Passfall L, Moattari K, Krol O, Kummer NA, Tretiakov P, Williamson T, Joujon-Roche R, Imbo B, Burhan Janjua M, Jankowski P, Paulino C, Schwab FJ, Owusu-Sarpong S, Singh V, Ahmad S, Onafowokan T, Lebovic J, Tariq M, Saleh H, Vira S, Smith JS, Diebo B, Schoenfeld AJ. Factors Influencing Maintenance of Alignment and Functional Improvement Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A 3-Year Outcome Analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:90-96. [PMID: 37199423 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective review. OBJECTIVE To assess the factors contributing to durability of surgical results following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND Factors contributing to the long-term sustainability of ASD correction are currently undefined. MATERIALS AND METHODS Operative ASD patients with preoperatively (baseline) and 3-year postoperatively radiographic/health-related quality of life data were included. At 1 and 3 years postoperatively, a favorable outcome was defined as meeting at least three of four criteria: (1) no proximal junctional failure or mechanical failure with reoperation, (2) best clinical outcome (BCO) for Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) (≥4.5) or Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (<15), (3) improving in at least one SRS-Schwab modifier, and (4) not worsening in any SRS-Schwab modifier. A robust surgical result was defined as having a favorable outcome at both 1 and 3 years. Predictors of robust outcomes were identified using multivariable regression analysis with conditional inference tree for continuous variables. RESULTS We included 157 ASD patients in this analysis. At 1 year postoperatively, 62 patients (39.5%) met the BCO definition for ODI and 33 (21.0%) met the BCO for SRS. At 3 years, 58 patients (36.9%) had BCO for ODI and 29 (18.5%) for SRS. Ninety-five patients (60.5%) were identified as having a favorable outcome at 1 year postoperatively. At 3 years, 85 patients (54.1%) had a favorable outcome. Seventy-eight patients (49.7%) met criteria for a durable surgical result. Multivariable adjusted analysis identified the following independent predictors of surgical durability: surgical invasiveness >65, being fused to S1/pelvis, baseline to 6-week pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis difference >13.9°, and having a proportional Global Alignment and Proportion score at 6 weeks. CONCLUSIONS Nearly 50% of the ASD cohort demonstrated good surgical durability, with favorable radiographic alignment and functional status maintained up to 3 years. Surgical durability was more likely in patients whose reconstruction was fused to the pelvis and addressed lumbopelvic mismatch with adequate surgical invasiveness to achieve full alignment correction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach
| | - Lara Passfall
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach
| | - Kevin Moattari
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach
| | - Oscar Krol
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach
| | - Nicholas A Kummer
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach
| | - Peter Tretiakov
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach
| | - Tyler Williamson
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach
| | - Rachel Joujon-Roche
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach
| | - Bailey Imbo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach
| | | | - Pawel Jankowski
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach
| | - Carl Paulino
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Frank J Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | | | - Vivek Singh
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach
| | - Salman Ahmad
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach
| | - Tobi Onafowokan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach
| | - Jordan Lebovic
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach
| | - Muhammad Tariq
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach
| | - Hesham Saleh
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach
| | - Shaleen Vira
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Bassel Diebo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Passias PG, Ahmad W, Kapadia BH, Krol O, Bell J, Kamalapathy P, Imbo B, Tretiakov P, Williamson T, Onafowokan OO, Das A, Joujon-Roche R, Moattari K, Passfall L, Kummer N, Vira S, Lafage V, Diebo B, Schoenfeld AJ, Hassanzadeh H. Risk of spinal surgery among individuals who have been re-vascularized for coronary artery disease. J Clin Neurosci 2024; 119:164-169. [PMID: 38101037 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2023.11.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2021] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS Revascularization is a more effective intervention to reduce future postop complications. METHODS Patients undergoing elective spine fusion surgery were isolated in the PearlDiver database. Patients were stratified by having previous history of vascular stenting (Stent), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and no previous heart procedure (No-HP). Means comparison tests (chi-squared and independent samples t-tests, as appropriate) compared differences in demographics, diagnoses, and comorbidities. Binary logistic regression assessed the odds of 30-day and 90-day postoperative (postop) complications associated with each heart procedure (Odds Ratio [95 % confidence interval]). Statistical significance was set p < 0.05. RESULTS 731,173 elective spine fusion patients included. Overall, 8,401 pts underwent a CABG, 24,037 pts Stent, and 698,735 had No-HP prior to spine fusion surgery. Compared to Stent and No-HP patients, CABG patients had higher rates of morbid obesity, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes (p < 0.001 for all). Meanwhile, stent patients had higher rates of PVD, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia (all p < 0.001). 30-days post-op, CABG patients had significantly higher complication rates including pneumonia, CVA, MI, sepsis, and death compared to No-HP (all p < 0.001). Stent patients vs. No-HF had higher 30-day post-op complication rates including pneumonia, CVA, MI, sepsis, and death. Furthermore, adjusting for age, comorbidities, and sex Stent was significantly predictive of a MI 30-days post-op (OR: 1.90 [1.53-2.34], P < 0.001). Additionally, controlling for levels fused, stent patients compared to CABG patients had 1.99x greater odds of a MI within 30-days (OR: 1.99 [1.26-3.31], p = 0.005) and 2.02x odds within 90-days postop (OR: 2.2 [1.53-2.71, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION With regards to spine surgery, coronary artery bypass graft remains the gold standard for risk reduction. Stenting does not appear to minimize risk of experiencing a post-procedure cardiac event as dramatically as CABG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- Department of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Waleed Ahmad
- Department of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bhaveen H Kapadia
- Department of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oscar Krol
- Department of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joshua Bell
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Pramod Kamalapathy
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Bailey Imbo
- Department of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter Tretiakov
- Department of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Tyler Williamson
- Department of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oluwatobi O Onafowokan
- Department of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ankita Das
- Department of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachel Joujon-Roche
- Department of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kevin Moattari
- Department of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lara Passfall
- Department of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicholas Kummer
- Department of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shaleen Vira
- Department of Orthopedics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bassel Diebo
- Department of Orthopedics, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Center for Surgery and Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hamid Hassanzadeh
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Passias PG, Naessig S, Williamson TK, Lafage R, Lafage V, Smith JS, Gupta MC, Klineberg E, Burton DC, Ames C, Bess S, Shaffrey C, Schwab FJ. Compensation from mild and severe cases of early proximal junctional kyphosis may manifest as progressive cervical deformity at two year follow-up. Spine Deform 2024; 12:221-229. [PMID: 38041769 DOI: 10.1007/s43390-023-00763-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative reciprocal changes (RC) in the cervical spine associated with varying factors of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) following fusions of the thoracopelvic spine are poorly understood. PURPOSE Explore reciprocal changes in the cervical spine associated with varying factors (severity, progression, patient age) of PJK in patients undergoing adult spinal deformity (ASD) correction. PATIENTS AND METHODS Retrospective review of a multicenter ASD database. INCLUSION ASD patients > 18 y/o, undergoing fusions from the thoracic spine (UIV: T6-T12) to the pelvis with two-year radiographic data. ASD was defined as: Coronal Cobb angle ≥ 20°, Sagittal Vertical Axis ≥ 5 cm, Pelvic Tilt ≥ 25°, and/or Thoracic Kyphosis ≥ 60°. PJK was defined as a ≥ 10° measure of the sagittal Cobb angle between the inferior endplate of the UIV and the superior endplate of the UIV + 2. Patients were grouped by mild (M; 10°-20°) and severe (S; > 20°) PJK at one year. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) controlled for CCI, age, PI and UIV. Unpaired and paired t test analyses determined difference between RC parameters and change between time points. Pearson bi-variate correlations analyzed associations between RC parameters (T4-T12, TS-CL, cSVA, C2-Slope, and T1-Slope) and PJK descriptors. RESULTS 284 ASD patients (UIV: T6: 1.1%; T7: 0.7%; T8: 4.6%; T9: 9.9%; T10: 58.8%; T11: 19.4%; T12: 5.6%) were studied. PJK analysis consisted of 182 patients (Mild = 91 and Severe = 91). Significant difference between M and S groups were observed in T4-T12 Δ1Y(- 16.8 v - 22.8, P = 0.001), TS-CLΔ1Y(- 0.6 v 2.8, P = 0.037), cSVAΔ1Y(- 1.8 v 1.9, P = 0.032), and C2 slopeΔ1Y(- 1.6 v 2.3, P = 0.022). By two years post-op, all changes in cervical alignment parameters were similar between mild and severe groups. Correlation between age and cSVAΔ1Y(R = 0.153, P = 0.034) was found. Incidence of severe PJK was found to correlate with TS-CLΔ1Y(R = 0.142, P = 0.049), cSVAΔ1Y(R = 0.171, P = 0.018), C2SΔ1Y(R = 0.148, P = 0.040), and T1SΔ2Y(R = 0.256, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS Compensation within the cervical spine differed between individuals with mild and severe PJK at one year postoperatively. However, similar levels of pathologic change in cervical alignment parameters were seen by two years, highlighting the progression of cervical compensation due to mild PJK over time. These findings provide greater evidence for the development of cervical deformity in individuals presenting with proximal junctional kyphosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
| | - Sara Naessig
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Tyler K Williamson
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Orthopedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Munish C Gupta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Douglas C Burton
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Christopher Ames
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Shay Bess
- Rocky Mountain Scoliosis and Spine, Denver, CO, USA
| | | | - Frank J Schwab
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Orthopedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Passias PG, Ahmad W, Williamson TK, Lebovic J, Kebaish K, Lafage R, Lafage V, Line B, Schoenfeld AJ, Diebo BG, Klineberg EO, Kim HJ, Ames CP, Daniels AH, Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Burton DC, Hart RA, Bess S, Schwab FJ, Gupta MC. Efficacy of Varying Surgical Approaches on Achieving Optimal Alignment in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:22-28. [PMID: 37493057 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Roussouly, SRS-Schwab, and Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) classifications define alignment by spinal shape and deformity severity. The efficacy of different surgical approaches and techniques to successfully achieve these goals is not well understood. PURPOSE Identify the impact of surgical approach and/or technique on meeting complex realignment goals in adult spinal deformity (ASD) corrective surgery. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective study. MATERIALS AND METHODS Included patients with ASD fused to pelvis with 2-year data. Patients were categorized by: (1) Roussouly: matching current and theoretical spinal shapes, (2) improving in SRS-Schwab modifiers (0, +, ++), and (3) improving GAP proportionality by 2 years. Analysis of covariance and multivariable logistic regression analyses controlling for age, levels fused, baseline deformity, and 3-column osteotomy usage compared the effect of different surgical approaches, interbody, and osteotomy use on meeting realignment goals. RESULTS A total of 693 patients with ASD were included. By surgical approach, 65.7% were posterior-only and 34.3% underwent anterior-posterior approach with 76% receiving an osteotomy (21.8% 3-column osteotomy). By 2 years, 34% matched Roussouly, 58% improved in GAP, 45% in SRS-Schwab pelvic tilt (PT), 62% sagittal vertical axis, and 70% pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis. Combined approaches were most effective for improvement in PT [odds ratio (OR): 1.7 (1.1-2.5)] and GAP [OR: 2.2 (1.5-3.2)]. Specifically, anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) below L3 demonstrated higher rates of improvement versus TLIFs in Roussouly [OR: 1.7 (1.1-2.5)] and GAP [OR: 1.9 (1.3-2.7)]. Patients undergoing pedicle subtraction osteotomy at L3 or L4 were more likely to improve in PT [OR: 2.0 (1.0-5.2)] and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis [OR: 3.8 (1.4-9.8)]. Clinically, patients undergoing the combined approach demonstrated higher rates of meeting SCB in Oswestry Disability Index by 2 years while minimizing rates of proximal junctional failure, most often with an ALIF at L5-S1 [Oswestry Disability Index-SCB: OR: 1.4 (1.1-2.0); proximal junctional failure: OR: 0.4 (0.2-0.8)]. CONCLUSIONS Among patients undergoing ASD realignment, optimal lumbar shape and proportion can be achieved more often with a combined approach. Although TLIFs, incorporating a 3-column osteotomy, at L3 and L4 can restore lordosis and normalize pelvic compensation, ALIFs at L5-S1 were most likely to achieve complex realignment goals with an added clinical benefit and mitigation of junctional failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital and New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Waleed Ahmad
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital and New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Tyler K Williamson
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital and New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Jordan Lebovic
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
| | - Khaled Kebaish
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Breton Line
- Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Bassel G Diebo
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Eric O Klineberg
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA
| | - Han Jo Kim
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Christopher P Ames
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Alan H Daniels
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Christopher I Shaffrey
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Orthopedic Surgery, Spine Division, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Douglas C Burton
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
| | - Robert A Hart
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Shay Bess
- Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO
| | - Frank J Schwab
- Department of Orthopedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Munish C Gupta
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Jackson-Fowl B, Hockley A, Naessig S, Ahmad W, Pierce K, Smith JS, Ames C, Shaffrey C, Bennett-Caso C, Williamson TK, McFarland K, Passias PG. Adult cervical spine deformity: a state-of-the-art review. Spine Deform 2024; 12:3-23. [PMID: 37776420 DOI: 10.1007/s43390-023-00735-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023]
Abstract
Adult cervical deformity is a structural malalignment of the cervical spine that may present with variety of significant symptomatology for patients. There are clear and substantial negative impacts of cervical spine deformity, including the increased burden of pain, limited mobility and functionality, and interference with patients' ability to work and perform everyday tasks. Primary cervical deformities develop as the result of a multitude of different etiologies, changing the normal mechanics and structure of the cervical region. In particular, degeneration of the cervical spine, inflammatory arthritides and neuromuscular changes are significant players in the development of disease. Additionally, cervical deformities, sometimes iatrogenically, may present secondary to malalignment or correction of the thoracic, lumbar or sacropelvic spine. Previously, classification systems were developed to help quantify disease burden and influence management of thoracic and lumbar spine deformities. Following up on these works and based on the relationship between the cervical and distal spine, Ames-ISSG developed a framework for a standardized tool for characterizing and quantifying cervical spine deformities. When surgical intervention is required to correct a cervical deformity, there are advantages and disadvantages to both anterior and posterior approaches. A stepwise approach may minimize the drawbacks of either an anterior or posterior approach alone, and patients should have a surgical plan tailored specifically to their cervical deformity based upon symptomatic and radiographic indications. This state-of-the-art review is based upon a comprehensive overview of literature seeking to highlight the normal cervical spine, etiologies of cervical deformity, current classification systems, and key surgical techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan Jackson-Fowl
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, 301 East 17th St, New York, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Aaron Hockley
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, USA
| | - Sara Naessig
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, 301 East 17th St, New York, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Waleed Ahmad
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, 301 East 17th St, New York, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Katherine Pierce
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, 301 East 17th St, New York, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Christopher Ames
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Christopher Shaffrey
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Claudia Bennett-Caso
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, 301 East 17th St, New York, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Tyler K Williamson
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, 301 East 17th St, New York, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Kimberly McFarland
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, 301 East 17th St, New York, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Peter G Passias
- Division of Spinal Surgery/Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Medical Center, NY Spine Institute, 301 East 17th St, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Passias PG, Williamson TK, Kummer NA, Pellisé F, Lafage V, Lafage R, Serra-Burriel M, Smith JS, Line B, Vira S, Gum JL, Haddad S, Sánchez Pérez-Grueso FJ, Schoenfeld AJ, Daniels AH, Chou D, Klineberg EO, Gupta MC, Kebaish KM, Kelly MP, Hart RA, Burton DC, Kleinstück F, Obeid I, Shaffrey CI, Alanay A, Ames CP, Schwab FJ, Hostin RA, Bess S. Cost Benefit of Implementation of Risk Stratification Models for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery. Global Spine J 2023:21925682231212966. [PMID: 38081300 DOI: 10.1177/21925682231212966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE Assess the extent to which defined risk factors of adverse events are drivers of cost-utility in spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. METHODS ASD patients with 2-year (2Y) data were included. Tertiles were used to define high degrees of frailty, sagittal deformity, blood loss, and surgical time. Cost was calculated using the Pearl Diver registry and cost-utility at 2Y was compared between cohorts based on the number of risk factors present. Statistically significant differences in cost-utility by number of baseline risk factors were determined using ANOVA, followed by a generalized linear model, adjusting for clinical site and surgeon, to assess the effects of increasing risk score on overall cost-utility. RESULTS By 2 years, 31% experienced a major complication and 23% underwent reoperation. Patients with ≤2 risk factors had significantly less major complications. Patients with 2 risk factors improved the most from baseline to 2Y in ODI. Average cost increased by $8234 per risk factor (R2 = .981). Cost-per-QALY at 2Y increased by $122,650 per risk factor (R2 = .794). Adjusted generalized linear model demonstrated a significant trend between increasing risk score and increasing cost-utility (r2 = .408, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS The number of defined patient-specific and surgical risk factors, especially those with greater than two, were associated with increased index surgical costs and diminished cost-utility. Efforts to optimize patient physiology and minimize surgical risk would likely reduce healthcare expenditures and improve the overall cost-utility profile for ASD interventions.Level of evidence: III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, NY, NY, USA
| | - Tyler K Williamson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Nicholas A Kummer
- Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, NY, NY, USA
| | - Ferran Pellisé
- Spine Surgery Unit, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Miguel Serra-Burriel
- Center for Research in Health and Economics, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Breton Line
- Denver International Spine Center, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Shaleen Vira
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Sleiman Haddad
- Spine Surgery Unit, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alan H Daniels
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Dean Chou
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Eric O Klineberg
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Munish C Gupta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Khaled M Kebaish
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael P Kelly
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Robert A Hart
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Douglas C Burton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Frank Kleinstück
- Spine Center Division, Department of Orthopedics and Neurosurgery, Schulthess Klinik, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Ibrahim Obeid
- Spine Surgery Unit, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Christopher I Shaffrey
- Spine Division, Departments of Neurosurgery and Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ahmet Alanay
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Acıbadem University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Christopher P Ames
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Frank J Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Richard A Hostin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor Scoliosis Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Shay Bess
- Denver International Spine Center, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Ye J, Gupta S, Farooqi AS, Yin T, Soroceanu A, Schwab FJ, Lafage V, Kelly MP, Kebaish K, Hostin R, Gum JL, Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Scheer JK, Protopsaltis TS, Passias PG, Klineberg EO, Kim HJ, Hart RA, Hamilton DK, Ames CP, Gupta MC. Predictive role of global spinopelvic alignment and upper instrumented vertebra level in symptomatic proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine 2023; 39:774-784. [PMID: 37542446 DOI: 10.3171/2023.6.spine23383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The authors of this study sought to evaluate the predictive role of global sagittal alignment and upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) level in symptomatic proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) among patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). METHODS Data on ASD patients who had undergone fusion of ≥ 5 vertebrae from 2008 to 2018 and with a minimum follow-up of 1 year were obtained from a prospectively collected multicenter database and evaluated (n = 1312). Radiographs were obtained preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years postoperatively. The 22-Item Scoliosis Research Society Patient Questionnaire Revised (SRS-22r) scores were collected preoperatively, 1 year postoperatively, and 2 years postoperatively. Symptomatic PJK was defined as a kyphotic increase > 20° in the Cobb angle from the UIV to the UIV+2. At 6 weeks postoperatively, sagittal parameters were evaluated and patients were categorized by global alignment and proportion (GAP) score/category and SRS-Schwab sagittal modifiers. Patients were stratified by UIV level: upper thoracic (UT) UIV ≥ T8 or lower thoracic (LT) UIV ≤ T9. RESULTS Patients who developed symptomatic PJK (n = 260) had worse 1-year postoperative SRS-22r mental health (3.70 vs 3.86) and total (3.56 vs 3.67) scores, as well as worse 2-year postoperative self-image (3.45 vs 3.65) and satisfaction (4.03 vs 4.22) scores (all p ≤ 0.04). In the whole study cohort, patients with PJK had less pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch (-0.24° vs 3.29°, p < 0.001) but no difference in their GAP score/category or SRS-Schwab sagittal modifiers compared with the patients without PJK. Regression showed a higher risk of PJK with a pelvic tilt (PT) grade ++ (OR 2.35) and less risk with a PI-LL grade ++ (OR 0.35; both p < 0.01). When specifically analyzing the LT UIV cohort, patients with PJK had a higher GAP score (5.66 vs 4.79), greater PT (23.02° vs 20.90°), and less PI-LL mismatch (1.61° vs 4.45°; all p ≤ 0.02). PJK patients were less likely to be proportioned postoperatively (17.6% vs 30.0%, p = 0.015), and regression demonstrated a greater PJK risk with severe disproportion (OR 1.98) and a PT grade ++ (OR 3.15) but less risk with a PI-LL grade ++ (OR 0.45; all p ≤ 0.01). When specifically evaluating the UT UIV cohort, the PJK patients had less PI-LL mismatch (-2.11° vs 1.45°) but no difference in their GAP score/category. Regression showed a greater PJK risk with a PT grade + (OR 1.58) and a decreased risk with a PI-LL grade ++ (OR 0.21; both p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Symptomatic PJK leads to worse patient-reported outcomes and is associated with less postoperative PI-LL mismatch and greater postoperative PT. A worse postoperative GAP score and disproportion are only predictive of symptomatic PJK in patients with an LT UIV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jichao Ye
- 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Sachin Gupta
- 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ali S Farooqi
- 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Tsung Yin
- 3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Alex Soroceanu
- 4University of Calgary Spine Program, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Frank J Schwab
- 5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Virginie Lafage
- 5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Michael P Kelly
- 7Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Khaled Kebaish
- 8Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Richard Hostin
- 9Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southwest Scoliosis Institute, Dallas, Texas
| | - Jeffrey L Gum
- 10Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Justin S Smith
- 11Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | | | - Justin K Scheer
- 13Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Peter G Passias
- 14Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Eric O Klineberg
- 15Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California
| | - Han Jo Kim
- 6Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Robert A Hart
- 16Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington; and
| | - D Kojo Hamilton
- 17Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Christopher P Ames
- 13Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Munish C Gupta
- 7Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Passias PG, Ahmad W, Dave P, Lafage R, Lafage V, Mir J, Klineberg EO, Kabeish KM, Gum JL, Line BG, Hart R, Burton D, Smith JS, Ames CP, Shaffrey CI, Schwab F, Hostin R, Buell T, Hamilton DK, Bess S. Economic burden of nonoperative treatment of adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine 2023; 39:751-756. [PMID: 37728175 DOI: 10.3171/2023.7.spine23195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to investigate the cost utility of nonoperative treatment for adult spinal deformity (ASD). METHODS Nonoperatively and operatively treated patients who met database criteria for ASD and in whom complete radiographic and health-related quality of life data at baseline and at 2 years were available were included. A cost analysis was completed on the PearlDiver database assessing the average cost of nonoperative treatment prior to surgical intervention based on previously published treatments (NSAIDs, narcotics, muscle relaxants, epidural steroid injections, physical therapy, and chiropractor). Utility data were calculated using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) converted to SF-6D with published conversion methods. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) used a 3% discount rate to account for residual decline in life expectancy (78.7 years). Minor and major comorbidities and complications were assessed according to the CMS.gov manual's definitions. Successful nonoperative treatment was defined as a gain in the minimum clinically importance difference (MCID) in both ODI and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-pain scores, and failure was defined as a loss in MCID or conversion to operative treatment. Patients with baseline ODI ≤ 20 and continued ODI of ≤ 20 at 2 years were considered nonoperative successful maintenance. The average utilization of nonoperative treatment and cost were applied to the ASD cohort. RESULTS A total of 824 patients were included (mean age 58.24 years, 81% female, mean body mass index 27.2 kg/m2). Overall, 75.5% of patients were in the operative and 24.5% were in the nonoperative cohort. At baseline patients in the operative cohort were significantly older, had a greater body mass index, increased pelvic tilt, and increased pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (all p < 0.05). With respect to deformity, patients in the operative group had higher rates of severe (i.e., ++) sagittal deformity according to SRS-Schwab modifiers for pelvic tilt, sagittal vertical axis, and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch (p < 0.05). At 2 years, patients in the operative cohort showed significantly increased rates of a gain in MCID for physical component summary of SF-36, ODI, and SRS-activity, SRS-pain, SRS-appearance, and SRS-mental scores. Cost analysis showed the average cost of nonoperative treatment 2 years prior to surgical intervention to be $2041. Overall, at 2 years patients in the nonoperative cohort had again in ODI of 0.36, did not show a gain in QALYs, and nonoperative treatment was determined to be cost-ineffective. However, a subset of patients in this cohort underwent successful maintenance treatment and had a decrease in ODI of 1.1 and a gain in utility of 0.006 at 2 years. If utility gained for this cohort was sustained to full life expectancy, patients' cost per QALY was $18,934 compared to a cost per QALY gained of $70,690.79 for posterior-only and $48,273.49 for combined approach in patients in the operative cohort. CONCLUSIONS Patients with ASD undergoing operative treatment at baseline had greater sagittal deformity and greater improvement in health-related quality of life postoperatively compared to patients treated nonoperatively. Additionally, patients in the nonoperative cohort overall had an increase in ODI and did not show improvement in utility gained. Patients in the nonoperative cohort who had low disability and sagittal deformity underwent successful maintenance and cost-effective treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- 1Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, Division of Spine, NYU Langone Medical Center; New York Spine Institute, New York, New York
| | - Waleed Ahmad
- 1Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, Division of Spine, NYU Langone Medical Center; New York Spine Institute, New York, New York
| | - Pooja Dave
- 1Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, Division of Spine, NYU Langone Medical Center; New York Spine Institute, New York, New York
| | - Renaud Lafage
- 2Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Virginie Lafage
- 2Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Jamshaid Mir
- 1Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, Division of Spine, NYU Langone Medical Center; New York Spine Institute, New York, New York
| | - Eric O Klineberg
- 3Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York
| | - Khaled M Kabeish
- 4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jeffrey L Gum
- 5Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Breton G Line
- 6Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, Colorado
| | - Robert Hart
- 7Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Douglas Burton
- 8Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Justin S Smith
- 9Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Christopher P Ames
- 8Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Christopher I Shaffrey
- 10Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Frank Schwab
- 2Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Richard Hostin
- 11Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southwest Scoliosis Center, Dallas, Texas; and
| | - Thomas Buell
- 12Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - D Kojo Hamilton
- 12Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Shay Bess
- 6Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Passfall L, Imbo B, Lafage V, Lafage R, Smith JS, Line B, Schoenfeld AJ, Protopsaltis T, Daniels AH, Kebaish KM, Gum JL, Koller H, Hamilton DK, Hostin R, Gupta M, Anand N, Ames CP, Hart R, Burton D, Schwab FJ, Shaffrey CI, Klineberg EO, Kim HJ, Bess S, Passias PG. The impact of baseline cervical malalignment on the development of proximal junctional kyphosis following surgical correction of thoracolumbar adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine 2023; 39:742-750. [PMID: 37503903 DOI: 10.3171/2023.5.spine22752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to identify the effect of baseline cervical deformity (CD) on proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and proximal junctional failure (PJF) in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). METHODS This study was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected, multicenter database comprising ASD patients enrolled at 13 participating centers from 2009 to 2018. Included were ASD patients aged > 18 years with concurrent CD (C2-7 kyphosis < -15°, T1S minus cervical lordosis > 35°, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis > 4 cm, chin-brow vertical angle > 25°, McGregor's slope > 20°, or C2-T1 kyphosis > 15° across any three vertebrae) who underwent surgery. Patients were grouped according to four deformity classification schemes: Ames and Passias CD modifiers, sagittal morphotypes as described by Kim et al., and the head versus trunk balance system proposed by Mizutani et al. Mean comparison tests and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the impact of these deformity classifications on PJK and PJF rates up to 3 years following surgery. RESULTS A total of 712 patients with concurrent ASD and CD met the inclusion criteria (mean age 61.7 years, 71% female, mean BMI 28.2 kg/m2, and mean Charlson Comorbidity Index 1.90) and underwent surgery (mean number of levels fused 10.1, mean estimated blood loss 1542 mL, and mean operative time 365 minutes; 70% underwent osteotomy). By approach, 59% of the patients underwent a posterior-only approach and 41% underwent a combined approach. Overall, 277 patients (39.1%) had PJK by 1 year postoperatively, and an additional 189 patients (26.7%) developed PJK by 3 years postoperatively. Overall, 65 patients (9.2%) had PJF by 3 years postoperatively. Patients classified as having a cervicothoracic deformity morphotype had higher rates of early PJK than flat neck deformity and cervicothoracic deformity patients (p = 0.020). Compared with the head-balanced patients, trunk-balanced patients had higher rates of PJK and PJF (both p < 0.05). Examining Ames modifier severity showed that patients with moderate and severe deformity by the horizontal gaze modifier had higher rates of PJK (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In patients with concurrent cervical and thoracolumbar deformities undergoing isolated thoracolumbar correction, the use of CD classifications allows for preoperative assessment of the potential for PJK and PJF that may aid in determining the correction of extending fusion levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Passfall
- 1Division of Spine Surgery, Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York
| | - Bailey Imbo
- 1Division of Spine Surgery, Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York
| | - Virginie Lafage
- 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York
| | - Renaud Lafage
- 3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Justin S Smith
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Breton Line
- 5Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Center, Presbyterian St. Luke's, Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, Colorado
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- 6Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Center for Surgery and Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Alan H Daniels
- 8Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Khaled M Kebaish
- 9Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jeffrey L Gum
- 10Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Heiko Koller
- 11Department of Neurosurgery, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Munich, Germany
- 21Department for Traumatology and Sports Injuries, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - D Kojo Hamilton
- 12Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Richard Hostin
- 13Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southwest Scoliosis Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Munish Gupta
- 14Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Neel Anand
- 15Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Health Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Christopher P Ames
- 16Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Robert Hart
- 17Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Douglas Burton
- 18Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Frank J Schwab
- 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York
| | - Christopher I Shaffrey
- 19Division of Spine Surgery, Departments of Neurosurgery and Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Eric O Klineberg
- 20Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, California; and
| | - Han Jo Kim
- 3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Shay Bess
- 5Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Center, Presbyterian St. Luke's, Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, Colorado
| | - Peter G Passias
- 1Division of Spine Surgery, Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Shah NV, Moattari CR, Lavian JD, Gedailovich S, Krasnyanskiy B, Beyer GA, Condron N, Passias PG, Lafage R, Jo Kim H, Schwab FJ, Lafage V, Paulino CB, Diebo BG. The Impact of Isolated Preoperative Cannabis Use on Outcomes Following Cervical Spinal Fusion: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Iowa Orthop J 2023; 43:117-124. [PMID: 38213849 PMCID: PMC10777691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
Background Cannabis is the most commonly used recreational drug in the USA. Studies evaluating cannabis use and its impact on outcomes following cervical spinal fusion (CF) are limited. This study sought to assess the impact of isolated (exclusive) cannabis use on postoperative outcomes following CF by analyzing outcomes like complications, readmissions, and revisions. Methods The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) was queried for patients who underwent CF between January 2009 and September 2013. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years and either a minimum 90-day (for complications and readmissions) or 2-year (for revisions) follow-up surveillance. Patients with systemic disease, osteomyelitis, cancer, trauma, and concomitant substance or polysubstance abuse/dependence were excluded. Patients with a preoperative International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis of isolated cannabis abuse (Cannabis) or dependence were identified. The primary outcome measures were 90-day complications, 90-day readmissions, and two-year revisions following CF. Cannabis patients were 1:1 propensity score-matched by age, gender, race, Deyo score, surgical approach, and tobacco use to non-cannabis users and compared for outcomes. Multivariate binary stepwise logistic regression models identified independent predictors of outcomes. Results 432 patients (n=216 each) with comparable age, sex, Deyo scores, tobacco use, and distribution of anterior or posterior surgical approaches were identified (all p>0.05). Cannabis patients were predominantly Black (27.8% vs. 12.0%), primarily utilized Medicaid (29.6% vs. 12.5%), and had longer LOS (3.0 vs. 1.9 days), all p≤0.001. Both cohorts experienced comparable rates of 90-day medical and surgical, as well as overall complications (5.6% vs. 3.7%) and two-year revisions (4.2% vs. 2.8%, p=0.430), but isolated cannabis patients had higher 90-day readmission rates (11.6% vs. 6.0%, p=0.042). Isolated cannabis use independently predicted 90-day readmission (Odds Ratio=2.0), but did not predict any 90-day complications or two year revisions (all p>0.05). Conclusion Isolated baseline cannabis dependence/abuse was associated with increased risk of 90-day readmission following CF. Further investigation of the physiologic impact of cannabis on musculoskeletal patients may elucidate significant contributory factors. Level of Evidence: III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil V. Shah
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Cameron R. Moattari
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Joshua D. Lavian
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Samuel Gedailovich
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Benjamin Krasnyanskiy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - George A. Beyer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Nolan Condron
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Peter G. Passias
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Han Jo Kim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Frank J. Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Carl B. Paulino
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Bassel G. Diebo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, The State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Mir JM, Galetta MS, Tretiakov P, Dave P, Lafage V, Lafage R, Schoenfeld AJ, Passias PG. Achievement and Maintenance of Optimal Alignment After Adult Spinal Deformity Corrective Surgery: A 5-Year Outcome Analysis. World Neurosurg 2023; 180:e523-e527. [PMID: 37774784 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.09.106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We sought to assess factors contributing to optimal radiographic outcomes. METHODS Operative adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with baseline and 5-year (5Y) data were included. Optimal alignment (O) was defined as improving in at least 1 Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab modifier without worsening in any Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab modifier. A robust outcome was defined as having optimal alignment 2 years (2Y) post operation that was maintained at 5Y. Predictors of robust outcomes were identified using multivariate regression analysis, with a conditional inference tree for continuous variables. RESULTS Two-hundred and ninety-seven ASD patients met inclusion criteria. Most patients (77.4%) met O at 6W, which decreased to 54.2% at 2Y. The majority of patients (89.4%) that met O at 2Y went on to meet radiographic durability at 5Y (48.5% of total cohort). Rates of junctional failure were higher in O2+5- compared with O2+5- (P = 0.013), with reoperation rates of 17.2% due to loss of alignment. Multivariable regression identified the following independent predictors of optimal alignment at 5Y in those that had O at 2Y: inadequate correction of pelvic tilt and overcorrection of the difference between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis (P < 0.05). Increased age, body mass index, and invasiveness were the most significant nonradiographic predictors for not achieving 5Y durability (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The durability of optimal alignment after ASD corrective surgery was seen in about half of the patients at 5Y. While the majority of patients at 2Y maintained their radiographic outcomes at 5Y, major contributors to loss of alignment included junctional failure and adjacent region compensation, with only a minority of patients losing correction through the existing construct. The reoperation rate for loss of alignment was 17.2%. Loss of alignment requiring reoperation had a detrimental effect on 5Y clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamshaid M Mir
- Division of Spine Surgery, Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Matthew S Galetta
- Division of Spine Surgery, Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Peter Tretiakov
- Division of Spine Surgery, Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Pooja Dave
- Division of Spine Surgery, Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Peter G Passias
- Division of Spine Surgery, Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Lafage R, Song J, Diebo B, Daniels AH, Passias PG, Ames CP, Bess S, Eastlack R, Gupta MC, Hostin R, Kebaish K, Kim HJ, Klineberg E, Mundis GM, Smith JS, Shaffrey C, Schwab F, Lafage V, Burton D. Alterations in Magnitude and Shape of Thoracic Kyphosis Following Surgical Correction for Adult Spinal Deformity. Global Spine J 2023:21925682231218003. [PMID: 38031967 DOI: 10.1177/21925682231218003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of prospective multicenter data. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to investigate the shape of TK before and after fusion in ASD patients treated with long fusion. METHODS ASD patients undergoing posterior spinal fusions including at least T5 to L1 without prior fusion extending to the thoracic spine were included. Patients were categorized based on the preoperative T1-T12 kyphosis into: Hypo-TK (if < 30°), Normal-TK, and Hyper-TK (if > 70°). Regional kyphosis at T10-L1 (Distal), T5-T10 (Middle), and T1-T5 (Proximal) and their relative contributions to total kyphosis were compared between groups, and the pre-to postoperative changes were investigated using paired t test. RESULTS In total, 329 patients were included in this analysis (mean age: 57 ± 16 years, 79.6% female). Preoperative T1-T12 TK for the entire cohort was 40.9 ± 2° (32% Hypo-TK, 11% Hyper-TK, 57% Normal-TK). The Hypo-TK group had the smallest distal TK (5.9 vs 17.1 & 26.0), and middle TK (8.0 vs 25.3 & 45.4), but the percentage of contribution to total kyphosis was not significantly different (Distal: 24.1% vs 34.1% vs 32.8%; Middle: 46.6% vs 53.9% vs 56.8%, all P > .1). Postoperatively, T1-12 TK increased significantly (40.9 ± 2.0° vs 57.8 ± 17.6°). Each group had a decrease in distal kyphosis (Hypo-TK 2.6 ± 10.4°; Normal-TK 8.9 ± 11.5°; Hyper-TK 14.9 ± 12°, all P < .05). The middle kyphosis significantly decreased for Hyper-TK (11.8 ± 12.4) and increased for both Normal-TK and Hypo-TK (3.8 ± 11° and 14.2 ± 11°). Proximal TK increased significantly for all groups by 14-18°. Deterioration from Normal-TK to Hyper-TK postoperatively was associated with lower rate of patient satisfaction (59.6% vs 77.3%, P = .032). CONCLUSIONS Posterior spinal fusion for ASD alters the magnitude and shape of thoracic kyphosis. While 60% of patients had a normal TK at baseline, 30% of those patients developed iatrogenic hyperkyphosis postoperatively. Patients with baseline hypokyphosis were more likely to be corrected to normal TK than hyperkyphotic patients. Future research should investigate TK restoration in ASD and its impact on clinical outcomes and complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Junho Song
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bassel Diebo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Alan H Daniels
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | | | - Christopher P Ames
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Shay Bess
- Denver International Spine Center, Denver, CO, USA
| | | | - Munish C Gupta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | - Khaled Kebaish
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Han Jo Kim
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric Klineberg
- Department of Orthopaedic surgery, University of Texas Health, Houston, TX
| | | | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | | | - Frank Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Douglas Burton
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas, KS, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Passias PG, Krol O, Williamson TK, Lafage V, Lafage R, Smith JS, Line B, Vira S, Lipa S, Daniels A, Diebo B, Schoenfeld A, Gum J, Kebaish K, Park P, Mundis G, Hostin R, Gupta MC, Eastlack R, Anand N, Ames C, Hart R, Burton D, Schwab FJ, Shaffrey C, Klineberg E, Bess S. The Benefit of Addressing Malalignment in Revision Surgery for Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Following ASD Surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2023; 48:1581-1587. [PMID: 36083599 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE Understand the benefit of addressing malalignment in revision surgery for proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA PJK is a common cause of revision surgery for adult spinal deformity patients. During a revision, surgeons may elect to perform a proximal extension of the fusion, or also correct the source of the lumbopelvic mismatch. MATERIALS AND METHODS Recurrent PJK following revision surgery was the primary outcome. Revision surgical strategy was the primary predictor (proximal extension of fusion alone compared with combined sagittal correction and proximal extension). Multivariable logistic regression determined rates of recurrent PJK between the two surgical groups with lumbopelvic surgical correction assessed through improving ideal alignment in one or more alignment criteria [Global Alignment and Proportionality (GAP), Roussouly-type, and Sagittal Age-Adjusted Score (SAAS)]. RESULTS A total of 151 patients underwent revision surgery for PJK. PJK occurred at a rate of 43.0%, and PJF at 12.6%. Patients proportioned in GAP postrevision had lower rates of recurrent PJK [23% vs. 42%; odds ratio (OR): 0.3, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.1-0.8, P =0.024]. Following adjusted analysis, patients who were ideally aligned in one of three criteria (Matching in SAAS and/or Roussouly matched and/or achieved GAP proportionality) had lower rates of recurrent PJK (36% vs. 53%; OR: 0.4, 95% CI: 0.1-0.9, P =0.035) and recurrent PJF (OR: 0.1, 95% CI: 0.02-0.7, P =0.015). Patients ideally aligned in two of three criteria avoid any development of PJF (0% vs. 16%, P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS Following revision surgery for PJK, patients with persistent poor sagittal alignment showed increased rates of recurrent PJK compared with patients who had abnormal lumbopelvic alignment corrected during the revision. These findings suggest addressing the root cause of surgical failure in addition to proximal extension of the fusion may be beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- Department of Orthopedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Oscar Krol
- Department of Orthopedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Tyler K Williamson
- Department of Orthopedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill, Northwell Health, New York, NY
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill, Northwell Health, New York, NY
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Breton Line
- Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO
| | - Shaleen Vira
- Department of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Shaina Lipa
- Department of Orthopedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Alan Daniels
- Department of Orthopedics, Brown University, Warren Alpert Medical School, Providence, RI
| | - Bassel Diebo
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SUNY Downstate, New York, NY
| | - Andrew Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Center for Surgery and Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Jeffrey Gum
- Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, KY
| | - Khaled Kebaish
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Paul Park
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Gregory Mundis
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA
| | - Richard Hostin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southwest Scoliosis Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Munish C Gupta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO
| | - Robert Eastlack
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Neel Anand
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Health Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Christopher Ames
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Robert Hart
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Douglas Burton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS
| | - Frank J Schwab
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Lenox Hill, Northwell Health, New York, NY
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | | | - Eric Klineberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA
| | - Shay Bess
- Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Passias PG, Pierce KE, Dave P, Lafage R, Lafage V, Schoenfeld AJ, Line B, Uribe J, Hostin R, Daniels A, Hart R, Burton D, Kim HJ, Mundis GM, Eastlack R, Diebo BG, Gum JL, Shaffrey C, Schwab F, Ames CP, Smith JS, Bess S, Klineberg E, Gupta MC, Hamilton DK. When not to Operate in Spinal Deformity: Identifying Subsets of Patients With Simultaneous Clinical Deterioration, Major Complications, and Reoperation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2023; 48:1481-1485. [PMID: 37470375 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review of a prospectively enrolled adult spinal deformity (ASD) database. OBJECTIVE To investigate what patient factors elevate the risk of sub-optimal outcomes after deformity correction. BACKGROUND Currently, it is unknown what factors predict a poor outcome after adult spinal deformity surgery, which may require increased preoperative consideration and counseling. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients >18 yrs undergoing surgery for ASD(scoliosis≥20°, SVA≥5 cm, PT≥25°, or TK≥60°). An unsatisfactory outcome was defined by the following categories met at two years: (1) clinical: deteriorating in ODI at two years follow-up (2) complications/reoperation: having a reoperation and major complication were deemed high risk for poor outcomes postoperatively (HR). Multivariate analyses assessed predictive factors of HR patients in adult spinal deformity patients. RESULTS In all, 633 adult spinal deformity (59.9 yrs, 79% F, 27.7 kg/m 2, CCI: 1.74) were included. Baseline severe Schwab modifier incidence (++): 39.2% pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis, 28.8% sagittal vertical axis, 28.9% PT. Overall, 15.5% of patients deteriorated in ODI by two years, while 7.6% underwent reoperation and had a major complication. This categorized 11 (1.7%) as HR. HR were more comorbid in terms of arthritis (73%), heart disease (36%), and kidney disease (18%), P <0.001. Surgically, HR had greater EBL (4431ccs) and underwent more osteotomies (91%), specifically Ponte(36%) and Three Column Osteotomies(55%), which occurred more at L2(91%). HR underwent more PLIFs (45%) and had more blood transfusion units (2641ccs), all P <0.050. The multivariate regression determined a combination of a baseline Distress and Risk Assessment Method score in the 75th percentile, having arthritis and kidney disease, a baseline right lower extremity motor score ≤3, cSVA >65 mm, C2 slope >30.2°, CTPA >5.5° for an R2 value of 0.535 ( P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS When addressing adult spine deformities, poor outcomes tend to occur in severely comorbid patients with major baseline psychological distress scores, poor neurologic function, and concomitant cervical malalignment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Katherine E Pierce
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Pooja Dave
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Breton Line
- Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO
| | - Juan Uribe
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | - Richard Hostin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor Scoliosis Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Alan Daniels
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Robert Hart
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Douglas Burton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Han Jo Kim
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | | | - Robert Eastlack
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA
| | - Bassel G Diebo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Jeffrey L Gum
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, KY
| | - Christopher Shaffrey
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Frank Schwab
- Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Christopher P Ames
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Shay Bess
- Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Clinic, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO
| | - Eric Klineberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA
| | - Munish C Gupta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University of St Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - D Kojo Hamilton
- Departments of Neurosurgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Passias PG, Mir JM, Williamson TK, Tretiakov PS, Dave P, Lafage V, Lafage R, Schoenfeld AJ. Should realignment goals vary based on patient frailty status in adult spinal deformity? J Neurosurg Spine 2023; 39:646-651. [PMID: 37728390 DOI: 10.3171/2023.5.spine23456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to adjust the sagittal age-adjusted score (SAAS) to accommodate frailty in alignment considerations and thereby increase the predictability of clinical outcomes and junctional failure. METHODS Surgical adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with 2-year data were included. Frailty was assessed with the continuous ASD modified frailty index (ASD-mFI). Two-year outcomes were proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), proximal junctional failure (PJF), major mechanical complications, and best clinical outcome (BCO), defined as Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score < 15 and Scoliosis Research Society outcomes questionnaire total score > 4.5 by 2 years. Linear regression analysis established a 6-week score based on the component scores of SAAS, frailty, and US normal values for ODI score. Logistic regression analysis followed by conditional inference tree run forest analysis generated categorical thresholds. Multivariate analysis, controlling for age, baseline deformity, and history of revision, was used to compare outcome rates, and logistic regression generated odds ratios for the continuous score. Thirty percent of the cohort was used as a random sample for internal validation. RESULTS In total, 412 patients were included (mean ± SD age 60.1 ± 14.2 years, 80% female, BMI 26.9 ± 5.4 kg/m2). Baseline frailty categories were as follows: 57% not frail, 30% frail, and 14% severely frail. Overall, by 2 years, 39% of patients had developed PJK, 8% PJF, and 21% mechanical complications; 22% had undergone a reoperation; and 15% met BCO. When the cohort as a whole was assessed, the 6-week SAAS had a correlation with the development of PJK and PJF, but not mechanical complications, reoperation, or BCO. Development of mechanical complications, PJF, reoperation, and BCO demonstrated correlations with ASD-mFI (all p < 0.05). Regression analysis modifying SAAS on the basis of ODI norms and frailty generated the following equation: frailty-adjusted SAAS (FAS) = 0.108 × T1 pelvic angle + 0.162 × pelvic tilt - 0.39 × pelvic incidence - lumbar lordosis - 0.03 × ASD-mFI - 1.6771. With conditional inference tree analysis, thresholds were derived for FAS: aligned < 1.7, offset 1.7-2.2, and severely offset > 2.2. Significance between FAS categories was found for PJK, PJF, mechanical complications, reoperation, and BCO by 2 years. Binary logistic regression, controlling for baseline deformity and revision status, demonstrated significance between FAS and all 5 outcome variables (all p < 0.01). Internal validation saw each outcome variable maintain significance between categories, with even greater odds for PJF (OR 13.4, 95% CI 4.7-38.3, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Consideration of physiological age, in addition to chronological age, may be beneficial in the management of operative goals to maximize clinical outcomes while minimizing junctional failure. This combination enables the spine surgeon to fortify a surgical plan for even the most challenging patients undergoing ASD corrective surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- 1Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, Division of Spine Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York
| | - Jamshaid M Mir
- 1Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, Division of Spine Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York
| | - Tyler K Williamson
- 1Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, Division of Spine Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York
| | - Peter S Tretiakov
- 1Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, Division of Spine Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York
| | - Pooja Dave
- 1Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, Division of Spine Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York Spine Institute, New York, New York
| | - Virginie Lafage
- 2Department of Orthopedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York
| | - Renaud Lafage
- 3Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York; and
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- 4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Passias PG, Tretiakov PS, Smith JS, Lafage R, Diebo B, Scheer JK, Eastlack RK, Daniels AH, Klineberg EO, Khabeish KM, Mundis GM, Turner JD, Gupta MC, Kim HJ, Schwab F, Bess S, Lafage V, Ames CP, Shaffrey CI. Are we improving in the optimization of surgery for high-risk adult cervical spine deformity patients over time? J Neurosurg Spine 2023; 39:628-635. [PMID: 37548546 DOI: 10.3171/2023.5.spine23457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate whether surgery for high-risk patients is being optimized over time and if poor outcomes are being minimized. METHODS Patients who underwent surgery for cervical deformity (CD) and were ≥ 18 years with baseline and 2-year data were stratified by year of surgery from 2013 to 2018. The cohort was divided into two groups based on when the surgery was performed. Patients in the early cohort underwent surgery between 2013 and 2015 and those in the recent cohort underwent surgery between 2016 and 2018. High-risk patients met at least 2 of the following criteria: 1) baseline C2-7 Cobb angle > 15°, mismatch between T1 slope and cervical lordosis ≥ 35°, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis > 4 cm, or chin-brow vertical angle > 25°; 2) age ≥ 70 years; 3) severe baseline frailty (Miller index); 4) Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 1 SD above the mean; 5) three-column osteotomy as treatment; and 6) fusion > 10 levels or > 7 levels for elderly patients. The mean comparison analysis assessed differences between groups. Stepwise multivariable linear regression described associations between increasing year of surgery and complications. RESULTS Eighty-two CD patients met high-risk criteria (mean age 62.11 ± 10.87 years, 63.7% female, mean BMI 29.70 ± 8.16 kg/m2, and mean CCI 1.07 ± 1.45). The proportion of high-risk patients increased with time, with 41.8% of patients in the early cohort classified as high risk compared with 47.6% of patients in the recent cohort (p > 0.05). Recent high-risk patients were more likely to be female (p = 0.008), have a lower BMI (p = 0.038), and have a higher baseline CCI (p = 0.013). Surgically, high-risk patients in the recent cohort were more likely to undergo low-grade osteotomy (p = 0.003). By postoperative complications, recent high-risk patients were less likely to experience any postoperative adverse events overall (p = 0.020) or complications such as dysphagia (p = 0.045) at 2 years. Regression analysis revealed increasing year of surgery to be correlated with decreasing minor complication rates (p = 0.030), as well as lowered rates of distal junctional kyphosis by 2 years (p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS Over time, high-risk CD patients have an increase in frequency and comorbidity rates but have demonstrated improved postoperative outcomes. These findings suggest that spine surgeons have improved over time in optimizing selection and reducing potential adverse events in high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter G Passias
- 1Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, Division of Spine Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, New York
- 2New York Spine Institute, New York, New York
| | - Peter S Tretiakov
- 1Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, Division of Spine Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, New York
- 2New York Spine Institute, New York, New York
| | - Justin S Smith
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Renaud Lafage
- 4Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York
| | - Bassel Diebo
- 5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Justin K Scheer
- 6Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Robert K Eastlack
- 7Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California
| | - Alan H Daniels
- 5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Eric O Klineberg
- 8Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, California
| | - Khaled M Khabeish
- 9Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Gregory M Mundis
- 7Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California
| | - Jay D Turner
- 10Department of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Munish C Gupta
- 11Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Han Jo Kim
- 12Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York
| | - Frank Schwab
- 4Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York
| | - Shay Bess
- 13Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Center, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, Colorado; and
| | - Virginie Lafage
- 4Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York
| | - Christopher P Ames
- 6Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Krol O, McFarland K, Owusu-Sarpong S, Sagoo N, Williamson T, Joujon-Roche R, Tretiakov P, Imbo B, Dave P, Mir J, Lebovic J, Onafowokan OO, Schoenfeld AJ, De la Garza Ramos R, Janjua MB, Sciubba DM, Diebo BG, Vira S, Smith JS, Lafage V, Lafage R, Passias PG. Impact of Frailty on the Development of Proximal Junctional Failure: Does Frailty Supersede Achieving Optimal Realignment? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2023; 48:1348-1353. [PMID: 37199421 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/31/2022] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) are often elderly, frail, and at elevated risk of adverse events perioperatively, with proximal junctional failure (PJF) occurring relatively frequently. Currently, the specific role of frailty in potentiating this outcome is poorly defined. PURPOSE To determine if the benefits of optimal realignment in ASD, with respect to the development of PJF, can be offset by increasing frailty. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS Operative ASD patients (scoliosis >20°, SVA>5 cm, pelvic tilt>25°, or TK>60°) fused to the pelvis or below with available baseline and 2-year (2Y) radiographic and HRQL data were included. The Miller Frailty Index (FI) was used to stratify patients into 2 categories: Not Frail (FI <3) and Frail (>3). Proximal Junctional Failure (PJF) was defined using the Lafage criteria. "Matched" and "unmatched" refers to ideal age-adjusted alignment postoperatively. Multivariable regression determined the impact of frailty on the development of PJF. RESULTS Two hundred eighty-four ASD patients met inclusion criteria [62.2yrs±9.9, 81%F, BMI: 27.5 kg/m 2 ±5.3, ASD-FI: 3.4±1.5, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI): 1.7±1.6]. Forty-three percent of patients were characterized as Not Frail (NF) and 57% were characterized as Frail (F). PJF development was lower in the NF group compared with the F group (7% vs . 18%; P =0.002). F patients had 3.2 × higher risk of PJF development compared to NF patients (OR: 3.2, 95% CI: 1.3-7.3, P =0.009). Controlling for baseline factors, F unmatched patients had a higher degree of PJF (OR: 1.4, 95% CI:1.02-1.8, P =0.03); however, with prophylaxis, there was no increased risk. Adjusted analysis shows F patients, when matched postoperatively in PI-LL, had no significantly higher risk of PJF. CONCLUSIONS An increasingly frail state is significantly associated with the development of PJF after corrective surgery for ASD. Optimal realignment may mitigate the impact of frailty on eventual PJF. Prophylaxis should be considered in frail patients who do not reach ideal alignment goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oscar Krol
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Kimberly McFarland
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | | | - Navraj Sagoo
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Tyler Williamson
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Rachel Joujon-Roche
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Peter Tretiakov
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Bailey Imbo
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Pooja Dave
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Jamshaid Mir
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| | - Jordan Lebovic
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Oluwatobi O Onafowokan
- Exeter Spine Unit, Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
| | - Andrew J Schoenfeld
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Rafael De la Garza Ramos
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | | | - Daniel M Sciubba
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore MD
| | - Bassel G Diebo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, SUNY Downstate Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Shaleen Vira
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurosurgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Peter G Passias
- Departments of Orthopaedic and Neurologic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital; New York Spine Institute, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Diebo BG, Tataryn Z, Alsoof D, Lafage R, Hart RA, Passias PG, Ames CP, Scheer JK, Lewis SJ, Shaffrey CI, Burton DC, Deviren V, Line BG, Soroceanu A, Hamilton DK, Klineberg EO, Mundis GM, Kim HJ, Gum JL, Smith JS, Uribe JS, Kelly MP, Kebaish KM, Gupta MC, Nunley PD, Eastlack RK, Hostin R, Protopsaltis TS, Lenke LG, Schwab FJ, Bess S, Lafage V, Daniels AH. Height Gain Following Correction of Adult Spinal Deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2023; 105:1410-1419. [PMID: 37478308 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.23.00031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Height gain following a surgical procedure for patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) is incompletely understood, and it is unknown if height gain correlates with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing ASD surgery. Patients with baseline, 6-week, and subanalysis of 1-year postoperative full-body radiographic and PROM data were examined. Correlation analysis examined relationships between vertical height differences and PROMs. Regression analysis was utilized to preoperatively estimate T1-S1 and S1-ankle height changes. RESULTS This study included 198 patients (mean age, 57 years; 69% female); 147 patients (74%) gained height. Patients with height loss, compared with those who gained height, experienced greater increases in thoracolumbar kyphosis (2.81° compared with -7.37°; p < 0.001) and thoracic kyphosis (12.96° compared with 4.42°; p = 0.003). For patients with height gain, sagittal and coronal alignment improved from baseline to postoperatively: 25° to 21° for pelvic tilt (PT), 14° to 3° for pelvic incidence - lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), and 60 mm to 17 mm for sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (all p < 0.001). The full-body mean height gain was 7.6 cm, distributed as follows: sella turcica-C2, 2.9 mm; C2-T1, 2.8 mm; T1-S1 (trunk gain), 3.8 cm; and S1-ankle (lower-extremity gain), 3.3 cm (p < 0.001). T1-S1 height gain correlated with the thoracic Cobb angle correction and the maximum Cobb angle correction (p = 0.002). S1-ankle height gain correlated with the corrections in PT, PI-LL, and SVA (p < 0.001). T1-ankle height gain correlated with the corrections in PT (p < 0.001) and SVA (p = 0.03). Trunk height gain correlated with improved Scoliosis Research Society (SRS-22r) Appearance scores (r = 0.20; p = 0.02). Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression scores correlated with S1-ankle height gain (r = -0.19; p = 0.03) and C2-T1 height gain (r = -0.18; p = 0.04). A 1° correction in a thoracic scoliosis Cobb angle corresponded to a 0.2-mm height gain, and a 1° correction in a thoracolumbar scoliosis Cobb angle resulted in a 0.25-mm height gain. A 1° improvement in PI-LL resulted in a 0.2-mm height gain. CONCLUSIONS Most patients undergoing ASD surgery experienced height gain following deformity correction, with a mean full-body height gain of 7.6 cm. Height gain can be estimated preoperatively with predictive ratios, and height gain was correlated with improvements in reported SRS-22r appearance and PROMIS scores. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bassel G Diebo
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | | | - Daniel Alsoof
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Renaud Lafage
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Northwell, New York, NY
| | | | - Peter G Passias
- Department of Orthopedics, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY
| | | | - Justin K Scheer
- University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Stephen J Lewis
- Division of Orthopaedics, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Douglas C Burton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Vedat Deviren
- University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Breton G Line
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Denver International Spine Center, Denver, Colorado
| | - Alex Soroceanu
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - D Kojo Hamilton
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Eric O Klineberg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-Davis, Davis, California
| | | | - Han Jo Kim
- Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY
| | - Jeffrey L Gum
- Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Justin S Smith
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Juan S Uribe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Michael P Kelly
- Division of Orthopedics & Scoliosis at Rady Children's Hospital-San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Khaled M Kebaish
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | | | - Richard Hostin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southwest Scoliosis Institute, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - Lawrence G Lenke
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Och Spine Hospital/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Frank J Schwab
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Northwell, New York, NY
| | - Shay Bess
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Denver International Spine Center, Denver, Colorado
| | - Virginie Lafage
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lenox Hill Northwell, New York, NY
| | - Alan H Daniels
- Department of Orthopedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| |
Collapse
|