Investigation into the accuracy and measurement methods of sequential 3D dental scan alignment

Comparison of intraoral and laboratory scanners to an industrial-grade scanner while analyzing the fabrication trueness of polymer and titanium complete-arch implant-supported frameworks

OBJECTIVES

To compare the scans of different intraoral scanners (IOSs) and laboratory scanners (LBSs) to those of an industrial-grade optical scanner by measuring deviations of complete-arch implant-supported frameworks from their virtual design file.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ten polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and 10 titanium (Ti) complete-arch implant-supported frameworks were milled from a master standard tessellation language (STL) file. An industrial-grade blue light scanner (AT), 2 LBSs (MT and E4), and 3 IOSs (PS, T3, and T4) were used to generate STL files of these frameworks. All STLs were imported into an analysis software (Geomagic Control X) and overall root mean square (RMS) values were calculated. Marginal surfaces of all STL files were then virtually isolated (Medit Link v 2.4.4) and marginal RMS values were calculated. Deviations in scans of tested scanners were compared with those in scans of AT by using a linear mixed effects model (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

When the scans of PEEK frameworks were considered, PS and T3 had similar overall RMS to those of AT (p ≥ .076). However, E4 and T4 had higher and MT had lower overall RMS than AT (p ≤ .002) with a maximum estimated mean difference of 13.41 µm. When the scans of Ti frameworks were considered, AT had significantly lower overall RMS than tested scanners (p ≤ .010) with a maximum estimated mean difference of 31.35 µm. Scans of tested scanners led to significantly higher marginal RMS than scans of AT (p ≤ .006) with a maximum estimated mean difference of 53.90 µm for PEEK and 40.50 µm for Ti frameworks.

CONCLUSION

Only the PEEK framework scans of PS and T3 led to similar overall deviations to those of AT. However, scans of all tested scanners resulted in higher marginal deviations than those of AT scans.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Scans performed by using PS and T3 may be alternatives to those of tested reference industrial scanner AT, for the overall fabrication trueness analysis of complete-arch implant-supported PEEK frameworks.

Reliability of digital repeated-scan superimposition and single-scan techniques for wear volume loss assessment on flat surfaces

OBJECTIVES

Evidence on the reliability of digital techniques for wear volume assessment using three-dimensional (3D) scan datasets is scarce. This study evaluated the reliability of a repeated-scan superimposition technique and two single-scan techniques in assessing wear volume loss on flat surfaces of 3D-printed resin specimens.

METHODS

Cuboid-shaped (15×10×10 mm) resin specimens were 3D-printed (n = 14) and scanned before and after 200,000 cycles of masticatory simulation. For the repeated-scan superimposition technique, digital 3D models of specimens before and after masticatory simulation were superimposed, and the volume loss was determined. The first single-scan technique utilized a computer-aided design freeware program, while the second one employed a 3D-metrology software program. In the freeware program, the worn area of 3D objects was edited directly to obtain a flat surface. In the 3D-metrology software program, the worn area was deleted first and then filled to the flat surface. The volume differences before and after editing were calculated in each software program. Agreement between the three measurement techniques was determined through intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). One-way analysis of variance was performed to compare the wear volume loss assessed by the three techniques (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

High inter-technique reliability was observed between the three assessment techniques (ICC = 0.998, p < .001). On pair-wise comparisons of two of the three techniques, all pairs showed high consistency (ICC ≥ 0.999, p < .001). No significant difference was found in the wear volume loss assessed using the three techniques (p = .996).

CONCLUSIONS

Digital repeated-scan superimposition and two single-scan techniques demonstrated high reliability in assessing wear volume loss on flat surfaces.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The repeated-scan superimposition technique can be effectively utilized to assess wear volume loss of anatomically shaped specimens and flat surfaces. This study indicates that the single-scan techniques may serve as a suitable alternative to the repeated-scan superimposition technique when evaluating wear volume loss of flat surfaces.

Effect of triangular mesh resolution on the geometrical trueness of segmented CBCT maxillofacial data into STL format

OBJECTIVES

To determine the optimal level of mesh reduction that would maintain acceptable levels of geometrical trueness while also minimizing the impact on other parameters such as file size and processing time.

METHODS

Intraoral and extraoral maxillofacial defects were created on 8 cadaver heads and scanned by using a CBCT scanner (NewTom 3D Imaging, Verona). DICOM data were segmented to produce head (n=8) and skull models (n=8) saved as standard tessellation language (STL) files. A further processing of head models was preformed to produce face (n=8) and ear models (n=8). A mesh reduction process was performed for each STL model (reference, R0) by generating 50% (R1), 75% (R2), and 90% (R3) reductions. The 3 datasets were compared to the R0 file using 3D evaluation software (GOM Inspect) using a global best-fit algorithm, to calculate the root mean square (RMS) deviations. Statistical analyses were performed at a level of significance of α=0.05.

RESULTS

There was no 3D deviation after the 50% triangular mesh reduction in the 4 datasets. Minor 3D deviations were observed after 75% reduction, in all groups. After 90% reduction, higher 3D deviations were observed, and especially in head and skull. Statistically significant increase in 3D deviations was observed with higher degrees of mesh reduction (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The resolution of CBCT-based maxillofacial defect models can be reduced up to 50%, with neglectable concern to inaccuracy.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Accurate maxillofacial models can be obtained from CBCT DICOM files after segmentation and export as STL files, even when the mesh resolution is reduced up to 50%. This information can be valuable for practitioners and researchers working with 3D models of maxillofacial defects.

Creating and analyzing digital scans of a mandibulectomy cast with simulated trismus

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Trismus associated with maxillofacial defects resulting from tumor resection or radiotherapy can make dental treatment uncomfortable for patients. Using an intraoral scanner instead of making a conventional impression could help to make prosthetic rehabilitation more comfortable. However, limited information is available regarding the feasibility and accuracy of intraoral scanners for scanning mandibular defects.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of using an intraoral scanner to digitize a cast of a mandibular defect under various simulated trismus conditions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An intraoral scanner was used to scan the mandibular cast under different simulated degrees of trismus (mouth opening 10, 20, and 30 mm) and nontrismus (mouth opening 40 mm). The surface areas captured were compared. The datasets were loaded into a 3-dimensional (3D) evaluation software program and then superimposed for precision analysis and on reference data for trueness analysis. One-way analysis of variance was used to compare surface area captured, precision, and trueness of the measurement under the different mouth opening conditions (α=.05).

RESULTS

The surface area for which 3D data were obtained by the intraoral scanner ranged from 3199.1 to 6161.6 mm2. The area differed significantly under all mouth opening conditions (P=.001), with a smaller scanned surface area captured in severe trismus (10 mm). Precision ranged from 0.032 to 0.056 mm, and trueness from 0.037 to 0.076 mm. No significant differences were seen in precision (P=.312), but significant differences were seen in trueness (P=.016) under all trismus conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Using an intraoral scanner appears feasible for digitizing mandibular defect casts with simulated mild and moderate trismus. The accuracy of the obtained data was clinically acceptable.

Effect of high-speed sintering on the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns

This study compared the marginal and internal fit of zirconia crowns fabricated using conventional and high-speed induction sintering. A typodont mandibular right first molar was prepared and 60 zirconia crowns were fabricated: 30 crowns using conventional sintering and 30 crowns using high-speed sintering. We presented a new evaluation methodology to measure the marginal and internal fit of restorations through digital scanning, aligning the two datasets, and measuring the distance between two arbitrary point sets of the datasets. For the marginal fit, we calculated the maximum values of the shortest distances between the marginal line of the prepared tooth and that of the crown. The calculated values ranged from 359 to 444 μm, with smaller values for the high-speed sintered crowns (P < 0.05). For the internal fit, we employed mesh sampling and computed the geodesic distances between the prepared tooth surface and the crown intaglio surface. The measured values ranged from 177 to 229 μm with smaller values for the high-speed sintered crowns, but no significant difference was found (P > 0.05). Based on our results, the high-speed sintering method can be considered a promising option for single-visit zirconia treatment in dental practice.

Positional transfer accuracy of titanium base implant abutment provided by two different scan body designs: an invitro study

BACKGROUND

The variabilities in design and material of scan bodies have a major role in the positional transfer accuracy of implants. The purpose of this invitro study was to compare the 3D transfer accuracy (trueness and precision) of titanium base (TB) abutment position provided by 2 different scan bodies: one-piece scan body (SB) in comparison to two-piece healing abutment and scan peg (HA-SP).

METHODS

A maxillary model with a dummy implant in the 2nd premolar (Proactive Tapered Implant; Neoss) was 3D printed and TB (Ti Neolink Mono; Neoss) was tightened on the implant and scanned by using a laboratory scanner (inEos X5; Dentsply Sirona) (reference scan). An SB (Elos Medtech) and an HA-SP (Neoss) were subsequently connected to the implant and were scanned 10 times each by using the same scanner (test scans). All the scans were exported as STL files and imported into CAD software where the TBs were formed. Test scans were superimposed on reference scans for transfer accuracy analysis using 3D metrology software (GOM Inspect; GOM GmbH) in terms of angular deviation in vertical and horizontal directions, linear deviation in each XYZ axis of TBs and total linear deviation in all axes. Statistical analysis was done using independent sample t test. When Levene's test for equality of variances was significant, Welch's t-test was used. (P value < 0.05) RESULTS: Significant differences were found amongst the tested groups in both angular and linear deviation in terms of trueness with less deviation values for the SB group (P < 0.001). For the precision, significant differences were found amongst the tested groups in angular deviation in vertical direction with less deviation value for the SB group compared to HA-SP group (P < 0.001). However, no significant difference was found between the tested groups regarding the angular deviation in horizontal direction (P = 1.000). Moreover, significant differences were found amongst the tested groups in linear deviations with less linear deviations in XYZ axes for SB compared to HA-SP group (P = 0.020, < 0.001, = 0.010 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

SB showed less angular and linear deviation values in the 3D positional transfer of TB than HA-SP indicating higher degree of accuracy of SB.

Effect of build angle on the dimensional accuracy of monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated with the nanoparticle jetting technique

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The build angle is an essential parameter in additive manufacturing. Its effect on the dimensional accuracy of zirconia restorations fabricated using the nanoparticle jetting (NPJ) technique is unknown.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of the build angle on the dimensional accuracy of monolithic zirconia complete crowns fabricated by using NPJ.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Standardized artificial right maxillary incisors and mandibular first molars were prepared for ceramic complete crowns. In total, 100 monolithic zirconia crowns were fabricated using NPJ at build angles of 0, 45, 90, 135, and 180 degrees (n=10/angle for incisors and molars). The dimensional accuracies in the external, marginal, and intaglio regions were determined by superimposing the scanned data and computer-aided design data on the crowns. Root mean square (RMS) values were used to analyze the accuracy of the zirconia crowns overall and at the external, marginal, and intaglio surfaces. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to examine the normality of data distribution. Differences among test groups were assessed using a 1-way analysis of variance and the post hoc least significant difference test (α=.05).

RESULTS

Significant differences were found in the accuracy of monolithic zirconia incisor and molar complete crowns in the external, marginal, and intaglio regions among the 5 build angles (P<.05). For incisors, the external RMS value was lowest for a build angle of 45 degrees (18.2 ±3.0 µm), the marginal and intaglio RMS values were lowest for a build angle of 135 degrees (47.4 ±10.7 and 26.5 ±6.1 µm, respectively), and the overall RMS values did not differ significantly among the 5 build angles (P>.05). For molars, build angles of 0 degrees and 180 degrees yielded the lowest RMS values overall (22.3 ±1.5 and 21.8 ±3.2 µm, respectively) and in the external (23.2 ±2.9 and 22.3 ±2.5 µm, respectively) and intaglio (22.2 ±3.7 and 21.2 ±4.6 µm, respectively) regions. No significant difference was observed in the marginal area among the 5 build angles (P>.05). The overall RMS values reflecting dimensional accuracy for the 5 build angles were between 23.5 and 26.7 µm for incisors and 21.8 and 26.2 µm for molars.

CONCLUSIONS

The dimensional accuracy of monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by using NPJ was affected by the build angle and was within clinically acceptable limits.

The subsurface lesion in erosive tooth wear

OBJECTIVES

This study compared the surface change on natural and polished enamel exposed to a joint mechanical and chemical wear regimen.

METHODS

Human enamel samples were randomly assigned to natural (n = 30) or polished (n = 30) groups, subjected to erosion (n = 10, 0.3% citric acid, 5 min), abrasion (n = 10, 30 s), or a combination (n = 10). Wear in the form of step height was measured with a non-contact profilometer, and surface changes were inspected with SEM on selected sections. Data was normalised and underwent repeated measures MANOVA, accounting for substrate and erosive challenge as independent variables, with Bonferroni correction for significant post hoc interactions.

RESULTS

After four cycles, polished samples had mean step heights of 3.08 (0.40) μm after erosion and 4.08 (0.37) μm after erosion/abrasion. For natural samples, these measurements were 1.52 (0.22) μm and 3.62 (0.39) μm, respectively. Natural surfaces displayed less wear than polished surfaces under erosion-only conditions (p<0.0001), but the difference disappeared with added abrasion. SEM revealed a shallow subsurface layer for polished surfaces and natural ones undergoing only erosion. However, natural surfaces exposed to both erosion and abrasion showed deeper subsurface changes up to 50 µm.

CONCLUSION

Natural enamel, when exposed to erosion alone, showed less wear and minimal subsurface alterations. But with added abrasion, natural enamel surfaces saw increased wear and notable subsurface changes compared to polished ones.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The pronounced subsurface lesions observed on eroded/abraded natural enamel surfaces highlight how combined wear challenges may accelerate tooth tissue loss.

Conventional cast vs. CAD/CAM post and core in a fully digital chairside workflow - An in vivo comparative study of accuracy of fit and feasibility of impression taking

OBJECTIVES

Clinical data for CAD/CAM post and cores (PC) is still scarce, even though developments in digital dentistry have improved dental treatment in many aspects. Therefore, the purpose of this in vivo study was to compare CAD/CAM PC fabricated in a fully digital chairside workflow to conventional cast PC (CPC) according to the accuracy of fit and the impression taking. The null hypothesis was that there is no significant difference between CAD/CAM PC and CPC.

METHODS

The study was conducted on 30 teeth in 25 patients receiving a CPC during their prosthetic treatment plan. On each tooth a conventional and a digital post impression were taken. Subsequently, one CPC following a conventional and one CAD/CAM PC following a digital workflow were fabricated. Both PC were tried-in intraorally and assessed according to a standardised evaluation sheet. The deviation between the two impression methods was evaluated by superimposing the datasets in a 3D analysis software. Statistical analysis for pairwise comparison was conducted according to Wilcoxon and median test with a significance level of p = 0.05.

RESULTS

CAD/CAM PC performed significantly better compared to CPC according to accuracy of fit (p = 0.022) and feasibility of impression taking (p < 0.001). The deviation between post impression methods increased from "coronal" to "apical". Between "coronal"/"middle" no significant difference (p = 0.158) was detected, whereas the pairwise comparison between the other measurement categories showed significant differences (p = 0.002, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The null hypothesis was rejected since CAD/CAM PC performed significantly better and the deviation between the post impression methods showed significant differences.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

By using intraoral scanners (IOS) teeth can be restored with customised CAD/CAM PC in a single session. Within the limitations of this study the fully digital chairside workflow led to superior accuracy of fit of PC and higher feasibility of impression taking than the conventional workflow for CPC.

Accuracy of photogrammetric imaging versus conventional impressions for complete arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: A comparative clinical study

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Clinical studies on the accuracy of the photogrammetric imaging technique for complete arch implant-supported fixed dental prostheses are lacking.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate the accuracy (trueness) of photogrammetric imaging for complete arch implant-supported prostheses by comparing photogrammetric imaging with verified conventional splinted impressions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Completely edentulous arches with at least 4 implants were included. Both photogrammetric imaging and conventional splinted impressions were performed in each jaw. The conventional casts were verified and scanned by using a laboratory scanner as the control. The distances and angulations between different implants (interimplant distances and interimplant angulations) were measured in all photogrammetric and conventional standard tessellation language (STL) files by using a reverse-engineering software program. The distance deviations between the photogrammetric and conventional impressions of the same participant were calculated as the primary outcome, and the angular deviations were obtained as the secondary outcome with descriptive analyses. The comparison between distance deviations and the clinically acceptable level of deviations (150 μm) was conducted by using the 1-sample t test. The effect of interimplant distances, interimplant angulations, and jaw (maxilla or mandible) on deviations was analyzed by using the Spearman correlation analysis, Kruskal-Wallis test, or Student t test, depending on the type of data (α=0.05 for all tests).

RESULTS

Fourteen edentulous jaws were included. The overall distance deviation of photogrammetric imaging was 70 ±57 μm, significantly lower than the clinically acceptable level of misfit (150 μm; P<.001). The overall angular deviation was 0.432 ±0.348 degrees. The distance deviations were correlated with interimplant distances with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.371 (P=.002). Interimplant angulation was not correlated with distance or angular deviations (P=.914, P=.914). Jaw was not correlated with distance or angular deviations either (P=.190, P=.209).

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy (trueness) of photogrammetric imaging of complete arch implant-supported prostheses was within a clinically acceptable range of errors. Distance deviations increased with greater interimplant distances. Interimplant angulations and jaw (maxilla or mandible) had no significant effect on the accuracy of photogrammetric imaging.

Fibre-reinforced Cad/CAM post and cores: The new "gold standard" for anterior teeth with extensive coronal destruction?-A fully digital chairside workflow

Objectives

Since one-third of persons suffer a dental trauma, treatment of anterior teeth using post and core (PC) is becoming important. In teeth with extensive destruction, cast PC (CPC) remain the "gold standard", even though they lead to aesthetic impairment and have a mismatching elastic modulus to that of dentin. Prefabricated fibre-reinforced posts have elastic modulus similar to that of dentin but the accuracy of fit and mechanical stability are worse. This study was aimed to evaluate the deviation and mechanical performance of fibre-reinforced CAD/CAM PC (FRPC) fabricated in a fully digital chairside workflow, compared to those of CPC.

Methods

On 30 teeth, a PC preparation was conducted, and a conventional and digital post impression were taken with an intraoral scanner. Fifteen teeth each were treated with CPC and FRPC, respectively. The deviation was evaluated by superimposing the datasets of the digitalised stone models and digital post impressions. Decementation and root fracture during chewing simulation were analysed by microscopy and X-ray. Statistical analysis was performed by pairwise comparison and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results

The median deviation for the "coronal", "middle" and "apical" were 14.5, 18.0 and 113.7 μm, respectively. The pairwise comparison for "coronal"/"middle" showed no significance (p = 0.465), whereas that for "coronal"/"apical" and "middle"/"apical" showed highly significant differences (p < 0.001). After chewing simulation, five decementations and two root fractures were detected for CPC. For FRPC, neither decementation nor root fracture were documented.

Significance

Within the limitations of this study, FRPC performed significantly better than CPC.

Assessment of guide fitting using an intra-oral scanner: An in vitro study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the capacity of an intra-oral scanner (IOS) to assess the position of an endodontic guide in vitro.

METHODS

Fourteen extracted human teeth were placed into a maxillary model and scanned using computed tomography and a reference laboratory scanner. An ideal endodontic guide was then created and modified by adding defects of different thicknesses to simulate incorrect positions: 50 μm, 150 μm, 400 μm, and 1000 μm. For each thickness, guides were printed three times and each guide was scanned by three experimented operators using a Trios 4 IOS (3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). The 36 scans were compared using a best-fit alignment to the master model without defect to define the accuracy of the method and the positioning error.

RESULTS

The IOS presented a mean trueness of 1.28 μm (SD= 12.70) and a mean precision of 11.52 μm (SD= 62.17). Considering all sizes of defect, the mean measured position of the endodontic guide was highly correlated (R>0.99) with the expected position. Compared to the ideal guide, there was a mean linear deviation of 46.11 μm (SD= 23.21) and a mean angular deviation of 5.9° (SD= 1.2); this deviation was not influenced by the operator.

CONCLUSION

The present study found that an IOS had good performance to detect a positioning error of the endodontic guide in vitro.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This new application of IOS has a promising potential in clinical practice to assist practitioners during the fitting of guides.

Clear guidance to select the most accurate technologies for 3D printing dental models - A network meta-analysis✰

OBJECTIVES

Thus far, the findings of numerous studies conducted on the accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) printed dental models are conflicting. Therefore, the aim of the network meta-analysis (NMA) is to determine the accuracy of 3D printed dental models compared with digital reference models.

DATA

Studies comparing the accuracy of 3D printed full-arch dental models manufactured using different printing techniques to initial STL files were included.

SOURCES

This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021285863). An electronic search was performed across four databases in November 2021, and search was restricted to the English language.

STUDY SELECTION

A systematic search was conducted based on a prespecified search query. 16,303 articles were pooled after the removal of the duplicates. Following study selection and data extraction, 11 eligible studies were included in the NMA in 6 subgroups. The outcomes were specified as trueness and precision and expressed as root mean square (RMS) and absolute mean deviation values. Seven printing technologies were analyzed: stereolithography (SLA), digital light processing (DLP), fused deposition modeling/fused filament fabrication (FDM/FFF), MultiJet, PolyJet, continuous liquid interface production (CLIP), and LCD technology. The QUADAS-2 and GRADE were used to evaluate the risk of bias and certainty of evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

SLA, DLP, and PolyJet technologies were the most accurate in producing full-arch dental models.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The findings of the NMA suggest that SLA, DLP, and PolyJet technologies are sufficiently accurate for full-arch dental model production for prosthodontic purposes. In contrast, FDM/FFF, CLIP, and LCD technologies are less suitable for manufacturing dental models.

Intraoral occlusal adjustment time and volume required for CAD/CAM crowns fabricated with different virtual mounting methods (A randomized crossover trial)

OBJECTIVE

To measure the required clinical time and volume of occlusal adjustment when the maxillary cast is positioned in a virtual articulator using one of three methods: digitization of a facebow-mounted mechanical articulator (group A), virtual Bonwill triangle (group B) or a 3D face scan (group F).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this randomized, triple-blind, crossover trial; 11 participants were enrolled. Every participant had one molar indicated for a single crown restoration. Three crowns were designed and milled for every participant molar totaling 33 crowns. Each of the three crowns was fabricated with the participant's casts virtually mounted utilizing a different method. An impression was taken of the crown in place before occlusal adjustment. The occlusal adjustment was then performed and timed with the three crowns in the different groups. After the occlusal adjustment, an impression of the adjusted crown was taken. The pre-adjustment and post-adjustment impressions were digitally superimposed and the volume difference was measured. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the groups.

RESULTS

Group A showed the shortest mean adjustment time (3:44.59 ± 3:39.07) followed by group F (4:30.09 ± 2:01.50) and group B (4:35.30 ± 2:32.33). The mean adjustment volume for group A was (28 ± 19.1 mm³) followed by group F (30.5 ± 18.8 mm³) and group B (40.6 ± 29.5 mm³). Different virtual mounting methods had no statistically significant effect on adjustment time (P-value = 0.538) or adjustment volume (P-value = 0.490).

CONCLUSIONS

A simplified approach in virtual articulator mounting appears to be justified in the construction of a single full-coverage prosthesis. Added labor, time and cost of more elaborate virtual mounting methods seem to be counterproductive.

Automatic registration of dental CT and 3D scanned model using deep split jaw and surface curvature

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In the medical field, various image registration applications have been studied. In dentistry, the registration of computed tomography (CT) volume data and 3D optically scanned models is essential for various clinical applications, including orthognathic surgery, implant surgical planning, and augmented reality. Our purpose was to present a fully automatic registration method of dental CT data and 3D scanned models.

METHODS

We use a 2D convolutional neural network to regress a curve splitting the maxilla (i.e., upper jaw) and mandible (i.e., lower jaw) and the points specifying the front and back ends of the crown from the CT data. Using this regressed information, we extract the point cloud and vertices corresponding to the tooth crown from the CT and scanned data, respectively. We introduce a novel metric, called curvature variance of neighbor (CVN), to discriminate between highly fluctuating and smoothly varying regions of the tooth crown. The registration based on CVN enables more accurate fine registration while reducing the effects of metal artifacts. Moreover, the proposed method does not require any preprocessing such as extracting the iso-surface for the tooth crown from the CT data, thereby significantly reducing the computation time.

RESULTS

We evaluated the proposed method with the comparison to several promising registration techniques. Our experimental results using three datasets demonstrated that the proposed method exhibited higher registration accuracy (i.e., 2.85, 1.92, and 7.73 times smaller distance errors for individual datasets) and smaller computation time (i.e., 4.12 times faster registration) than one of the state-of-the-art methods. Moreover, the proposed method worked considerably well for partially scanned data, whereas other methods suffered from the unbalancing of information between the CT and scanned data.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed method was able to perform fully automatic and highly accurate registration of dental CT data and 3D scanned models, even with severe metal artifacts. In addition, it could achieve fast registration because it did not require any preprocessing for iso-surface reconstruction from the CT data.

Comparative Analysis of Three Facial Scanners for Creating Digital Twins by Focusing on the Difference in Scanning Method

BACKGROUND

Multi-dimensional facial imaging is increasingly used in hospital clinics. A digital twin of the face can be created by reconstructing three-dimensional (3D) facial images using facial scanners. Therefore, the reliability, strengths, and weaknesses of scanners should be investigated and approved; Methods: Images obtained from three facial scanners (RayFace, MegaGen, and Artec Eva) were compared with cone-beam computed tomography images as the standard. Surface discrepancies were measured and analyzed at 14 specific reference points; Results: All scanners used in this study achieved acceptable results, although only scanner 3 obtained preferable results. Each scanner exhibited weak and strong points because of differences in the scanning methods. Scanner 2 exhibited the best result on the left endocanthion; scanner 1 achieved the best result on the left exocanthion and left alare; and scanner 3 achieved the best result on the left exocanthion (both cheeks); Conclusions: These comparative analysis data can be used when creating digital twins through segmentation, selecting and merging data, or developing a new scanner to overcome all shortcomings.

What to Prefer in Patients with Multibracket Appliances? Digital vs. Conventional Full-Arch Impressions-A Reference Aid-Based In Vivo Study

This study aimed to investigate the transfer accuracy and required time for digital full-arch impressions obtained from intraoral scanners (IOSs) versus conventional alginate impressions (CAIs) in patients with multibracket appliances (MBA). Thirty patients with buccal MBAs (metal brackets, archwire removed) were examined using an established reference aid method. Impression-taking using four IOSs (Primescan, Trios 4, Medit i700, Emerald S) and one CAI with subsequent plaster casting were conducted. One-hundred-twenty (n = 30 × 4) scans were analyzed with 3D software (GOM Inspect) and 30 (n = 30 × 1) casts were assessed using a coordinate measurement machine. Six distances and six angles were measured and compared to the reference aid values (ANOVA; p < 0.05). Except for the intermolar distance, transfer accuracy was significantly higher with IOSs than with CAIs (p < 0.05). No such difference was found regarding the six angles. In patients with MBAs, digital impression-taking using IOSs can be recommended. For all measured variables except one, the transfer accuracy of IOSs was better than or at least equivalent to the data from CAIs. In addition, significantly (p < 0.001) less time was necessary for all IOSs in comparison to CAIs plus plaster casting.

Effect of various printing parameters on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of 3D-printed partial denture framework

OBJECTIVES

To measure and compare the accuracy of 3D-printed materials used for RPD production to improve workflow and eliminate errors in manufacturing.

METHODS

A partially edentulous maxilla (Kennedy Class III, modification 1) was prepared and designed with proximal plates, rest seats and clasps in one first premolar, one canine and two second molars. A total of 540 3D printed RPD frameworks were 3D printed with three different types of resin (DentaCAST (Asiga, Australia), SuperCAST (Asiga, Australia) and NextDent (3D Systems, Netherlands)). To evaluate the trueness of the printing materials, they were printed with three types of layer thickness: 50 μm, 75 μm and 100 μm, using two types of build angles: 0° and 45° and three types of plate locations: side, middle and corner. After production, all specimens were scanned and superimposed with a control sample that was digitally designed. Using the initial alignment and best-fit alignment method, the root mean square error (RMSE) was calculated. To capture region specific discrepancy, 10 points of XYZ internal discrepancy within RPDs were measured and Euclidean error was calculated. Data was statistically analysed using Shapiro-Wilk and Kruskal-Wallis tests, one-way ANOVA and T-test (SPSS Version 29) and MATLAB (R2022b).

RESULTS

Optimal results were found using 45°, middle of the build plate and layer thicknesses of 100 μm (115 ± 19 μm, DentaCAST), 75 μm (143 ± 14 μm, NextDent), 50 μm (98 ± 35 μm, SuperCAST), which were clinically acceptable. Results were statistically significant when comparing layer thickness in each testing group (p < 0.001). Layer thickness was a primary parameter in the determination of print accuracy among all materials (p < 0.001). Higher discrepancies and failures were observed in 0° prints. No statistically significant difference was found in material usage between build angles or layer thickness (p > 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

All three 3D printing materials exhibited clinically acceptable RMSE results with a build angle of 45° with a printing layer thickness of 50 μm for SuperCAST, 75 μm NextDent and 100 μm for DentaCAST. The highest discrepancies were mostly found in posterior clasps, while the lowest discrepancy was found in palatal straps. Despite unoptimized spacing of prints, frameworks configured to print in the middle of the build plate result in the least printing failures.

Effect of measurement techniques and operators on measured deviations in digital implant scans

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of different measurement techniques and operators on measured deviations in vitro implant scans.

METHODS

A 2-piece system that comprises a healing abutment (HA) and a scan body (SB) was mounted onto an implant at right first molar site of a polymethylmethacrylate mandibular dentate model. Model was digitized by using an industrial scanner (reference model scan, n = 1) and an intraoral scanner (test scan, n = 20). All standard tessellation language files were imported into a 3-dimensional analysis software and superimposed. Three operators with similar experience performed circle-based and point-based deviation analyses (n = 20). Deviations measured with different techniques were compared with paired samples t-test within each operator, while the reliability of the operators was assessed by using F-tests for both technqiues (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

Point-based technique resulted in lower deviations than circle-based technique for all operators (P = .001) with to higher reliability among operators (ICC = 0.438, P = .001). The correlation among the operators was nonsignificant when circle-based technique was used (ICC = 0.114, P = .189).

CONCLUSION

Lower deviations were detected with the point-based technique. In addition, different operators' measurements had higher correlation when point-based technique was used compared with circle-based technique.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Point-based technique may be preferred over circle-based technique for research studies on scan accuracy of implants, given its higher reliability. The accuracy of measured deviations may increase if the number of planes are increased, which can facilitate point generation at different surfaces of the scan body.

Effect of build orientation and layer thickness on manufacturing accuracy, printing time, and material consumption of 3D printed complete denture bases

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the influence of build orientation and layer thickness on manufacturing accuracy, material consumption, and printing time of complete denture (CD) bases fabricated using digital light processing (DLP).

METHODS

The CD base was designed on the basis of a standard maxillary edentulous model. Seventy CD bases were fabricated using a DLP 3D printer (Pro95, SprintRay, USA) and printable CD base material (DENTCA Denture Base II, Dentca, USA) at seven build orientations (0°, labial 45°, labial 90°, posterior 45°, posterior 90°, buccal 45°, and buccal 90°) and two types of layer thicknesses (50- and 100 μm) (n = 5). All test CD bases were digitalized and superimposed on the reference cast by section-based best-fit alignment. For evaluating manufacturing accuracy, deviation analysis was performed to compare the test data with the reference cast using the "3D Compare" in the 3D metrology software. The printing time and material consumption were calculated using slicing software and recorded, respectively. The two-way ANOVA test was used for accuracy evaluation, and the non-parametric test was used to evaluate printing time and material consumption (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences were found in the manufacturing accuracy (p < 0.001), printing time (p < 0.001), and material consumption (p < 0.001) among the build orientation groups. The labial 45° and labial 90° groups showed the best accuracy. The 90° build orientations required the least material consumption and longest printing time; the labial 45° group consumed the most printing materials; the 0° group required the shortest printing time to fabricate a CD base. Moreover, the layer thickness influenced the printing time (p < 0.001) rather than the accuracy (p = 0.560) and material consumption (p = 1.000).

CONCLUSIONS

When DLP was used to fabricate the CD bases, the build orientation influenced the manufacturing accuracy, material consumption, and printing time. However, the layer thickness only affected the printing time.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This study suggests that optimizing the build orientation can improve the manufacturing accuracy and reduce the material consumption and printing time of a DLP-printed CD base. The fast-printing setting (100 μm layer thickness) can reduce the printing time without compromising the manufacturing accuracy of the CD base.

Comparison of denture base adaptation between additive and conventional fabrication techniques

PURPOSE

This in vitro study compared the adaptation of denture bases fabricated by injection molding (IM), compression molding (CM), liquid crystal display (LCD), and digital light processing (DLP) techniques.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A definitive maxillary cast was duplicated using a silicone mold to create 40 gypsum casts that were laser scanned before any fabrication procedures were initiated. For the DLP and LCD groups, 20 denture bases (10 in each group) were virtually designed and manufactured referring to the digitalized data. For the CM and IM groups, 20 denture bases (10 in each group) were molded using gypsum models. A total of 40 gypsum models and their corresponding denture bases were scanned. The scanned intaglio surface of each denture base was superimposed on the scanned reference cast to compare the degree of tissue surface adaptation. The three-dimensional surface deviations of the total intaglio surface, denture border apex, palatal vault, and crest of the ridge were evaluated on the basis of the best fit algorithm technique using inspection software. The data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison test (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

According to the superimposing results, for the total intaglio surface, the lowest deviation was present on the injection-molded group and the highest deviation occurred on the LCD group. For the palatal vault, the lowest deviation was present on the DLP group and the highest deviation occurred in the compression molded group. For the crest of the ridge, the lowest deviation was present in the injection-molded group and the highest deviation occurred in the LCD group. For the denture border apex, the lowest deviation was present in the DLP group and the highest deviation occurred in the LCD group.

CONCLUSIONS

Maxillary denture bases fabricated using DLP and IM techniques showed higher surface adaptation than the bases fabricated using LCD and CM techniques. Among the conventional techniques, higher compatible dentures can be produced with IM; among the additive techniques, higher compatible dentures can be produced with DLP.

Effect of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing technique on the accuracy of fixed partial denture patterns used for casting or pressing

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of additive and subtractive manufacturing on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of fixed partial denture patterns (FPDPs) used for casting or pressing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 3-unit complete coverage FPD on mandibular right first premolar and first molar teeth was virtually designed. Using the design data, FPD patterns were fabricated from an additively manufactured resin (PR, ProArt Print Wax) and 2 CAD-CAM wax discs (YW, ProArt CAD Wax Yellow and BW, ProArt CAD Wax Blue) (n = 10). Each pattern was then digitized with a scanner (CEREC Primescan) and evaluated for 3D surface deviation at 4 different surfaces (overall, external, marginal, and intaglio surfaces) by using a 3D analysis software (Medit Link). Root mean square (RMS) values were automatically calculated. Data were analyzed by using Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's post hoc tests for trueness and precision (α= 0.05).

RESULTS

Significant differences were found among the RMS values for overall (P<.001) and each surface (P≤.040) evaluated. PR had the highest overall (P≤.011) and intaglio surface (P≤.01) deviations, while the difference between YW and BW was not significant (P≥.199). PR had the highest (P≤.027) and BW had the lowest (P≤.042) external surface mean RMS values. BW had higher mean marginal RMS value than YW (P=.047). For precision, significant differences were observed among test groups only for marginal RMS values (P=.002). PR had lower precision than BW (P=.002).

CONCLUSIONS

BW and YW FPDPs mostly had higher trueness compared with PR FPDPs. However, considering relatively smaller deviations at marginal and intaglio surfaces and the fact that patterns mostly had similar precision, clinical fit of FPDs fabricated by using tested patterns may be similar.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Definitive 3-unit fixed partial dentures fabricated by using tested patterns may be similar. However, FPDs fabricated with tested additively manufactured resin patterns might result in more chairside adjustments than those fabricated with tested subtractively manufactured wax patterns.

Monitoring of erosive tooth wear: what to use and when to use it

Although we are increasingly recognising the need to assess patients for accelerated rates of tooth wear progression, it is often difficult to do so within a feasible diagnostic window. This paper aims to provide evidence-based timelines which a diagnosing clinician can expect to assess tooth wear progression in study models, clinical indices, clinical photographs and visually with intraoral scans. It also discusses new technologies emerging for the quantitative assessment of tooth wear, timelines for diagnosis, and caveats in the 3D scan registration and analysis process.

Comparison between stereophotogrammetric, digital, and conventional impression techniques in implant-supported fixed complete arch prostheses: An in vitro study

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Conventional impressions and digital intraoral scanning for implant-supported fixed complete arch prostheses still have many problems that influence accuracy. Although stereophotogrammetry may offer a reliable alternative to other techniques, it has seldom been investigated.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to measure and compare the intraoral scan body deviations of the reference cast with the intraoral scan body distortions obtained by conventional, digital, and stereophotogrammetric techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An edentulous maxillary "all-on-four" cast was prepared with 2 straight and two 17-degree angled screw-retained abutments screwed on the implant. Three capture techniques were compared: the conventional impression technique (CI group) using impression plaster (IP), the digital intraoral scanning (DIS group) technique, and the stereophotogrammetry (SPG group) technique. A calibrated extraoral scanner was used to digitize the definitive cast to compare its intraoral scan body positions with those of the other techniques in terms of global angular distortion and 3D deviations of the whole scan body and flat angled surface alone by using an inspection and metrology software program and the best fit alignment technique. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests showed normal distribution of the quantitative variables. Thus, the repeated measures analyses of variance followed by univariate analysis and Bonferroni multiple comparison tests were performed to analyze the data (α=.05).

RESULTS

Significant global angular discrepancies and 3D deviations of the whole scan body and flat angled surface were found among the CI, DI, and SPG groups for both trueness (P<.001) and precision (P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The stereophotogrammetry capture technique reported the highest accuracy in terms of trueness and precision for the intraoral scan bodies of all the techniques evaluated. However, at the flat angled surface region of the scan body, higher trueness was detected with the digital technique. Conventional impressions showed better trueness results than the digital ones, but the opposite was true of precision.

Accuracy of Direct Composite Veneers via Injectable Resin Composite and Silicone Matrices in Comparison to Diagnostic Wax-Up

Purpose: To evaluate the discrepancy between the diagnostic wax-up and the resulting direct veneers using different matrices. Materials and method: A total of 48 identical misaligned models, 12 wax-up models and one ‘every other tooth’ wax-up model were 3D printed. Group 1: Transparent silicone matrices with holes for the injection of the flowable composite. Group 2: The same procedure as group 1, but the first three teeth were restored using the matrix constructed from the ‘every other tooth’ wax-up model. Group 3: Transparent silicone matrices cut for each tooth and preheated resin composite. Group 4: The same procedure as group 3, but the loaded matrix was placed first in the clear plastic tray, which was used for the matrix’s fabrication. Group 5: Wax-up models (control group). Scans from the veneers were superimposed with the scans from the wax-up and compared using the Patient Monitoring software. Measurements were made at the incisal, middle and cervical third. Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn post-hoc test (p < 0.05) were used to analyze the results. Results: No statistically significant differences were found between groups 1 and 2 and the control. Group 3 was different from the control in the incisal and middle third, and group 4 was different in the cervical third. Conclusions: (1) Use of one or two matrices and the injection of flowable composite were accurate techniques. (2) Use of a matrix for each tooth combined with a pre-heated composite was the most inaccurate technique, but the use of the clear tray in combination with the matrix improved the accuracy.

The transfer accuracy of digital and conventional full-arch impressions influenced by fixed orthodontic appliances: a reference aid-based in vitro study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the influence of fixed orthodontic appliances (FOAs) on the transfer accuracy of full-arch impressions by five intraoral scanners (IOSs): CS3600, Primescan, Trios 4, Medit i500, Emerald S, and one conventional alginate impression (CAI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

To compare the data with the actual model situation, an established reference aid-based method was applied. A test model with human teeth was used and modified for each testing group, resulting in five different settings: natural teeth (group A), metal brackets without/with wire (groups B/C), ceramic brackets without/with wire (groups D/E). A total of 300 (n = 12 × 5 × 5) scan datasets of IOSs were analyzed using a 3D software (GOM Inspect) and 60 (n = 12 × 5) plaster casts of CAI were measured with a coordinate measurement machine. The deviations between the reference aid and the impressions were determined.

RESULTS

For all groups with brackets (B to E), IOSs showed a higher transfer accuracy compared to CAI, even for long-span distances. However, some significant differences between the IOSs were observed (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of this in vitro study, IOSs can be recommended for impressions with and without FOAs, even if CAI showed the smallest average deviations in settings without FOAs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

IOSs are widely used in orthodontics and the current study demonstrated that their use enables fast impression taking even in settings with fixed orthodontic appliances. In addition, for these settings, the transfer accuracy is higher than with conventional alginate impressions. Nevertheless, a re-investigation in a clinical setting should be performed to verify the current in vitro findings.

Wear behaviour of direct composite restorations in tooth wear patients: a 5-year clinical study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the wear behaviour of direct composite restorations after 5 years and associated patient factors.

METHODS

38 patients (6 females, 32 males; 35.2 ± 7.6y) from the Radboud Tooth Wear Project with generalized moderate to severe tooth wear were treated with direct composite restorations on all teeth. Ethical approval was sought and granted before the study was undertaken. Intraoral 3D scans were recorded at 1 month (baseline) and 5 years (recall) after treatment. The amount of height loss was measured at six index teeth (first molars and upper central incisors). Patient factors (age, vertical dimension of occlusion increase, bite force, aetiology score, jaw position and bearing/ non-bearing cusps) were included in the analysis. Multilevel multiple regression with bootstrapping was used to analyse the influence of these factors on wear behaviour of restorations. Observer reliability was tested by paired t-tests and Band-Altman plots (p<0.05) RESULTS: After 5 years, the mean height loss was 0.23± 0.19 mm for incisors and 0.43± 0.24 mm for molars (p≤0.001). Patient factors did not show any significant influence on height loss of the composite restorations, while bearing cusps showed significant more wear compared to non-bearing cusps (p≤0.001). The observer reliability tests confirmed the repeatability (correlation of 0.809, DME 0.103).

CONCLUSIONS

Wear of composite restorations is a significant and relevant factor over time in patients treated with severe tooth wear. Within the limitations of this clinical study, patient factors were found not to have a significant effect on wear behaviour of direct composite restorations.

In vitro scan accuracy and time efficiency in various implant-supported fixed partial denture situations

OBJECTIVES

To compare the accuracy and time efficiency of different digital workflows in 3 implant-supported fixed partial denture situations.

METHODS

Three partially edentulous maxillary models with 2 implants (Model 1: implants at lateral incisor sites; Model 2: implants at right canine and first molar sites; Model 3: implants at right first premolar and first molar sites) were digitized (ATOS Capsule 200MV120, n=1) for reference scans. Test scans were performed for direct (Primescan (DDW-P) and Trios 3 (DDW-T)) and indirect (IDW) digital workflows (n=14). For IDW, stone casts (type IV) were obtained from vinylsiloxanether impressions and digitized (S600 Arti). The scan/impression and post processing times were recorded. Reference and test scans were superimposed (GOM Inspect) to calculate 3D point, inter-implant distance, and angular deviations. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used for trueness and precision analyses (α=.05).

RESULTS

Tested workflows affected trueness (P≤.030) and precision (P<.001) of scans (3D point, inter-implant distance, and angular deviations) within models. DDW-P had the highest accuracy (3D point deviations) for models 1 and 3 (P≤.046). IDW had the lowest accuracy for model 2 (P<.01). DDW-P had the highest accuracy (inter-implant distance deviations) for model 3 (P≤.048). Direct digital workflow mostly led to lower angular deviations (P≤.040), and higher precision for models 2 (mesiodistal direction) and 3 (P<.001). The time for direct digital workflow was shorter (P<.001), DDW-P being more efficient than DDW-T (P=.008).

CONCLUSION

Direct digital workflow was more accurate and efficient than indirect digital workflow in tested partial edentulism situations with 2 implants.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Tested intraoral scanners can be recommended for accurate and efficient impressions of anterior and posterior 3- or 4-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures.

Accuracy of digital auricular impression using intraoral scanner versus conventional impression technique for ear rehabilitation: A controlled clinical trial

PURPOSE

This research aims to compare the accuracy of different auricular impression techniques used to produce either a mirror image of the unaffected ear or a surgical stent and template for auricular rehabilitation. The research compares two digital ear impression techniques using an Intra-Oral digital Scanner (IOS) (with /without markers) versus a traditional technique using hydrocolloid impression materials.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eight participants were selected with intact right ears. Patients' right ears were digitally scanned with an IOS, once with resin markers and once without markers. A conventional auricular impression was taken for each participant, which was then scanned using a desktop scanner. The digital IOS technique with markers was set as a reference model. Total 3D deviations between the study groups were calculated using Geomagic control software (software for 3D coordinate measuring technology). An independent sample t-test was used to make comparisons between the two tested groups.

RESULTS

The conventional impression and the intraoral scan without markers recorded a mean of 1.4057 ± 0.3581 and 0.7605±0.1469, respectively, of total 3D deviation from the intraoral scan with markers. There was a significant difference in auricular impression accuracy between conventional and intraoral scans without markers.

CONCLUSIONS

Using intraoral scanners facilitates impression acquisition and increases the accuracy compared to traditional hydrocolloid impression techniques, which may affect the shape of tissue due to its liability to be compressed by the impression material. Using markers allows for very precise data collection, reducing stitching complications that affect the accuracy of scans taken without markers.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The proposed technique for auricular digital impression using an intraoral scanner guarantees a fast technique with accurate results in acquiring anatomical data for the rehabilitation of ear defects. This research was registered on clinicaltrials.gov with the following registration number: NCT04893902.

Dimensional Changes in Extraction Sockets: A Pilot Study Evaluating Differences between Digital and Conventional Impressions

Traditionally, soft tissue records are obtained by dental impression using impression materials; however, accurately recording the soft tissue immediately after tooth extraction is difficult. We measured the tissue changes after tooth extraction and compared two impression modalities (digital versus conventional) by measuring the changes at the soft tissue level. In this case, 15 patients with 17 single extraction sites were enrolled. Conventional impression (CI) using vinyl polysiloxane material and digital impression (DI) using an intraoral scanner were prepared immediately after extraction (T0) and at 2 months post-extraction (T1). Standard tessellation language files were generated for superimposition of the tissue surface. The tissue changes and discrepancies were measured on the superimposed surfaces. The differences in the changes and the discrepancy between the tissue surface impression at each time point were compared. At all measuring levels, the total tissue change was significantly different between groups DI and CI (p < 0.05). DI exhibited a more pronounced tissue surface at both time points, and the total discrepancy was statistically significantly greater at T0 than at T1 (p < 0.05). The values from DI and CI demonstrated small but significantly different for the same study material. The interpretation of such differences may depend on the clinical situation or scientific value.

Additive or subtractive manufacturing of crown patterns used for pressing or casting: A trueness analysis

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effect of subtractive and additive manufacturing techniques on the trueness of crown patterns used for pressing or casting.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A complete-coverage mandibular right first molar crown was designed in standard tessellation language (STL) format. This STL served as the control (C-STL) and was used to fabricate 30 crown patterns in 3D-printed resin (PR, ProArt Print Wax), millable wax suitable for casting (BW, ProArt CAD Wax Blue), and millable wax suitable for pressing (YW, ProArt CAD Wax Yellow) (n = 10). Subtractively manufactured patterns were fabricated by using a 5-axis milling unit (PrograMill PM7), while 3D-printed patterns were fabricated by using a digital light processing-based 3D printer (PrograPrint PR5; Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein). All fabricated patterns were digitized by using an intraoral scanner (CEREC Primescan SW 5.2) to generate test-STLs. C-STL and test-STLs were transferred into a 3D analysis software (Medit Link v 2.4.4). Trueness evaluation was performed at 4 different surfaces (external, intaglio with margin, marginal, and intaglio without margin) and for complete scan meshes (overall) by using the root mean square (RMS) method. Data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (α = .05).

RESULTS

RMS values varied significantly at all surfaces (P < .001), except for marginal surface (P = .151). PR had the highest RMS values at external surface (P ≤ .007), intaglio surfaces (with (P ≤ .003) and without margin (P ≤ .005)), and overall (P ≤ .01). No significant differences were observed between YW and BW (P ≥ .223).

CONCLUSION

Patterns fabricated by using subtractive manufacturing exhibited high trueness. The deviation values, in general, were small, particularly at intaglio and marginal surfaces; thus, clinical difference in crown-fit may be negligible using additive or subtractive technique.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The fit of definitive crowns may be similar when tested crown patterns are additively or subtractively manufactured. However, crowns fabricated by using tested 3D-printed resin patterns may require more chairside adjustments compared with those fabricated by using subtractively manufactured wax patterns.

Twenty-four months in vivo wear of enamel antagonists to lithium disilicate implant crowns - a pilot study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether there is a significant difference between the ratio of wear of lithium disilicate implant crowns and their enamel antagonists and adjacent enamel/enamel antagonist contacts. Additionally, the movement of the adjacent teeth was determined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Intraoral scans of the occlusal surfaces of 41 patients were performed after insertion of the implant restoration (baseline), after 12 and 24 months. From the initial study cohort, eleven implant crown/enamel antagonist pairs with adjacent enamel antagonist pairs could be analyzed in nine patients after 12 months. After 24 months, ten implant crowns of eight patients were available due to one decementation of an implant crown. A semiautomatic specifically developed iterative closest point algorithm was used to superimpose the surfaces of the baseline scan with the follow-up scans to measure the maximum height loss of each identified wear side. The mean maximum tooth wear and the standard deviation (SD) were calculated per unit. The ratio of wear of enamel/enamel antagonist teeth and the wear ratio of adjacent lithium disilicate implant crowns and their enamel antagonist surfaces were evaluated. Tooth movements were described by translations and rotations using a separate measurement procedure. The surfaces of the scans were superimposed setting the implant as a reference structure for registration.

RESULTS

After 12 months the wear ratio between the enamel antagonist pairs was 0.95 ± 0.27 µm and the ratio between lithium disilicate/enamel was 0.73 ± 0.49 µm. After 24 months the ratio of enamel antagonist pairs was 1.04 ± 0.28 µm and the ratio of lithium disilicate/enamel was 0.73 ± 0.51 µm. The ratios did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoral scanning and computer analysis showed that the two-years wear ratios between enamel/enamel and enamel/lithium disilicate implant crowns did not differ significantly.

STATEMENT OF CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The methodology described in this study could measure tooth wear and detect long-term wear performance. In the future, digital monitoring of prosthetic restorations should be integrated into clinical workflow to identify potential factors affecting longevity.

The threshold of an intra oral scanner to measure lesion depth on natural unpolished teeth

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the threshold and accuracy of intraoral scanning in measuring freeform human enamel surfaces.

METHODS

Software softgauges, ranging between 20 and 160 µm depth, were used to compare four workflow analysis techniques to measure step height on a freeform surface; with or without reference areas and in combination with surface-subtraction to establish which combination produced the most accurate outcome. Having established the optimum combination, 1.5 mm diameter, individual depths ranging from 11 to 81 µm were created separately on 14 unpolished human enamel samples and then scanned with gold standard laboratory optical profilometry (NCLP, TaiCaan Technologies™, XYRIS2000CL, UK) and a clinical intraoral scanner (TrueDefinition™, Midmark Corp., USA). The sequence of surface registration and subtraction determined from the softgauges was used to measure step height on natural human enamel surfaces. Step heights (μm) were compared using two-way ANOVA with post-hoc Bonferroni (p < 0.05) and Bland-Altman analyses.

RESULTS

Software differences were significantly reduced from - 29.7 to - 32.5% without, to - 2.4 to - 3.6% with reference areas (p < 0.0001) and the addition of surface-subtraction after registration reduced this further to 0.0 to - 0.3% (p < 0.0001). The intraoral scanner had a depth discrimination threshold of 73 µm on unpolished natural enamel and significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed compared to NCLP below this level.

SIGNIFICANCE

The workflow of combining surface-registration and subtraction of surface profiles taken from intraoral scans of freeform unpolished enamel enabled confident measurement of step height above 73 µm. The limits of the scanner is related to data capture and these results provide opportunities for clinical measurement.

Best-Fit Algorithm Influences on Virtual Casts' Alignment Discrepancies

PURPOSE

To measure the influence of best-fit (BF) algorithms (entire dataset, 3 or 6 points landmark-based, or section-based BF) on virtual casts and their alignment discrepancies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A mandibular typodont was obtained and digitized by using an industrial scanner (GOM Atos Q 3D 12M). A control mesh was acquired. The typodont was digitized by using an intraoral scanner (TRIOS 4). Based on the alignment procedures, four groups were created: BF of the entire dataset (BF group), landmark-based BF using 3 reference points (LBF-3 group), or 6 reference points (LBF-6 group), and section-based BF (SBF group). The root mean square (RMS) error was calculated. One-way ANOVA and post-hoc pairwise multi-comparison Tukey were used to analyze the data (α = .05).

RESULTS

Significant RMS error mean value differences were found across the groups (P<.001). Tukey test revealed significant RMS error mean value differences between the BF and LBF-3 groups (P = .022), BF and LBF-6 groups (P<.001), LB-3 and LB-6 groups (P<.001), LBF-3 and SBF groups (P<.001), and LBF-6 and SBF groups (P<.001). The LBF-6 group had the lowest trueness, while SBF and BF groups obtained the highest trueness values. Furthermore, significant SD differences were revealed across the groups tested (P<.001). Tukey test revealed significant SD differences between the BF and LBF-6 groups (P<.001), LBF-3 and LB-6 groups (P<.001), LBF-3 and SBF groups (P = .004), and LBF-6 and SBF groups (P<.001). The BF and SBF groups showed equal and highest precision, while the LBF-6 group had the lowest precision.

CONCLUSIONS

The best-fit algorithms tested influenced the virtual casts' alignment discrepancy. Entire dataset or section-based best-fit algorithms obtained the highest virtual casts' alignment trueness and precision compared with the landmark-based method.

In Vivo Complete-Arch Implant Digital Impressions: Comparison of the Precision of Three Optical Impression Systems

(1) Multiple in vitro studies reported insufficient accuracy of intraoral scanners (IOSs) for complete-arch multiple implant impression. The aim of the study is to analyze the precision of three IOSs, PIC dental (Pic dental, Iditec North West SL), TRIOS 3 (3Shape), and True Definition (Midmark Corporation) and the influence of several factors in the edentulous complete maxillary and mandibular arch. (2) A fully edentulous patient with eight implants in the maxillary and in the mandibular jaw was selected. Five impressions were taken per system and arch. A suprastructure was designed on each digital working cast. The precision was analyzed comparing each of the 28 distances and seven relative angulations of the abutments of all the designed suprastructures. The descriptive statistics, the Student's t-test, and the ANOVA test were used to analyze the data (α = 0.05). (3) Significant differences were observed when comparing the IOSs in some of the distances and angulations. (4) The increase in the distance between implants affected the precision of T and TD but not the PIC system. The type of arch did not affect the PIC precision, but the T and TD systems performed worse in the mandibular arch. The system with the best precision was the PIC, followed by TD, and then T.

Triangular mesh reduction of digitized maxillectomy defects for prosthetic rehabilitation: A 3D deviation study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of different amounts of triangular mesh reduction on the trueness of digitized complete-arch dentate and edentulous maxillectomy defects models.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty gypsum maxillectomy defect models (dentate and edentate group: n=10) were digitized using the Trios 3 intraoral scanner, scanning the teeth, mucosa and maxillectomy defect. These datasets (reference, R₀) were saved as standard tessellation language (STL) files, and triangular mesh reduction was performed using Meshmixer's reduction tool. Digital test-datasets with file sizes reduced by 50%(R₁), 75%(R₂), and 90%(R₃) were generated (each: n=20). Each test-dataset was compared to the R₀ file using 3D evaluation software (GOM Inspect), applying automated pre-alignment followed by a global best-fit alignment, and root mean square (RMS) 3-dimensional (3D) deviations were calculated. Statistical analyses were performed, at a level of significance of α=0.05.

RESULTS

The number of triangles, and STL file size were synchronized with each other and inversely proportional to the amount of mesh reduction. The resulting mean percentages of the STL file sizes were 50.00% for R₁, 24.93% for R₂, and 10.00% for R₃. There were no 3D deviations at 50% triangular mesh reduction. The 3D deviations increased with the amount of mesh reduction: at 75% reduction the median deviations were lower (dentate:0.0016mm, IQR:0.0015-0.0018; edentate:0.0016mm, IQR:0.0015-0.0016), than at 90% (dentate:0.004mm, IQR:0.0038-0.0041; edentate:0.003mm, IQR:0.0036-0.0039). A statistically significant increase in 3D deviations was observed with higher degrees of mesh reduction (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Triangular mesh reduction results in a significant increase in 3D deviations if the reduction is more than 75%.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Digital models of patients with maxillectomy defects can be saved with a mesh reduction of 50% without affecting the trueness. The use of a 50% mesh reduction decreases the required storage capacity by 50%.

Efficacy of Constructing Digital Hybrid Skull-Dentition Images Using an Intraoral Scanner and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) can distort dentition, and additional imaging is often required. A plaster model to help digitize dental images has been widely used in clinical practice, but there are some inconveniences such as complexity of the process and the risk of damage. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential for improving dentition imaging with CBCT scans using an intraoral scanner instead of a plaster model. The study used laser model-scanned images of plaster models, imaging from two intraoral scanners, and CBCT images from 20 patients aged 12-18 years. CS 3600 (Carestream Dental, Atlanta, USA) and i700 (Medit, Seoul, Korea) were used as intraoral scanners. The full arch was scanned at once or in three sections using intraoral scanners. The segmented scans were merged to obtain full-arch images. With i700, full-arch images were additionally acquired using its "smart stich" function. The virtual skull-dentition hybrid images obtained from intraoral scanners were superimposed with images obtained using a plaster cast. The difference and distance of coordinate values at each reference point were measured. The average distances from the images obtained with the plaster cast were smaller than 0.39 mm, which is the voxel size of CBCT. Scanning the complete or partial arch using CS 3600 or i700 satisfactorily complemented the CBCT when compared to the plaster model. The virtual skull-dentition hybrid image obtained from intraoral scanners will be clinically useful, especially for patients and surgeons who have difficulty in scanning the complete arch at once.

Accuracy of Dental and Industrial 3D Printers

PURPOSE

This in vitro study evaluated the dimensional accuracy of three 3D printers and one milling machine with their respective polymeric materials using a simplified geometrical model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A simplified computer-aided design (CAD) model was created. The test samples were fabricated with three 3D printers: a dental desktop stereolithography (SLA) printer, an industrial SLA printer, and an industrial fused deposition modeling (FDM) printer, as well as a 5-axis milling machine. One polymer material was used per industrial printer and milling machine while two materials were used with the dental printer for a total of five study groups. Test specimens were then digitized using a laboratory scanner. The virtual outer caliper method was used to measure the linear dimensions of the digitized 3D printed and milled specimens in x-, y-, and z-axes, and compare them to the known values of the CAD model. Data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA on Ranks followed by the Tukey's test.

RESULTS

Milled specimens were not significantly different from the CAD model in any dimension (p > 0.05). All 3D printed specimens were significantly different from the CAD model in all dimensions (p = 0.01), except the dental SLA 3D printer with one of the polymers tested (Bis-GMA) which was not significantly different in two (x and z) dimensions (p = 0.4 and p = 0.12).

CONCLUSIONS

The milling technology tested provided greater dimensional accuracy than the selected 3D printing. Printer, printing technology, and material selection affected the accuracy of the printed model.

Effect of vibration on orthodontic tooth movement in a double blind prospective randomized controlled trial

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of vibration on orthodontic tooth movement and safety assessment based on our previous basic research in animal experiments. A double-blind prospective randomized controlled trial using split-mouth design was conducted in patients with malocclusion. The left and right sides of maxillary arch were randomly assigned to vibration (TM + V) and non-vibration (TM) groups. After leveling, vibrations (5.2 ± 0.5 g-forces (gf), 102.2 ± 2.6 Hertz (Hz)) were supplementary applied to the canine retracted with 100 gf in TM + V group for 3 min at the monthly visit under double-blind fashion, and the canine on the other side without vibration was used as TM group. The amount of tooth movement was measured blindly using a constructed three-dimensional dentition model. The amount of canine movement per visit was 0.89 ± 0.55 mm in TM group (n = 23) and 1.21 ± 0.60 mm in TM + V group (n = 23), respectively. There was no significant difference of pain and discomfort, and root resorption between the two groups. This study indicates that static orthodontic force with supplementary vibration significantly accelerated tooth movement in canine retraction and reduced the number of visits without causing side effects.

Accuracy of full-arch digitalization for partially edentulous jaws - a laboratory study on basis of coordinate-based data analysis

Objectives

To compare the accuracy (trueness and precision) of direct digitization of four different dental gap situation with two IOS (intraoral scanner).

Materials and methods

Four partially edentulous polyurethane mandible models were used: (1) A (46, 45, 44 missing), (2) B (45, 44, 34, 35 missing), (3) C (42, 41, 31, 32 missing), and (4) D (full dentition). On each model, the same reference object was fixed between the second molars of both quadrants. A dataset (REF) of the reference object was generated by a coordinate measuring machine. Each model situation was scanned by (1) OMN (Cerec AC Omnicam) and (2) PRI (Cerec Primescan AC) (n = 30). Datasets of all 8 test groups (N = 240) were analyzed using inspection software to determine the linear aberrations in the X-, Y-, Z-axes and angular deviations. Mann–Whitney U and two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests were used to detect differences for trueness and precision.

Results

PRI revealed higher trueness and precision in most of the measured parameters (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\overrightarrow{V}}_{E}$$\end{document}V→E 120.95 to 175.01 μm, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\overrightarrow{V}_{E}$$\end{document}V→E(x) − 58.50 to − 9.40 μm, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\overrightarrow{V}_{E}$$\end{document}V→E (z) − 70.35 to 63.50 μm), while OMN showed higher trueness for \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\overrightarrow{V}_{E}$$\end{document}V→E (y) regardless of model situation (− 104.90 to 34.55 μm). Model D revealed the highest trueness and precision in most of the measured parameters regardless of IOS (\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\overrightarrow{V}_{E}$$\end{document}V→E 120.95 to 195.74 μm, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\overrightarrow{V}_{E}$$\end{document}V→E (x) − 9.40 to 66.75 μm,\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\overrightarrow{V}_{E}$$\end{document}V→E (y) − 14.55 to 51.50 μm, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\overrightarrow{V}_{E}$$\end{document}V→E (z) 63.50 to 120.75 μm).

Conclusions

PRI demonstrated higher accuracy in the X- and Z-axes, while OMN depicted higher trueness in the Y-axis. For PRI, Model A revealed the highest distortion, while for OMN, Model B produced the largest aberrations in most parameters.

Clinical relevance

Current results suggest that both investigated IOS are sufficiently accurate for the manufacturing of tooth-borne restorations and orthodontic appliances. However, both hardware specifications of IOS and the presence of edentulous gaps in the dental model have an influence on the accuracy of the virtual model dataset.

Evaluation of the Relationships between Intestinal Regional Lymph Nodes and Immune Responses in Viral Infections in Children

Viral infections increase the risk of developing allergies in childhood, and disruption of mucosal homeostasis is presumed to be involved. However, no study has reported a role for viral infections in such disruption. In this study, we clarified the mechanism of immunoglobulin A (IgA) overproduction in viral infections. Autopsies were performed on 33 pediatric cases, IgA and interferon (IFN)β levels were measured, and histopathological and immunohistochemical examinations were conducted. Furthermore, we cultured human cells and measured IFNβ and IgA levels to examine the effect of viral infections on IgA production. Blood IgA levels in viral infections were higher than in bacterial infections. Moreover, IFNβ levels in most viral cases were below the detection limit. Cell culture revealed increased IgA in gastrointestinal lymph nodes, especially in Peyer’s patches, due to enhanced IFNβ after viral stimulation. Conversely, respiratory regional lymph nodes showed enhanced IgA with no marked change in IFNβ. Overproduction of IgA, identified as an aberration of the immune system and resulting from excessive viral infection-induced IFNβ was observed in the intestinal regional lymph nodes, particularly in Peyer’s patches. Further, increased IgA without elevated IFNβ in the respiratory system suggested the possibility of a different mechanism from the gastrointestinal system.

Accuracy of metal 3D printed frameworks for removable partial dentures evaluated by digital superimposition

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the accuracy of metal 3D printed frameworks (MEP group) for removable partial dentures (RPDs) by digital superimposition, in comparison to that of frameworks produced by the conventional (CON group) and resin printing/casting (RPC group) workflows.

METHODS

A partially edentulous maxillary dentiform was prepared with rest seats and guiding planes on the right canine, left first premolar, and left second molar. Thirty master casts were prepared via repeated impressions of the dentiform. Frameworks were fabricated by three different workflows (n = 10 for each group). The internal discrepancies of the frameworks were assessed at 12 points by digital scanning with an optical triangulation principle-based tabletop scanner and superimposition using a reference best-fit alignment method. First, the master cast was scanned alone. Subsequently, a thin silicone material was applied to the framework and fitted onto the master cast, after which the framework was removed. Finally, the master cast with the silicone material attached was rescanned. The data from the two scans were matched, with the reference being the area not occupied by the silicone.

RESULTS

For the CON, MEP, and RPC groups, respectively, the mean overall internal discrepancies (279.72 µm, 241.02 µm, and 331.70 µm), and the mean internal discrepancies on palate areas (292.92 µm, 250.72 µm, and 355.84 µm) and rest seat areas (240.12 µm, 211.91 µm, and 259.26 µm) did not significantly differ among the three fabrication methods (p = 0.558, 0.542, and 0.774).

SIGNIFICANCE

The reference best-fit alignment of scan datasets is a useful approach to evaluate the internal discrepancy of frameworks. Metal 3D printing produces RPD frameworks that are comparable to conventional frameworks and meet clinical standards.

Influence of 3D analysis software on measured deviations of CAD-CAM resin crowns from virtual design file: an in-vitro study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate a nonmetrology-grade and a metrology-grade 3D analysis software when measuring the deviations of CAD-CAM fabricated crowns from the virtual design file.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A right first molar on a mandibular dentate model was prepared and scanned by using an intraoral scanner, i500 (Medit). A complete coverage crown was designed in standard tessellation language format and 20 resin crowns were fabricated by using computer aided design-computer aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM). The crowns were then digitized by using the same intraoral scanner (test-scans). Root mean square (RMS) method was used to evaluate the deviations between the test-scans and the design file of the crowns on 3 surfaces (overall, external, and internal) by using a metrology-grade, Geomagic Control X (3D Systems) and a nonmetrology-grade, Medit Link (Medit) software. The data were analyzed with Welch two-sample t-tests to compare two software for the non-inferiority of the nonmetrology-grade software with a 50 µm threshold and the potential superiority of the metrology-grade software (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

The Welch two-sample t-tests for the non-inferiority analysis showed that the differences between the nonmetrology-grade and the metrology-grade software were below the threshold of 50 µm for each surface tested (p <.001). The differences between the two-tested software were nonsignificant for each surface analyzed when superiority was considered (p ≥.194).

CONCLUSION

The nonmetrology-grade software performed similar to the metrology-grade software when analyzing the deviations of CAD-CAM crowns. Therefore, the nonmetrology-grade 3D analysis software may be considered for the deviation measurements of similar restorations.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The trueness of crowns after fabrication may affect their fit, and 3D analysis of trueness prior to the delivery appointment with the tested nonmetrology-grade software after fabrication may facilitate potential clinical adjustments and delivery of the crowns.

Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study

Background

To compare the accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation.

Methods

A master cast containing 6 implant abutment replicas was fabricated. Group PG: digital impressions were taken 10 times using a photogrammetry system; Group IOS: intraoral scanning was performed to fabricate 10 digital impressions; Group CNV: splinted open-tray impression technique was used to fabricate 10 definitive casts. The master cast and conventional definitive casts were digitized with a laboratory reference scanner. For all STL files obtained, scan bodies were converted to implant abutment replicas using a digital library. The accuracy of a digitizer was defined by 2 main parameters, trueness and precision. "Trueness" was used to describe the deviation between test files and reference file, and "precision" was used to describe the closeness between test files. Then, the trueness and precision of three impression techniques were evaluated and statistically compared (α = 0.05).

Results

The median trueness was 24.45, 43.45 and 28.70 μm for group PG, IOS and CNV; Group PG gave more accurate trueness than group IOS (P < 0.001) and group CNV (P = 0.033), group CNV showed more accurate trueness than group IOS (P = 0.033). The median precision was 2.00, 36.00 and 29.40 μm for group PG, IOS and CNV; Group PG gave more accurate precision than group IOS (P < 0.001) and group CNV (P < 0.001), group CNV showed more accurate precision than IOS (P = 0.002).

Conclusions

For complete-arch implant rehabilitation, the photogrammetry system showed the best accuracy of all the impression techniques evaluated, followed by the conventional impression technique, and the intraoral scanner provided the least accuracy.

A novel computer-aided method for direct measurements and visualization of gingival margin changes

AIM

To introduce and validate a computer-aided method for direct measurements and visualization of gingival margin (GM) changes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The method consists of five main steps: digital model acquisition, superimposition, computer-aided GM detection, distance calculation between the GM curves, and visualization. The precision of the method was evaluated with repeatability and reproducibility analysis (n = 78 teeth). The method's repeatability was evaluated by repeating the algorithm on the same digital models by two operators. The reproducibility was evaluated by repeating the algorithm on two consecutive digital models obtained with a scan-rescan process at the same time point on the same patient. For demonstration, the proposed method for direct measurements of GM changes was performed on patients who had undergone root coverage procedures and treatment of periodontal disease.

RESULTS

Excellent repeatability was found for both intra- and inter-operator variability, that is, 0.00 mm, regarding computer-aided GM detection. The reproducibility of computer-aided GM detection evaluated on scan-rescan models was 0.10 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

The presented method enables the evaluation of GM changes in a simple, precise, and comprehensive manner through non-invasive acquisition and superimposition of digital models.