Safety and Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Cancer and Preexisting Autoimmune Disease: A Nationwide, Multicenter Cohort Study

Evolving Management of Stage IV Melanoma

Significant advancements have been made in the treatment of advanced melanoma with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, novel immunotherapies, and BRAF/MEK-targeted therapies with numerous frontline treatment options. However, there remains suboptimal evidence to guide treatment decisions in many patients. These include patients with newly diagnosed disease, immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-resistant/ICI-refractory disease, CNS metastases, history of autoimmune disease, and/or immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare melanoma associated with a poor prognosis in the metastatic setting. Systemic treatments, including checkpoint inhibitors, failed to demonstrate any survival benefit. Tebentafusp, a bispecific molecule, is the first treatment to improve overall survival (OS) in patients with HLA A*02:01-positive metastatic UM.

Balancing the Risk of Adverse Events against the Efficacy of Immunotherapy in Advanced Thymic Epithelial Tumors

Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare thoracic malignancies with a favorable prognosis when complete surgical resection can be achieved. Therapeutic options for advanced, irresectable, or recurrent disease are limited and currently, a therapeutic standard treatment beyond platinum-based chemotherapy is undefined. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are effective against TETs, however their use is associated with a serious risk of immune-mediated toxicity. In this article, we highlight new insights regarding markers of predictive value for both treatment efficacy and risk of adverse effects in immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment for thymic epithelial tumors.

Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced cancer patients with autoimmune disease: A meta-analysis

Cancer patients with autoimmune disease (AID) are usually excluded from clinical trials involving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The available electronic databases were systematically searched from inception until July 3, 2022. We recorded the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) data of included studies. This meta-analysis included 14 studies comprising 11511 participants; however, only 8716 participants were treated with ICI. Therefore, the analysis was conducted on 8716 patients (769 patients with AID compared to 7947 patients without AID). The pooled risk ratio (RR) for any grade and grade ≥3 irAEs was 1.74 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27-2.37) and 1.43 (95% CI: 1.10-1.88), respectively. The irAEs in the same system as that of the AID were referred to as AID-homogeneous irAEs; in the other cases, there were referred to as AID-heterogeneous irAEs. Subgroup analysis found that the higher risk of AID-homogeneous irAEs contributed to the higher risk of overall irAEs among patients with AID. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) for PFS and OS was 1.09 (95% CI: 0.96-1.24) and 1.07 (95% CI: 0.94-1.22), respectively. The results of PFS and OS subgroup analyses matched the overall results. Patients with AID had a significantly higher risk of developing any grade and ≥3 grade irAEs under ICI therapy, specifically AID-homogeneous irAEs; however, the frequency of AID-heterogeneous irAEs in patients with AID was similar to irAEs in patients without AID. No statistically significant differences in PFS and OS were observed between the two groups.

Drug Repurposing at the Interface of Melanoma Immunotherapy and Autoimmune Disease

Cancer cells have a remarkable ability to evade recognition and destruction by the immune system. At the same time, cancer has been associated with chronic inflammation, while certain autoimmune diseases predispose to the development of neoplasia. Although cancer immunotherapy has revolutionized antitumor treatment, immune-related toxicities and adverse events detract from the clinical utility of even the most advanced drugs, especially in patients with both, metastatic cancer and pre-existing autoimmune diseases. Here, the combination of multi-omics, data-driven computational approaches with the application of network concepts enables in-depth analyses of the dynamic links between cancer, autoimmune diseases, and drugs. In this review, we focus on molecular and epigenetic metastasis-related processes within cancer cells and the immune microenvironment. With melanoma as a model, we uncover vulnerabilities for drug development to control cancer progression and immune responses. Thereby, drug repurposing allows taking advantage of existing safety profiles and established pharmacokinetic properties of approved agents. These procedures promise faster access and optimal management for cancer treatment. Together, these approaches provide new disease-based and data-driven opportunities for the prediction and application of targeted and clinically used drugs at the interface of immune-mediated diseases and cancer towards next-generation immunotherapies.

Treatment of rheumatic adverse events of cancer immunotherapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), used to treat many advanced cancers, activate the immune system to elicit an antitumor response. ICIs can also cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) when nontumor tissues are affected by excess inflammation and autoimmunity. Rheumatic irAEs include inflammatory arthritis, myositis, sicca syndrome, polymyalgia rheumatica, and several other rare phenotypes. Treating rheumatic irAEs requires balancing the desire to decrease off-target inflammation while not negatively impacting the antitumor immune response. In this review, treatment recommendations for rheumatic irAEs have been discussed. Pathogenesis of rheumatic irAEs has been briefly reviewed. Knowledge about the effects of corticosteroids and steroid-sparing agents on tumor responses has been detailed to give context for treatment decisions. Recommendations ultimately depend not only on the clinical presentation and severity of the irAE but also on the goals of cancer treatment. Finally, how to safely use ICI therapy in patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases is considered.

Pre-Existing Autoimmune Disease Increases the Risk of Cardiovascular and Noncardiovascular Events After Immunotherapy

Background

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is associated with cardiovascular (CV) events, and patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease are at increased CV risk.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to characterize the risk for CV events in patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease post-ICI.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of 6,683 patients treated with ICIs within an academic network. Autoimmune disease prior to ICI was confirmed by chart review. Baseline characteristics and risk for CV and non-CV immune-related adverse events were compared with a matched control group (1:1 ratio) of ICI patients without autoimmune disease. Matching was based on age, sex, history of coronary artery disease, history of heart failure, and diabetes mellitus. CV events were a composite of myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass graft, stroke, transient ischemic attack, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or myocarditis. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the association between autoimmune disease and CV events.

Results

Among 502 patients treated with ICIs, 251 patients with and 251 patients without autoimmune disease were studied. During a median follow-up period of 205 days, there were 45 CV events among patients with autoimmune disease and 22 CV events among control subjects (adjusted HR: 1.77; 95% CI: 1.04-3.03; P = 0.0364). Of the non-CV immune-related adverse events, there were increased rates of psoriasis (11.2% vs 0.4%; P < 0.001) and colitis (24.3% vs 16.7%; P = 0.045) in patients with autoimmune disease.

Conclusions

Patients with autoimmune disease have an increased risk for CV and non-CV events post-ICI.

Immune-related adverse events in patients with pre-existing autoimmune rheumatologic disease on immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

Introduction

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) enhance the immune system’s ability to target and destroy cancer cells, but this non-specific immune overactivation can result in immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Patients with underlying autoimmune diseases were excluded from the original ICI clinical trials because of the theoretical risk of irAEs. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of irAEs in patients with pre-existing rheumatologic diseases on ICIs, impact of anti-rheumatic therapy on irAEs, and malignancy outcomes.

Methods

We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with a pre-existing rheumatologic diagnosis receiving ICIs at the University of North Carolina from 2014 to 2019. Risk differences (RD) and asymptotic 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) using a continuity correction along with odds ratios (OR) and exact 95% CIs were produced between pre-specified risk factors and flares of the underlying rheumatologic disease and/or irAEs. Kaplan–Meier survival estimates for time to unfavorable cancer response between subsets of patients were compared using the log-rank test.

Results

We identified 45 patients receiving an ICI with an underlying rheumatologic diagnosis, including 22 with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Overall, 13 patients (29%) had a flare of their autoimmune disease, 20 patients (44%) had a new-onset irAE, and 27 (60%) had either a flare or new-onset irAE. Patients with RA had higher risk of flares compared to those with other rheumatologic disorders (45% vs 13%, RD 32%, 95% CI 2.0–56.8); all RA flares were ≤ grade 2 and treated in the outpatient setting. Concurrent treatment of the rheumatologic disease at the start of ICI therapy was not associated with a reduced risk of flare (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.19–3.76) or new onset irAE (OR 3.21, 95% CI 0.83–13.6) compared to those not on anti-rheumatic medications. Anti-rheumatic therapy did not impact time to unfavorable malignancy outcome (p = 0.52).

Conclusion

The majority of our study cohort experienced a flare or new onset irAE with ICI treatment. Treatment with anti-rheumatic therapy did not prevent disease flares or new onset irAEs, but did not negatively impact malignancy outcomes. Research is needed to determine safe anti-rheumatic therapy options to prevent flares and irAEs that do not interfere with malignancy outcomes.

Management of Cancer-Associated Myositis

Purpose of the Review

Cancer-associated myositis (CAM) is defined as when cancer appears within 3 years of myositis onset. Dermatomyositis and seronegative immune–mediated necrotizing myopathy are the phenotypes mostly related to cancer. In general, treatment principles in myositis patients with and without CAM are similar. However, some aspects of myositis management are particular to CAM, including (a) the need for a multidisciplinary approach and a close relationship with the oncologist, (b) the presence of immunosuppressive and antineoplastic drug interactions, and (c) the role of the long-term immunosuppressive therapy as a risk factor for cancer relapse or development of a second neoplasm. In this review, we will also discuss immunotherapy in patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors as a treatment for their cancer.

Recent Findings

Studies on cancer risk in patients treated with long-term immunosuppressive drugs, in autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis, and in solid organ transplant recipients have shed some light on this topic. Immunotherapy, which has been a great advance for the treatment of some types of malignancy, may be also of interest in CAM, given the special relationship between both disorders.

Summary

Management of CAM is a challenge. In this complex scenario, therapeutic decisions must consider both diseases simultaneously.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40674-022-00197-2.

Immune-related conditions and cancer-specific mortality among older adults with cancer in the United States

Immunity may play a role in preventing cancer progression. We studied associations of immune-related conditions with cancer-specific mortality among older adults in the United States. We evaluated 1 229 443 patients diagnosed with 20 common cancer types (age 67-99, years 1993-2013) using Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare data. With Medicare claims, we ascertained immune-related medical conditions diagnosed before cancer diagnosis (4 immunosuppressive conditions [n = 3380 affected cases], 32 autoimmune conditions [n = 155 766], 3 allergic conditions [n = 101 366]). For each cancer site, we estimated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for cancer-specific mortality associated with each condition, applying a Bonferroni cutoff for significance (P < 5.1 × 10-5 ). Bayesian metaanalysis methods were used to detect patterns across groups of conditions and cancers. We observed 21 associations with cancer-specific mortality at the Bonferroni threshold. Increased cancer-specific mortality was observed with rheumatoid arthritis for patients with melanoma (aHR 1.51, 95% CI 1.31-1.75) and breast cancer (1.24, 1.15-1.33)), and with hemolytic anemia for bladder cancer (2.54, 1.68-3.82). Significant inverse associations with cancer-specific mortality were observed for allergic rhinitis (range of aHRs: 0.84-0.94) and asthma (0.83-0.95) for cancers of the lung, breast, and prostate. Cancer-specific mortality was nominally elevated in patients with immunosuppressive conditions for eight cancer types (aHR range: 1.27-2.36; P-value range: 7.5 × 10-5 to 3.1 × 10-2 ) and was strongly associated with grouped immunosuppressive conditions using Bayesian metaanalyses methods. For older patients with several cancer types, certain immunosuppressive and autoimmune conditions were associated with increased cancer-specific mortality. In contrast, inverse associations with allergic conditions may reflect enhanced immune control of cancer.

Quality and content evaluation of websites with information about immune checkpoint inhibitors: An environmental scan

BACKGROUND

Trustworthy educational information for patients is critical for increasing their knowledge base and preparing them for shared decision making with clinicians. As the internet has become an important source of health information for many patients, the purpose of this study was to assess the quality and content of websites with educational content about immune checkpoint inhibitors.

METHODS

We performed an environmental scan of the currently available websites providing educational information for patients about immune checkpoint inhibitors. We used three search engines: Google, Bing, and Yahoo! (9/20/2021). Two independent investigators selected relevant uniform resource locators (URLs), appraised the quality of the websites, and collected their characteristics. We evaluated the accuracy, completeness, technical elements, design and aesthetics, readability, usability, and accessibility of the websites. The user experience was also evaluated.

RESULTS

We identified 37 websites for analysis. In 10 websites (27%), it was not possible to know the source of the information provided. Thirty-three (89%) provided a definition with a simple explanation of cancer and treatment and 30 (81%) on complications of immune checkpoint inhibitors; only seven (19%) provided information about the balance between risks and benefits. Thirty-five (95%) provided a statement of purpose. Regarding the design, all 37 (100%) had appropriate visual aspects, typography, and grammar. Thirty-six (97%) were well organized. For most of the websites (n = 35, 95%) the content was easy to find. Only two websites had a readability score of 6, while the others had higher scores. Regarding the user experience, the overall quality of websites was rated as excellent in 16 (43%), good in 14 (38%), and fair in 7 (19%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings reveal that websites with information about immune checkpoint inhibitors mostly have general information about cancer, the treatments, and adverse events. Few websites provide information about the balance between harms and benefits of treatment, costs, the source of the information, or the hierarchy of evidence. These findings identify the gap in the quality and content of websites for patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and can help website creators and developers.

Immune-checkpoint inhibitor use in patients with cancer and pre-existing autoimmune diseases

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically changed the management of advanced cancers. Designed to enhance the antitumour immune response, they can also cause off-target immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which are sometimes severe. Although the efficacy of ICIs suggests that they could have wide-ranging benefits, clinical trials of the drugs have so far excluded patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease. However, evidence is accumulating with regard to the use of ICIs in this 'at-risk' population, with retrospective data suggesting that they have an acceptable safety profile, but that there is a risk of disease flare or other irAE occurrence. The management of immunosuppressive drugs at ICI initiation in patients with autoimmune disease (or later in instances of disease flare or irAE) remains a question of particular interest in clinical practice, in which there is always a search for the balance between protecting against autoimmunity and ensuring a good tumour response. Although temporary use of immunosuppressants seems safe, prolonged use or use at ICI initiation might hamper the antitumour immune response, prompting clinicians to use the minimal efficient immunosuppressive regimen. However, a new paradigm is emerging, in which inhibitors of TNF or IL-6 could have synergistic effects with ICIs on tumour response, while also preventing severe irAEs. If confirmed, this 'decoupling' effect on toxicity and efficacy could change therapeutic practice in this field. Knowledge of the current use of ICIs in patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease, particularly with regard to the use of immunosuppressive drugs and/or biologic DMARDs, can help to guide clinical practice.

The role of immune checkpoints in cardiovascular disease

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are monoclonal antibodies which bind to immune checkpoints (IC) and their ligands to prevent inhibition of T-cell activation by tumor cells. Currently, multiple ICI are approved targeting Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4), Programmed Death Protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand PD-L1, and Lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3). This therapy has provided potent anti-tumor effects and improved prognosis for many cancer patients. However, due to systemic effects, patients can develop immune related adverse events (irAE), including possible life threatening cardiovascular irAE, like atherosclerosis, myocarditis and cardiomyopathy. Inhibition of vascular IC is associated with increased atherosclerotic burden and plaque instability. IC protect against atherosclerosis by inhibiting T-cell activity and cytokine production, promoting regulatory T-cell differentiation and inducing T-cell exhaustion. In addition, PD-L1 on endothelial cells might promote plaque stability by reducing apoptosis and increasing expression of tight junction molecules. In the heart, IC downregulate the immune response to protect against cardiac injury by reducing T-cell activity and migration. Here, inhibition of IC could induce life-threatening T-cell-mediated-myocarditis. One proposed purpose behind lymphocyte infiltration is reaction to cardiac antigens, caused by decreased self-tolerance, and thereby increased autoimmunity because of IC inhibition. In addition, there are several reports of ICI-mediated cardiomyopathy with immunoglobulin G expression on cardiomyocytes, indicating an autoimmune response. IC are mostly known due to their cardiotoxicity. However, t his review compiles current knowledge on mechanisms behind IC function in cardiovascular disease with the aim of providing an overview of possible therapeutic targets in prevention or treatment of cardiovascular irAEs.

A Safety Analysis of Programmed Death 1 Pathway Inhibitors in Patients With Solid Tumor Malignancies and Preexisting Autoimmune Disease

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to characterize the safety of programmed death 1 inhibitors in patients with preexisting autoimmune disease.

METHODS

A medical records review study was conducted on adults with solid tumor malignancies who received ≥1 dose of pembrolizumab or nivolumab at Emory Healthcare from September 4, 2014 until December 31, 2019. All autoimmune patients were included (n = 77), whereas the nonautoimmune patients were randomized and the first 156 patients were included in a 2:1 ratio to autoimmune patients. The primary objective was the comparison of incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) between patients with preexisting autoimmune disease and those without. Secondary objectives included irAE characterization, irAE treatment, and survival analyses.

RESULTS

Preexisting autoimmune disease was controlled in all of the autoimmune patients before immunotherapy initiation. The rate of irAE was 32.7% in the nonautoimmune group and 42.9% in the autoimmune group (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-1.14; p = 0.130). In the patient population diagnosed with a rheumatologic autoimmune disease, 23.81% of irAEs were considered to be a flare of their preexisting autoimmune disease. Less patients in the autoimmune group experienced a grade ≥3 irAE (21.21% vs 37.25%, p = 0.379) and received systemic corticosteroids (54.55% vs 67.35%, p = 0.241) for the treatment of the irAE.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that pembrolizumab and nivolumab can be safely administered in patients with controlled preexisting autoimmune diseases without a significant increase in irAE compared with patients without autoimmune diseases. Inclusion of patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases in prospective clinical trials is warranted.

Systemic Sclerosis Association with Malignancy

The association of systemic sclerosis (SSc) and cancer is well known from several decades suggesting common genetic and environmental risk factors involved in the development of both diseases. Immunosuppressive drugs widely used in SSc may increase the risk of cancer occurrence and different SSc clinical and serological features identify patients at major risk to develop malignancy. In this context, among serological features, presence of anti-RNA polymerase III and anti-topoisomerase I autoantibodies seems to increase cancer frequency in SSc patients (particularly lung and breast cancers). Lung fibrosis and a long standing SSc pulmonary involvement have been largely proposed as lung cancer risk factors, and the exposure to cyclophosphamide and an upper gastrointestinal involvement have been traditionally linked to bladder and oesophagus cancers, respectively. Furthermore, immune checkpoint inhibitors used for cancer therapy can induce immune-related adverse events, which are more frequent and severe in patients with pre-existing autoimmune diseases such as SSc. The strong association between SSc and cancer occurrence steers clinicians to carefully survey SSc patients performing periodical malignancy screening. In the present review, the most relevant bilateral relationships between SSc and cancer will be addressed.

Randomized Versus Real-World Evidence on the Efficacy and Toxicity of Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer in Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer or Melanoma: A Meta-analysis

Background

Both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world evidence (RWE) studies provide results regarding the efficacy and toxicity of checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients. The results from these two sources are considered complementary but whether they are comparable remains unknown.

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of checkpoint inhibitors between RCTs and RWE studies in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or melanoma.

Patients and Methods

Two electronic databases were searched to identify eligible studies, either RCTs or RWE studies, investigating the efficacy or toxicity of checkpoint inhibitors given for indications that were approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) at the date of the last search. A meta-analysis was performed and the pooled estimates of objective response rates (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity and treatment discontinuation between RCTs and RWE studies were compared.

Results

In total, 43 RWE studies and 15 RCTs were eligible, with adequate data for pooled estimates for immunotherapy indications regarding NSCLC and melanoma. No statistically significant or clinically meaningful differences in terms of pooled PFS, OS, or rates of treatment discontinuation due to toxicity between RCTs and RWE studies were observed. In some indications, a higher rate of response rates and lower rate of toxicity in favor of RWE was observed.

Conclusion

In patients with melanoma or NSCLC, the clinical value of checkpoint inhibitors is evident in both RCTs and real-world settings. Some differences in response or toxicity rates in favor of RWE mainly reflects the inherent difficulties in evaluating these outcomes in RWE studies.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11523-022-00901-1.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of Patients With Cancer and Preexisting Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Background

Immunotherapies represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment. A large part of the population has both cancer and psoriasis but is usually excluded from ICI clinical trials because of the dysregulated activation of the immune system. This is the first study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ICI therapy in patients with cancer and preexisting psoriasis.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and MEDLINE databases were searched from inception through February 2022. Observational studies on patients with cancer and confirmed psoriasis before ICI initiation were included. Outcomes included the incidence of psoriasis flares, de novo immune-related adverse events (irAEs), discontinuation rate due to flare/de novo irAEs, and efficacy of ICI therapy. Clinical manifestations, management, and outcomes for adverse events (AEs) were systematically reviewed. All pooled analyses were based on a random-effects model using Stata software. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed to identify sources of heterogeneity.

Results

Twelve studies involving 191 patients were included. The pooled incidence of psoriasis flares was 45.0% (95% CI: 31.1%-58.9%, I² = 71.7%) and 44.9% (95% CI: 29.0%–60.7%, I² = 71.8%) for de novo irAEs. The tumor type, psoriasis subtype, ICI class, and country were the main sources of heterogeneity. Grade 3–4 flares occurred in 10.8% (95% CI: 5.3%–16.3%) of patients, and about 16.6% (95% CI: 10.7%–22.5%) of patients experienced grade 3–4 de novo irAEs. The estimated incidence of ICI discontinuation due to AE was 18.5% (95% CI: 6.1%–30.8%, I² = 68.7%). The median times to develop flare and de novo irAEs were 44 and 63 days, respectively. Endocrinopathies and colitis were the most common de novo irAEs. Conventional therapy is effective for most AEs. The estimated objective response rate (ORR) of ICIs was 38.1% (95% CI: 11.8%–64.3%, I² = 81.7%), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 64.5% (95% CI: 55.3%–73.8%, I² = 0).

Conclusions

The flare of patients with cancer and preexisting psoriasis treated with ICI therapy is frequent, but the incidence of de novo irAEs and the efficacy of ICI therapy are comparable to those of the general population. Most AEs are mild and manageable with conventional therapy, which required discontinuation of ICI therapy in 18.5%.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022320646

Risk of irAEs in patients with autoimmune diseases treated by immune checkpoint inhibitors for stage III or IV melanoma: results from a matched case-control study

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease (pAID) treated by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for stage III or IV melanoma.

METHODS

Case-control study performed on a French multicentric prospective cohort of patients with melanoma, matched for irAE risk factors and oncological staging. Risk of irAE was assessed by logistic regression.

RESULTS

110 patients with pAID were included and matched with 330 controls, from March 2013 to October 2020. Over a median follow-up period of 7.2 months for cases and 6.9 months for controls, the ORs of developing all-grade and grade ≥3 irAEs among cases compared with controls were 1.91 (95% CI (1.56 to 2.27)) and 1.44 (95% CI (1.08 to 1.82)), respectively. Patients with pAID had an increased risk of multiple irAEs (OR 1.46, 95% CI (1.15 to 2.67)) and a shorter time to irAE onset. In contrast, there were no difference in irAE-related mortality nor in the rate of treatment discontinuation, and a landmark analysis revealed a better survival at 24 months among cases (p=0.02). Thirty per cent of cases experienced a pAID flare during follow-up, and baseline immunosuppression did not prevent irAE occurrence. Last, we report associations between the pAID clinical subsets and organ-specific irAEs.

CONCLUSION

In our study, patients with pAID were at greater risk of all-grade, severe and multiple irAEs, yet had a better 24-month survival than controls. Thus, patients with pAID should be eligible for ICI therapy but benefit from a close monitoring for irAE occurrence, especially during the first months of therapy.

Immune-Mediated Hepatitis During Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor cancer Immunotherapy: Lessons From Autoimmune Hepatitis and Liver Immunology

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are being increasingly used to successfully treat several types of cancer. However, due to their mode of action, these treatments are associated with several immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including immune-mediated autoimmune-like hepatitis in 5 to 10% of cases. The specific immune mechanism responsible for the development of immune-mediated liver injury caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ILICI) is currently unknown. This review summarizes the current knowledge on hepatic irAEs during cancer immunotherapy. It also addresses the clinical management of ILICI and how it is becoming an increasingly important clinical issue. Clinical, histological, and laboratory features of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and ILICI are compared, and their shared and distinctive traits are discussed in an effort to better understand the development of hepatic irAEs. Finally, based on the current knowledge of liver immunology and AIH pathogenesis, we propose a series of events that could trigger the observed liver injury in ICI-treated patients. This model could be useful in the design of future studies aiming to identify the specific immune mechanism(s) at play in ILICI and improve immune checkpoint inhibitor cancer immunotherapy.

Aseptic Abscess Syndrome: Clinical Characteristics, Associated Diseases, and up to 30 Years’ Evolution Data on a 71-Patient Series

Aseptic abscess (AA) syndrome is a rare type of inflammatory disorder involving polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs), often associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study sought to describe the clinical characteristics and evolution of this syndrome in a large cohort. We included all patients included in the French AA syndrome register from 1999 to 2020. All patients fulfilled the criteria outlined by André et al. in 2007. Seventy-one patients were included, 37 of which were men (52.1%), of a mean age of 34.5 ± 17 years. The abscesses were located in the spleen (71.8%), lymph nodes (50.7%), skin (29.5%), liver (28.1%), lung (22.5), and rarer locations (brain, genitals, kidneys, ENT, muscles, or breasts). Of all the patients, 59% presented with an associated disease, primarily IBD (42%). They were treated with colchicine (28.1%), corticosteroids (85.9%), immunosuppressants (61.9%), and biologics (32.3%). A relapse was observed in 62% of cases, mostly in the same organ. Upon multivariate analysis, factors associated with the risk of relapse were: prescription of colchicine (HR 0.52; 95% CI [0.28–0.97]; p = 0.042), associated IBD (HR 0.57; 95% CI [0.32–0.99]; p = 0.047), and hepatic or skin abscesses at diagnosis (HR 2.14; 95% CI [1.35–3.40]; p = 0.001 and HR 1.78; 95% CI [1.07–2.93]; p = 0.024, respectively). No deaths occurred related to this disease. This large retrospective cohort study with long follow up showed that AA syndrome is a relapsing systemic disease that can evolve on its own or be the precursor of an underlying disease, such as IBD. Of all the available treatments, colchicine appeared to be protective against relapse.

Challenging Dermatologic Considerations Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have emerged as a new paradigm in oncologic care for many malignancies. However, nonspecific immune activation has led to "collateral damage" in the form of immune-related adverse events, with skin being a commonly affected organ. Cutaneous immune-related adverse events include a wide spectrum of clinical presentations and challenging considerations, often necessitating dermatology referral to support diagnosis and management, particularly for atypical presentations or more severe, cutaneous immune-related adverse events that may require specialized dermatologic evaluations including biopsy and histopathology. Close collaborations between oncologists and dermatologists may optimize clinical decision making in the following challenging management settings: non-steroidal therapies for corticosteroid-refractory, cutaneous immune-related adverse events, immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge, balancing cutaneous immune-related adverse events and treatments, and immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease, skin conditions, and organ transplants. These complex clinical decisions that often lack rigorous data should be made in close collaboration with dermatologists to minimize unnecessary morbidity and mortality. This article provides a review of approaches to challenging dermatologic considerations associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies.

Clinical Patterns and Follow-Up of Inflammatory Arthritis and Other Immune-Related Adverse Events Induced by Checkpoint Inhibitors. A Multicenter Study

Objectives

To describe different clinical patterns of rheumatic immune-related adverse events (irAEs) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and their rheumatic and oncologic outcomes.

Methods

We classified clinical syndromes according to five different categories: non-inflammatory arthralgias (NIA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-like, psoriatic arthritis (PsA)-like, polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR)-like, and a miscellaneous group of patients with other syndromes. We conducted a baseline visit and then follow-up in order to determine their clinical pattern, treatment response, and outcome.

Results

We included 73 patients (64% male) with a mean age of 66.1 ± 11.6 years. Main underlying diagnosis was lung carcinoma in 29 (39%) patients, melanoma in 20 (27%), and renal-urothelial cancer in 11 (15%). Main ICI included Pembrolizumab in 24 (32%), Nivolumab 17 (23%), and Atezolizumab 7 (9 %). Seventeen out of seventy-three patients had an underlying rheumatic disease before ICI treatment. Fourteen patients developed other irAEs before or simultaneously with rheumatic syndromes. Main rheumatic irAEs included: RA-like in 31 (42.4%), NIA in 19 (26.0%), PMR-like in 10 (13.7%), and PsA-like in 5 (6.8%), among others. Median time from ICI to irAEs was 5 months (IQR 3–9). Those patients who received combined therapy, had a trend for an earlier presentation than those who received monotherapy (4.3 months IQR 1.85–17 vs. 6 months IQR 3–9.25, p = NS). Mean follow-up time was 14.0 ± 10.8 (SD, months). At the last visit, 47 % were taking glucocorticoids and 11% DMARD therapy. At the last visit, 13 (17.8%) patients remained with persistent arthritis, 19 (26%) had intermittent flares, and 39 (53.4%) had a self-limited pattern. Only in 15.1% of patients ICI therapy was discontinued.

Conclusions

We described different patterns according to treatment and irAEs. Combined ICI therapy had an earlier onset of symptoms. Patients who presented as RA-like, had a higher risk of persistent arthritis. After a mean follow-up of more than 1 year, one-fifth of the patients remained with persistent arthritis and 11% required DMARD therapy.

Immunotherapy-induced retinopathy mimicking cancer associated retinopathy

PURPOSE

To report a patient who developed a cancer associated retinopathy (CAR) like syndrome in the setting of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib combination therapy for metastatic endometrial carcinoma. Symptoms resolved with normalization of objective functional tests following cessation of medications.

OBSERVATIONS

A 52-year-old female with history of endometrial carcinoma, managed with pembrolizumab infusions and daily oral lenvatinib treatment for 18 months, presented to a tertiary eye center with complaints of nyctalopia, photosensitivity and photopsia. Further investigations revealed a reduction in b-wave amplitude on full field ERG (ffERG), a mild color vision deficit, and positive antiretinal antibodies against carbonic anhydrase II, enolase and arrestin. A preliminary diagnosis of CAR was made. One month following diagnosis, the patient discontinued both lenvatinib and pembrolizumab and subsequently reported significant improvement in her eye symptoms and vision. Repeat ffERG had normalized with a robust b-wave, with an improvement noted on repeat color vision testing. A presumed diagnosis of immunotherapy-induced retinopathy was made, with clinical findings mimicking CAR.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE

Pembrolizumab and lenvatinib treatment may be associated with a reversible retinopathy, with presentation very similar to CAR.

Holistic Approach to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Adverse Events

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) block inhibitory molecules, such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), or its ligand, programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1) and enhance antitumor T-cell activity. ICIs provide clinical benefits in a percentage of patients with advanced cancers, but they are usually associated with a remarkable spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) (e.g., rash, colitis, hepatitis, pneumonitis, endocrine, cardiac and musculoskeletal dysfunctions). Particularly patients on combination therapy (e.g., anti-CTLA-4 plus anti-PD-1/PD-L1) experience some form of irAEs. Different mechanisms have been postulated to explain these adverse events. Host factors such as genotype, gut microbiome and pre-existing autoimmune disorders may affect the risk of adverse events. Fatal ICI-related irAEs are due to myocarditis, colitis or pneumonitis. irAEs usually occur within the first months after ICI initiation but can develop as early as after the first dose to years after ICI initiation. Most irAEs resolve pharmacologically, but some appear to be persistent. Glucocorticoids represent the mainstay of management of irAEs, but other immunosuppressive drugs can be used to mitigate refractory irAEs. In the absence of specific trials, several guidelines, based on data from retrospective studies and expert consensus, have been published to guide the management of ICI-related irAEs.

Review of Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)—Their Incidence, Management, Multiorgan irAEs, and Rechallenge

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of advanced malignancies, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These agents have improved clinical outcomes and have become quite an attractive alternative alone or combined with other treatments. Although ICIs are tolerated better, they also lead to unique toxicities, termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs). A reconstituted immune system may lead to dysregulation in normal immune self-tolerance and cause inflammatory side effects (irAEs). Although any organ system can be affected, immune-related adverse events most commonly involve the gastrointestinal tract, endocrine glands, skin, and liver. They can occur anytime during the treatment course and rarely even after completion. Owen and colleagues showed that approximately 30% of patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs develop irAEs. Kichenadasse et al. conducted a thorough evaluation of multiorgan irAEs, which is of particular interest because information regarding these types of irAEs is currently sparse. It is important to delineate between infectious etiologies and symptom progression during the management of irAEs. Close consultation with disease-specific subspecialties is encouraged. Corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment of most irAEs. Early intervention with corticosteroids is crucial in the general management of immune-mediated toxicity. Grade 1–2 irAEs can be closely monitored; hypothyroidism and other endocrine irAEs may be treated with hormone supplementation without the need for corticosteroid therapy. Moderate- to high-dose steroids and other additional immunosuppressants such as tocilizumab and cyclophosphamide might be required in severe, grade 3–4 cases. Recently, increasing research on irAEs after immunotherapy rechallenge has garnered much attention. Dolladille and colleagues assessed the safety in patients with cancer who resumed therapy with the same ICIs and found that rechallenge was associated with about 25–30% of the same irAEs experienced previously (4). However, such data should be carefully considered. Further pooled analyses may be required before we conclude about ICIs’ safety in rechallenge.

PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Patients With Preexisting Autoimmune Diseases

Autoimmune diseases and malignant tumors are the two hotspots and difficulties that are currently being studied and concerned by the medical field. The use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors improves the prognosis of advanced tumors, but excessive immune responses can also induce immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Due to this concern, many clinical trials exclude cancer patients with preexisting autoimmune disease (AID). This review outlines the possible mechanisms of irAE, discusses the safety and efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in cancer patients with preexisting AID, and emphasizes the importance of early recognition, continuous monitoring, and multidisciplinary cooperation in the prevention and management of cancer patients with preexisting AID.

Checkpoint Inhibitors and Induction of Celiac Disease-like Condition

Immune checkpoint inhibitors herald a new era in oncological therapy-resistant cancer, thus bringing hope for better outcomes and quality of life for patients. However, as with other medications, they are not without serious side effects over time. Despite this, their advantages outweigh their disadvantages. Understanding the adverse effects will help therapists locate, apprehend, treat, and perhaps diminish them. The major ones are termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs), representing their auto-immunogenic capacity. This narrative review concentrates on the immune checkpoint inhibitors induced celiac disease (CD), highlighting the importance of the costimulatory inhibitors in CD evolvement and suggesting several mechanisms for CD induction. Unraveling those cross-talks and pathways might reveal some new therapeutic strategies.

Treatment Equity in the Immunotherapy Era: Options for Patients with Both Autoimmune Disease and GU Cancers

Numerous immunotherapeutic agents, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have been approved for the treatment of genitourinary (GU) malignancies. While ICIs have improved treatment outcomes and expanded treatment options, they can cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The scope of irAEs is broad, and this paper aims to review the rheumatologic side effects associated with immunotherapy drugs approved for bladder cancer and renal cell carcinoma. IrAEs are graded by the common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE), which ranges from 1 to 5. The management of irAEs includes corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive therapies, and it may require discontinuation of immunotherapy. Several real world experience studies suggest that most patients with pre-existing autoimmune diseases treated with ICI did not have to discontinue treatment due to immune-mediated side effects. While data suggest autoimmune side effects are manageable, patients with pre-existing autoimmune diseases are often excluded from immunotherapy clinical trials. Better understanding of these irAEs will improve its safety and expand its use in those with underlying autoimmune disease.

Disease exacerbation is common in inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors for malignancy

BACKGROUND

Colitis is a known potential toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Studies evaluating the risk of disease exacerbation following ICI treatment in patients with pre-existing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are limited.

AIM

To assess the clinical characteristics of IBD patients treated with ICIs and determine prevalence of subsequent IBD exacerbations.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients in the Stanford Research Repository database with pre-existing IBD who were exposed to ICIs.

RESULTS

The prevalence of IBD exacerbation following ICI was 36.8% amongst 19 patients meeting inclusion criteria. Patients with exacerbations had more gastrointestinal-related hospitalizations (4 of 7) than patients without exacerbations (0 of 12; P = 0.0090).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of IBD exacerbations following ICI was higher than reported rates of ICI-induced colitis and diarrhea in the general population and was associated with hospitalization.

Tumor necrosis factor alpha neutralization attenuates immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced activation of intermediate monocytes in synovial fluid mononuclear cells from patients with inflammatory arthritis

Objective

During treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) such as the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab, half of patients with pre-existing inflammatory arthritis experience disease flares. The underlying immunological mechanisms have not been characterized. Here, we investigate the effect of pembrolizumab on cells involved in inflammation and destruction in the synovial joint and how immunosuppressive treatments affect the pembrolizumab-induced immune reactions.

Methods

We included synovial fluid mononuclear cells (SFMCs, n = 28) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs, n = 6) from patients with rheumatoid arthritis and peripheral spondyloarthritis and PBMCs from healthy controls (n = 6). Fibroblast-like synovial cells (FLSs) were grown from SFMCs. The in vitro effect of pembrolizumab was tested in SFMCs cultured for 48 h, FLS-PBMC co-cultures and in SFMCs cultured for 21 days (inflammatory osteoclastogenesis). Cells and supernatants were analyzed by ELISA, flow cytometry, and pro-inflammatory multiplex assay. Finally, the effect of the disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) adalimumab (TNFα inhibitor), tocilizumab (IL-6R inhibitor), tofacitinib (JAK1/JAK3 inhibitor), and baricitinib (JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor) on pembrolizumab-induced immune reactions was tested.

Results

Pembrolizumab significantly increased monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) production by arthritis SFMCs (P = 0.0031) but not by PBMCs from patients or healthy controls (P = 0.77 and P = 0.43). Pembrolizumab did not alter MMP-3 production in FLS-PBMC co-cultures (P = 0.76) or TRAP secretion in the inflammatory osteoclastogenesis model (P = 0.28). In SFMCs, pembrolizumab further increased the production of TNFα (P = 0.0110), IFNγ (P = 0.0125), IL-12p70 (P = 0.0014), IL-10 (P = 0.0100), IL-13 (P = 0.0044), IL-2 (P = 0.0066), and IL-4 (P = 0.0008) but did not change the production of IL-6 (P = 0.1938) and IL-1 (P = 0.1022). The SFMCs treated with pembrolizumab showed an increased frequency of intermediate monocytes (P = 0.044), and the MCP-1 production increased only within the intermediate monocyte subset (P = 0.028). Lastly, adalimumab, baricitinib, and tofacitinib treatment were able to attenuate the pembrolizumab-induced MCP-1 production (P = 0.0004, P = 0.033, and P = 0.025, respectively), while this was not seen with tocilizumab treatment (P = 0.75).

Conclusion

Pembrolizumab specifically activated intermediate monocytes and induced the production of several cytokines including TNFα but not IL-6. These findings indicate that flares in patients with pre-existing inflammatory arthritis involve monocyte activation and could be managed with TNFα neutralization.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13075-022-02737-6.

Immunotherapy and Gene Therapy: New Challenges in the Diagnosis and Management of Drug-Induced Liver Injury

In the last 5 years, the landscape of oncologic treatment has been deeply modified with the development and use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) that exert their antitumoral effect by reverting the exhausted phenotype of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. This innovative therapeutic strategy has widely changed the prognosis of some advanced neoplastic diseases such as melanoma and lung cancer, providing durable remission for a significant number of patients. Unfortunately, immune-related adverse events (irAEs), especially ICI-induced hepatitis, may be very severe in some cases, impairing the prognosis of the patient. Guidelines available today on the diagnosis and management of ICI-induced hepatitis are mainly based on expert opinions and case series. This lack of large data is explained not only by the low incidence of hepatic adverse events but also by their clinical heterogeneity and variable severity. In this article, we will review the clinical, biological, and histological characteristics of ICI-induced liver injury. We will discuss the current knowledge on their pathological mechanisms and their therapeutic strategy based on immunosuppressive treatment for more severe cases. Regarding severity assessment, we will discuss the gap between the oncologist and the hepatologist’s point of view, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary management. While initially developed for notably less frequent diseases than neoplastic ones, gene therapy is going to be a revolution for the treatment of diseases not responding to pharmacological therapy. Limited but growing data describe liver injury after the administration of such therapy whose exact physiopathology remains unknown. In this article, we will discuss the available data supporting the role of gene therapies in the onset of drug-induced liver injury and related mechanisms. We will describe the clinical context, the biological and histological features, and the management currently proposed.

Systemic lupus erythematosus reactivation after chemoimmunotherapy in preexisting autoimmune disease

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) offers new possibilities in modern treatment of many types of cancers. Few data regarding safety and efficacy of ICIs are available, and are mainly from retrospective studies and case reports rather than from clinical trials, in the context of preexisting autoimmune disease, mainly due to the risk of severe toxicity. We present an unexpected life-threatening reactivation of systemic lupus erythematosus after one dose of chemo-immunotherapy with pembrolizumab for oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. We analyze data coming from the published literature in this setting and discuss the risk-benefit balance of immunotherapy in patients with preexisting severe autoimmune disease.

Predicting Outcome in Combination Treatment of TACE and Camrelizumab for Advanced Hepatocellular carcinoma: Tumor Hypervascularity and Reactive Cutaneous Capillary Endothelial Proliferation

Objective

To validate the robust predictive values of tumor vascularity and reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP) in combination treatment of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and camrelizumab for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and then select the potential candidates who would survive best from such treatment.

Methods

The clinical data of 113 patients with advanced HCC treated with TACE and camrelizumab from January 2019 to December 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Mann Whitney U-test was used to evaluate the correlation between vascular distribution and RCCEP and tumor response; Kaplan Meier technique was used to evaluate time to progress (TTP) and overall survival (OS), and log rank test was used for comparison; multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the related influencing factors.

Results

The TTP and OS of TACE combined with carrelizumab in patients with advanced HCC were 7.1 and 14.3 months. Hypervascularity and development of RCCEP were good predictors of TTP (HR 2.561, P < 0.001; HR 1.486, P = 0.032) and OS (HR 2.854, P < 0.001; HR 1.634, P = 0.011). The median TTP and OS of patients with hypervascularity and RCCEP were 10.6 and 19.3 months, which were better than those with only hypervascularity (6.8 months, P = 0.016; 11.6 months, P = 0.003) and only RCCEP (6.2 months, P = 0.039; 13.5 months, P = 0.042), as well as those with neither (3.8 months, P < 0.001; 7.4 months, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Tumor hypervascularity and development of RCCEP were favorable predictive factors for the combination treatment of TACE and carrelizumab, with both of which the patients survived longest and might be the potential candidates.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor induced colitis: A nationwide population-based study

BACKGROUND

ICIs are used in the management of several malignancies. However, they can result in immune-related adverse events, such as colitis. The aim of this study is to obtain an epidemiological survey of patients who develop immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced colitis and identify underlying risk factors.

METHODS

A cohort study was performed using Explorys, a US-based population database. Our cohort included all patients in a five-year interval on an ICI. We further identified those who developed colitis after initiating an ICI. Demographic data and possible risk factors were assessed. Odds ratios were calculated and multivariable statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

3.6% of patients developed ICI-induced colitis. Women [OR: 1.2; 95% CI 1.224-1.231, p <0.001], Caucasians [OR: 2.3; 2.284 - 2.299], individuals older than 65 years [OR: 1.3; 1.319 - 1.326], obese patients [OR: 3.3; 3.273 - 3.302], and those with a history of alcohol abuse [OR: 2.5; 2.485 - 2.523] were more likely to develop colitis. Patients who received Nivolumab [OR: 2.8; 2.563 - 3.022], Ipilimumab [OR: 4.9; 3.937 - 6.061], Pembrolizumab [OR 2.7; 2.463 - 2.868], and Atezolizumab [OR 2.9; 2.430 - 3.388] had an increased odds of developing colitis. The majority of cases were diagnosed in the first 6 months of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest study to describe the epidemiology of ICI-induced colitis and it is the first to identify underlying risk factors. Ipilimumab poses the greatest risk for ICI-induced colitis. The risk of colitis should be discussed with all patients prior to initiating an ICI, as it may be a factor in choosing among ICIs.

Should we be Afraid of Immune Check Point Inhibitors in Cancer Patients with Pre-Existing Rheumatic Diseases? Immunotherapy in Pre-Existing Rheumatic Diseases

Background:

Cancer immunotherapy is rapidly expanding but its clinical efficacy is hampered by immune related adverse events (ir-AE). There is a concern regarding patients with pre-existing auto-immune diseases (PAD) undergoing immunotherapy.

Methods:

An electronic search was performed (Medline) to identify cases of patients with PAD treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).

Results:

Published data are rather limited but continue to emerge. Patients with PAD exhibit a high risk of PAD flare and/or de novo ir-AE. In most cases PAD flares and de novo irAEs were not severe and could be managed effectively with standard treatment.

Conclusions:

This risk in patients with PAD appears acceptable, and therefore, these patients could receive immunotherapy under close monitoring. Collaboration of oncologists and rheumatologists for the management of these patients is crucial.

The foundations of immune checkpoint blockade and the ipilimumab approval decennial

Cancer immunity, and the potential for cancer immunotherapy, have been topics of scientific discussion and experimentation for over a hundred years. Several successful cancer immunotherapies - such as IL-2 and interferon-α (IFNα) - have appeared over the past 30 years. However, it is only in the past decade that immunotherapy has made a broad impact on patient survival in multiple high-incidence cancer indications. The emergence of immunotherapy as a new pillar of cancer treatment (adding to surgery, radiation, chemotherapy and targeted therapies) is due to the success of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) drugs, the first of which - ipilimumab - was approved in 2011. ICB drugs block receptors and ligands involved in pathways that attenuate T cell activation - such as cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4), programmed cell death 1 (PD1) and its ligand, PDL1 - and prevent, or reverse, acquired peripheral tolerance to tumour antigens. In this Review we mark the tenth anniversary of the approval of ipilimumab and discuss the foundational scientific history of ICB, together with the history of the discovery, development and elucidation of the mechanism of action of the first generation of drugs targeting the CTLA4 and PD1 pathways.

Anti-γ-Aminobutyric Acid Type β Receptor Antibody-Associated Encephalitis After 2 Cycles of Durvalumab Therapy in a Patient with Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Case Report

Anti-γ-aminobutyric acid type β receptor (anti-GABA_BR) antibody-associated encephalitis is a type of autoimmune encephalitis. According to current literature, its pathogenesis is reported to be closely related to tumor factors. However, diagnosis can be difficult because of the rarity of cases, limited clinical understanding, and a lack of specificity in clinical manifestation and imaging presentation. Clinical trials have demonstrated that immunotherapy can prolong the survival of patients with small cell lung cancer; however, in some cases, immunotherapy may induce anti-GABA_BR antibody-associated encephalitis. Patients who develop this encephalitis during immunotherapy often delay treatment because the cause is not clearly identified. In this study, we report a case of a 61-year-old man with a confirmed diagnosis of small cell lung cancer who had acute onset of cognitive impairment and seizures after two cycles of durvalumab (AstraZeneca UK Limited) combination chemotherapy. This reaction was initially considered as an immune-related adverse event (irAE) caused by durvalumab treatment, and the patient was eventually considered to have a paraneoplastic neurological disorder caused by the primary tumor. This report raises awareness of the symptoms of cognitive impairment and seizures in patients with small cell lung cancer, and the possible adverse events associated with immunotherapy. This case also highlights the importance of detecting anti-GABA_BR antibodies in patients with small cell lung cancer.

Risk factors for immune-related adverse events: what have we learned and what lies ahead?

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have heralded the advent of a new era in oncology by holding the promise of prolonged survival in severe and otherwise treatment-refractory advanced cancers. However, the remarkable antitumor efficacy of these agents is overshadowed by their potential for inducing autoimmune toxic effects, collectively termed immune-related adverse events (irAEs). These autoimmune adverse effects are often difficult to predict, possibly permanent, and occasionally fatal. Hence, the identification of risk factors for irAEs is urgently needed to allow for prompt therapeutic intervention. This review discusses the potential mechanisms through which irAEs arise and summarizes the existing evidence regarding risk factors associated with the occurrence of irAEs. In particular, we examined available data regarding the effect of a series of clinicopathological and demographic factors on the risk of irAEs.

Management of Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy: ASCO Guideline Update

PURPOSE

To increase awareness, outline strategies, and offer guidance on the recommended management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPi) therapy.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary panel of medical oncology, dermatology, gastroenterology, rheumatology, pulmonology, endocrinology, neurology, hematology, emergency medicine, nursing, trialists, and advocacy experts was convened to update the guideline. Guideline development involved a systematic literature review and an informal consensus process. The systematic review focused on evidence published from 2017 through 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 175 studies met the eligibility criteria of the systematic review and were pertinent to the development of the recommendations. Because of the paucity of high-quality evidence, recommendations are based on expert consensus.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Recommendations for specific organ system-based toxicity diagnosis and management are presented. While management varies according to the organ system affected, in general, ICPi therapy should be continued with close monitoring for grade 1 toxicities, except for some neurologic, hematologic, and cardiac toxicities. ICPi therapy may be suspended for most grade 2 toxicities, with consideration of resuming when symptoms revert ≤ grade 1. Corticosteroids may be administered. Grade 3 toxicities generally warrant suspension of ICPis and the initiation of high-dose corticosteroids. Corticosteroids should be tapered over the course of at least 4-6 weeks. Some refractory cases may require other immunosuppressive therapy. In general, permanent discontinuation of ICPis is recommended with grade 4 toxicities, except for endocrinopathies that have been controlled by hormone replacement. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines.

A review of neurotoxicities associated with immunotherapy and a framework for evaluation

Immuno-oncology agents, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapies, are increasing in use for a growing list of oncologic indications. While harnessing the immune system against cancer cells has a potent anti-tumor effect, it can also cause widespread autoimmune toxicities that limit therapeutic potential. Neurologic toxicities have unique presentations and can progress rapidly, necessitating prompt recognition. In this article, we review the spectrum of central and peripheral neurologic immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with ICI therapies, emphasizing a diagnostic framework that includes consideration of the therapy regimen, timing of symptom onset, presence of non-neurologic irAEs, pre-existing neurologic disease, and syndrome specific features. In addition, we review the immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) associated with CAR-T cell therapy and address diagnostic challenges specific to patients with brain metastases. As immunotherapy use grows, so too will the number of patients affected by neurotoxicity. There is an urgent need to understand pathogenic mechanisms, predictors, and optimal treatments of these toxicities, so that we can manage them without sacrificing anti-tumor efficacy.

Safety and Clinical Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Cancer and Preexisting Autoimmune Diseases

Immunotherapy has revolutionized treatment outcomes in numerous cancers. However, clinical trials have largely excluded patients with autoimmune diseases (ADs) due to the risk of AD flares or predilection for developing organ-specific inflammation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with cancer and preexisting ADs. A retrospective, single-center study of patients with cancer initiated on immune checkpoint inhibitors between 2012 and 2019 was conducted. The primary outcome was the development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) with respect to the presence of AD at baseline. Associations were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves, bivariate and multivariable analyses. Of the 417 patients included in this study, 63 patients (15%) had preexisting ADs. A total of 218 patients (53%) developed at least 1 irAE. There was no association between the presence of baseline AD on the development, grade, or number of irAEs; time to irAE or irAE recovery; systemic corticosteroid or additional immunosuppressant treatment for irAEs; permanent treatment discontinuation; or overall response rate. Two smaller cohorts were studied, melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer, and there was no effect of baseline AD on overall survival on either cohort. However, a greater proportion of patients with baseline ADs had full recovery from their irAE (P=0.037). Furthermore, age below 65, baseline steroid use, and single-agent immunotherapy regimens were protective in terms of the development of irAEs. Our study suggests that immune checkpoint inhibitors have similar safety and efficacy profiles in patients with preexisting ADs.

Immunotherapy in Special and Rare Situations: A Brief Review

Immunotherapy has established itself as an important component of the treatment armamentarium against various solid as well as hematologic cancers. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) provide for a very well-tolerated and efficacious treatment option that has improved survival in several cancers. The approved ICIs mainly consist of antibodies targeting cytotoxic T lymphocyte–associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or its ligand, programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1). However, most clinical trials of ICI have excluded patients from high-risk populations, such as those with autoimmune diseases, patients on chronic steroid intake for various reasons or preexisting HIV infections. The older adults are also an underrepresented section of the population enrolled into such trials, most probably due to the higher prevalence of comorbidities and frailty affecting their Eastern Co-Operative Oncology Group performance status, and thus the eligibility for clinical trial enrollment. This paper aimed to briefly review the available evidence and thus guide the decision-making process for use of ICI in such rare and special situations.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with pre-existing psoriasis: safety and efficacy

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are approved to treat multiple cancers. Retrospective analyses demonstrate acceptable safety of ICIs in most patients with autoimmune disease, although disease exacerbation may occur. Psoriasis vulgaris is a common, immune-mediated disease, and outcomes of ICI treatment in patients with psoriasis are not well described. Thus we sought to define the safety profile and effectiveness of ICIs in patients with pre-existing psoriasis.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, patients from eight academic centers with pre-existing psoriasis who received ICI treatment for cancer were evaluated. Main safety outcomes were psoriasis exacerbation and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). We also assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival.

Results

Of 76 patients studied (50 (66%) male; median age 67 years; 62 (82%) with melanoma, 5 (7%) with lung cancer, 2 (3%) with head and neck cancer, and 7 (9%) with other cancers; median follow-up 25.1 months (range=0.2–99 months)), 51 (67%) received anti-PD-1 antibodies, 8 (11%) anti-CTLA-4, and 17 (22%) combination of anti-PD-1/CTLA-4. All patients had pre-existing psoriasis, most frequently plaque psoriasis (46 patients (61%)) and 15 (20%) with psoriatic arthritis. Forty-one patients (54%) had received any prior therapy for psoriasis although only two (3%) were on systemic immunosuppression at ICI initiation. With ICI treatment, 43 patients (57%) experienced a psoriasis flare of cutaneous and/or extracutaneous disease after a median of 44 days of receiving ICI. Of those who experienced a flare, 23 patients (53%) were managed with topical therapy only; 16 (21%) needed systemic therapy. Only five patients (7%) required immunotherapy discontinuation for psoriasis flare. Forty-five patients (59%) experienced other irAEs, 17 (22%) of which were grade 3/4. PFS with landmark analysis was significantly longer in patients with a psoriasis flare versus those without (39 vs 8.7 months, p=0.049).

Conclusions

In this multicenter study, ICI therapy was associated with frequent psoriasis exacerbation, although flares were manageable with standard psoriasis treatments and few required ICI discontinuation. Patients who experienced disease exacerbation performed at least as well as those who did not. Thus, pre-existing psoriasis should not prevent patients from receiving ICIs for treatment of malignancy.

Rheumatological Immune-related Adverse Events of Checkpoints Inhibitors: a Narrative Review for the Latin American Rheumatologist

Latin America is experiencing a demographic and epidemiological transition, with an increase in non-communicable diseases such as cancer. One of the greatest advances in the therapeutic approach to cancer has been the discovery of immunotherapy, and specifically of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). Since inhibition of CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 enhances the immune response, cancer immunotherapies are associated with a new class of toxicities of autoimmune and/or autoinflammatory origin. These immune-related adverse events (irAEs) result in a broad spectrum of clinical events including rheumatic clinical syndromes, which may resemble classic rheumatic diseases. The most common rheumatic manifestations include inflammatory arthritis, myositis, vasculitis, and sicca syndrome. Recognizing rheumatologic irAEs is challenging due to the wide spectrum of clinical presentations that often do not fulfill traditional classification criteria of rheumatic diseases. A delayed diagnosis and treatment can lead to long-term disability, and disorders may become chronic and require ongoing immunosuppressive therapy. The management of irAEs includes the prompt detection and appropriate grading since their management is dictated by their severity. The growing use of CPIs, and the ensuing increase in irAEs, warrants an increasing collaboration between rheumatologists and oncologists. Understanding the pathophysiology, diagnosis, grading, and therapeutic implications of irAEs in patients with cancer is thus a requirement for Latin American oncologists and rheumatologists alike.

Risk of Toxicity After Initiating Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used to treat advanced cancer. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with an increased risk of malignancies; however, patients with RA have been excluded from ICI trials. In this study, we evaluated risk of toxicity after initiation of ICI treatment in RA patients.

METHODS

We conducted a single-institution, medical records review analysis to assess the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and autoimmune disease (AID) flares among patients with AIDs treated with ICIs from 2011 to 2018. A subgroup analysis for RA patients was performed with frequencies of irAEs and AID flares reported.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients with RA who were treated with ICI for malignancy were identified. At the time of ICI initiation, 86% had inactive RA disease activity. Immune-related adverse events occurred in 7 (32%) of patients, with 2 (9%) developing grade 3 (i.e., severe) irAEs. Immune checkpoint inhibitors were temporarily discontinued because of irAEs in 5 patients (23%), and permanently in 1 patient. Rheumatoid arthritis flares occurred in 12 patients (55%). Of those, 10 (83%) received oral corticosteroids with an adequate treatment response.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis suggests that irAEs following ICI treatment are not increased among RA patients compared with other cancer patients. Heightened RA disease activity during ICI treatment is common, but most adverse events are manageable with oral corticosteroids, and few require permanent ICI discontinuation. A close collaboration between the oncologist and rheumatologist is advisable when considering ICIs in patients with RA.

Immunotherapy Use in Patients With Lung Cancer and Comorbidities

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is now in widespread clinical use for the treatment of lung cancer. Although patients with autoimmune disease and other comorbidities were excluded from initial clinical trials, emerging real-world experience suggests that these promising treatments may be administered safely to individuals with inactive low-risk autoimmune disease such as rheumatoid arthritis or psoriasis, mild to moderate renal and hepatic dysfunction, and certain chronic viral infections. Considerations for ICI in autoimmune disease populations include exacerbations of the underlying autoimmune disease, increased risk of ICI-induced immune-related adverse events, and potential for compromised efficacy if patients are receiving chronic immunosuppression. Immune checkpoint inhibitor use in higher-risk autoimmune conditions, such as myasthenia gravis or multiple sclerosis, requires careful evaluation on a case-by-case basis. Immune checkpoint inhibitor use in individuals with solid organ transplant carries a substantial risk of organ rejection. Ongoing research into the prediction of ICI efficacy and toxicity may help in patient selection, treatment, and monitoring.