Surgical resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer: a systematic review of published studies

Factors that influence treatment strategies in advanced colorectal cancer

This review focuses on the factors that now influence our treatment strategies designed to increase the pool of patients with colorectal liver metastases for whom curative treatment may be possible. These strategies include improved preoperative staging techniques, new standards for surgical resection, novel surgical strategies, the application of modern systemic chemotherapy in a neoadjuvant setting, an emerging role for ablative therapies and an emphasis on the collaborative, a reappraisal of staging advanced disease, multidisciplinary management, and defining the role of the patient in managing their disease. It is now clear that an aggressive multi-disciplinary approach to the management of this problem will lead to nearly one third of these patients being considered for treatment that even if not achieving complete cure, offers significant long-term survival.

A critical appraisal of the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases: a case-controlled study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of patients that received neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and compare them with a matched cohort of patients that underwent resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

687 patients have undergone curative resection between January 1993 and January 2006. In this period, 84 patients received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and 71 of this group went on to resection. A control group was chosen, matched with these patients, made up of patients who underwent resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

There was no difference in clinico-pathological features between the neoadjuvant and the control group. However patients in the control group had more-extended resections and longer hospital stays than those in the neoadjuvant group (p = 0.015). Patients in the control group had an increased incidence of early recurrences (p < 0.001). Despite this, there was no significant difference in either the cancer-specific or the disease-free survival between the two groups of patients.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has a role in the management of patients with disease that is considered initially unresectable as a down-sizing technique. In patients with resectable disease, the test-of-time approach that neoadjuvant therapy offers is yet to be proven.

Radiofrequency ablation versus resection for resectable colorectal liver metastases: time for a randomized trial?

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection is the gold standard in the treatment of resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). In several centers, resection is being replaced by radiofrequency ablation (RFA), even though there is no evidence yet from randomized trials to support this. The aim of this study was to critically review the oncological evidence for and against the use of RFA for resectable CRLM.

METHODS

An exhaustive review of RFA of colorectal metastases was carried out.

RESULTS

Five-year survival data after RFA for resectable CRLM are not available. Percutaneous RFA is associated with worse local control, worse staging, and a small risk of electrode track seeding when compared with resection (level V evidence). For tumors </=3 cm, local control after surgical RFA is equivalent to resection, especially if applied by experienced physicians to nonperivascular tumors (level V evidence). There is indirect evidence for profoundly different biological effects of RFA and resection.

CONCLUSIONS

A subgroup of patients has been identified for whom local control after RFA might be equivalent to resection. Whether this is true, and whether this translates into equivalent survival, remains to be proven. The time has come for a randomized trial.

Liver resection for metastases from renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of liver resection in patients with hepatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma and to identify selection criteria for patients suitable for resection.

METHODS

Between January 1988 and March 2006, 31 patients underwent liver resection for metastases from renal cell carcinoma. Patients were identified from a prospective database and retrospectively reviewed. Patient, tumor, and operative parameters were analyzed for their influence on long-term survival.

RESULTS

The overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 82.2%, 54.3%, and 38.9%, respectively. One patient was deceased and 4 developed complications during the postoperative course. In the univariate analysis, site of the primary tumor (P = 0.013), disease-free interval (P = 0.012), and resection margins (P = 0.008) showed significant influence on long-term survival. In the multivariate analysis, only the resection margins were identified as an independent prognostic factor after liver resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver resection is effective and safe in the treatment of patients with hepatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma and offers the chance of long-term survival and cure. Achieving a margin-negative resection is the most important criterion in the selection of suitable patients for liver resection. However, the number of patients in the present study was small, and investigations of larger series may provide further prognostic parameters in these patients.

Prudent application of radiofrequency ablation in resectable colorectal liver metastasis

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for liver metastasis of colorectal (H-CRC) origin is a well-documented technique in surgically unresectable disease. Overall recurrence figures appear inferior to resection but are based on a selection of patients with unresectable disease, often due to multiple localisations of extensive disease. Lesion based recurrence is probably more appropriate to predict results of RFA in surgically resectable H-CRC and figures may be good enough to consider RFA an alternative treatment in high risk patients.

Surgical resection of pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer: a systematic review of published series

The treatment of patients with pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer continues to evolve. Recently the use of novel agents as a first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal disease has generated cautious optimism in the oncological community. However, pulmonary metastasectomy remains a mainstay in a multidisciplinary concept for a highly selected subset of patients. A selected group of patients with metastases limited to the lungs may benefit from pulmonary metastasectomy with a 5-year survival rate of up to more than 50%. This review evaluates the current status of surgical resection in pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer, with special emphasis on prognostic factors that influence survival, as well as on surgical approach and lymph node dissection and its impact on the management of patients with metastatic colorectal disease.

Two-stage Hepatectomy Approach for Initially Unresectable Colorectal Hepatic Metastases

Two-stage hepatectomy has been developed as a surgical strategy for extremely difficult cases of bilobar multinodular metastatic liver disease. This strategy is applied when it is impossible to resect all malignant lesions in a single procedure. The main principle of this approach is sequential resection by a two-staged hepatectomy. Its goal is to achieve a complete metastasectomy in those cases in which a complete resection with a single hepatectomy would have left a remnant postresection liver too small for patient survival. This article describes strategic surgical approaches to multinodular metastatic disease and provides decision guidelines for two-stage hepatectomies.

Surgical and Nonsurgical Therapy for Lung Metastasis: Indications and Outcomes

The management of pulmonary metastasis is a broad and multifaceted topic. Because of the filtration function and the favorable microenvironment of the lung, most malignancies cause pulmonary metastases. This article focuses on recent experience with secondary lung malignancies and their newer treatment options, indications, and technical aspects.

Tumour markers in colorectal cancer: European Group on Tumour Markers (EGTM) guidelines for clinical use

The aim of this article is to present updated guidelines for the use of serum, tissue and faecal markers in colorectal cancer (CRC). Lack of specificity and sensitivity preclude the use of all existing serum markers for the early detection of CRC. For patients with stage II or stage III CRC who may be candidates for either liver resection or systemic treatment should recurrence develop, CEA should be measured every 2-3 months for at least 3 years after diagnosis. Insufficient evidence exists to recommend routine use of tissue factors such as thymidylate synthase, microsatellite instability (MSI), p53, K-ras and deleted in colon cancer (DCC) for either determining prognosis or predicting response to therapy in patients with CRC. Microsatellite instability, however, may be used as a pre-screen for patients with suspected hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Faecal occult blood testing but not faecal DNA markers may be used to screen asymptomatic subjects 50 years or older for early CRC.

Radiological staging of colorectal liver metastases

Rapid advances in imaging technology have improved the detection, characterization and staging of colorectal liver metastases. Multi-modality imaging approach is usually the more useful in staging colorectal liver metastases. Multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) remains the main imaging modality for preoperative planning, lesion detection and tumour surveillance. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and contrast enhanced ultrasonography (US) are invaluable in problem solving for characterization indeterminate lesions, while contrast enhanced intra-operative ultrasound (CE-IOUS) may be the new gold standard staging tool prior to liver resection. Ultimately, the imaging strategy has to be tailored to the clinical situation to obtain the most relevant information for optimal use of available imaging resources.

Perinecrotic hypoxia contributes to ischemia/reperfusion-accelerated outgrowth of colorectal micrometastases

Ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) is often inevitable during hepatic surgery and may stimulate the outgrowth of colorectal micrometastases. Postischemic microcirculatory disturbances contribute to I/R damage and may induce prolonged tissue hypoxia and consequent stabilization of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1alpha. The aim of this study was to evaluate the contribution of postischemic microcirculatory disturbances, hypoxia, and HIF-1alpha to I/R-accelerated tumor growth. Partial hepatic I/R attributable to temporary clamping of the left liver lobe induced microcirculatory failure for up to 5 days. This was accompanied by profound and prolonged perinecrotic tissue hypoxia, stabilization of HIF-1alpha, and massive perinecrotic outgrowth of pre-established micrometastases. Restoration of the microcirculation by treatment with Atrasentan and L-arginine minimized hypoxia and HIF-1alpha stabilization and reduced the accelerated outgrowth of micrometastases by 50%. Destabilization of HIF-1alpha by the HSP90 inhibitor 17-DMAG caused an increase in tissue necrosis but reduced I/R-stimulated tumor growth by more than 70%. In conclusion, prevention of postischemic microcirculatory disturbances and perinecrotic hypoxia reduces the accelerated outgrowth of colorectal liver metastases after I/R. This may, at least in part, be attributed to the prevention of HIF-1alpha stabilization. Prevention of tissue hypoxia or inhibition of HIF-1alpha may represent attractive approaches to limiting recurrent tumor growth after hepatic surgery.

Recurrence and Survival Outcomes after Hepatic Resection with or without Cryotherapy for Liver Metastases from Colorectal Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Some reports support resection combined with cryotherapy for patients with multiple bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) that would otherwise be ineligible for curative treatments. This series demonstrates long-term results of 415 patients with CRLM who underwent resection with or without cryotherapy.

METHODS

Between April 1990 and January 2006, 291 patients were treated with resection only and 124 patients with combined resection and cryotherapy. Recurrence and survival outcomes were compared. Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression analyses were used to identify significant prognostic indicators for survival.

RESULTS

Median length of follow-up was 25 months (range 1-124 months). The 30-day perioperative mortality rate was 3.1%. Overall median survival was 32 months (range 1-124 months), with 1-, 3- and 5-year survival values of 85%, 45% and 29%, respectively. The overall recurrence rates were 66% and 78% for resection and resection/cryotherapy groups, respectively. For the resection group, the median survival was 34 months, with 1-, 3- and 5- year survival values of 88%, 47% and 32%, respectively. The median survival for the resection/cryotherapy group was 29 months, with 1-, 3- and 5-year survival values of 84%, 43% and 24%, respectively (P = 0.206). Five factors were independently associated with an improved survival: absence of extrahepatic disease at diagnosis, well- or moderately-differentiated colorectal cancer, largest lesion size being 4 cm or less, a postoperative CEA of 5 ng/ml or less and absence of liver recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term survival results of resection combined with cryotherapy for multiple bilobar CRLM are comparable to that of resection alone in selected patients.

When professional opinion is not enough

Surgical resection of pulmonary metastases in patients with colorectal cancer is common practice, but Tom Treasure, Martin Utley, and Ian Hunt question the strength of evidence behind advice from NICE

Repeat liver resection for recurrent liver metastases from colorectal cancer

AIMS

Numerous patients suffer from recurrence after resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Recurrence is frequently restricted to the liver and repeat liver resection may offer a curative option in these patients. This study was conducted to clarify safety and effectiveness of this treatment and to identify prognostic factors of a favourable outcome after repeat hepatectomy.

METHODS

Between January 1988 and March 2006 in our institution 811 patients underwent 841 liver resections for metastases from colorectal cancer. Among these, 94 patients underwent a repeat hepatectomy. Patients were identified from a prospective database and retrospectively reviewed. Results of different time periods were assessed and prognostic factors for a favourable outcome were determined.

RESULTS

The perioperative morbidity and mortality was 24% (23 of 94) and 3% (3 of 94), respectively. The one-, three-, five- and ten-year survival for all patients in this series was 89%, 55%, 38% and 23%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, pT-stage of the primary, diameter of the largest metastases, surgical radicality, period of resection and distribution of metastases showed statistically significant influence on survival. The multivariate analysis revealed only pT-stage of the primary tumour, surgical radicality and period of resection as independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat hepatectomy is a safe and effective treatment for recurrent liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Perioperative risk and long-term survival were similar when compared to the results obtained during the initial resection. Achieving a curative resection is the most relevant prognostic factor for a favourable prognosis after repeat liver resection.

C-reactive protein as a predictor of prognosis following curative resection for colorectal liver metastases

There is increasing evidence that systemic inflammatory response has a positive correlation with a poorer outcome in patients undergoing resection for solid tumours. The aim of this study was to analyse the impact of an elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), an outcome following curative resection for colorectal liver metastases. One hundred and seventy patients who underwent curative resection for colorectal liver metastases were included in the study. Laboratory measurements of haemoglobin, white cell, platelets, albumin and CRP were taken on the day before surgery. Elevated CRP (>10 mg l(-1)) was present in 54 (31.8%) patients. The median survival of patients with an elevated CRP was 19 months (95% CI 7.5-31.2 months) compared to 42.8 months (95% CI 33.2-52.5 months) for those with a normal CRP, P=0.004. Similarly, when assessing disease-free survival, patients with an elevated CRP had poorer disease-free survival (median of 11.8 months (95% CI 6.4-17.3) compared to median of 15.1 months (95% CI 11.1-19.1)), P=0.043. The result of the study showed that an elevated preoperative CRP is a predictor of poor outcome in patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal liver metastases.

Recent trends in liver resection surgery activity and population utilization rates in English regions

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a study to examine recent trends in population-based utilization rates for liver resection surgery in England, to help identify potentially unmet healthcare need and to help inform future service planning.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Hospital Episodes Statistics data were analysed for the 5-year period 2000-1 to 2004-5 to identify episodes of care relating to liver resection surgery (defined as OPSC IV codes J21 to J24, J31, J38 and J39).

RESULTS

In England, the liver excision surgery population access rate was 1.82 and 2.95/100,000 general population in 2000-1 and 2004-5, respectively--a 62% increase during the 5-year study period, or a mean 12% annual increase. About two-thirds of all liver resection surgery (69%) related to metastatic liver disease. Between English regions, utilization rates ranged from 0.5 to 4.5/100,000 general population in 2000-1; and from 0.8 to 4.6/100 000 general population in 2004-5.

DISCUSSION

In recent years, a rapid increase in liver resection surgery activity has been observed. Most of the activity was related to metastatic disease. There was substantial regional variation in population utilization rates within the same country. This variation is unlikely to represent regional differences in disease burden and healthcare need.

Colorectal liver metastases: current and future perspectives

This review focuses on a variety of recent strategies that have been designed to increase the pool of patients with colorectal liver metastases for whom curative treatment may be possible. These strategies include improved preoperative staging techniques, new standards for surgical resection, novel surgical strategies, the application of modern systemic chemotherapy in a neoadjuvant setting, an emerging role for ablative therapies and an emphasis on the collaborative, multidisciplinary management of this disease.