ASCEND-8: A Randomized Phase 1 Study of Ceritinib, 450 mg or 600 mg, Taken with a Low-Fat Meal versus 750 mg in Fasted State in Patients with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK)-Rearranged Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Effect of ceritinib on the pharmacokinetics of coadministered CYP3A and 2C9 substrates: a phase I, multicenter, drug-drug interaction study in patients with ALK + advanced tumors

Purpose

Ceritinib is an ALK receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved as first- and second-line treatment in adult patients with ALK + metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The study investigated the drug–drug interaction (DDI) potential of ceritinib when coadministered with midazolam and warfarin as probe substrates for CYP3A and CYP2C9 activity, respectively.

Methods

This was a phase I, multicenter, open-label, single sequence, crossover DDI study in 33 adult patients with ALK + NSCLC or other advanced tumors. A single dose of a cocktail consisting of midazolam and warfarin was administered with and without concomitant administration of ceritinib. The primary objective was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of midazolam and warfarin. Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability, overall response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DOR) of ceritinib 750 mg once daily.

Results

Ceritinib inhibited CYP3A-mediated metabolism of midazolam, resulting in a markedly increased AUC (geometric mean ratio [90% confidence interval]) by 5.4-fold (4.6, 6.3). Ceritinib also led to an increase in the AUC of S-warfarin by 54% (36%, 75%). The pharmacokinetics and safety profile of ceritinib in this study are consistent with previous reports and no new safety signals were reported. Among the 19 patients with NSCLC, efficacy (ORR: 42.1% and DCR: 63.2%) was similar to that reported previously in studies of pretreated patients with ALK + NSCLC.

Conclusion

Ceritinib is a strong CYP3A inhibitor and a weak CYP2C9 inhibitor. These findings should be reflected as actionable clinical recommendations in the prescribing information for ceritinib with regards to concomitant medications whose pharmacokinetics may be altered by ceritinib.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00280-020-04180-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of ceritinib vs. crizotinib in previously untreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Hong Kong

INTRODUCTION

Lower-dose ceritinib (450 mg) once-daily with food was approved in 2018 in Hong Kong (HK) for first-line treatment of patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK +) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study examined the cost-effectiveness of ceritinib vs. crizotinib in the first-line treatment of ALK + NSCLC from a HK healthcare service provider's or government's perspective.

METHODS

Costs and effectiveness of first-line ceritinib vs. crizotinib over a 20-year time horizon was evaluated using a partitioned survival model with three health states (stable disease, progressed disease, and death). The efficacy data for ceritinib were obtained from a phase 3 trial comparing ceritinib with chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (ASCEND-4) and extrapolated using parametric survival models. Long-term survival associated with crizotinib were estimated using hazard ratio of crizotinib vs. ceritinib obtained from matching-adjusted indirect comparison based on ASCEND-4 and PROFILE 1014 trials. Drug acquisition, administration, adverse events costs, and medical costs associated with each health state were obtained from public sources and converted to 2018 US Dollars. Incremental costs per quality-adjusted-life-year (QALY) and life-year (LY) gained were estimated for ceritinib vs. crizotinib.

RESULTS

The base case results showed that ceritinib was associated with 3.22 QALYs, 4.51 LYs, and total costs of $157,581 over 20 years. Patients receiving crizotinib had 2.68 QALYs, 3.85 LYs, and $150,424 total costs over the same time horizon. The incremental cost per QALY gained for ceritinib vs crizotinib was $13,343. Results were robust to deterministic sensitivity analyses in most scenarios.

CONCLUSION

Ceritinib offers a cost-effective option compared to crizotinib for previously untreated ALK + advanced NCSLC in HK.

Phase 1/2 study of ceritinib in Chinese patients with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with crizotinib: Results from ASCEND-6

BACKGROUND

Patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with crizotinib inevitably relapse, with brain as common site of progression.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

ASCEND-6, a phase 1/2, single-arm study, included adult Chinese patients with stage IIIB or IV ALK+ NSCLC pretreated with crizotinib as the last therapy (irrespective of prior chemotherapies [≤2]). Primary endpoints were pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability. Key secondary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR; investigator assessed).

RESULTS

Of the 103 enrolled patients, all received prior crizotinib, 70 % received ≥1 prior chemotherapy regimen, and 63.1 % had brain metastases at baseline. In the phase 1 component, 20 patients completed a 5-day PK run-in period. Median T_max (n = 16) was ∼6 h; geometric means of AUC_{0-24 h} (n = 16) and C_max (n = 16) at steady state were 22,000 ng*h/mL and 1080 ng/mL, respectively. In the final analysis, median follow-up time was 34 months (range: 27.8-40.6). The ORR was 41.7 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 32.1-51.9), and median progression-free survival was 7.2 months (95 % CI: 4.1-7.5). Median overall survival was 17.5 months (95 % CI: 10.8-24.3). Most frequent adverse events, regardless of study drug relationship (mostly grade 1/2), were diarrhea (74.8 %), vomiting (62.1 %), alanine transaminase increased (59.2 %), aspartate transaminase increased (58.3 %), and nausea (58.3 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Ceritinib PK in Chinese patients is consistent with those observed in the global ASCEND-1 study. Ceritinib was well tolerated and showed durable responses in Chinese patients with ALK+ NSCLC who progressed after crizotinib and ≤2 prior lines of chemotherapy.

Inhibition and induction of CYP enzymes in humans: an update

The cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme family is the most important enzyme system catalyzing the phase 1 metabolism of pharmaceuticals and other xenobiotics such as herbal remedies and toxic compounds in the environment. The inhibition and induction of CYPs are major mechanisms causing pharmacokinetic drug–drug interactions. This review presents a comprehensive update on the inhibitors and inducers of the specific CYP enzymes in humans. The focus is on the more recent human in vitro and in vivo findings since the publication of our previous review on this topic in 2008. In addition to the general presentation of inhibitory drugs and inducers of human CYP enzymes by drugs, herbal remedies, and toxic compounds, an in-depth view on tyrosine-kinase inhibitors and antiretroviral HIV medications as victims and perpetrators of drug–drug interactions is provided as examples of the current trends in the field. Also, a concise overview of the mechanisms of CYP induction is presented to aid the understanding of the induction phenomena.

MiR-187 suppresses non-small-cell lung cancer cell proliferation by targeting FGF9

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the main pathological type of lung cancer and has a low overall five-year survival rate. miR-187 has been reported to play major roles in various tumor types. In this study, we explored the impact of miR-187 on NSCLC. qRT-PCR results demonstrated that miR-187 expression is lower in NSCLC and cancer cells than normal tissues and normal lung cells. miR-187 expression levels are associated with tumor size, TNM stage and overall survival rate. MTS and colony formation assays showed that high miR-187 expression inhibits NSCLC cell proliferation and colony formation ability, and flow cytometry showed that miR-187 overexpression induces cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase. A luciferase reporter assay showed that FGF9 is a target of miR-187. miR-187 overexpression reduces the expression of FGF9, cyclin D1 CDK4 and CDK6. Therefore, miR-187 may present a new NSCLC treatment target by regulates cyclins-related protein expression.

Discovery of anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors from natural product library: A holistic in silico approach

Over the years, phytochemical compounds have shown compelling evidences in exhibiting powerful antitumor properties. Moreover, due to the lack of safety and high cost of cancer therapies, opportunities are being sought out in these compounds as an alternative treatment modality. Therefore, in the present study, 1,574 compounds from NPACT library were examined to excavate potent and nontoxic anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors. Notably, two pharmacophore hypotheses (AAAHP and DDRRR) were generated using ligand-based and energy-based techniques, respectively, to eliminate false-positive prediction in database screening. Furthermore, molecular docking and Prime MM/GBSA analysis were performed on the screened compounds to examine inhibitory activity against ALK. The analysis revealed that the two hits, namely, NPACT00018 and NPACT01077, exhibited better docking scores, binding energies, and also ensured excellent drug-likeness properties than the reference compound, crizotinib. Finally, the results were subjected to molecular dynamics studies to gain insight into the stability of these compounds in the binding pocket of ALK protein. Indeed, the useful predictions generated by the present computational models are of immense importance and could further speed up the anticancer drug development in the near future.

Alectinib following brigatinib: an efficient sequence for the treatment of advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive lung cancer patients

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-translocations are present in up to 5% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), most of them being adenocarcinomas. Even though the availability of five potent ALK-inhibitors for the treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC patients, there is no consensus about the ideal therapy sequence. Alectinib has been so far successfully and routinely used as first-line therapy, especially in patients presenting central nervous system lesions; however, with the very recent European approval of brigatinib in the first line, a new treatment option is now available for ALK+ patient collective. In this case series, efficient systemic and intracranial responses to alectinib late-line treatment following brigatinib therapy are reported. This therapeutic sequence is going to gain therefore more importance in a near future.

Optimal Care for Patients with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK)-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Review on the Role and Utility of ALK Inhibitors

The treatment of advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has undergone a paradigm shift in the last decade. Molecular characterization of the disease has led to the rapid development of personalized medicine and swift delivery of targeted therapies to patients. The discovery of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene in patients with NSCLC has resulted in rapid bench–bedside transition of several active drugs, with several others currently in clinical trials. After the first-generation ALK inhibitor crizotinib, next-generation ALK inhibitors have entered clinical applications for ALK-rearranged NSCLC. Ceritinib, alectinib, and brigatinib have all received approval for ALK-positive patients who have failed prior crizotinib, as well as first-line therapy in treatment-naïve patients based on favorable efficacy. Most recently, lorlatinib, a potent, newer-generation ALK inhibitor, has been approved as second- or third-line treatment. These advances have led to better patient outcomes, but concurrently have led to several crucial unanswered questions about optimal care for ALK-positive NSCLC patients. The ultimate acquisition of resistance to ALK-inhibitor therapy poses a challenge to ongoing research efforts, in addition to the routine management of these patients in the clinic. This review provides a summary of the clinical development of crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib and highlights current management paradigms, current and evolving clinical information, emerging clinical decision-making and sequencing of therapy in advanced, metastatic, or recurrent ALK-positive NSCLC.

Clinical implications of food-drug interactions with small-molecule kinase inhibitors

During the past two decades, small-molecule kinase inhibitors have proven to be valuable in the treatment of solid and haematological tumours. However, because of their oral administration, the intrapatient and interpatient exposure to small-molecule kinase inhibitors (SMKIs) is highly variable and is affected by many factors, such as concomitant use of food and herbs. Food-drug interactions are capable of altering the systemic bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of these drugs. The most important mechanisms underlying food-drug interactions are gastrointestinal drug absorption and hepatic metabolism through cytochrome P450 isoenzymes. As food-drug interactions can lead to therapy failure or severe toxicity, knowledge of these interactions is essential. This Review provides a comprehensive overview of published studies involving food-drug interactions and herb-drug interactions for all registered SMKIs up to Oct 1, 2019. We critically discuss US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidelines concerning food-drug interactions and offer clear recommendations for their management in clinical practice.

Pharmacological and clinical properties of lorlatinib in the treatment of ALK-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 3-7% of advanced non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) are driven by an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement. Crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, and brigatinib are active ALK inhibitors (ALKi) used to treat this oncogene-driven subset of NSCLC. Resistance occurs with time to ALKi and new therapeutics are being developed. Lorlatinib is an efficacious third-generation ALKi with an ability to overcome resistance mutations that develop with first- or second-generation ALKi.

AREAS COVERED

Herein, the authors review the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, and safety of lorlatinib and provide their future perspectives on this drug.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

Lorlatinib is a potent ALK and ROS-1 inhibitor that also has activity against many acquired ALK resistance mutations. Clinical trials show the robust systemic and intracranial anti-tumor activity of lorlatinib in ALK rearranged advanced NSCLC. Adverse events of lorlatinib are unique and manageable. These include hypocholesteremia, hypertriglyceridemia, edema, cognitive effects, weight gain, and diarrhea. Loratinib will play an increasing role in the management of ALK-rearranged NSCLC with the optimal sequencing of ALKi undergoing further research.

Cost Effectiveness of Ceritinib and Alectinib Versus Crizotinib in First-Line Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Crizotinib, ceritinib, and alectinib improved survival in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) arrangement non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, the long-term economic outcomes of using ceritinib and alectinib versus crizotinib are still unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This analysis aimed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of ceritinib and alectinib versus crizotinib in the Chinese healthcare setting.

METHODS

A Markov model was developed to project the economic and health outcomes for the treatment of advanced NSCLC with ceritinib, alectinib or crizotinib. A network meta-analysis was performed to calculate the hazard ratios of ceritinib and alectinib versus crizotinib by pooling published trials. Cost and utility values were obtained from the literature, and one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were carried out to determine the robustness of the model outcomes. The primary outputs included total cost, life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

RESULTS

Treatment with alectinib and ceritinib yielded an additional 1.00 and 1.09 QALYs and incremental costs of $62,232 and $15,165, resulting in an ICER of $62,231 and $13,905 per QALY compared with crizotinib, respectively. Parameters related to drug costs and progression-free survival were the main drivers of the model outcomes. From the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, ceritinib and alectinib had a 99.9% and 0% probability of being cost effective, respectively, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of US$28,410/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that compared with crizotinib and alectinib, ceritinib is a cost-effective option for treatment-naïve patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC.

Efficacy and safety of ceritinib in anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

What is known and objective

Ceritinib is a new, oral, potent and selective second‐generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor approved by the Food and Drug Administration of the United States in April 2014. It is active in crizotinib‐resistant patients, especially in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastasis. The aim of this study was to analyse the effects and side effects of ceritinib in ALK‐rearranged NSCLC.

Methods

We searched articles published from January 1980 to March 2019 in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. The pooled estimate and 95% CI were calculated with DerSimonian‐Laird method and the random effect model.

Results and discussion

From 15 articles, 2,598 patients were included in the meta‐analysis. Eleven studies reported the ORR, and the DCR was presented in 10 studies. The ORR and DCR of ceritinib were 0.48 (95% CI, 0.39‐0.57) and 0.76 (95% CI, 0.69‐0.82), respectively. The PFS and OS were presented in nine and three eligible studies, respectively. The PFS and OS of ceritinib were 7.26 months (95% CI, 5.10‐9.43) and 18.73 months (95% CI; 14.59‐22.87). These results suggested that ceritinib can effectively treat patients with ALK‐rearranged NSCLC. Diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting were the three most common AEs and occurred in 69% (95% CI 51.7‐87.1%), 66% (95% CI 47.0‐85.8%) and 51% (95% CI 35.9‐66.8%) of patients, respectively. Considering serious gastrointestinal AEs, antiemetic and antidiarrhoeal drugs should be considered to improve a patient's tolerance to ceritinib.

What is new and conclusion

Ceritinib is effective in the treatment of patients with ALK‐rearranged NSCLC with crizotinib resistance. The DCR was up to 76%, and PFS was extended to 7.6 months. The AEs were acceptable.

Pharmacokinetic-Based Drug-Drug Interactions with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitors: A Review

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors are important treatment options for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), associated with ALK gene rearrangement. Patients with ALK gene rearrangement show sensitivity to and benefit clinically from treatment with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs). To date, crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, lorlatinib, and entrectinib have received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration and/or the European Medicines Agency for use during the treatment of ALK-gene-rearrangement forms of NSCLC. Although the oral route of administration is convenient and results in good compliance among patients, oral administration can be affected by many factors, such as food, intragastric pH, cytochrome P450 enzymes, transporters, and p-glycoprotein. These factors can result in increased risks for serious adverse events or can lead to reduced therapeutic effects of ALK-TKIs. This review characterizes and summarizes the pharmacokinetic parameters and drug–-drug interactions associated with ALK-TKIs to provide specific recommendations for oncologists and clinical pharmacists when prescribing ALK-TKIs.

Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Mutation-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with anaplastic lymphoma kinase chromosomal rearrangements has been revolutionized by the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Excellent progress has been made over the past decade, with 4 TKIs now approved in the front-line setting. Alectinib is the preferred first-line option based on its efficacy and side-effect profile. The central nervous system (CNS) activity of alectinib and brigatinib has allowed for treatment of CNS metastases with TKI therapy. Once resistance inevitably develops, newer therapies such as lorlatinib can be considered.

ALK inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We sought to assess the relative effects of individual anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and grey literature (July 23, 2019) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included participants with ALK- or ROS1-positive NSCLC who received any ALK inhibitor compared with placebo, another ALK inhibitor, or the same ALK inhibitor at a different dose. The primary outcome was treatment-related death. Secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and serious adverse events. Data were pooled via meta-analysis and network meta-analysis, and risk of bias was assessed. PROSPERO: CRD42017077046.

RESULTS

Thirteen RCTs reporting outcomes of interest among participants with ALK-positive NSCLC were identified. Treatment-related deaths were rare, with 10 deaths attributed to crizotinib (risk difference v. chemotherapy: 0.49, 95% credible interval [CrI] -0.16 to 1.46; odds ratio 2.58 (0.76-11.37). All ALK inhibitors improved PSF relative to chemotherapy (hazard ratio [95% CrI]: crizotinib 0.46 [0.39-0.54]; ceritinib 0.52 [0.42-0.64]; alectinib 300 BID 0.16 [0.08-0.33]; alectinib 600 BID 0.23 [0.17-0.30]; brigatinib 0.23 [0.15-0.35]), while alectinib and brigatinib improved PFS over crizotinib and ceritinib (alectinib v. crizotinib 0.34 [0.17-0.70]; alectinib v. ceritinib 0.30 [0.14-0.64]; brigatinib v. crizotinib 0.49 [0.33-0.73]; brigatinib v. ceritinib 0.43 [0.27-0.70]). OS was improved with alectinib compared with chemotherapy (HR 0.57 [95% CrI 0.39-0.83]) and crizotinib (0.68 [0.48-0.96]). Use of crizotinib (odds ratio 2.08 [95% CrI 1.56-2.79]) and alectinib (1.60 [1.00-2.58]) but not ceritinib (1.25 [0.90-1.74), increased the risk of serious adverse events compared with chemotherapy. Results were generally consistent among treatment-experienced or naïve participants.

CONCLUSION(S)

Treatment-related deaths were infrequent among ALK-positive NSCLC. PFS may be improved by alectinib and brigatinib relative to other ALK inhibitors; however, the assessment of OS is likely confounded by treatment crossover and should be interpreted with caution.

Treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer: update and perspectives

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We describe recent developments in the rapidly evolving field of anaplastic lymphoma kinase-targeting agents.

RECENT FINDINGS

Five targeted drugs are currently available in the clinic via regular approval or named patient programs, including crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib and lorlatinib. Further drugs are tested in clinical trials. This review summarizes published data, together with drug-specific information on dosing and toxicity. Moreover, we discuss different clinical scenarios and potential treatment options in patients with tumor progression, based on current literature and our own experience.

SUMMARY

Patients with metastatic, anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged nonsmall cell lung cancer should be managed by interdisciplinary expert teams. New drugs with enhanced brain activity are available, and some patients may benefit from local therapies.

Final Overall Survival and Other Efficacy and Safety Results From ASCEND-3: Phase II Study of Ceritinib in ALKi-Naive Patients With ALK-Rearranged NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

The phase II, single-arm ASCEND-3 study assessed the efficacy and safety of ceritinib in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor (ALKi)-naive patients with ALK-rearranged NSCLC who had received at least three previous lines of chemotherapy. Here, we report the final efficacy and safety results.

METHODS

Eligible patients (including those with asymptomatic or neurologically stable brain metastases) received oral ceritinib (750 mg/day, fasted). The primary end point was investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR). Secondary end points were Blinded Independent Review Committee-assessed ORR; investigator- and Blinded Independent Review Committee-assessed overall intracranial response rate, duration of response, time to response, disease control rate, and progression-free survival (PFS); overall survival (OS); and safety. Exploratory end points included patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 124 patients enrolled, 122 (98.4%) had received previous antineoplastic medications (31 patients [25.0%] received at least three regimens), and 49 (39.5%) had baseline brain metastases. The median follow-up time (data cutoff: January 22, 2018) was 52.1 (range, 48.4-60.1) months. The investigator-assessed ORR was 67.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 58.8-75.9), and the median PFS was 16.6 months (95% CI: 11.0-23.2). The median OS was 51.3 months (95% CI: 42.7-55.3). Most common adverse events (all grades, ≥60% of patients, all-causality) were diarrhea (85.5%), nausea (78.2%), and vomiting (71.8%). Overall, 18 patients (14.5%) had an adverse event leading to treatment discontinuation. Health-related quality of life was maintained during ceritinib treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Ceritinib exhibited prolonged and clinically meaningful OS, PFS, and duration of response in chemotherapy-pretreated (at least three lines), ALKi-naive patients with ALK+ NSCLC. The safety profile was consistent with that reported in previous studies.

[Therapeutic strategies in advanced ALK positive non-small cell lung cancer]

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement is a therapeutically targetable oncogenic driver found in 5% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The objective of this paper is to synthesise current knowledge on ALK rearrangement and its impact on the management of advanced NSCLC. Several inhibitors of the tyrosine kinase of ALK (crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib) have been approved as first line therapies in patients with advanced ALK positive NSCLC, which are associated with a better median progression-free survival than conventional chemotherapy. Unfortunately, the emergence of drug resistance leads to tumor progression. In patients with oligoprogressive disease if local ablative therapy can be effected, continuing with the same ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor is one option. In patients with progression, clinicians may consider switching to another therapy. Rebiopsy of the tumor or liquid biopsy could be attempted to identify the mechanisms of resistance and to customize ALK-target therapy. The emergence of crizotinib drug resistance has prompted the development of next generation drugs including ceritinb, alectinib, brigatinib and lorlatinib. The ability to quickly develop targeted therapies against specific oncogenic drivers will require close co-operation between pathologists, pulmonologists and oncologists in the future to keep pace with drug discoveries and to define optimal therapeutic strategies.

New generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene translocations are pro-tumoral driver alterations that encompass 3-7% of non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with specific, clinic and histologic features. The therapeutic strategy depends on anti-ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of which crizotinib was the first approved for clinical use. Despite its use improved significantly progression-free survival, overall response rate and duration of response of this illness, after a median period of 10.9 months all patients progress due to the development of acquired resistance mutations in the ALK tyrosine kinase domain in approximately one third of patients. Moreover, 60-90% of patients treated with crizotinib has a progression in the central nervous system (CNS) in absence of extracranial worsening of the disease. This is primarily attributed to poor CNS penetration by crizotinib as many pre-clinical and clinical models suggest. For instance, in order to overtake acquired resistance to crizotinib, prolong the control of the disease and manage CNS localizations, several II and III generation TKIs have been developed. Some of them were approved after the failure of crizotinib (ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib and lorlatinib) and in first line setting (ceritinib, alectinib and brigatinib) while others are still under evaluation for TKI-naive patients such as lorlatinib, ensartinib and entrectinib. In this review we will discuss the most recent results of new TKIs in order to describe a fast growing therapeutic landscape in this setting.

Expanding anaplastic lymphoma kinase therapeutic indication to early stage non-small cell lung cancer

Oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients have been witnessing overwhelming therapeutic improvements, especially in advanced disease management, due to the advent of more potent tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, the concrete chance to cure anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged patients remains prerogative of surgical and peri-operative medical approaches to early disease stage. Clinical investigations in the adjuvant setting of genotype-restricted lung cancers (i.e., EGFR+, ALK+, etc.) are under-represented owing to the need of large patients' enrollment and solid overall survival (OS) data, which solely can show real long-term impact of these therapeutic interventions. Current available radiological and molecular technologies will widely increase the number of surgical early stage patients, including ALK+, spurring the development of rational approaches aimed to prevent disease recurrence and prolong patients' survival. Ongoing clinical trials, evaluating crizotinib and alectinib as adjuvant treatments, will gauge the real impact of TKIs in terms of patients' disease free survival (DFS) and OS; other peri-operative investigations (e.g., neo-adjuvant strategies) will add information about ALK inhibitors' tumor growth restraint capacities and early adaptation mechanisms to ALK targeting. Nevertheless, multiple questions are and will remain unanswered: if should be treated indifferently all ALK+ patients or, alternatively, should be stratified in different risk groups based on the detectable residual disease [i.e., minimal residual disease (MRD) after surgery]; whether ALK inhibitors administration could facilitate the accumulations of persister cells driving resistance mechanisms to targeted therapies; if alternative strategies, as combined treatments targeting different molecular hubs, could enhance disease control and cancer eradication.

Model-Based Economic Evaluation of Ceritinib and Platinum-Based Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatments for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in China

INTRODUCTION

A trial-based assessment was completed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ceritinib as a first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with rearrangement of anaplastic lymphoma kinase.

METHODS

Based on the disease situation of advanced NSCLC, a Markov model was constructed to estimate the costs and benefits of ceritinib and platinum-based chemotherapy. The cost information and health utilities were obtained from published literature. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated. The stability of the model was verified by sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

The base case analysis results indicated that compared with platinum-based chemotherapy, ceritinib therapy would increase benefits in a 5-, 10- and 15-year time horizon, with extra costs of $230,661.61, $149,321.52 and $136,414.43 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, respectively. The most sensitive parameter in the model analysis was the cost of ceritinib. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested that at the current price of ceritinib, the chance of ceritinib being cost-effective was 0 at the willingness-to-pay threshold of $27,142.85 per quality-adjusted life-year (three times the per capita gross domestic product of China).

CONCLUSION

As a first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC with rearrangement of anaplastic lymphoma kinase, ceritinib is unlikely to be cost-effective at the current price from the Chinese healthcare perspective. To meet the treatment demands of patients, it may be a better option to reduce the price or provide appropriate drug assistance policies.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Of Ceritinib And Alectinib Versus Crizotinib In The Treatment Of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background

This study aimed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of crizotinib versus ceritinib or alectinib as first-line-targeted drug therapy for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China.

Methods

The Markov model was used to simulate the medical cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of patients using crizotinib, ceritinib, or alectinib over a 10-year period by establishing three health states: progression-free, post-progression, and death. Randomized controlled clinical data were collected from the open-label, randomized phase 3 trials ALEX and ASCEND-4. Cost and utility values were derived from local charges and literature. Sensitivity analyses included one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

Results

Compared with patients who used crizotinib as first-line treatment, patients in the ceritinib and alectinib groups yielded an additional 1.32 and 3.30 QALYs with an incremental cost of $84,728.20 and $339,114.36, respectively. Thus, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $64,398.83 and $102,675.74 per QALY in the ceritinib and alectinib groups, respectively. Alectinib was estimated to be more effective (4.68 QALY) and more costly ($432,063.06) with an ICER of $128,019.42 per QALY compared with ceritinib (2.69 QALY and $177,676.90). Results were robust to deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion

As a first-line treatment regimen, ceritinib and alectinib can extend the survival time of patients compared with crizotinib, but the medical cost also increases accordingly. According to the World Health Organization's three-percent GDP measurement, first-line treatment with Crizotinib is the most cost-effective.

Ceritinib plus Nivolumab in Patients with Advanced ALK-Rearranged Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results of an Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 1B Study

INTRODUCTION

Induction of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression due to constitutive oncogenic signaling has been reported in NSCLC models harboring echinoderm microtubule associated protein like 4 gene (EML4)-ALK receptor tyrosine kinase gene (ALK) rearrangements. We assessed the safety and activity of ceritinib plus nivolumab in these patients.

METHODS

In this open-label, phase 1B, multicenter, dose escalation and expansion study, previously treated (with ALK receptor tyrosine kinase [ALK] inhibitor [ALKI]/chemotherapy) or treatment-naive patients with stage IIIB or IV ALK-rearranged NSCLC received nivolumab, 3 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks, plus ceritinib, 450 mg/300 mg daily, with a low-fat meal.

RESULTS

In total, 36 patients were treated (a 450-mg cohort [n=14] and a 300-mg cohort [n=22]). In the 450-mg cohort, four patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities. In the 300-mg cohort, two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities. Among ALKI-naive patients, the overall response rate (ORR) was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 35.9-99.6) in the 450-mg cohort and 60% (95% CI: 26.2-87.8) in the 300-mg cohort. Among ALKI-pretreated patients, the ORR was 50% (95% CI: 15.7-84.3) in the 450-mg cohort and 25% (95% CI: 5.5-57.2) in the 300-mg cohort. The ORR point estimate was observed to be greater in patients who were positive for PD-L1 than in those who were negative for PD-L1, with overlapping CIs (e.g., at a cutoff ≥1% PD-L1, 64% of patients [95% CI: 35.1-87.2] had confirmed responses as compared with those with negative PD-L1 staining (31% [95% CI: 11.0-58.7]). The most frequently reported grade 3 or 4 adverse events were increased alanine aminotransferase level (25%), increased gamma-glutamyl transferase level (22%), increased amylase level (14%), increased lipase level (11%), and maculopapular rash (11%). The incidence of all-grade rash (grouped term) was 64% in both cohorts; grade 3 rash was reported in 29% and 14% of patients in the 450-mg and 300-mg cohorts, respectively; no grade 4 rash was reported.

CONCLUSION

Ceritinib plus nivolumab has activity; ORR appears to correlate with PD-L1 at baseline. Toxicity, especially rash, is more common than with either single agent.

Differences Between the East and the West in Managing Advanced-Stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is a common cancer associated with high mortality rates worldwide. Unfortunately, it usually presents at a late stage, precluding the chance of curative therapy. The discovery of oncogenic driver mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer over the past 20 years has led to new molecular targeted therapies that have dramatically improved treatment efficacy and quality of life. New generations of therapy that target the drug-resistant mutations have also quickly evolved, benefiting patients who are refractory or intolerant to first-line targeted therapy. Eastern patients, from Southeast Asia, Japan and China, are known to have a higher incidence of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation. Therefore, compared with the West, more patients would benefit from these recent advances. In contrast, survival of patients without driver mutations has benefited from advances in novel therapeutics, including the immune checkpoint inhibitors. The current review aims to highlight the recent developments in the management of advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer and to compare the differences in clinical practice between Eastern and Western countries.

The Effect of a High-Fat Meal on the Pharmacokinetics of Brigatinib, an Oral Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitor, in Healthy Volunteers

Brigatinib, a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, received accelerated approval in the United States for the treatment of patients with metastatic ALK+ non-small-cell lung cancer who have progressed on or are intolerant to crizotinib. A clinical study was conducted to assess the effect of food on brigatinib pharmacokinetics (PK). Healthy subjects received a single oral dose of brigatinib 180 mg (2 × 90-mg tablets) after a 10-hour fast or after a high-fat meal in a 2-period, 2-sequence crossover study. Plasma samples for PK characterization were collected over 168 hours postdose. Twenty-four subjects were enrolled (mean age 44 years; 58% male), with 21 included in the PK-evaluable population. Brigatinib peak concentration was reduced by 13% under fed (high-fat meal) versus fasted conditions, with no effect on area under the concentration-time curve. The median time to peak concentration of brigatinib was longer under fed conditions (5 hours) than in fasted conditions (2 hours). Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar under fasted (48%) and fed (46%) conditions and were of mild intensity. Consumption of a high-fat meal decreased the rate of brigatinib oral absorption but had no impact on the extent of absorption, thereby supporting brigatinib administration without regard to meals. These recommendations are reflected in the US prescribing information for brigatinib.

How I treat ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer

Since the discovery of anaplastic lymphocyte kinase (ALK) rearrangement in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and subsequent development of increasingly effective and central nervous system (CNS)-penetrant first-generation, second-generation and third-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the landscape of resistance mechanisms and treatment decisions has become increasingly complex. Tissue and/or plasma-based molecular tests can identify not only the rearrangement proper but also common resistance mechanisms to guide decision-making for further lines of treatment. However, frequently encountered questions exist regarding how to diagnosis ALK rearrangement, how to select a first-line ALK TKI, how to diagnose and manage ALK TKI resistance, how to control CNS disease and how to handle failure of ALK inhibition. Herein, we attempt to answer these questions through the evidence-based interpretation of studies on ALK-rearranged NSCLC combined with experience gained from our institution. The authors also propose a therapeutic algorithm for the management of this complex and highly treatable disease to assist clinicians globally in the treatment of patients with ALK-positive NSCLC.

The Effect of Using Pazopanib With Food vs. Fasted on Pharmacokinetics, Patient Safety, and Preference (DIET Study)

Pazopanib is taken fasted in a fixed oral daily dose of 800 mg. We hypothesized that ingesting pazopanib with food may improve patients' comfort and reduce gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events. Therefore, we investigated the bioequivalent dose of pazopanib when taken with food compared with 800 mg pazopanib taken fasted. In addition, we investigated the differences in GI toxicity, patient satisfaction, and patient's preference for either intake. The intake of 600 mg pazopanib with food resulted in a bioequivalent exposure and was preferred over a standard pazopanib dose without food. No differences were seen in GI toxicities under both intake regimens. Patients seem to be more positive about their feelings about side effects and satisfaction with their therapy when pazopanib was taken with food. Forty-one of the patients (68%) preferred the intake with a continental breakfast.

Impact of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Starting Dose on Outcomes in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can cause intolerable adverse events in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and may be prescribed at a lower dose.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to analyze the starting doses of oral EGFR and ALK TKIs in patients diagnosed with NSCLC at our institution.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review with patients on EGFR and ALK TKIs for NSCLC. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: patients initiated on Food and Drug Administration (FDA) standard dose (SD) and patients initiated on a reduced dose (RD). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and other treatment outcomes were compared between both groups.

RESULTS

Ninety patients were included for analysis. The median time-to-progression for the SD group (n = 67) and RD group (n = 23) were 13.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]:8.9-15.6) and 15.1 months (95%CI: 5.6-21.5), respectively. Median time-to-death was not estimable for OS. The predicted OS probability at approximately 15 months post treatment initiation for the SD group and RD group was 81.8% and 80.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Patients who initiated TKI therapy at a RD did not have different PFS and 15-month survival outcomes than patients who initiated TKI therapy at the FDA SD.

ASCEND-8 pharmacokinetic, safety, and efficacy data for ceritinib 450 mg with food in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung Cancer: A clinical perspective

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is diagnosed in up to 126,000 patients worldwide annually. Ceritinib is a next-generation ALK-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic ALK+ NSCLC. In December 2017, the US Food and Drug Administration-approved dose of ceritinib was changed from 750 mg/day under fasting conditions to 450 mg/day taken with food for the treatment of patients with ALK+ NSCLC. This change was implemented on the basis of data from studies designed to investigate ways to reduce the frequency of gastrointestinal adverse events noted in patients enrolled in several ASCEND clinical trials that evaluated a ceritinib 750-mg fasted dose as either first- or second/third-line treatment. This review highlights and discusses published findings from the ASCEND-8 food-effect trial and includes commentary from physicians regarding their own clinical cases of patients who were enrolled in the trial and treated with either the 750-mg fasted or 450-mg fed dose of ceritinib. The review also discusses the implications of using the recently approved ceritinib 450-mg dose in the clinical setting.

Emerging therapies for non-small cell lung cancer

Recent advances in the field of novel anticancer agents prolong patients' survival and show a promising future. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy for lung cancer are the two major areas undergoing rapid development. Although increasing novel anticancer agents were innovated, how to translate and optimize these novel agents into clinical practice remains to be explored. Besides, toxicities and availability of these drugs in specific regions should also be considered during clinical determination. Herein, we summarize emerging agents including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, checkpoint inhibitors, and other potential immunotherapy such as chimeric antigen receptor T cell for non-small cell lung cancer attempting to provide insights and perspectives of the future in anticancer treatment.

Treatment of ALK-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer: recent advances

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The review will highlight recent advances in development of ALK-TKIs and management of patients with ALK-positive nonsmall cell lung cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

There has been rapid progress in the use of targeted therapies for ALK-positive NSCLC. Since the discovery, development and approval of crizotinib in 2011, three second-generation ALK-TKIs, ceritinib, alectinib and brigatinib have been approved by the FDA. A range of newer generation ALK inhibitors with improved potency against ALK and against mutations that confer resistance to crizotinib are in clinical development.

SUMMARY

Our review will discuss the recent phase III data with ceritinib and alectinib as well as clinical trials with other ALK inhibitors. We will also address two important issues in the management of ALK-positive NSCLC, prevention and treatment of brain metastases and management of emergent ALK-TKI resistance mechanisms.

Clinical development of targeted and immune based anti-cancer therapies

Cancer is currently the second leading cause of death globally and is expected to be responsible for approximately 9.6 million deaths in 2018. With an unprecedented understanding of the molecular pathways that drive the development and progression of human cancers, novel targeted therapies have become an exciting new development for anti-cancer medicine. These targeted therapies, also known as biologic therapies, have become a major modality of medical treatment, by acting to block the growth of cancer cells by specifically targeting molecules required for cell growth and tumorigenesis. Due to their specificity, these new therapies are expected to have better efficacy and limited adverse side effects when compared with other treatment options, including hormonal and cytotoxic therapies. In this review, we explore the clinical development, successes and challenges facing targeted anti-cancer therapies, including both small molecule inhibitors and antibody targeted therapies. Herein, we introduce targeted therapies to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), BRAF, and the inhibitors of the T-cell mediated immune response, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)/ PD-1 ligand (PD-1 L).

The incidence of ALK inhibitor-related pneumonitis in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated the incidence of pneumonitis in clinical trials of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and compared the incidence among different cohorts, in order to identify possible predisposing factors for ALK inhibitor-related pneumonitis.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE search up to 1/30/18 using the keywords, "alectinib", "ceritinib", "crizotinib", "brigatinib", and "lung cancer", resulting in a total of 20 eligible cohorts with 2261 patients treated with ALK inhibitor monotherapy for advanced NSCLC. The pooled incidences of all-grade, high-grade, and grade 5 pneumonitis were calculated. Subgroup analyses were conducted with meta-regression using study-level covariates.

RESULTS

The overall pooled incidence of pneumonitis was 2.14% (95% CI: 1.37-3.34) for all grade, 1.33% (95% CI: 0.80-2.21) for high grade, and 0.22% (95% CI: 0.09-0.52) for grade 5 pneumonitis. The incidence was significantly higher in studies from Japan compared to studies of non-Japan origin, for all-grade (6.25% vs 1.14%, p < 0.001) and high-grade pneumonitis (3.31% vs 0.39%, p < 0.001). Multivariate meta-regression demonstrated the cohorts from Japanese studies had significantly higher odds of pneumonitis for all-grade (odds ratio [OR]: 4.329 [95% CI: 1.918, 9.770], p < 0.001) compared to those of non-Japan origin, after adjusting for types of ALK inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall incidence of ALK inhibitor pneumonitis was 2.14% in patients with advanced NSCLS. The patients from Japanese cohorts had a higher incidence of ALK-inhibitor pneumonitis, which indicates the need for increased awareness and caution for pneumonitis in Japanese patients treated with ALK inhibitors.

First-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with ALK rearrangement: state of the art and future development

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 5% of all diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harbor a genetic rearrangement between the ALK and EML4 genes, representing a specific molecular, histological and clinical subgroup (ALK+ NSCLC). To date, upfront treatment with ALK-tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs) has replaced chemotherapy in the first line setting for this subset of patients with excellent results. However, all treated patients eventually develop acquired resistance mechanisms to these agents (mainly resistance mutations) and experience progression of the disease. Areas covered: This paper provides a comprehensive state-of-the-art review about first-line approved ALK-TKIs, furthermore, it discusses the most promising ALK-TKIs under development designed to overcome resistance mutations and their implications. Expert opinion: Alectinib should currently be regarded as the standard of care for the first-line treatment of ALK+ NSCLC, considering its superior efficacy and safety profile. Regarding developing agents, lorlatinib and ensartinib appear to be the most promising ones, even though the data from their trials are still immature.

Pan-Asian adapted Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a CSCO-ESMO initiative endorsed by JSMO, KSMO, MOS, SSO and TOS

The most recent version of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was published in 2016. At the ESMO Asia Meeting in November 2017 it was decided by both ESMO and the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) to convene a special guidelines meeting immediately after the Chinese Thoracic Oncology Group Annual Meeting 2018, in Guangzhou, China. The aim was to adapt the ESMO 2016 guidelines to take into account the ethnic differences associated with the treatment of metastatic NSCLC cancer in Asian patients. These guidelines represent the consensus opinions reached by experts in the treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC representing the oncological societies of China (CSCO), Japan (JSMO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), Singapore (SSO) and Taiwan (TOS). The voting was based on scientific evidence, and was independent of both the current treatment practices and the drug availability and reimbursement situations in the six participating Asian countries. During the review process, the updated ESMO 2018 Clinical Practice Guidelines for metastatic NSCLC were released and were also considered, during the final stages of the development of the Pan-Asian adapted Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Dosage adjustments in pivotal clinical trials with oral targeted therapies in solid tumors conducted in Europe

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate in what measure is dosage adjustment particularly prevalent in pivotal clinical trials of oral targeted therapy drugs approved by the European Medicine Agency as of July 31, 2018, for the treatment of solid tumors.

METHODS

We performed a search on the official EMA site on human medicines, using as Keyword Search the ATC Code L01X (other antineoplastic agents); from the list of drugs results, we subsequently excluded antineoplastic drugs for hematological diseases, as well as refused and withdrawn drugs. For all analyzed drugs, we recorded full dosages, dose adjustments with relative reduction percentage, reason for the adjustments, number of patients included in the trial, percentage of patients who reduced their dosage or temporarily discontinued therapy, cause of dose reduction, and presence or absence of reference to a clinical outcome in patients who reduced their dose or discontinued therapy.

RESULTS

We considered 74 pivotal trials on 29 target therapies, of which 56 (76%) provide information on dosage reduction, 41 (55%) on therapy suspension, and 29 (39%) on the dose taken by the sample. Trials that provide information on dosage adjustment include reduction and suspension data widely used to manage side effects; they concern, respectively, 32 and 44% of the samples considered. No trial results take account of the possible role of adjustment in clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

It would be advisable for pivotal clinical trials to give more relevance to dose management, which is a widely used tool for the management of adverse events in clinical practice. To date, such information is lacking.

What It Takes to Improve a First-Generation Inhibitor to a Second- or Third-Generation Small Molecule

Since the first generation of small molecules was included in the armamentarium of treatment of solid tumors (imatinib, erlotinib, etc.), there has been an expansion of anticancer small molecules, mostly kinase inhibitors, in development. Some of these drugs may not be a real breakthrough but may be similar in pharmacologic properties and marginal benefit over previously existing agents for the same indication (i.e., me-too drugs). Other drugs, however, have been specifically designed to solve an unmet medical need. Overcoming the problems of the blood-brain barrier and brain metastasis, emerging resistance mutations (such as gatekeeper mutations), or increasing selectivity/potency can be addressed with modern drug design. In this article, we discuss the advancements in the field of drug discovery, drug development, and clinical development that have enabled solving some of these issues. The evolution of the different generations of EGFR and anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors exemplifies recent advancements in pharmacology that are driving the field of anticancer small molecules as a whole.

Therapeutic decision based on molecular detection of resistance mechanism in an ALK-rearranged lung cancer patient: a case report

Background

The use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of ALK is the therapy of choice for ALK-fusion patients. Unfortunately, all patients under this kind of treatment eventually develop acquired resistance through several well-known mechanisms, such as acquisition of a secondary mutation within the kinase domain, activation of a bypass signaling pathway, or a histological change like small-cell lung cancer transformation. At the time of progression, a tissue re-biopsy may give important molecular and morphological information regarding the mechanisms driving resistance to ALK TKIs. However, this procedure is not always feasible and it may not reflect the tumor heterogeneity, and therefore gives incomplete information. To overcome these drawbacks, the analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) isolated from plasma, the so-called liquid biopsy, is emerging as a noninvasive and useful tool for detecting resistance mutations. Secondary resistance mutations are common in second-generation TKIs resistant patients and among these, Gly1202Arg (p.G1202R) emerged as the most frequent mutation.

Case presentation

We have treated an ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma patient with a sequential strategy of ALK TKIs. Patient follow-up was performed combining clinical, radiological, and molecular profiling. ctDNA was isolated from plasma and by means of ultra-deep next generation sequencing; we searched for secondary ALK resistance mutations on exons 21-25. ALK mutation Gly1202Arg (G1202R) was detected. We have documented consistency between plasma levels of G1202R mutation and radiological progression or improvement.

Conclusion

Liquid biopsy appears to be a promising tool to anticipate progression and to drive the therapeutic strategy based upon ALK resistance mutations.

Safety issues with the ALK inhibitors in the treatment of NSCLC: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting the chromosomal rearrangements of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene (ALK) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were associated with superior clinical outcome. Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are known to have peculiar toxicity profile, hence, increasing awareness to the safety profile of ALK inhibitors is essential.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic review of literature has been conducted to include prospective trials that used the ALK inhibitors Crizotinib, Ceritinib, Alectinib, Brigatinib and Lorlatinib in patients with advanced NSCLC and have available efficacy and toxicity results.

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies including 2793 patients were considered eligible for our review and included two phase IB, seven phase II and five phase III studies. The most common adverse events (AEs) observed with ALK inhibitors were gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities as nausea (up to 83%), vomiting (up to 67%) and diarrhea (up to 86%), elevation of liver enzymes occurred in up to 60% and fatigue (up to 43%). There were differences in the toxicity patterns between the different ALK inhibitors with more GI and hepatic toxicities with Ceritinib, more visual disorders with Crizotinib, more dysgeusia with crizotinib and Alectinib and possibly more respiratory complications with Brigatinib. Most of the AEs were low grade and treatment-related deaths were associated with ALK inhibitors in 0-1% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Most of adverse effects of ALKi can be managed efficiently via dose modifications or interruptions. Timely identification of each ALKi pattern of toxicity can prevent treatment-related morbidity and mortality in this palliative setting.

[Current Status for Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

The incidence of ALK gene rearrangement in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was about 3% to 5%. ALK gene inhibitors have made great breakthrough in recent years, significantly extending the survival period of patients with ALK(+) advanced NSCLC. But the majority of patients will be acquired drug resistance after treatment. This article has been explained separately from the ALK genetic background, the detection method, the treatment of the three generations of ALK inhibitors and the strategy after drug resistance. It is desire to have reference value and reference meaning for clinical work.
.

Canadian perspectives: update on inhibition of ALK-positive tumours in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Background

Inhibition of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (alk) oncogenic driver in advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma (nsclc) improves survival. In 2015, Canadian thoracic oncology specialists published a consensus guideline about the identification and treatment of ALK-positive patients, recommending use of the alk inhibitor crizotinib in the first line. New scientific literature warrants a consensus update.

Methods

Clinical trials of alk inhibitor were reviewed to assess benefits, risks, and implications relative to current Canadian guidance in patients with ALK-positive nsclc.

Results

Randomized phase iii trials have demonstrated clinical benefit for single-agent alectinib and ceritinib used in treatment-naïve patients and as second-line therapy after crizotinib. Phase ii trials have demonstrated activity for single-agent brigatinib and lorlatinib in further lines of therapy. Improved responses in brain metastases were observed for all second- and next/third-generation alk tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients progressing on crizotinib. Canadian recommendations are therefore revised as follows:■ Patients with advanced nonsquamous nsclc have to be tested for the presence of an ALK rearrangement.■ Treatment-naïve patients with ALK-positive disease should initially be offered single-agent alectinib or ceritinib, or both sequentially.■ Crizotinib-refractory patients should be treated with single-agent alectinib or ceritinib, or both sequentially.■ Further treatments could include single-agent brigatinib or lorlatinib, or both sequentially.■ Patients progressing on alk tyrosine kinase inhibitors should be considered for pemetrexed-based chemotherapy.■ Other systemic therapies should be exhausted before immunotherapy is considered.

Summary

Multiple lines of alk inhibition are now recommended for patients with advanced nsclc with an ALK rearrangement.

Ceritinib Alone for Crizotinib-naive Versus Crizotinib-pretreated for Management of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-rearrangement Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review

Ceritinib shows a promising efficacy in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearrangement non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The present systematic review determined the whole body and intracranial effectiveness and safety of ceritinib in crizotinib-naive versus crizotinib-pretreated regimens in ALK-rearrangement NSCLC. A comprehensive search of databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, Web of Science, and COCHRANE, was performed to identify clinical trials in English-language journals. We estimated the pooled progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR) for ceritinib in whole body and intracranial responses to find differences between crizotinib-naive and crizotinib-pretreated regimens. The intracranial disease control rate in both crizotinib-naive and crizotinib-pretreated regimens was also estimated. The pooled efficacy parameters were as follows: ORR, 56.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53.6%-60.1%); PFS, 8.26 months (95% CI, 6.18-11.07 months); intracranial ORR, 41.3% (95% CI, 35.3%-47.6%); and intracranial disease control rate, 79.8% (95% CI, 73.8%-84.7%). The pooled ceritinib for crizotinib-naive showed a trend toward greater ORR and longer PFS compared with ceritinib for crizotinib-pretreated (68.9% and 14.62 months vs. 48.2% and 6.32 months, respectively). The intracranial ORR for ceritinib as the initial regimen was 50.6% compared with 33.6% for crizotinib-pretreated. The discontinuation and dose reduction rates were 3.1% and 38.4%, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 adverse effects were increased alanine aminotransferase (25.5%), increased γ-glutamyltransferase (12.6%), and increased aspartate aminotransferase (11.1%). Ceritinib is an effective agent for both crizotinib-naive and crizotinib-pretreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic ALK-rearranged NSCLC. Ceritinib has significant activity in crizotinib-naive patients with brain metastases.