[Treatment of bleeding gastroduodenal ulcer]

Of 1700 patients (31/100,000 inhabitants) with endoscopically verified bleeding gastroduodenal ulcer registered yearly in Denmark, 20% rebled, 8% had surgery, and 11% died. Forrest Ia-IIb ulcers are treated endoscopically with combined or thermal methods. Monotherapy with epinephrine is insufficient. The effect of tranexamic acid is uncertain. Proton pump inhibitors reduce rebleeding and surgery but not mortality. H. Pylori should be diagnosed and eradicated in order to reduce recurrence. Second look gastroscopy should be used for selected cases only. Treatment by dedicated teams may be beneficial.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Acid Suppression, and Mycobacterium avium Complex Pulmonary Disease

BACKGROUND

Weekly symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) occur in 20% of the population, and GERD has been implicated in the pathophysiology of many respiratory diseases. Microaspiration of contaminated water is a potential portal of entry for Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) organisms into the respiratory tract, and acid-suppression therapy may enhance the survival of mycobacteria in the stomach. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of GERD, swallowing disorders, reflux symptoms, and acid-suppression therapy in patients with MAC lung disease (MAC positive [MAC+]), and to compare these patients to control subjects without MAC lung disease (MAC negative [MAC-]).

METHODS

Clinical information was collected on 58 MAC+ patients and 58 age- and sex-matched MAC- patients who were asked to complete a DeMeester questionnaire of reflux symptoms and to identify any acid-suppressive medication consumed.

RESULTS

A clinical diagnosis of GERD was documented in 23 of 52 MAC+ patients (44.2%), compared to 16 MAC- patients (27.6%) [p = 0.019]. MAC+ patients consumed significantly more histamine type 2 receptor antagonists and prokinetic agents, and MAC- patients consumed more antacids. The mean DeMeester questionnaire score (+/- SD) for MAC+ patients was 1.39 +/- 1.8, and for MAC- patients was 0.88 +/- 1.4. (p = 0.098). Aspiration was suspected in nine MAC+ patients (15.5%), compared to three MAC- patients (5.2%) [p = 0.032]. There was no association between GERD and radiologic presentation of MAC disease. Consolidation and nodules > 5 mm were more common in those receiving acid suppression than those who were not.

CONCLUSIONS

GERD, acid suppression, and clinically suspected aspiration are more common in patients with MAC lung disease than in similar patients without MAC disease.

Results from the pediatric European register for treatment of Helicobacter pylori (PERTH)

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Data on the eradication treatment for childhood Helicobacter pylori are scanty. A register was established on the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) website to collect data on treatment performed by European pediatricians to ascertain what is practiced in the field.

SUBJECTS

From January 2001 to December 2002, information on 597 children were entered by 23 European Centers, but only data of 518 treated children were completed and analyzed (86.7%, 262 male subjects, median age 9 years, range 1-14). According to their nationality, 226 children were from Southern Europe, 132 from Eastern Europe, 68 from Western Europe, and 4 from northern Europe, 68 from North Africa, and 20 from Asia. At endoscopy, 454 children had gastritis and 64 had ulcer (12.3%). Antibiotic sensitivity, tested in 361 cases, revealed 18% clarithromycin-resistant and 19% metronidazole-resistant H. pylori strains.

RESULTS

Treatment was performed for 1 week in 388 and for 2 weeks in 130 children. Antibiotics were associated with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) in 345 and with bismuth in 121 children. Triple therapy was given to 485 children, dual therapy to 26, quadruple to 7. Follow-up data, by (13)C-Urea-Breath Test or histology or both, were available for 480 children. Overall eradication rate was 65.6%, significantly higher in children with ulcer (79.7%) than without (63.9%, p = .001). When given as first treatment, bismuth-containing triple therapies were more efficacious than PPI-containing ones (77% versus 64%, p = .02, OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.1-3.3). Twenty-seven different treatment regimens were used, but only six were administered to at least 18 children (range 18-157). There was no difference between treatments given for 1 or 2 weeks, or given as first or second therapies.

CONCLUSION

European pediatricians entering data in the register used 27 different regimens. Bismuth-containing therapies resulted in higher eradication rate. Omeprazole-containing triple therapies were the most used although their efficacy was low. Therapies recommended for adults do not appear to be suitable for children.

Appropriate management of symptomatic GORD in primary care: has expert opinion changed between 2001 and 2005?

OBJECTIVE

To determine current opinions of clinical experts on the appropriate management of symptomatic GORD in primary care, and to compare these opinions with those from a similar study conducted in 2001.

METHODS

In 2001, a panel of 6 Belgian general practitioners and 6 gastroenterologists assessed the appropriateness of referral versus short-term anti-secretory medication for 768 different patient profiles, using the RAND/UCLA method. Applying a similar methodology, the same panel repeated these assessments in 2005. In addition, panellists were asked to indicate the preferred type of medication for all patient profiles.

RESULTS

Agreement between the results of 2001 and 2005 was high. Appropriateness ratings on referral versus medication were similar in 79% of patient profiles (weighted kappa value 0.77). Higher age and use of NSAIDs remained the dominant factors in favour of referral. Medication preference (not measured in 2001) showed marked differences between general practitioners and gastroenterologists. Gastroenterologists showed a higher preference for PPI high dose, whereas general practitioners more frequently chose for PPI low dose. H2-receptor antagonists were preferred in only few cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that expert opinion on the appropriateness of referral for endoscopy in patients with symptomatic GORD has only slightly changed over the past few years. Preferences for low and high dose PPIs varied between the two groups of physicians, which is most likely to be ascribed to the different patient populations seen in either primary or specialised care.

Application of bleeding prophylactic criteria (NICE) in patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding. A Swiss prospective study

Multiple treatment guidelines for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) suggest that patients with one or more risk factors for NSAID-related ulcer complications should be prescribed preventive strategies such as acid-suppressive drugs, misoprostol or COX-2-specific inhibitors to reduce their risk of serious ulcer complications. However data are lacking as to how many patients have been on preventive measures in accordance to the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) criteria in our population. We therefore evaluated the extent to which patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding have been under ulcer-preventive strategies at the time of hospital entry. In a one-year-bleeding-study at the Waid city hospital, Zürich, ulcer preventive treatment was practiced in only 25% of 214 patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding. We conclude that ulcer prevention in everyday medical practice is still being seldom applied.

Overlap of symptoms of dyspepsia and gastroesophageal reflux in the community

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Dyspepsia and gastroesophageal reflux disease are common chronic diseases. In the clinical setting, some patients express both problems together; however, little is known about the real prevalence of the presence of the two symptoms. Turkey is particularly interesting because of differences observed from developed countries. We aimed to derive data from our previous prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease study and evaluate the overlap of the two symptoms.

METHODS

We used a previously validated and culturally adapted reflux questionnaire, which was translated into Turkish. The questionnaire was applied to 630 randomly selected subjects older than 20 years living in a population of 8857 adults.

RESULTS

28.6% (180/630) of all responders defined dyspepsia within the last 12-month period. When symptom prevalence was considered at least weekly, the prevalence was 10% for heartburn, 15.6% for acid regurgitation, and 20% for either symptom. While the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease was 29.4% in patients with dyspepsia, dyspepsia was found in 43.1% of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Only 21% of symptomatic subjects or 8.4% of the entire study population had both symptoms. Dyspepsia was defined as the most bothersome symptom. 54.3% of all dyspeptic patients and 67.3% with both gastroesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia used a gastric medication (p>0.05). 29.9% of subjects with dyspeptic symptoms defined antacid consumption and 28.3% acid inhibitor therapy.

CONCLUSION

Dyspepsia was defined as the most bothersome symptom compared to gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms. The prevalence of dyspepsia in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease is more common than vice versa. However, the overlap of the two symptom groups was lower than expected in this low-income, Caucasian population.

Stress-ulcer prophylaxis for general medical patients: a review of the evidence

BACKGROUND

Gastric stress ulceration and bleeding are common occurrences in the critically ill and prophylactic acid-suppression is used almost universally in this population. Evidence suggests that general medical patients hospitalized outside of the intensive care unit often receive similar therapy.

PURPOSE

To determine how frequently general medical patients are prescribed stress ulcer prophylaxis and what evidence exists for doing so.

DATA SOURCE

The MEDLINE database (1966 to October 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (4th Quarter 2005), and the bibliographies of selected articles.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies that contained significant data about either the frequency of use of stress ulcer prophylaxis in general medical patients or gastrointestinal bleeding outcomes in patients given prophylaxis.

DATA EXTRACTION

The primary author extracted prevalence and outcome data.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Descriptive studies suggest that 20-25% of general medical patients receive acid suppression for stress ulcer prophylaxis in the absence of presumed (but not established) risk factors for bleeding. Only two randomized, controlled trials evaluated the effects of prophylaxis in this population. The first found a reduction in clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding from 6% (3 of 48) with placebo to zero (n = 52) with magaldrate. The second found a reduction in clinically significant bleeding from 3% (2 of 70) with sucralfate to zero (n = 74) with cimetidine.

CONCLUSION

A significant number of general medical patients are prescribed acid-suppressive therapy for stress ulcer prophylaxis. The literature provides only sparse guidance on this issue with two randomized trials showing a possible benefit for prophylaxis. Further study is needed.

Nocturnal asthma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To examine recent advancements of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of nocturnal asthma.

RECENT FINDINGS

In a large cross-sectional survey, the prevalence of nocturnal symptoms was 60%. Forty-two percent of patients who completed the study did not declare nocturnal symptoms that were detected by physicians. A recent study including 47 individuals with nocturnal and nonnocturnal asthma showed that allele genotype Gly16 was significantly higher in the nocturnal asthma group (72%) compared with the nonnocturnal asthma group (54%). A randomized double-blind study of nocturnal asthma with esomeprazole improved the peak expiratory flow rate in individuals with both nocturnal asthma and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Of patients with nocturnal asthma and snoring, 48% had obstructive sleep apnea. After continuous positive airway pressure treatment, there was significant improvement of asthma nighttime symptom scores; however, no significant difference in lung functions was observed.

SUMMARY

Nocturnal symptoms in asthma are frequently underdiagnosed. Obstructive sleep apnea may be prevalent in nocturnal asthma. The Gly16 polymorphism of the beta2-receptor is common in nocturnal asthma. Gastric suppression treatment in patients with both gastroesophageal reflux disease and nocturnal asthma improved the peak expiratory flow rate. Continuous positive airway pressure improves nocturnal symptoms but not lung function tests.

Comparative drug effects: the case of GERD therapies

The results of clinical trials and approved Food and Drug Administration Drug Applications inform decision makers that a drug was effective in its labeled indications without causing unacceptable side effects. But purchasers for large medical organizations and members of health insurer or managed care organizations need relative effectiveness data to enable them to select the product from among the four, six, or ten competing alternative drug products available in that family. Retrospective studies are capable of providing this data after about a year of use by utilizing a database containing a large number of patients. An alternative means of determining this was explored using a new technique from a nationwide patient satisfaction study. Using GERD as an example, the authors were able to determine differences in patient satisfaction between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), H(2) antagonists, and antacids, and even within the PPI category, down to individual products. The piloted method is rapid and inexpensive and can be an alternative for clinicians developing disease management protocols for specific conditions.

Approach to managing undiagnosed chest pain: could gastroesophageal reflux disease be the cause?

OBJECTIVE

To highlight gastroesophageal reflux disease as a common cause of undiagnosed chest pain.

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

Diagnostic considerations are based on information in peer-reviewed articles retrieved from MEDLINE. Studies had to be in English and involve at least 30 subjects. Population-based studies had to have a sample size of at least 300 and a response rate of at least 60%. Thirty-seven relevant articles were found.

MAIN MESSAGE

Clinical management of patients presenting with diagnostically challenging chest pain starts with a careful search for coronary artery disease and other potentially life-threatening causes. Investigations must continue until the underlying disease is identified and symptoms have been effectively controlled. Ongoing symptoms of undiagnosed chest pain cause considerable suffering, impair quality of life, and add unnecessary costs to the health care system. In more than half the patients with undiagnosed chest pain, symptoms are caused by gastroesophageal disease. Empirical acid-suppressive therapy with a proton pump inhibitor can assist clinicians in identifying patients whose symptoms are acid-related.

CONCLUSION

Many patients with undiagnosed chest pain can be managed in primary care, minimizing the need for referrals and costly investigations.

Comparison of the effects of immediate-release omeprazole oral suspension, delayed-release lansoprazole capsules and delayed-release esomeprazole capsules on nocturnal gastric acidity after bedtime dosing in patients with night-time GERD symptoms

BACKGROUND

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients on proton pump inhibitors before breakfast or dinner have acid recovery at night. Bedtime immediate-release omeprazole (IR-OME) demonstrated better control of nocturnal pH than pantoprazole before dinner.

AIM

To compare repeated once daily bedtime dosing of IR-OME, lansoprazole and esomeprazole on nocturnal gastric acidity.

METHODS

Open-label, randomized, crossover study enrolling 54 patients with nocturnal GERD symptoms comparing IR-OME, lansoprazole and esomeprazole at steady state for nocturnal acid breakthrough (NAB), percentage of time with gastric pH > 4 and median gastric pH.

RESULTS

Onset of nocturnal acid control with IR-OME was rapid. During the first half of the night, percentage of time with gastric pH > 4 and median gastric pH were significantly higher after IR-OME compared to esomeprazole or lansoprazole (P < 0.001, both comparisons). Over the 8-h night-time period, acid control with IR-OME was significantly better than lansoprazole (P < 0.001), and comparable to esomeprazole. IR-OME reduced NAB compared with esomeprazole and lansoprazole (61% vs. 92% and 92%; P < 0.001, both comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

Bedtime IR-OME provided more rapid control of night-time gastric pH and decreased NAB compared with esomeprazole and lansoprazole. Nocturnal acid control with IR-OME was superior to lansoprazole and comparable to esomeprazole. Bedtime dosing with IR-OME may be effective for patients with night-time heartburn.

Meta-analysis: the efficacy of over-the-counter gastro-oesophageal reflux disease therapies

BACKGROUND

Over-the-counter histamine-2 receptor antagonists, antacids and alginate/antacids are commonly used for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

AIM

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of related treatment trials.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search and abstraction of randomized, placebo-controlled trials conducted during 1972-2005. Study quality was measured by the Jadad score (0-5). Results were pooled using random effects model.

RESULTS

Ten trials (n = 3442, placebo = 2940; Jadad score 3.5) showed a higher response with histamine-2 receptor antagonists in regard to complete relief of heartburn, symptomatic improvement, and episodes requiring rescue antacids. The absolute benefit increase was 10-12% and relative benefit increase was 19-41%. Four trials (n = 578, placebo = 577; Jadad score 3.5) showed a trend in favour of antacids in symptomatic improvement (absolute benefit increase 8%, 95% CI: 0-16%; relative benefit increase 0.11) and requirement of rescue antacids (OR 0.70, 95% CI: 0.59-0.84). Four trials (n = 146, placebo = 138; Jadad score 3.8) found alginate/antacid combination superior to placebo in symptomatic improvement (absolute benefit increase 26%, 95% CI: 12%-41%, relative benefit increase 0.60).

CONCLUSIONS

Over-the-counter medications are effective in treating symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Compared with the placebo response, which ranged between 37% and 64%, the relative benefit increase was up to 41% with histamine-2 receptor antagonists, 60% with alginate/antacid combinations, and 11% with antacids.

The efficacy of hydrotalcite compared with OTC famotidine in the on-demand treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND

Antacids and gastric acid inhibitors are effective in the self-treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim was to investigate onset of action of the antacid hydrotalcite compared with the OTC H2-receptor antagonist famotidine in patients suffering from heartburn.

MATERIAL/METHODS

A total of 53 patients with endoscopically diagnosed GERD grade 0-1 took part in this open, randomized, parallel-group comparison trial: 26 patients received a single dose of 1000 mg hydrotalcite and 27 patients a single dose of 10 mg famotidine on the occasion of a symptomatic reflux episode. Severity of heartburn and accompanying symptoms were documented on a four-point verbal rating scale (VRS) at baseline and up to four hours after intake. Onset and duration of action were defined by the number of patients experiencing improvement of heartburn from severe or moderate to mild or none compared with baseline.

RESULTS

Hydrotalcite was significantly superior (p<0.001) to famotidine in increasing the proportion of responders within the first 45 minutes, starting 10 minutes after drug intake. Between 60 and 120 minutes, both compounds showed equal efficacy. Three hours after intake the response rate was 90.9% for hydrotalcite and 92.0% for famotidine. After four hours the response rates were 86.4% for hydrotalcite and 96.0% for famotidine. In both groups, no adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that hydrotalcite relieves the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux faster than OTC famotidine and is equally effective for up to two hours. It is a safe and effective self-medication for on-demand treatment of heartburn.

[Modern attitude towards management of laryngopharyngeal form of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Lithuanian clinical practice guidelines for adults]

The aim of this article is to introduce Lithuanian clinical practice guidelines for the management of laryngopharyngeal form of gastroesophageal reflux disease for standardization of the diagnosis and treatment of the disease and prevention of its complications. Composed guidelines provide recommendations for primary care physicians as well as otorhinolaryngologists and gastroenterologists for the management of adults with uncomplicated laryngopharyngeal form of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Committee composed of experts from Lithuanian Otorhinolaryngological and Gastroenterological Societies developed guidelines based on a comprehensive review of the evidence-based literature related to laryngopharyngeal form of gastroesophageal reflux disease and guidelines of other countries. The guidelines provide description of each medicine groups with emphasis on proton pump inhibitors as the most effective drugs for the treatment of laryngopharyngeal form of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Indications for empirical treatment with proton pump inhibitors are described, as well as duration of treatment, doses, optimal regimen of use, and assessment of treatment efficacy. The therapy should begin with the application of proton pump inhibitors twice daily, before meal for three months. Combined therapy for nonresponders is described. Algorithm for stopping the medication is recommended. These recommendations may provide an efficient and economical approach to the management of this problem.

Endoscopic gastroplication for the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a randomised, sham-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is rapidly emerging, but there is a great need for randomised controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A single-centre, double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial of endoscopic gastroplication by the Endocinch suturing system.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

60 patients with GORD were randomly assigned to three endoscopic gastroplications (n = 20), a sham procedure (n = 20) or observation (n = 20). The research nurse and patients in the active and sham groups were blinded to the procedure assignment. After 3 months, open-label active treatment was offered to all patients.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measures were proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and GORD symptoms, and secondary measures were quality of life, 24-h oesophageal acid exposure, oesophageal manometry and adverse events. Follow-up assessments were performed at 3, 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

At 3 months, the percentage of patients who had reduced drug use by > or =50% was greater in the active treatment group (65%) than in the sham (25%) or observation groups (0%) (p<0.02). Symptoms (heartburn and to a lesser extent regurgitation) improved more in the active group than in the sham group. Three Short Form-20 quality of life subscales (role function, general health and bodily pain perception) improved in the active group versus sham. Oesophageal acid exposure was modestly decreased after active treatment (p<0.02), but not significantly greater than after the sham procedure (p = 0.61). The active treatment effects on PPI use, symptoms and quality of life persisted after 6 and 12 months of open-label follow-up (n = 41), but 29% of patients were retreated in this period. No serious adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic gastroplication, using the Endocinch device, reduced acid-inhibitory drug use, improved GORD symptoms and improved the quality of life at 3 months compared with a sham procedure. The effects persisted up to 12 months. However, the reduction in oesophageal acid exposure was not greater after endoscopic treatment than after a sham procedure.

Endoscopic full-thickness plication for the treatment of GERD: long-term multicenter results

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study was to assess the long-term safety and durability of effect for endoscopic full-thickness plication for the treatment of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The Plicator (NDO Surgical, Inc., Mansfield, MA) used delivers a transmural suture through the gastric cardia to restructure the antireflux barrier. Published reports have shown the Plicator procedure to be effective in reducing GERD symptoms and medication use at 1 year post-plication.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with chronic heartburn requiring maintenance daily anti-secretory therapy were treated at five sites. Patients received a single full-thickness plication in the gastric cardia 1cm below the gastroesophageal junction (GE) junction. Re-treatments were not permitted. Patients were evaluated at baseline for GERD symptoms and medication use. Intermediate (12 month) and long-term subject follow-up (median follow-up: 36.4 months; range, 31.2-43.9 months) were completed to evaluate procedure safety and durability of effect.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients completed the 12-month and 36-month follow-up. All procedure-related adverse events occurred acutely, and no new events were observed during extended follow-up. At 36-months post-procedure, 57% (16/28) of baseline proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-dependent patients remained off daily PPI therapy. Treatment effect remained stable from 12- to 36-months, with 21/29 patients off daily PPI at 12 months compared to 17/29 patients at 36-months. Median GERD- Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) scores remained significantly improved at 36 months versus baseline off-meds scores (8 versus 19, p < 0.001). In addition, the proportion of patients achieving > or = 50% improvement in GERD-HRQL score was consistent from 12 months (59%) to 36 months (55%).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic full-thickness plication can reduce GERD symptoms and medication use for at least 3-years post-procedure. Treatment effect is stable from 1 to 3 years, and there are no long-term procedural adverse effects.

Acid-suppressing drugs and gastroesophageal reflux disease as risk factors for acute pancreatitis--results from a Swedish Case-Control Study

PURPOSE

To study risk factors for acute pancreatitis, here with emphasis on gastro-intestinal diseases and their treatments.

METHODS

Population based case-control study covering four areas in Sweden encompassing 2.2 million inhabitants. Included were 462 incident cases of acute pancreatitis aged 20-85 years, hospitalized from 1 January 1995-31 May 1998, and 1,781 unmatched controls randomly selected from the study base using a population register. Information was captured from medical records and structured telephone interviews.

RESULTS

Current use of H(2) antagonists starting within 6 months of index-date was associated with acute pancreatitis with an adjusted OR of 4.9 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6-15), and current use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) with an adjusted OR of 3.2 (95%CI 1.4-7.4). For both drug classes, the ORs tended to be higher at higher doses. Gastritis/gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) within the last 12 months not treated with PPIs or H(2)-antagonists and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) not treated with anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive drugs were associated with development of acute pancreatitis with adjusted odds ratios (OR) of 1.9 (95%CI 1.2-3.0) and 5.1 (95%CI 2.0-13) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Current IBD without treatment and gastritis/GERD without treatment were found to be associated with increased risks to develop acute pancreatitis but the nature of the latter association needs to be further evaluated. On balance, we judge that the observed associations between current use of H(2)-antagonists and PPIs and increased risk of acute pancreatitis are unlikely to be explained by bias.

What over-the-counter preparations are pregnant women taking? A literature review

AIM

This paper presents an overview of current literature relating to over-the-counter and herbal preparations use, with a focus on pregnancy.

BACKGROUND

Internationally, there has been a shift towards self-medication through over-the-counter release of many prescription-category drugs and wider acceptance and use of herbal preparations. The general community perception that these preparations are safe may lead to inappropriate use, especially during pregnancy.

METHOD

A range of databases was searched to identify papers addressing 'over-the-counter preparations/medications', 'non-prescription medications', 'herbal preparations' and 'pregnancy', including Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing, Allied Health Literature, Proquest and Sciencedirect. Midwifery, nursing and scientific papers published from 2000 onwards were included, along with a small number of scientific papers published from 1995 onwards, and some key textbooks to clarify the definitions.

FINDINGS

Pregnant women use a range of over-the-counter preparations, including analgesics, antihistamines, antacids and a variety of herbal preparations. However, in many cases, it is unclear whether their use is actually safe in the short- or long-term for mother or baby, owing to an inadequate evidence-base to support the use of these preparations during pregnancy.

CONCLUSION

While there is extensive literature on the use of over-the-counter preparations generally, less is available about their use in pregnancy. Further research is needed to explore the prevalence of use and effects of these preparations in pregnancy and neonatal outcomes, and to support midwives and nurses in harm minimization through the promotion of informed risk-avoidance behaviours.

Use of antisecretory drugs among consumers of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the general population

BACKGROUND

Overall success of prophylactic strategies against non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) complications depends on the use of gastroprotective drugs.

AIM

We examined the use of antisecretory drugs in NSAID users in the general population of Spain.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

In 2002, a phone interview was conducted with 2500 persons representative of the general population of Spain. Using a validated questionnaire, we asked about the use of NSAID, aspirin and antisecretory drugs, and history of digestive diseases. We estimated the use of antisecretory drugs in NSAID users, according to risk factors for gastrointestinal (GI) lesions associated with NSAID.

RESULTS

In total, 425 persons [17.0% (95% CI 15.5-18.5%)] were NSAID users. Of them, 69 persons (16.2%; 95% CI 12.7-19.7%) used antisecretory drugs [proton pump inhibitor (PPI) 11.8% and H2-blocker 4.9%]. Forty-four of the 224 NSAID users (19.6%) with one risk factor for GI lesions were antisecretory drug users (PPI 16%; H2-blocker 4%), compared with 24 of the 197 NSAID users (12.7%) without risk factors (PPI 6.6%; H2-blocker 6.1%). NSAID users with risk factors for GI lesions but without upper GI (UGI) symptoms did not consume more antisecretory drugs than equivalent non-NSAID users (12.9% vs. 10.7%).

CONCLUSION

Current strategies to prevent GI lesions in NSAID users are not effective from a population perspective, especially in subjects without UGI symptoms.

Comparative analysis of prevalence, risk factors, and molecular epidemiology of antibiotic-associated diarrhea due to Clostridium difficile, Clostridium perfringens, and Staphylococcus aureus

We prospectively studied the comparative epidemiology and risk factors for Clostridium difficile, Clostridium perfringens, and Staphylococcus aureus antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD). Four thousand six hundred fifty-nine inpatient fecal specimens (11 months) were tested for C. difficile cytotoxin, C. perfringens enterotoxin, and S. aureus by Vero cell assay, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and growth on fresh blood agar, respectively. Two distinct age-, sex-, and location-matched control patient groups were used for multivariate logistic regression risk factor analyses: symptomatic patients who were AAD pathogen negative and asymptomatic patients with histories of recent antimicrobial therapy. All AAD pathogen isolates were DNA fingerprinted. In AAD cases, the prevalences of C. difficile cytotoxin, C. perfringens enterotoxin, and S. aureus were 12.7%, 3.3%, and 0.2%, respectively (15.8% overall). Age of >70 years was a common risk factor. Other risk factors for infective AAD and C. difficile AAD included length of hospital stay and use of feeding tubes (length of stay odds ratios [OR], 1.017 and 1.012; feeding tube OR, 1.864 and 2.808). Female gender and use of antacids were significantly associated with increased risk of C. perfringens AAD (OR, 2.08 and 2.789, respectively), but unlike what was found for C. difficile AAD, specific antibiotic classes were not associated with increased risk. A limited number of genotypes caused the majority of C. difficile and C. perfringens AAD cases. Similar to what was found for C. difficile AAD, there was epidemiological evidence of C. perfringens AAD case clustering and reinfection due to different strains. C. difficile AAD was approximately 4 and 60 times more common than C. perfringens AAD and S. aureus AAD, respectively. Risk factors for these AAD pathogens differed, highlighting the need to define specific control measures. There is evidence of nosocomial transmission in cases of C. perfringens AAD.

A comparison between sodium alginate and magaldrate anhydrous in the treatment of patients with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms

The aims of the present study were to compare effects of sodium alginate and the antacid magaldrate anhydrous in adults with gastroesophageal reflux (GOR) symptoms. Patients with heartburn and/or acid regurgitation for at least 3 days in the week before the study started (n=203) were randomized to receive a single dose of sodium alginate or magaldrate anhydrous at the onset of symptoms during a 3-day run-in period. Patients with symptoms during the run-in (n=191) were rerandomized to receive a 14-day treatment with either drug given as four daily doses. A speed of action < or =30 min was significantly more frequent among patients in the alginate group (49.4% vs. 40.4%; P=0.0074). A trend toward a more prolonged duration of action (median: 16.5 vs. 12.7 hr) and a greater sum of the symptom intensity difference (median: 40.0 vs. 31.0) was observed in the sodium alginate group. Total disappearance of symptoms was reported in 81.6% and 73.9% of patients in the sodium alginate group and magaldrate group, respectively. We conclude that sodium alginate was faster than magaldrate in relieving GRO symptoms and showed a tendency toward a more prolonged duration of action and a higher level of efficacy.

Does delayed gastric emptying shorten the H pylori eradication period? A double blind clinical trial

AIM: To evaluate the gastric emptying inhibitory effects of sugar and levodopa on H pylori eradication period.

METHODS: A total of 139 consecutive patients were randomized into 6 groups. The participants with peptic ulcer disease or non-ulcer dyspepsia non-responding to other medications who were also H pylori-positive patients either with positive rapid urease test (RUT) or positive histology were included. All groups were pretreated with omeprazole for 2 d and then treated with quadruple therapy regimen (omeprazole, bismuth, tetracycline and metronidazole); all drugs were given twice daily. Groups 1 and 2 were treated for 3 d, groups 3, 4 and 5 for 7 d, and group 6 for 14 d. Groups 1 to 4 received sugar in the form of 10% sucrose syrup. Levodopa was prescribed for groups 1 and 3. Patients in groups 2 and 4 were given placebo for levodopa and groups 5 and 6 received placebos for both sugar and levodopa. Upper endoscopy and biopsies were carried out before treatment and two months after treatment. Eradication of H pylori was assessed by RUT and histology 8 wk later.

RESULTS: Thirty patients were excluded. Per-protocol analysis showed successful eradication in 53% in group 1, 56% in group 2, 58% in group 3, 33.3% in group 4, 28% in group 5, and 53% in group 6. Eradication rate, patient compliance and satisfaction were not significantly different between the groups.

CONCLUSION: It seems that adding sugar or levodopa or both to anti H pylori eradication regimens may lead to shorter duration of treatment.

Pharmacological interventions for non-ulcer dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

The commonest cause of upper gastrointestinal symptoms is non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD) and yet the pathophysiology of this condition has been poorly characterised and the optimum treatment is uncertain. It is estimated that pound450 million is spent on dyspepsia drugs in the UK each year.

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to determine the effectiveness of six classes of drugs (antacids, histamine H(2) antagonists, proton pump inhibitors, prokinetics, mucosal protecting agents and antimuscarinics) in the improvement of either the individual or global dyspepsia symptom scores and also quality of life scores patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2006), EMBASE (1988 to January 2006), CINAHL (1982 to January 2006), SIGLE, and reference lists of articles. We also contacted experts in the field and pharmaceutical companies. Trials were located through electronic searches of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and SIGLE, using appropriate subject headings and text words, searching bibliographies of retrieved articles, and through contacts with experts in the fields of dyspepsia and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing drugs of any of the six groups with each other or with placebo for non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility, trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 73 trials: prokinetics (19 trials with dichotomous outcomes evaluating 3178 participants; relative risk reduction (RRR) 33%; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 18% to 45%), H(2)RAs (12 trials evaluating 2,183 participants; RRR 23%; 95% CI 8% to 35%) and PPIs (10 trials evaluating 3,347 participants; RRR 13%; 95% CI 4% to 20%) were significantly more effective than placebo. Bismuth salts (six trials evaluating 311 participants; RRR 40%; 95% CI -3 to 65%) were superior to placebo but this was of marginal statistical significance. Antacids (one trial evaluating 109 participants; RRR -2%; 95% CI -36% to 24%) and sucralfate (two trials evaluating 246 participants; RRR 29%; 95% CI -40% to 64%) were not statistically significantly superior to placebo. A funnel plot suggested that the prokinetic results could be due to publication bias or other small study effects.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence that anti-secretory therapy may be effective in NUD. The trials evaluating prokinetic therapy are difficult to interpret as the meta-analysis result could have been due to publication bias. The effect of these drugs is likely to be small and many patients will need to take them on a long-term basis so economic analyses would be helpful and ideally the therapies assessed need to be inexpensive and well tolerated.

A randomised controlled trial of ablation of Barrett's oesophagus with multipolar electrocoagulation versus argon plasma coagulation in combination with acid suppression: long term results

BACKGROUND

Many modalities have been used to ablate Barrett's oesophagus (BO). However, long term results and comparative effectiveness are unknown.

AIMS

Our aim was to compare the long term efficacy of achieving complete reversal (endoscopic and histological) between multipolar electrocoagulation (MPEC) and argon plasma coagulation (APC) in BO patients and assess factors influencing successful ablation.

METHODS

Patients with BO, 2-6 cm long, underwent 24 hour pH testing on proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. Patients were then randomised by BO length to undergo ablation with MPEC or APC every 4-8 weeks until endoscopic reversal or maximal of six treatment sessions.

RESULTS

Thirty five BO patients have been followed for at least two years following endoscopic ablation, 16 treated with MPEC and 19 with APC. There was complete reversal of BO in 24 patients (69%); 75% with MPEC and 63% with APC (p = 0.49). There was no difference in the number of sessions required in the two groups. There was no difference in age, pH results, BO length, PPI dose, or hiatal hernia size between patients with and without complete reversal. One patient developed an oesophageal stricture but there were no major complications such as bleeding or perforation.

CONCLUSIONS

In BO patients treated with MPEC or APC in combination with acid suppression, at long term follow up, complete reversal of BO can be maintained in approximately 70% of patients, irrespective of the technique. There are no predictors associated with achieving complete reversal of BO. Continued surveillance is still indicated in the post ablative setting. As yet, these techniques are not ready for clinical application (other than for high grade dysplasia or early oesophageal adenocarcinoma) and cannot be offered outside the research arena.

Antireflux surgery for non-erosive and erosive reflux disease in community practice

BACKGROUND

Antireflux surgery has been mainly evaluated in tertiary referral centres. Data regarding post-operative outcome in non-erosive reflux disease are lacking.

AIM

To assess long-term outcome after antireflux surgery performed in a community practice setting.

METHODS

We selected consecutively 60 non-erosive reflux disease patients and 61 erosive oesophagitis patients with symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. After surgery, each subject answered a validated disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire and another questionnaire focusing on symptoms, late morbidity and drug use.

RESULTS

After a 43-month median follow-up, an excellent outcome was reported by less than two-thirds of patients. Quality of life scores were lower in the non-erosive reflux disease group, especially in female patients. Non-erosive reflux disease patients reported more daily symptoms and more reflux-related symptoms (P = 0.04). Proton-pump inhibitor use was higher in non-erosive reflux disease patients (P < 0.005). Multivariate analysis identified four independent predictive factors associated with better outcome, namely male gender, abnormal preoperative acid exposure, a long duration of symptoms and surgical expertise.

CONCLUSIONS

In community practice, the results of antireflux surgery are inferior to those reported by tertiary centres. Outcome seems poorer in non-erosive reflux disease especially in female patients. Nearly one-third of the non-erosive reflux disease patients continue to take proton-pump inhibitors. These results highlight the need for careful selection of patients before antireflux surgery.

Impact of Helicobacter pylori on the management of dyspepsia in primary care

BACKGROUND

It is unclear what impact Helicobacter pylori infection has had on the management of dyspepsia in primary care and to what extent published guidelines on H. pylori are implemented in routine clinical practice.

AIM

To assess the impact of H. pylori infection on the management of dyspepsia in primary care.

METHODS

Patients referred by primary care doctors to an open-access 13-carbon urea breath test service over a 2-year period for their first urea breath test were included in the study. Individual breath results were linked with data on prescribing obtained from the General Medical Services prescription database.

RESULTS

Of 805 patients, 374 (47%) had a positive urea breath test and 431 (54%) a negative urea breath test. Of positive urea breath test patients, only 245 (64%) were prescribed eradication therapy in the 3 months after the breath test and only 43% were referred back for re-testing. In the year after the urea breath test, there was a significant fall in prescribing of antisecretory therapy which was greatest in the patients who received H. pylori therapy (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There appears to be under and inappropriate treatment of H. pylori infection in primary care, and a low rate of re-testing after eradication, indicating that current guidelines are not well implemented in practice.

Review article: current and emerging therapies for functional dyspepsia

Functional dyspepsia represents a heterogeneous group of gastrointestinal disorders marked by the presence of upper abdominal pain or discomfort. Although its precise definition has evolved over the last several decades, this disorder remains shrouded in controversy. The symptoms of functional dyspepsia may overlap with those of other functional bowel disorders including irritable bowel syndrome and non-erosive reflux disease. There may be coexistent psychological distress or disease complicating its presentation and response to therapy. Given the prevalence and chronicity of functional dyspepsia, it remains a great burden to society. Suspected physiological mechanisms underlying functional dyspepsia include altered motility, altered visceral sensation, inflammation, nervous system dysregulation and psychological distress. Yet the exact pathophysiological mechanisms that cause symptoms in an individual patient remain difficult to delineate. Numerous treatment modalities have been employed including dietary modifications, pharmacological agents directed at various targets within the gastrointestinal tract and central nervous system, psychological therapies and more recently, complementary and alternative treatments. Unfortunately, to date, all of these therapies have yielded only marginal results. A variety of emerging therapies are being developed for functional dyspepsia. Most of these therapies are intended to normalize pain perception and gastrointestinal motor and reflex function in this group of patients.

Routine prophylactic drugs in normal labour for reducing gastric aspiration and its effects

BACKGROUND

Women in normal labour may sometimes go on to have general anaesthesia if labour becomes abnormal, for example if a caesarean section is required. General anaesthesia carries a very small risk of regurgitation and inhalation of stomach contents into the lungs. This can cause inflammation, particularly if the fluid is acidic, and can lead to severe morbidity and very occasionally mortality. Labour hormones increase the risk of gastric aspiration or Mendelsohn's syndrome, though the exact incidence is unknown. The routine administration of acid prophylaxis drugs to all women in normal labour is commonly practiced worldwide, to reduce gastric aspiration by reducing the volume and acidity of stomach contents.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of routine prophylaxis drugs for women in normal labour to reduce gastric aspiration and its effects.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Trials Register (December 2005), EMBASE (1974 to April 2005) and CINAHL (1982 to April 2005).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of women in normal labour assessing the routine administration of drugs (antacids, H(2) receptor antagonists, dopamine antagonists and proton-pump inhibitors) compared with placebo/no treatment, and compared with other drugs for reducing gastric aspiration.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility, quality, extracted data and performed double-data entry.

MAIN RESULTS

Three trials were included, involving 2465 women, assessing the effects of antacids, H(2) receptor antagonists and dopamine antagonists. There were no trials on proton-pump inhibitors. None of the trials were of good quality, and none assessed the incidence of gastric aspiration, Mendelsohn's syndrome or their consequences. All the studies assessed vomiting, and there was limited evidence that vomiting may be reduced by antacids (relative risk (RR) 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27 to 0.77, n = 578, one trial) or by dopamine antagonists given alongside pethidine (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.68, n = 584, one trial). Comparisons between different drugs showed no significant differences, though the number of participants was small. There was no evidence that H(2) receptor antagonists improved outcomes compared with antacids, though only one trial addressed this issue.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no good evidence to support the routine administration of acid prophylaxis drugs in normal labour to prevent gastric aspiration and its consequences. Giving such drugs to women once a decision to give general anaesthesia is made, is assessed in another Cochrane review.

Oesophageal acid exposure and altered neurocardiac function in patients with GERD and idiopathic cardiac dysrhythmias

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal sensory stimuli alter neurocardiac function through autonomic reflexes.

AIM

To evaluate in patients with idiopathic supraventricular cardiac dysrhythmias and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) whether GE reflux alters neurocardiac function and the effect of acid suppression on cardiac symptoms.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients (13 females and 19 males; age: 20-69 years) with dysrhythmias plus GERD, and nine patients (five females and four males; age: 43-58 years) with GERD only, underwent simultaneous 24-h pH-metry and ECG monitoring. Power spectrum analysis of heart rate variability (PSHRV) was obtained with both its low frequency (LF, sympathetic modulation) and high frequency (HF, vagal modulation) components. Hourly mean oesophageal pH and LF/HF ratio were correlated. A 3 months full-dosage PPI therapy (esomeprazole 40 mg/day) was prescribed.

RESULTS

In 18 (56%) of the 32 patients with dysrhythmia and in none with GERD only, a significant (P < 0.05) correlation between oesophageal pH and LF/HF ratio (oesophagus-heart correlation) was observed. A significant reduction of cardiac symptoms after PPI therapy was observed only in these patients (13/16 vs. 4/11, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study has identified a subgroup of dysrhythmic patients in whom the oesophageal acid stimulus elicited cardiac autonomic reflexes. In these patients acid suppression seems to improve GERD and cardiac symptoms.

Effects of low-power argon plasma coagulation thermoablation of Barrett's epithelium on oesophageal motility

INTRODUCTION

Oesophageal dysmotility contributes to the pathogenesis of Barrett's epithelium (BE) allowing prolonged mucosal contact with injurious refluxate. Argon plasma coagulation (APC) is effective for BE ablation, but it is unknown whether the procedure affects oesophageal motility.

AIM

To assess the effect of low power (30 W) APC therapy on oesophageal motility in patients with BE.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients with at least 4 cm of BE underwent oesophageal manometry before and after APC ablation. All were on proton pump inhibitors. Oesophageal body peristaltic wave duration and amplitude, and lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) pressure and length were compared before and after treatment.

RESULTS

In a total of 28 men and five women, with a mean age of 63.4 years (range 39-79) and mean BE length 6.5 cm (range 4-19), macroscopic clearance was achieved in 28 patients. A small statistically significant (P<0.05) increase in peristaltic wave amplitude was seen after APC [mean (SD) mmHg before versus after: 30.4 (15.2) versus 36.2 (20.1) at 13.5 cm, 47.6 (27.1) versus 54.5 (26.8) at 8.5 cm, and 51.2 (35.3) versus 58 (34.4) at 3.5 cm above the LOS]. No changes in either peristaltic wave duration or LOS parameters [mean (SD) pressure 10.6 (5.6) versus 10.3 (4.3) mmHg; length 2.8 (1.3) versus 2.8 (1.0) cm] were observed.

CONCLUSION

APC ablation of BE at a power setting of 30 W does not impair oesophageal motility.

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease refers to reflux of gastric contents into the oesophagus leading to oesophagitis, reflux symptoms sufficient to impair quality of life, or long-term complications. Transient relaxation of the lower oesophageal sphincter is believed to be the primary mechanism of the disease although the underlying cause remains uncertain. Obesity and smoking are weakly associated with the disease and genetic factors might be important. A negative association with Helicobacter pylori exists, but eradication of H pylori does not seem to cause reflux disease. Diagnosis is imprecise as there is no gold standard. Reflux symptoms are helpful in diagnosis but they lack sensitivity. Ambulatory oesophageal pH monitoring also seems to be insensitive despite high specificity. Empirical acid suppression with a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) has reasonable sensitivity but poor specificity. Some evidence suggests that once patients develop the disease, severity is determined early and patients seem to continue with that phenotype long term. Unfortunately, most patients do not respond to life-style advice and require further therapy. H2 receptor antagonists and PPIs are better than placebo in oesophagitis, with a number needed to treat of five and two, respectively. In non-erosive reflux disease, acid suppression is better than placebo but the response rate is lower. Most patients need long-term treatment because the disease usually relapses. The role of endoscopic therapy is uncertain. Anti-reflux surgery is probably as effective as PPI therapy although there is a low operative mortality and morbidity.

Prescribing of acid suppressive therapy: interactions between hospital and primary care

BACKGROUND

Overuse of acid suppressive therapy in the hospital setting and in primary care is well documented.

AIM

To describe interactions between prescriptions of acid suppressive therapy in hospital and in primary care.

METHODS

All patients admitted to hospital over a 24-month period were identified. Details about prescription of acid suppressive therapy were retrieved. All prescriptions of acid suppressive therapy redeemed by these patients 12 months before and after discharge were retrieved from a prescription database.

RESULTS

A total of 549 of 4477 patients (12.3%) were treated with acid suppressive therapy while in hospital, but acid suppressive therapy was prescribed de novo in only 192 (35%) of these cases. Information about indication for acid suppressive therapy and planned duration of therapy were given in the discharge letter in only 25% and 17% of the cases, respectively. Among patients treated with acid suppressive therapy during admission, prescriptions on acid suppressive therapy were redeemed by 67% in the year before admission and by 74% in the year after discharge. Among patients who had the acid suppressive therapy discontinued during admission (n = 67), 48% resumed acid suppressive therapy within the following 12 months. Of all subjects treated with acid suppressive therapy in the hospital catchment area, 7.8% were seen in our department.

CONCLUSIONS

Decisions about acid suppressive therapy prescribing in hospital has little influence on prescribing in primary care.

Review article: the opportunities and benefits of extended acid suppression

Acid suppression therapy with proton pump inhibitors is associated with well-established benefits in the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux (GERD) and other acid-related disorders. However, a number of issues still remain unsettled. Despite their clinical efficacy, when given once daily, currently available proton pump inhibitors may not adequately control intragastric acidity during the night in a significant proportion of both healthy subjects and GERD patients, in whom symptom relief remains suboptimal. Although some novel proton pump inhibitors have been synthesized, only few reached clinical testing. Amongst them, tenatoprazole represents a true advance displaying a long half-life (five to seven times longer than that of currently available drugs) and extended acid suppression covering both day and night. All the available clinical studies suggest both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic advantages of tenatoprazole over esomeprazole. As this last compound provides - amongst the members of the class - the most effective control of intragastric pH whatever the parameter considered, it is conceivable that tenatoprazole could similarly be better than the other existing proton pump inhibitors. Tenatoprazole appears to be a promising proton pump inhibitor for the treatment of acid-related diseases, where it has the potential to address unmet clinical needs.

Review article: the clinical pharmacology of proton pump inhibitors

Proton pump inhibitors inhibit the gastric H+/K+-ATPase via covalent binding to cysteine residues of the proton pump. All proton pump inhibitors must undergo acid accumulation in the parietal cell through protonation, followed by activation mediated by a second protonation at the active secretory canaliculus of the parietal cell. The relative ease with which these steps occur with different proton pump inhibitors underlies differences in their rates of activation, which in turn influence the location of covalent binding and the stability of inhibition. Slow activation is associated with binding to a cysteine residue involved in proton transport that is located deep in the membrane. However, this is inaccessible to the endogenous reducing agents responsible for restoring H+/K+-ATPase activity, favouring a longer duration of gastric acid inhibition. Pantoprazole and tenatoprazole, a novel proton pump inhibitor which has an imidazopyridine ring in place of the benzimidazole moiety found in other proton pump inhibitors, are activated more slowly than other proton pump inhibitors but their inhibition is resistant to reversal. In addition, tenatoprazole has a greatly extended plasma half-life in comparison with all other proton pump inhibitors. The chemical and pharmacological characteristics of tenatoprazole give it theoretical advantages over benzimidazole-based proton pump inhibitors that should translate into improved acid control, particularly during the night.

Flow and sequential injection methods for the spectrofluorimetric determination of aluminium in pharmaceutical products using chromotropic acid as chromogenic reagent

This work reports rapid and sensitive FI and SI spectrofluorimetric methods for the determination of aluminium in pharmaceutical formulations. The methods are based on the reaction of aluminium with chromotropic acid (CA) in acidic medium to form a water-soluble complex (lambdaex.=360 nm, lambdaem.=385 nm). The proposed methods were validated in terms of linearity, repeatability, detection limit, accuracy and selectivity. The calibration curves were linear over the range of 0.03-2.0 and 0.1-4.0mg/l of aluminium using the FI and SI assays, respectively. The repeatabilities (sr=0.8% and 1.1% at 1mg/l aluminium using the FI and the SI assay, respectively, n=12) were satisfactory. The FI and SI methods proved to be adequately selective and sensitive with respective 3sigma limits of detection equal to cL=0.01 and 0.03 mg/l Al(III). The sampling rates were 120 and 72 h(-1) with the FI and SI assay. The methods were applied successfully to the analysis of pharmaceutical formulations (tablets and suspensions). The results were in good agreement with those by an official reference method and the nominal values of the pharmaceutical products.