Trends in the Use of Recombinant Activated Factor VII and Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Heart Transplant Patients in Virginia

OBJECTIVES

To explore trends in intraoperative procoagulant factor concentrate use in patients undergoing heart transplantation (HTx) in Virginia. Secondarily, to evaluate their association with postoperative thrombosis.

DESIGN

Patients who underwent HTx were identified using a statewide database. Trends in off-label recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) use and on-label and off-label prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) use were tested using the Mantel-Haenszel test. Multivariate logistic regression was used to test for an association between procoagulant factor concentrate administration and thrombosis.

SETTING

Virginia hospitals performing HTx.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults undergoing HTx between 2012 and 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Among 899 patients who required HTx, 100 (11.1%) received off-label rFVIIa, 69 (7.7%) received on-label PCC, and 80 (8.9%) received off-label PCC. There was a downward trend in the use of rFVIIa over the 10-year period (p = 0.04). There was no trend in on-label PCC use (p = 0.12); however, there was an increase in off-label PCC use (p < 0.001). Patients who received rFVIIa were transfused more and had longer cardiopulmonary bypass time (p < 0.001). Receipt of rFVIIa was associated with increased thrombotic risk (odds ratio [OR] 1.92; 95% CI 1.12-3.29; p = 0.02), whereas on-label and off-label PCC use had no association with thrombosis (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.49-1.96, p = 0.96 for on-label use; and OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.29-1.30, p = 0.20 for off-label use).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of rFVIIa in HTx decreased over the past decade, whereas off-label PCC use increased. Receipt of rFVIIa was associated with thrombosis; however, patients who received rFVIIa were more severely ill, and risk adjustment may have been incomplete.

Retrospective Comparison of Recombinant Activated Factor VII Versus 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Cardiac Surgical Patients

OBJECTIVES

To compare the incidences of postoperative thrombotic complications, transfusion of blood products, and chest tube output in congenital cardiac surgical patients who received either recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) or 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC).

DESIGN

We performed a retrospective study.

SETTING

Patients who underwent surgery at a tertiary academic hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Pediatric patients who underwent cardiac surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Data were obtained from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium databases, as well as from manual chart review. Adjusted p values were obtained from multivariate regression using age (days), surgeon (number), cardiopulmonary bypass time (minutes), and need for deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (yes/no). A total of 55 patients were included in the 4F-PCC group, and 89 in the rFVIIa group. The median dose of rFVIIa was 77 mcg/kg (46-88), and the median dose of 4F-PCC was 31 IU/kg (24-43). The incidences of thrombotic complications were 8% in the 4F-PCC group and 30% in the rFVIIa group (adjusted p = 0.023). No difference was reported between the groups regarding chest tube output on days 1 and 2 or transfusion of blood products. Using a sensitivity analysis with propensity matching, the incidence of thrombosis was 10% in the 4F-PCC group (n = 38), and 31% in the rFVIIa group (n = 39) (p = 0.036). No difference was reported in terms of bleeding or transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study suggested that the administration of rFVIIa was associated with a higher risk of thrombotic complications when compared to 4F-PCC, without benefits in terms of bleeding and transfusions.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of eptacog beta (coagulation factor VIIa [recombinant]-jncw) for the treatment of hemophilia A and B with inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Bypassing agents (BPAs) are used to treat acute bleeding episodes, manage bleeding during perioperative care, and prophylactically minimize bleed occurrence in persons with hemophilia A or B with inhibitors (PwHABI). However, the effectiveness of BPAs that have been prescribed for the last several decades can be variable, motivating the development of a new recombinant activated factor VII, eptacog beta.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers key eptacog beta findings from phase 1b and phase 3 (PERSEPT) clinical trials, which formed the basis for its regulatory approval to treat PwHABI ages 12 and older. Descriptions of eptacog beta structure and glycosylation profile, mechanism of action, preclinical study results, and cost analyses are also presented.

EXPERT OPINION

PwHABI have had only two options for bleed treatment for the past several decades. With its distinct glycosylation profile, eptacog beta offers a novel therapy aiming to improve upon BPAs currently in use, providing an option with more than one dosing regimen and a rapid response that allows most bleeds to be treated with just one dose. This has become particularly important given the use of subcutaneous medications (e.g., emicizumab) for prophylaxis of bleeding. Clinicians should consider eptacog beta as a BPA for all PwHABI.

COMPARING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CONCENTRATE OF ALL PROTHROMBIN COMPLEX FACTORS WITH RECOMBINANT HUMAN COAGULATION FACTOR VIIa IN THE TREATMENT OF BLEEDING AFTER CARDIAC SURGERY

OBJECTIVE

Aim: The authors evaluated the effectiveness of treatment with recombinant human coagulation factor VIIa and concentrate of all prothrombin complex factors in patients with massive postoperative bleeding that could not be controlled with traditional therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Materials and Methods: In the period from 2020 to 2021, recombinant human coagulation factor VIIa was administered to 18 patients after cardiac surgery (group I), while the concentrate of all prothrombin complex factors was administered to 16 patients postoperatively (group II). During this period, 647 patients were operated on. The patients had normal coagulation screening tests (APTT, INR, TT, fibrinogen level, and PLT level) before surgery. Mean blood loss before and after administration of eptacog alfa and the total prothrombin complex concentrate was assessed. The mean dose of eptacog alfa was 30.95 mcg/kg b.w., and the total prothrombin complex factor concentrate dose was 14.17 mcg/kg b.w. After transfusion with red blood cell concentrate, fresh frozen plasma, and platelet concentrate, in the absence of improvement in the dynamics of postoperative drainage, it was decided to include recombinant human coagulation factor VIIa or a concentrate of all prothrombin complex factors in the treatment.

RESULTS

Results: After administration of recombinant human coagulation factor VIIa at a dose of 30.95 mcg/kg b.w., bleeding stopped in 12 patients, but the remaining 6 patients required reoperation due to persistently high drainage. The decision to perform a rethoracotomy was made by a team of cardiothoracic surgeons and anesthesiologists, taking into account the dynamics of drainage (bleeding) and the hemodynamic stability of the patient. After the administration of concentrate of all prothrombin complex factors at a dose of 14.17 U/kg b.w., bleeding stopped in 12 patients. Four patients required reoperation due to persistent bleeding.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: Treatment with recombinant human coagulation factor VIIa and concentrate of all prothrombin complex factors is effective and safe for cardiac surgery patients.

The Use of Recombinant Activated Factor VII in Patients with Glanzmann's Thrombasthenia

Platelet transfusion is the standard treatment to control or prevent bleeding in patients with Glanzmann's thrombasthenia (GT), but platelets are often unavailable. Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is an effective alternative to platelets in patients with GT with past/present refractoriness to platelet transfusions and antibodies to platelets. However, there is an unmet need for an alternative to platelets in patients without antibodies. This report summarizes evidence of efficacy and safety of rFVIIa in patients with GT without refractoriness or antibodies to platelets from three different sources: the Glanzmann's Thrombasthenia Registry (GTR), published literature (January 01, 1999 to December 01, 2017), and the Novo Nordisk safety surveillance database. In the GTR, 133 patients received rFVIIa for the treatment of 333 bleeding episodes and prevention of bleeding in 157 surgical procedures. Overall efficacy rates were 79 and 88%, respectively, in patients treated for bleeding episodes or for the prevention of bleeding during surgery; effectiveness was generally similar across refractoriness/antibody status categories. Median dose per infusion of rFVIIa was close to that recommended for patients with GT (90 µg/kg). Data from 14 published case reports also demonstrated that rFVIIa is effective with an acceptable safety profile in patients with GT without antibodies to platelets. Analysis of adverse events reported in GTR and in Novo Nordisk safety surveillance database did not raise any new safety concerns. These data supported the label extension of rFVIIa to include cases where platelets are not readily available, which was approved by the European Medicines Agency in December 2018.

Safety analysis of rFVIIa with emicizumab dosing in congenital hemophilia A with inhibitors: Experience from the HAVEN clinical program

BACKGROUND

Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa; eptacog alfa activated, NovoSeven® , Novo Nordisk A/S) is a bypassing agent used in congenital hemophilia A patients with inhibitors. Emicizumab (Hemlibra® ; F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd) is a recombinant, humanized, bispecific monoclonal antibody used for routine prophylaxis in patients with congenital hemophilia A with inhibitors. Concomitant use of the hemostatic agents rFVIIa and emicizumab carries a theoretical increased risk of thrombotic complications. Roche and Novo Nordisk collaboratively analyzed all available data on the use of rFVIIa in patients receiving emicizumab prophylaxis in the Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Prophylactic Emicizumab Versus no Prophylaxis in Hemophilia A Participants With Inhibitors (HAVEN) clinical development program.

OBJECTIVE

Obtain further insights into the concomitant clinical use and safety of rFVIIa and emicizumab.

METHODS

The initial individual rFVIIa dose, dosing intervals and cumulative dosing were evaluated in the HAVEN 1, HAVEN 2, and HAVEN 4 trials. All adverse events reported in each of the three trials in patients treated with rFVIIa, including available narratives, were assessed.

RESULTS

The vast majority of bleeds occurred in HAVEN 1. When rFVIIa was used to treat a bleeding episode, a 100 ± 20 μg/kg dose was used to initiate treatment in the majority of cases. The dosing interval, as well as cumulative dosing were consistent with prescribing information and current practice. No serious adverse events, no thrombotic microangiopathy cases, or thromboembolic events were assessed to be associated with rFVIIa when used in conjunction with emicizumab prophylaxis in the HAVEN trials.

CONCLUSION

rFVIIa use in the context of emicizumab prophylaxis does not change the rFVIIa safety profile as described in the product information.

Thrombogenic Side-Effects of Recombinant Factor VIIa after use in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) has been used ‘off licence’ to successfully treat bleeding and reduce transfusion requirements in complex cardiac surgery. However, concerns over thrombogenic side-effects have limited but not excluded its use in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG).

We present two cases of CABG (one ‘on pump’ and one ‘off pump’) which were complicated by intraoperative aortic dissection and severe bleeding. In both cases the bleeding was successfully treated with rFVIIa. However the first case suffered from severe postoperative arrhythmias, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest and worsening left ventricular dysfunction, suggesting graft patency may have been impaired, whereas the second case remained symptom-free suggesting graft patency was unaffected by the use of rFVIIa. If rFVIIa is needed to treat bleeding during CABG surgery, it may be more appropriate to administer smaller, repeated doses to minimize the risk of thrombosis and early graft failure.

Phase 1, single-dose escalating study of marzeptacog alfa (activated), a recombinant factor VIIa variant, in patients with severe hemophilia

Essentials Marzeptacog alfa (activated) [MarzAA] is a novel variant of activated human factor VII. A phase 1 dose escalation trial of MarzAA was conducted in subjects with severe hemophilia. MarzAA was safe and tolerated at intravenous doses up to 30 μg kg-1 Data observed support further trials for hemophilia patients with inhibitors to factors VIII/IX.

SUMMARY

Background Marzeptacog alfa (activated) (MarzAA), a new recombinant activated human factor VII (rFVIIa) variant with four amino acid substitutions, was developed to provide increased procoagulant activity and a longer duration of action in people with hemophilia. Objectives To investigate the safety, tolerability, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of single ascending intravenous bolus doses of MarzAA in non-bleeding patients with congenital hemophilia A or B with or without inhibitors. Methods This international, phase 1, open-label study (NCT01439971) enrolled males aged 18-64 years with severe hemophilia A or B, with or without FVIII or FIX inhibitors. Subjects were assigned to single-dose MarzAA cohorts (0.5, 4.5, 9, 18 or 30 μg kg-1 ). Blood sampling was performed predose and postdose, and subjects were monitored for 60 days postdose. Safety endpoints included adverse events, vital sign changes, electrocardiograms, laboratory abnormalities, and immunogenicity; secondary endpoints included evaluation of PK and PD. Results Overall, in 25 patients, MarzAA was well tolerated at all dose levels tested, and was not associated with dose-limiting toxicity. No treatment-emergent severe or serious adverse events occurred. MarzAA showed linear dose-response PK across the 4.5-30 μg kg-1 dose range, with a terminal half-life of ⁓ 3.5 h. Dose-dependent shortening of the activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time, and evidence of an increase in peak thrombin as determined with a thrombin generation assay, were observed at all doses. Conclusions MarzAA was tolerated at doses up to 30 μg kg-1 . The safety profile and pharmacological effects observed support further clinical trials for the treatment of hemophilic patients with inhibitors.

Lessons from a systematic literature review of the effectiveness of recombinant factor VIIa in acquired haemophilia

To conduct a systematic review of the literature reporting efficacy and safety of recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) for the treatment of bleeding in acquired haemophilia and, if data permitted, undertake a meta-analysis of the current evidence. MEDLINE^®, Embase^®, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were searched for all studies on rFVIIa treatment in acquired haemophilia. Heterogeneity of included studies was measured using the inconsistency index (I²). Of the 2353 publications screened, 290 potentially relevant references were identified: 12 studies published in 32 publications met inclusion criteria. In total, 1244 patients and 1714 bleeds were included (671 patients received rFVIIa treatment for 1063 bleeds). In seven of 12 studies, the initial dose of Recombinant FVIIa was 90 ± 10 μg/kg. Recombinant FVIIa was used as first-line therapy in the majority of cases. Median number of doses administered ranged from 10 to 28. Between 68 and 74% of bleeds were spontaneous, whereas 4-50% were traumatic. Thirty-nine to 90% of bleeds were severe. Haemostatic effectiveness was > 90% in 5/6 studies for both patient and bleed level. Recombinant FVIIa had a favourable safety profile with low risk of general adverse events and thromboembolic-associated events. The heterogeneity of the studies and data precluded a meta-analysis. Recombinant FVIIa demonstrated effectiveness for the treatment of bleeds and had a good safety profile. It is apparent from these data that there is a need for more standardised measures of clinical effectiveness in acquired haemophilia to enable comparison and pooling of results in the future.

Haemostatic therapies for acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Outcome after spontaneous (non-traumatic) intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is influenced by haematoma volume; up to one-third of ICHs enlarge within 24 hours of onset. Early haemostatic therapy might improve outcome by limiting haematoma growth. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2006, and last updated in 2009.

OBJECTIVES

To examine 1) the effectiveness and safety of individual classes of haemostatic therapies, compared against placebo or open control, in adults with acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage, and 2) the effects of each class of haemostatic therapy according to the type of antithrombotic drug taken immediately before ICH onset (i.e. anticoagulant, antiplatelet, or none).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Trials Register, CENTRAL; 2017, Issue 11, MEDLINE Ovid, and Embase Ovid on 27 November 2017. In an effort to identify further published, ongoing, and unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCT), we scanned bibliographies of relevant articles and searched international registers of RCTs in November 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We sought randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of any haemostatic intervention (i.e. pro-coagulant treatments such as coagulation factors, antifibrinolytic drugs, or platelet transfusion) for acute spontaneous ICH, compared with placebo, open control, or an active comparator, reporting relevant clinical outcome measures.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and contacted corresponding authors of eligible RCTs for specific data if they were not provided in the published report of an RCT.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 12 RCTs involving 1732 participants. There were seven RCTs of blood clotting factors versus placebo or open control involving 1480 participants, three RCTs of antifibrinolytic drugs versus placebo or open control involving 57 participants, one RCT of platelet transfusion versus open control involving 190 participants, and one RCT of blood clotting factors versus fresh frozen plasma involving five participants. We were unable to include two eligible RCTs because they presented aggregate data for adults with ICH and other types of intracranial haemorrhage. We identified 10 ongoing RCTs. Across all seven criteria in the 12 included RCTs, the risk of bias was unclear in 37 (44%), high in 16 (19%), and low in 31 (37%). Only one RCT was at low risk of bias in all criteria.In one RCT of platelet transfusion versus open control for acute spontaneous ICH associated with antiplatelet drug use, there was a significant increase in death or dependence (modified Rankin Scale score 4 to 6) at day 90 (70/97 versus 52/93; risk ratio (RR) 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04 to 1.61, one trial, 190 participants, moderate-quality evidence). All findings were non-significant for blood clotting factors versus placebo or open control for acute spontaneous ICH with or without surgery (moderate-quality evidence), for antifibrinolytic drugs versus placebo (moderate-quality evidence) or open control for acute spontaneous ICH (moderate-quality evidence), and for clotting factors versus fresh frozen plasma for acute spontaneous ICH associated with anticoagulant drug use (no evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on moderate-quality evidence from one trial, platelet transfusion seems hazardous in comparison to standard care for adults with antiplatelet-associated ICH.We were unable to draw firm conclusions about the efficacy and safety of blood clotting factors for acute spontaneous ICH with or without surgery, antifibrinolytic drugs for acute spontaneous ICH, and clotting factors versus fresh frozen plasma for acute spontaneous ICH associated with anticoagulant drug use.Further RCTs are warranted, and we await the results of the 10 ongoing RCTs with interest.

Factor XIII cotreatment with hemostatic agents in hemophilia A increases fibrin α-chain crosslinking

Essentials Factor XIII (FXIII)-mediated fibrin crosslinking is delayed in hemophilia. We determined effects of FXIII cotreatment with hemostatic agents on clot parameters. FXIII cotreatment accelerated FXIII activation and crosslinking of fibrin and α2 -antiplasmin. These data provide biochemical rationale for FXIII cotreatment in hemophilia.

SUMMARY

Background Hemophilia A results from the absence, deficiency or inhibition of factor VIII. Bleeding is treated with hemostatic agents (FVIII, recombinant activated FVII [rFVIIa], anti-inhibitor coagulation complex [FEIBA], or recombinant porcine FVIII [rpFVIII]). Despite treatment, some patients have prolonged bleeding. FXIII-A2 B2 (FXIII) is a protransglutaminase. During clot contraction, thrombin-activated FXIII (FXIIIa) crosslinks fibrin and α2 -antiplasmin, which promotes red blood cell retention and increases clot stability and weight. We hypothesized that FXIII cotreatment in hemophilia would accelerate FXIII activation, leading to increased fibrin crosslinking. Methods FVIII-deficient plasma and whole blood were clotted with or without hemostatic agents (FVIII, rFVIIa, FEIBA, or recombinant B-domain-deleted porcine FVIII [rpFVIII]) and/or FXIII. The effects on FXIII activation, thrombin generation, fibrin and α2 -antiplasmin crosslinking, clot formation and clot weight were measured by western blotting, calibrated automated thrombography, thromboelastography, and clot contraction assays. Results As compared with FVIII-treated hemophilic plasma, FVIII + FXIII cotreatment accelerated FXIIIa formation without increasing thrombin generation. As compared with buffer-treated or FXIII-treated hemophilic plasma, FVIII treatment and FVIII + FXIII cotreatment increased the generation and amount of crosslinked fibrin, including α-chain-rich high molecular weight species and crosslinked α2 -antiplasmin. In the presence of FVIII inhibitors, as compared with hemostatic treatments (rFVIIa, FEIBA, or rpFVIII) alone, FXIII cotreatment increased whole blood clot weight. Conclusion In hemophilia A plasma and whole blood, FXIII cotreatment with hemostatic agents accelerated FXIIIa formation, increased the generation and amount of fibrin α-chain crosslinked species, accelerated α2 -antiplasmin crosslinking, and increased clot weight. FXIII cotreatment with hemostatic therapy may augment hemostasis through increased crosslinking of fibrin and α2 -antiplasmin.

Hemophilia and inhibitors: current treatment options and potential new therapeutic approaches

The immune response to infused factor concentrates remains a major source of morbidity and mortality in the treatment of patients with hemophilia A and B. This review focuses on current treatment options and novel therapies currently in clinical trials. After a brief review of immune tolerance regimens, the focus of the discussion is on preventing bleeding in patients with hemophilia and inhibitors. Recombinant factor VIIa and activated prothrombin complex concentrates are the mainstays in treating bleeds in patients with inhibitors. Both agents have been shown to reduce bleeding episodes to a similar degree when infused prophylactically; however, individual patients may respond better to one agent over the other at any given time. The international immune tolerance trial revealed that a high-dose factor VIII regimen provided significantly better bleeding protection than the low-dose regimen. Given the high cost of treatment and the potential for a high-dose immune tolerance regimen to prevent bleeding in some patients, we discuss how we treat patients to maximize the prevention of bleeds while minimizing cost. Novel approaches to treatment of these patients are in development. These include agents that mimic factor VIII or augment thrombin generation by bypassing the inhibitor, as well as agents that inhibit the natural anticoagulants.

Control of Bleeding Caused by Thrombocytopenia Associated With Hematologic Malignancy: An Audit of the Clinical Use of Recombinant Activated Factor VII

This paper presents an analysis of 24 cases in which recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) was used in the management of hemorrhage in patients with thrombocytopenia associated with hematologic malignancies. This is the largest case aggregation to date and focuses on preliminary experience in the off-label use of this hemostatic agent. Data were extracted from the international, Internet-based registry, www.haemostasis.com, accessed in September 2003. The search results were manually cross-checked against monthly summary reports. The physicians providing the cases were contacted individually to approve the use of their cases, supply any information missing from the database, and validate the data already held. Patients with acute myeloid leukemia, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, Hodgkin’s disease, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, Burkitt’s lymphoma, B-cell or T-cell lymphoma, or aplastic anemia received rFVIIa at total doses of between 18 and 1040 μg/kg body weight. Bleeding stopped in 11 of 24 (46%) patients, markedly decreased in 8 of 24 (33%) patients, and decreased in 4 of 24 (17%) patients. In most patients, the response was achieved within 2.5 hours of administration of rFVIIa. The use of rFVIIa was generally well tolerated—1 case of ischemic stroke was considered to be possibly related to rFVIIa administration, but this has yet to be confirmed. A review of these 24 cases submitted to the www.haemostasis.com database suggests that rFVIIa is beneficial in the management of hemorrhage in patients with thrombocytopenia and hematologic malignancies. This warrants further investigation in rigorously controlled clinical trials.

Systematic monitoring of hemostatic management in hemophilia A patients with inhibitor in the perioperative period using rotational thromboelastometry

BACKGROUND

The management of hemophilia A (HA) patients with inhibitors on bypassing therapy remains challenging. In particular, the monitoring of treatment is restricted by the limited reliability and lack of standardization of currently available methods to evaluate the physiological effects of various hemostatic agents. Accurate monitoring of these patients is particularly important in surgical situations. The recently developed comprehensive coagulation assays, including rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), may be useful in these circumstances.

OBJECTIVE

We have attempted to establish a systematic monitoring protocol using ROTEM (NATEM triggered by CaCl2 ) to evaluate the choice and effectiveness of different bypassing agents in the perioperative period.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The hemostatic effects of recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) and activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCC) were determined using a three-step procedure (spike, preoperative and perioperative) in eight patients with HA inhibitor admitted for elective surgery and assessed for individually tailored therapy. The ROTEM parameters demonstrated similar improvement to approximately normal levels at each stage after treatment with rFVIIa. Results in the presence of aPCC showed a marked improvement in the spike data, although this appeared to be different from those in the preoperative and perioperative assessments. The information derived from the spike and preoperative findings provided a useful guide for establishing an effective dose of therapeutic material, and facilitated good hemostatic control during and after surgery in all cases.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that this systematic analysis using ROTEM could provide a promising strategy for the use of bypassing therapy in HA patients with inhibitor.

Risk of thromboembolic events after protocolized warfarin reversal with 3-factor PCC and factor VIIa

Bleeding events and life-threatening hemorrhage are the most feared complications of warfarin therapy. Prompt anticoagulant reversal aimed at replacement of vitamin K-dependent clotting factors is essential to promote hemostasis. A retrospective cohort study of warfarin-treated patients experiencing a life-threatening hemorrhage treated with an institution-specific warfarin reversal protocol (postimplementation group) and those who received the prior standard of care (preimplementation group) was performed. The reversal protocol included vitamin K, 3-factor prothrombin complex concentrate, and recombinant factor VIIa. Demographic and clinical information, anticoagulant reversal information, and all adverse events attributed to warfarin reversal were recorded. A total of 227 patients were included in final analysis, 109 in the preimplementation group and 118 in the postimplementation group. Baseline patient characteristics were similar in both groups, with the exception of higher average Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores in the postimplementation group (P = .0005). The most common indication for anticoagulation reversal was intraparenchymal hemorrhage. Prereversal international normalized ratios (INRs) were similar in both groups. Attainment of INR normalization to less than 1.4 was higher, and rebound INR was lower in the postimplementation group (P < .0001; P = .0013). Thromboembolic complications were significantly higher in the postimplementation group (P = .003). Elevated baseline Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and mechanical valve as an indication for anticoagulation were independently associated with thrombotic complications (P = .005). A warfarin reversal protocol consisting of 3-factor prothrombin complex concentrate, recombinant factor VIIa, and vitamin K more consistently normalized INR values to less than 1.4 as compared to the prior standard of care in a diverse patient population. This success came at the cost of a 2-fold increase in risk of thromboembolic complications.

[Using recombinant activated blood coagulation factor VII for treatment of hemorrhagic syndrome in patients with thrombocytopenia]

The review deals with an analysis of the use of recombinant activated factor clotting VII (rFVIIa) for the treatment of hemorrhagic syndrome in patients with thrombocytopenia. The review discusses cases of rFVIIa use during bleeding of different localization and different invasive interventions, a frequency of thrombotic complications and causes of the rFVlIIa insufficiency.

Recombinant Factor VIIa: clinical applications for an intravenous hemostatic agent with broad-spectrum potential

Recombinant Factor VIIa (NovoSeven, Novo Nordisk) is a unique hemostatic agent with potential for broad-spectrum applications in bleeding patients with congenital and acquired bleeding abnormalities. At present, recombinant Factor VIIa is only approved for the treatment of hemophilia A and B patients who have acquired antibodies to Factors VIII and IX. However, the literature is rapidly expanding indicating that rFVIIa could benefit patients with bleeding due to a variety of etiologies. Unfortunately, the vast majority of these reports are case studies or small-series summaries, and are neither prospective nor controlled. Controlled trials are currently underway in several potential areas of application. While the possibility of thrombotic complications has been a clinical concern, safety data on patients treated to date have not revealed a significant problem. Expansion of the clinical applications for this interesting and important hemostatic agent are hampered by its expense, the limited scope of the US Food and Drug Administration approval for its use, and the absence of an appropriate laboratory monitoring assay.

40K glycoPEGylated, recombinant FVIIa: 3-month, double-blind, randomized trial of safety, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy in hemophilia patients with inhibitors

BACKGROUND

A 40K glycoPEGylated, recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) bypassing agent (N7-GP) with a prolonged half-life (15 h) compared with rFVIIa was developed as a potential candidate for bleed-preventive regimens in patients with hemophilia and inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of multiple doses of N7-GP in congenital hemophilia A and B patients with high-titer inhibitors.

PATIENTS/METHODS

In this global, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, phase 2 trial, 25, 100 or 200 μg kg(-1)  N7-GP was administered intravenously once every second day during a 3-month, bleed-preventive regimen and compared with a preceding 3-month observation period with on-demand treatment of bleeds with rFVIIa. The primary endpoint was adverse events; secondary endpoints were evaluation of immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics and efficacy.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Overall, 23 patients were randomized and dosed (n = 8/7/8 for 25/100/200 μg kg(-1) ). N7-GP was well tolerated, with a low frequency of adverse events. No serious adverse events, immunogenic or thromboembolic events related to N7-GP were reported. The pharmacokinetic properties of N7-GP were similar to those reported in phase 1. The annualized bleeding rate (ABR) decreased in the treatment period vs. the observation period at all N7-GP dose levels. However, a dose-response relationship in the reduction could not be established in the N7-GP dose range evaluated. The ABR was also reduced at two dose levels during the last part of the observation period, and increased notably in the follow-up period irrespective of previous N7-GP dose. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (

REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT00951405).

Phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose escalation study of the recombinant factor VIIa variant BAY 86-6150 in hemophilia

BACKGROUND

BAY 86-6150 is a new human recombinant factor VIIa variant developed for high procoagulant activity and longer action in people with hemophilia with inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of BAY 86-6150 in non-bleeding hemophilia subjects.

METHODS

The study included non-bleeding men (18-65 years of age) with moderate or severe hemophilia A or B with or without inhibitors. Sixteen subjects were randomized 3 : 1 to four cohorts of escalating doses of BAY 86-6150 (6.5, 20, 50 or 90 μg kg(-1) [n = 3 per cohort]) or placebo (n = 1 per cohort); an independent data-monitoring committee reviewed previous cohort data before the next dose escalation. Blood sampling was performed predose and postdose; subjects were monitored for 50 days postdose.

RESULTS

At the tested doses, BAY 86-6150 was not associated with clinically significant adverse events or dose-limiting toxicities. BAY 86-6150 pharmacokinetics exhibited a linear dose response, with a half-life of 5-7 h. Subjects demonstrated consistent, dose-dependent thrombin generation ex vivo in platelet-poor plasma (PPP) (mean peak effect, 26-237 nm thrombin from 6.5 to 90 μg kg(-1)). Peak thrombin levels over time paralleled BAY 86-6150, with thrombin kinetics appearing to be slightly shorter; thus, circulating BAY 86-6150 retained activity. There were corresponding decreases in activated partial thromboplastin and prothrombin times. No subject developed de novo anti-BAY 86-6150 neutralizing antibodies during the 50-day follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first-in-human, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose escalation study, BAY 86-6150 was tolerated at the highest dose (90 μg kg(-1)), with no safety concerns. Safety and efficacy will be further evaluated in phase II/III studies.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of recombinant canine FVIIa in a study dosing one haemophilia A and one haemostatically normal dog

Recombinant human FVIIa (rhFVIIa) corrects the coagulopathy in hemophilia A and B as well as FVII deficiency. This is also the case in dogs until canine anti-human FVIIa antibodies develop (~2 weeks). Recombinant canine factor VIIa (rcFVIIa), successfully over-expressed by gene transfer in haemophilia dogs, has provided long-term haemostasis (>2 years). However, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and safety of rcFVIIa after pharmacological administration have not been reported. We therefore wanted to explore the safety, PK and PD of rcFVIIa in dogs. A pilot study was set up to evaluate the safety as well as PK and PD of rcFVIIa after a single intravenous dose of 270 μg kg(-1) to one HA and one haemostatically normal dog and to directly compare rcFVIIa with rhFVIIa in these two dogs. Single doses of rcFVIIa and rhFVIIa were well tolerated. No adverse events were observed. Pharmacokinetic characteristics including half-life (FVIIa activity: 1.2-1.8 h; FVIIa antigen 2.8-3.7 h) and clearance were comparable for rcFVIIa and rhFVIIa. Kaolin-activated thromboelastography approached normal in the HA dog with the improvement being most pronounced after rcFVIIa. This study provided the first evidence that administering rcFVIIa intravenously is feasible, safe, well tolerated and efficacious in correcting the haemophilic coagulopathy in canine HA and that rcFVIIa exhibits pharmacokinetic characteristics comparable to rhFVIIa in haemophilic and haemostatically competent dogs. This strengthens the hypothesis that rcFVIIa can be administered to dogs to mimic the administration of rhFVIIa to humans.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of recombinant canine FVIIa in a study dosing one haemophilia A and one haemostatically normal dog

Recombinant human FVIIa (rhFVIIa) corrects the coagulopathy in hemophilia A and B as well as FVII deficiency. This is also the case in dogs until canine anti-human FVIIa antibodies develop (~2 weeks). Recombinant canine factor VIIa (rcFVIIa), successfully over-expressed by gene transfer in haemophilia dogs, has provided long-term haemostasis (>2 years). However, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and safety of rcFVIIa after pharmacological administration have not been reported. We therefore wanted to explore the safety, PK and PD of rcFVIIa in dogs. A pilot study was set up to evaluate the safety as well as PK and PD of rcFVIIa after a single intravenous dose of 270 μg kg(-1) to one HA and one haemostatically normal dog and to directly compare rcFVIIa with rhFVIIa in these two dogs. Single doses of rcFVIIa and rhFVIIa were well tolerated. No adverse events were observed. Pharmacokinetic characteristics including half-life (FVIIa activity: 1.2-1.8 h; FVIIa antigen 2.8-3.7 h) and clearance were comparable for rcFVIIa and rhFVIIa. Kaolin-activated thromboelastography approached normal in the HA dog with the improvement being most pronounced after rcFVIIa. This study provided the first evidence that administering rcFVIIa intravenously is feasible, safe, well tolerated and efficacious in correcting the haemophilic coagulopathy in canine HA and that rcFVIIa exhibits pharmacokinetic characteristics comparable to rhFVIIa in haemophilic and haemostatically competent dogs. This strengthens the hypothesis that rcFVIIa can be administered to dogs to mimic the administration of rhFVIIa to humans.

[The "Seville" Consensus Document on Alternatives to Allogenic Blood Transfusion. Sociedades españolas de Anestesiología (SEDAR), Medicina Intensiva (SEMICYUC), Hematología y Hemoterapia (AEHH), Transfusión sanguínea (SETS) Trombosis y Hemostasia (SETH)]

The Consensus Document on Alternatives to Allogenic Blood Transfusion (AABT) has been drawn up by a panel of experts from 5 scientific societies. The Spanish Societies of Anesthesiology (SEDAR), Critical Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC), Hematology and Hemotherapy (AEHH), Blood Transfusion (SETS) and Thrombosis and Hemostasis (SETH) have sponsored and participated in this Consensus Document. Alternatives to blood transfusion have been divided into pharmacological and non-pharmacological, with 4 modules and 12 topics. The main objective variable was the reduction of allogenic blood transfusions and/or the number of transfused patients. The extent to which this objective was achieved by each AABT was evaluated using the Delphi method, which classifies the grade of recommendation from A (supported by controlled studies) to E (non-controlled studies and expert opinion). The experts concluded that most of the indications for AABT were based on middle or low grades of recommendation, "C", "D", or "E", thus indicating the need for further controlled studies.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of a glycoPEGylated recombinant activated factor VII derivative: a randomized first human dose trial in healthy subjects

BACKGROUND

Extensive research is currently ongoing to prolong the half-life of coagulation factors. One of these techniques is glycoPEGylation, which has also been applied to recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa), resulting in a rFVIIa derivative (N7-GP) with a prolonged terminal half-life (t(1/2) ). The main clinical purpose of N7-GP is to provide safe and effective prophylaxis to patients with hemophilia and inhibitors. The prolonged t(1/2) of N7-GP can potentially reduce the dosing frequency and thereby facilitate convenience and compliance, which are two significant barriers to effective prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the safety and pharmacokinetics of single doses of N7-GP in healthy men.

METHODS

 A randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation trial with five cohorts (N7-GP dose of 12.5-100 μg kg(-1) ) was performed. In each cohort, eight subjects were randomized to receive N7-GP (n = 6) or placebo (n = 2).

RESULTS

The mean FVIIa activity was measurable for up to at least 72 h after dosing, and the overall mean t(1/2) for FVIIa activity was 15 h. The pharmacokinetics of N7-GP appeared to be dose-proportional in the dose range investigated. No serious adverse events (including thromboembolic events) were reported. The frequency of adverse events was similar in both the placebo and N7-GP groups. No neutralizing antibodies against N7-GP were detected. A pharmacologic effect was apparent from a dose-dependent statistically significant decrease in the mean prothrombin time in all N7-GP groups as compared with placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

 N7-GP had a plasma half-life of 15 h and a profile that makes it a potential candidate for prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia and inhibitors.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of subcutaneously administered recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa)

BACKGROUND

 Recombinant activated factor VIIa (rFVIIa) is used to treat bleeds in hemophilia patients with inhibitors. A subcutaneous formulation could potentially improve its half-life and make it suitable for prophylactic treatment.

OBJECTIVES

 A study was conducted to determine the safety of subcutaneously administered rFVIIa in patients with hemophilia and the pharmacokinetic profile (including bioavailability).

PATIENTS/METHODS

 This was a multicenter, open-label, cross-over comparison of single doses of intravenous rFVIIa 90μgkg(-1) and a new formulation of rFVIIa for subcutaneous injection at dose levels of 45, 90, 180, 270 and 360μgkg(-1) . Sixty subjects (12 per dose cohort) with hemophilia A or B were enrolled.

RESULTS

 Subcutaneously administered rFVIIa showed lower mean peak plasma concentrations and prolonged FVII activity (C(max) , 0.44-5.16IU mL(-1) [across doses]; t(1/2) , 12.4h; t(max) , 5.6h) compared with intravenously administered rFVIIa (C(max) , 51.7IUmL(-1) ; t(1/2) , 2.7h; t(max) , <10min). The absolute bioavailability of subcutaneous rFVIIa ranged from 21.1 to 30.1% across dose levels. Dose proportionality was observed within a 2-fold dose increase but not across the full dose range. No thromboembolic events, drug-related serious adverse events, severe injection-site reactions or neutralizing antibodies were reported (primary endpoint). Mild and moderate injection-site reactions were more frequent with subcutaneous than with intravenous injections.

CONCLUSION

 This phase I clinical trial did not identify safety concerns of prolonged exposure to rFVIIa administered subcutaneously in single doses to hemophilia patients.

[The role of recombinant activated factor VII in neuro- surgical and neurocritical patients]

Central nervous system haemorrhage is a severe pathology, as a small amount of bleeding inside the brain can result in devastating consequences. Haemostatic agents might decrease the consequences of intra- cranial bleeding, whichever spontaneous, traumatic, or anticoagulation treatment etiology. Proacogulant recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) has been given after central nervous system bleeding, with an off-label indication. In this update, we go over the drug mechanism of action, its role in the treatment of central nervous system haemorrhage and the published evidences regarding this subject. We carried out a literature review concerning the treatment with rFVIIa in central nervous system haemorrhage, neurocritical pathologies and neurosurgical procedures, searching in MEDLINE and in clinical trials registry: http://clinicaltrials.gov (last review September 2010), as well as performing a manual analysis of collected articles, looking for aditional references. The results of randomized clinical trials do not support the systematic administration of rFVIIa for spontaneous intracranial cerebral haemorrhage. In other central nervous system related haemorrhages, the current available data consist on retrospective studies, expert opinion or isolated case reports.

Off-label recombinant factor VIIa use and thrombosis in children: a multi-center cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To describe the off-label use of recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) in tertiary care pediatric hospitals across the United States and to assess thrombotic events.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective multi-center cohort study using the Pediatric Health Information System administrative database. Children 18 years of age or younger who received rFVIIa between 2000 and 2007 were included. A label admission was defined as an admission with an International Classification of Diseases diagnostic code for hemophilia or factor VII deficiency; admissions without these codes were classified as off-label.

RESULTS

There were 4942 rFVIIa admissions, representing 3764 individual subjects; 74% (3655) of the admissions were off-label. There was a 10-fold increase in the annual rate of off-label admissions from 2000 to 2007 (from 2 to 20.8 per 10 000 hospital admissions, P < .001). The mortality rate in the off-label group was 34% (1258/3655). Thrombotic events occurred in 10.9% (399/3655) of the off-label admissions.

CONCLUSIONS

The off-label use of rFVIIa in hospitalized children is increasing rapidly despite the absence of adequate clinical trials demonstrating safety and efficacy. Thrombotic events are common and mortality is high among patients receiving off-label rFVIIa. Further studies are warranted to determine whether these adverse events are attributable to rFVIIa.

Systematic review: benefits and harms of in-hospital use of recombinant factor VIIa for off-label indications

BACKGROUND

Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa), a hemostatic agent approved for hemophilia, is increasingly used for off-label indications.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the benefits and harms of rFVIIa use for 5 off-label, in-hospital indications: intracranial hemorrhage, cardiac surgery, trauma, liver transplantation, and prostatectomy.

DATA SOURCES

Ten databases (including PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library) queried from inception through December 2010. Articles published in English were analyzed.

STUDY SELECTION

Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts to identify clinical use of rFVIIa for the selected indications and identified all randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies for full-text review.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently assessed study characteristics and rated study quality and indication-wide strength of evidence.

DATA SYNTHESIS

16 RCTs, 26 comparative observational studies, and 22 noncomparative observational studies met inclusion criteria. Identified comparators were limited to placebo (RCTs) or usual care (observational studies). For intracranial hemorrhage, mortality was not improved with rFVIIa use across a range of doses. Arterial thromboembolism was increased with medium-dose rFVIIa use (risk difference [RD], 0.03 [95% CI, 0.01 to 0.06]) and high-dose rFVIIa use (RD, 0.06 [CI, 0.01 to 0.11]). For adult cardiac surgery, there was no mortality difference, but there was an increased risk for thromboembolism (RD, 0.05 [CI, 0.01 to 0.10]) with rFVIIa. For body trauma, there were no differences in mortality or thromboembolism, but there was a reduced risk for the acute respiratory distress syndrome (RD, -0.05 [CI, -0.02 to -0.08]). Mortality was higher in observational studies than in RCTs.

LIMITATIONS

The amount and strength of evidence were low for most outcomes and indications. Publication bias could not be excluded.

CONCLUSION

Limited available evidence for 5 off-label indications suggests no mortality reduction with rFVIIa use. For some indications, it increases thromboembolism.

Recombinant factor VIIa for the prevention and treatment of bleeding in patients without haemophilia

BACKGROUND

Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) is licensed for use in patients with haemophilia and inhibitory allo-antibodies. It is also increasingly being used for off-license indications to prevent bleeding in operations where blood loss is likely to be high, and/or to stop bleeding that is proving difficult to control by other means.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of rFVIIa when used therapeutically to control active bleeding, or prophylactically to prevent (excessive) bleeding in patients without haemophilia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Injuries Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and other specialised databases up to 25 February 2009.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing rFVIIa with placebo, or one dose of rFVIIa with another, in any patient population (except haemophilia). Outcomes were mortality, blood loss or control of bleeding, red cell transfusion requirements, number of patients transfused and thromboembolic adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed potentially relevant studies for inclusion, extracted data and examined risk of bias. We considered prophylactic and therapeutic rFVIIa studies separately.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-five RCTs were included: 24 were placebo-controlled double-blind RCTs and one compared different doses of rFVIIa.Fourteen trials involving 1137 participants examined the prophylactic use of rFVIIa; 713 received rFVIIa. There was no evidence of mortality benefit (RR 1.06; 95% CI 0.50 to 2.24). There was decreased blood loss (WMD -272 mL; 95% CI -399 to -146) and decreased red cell transfusion requirements (WMD -243 mL; 95% CI -393 to -92) with rFVIIa treatment; however these values were likely overestimated due to the inability to incorporate data from trials showing no difference of rFVIIa treatment compared to placebo. There was a trend in favour of rFVIIa in the number of participants transfused (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.82 to 1.02). But there was a trend against rFVIIa with respect to thromboembolic adverse events (RR 1.32; 95% CI 0.84 to 2.06).Eleven trials involving 2366 participants examined the therapeutic use of rFVIIa; 1507 received rFVIIa. There were no outcomes where any observed advantage, or disadvantage, of rFVIIa over placebo could not have been observed by chance alone. There was a trend in favour of rFVIIa for reducing mortality (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.77 to 1.03). However, there was a trend against rFVIIa for increased thromboembolic adverse events (RR 1.21; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.58).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness of rFVIIa as a more general haemostatic drug, either prophylactically or therapeutically, remains unproven. The use of rFVIIa outside its current licensed indications should be restricted to clinical trials.

Recombinant factor VIIa is associated with an improved 24-hour survival without an improvement in inpatient survival in massively transfused civilian trauma patients

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) is associated with increased survival and/or thromboembolic complications.

INTRODUCTION

Uncontrollable hemorrhage is the main cause of early mortality in trauma. rFVIIa has been suggested for the management of refractory hemorrhage. However, there is conflicting evidence about the survival benefit of rFVIIa in trauma. Furthermore, recent reports have raised concerns about increased thromboembolic events with rFVIIa use.

METHODS

Consecutive massively transfused (> 8 units of red blood cells within 12 h) trauma patients were studied. Data on demographics, injury severity scores, baseline laboratory values and use of rFVIIa were collected. Rate of transfusion in the first 6 h was used as surrogate for bleeding. Study outcomes included 24-hour and in-hospital survival, and thromboembolic events. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine the impact of rFVIIa on 24-hour and in-hospital survival.

RESULTS

Three-hundred and twenty-eight patients were massively transfused. Of these, 72 patients received rFVIIa. As expected, patients administered rFVIIa had a greater degree of shock than the non-rFVIIa group. Using logistic regression to adjust for predictors of death in the regression analysis, rFVIIa was a significant predictor of 24-hour survival (odds ratio (OR) = 2.65; confidence interval 1.26-5.59; p = 0.01) but not of in-hospital survival (OR = 1.63; confidence interval 0.79-3.37; p = 0.19). No differences were seen in clinically relevant thromboembolic events.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite being associated with improved 24-hour survival, rFVIIa is not associated with a late survival to discharge in massively transfused civilian trauma patients.

Safety of recombinant activated factor VII in randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

The use of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) on an off-label basis to treat life-threatening bleeding has been associated with a perceived increased risk of thromboembolic complications. However, data from placebo-controlled trials are needed to properly assess the thromboembolic risk. To address this issue, we evaluated the rate of thromboembolic events in all published randomized, placebo-controlled trials of rFVIIa used on an off-label basis.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 35 randomized clinical trials (26 studies involving patients and 9 studies involving healthy volunteers) to determine the frequency of thromboembolic events. The data were pooled with the use of random-effects models to calculate the odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Among 4468 subjects (4119 patients and 349 healthy volunteers), 401 [corrected] had thromboembolic events (9.0%). [corrected] Rates of arterial thromboembolic events among all 4468 subjects were higher among those who received rFVIIa than among those who received placebo (5.5% vs. 3.2%, P=0.003). Rates of venous thromboembolic events were similar among subjects who received rFVIIa and those who received placebo (5.3% vs. 5.7%). Among subjects who received rFVIIa, 2.9% had coronary arterial thromboembolic events, as compared with 1.1% of those who received placebo (P=0.002). Rates of arterial thromboembolic events were higher among subjects who received rFVIIa than among subjects who received placebo, particularly among those who were 65 years of age or older (9.0% vs. 3.8%, P=0.003); the rates were especially high among subjects 75 years of age or older (10.8% vs. 4.1%, P=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large and comprehensive cohort of persons in placebo-controlled trials of rFVIIa, treatment with high doses of rFVIIa on an off-label basis significantly increased the risk of arterial but not venous thromboembolic events, especially among the elderly. (Funded by Novo Nordisk.).

[Recombinant activated factor VII in the treatment of life threatening post-partum haemorrhage; registry UniSeven in the Czech Republic]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the data related to the treatment of 80 Czech patients with life threatening postpartum haemorrhage recorded in the clinical registry UniSeven during years 2004-2009.

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational, multicentre study.

SETTINGS

ICU and Obstetrics departments of University and Regional hospitals in Czech Republic.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

UniSeven is an international academic project of Masaryk University in Brno, Czech Republic, focused on recording of clinical data related to "off-label" use of rFVIIa (Novo Seven) in life threatening bleeding. Data of 80 case reports of post partum haemorrhage from the registry was analysed from the clinical (efficacy and safety) as well as laboratory aspects.

RESULTS

In 97.5% of our patients the treatment with rFVIIa was able to control the bleeding. In 53 women (66.3%) only one dose of rFVIIa was sufficient to control the bleeding. The rest of the patient received two or more rFVIIa doses. First dose of rFVIIa given to patients who needed more than one dose was significantly lower (96.6 microg/kg) compared to patient succesfully treated with one dose only (110.6 microg/kg; p = 0.048). The mortality rate in our cohort of patients was 2.5%. We have not recorded any thrombembolic event as and adverse event related to the rFVIIa treatment. In 74.3% of patients where rFVIIa was administered before considering the hysterectomy, it was able to avoid hysterectomy what we consider to be a significant improvement of the patients' quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data were also considered during the work up of national guidelines for the treatment of life threatening post-partum haemorrhage in the Czech Republic.

Haemostatic drug therapies for acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Because spontaneous (non-traumatic) intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) volume influences its outcome and a third of ICHs enlarge by a third within 24 hours of onset, early haemostatic drug therapy might improve outcome. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2006.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the clinical effectiveness and safety of haemostatic drug therapies for acute ICH in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) design.

SEARCH STRATEGY

I searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched 26 June 2009), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2009), MEDLINE (1966 to June 2009) and EMBASE (1980 to June 2009). In an effort to identify further published, ongoing and unpublished studies I scanned bibliographies of relevant articles, searched international registers of clinical trials and research, and contacted authors and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

I sought RCTs of any haemostatic drug therapy for acute ICH, compared against placebo or open control, with relevant clinical outcome measures.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently applied the inclusion criteria, reviewed the relevant studies, and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

I found five phase II RCTs and one phase III RCT, involving 1398 adults aged 18 years or over, within four hours of ICH onset: 423 participants received placebo and 975 participants received haemostatic drugs (two received epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) and 973 received recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa)). Haemostatic drugs did not significantly reduce 90-day case fatality after ICH (risk ratio (RR) 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58 to 1.25), and rFVIIa did not significantly reduce death or dependence on the modified Rankin Scale (grades 4 to 6) within 90 days of ICH (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.15). There was a trend towards more participants on rFVIIa experiencing thromboembolic serious adverse events (RR 1.37, 95% CI 0.74 to 2.55)

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Haemostatic drugs cannot be recommended for the treatment of acute spontaneous ICH in clinical practice, but a large RCT would be justified.

Recombinant activated factor VII for treatment of refractory hemorrhage after surgery for acute aortic dissection

Despite appropriate treatment, surgery for aortic dissection is frequently associated with bleeding problems. In these series we report on the employment of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) for refractory hemorrhage after emergency surgery for acute type A aortic dissection, used to face the problems of postoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements. Despite the good results of the therapy, a patient presented with thrombosis of the left cavernous sinus. Although a risk of thromboembolic complications has to be considered, rFVIIa is a reasonable rescue option in life-threatening hemorrhage and enlarges our hemostatic armamentarium in surgery for acute aortic dissection.

[Recombinant activated factor VII for perioperative bleeding]

Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is a new haemostatic drug, originally used for the treatment of patients with hemophilia A and B. At the present time it is used for other bleeding conditions such as the perioperative period. When used prophylactically there is a reduction in the number of bleeding episodes but no changes in the need for blood transfusion or other blood products. The adverse effects are arterial or venous thromboembolic events that are mostly related to the severity of the underlying disease of the patient and the concurrent administration of other haemostatic agents, rather than the use of rFVIIa. Its use is recommended when there is a persistent bleeding after the reposition of blood products and when surgical causes of bleeding have been discarded. The cost of the medication should also be considered before its use.

[Relevance of a single dose of 270 microg/kg recombinant factor VIIa for the treatment of patients with haemophilia and inhibitors - Recommendations from the GTH experts]

Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa; NovoSeven) is, besides other indications, authorised for the treatment of bleeding episodes in patients with hereditary haemophilia A or B and inhibitors. Based on the results of three clinical studies, marketing authorisation was granted for the single dose of 270 microg/kg body weight rFVIIa for the treatment of mild to moderate bleeding episodes in patients with haemophilia A or B with inhibitors in March 2007. Thereupon, an expert group analysed the relevance of this additional treatment option for clinical routine. Compared with the repeated application of 90 microg/kg body weight rFVIIa, quality of life may be improved if the single dose of 270 microg/kg body weight rFVIIa reduces the number of injections. The single dose has a benefit for those patients who require several rFVIIa applications or who do not respond adequately to low doses. Moreover, patients with poor venous access or patients who fear injections or reject them (especially children) may benefit from the single dose. The prescription of 270 microg/kg body weight rFVIIa as a single dose instead of multiple dosing of 90 microg/kg body weight is basically an individual and indication-related decision.

Factor VIIa and its potential therapeutic use in bleeding-associated pathologies

Recombinant FVIIa (rFVIIa) was developed for treatment of haemophilia patients with inhibitors against FVIII/FIX. The haemostatic efficacy rate of 80-90% including major orthopaedic surgery (dosing of 90-120 microg/kg every other hour [h] for at least the first 24 h) was achieved in these patients. In a home-treatment setting the efficacy rate of haemostasis in mild-moderate bleedings was 92% (average number of 90 microg/kg doses was 2.2). A wide individual variation regarding recovery of rFVIIa (46 +/- 12%; median 43%) as well as of clearance rate (36 +/- 8 ml/kg/h; median 32 ml/kg/h in adults; children 2-3 times higher) has been observed. Thus children may require higher doses than adults. Accordingly the use of a dose of 270 microg/kg in one single injection was approved in the EU. Recent experience indicates that repeated doses of rFVIIa may decrease the number of bleeds in "target joints", and thus may be useful as prophylaxis in severe hemophilia with inhibitors. Pharmacological concentrations of rFVIIa have been shown to enhance the thrombin generation on thrombin activated platelets in a cell-based model. By doing so a tight structured fibrin haemostatic plug resistant against premature lysis is formed. rFVIIa has been shown to induce haemostasis not only in haemophilia but also in other situations characterized by an impaired thrombin generation such as platelet defects, dilution coagulopathy developed as a result of trauma and extensive surgery. A special form of profuse bleeding, that may cause extensive problems is postpartum haemorrhage.

Fatal thrombosis with activated factor VII in a paediatric patient on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Bleeding remains a potential complication for patients requiring extracorporeal life support systems. Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is one of the drugs used in controlling bleeding. Its use is generally found to be safe. We report a paediatric patient who developed fatal thrombosis with the use of rFVIIa whilst on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and discuss the possible factors that lead to fatal thrombosis.

Efficacy and safety of recombinant activated factor VII for acute intracerebral hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Intracerebral hemorrhage is the least treatable form of stroke. We performed this phase 3 trial to confirm a previous study in which recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) reduced growth of the hematoma and improved survival and functional outcomes.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 841 patients with intracerebral hemorrhage to receive placebo (268 patients), 20 microg of rFVIIa per kilogram of body weight (276 patients), or 80 microg of rFVIIa per kilogram (297 patients) within 4 hours after the onset of stroke. The primary end point was poor outcome, defined as severe disability or death according to the modified Rankin scale 90 days after the stroke.

RESULTS

Treatment with 80 microg of rFVIIa per kilogram resulted in a significant reduction in growth in volume of the hemorrhage. The mean estimated increase in volume of the intracerebral hemorrhage at 24 hours was 26% in the placebo group, as compared with 18% in the group receiving 20 microg of rFVIIa per kilogram (P=0.09) and 11% in the group receiving 80 microg (P<0.001). The growth in volume of intracerebral hemorrhage was reduced by 2.6 ml (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.3 to 5.5; P=0.08) in the group receiving 20 microg of rFVIIa per kilogram and by 3.8 ml (95% CI, 0.9 to 6.7; P=0.009) in the group receiving 80 microg, as compared with the placebo group. Despite this reduction in bleeding, there was no significant difference among the three groups in the proportion of patients with poor clinical outcome (24% in the placebo group, 26% in the group receiving 20 microg of rFVIIa per kilogram, and 29% in the group receiving 80 microg). The overall frequency of thromboembolic serious adverse events was similar in the three groups; however, arterial events were more frequent in the group receiving 80 microg of rFVIIa than in the placebo group (9% vs. 4%, P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Hemostatic therapy with rFVIIa reduced growth of the hematoma but did not improve survival or functional outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00127283 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Failure of an Abiomed left ventricular assist device in association with factor VIIa administration

Factor VIIa might be a useful treatment for coagulopathy and massive hemorrhage following implantation of a mechanical circulatory assist device, but there is a theoretical risk of device thrombosis. To date this complication has not been reported. We describe the first case of clotting of a left ventricular assist device immediately after administration of factor VIIa.

The effect of activated factor VII for intracerebral hemorrhage beyond 3 hours versus within 3 hours

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Recombinant-activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is an investigational treatment for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We have evaluated the drug's treatment effect based on time to treatment.

METHODS

ICH patients treated up to 4 hours from symptom onset were divided based on time to treatment: <or=3 hours (3H) and 3 to 4 hours (4H). Head CT was done at baseline and 24 hours. Outcome measures included: ICH growth at 24 hours, mortality, favorable outcome and discharge disposition. A cohort of nontreated matched ICH patients was used to asses the clinical efficacy.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were treated with rFVIIa: 24 in the 3H group (range 70 to 180 minutes), 22 in the 4H group (range 181 to 300). One hundred and forty-eight patients formed the control group. Mean baseline ICH volume was 8.8 mL for 3H and 10.1 mL for 4H. Mean 24-hour volume was 9.3 mL for 3H (absolute increase 1.05 mL, relative increase 11.9%) and 11.5 mL for 4H (absolute increase 1.1 mL, relative increase 10.9%); P=0.47 is for the difference in relative increase. Mortality was 12.5% for 3H group, 13.6% for 4H, and 13.1% for the control. In the 3H group, 58.3% were discharged with a poor outcome, compared with 54.5% in 4H and 54.1% in the control. Thrombotic adverse events occurred in 11.1% of patients treated with rFVIIa.

CONCLUSIONS

In our off-label with rFVIIa, we did not find evidence of a treatment effect based on time to treatment. Other criteria should be sought to identify patients who might benefit clinically from rFVIIa.