A systematic review on reporting quality of economic evaluations for negotiated glucose-lowering drugs in China national reimbursement drug list

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to examine the reporting quality of existing economic evaluations for negotiated glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs) included in China National Reimbursement Drug List (NRDL) using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2013 (CHEERS 2013).

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature research through 7 databases to identify published economic evaluations for GLDs included in the China NRDL up to March 2021. Reporting quality of identified studies was assessed by two independent reviewers based on the CHEERS checklist. The Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test were performed to examine the association between reporting quality and characteristics of the identified studies.

RESULTS

We have identified 24 studies, which evaluated six GLDs types. The average score rate of the included studies was 77.41% (SD:13.23%, Range 47.62%-91.67%). Among all the required reporting items, characterizing heterogeneity (score rate = 4.17%) was the least satisfied item. Among six parts of CHEERS, results part scored least at 0.55 (score rate = 54.79%) because of the incompleteness of characterizing uncertainty. Results from the Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test showed that model choice, journal type, type of economic evaluations, and study perspective were associated with the reporting quality of the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

There remains room to improve the reporting quality of economic evaluations for GLDs in NRDL. Checklists such as CHEERS should be widely used to improve the reporting quality of economic researches in China.

Translating trial results into interpretable risk estimates: Systematic analysis of cardiorenal outcome trials of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In a randomised controlled trial (RCT), the between-arm difference in the average probability of an event per unit of time (i.e., yearly incidence risk difference, YIRD) is an easy-to-interpret treatment effect metric. We aimed to quantify the YIRD in cardiorenal RCTs of GLP-1RAs or SGLT-2is.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We digitally searched for RCTs published up to March 1st, 2023, including subjects with type 2 diabetes randomised to GLP-1RAs or SGLT-2is and investigating cardiorenal outcomes or death. We extracted information from Kaplan-Meier (KM) plots to obtain time-to-event individual data and estimate within-arm yearly incidence risk and YIRD. Data from 19 RCTs (28 kM plots) were analysed: comparing treatment to placebo, in GLP-1RA RCTs the YIRD ranged from 0.2 % (95 % CI: -0.7 %, 1.1 %) to -1.9 % (-3.1, -0.7), for primary outcome; and from -0.2 % (-0.5, 0.2) to -0.4 % (-0.7 %, -0.0 %), for mortality. With the exception of SOLOIST-WHF (YIRD 11.9 % for primary outcome), corresponding estimates in SGLT-2is RCTs were: from -0.1 % (-0.4, 0.1) to -5.0 % (-7.7, -2.6), for primary outcome; and from -0.1 % (-0.2, 0.1) to -1.9 % (-4.4 %, 0.6 %), for mortality.

CONCLUSION

The YIRD metric complements other relative treatment effect estimates and helps quantify the absolute benefit of GLP-1RAs and SGLT-2is.

GLP-1 receptor agonists-SGLT-2 inhibitors combination therapy and cardiovascular events after acute myocardial infarction: an observational study in patients with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Few studies explored the effect of the combination of glucose sodium-cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) on the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

METHODS

We recruited patients with T2D and AMI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, treated with either SGLT-2i or GLP-1RA for at least 3 months before hospitalization. Subjects with HbA1c < 7% at admission were considered in good glycemic control and maintained the same glucose-lowering regimen, while those with poor glycemic control (HbA1c ≥ 7%), at admission or during follow-up, were prescribed either a SGLT-2i or a GLP-1RA to obtain a SGLT-2i/GLP-1RA combination therapy. The primary outcome was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as cardiovascular death, re-acute coronary syndrome, and heart failure related to AMI during a 2-year follow-up. After 3 months, the myocardial salvage index (MSI) was assessed by single-photon emission computed tomography.

FINDINGS

Of the 537 subjects screened, 443 completed the follow-up. Of these, 99 were treated with SGLT-2i, 130 with GLP-1RA, and 214 with their combination. The incidence of MACE was lower in the combination therapy group compared with both SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA treated patients, as assessed by multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors (HR = 0.154, 95% CI 0.038-0.622, P = 0.009 vs GLP-1RA and HR = 0.170, 95% CI 0.046-0.633, P = 0.008 vs SGLT-2i). The MSI and the proportion of patients with MSI > 50% was higher in the SGLT-2i/GLP-1RA group compared with both SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA groups.

INTERPRETATION

The combination of SGLT-2i and GLP-1RA is associated with a reduced incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with T2D and AMI compared with either drug used alone, with a significant effect also on peri-infarcted myocardial rescue in patients without a second event. Trial registraition ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06017544.

Multimorbidity, Polypharmacy, Severe Hypoglycemia, and Glycemic Control in Patients Using Glucose-Lowering Drugs for Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Health Insurance Claims in Japan

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to understand the actual status of multimorbidity and polypharmacy among patients with type 2 diabetes using glucose-lowering drugs, and to assess the effects of patient characteristics on severe hypoglycemia and glycemic control.

METHODS

We designed a retrospective cohort study using health insurance claims and medical checkup data in Japan from April 2016 to February 2021 and identified patients with type 2 diabetes who were prescribed glucose-lowering drugs. We analyzed data on patient characteristics, including multimorbidity and polypharmacy, calculated the incidence rate for severe hypoglycemic events, applied a negative binomial regression model to explore factors that affected severe hypoglycemia, and analyzed the status of glycemic control in the subcohort for which HbA1c data were available.

RESULTS

Within the analysis population (n = 93,801), multimorbidity was present in 85.5% and mean ± standard deviation for oral drug prescriptions was 5.6 ± 3.5 per patient, while for those aged 75 years or older these numbers increased to 96.3% and 7.1 ± 3.5, respectively. The crude incidence rate for severe hypoglycemia was 5.85 (95% confidence interval 5.37, 6.37) per 1000 person-years. Risk factors for severe hypoglycemia included younger and older age, prior severe hypoglycemia, use of insulin, sulfonylurea, two-drug therapy including sulfonylurea or glinides, three-or-more-drug therapy, excessive polypharmacy, and comorbidities including end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis. Subcohort analysis (n = 26,746) showed that glycemic control is not always maintained according to guidelines.

CONCLUSION

Patients with type 2 diabetes, particularly older patients, experienced high multimorbidity and polypharmacy. Several risk factors for severe hypoglycemia were identified, most notably younger age, ESRD, history of severe hypoglycemia, and insulin therapy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000046736).

Characteristics of subjects with type 2 diabetes enrolled in randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled trials in Japan: A systematic review

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to understand the characteristics of type 2 diabetes subjects enrolled in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs according to therapeutic regimens through systematic literature review.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed and the database of the Japanese Medical Abstract Society (ICHUSHI) were searched for studies published from 2010 to 2019 reporting the efficacy and safety of glucose-lowering drugs in Japanese individuals with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes, and therapeutic regimens, demographics and clinical characteristics at the baseline were extracted. We evaluated the treatment arms, not the placebo arms.

RESULTS

The literature searches identified 2,656 publications, 145 of which met all eligibility criteria and included 282 eligible arms. In the past 10 years, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor was the most frequently studied in both RCTs and non-RCTs. Regarding the characteristics of enrolled subjects, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist have been studied more in relatively obese subjects, and insulin has been studied in higher proportion of subjects with disease duration ≥10 years. Most of the RCTs included subjects aged 55-64 years, whereas a higher proportion of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor and insulin arms in the non-RCTs included those aged ≥65 years. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor were evaluated in subjects with no abnormalities in blood pressure or lipid parameters; however, only a few reports of those parameters have been assessed with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist and insulin.

CONCLUSIONS

As RCTs and non-RCTs differ in the baseline characteristics of type 2 diabetes subjects, it is necessary to integrate and evaluate both to understand the actual treatment status of type 2 diabetes.

Registry-based randomised clinical trials: a remedy for evidence-based diabetes care?

This narrative review describes a new approach to navigation in a challenging landscape of clinical drug development in diabetes. Successful outcome studies in recent years have led to new indications and guidelines in type 2 diabetes, yet the number of clinical trials in diabetes is now declining. This is due to many environmental factors acting in concert, including the prioritisation of funding for other diseases, high costs of large randomised clinical trials, increase in regulatory requirements and limited entry of novel candidate drugs. There is a need for novel and cost-effective paradigms of clinical development to meet these and other challenges. The concept of registry-based randomised clinical trials (RRCTs) is an attractive option. In this review we focus on type 2 diabetes and the prevention of cardiovascular and microvascular comorbidities and mortality, using the Swedish SMARTEST trial as an example of an RRCT. We also give some examples from other disease areas. The RRCT concept is a novel, cost-effective and scientifically sound approach for conducting large-scale diabetes trials in a real-world setting.

Old and new classes of glucose-lowering agents as treatments for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A narrative review

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become the most common chronic liver disease with a global prevalence of about 55% in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). T2DM, obesity and NAFLD are three closely inter-related pathological conditions. In addition, T2DM is one of the strongest clinical risk factors for the faster progression of NAFLD to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Increasing evidence suggests that newer classes of glucose-lowering drugs, such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors or sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, could reduce the rates of NAFLD progression. This narrative review aims to briefly summarize the recent results from randomized controlled trials testing the efficacy and safety of old and new glucose-lowering drugs for the treatment of NAFLD or NASH in adults both with and without coexisting T2DM.

Metagenomic analysis reveals crosstalk between gut microbiota and glucose-lowering drugs targeting the gastrointestinal tract in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: a 6 month, two-arm randomised trial

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

The use of oral glucose-lowering drugs, particularly those designed to target the gut ecosystem, is often observed in association with altered gut microbial composition or functional capacity in individuals with type 2 diabetes. The gut microbiota, in turn, plays crucial roles in the modulation of drug efficacy. We aimed to assess the impacts of acarbose and vildagliptin on human gut microbiota and the relationships between pre-treatment gut microbiota and therapeutic responses.

METHODS

This was a randomised, open-labelled, two-arm trial in treatment-naive type 2 diabetes patients conducted in Beijing between December 2016 and December 2017. One hundred participants with overweight/obesity and newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes were recruited from the Pinggu Hospital and randomly assigned to the acarbose (n=50) or vildagliptin (n=50) group using sealed envelopes. The treatment period was 6 months. Blood, faecal samples and visceral fat data from computed tomography images were collected before and after treatments to measure therapeutic outcomes and gut microbiota. Metagenomic datasets from a previous type 2 diabetes cohort receiving acarbose or glipizide for 3 months were downloaded and processed. Statistical analyses were applied to identify the treatment-related changes in clinical variables, gut microbiota and associations.

RESULTS

Ninety-two participants were analysed. After 6 months of acarbose (n=44) or vildagliptin (n=48) monotherapy, both groups achieved significant reductions in HbA_1c (from 60 to 46 mmol/mol [from 7.65% to 6.40%] in the acarbose group and from 59 to 44 mmol/mol [from 7.55% to 6.20%] in the vildagliptin group) and visceral fat areas (all adjusted p values for pre-post comparisons <0.05). Both arms showed drug-specific and shared changes in relative abundances of multiple gut microbial species and pathways, especially the common reductions in Bacteroidetes species. Three months and 6 months of acarbose-induced changes in microbial composition were highly similar in type 2 diabetes patients from the two independent studies. Vildagliptin treatment significantly enhanced fasting active glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) levels. Baseline gut microbiota, rather than baseline GLP-1 levels, were strongly associated with GLP-1 response to vildagliptin, and to a lesser extent with GLP-1 response to acarbose.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

This study reveals common microbial responses in type 2 diabetes patients treated with two glucose-lowering drugs targeting the gut differently and acceptable performance of baseline gut microbiota in classifying individuals with different GLP-1 responses to vildagliptin. Our findings highlight bidirectional interactions between gut microbiota and glucose-lowering drugs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02999841 FUNDING: National Key Research and Development Project: 2016YFC1304901.

Cardiologist's approach to the diabetic patient: No further delay for a paradigm shift

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is constantly increasing worldwide and its most critical determinant of morbidity and mortality is still represented by cardiovascular (CV) complications. For years, cardiologists' approach to diabetic patients has been focused on risk factors optimization, with positive results. However, the management of DM per se was never truly considered in order to obtain prevention from major CV events, because medications used for glycemic control were not expected to gain CV benefit. Early trials concerning intensive versus conventional glycemia control did not prove useful in reducing the number of CV events. The introduction of new molecules led to a game change in DM treatment, as some new glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs), such as sodium-glucose linked transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA), showed not only to be safe but also to ensure CV benefit. A combination of anti-atherogenic effects and hemodynamic improvements are likely explanations of the observed reduction of CV events and mortality. These evidence opened a completely new era in the field of GLDs and of DM treatment. Nonetheless, the presence of residual cardiovascular risk despite optimal medical therapy remains an issue and an aggressive strategy against multiple risk factors is suggested. A paradigm shift toward a new approach to DM management should be made with no further delay with the use of medications that may prevent CV events in an integrated strategy of CV risk reduction.

Glucose-Lowering Drugs and Fracture Risk-a Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with increased fracture risk. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the effects of different classes of glucose-lowering drugs on fracture risk in patients with type 2 DM. The heterogeneity of the included studies did not allow formal statistical analyses.

RECENT FINDINGS

Sixty studies were included in the review. Metformin, dipeptidylpeptidase-IV inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2-inhibitors do not appear to increase fracture risk. Results for insulin and sulphonylureas were more disparate, although there may be an increased fracture risk related to hypoglycemia and falls with these treatments. Glitazones were consistently associated with increased fracture risk in women, although the evidence was sparser in men. New glucose-lowering drugs are continuously being developed and better understanding of these is leading to changes in prescription patterns. Our findings warrant continued research on the effects of glucose-lowering drugs on fracture risk, elucidating the class-specific effects of these drugs.

Glycemic control and the incidence of neoplasm in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

Previous epidemiologic studies indicate an increased risk of cancer and cancer mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Whether the resolution of hyperglycemia will lead to reduced risk of neoplasm in T2D remains uncertain. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the association between glycemic control and incidence of neoplasm in T2D patients.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in T2D with significant HbA1c reduction difference between intensive/active and standard/control groups plus follow-up ≥48 weeks were included and analyzed by fixed-effect models, random-effect model, and meta-regression analysis accordingly.

RESULTS

Overall, 52 studies were included. Compared with standard/control treatment, intensive/active treatment led to significantly greater HbA1c reduction from baseline (WMD = -0.51%, 95% CI, -0.55 to -0.46%, P < 0.001), but was not associated with a decreased incidence of neoplasm (OR = 0.99, 95% CI, 0.94-1.03, I² = 2%) in T2D. Meta-regression analysis indicated that HbA1c reduction difference between intensive/active treatment and standard/control treatment was not associated with the incidence of neoplasm in T2D patients (β = -0.0011, 95% CI, -0.0058 to 0.0035, P = 0.625). In neoplasm-site subgroup analysis, a decreased incidence of breast neoplasm was observed in T2D patients using dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitor (OR = 0.56, 95% CI, 0.35-0.89, I² = 0%) and incidence of prostate neoplasm was reduced in T2D patients with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist treatment (OR = 0.66, 95% CI, 0.47-0.91, I² = 0%).

CONCLUSION

Improved glycemic control in short and medium periods achieved by existing glucose-lowering drugs or strategies may not confer reduced risk of neoplasm in patients with T2D. Studies with longer follow-up duration are needed to better elucidate the long-period effects.

Glucose-lowering therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a major risk factor for developing cardiovascular disease, and many patients with diabetes have prevalent cardiovascular complications. Recent cardiovascular outcome clinical trials suggest that certain new glucose-lowering drugs are accompanied by additional cardioprotective properties. Indeed, selected glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists have a proved cardiovascular benefit in terms of a reduced incidence of ischaemic events, while sodium/glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors have also shown significant protection, with a striking effect on heart failure and renal endpoints. These findings have been integrated in recent guidelines which now recommend prescribing (when initial metformin monotherapy fails) a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist or a sodium/glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor with clinical trial-confirmed benefit in patients with diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and a sodium/glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor in such patients with heart failure or chronic kidney disease at initial stages. Furthermore, the new 2019 European Society of Cardiology guidelines in collaboration with the European Association for the Study of Diabetes recommend a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist or a sodium/glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor in treatment-naive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with pre-existing cardiovascular disease or at high cardiovascular risk. Future research will disentangle the mechanisms underpinning these beneficial effects and will also establish to what extent these results are generalisable to the whole diabetes population. In the meantime, available evidence should prompt a wide diffusion of these two classes of drugs among patients with diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Here, we briefly summarise recent findings emerging from cardiovascular outcome clinical trials, discuss their impact on treatment algorithms and propose new possible approaches to improve our knowledge further regarding the cardiovascular effect of glucose-lowering medications.

Metabolic liver disease in diabetes - From mechanisms to clinical trials

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) comprises fatty liver (steatosis), non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and fibrosis/cirrhosis and may lead to end-stage liver failure or hepatocellular carcinoma. NAFLD is tightly associated with the most frequent metabolic disorders, such as obesity, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Both multisystem diseases share several common mechanisms. Alterations of tissue communications include excessive lipid and later cytokine release by dysfunctional adipose tissue, intestinal dysbiosis and ectopic fat deposition in skeletal muscle. On the hepatocellular level, this leads to insulin resistance due to abnormal lipid handling and mitochondrial function. Over time, cellular oxidative stress and activation of inflammatory pathways, again supported by multiorgan crosstalk, determine NAFLD progression. Recent studies show that particularly the severe insulin resistant diabetes (SIRD) subgroup (cluster) associates with NAFLD and its accelerated progression and increases the risk of diabetes-related cardiovascular and kidney diseases, underpinning the critical role of insulin resistance. Consequently, lifestyle modification and certain drug classes used to treat T2DM have demonstrated effectiveness for treating NAFLD, but also some novel therapeutic concepts may be beneficial for both NAFLD and T2DM. This review addresses the bidirectional relationship between mechanisms underlying T2DM and NAFLD, the relevance of novel biomarkers for improving the diagnostic modalities and the identification of subgroups at specific risk of disease progression. Also, the role of metabolism-related drugs in NAFLD is discussed in light of the recent clinical trials. Finally, this review highlights some challenges to be addressed by future studies on NAFLD in the context of T2DM.

Impact of preexisting type 2 diabetes mellitus and antidiabetic drugs on all-cause and cause-specific mortality among Medicaid-insured women diagnosed with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

We investigated the influence preexisting type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and antidiabetic drugs have on all-cause and cause-specific mortality among Medicaid-insured women diagnosed with breast cancer.

METHODS

9221 women aged <64 years diagnosed with breast cancer and reported to the New York State (NYS) Cancer Registry from 2004 to 2016 were linked with Medicaid claims. Preexisting T2DM was determined by three diagnosis claims for T2DM with at least one claim prior to breast cancer diagnosis and a prescription claim for an antidiabetic drug within three months following breast cancer diagnosis. Estimated menopausal status was determined by age (premenopausal age <50; postmenopausal age ≥50). Hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (95 %CI) were calculated with Cox proportional hazards regression, adjusting for confounders.

RESULTS

Women with preexisting T2DM had greater all-cause (HR = 1.40; 95 %CI 1.21, 1.63), cancer-specific (HR = 1.24; 95 %CI 1.04, 1.47), and cardiovascular-specific (HR = 2.46; 95 %CI 1.54, 3.90) mortality hazard compared to nondiabetic women. In subgroup analyses, the association between T2DM and all-cause mortality was found among non-Hispanic White (HR 1.78 95 %CI 1.38, 2.30) and postmenopausal (HR = 1.47; 95 %CI 1.23, 1.77) women, but not among other race/ethnicity groups or premenopausal women. Additionally, compared to women prescribed metformin, all-cause mortality hazard was elevated among women prescribed sulfonylurea (HR = 1.44; 95 %CI 1.06, 1.94) or insulin (HR = 1.54; 95 %CI 1.12, 2.11).

CONCLUSION

Among Medicaid-insured women with breast cancer, those with preexisting T2DM have an increased mortality hazard, especially when prescribed sulfonylurea or insulin. Further research is warranted to determine the role antidiabetic drugs have on survival among women with breast cancer.

Type 2 diabetes treatment and progression of chronic kidney disease in Italian family practice

AIMS

Progressive chronic kidney disease represents a dreadful complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We tested the pattern of use and the renal effects of old glucose-lowering drugs in T2DM patients cared for by Italian general practitioners (GPs).

METHODS

Data of 2606 T2DM patients were extracted from the databases of GPs, who do not have access to the most recent glucose-lowering drugs in Italy. The rate of kidney function decline was calculated by CKD-EPI_cr, based on two consecutive creatinine values.

RESULTS

Metformin was used in 55% of cases, either alone or with sulfonylureas/repaglinide, across the whole spectrum of CKD (from 66% in stage G1 to only 8% in G4). Sulfonylurea use peaked at 21-22% in stage G2-G3a, whereas repaglinide use significantly increased from 8% in G1 to 22% in G4. The median rate of CKD decline was - 1.64 mL/min/1.73 m² per year; it was higher in G1 (- 3.22 per year) and progressively lower with CKD severity. 826 cases (31.7%) were classified as fast progressors (eGFR decline more negative than - 5 mL/min/1.73 m² per year). The risk of fast progressing CKD was associated with increasing BMI, albuminuria, and sulfonylurea use, alone (OR, 1.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-1.85), or in association with metformin (OR, 1.40; 95% CI 1.04-1.88). No associations were demonstrated for metformin, cardiovascular and lipid lowering drug use.

CONCLUSION

In the setting of Italian family practice, sulfonylurea use is associated with progressive CKD in patients with T2DM. Metformin, at doses progressively reduced according to CKD stages, as recommended by guidelines, is not associated with fast progression.

The influence of anti-hyperglycemic drug therapy on cardiovascular and heart failure outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) are at a substantially increased risk of heart failure (HF) and HF mortality. Despite the lack of evidence that tight glycemic control reduces the incidence of cardiovascular (CV) events, a growing body of evidence suggests that the choice of glucose-lowering agents may influence outcomes including HF. Thiazolidinediones are associated with a significant risk of HF. For metformin, sulphonylureas and insulin, little data is available to indicate the impact on HF. The glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists, liraglutide and semaglutide, have been shown to reduce major CV events, but did not affect rates of hospitalization for HF. Clinical trials have demonstrated diverse effects of Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors on HF; saxagliptin showed an increased risk of HF admissions, alogliptin was associated with higher rates of new HF admissions, while sitagliptin had a neutral effect. The sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, empagliflozin and canagliflozin, have been recently shown to reduce the incidence of HF and cardiovascular mortality in patients with and without a history of HF. This review will summarize key findings of the impact of glucose-lowering agents on CV safety and HF-associated outcomes, present available data on the underlying mechanisms for the benefits of the SGLT2 inhibitors on HF, and discuss strategies to improve outcomes in patients with DM and high CV risk.

Cardiologist and Diabetologist crosstalk in the era of cardiovascular outcome trials of novel glucose-lowering drugs

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes continues to increase and cardiovascular (CV) diseases remain the leading cause of death in diabetic patients. Diabetologists and Cardiologists have to work together in order to provide the best management to these patients. After years of disappointing studies showing no reduction of CV events with strict glycaemic control, some of the novel glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs) seem to offer a new approach to tackle the problem, since the CV outcome trials (CVOTs-D) of liraglutide, semaglutide, empagliflozin and canagliflozin have demonstrated not only their CV safety but also their efficacy in the reduction of CV morbidity and mortality. Along with the initial enthusiasm, concerns have been raised about the economical sustainability of long-term therapies considering higher costs of new molecules relative to the traditional ones. As expenses in the medical field are on the rise, healthcare systems need to balance the positive impact of an intervention and its overall cost. This review is meant to offer the Cardiologists a different point of view on the positive influence of GLDs, in the light of the main trials in the CV fields they are familiar with. The purpose of this article is to critically review the magnitude of the CVOTs-D results by the analysis of their statistical determinants, to establish the extent of the GLDs positive impact on patients with both diabetes and CV disease. The analysis has been performed taking into account models and statistical determinants used in the main landmark cardiology trials. It is fundamental to translate the result of CVOTs-D in clinical practice: the interdisciplinary crosstalk between the Cardiologist and Diabetologist is of paramount importance in order to fully exploit the power of the new available pharmacological strategies.

Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials of Glucose-Lowering Drugs or Strategies in Type 2 Diabetes

As recently as 20 years ago there were no randomized controlled trials of potentially cardiovascular protective therapies in people with type 2 diabetes. The ongoing cardiovascular trials bring needed evidence. Both primary and subsidiary analyses have transformed diabetes from a largely eminence based specialty to one that is firmly evidence based. These studies have provided evidence supporting glucose-lowering drugs for patients with cardiovascular risk factors. Randomized controlled trials such as those described here will continue to challenge assumptions and create new approaches and paradigms that can be pursued to reduce and hopefully eliminate serious cardiovascular and other consequences of diabetes.

Lower risk of dementia with pioglitazone, compared with other second-line treatments, in metformin-based dual therapy: a population-based longitudinal study

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

The effect of pioglitazone was compared with that of other second-line glucose-lowering drugs on the risk of dementia among individuals with type 2 diabetes receiving metformin-based dual therapy.

METHODS

A total of 204,323 individuals with type 2 diabetes aged ≥18 years who were stable metformin users and dementia-free before the initiation of second-line glucose-lowering medication were identified in the period 2000-2011 from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database and followed to the end of 2013. Primary analyses included 51,415 individuals aged ≥65 years without dementia events in the first year of second-line glucose-lowering treatment. Study subjects were classified into mutually exclusive groups according to various second-line glucose-lowering drugs to metformin. Cox proportional hazards models were applied to assess the time-to-event between propensity score-matched glucose-lowering treatment groups.

RESULTS

Individuals aged ≥65 years on metformin + pioglitazone had a significantly lower risk of dementia compared with those on metformin + sulfonylurea (HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.34, 0.93), and a lower, but insignificant, risk of dementia compared with those on other metformin-based dual regimens (i.e. metformin + acarbose, metformin + meglitinide, metformin + insulin or metformin + dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors). Among individuals aged ≥18 years, there was also a decreased risk of dementia in those taking pioglitazone compared with those taking other second-line glucose-lowering drugs. A lower incidence of dementia was found in users of metformin + pioglitazone compared with users of metformin + rosiglitazone.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Pioglitazone as a second-line treatment after metformin might provide a protective effect on dementia risk among individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Changes in glucose-lowering drug use before and after cancer diagnosis in patients with diabetes

AIM

This study explores the changes in glucose-lowering drug (GLD) use before and after cancer diagnosis among patients with diabetes.

METHODS

New GLD users (1998-2011) living in the Dutch ECR-PHARMO catchment area were selected from the PHARMO Database Network (n=52,228). Those with a primary cancer diagnosis were considered cases (n=3281) and matched with eligible controls (n=12,891) without cancer during follow-up. Conditional logistic regression analysis was used to assess changes in GLD use, such as treatment add-ons, treatments drops and initiation of insulin, for cases compared with controls associated with specific cancer types in four time windows (6-3 and 0-3months before cancer diagnosis; 0-3 and 3-6months after cancer diagnosis).

RESULTS

In the 3months before cancer diagnosis, patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancers (oesophageal, stomach, pancreatic, liver cancers) had higher odds of initiating insulin (OR: 9.3; 95% CI: 3.6-24.1); to a lesser extent, this was also observed in the 3months prior to that (at 6months, OR: 3.9; 95% CI: 1.3-12.1). Diagnosis of colorectal (OR: 3.4; 95% CI: 1.4-8.4), pulmonary (OR: 2.5; 95% CI: 1.1-5.4) and upper GI (OR: 13.6; 95% CI: 5.0-36.9) cancers was associated with increased odds of initiating insulin in the 3months after cancer diagnosis. During all study time windows, the odds of treatment drops were higher for patients with upper GI cancers whereas, for most other cancers, these odds were higher only after a diagnosis of cancer.

CONCLUSION

The greater odds of initiating insulin during the 6months prior to diagnosis of upper GI cancers suggest reverse causation. After cancer diagnosis, drops in use of GLDs was commonly seen.

Sex and gender differences in therapy of type 2 diabetes

Clinical guidelines for the management of type 2 diabetes recommend individual therapy considering age, duration of disease, presence of complication and risk of hypoglycaemia. However, at present, the patient's sex has no impact on clinical decisions. Yet, there is mounting data pointing at biological and psychosocial differences between men and women with great impact on progression of disease and complications. Moreover, choices and preferences of therapeutic strategies as well as adherence to lifestyle and pharmacological interventions differ in both sexes. In addition, drug therapy may have sex-specific side effects. Therefore, there is need of more research on biological differences and of evidence-based individualised targeted sex-sensitive therapeutic concepts. Clinical guidelines must consider relevant sex-differences. Development and implementation of sex-specific programs may help to improve adherence to therapy and to reduce progression of disease and development of complications. A more gender-sensitive clinical approach may improve quality of life and increase health and life expectancy in men and women with type 2 diabetes.

Which treatment for type 2 diabetes associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease?

Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are highly prevalent in the community, and share common pathogenic mechanisms. There is also evidence that T2DM may be favored by hepatic fat accumulation; in turn the presence of T2DM is a risk factor for liver disease progression. The treatment of T2DM has considerably changed in the past few years; new drug classes, promoting glucose-lowering through mechanisms different from classical insulin-sensitizing or insulin-secreting action, have been added to continuing lifestyle intervention. Metformin and pioglitazone may be safely used in the presence of liver fat, whereas sulfonylureas and insulin itself have been associated with NAFLD progression and adverse outcome. Drugs acting on the incretin axis and on Na-glucose co-transport at renal tubular level offer new hopes for a tailored treatment able to reduce the burden of hepatic triglyceride accumulation and liver disease progression.

Use of glucose-lowering drugs and risk of fracture in patients with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus is associated with an increased risk of hip fracture. The aim of this cohort study was to investigate whether glucose-lowering drugs influence the risk of hip fracture in patients with incident diabetes.

METHODS

A study was performed on a cohort of patients with incident type 2 diabetes. Diabetes diagnosis was defined using information from the Danish National Patient Registry and reimbursement information of glucose-lowering drugs from the Register of Medicinal Product Statistics. The period of observation was from 01.01.1996 till 31.12.2011. The primary exposure was glucose-lowering drugs and the primary endpoint was hip fracture. Unadjusted, adjusted, and propensity score adjusted Cox regressions were performed.

RESULTS

5244 patients with type 2 diabetes with a mean follow up of 5.5years were included in the study. Use of sulphonylureas within the last 90days was associated with hip fracture in patients with type 2 diabetes, hazard ratio 1.64 (95% confidence interval: 1.54,1.75), whereas ever use of sulohonylyreas was not associated with an increased risk of fractures. Use of sulphonylureas within the last 90days was also associated with an increased risk of fractures at other sites. Use of glitazones within the last 90days was associated with an increased risk of hip fracture, hazard ratio 2.07 (95% confidence interval: 1.39,3.07), whereas ever use was not associated with an increased risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Current use of sulphonylureas was associated with hip fracture in patients with type 2 diabetes. Speculatively, this may be due to hypoglycemia resulting in falls.

Impact of cancer diagnosis and treatment on glycaemic control among individuals with colorectal cancer using glucose-lowering drugs

AIMS

This study aims to evaluate the impact of cancer and its treatment on HbA1c values among individuals with colorectal cancer (CRC) using glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs).

METHODS

Patients with primary CRC (1998-2011) were selected from the Eindhoven Cancer Registry and linked to the PHARMO Database Network including outpatient pharmacy and clinical laboratory data. Patients with more than 2 years of GLDs use prior to cancer diagnosis were included. Linear mixed-effects models were conducted to evaluate changes in HbA1c for colon cancer (CC) and rectal cancer (RC) patients in the 4 years around CRC diagnosis.

RESULTS

Of all CRC patients (n = 4714), 294 (6 %) GLDs users with CC and 144 (3 %) with RC were selected. In the crude model, mean HbA1c at cancer diagnosis was 6.9 % (51.6 mmol/mol) among CC patients and 7.1 % (53.5 mmol/mol) among RC patients. Among CC patients, HbA1c decreased with 0.12 % per year (p = 0.0002) before cancer diagnosis in the adjusted model, and after diagnosis, it increased with 0.12 % per year (p = 0.02). In subgroup analyses, effects on HbA1c were more pronounced in users of anti-anaemic preparations. Among RC patients, HbA1c decreased before diagnosis with 0.18 % per year (p = 0.0006), whereas after diagnosis it changed non-significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Among users of GLDs, HbA1c decreased with 0.12-0.18 % (1-2 mmol/mol) per year before CRC diagnosis. Only among CC patients, HbA1c increased after diagnosis (0.12 % per year; 1.3 mmol/mol). Modest changes in HbA1c before CRC diagnosis may reflect the effects of an undiagnosed cancer, such as weight loss, anaemia, or the use of anti-anaemic preparations.

Impact of glucose-lowering drugs on cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is characterized by multiple pathophysiologic abnormalities. With time, multiple glucose-lowering medications are commonly required to reduce and maintain plasma glucose concentrations within the normal range. Type 2 diabetes mellitus individuals also are at a very high risk for microvascular complications and the incidence of heart attack and stroke is increased two- to three-fold compared with non-diabetic individuals. Therefore, when selecting medications to normalize glucose levels in T2DM patients, it is important that the agent not aggravate, and ideally even improve, cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) and reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In this review, we examine the effect of oral (metformin, sulfonylureas, meglitinides, thiazolidinediones, DPP4 inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors, and α-glucosidase inhibitors) and injectable (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and insulin) glucose-lowering drugs on established CVRFs and long-term studies of cardiovascular outcomes. Firm evidence that in T2DM cardiovascular disease can be reversed or prevented by improving glycaemic control is still incomplete and must await large, long-term clinical trials in patients at low risk using modern treatment strategies, i.e., drug combinations designed to maximize HbA1c reduction while minimizing hypoglycaemia and excessive weight gain.

[Cardiovascular effects and safety of glucose-lowering drugs: current situation]

Diabetes mellitus is an independent cardiovascular risk factor. Therefore, in addition to normalising blood glucose, the aim of the treatment for diabetes mellitus should be to prevent cardiovascular complications. However, the evidence available on the cardio-protective role of the different glucose-lowering drugs is scarce and poor, particularly as regards with the risk of major cardiovascular events. In this context, the regulatory agencies have modified the regulations for the approval of glucose-lowering drugs, now requiring to demonstrate the glucose-lowering effect together with a robust assessment of the cardiovascular safety. The aim of this work is to review the cardiovascular effects of the different glucose-lowering drugs, focusing on their impact on the risk of major cardiovascular events.