Radiation and Chemical Program Research for Multi-Utility and Repurposed Countermeasures: A US Department of Health and Human Services Agencies Perspective

Although chemical and radiological agents cause toxicity through different mechanisms, the multiorgan injuries caused by these threats share similarities that convene on the level of basic biological responses. This publication will discuss these areas of convergence and explore "multi-utility" approaches that could be leveraged to address common injury mechanisms underlying actions of chemical and radiological agents in a threat-agnostic manner. In addition, we will provide an overview of the current state of radiological and chemical threat research, discuss the US Government's efforts toward medical preparedness, and identify potential areas for collaboration geared toward enhancing preparedness and response against radiological and chemical threats. We also will discuss previous regulatory experience to provide insight on how to navigate regulatory paths for US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval/licensure/clearance for products addressing chemical or radiological/nuclear threats. This publication follows a 2022 trans-agency meeting titled, "Overlapping Science in Radiation and Sulfur Mustard Exposures of Skin and Lung: Consideration of Models, Mechanisms, Organ Systems, and Medical Countermeasures," sponsored by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), a part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Discussions from this meeting explored the overlapping nature of radiation and chemical injury and spurred increased interest in how preparedness for one threat leads to preparedness for the other. Herein, subject matter experts from the NIAID and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), a part of the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response (ASPR), summarize the knowledge gained from recently funded biomedical research, as well as insights from the 2022 meeting. These topics include identification of common areas for collaboration, potential use of biomarkers of injury to identify injuries caused by both hazards, and common and widely available treatments that could treat damage caused by radiological or chemical threats.

Blood product use for radiological/nuclear trauma: product development and US regulatory considerations

Blood products are likely to be critical components of the medical response to nuclear detonation, as the hematopoietic subsyndrome of acute radiation syndrome (H-ARS) includes depletion of platelets and red blood cells that can lead to lethal hemorrhage and anemia. There is, however, only limited clinical information on the use of blood products to treat H-ARS. As currently configured, the US blood supply cannot meet the predicted surge in blood product demand that is likely to occur short-term and possibly long-term in the event of a large nuclear detonation. As part of the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response within the US Department of Health and Human Services, the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) is addressing this preparedness gap by supporting the development of novel blood products and devices with characteristics that improve blood product storage and use in austere operational environments. The US Food and Drug Administration's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) recently issued draft guidance on the development of drugs and biologics regulated by CDER to prevent or treat Acute Radiation Syndrome under the provisions of the "Animal Rule." The commentary provided here discusses the unique regulatory scheme for transfusion components and blood products regulated as biological drugs by Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, including the ambiguity surrounding the evidentiary requirements for their approval for H-ARS, and whether, under certain circumstances, a specific H-ARS indication is necessary if relevant commercial indications are approved.

Sex differences in radiation research

PURPOSE

The Sex Differences in Radiation Research workshop addressed the role of sex as a confounder in radiation research and its implication in real-world radiological and nuclear applications.

METHODS

In April 2022, HHS-wide partners from the Radiation and Nuclear Countermeasures Program, the Office of Research on Women's Health National Institutes of Health Office of Women's Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and the Radiological and Nuclear Countermeasures Branch at the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority conducted a workshop to address the scientific implication and knowledge gaps in understanding sex in basic and translational research. The goals of this workshop were to examine sex differences in 1. Radiation animal models and understand how these may affect radiation medical countermeasure development; 2. Biodosimetry and/or biomarkers used to assess acute radiation syndrome, delayed effects of acute radiation exposure, and/or predict major organ morbidities; 3. medical research that lacks representation from both sexes. In addition, regulatory policies that influence inclusion of women in research, and the gaps that exist in drug development and device clearance were discussed. Finally, real-world sex differences in human health scenarios were also considered.

RESULTS

This report provides an overview of the two-day workshop, and open discussion among academic investigators, industry researchers, and U.S. government representatives.

CONCLUSIONS

This meeting highlighted that current study designs lack the power to determine statistical significance based on sex, and much is unknown about the underlying factors that contribute to these differences. Investigators should accommodate both sexes in all stages of research to ensure that the outcome is robust, reproducible, and accurate, and will benefit public health.

Immune Dysfunction from Radiation Exposure

The hematopoietic system is highly sensitive to ionizing radiation. Damage to the immune system may result in opportunistic infections and hemorrhage, which could lead to mortality. Inflammation triggered by tissue damage can also lead to additional local or widespread tissue damage. The immune system is responsible for tissue repair and restoration, which is made more challenging when it is in the process of self-recovery. Because of these challenges, the Radiation and Nuclear Countermeasures Program (RNCP) and the Basic Immunology Branch (BIB) under the Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation (DAIT) within the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), along with partners from the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), and the Radiation Injury Treatment Network (RITN) sponsored a two-day meeting titled Immune Dysfunction from Radiation Exposure held on September 9-10, 2020. The intent was to discuss the manifestations and mechanisms of radiation-induced immune dysfunction in people and animals, identify knowledge gaps, and discuss possible treatments to restore immune function and enhance tissue repair after irradiation.

Preparedness for a 'no-notice' mass-casualty incident: a nuclear detonation scenario

PURPOSE

An effective response for a mass-casualty incident requires understanding the relevant basic science and physical impact; detailed preparedness among jurisdictions; and clear, sequential response planning, including formal operational exercises, logistics, interagency, and public-private coordination, rapid activation of resilience, and continual improvement from lessons learned and new knowledge. This ConRad 2021 meeting report describes steps for civilian medical and public health response planning for a nuclear detonation; the utility of this type of planning for broader application; and extension of this planning to the international community.

CONCLUSION

A nuclear detonation requires a response within minutes to what will be a large-scale disaster complicated by radiation, including some elements that are similar to a broad range of incidents. The response could be further complicated if multiple incidents occur simultaneously. Required are detailed planning, preparedness and scripting for an immediate operational response, addressing clinical manifestations of evolving radiation illness, and flexibility to adapt to a rapidly changing situation. This need translates into the use of just-in-time information; effective, credible communication; situational awareness on a global scale; and a template upon which to apply capabilities in a multi-sector response. This effort is greatly facilitated using a 'playbook' approach, the basics of which are presented.

Interagency approaches to animal models for acute radiation exposure

Ionizing radiation can cause devastating injuries including hemorrhage, immune suppression, increased susceptibility to infection, and death. Medical countermeasures (MCMs) that address and mitigate radiation-induced injuries are the most important tools for countering the consequences of radiation exposure. Likewise, in matters of public health security, the development and advancement of radiological MCMs are fundamental for establishing an effective response to radiological and nuclear threats. United States Government agencies such as the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) have dedicated significant efforts to advance the development of MCMs to treat radiation injury and facilitate their introduction into the public sphere. Due to the severe nature of radiation injuries, clinical trials are unethical. Therefore, nonclinical models that accurately replicate clinical manifestations of ionizing radiation injury observed in humans are essential to MCM advancement. The most frequently used nonclinical models of radiation injury are rodents and non-human primates (NHPs). These species reproduce many aspects of human disease caused by ionizing radiation and have been pivotal for the development and licensure of radiological MCMs. Despite these successes, model drawbacks have prompted the exploration and development of additional nonclinical models. Minipigs and rabbits show promise as acceptable models of radiation injury and demonstrate the potential to contribute significantly to MCM advancement. This collection of research showcases the capabilities of minipigs and rabbits in mirroring clinically relevant aspects of radiation-induced disease and documents the potential value these models may hold for radiological and nuclear MCM research. Together, these government-funded studies represent advances in radiological MCM development that can facilitate the emergence of cutting-edge technologies.

In Vitro Methods to Characterize the Effects of Tobacco and Nontobacco Products on Human Platelet Function

In this document, we describe methods for the isolation, treatment, and functional testing of human blood platelets in vitro. Functional assays for inflammatory function include flow cytometry and immunoassays for platelet release of platelet factor 4, soluble CD40L, prostaglandin E₂ , and thromboxane. Assays for platelet hemostatic function described here examine platelet spreading, aggregation using platelet-rich plasma, and thromboelastography. Also described here are methods for testing cigarette smoke on primary human platelets in vitro, which our lab developed to address a major knowledge gap regarding how cigarette smoke dysregulates platelets and how this platelet dysregulation contributes to cardiovascular disease. Some of these protocols may be repurposed for investigation of the toxicity potential of other tobacco products and environmental insults. © 2018 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

The HIV protease inhibitor, ritonavir, dysregulates human platelet function in vitro

There are 37 million people globally infected with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). People living with HIV can achieve nearly normal lifespans due to the use of antiretroviral drugs (ARVs). However, people living with HIV experience chronic inflammation and increased risk for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) relative to uninfected people. While the cause for this risk is unclear, some ARVs have been associated with CVD, and it is speculated that some ARVs potentiate inflammation in infected individuals. Platelets are a critical link between inflammation and the development and progression of CVD, but the effects of ARVs on platelets are largely understudied. In this study, we examined the effects of ARVs on human platelet function in vitro. Our data show that the ARV ritonavir, a protease inhibitor, severely altered human platelet lipid mediator production (prostaglandin E2 and thromboxane) in both resting and activated platelets. Further characterization revealed that ritonavir altered measures of platelet hemostatic and thrombotic function that included significantly decreased platelet spreading, increased platelet aggregation, and trended toward increased clot strength. These data provide proof-of-principle that ARVs can directly dysregulate human platelets, possibly contributing to inflammation-related comorbidities. These data may provide mechanistic insight into the factors contributing to increased risk of CVD in people living with HIV, and may help guide future development of new HIV agents and ARV regimens that mitigate platelet dysregulation by ARVs.

Antiretroviral drugs and tobacco smoke dysregulate human platelets: A novel investigation into the etiology of HIV co-morbid cardiovascular disease

While antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) successfully suppress Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), HIV-infected persons still have a shorter lifespan and are at higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared to uninfected persons. CVD is the number one cause of death globally, and is now appreciated as an inflammatory disease. HIV-infected persons experience chronic inflammation, thought to be caused by low levels of HIV proteins, daily use of ARVs, and increased rates of smoking. The impact of ARVs on CVD risk remains unclear, with some studies linking ARVs to CVD. Additionally, when controlled for smoking status HIV-infected persons were still at greater risk for CVD. Platelets are important in the development of CVD, but the effects of ARVs on platelets are unstudied. Additionally, cigarette smoke is known to activate platelets, inducing inflammation. Our novel study investigates the effects of ARVs and cigarette smoke, alone and in combination, on human platelet function. Our striking in vitro findings demonstrate that the ARVs Ritonavir and Darunavir, as well as cigarette smoke, dysregulate platelet function. Treatment with the protease inhibitor Ritonavir resulted in a dose-dependent increase in platelet production of proinflammatory mediator prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) (p<0.001). Additionally, when combined with cigarette smoke, Darunavir induced production of PGE2 (p<0.01). Combined doses of Ritonavir and Darunavir at physiological concentrations inhibited platelet spreading, similar to the effect of cigarette smoke. We hypothesize that cigarette smoke and ARVs act in combination to activate platelets and thus contribute to the chronic inflammation which leads to CVD.

In Vitro and Ex Vivo Approaches to Evaluate Next-Generation Tobacco and Non-Tobacco Products on Human Blood Platelets

Human blood platelets are major hemostatic regulators in the circulation and important in the mediation of chronic inflammation and immunomodulation. They are key elements that promote cardiovascular pathogenesis that leads to atherosclerosis, thrombosis, myocardial infarction, and stroke. New information on tobacco use and platelet dysregulation shows that these highly understudied vascular cells are dysregulated by tobacco smoke. Thus, platelet function studies should be an important consideration for the evaluation of existing and next-generation tobacco and non-tobacco products. Novel in vitro approaches are being sought to investigate these products and their influence on platelet function. Platelets are ideally suited for product assessment, as robust and novel in vitro translational methods are available to assess platelet function. Furthermore, the use of human biological systems has the advantage that risk predictions will better reflect the human condition.