Comparing Mortality of Peritoneal and Hemodialysis Patients in an Era of Medicare Payment Reform

BACKGROUND

Prior studies have shown peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients to have lower or equivalent mortality to patients who receive in-center hemodialysis (HD). Medicare's 2011 bundled dialysis prospective payment system encouraged expansion of home-based PD with unclear impacts on patient outcomes. This paper revisits the comparative risk of mortality between HD and PD among patients with incident end-stage kidney disease initiating dialysis in 2006-2013.

RESEARCH DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing 2-year all-cause mortality among patients with incident end-stage kidney disease initiating dialysis via HD and PD in 2006-2013, using data from the US Renal Data System and Medicare. Analysis was conducted using Cox proportional hazards models fit with inverse probability of treatment weighting that adjusted for measured patient demographic and clinical characteristics and dialysis market characteristics.

RESULTS

Of the 449,652 patients starting dialysis between 2006 and 2013, the rate of PD use in the first 90 days increased from 9.3% of incident patients in 2006 to 14.2% in 2013. Crude 2-year mortality was 27.6% for patients dialyzing via HD and 16.7% for patients on PD. In adjusted models, there was no evidence of mortality differences between PD and HD before and after bundled payment (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-1.04; P=0.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall mortality for HD and PD use was similar and mortality differences between modalities did not change before versus after the 2011 Medicare dialysis bundled payment, suggesting that increased use of home-based PD did not adversely impact patient outcomes.

[Peritoneal dialysis in the Lazio region: results from 2017 regional audit]

In 2011, a first peritoneal dialysis audit was held in the Lazio region to analyze the problems hindering the spread of this method and to improve the quality of care through the sharing of best practices across Centers. A scientific board was therefore set up, representing all the Centers offering PD, in order to assess clinical effectiveness using KPIs (Key Performance Indicators) and to quantify the objectives to be achieved. The analysis made it possible to identify the main problems and take action, all the while monitoring progress through KPIs. A second audit was carried out in 2017 and the collected data was analyzed and compared with the findings of the previous study. Overall, data showed an increase in prevalence, although the incidence showed a slight decrease. Indicators on the change of dialysis treatment, the dropout from domiciliary treatment and the incidence of late referral appeared stable over time. A slight improvement was observed in clinical data on peritonitis and on the length of hospitalization. All participants in the audit declared that sharing and discussing clinical practices had been really useful. In addition, through the drafting of practical documents (guides for patients, guidance on informed consent, protocols of clinical follow-up), a number of tools have been provided to ensure a uniformly high level of care across the different regional Centers.

Effects of different education methods in peritoneal dialysis application training on psychomotor skills and self-efficacy of nursing students

BACKGROUND

Applying the proper technique for connections in Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) is crucial in preventing potential infectious complications.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of different education methods in PD application training on the psychomotor skills and self-efficacy of nursing students.

METHODS

The randomized controlled and experimental study was conducted with a total of 28 nursing student participants. The PD training was provided theoretically and by using a PD simulator for the experimental group and by using videos for the control group. At the end of the training, each student who was included in the experimental and control group were asked to perform PD on the PD simulator one by one. Psychomotor skills were evaluated according to the PD application skill evaluation criteria. Self-efficacy of the students before and after the application was also measured.

RESULTS

Psychomotor skill scores of the students were found to be significantly higher in the experimental group, and there was no significant difference between the experimental and control groups in terms of self-efficacy scores. No statistically significant difference was detected between the self-efficacy scores of the experimental group regarding pre-test and post-test results.

CONCLUSION

This technique can be used to improve the development of psychomotor skills, since the demonstration of the PD application with the simulation technique is effective in the development of psychomotor skills.

Renal Association Clinical Practice Guideline on peritoneal dialysis in adults and children

These guidelines cover all aspects of the care of patients who are treated with peritoneal dialysis. This includes equipment and resources, preparation for peritoneal dialysis, and adequacy of dialysis (both in terms of removing waste products and fluid), preventing and treating infections. There is also a section on diagnosis and treatment of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis, a rare but serious complication of peritoneal dialysis where fibrotic (scar) tissue forms around the intestine. The guidelines include recommendations for infants and children, for whom peritoneal dialysis is recommended over haemodialysis.Immediately after the introduction there is a statement of all the recommendations. These recommendations are written in a language that we think should be understandable by many patients, relatives, carers and other interested people. Consequently we have not reworded or restated them in this lay summary. They are graded 1 or 2 depending on the strength of the recommendation by the authors, and A-D depending on the quality of the evidence that the recommendation is based on.

Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Peritoneal Dialysis (SONG-PD): Study Protocol for Establishing a Core Outcome Set in PD

BACKGROUND

Worldwide, approximately 11% of patients on dialysis receive peritoneal dialysis (PD). Whilst PD may offer more autonomy to patients compared with hemodialysis, patient and caregiver burnout, technique failure, and peritonitis remain major challenges to the success of PD. Improvements in care and outcomes are likely to be mediated by randomized trials of innovative therapies, but will be limited if the outcomes measured and reported are not important for patients and clinicians. The aim of the Standardised Outcomes in Nephrology-Peritoneal Dialysis (SONG-PD) study is to establish a set of core outcomes for trials in patients on PD based on the shared priorities of all stakeholders, so that outcomes of most relevance for decision-making can be evaluated, and that interventions can be compared reliably.

METHODS

The 5 phases in the SONG-PD project are: a systematic review to identify outcomes and outcome measures that have been reported in randomized trials involving patients on PD; focus groups using nominal group technique with patients and caregivers to identify, rank, and describe reasons for their choice of outcomes; semi-structured key informant interviews with health professionals; a 3-round international Delphi survey involving a multi-stakeholder panel; and a consensus workshop to review and endorse the proposed set of core outcome domains for PD trials.

DISCUSSION

The establishment of 3 to 5 high-priority core outcomes, to be measured and reported consistently in all trials in PD, will enable patients and clinicians to make informed decisions about the relative effectiveness of interventions, based upon outcomes of common importance.

[10 years of external quality assurance in dialysis in Germany: Results and future prospects]

BACKGROUND

In 2006, the Federal Joint Committee introduced a quality assurance programme for ambulatory dialysis treatment in Germany. Regarding the impact of chronic dialysis treatment on the quality of life of patients and on health care costs, quality assurance in dialysis is considered highly relevant. The directive on Quality Assurance in Dialysis (QSD-RL) established an external quality assurance programme on the basis of the assessment of certain quality parameters combined with an internal quality management system based on benchmarking parameters in all dialysis practices and centres. Data on quality parameters are collected and analysed quarterly. Regional associations of statutory health insurance physicians take responsibility for quality improvement measures and sanctions. This article aims to provide an overview of the development of quality parameters from 2008 to 2015.

METHODS

We analysed the summarised annual quality reports published on the website of the Federal Joint Committee between 2009 and 2016. We present results on the so-called core quality parameters duration and frequency of dialysis sessions (both for haemodialysis patients), wKt/V for peritoneal dialysis patients, and percentage of haemodialysis patients with central venous catheters which has only been measured since 2014.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

In 2015, 92,000 patients received outpatient dialysis. Between 2008 and 2015, the results for the core quality parameters duration and frequency of haemodialysis improved while the results for wKt/V seemingly show an unfavourable trend. The percentage of patients with central venous catheters appears to be quite high, and thus indicates that there is potential for quality improvement.

FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

For the future, the Federal Joint Committee has resolved to merge the quality assurance programmes in dialysis and in kidney transplantation into a newly designed programme that has the potential to follow patients through all stages and kinds of renal replacement therapy and to focus on further aspects of treatment quality.

A contemporary approach to the prevention of peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis in children: the role of improvement science

Peritonitis is a leading cause of hospitalizations, morbidity, and modality change in pediatric chronic peritoneal dialysis (CPD) patients. Despite guidelines published by the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis aimed at reducing the risk of peritonitis, registry data have revealed significant variability in peritonitis rates among centers caring for children on CPD, which suggests variability in practice. Improvement science methods have been used to reduce a variety of healthcare-associated infections and are also being applied successfully to decrease rates of peritonitis in children. A successful quality improvement program with the goal of decreasing peritonitis will not only include primary drivers directly linked to the outcome of peritonitis, but will also direct attention to secondary drivers that are important for the achievement of primary drivers, such as health literacy and patient and family engagement strategies. In this review, we describe a comprehensive improvement science model for the reduction of peritonitis in pediatric patients on CPD.

The Use of a Multidimensional Measure of Dialysis Adequacy-Moving beyond Small Solute Kinetics

Urea removal has become a key measure of the intensity of dialysis treatment for kidney failure. Small solute removal, exemplified by Kt/Vurea, has been broadly applied as a means to quantify the dose of thrice weekly hemodialysis. Yet, the reliance on small solute clearances alone as a measure of dialysis adequacy fails fully to quantify the intended clinical effects of dialysis therapy. This review aims to (1) understand the strengths and limitations of small solute kinetics as a surrogate marker of dialysis dose, and (2) present the prospect of a more comprehensive construct for dialysis dose, one that considers more broadly the goals of ESRD care to maximize both quality of life and survival. On behalf of the American Society of Nephrology Dialysis Advisory Group, we propose the need to ascertain the validity and utility of a multidimensional measure that moves beyond small solute kinetics alone to quantify optimal dialysis derived from both patient-reported and comprehensive clinical and dialysis-related measures.

[Best practices on peritoneal dialysis: the audit of Lazio Region]

The diffusion of peritoneal methodology can not be something out of the real organizational context and the regional directive can not be the only means to encourage the diffusion. There is the need to provide effective and sustainable levels of assistance through a clinical scientific support and sharing of best-practises. On one side, the aim is to provide an aid by the centers with great expertise in the methodology, recognized as reference points; on the other side, to establish the shared K.P.I.s (Key Performance Index), to asses the clinical effectiveness and measure the objectives to be achieved, through a modality of valuation to establish the real applicability. For this purpose, a scientific board was founded, composed by the heads of UU.OO, that provide the peritoneal dialysis, to determine which aspects to investigate and identify factors of supply improvement. The selected method was the clinical audit. The analysis of the 2011 data has allowed us to capture the situation of the peritoneal dialysis in the Lazio Region. The formative procedure has enabled the centers to share and standardize protocols and therapeutic procedures, identify the strengths of peritoneal dialysis in the Lazio Region and define the KPIs through whose compare and monitor the centers over time. The conclusive analysis of the audit has enabled to identify a series of activities to be undertaken together in order to improve the situation of the peritoneal dialysis in the Lazio Region. In the following years, surveys will be carried out to verify the KPIs trend.

Stability of Vancomycin in Icodextrin Peritoneal Dialysis Solution

Background:

Icodextrin is a glucose polymer used as an alternative osmotic agent in peritoneal dialysis (PD) solutions. There are few data regarding the long-term stability of vancomycin in icodextrin PD solution.

Objective:

To determine the chemical stability of vancomycin in icodextrin PD solution in polyvinyl chloride containers over a 7 day period at 4, 24, and 37 °C.

Methods:

Study samples were prepared by adding 2000 mg vancomycin HCl to commercially available 2.0 L bags of icodextrin 7.5% PD solution. Nine bags were prepared and stored in the following conditions: 3 under refrigeration (5 °C), 3 at room temperature (24 °C), and 3 at body temperature (37 °C). Samples were withdrawn from each bag immediately after preparation and at predetermined intervals over the subsequent 7 days. Solutions were visually inspected for precipitation, cloudiness, or discoloration at each sampling interval. Total concentration of vancomycin in dialysate fluid was determined by high performance liquid chromatography.

Results:

Under refrigeration, a mean ± SD of 99.7% ± 0.5% of the initial vancomycin concentration remained at 168 hours (7 days). At room temperature, 97.5% ± 3.4% remained at 168 hours. At body temperature, 94.3% ± 3.9% remained at 24 hours. Stability was not assessed beyond these time points.

Conclusions:

Premixed vancomycin-icodextrin PD solutions, whether stored refrigerated or at room temperature, were found to be stable for up to 7 days. However, we recommend that these solutions be kept refrigerated whenever possible. Solutions stored at body temperature were stable for up to 24 hours, permitting the practice of prewarming solutions prior to administration.

Risk Factors for and Outcomes of Catheter-Associated Peritonitis in Children: The SCOPE Collaborative

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The Standardizing Care to Improve Outcomes in Pediatric ESRD Collaborative is a quality improvement initiative that aims to reduce peritoneal dialysis-associated infections in pediatric patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis. Our objectives were to determine whether provider compliance with peritoneal dialysis catheter care bundles was associated with lower risk for infection at the individual patient level and describe the epidemiology, risk factors, and outcomes for peritonitis in the Standardizing Care to Improve Outcomes in Pediatric ESRD Collaborative.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We collected peritoneal dialysis characteristics, causative organisms, compliance with care bundles, and outcomes in children with peritonitis between October of 2011 and September of 2014. Chi-squared tests, t tests, and generalized linear mixed models were used to assess risk factors for peritonitis.

RESULTS

Of 734 children enrolled (54% boys; median age =9 years old; interquartile range, 1-15) from 29 centers, 391 peritonitis episodes occurred among 245 individuals over 10,130 catheter-months. The aggregate annualized peritonitis rate was 0.46 episodes per patient-year. Rates were highest among children ≤2 years old (0.62 episodes per patient-year). Gram-positive peritonitis predominated (37.8%) followed by culture-negative (24.7%), gram-negative (19.5%), and polymicrobial (10.3%) infections; fungal only peritonitis accounted for 7.7% of episodes. Compliance with the follow-up bundle was associated with a lower rate of peritonitis (rate ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.30 to 0.80) in the multivariable model. Upward orientation of the catheter exit site (rate ratio, 4.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.49 to 11.89) and touch contamination (rate ratio, 2.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.44 to 3.34) were also associated with a higher risk of peritonitis. Infection outcomes included resolution with antimicrobial treatment alone in 76.6%, permanent catheter removal in 12.2%, and catheter removal with return to peritoneal dialysis in 6% of episodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower compliance with standardized practices for follow-up peritoneal dialysis catheter care in the Standardizing Care to Improve Outcomes in Pediatric ESRD Collaborative was associated with higher risk of peritonitis. Quality improvement and prevention strategies have the potential to reduce peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis.

Implementation of standardized follow-up care significantly reduces peritonitis in children on chronic peritoneal dialysis

The Standardizing Care to improve Outcomes in Pediatric End stage renal disease (SCOPE) Collaborative aims to reduce peritonitis rates in pediatric chronic peritoneal dialysis patients by increasing implementation of standardized care practices. To assess this, monthly care bundle compliance and annualized monthly peritonitis rates were evaluated from 24 SCOPE centers that were participating at collaborative launch and that provided peritonitis rates for the 13 months prior to launch. Changes in bundle compliance were assessed using either a logistic regression model or a generalized linear mixed model. Changes in average annualized peritonitis rates over time were illustrated using the latter model. In the first 36 months of the collaborative, 644 patients with 7977 follow-up encounters were included. The likelihood of compliance with follow-up care practices increased significantly (odds ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.10, 1.19). Mean monthly peritonitis rates significantly decreased from 0.63 episodes per patient year (95% confidence interval 0.43, 0.92) prelaunch to 0.42 (95% confidence interval 0.31, 0.57) at 36 months postlaunch. A sensitivity analysis confirmed that as mean follow-up compliance increased, peritonitis rates decreased, reaching statistical significance at 80% at which point the prelaunch rate was 42% higher than the rate in the months following achievement of 80% compliance. In its first 3 years, the SCOPE Collaborative has increased the implementation of standardized follow-up care and demonstrated a significant reduction in average monthly peritonitis rates.

ISPD Cardiovascular and Metabolic Guidelines in Adult Peritoneal Dialysis Patients Part I - Assessment and Management of Various Cardiovascular Risk Factors

Cardiovascular disease contributes significantly to the adverse clinical outcomes of peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Numerous cardiovascular risk factors play important roles in the development of various cardiovascular complications. Of these, loss of residual renal function is regarded as one of the key cardiovascular risk factors and is associated with an increased mortality and cardiovascular death. It is also recognized that PD solutions may incur significant adverse metabolic effects in PD patients. The International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) commissioned a global workgroup in 2012 to formulate a series of recommendations regarding lifestyle modification, assessment and management of various cardiovascular risk factors, as well as management of the various cardiovascular complications including coronary artery disease, heart failure, arrhythmia (specifically atrial fibrillation), cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease and sudden cardiac death, to be published in 2 guideline documents. This publication forms the first part of the guideline documents and includes recommendations on assessment and management of various cardiovascular risk factors. The documents are intended to serve as a global clinical practice guideline for clinicians who look after PD patients. The ISPD workgroup also identifies areas where evidence is lacking and further research is needed.

Best practices on pregnancy on dialysis: the Italian Study Group on Kidney and Pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Pregnancy during dialysis is increasingly being reported and represents a debated point in Nephrology. The small number of cases available in the literature makes evidence-based counselling difficult, also given the cultural sensitivity of this issue. Hence, the need for position statements to highlight the state of the art and propose the unresolved issues for general discussion.

METHODS

A systematic analysis of the literature (MESH, Emtree and free terms on pregnancy and dialysis) was conducted and expert opinions examined (Study Group on Kidney and Pregnancy; experts involved in the management of pregnancy in dialysis in Italy 2000-2013). Questions regarded: timing of dialysis start in pregnancy; mode of treatment, i.e. peritoneal dialysis (PD) versus haemodialysis (HD); treatment schedules (for both modes); obstetric surveillance; main support therapies (anaemia, calcium-phosphate parathormone; acidosis); counselling tips.

MAIN RESULTS

Timing of dialysis start is not clear, considering also the different support therapies; successful pregnancy is possible in both PD and HD; high efficiency and strict integration with residual kidney function are pivotal in both treatments, the blood urea nitrogen test being perhaps a useful marker in this context. To date, long-hour HD has provided the best results. Strict, personalized obstetric surveillance is warranted; therapies should be aimed at avoiding vitamin B12, folate and iron deficits, and at correcting anaemia; vitamin D and calcium administration is safe and recommended. Women on dialysis should be advised that pregnancy is possible, albeit rare, with both types of dialysis treatment, and that a success rate of over 75% may be achieved. High dialysis efficiency and frequent controls are needed to optimize outcomes.

Adequacy of peritoneal dialysis: Kt/V revisited

OBJECTIVE

Kt/V urea has been used to assess adequacy of peritoneal dialysis. However, Kt/V urea only reflects the clearance of solute without taking into consideration the effects of dietary protein intake (DPI). The objective of this study is to evaluate the value of Kt/V based on nitrogen balance and to observe if it is the best adequacy index.

METHODS

On the premise that nitrogen balance is obtained, we calculated the minimal adequate dialysate volume and dialysis index (DI), Kt/V and solute removal index (SRI). We compared the values of DI, Kt/V and SRI to evaluate the adequacy of peritoneal dialysis.

RESULTS

Kt/V was changed with DPI and body weight of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. We cannot define adequate dialysis with a single value while DPI and body weight are different since CAPD, SRI and Kt/V are numerically equal. However, dialysis index (DI) can reflect the minimal adequate dialysate volume when DPI and body weight are different and, thus, reflects the adequacy of dialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

DI reflects the balance between DPI and solute clearance; thus, it is more useful to evaluate dialysis adequacy than Kt/V and SRI in clinically stable peritoneal dialysis patients.

[Optimal use of peritoneal dialysis with multi-disciplinary management]

INTRODUCTION

Considering the increasing incidence of chronic kidney disease and the increased use of peritoneal dialysis, we wanted to assess whether the multidisciplinary management of patients in peritoneal dialysis might produce improvement in the quality of patients' lives when compared to management by a routine team of operators.

METHODS

Our study observed 40 patients on peritoneal dialysis in our Department between 2010 and 2012. They were randomly assigned to either group A, the routine team which consisted of a nephrologist and a nurse, or group B, a multidisciplinary team comprising several medical specialists, a nurse, a psychologist and a social worker. Two tests, KDQOL-SF and MMPI-2, were administered to both groups.

RESULTS

In group B, the number of days of hospitalization and day hospital were more than 88% lower when compared to group A. The multidisciplinary team achieved better results with the KDQOL-SF test with regards to both emotional and objective dimensions. The Pearson coefficient between the results of the two questionnaires shows how multidisciplinary management can positively influence the perceived well-being of the patient and his or her adherence to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In a multidisciplinary team, each operator, in addition to his or her specific role, also contributes to the achievement of the overall objective, namely of ensuring an optimal quality of life to the patient on peritoneal dialysis thereby allowing these patients to continue their professional and social lives.

A Brazilian experience in assisted automated peritoneal dialysis: a reliable and effective home care approach

INTRODUCTION

Automated assisted peritoneal dialysis (AAPD) has been shown to be successful as renal replacement therapy for elderly and physically incapable end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. In early 2003, a pioneer AAPD program was initiated at GAMEN Renal Clinic in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. ♢

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the results of an AAPD program offered as an option to elderly ESRD patients with physical or cognitive debilities or as last resort to patients with vascular access failure or hemodynamic instability during hemodialysis. ♢

METHODS

A cohort of 30 consecutive patients started AAPD from January 2003 to March 2008 and was followed to July 2009. Demographics, clinical and laboratory parameters, causes of death, and patient and technique survival were analyzed. ♢

RESULTS

Median age of the patients was 72 years (range: 47 - 93 years), with 60% being older than 65. The Davies score was greater than 2 in 73% of patients, and the Karnofsky index was less than 70 in 40%. The overall peritonitis rate was 1 episode in 37 patient-months. The total duration of AAPD ranged from 3 to 72 months. Patient survival was 80% at 12 months, 60% at 24 months, and 23.3% at 48 months. The most common cause of death was cardiovascular problems (70%). ♢

CONCLUSIONS

In this clinical observational study, AAPD fulfilled its expected role, offering an opportune, reliable, and effective homecare alternative for ESRD patients with no other renal replacement therapy options.

Searching the optimal PTH target range in children undergoing peritoneal dialysis: new insights from international cohort studies

The treatment of the mineral and bone disorder associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD-MBD) remains a major challenge in pediatric patients. The principal aims of therapeutic measures are not only to prevent the debilitating skeletal complications and to achieve normal growth but also to preserve long-term cardiovascular health. Serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels are used as a surrogate parameter of bone turnover. Whereas it is generally accepted that serum calcium and phosphate levels should be kept within the range for age, current pediatric consensus guidelines differ markedly with respect to the optimal PTH target range and operate on a limited evidence base. Recently, the International Pediatric Dialysis Network (IPPN) established a global registry collecting detailed clinical and biochemical information, including data relevant to CKD-MBD in children on chronic peritoneal dialysis (PD). This review highlights the current evidence basis regarding the optimal PTH target range in pediatric CKD patients, and re-assesses the current guidelines in view of the outcome data collected by the IPPN registry. Based on a comprehensive evaluation of CKD-MBD outcome measures in this global patient cohort, a PTH target range of 1.7-3 times the upper limit of normal (i.e. 100-200 pg/ml) appears reasonable in children undergoing chronic PD.

[Indications from the first audit on peritoneal dialysis in Piedmont and Aosta valley]

In March 2009 a clinical audit was held in Turin on peritoneal dialysis in order to analyze the problems that still hinder the effective deployment of the technique in Piedmont-Aosta Valley. Various data about epidemiological and clinical management were collected by means of a questionnaire that all 26 nephrology centers of the two regions responded to. The two major critical issues highlighted were the role of the outpatient facility dedicated to uremic patients and why the peritoneal technique was not chosen for new dialysis patients. With regard to the first issue, the presence of a well structured outpatient facility dedicated to chronic renal failure seems to direct more uremic patients to peritoneal dialysis, at the same time decreasing the rate of late referrals. Regarding the second issue, patient choice was the leading cause followed by problems related to the partner, while traditional clinical contraindications interfered to a lesser extent with the choice of dialysis technique. We therefore believe that it will be possible to increase the use of peritoneal dialysis by improving organizational aspects of the dialysis center and trying to remedy the lack of social support. Accurate information and early care of uremic patients by dedicated outpatient facilities are in fact able to lead more patients to choose peritoneal dialysis. The implementation of measures of support, such as financial incentives to dialysis patients following a recent decision of the Piedmont region, could help to overcome problems related to the lack or unhelpfulness of a partner.

Descriptive study about the practice of home peritoneal dialysis

INTRODUCTION

As experienced with the assistance evaluation of children/adolescents with chronic kidney disease in dialysis treatment on hospital we thought about which aspects could be relevant to the peritoneal dialysis (PD) application at home. The objective was to describe the level of schooling and information of the parents about the PD technique, general conditions of the place used to do PD at home and search association with inadequate technique.

METHOD

From March 2004 to May 2006 a descriptive study of an universe of 30 children and adolescents with chronic kidney disease treated in the HC/UFMG. To obtain the results was undertaken the software SPSS version 13.0. The parameters: low educational level, low family income, inadequate level of information, inadequate hygiene of hands during peritoneal dialysis (PD) procedure, were associated with worse quality of PD technique.

RESULTS

The technique application of PD quality was considered inadequate in 18 (60%) patients. All the Odds Ratio values were into the confidence interval (95%) limits and were higher than 1 showing a possibility of a positive association between some independent variables and variable researched although without statistic significance.

CONCLUSION

The statistical analysis did not show association between the parameters tested although they may have a positive role in the success of the dialysis technique.

Substitute treatment and replacement in chronic kidney disease: peritoneal dialysis, hemodialysis and transplant

Chronic dialysis replacement treatments or renal transplants are instituted when the patient's glomerular filtration rate, measured by 24-h urine endogenous creatinine clearance, is <10-15 ml/mm and, as the The National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF KDOQI), European and Canadian guidelines point out, when one or two of the following complications occur: "uremic toxicity" symptoms, significant fluid retention that does not respond to loop diuretics, hyperkalemia, chronic anemia (hemoglobin <8 g), metabolic acidosis or acute pulmonary edema. In all patients for whom transplant is indicated, a selected live donor must be sought or, in the absence of contraindications, the patient should be registered with the national cadaver donation waiting list. While waiting for the transplant, patients will be on a chronic dialysis program. There is no national registry of patients undergoing chronic dialysis; only indirect data from the Mexican Kidney Foundation and the dialysis industry are available. However, it is estimated that 40,000-50,000 people are under this treatment and the numbers grow by 11% every year. Overall, it is thought that for every patient receiving chronic dialysis, there is one more patient who dies without access to therapy. Hemodialysis units must comply with the Official Hemodialysis Standard and the General Health Council Hemodialysis Unit Quality Assessment Form.

[An assessment approach to the adequacy of peritoneal dialysis based on modified MART2 network]

Against the large number of assessment indices to the adequacy peritoneal dialysis and incompatibility of some indices, an intelligent assessment approach to the peritoneal dialysis adequacy based on MART2 (modified from ART2) network is proposed. After non-dimension and weighting preconditioning, the assessment indices were put to MART2 and sorted into many clusters. The center-of-gravity of each cluster was identified as adequacy or inadequacy according to the assessment criteria of dialysis adequacy, and the adequacy of each cluster could be determined by the adequacy of corresponding center-of-gravity when the network threshold was high. Finally, the peritoneal dialysis adequacy of each patient could be judged according to the adequacy of cluster to which the patients' indices belong. Experimental results demounstrate its effectiveness.

Karl d. Nolph state of the art lecture: feasible and future options for salvation of the peritoneal membrane

A review is given of the various available strategies that can be used to protect the peritoneal membrane. A discussion of experimental studies on approaches that are still experimental, but that might be applied in patients in the future, follows. The currently available approaches include dietary sodium restriction, use of high-dose loop diuretics and of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system. All should preferably be combined with a dialysis prescription aimed at reducing the patient's exposure to glucose and its degradation products. The experimental studies indicate favorable effects of combining osmotic agents, together with drugs that interfere with the polyol pathway and the formation of advanced glycosylation end-products.

Monitoring clinical standards in a chronic peritoneal dialysis program

Multiple factors may influence the effectiveness of a chronic peritoneal dialysis program. Continuous monitoring of various aspects of clinical standards with reviews enhances opportunities for bridging the gap between existing practice and good practice, and good practice to best practice.

Peritoneal dialysis in the pediatric intensive care unit setting

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in pediatric and neonatal intensive care units (ICUs). Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is frequently needed in children in whom supportive therapy is not enough to satisfy metabolic demands or to provide adequate nutrition in cases of oliguric kidney failure. The decision to begin dialysis should not be delayed, because experience in infants shows that the shorter the time from the ischemic insult to the beginning of dialysis, the higher the survival rate. The use of continuous RRT (CRRT) in pediatric patients in the ICU has almost tripled; at the same time, the use of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and intermittent hemodialysis has markedly declined. Patient age seems to be the most important factor influencing the decision on the choice of dialysis modality. Although CRRT is reported as the preferred dialysis modality for acutely ill children, PD is still the most common modality used in patients under 6 years of age. Among the several advantages that PD offers, relatively low cost is probably the most significant. Other advantages include technical simplicity, lack of a need for anticoagulation or placement of a central venous catheter, and excellent tolerance in hemodynamically unstable patients. Much controversy exists regarding the adequacy of PD in hypercatabolic patients in the ICU. Nonetheless, when Kt/V has been applied to acutely ill children, it has been shown that PD can provide adequate clearances for most infants. No prospective studies have evaluated the effect of dialysis modality on the outcomes of children with AKI in the ICU setting. The decision about dialysis modality should therefore be based on local expertise, resources available, and the patient's clinical status.

Improving technique survival in peritoneal dialysis: what is modifiable?

The continuous quality improvement approach in peritoneal dialysis practice necessitates definition of the factors and the procedures that may possibly be contributing to the final success of peritoneal dialysis. The philosophy of continuous quality improvement uses the Plan, Do, Check, Act (PDCA) cycle. To improve the procedures used during peritoneal dialysis, the first step is to create a plan, then to carry out the plan, to check it, and after the collection of satisfactory information, to execute the chosen improvement action. Several studies have identified the most frequent causes of transfer from PD to HD as infection, catheter problems, inadequate dialysis, and psychosocial factors, among others. According to training guidelines from the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis, seven points are of major importance to decrease infection risks: exit-site care, catheter placement, antibiotic prophylaxis for procedures, prevention of bowel-source peritonitis, prevention of fungal peritonitis, and connection methods. On the other hand, other factors such as hypoalbuminemia, depression, and obesity should also be taken into consideration for better technique survival in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Patient selection for automated peritoneal dialysis: for whom, when?

The use of the various forms of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) has increased considerably in the past few years. This increase has in part been driven by technology, through improved cycler design. Other contributing factors include better adjustment of APD to patient lifestyle, the flexibility that APD offers to patients, and the increased ability of APD to achieve adequacy and ultrafiltration targets. For high transporters and for patients unable to perform peritoneal dialysis (PD) on their own (for example, pediatric and elderly patients), APD is considered the most suitable PD modality. Furthermore, APD has been associated with improved compliance, lower intraperitoneal pressure, and lower incidences of peritonitis. On the other hand, concerns have been raised regarding increased complexity and cost, a more rapid decline in residual renal function, inadequate sodium removal, and disturbed sleep. Automated PD is an alternative to continuous ambulatory PD when a higher dialysis dose is needed, and it could be a reliable alternative for unplanned or urgent dialysis start. Other than beneficial results in high transporters, the medical advantages of APD remain controversial. Individual patient choice therefore remains the main indication for the application of APD, which should be made available to all patients starting PD.

Optimal use of peritoneal dialysis in patients with diabetes

The survival of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) resulting from diabetes continues to improve, but the survival rate among diabetic ESRD patients remains the lowest among all primary diagnoses probably because of the higher prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidity associated with diabetes. Diabetes, age, and comorbidity all significantly modify the effect of treatment modality on patient survival. As compared with hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD) offers an equal or lower risk of death across all subgroups during the first 1-2 years of dialysis. The association of PD with better outcomes than are seen with HD is probably a result of a lower prevalence of infections and congestive heart failure and better preservation of residual renal function (RRF) in PD patients. Use of angiotensin converting-enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) helps to preserve RRF in ESRD patients and to maintain peritoneal membrane integrity longer in PD patients. Antioxidants can also support preservation of peritoneal membrane function. Peritoneal dialysis should be the initial modality of dialysis in all ESRD patients. Older patients (age > or = 45 years) with diabetes and patients without diabetes may switch to HD or receive a kidney graft in 1-2 years' time; younger patients (age < 45 years) with diabetes may stay on PD longer. Use of ACEI and ARB or antioxidants can help to maintain peritoneal membrane function longer.

Peritoneal dialysis prescription in children: bedside principles for optimal practice

There is no unique optimal peritoneal dialysis prescription for all children, although the goals of ultrafiltration and blood purification are universal. In turn, a better understanding of the physiology of the peritoneal membrane, as a dynamic dialysis membrane with an exchange surface area recruitment capacity and unique permeability characteristics, results in the transition from an empirical prescription process based on clinical experience alone to the potential for a personalized prescription with individually adapted fill volumes and dwell times. In all cases, the prescribed exchange fill volume should be scaled for body surface area (ml/m(2)), and volume enhancement should be conducted based on clinical tolerance and intraperitoneal pressure measurements (IPP; cmH(2)O). The exchange dwell times should be determined individually and adapted to the needs of the patient, with particular attention to phosphate clearance and ultrafiltration capacity. The evolution of residual kidney function and the availability of new, more physiologic, peritoneal dialysis fluids (PDFs) also influence the prescription process. An understanding of all of these principles is integral to the provision of clinically optimal PD.

[Results of applying the Scientific Technical Quality Programme and Constant Quality Improvement for peritoneal dialysis]

INTRODUCTION

In last time it was tried to homogenize the clinical activity and to make the decisions easier. In the field of Nephrology, the Spanish Society of Nephrology has developed different guidelines that have managed an improvement in patient s monitoring. That is the reason why the Quality Working Group in Nephrology was created, whose basic working field was haemodialysis, although its collaboration with an expert group in peritoneal dialysis (PD) has allowed the developement of a Scientific Technical Quality Programme and Constant Quality Improvement in PD.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We checked the clinical histories of all the patients in PD in the course of 2008 in the Peritoneal Dialysis Unit at our institution and we evaluated all the quality indicators that were described in the Scientific Technical Quality Programme and of Constant Quality Improvement in PD.

RESULTS

During 2008 a total of 41 patients were treated in the Peritoneal Dialysis Unit at our institution, 43.9% women. Incidence was 14 (51.8%) and 21.4% were diabetics. No patients cames from transplant unit and 2 came from haemodilalysis unit (7.1%). Mean age in incident population was 60 +/- 13 years and in prevalent population was 53.9 +/- 14.4 years. Mean follow-up in PD was 25.9 +/- 19.9 months. Modified Charlson comorbility index average in incident patients was 6 and in prevalent patients was 5. 70.7% were included in transplant programme and 3 were transplanted in the year s course (10.3%). There were 19 hospital admissions (rate: 0.46 admission per patient/year in risk) with a mean stay of 7.3 days (rate: 3.4 days per patient/year in risk). During 2008 6 patients leaved PD (2 transfers to haemodialysis, 3 transplants and 1 death). 16 infective peritonitis (overall rate: 1 episode every 24 months) and 23 exit side infections were reported (rate: 1 episode every 18 months). Mean Kt/V was 2,4 +/- 0.06 (92.7% of patients achieved the stablished standards). All non-anuric patients had measured residual renal function and only 1 patient did not achieve the goal of fluid output > 1000 ml/day. No patient used 3.86-4.25% bags. Stablished standards were achieve by analitic indicators with regard to epoetin resistence index, LDL- cholesterol, phosphate, calcium-phosphate product and PTH.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of the Scientific Technical Quality Programme and of Constant Quality Improvement in PD has made possible to know the current situation of our unit and to raise some matters when it is necessary to insist to get a better quality in our assistance.

Standardized peritoneal equilibration test in Japanese children and the influence of long-term peritoneal dialysis

OBJECTIVE

To establish a standardized method and standard values of peritoneal equilibration test (PET) in children and to elucidate the factors influencing peritoneal permeability, we standardized the method of PET in the leading hospitals of the Japanese Study Group of Pediatric Peritoneal Dialysis.

METHODS

Using 2.5% glucose dialysate and an infusion volume of 1,100 mL/m(2) body surface area (BSA), we performed 202 standardized PETs. The patients within 1 month of a peritonitis episode were excluded.

RESULTS

The-1 standard deviation (SD), mean, and +1 SD values of end dialysate-to-initial dialysate ratio of (D/D(0)) glucose were 0.31, 0.41, and 0.51 respectively. The dialysate-to-plasma ratios (D/P) of creatinine were 0.52, 0.65, and 0.78. These values were similar to those of Twardowski's adult PET, although previous reports about standardized pediatric PET described more permeable values. Because the duration of PD was longer in the study patients, peritoneal permeability was increased significantly in patients with and without experience of peritonitis alike. The slope indices of the regression equations between the duration of PD and peritoneal permeability in the two groups were same.

CONCLUSIONS

Standardized PET in Japanese children with 2.5% glucose dialysate and an infusion volume of 1,100 mL/m(2) BSA produces standard values similar to those of Twardowski's adult PET. This standardized method of PET is suitable for pediatric PD patients, and peritoneal permeability in children is not higher than that in adults. In addition, the study data show that long-term peritoneal dialysis worsens peritoneal function more than experience of peritonitis does.

Peritoneal dialysis prescription suitable for children with anuria

Peritoneal dialysis patients with anuria have a poor prognosis because of uremia and volume overload. In the present paper, I discuss a suitable prescription for children with anuria. The discussion begins with the principles of prescription from the viewpoint of guidelines. Next, I present prescription and adequacy in children with regard to Kt/V urea, creatinine clearance, phosphorous, and ultrafiltration. Finally, I discuss how to prescribe for anuric children.

Two-year experience with telemedicine in the follow-up of patients in home peritoneal dialysis

We evaluated the use of telemedicine in the long-term control of stable patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis at home. From September 2003 to August 2005, patients were randomly selected from current cases and invited to join study group A, in which they had telemedicine support. Patients not selected for this group, or who refused the invitation, were placed in study group B, and used for comparison. There were 25 patients in group A and 32 patients in group B. Videoconferencing equipment was installed in each patient's home, connected to a videoconferencing unit at the hospital by three ISDN lines. Patients in group A were followed for a mean of 8 months (range 3-24) with alternate months of teleconsultations and hospital visits. A total of 172 teleconsultations were conducted. A mean of 22 min (SD 9) were spent on each teleconsultation, significantly less than in hospital consultations, which took a mean of 33 min (SD 8) (P<0.01). In 148 teleconsultations (89%) medical treatment was modified. In 4 cases (2%) patients needed a hospital visit. In all instances (100%) the condition of the catheter exit site and the presence of oedema could be evaluated. In group A, the estimated cost of telemedicine was euro198 and that of a hospital visit was euro177. The mean hospitalization rate was 2.2 days/patient/year in group A and 5.7 days/patient/year in group B (P<0.05). Home telemedicine appears to be clinically useful in the long-term follow-up of stable patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis, and the costs and savings also seem to be encouraging.