1
|
de Tute RM, Pawlyn C, Cairns DA, Davies FE, Menzies T, Rawstron A, Jones JR, Hockaday A, Henderson R, Cook G, Drayson MT, Jenner MW, Kaiser MF, Gregory WM, Morgan GJ, Jackson GH, Owen RG. Minimal Residual Disease After Autologous Stem-Cell Transplant for Patients With Myeloma: Prognostic Significance and the Impact of Lenalidomide Maintenance and Molecular Risk. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:2889-2900. [PMID: 35377708 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Minimal residual disease (MRD) can predict outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma, but limited data are available on the prognostic impact of MRD when assessed at serial time points in the context of maintenance therapy after autologous stem-cell transplant (ASCT) and the interaction between MRD and molecular risk. METHODS Data from a large phase III trial (Myeloma XI) were examined to determine the relationship between MRD status, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in post-ASCT patients randomly assigned to lenalidomide maintenance or no maintenance at 3 months after ASCT. MRD status was assessed by flow cytometry (median sensitivity 0.004%) before maintenance random assignment (ASCT + 3) and 6 months later (ASCT + 9). RESULTS At ASCT + 3, 475 of 750 (63.3%) patients were MRD-negative and 275 (36.7%) were MRD-positive. MRD-negative status was associated with improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.58 P < .001) and OS (HR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.85; P = .0046). At ASCT + 9, 214 of 326 (65.6%) were MRD-negative and 112 (34.4%) were MRD-positive. MRD-negative status was associated with improved PFS (HR = 0.20; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.31; P < .0001) and OS (HR = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.75; P = .0077). The findings were very similar when restricted to patients with complete response/near complete response. Sustained MRD negativity from ASCT + 3 to ASCT + 9 or the conversion to MRD negativity by ASCT + 9 was associated with the longest PFS/OS. Patients randomly assigned to lenalidomide maintenance were more likely to convert from being MRD-positive before maintenance random assignment to MRD-negative 6 months later (lenalidomide 30%, observation 17%). High-risk molecular features had an adverse effect on PFS and OS even for those patients achieving MRD-negative status. On multivariable analysis of MRD status, maintenance therapy and molecular risk maintained prognostic impact at both ASCT + 3 and ASCT + 9. CONCLUSION In patients with multiple myeloma, MRD status at both ASCT + 3 and ASCT + 9 is a powerful predictor of PFS and OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth M de Tute
- Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte Pawlyn
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - David A Cairns
- Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Faith E Davies
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - Tom Menzies
- Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Andy Rawstron
- Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - John R Jones
- Eastbourne District General Hospital, Eastbourne, United Kingdom
- Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Sussex, United Kingdom
- Kings College Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anna Hockaday
- Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Rowena Henderson
- Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Gordon Cook
- Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
- Kings College Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark T Drayson
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew W Jenner
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Martin F Kaiser
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Walter M Gregory
- Leeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | - Graham H Jackson
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Roger G Owen
- Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Croft J, Ellis S, Sherborne AL, Sharp K, Price A, Jenner MW, Drayson MT, Owen RG, Chown S, Lindsay J, Karunanithi K, Hunter H, Gregory WM, Davies FE, Morgan GJ, Cook G, Atanesyan L, Savola S, Cairns DA, Jackson G, Houlston RS, Kaiser MF. Copy number evolution and its relationship with patient outcome-an analysis of 178 matched presentation-relapse tumor pairs from the Myeloma XI trial. Leukemia 2021; 35:2043-2053. [PMID: 33262523 PMCID: PMC8257500 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-020-01096-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Structural chromosomal changes including copy number aberrations (CNAs) are a major feature of multiple myeloma (MM), however their evolution in context of modern biological therapy is not well characterized. To investigate acquisition of CNAs and their prognostic relevance in context of first-line therapy, we profiled tumor diagnosis-relapse pairs from 178 NCRI Myeloma XI (ISRCTN49407852) trial patients using digital multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. CNA profiles acquired at relapse differed substantially between MM subtypes: hyperdiploid (HRD) tumors evolved predominantly in branching pattern vs. linear pattern in t(4;14) vs. stable pattern in t(11;14). CNA acquisition also differed between subtypes based on CCND expression, with a marked enrichment of acquired del(17p) in CCND2 over CCND1 tumors. Acquired CNAs were not influenced by high-dose melphalan or lenalidomide maintenance randomization. A branching evolution pattern was significantly associated with inferior overall survival (OS; hazard ratio (HR) 2.61, P = 0.0048). As an individual lesion, acquisition of gain(1q) at relapse was associated with shorter OS, independent of other risk markers or time of relapse (HR = 2.00; P = 0.021). There is an increasing need for rational therapy sequencing in MM. Our data supports the value of repeat molecular profiling to characterize disease evolution and inform management of MM relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Croft
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Sidra Ellis
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Amy L Sherborne
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Kim Sharp
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Amy Price
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Matthew W Jenner
- Department of Haematology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Mark T Drayson
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Roger G Owen
- Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Sally Chown
- Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, UK
| | | | | | | | - Walter M Gregory
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, Leeds, UK
| | - Faith E Davies
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gareth J Morgan
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gordon Cook
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - David A Cairns
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, Leeds, UK
| | - Graham Jackson
- Department of Haematology, University of Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Richard S Houlston
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Martin F Kaiser
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
- Department of Hematology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jackson GH, Davies FE, Pawlyn C, Cairns DA, Striha A, Collett C, Waterhouse A, Jones JR, Kishore B, Garg M, Williams CD, Karunanithi K, Lindsay J, Allotey D, Shafeek S, Jenner MW, Cook G, Russell NH, Kaiser MF, Drayson MT, Owen RG, Gregory WM, Morgan GJ. Lenalidomide before and after autologous stem cell transplantation for transplant-eligible patients of all ages in the randomized, phase III, Myeloma XI trial. Haematologica 2021; 106:1957-1967. [PMID: 32499244 PMCID: PMC8252959 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2020.247130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The optimal way to use immunomodulatory drugs as components of induction and maintenance therapy for multiple myeloma is unresolved. We addressed this question in a large phase III randomized trial, Myeloma XI. Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (n = 2042) were randomized to induction therapy with cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (CTD) or cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (CRD). Additional intensification therapy with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (CVD) was administered before ASCT to patients with a suboptimal response to induction therapy using a response-adapted approach. After receiving high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), eligible patients were further randomized to receive either lenalidomide alone or observation alone. Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The CRD regimen was associated with significantly longer PFS (median: 36 vs. 33 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.96; P = 0.0116) and OS (3-year OS: 82.9% vs. 77.0%; HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63-0.93; P = 0.0072) compared with CTD. The PFS and OS results favored CRD over CTD across all subgroups, including patients with International Staging System stage III disease (HR for PFS, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58-0.93; HR for OS, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.56-1.09), high-risk cytogenetics (HR for PFS, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43-0.84; HR for OS, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.42-1.15) and ultra high-risk cytogenetics (HR for PFS, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.41-1.11; HR for OS, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.34-1.25). Among patients randomized to lenalidomide maintenance (n = 451) or observation (n = 377), maintenance therapy improved PFS (median: 50 vs. 28 months; HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.37-0.60; P < 0.0001). Optimal results for PFS and OS were achieved in the patients who received CRD induction and lenalidomide maintenance. The trial was registered with the EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT 2009-010956-93) and ISRCTN49407852.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graham H. Jackson
- Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Faith E. Davies
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charlotte Pawlyn
- The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - David A. Cairns
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Alina Striha
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Corinne Collett
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Anna Waterhouse
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - John R. Jones
- King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Mamta Garg
- Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
| | - Cathy D. Williams
- Centre for Clinical Haematology, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | - David Allotey
- Derby Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
| | - Salim Shafeek
- Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, UK
| | - Matthew W. Jenner
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Gordon Cook
- Section of Experimental Haematology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Nigel H. Russell
- Centre for Clinical Haematology, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Martin F. Kaiser
- The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mark T. Drayson
- Clinical Immunology, School of Immunity and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Roger G. Owen
- St James's University Hospital, Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service (HMDS), Leeds, UK
| | - Walter M. Gregory
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jackson GH, Pawlyn C, Cairns DA, Striha A, Collett C, Waterhouse A, Jones JR, Wilson J, Taylor C, Kishore B, Garg M, Williams CD, Karunanithi K, Lindsay J, Jenner MW, Cook G, Russell NH, Drayson MT, Kaiser MF, Owen RG, Gregory WM, Davies FE, Morgan GJ. Optimising the value of immunomodulatory drugs during induction and maintenance in transplant ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results from Myeloma XI, a multicentre, open-label, randomised, Phase III trial. Br J Haematol 2021; 192:853-868. [PMID: 32656799 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.16945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Second-generation immunomodulatory agents, such as lenalidomide, have a more favourable side-effect profile than the first-generation thalidomide, but their optimum combination and duration for patients with newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible myeloma (ND-TNE-MM) has not been defined. The most appropriate delivery and dosing regimens of these therapies for patients at advanced age and frailty status is also unclear. The Myeloma XI study compared cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone (CTDa) to cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (CRDa) as induction therapy, followed by a maintenance randomisation between ongoing therapy with lenalidomide or observation for patients with ND-TNE-MM. CRDa deepened response but did not improve progression-free (PFS) or overall survival (OS) compared to CTDa. However, analysis by age group highlighted significant differences in tolerability in older, frailer patients that may have limited treatment delivery and impacted outcome. Deeper responses and PFS and OS benefits with CRDa over CTDs were seen in patients aged ≤70 years, with an increase in toxicity and discontinuation observed in older patients. Our results highlight the importance of considering age and frailty in the approach to therapy for patients with ND-TNE-MM, highlighting the need for prospective validation of frailty adapted therapy approaches, which may improve outcomes by tailoring treatment to the individual.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graham H Jackson
- Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Charlotte Pawlyn
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - David A Cairns
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Alina Striha
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Corinne Collett
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Anna Waterhouse
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - John R Jones
- Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jamie Wilson
- Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Chichester, UK
| | | | - Bhuvan Kishore
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Mamta Garg
- Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
| | - Cathy D Williams
- Centre for Clinical Haematology, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Jindriska Lindsay
- E1ast Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury, UK
| | - Matthew W Jenner
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Gordon Cook
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Cancer Centre, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Nigel H Russell
- Centre for Clinical Haematology, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Mark T Drayson
- Clinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Martin F Kaiser
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Roger G Owen
- Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service (HMDS), St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Walter M Gregory
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Faith E Davies
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NY Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gareth J Morgan
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NY Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Howard DR, Hockaday A, Brown JM, Gregory WM, Todd S, Munir T, Oughton JB, Dimbleby C, Hillmen P. A platform trial in practice: adding a new experimental research arm to the ongoing confirmatory FLAIR trial in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Trials 2021; 22:38. [PMID: 33419469 PMCID: PMC7792072 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04971-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The FLAIR trial in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia has a randomised, controlled, open-label, confirmatory, platform design. FLAIR was successfully amended to include an emerging promising experimental therapy to expedite its assessment, greatly reducing the time to reach the primary outcome compared to running a separate trial and without compromising the validity of the research or the ability to recruit to the trial and report the outcomes. The methodological and practical issues are presented, describing how they were addressed to ensure the amendment was a success. METHODS FLAIR was designed as a two-arm trial requiring 754 patients. In stage 2, two new arms were added: a new experimental arm and a second control arm to protect the trial in case of a change in practice. In stage 3, the original experimental arm was closed as its planned recruitment target was reached. In total, 1516 participants will be randomised to the trial. RESULTS The changes to the protocol and randomisation to add and stop arms were made seamlessly without pausing recruitment. The statistical considerations to ensure the results for the original and new hypotheses are unbiased were approved following peer review by oversight committees, Cancer Research UK, ethical and regulatory committees and pharmaceutical partners. These included the use of concurrent comparators in case of any stage effect, appropriate control of the type I error rate and consideration of analysis methods across trial stages. The operational aspects of successfully implementing the amendments are described, including gaining approvals and additional funding, data management requirements and implementation at centres. CONCLUSIONS FLAIR is an exemplar of how an emerging experimental therapy can be assessed within an existing trial structure without compromising the conduct, reporting or validity of the trial. This strategy offered considerable resource savings and allowed the new experimental therapy to be assessed within a confirmatory trial in the UK years earlier than would have otherwise been possible. Despite the clear efficiencies, treatment arms are rarely added to ongoing trials in practice. This paper demonstrates how this strategy is acceptable, feasible and beneficial to patients and the wider research community. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN01844152 . Registered on August 08, 2014.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dena R Howard
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | - Anna Hockaday
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Julia M Brown
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Walter M Gregory
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Susan Todd
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Reading, Reading, UK
| | - Tahla Munir
- St James's Institute of Oncology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Jamie B Oughton
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Claire Dimbleby
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Peter Hillmen
- St James's Institute of Oncology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
- Section of Experimental Haematology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jackson GH, Pawlyn C, Cairns DA, de Tute RM, Hockaday A, Collett C, Jones JR, Kishore B, Garg M, Williams CD, Karunanithi K, Lindsay J, Rocci A, Snowden JA, Jenner MW, Cook G, Russell NH, Drayson MT, Gregory WM, Kaiser MF, Owen RG, Davies FE, Morgan GJ. Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone, and cyclophosphamide (KRdc) as induction therapy for transplant-eligible, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients (Myeloma XI+): Interim analysis of an open-label randomised controlled trial. PLoS Med 2021; 18:e1003454. [PMID: 33428632 PMCID: PMC7799846 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carfilzomib is a second-generation irreversible proteasome inhibitor that is efficacious in the treatment of myeloma and carries less risk of peripheral neuropathy than first-generation proteasome inhibitors, making it more amenable to combination therapy. METHODS AND FINDINGS The Myeloma XI+ trial recruited patients from 88 sites across the UK between 5 December 2013 and 20 April 2016. Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma eligible for transplantation were randomly assigned to receive the combination carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone, and cyclophosphamide (KRdc) or a triplet of lenalidomide, dexamethasone, and cyclophosphamide (Rdc) or thalidomide, dexamethasone, and cyclophosphamide (Tdc). All patients were planned to receive an autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) prior to a randomisation between lenalidomide maintenance and observation. Eligible patients were aged over 18 years and had symptomatic myeloma. The co-primary endpoints for the study were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for KRdc versus the Tdc/Rdc control group by intention to treat. PFS, response, and safety outcomes are reported following a planned interim analysis. The trial is registered (ISRCTN49407852) and has completed recruitment. In total, 1,056 patients (median age 61 years, range 33 to 75, 39.1% female) underwent induction randomisation to KRdc (n = 526) or control (Tdc/Rdc, n = 530). After a median follow-up of 34.5 months, KRdc was associated with a significantly longer PFS than the triplet control group (hazard ratio 0.63, 95% CI 0.51-0.76). The median PFS for patients receiving KRdc is not yet estimable, versus 36.2 months for the triplet control group (p < 0.001). Improved PFS was consistent across subgroups of patients including those with genetically high-risk disease. At the end of induction, the percentage of patients achieving at least a very good partial response was 82.3% in the KRdc group versus 58.9% in the control group (odds ratio 4.35, 95% CI 3.19-5.94, p < 0.001). Minimal residual disease negativity (cutoff 4 × 10-5 bone marrow leucocytes) was achieved in 55% of patients tested in the KRdc group at the end of induction, increasing to 75% of those tested after ASCT. The most common adverse events were haematological, with a low incidence of cardiac events. The trial continues to follow up patients to the co-primary endpoint of OS and for planned long-term follow-up analysis. Limitations of the study include a lack of blinding to treatment regimen and that the triplet control regimen did not include a proteasome inhibitor for all patients, which would be considered a current standard of care in many parts of the world. CONCLUSIONS The KRdc combination was well tolerated and was associated with both an increased percentage of patients achieving at least a very good partial response and a significant PFS benefit compared to immunomodulatory-agent-based triplet therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov ISRCTN49407852.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graham H. Jackson
- Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte Pawlyn
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - David A. Cairns
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Ruth M. de Tute
- Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Anna Hockaday
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Corinne Collett
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - John R. Jones
- Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bhuvan Kishore
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Mamta Garg
- Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Cathy D. Williams
- Centre for Clinical Haematology, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Kamaraj Karunanithi
- University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom
| | - Jindriska Lindsay
- East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury, United Kingdom
| | - Alberto Rocci
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - John A. Snowden
- Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew W. Jenner
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Gordon Cook
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
- Section of Experimental Haematology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Nigel H. Russell
- Centre for Clinical Haematology, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Mark T. Drayson
- Clinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Walter M. Gregory
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Martin F. Kaiser
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Roger G. Owen
- Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Faith E. Davies
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Gareth J. Morgan
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States of America
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Franks KN, McParland L, Webster J, Baldwin DR, Sebag-Montefiore D, Evison M, Booton R, Faivre-Finn C, Naidu B, Ferguson J, Peedell C, Callister MEJ, Kennedy M, Hewison J, Bestall J, Gregory WM, Hall P, Collinson F, Olivier C, Naylor R, Bell S, Allen P, Sloss A, Snee M. SABRTooth: a randomised controlled feasibility study of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) with surgery in patients with peripheral stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer considered to be at higher risk of complications from surgical resection. Eur Respir J 2020; 56:2000118. [PMID: 32616595 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00118-2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a well-established treatment for medically inoperable peripheral stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Previous nonrandomised evidence supports SABR as an alternative to surgery, but high-quality randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence is lacking. The SABRTooth study aimed to establish whether a UK phase III RCT was feasible. DESIGN AND METHODS SABRTooth was a UK multicentre randomised controlled feasibility study targeting patients with peripheral stage I NSCLC considered to be at higher risk of surgical complications. 54 patients were planned to be randomised 1:1 to SABR or surgery. The primary outcome was monthly average recruitment rates. RESULTS Between July 2015 and January 2017, 318 patients were considered for the study and 205 (64.5%) were deemed ineligible. Out of 106 (33.3%) assessed as eligible, 24 (22.6%) patients were randomised to SABR (n=14) or surgery (n=10). A key theme for nonparticipation was treatment preference, with 43 (41%) preferring nonsurgical treatment and 19 (18%) preferring surgery. The average monthly recruitment rate was 1.7 patients against a target of three. 15 patients underwent their allocated treatment: SABR n=12, surgery n=3. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that a phase III RCT randomising higher risk patients between SABR and surgery is not feasible in the National Health Service. Patients have pre-existing treatment preferences, which was a barrier to recruitment. A significant proportion of patients randomised to the surgical group declined and chose SABR. SABR remains an alternative to surgery and novel study approaches are needed to define which patients benefit from a nonsurgical approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin N Franks
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Joint first authors
| | - Lucy McParland
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Joint first authors
| | - Joanne Webster
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - David Sebag-Montefiore
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Matthew Evison
- Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard Booton
- Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Corinne Faivre-Finn
- University of Manchester and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Babu Naidu
- Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Clive Peedell
- The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| | | | - Martyn Kennedy
- Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK
| | - Jenny Hewison
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Janine Bestall
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Walter M Gregory
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Peter Hall
- Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Fiona Collinson
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Catherine Olivier
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Rachel Naylor
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Sue Bell
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Peter Allen
- Patient and Public Involvement Representative, Leeds, UK
| | - Andrew Sloss
- Patient and Public Involvement Representative, Leeds, UK
| | - Michael Snee
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shah V, Sherborne AL, Johnson DC, Ellis S, Price A, Chowdhury F, Kendall J, Jenner MW, Drayson MT, Owen RG, Gregory WM, Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Cook G, Cairns DA, Houlston RS, Jackson G, Kaiser MF. Predicting ultrahigh risk multiple myeloma by molecular profiling: an analysis of newly diagnosed transplant eligible myeloma XI trial patients. Leukemia 2020; 34:3091-3096. [PMID: 32157174 PMCID: PMC7584474 DOI: 10.1038/s41375-020-0750-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2019] [Revised: 02/04/2020] [Accepted: 02/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Vallari Shah
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Amy L Sherborne
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - David C Johnson
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Sidra Ellis
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Amy Price
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Farzana Chowdhury
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Jack Kendall
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Matthew W Jenner
- Department of Haematology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Mark T Drayson
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Roger G Owen
- Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Walter M Gregory
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, Leeds, UK
| | - Gareth J Morgan
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Faith E Davies
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Gordon Cook
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - David A Cairns
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, Leeds, UK
| | - Richard S Houlston
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Molecular and Population Genetics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Graham Jackson
- Department of Haematology, University of Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Martin F Kaiser
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bradbury CA, Craig Z, Cook G, Pawlyn C, Cairns DA, Hockaday A, Paterson A, Jenner MW, Jones JR, Drayson MT, Owen RG, Kaiser MF, Gregory WM, Davies FE, Child JA, Morgan GJ, Jackson GH. Thrombosis in patients with myeloma treated in the Myeloma IX and Myeloma XI phase 3 randomized controlled trials. Blood 2020; 136:1091-1104. [PMID: 32438407 PMCID: PMC7453153 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2020005125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients treated with immunomodulatory drugs are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), but data are lacking from large prospective cohorts. We present thrombosis outcome data from Myeloma IX (n = 1936) and Myeloma XI (n = 4358) phase 3 randomized controlled trials for NDMM that treated transplant-eligible and transplant-ineligible patients before and after publication of thrombosis prevention guidelines. In Myeloma IX, transplant-eligible patients randomly assigned to cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (CVAD) induction had higher risk of VTE compared with patients treated with cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (CTD) (22.5% [n = 121 of 538] vs 16.1% [n = 89 of 554]; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR],1.46; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.11-1.93). For transplant-ineligible patients, those randomly assigned to attenuated CTD (CTDa) induction had a higher risk of VTE compared with those treated with melphalan and prednisolone (MP) (16.0% [n = 68 of 425] vs 4.1% [n = 17 of 419]; aHR, 4.25; 95% CI, 2.50-7.20). In Myeloma XI, there was no difference in risk of VTE (12.2% [n = 124 of 1014] vs 13.2% [n = 133 of 1008]; aHR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.72-1.18) or arterial thrombosis (1.2% [n = 12 of 1014] vs 1.5% [n = 15 of 1008]; aHR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.37-1.70) between transplant-eligible pathways for patients treated with cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (CRD) or CTD. For transplant-ineligible patients, there was no difference in VTEs between attenuated CRD (CRDa) and CTDa (10.4% [n = 95 of 916] vs 10.7% [n = 97 of 910]; aHR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.73-1.29). However, arterial risk was higher with CRDa than with CTDa (3.1% [n = 28 of 916] vs 1.6% [n = 15 of 910]; aHR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.02-3.57). Thrombotic events occurred almost entirely within 6 months of treatment initiation. Thrombosis was not associated with inferior progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS), apart from inferior OS for patients with arterial events (aHR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.12-2.08) in Myeloma XI. The Myeloma XI trial protocol incorporated International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) thrombosis prevention recommendations and compared with Myeloma IX, more patients received thromboprophylaxis (80.5% vs 22.3%) with lower rates of VTE for identical regimens (CTD, 13.2% vs 16.1%; CTDa, 10.7% vs 16.0%). However, thrombosis remained frequent in spite of IMWG-guided thromboprophylaxis, suggesting that new approaches are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte A Bradbury
- School of Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Zoe Craig
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Gordon Cook
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
- Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte Pawlyn
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- The Royal Marsden Hospital National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - David A Cairns
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Anna Hockaday
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Andrea Paterson
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew W Jenner
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - John R Jones
- Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark T Drayson
- Clinical Immunology, School of Immunity and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Roger G Owen
- Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Martin F Kaiser
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- The Royal Marsden Hospital National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Walter M Gregory
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Faith E Davies
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY; and
| | - J Anthony Child
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Gareth J Morgan
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY; and
| | - Graham H Jackson
- Freeman Hospital, University of Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jackson GH, Davies FE, Pawlyn C, Cairns DA, Striha A, Collett C, Waterhouse A, Jones JR, Kishore B, Garg M, Williams CD, Karunanithi K, Lindsay J, Wilson JN, Jenner MW, Cook G, Kaiser MF, Drayson MT, Owen RG, Russell NH, Gregory WM, Morgan GJ. Response-adapted intensification with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus no intensification in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (Myeloma XI): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol 2019; 6:e616-e629. [PMID: 31624047 PMCID: PMC7043012 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(19)30167-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Revised: 07/16/2019] [Accepted: 07/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple myeloma has been shown to have substantial clonal heterogeneity, suggesting that agents with different mechanisms of action might be required to induce deep responses and improve outcomes. Such agents could be given in combination or in sequence on the basis of previous response. We aimed to assess the clinical value of maximising responses by using therapeutic agents with different modes of action, the use of which is directed by the response to the initial combination therapy. We aimed to assess response-adapted intensification treatment with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (CVD) versus no intensification treatment in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who had a suboptimal response to initial immunomodulatory triplet treatment which was standard of care in the UK at the time of trial design. METHODS The Myeloma XI trial was an open-label, randomised, phase 3, adaptive design trial done at 110 National Health Service hospitals in the UK. There were three potential randomisations in the study: induction treatment, intensification treatment, and maintenance treatment. Here, we report the results of the randomisation to intensification treatment. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older and had symptomatic or non-secretory, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, had completed their assigned induction therapy as per protocol (cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone or cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone) and achieved a partial or minimal response. For the intensification treatment, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to cyclophosphamide (500 mg daily orally on days 1, 8, and 15), bortezomib (1·3 mg/m2 subcutaneously or intravenously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11), and dexamethasone (20 mg daily orally on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12) up to a maximum of eight cycles of 21 days or no treatment. Patients were stratified by allocated induction treatment, response to induction treatment, and centre. The co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival and overall survival, assessed from intensification randomisation to data cutoff, analysed by intention to treat. Safety analysis was per protocol. This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN49407852, and clinicaltrialsregister.eu, number 2009-010956-93, and has completed recruitment. FINDINGS Between Nov 15, 2010, and July 28, 2016, 583 patients were enrolled to the intensification randomisation, representing 48% of the 1217 patients who achieved partial or minimal response after initial induction therapy. 289 patients were assigned to CVD treatment and 294 patients to no treatment. After a median follow-up of 29·7 months (IQR 17·0-43·5), median progression-free survival was 30 months (95% CI 25-36) with CVD and 20 months (15-28) with no CVD (hazard ratio [HR] 0·60, 95% CI 0·48-0·75, p<0·0001), and 3-year overall survival was 77·3% (95% Cl 71·0-83·5) in the CVD group and 78·5% (72·3-84·6) in the no CVD group (HR 0·98, 95% CI 0·67-1·43, p=0·93). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events for patients taking CVD were haematological, including neutropenia (18 [7%] patients), thrombocytopenia (19 [7%] patients), and anaemia (8 [3%] patients). No deaths in the CVD group were deemed treatment related. INTERPRETATION Intensification treatment with CVD significantly improved progression-free survival in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and a suboptimal response to immunomodulatory induction therapy compared with no intensification treatment, but did not improve overall survival. The manageable safety profile of this combination and the encouraging results support further investigation of response-adapted approaches in this setting. The substantial number of patients not entering this trial randomisation following induction therapy, however, might support the use of combination therapies upfront to maximise response and improve outcomes as is now the standard of care in the UK. FUNDING Cancer Research UK, Celgene, Amgen, Merck, Myeloma UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graham H Jackson
- Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
| | - Faith E Davies
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NY Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charlotte Pawlyn
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - David A Cairns
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Alina Striha
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Corinne Collett
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Anna Waterhouse
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - John R Jones
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Mamta Garg
- Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
| | - Cathy D Williams
- Centre for Clinical Haematology, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | - Jamie N Wilson
- Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Chichester, UK
| | - Matthew W Jenner
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Gordon Cook
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Section of Experimental Haematology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Martin F Kaiser
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mark T Drayson
- Clinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Roger G Owen
- Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Nigel H Russell
- Centre for Clinical Haematology, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Walter M Gregory
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Gareth J Morgan
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NY Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Went M, Kinnersley B, Sud A, Johnson DC, Weinhold N, Försti A, van Duin M, Orlando G, Mitchell JS, Kuiper R, Walker BA, Gregory WM, Hoffmann P, Jackson GH, Nöthen MM, da Silva Filho MI, Thomsen H, Broyl A, Davies FE, Thorsteinsdottir U, Hansson M, Kaiser M, Sonneveld P, Goldschmidt H, Stefansson K, Hemminki K, Nilsson B, Morgan GJ, Houlston RS. Transcriptome-wide association study of multiple myeloma identifies candidate susceptibility genes. Hum Genomics 2019; 13:37. [PMID: 31429796 PMCID: PMC6700979 DOI: 10.1186/s40246-019-0231-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2019] [Accepted: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of multiple myeloma (MM) have identified variants at 23 regions influencing risk, the genes underlying these associations are largely unknown. To identify candidate causal genes at these regions and search for novel risk regions, we performed a multi-tissue transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS). RESULTS GWAS data on 7319 MM cases and 234,385 controls was integrated with Genotype-Tissue Expression Project (GTEx) data assayed in 48 tissues (sample sizes, N = 80-491), including lymphocyte cell lines and whole blood, to predict gene expression. We identified 108 genes at 13 independent regions associated with MM risk, all of which were in 1 Mb of known MM GWAS risk variants. Of these, 94 genes, located in eight regions, had not previously been considered as a candidate gene for that locus. CONCLUSIONS Our findings highlight the value of leveraging expression data from multiple tissues to identify candidate genes responsible for GWAS associations which provide insight into MM tumorigenesis. Among the genes identified, a number have plausible roles in MM biology, notably APOBEC3C, APOBEC3H, APOBEC3D, APOBEC3F, APOBEC3G, or have been previously implicated in other malignancies. The genes identified in this TWAS can be explored for follow-up and validation to further understand their role in MM biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly Went
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5NG, UK.
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5NG, UK.
| | - Ben Kinnersley
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Amit Sud
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - David C Johnson
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Niels Weinhold
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Asta Försti
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mark van Duin
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3075, EA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Giulia Orlando
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Jonathan S Mitchell
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Rowan Kuiper
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3075, EA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Brian A Walker
- Myeloma Institute for Research and Therapy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA
| | - Walter M Gregory
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9PH, UK
| | - Per Hoffmann
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn, D-53127, Bonn, Germany
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, 4003, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Markus M Nöthen
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn, D-53127, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Genomics, Life & Brain Center, University of Bonn, D-53127, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Hauke Thomsen
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Annemiek Broyl
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3075, EA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Faith E Davies
- Myeloma Institute for Research and Therapy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA
| | | | - Markus Hansson
- Hematology Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, SE-221 85, Lund, Sweden
- Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, BMC B13, SE-221 84, Lund, Sweden
| | - Martin Kaiser
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Pieter Sonneveld
- Myeloma Institute for Research and Therapy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn, D-53127, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Kari Hemminki
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Björn Nilsson
- Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, BMC B13, SE-221 84, Lund, Sweden
- Broad Institute, 7 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA
| | - Gareth J Morgan
- Myeloma Institute for Research and Therapy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA
| | - Richard S Houlston
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5NG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jones JR, Weinhold N, Ashby C, Walker BA, Wardell C, Pawlyn C, Rasche L, Melchor L, Cairns DA, Gregory WM, Johnson D, Begum DB, Ellis S, Sherborne AL, Cook G, Kaiser MF, Drayson MT, Owen RG, Jackson GH, Davies FE, Greaves M, Morgan GJ. Clonal evolution in myeloma: the impact of maintenance lenalidomide and depth of response on the genetics and sub-clonal structure of relapsed disease in uniformly treated newly diagnosed patients. Haematologica 2019; 104:1440-1450. [PMID: 30733268 PMCID: PMC6601103 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2018.202200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2018] [Accepted: 01/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The emergence of treatment resistant sub-clones is a key feature of relapse in multiple myeloma. Therapeutic attempts to extend remission and prevent relapse include maximizing response and the use of maintenance therapy. We used whole exome sequencing to study the genetics of paired samples taken at presentation and at relapse from 56 newly diagnosed patients, following induction therapy, randomized to receive either lenalidomide maintenance or observation as part of the Myeloma XI trial. Patients included were considered high risk, relapsing within 30 months of maintenance randomization. Patients achieving a complete response had predominantly branching evolutionary patterns leading to relapse, characterized by a greater mutational burden, an altered mutational profile, bi-allelic inactivation of tumor suppressor genes, and acquired structural aberrations. Conversely, in patients achieving a partial response, the evolutionary features were predominantly stable with a similar mutational and structural profile seen at both time points. There were no significant differences between patients relapsing after lenalidomide maintenance versus observation. This study shows that the depth of response is a key determinant of the evolutionary patterns seen at relapse. This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov identifier: 01554852.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John R Jones
- Department of Haematology, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Niels Weinhold
- Myeloma Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Cody Ashby
- Myeloma Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Brian A Walker
- Myeloma Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Chris Wardell
- Myeloma Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Charlotte Pawlyn
- Department of Haematology, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Leo Rasche
- Myeloma Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | | | - David A Cairns
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, UK
| | - Walter M Gregory
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, UK
| | | | - Dil B Begum
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Sidra Ellis
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Amy L Sherborne
- Myeloma Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Gordon Cook
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, UK
| | - Martin F Kaiser
- Department of Haematology, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Mark T Drayson
- Clinical Immunology, School of Immunity and Infection, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Roger G Owen
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, UK
| | - Graham H Jackson
- Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Faith E Davies
- Myeloma Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Mel Greaves
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Gareth J Morgan
- Myeloma Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cook G, Royle KL, Pawlyn C, Hockaday A, Shah V, Kaiser MF, Brown SR, Gregory WM, Child JA, Davies FE, Morgan GJ, Cairns DA, Jackson GH. A clinical prediction model for outcome and therapy delivery in transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma (UK Myeloma Research Alliance Risk Profile): a development and validation study. Lancet Haematol 2019; 6:e154-e166. [PMID: 30738834 PMCID: PMC6391517 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(18)30220-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2018] [Revised: 11/30/2018] [Accepted: 11/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tolerability of treatments for multiple myeloma can depend on the characteristics of the patient being treated. We aimed to develop and validate a risk profile, using routinely collected data, that could predict overall survival in patients with multiple myeloma who were ineligible for stem-cell transplantation. METHODS We used patient data from two randomised controlled trials done in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who were ineligible for stem-cell transplantation (the NCRI Myeloma XI study [NCRI-XI, n=1852] and the MRC Myeloma IX study [MRC-IX, n=520]), to develop the UK Myeloma Research Alliance Risk Profile (MRP) for overall survival. We used multivariable Cox regression with a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator penalty term. Multiple imputation by chained equations was used to account for missing data in the development and internal validation of the model. The MRP was internally validated in NCRI-XI and externally validated in MRC-IX. The D-statistic was estimated in the developed model and used to internally and externally validate the model according to prespecified criteria. FINDINGS The MRP included WHO performance status, International Staging System, age, and C-reactive protein concentration as prognostic variables. The MRP was prognostic of overall survival and was successfully internally validated in NCRI-XI and externally validated in MRC-IX (D-statistic NCRI-XI: 0·840 [95% CI 0·718-0·963] and MRC-IX: 0·654 [0·497-0·811]). The MRP groups defining low-risk, medium-risk, and high-risk patients were associated with progression-free survival and early mortality. A decrease in the percentage of protocol dose delivered and quality of life at baseline were associated with increased risk. The MRP groups remained prognostic in patients exposed to different therapeutic combinations and in patients with genetic high-risk disease defined according to both the UK and International Myeloma Working Group definitions. INTERPRETATION We have developed and externally validated a risk profile for overall survival containing widely available clinical parameters. This risk profile could aid decision making in patients with multiple myeloma ineligible for stem-cell transplantation, but further external validation is required. FUNDING Medical Research Council, Novartis, Schering Health Care, Chugai, Pharmion, Celgene, Ortho Biotech, Cancer Research UK, Celgene, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Amgen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordon Cook
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | - Kara-Louise Royle
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Anna Hockaday
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Sarah R Brown
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Walter M Gregory
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - J Anthony Child
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Faith E Davies
- Myeloma Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Gareth J Morgan
- Myeloma Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - David A Cairns
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Graham H Jackson
- Department of Haematology, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tulotta C, Lefley DV, Freeman K, Gregory WM, Hanby AM, Heath PR, Nutter F, Wilkinson JM, Spicer-Hadlington AR, Liu X, Bradbury SMJ, Hambley L, Cookson V, Allocca G, Kruithof de Julio M, Coleman RE, Brown JE, Holen I, Ottewell PD. Endogenous Production of IL1B by Breast Cancer Cells Drives Metastasis and Colonization of the Bone Microenvironment. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25:2769-2782. [PMID: 30670488 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-2202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2018] [Revised: 11/20/2018] [Accepted: 01/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Breast cancer bone metastases are incurable, highlighting the need for new therapeutic targets. After colonizing bone, breast cancer cells remain dormant, until signals from the microenvironment stimulate outgrowth into overt metastases. Here we show that endogenous production of IL1B by tumor cells drives metastasis and growth in bone. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Tumor/stromal IL1B and IL1 receptor 1 (IL1R1) expression was assessed in patient samples and effects of the IL1R antagonist, Anakinra, or the IL1B antibody canakinumab on tumor growth and spontaneous metastasis were measured in a humanized mouse model of breast cancer bone metastasis. Effects of tumor cell-derived IL1B on bone colonization and parameters associated with metastasis were measured in MDA-MB-231, MCF7, and T47D cells transfected with IL1B/control. RESULTS In tissue samples from >1,300 patients with stage II/III breast cancer, IL1B in tumor cells correlated with relapse in bone (HR = 1.85; 95% CI, 1.05-3.26; P = 0.02) and other sites (HR = 2.09; 95% CI, 1.26-3.48; P = 0.0016). In a humanized model of spontaneous breast cancer metastasis to bone, Anakinra or canakinumab reduced metastasis and reduced the number of tumor cells shed into the circulation. Production of IL1B by tumor cells promoted epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (altered E-Cadherin, N-Cadherin, and G-Catenin), invasion, migration, and bone colonization. Contact between tumor and osteoblasts or bone marrow cells increased IL1B secretion from all three cell types. IL1B alone did not stimulate tumor cell proliferation. Instead, IL1B caused expansion of the bone metastatic niche leading to tumor proliferation. CONCLUSIONS Pharmacologic inhibition of IL1B has potential as a novel treatment for breast cancer metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Tulotta
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Diane V Lefley
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Katy Freeman
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Walter M Gregory
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew M Hanby
- Institute of Molecular Medicine, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Paul R Heath
- Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Faith Nutter
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - J Mark Wilkinson
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | | | - Xinming Liu
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Steven M J Bradbury
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Lisa Hambley
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Victoria Cookson
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Gloria Allocca
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | | | - Robert E Coleman
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Janet E Brown
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Ingunn Holen
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Penelope D Ottewell
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Jackson GH, Davies FE, Pawlyn C, Cairns DA, Striha A, Collett C, Hockaday A, Jones JR, Kishore B, Garg M, Williams CD, Karunanithi K, Lindsay J, Jenner MW, Cook G, Russell NH, Kaiser MF, Drayson MT, Owen RG, Gregory WM, Morgan GJ. Lenalidomide maintenance versus observation for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (Myeloma XI): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2019; 20:57-73. [PMID: 30559051 PMCID: PMC6318225 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30687-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 230] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2018] [Revised: 09/06/2018] [Accepted: 09/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide maintenance therapy have improved progression-free survival, primarily following autologous stem-cell transplantation. A beneficial effect of lenalidomide maintenance therapy on overall survival in this setting has been inconsistent between individual studies. Minimal data are available on the effect of maintenance lenalidomide in more aggressive disease states, such as patients with cytogenetic high-risk disease or patients ineligible for transplantation. We aimed to assess lenalidomide maintenance versus observation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, including cytogenetic risk and transplantation status subgroup analyses. METHODS The Myeloma XI trial was an open-label, randomised, phase 3, adaptive design trial with three randomisation stages done at 110 National Health Service hospitals in England, Wales, and Scotland. There were three potential randomisations in the study: induction treatment (allocation by transplantation eligibility status); intensification treatment (allocation by response to induction therapy); and maintenance treatment. Here, we report the results of the randomisation to maintenance treatment. Eligible patients for maintenance randomisation were aged 18 years or older and had symptomatic or non-secretory multiple myeloma, had completed their assigned induction therapy as per protocol and had achieved at least a minimal response to protocol treatment, including lenalidomide. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1 from Jan 13, 2011, to Jun 27, 2013, and 2:1 from Jun 28, 2013, to Aug 11, 2017) to lenalidomide maintenance (10 mg orally on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle) or observation, and stratified by allocated induction and intensification treatment, and centre. The co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival and overall survival, analysed by intention to treat. Safety analysis was per protocol. This study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN49407852, and clinicaltrialsregister.eu, number 2009-010956-93, and has completed recruitment. FINDINGS Between Jan 13, 2011, and Aug 11, 2017, 1917 patients were accrued to the maintenance treatment randomisation of the trial. 1137 patients were assigned to lenalidomide maintenance and 834 patients to observation. After a median follow-up of 31 months (IQR 18-50), median progression-free survival was 39 months (95% CI 36-42) with lenalidomide and 20 months (18-22) with observation (hazard ratio [HR] 0·46 [95% CI 0·41-0·53]; p<0·0001), and 3-year overall survival was 78·6% (95% Cl 75·6-81·6) in the lenalidomide group and 75·8% (72·4-79·2) in the observation group (HR 0·87 [95% CI 0·73-1·05]; p=0·15). Progression-free survival was improved with lenalidomide compared with observation across all prespecified subgroups. On prespecified subgroup analyses by transplantation status, 3-year overall survival in transplantation-eligible patients was 87·5% (95% Cl 84·3-90·7) in the lenalidomide group and 80·2% (76·0-84·4) in the observation group (HR 0·69 [95% CI 0·52-0·93]; p=0·014), and in transplantation-ineligible patients it was 66·8% (61·6-72·1) in the lenalidomide group and 69·8% (64·4-75·2) in the observation group (1·02 [0·80-1·29]; p=0·88). By cytogenetic risk group, in standard-risk patients, 3-year overall survival was 86·4% (95% CI 80·0-90·9) in the lenalidomide group compared with 81·3% (74·2-86·7) in the observation group, and in high-risk patients, it was 74.9% (65·8-81·9) in the lenalidomide group compared with 63·7% (52·8-72·7) in the observation group; and in ultra-high-risk patients it was 62·9% (46·0-75·8) compared with 43·5% (22·2-63·1). Since these subgroup analyses results were not powered they should be interpreted with caution. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events for patients taking lenalidomide were haematological, including neutropenia (362 [33%] patients), thrombocytopenia (72 [7%] patients), and anaemia (42 [4%] patients). Serious adverse events were reported in 494 (45%) of 1097 patients receiving lenalidomide compared with 150 (17%) of 874 patients on observation. The most common serious adverse events were infections in both the lenalidomide group and the observation group. 460 deaths occurred during maintenance treatment, 234 (21%) in the lenalidomide group and 226 (27%) in the observation group, and no deaths in the lenalidomide group were deemed treatment related. INTERPRETATION Maintenance therapy with lenalidomide significantly improved progression-free survival in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma compared with observation, but did not improve overall survival in the intention-to-treat analysis of the whole trial population. The manageable safety profile of this drug and the encouraging results in subgroup analyses of patients across all cytogenetic risk groups support further investigation of maintenance lenalidomide in this setting. FUNDING Cancer Research UK, Celgene, Amgen, Merck, and Myeloma UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Graham H Jackson
- Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
| | - Faith E Davies
- The Myeloma Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Charlotte Pawlyn
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - David A Cairns
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Alina Striha
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Corinne Collett
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Anna Hockaday
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - John R Jones
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Mamta Garg
- Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
| | - Cathy D Williams
- Centre for Clinical Haematology, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | - Matthew W Jenner
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Gordon Cook
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Section of Experimental Haematology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Nigel H Russell
- Centre for Clinical Haematology, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Martin F Kaiser
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Mark T Drayson
- Clinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Roger G Owen
- Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Walter M Gregory
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Gareth J Morgan
- The Myeloma Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Went M, Sud A, Speedy H, Sunter NJ, Försti A, Law PJ, Johnson DC, Mirabella F, Holroyd A, Li N, Orlando G, Weinhold N, van Duin M, Chen B, Mitchell JS, Mansouri L, Juliusson G, Smedby KE, Jayne S, Majid A, Dearden C, Allsup DJ, Bailey JR, Pratt G, Pepper C, Fegan C, Rosenquist R, Kuiper R, Stephens OW, Bertsch U, Broderick P, Einsele H, Gregory WM, Hillengass J, Hoffmann P, Jackson GH, Jöckel KH, Nickel J, Nöthen MM, da Silva Filho MI, Thomsen H, Walker BA, Broyl A, Davies FE, Hansson M, Goldschmidt H, Dyer MJS, Kaiser M, Sonneveld P, Morgan GJ, Hemminki K, Nilsson B, Catovsky D, Allan JM, Houlston RS. Genetic correlation between multiple myeloma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia provides evidence for shared aetiology. Blood Cancer J 2018; 9:1. [PMID: 30602759 PMCID: PMC6315026 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-018-0162-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2018] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The clustering of different types of B-cell malignancies in families raises the possibility of shared aetiology. To examine this, we performed cross-trait linkage disequilibrium (LD)-score regression of multiple myeloma (MM) and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) genome-wide association study (GWAS) data sets, totalling 11,734 cases and 29,468 controls. A significant genetic correlation between these two B-cell malignancies was shown (Rg = 0.4, P = 0.0046). Furthermore, four of the 45 known CLL risk loci were shown to associate with MM risk and five of the 23 known MM risk loci associate with CLL risk. By integrating eQTL, Hi-C and ChIP-seq data, we show that these pleiotropic risk loci are enriched for B-cell regulatory elements and implicate B-cell developmental genes. These data identify shared biological pathways influencing the development of CLL and, MM and further our understanding of the aetiological basis of these B-cell malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly Went
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK.
| | - Amit Sud
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK
| | - Helen Speedy
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK
| | - Nicola J Sunter
- Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK
| | - Asta Försti
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, SE-205 02, Malmo, Sweden
| | - Philip J Law
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK
| | - David C Johnson
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK
| | - Fabio Mirabella
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK
| | - Amy Holroyd
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK
| | - Ni Li
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK
| | - Giulia Orlando
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK
| | - Niels Weinhold
- Myeloma Institute for Research and Therapy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mark van Duin
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3075 EA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bowang Chen
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jonathan S Mitchell
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK
| | - Larry Mansouri
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, 75105, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Gunnar Juliusson
- Lund Strategic Research Center for Stem Cell Biology and Cell Therapy, Hematology and Transplantation, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Karin E Smedby
- Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sandrine Jayne
- Ernest and Helen Scott Haematological Research Institute, Leicester University, Leicester, UK
| | - Aneela Majid
- Ernest and Helen Scott Haematological Research Institute, Leicester University, Leicester, UK
| | - Claire Dearden
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK
| | - David J Allsup
- Department of Haematology, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK
| | - James R Bailey
- Hull York Medical School and University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Guy Pratt
- Department of Haematology, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Chris Pepper
- Department of Haematology, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Chris Fegan
- Cardiff and Vale National Health Service Trust, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK
| | - Richard Rosenquist
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, 75105, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Rowan Kuiper
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3075 EA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Owen W Stephens
- Myeloma Institute for Research and Therapy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA
| | - Uta Bertsch
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Centre of Tumor Diseases, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Broderick
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK
| | | | - Walter M Gregory
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9PH, UK
| | - Jens Hillengass
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Per Hoffmann
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn, D-53127, Bonn, Germany
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, 4003, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Karl-Heinz Jöckel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Jolanta Nickel
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus M Nöthen
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn, D-53127, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Genomics, Life and Brain Center, University of Bonn, D-53127, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Hauke Thomsen
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Brian A Walker
- Myeloma Institute for Research and Therapy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA
| | - Annemiek Broyl
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3075 EA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Faith E Davies
- Myeloma Institute for Research and Therapy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA
| | - Markus Hansson
- Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, SE-205 02, Malmo, Sweden
- Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, BMC B13, SE-221 84 Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Centre of Tumor Diseases, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin J S Dyer
- Ernest and Helen Scott Haematological Research Institute, Leicester University, Leicester, UK
| | - Martin Kaiser
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK
| | - Pieter Sonneveld
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3075 EA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gareth J Morgan
- Myeloma Institute for Research and Therapy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA
| | - Kari Hemminki
- German Cancer Research Center, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, SE-205 02, Malmo, Sweden
| | - Björn Nilsson
- Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, BMC B13, SE-221 84 Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Broad Institute, 7 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA
| | - Daniel Catovsky
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK
| | - James M Allan
- Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK
| | - Richard S Houlston
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ubellacker JM, Baryawno N, Severe N, DeCristo MJ, Sceneay J, Haider MT, Rhee CS, Qin Y, Holen I, Gregory WM, Brown JE, Coleman RE, Scadden DT, McAllister SS. Abstract B13: Plasma G-CSF levels are predictive of lack of response to zoledronic acid treatment in reducing breast cancer recurrence. Mol Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1557-3125.advbc17-b13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Some breast cancer patients have no evidence of metastatic disease at the time of original diagnosis, yet ~30-40% of patients will experience recurrent breast cancer. Over 90% of breast cancer deaths occur due to distant spread of the disease, and bone is the most common site of breast cancer metastasis. Bisphosphonates, such as zoledronic acid (ZA), are used to treat patients with osteolytic disease, including metastatic breast cancer. ZA has been demonstrated to reduce disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) and breast cancer recurrence, but not all patients see this benefit and it is not yet clear what predicts benefit from adjuvant ZA treatment; the mechanism of action for this effect of ZA in reducing breast cancer remains undetermined. Here, we establish that ZA renders osteoclast progenitor cells (OCPs) tumor suppressive, primarily by directing their lineage potential. In instances where the OCP lineage potential was modulated via systemic or tumor-derived granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), OCPs did not differentiate into tumor-suppressive populations but instead into mature osteoclasts. High G-CSF was sufficient to abrogate the tumor-suppressive effect of ZA. Furthermore, we determined that in a subset of patient plasma samples from the AZURE clinical trial where stage II/III breast cancer patients were randomized to receive standard systemic treatment alone with adjuvant ZA treatment, patients who had baseline plasma G-CSF levels >23 pg/mL had reduced disease-free survival as assessed over a 10-year period post treatment initiation compared to patients with baseline plasma G-CSF levels <23 pg/mL (p=0.02). These findings indicate that patients with higher baseline plasma G-CSF levels will not likely observe reduction in breast cancer recurrence with adjuvant ZA treatment, and in fact may have worse prognosis with adjuvant ZA treatment as compared to control treatment. Our data are the first to demonstrate that ZA mediates its tumor-suppressive function via the OCP population and implicate capitalizing on the differentiation potential of the OCPs to maximize patient response to adjuvant ZA treatment in breast cancer risk of recurrence.
Citation Format: Jessalyn M. Ubellacker, Ninib Baryawno, Nicolas Severe, Molly J. DeCristo, Jaclyn Sceneay, Marie-Therese Haider, Catherine S. Rhee, Yuanbo Qin, Ingunn Holen, Walter M. Gregory, Janet E. Brown, Robert E. Coleman, David T. Scadden, Sandra S. McAllister. Plasma G-CSF levels are predictive of lack of response to zoledronic acid treatment in reducing breast cancer recurrence [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Advances in Breast Cancer Research; 2017 Oct 7-10; Hollywood, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2018;16(8_Suppl):Abstract nr B13.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ninib Baryawno
- 2Center for Regenerative Medicine and the Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA,
| | - Nicolas Severe
- 2Center for Regenerative Medicine and the Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA,
| | | | - Jaclyn Sceneay
- 3Hematology Division, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA,
| | - Marie-Therese Haider
- 4Department of Oncology & Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, United Kingdom,
| | - Catherine S. Rhee
- 2Center for Regenerative Medicine and the Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA,
| | - Yuanbo Qin
- 3Hematology Division, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA,
| | - Ingunn Holen
- 4Department of Oncology & Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK, United Kingdom,
| | - Walter M. Gregory
- 5Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom,
| | - Janet E. Brown
- 6Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology, Weston Park Hospital, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Robert E. Coleman
- 6Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology, Weston Park Hospital, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - David T. Scadden
- 2Center for Regenerative Medicine and the Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA,
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ubellacker JM, Baryawno N, Severe N, DeCristo MJ, Sceneay J, Hutchinson JN, Haider MT, Rhee CS, Qin Y, Gregory WM, Garrido-Castro AC, Holen I, Brown JE, Coleman RE, Scadden DT, McAllister SS. Modulating Bone Marrow Hematopoietic Lineage Potential to Prevent Bone Metastasis in Breast Cancer. Cancer Res 2018; 78:5300-5314. [PMID: 30065048 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-18-0548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2018] [Revised: 06/12/2018] [Accepted: 07/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The presence of disseminated tumor cells in breast cancer patient bone marrow aspirates predicts decreased recurrence-free survival. Although it is appreciated that physiologic, pathologic, and therapeutic conditions impact hematopoiesis, it remains unclear whether targeting hematopoiesis presents opportunities for limiting bone metastasis. Using preclinical breast cancer models, we discovered that marrow from mice treated with the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid (ZA) are metastasis-suppressive. Specifically, ZA modulated hematopoietic myeloid/osteoclast progenitor cell (M/OCP) lineage potential to activate metastasis-suppressive activity. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) promoted ZA resistance by redirecting M/OCP differentiation. We identified M/OCP and bone marrow transcriptional programs associated with metastasis suppression and ZA resistance. Analysis of patient blood samples taken at randomization revealed that women with high-plasma G-CSF experienced significantly worse outcome with adjuvant ZA than those with lower G-CSF levels. Our findings support discovery of therapeutic strategies to direct M/OCP lineage potential and biomarkers that stratify responses in patients at risk of recurrence.Significance: Bone marrow myeloid/osteoclast progenitor cell lineage potential has a profound impact on breast cancer bone metastasis and can be modulated by G-CSF and bone-targeting agents. Cancer Res; 78(18); 5300-14. ©2018 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessalyn M Ubellacker
- Hematology Division, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ninib Baryawno
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Center for Regenerative Medicine and the Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Nicolas Severe
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Center for Regenerative Medicine and the Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Molly J DeCristo
- Hematology Division, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jaclyn Sceneay
- Hematology Division, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - John N Hutchinson
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan, School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Marie-Therese Haider
- Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology, Department of Oncology & Metabolism, Weston Park Hospital, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Catherine S Rhee
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Center for Regenerative Medicine and the Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Yuanbo Qin
- Hematology Division, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Walter M Gregory
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Ana C Garrido-Castro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ingunn Holen
- Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology, Department of Oncology & Metabolism, Weston Park Hospital, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Janet E Brown
- Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology, Department of Oncology & Metabolism, Weston Park Hospital, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Robert E Coleman
- Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology, Department of Oncology & Metabolism, Weston Park Hospital, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - David T Scadden
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Center for Regenerative Medicine and the Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | - Sandra S McAllister
- Hematology Division, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. .,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts.,Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Royle KL, Gregory WM, Cairns DA, Bell SE, Cook G, Owen RG, Drayson MT, Davies FE, Jackson GH, Morgan GJ, Child JA. Quality of life during and following sequential treatment of previously untreated patients with multiple myeloma: findings of the Medical Research Council Myeloma IX randomised study. Br J Haematol 2018; 182:816-829. [PMID: 29984830 PMCID: PMC6175065 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.15459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2018] [Accepted: 05/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
In the Medical Research Council (MRC) Myeloma IX trial (ISRCTN684564111) patients were randomised to sodium clodronate or zoledronic acid and induction treatment: cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (CVAD) or cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone (CTD) followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in the intensive pathway; attenuated CTD or melphalan and prednisolone (MP) in the non-intensive pathway. Subsequent randomisation allocated patients to either thalidomide or observation. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life (QoL) questionnaires, QLQ-C30 and QLQ-MY24, were administered at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months and annually thereafter, enabling the effect of sequential treatment on patient-reported health-related QoL (HR-QoL) to be investigated. The protocol specified four subscales of interest: Pain, Fatigue, Global Health Status/Quality of Life and Physical Functioning at 3, 6 and 12 months that were compared using linear models. The intensive pathway showed significant differences in favour of CTD for Fatigue at 3 months and Physical Functioning at 12 months. The non-intensive pathway and maintenance phase reported significant differences at 3 months; Pain (improved with attenuated CTD) and Global Health status/Quality of Life (improved with observation). The improved outcomes in MRC Myeloma IX were accompanied by some beneficial and few detrimental effects on HR-QoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Mark T Drayson
- Clinical Immunology Service, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Graham H Jackson
- Northern Cancer Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Howard DR, Munir T, McParland L, Rawstron AC, Chalmers A, Gregory WM, O'Dwyer JL, Smith A, Longo R, Varghese A, Smith A, Hillmen P. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness results from the randomised, Phase IIB trial in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia to compare fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab with fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone and low-dose rituximab: the Attenuated dose Rituximab with ChemoTherapy In Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (ARCTIC) trial. Health Technol Assess 2018. [PMID: 28628003 DOI: 10.3310/hta21280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The conventional frontline therapy for fit patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab (FCR). Rituximab (Mabthera®, Roche Products Ltd) targets the CD20 antigen, which is expressed at low levels in CLL. The standard dose of rituximab in CLL (375 mg/m2 in cycle 1 and 500 mg/m2 in cycles 2-6) was selected based on toxicity data only. Small doses of rituximab (as low as 20 mg) have biological activity in CLL, with an immediate reduction in circulating CLL cells and down-regulation of CD20. Phase II trials had suggested improved efficacy with the addition of mitoxantrone to FCR. The key assumption for the Attenuated dose Rituximab with ChemoTherapy In CLL (ARCTIC) trial was that the addition of mitoxantrone to fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and low-dose rituximab would be more effective than conventional FCR. OBJECTIVES To assess whether fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone and low-dose rituximab (FCM-miniR) (100 mg of rituximab per cycle) was non-inferior to FCR in frontline CLL. Complete response (CR) rate was the primary end point, with the secondary end points being progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate, eradication of minimal residual disease (MRD), safety and cost-effectiveness. DESIGN ARCTIC was a UK multicentre, randomised, controlled, open, Phase IIB non-inferiority trial in previously untreated CLL. A total of 206 patients with previously untreated CLL who required treatment, according to the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia criteria, were to be randomised to FCR or FCM-miniR. There was an independent Data Monitoring and Ethics Committee (DMEC) with a pre-planned interim efficacy assessment on 103 participants. RESULTS The DMEC's interim analysis led to early trial closure. Although the response rates in both arms were higher than anticipated, FCM-miniR had a lower CR rate than FCR. This was partly attributable to the higher toxicity associated with mitoxantrone. A total of 100 participants completed FCR, 79 completed FCM-miniR and 21 commenced FCM-miniR but switched to FCR following DMEC recommendations. The CR rate for participants receiving FCR was 76%, compared with 55% for FCM-miniR (adjusted odds ratio 0.37; 95% confidence interval 0.19 to 0.73). Key secondary end points also showed that FCR was superior, with more participants achieving MRD negativity (57% for FCR vs. 46% for FCM-miniR). More participants experienced a serious adverse reaction with FCM-miniR compared with FCR (50% vs. 41%). At a median of 37.3 months' follow-up, the PFS and OS rates are good compared with previous studies, with no significant difference between the treatment arms. The economic analysis indicates that because FCM-miniR is less effective than FCR, FCM-miniR is not expected to be cost-effective over a lifetime horizon, producing a mean cost-saving of -£7723, a quality-adjusted life-year loss of -0.73 and a resulting incremental net monetary loss of -£6780. CONCLUSIONS FCM-miniR is less well tolerated, with poorer response rates, than FCR, partly owing to the additional toxicity associated with mitoxantrone. In view of this, FCM-miniR will not be taken forward into a larger definitive Phase III trial. The trial demonstrated that oral FCR yields extremely high response rates compared with historical series with intravenous chemotherapy. FUTURE WORK We shall compare the results of ARCTIC with those of the ADMIRE (Does the ADdition of Mitoxantrone Improve Response to FCR chemotherapy in patients with CLL?) trial, which compared FCR with FCM-R to assess the efficacy of low- versus standard-dose rituximab, allowing for the toxicity associated with mitoxantrone. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN16544962. FUNDING This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 21, No. 28. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dena R Howard
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Talha Munir
- Department of Haematology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Lucy McParland
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Andy C Rawstron
- Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Anna Chalmers
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Walter M Gregory
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - John L O'Dwyer
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Alison Smith
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Roberta Longo
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Abraham Varghese
- Department of Haematology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Alexandra Smith
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Peter Hillmen
- Section of Experimental Haematology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology (LICAP), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Went M, Sud A, Law PJ, Johnson DC, Weinhold N, Försti A, van Duin M, Mitchell JS, Chen B, Kuiper R, Stephens OW, Bertsch U, Campo C, Einsele H, Gregory WM, Henrion M, Hillengass J, Hoffmann P, Jackson GH, Lenive O, Nickel J, Nöthen MM, da Silva Filho MI, Thomsen H, Walker BA, Broyl A, Davies FE, Langer C, Hansson M, Kaiser M, Sonneveld P, Goldschmidt H, Hemminki K, Nilsson B, Morgan GJ, Houlston RS. Assessing the effect of obesity-related traits on multiple myeloma using a Mendelian randomisation approach. Blood Cancer J 2017; 7. [PMID: 28622301 PMCID: PMC5520395 DOI: 10.1038/bcj.2017.48] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- M Went
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A Sud
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - P J Law
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - D C Johnson
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - N Weinhold
- Myeloma Institute for Research and Therapy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A Försti
- Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmo, Sweden
| | - M van Duin
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J S Mitchell
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - B Chen
- Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - R Kuiper
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - O W Stephens
- Myeloma Institute for Research and Therapy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - U Bertsch
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Campo
- Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - H Einsele
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - W M Gregory
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - M Henrion
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - J Hillengass
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - P Hoffmann
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Biomedicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - G H Jackson
- Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle, UK
| | - O Lenive
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - J Nickel
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M M Nöthen
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Genomics, Life & Brain Center, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - M I da Silva Filho
- Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - H Thomsen
- Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - B A Walker
- Myeloma Institute for Research and Therapy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - A Broyl
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F E Davies
- Myeloma Institute for Research and Therapy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - C Langer
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - M Hansson
- Division of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Hematology Clinic, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - M Kaiser
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - P Sonneveld
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H Goldschmidt
- Department of Internal Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - K Hemminki
- Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmo, Sweden
| | - B Nilsson
- Division of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Laboratory Medicine, Office of Medical Services, Lund, Sweden
- Broad Institute, 7 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - G J Morgan
- Myeloma Institute for Research and Therapy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - R S Houlston
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
- E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Shah V, Sherborne AL, Walker BA, Johnson DC, Boyle EM, Ellis S, Begum DB, Proszek PZ, Jones JR, Pawlyn C, Savola S, Jenner MW, Drayson MT, Owen RG, Houlston RS, Cairns DA, Gregory WM, Cook G, Davies FE, Jackson GH, Morgan GJ, Kaiser MF. Prediction of outcome in newly diagnosed myeloma: a meta-analysis of the molecular profiles of 1905 trial patients. Leukemia 2017; 32:102-110. [PMID: 28584253 PMCID: PMC5590713 DOI: 10.1038/leu.2017.179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 166] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2017] [Revised: 05/11/2017] [Accepted: 05/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Robust establishment of survival in multiple myeloma (MM) and its relationship to recurrent genetic aberrations is required as outcomes are variable despite apparent similar staging. We assayed copy number alterations (CNA) and translocations in 1036 patients from the NCRI Myeloma XI trial and linked these to overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival. Through a meta-anlysis of these data with data from MRC Myeloma IX trial, totalling 1905 newly diagnosed MM patients (NDMM), we confirm the association of t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), del(17p) and gain(1q21) with poor prognosis with hazard ratios (HRs) for OS of 1.60 (P=4.77 × 10-7), 1.74 (P=0.0005), 1.90 (P=0.0089), 2.10 (P=8.86 × 10-14) and 1.68 (P=2.18 × 10-14), respectively. Patients with 'double-hit' defined by co-occurrence of at least two adverse lesions have an especially poor prognosis with HRs for OS of 2.67 (P=8.13 × 10-27) for all patients and 3.19 (P=1.23 × 10-18) for intensively treated patients. Using comprehensive CNA and translocation profiling in Myeloma XI we also demonstrate a strong association between t(4;14) and BIRC2/BIRC3 deletion (P=8.7 × 10-15), including homozygous deletion. Finally, we define distinct sub-groups of hyperdiploid MM, with either gain(1q21) and CCND2 overexpression (P<0.0001) or gain(11q25) and CCND1 overexpression (P<0.0001). Profiling multiple genetic lesions can identify MM patients likely to relapse early allowing stratification of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Shah
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A L Sherborne
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - B A Walker
- MIRT, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - D C Johnson
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - E M Boyle
- Department of Haematology, Hopital Huriez, CHRU, Lille, France
| | - S Ellis
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - D B Begum
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - P Z Proszek
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - J R Jones
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - C Pawlyn
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - S Savola
- MRC Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M W Jenner
- Department of Haematology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - M T Drayson
- Clinical Immunology, School of Immunity & Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - R G Owen
- Department of Haematology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - R S Houlston
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - D A Cairns
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - W M Gregory
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - G Cook
- Section of Experimental Haematology, Leeds Institute of Cancer & Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - F E Davies
- MIRT, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - G H Jackson
- Department of Haematology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - G J Morgan
- MIRT, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - M F Kaiser
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Heaney JLJ, Campbell JP, Griffin AE, Birtwistle J, Shemar M, Child JA, Gregory WM, Cairns DA, Morgan G, Jackson G, Drayson MT. Diagnosis and monitoring for light chain only and oligosecretory myeloma using serum free light chain tests. Br J Haematol 2017; 178:220-230. [PMID: 28573706 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.14753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2016] [Accepted: 03/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
This study aims to guide the integration of serum free light chain (sFLC) tests into clinical practice, including a new rapid test (Seralite® ). Blood and urine analysis from 5573 newly diagnosed myeloma patients identified 576 light chain only (LCO) and 60 non-secretory (NS) cases. Serum was tested by Freelite® and Seralite® at diagnosis, maximum response and relapse. 20% of LCO patients had urine FLC levels below that recommended for measuring response but >97% of these had adequate sFLC levels (oligosecretory). The recommended Freelite® sFLC ≥100 mg/l for measuring response was confirmed and the equivalent Seralite® FLC difference (dFLC) >20 mg/l identified. By both methods, ≥38% of NS patients had measurable disease (oligosecretory). Higher sFLC levels were observed on Freelite® at all time points. However, good clinical concordance was observed at diagnosis and in response to therapy. Achieving at least a very good partial response according to either sFLC method was associated with better patient survival. Relapse was identified using a Freelite® sFLC increase >200 mg/l and found 100% concordance with a corresponding Seralite® dFLC increase >30 mg/l. Both Freelite® and Seralite® sensitively diagnose and monitor LCO/oligosecretory myeloma. Rapid testing by Seralite® could fast-track FLC screening and monitoring. Response by sFLC assessment was prognostic for survival and demonstrates the clinical value of routine sFLC testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L J Heaney
- Clinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - John P Campbell
- Clinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Anne E Griffin
- Clinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jane Birtwistle
- Clinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - J Anthony Child
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - David A Cairns
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Gareth Morgan
- The Myeloma Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | | | - Mark T Drayson
- Clinical Immunology Service, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Munshi NC, Avet-Loiseau H, Rawstron AC, Owen RG, Child JA, Thakurta A, Sherrington P, Samur MK, Georgieva A, Anderson KC, Gregory WM. Association of Minimal Residual Disease With Superior Survival Outcomes in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol 2017; 3:28-35. [PMID: 27632282 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 353] [Impact Index Per Article: 50.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Importance Numerous studies have evaluated the prognostic value of minimal residual disease (MRD) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Most studies were small and varied in terms of patient population, treatment, and MRD assessment methods. Objective To evaluate the utility of MRD detection in patients with newly diagnosed MM. Data Sources A Medline search was conducted for articles published in English between January 1990 and January 2016. Study Selection Eligible studies reported MRD status and progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) in 20 or more patients following treatment. Among 405 articles identified, 21 met the initial eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. Data Extraction and Synthesis Information on patient characteristics, treatment, MRD assessment, and outcomes were extracted using a standard form. Main Outcomes and Measures The impact of MRD status on PFS and OS was assessed by pooling data from relevant trials. Data were adjusted to allow for different proportions of patients with MRD in different studies, and analyzed using the Peto method. Forest plots were created based on Cox model analysis. Other prespecified research questions were addressed qualitatively. Results Fourteen studies (n = 1273) provided data on the impact of MRD on PFS, and 12 studies (n = 1100) on OS. Results were reported specifically in patients who had achieved conventional complete response (CR) in 5 studies for PFS (n = 574) and 6 studies for OS (n = 616). An MRD-negative status was associated with significantly better PFS overall (hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.36-0.48; P < .001) and in studies specifically looking at CR patients (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.34-0.56; P < .001). Overall survival was also favorable in MRD-negative patients overall (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.46-0.71; P < .001) and in CR patients (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.33-0.67; P < .001). Tests of heterogeneity found no significant differences among the studies for PFS and OS. Conclusions and Relevance Minimal residual disease-negative status after treatment for newly diagnosed MM is associated with long-term survival. These findings provide quantitative evidence to support the integration of MRD assessment as an end point in clinical trials of MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil C Munshi
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Herve Avet-Loiseau
- Unit for Genomics in Myeloma, Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Roger G Owen
- St James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Mehmet Kemal Samur
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Kenneth C Anderson
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Snee MP, McParland L, Collinson F, Lowe CM, Striha A, Baldwin DR, Naidu B, Sebag-Montefiore D, Gregory WM, Bestall J, Hewison J, Hinsley S, Franks KN. Erratum to: The SABRTooth feasibility trial protocol: a study to determine the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a phase III randomised controlled trial comparing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) with surgery in patients with peripheral stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) considered to be at higher risk of complications from surgical resection. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2016; 2:55. [PMID: 27976752 PMCID: PMC5154043 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-016-0095-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- M P Snee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF UK
| | - L McParland
- Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, 71-75 Clarendon Road, Leeds, LS2 9PH UK
| | - F Collinson
- Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, 71-75 Clarendon Road, Leeds, LS2 9PH UK
| | - C M Lowe
- Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, 71-75 Clarendon Road, Leeds, LS2 9PH UK
| | - A Striha
- Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, 71-75 Clarendon Road, Leeds, LS2 9PH UK
| | - D R Baldwin
- Respiratory Medicine Unit, David Evans Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals and University of Nottingham, Hucknall Rd, Nottingham, NG5 1PB UK
| | - B Naidu
- School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT, UK
| | - D Sebag-Montefiore
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF UK ; Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF UK
| | - W M Gregory
- Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, 71-75 Clarendon Road, Leeds, LS2 9PH UK
| | - J Bestall
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, 101 Clarendon Rd, Leeds, LS2 9LJ UK
| | - J Hewison
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, 101 Clarendon Rd, Leeds, LS2 9LJ UK
| | - S Hinsley
- Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, 71-75 Clarendon Road, Leeds, LS2 9PH UK
| | - K N Franks
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Jones JR, Cairns DA, Gregory WM, Collett C, Pawlyn C, Sigsworth R, Striha A, Henderson R, Kaiser MF, Jenner M, Cook G, Russell NH, Williams C, Pratt G, Kishore B, Lindsay J, Drayson MT, Davies FE, Boyd KD, Owen RG, Jackson GH, Morgan GJ. Second malignancies in the context of lenalidomide treatment: an analysis of 2732 myeloma patients enrolled to the Myeloma XI trial. Blood Cancer J 2016; 6:e506. [PMID: 27935580 PMCID: PMC5223149 DOI: 10.1038/bcj.2016.114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2016] [Accepted: 10/24/2016] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
We have carried out the largest randomised trial to date of newly diagnosed myeloma patients, in which lenalidomide has been used as an induction and maintenance treatment option and here report its impact on second primary malignancy (SPM) incidence and pathology. After review, 104 SPMs were confirmed in 96 of 2732 trial patients. The cumulative incidence of SPM was 0.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4–1.0%), 2.3% (95% CI 1.6–2.7%) and 3.8% (95% CI 2.9–4.6%) at 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. Patients receiving maintenance lenalidomide had a significantly higher SPM incidence overall (P=0.011). Age is a risk factor with the highest SPM incidence observed in transplant non-eligible patients aged >74 years receiving lenalidomide maintenance. The 3-year cumulative incidence in this group was 17.3% (95% CI 8.2–26.4%), compared with 6.5% (95% CI 0.2–12.9%) in observation only patients (P=0.049). There was a low overall incidence of haematological SPM (0.5%). The higher SPM incidence in patients receiving lenalidomide maintenance therapy, especially in advanced age, warrants ongoing monitoring although the benefit on survival is likely to outweigh risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J R Jones
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.,The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - D A Cairns
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - W M Gregory
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - C Collett
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - C Pawlyn
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.,The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - R Sigsworth
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - A Striha
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - R Henderson
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - M F Kaiser
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.,The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - M Jenner
- Department of Haematology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - G Cook
- University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - N H Russell
- Centre for Clinical Haematology, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - C Williams
- Centre for Clinical Haematology, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - G Pratt
- Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - B Kishore
- Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - J Lindsay
- Department of Haematology, East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Kent, UK
| | - M T Drayson
- Clinical Immunology, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - F E Davies
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.,The Myeloma Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - K D Boyd
- The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - G H Jackson
- Department of Haematology, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - G J Morgan
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.,The Myeloma Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Pawlyn C, Kaiser MF, Heuck C, Melchor L, Wardell CP, Murison A, Chavan SS, Johnson DC, Begum DB, Dahir NM, Proszek PZ, Cairns DA, Boyle EM, Jones JR, Cook G, Drayson MT, Owen RG, Gregory WM, Jackson GH, Barlogie B, Davies FE, Walker BA, Morgan GJ. The Spectrum and Clinical Impact of Epigenetic Modifier Mutations in Myeloma. Clin Cancer Res 2016; 22:5783-5794. [PMID: 27235425 PMCID: PMC5124543 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-1790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2015] [Revised: 03/24/2016] [Accepted: 04/27/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Epigenetic dysregulation is known to be an important contributor to myeloma pathogenesis but, unlike other B-cell malignancies, the full spectrum of somatic mutations in epigenetic modifiers has not been reported previously. We sought to address this using the results from whole-exome sequencing in the context of a large prospective clinical trial of newly diagnosed patients and targeted sequencing in a cohort of previously treated patients for comparison. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Whole-exome sequencing analysis of 463 presenting myeloma cases entered in the UK NCRI Myeloma XI study and targeted sequencing analysis of 156 previously treated cases from the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (Little Rock, AR). We correlated the presence of mutations with clinical outcome from diagnosis and compared the mutations found at diagnosis with later stages of disease. RESULTS In diagnostic myeloma patient samples, we identify significant mutations in genes encoding the histone 1 linker protein, previously identified in other B-cell malignancies. Our data suggest an adverse prognostic impact from the presence of lesions in genes encoding DNA methylation modifiers and the histone demethylase KDM6A/UTX The frequency of mutations in epigenetic modifiers appears to increase following treatment most notably in genes encoding histone methyltransferases and DNA methylation modifiers. CONCLUSIONS Numerous mutations identified raise the possibility of targeted treatment strategies for patients either at diagnosis or relapse supporting the use of sequencing-based diagnostics in myeloma to help guide therapy as more epigenetic targeted agents become available. Clin Cancer Res; 22(23); 5783-94. ©2016 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Christoph Heuck
- Myeloma Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | | | | | - Alex Murison
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Shweta S Chavan
- Myeloma Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | | | - Dil B Begum
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nasrin M Dahir
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - David A Cairns
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Eileen M Boyle
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - John R Jones
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Mark T Drayson
- Clinical Immunology, School of Immunity and Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Roger G Owen
- St James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Walter M Gregory
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Graham H Jackson
- Department of Haematology, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom
| | - Bart Barlogie
- Myeloma Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Faith E Davies
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- Myeloma Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Brian A Walker
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- Myeloma Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| | - Gareth J Morgan
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
- Myeloma Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Howard DR, Brown JM, Todd S, Gregory WM. Recommendations on multiple testing adjustment in multi-arm trials with a shared control group. Stat Methods Med Res 2016; 27:1513-1530. [PMID: 27647808 DOI: 10.1177/0962280216664759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Multi-arm clinical trials assessing multiple experimental treatments against a shared control group can offer efficiency advantages over independent trials through assessing an increased number of hypotheses. Published opinion is divided on the requirement for multiple testing adjustment to control the family-wise type-I error rate (FWER). The probability of a false positive error in multi-arm trials compared to equivalent independent trials is affected by the correlation between comparisons due to sharing control data. We demonstrate that this correlation in fact leads to a reduction in the FWER, therefore FWER adjustment is not recommended solely due to sharing control data. In contrast, the correlation increases the probability of multiple false positive outcomes across the hypotheses, although standard FWER adjustment methods do not control for this. A stringent critical value adjustment is proposed to maintain equivalent evidence of superiority in two correlated comparisons to that obtained within independent trials. FWER adjustment is only required if there is an increased chance of making a single claim of effectiveness by testing multiple hypotheses, not due to sharing control data. For competing experimental therapies, the correlation between comparisons can be advantageous as it eliminates bias due to the experimental therapies being compared to different control populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dena R Howard
- 1 Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Julia M Brown
- 1 Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Susan Todd
- 2 Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Reading, Reading, UK
| | - Walter M Gregory
- 1 Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Snee MP, McParland L, Collinson F, Lowe CM, Striha A, Baldwin DR, Naidu B, Sebag-Montefiore D, Gregory WM, Bestall J, Hewison J, Hinsley S, Franks K. The SABRTooth feasibility trial protocol: a study to determine the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a phase III randomised controlled trial comparing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) with surgery in patients with peripheral stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) considered to be at higher risk of complications from surgical resection. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2016; 2:5. [PMID: 27965826 PMCID: PMC5153694 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-016-0046-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2015] [Accepted: 01/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is potentially curable, and surgery is considered to be the standard of care for patients with good performance status and minimal co-morbidity. However, a significant proportion of patients with stage I NSCLC have a poorer performance status and significant medical co-morbidity that make them at higher risk of morbidity and mortality from surgery. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), which uses modern radiotherapeutic techniques to deliver large doses of radiation, has shown superiority over conventional radiotherapy in terms of local control and toxicity and is a standard of care for patients with stage I NSCLC who are at too high risk for surgery. However, it is not known whether surgery or SABR is the most effective in patients with stage I NSCLC who are suitable for surgery but are less fit and at higher risk surgical complications. Previous randomised studies have failed to recruit in this setting, and therefore, a feasibility study is required to see whether a full randomised control trial would be possible. Methods/design SABRTooth is a UK-based, multi-centre, open-label, two-group individually (1:1) randomised controlled feasibility study in patients with peripheral stage I NSCLC considered to be at higher risk from surgical resection. The study will assess the feasibility of conducting a definitive large-scale phase III trial. The primary objective is to assess recruitment rates to provide evidence that, when scaled up, recruitment to a large phase III trial would be possible; the target recruitment being 54 patients in total, over a 21-month period. There are multiple secondary and exploratory objectives designed to explore the optimum recruitment and data collection strategies to help optimise the design of a future phase III trial. Discussion To know whether SABR is a better, equivalent or inferior alternative to surgery for higher risk patients is a key question in lung cancer. Other studies comparing SABR to surgery have closed early due to poor recruitment, and therefore, the SABRTooth feasibility study has been designed around the UK National Health Service (NHS) cancer pathway incorporating many design features in order to maximise recruitment for a future definitive phase III trial. Trial registration controlled-trials.com ISRCTN13029788
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M P Snee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF UK
| | - L McParland
- Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, 71-75 Clarendon Road, Leeds, LS2 9PH UK
| | - F Collinson
- Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, 71-75 Clarendon Road, Leeds, LS2 9PH UK
| | - C M Lowe
- Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, 71-75 Clarendon Road, Leeds, LS2 9PH UK
| | - A Striha
- Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, 71-75 Clarendon Road, Leeds, LS2 9PH UK
| | - D R Baldwin
- Respiratory Medicine Unit, David Evans Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals and University of Nottingham, Hucknall Rd, Nottingham, NG5 1PB UK
| | - B Naidu
- School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Edgbaston B15 2TT UK
| | - D Sebag-Montefiore
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF UK.,Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF UK
| | - W M Gregory
- Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, 71-75 Clarendon Road, Leeds, LS2 9PH UK
| | - J Bestall
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, 101 Clarendon Rd, Leeds, LS2 9LJ UK
| | - J Hewison
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, 101 Clarendon Rd, Leeds, LS2 9LJ UK
| | - S Hinsley
- Clinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, 71-75 Clarendon Road, Leeds, LS2 9PH UK
| | - K Franks
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Gregory WM, Twelves CJ, Bell R, Smye SW, Howard DR, Coleman RE, Cameron DA. Characterizing and quantifying the effects of breast cancer therapy using mathematical modeling. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 155:303-11. [PMID: 26783036 PMCID: PMC4729810 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-3684-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2015] [Accepted: 01/07/2016] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
We designed a mathematical model to describe and quantify the mechanisms and dynamics of tumor growth, cell-kill and resistance as they affect durations of benefit after cancer treatment. Our aim was to explore how treatment efficacy may be related to primary tumor characteristics, with the potential to guide future trial design and appropriate selection of therapy. Assuming a log-normal distribution of both resistant disease and tumor doubling times generates disease-free survival (DFS) or invasive DFS curves with specific shapes. Using a multivariate mathematical model, both treatment and tumor characteristics are related to quantified resistant disease and tumor regrowth rates by allowing different mean values for the influence of different treatments or clinical subtypes on these two log-normal distributions. Application of the model to the CALGB 9741 adjuvant breast cancer trial showed that dose-dense therapy was estimated to achieve an extra 3/4 log of cell-kill compared to standard therapy, but only in patients with more rapidly growing ER-negative tumors. Application of the model to the AZURE trial of adjuvant bisphosphonate treatment suggested that the 5-year duration of zoledronic acid was adequate for ER-negative tumors, but may not be so for ER-positive cases, with increased recurrences after ceasing the intervention. Mathematical models can identify different effects of treatment by subgroup and may aid in treatment design, trial analysis, and appropriate selection of therapy. They may provide a more appropriate and insightful tool than the conventional Cox model for the statistical analysis of response durations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Walter M Gregory
- Leeds Institute for Clinical Trials Research (LICTR), University of Leeds, Clinical Trials Research House, 71-75 Clarendon Road, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
| | | | | | - Stephen W Smye
- St. James's Academic Division of Medical Physics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Dena R Howard
- Leeds Institute for Clinical Trials Research (LICTR), University of Leeds, Clinical Trials Research House, 71-75 Clarendon Road, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Walker BA, Boyle EM, Wardell CP, Murison A, Begum DB, Dahir NM, Proszek PZ, Johnson DC, Kaiser MF, Melchor L, Aronson LI, Scales M, Pawlyn C, Mirabella F, Jones JR, Brioli A, Mikulasova A, Cairns DA, Gregory WM, Quartilho A, Drayson MT, Russell N, Cook G, Jackson GH, Leleu X, Davies FE, Morgan GJ. Mutational Spectrum, Copy Number Changes, and Outcome: Results of a Sequencing Study of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:3911-20. [PMID: 26282654 PMCID: PMC6485456 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.59.1503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 401] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE At the molecular level, myeloma is characterized by copy number abnormalities and recurrent translocations into the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus. Novel methods, such as massively parallel sequencing, have begun to describe the pattern of tumor-acquired mutations, but their clinical relevance has yet to be established. METHODS We performed whole-exome sequencing for 463 patients who presented with myeloma and were enrolled onto the National Cancer Research Institute Myeloma XI trial, for whom complete molecular cytogenetic and clinical outcome data were available. RESULTS We identified 15 significantly mutated genes: IRF4, KRAS, NRAS, MAX, HIST1H1E, RB1, EGR1, TP53, TRAF3, FAM46C, DIS3, BRAF, LTB, CYLD, and FGFR3. The mutational spectrum is dominated by mutations in the RAS (43%) and nuclear factor-κB (17%) pathways, but although they are prognostically neutral, they could be targeted therapeutically. Mutations in CCND1 and DNA repair pathway alterations (TP53, ATM, ATR, and ZNFHX4 mutations) are associated with a negative impact on survival. In contrast, those in IRF4 and EGR1 are associated with a favorable overall survival. We combined these novel mutation risk factors with the recurrent molecular adverse features and international staging system to generate an international staging system mutation score that can identify a high-risk population of patients who experience relapse and die prematurely. CONCLUSION We have refined our understanding of genetic events in myeloma and identified clinically relevant mutations that may be used to better stratify patients at presentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian A Walker
- Brian A. Walker, Eileen M. Boyle, Christopher P. Wardell, Alex Murison, Dil B. Begum, Nasrin M. Dahir, Paula Z. Proszek, David C. Johnson, Martin F. Kaiser, Lorenzo Melchor, Lauren I. Aronson, Charlotte Pawlyn, Fabio Mirabella, John R. Jones, Annamaria Brioli, Faith E. Davies, and Gareth J. Morgan, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Matthew Scales, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey; David A. Cairns, Walter M. Gregory, and Ana Quartilho, University of Leeds; Gordon Cook, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Nigel Russell, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham; Graham H. Jackson, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Aneta Mikulasova, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; and Xavier Leleu, Hôpital C. Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Eileen M Boyle
- Brian A. Walker, Eileen M. Boyle, Christopher P. Wardell, Alex Murison, Dil B. Begum, Nasrin M. Dahir, Paula Z. Proszek, David C. Johnson, Martin F. Kaiser, Lorenzo Melchor, Lauren I. Aronson, Charlotte Pawlyn, Fabio Mirabella, John R. Jones, Annamaria Brioli, Faith E. Davies, and Gareth J. Morgan, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Matthew Scales, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey; David A. Cairns, Walter M. Gregory, and Ana Quartilho, University of Leeds; Gordon Cook, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Nigel Russell, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham; Graham H. Jackson, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Aneta Mikulasova, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; and Xavier Leleu, Hôpital C. Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Christopher P Wardell
- Brian A. Walker, Eileen M. Boyle, Christopher P. Wardell, Alex Murison, Dil B. Begum, Nasrin M. Dahir, Paula Z. Proszek, David C. Johnson, Martin F. Kaiser, Lorenzo Melchor, Lauren I. Aronson, Charlotte Pawlyn, Fabio Mirabella, John R. Jones, Annamaria Brioli, Faith E. Davies, and Gareth J. Morgan, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Matthew Scales, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey; David A. Cairns, Walter M. Gregory, and Ana Quartilho, University of Leeds; Gordon Cook, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Nigel Russell, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham; Graham H. Jackson, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Aneta Mikulasova, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; and Xavier Leleu, Hôpital C. Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Alex Murison
- Brian A. Walker, Eileen M. Boyle, Christopher P. Wardell, Alex Murison, Dil B. Begum, Nasrin M. Dahir, Paula Z. Proszek, David C. Johnson, Martin F. Kaiser, Lorenzo Melchor, Lauren I. Aronson, Charlotte Pawlyn, Fabio Mirabella, John R. Jones, Annamaria Brioli, Faith E. Davies, and Gareth J. Morgan, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Matthew Scales, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey; David A. Cairns, Walter M. Gregory, and Ana Quartilho, University of Leeds; Gordon Cook, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Nigel Russell, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham; Graham H. Jackson, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Aneta Mikulasova, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; and Xavier Leleu, Hôpital C. Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Dil B Begum
- Brian A. Walker, Eileen M. Boyle, Christopher P. Wardell, Alex Murison, Dil B. Begum, Nasrin M. Dahir, Paula Z. Proszek, David C. Johnson, Martin F. Kaiser, Lorenzo Melchor, Lauren I. Aronson, Charlotte Pawlyn, Fabio Mirabella, John R. Jones, Annamaria Brioli, Faith E. Davies, and Gareth J. Morgan, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Matthew Scales, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey; David A. Cairns, Walter M. Gregory, and Ana Quartilho, University of Leeds; Gordon Cook, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Nigel Russell, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham; Graham H. Jackson, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Aneta Mikulasova, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; and Xavier Leleu, Hôpital C. Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Nasrin M Dahir
- Brian A. Walker, Eileen M. Boyle, Christopher P. Wardell, Alex Murison, Dil B. Begum, Nasrin M. Dahir, Paula Z. Proszek, David C. Johnson, Martin F. Kaiser, Lorenzo Melchor, Lauren I. Aronson, Charlotte Pawlyn, Fabio Mirabella, John R. Jones, Annamaria Brioli, Faith E. Davies, and Gareth J. Morgan, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Matthew Scales, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey; David A. Cairns, Walter M. Gregory, and Ana Quartilho, University of Leeds; Gordon Cook, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Nigel Russell, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham; Graham H. Jackson, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Aneta Mikulasova, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; and Xavier Leleu, Hôpital C. Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Paula Z Proszek
- Brian A. Walker, Eileen M. Boyle, Christopher P. Wardell, Alex Murison, Dil B. Begum, Nasrin M. Dahir, Paula Z. Proszek, David C. Johnson, Martin F. Kaiser, Lorenzo Melchor, Lauren I. Aronson, Charlotte Pawlyn, Fabio Mirabella, John R. Jones, Annamaria Brioli, Faith E. Davies, and Gareth J. Morgan, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Matthew Scales, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey; David A. Cairns, Walter M. Gregory, and Ana Quartilho, University of Leeds; Gordon Cook, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Nigel Russell, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham; Graham H. Jackson, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Aneta Mikulasova, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; and Xavier Leleu, Hôpital C. Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - David C Johnson
- Brian A. Walker, Eileen M. Boyle, Christopher P. Wardell, Alex Murison, Dil B. Begum, Nasrin M. Dahir, Paula Z. Proszek, David C. Johnson, Martin F. Kaiser, Lorenzo Melchor, Lauren I. Aronson, Charlotte Pawlyn, Fabio Mirabella, John R. Jones, Annamaria Brioli, Faith E. Davies, and Gareth J. Morgan, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Matthew Scales, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey; David A. Cairns, Walter M. Gregory, and Ana Quartilho, University of Leeds; Gordon Cook, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Nigel Russell, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham; Graham H. Jackson, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Aneta Mikulasova, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; and Xavier Leleu, Hôpital C. Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Martin F Kaiser
- Brian A. Walker, Eileen M. Boyle, Christopher P. Wardell, Alex Murison, Dil B. Begum, Nasrin M. Dahir, Paula Z. Proszek, David C. Johnson, Martin F. Kaiser, Lorenzo Melchor, Lauren I. Aronson, Charlotte Pawlyn, Fabio Mirabella, John R. Jones, Annamaria Brioli, Faith E. Davies, and Gareth J. Morgan, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Matthew Scales, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey; David A. Cairns, Walter M. Gregory, and Ana Quartilho, University of Leeds; Gordon Cook, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Nigel Russell, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham; Graham H. Jackson, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Aneta Mikulasova, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; and Xavier Leleu, Hôpital C. Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Lorenzo Melchor
- Brian A. Walker, Eileen M. Boyle, Christopher P. Wardell, Alex Murison, Dil B. Begum, Nasrin M. Dahir, Paula Z. Proszek, David C. Johnson, Martin F. Kaiser, Lorenzo Melchor, Lauren I. Aronson, Charlotte Pawlyn, Fabio Mirabella, John R. Jones, Annamaria Brioli, Faith E. Davies, and Gareth J. Morgan, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Matthew Scales, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey; David A. Cairns, Walter M. Gregory, and Ana Quartilho, University of Leeds; Gordon Cook, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Nigel Russell, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham; Graham H. Jackson, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Aneta Mikulasova, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; and Xavier Leleu, Hôpital C. Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Lauren I Aronson
- Brian A. Walker, Eileen M. Boyle, Christopher P. Wardell, Alex Murison, Dil B. Begum, Nasrin M. Dahir, Paula Z. Proszek, David C. Johnson, Martin F. Kaiser, Lorenzo Melchor, Lauren I. Aronson, Charlotte Pawlyn, Fabio Mirabella, John R. Jones, Annamaria Brioli, Faith E. Davies, and Gareth J. Morgan, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Matthew Scales, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey; David A. Cairns, Walter M. Gregory, and Ana Quartilho, University of Leeds; Gordon Cook, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Nigel Russell, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham; Graham H. Jackson, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Aneta Mikulasova, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; and Xavier Leleu, Hôpital C. Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Matthew Scales
- Brian A. Walker, Eileen M. Boyle, Christopher P. Wardell, Alex Murison, Dil B. Begum, Nasrin M. Dahir, Paula Z. Proszek, David C. Johnson, Martin F. Kaiser, Lorenzo Melchor, Lauren I. Aronson, Charlotte Pawlyn, Fabio Mirabella, John R. Jones, Annamaria Brioli, Faith E. Davies, and Gareth J. Morgan, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Matthew Scales, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey; David A. Cairns, Walter M. Gregory, and Ana Quartilho, University of Leeds; Gordon Cook, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Nigel Russell, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham; Graham H. Jackson, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Aneta Mikulasova, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; and Xavier Leleu, Hôpital C. Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Charlotte Pawlyn
- Brian A. Walker, Eileen M. Boyle, Christopher P. Wardell, Alex Murison, Dil B. Begum, Nasrin M. Dahir, Paula Z. Proszek, David C. Johnson, Martin F. Kaiser, Lorenzo Melchor, Lauren I. Aronson, Charlotte Pawlyn, Fabio Mirabella, John R. Jones, Annamaria Brioli, Faith E. Davies, and Gareth J. Morgan, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Matthew Scales, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey; David A. Cairns, Walter M. Gregory, and Ana Quartilho, University of Leeds; Gordon Cook, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Nigel Russell, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham; Graham H. Jackson, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Aneta Mikulasova, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; and Xavier Leleu, Hôpital C. Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Fabio Mirabella
- Brian A. Walker, Eileen M. Boyle, Christopher P. Wardell, Alex Murison, Dil B. Begum, Nasrin M. Dahir, Paula Z. Proszek, David C. Johnson, Martin F. Kaiser, Lorenzo Melchor, Lauren I. Aronson, Charlotte Pawlyn, Fabio Mirabella, John R. Jones, Annamaria Brioli, Faith E. Davies, and Gareth J. Morgan, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Matthew Scales, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey; David A. Cairns, Walter M. Gregory, and Ana Quartilho, University of Leeds; Gordon Cook, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Nigel Russell, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham; Graham H. Jackson, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Aneta Mikulasova, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; and Xavier Leleu, Hôpital C. Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - John R Jones
- Brian A. Walker, Eileen M. Boyle, Christopher P. Wardell, Alex Murison, Dil B. Begum, Nasrin M. Dahir, Paula Z. Proszek, David C. Johnson, Martin F. Kaiser, Lorenzo Melchor, Lauren I. Aronson, Charlotte Pawlyn, Fabio Mirabella, John R. Jones, Annamaria Brioli, Faith E. Davies, and Gareth J. Morgan, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Matthew Scales, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey; David A. Cairns, Walter M. Gregory, and Ana Quartilho, University of Leeds; Gordon Cook, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Nigel Russell, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham; Graham H. Jackson, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Aneta Mikulasova, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; and Xavier Leleu, Hôpital C. Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Annamaria Brioli
- Brian A. Walker, Eileen M. Boyle, Christopher P. Wardell, Alex Murison, Dil B. Begum, Nasrin M. Dahir, Paula Z. Proszek, David C. Johnson, Martin F. Kaiser, Lorenzo Melchor, Lauren I. Aronson, Charlotte Pawlyn, Fabio Mirabella, John R. Jones, Annamaria Brioli, Faith E. Davies, and Gareth J. Morgan, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Matthew Scales, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey; David A. Cairns, Walter M. Gregory, and Ana Quartilho, University of Leeds; Gordon Cook, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Nigel Russell, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham; Graham H. Jackson, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Aneta Mikulasova, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; and Xavier Leleu, Hôpital C. Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Aneta Mikulasova
- Brian A. Walker, Eileen M. Boyle, Christopher P. Wardell, Alex Murison, Dil B. Begum, Nasrin M. Dahir, Paula Z. Proszek, David C. Johnson, Martin F. Kaiser, Lorenzo Melchor, Lauren I. Aronson, Charlotte Pawlyn, Fabio Mirabella, John R. Jones, Annamaria Brioli, Faith E. Davies, and Gareth J. Morgan, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Matthew Scales, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey; David A. Cairns, Walter M. Gregory, and Ana Quartilho, University of Leeds; Gordon Cook, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Nigel Russell, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham; Graham H. Jackson, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Aneta Mikulasova, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; and Xavier Leleu, Hôpital C. Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - David A Cairns
- Brian A. Walker, Eileen M. Boyle, Christopher P. Wardell, Alex Murison, Dil B. Begum, Nasrin M. Dahir, Paula Z. Proszek, David C. Johnson, Martin F. Kaiser, Lorenzo Melchor, Lauren I. Aronson, Charlotte Pawlyn, Fabio Mirabella, John R. Jones, Annamaria Brioli, Faith E. Davies, and Gareth J. Morgan, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Matthew Scales, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey; David A. Cairns, Walter M. Gregory, and Ana Quartilho, University of Leeds; Gordon Cook, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Nigel Russell, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham; Graham H. Jackson, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Aneta Mikulasova, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; and Xavier Leleu, Hôpital C. Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Walter M Gregory
- Brian A. Walker, Eileen M. Boyle, Christopher P. Wardell, Alex Murison, Dil B. Begum, Nasrin M. Dahir, Paula Z. Proszek, David C. Johnson, Martin F. Kaiser, Lorenzo Melchor, Lauren I. Aronson, Charlotte Pawlyn, Fabio Mirabella, John R. Jones, Annamaria Brioli, Faith E. Davies, and Gareth J. Morgan, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Matthew Scales, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey; David A. Cairns, Walter M. Gregory, and Ana Quartilho, University of Leeds; Gordon Cook, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Nigel Russell, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham; Graham H. Jackson, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Aneta Mikulasova, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; and Xavier Leleu, Hôpital C. Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Ana Quartilho
- Brian A. Walker, Eileen M. Boyle, Christopher P. Wardell, Alex Murison, Dil B. Begum, Nasrin M. Dahir, Paula Z. Proszek, David C. Johnson, Martin F. Kaiser, Lorenzo Melchor, Lauren I. Aronson, Charlotte Pawlyn, Fabio Mirabella, John R. Jones, Annamaria Brioli, Faith E. Davies, and Gareth J. Morgan, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Matthew Scales, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey; David A. Cairns, Walter M. Gregory, and Ana Quartilho, University of Leeds; Gordon Cook, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Nigel Russell, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham; Graham H. Jackson, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Aneta Mikulasova, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; and Xavier Leleu, Hôpital C. Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Mark T Drayson
- Brian A. Walker, Eileen M. Boyle, Christopher P. Wardell, Alex Murison, Dil B. Begum, Nasrin M. Dahir, Paula Z. Proszek, David C. Johnson, Martin F. Kaiser, Lorenzo Melchor, Lauren I. Aronson, Charlotte Pawlyn, Fabio Mirabella, John R. Jones, Annamaria Brioli, Faith E. Davies, and Gareth J. Morgan, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Matthew Scales, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey; David A. Cairns, Walter M. Gregory, and Ana Quartilho, University of Leeds; Gordon Cook, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Nigel Russell, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham; Graham H. Jackson, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Aneta Mikulasova, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; and Xavier Leleu, Hôpital C. Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Nigel Russell
- Brian A. Walker, Eileen M. Boyle, Christopher P. Wardell, Alex Murison, Dil B. Begum, Nasrin M. Dahir, Paula Z. Proszek, David C. Johnson, Martin F. Kaiser, Lorenzo Melchor, Lauren I. Aronson, Charlotte Pawlyn, Fabio Mirabella, John R. Jones, Annamaria Brioli, Faith E. Davies, and Gareth J. Morgan, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Matthew Scales, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey; David A. Cairns, Walter M. Gregory, and Ana Quartilho, University of Leeds; Gordon Cook, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Nigel Russell, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham; Graham H. Jackson, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Aneta Mikulasova, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; and Xavier Leleu, Hôpital C. Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Gordon Cook
- Brian A. Walker, Eileen M. Boyle, Christopher P. Wardell, Alex Murison, Dil B. Begum, Nasrin M. Dahir, Paula Z. Proszek, David C. Johnson, Martin F. Kaiser, Lorenzo Melchor, Lauren I. Aronson, Charlotte Pawlyn, Fabio Mirabella, John R. Jones, Annamaria Brioli, Faith E. Davies, and Gareth J. Morgan, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Matthew Scales, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey; David A. Cairns, Walter M. Gregory, and Ana Quartilho, University of Leeds; Gordon Cook, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Nigel Russell, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham; Graham H. Jackson, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Aneta Mikulasova, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; and Xavier Leleu, Hôpital C. Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Graham H Jackson
- Brian A. Walker, Eileen M. Boyle, Christopher P. Wardell, Alex Murison, Dil B. Begum, Nasrin M. Dahir, Paula Z. Proszek, David C. Johnson, Martin F. Kaiser, Lorenzo Melchor, Lauren I. Aronson, Charlotte Pawlyn, Fabio Mirabella, John R. Jones, Annamaria Brioli, Faith E. Davies, and Gareth J. Morgan, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Matthew Scales, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey; David A. Cairns, Walter M. Gregory, and Ana Quartilho, University of Leeds; Gordon Cook, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Nigel Russell, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham; Graham H. Jackson, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Aneta Mikulasova, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; and Xavier Leleu, Hôpital C. Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Xavier Leleu
- Brian A. Walker, Eileen M. Boyle, Christopher P. Wardell, Alex Murison, Dil B. Begum, Nasrin M. Dahir, Paula Z. Proszek, David C. Johnson, Martin F. Kaiser, Lorenzo Melchor, Lauren I. Aronson, Charlotte Pawlyn, Fabio Mirabella, John R. Jones, Annamaria Brioli, Faith E. Davies, and Gareth J. Morgan, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Matthew Scales, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey; David A. Cairns, Walter M. Gregory, and Ana Quartilho, University of Leeds; Gordon Cook, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Nigel Russell, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham; Graham H. Jackson, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Aneta Mikulasova, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; and Xavier Leleu, Hôpital C. Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Faith E Davies
- Brian A. Walker, Eileen M. Boyle, Christopher P. Wardell, Alex Murison, Dil B. Begum, Nasrin M. Dahir, Paula Z. Proszek, David C. Johnson, Martin F. Kaiser, Lorenzo Melchor, Lauren I. Aronson, Charlotte Pawlyn, Fabio Mirabella, John R. Jones, Annamaria Brioli, Faith E. Davies, and Gareth J. Morgan, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Matthew Scales, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey; David A. Cairns, Walter M. Gregory, and Ana Quartilho, University of Leeds; Gordon Cook, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Nigel Russell, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham; Graham H. Jackson, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Aneta Mikulasova, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; and Xavier Leleu, Hôpital C. Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Gareth J Morgan
- Brian A. Walker, Eileen M. Boyle, Christopher P. Wardell, Alex Murison, Dil B. Begum, Nasrin M. Dahir, Paula Z. Proszek, David C. Johnson, Martin F. Kaiser, Lorenzo Melchor, Lauren I. Aronson, Charlotte Pawlyn, Fabio Mirabella, John R. Jones, Annamaria Brioli, Faith E. Davies, and Gareth J. Morgan, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Matthew Scales, The Institute of Cancer Research, Surrey; David A. Cairns, Walter M. Gregory, and Ana Quartilho, University of Leeds; Gordon Cook, St James's University Hospital, Leeds; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Nigel Russell, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham; Graham H. Jackson, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom; Aneta Mikulasova, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; and Xavier Leleu, Hôpital C. Huriez, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
de Tute RM, Rawstron AC, Gregory WM, Child JA, Davies FE, Bell SE, Cook G, Szubert AJ, Drayson MT, Jackson GH, Morgan GJ, Owen RG. Minimal residual disease following autologous stem cell transplant in myeloma: impact on outcome is independent of induction regimen. Haematologica 2015; 101:e69-71. [PMID: 26471484 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2015.128215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Faith E Davies
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Sue E Bell
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Gareth J Morgan
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Walker BA, Wardell CP, Murison A, Boyle EM, Begum DB, Dahir NM, Proszek PZ, Melchor L, Pawlyn C, Kaiser MF, Johnson DC, Qiang YW, Jones JR, Cairns DA, Gregory WM, Owen RG, Cook G, Drayson MT, Jackson GH, Davies FE, Morgan GJ. APOBEC family mutational signatures are associated with poor prognosis translocations in multiple myeloma. Nat Commun 2015; 6:6997. [PMID: 25904160 PMCID: PMC4568299 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 223] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2014] [Accepted: 03/24/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
We have sequenced 463 presenting cases of myeloma entered into the UK Myeloma XI study using whole exome sequencing. Here we identify mutations induced as a consequence of misdirected AID in the partner oncogenes of IGH translocations, which are activating and associated with impaired clinical outcome. An APOBEC mutational signature is seen in 3.8% of cases and is linked to the translocation-mediated deregulation of MAF and MAFB, a known poor prognostic factor. Patients with this signature have an increased mutational load and a poor prognosis. Loss of MAF or MAFB expression results in decreased APOBEC3B and APOBEC4 expression, indicating a transcriptional control mechanism. Kataegis, a further mutational pattern associated with APOBEC deregulation, is seen at the sites of the MYC translocation. The APOBEC mutational signature seen in myeloma is, therefore, associated with poor prognosis primary and secondary translocations and the molecular mechanisms involved in generating them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian A Walker
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Christopher P Wardell
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Alex Murison
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Eileen M Boyle
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Dil B Begum
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Nasrin M Dahir
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Paula Z Proszek
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Lorenzo Melchor
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Charlotte Pawlyn
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Martin F Kaiser
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - David C Johnson
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Ya-Wei Qiang
- Myeloma Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, USA
| | - John R Jones
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK
| | - David A Cairns
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Walter M Gregory
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Roger G Owen
- St James's University Hospital, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Gordon Cook
- St James's University Hospital, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Mark T Drayson
- Clinical Immunology, School of Immunity &Infection, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | - Graham H Jackson
- Department of Haematology, Newcastle University, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
| | - Faith E Davies
- 1] Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK [2] Myeloma Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, USA
| | - Gareth J Morgan
- 1] Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SM2 5NG, UK [2] Myeloma Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Cohen DR, Todd S, Gregory WM, Brown JM. Adding a treatment arm to an ongoing clinical trial: a review of methodology and practice. Trials 2015; 16:179. [PMID: 25897686 PMCID: PMC4457999 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0697-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2014] [Accepted: 03/31/2015] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Incorporating an emerging therapy as a new randomisation arm in a clinical trial that is open to recruitment would be desirable to researchers, regulators and patients to ensure that the trial remains current, new treatments are evaluated as quickly as possible, and the time and cost for determining optimal therapies is minimised. It may take many years to run a clinical trial from concept to reporting within a rapidly changing drug development environment; hence, in order for trials to be most useful to inform policy and practice, it is advantageous for them to be able to adapt to emerging therapeutic developments. This paper reports a comprehensive literature review on methodologies for, and practical examples of, amending an ongoing clinical trial by adding a new treatment arm. Relevant methodological literature describing statistical considerations required when making this specific type of amendment is identified, and the key statistical concepts when planning the addition of a new treatment arm are extracted, assessed and summarised. For completeness, this includes an assessment of statistical recommendations within general adaptive design guidance documents. Examples of confirmatory ongoing trials designed within the frequentist framework that have added an arm in practice are reported; and the details of the amendment are reviewed. An assessment is made as to how well the relevant statistical considerations were addressed in practice, and the related implications. The literature review confirmed that there is currently no clear methodological guidance on this topic, but that guidance would be advantageous to help this efficient design amendment to be used more frequently and appropriately in practice. Eight confirmatory trials were identified to have added a treatment arm, suggesting that trials can benefit from this amendment and that it can be practically feasible; however, the trials were not always able to address the key statistical considerations, often leading to uninterpretable or invalid outcomes. If the statistical concepts identified within this review are considered and addressed during the design of a trial amendment, it is possible to effectively assess a new treatment arm within an ongoing trial without compromising the original trial outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dena R Cohen
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
| | - Susan Todd
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6AX, UK.
| | - Walter M Gregory
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
| | - Julia M Brown
- Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Affiliation(s)
- R L Souhami
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University College
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Wu P, Walker BA, Broyl A, Kaiser M, Johnson DC, Kuiper R, van Duin M, Gregory WM, Davies FE, Brewer D, Hose D, Sonneveld P, Morgan GJ. A gene expression based predictor for high risk myeloma treated with intensive therapy and autologous stem cell rescue. Leuk Lymphoma 2014; 56:594-601. [PMID: 24913504 PMCID: PMC4444991 DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2014.911863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Myeloma is characterized by a highly variable clinical outcome. Despite the effectiveness of high-dose therapy, 15% of patients relapse within 1 year. We show that these cases also have a significantly shorter post-relapse survival compared to the others (median 14.9 months vs. 40 months, p = 8.03 × 10− 14). There are no effective approaches to define this potentially distinct biological group such that treatment could be altered. In this work a series of uniformly treated patients with myeloma were used to develop a gene expression profiling (GEP)-based signature to identify this high risk clinical behavior. Gene enrichment analyses applied to the top differentially expressed genes showed a significant enrichment of epigenetic regulators as well as “stem cell” myeloma genes. A derived 17-gene signature effectively identifies patients at high risk of early relapse as well as impaired overall survival. Integrative genomic analyses showed that epigenetic mechanisms may play an important role on transcription of these genes.
Collapse
|
37
|
Viprey VF, Gregory WM, Corrias MV, Tchirkov A, Swerts K, Vicha A, Dallorso S, Brock P, Luksch R, Valteau-Couanet D, Papadakis V, Laureys G, Pearson AD, Ladenstein R, Burchill SA. Neuroblastoma mRNAs predict outcome in children with stage 4 neuroblastoma: a European HR-NBL1/SIOPEN study. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:1074-83. [PMID: 24590653 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.53.3604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the hypothesis that detection of neuroblastoma mRNAs by reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RTqPCR) in peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow aspirates (BM) from children with stage 4 neuroblastoma are clinically useful biomarkers of risk. METHODS RTqPCR for paired-like homeobox 2b (PHOX2B), tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), and doublecortin (DCX) mRNA in PB and BM of children enrolled onto the High-Risk Neuroblastoma Trial-1 of the European Society of Pediatric Oncology Neuroblastoma Group (HR-NBL1/SIOPEN) was performed at diagnosis and after induction therapy. RESULTS High levels of TH, PHOX2B, or DCX mRNA in PB or BM at diagnosis strongly predicted for worse event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) in a cohort of 290 children. After induction therapy, high levels of these mRNAs predicted worse EFS and OS in BM but not in PB. Combinations of mRNAs in BM did not add to the predictive power of any single mRNA. However, in the original (n = 182) and validation (n = 137) PB cohorts, high TH (log10TH > 0.8) or high PHOX2B (log10PHOX2B > 0.28) identify 19% of children as ultrahigh risk, with 5-year EFS and OS rates of 0%; OS rate was 25% (95% CI, 16% to 36%) and EFS rate was 38% (95% CI, 28% to 49%) in the remaining children. The magnitude of reduction in mRNA level between diagnosis and postinduction therapy in BM or PB was not of additional predictive value. CONCLUSION High levels of TH and PHOX2B mRNA in PB at diagnosis objectively identify children with ultrahigh-risk disease who may benefit from novel treatment approaches. The level of TH, PHOX2B, and DCX mRNA in BM and/or PB at diagnosis might contribute to an algorithm to improve stratification of children for treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virginie F Viprey
- Virginie F. Viprey and Susan A. Burchill, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology; Walter M. Gregory, Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds; Penelope Brock, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London; Andrew D. Pearson, Institute of Cancer Research/Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom; Maria V. Corrias and Sandro Dallorso, Gaslini Institute, Genoa; Roberto Luksch, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy; Andrei Tchirkov, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Clermont-Ferrand and Clermont Université, Université d'Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand; Dominique Valteau-Couanet, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Katrien Swerts and Genevieve Laureys, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium; Ales Vicha, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic; Vassilios Papadakis, Agia Sofia Children's Hospital, Athens, Greece; and Ruth Ladenstein, Children's Cancer Research Institute/St Anna Children's Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Jackson GH, Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Wu P, Gregory WM, Bell SE, Szubert AJ, Navarro Coy N, Drayson MT, Owen RG, Feyler S, Ashcroft AJ, Ross FM, Byrne J, Roddie H, Rudin C, Boyd KD, Osborne WL, Cook G, Child JA. Osteonecrosis of the jaw and renal safety in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: Medical Research Council Myeloma IX Study results. Br J Haematol 2014; 166:109-17. [PMID: 24673708 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.12861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2013] [Accepted: 01/22/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Bisphosphonates are recommended in patients with osteolytic lesions secondary to multiple myeloma. We report on the safety of bisphosphonate therapy with long-term follow-up in the Medical Research Council Myeloma IX study. Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma were randomised to zoledronic acid (ZOL; 4 mg intravenously every 21-28 d) or clodronate (CLO; 1600 mg/d orally) plus chemotherapy. Among 1960 patients (5.9-year median follow-up), both bisphosphonates were well tolerated. Acute renal failure events were similar between groups (ZOL 5.2% vs. CLO 5.8% at 2 years; incidence plateaued thereafter). The overall incidence of confirmed osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) was low, but higher with ZOL (ZOL 3.7% vs. CLO 0.5%; P < 0.0001). ONJ events were generally low grade and most occurred between 8 and 30 months (median time to ONJ, 23.7 months). Among 10 patients with ONJ recovery data, four patients in the ZOL group completely recovered, two patients improved, and three patients experienced no improvement; one CLO patient experienced no improvement. Dental surgery or trauma preceded ONJ in six ZOL patients. The incidence of renal adverse events was similar for ZOL and CLO. ONJ incidence remained low and was lower with CLO compared to ZOL. We have seen no further ONJ cases to date.
Collapse
|
39
|
Rawstron AC, Child JA, de Tute RM, Davies FE, Gregory WM, Bell SE, Szubert AJ, Navarro Coy N, Drayson MT, Feyler S, Ross FM, Cook G, Jackson GH, Morgan GJ, Owen RG. Reply to M. Roschewski et al. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:476-7. [PMID: 24419132 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.53.0980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
40
|
Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Gregory WM, Bell SE, Szubert AJ, Cook G, Drayson MT, Owen RG, Ross FM, Jackson GH, Child JA. Long-term follow-up of MRC Myeloma IX trial: Survival outcomes with bisphosphonate and thalidomide treatment. Clin Cancer Res 2013; 19:6030-8. [PMID: 23995858 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-12-3211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 121] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Medical Research Council (MRC) Myeloma IX was a phase III trial evaluating bisphosphonate and thalidomide-based therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Results were reported previously after a median follow-up of 3.7 years (current controlled trials number: ISRCTN68454111). Survival outcomes were reanalyzed after an extended follow-up (median, 5.9 years). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN At first randomization, patients (N = 1,970) were assigned to bisphosphonate (clodronic acid or zoledronic acid) and induction therapies [cyclophosphamide-vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone (CVAD) or cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone (CTD) followed by high-dose therapy plus autologous stem cell transplantation for younger/fitter patients (intensive pathway), and melphalan-prednisone (MP) or attenuated CTD (CTDa) for older/less fit patients (nonintensive pathway)]. At second randomization, patients were assigned to thalidomide maintenance therapy or no maintenance. Interphase FISH (iFISH) was used to analyze cytogenics. RESULTS Zoledronic acid significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS; HR, 0.89; P = 0.02) and overall survival (OS; HR, 0.86; P = 0.01) compared with clodronic acid. In the intensive pathway, CTD showed noninferior PFS and OS compared with CVAD, with a trend toward improved OS in patients with favorable cytogenics (P = 0.068). In the nonintensive pathway, CTDa significantly improved PFS (HR, 0.81; P = 0.007) compared with MP and there was an emergent survival benefit after 18 to 24 months. Thalidomide maintenance improved PFS (HR, 1.44; P < 0.0001) but not OS (HR, 0.96; P = 0.70), and was associated with shorter OS in patients with adverse cytogenics (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Long-term follow-up is essential to identify clinically meaningful treatment effects in myeloma subgroups based on cytogenetics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gareth J Morgan
- Authors' Affiliations: Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, London; Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds; St James's University Hospital, Leeds; University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, University of Southampton, Salisbury; and University of Newcastle, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Rawstron AC, Child JA, de Tute RM, Davies FE, Gregory WM, Bell SE, Szubert AJ, Navarro-Coy N, Drayson MT, Feyler S, Ross FM, Cook G, Jackson GH, Morgan GJ, Owen RG. Minimal Residual Disease Assessed by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry in Multiple Myeloma: Impact on Outcome in the Medical Research Council Myeloma IX Study. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31:2540-7. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.46.2119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 325] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the prognostic value of minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment in patients with multiple myeloma treated in the MRC (Medical Research Council) Myeloma IX trial. Patients and Methods Multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) was used to assess MRD after induction therapy (n = 378) and at day 100 after autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT; n = 397) in intensive-pathway patients and at the end of induction therapy in non–intensive-pathway patients (n = 245). Results In intensive-pathway patients, absence of MRD at day 100 after ASCT was highly predictive of a favorable outcome (PFS, P < .001; OS, P = .0183). This outcome advantage was demonstrable in patients with favorable and adverse cytogenetics (PFS, P = .014 and P < .001, respectively) and in patients achieving immunofixation-negative complete response (CR; PFS, P = .0068). The effect of maintenance thalidomide was assessed, with the shortest PFS demonstrable in those MRD-positive patients who did not receive maintenance and longest in those who were MRD negative and did receive thalidomide (P < .001). Further analysis demonstrated that 28% of MRD-positive patients who received maintenance thalidomide became MRD negative. MRD assessment after induction therapy in the non–intensive-pathway patients did not seem to be predictive of outcome (PFS, P = .1). Conclusion MRD assessment by MFC was predictive of overall outcome in patients with myeloma undergoing ASCT. This predictive value was seen in patients achieving conventional CR as well as patients with favorable and adverse cytogenetics. The effects of maintenance strategies can also be evaluated, and our data suggest that maintenance thalidomide can eradicate MRD in some patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andy C. Rawstron
- Andy C. Rawstron, Ruth M. de Tute, Gordon Cook, and Roger G. Owen, St James's University Hospital; J. Anthony Child, Walter M. Gregory, Sue E. Bell, Alexander J. Szubert, and Nuria Navarro-Coy, University of Leeds, Leeds; Faith E. Davies and Gareth J. Morgan, Institute of Cancer Research, London; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Sylvia Feyler, Calderdale and Huddersfield National Health Service Trust, Huddersfield; Fiona M. Ross, Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury; and
| | - J. Anthony Child
- Andy C. Rawstron, Ruth M. de Tute, Gordon Cook, and Roger G. Owen, St James's University Hospital; J. Anthony Child, Walter M. Gregory, Sue E. Bell, Alexander J. Szubert, and Nuria Navarro-Coy, University of Leeds, Leeds; Faith E. Davies and Gareth J. Morgan, Institute of Cancer Research, London; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Sylvia Feyler, Calderdale and Huddersfield National Health Service Trust, Huddersfield; Fiona M. Ross, Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury; and
| | - Ruth M. de Tute
- Andy C. Rawstron, Ruth M. de Tute, Gordon Cook, and Roger G. Owen, St James's University Hospital; J. Anthony Child, Walter M. Gregory, Sue E. Bell, Alexander J. Szubert, and Nuria Navarro-Coy, University of Leeds, Leeds; Faith E. Davies and Gareth J. Morgan, Institute of Cancer Research, London; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Sylvia Feyler, Calderdale and Huddersfield National Health Service Trust, Huddersfield; Fiona M. Ross, Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury; and
| | - Faith E. Davies
- Andy C. Rawstron, Ruth M. de Tute, Gordon Cook, and Roger G. Owen, St James's University Hospital; J. Anthony Child, Walter M. Gregory, Sue E. Bell, Alexander J. Szubert, and Nuria Navarro-Coy, University of Leeds, Leeds; Faith E. Davies and Gareth J. Morgan, Institute of Cancer Research, London; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Sylvia Feyler, Calderdale and Huddersfield National Health Service Trust, Huddersfield; Fiona M. Ross, Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury; and
| | - Walter M. Gregory
- Andy C. Rawstron, Ruth M. de Tute, Gordon Cook, and Roger G. Owen, St James's University Hospital; J. Anthony Child, Walter M. Gregory, Sue E. Bell, Alexander J. Szubert, and Nuria Navarro-Coy, University of Leeds, Leeds; Faith E. Davies and Gareth J. Morgan, Institute of Cancer Research, London; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Sylvia Feyler, Calderdale and Huddersfield National Health Service Trust, Huddersfield; Fiona M. Ross, Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury; and
| | - Sue E. Bell
- Andy C. Rawstron, Ruth M. de Tute, Gordon Cook, and Roger G. Owen, St James's University Hospital; J. Anthony Child, Walter M. Gregory, Sue E. Bell, Alexander J. Szubert, and Nuria Navarro-Coy, University of Leeds, Leeds; Faith E. Davies and Gareth J. Morgan, Institute of Cancer Research, London; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Sylvia Feyler, Calderdale and Huddersfield National Health Service Trust, Huddersfield; Fiona M. Ross, Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury; and
| | - Alexander J. Szubert
- Andy C. Rawstron, Ruth M. de Tute, Gordon Cook, and Roger G. Owen, St James's University Hospital; J. Anthony Child, Walter M. Gregory, Sue E. Bell, Alexander J. Szubert, and Nuria Navarro-Coy, University of Leeds, Leeds; Faith E. Davies and Gareth J. Morgan, Institute of Cancer Research, London; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Sylvia Feyler, Calderdale and Huddersfield National Health Service Trust, Huddersfield; Fiona M. Ross, Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury; and
| | - Nuria Navarro-Coy
- Andy C. Rawstron, Ruth M. de Tute, Gordon Cook, and Roger G. Owen, St James's University Hospital; J. Anthony Child, Walter M. Gregory, Sue E. Bell, Alexander J. Szubert, and Nuria Navarro-Coy, University of Leeds, Leeds; Faith E. Davies and Gareth J. Morgan, Institute of Cancer Research, London; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Sylvia Feyler, Calderdale and Huddersfield National Health Service Trust, Huddersfield; Fiona M. Ross, Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury; and
| | - Mark T. Drayson
- Andy C. Rawstron, Ruth M. de Tute, Gordon Cook, and Roger G. Owen, St James's University Hospital; J. Anthony Child, Walter M. Gregory, Sue E. Bell, Alexander J. Szubert, and Nuria Navarro-Coy, University of Leeds, Leeds; Faith E. Davies and Gareth J. Morgan, Institute of Cancer Research, London; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Sylvia Feyler, Calderdale and Huddersfield National Health Service Trust, Huddersfield; Fiona M. Ross, Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury; and
| | - Sylvia Feyler
- Andy C. Rawstron, Ruth M. de Tute, Gordon Cook, and Roger G. Owen, St James's University Hospital; J. Anthony Child, Walter M. Gregory, Sue E. Bell, Alexander J. Szubert, and Nuria Navarro-Coy, University of Leeds, Leeds; Faith E. Davies and Gareth J. Morgan, Institute of Cancer Research, London; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Sylvia Feyler, Calderdale and Huddersfield National Health Service Trust, Huddersfield; Fiona M. Ross, Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury; and
| | - Fiona M. Ross
- Andy C. Rawstron, Ruth M. de Tute, Gordon Cook, and Roger G. Owen, St James's University Hospital; J. Anthony Child, Walter M. Gregory, Sue E. Bell, Alexander J. Szubert, and Nuria Navarro-Coy, University of Leeds, Leeds; Faith E. Davies and Gareth J. Morgan, Institute of Cancer Research, London; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Sylvia Feyler, Calderdale and Huddersfield National Health Service Trust, Huddersfield; Fiona M. Ross, Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury; and
| | - Gordon Cook
- Andy C. Rawstron, Ruth M. de Tute, Gordon Cook, and Roger G. Owen, St James's University Hospital; J. Anthony Child, Walter M. Gregory, Sue E. Bell, Alexander J. Szubert, and Nuria Navarro-Coy, University of Leeds, Leeds; Faith E. Davies and Gareth J. Morgan, Institute of Cancer Research, London; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Sylvia Feyler, Calderdale and Huddersfield National Health Service Trust, Huddersfield; Fiona M. Ross, Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury; and
| | - Graham H. Jackson
- Andy C. Rawstron, Ruth M. de Tute, Gordon Cook, and Roger G. Owen, St James's University Hospital; J. Anthony Child, Walter M. Gregory, Sue E. Bell, Alexander J. Szubert, and Nuria Navarro-Coy, University of Leeds, Leeds; Faith E. Davies and Gareth J. Morgan, Institute of Cancer Research, London; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Sylvia Feyler, Calderdale and Huddersfield National Health Service Trust, Huddersfield; Fiona M. Ross, Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury; and
| | - Gareth J. Morgan
- Andy C. Rawstron, Ruth M. de Tute, Gordon Cook, and Roger G. Owen, St James's University Hospital; J. Anthony Child, Walter M. Gregory, Sue E. Bell, Alexander J. Szubert, and Nuria Navarro-Coy, University of Leeds, Leeds; Faith E. Davies and Gareth J. Morgan, Institute of Cancer Research, London; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Sylvia Feyler, Calderdale and Huddersfield National Health Service Trust, Huddersfield; Fiona M. Ross, Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury; and
| | - Roger G. Owen
- Andy C. Rawstron, Ruth M. de Tute, Gordon Cook, and Roger G. Owen, St James's University Hospital; J. Anthony Child, Walter M. Gregory, Sue E. Bell, Alexander J. Szubert, and Nuria Navarro-Coy, University of Leeds, Leeds; Faith E. Davies and Gareth J. Morgan, Institute of Cancer Research, London; Mark T. Drayson, University of Birmingham, Birmingham; Sylvia Feyler, Calderdale and Huddersfield National Health Service Trust, Huddersfield; Fiona M. Ross, Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury; and
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Wu P, Agnelli L, Walker BA, Todoerti K, Lionetti M, Johnson DC, Kaiser M, Mirabella F, Wardell C, Gregory WM, Davies FE, Brewer D, Neri A, Morgan GJ. Improved risk stratification in myeloma using a microRNA-based classifier. Br J Haematol 2013; 162:348-59. [PMID: 23718138 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.12394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2013] [Accepted: 04/03/2013] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogeneous disease. International Staging System/fluorescence hybridization (ISS/FISH)-based model and gene expression profiles (GEP) are effective approaches to define clinical outcome, although yet to be improved. The discovery of a class of small non-coding RNAs (micro RNAs, miRNAs) has revealed a new level of biological complexity underlying the regulation of gene expression. In this work, 163 presenting samples from MM patients were analysed by global miRNA profiling, and distinct miRNA expression characteristics in molecular subgroups with prognostic relevance (4p16, MAF and 11q13 translocations) were identified. Furthermore we developed an "outcome classifier", based on the expression of two miRNAs (MIR17 and MIR886-5p), which is able to stratify patients into three risk groups (median OS 19.4, 40.6 and 65.3 months, P = 0.001). The miRNA-based classifier significantly improved the predictive power of the ISS/FISH approach (P = 0.0004), and was independent of GEP-derived prognostic signatures (P < 0.002). Through integrative genomics analysis, we outlined the potential biological relevance of the miRNAs included in the classifier and their putative roles in regulating a large number of genes involved in MM biology. This is the first report showing that miRNAs can be built into molecular diagnostic strategies for risk stratification in MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping Wu
- Section of Haemato-Oncology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Brioli A, Boyd KD, Kaiser MF, Pawlyn C, Wu P, Gregory WM, Owen R, Ross FM, Jackson GH, Cavo M, Davies FE, Morgan GJ. Response and biological subtype of myeloma are independent prognostic factors and combine to define outcome after high-dose therapy. Br J Haematol 2013; 161:291-4. [DOI: 10.1111/bjh.12218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kevin D. Boyd
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Haemato-Oncology Research Unit; The Institute of Cancer Research; London; UK
| | - Martin F. Kaiser
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Haemato-Oncology Research Unit; The Institute of Cancer Research; London; UK
| | - Charlotte Pawlyn
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Haemato-Oncology Research Unit; The Institute of Cancer Research; London; UK
| | - Ping Wu
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Haemato-Oncology Research Unit; The Institute of Cancer Research; London; UK
| | | | - Roger Owen
- St James's University Hospital; Leeds; UK
| | - Fiona M. Ross
- Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory; University of Southampton; Salisbury; UK
| | - Graham H. Jackson
- Department of Haematology; University of Newcastle; Newcastle-upon-Tyne; UK
| | - Michele Cavo
- Istituto di Ematologia Seràgnoli; Università degli Studi di Bologna; Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi; Bologna; Italy
| | - Faith E. Davies
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Haemato-Oncology Research Unit; The Institute of Cancer Research; London; UK
| | - Gareth J. Morgan
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Haemato-Oncology Research Unit; The Institute of Cancer Research; London; UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Brioli A, Kaiser MF, Pawlyn C, Wu P, Gregory WM, Owen R, Ross FM, Jackson GH, Cavo M, Davies FE, Morgan GJ. Biologically defined risk groups can be used to define the impact of thalidomide maintenance therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma 2013; 54:1975-81. [PMID: 23270579 DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2012.760736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Maintenance therapy is an attractive strategy for patients with multiple myeloma. However, the impact of maintenance thalidomide according to the underlying biology of the disease is still a matter of debate, with some studies suggesting that thalidomide is more beneficial in high risk disease, whilst others show the opposite. Biological risk groups defined by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are powerful predictors of outcome. In this report we investigated the effect of maintenance thalidomide in different biological risk groups defined by different FISH categories. Our data show that maintenance thalidomide improves outcome in patients with biologically low risk disease, defined by the absence of adverse cytogenetic lesion or by the presence of hyperdiploidy alone. Conversely, thalidomide maintenance is detrimental for the overall survival of patients with biological high risk. We conclude that it is important to identify biologically low risk patients who will benefit from a maintenance strategy with thalidomide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annamaria Brioli
- Haemato-Oncology Research Unit, Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Collinson FJ, Gregory WM, McCabe C, Howard H, Lowe C, Potrata D, Tubeuf S, Hanlon P, McParland L, Wah T, Selby PJ, Hewison J, Brown J, Brown J. The STAR trial protocol: a randomised multi-stage phase II/III study of Sunitinib comparing temporary cessation with allowing continuation, at the time of maximal radiological response, in the first-line treatment of locally advanced/metastatic renal cancer. BMC Cancer 2012; 12:598. [PMID: 23241439 PMCID: PMC3583710 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2012] [Accepted: 11/22/2012] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over recent years a number of novel therapies have shown promise in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Internationally the standard of care of first-line therapy is sunitinib™, after a clear survival benefit was demonstrated over interferon-α. Convention dictates that sunitinib is continued until evidence of disease progression, assuming tolerability, although there is no evidence that this approach is superior to intermittent periods of treatment. The purpose of the STAR trial is to compare the standard treatment strategy (conventional continuation strategy, CCS) with a novel drug free interval strategy (DFIS) which includes planned treatment breaks. METHODS/DESIGN The STAR trial is an NIHR HTA-funded UK pragmatic randomised phase II/III clinical trial in the first-line treatment of advanced RCC. Participants will be randomised (1:1) to either a sunitinib CCS or a DFIS. The overall aim of the trial is to determine whether a DFIS is non-inferior, in terms of 2-year overall survival (OS) and quality adjusted life years (QALY) (averaged over treatment and follow up), compared to a CCS. The QALY primary endpoint was selected to assess whether any detriment in terms of OS could be balanced with improvements in quality of life (QoL). This is a complex trial with a number of design challenges, and to address these issues a feasibility stage is incorporated into the trial design. Predetermined recruitment (stage A) and efficacy (stage B) intermediary endpoints must be met to allow continuation to the overall phase III trial (stage C). An integral qualitative patient preference and understanding study will occur alongside the feasibility stage to investigate patients' feelings regarding participation or non-participation in the trial. DISCUSSION The optimal duration of continuing sunitinib in advanced RCC is unknown. Novel targeted therapies do not always have the same constraints to treatment duration as standard chemotherapeutic agents and currently there are no randomised data comparing different treatment durations. Incorporating planned treatment breaks has the potential to improve QoL and cost effectiveness, hopefully without significant detriment on OS, as has been demonstrated in other cancer types with other treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION Controlled-trials.com ISRCTN 06473203.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona J Collinson
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Walter M Gregory
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Chris McCabe
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Charles Thackrah Building, University of Leeds, 101 Clarendon Road, Leeds, LS2 9LJ, UK
| | - Helen Howard
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Catherine Lowe
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - DrBarbara Potrata
- Charles Thackrah Building, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Sandy Tubeuf
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Charles Thackrah Building, University of Leeds, 101 Clarendon Road, Leeds, LS2 9LJ, UK
| | - Pat Hanlon
- Patient Representative National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) Renal Cancer Clinical Studies Group, Leeds, UK
| | - Lucy McParland
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - T Wah
- Department of Radiology St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Peter J Selby
- Cancer Research Building, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Jenny Hewison
- Charles Thackrah Building, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9TF, UK
| | - Julia Brown
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Janet Brown
- Cancer Research UK Experimental Centres at Leeds and Sheffield, Leeds, LS2 9TF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Sim SH, Messenger MP, Gregory WM, Wind TC, Vasudev NS, Cartledge J, Thompson D, Selby PJ, Banks RE. Prognostic utility of pre-operative circulating osteopontin, carbonic anhydrase IX and CRP in renal cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer 2012; 107:1131-7. [PMID: 22918393 PMCID: PMC3461155 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Objectively measured circulating biomarkers of prognosis complementing existing clinicopathological models are needed in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Methods: Blood samples collected from 216 RCC patients in Leeds before nephrectomy (median follow-up 7 years) were analysed for C-reactive protein (CRP), osteopontin (OPN) and carbonic anhydrase IX (CA9) and prognostic significance determined. Results: CA9, OPN and CRP were univariately prognostic for overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) with CRP and CA9 being independently prognostic for OS/CSS and OS, respectively. Including CA9, OPN and CRP with other conventional prognostic factors gave a superior predictive capacity when compared with a previously published pre-operative clinical nomogram (Karakiewicz et al, 2009). Osteopontin outperformed this nomogram and the post-operative SSIGN score for OS but not for CSS, being significantly predictive for non-cancer deaths. Osteopontin, CRP and CA9 outperformed stage (c-index 76% compared with 70% for stage) and OPN or CA9 identified several subsets of poor prognosis patients including in T1 patients, who may benefit from adjuvant therapy and increased surveillance. Conclusion: Circulating CA9, OPN and CRP add value to existing clinicopathological prognostic factors/models and support further studies to investigate their potential use in improving the clinical management of RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S H Sim
- St James's Institute of Oncology, Bexley Wing, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Gregory WM, Bell SE, Szubert AJ, Navarro Coy N, Cook G, Feyler S, Johnson PRE, Rudin C, Drayson MT, Owen RG, Ross FM, Russell NH, Jackson GH, Child JA. Cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone as induction therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients destined for autologous stem-cell transplantation: MRC Myeloma IX randomized trial results. Haematologica 2012; 97:442-50. [PMID: 22058209 PMCID: PMC3291601 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2011.043372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2011] [Revised: 10/18/2011] [Accepted: 10/24/2011] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thalidomide is active in multiple myeloma and is associated with minimal myelosuppression, making it a good candidate for induction therapy prior to high-dose therapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation. DESIGN AND METHODS Oral cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone was compared with infusional cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. RESULTS The post-induction overall response rate (≥ partial response) for the intent-to-treat population was significantly higher with cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone (n=555) versus cyclophosphamide-vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone (n=556); 82.5% versus 71.2%; odds ratio 1.91; 95% confidence interval 1.44-2.55; P<0.0001. The complete response rates were 13.0% with cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone and 8.1% with cyclophos-phamide-vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone (P=0.0083), with this differential response being maintained in patients who received autologous stem-cell transplantation (post-transplant complete response 50.0% versus 37.2%, respectively; P=0.00052). Cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone was non-inferior to cyclophosphamide-vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone for progression-free and overall survival, and there was a trend toward a late survival benefit with cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone in responders. A trend toward an overall survival advantage for cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone over cyclophosphamide-vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone was also observed in a subgroup of patients with favorable interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization. Compared with cyclophosphamide-vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone was associated with more constipation and somnolence, but a lower incidence of cytopenias. CONCLUSIONS The cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone regimen showed improved response rates and was not inferior in terms of survival outcomes to the standard infusional regimen of cyclophosphamide-vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone. Based on its oral administration and the reduced incidence of infection and cytopenia, cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexa-methasone may be considered an effective induction therapy option for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. (ISRCTN: 68454111).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gareth J Morgan
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Boyd KD, Ross FM, Tapper WJ, Chiecchio L, Dagrada G, Konn ZJ, Gonzalez D, Walker BA, Hockley SL, Wardell CP, Gregory WM, Child JA, Jackson GH, Davies FE, Morgan GJ. The clinical impact and molecular biology of del(17p) in multiple myeloma treated with conventional or thalidomide-based therapy. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2011; 50:765-74. [PMID: 21961181 DOI: 10.1002/gcc.20899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Hemizygous deletion of 17p (del(17p)) has been identified as a variable associated with poor prognosis in myeloma, although its impact in the context of thalidomide therapy is not well described. The clinical outcome of 85 myeloma patients with del(17p) treated in a clinical trial incorporating both conventional and thalidomide-based induction therapies was examined. The clinical impact of deletion, low expression, and mutation of TP53 was also determined. Patients with del(17p) did not have inferior response rates compared to patients without del(17p), but, despite this, del(17p) was associated with impaired overall survival (OS) (median OS 26.6 vs. 48.5 months, P < 0.001). Within the del(17p) group, thalidomide induction therapy was associated with improved response rates compared to conventional therapy, but there was no impact on OS. Thalidomide maintenance was associated with impaired OS, although our analysis suggests that this effect may have been due to confounding variables. A minimally deleted region on 17p13.1 involving 17 genes was identified, of which only TP53 and SAT2 were underexpressed. TP53 was mutated in <1% in patients without del(17p) and in 27% of patients with del(17p). The higher TP53 mutation rate in samples with del(17p) suggests a role for TP53 in these clinical outcomes. In conclusion, del(17p) defined a patient group associated with short survival in myeloma, and although thalidomide induction therapy was associated with improved response rates, it did not impact OS, suggesting that alternative therapeutic strategies are required for this group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin D Boyd
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Section of Haemato-Oncology, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Cohen DR, Hillmen P, Brown JM, Gregory WM. Experiences in the design and implementation of phase II trials in CLL. Trials 2011. [PMCID: PMC3287813 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-s1-a92] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
|
50
|
Boyd KD, Ross FM, Walker BA, Wardell CP, Tapper WJ, Chiecchio L, Dagrada G, Konn ZJ, Gregory WM, Jackson GH, Child JA, Davies FE, Morgan GJ. Mapping of chromosome 1p deletions in myeloma identifies FAM46C at 1p12 and CDKN2C at 1p32.3 as being genes in regions associated with adverse survival. Clin Cancer Res 2011; 17:7776-84. [PMID: 21994415 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-11-1791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Regions on 1p with recurrent deletions in presenting myeloma patients were examined with the purpose of defining the deletions and assessing their survival impact. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Gene mapping, gene expression, FISH, and mutation analyses were conducted on patient samples from the MRC Myeloma IX trial and correlated with clinical outcome data. RESULTS 1p32.3 was deleted in 11% of cases, and deletion was strongly associated with impaired overall survival (OS) in patients treated with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). In patients treated less intensively, del(1)(p32.3) was not associated with adverse progression-free survival (PFS) or OS. The target of homozygous deletions was CDKN2C, however its role in the adverse outcome of cases with hemizygous deletion was less certain. 1p22.1-21.2 was the most frequently deleted region and contained the candidate genes MTF2 and TMED5. No mutations were identified in these genes. 1p12 was deleted in 19% of cases, and deletion was associated with impaired OS in univariate analysis. The target of homozygous deletion was FAM46C, which was mutated in 3.4% of cases. When cases with FAM46C deletion or mutation were considered together, they were strongly associated with impaired OS in the intensive treatment setting. CONCLUSION Deletion of 1p32.3 and 1p12 was associated with impaired OS in myeloma patients receiving ASCT. FAM46C was identified as a gene with potential pathogenic and prognostic significance based on the occurrence of recurrent homozygous deletions and mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin D Boyd
- The Institute of Cancer Research, Haemato-oncology Research Unit, Division of Molecular Pathology, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|