Trends from two decades of orphan designations in paediatric rare neuromuscular diseases

Rare diseases are characterized by substantial unmet need mostly because the majority have limited, or no treatment options and a large number also affect children. Since the inception of EU orphan regulation in 2000 the European Medicines Agency Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products has received several applications for paediatric rare neuromuscular diseases (PERAN) however treatment options remain limited. Here we discuss the results form an observational, retrospective, cross-sectional study to characterize the currently authorised orphan medicinal products (OMP) and orphan designations (OD) given to products for PERAN in the last two decades. In the EU about half of PERAN diseases have at least one active OD approved since 2000, and about half of these are for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). The large majority of PERAN diseases do not have an authorised medicine with only 6 OMP currently authorised for Spinal muscular atrophy (3); DMD (1) and Myasthenia gravis (2). One in five products have inactive or discontinued regulatory development but clinical trials are ongoing for the vast majority of PERAN diseases, and more than half are in the final stage of clinical research with significantly more products with medical plausibility based in clinical data reaching advanced stages in clinical development.

Development of precision therapies for rare inborn errors of metabolism: Functional investigations in cell culture models

Due to the low number of patients, rare genetic diseases are a special challenge for the development of therapies, especially for diseases that result from numerous, patient-specific pathogenic variants. Precision medicine makes use of various kinds of molecular information about a specific variant, so that the possibilities for an effective therapy based on the molecular features of the variants can be elucidated. The attention to personalized precision therapies has increased among scientists and clinicians, since the "single drug for all patients" approach does not allow the classification of individuals in subgroups according to the differences in the disease genotype or phenotype. This review article summarizes some approaches of personalized precision medicine that can be used for a cost-effective and fast development of therapies, even for single patients. We have focused on specific examples on inborn errors of metabolism, with special attention on drug repurposing. Furthermore, we provide an overview of cell culture models that are suitable for precision medicine approaches.

Rare diseases and pyruvate kinase M2: a promising therapeutic connection

Pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) is a key glycolytic enzyme that regulates proliferating cell metabolism. The role of PKM2 in common diseases has been well established, but its role in rare diseases (RDs) is less understood. Over the past few years, PKM2 has emerged as a crucial player in RDs, including, neoplastic, respiratory, metabolic, and neurological disorders. Herein, we summarize recent findings and developments highlighting PKM2 as an emerging key player in RDs. We also discuss the current status of PKM2 modulation in RDs with particular emphasis on preclinical and clinical studies in addition to current challenges in the field.

Between hope and reality: treatment of genetic diseases through nucleic acid-based drugs

Rare diseases (RD) affect a small number of people compared to the general population and are mostly genetic in origin. The first clinical signs often appear at birth or in childhood, and patients endure high levels of pain and progressive loss of autonomy frequently associated with short life expectancy. Until recently, the low prevalence of RD and the gatekeeping delay in their diagnosis have long hampered research. The era of nucleic acid (NA)-based therapies has revolutionized the landscape of RD treatment and new hopes arise with the perspectives of disease-modifying drugs development as some NA-based therapies are now entering the clinical stage. Herein, we review NA-based drugs that were approved and are currently under investigation for the treatment of RD. We also discuss the recent structural improvements of NA-based therapeutics and delivery system, which overcome the main limitations in their market expansion and the current approaches that are developed to address the endosomal escape issue. We finally open the discussion on the ethical and societal issues that raise this new technology in terms of regulatory approval and sustainability of production.

Global Barriers to Accessing Off-Patent Endocrine Therapies: A Renaissance of the Orphan Disease?

CONTEXT

Clinical endocrinology encompasses many diseases requiring long-term drug therapy. Prohibitive pricing of some endocrine drugs classified as essential by the World Health Organization has created suboptimal care of patients with endocrine disorders.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

This review is based on evidence obtained from several databases and search engines including PubMed, Google, and Google Scholar; reference searches; manual searching for web pages of international regulatory bodies; and the authors' experience from different healthcare settings.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

After the expiry of a patent, generic versions with the opportunity for increased availability and a price reduction are expected. There are access barriers worldwide for many off-patent endocrine drugs. The high price is the main issue for several medicines including insulin, hydrocortisone, testosterone, and gonadotropins. This is caused by several factors including the market monopoly due to the lack of registered generics or suppliers limiting the benefit of competition and a complex supply chain. Additionally, the lack of some medicines has been concerning due to market factors such as the relatively small number of patients, making it less attractive for the manufacturers. Commissioning of nonprofit manufacturers and state manufacturing as well as strict price control measures could alleviate this situation.

CONCLUSION

Lack of availability and disproportionate price inflation affecting essential off-patent endocrine therapies is common due to several interrelated factors. Global collaboration among healthcare organizations with the support of policymaking bodies might be needed to mitigate this.

The impact of rare cancer and early-line treatments on the benefit of comprehensive genome profiling-based precision oncology

BACKGROUND

Comprehensive genome profiling (CGP) serves as a guide for suitable genomically matched therapies for patients with cancer. However, little is known about the impact of the timing and types of cancer on the therapeutic benefit of CGP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single hospital-based pan-cancer prospective study (TOP-GEAR; UMIN000011141) was conducted to examine the benefit of CGP with respect to the timing and types of cancer. Patients with advanced solid tumors (>30 types) who either progressed with or without standard treatments were genotyped using a single CGP test. The subjects were followed up for a median duration of 590 days to examine therapeutic response, using progression-free survival (PFS), PFS ratio, and factors associated with therapeutic response.

RESULTS

Among the 507 patients, 62 (12.2%) received matched therapies with an overall response rate (ORR) of 32.3%. The PFS ratios (≥1.3) were observed in 46.3% (19/41) of the evaluated patients. The proportion of subjects receiving such therapies in the rare cancer cohort was lower than that in the non-rare cancer cohort (9.6% and 17.4%, respectively; P = 0.010). However, ORR of the rare cancer patients was higher than that in the non-rare cancer cohort (43.8% and 20.0%, respectively; P = 0.046). Moreover, ORR of matched therapies in the first or second line after receiving the CGP test was higher than that in the third or later lines (62.5% and 21.7%, respectively; P = 0.003). Rare cancer and early-line treatment were significantly and independently associated with ORR of matched therapies in multivariable analysis (P = 0.017 and 0.004, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Patients with rare cancer preferentially benefited from tumor mutation profiling by increasing the chances of therapeutic response to matched therapies. Early-line treatments after profiling increase the therapeutic benefit, irrespective of tumor types.

Sensory neuropathy as a manifestation of multiple acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase deficiency

Multiple acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase deficiency (MADD) is a rare metabolic disorder which typically manifests with muscle weakness. However, despite late-onset MADD being treatable, it is often misdiagnosed, due in part to the heterogeneity of presentations. We report a case of late-onset MADD manifesting first as a sensory neuropathy before progressing to myopathic symptoms and acute metabolic decompensation. Early diagnostic workup with acylcarnitine profiling and organic acid analysis was critical in patient outcome; metabolic decompensation and myopathic symptoms were completely reversed with riboflavin supplementation and dietary modification, although sensory neuropathy persisted. Clinical consideration of MADD as part of the differential diagnosis of neuropathy with myopathy is crucial for a timely diagnosis and treatment of MADD.

Analysis of caregiver perspectives on patients with mucopolysaccharidosis II treated with pabinafusp alfa: results of qualitative interviews in Japan

BACKGROUND

Mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II), or Hunter syndrome, is a rare X-linked metabolic disorder predominantly affecting males. Pabinafusp alfa, an iduronate-2-sulfatase enzyme designed to cross the blood-brain barrier, was approved in Japan in 2021 as the first enzyme replacement therapy targeting both the neuropathic and somatic signs and symptoms of MPS II. This study reports caregivers' experiences of MPS II patients receiving pabinafusp alfa through qualitative interviews.

METHODS

Semi-structured, qualitative interviews were conducted with caregivers at seven clinical sites in Japan using a semi-structured moderation guide (Voice of the Caregiver guide). Thematic analysis was applied to the interview transcripts to identify symptoms and health-related quality of life impacts at baseline, changes during treatment, and overall treatment experience.

RESULTS

Seven caregivers from 16 trial sites participated, representing seven children aged 8-18 years who had received pabinafusp alfa for 3.3-3.5 years at the time of the interviews. Data suggest a general trend toward improvement in multiple aspects, although not all caregivers observed discernible changes. Reported cognitive improvements included language skills, concentration, self-control, eye contact, mental clarity, concept understanding, following instructions, and expressing personal needs. Further changes were reported that included musculoskeletal improvements and such somatic changes as motor function, mobility, organ involvement, joint mobility, sleep patterns, and fatigue. Four caregivers reported improvements in family quality of life, five expressed treatment satisfaction, and all seven indicated a strong willingness to continue treatment of their children with pabinafusp alfa.

CONCLUSION

Caregivers' perspectives in this study demonstrate treatment satisfaction and improvement in various aspects of quality of life following therapy with pabinafusp alfa. These findings enhance understanding of pabinafusp alfa's potential benefits in treating MPS II and contribute to defining MPS II-specific outcome measures for future clinical trials.

Mucopolysaccharidosis type VII (Sly syndrome) - What do we know?

Mucopolysaccharidosis type VII (MPS VII) is an ultra-rare, life-threatening, progressive disease caused by genetic mutations that affect lysosomal storage/function. MPS VII has an estimated prevalence of <1:1,000,000 and accounts for <3% of all MPS diagnoses. Given the rarity of MPS VII, comprehensive information on the disease is limited and we present a review of the current understanding. In MPS VII, intracellular glycosaminoglycans accumulate due to a deficiency in the lysosomal enzyme that is responsible for their degradation, β-glucuronidase, which is encoded by the GUSB gene. MPS VII has a heterogeneous presentation. Features can manifest across multiple systems and can vary in severity, age of onset and progression. The single most distinguishing clinical feature of MPS VII is non-immune hydrops fetalis (NIHF), which presents during pregnancy. MPS VII usually presents within one month of life and become more prominent at 3 to 4 years of age; key features are skeletal deformities, hepatosplenomegaly, coarse facies, and cognitive impairment, although phenotypic variation is a hallmark. Current treatments include hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and enzyme replacement therapy with vestronidase alfa. Care should be individualized for each patient. Development of consensus guidelines for MPS VII management and treatment is needed, as consolidation of expert knowledge and experience (for example, through the MPS VII Disease Monitoring Program) may provide a significant positive impact to patients.

Potential of Artificial Intelligence to Accelerate Drug Development for Rare Diseases

The growth in breadth and depth of artificial intelligence (AI) applications has been fast, running hand in hand with the increasing amount of digital data available. Here, we comment on the application of AI in the field of drug development, with a strong focus on the specific achievements and challenges posed by rare diseases. Data paucity and high costs make drug development for rare diseases especially hard. AI can enable otherwise inaccessible approaches based on the large-scale integration of heterogeneous datasets and knowledge bases, guided by expert biological understanding. Obstacles still exist for the routine use of AI in the usually conservative pharmaceutical domain, which can easily become disillusioned. It is crucial to acknowledge that AI is a powerful, supportive tool that can assist but not replace human expertise in the various phases and aspects of drug discovery and development.

Whipple's disease: A rare disease that can be spotted by many doctors

Whipple's disease, an extremely rare, chronic infection caused by Tropheryma whipplei, an actinobacterium ubiquitously present in the environment, is a multisystemic condition that can affect several organs. Therefore, Whipple's disease should always be considered by physicians working across various branches of medicine, including internal medicine, rheumatology, infectious diseases, gastroenterology, haematology, and neurology. Initially, Whipple's disease is challenging to diagnose due to both its rarity and non-specific clinical features, almost indistinguishable from rheumatological conditions. A few years later, the onset of gastrointestinal symptoms increases the specificity of its clinical picture and helps in reaching the correct diagnosis. Diagnosis is typically made by finding PAS-positive macrophages in the lamina propria at duodenal biopsy. PCR for Tropheryma whipplei is nowadays also increasingly available, and represents an undeniable help in diagnosing this condition. However, it may also be misleading as false positives can occur. If not promptly recognized and treated, central nervous system involvement may develop, which can be fatal. The therapeutic gold standard has not yet been fully established, particularly in cases of recurrent disease, neurological involvement, and an immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome that may arise following the initiation of antibiotic therapy.

The Orphan Drug Act at 40: Legislative Triumph and the Challenges of Success

Policy Points The Orphan Drug Act (ODA) was the result of patient advocacy and by many measures has been strikingly successful. However, approximately 95% of the more than 7,000 known rare diseases still have no US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment. The ODA's success led to sustained criticism of high drug prices, often for products that have orphan drug indications. Critics misconstrue the ODA's intent and propose reducing its incentives instead of pursuing policies focused on addressing broader prescription drug price challenges that exist in both the orphan and nonorphan drug market. Patients and their families will continue to defend the purpose and integrity of the ODA and to drive investments into rare disease research and clinical development.

Trends in orphan medicinal products approvals in the European Union between 2010-2022

BACKGROUND

Over the last twenty years of orphan drug regulation in Europe, the regulatory framework has increased its complexity, with different regulatory paths and tools engineered to facilitate the innovation and accelerate approvals. Recently, the proposal of the new Pharmaceutical Legislation for the European Union, which will replace at least three Regulations and one Directive, was released and its new framework is raising many questions. The aim of this study was to present a characterisation of the Orphan Medicinal Products (OMPs) authorised by the European Commission (EC), between 2010 and 2022, looking into eighteen variables, contributing to the ongoing discussion on the proposal and implementation of the new Pharmaceutical Legislation proposed.

METHODS

Data of the OMPs identified and approved between 2010 and 2022 were extracted from the European Public Assessment Reports (EPARs) produced by the European Medicines Agency. Information regarding legal basis of the application, applicant, protocol assistance received, type of authorization, registration status, type of molecule, ATC code, therapeutic area, target age, disease prevalence, number of pivotal clinical trials supporting the application, clinical trial designs, respective efficacy endpoints and number of patients enrolled in the pivotal clinical trials were extracted. A descriptive statistical analysis was applied.

RESULTS

We identified 192 OMPs approved in the period between 2010 and 2022. 89% of the OMPs have legal basis of "full application". 86% of the sponsors received protocol assistance whereas 64% of the MAA benefited from the accelerated assessment. 53% of the active substances are small molecules; about 1 in 5 molecules are repurposed. 40% of the OMPs have oncological therapeutic indications and 56% of the OMPs are intended to treat only adults. 71% of the products were approved based on a single pivotal trial.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis of OMPs approved between 2010 and 2022 shows that a shift has occurred in the rare disease medicine development space. Through the period studied we observe an increase of non-small molecules approved, accelerated assessment received and non-standard MA's granted.

Analysis of the first ten years of FDA's rare pediatric disease priority review voucher program: designations, diseases, and drug development

BACKGROUND

The Rare Pediatric Disease (RPD) Priority Review Voucher (PRV) Program was enacted in 2012 to support the development of new products for children. Prior to requesting a voucher, applicants can request RPD designation, which confirms their product treats or prevents a rare disease in which the serious manifestations primarily affect children. This study describes the trends and characteristics of these designations. Details of RPD designations are not publicly disclosable; this research represents the first analysis of the RPD designation component of the program.

RESULTS

We used an internal US Food and Drug Administration database to analyze all RPD designations between 2013 and 2022. Multiple characteristics were analyzed, including the diseases targeted by RPD designation, whether the product targeted a neonatal disease, product type (drug/biologic), and the level of evidence (preclinical/clinical) to support designation. There were 569 RPD designations during the study period. The top therapeutic areas were neurology (26%, n = 149), metabolism (23%, n = 131), oncology (18%, n = 105). The top diseases targeted by RPD designation were Duchenne muscular dystrophy, neuroblastoma, and sickle cell disease. Neonatology products represented 6% (n = 33), over half were for drug products and 38% were supported by clinical data.

CONCLUSIONS

The RPD PRV program was created to encourage development of new products for children. The results of this study establish that a wide range of diseases have seen development-from rare pediatric cancers to rare genetic disorders. Continued support of product development for children with rare diseases is needed to find treatments for all children with unmet needs.

Institutional Priority-Setting for Novel Drugs and Therapeutics: A Qualitative Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of guidance on approaches to formulary management and funding for high-cost drugs and therapeutics by individual healthcare institutions. The objective of this review was to assess institutional approaches to resource allocation for such therapeutics, with a particular focus on paediatric and rare disease populations.

METHODS

A search of Embase and MEDLINE was conducted for studies relevant to decision-making for off-formulary, high-cost drugs and therapeutics. Abstracts were evaluated for inclusion based on the Simple Multiple-Attribute Rating Techniques (SMART) criteria. A framework of 30 topics across 4 categories was used to guide data extraction and was based on findings from the initial abstract review and previous health technology assessment (HTA) publications. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted using QSR NVivo 12 software.

RESULTS

A total of 168 studies were included for analysis. Only 4 (2%) focused on paediatrics, while 21 (12%) centred on adults and the remainder (85%) did not specify. Thirty-two (19%) studies discussed the importance of high-cost therapeutics and 34 (23%) focused on rare/orphan drugs. Five themes were identified as being relevant to institutional decision-making for high-cost therapeutics: institutional strategy, substantive criteria, procedural considerations, guiding principles and frameworks, and operational activities. Each of these themes encompassed several sub-themes and was complemented by a sixth category specific to paediatrics and rare diseases.

CONCLUSION

The rising cost of novel drugs and therapeutics underscores the need for robust, evidence-based, and ethically defensible decision-making processes for health technology funding, particularly at the hospital level. Our study highlights practices and themes to aid decision-makers in thinking critically about institutional, substantive, procedural, and operational considerations in support of legitimate decisions about institutional funding of high-cost drugs and therapeutics, as well as opportunities and challenges that exist for paediatric and rare disease populations.

Creating a Roadmap to Quantitative Systems Pharmacology-Informed Rare Disease Drug Development: A Workshop Report

One of the goals of the Accelerating Rare Disease Cures (ARC) program in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) at the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is the development and use of regulatory and scientific tools, including drug/disease modeling, dose selection, and translational medicine tools. To facilitate achieving this goal, the FDA in collaboration with the University of Maryland Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation (M-CERSI) hosted a virtual public workshop on May 11, 2023, entitled "Creating a Roadmap to Quantitative Systems Pharmacology-Informed Rare Disease Drug Development." This workshop engaged scientists from pharmaceutical companies, academic institutes, and the FDA to discuss the potential utility of quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) in rare disease drug development and identify potential challenges and solutions to facilitate its use. Here, we report the main findings from this workshop, highlight the key takeaways, and propose a roadmap to facilitate the use of QSP in rare disease drug development.

High-cost drugs for rare diseases: their expenditure and value based on a regional area-based study

Background: in the field of rare diseases (RDs) most of the European studies on budget impact analysis of drugs that have been conducted often lay on theoretical assumptions and focus only on Orphan drugs (ODs). Objectives: we aimed to estimate the budget impact of specific drugs for non-oncological RDs, both ODs and non-ODs, using real-world data about patients residing in Veneto Region (Italy) and to describe its expenditure structure and dynamics. Methods: a population-based multi-source observational study was conducted using data from Regional administrative databases; an ad-hoc drugs' list specific for RDs including both ODs and non-ODs and classifying them by ATC codes has been created. Results: In 2019, the total expenditure for drugs specific for RDs was EUR 97.2 million (6.6% of the total Regional budget). The RD drug list included 58 ATC codes, of which 15 ATC had an annual budget impact over EUR 1 million ("blockbuster drugs"). The most expensive treatment was a non-OD drug (Coagulation factor VIII). The two most represented therapeutical areas were the metabolic and the hematological ones. Conclusions: Cost analyses on RD high-cost drugs expenditure should consider any specific RD drug, not only ODs. Expenditure dynamics for RD drugs are peculiar showing "blockbuster drugs". Some therapeutical areas seem to be lacking in the drug research field.

TLDA: A transfer learning based dual-augmentation strategy for traditional Chinese Medicine syndrome differentiation in rare disease

The Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) has demonstrated its significant medical value over the decades, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. TCM-AI interdisciplinary models have been proposed to model TCM knowledge, diagnosis, and treatment experiments in clinical practice. Among them, numerous models have been developed to simulate the syndrome differentiation process of human TCM doctors for automatic syndrome diagnosis. However, these models are designed for normal scenarios and trained using a supervised learning paradigm which needs tens of thousands of training samples. They fail to effectively differentiate syndromes in rare disease scenarios where the available TCM electronic medical records (EMRs) are very limited for each unique syndrome. To address the challenge of rare diseases, this study proposes a simple yet effective method called Transfer Learning based Dual-Augmentation (TLDA). TLDA aims to augment the limited EMRs at both the sample-level and feature-level, enriching the pathological and medical information during training. Extended experiments involving 11 comparison models, including the state-of-the-art model, demonstrate the effectiveness of TLDA. TLDA outperforms all comparison models by a significant margin. Furthermore, TLDA can also be extended to other medical tasks when the EMRs for diagnosis are limited in samples.

Expansion of Anticomplement Therapy Indications from Rare Genetic Disorders to Common Kidney Diseases

Complement constitutes a major part of the innate immune system. The study of complement in human health has historically focused on infection risks associated with complement protein deficiencies; however, recent interest in the field has focused on overactivation of complement as a cause of immune injury and the development of anticomplement therapies to treat human diseases. The kidneys are particularly sensitive to complement injury, and anticomplement therapies for several kidney diseases have been investigated. Overactivation of complement can result from loss-of-function mutations in complement regulators; gain-of-function mutations in key complement proteins such as C3 and factor B; or autoantibody production, infection, or tissue stresses, such as ischemia and reperfusion, that perturb the balance of complement activation and regulation. Here, we provide a high-level review of the status of anticomplement therapies, with an emphasis on the transition from rare diseases to more common kidney diseases.

User Centered Rare Disease Clinical Trial Knowledge Graph (RCTKG)

Drug development in rare diseases is challenging due to the limited availability of subjects with the diseases and recruiting from a small patient population. The high cost and low success rate of clinical trials motivate deliberate analysis of existing clinical trials to understand status of clinical development of orphan drugs and discover new insight for new trial. In this project, we aim to develop a user centered Rare disease based Clinical Trial Knowledge Graph (RCTKG) to integrate publicly available clinical trial data with rare diseases from the Genetic and Rare Disease (GARD) program in a semantic and standardized form for public use. To better serve and represent the interests of rare disease users, user stories were defined for three types of users, patients, healthcare providers and informaticians, to guide the RCTKG design in supporting the GARD program at NCATS/NIH and the broad clinical/research community in rare diseases.

Applying the win ratio method in clinical trials of orphan drugs: an analysis of data from the COMET trial of avalglucosidase alfa in patients with late-onset Pompe disease

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials for rare diseases often include multiple endpoints that capture the effects of treatment on different disease domains. In many rare diseases, the primary endpoint is not standardized across trials. The win ratio approach was designed to analyze multiple endpoints of interest in clinical trials and has mostly been applied in cardiovascular trials. Here, we applied the win ratio approach to data from COMET, a phase 3 trial in late-onset Pompe disease, to illustrate how this approach can be used to analyze multiple endpoints in the orphan drug context.

METHODS

All possible participant pairings from both arms of COMET were compared sequentially on changes at week 49 in upright forced vital capacity (FVC) % predicted and six-minute walk test (6MWT). Each participant's response for the two endpoints was first classified as a meaningful improvement, no meaningful change, or a meaningful decline using thresholds based on published minimal clinically important differences (FVC ± 4% predicted, 6MWT ± 39 m). Each comparison assessed whether the outcome with avalglucosidase alfa (AVA) was better than (win), worse than (loss), or equivalent to (tie) the outcome with alglucosidase alfa (ALG). If tied on FVC, 6MWT was compared. In this approach, the treatment effect is the ratio of wins to losses ("win ratio"), with ties excluded.

RESULTS

In the 2499 possible pairings (51 receiving AVA × 49 receiving ALG), the win ratio was 2.37 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-4.29, p = 0.005) when FVC was compared before 6MWT. When the order was reversed, the win ratio was 2.02 (95% CI, 1.13-3.62, p = 0.018).

CONCLUSION

The win ratio approach can be used in clinical trials of rare diseases to provide meaningful insight on treatment benefits from multiple endpoints and across disease domains.

Using automated text classification to explore uncertainty in NICE appraisals for drugs for rare diseases

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the application, feasibility, and validity of supervised learning models for text classification in appraisals for rare disease treatments (RDTs) in relation to uncertainty, and analyzed differences between appraisals based on the classification results.

METHODS

We analyzed appraisals for RDTs (n = 94) published by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) between January 2011 and May 2023. We used Naïve Bayes, Lasso, and Support Vector Machine models in a binary text classification task (classifying paragraphs as either referencing uncertainty in the evidence base or not). To illustrate the results, we tested hypotheses in relation to the appraisal guidance, advanced therapy medicinal product (ATMP) status, disease area, and age group.

RESULTS

The best performing (Lasso) model achieved 83.6 percent classification accuracy (sensitivity = 74.4 percent, specificity = 92.6 percent). Paragraphs classified as referencing uncertainty were significantly more likely to arise in highly specialized technology (HST) appraisals compared to appraisals from the technology appraisal (TA) guidance (adjusted odds ratio = 1.44, 95 percent CI 1.09, 1.90, p = 0.004). There was no significant association between paragraphs classified as referencing uncertainty and appraisals for ATMPs, non-oncology RDTs, and RDTs indicated for children only or adults and children. These results were robust to the threshold value used for classifying paragraphs but were sensitive to the choice of classification model.

CONCLUSION

Using supervised learning models for text classification in NICE appraisals for RDTs is feasible, but the results of downstream analyses may be sensitive to the choice of classification model.

Knowledge and Attitudes of Clinical Trials among Patients with Rare Diseases and the Guardians in China

BACKGROUND

Conducting of clinical trials for rare diseases faces multiple challenges. Patients' cognition and attitude toward clinical trials are crucial, which may affect their participation and compliance, and affect the schedule of clinical trials eventually.

OBJECTIVE AND METHOD

This study aims to explore the knowledge and attitudes of clinical trials of patients with rare diseases or patients' guardians. An anonymous cross-sectional survey was conducted from November 1, 2021, to November 30, 2021. A total of 1131 valid questionnaires were included. Among them, 417 were filled in by the patients themselves, and 714 were answered by the patients' guardians.

RESULTS

The average score of clinical trial knowledge of the patients (8.25) was lower than that of the guardians (8.85). The willingness of the patients to participate in clinical trials was high (4.28), and the willingness of the patients' guardians was also high for patients to participate in clinical trials (4.35). The main promoting factors of clinical trial participation were the possibility of curing the disease. The main hindering factors of participation in clinical trials were lack of access to clinical trial information and concern about the safety and effectiveness of the trial drug.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, most respondents had some basic knowledge of clinical trials and high willingness to participate in clinical trials. But there were some cognitive deficiencies about clinical trials and many hindering factors to participate in clinical trials. Clinical trials of rare diseases should be patient-centered and truly meet the unmet clinical, psychological, and social needs of patients with rare diseases.

Non-viral delivery of nucleic acid for treatment of rare diseases of the muscle

Rare muscular disorders (RMDs) are disorders that affect a small percentage of the population. The disorders which are attributed to genetic mutations often manifest in the form of progressive weakness and atrophy of skeletal and heart muscles. RMDs includes disorders such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), GNE myopathy, spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), limb girdle muscular dystrophy, and so on. Due to the infrequent occurrence of these disorders, development of therapeutic approaches elicits less attention compared with other more prevalent diseases. However, in recent times, improved understanding of pathogenesis has led to greater advances in developing therapeutic options to treat such diseases. Exon skipping, gene augmentation, and gene editing have taken the spotlight in drug development for rare neuromuscular disorders. The recent innovation in targeting and repairing mutations with the advent of CRISPR technology has in fact opened new possibilities in the development of gene therapy approaches for these disorders. Although these treatments show satisfactory therapeutic effects, the susceptibility to degradation, instability, and toxicity limits their application. So, an appropriate delivery vector is required for the delivery of these cargoes. Viral vectors are considered potential delivery systems for gene therapy; however, the associated concurrent immunogenic response and other limitations have paved the way for the applications of other non-viral systems like lipids, polymers, cellpenetrating peptides (CPPs), and other organic and inorganic materials. This review will focus on non-viral vectors for the delivery of therapeutic cargoes in order to treat muscular dystrophies.

Decisions on Non-oncology Breakthrough Therapy Designation Requests in 2017-2019

BACKGROUND

The US Food and Drug Administration's Breakthrough Therapy Designation (BTD) program is intended to facilitate and expedite development of investigational drugs to address unmet medical needs. The objective of this study is to provide an update on FDA's process for review of BTD requests.

METHODS

We reviewed Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) decisions to grant or deny breakthrough therapy designation requests for non-oncology drugs or biological products ("drugs") from January 1, 2017, through December 31, 2019. Data collection included characteristics of the corresponding drug and condition, reasons for granting or denying breakthrough therapy status, reasons for rescinding or withdrawing breakthrough therapy status after a request was granted (if applicable), and subsequent marketing approval status through 2022.

RESULTS

Among 240 requests, 93 (39%) requests were granted and 147 (61%) requests were denied. Granting of requests was more common for conditions where no therapy was available or for orphan diseases. Common reasons for denial included data-related issues, insufficient treatment effect, inadequate study design, endpoint attributes, safety issues, and reliance on post hoc analyses. Among 28 drugs receiving marketing approval as of the end of 2022 for the indication for which BTD was previously granted, 21 (75%) involved a first-in-class mechanism of action.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis describes CDER's decision-making process related to review of requests for breakthrough therapy designations and enhances public awareness regarding efforts to expedite drug development.

Cost of Exempting Sole Orphan Drugs From Medicare Negotiation

Importance

The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) requires Medicare to negotiate prices for some high-spending drugs but exempts drugs approved solely for the treatment of a single rare disease.

Objective

To estimate Medicare spending and global revenues for drugs that might have been exempt from negotiation from 2012 to 2021.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study analyzed drugs that met the IRA threshold for price negotiation (Medicare spending >$200 million/y) in any year from 2012 to 2021 and had an Orphan Drug Act designation. We stratified drugs into 4 mutually exclusive categories: approved for a single rare disease (sole orphan), approved for multiple rare diseases (multiorphan), initially approved for a rare disease and subsequently approved for a nonrare disease (orphan first), and initially approved for a nonrare disease and subsequently approved for a rare disease (non-orphan first).

Outcomes

The primary outcomes were the number of sole orphan drugs, estimated Medicare spending on those drugs from 2012 to 2021, and global revenue since launch.

Results

Among 282 drugs, 95 (34%) were approved to treat at least 1 rare disease, including 25 sole orphan drugs (26%), 20 multiorphan drugs (21%), 13 orphan first drugs (14%), and 37 non-orphan first drugs (39%). From 2012 to 2021, Medicare spending on sole orphan drugs increased from $3.4 billion to $10.0 billion. Each year, a median (IQR) of $2.5 ($1.9-$2.6) billion in Medicare spending would have been excluded from price negotiation because of the sole orphan exemption. The cumulative global revenue of the median (IQR) sole orphan drug was $11 ($6.6-$19.2) billion.

Conclusions and Relevance

The sole orphan exemption will exclude billions of dollars of Medicare drug spending from price negotiation. The high level of global revenues achieved by these drugs, however, suggests that special exemption is unnecessary for them to achieve financial success. Congress could consider removing the sole orphan exemption to obtain additional savings for patients and taxpayers and to eliminate any potential disincentive for developing additional indications for these drugs.

Uptake of orphan drugs in the WHO essential medicines lists

Objective

We evaluated the uptake of medicines licensed as orphan drugs by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or European Medicines Agency (EMA) into the WHO Model list of essential medicines and the WHO Model list of essential medicines for children from 1977 to 2021.

Methods

We collated and analysed data on drug characteristics, reasons for adding or rejecting medicines, and time between regulatory approval and inclusion in the lists. We compared trends in listing orphan drugs before and after revisions to the inclusion criteria of the essential medicines lists in 2001, as well as differences in trends for listing orphan and non-orphan drugs, respectively.

Findings

The proportion of orphan drugs in the essential medicines lists increased from 1.9% (4/208) in 1977 to 14.6% (70/478) in 2021. While orphan drugs for communicable diseases have remained stable over time, we observed a considerable shift towards more orphan drugs for noncommunicable diseases, particularly for cancer. The median period for inclusion in the essential medicines lists after either FDA or EMA first approval was 13.5 years (range: 1-28 years). Limited clinical evidence base and uncertainty about the magnitude of net benefit were the most frequent reasons to reject proposals to add new orphan drugs to the essential medicines lists.

Conclusion

Despite lack of a global definition of rare diseases, the essential medicines lists have broadened their scope to include medicines for rare conditions. However, the high costs of many listed orphan drugs pose accessibility and reimbursement challenges in resource-constrained settings.

Orphan Drug Label Expansions: Analysis Of Subsequent Rare And Common Indication Approvals

The Orphan Drug Act of 1983 was enacted to provide financial incentives to stimulate drug development for rare diseases. In recent years, concerns have been raised regarding these orphan drugs, including how many are being approved for both rare and common diseases and the number of subsequent indication approvals. Policy makers have suggested modifications to the Orphan Drug Act's incentives to address these concerns. In this study we investigated the approval "family trees" of orphan drugs. We found that 491 novel orphan drugs were approved between 1990 and 2022. To date, 65 percent have been approved for a single rare disease, 15 percent have been approved for multiple rare diseases, and 20 percent have been approved for both rare and common diseases. Ten percent of orphan drugs received a subsequent indication approval for a pediatric population of an orphan disease. Revenue estimates from 2021 show that one-third of the drugs approved for both rare and common indications and 6 percent of rare-only drugs were among the 200 top-selling drugs worldwide. The results have implications for the possible externalities of modifying the incentives of the Orphan Drug Act, such as a potential decrease in the initiation of programs to develop pediatric rare disease drugs.

Orphan drug development: Challenges, regulation, and success stories

Rare diseases, also known as orphan diseases, are diseases with low occurrence in the population. Developing orphan drugs is challenging because of inadequate financial and scientific resources and insufficient subjects to run clinical trials. With advances in genome sequencing technologies, emergence of cell and gene therapies, and the latest developments in regulatory pathways, some orphan drugs that have curative potential have been approved. In India, due to its large population and resource crunch, developing orphan drugs is phenomenally challenging. After adopting the Orphan Drug Act, the US-FDA has continuously made advances in regulatory pathways for orphan drugs. Particularly, n-of-one clinical trials have been successful in some cases. India has recently adopted policies that have impacted the long-neglected rare-disease ecosystem; however, there is no clear regulatory path for orphan drug development in India. We have proposed a multi-pronged approach involving close collaboration between the government, regulatory bodies, industries, and patient advocacy groups to boost orphan drug development in India. We believe that rapidly evolving technologies and business models can enable better and faster development of novel orphan drugs in India and other resource-constrained countries.

The future of rare disease drug development: the rare disease cures accelerator data analytics platform (RDCA-DAP)

Rare disease drug development is wrought with challenges not the least of which is access to the limited data currently available throughout the rare disease ecosystem where sharing of the available data is not guaranteed. Most pharmaceutical sponsors seeking to develop agents to treat rare diseases will initiate data landscaping efforts to identify various data sources that might be informative with respect to disease prevalence, patient selection and identification, disease progression and any data projecting likelihood of patient response to therapy including any genetic data. Such data are often difficult to come by for highly prevalent, mainstream disease populations let alone for the 8000 rare disease that make up the pooled patient population of rare disease patients. The future of rare disease drug development will hopefully rely on increased data sharing and collaboration among the entire rare disease ecosystem. One path to achieving this outcome has been the development of the rare disease cures accelerator, data analytics platform (RDCA-DAP) funded by the US FDA and operationalized by the Critical Path Institute. FDA intentions were clearly focused on improving the quality of rare disease regulatory applications by sponsors seeking to develop treatment options for various rare disease populations. As this initiative moves into its second year of operations it is envisioned that the increased connectivity to new and diverse data streams and tools will result in solutions that benefit the entire rare disease ecosystem and that the platform becomes a Collaboratory for engagement of this ecosystem that also includes patients and caregivers.

Addressing a broken drug pipeline for preterm birth: why early preterm birth is an orphan disease

Preterm birth remains one of the most urgent unresolved medical problems in obstetrics, yet only 2 therapeutics for preventing preterm birth have ever been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration, and neither remains on the market. The recent withdrawal of 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17-OHPC, Makena) marks a new but familiar era for obstetrics with no Food and Drug Administration-approved pharmaceuticals to address preterm birth. The lack of pharmaceuticals reflects a broad and ineffective pipeline hindered by extensive regulatory hurdles, soaring costs of performing drug research, and concerns regarding adverse effects among a particularly vulnerable population. The pharmaceutical industry has historically limited investments in research for diseases with similarly small markets, such as cystic fibrosis, given their rarity and diminished projected financial return. The Orphan Drug Act, however, incentivizes drug development for "orphan diseases", defined as affecting <200,000 people in the United States annually. Although the total number of preterm births in the United States exceeds this threshold annually, the early subset of preterm birth (<34 weeks' gestation) would qualify, which is predominantly caused by inflammation and infection. The scientific rationale for classifying preterm birth into early and late subsets is strong given that their etiologies differ, and therapeutics that may be efficacious for one subset may not work for the other. For example, antiinflammatory therapeutics would be expected to be highly effective for early but not late preterm birth. A robust therapeutic pipeline of antiinflammatory drugs already exists, which could be used to target spontaneous early preterm birth, in combination with antibiotics shown to sterilize the amniotic cavity. New applications for therapeutics targeting spontaneous early preterm birth could categorize as orphan disease drugs, which could revitalize the preterm birth therapeutic pipeline. Herein, we describe why drugs targeting early preterm birth should qualify for orphan status, which may increase pharmaceutical interest for this vitally important obstetrical condition.

Challenges, approaches and enablers: effectively triangulating towards dose selection in pediatric rare diseases

Dose selection is an integral part of a molecule's journey to become medicine. On top of typical challenges faced in dose selection for more common diseases, pediatric rare disease has additional unique challenges due to the combination of 'rare' and 'pediatric' populations. Using the central theme of maximizing 'relevant' information to overcome information paucity, dose selection strategy in pediatric rare diseases is discussed using a triangulation concept involving challenges, approaches and very importantly, enablers. Using actual examples, unique scenarios are discussed where specific enablers allowed certain approaches to be used to overcome the challenges. The continued need for model-informed drug development is also discussed using examples of where modeling and simulation tools have been successfully used in bridging available information to select pediatric doses in rare disease. Additionally, challenges with translation and associated dose selection of new modalities such as gene therapy in rare diseases are examined with the lens of continuous learning and knowledge development that will enable pediatric dose selection of these modalities with confidence.

Empirical bayes approach for dynamic bayesian borrowing for clinical trials in rare diseases

Application of Bayesian methods is one the tools that can be used to face the multiple challenges that are met when clinical trials must be conducted in rare diseases. We propose in this work to use a dynamic Bayesian borrowing approach, based on a mixture prior, to complement the control arm of a comparative trial and estimate the mixture parameter by an Empirical Bayes approach. The method is compared, using simulations, with an approach based on a pre-specified (non-adaptive) informative prior. The simulation study shows that the proposed method exhibits similar power as the non-adaptive prior and drastically reduce type I error in case of severe discrepancy between the informative prior and the study control arm data. In case of limited discrepancy between the informative prior and the study control arm data, then our proposed adaptive prior does not reduce the inflation of the type I error.

A retrospective study of 222 patients with newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma-Outcomes indicative for improved survival overtime

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare disease with an incidence of 0.4/per 100,000 person-years. As there is a limited number of prospective randomized trials in PCNSL, large retrospective studies on this rare disease may yield information that might prove useful for the future design of randomized clinical trials. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 222 newly diagnosed PCNSL patients treated in five referral centers in Israel between 2001 and 2020. During this period, combination therapy became the treatment of choice, rituximab has been added to the induction therapy, and consolidation with irradiation was largely laid off and was mostly replaced by high-dose chemotherapy with or without autologous stem cell transplantation (HDC-ASCT). Patients older than 60 comprised 67.5% of the study population. First-line treatment included high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) in 94% of patients with a median MTX dose of 3.5 g/m2 (range 1.14-6 g/m2 ) and a median cycle number of 5 (range 1-16). Rituximab was given to 136 patients (61%) and consolidation treatment to 124 patients (58%). Patients treated after 2012 received significantly more treatment with HD-MTX and rituximab, more consolidation treatments, and autologous stem cell transplantation. The overall response rate was 85% and the complete response (CR)/unconfirmed CR rate was 62.1%. After a median follow-up of 24 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 21.9 and 43.5 months respectively with a significant improvement since 2012 (PFS: 12.5 vs. 34.2 p = 0.006 and OS: 19.9 vs. 77.3 p = 0.0003). A multivariate analysis found that the most important factors related to OS were obtaining a CR followed by rituximab treatment and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. The observed improvement in outcomes may be due to multiple components such as an intention to treat all patients regardless of age with HD-MTX-based combination chemotherapy, treatment in dedicated centers, and more aggressive consolidation with the introduction of HDC-ASCT.

Achieving big with small: quantitative clinical pharmacology tools for drug development in pediatric rare diseases

Pediatric populations represent a major fraction of rare diseases and compound the intrinsic challenges of pediatric drug development and drug development for rare diseases. The intertwined complexities of pediatric and rare disease populations impose unique challenges to clinical pharmacologists and require integration of novel clinical pharmacology and quantitative tools to overcome multiple hurdles during the discovery and development of new therapies. Drug development strategies for pediatric rare diseases continue to evolve to meet the inherent challenges and produce new medicines. Advances in quantitative clinical pharmacology research have been a key component in advancing pediatric rare disease research to accelerate drug development and inform regulatory decisions. This article will discuss the evolution of the regulatory landscape in pediatric rare diseases, the challenges encountered during the design of rare disease drug development programs and will highlight the use of innovative tools and potential solutions for future development programs.

Qualified placebo for trials of herbal medicine treatment in rare diseases? A cross-sectional analysis

BACKGROUND

While substantial placebos have been used in herbal medicine (HM) clinical trials for rare diseases, the use and quality of reporting of HM-placebo remain unclear. We aim to describe the use of HM-placebo in clinical trials for rare diseases and determine the quality of reporting in these trials.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, SinoMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang database, China Science and Technology Journal Database, National Institute of Informatics Support Academic Information Services, ClinicalTrials.gov and Chinese Clinical Trials Registry from their inception date to 14 February 2023 to identify registered and published trials that use placebos as a comparator in rare diseases. We collected data on placebo use reporting and the efficacy and safety of placebo. Descriptive statistics, the Chi-square test, and Binary multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to determine the placebo characteristics of the HM trial and its effect on reporting.

RESULTS

Among the 55 studies, we included that with a median administration time of placebo of 84 days (IQR 42-180) and a median placebo sample size of 30 (IQR 24-54). About half of the trials (27, 49.1%) did not provide their ethical approvals, and one trial had details of informed consent. None of the studies were fully reported and more than half of the items reported less than 50%. A total of 10 trials (18.2%) of placebo has active ingredients even though none of them performed pharmacological inert tests. Of the 29 studies with available data on adverse events, 5 (17.2%) trials did not show a better safety profile in the placebo group. Under the context that a relatively high-quality report is defined as a report with more than 9 items, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in the rate of relatively high-quality reports of the administration time (p = 0.047, OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.90), but the results are not representative.

CONCLUSION

The overall situation of HM-placebo in the field of rare diseases was poor. In particular, the placebo is tied to the quality of trials, and poor placebo hinders the generation of high-quality evidence for herbal clinical trials in the field of rare diseases. We summarize the current methods of assessment involved in the use of placebos and propose various considerations for placebos in different contexts. Our study can greatly promote rare disease researchers to review the quality of their placebo and clinical trials. It is imperative to guarantee that meticulously conducted research generates clinical evidence of the highest caliber. We also expect that in the future, more rigorous relevant standards about the reporting and design of HM-placebo will be developed. High-quality clinical trials are the prerequisite for the wide clinical application of herbal medicines for rare diseases.

Efficacy and safety of compassionate use for rare diseases: a scoping review from 1991 to 2022

BACKGROUND

Compassionate use is a system that provides patients with expedited access to drugs which has not yet been approved, but currently in clinical trials. The investigational drugs have been authorized for compassionate use in cases involving patients suffered from life-threatening diseases and with no alternative treatments. For instance, patients afflicted with highly heterogeneous rare diseases are eligible for treatment assistance through the compassionate use program. This study aims to investigate the characteristics of compassionate use in the context of rare diseases, evaluate the efficacy and safety of compassionate use for rare diseases, and analyze the marketing approval of investigational drugs.

METHODS

The case reports/case series of compassionate use were collected by conducting searches on Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI and SinoMed, spanning from January 1991 to December 2022. Subsequently, two independent reviewers evaluated these reports. Case reports/case series that met the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria were enrolled. Information extracted from these reports and series included patients' basic information, the investigational drug's name, its indication, adverse events, treatment outcomes, and other relevant data.

RESULTS

A total of forty-six studies were included, encompassing 2079 patients with an average age of 38.1 years. Thirty-nine different drugs were involved in 46 studies. Furthermore, neoplasms emerged as the most common therapeutic area for compassionate use in rare disease management (23/46, 50.0%). Regarding the treatment efficacy, four studies reported successful disease resolution, while 35 studies observed symptom improvement among patients. Conversely, four studies documented no significant effects on patients' diseases. Moreover, one study reported worsened results following compassionate use, while the efficacy was not described in 2 studies. Adverse events were reported in 31 studies (67.4%) because of the compassionate use, while no adverse events occurred in 13 studies (28.3%). In other 2 studies, there was no description about whether treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were happened. 136 patients (6.5%) had Grade 5 adverse events (death), of which 19 deaths (0.9%) were considered to be related to compassionate use. Furthermore, the investigational drugs in 33 studies (33/46, 71.7%) received new drug approval at the end of January 31, 2023.The time lag from the start of the compassionate use to the formal approval of the investigational drug was 790.5 (IQR 359-2199.3) days. We found that in 11 studies, encompassing 9 different drugs, some compassionate use indications had not received regulatory authorities at the end of January 31, 2023.

CONCLUSION

The current status of compassionate use for rare diseases was clarified systematically in this study. Compassionate use of investigational drug is a significant treatment option for rare disease. In general, compassionate use appears to demonstrate favorable efficacy in the context of rare diseases, with a significant proportion of compassionate use drugs subsequently receiving marketing approval. However, the safety of drugs for compassionate use cannot be fully evaluated due to the safety data were not covered in some enrolled studies. Therefore, the establishment of an adverse event reporting system specific to compassionate use is warranted.

Prevalence and nature of manufacturer-sponsored patient support programs for prescription drugs in Canada: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Globally, pharmaceutical companies offer patient support programs in tandem with their products, which aim to enhance medication adherence and patient experience through education, training, support and financial assistance. We sought to identify the proportion and characteristics of such patient support programs in Canada and to describe the nature of supports provided.

METHODS

We conducted a crosssectional study to identify and characterize all marketed prescription drugs available in Canada as of Aug. 23, 2022, using the Health Canada Drug Product and CompuScript databases. To describe the nature of supports provided, we conducted a content analysis of publicly available patient support program websites and Web-based documents. Using logistic regression, we identified characteristics of drugs associated with having a patient support program including brand-name or branded generic (generic medications with a proprietary name), orphan (medications for rare diseases) or biologic drug status; estimated total cost of prescriptions dispensed at retail pharmacies; and price per unit.

RESULTS

Of the 2556 prescription drugs marketed by 89 companies in the study period, 256 (10.0%) had a patient support program in Canada. Many of the 89 drug manufacturers (n = 55, 61.8%) offered at least 1 patient support program, frequently relying on third-party administrators for delivery. Brandname and branded generic medications, biologic agents and drugs with orphan status were more likely to have a patient support program than generic drugs. Compared with drugs priced $1.01-$10.00 per unit, drugs priced $10.01-$100.00 per unit were nearly 8 times more likely to have a patient support program (adjusted odds ratio 7.54, 95% confidence interval 4.07- 14.64). Most sampled patient support programs included reimbursement navigation (n = 231, 90.2%) and clinical case management (n = 223, 87.1%).

INTERPRETATION

About 1 in 10 drugs marketed in Canada has a manufacturersponsored patient support program, but these are concentrated around brand-name, branded generic, biologic and high-cost drugs, often for rare diseases. To understand the impact of patient support programs on health outcomes and sustainable access to cost-effective medicines, greater transparency and independent evaluation of patient support programs is necessary.

Role of pharmacists in the context of rare diseases: a scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION

Rare diseases are chronic conditions, generally incurable, progressive and disabling, which may result in early death. Access to therapeutic products, both medicines and appropriate medical devices, is essential to prevent the progression of the disease and maintain the patients' quality of life. Pharmacists can be part of health teams, in charge of guiding patients' journey, monitoring pharmacotherapy and identifying risks. This scoping review aims to identify and summarise evidence on the role of pharmacists and its impact in the field of rare diseases.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The searches will be conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guideline for protocols. Three electronic databases will be consulted. Studies reporting on qualitative and/or quantitative data from any world region will be considered. There will be no language or initial time limit for studies inclusion, until December 2022. To be eligible for inclusion, studies must focus on the role pharmacists in clinical services aimed at promote the access to medicines, prevention and resolution of problems related to pharmacotherapy. No assessments of items' quality will be made, as the purpose of this scoping review is to synthesise and describe the coverage of the evidence. Clinical, humanistic or economic outcomes from studies that meet the inclusion criteria will be included in the review. The analysis will synthesise the available evidence and may be able to push pharmaceutical practice forward, aiding professionals, educators and managers in the implementation of new approaches to better meet the needs of rare diseases and providing opportunities for future research.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Primary data will not be collected in this study and formal ethical approval is not required. The findings of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

A Case of Intramural Gastric Wall Abscess, a Rare Disease Successfully Treated with Endoscopic Incision and Drainage

Gastric wall abscess is a rare condition characterized by a purulent inflammatory process resulting in the formation of a pocket of pus in the stomach. As the mucosa is usually intact, it requires various tools such as endoscopic ultrasonography or computed tomography for the differential diagnosis to rule out more common subepithelial tumors. Even after the diagnosis, the treatment for gastric wall abscess was previously restricted to surgical resection in combination with antibiotics. Currently, in order to avoid unnecessary surgery, the alternative method of initial treatment with an endoscopic approach is recommended. It also helps to choose appropriate antibiotics with confirmation of the pathogen by drainage. There are few reports that describe the detailed processing of the endoscopic drainage, and there is no consensus on the treatment. The pathogens that cause gastric wall abscess are usually Streptococci, Staphylococci, and Escherichia coli. There is only one case reported to be caused by Candida albicans. This is the first report of Elizabethkingia anopheles as the pathogen of the gastric wall abscess. Here, we report a case of gastric wall abscess in a 75-year-old man, safely treated by endoscopic drainage and antibiotics, confirmed by isolating the contents of the abscess.

Napkin math can change the world

Mathematical models hold the key to equitable patient care.

Case study using RWD in the context of a pivotal trial for regulatory approval in a rare disease

Rare disorders impact millions of children worldwide, and developing new medicines in this setting is associated with multiple challenges. In this paper, we share a successful story of how real-world data (RWD) were leveraged to accelerate evidence generation and patient access to a life-changing therapy in patients with severe manifestations of PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum who require systemic therapy. Despite all the existing regulatory guidelines considering real-world evidence (RWE), there is limited regulatory precedent of the use of this framework in support of a new indication. Thus, our case study illustrates design innovations based on the use of a compassionate use program, primarily in children, as a RWD source for approval of a new therapy in a rare disorder. We highlight the systematic considerations and mitigation of potential sources of bias in order to transform the data into actionable evidence. Our experience shows that RWE can be successfully used with appropriate study planning and mitigation in the context of a rare disorder with a high unmet medical need. Some lessons learned from this case study can benefit therapeutic development in rare disorders.

Costs of orphan medicinal products: longitudinal analysis of expenditure in Wales

BACKGROUND

The Orphan Regulation ((EC) No 141/2000) has successfully redirected private and public investment towards previously neglected areas through incentives, regulatory obligations and rewards. However, the growth in the number of licensed orphan medicinal products (OMPs) has led to concerns about increased costs. The aims were to investigate the trend in the costs of OMPs to the National Health Service in Wales, to attribute costs of medicines within and outside periods of marketing exclusivity, and estimate the contribution of individual medicines to the overall costs of OMPs.

METHODS

Expenditure on OMPs in Wales was analysed between the 2014/15 and 2019/20 financial years using data on prescriptions dispensed in primary care, secondary care, and specialised commissioned services. OMP spend was calculated as a proportion of total medicines expenditure, whether it was incurred during, or outside the marketing exclusivity period (MEP), and by therapeutic area and medicine.

RESULTS

Overall spend on OMPs and all medicines increased from £32 m to £82 m, and from £1,030 m to £1,198 m, respectively, with the proportion of spend on OMPs more than doubling from 3.1% to 6.9% per annum. Average year-on-year growth in the costs of OMPs was 21%, compared to 2% for other medicines. Costs following MEP expiry contributed significantly to overall OMP costs, increasing from £8 m to £30 m, corresponding to an increase from 24% to 37%. Treatments for 'malignant disease and immunosuppression', 'nutrition and blood' and the 'respiratory system' accounted for 90% of all OMP spend. Half of total OMP annual expenditure was on just 4 medicines in 2014/15, increasing to 8 in 2019/20.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the number of OMPs and the amount spent on OMPs in Wales has increased over time, possibly as a consequence of favourable licensing conditions, permissive health technology assessment policies and dedicated funding.