Double-blind, placebo-controlled immunotherapy with mixed grass-pollen allergoids. IV. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of two dosages of a high-molecular-weight allergoid

Effectiveness of specific immunotherapy in the treatment of allergic rhinitis: an analysis of randomized, prospective, single- or double-blind, placebo-controlled studies

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of specific immunotherapy (SIT) in the treatment of allergic rhinitis has been supported by empirical evidence and clinical experience.

OBJECTIVE

This report is an analysis of multiple studies involving patients with documented allergic rhinitis.

METHODS

All studies of the effectiveness of SIT in the treatment of allergic rhinitis published in English between the years 1966 and 1996 were identified through a MEDLINE search. All prospective, single- or double-blind, placebo-controlled studies were included in the analysis. One author (R.N.R.) extracted data from the studies. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model for a variety of clinical measures in studies that permitted the extraction of numbers of patients with positive and negative outcomes.

RESULTS

Data were extracted from 16 studies of the clinical effectiveness of SIT in the treatment of allergic rhinitis, involving 759 patients (546 adults, 53 children, 160 all ages). In 15 (94%) of the studies, investigators concluded that SIT was effective. In the remaining study (the only one conducted in children), investigators concluded that SIT was not effective. Symptoms of allergic rhinitis were more likely to improve in patients receiving SIT than in the comparison patients (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.48 to 2.23). Symptom-medication scores were significantly lower in patients receiving SIT than in the comparison patients in all studies using such measures (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Results of this analysis support the conclusion that SIT is effective in the treatment of allergic rhinitis.

Genetically engineered and synthetic allergen derivatives: candidates for vaccination against type I allergy

Type I allergy, a hypersensitivity disease affecting almost 20% of the population worldwide, is based on the IgE recognition of otherwise harmless antigens (i.e., allergens). Allergen-induced crosslink of effector cell-bound IgE antibodies leads to the release of biological mediators and thus to immediate disease symptoms (allergic rhinitis, conjunctivitis and asthma). Specific immunotherapy, the only causative treatment of Type I allergy, is based on the administration of increasing doses of allergens to allergic patients in order to yield allergen-specific non-responsiveness. Major disadvantages are 1. that current forms of allergen immunotherapy are performed with allergens difficult to standardize which cannot be matched to the patients reactivity profile and 2. that the administration of active allergen preparations can cause anaphylactic side effects. Through the application of molecular biological techniques many relevant environmental allergens have been produced as active recombinant proteins which allow component-resolved allergy diagnosis and thus represent the basis for patient-tailored forms of immunotherapy. Here we review molecular strategies which have been recently applied to generate genetically engineered and synthetic hypoallergenic allergen derivatives for patient-tailored and safe vaccination against Type I allergy.

Comparison between nasal provocation tests and skin tests in patients treated with loratadine and cetirizine

BACKGROUND

The effect of H1-blockers may differ depending on the target organ.

OBJECTIVE

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out to compare the effect of a 7-day treatment with loratadine (10 mg daily) or cetirizine (10 mg daily) on nasal challenge with grass pollen grains and skin tests with allergen or histamine.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients were enrolled, but the analysis was carried out on 23. Nasal challenge was carried out by using 5-fold increasing numbers of pollen grains. Skin prick tests were done with serial concentrations of allergens and 1 concentration of histamine. Patients were tested in a cross-over design, with each treatment being administered for the previous 7 days and with a 2-week washout period.

RESULTS

By comparison with placebo, loratadine and cetirizine increased significantly the threshold number of pollen grains required to induce a positive nasal challenge (P <.001). There was no difference between loratadine and cetirizine. Skin test responses to allergen were significantly reduced by loratadine and cetirizine by comparison with placebo. Skin test responses to histamine were significantly decreased by the 2 H1-blockers, but they were more profoundly decreased by cetirizine than by loratadine.

CONCLUSIONS

Both H1-blockers reduced similarly allergen-induced skin test and nasal challenge responses. Cetirizine was more effective on histamine skin test responses.

Long-term treatment with allergoid immunotherapy with Parietaria. Clinical and immunologic effects in a randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Specific immunotherapy (SIT) is a valuable treatment for respiratory allergy, and the use of chemically modified allergens (allergoids) has improved its safety, as testified by several studies. We evaluated the effects of a SIT course with an allergoid extract of Parietaria pollen in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

METHODS

The study was double-blind in the first year; then it was prolonged up to 3 years with all patients on active treatment. Clinical effectiveness, safety, skin reactivity, systemic immunologic parameters, and subjective assessment were evaluated. We also had available a self-evaluation recorded in a follow-up visit 4 years after the discontinuation of SIT.

RESULTS

A significant reduction of the symptoms plus drug intake scores during the pollen seasons was observed in the patients receiving active SIT. The placebo patients, after switching to active SIT, also showed significant clinical improvement. The clinical efficacy persisted during years 2 and 3 of treatment. After year 1, the actively treated patients reported a significant subjective improvement (frequency of symptoms, P = 0.001; duration of symptoms, P = 0.024; physical performance, P = 0.043) compared with the placebo group. The self-evaluation by visual analog scale showed that all patients maintained a significant clinical improvement up to 4 years after discontinuing SIT (year 1: active=+31.6%, placebo=-15.7%; year 7: active=+35.8%, placebo=+31.3%). The systemic immunologic changes after active SIT paralleled those described elsewhere (IgE decreased from 22 to 9 and from 21 to 8 IU/ml; IgG4 increased from 43 to 87 and from 18 to 60 IU/ml). A significant decrease in skin reactivity to three different allergen concentrations was observed at year 3 compared with pretreatment values (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The investigational SIT with Parietaria appeared to be effective and safe; a 3-year course of treatment achieved a long-lasting efficacy.

Physicochemical and immunologic characterization of low-molecular-weight allergoids of Dactylis glomerata pollen proteins

BACKGROUND

Orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata) pollen proteins were chemically modified by means of acid anhydrides (maleic and succinic anhydride) to obtain low-molecular-weight allergoids. Chemical modification in both cases led to the replacement of one positive charge (epsilon amino group of Lys) by one negative charge, yielding proteins with changed physicochemical properties in comparison to the native orchard grass-pollen proteins.

METHODS

Physicochemical characterization of derivatives was done by gel chromatography, SDS-PAGE, and isoelectric focusing. To examine the IgE-binding properties of these derivatives, we carried out immunoblotting. To examine the ability of derivatives to induce IgG production, we immunized rabbits. Skin prick testing with the allergoids was performed on 15 individuals allergic to orchard grass pollens and on two healthy subjects.

RESULTS

It was shown that the modified proteins retain their original molecular weights, but change pI to more acidic values. In the case of allergoids, a strong reduction in IgE binding was found. Immunization of rabbits with allergoids showed that the derivatives retain the ability to induce IgG production, and that the antisera obtained in such a way react to native (unmodified) extract. The ability of derivatives to induce allergic reaction was significantly reduced. The patients (86.6%) included in our study exhibited less than 50% of native extract response. Among them, 53.3% had no response to one or both allergoids.

CONCLUSIONS

These modification procedures yield allergoids with a reduced allergenic activity and preserved immunogenic potential suitable for use in immunotherapy.

Responses of human birch pollen allergen-reactive T cells to chemically modified allergens (allergoids)

BACKGROUND

Allergoids are widely used in specific immunotherapy for the treatment of IgE-mediated allergic diseases.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyse whether a modification of birch pollen allergens with formaldehyde affects the availability of T-cell epitopes.

METHODS

Efficient modification of the allergens was verified by determining IgE and IgG binding activity using ELISA inhibition tests. T-cell responses to birch pollen allergoids were analysed in polyclonal systems, using peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) of five birch pollen-allergic individuals, as well as birch pollen extract-reactive T-cell lines (TCL), established from the peripheral blood of 14 birch pollen-allergic donors. To determine whether the modification of natural (n)Bet v 1 with formaldehyde or maleic anhydride results in epitope-specific changes in T-cell reactivities, 22 Bet v 1-specific T-cell clones (TCC), established from nine additional birch pollen-allergic individuals, were tested for their reactivity with these products.

RESULTS

The majority of PBMC and TCL showed a reduced response to the birch pollen extract allergoid. Bet v 1-specific TCC could be divided into allergoid-reactive and -non-reactive TCC. No simple correlation between possible modification sites of formaldehyde in the respective T-cell epitopes and the stimulatory potential of the allergoid was observed. Mechanisms of suppression or of anergy induction were excluded as an explanation for the non-reactivity of representative TCC. All TCC could be stimulated by maleylated and unmodified nBet v 1 to a similar extent.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate differences in the availability of T-cell epitopes between allergoids and unmodified allergens, which are most likely due to structural changes within the allergen molecule.

A double-blind study of the discontinuation of ragweed immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy effectively treats the symptoms of allergic rhinitis and improves its pathophysiology. We studied whether the effects of immunotherapy on the early response to nasal challenge with antigen and seasonal symptoms persist after discontinuation.

METHODS

Twenty subjects with ragweed allergy who were receiving immunotherapy and who had nasal challenges performed before initiation of treatment were selected. The patients had been receiving maintenance therapy with aqueous ragweed extract at a dose of 12 microg of Amb a 1 equivalent for a minimum of 3 years, at which point they were randomized to receive either placebo injections or to continue with the maintenance dose. Nasal challenges were performed before and 1 year after randomization. Nasal challenges were monitored by counting the number of sneezes and measuring histamine, N-alpha-tosyl-L-arginine methyl ester-esterase activity, and kinins in recovered nasal lavages. In the same year symptom diaries were collected during the ragweed season.

RESULTS

The initial immunotherapy significantly reduced responses to nasal challenge in both groups. The group continuing to receive active treatment showed no significant changes from the response before randomization. In contrast, the group randomized to placebo treatment showed a partial return of histamine, kinins, and N-alpha-tosyl-L-arginine methyl ester-esterase in nasal secretions and the numbers of sneezes. IgG antibodies to ragweed declined only in the group switched to placebo treatment. Seasonal rises of IgE antibodies to ragweed did not return during the first season after treatment was stopped. Symptoms reported during the ragweed season were not different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

One year after discontinuation of ragweed immunotherapy, nasal challenges showed partial recrudescence of mediator responses even though reports during the season appeared to indicate continued suppression of symptoms.

Allergen induced cytokine profiles in type I allergic individuals before and after immunotherapy

Allergen immunotherapy (IT) involves subcutaneous injections of increasing doses of specific allergen over a period of time. It is recognised as highly effective in the treatment of patients with allergic rhinitis. However, the specific immunological mechanisms by which IT achieves its effect have not been fully elucidated. Recent studies, have shown that the clinical effects following IT of allergic individuals is concomitant with a reduced production of IL-4 by allergen specific CD4+ T-cells. The aim of the present study was to gain better knowledge about the immunological mechanisms by which IT exerts its beneficial effects. For this purpose, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from ten individuals receiving birch allergen or placebo in an IT-study performed in a double-blind manner, were analysed for IL-4, IFN-gamma, IL-5 and IL-10 mRNA expression at the onset of the study and during the pollen season, during treatment. Both spontaneous and in vitro allergen-induced cytokine mRNA expression was analysed using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Spontaneous expression of IL-4 mRNA could be detected in most of the allergic patients, but not in healthy donors. The IT-treated patients showed a decrease in the spontaneous expression of IL-4 mRNA during the pollen season as compared to at the onset of the study, while in patients receiving placebo the IL-4 mRNA expression increased or remained unchanged. Similar results were obtained after in vitro stimulation with allergen. This was in contrast to the results for IFN-gamma, which was readily detected in both patient groups with no significant differences between the groups at either timepoint. IL-5 was shown to be increased during the pollen season in both groups and thereby presumably not affected by allergen IT. Taken together, these observations suggest that the cytokine profiles in circulating T lymphocytes change as a consequence of allergen IT.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of immunotherapy with grass-pollen extract Alutard SQ during a 3-year period with initial rush immunotherapy

Thirty patients with asthma and/or monosensitized allergic rhinitis caused by grass pollen whose ages ranged from 15 to 35 years were selected. Two groups were established at random: an active group and a placebo group, and a double-blind study was done on treatment with immunotherapy for a period of 3 continuous years, with initiation doses administered according to the rush immunotherapy technique. Grass-pollen allergen extract Alutard SQ and histamine as a placebo were used. The objective parameters of efficacy evaluated were end-point cutaneous tests, conjunctival provocation, bronchial provocation, and symptom/medication scores, as well as specific immunoglobulin determinations. The statistical evaluation of the results was significant for the differences existing between the initial and final time of the active group, and there were significant differences between the two groups for all of the parameters considered. We found no relationship between clinical improvement and the range of specific immunoglobulin E values. Regarding the safety of the treatment, systemic adverse effects were manifested only in the initial phase (rush immunotherapy), and were easily controlled by treatment. We conclude that the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy with grass pollen make it possible to consider this treatment fundamental in these patients.

Grass pollen immunotherapy inhibits allergen-induced infiltration of CD4+ T lymphocytes and eosinophils in the nasal mucosa and increases the number of cells expressing messenger RNA for interferon-gamma

BACKGROUND

Grass pollen injection immunotherapy is effective in patients with summer hay fever, although efficacy must be balanced against possible side effects. The mechanism of immunotherapy is unknown but may be related to its ability to inhibit allergen-induced late responses, which are known to be characterized by infiltration of T lymphocytes, eosinophils, and cells with messenger RNA for so-called TH2-type cytokines (IL-4 and IL-5).

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to observe the effect of grass pollen immunotherapy on late nasal responses and associated cellular infiltration and cytokine mRNA expression.

METHODS

We performed local nasal provocation with grass pollen (and a control challenge) in 28 patients after a 12-month double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of immunotherapy. Nasal biopsy specimens were obtained at 24 hours and processed for immunohistology and in situ hybridization studies.

RESULTS

Grass pollen immunotherapy inhibited allergen-induced immediate (0 to 60 minutes) increases in sneezing (p < 0.02) and nasal blocking (p < 0.01) and late (0 to 24 hours) nasal symptoms (p < 0.05). Immunotherapy also inhibited the associated infiltration of the nasal mucosa by CD4+ T lymphocytes and total (major basic protein-containing) and "activated" (cationic protein-secreting) eosinophils (all p = 0.03). There was a significant (p = 0.04) increase in cells expressing mRNA for interferon-gamma at 24 hours after allergen challenge, which correlated inversely with patients' seasonal symptoms (r = -0.65, p < 0.05) and medication requirements (r = -0.75, p < 0.02) during the pollen season.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that successful grass pollen immunotherapy for summer hay fever may act by inhibiting allergen-induced T lymphocyte and eosinophil recruitment and eosinophil activation in the target organ, possibly through a mechanism involving protective local increases in TH1-type cells.

New insights into the mechanisms of immunotherapy

Allergen-specific immunotherapy retains a place in treatment in patients with allergic rhinitis who fail to respond to conventional treatment with antihistamines and topical corticosteroids. Studies on mechanisms of immunotherapy have previously focussed on changes in serum antibodies, including blunting of seasonal rises in specific IgE and increase in "blocking" specific IgG antibodies. Immunotherapy in patients with rhinitis has also been shown to inhibit effector cells with a decrease in nasal mucosal eosinophils and epithelial mast cells. Recent evidence suggests that these events may be orchestrated by an effect of immunotherapy on T lymphocytes with alteration from a predominant "Th2" response (interleukin 4 and 5) in favour of an additional "Th1" response (gamma interferon) which may decrease tissue eosinophilia and local IgE production. Novel therapeutic approaches to allergic diseases might include use of topical gamma interferon, immunosuppressive agents, anti-CD4 antibodies or strategies directed specifically against IL-4 or IL-5.

Safety considerations in assessing the role of immunotherapy in allergic disorders

Specific immunotherapy (SIT) is accepted as an effective treatment of allergic diseases when high quality extracts are used. However, this form of treatment can cause untoward reactions among which systemic reactions are the most severe. Although life-threatening reactions are rare and deaths exceptionally reported, SIT should be prescribed by allergists to patients with well defined characteristics, and administered with care by (or under the close supervision of) physicians trained to deal rapidly with the reactions. Reactions with standardised extracts occur mostly during the dose increase phase but they can be prevented using adapted schedules and premedication. During maintenance injections or when vial batches are changed, standardised extracts of known shelf-life usually result in a low rate of systemic reactions. Patients with asthma are more prone to develop systemic reactions, and allergens should not be administered to patients with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) under 70% of predicted or in those who have unstable or symptomatic asthma. Systemic reactions may be observed with all allergens and allergenic preparations although it appears that high molecular weight extracts may be safer.

Allergen immunotherapy. Review of efficacy and current practice

The modern use of allergen immunotherapy is described. Evidence for efficacy in inhalant allergy and insect sting allergy is reviewed. Current indications for allergen immunotherapy are discussed.

Differences in clinical and immunologic reactivity of patients allergic to grass pollens and to multiple-pollen species. II. Efficacy of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, specific immunotherapy with standardized extracts

The IgE response of patients only allergic to grass pollens differs from response of patients allergic to multiple-pollen species. The IgE immunoblots to orchard-grass pollens confirmed that polysensitized patients had more proteins revealed than patients only allergic to grass pollens. To determine if both groups of patients present a different response toward specific immunotherapy (IT), a double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed in 70 patients. Patients receiving the active treatment had a rush IT with either a standardized orchard grass-pollen extract or with a standardized mixed-pollen extract prepared, depending on the sensitivity of the patients. The maintenance dose was defined as that dose effective in grass-pollen IT in previous experiments. The same equipotent maintenance dose was administered for all pollen species. Symptom-medication scores during the pollen season and nasal challenge with orchard grass-pollen grains demonstrated that grass pollen-allergic patients had a significantly improved efficacy by comparison to placebo treatment, whereas polysensitized patients had a nonsignificant improvement. Serum grass-pollen IgG was significantly increased after IT in both treated groups. This study demonstrate that the response toward specific IT differs in patients only allergic to grass pollens by comparison to polysensitized patients.