Durvalumab, with or without tremelimumab, plus platinum-etoposide versus platinum-etoposide alone in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (CASPIAN): updated results from a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial

Small cell lung cancer with liver metastases: from underlying mechanisms to treatment strategies

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents an aggressive neuroendocrine (NE) tumor within the pulmonary region, characterized by very poor prognoses. Druggable targets for SCLC remain limited, thereby constraining treatment options available to patients. Immuno-chemotherapy has emerged as a pivotal therapeutic strategy for extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC), yet it fails to confer significant efficacy in cases involving liver metastases (LMs) originating from SCLC. Therefore, our attention is directed towards the challenging subset of SCLC patients with LMs. Disease progression of LM-SCLC patients is affected by various factors in the tumor microenvironment (TME), including immune cells, blood vessels, inflammatory mediators, metabolites, and NE substances. Beyond standard immuno-chemotherapy, ongoing efforts to manage LMs in SCLC encompass anti-angiogenic therapy, radiotherapy, microwave ablation (MWA) / radiofrequency ablation (RFA), trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE), and systemic therapies in conjunction with local interventions. Prospective experimental and clinical investigations into SCLC should prioritize precise and individualized approaches to enhance the prognosis across distinct patient cohorts.

A Phase I First-in-Human Study of ABBV-011, a Seizure-Related Homolog Protein 6-Targeting Antibody-Drug Conjugate, in Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Seizure-related homolog protein 6 (SEZ6) is a novel target expressed in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). ABBV-011, a SEZ6-targeted antibody conjugated to calicheamicin, was evaluated in a phase I study (NCT03639194) in patients with relapsed/refractory SCLC. We report initial outcomes of ABBV-011 monotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

ABBV-011 was administered intravenously once every 3 weeks during dose escalation (0.3-2 mg/kg) and expansion. Patients with SEZ6-positive tumors (≥25% of tumor cells with ≥1+ staining intensity by IHC) were preselected for expansion. Safety, tolerability, antitumor activity, and pharmacokinetics were evaluated.

RESULTS

As of August 2022, 99 patients received ABBV-011 monotherapy [dose escalation, n = 36; Japanese dose evaluation, n = 3; dose expansion, n = 60 (1 mg/kg, n = 40)]; the median age was 63 years (range, 41-79 years). Also, 32%, 41%, and 26% of patients received 1, 2, and ≥3 prior therapies, respectively. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached through 2.0 mg/kg. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were fatigue (50%), nausea (42%), and thrombocytopenia (41%). The most common hepatic treatment-emergent adverse events were increased aspartate aminotransferase (22%), increased γ-glutamyltransferase (21%), and hyperbilirubinemia (17%); two patients experienced veno-occlusive liver disease. The objective response rate was 19% (19/98). In the 1-mg/kg dose-expansion cohort (n = 40), the objective response rate was 25%; the median response duration was 4.2 months (95% confidence interval, 2.6-6.7); and the median progression-free survival was 3.5 months (95% confidence interval, 1.5-4.2).

CONCLUSIONS

ABBV-011 1.0 mg/kg every 3 weeks monotherapy was well tolerated and demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory SCLC. SEZ6 is a promising novel SCLC target and warrants further investigation.

Opportunities and challenges of using circulating tumor DNA to predict lung cancer immunotherapy efficacy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), particularly anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1)/ programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies, have led to significant progress in lung cancer treatment. However, only a minority of patients have responses to these therapies. Detecting peripheral blood of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) allows minimally invasive diagnosis, characterization, and monitoring of lung cancer. ctDNA has potential to be a prognostic biomarker and a predictor of the response to ICI therapy since it can indicate the genomic status and tumor burden. Recent studies on lung cancer have shown that pretreatment ctDNA analysis can detect residual proliferative disease in the adjuvant immunotherapy setting and evaluate tumor burden in patients with metastatic disease. Early ctDNA dynamics can not only predict the clinical outcome of ICI therapy but also help distinguish between pseudoprogression and real progression. Furthermore, in addition to quantitative assessment, ctDNA can also detect genetic predictors of response to ICI therapy. However, barriers still exist in the application of ctDNA analysis in clinical lung cancer treatment. The predictive value of ctDNA in lung cancer immunotherapy requires further identification and resolution of these challenges. This review aims to summarize the existing data of ctDNA analysis in patients receiving immunotherapy for lung cancer, understand the limitations of clinical treatment, and discuss future research directions.

Comprehensive genomic and spatial immune infiltration analysis of survival outliers in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer receiving first-line chemoimmunotherapy

BACKGROUND

A minority of patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) exhibit prolonged survival following first-line chemoimmunotherapy, which warrants the use of reliable biomarkers. Here, we investigated the disparities in genomics and immune cell spatial distribution between long- and short-term survival of patients with ES-SCLC.

METHODS

We retrospectively recruited 11 long-term (>2 years) and 13 short-term (<9 months) ES-SCLC survivors receiving first-line chemoimmunotherapy. The samples were processed using targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS), programmed death ligand-1 staining, multiplex immunohistochemical staining for immune cells (mIHC), tumor mutation burden (TMB), and chromosomal instability score measurements. The expression of putative genes in SCLC at the bulk and single-cell RNA-sequencing levels, as well as the role of putative genes in pan-cancer immunotherapy cohorts, were analyzed.

RESULTS

At the genomic level, a greater proportion of the smoking signature and higher TMB (>3.1) were associated with favorable survival. At the single-gene and pathway levels, tNGS revealed that MCL1 and STMN1 amplification and alterations in the apoptosis pathway were more common in short-term survivors, whereas alterations in the DLL3, KMT2B, HGF, EPHA3, ADGRB3, lysine deprivation, and HGF-cMET pathways were observed more frequently in long-term survivors. mIHC analysis of immune cells with different spatial distributions revealed that long-term survivors presented increased numbers of M1-like macrophages in all locations and decreased numbers of CD8+ T cells in the tumor stroma. Bulk transcriptomic analysis demonstrated that high levels of STMN1 and DLL3 represented an immune-suppressive tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), whereas HGF indicated an immune-responsive TIME. The expression levels of our putative genes were comparative in both TP53/RB1 mutant-type and TP53/RB1 wild-type. At the single-cell level, STMN1, MCL1, and DLL3 were highly expressed among all molecular subtypes (SCLC-A, SCLC-N, and SCLC-P), with STMN1 being enriched in cell division and G2M checkpoint pathways.

CONCLUSIONS

For ES-SCLC patients receiving first-line chemoimmunotherapy, alterations in DLL3, KMT2B, HGF, EPHA3, and ADGRB3 and a greater proportion of M1-like macrophages infiltration in all locations were predictors of favorable survival, while MCL1 and STMN1 amplification, as well as a greater proportion of CD8+ T cells infiltrating the tumor stroma, predicted worse survival.

Recent advances in immunotherapy for small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to provide an overview of recent advances in immunotherapy for small cell lung cancer (SCLC), with a focus on the current status of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), novel combination strategies, and key biomarkers.

RECENT FINDINGS

The integration of ICIs into standard chemotherapy has established them as the first-line treatment for extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC). The ADRIATIC trial further demonstrated the efficacy of ICI maintenance therapy in limited-stage SCLC. Additionally, combining radiotherapy with ICIs has shown promising synergistic effects, including the abscopal and radscopal effects. Ongoing investigations into the combination of ICIs with targeted therapies, such as antiangiogenic agents and DNA damage response inhibitors, have yielded encouraging preliminary results. Notably, the novel therapeutic agent tarlatamab, the first bispecific DLL3-directed CD3 T-cell engager, has recently received FDA approval for second-line treatment of ES-SCLC. Advances in omics technologies have shed light on the intra-tumor and inter-tumor heterogeneity of SCLC, leading to the identification of new molecular subtypes and biomarkers, thereby paving the way for precision medicine.

SUMMARY

Despite the improved outcomes associated with immunotherapy in SCLC, the overall clinical benefit remains modest. Further preclinical and clinical studies are essential to identify optimal treatment regimens and enhance therapeutic efficacy.

Total baseline tumor size predicts survival among patients with advanced small-cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy plus programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor as first-line therapy: a multicenter retrospective observational study

Introduction

Total baseline tumor size (BTS) is a prognostic factor for programmed death 1 and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor treatments. However, the prognostic value of total BTS for patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) who receive chemotherapy plus PD-L1 inhibitor remains unknown. Thus, in this study, we aimed to determine whether total BTS is associated with prognosis in patients with SCLC who receive chemotherapy plus PD-L1 inhibitor as first-line therapy.

Methods

This study included patients with extensive-stage SCLC or post-chemoradiotherapy recurrence of limited-stage SCLC who received chemotherapy plus PD-L1 inhibitor as first-line therapy from August 2019 to December 2022. The two lesions with the largest diameter among the measurable lesions in each organ were selected from up to five organs (maximum of 10 lesions), and the sum of all diameters was defined as total BTS. The patients were divided into two groups, large or small, with total BTS using X-tile software. Median survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the groups were compared using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses examined the association between total BTS and prognosis.

Results

Fifty patients were included; 14% had large total BTS (>183.2 mm) and 86% had small total BTS (≤183.2 mm). The median observation period was 10.5 months. The large total BTS group showed significantly worse overall survival than the small total BTS group (median: 26.8 months vs. 5.7 months, P = 0.0003). The multivariate analysis indicated that large total BTS was an independent negative predictor of overall survival (hazard ratio: 7.14, 95% confidence interval: 1.89-26.96).

Discussion

Total BTS is a potentially useful prognostic factor for patients with advanced SCLC who receive chemotherapy plus PD-L1 inhibitor as first-line therapy.

Study design and rationale for IFCT- 2203 TAXIO: A study that aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a first-line chemotherapy regimen without etoposide, combined with durvalumab, for patients with extensive disease small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown improvement in overall survival with anti-PD1/PD-L1 molecules in combination with cisplatin/carboplatin and etoposide as a first-line treatment for Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC). However, first-line efficacy remains limited and well below that observed in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Etoposide may have a detrimental effect on lymphocyte activation, which could explain the limited benefit of immunotherapy in the first line and the lack of benefit in the second line for patients previously exposed to high levels of etoposide.

METHODS

We initiated a multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase II study of a chemotherapy regimen with durvalumab, combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel for extensive disease SCLC. Eligible patients will receive durvalumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel every 3 weeks for up to 4 cycles, followed by durvalumab every 4 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. A total of 67 patients will be enrolled in this study, with a 12-month enrollment period and 36-month follow-up. The primary endpoint is Overall Survival (OS) rate at 12 months. Secondary endpoints are best response rate, OS, OS at 24- and 36 months, progression free survival (PFS), duration of response, quality of life and safety.

RESULTS

This study aims to establish the efficacy of durvalumab combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with extensive disease Small Cell Lung Cancer.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

EU CT: 2023-504670-38-00.

Current Radiotherapy Management of Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the Immunotherapy Era: An Italian National Survey on Behalf of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO)

BACKGROUND

Extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) treatment has recently been revolutionized by the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors. This survey was conducted to evaluate the current pattern of care among Italian clinicians, in particular about the integration with radiation therapy (RT).

METHODS

In June 2023, 225 Italian cancer care professionals were invited to complete a 21-question web-based survey about ES-SCLC management through personal contacts and the Italian Association for Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) network.

RESULTS

We received 90 responses; the majority were radiation oncologists (89%) with more than 10 years of experience (51%). The preferred management of ES-SCLC in patients with a good performance status was concomitant chemo-immunotherapy (84%). Almost all respondents recommended prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) (85%), taking into account age and thoracic response; PCI was performed mainly between the end of chemotherapy and before starting immunotherapy (37%), with a three-dimensional conformal technique (46%). Furthermore, 83% of respondents choose to deliver thoracic RT in the case of both an intrathoracic and extrathoracic response, with an RT schedule of 30 Gy/10 fractions. Stereotactic RT is increasingly being used in oligoprogressions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis showed the variability of real-world management of ES-SCLC. Future clinical trials and developments are needed to improve the multidisciplinary treatment of these patients.

MTAP as an emerging biomarker in thoracic malignancies

S-methyl-5'-thioadenosine phosphorylase (MTAP) deficiency is an emerging biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and beyond. The MTAP gene is located in the chromosomal region 9p21.3, which shows one of the most common homozygous deletions across all human cancers (9p21 loss). Loss of 9p21 is found in the majority of pleural mesotheliomas, where it serves as an established diagnostic marker. Until recently, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was the gold standard for the detection of 9p21 losses, but loss of MTAP expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) gains increasing importance as an easy to apply and cost-effective diagnostic surrogate marker. Besides, MTAP loss, which has been reported in 13% of NSCLC, is becoming an emerging predictive biomarker in two different scenarios in NSCLC and other cancer types: 1) MTAP loss seems to negatively predict the response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment via silencing of the tumor microenvironment, and 2) MTAP loss serves as a predictive biomarker for novel targeted treatment strategies. MTAP deficiency leads to an impaired function of the protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) due to its partial inhibition by MTAP's accumulating substrate methylthioadenosine (MTA). This process leaves MTAP deficient tumor cells heavily dependent on the remaining function of PRMT5, making it a perfect target for synthetic lethality. Indeed, MTA-cooperative PRMT5-inhibitors are now tested in several clinical trials with promising early results in solid malignancies. With its emergence as a predictive biomarker, the implementation of MTAP IHC into diagnostic routine for NSCLC and other tumors is likely to take place soon. In this review article, we summarize the current literature on the role of MTAP in thoracic tumors and evaluate different testing methods, including IHC, FISH and next generation sequencing.

CAR-T cell therapy: Challenge and opportunity for effective treatment of small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a devastating malignancy characterized by rapid metastasis, drug resistance, and frequent recurrence. Owing to the paucity of existing therapeutic options, the prognosis of SCLC remains poor. Recently, the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy has resulted in modest improvements in treatment responses. In this review, we characterize the biological signature of SCLC and outline the obstacles to current treatment, including impaired antigen presentation and T cell infiltration. These obstacles may potentially be overcome by chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy. For the first time, we summarize the available data and discuss the future prospects of CAR-T cell therapy for the treatment of SCLC. Given the high heterogeneity and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment of SCLC, structural modifications of CAR-T cells and combination therapy may be required to elicit a successful antitumor response. Further research, including clinical trials, is needed to determine the suitability of CAR-T cell therapy as a treatment for SCLC.

Clinical Benefits of new Systemic Therapy for Small-Cell Lung Cancer Over Two Decades: A Cross-Sectional Study

INTRODUCTION

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is one of the most lethal malignancies worldwide. This study aimed to examine the clinical benefits of new systemic therapies derived from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from 2002 to 2023 based on the magnitude of clinical benefit scale developed by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO-MCBS).

METHODS

We searched PubMed for Phase 3 RCTs on systemic therapy for SCLC published between January 2002 and December 2023. Therapeutic benefit was graded from 5 to 1 according to the ESMO-MCBS framework, with a score of 4 or 5 representing a meaningful clinical benefit. The statistical power of the trial design was also assessed using ESMO-MCBS.

RESULTS

Sixty-four RCTs with 23 683 participants were eligible for inclusion. The number of RCTs related to molecular targeted therapy or immunotherapy has increased over the years. Among the 62 RCTs for which statistical power could be evaluated, 38 (61.3%) were designed to identify an effect size that would meet the ESMO-MCBS benefit threshold and were less likely to investigate second- or subsequent-line treatment (15.8% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.004), have noninferiority design (0% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.002) and set PFS (0% vs. 16.7%) or response rate (0% vs. 16.7%) as the only primary endpoint (p = 0.002). The ESMO-MCBS framework was applied in 29 RCTs reporting positive results, and only 8 (27.6%) met the threshold for a clinical benefit. The RCTs designed to detect differences that would meet the thresholds were more likely to demonstrate meaningful clinical benefit (87.5% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.099).

CONCLUSION

Most positive SCLC-RCTs did not meet the ESMO-MCBS threshold for meaningful clinical benefits. Strict power calculations should be adopted in the design of future RCTs.

A novel anti-CTLA-4 nanobody-IL12 fusion protein in combination with a dendritic cell/tumour fusion cell vaccine enhances the antitumour activity of CD8+ T cells in solid tumours

BACKGROUND

We previously developed a nanobody targeting CTLA-4 and demonstrated that it can boost antitumour T-cell responses in vitro; however, the resulting responses after the injection of T cells into cancer models are usually weak and transient. Here, we explored whether fusing our nanobody to IL-12 would enable it to induce stronger, longer-lasting T-cell immune responses after exposure to immature dendritic cell and tumour cell fusions.

RESULTS

The fusion protein enhanced the response of CD8+ T cells to tumour antigens in vitro and led to stronger, more persistent immune responses after the T cells were injected into mice bearing different types of xenografts.

CONCLUSION

Our in vitro and in vivo results suggest the anticancer potential of our nanobody-interleukin fusion system and support the clinical application of this fusion approach for various nanobodies.

Potential immunologic and prognostic roles of CHRNA6 in SCLC and pan-cancer

Background

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is considered the most malignant subtype of lung cancer, and it has a restricted range of therapeutic choices. The emergence of immunotherapy has offered new possibilities for patients with SCLC. However, the scarcity of clinical specimens has hampered the progress of clinical studies and we still face a shortage of dependable indicators to forecast the effectiveness of immunotherapy for SCLC.

Methods

In our study, we assessed the ImmuneScore and StromalScore of 81 SCLC samples obtained from the cBioPortal database. By comparing gene expression differences between the high and low immune scores groups, we identified 24 differentially expressed genes. Subsequently, an intersection was performed with genes that exhibited differential expression between normal and SCLC tissues, leading us to isolate the gene CHRNA6. To gain a deeper insight into the possible significance of CHRNA6 in SCLC, we singled out 50 genes that showed the most pronounced positive and negative associations with its expression. We then pinpointed hub genes for subsequent functional enrichment analyses by establishing a protein-protein interactions network. We additionally assessed the link between CHRNA6 expression in SCLC and characteristics of the immune microenvironment, along with the efficacy of immunotherapy, using the CIBERSORT, immunophenoscores (IPS), and tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion (TIDE) algorithms. Furthermore, we confirmed the prognostic impact of CHRNA6 expression in SCLC patients undergoing immunotherapy within a clinical cohort. Lastly, we obtained data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to investigate CHRNA6 expression in various tumors and its associations with genetic alterations, DNA methylation, copy number variation, clinicopathological characteristics, biological processes, immune microenvironment, prognosis, and drug sensitivity.

Results

In SCLC, we found that CHRNA6 function was associated with immune activation pathways such as antigen presentation processing and positive regulation of adaptive immune response, and that CHRNA6 demonstrated a strong correlation with immune cells infiltration. In addition, analysis of the clinical cohort revealed that patients with SCLC who exhibited elevated expression of CHRNA6 experienced better responses to immunotherapy. Our pan-cancer analysis disclosed that the expression of CHRNA6 is dysregulated in a multitude of cancers, potentially due to genetic mutations, copy number gains, and DNA demethylation. The gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) outcomes indicated that CHRNA6 participates in immune responses and may play a positive immune regulatory role in most cancers. Furthermore, CHRNA6 has been observed to have a notable relationship with immune checkpoints, immunomodulators, immune cell infiltration, patient outcomes, and drug sensitivity across various cancers.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that the CHRNA6 may act as a predictive indicator for SCLC patients receiving immunotherapy. The study also uncovers the aberrant expression of CHRNA6 in a range of human cancers and its potential roles in immunology and prognosis, offering novel perspectives for tailored cancer therapies.

Transcriptomic Heterogeneity of EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Evolution Toward Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Histologic transformation from EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a key mechanism of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). However, transcriptomic changes between NSCLC and transformed SCLC (t-SCLC) remain unexplored.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We conducted whole-transcriptome analysis of 59 regions of interest through the spatial profiling of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues obtained from 10 patients (lung adenocarcinoma, 22; combined SCLC/NSCLC, 7; and t-SCLC, 30 regions of interests). Transcriptomic profiles and differentially expressed genes were compared between pre- and post-transformed tumors.

RESULTS

Following EGFR-TKI treatment, 93.7% (15/16) of t-SCLC components evolved into neuroendocrine-high subtypes (SCLC-A or SCLC-N). The transition to t-SCLC occurred regardless of EGFR-TKI treatment and EGFR mutational status, with a notable decrease in EGFR expression (P < 0.001) at both mRNA and protein levels. Pathway analysis revealed that gene overexpression was related to epigenetic alterations in t-SCLC. Interestingly, histone deacetylase inhibitors restored EGFR expression in SNU-2962A cells and their organoid model. The synergistic effects of third-generation EGFR-TKI osimertinib and the histone deacetylase inhibitor fimepinostat were validated in both in vitro and in vivo models.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that most t-SCLC cases showed neuronal subtypes with low EGFR expression. Differentially expressed gene analysis and t-SCLC preclinical models identified an epigenetic modifier as a promising treatment strategy for t-SCLC.

Real-world efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with advanced pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma: a single-center analysis

Background

Immunotherapy blocking programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) has revolutionized the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), but only with limited real-world efficacy data; evidence from immunotherapy for other pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (PNEC) is scarce.

Objective

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of receiving PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with advanced PNEC and explore factors related to survival prognosis, providing clues for treatment for patients with advanced PNEC.

Methods

In all, 203 patients with advanced PNEC who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors between January 2019 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

For the 203 patients, the objective response rate (ORR) was 48.3%, the disease control rate (DCR) was 83.3%, the median PFS (mPFS) was 6.0 months, and the median OS (mOS) was 13.1 months. Among them, the histology was 166 SCLC, 13 large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, and 24 other unspecified PNEC. Histologically, no significant difference was observed in PFS (p = 0.240) or OS (p = 0.845). In first-line (1L) treatment (N = 125), patients received chemoimmunotherapy and had an ORR of 64.8%, DCR of 92.0%, mPFS of 6.6 months, and mOS of 14.9 months. In second-line (2L) or later-line setting, the ORR, DCR, mPFS, and mOS were 21.8%, 69.2%, 4.4, and 9.4 months; immunotherapy plus small-molecule antiangiogenic agents showed significantly greater PFS than immunotherapy monotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy (6.4 vs 1.4 vs 3.7 months, p = 0.041). Patients without liver metastasis had superior PFS (7.0 vs 5.1 months, p < 0.001) and OS (19.2 vs 9.6 months, p < 0.001) than those with liver metastasis.

Conclusion

In clinical practice, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are effective in patients with advanced PNEC, regardless of the pathological histology. The efficacy of 1L immunochemotherapy is worthy of recognition, and the addition of small-molecule antiangiogenic agents to immunotherapy in 2L or later-line treatment provides a better survival trend.

Design

Retrospective study.

Peripheral NK cells identified as the predictor of response in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer patients treated with first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Although immunotherapy improves outcomes in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), the search for biomarkers predicting treatment success is crucial. Natural killer (NK) cells are potential indicators in various cancers, however, their precise role in ES-SCLC prognosis remains unclear.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 33 patients with ES-SCLC treated with first-line immuno-chemotherapy were enrolled. The peripheral NK cell percentage and its longitudinal dynamics were analyzed using flow cytometry. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated as hazard ratio (HR) and compared statistically.

RESULTS

The median PFS was better in the group with normal baseline NK cell levels than the low group (7.0 vs. 4.6 months; HR = 0.17; 95% CI 0.07-0.41; P < 0.0001), but there was no association with OS (14.9 vs. 10.3 months; HR = 0.55; 95% CI 0.23-1.31; P = 0.171). Furthermore, the NK cell% for 95.0% of patients increased after immunochemotherapy in the clinical response group (P = 0.0047), which led to a better median PFS (6.3 vs. 2.1 months; HR = 0.23; 95% CI 0.05-0.98; P < 0.0001) and OS (14.9 vs. 5.9 months; HR = 0.20; 95% CI 0.04-1.02; P < 0.0001). Similar trends were observed with NK cell% changes up to disease progression, improving PFS (6.5 vs. 4.3; HR = 0.41; 95% CI 0.12-0.92; P = 0.0049) and OS (17.4 vs. 9.7; HR = 0.42; 95% CI 0.17-1.02; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In patients with ES-SCLC, the percentage and changes in peripheral NK cells can predict the response to combined immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

Clinical outcomes and synergistic effect between radiotherapy and immunotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a real-world study

BACKGROUND

Patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) experience significant therapeutic challenges and limited survival rates. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of combining immunotherapy (IT) with chemotherapy (CT) for treating ES-SCLC and to explore the synergistic effect between radiotherapy (RT) and IT.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis examined patients with ES-SCLC who received treatment at three centers. Furthermore, propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was conducted. The Kaplan‒Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to compare the survival outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 257 eligible patients with ES-SCLC were included in the analysis. Among all patients, the median overall survival (mOS) was 18.0 m in the chemoimmunotherapy (CT + IT) group and 15.7 m in the CT group (p = 0.208). The median real-world progression-free survival (mrwPFS) was 7.7 m and 6.8 m (p = 0.043) in the CT + IT and CT group, respectively. Moreover, the mOS was 22.0 m in the chemoradiotherapy (CT + RT) group and 13.6 m in the CT group (p < 0.001). The mrwPFS was 7.4 m and 6.0 m (p = 0.175) in the CT + RT group and CT group, respectively. The multivariate analyses revealed that sex, liver metastasis and RT were independent prognostic factors for OS (p < 0.05), while liver metastasis and IT were found to be independent predictive factors of real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) (p < 0.05). After PSM, the mOS was 23.2 m in the CT + IT group and 13.0 m in the CT group (p = 0.008). The mrwPFS was 7.3 m and 6.2 m (p = 0.096) in the CT + IT group and the CT group, respectively. Moreover, the mOS was 21.4 m in the CT + RT group and 12.5 m in the CT group (p < 0.001). The mrwPFS was 7.3 m and 5.2 m (p = 0.220) in the CT + RT group and the CT group, respectively. Additionally, our study revealed that in the PD-1 group, RT significantly improved patient survival (36.0 m vs. 15.8 m, p = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

An increasing number of treatment options are being explored for ES-SCLC, and CT is the cornerstone of treatment for this disease. Combining CT with IT and RT has demonstrated remarkable efficacy and excellent safety profiles, and such treatments are worthy of further exploration.

ATR inhibition activates cancer cell cGAS/STING-interferon signaling and promotes antitumor immunity in small-cell lung cancer

Patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have poor prognosis and typically experience only transient benefits from combined immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and chemotherapy. Here, we show that inhibition of ataxia telangiectasia and rad3 related (ATR), the primary replication stress response activator, induces DNA damage-mediated micronuclei formation in SCLC models. ATR inhibition in SCLC activates the stimulator of interferon genes (STING)-mediated interferon signaling, recruits T cells, and augments the antitumor immune response of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) blockade in mouse models. We demonstrate that combined ATR and PD-L1 inhibition causes improved antitumor response than PD-L1 alone as the second-line treatment in SCLC. This study shows that targeting ATR up-regulates major histocompatibility class I expression in preclinical models and SCLC clinical samples collected from a first-in-class clinical trial of ATR inhibitor, berzosertib, with topotecan in patients with relapsed SCLC. Targeting ATR represents a transformative vulnerability of SCLC and is a complementary strategy to induce STING-interferon signaling-mediated immunogenicity in SCLC.

Efficacy of carboplatin-etoposide rechallenge after first-line chemo-immunotherapy in ES-SCLC: an international multicentric analysis

Background and objectives

Second-line treatment for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is primarily guided by the time elapsed since the last platinum dose. Rechallenge with carboplatin and etoposide has demonstrated superior outcomes compared to topotecan if the platinum-free interval (PFI) is longer than 90 days and is considered the standard of care. However, these findings predate the chemo-immunotherapy era. This study investigates the effectiveness of the rechallenge strategy after chemo-immunotherapy in a real-world setting.

Design and methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients with the extensive stage (ES)-SCLC who received rechallenge with carboplatin and etoposide after first-line chemoimmunotherapy between September 2020 and August 2023 in nine European centres. Demographic and clinical data were collected and analysed.

Results

A total of 93 patients were included. Sixty-six (71%) patients had a PFI between 3 and 6 months. Consolidation thoracic radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation had been administered in 31 (33.3%) patients and 20 (21.5%) patients, respectively. Overall response rate was 59.1%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.3-5.7) and median overall survival (OS) was 7 months (95% CI 5.7-8.3). Notably, PFS and OS were not different according to PFI (3-6 m vs > 6 m).

Conclusion

Rechallenge with carboplatin and etoposide is a valid second-line option in patients with ES-SCLC whose disease progresses after first-line chemoimmunotherapy. Our analysis shows similar results to previous studies. Furthermore, outcomes were consistent across patients with different PFIs, confirming its efficacy in patients with a PFI longer than 3 months.

Novel Combinations of Immunotherapies or DNA Damage Repair Inhibitors in Platinum-Refractory Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase II BALTIC Study

PURPOSE

The phase II, multiarm, signal-searching BALTIC study (NCT02937818) assessed novel treatment combinations for platinum-refractory/resistant extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with ES-SCLC with progressive disease during or within 90 days of completing first-line platinum-based chemotherapy received one of three regimens: durvalumab plus tremelimumab followed by durvalumab monotherapy (arm A), adavosertib plus carboplatin (arm B), or ceralasertib plus olaparib (arm C). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate. Prespecified exploratory biomarker analyses were conducted in arms A and C.

RESULTS

In arm A (n = 41), arm B (n = 10), and arm C (n = 21), the confirmed objective response rates were 7.3%, 0%, and 4.8%, respectively. Safety profiles in all arms were consistent with those of the individual drugs. In arm A, patients with PD-L1 expression (tumor cells or immune cells) ≥1% seemed to have a greater likelihood of achieving disease control with durvalumab plus tremelimumab than those with PD-L1 (tumor cells and immune cells) <1%, and lower baseline ctDNA and reduction in the on-treatment ctDNA level were both associated with longer overall survival. Among patients treated with ceralasertib plus olaparib in arm C, specific immune response-relevant circulating chemokines and cytokines were identified as early biomarkers of survival and pharmacodynamic biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

In BALTIC, all combination regimens demonstrated tolerable safety profiles, but antitumor activity was limited in refractory/resistant ES-SCLC. Among patients treated with durvalumab plus tremelimumab, an association of on-treatment reduction in ctDNA with longer overall survival suggests the potential use of ctDNA as a surrogate of treatment response, warranting further investigation.

Integration of clinical and blood parameters in risk prognostication for patients receiving immunochemotherapy for extensive stage small cell lung cancer: real-world data from two centers

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) had modest advances in the treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) in clinical trials, but there is a lack of biomarkers for prognosis in clinical practice.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from ES-SCLC patients who received ICIs combined chemotherapy from two centers in China, integrated clinical and blood parameters, and constructed risk prognostication for immunochemotherapy. The population was divided into high- and low-risk groups, and the performance of the model was assessed separately in the training and validation cohorts.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty and 43 patients were included in the training and validation groups, respectively. The important predictors were screened including body mass index, liver metastases, coefficient variation of red blood cell distribution width, lactate dehydrogenase, albumin, and C-reactive protein. Predicting 1-year overall survival (OS), the AUC values under ROC for the model under training, internal validation, and external validation were 0.760, 0.732, and 0.722, respectively, and the calibration curve and clinical decision curve performed well. Applied the model to divide patients into low-risk and high-risk groups, and the median OS was 23.7 months and 9.1 months, and the median progression-free survival was 8.2 months and 4.8 months, respectively; furthermore, this ability to discriminate survival was also observed in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

We constructed a novel prognostic model for ES-SCLC to predict survival employing baseline tumor burden, nutritional and inflammatory parameters, it is easily measured to screen high-risk patient populations.

Challenges and future perspectives for the use of temozolomide in the treatment of SCLC

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), accounting for 10-20 % of all lung tumors, represents the most aggressive high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma. Most patients are diagnosed with extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC), with brian metastases identified in ∼ 80 % of cases during the disease cours, and the prognosis is dismal, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5 %. Current available treatments in the second-line setting are limited, and topotecan has long been the only FDA-approved drug in relapsed or refractory ES-SCLC, until the recent approval of lurbinectedin, a selective inhibitor of RNA polymerase II. Temozolomide (TMZ) is an oral alkylating agent, which showed single-agent activity in SCLC, particularly among patients with O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation. Several studies have revealed the synergistic activity of temozolomide with poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, that prevent repair of TMZ-induced DNA damage. This review focuses on the rationale for the use of TMZ in ES-SCLC and provides an overview of the main trials that have evaluated and are currently investigating its role, both as a single-agent and in combinations, in relapse or refractory disease.

Impact of thoracic radiotherapy on first-line treatment outcomes in ES-SCLC patients

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic advantage of thoracic radiotherapy (tRT) as an adjunct to first-line immunotherapy and chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) remains unclear. We sought to elucidate this in a retrospective cohort study comparing the effectiveness and safety of tRT in combination with first-line immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

METHODS

Our retrospective study included patients with ES-SCLC, treated at the West China Hospital between January 2019 and December 2022. They received first-line immunotherapy and chemotherapy and were categorized into two cohorts based on the administration of tRT. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Cox regression analysis was utilized to identify potential independent predictors of prognosis and to compare the treatment outcomes across various patient subgroups. Treatment-related toxicities across both cohorts were compared using the Chi-squared test.

RESULTS

A total of 99patients were eligible for the study, out of which 55 received tRT. The medianduration of follow-up was 39 months. Remarkably, patients who received tRTdemonstrated superior OS and PFS in comparison to those who did not (P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis further confirmed these findings. Multivariate analysisidentified treatment group and liver metastasis as independent prognosticfactors (P < 0.05). The incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events showed nostatistically significant difference between the two cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, weconfirmed that the addition of tRT to the conventional regimen of first-linechemotherapy and immunotherapy yields better survival outcomes without asignificant increase in toxicity.

Adebrelimab plus chemotherapy and sequential thoracic radiotherapy as first-line therapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC): a phase II trial

Background

This phase II prospective trial aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of adebrelimab (PD-L1 antibody) plus first-line chemotherapy followed by sequential thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) combined with adebrelimab in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Biomarkers associated with potential therapeutic effects were also explored.

Methods

Patients with previously untreated ES-SCLC were enrolled at Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute (Jinan, China). Patients received 4-6 cycles of adebrelimab (20 mg/kg, D1, Q3W) combined with EP/EC (etoposide, 100 mg/m2, D1-3, Q3W and cisplatin, 75 mg/m2, D1, Q3W or carboplatin, AUC = 5, D1, Q3W). Then patients with response sequentially underwent consolidative TRT (≥30 Gy in 10 fractions or ≥50 Gy in 25 fractions, involved-field irradiation), and maintenance adebrelimab until disease progression or intolerable adverse events (AEs). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Genomic and circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) profiling were also analyzed with tumour tissues and peripheral blood. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04562337.

Findings

From October 2020 to April 2023, 67 patients diagnosed with ES-SCLC were enrolled and received at least one dose of study treatment. All patients were included in the efficacy and safety analyses. 45 patients received sequential TRT as planned. The median OS and progression-free survival (PFS) was 21.4 months (95% CI: 17.2-not reached months) and 10.1 months (95% CI: 6.9-15.5 months), respectively. The confirmed objective response rate was 71.6% (48/67, 95% CI: 59.3-82.0%) and disease control rate was 89.6% (60/67, 95% CI: 79.7-95.7%). There were no treatment-related deaths. The most common grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were hematological toxicities. The incidence of any grade and G3+ pneumonitis was 25% (17/67) and 6% (4/67), respectively. No unexpected adverse events were observed. Patients without co-mutations of TP53/RB1 in both tissue and peripheral blood displayed longer PFS (tissue, P = 0.071; ctDNA, P = 0.060) and OS (tissue, P = 0.032; ctDNA, P = 0.031).

Interpretation

Adebrelimab plus chemotherapy and sequential TRT as first-line therapy for ES-SCLC showed promising efficacy and acceptable safety.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82172865), Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. and Amoy Diagnostics Co., Ltd.

Association Between Sarcopenia, Clinical Outcomes, and Survival in Patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with First-Line Immunochemotherapy: A Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between sarcopenia, short-term efficacy, and long-term survival in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) treated with standard first-line immunochemotherapy.

METHODS

A total of 63 patients initially diagnosed with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer were enrolled in the prospective study from December 1, 2020 to December 31, 2022. The clinical characteristics, body composition, blood test results, and image data were obtained before treatment. Patients were divided into sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups according to the diagnostic criteria of the Asian Sarcopenia Working Group 2019. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and comprehensive survival analyses were performed. Secondary outcomes included short-term efficacy and adverse events associated with first-line immunochemotherapy.

RESULTS

The median age of the 63 patients enrolled in our study was 63.0 years (40-80 years). The incidence of sarcopenia was 19.0% (12/63) in patients with extensive SCLC. Compared with non-sarcopenia patients, extensive-stage SCLC patients with sarcopenia were significantly older (69.0 vs. 62.0, P = 0.017), and had lower body mass index (BMI) (20.29 vs. 24.27, P < 0.001), hand grip strength (HGS) (20.42 vs. 30.75, P < 0.001), and albumin (35.9 vs. 41.40, P < 0.001). The objective response rate after two cycles of standard first-line immunochemotherapy in the sarcopenia group was lower than in the non-sarcopenia group (30.0 vs. 78.9%, P = 0.012). There was no significant difference in chemotherapy-related hematological toxicity between the two groups. During a median follow-up of 15 months (3-33 months), patients with extensive SCLC had a median OS of 24 months, with 1-year survival of 75% and 2-year survival of 52%, respectively. Compared to non-sarcopenia patients, the median OS in the sarcopenia group was significantly shorter (9 vs. 24 months, P = 0.0014). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that sarcopenia was an independent risk factor for OS in patients with extensive SCLC (HR = 4.993, 95%CI = 1.106-22.538, P = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with Extensive SCLC and sarcopenia had worse clinical outcomes and shorter OS. Sarcopenia is a prognostic factor affecting first-line treatment efficacy and long-term survival of patients with SCLC in the era of immunotherapy.

Immunotherapy for small cell lung cancer: the current state and future trajectories

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) constitutes approximately 10% to 15% of all lung cancer diagnoses and represents a pressing global public health challenge due to its high mortality rates. The efficacy of conventional treatments for SCLC is suboptimal, characterized by limited anti-tumoral effects and frequent relapses. In this context, emerging research has pivoted towards immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy, a rapidly advancing field that has shown promise in ameliorating the clinical outcomes of SCLC patients. Through originally developed for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), these therapies have extended new treatment avenues for SCLC. Currently, a nexus of emerging hot-spot treatments has demonstrated significant therapeutic efficacy. Based on the amalgamation of chemotherapy and immunotherapy, and the development of new immunotherapy agents, the treatment of SCLC has seen the hoping future. Progress has been achieved in enhancing the tumor immune microenvironment through the concomitant use of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), as evinced by emerging clinical trial data. Moreover, a tripartite approach involving immunotherapy, targeted therapy, and chemotherapy appears auspicious for future clinical applications. Overcoming resistance to post-immunotherapy regimens remains an urgent area of exploration. Finally, bispecific antibodies, adoptive cell transfer (ACT), oncolytic virus, monotherapy, including Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) and T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT), as well as precision medicine, may present a prospective route towards achieving curative outcomes in SCLC. This review aims to synthesize extant literature and highlight future directions in SCLC treatment, acknowledging the persistent challenges in the field. Furthermore, the continual development of novel therapeutic agents and technologies renders the future of SCLC treatment increasingly optimistic.

DB-1314, a novel DLL3-targeting ADC with DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor, exhibits promising safety profile and therapeutic efficacy in preclinical small cell lung cancer models

BACKGROUND

Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) is highly expressed on the cell surface of small cell lung cancer (SCLC), one of the most lethal malignancies, but minimally or not in normal tissues, making it an attractive target for SCLC. However, none of the DLL3-targeting antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have been approved for SCLC therapy yet. We developed DB-1314, the new anti-DLL3 ADC composed of a novel humanized anti-DLL3 monoclonal antibody (DB131401) conjugated with eight molecules of P1021 (topoisomerase I inhibitor), and described its preclinical profiles.

METHODS

The binding epitope for DB131401 and Rovalpituzumab was tested by biolayer interferometry. The binding affinity and specificity of DB-1314 to DLL3 and other homologous proteins were respectively measured by surface plasmon resonance and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Internalization, bystander effects, and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) were assessed by respective assay. DLL3 was quantified by antibodies bound per cell assay and immunohistochemistry. In vitro and in vivo growth inhibition studies were evaluated in SCLC cell lines, and cell line/patient-derived xenograft models. The safety profile was measured in cynomolgus monkeys.

RESULTS

DB-1314 induces potent, durable, and dose-dependent antitumor effects in cells in vitro and in cell/patient-derived xenograft models in vivo. The killing activity of DB-1314 mechanically arises from P1021-induced DNA damage, whereby P1021 is delivered and released within tumor cells through DLL3-specific binding and efficient internalization. Bystander effects and ADCC also contribute to the antitumor activity of DB-1314. DB-1314 displays favorable pharmacokinetic and toxicokinetic profiles in rats and cynomolgus monkeys; besides, DB-1314 is well-tolerated at a dose of up to 60 mg/kg in monkeys.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that DB-1314 may be a candidate ADC targeting DLL3 for the treatment of DLL3-positive SCLC, supporting further evaluation in the clinical setting.

Promising therapy for neuroendocrine prostate cancer: current status and future directions

Neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC) is a highly aggressive variant of castration-resistant prostate cancer. It is characterized by low or no expression of the androgen receptor (AR), activation of AR-independent signaling, and increased neuroendocrine phenotype. Most of NEPC is induced by treatment of androgen deprivation therapy and androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs). Currently, the treatment of NEPC follows the treatment strategy for small-cell lung cancer, lacking effective drugs and specific treatment options. This review summarizes potential novel targets and therapies for NEPC treatment, including epigenetic regulators (zeste homolog 2 inhibitors, lysine-specific demethylase 1 inhibitors), aurora kinase A inhibitors, poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors, delta-like ligand 3 targeted therapies, a combination of immunotherapies, etc. Other promising targets and future directions are also discussed in this review. These novel targets and therapies may provide new opportunities for the treatment of NEPC.

Small cell lung cancer: emerging subtypes, signaling pathways, and therapeutic vulnerabilities

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a recalcitrant cancer characterized by early metastasis, rapid tumor growth and poor prognosis. In recent decades, the epidemiology, initiation and mutation characteristics of SCLC, as well as abnormal signaling pathways contributing to its progression, have been widely studied. Despite extensive investigation, fewer drugs have been approved for SCLC. Recent advancements in multi-omics studies have revealed diverse classifications of SCLC that are featured by distinct characteristics and therapeutic vulnerabilities. With the accumulation of SCLC samples, different subtypes of SCLC and specific treatments for these subtypes were further explored. The identification of different molecular subtypes has opened up novel avenues for the treatment of SCLC; however, the inconsistent and uncertain classification of SCLC has hindered the translation from basic research to clinical applications. Therefore, a comprehensives review is essential to conclude these emerging subtypes and related drugs targeting specific therapeutic vulnerabilities within abnormal signaling pathways. In this current review, we summarized the epidemiology, risk factors, mutation characteristics of and classification, related molecular pathways and treatments for SCLC. We hope that this review will facilitate the translation of molecular subtyping of SCLC from theory to clinical application.

Overexpression of ESYT3 improves radioimmune responses through activating cGAS-STING pathway in lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy can modulate systemic antitumor immunity, while immune status in the tumor microenvironment also influences the efficacy of radiotherapy, but relevant molecular mechanisms are poorly understood in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD).

METHODS

In this study, we innovatively proposed a radiotherapy response classification for LUAD, and discovered ESYT3 served as a tumor suppressor and radioimmune response sensitizer. ESYT3 expression was measured both in radioresistant and radiosensitive LUAD tissues and cells. The influence of ESYT3 on radiotherapy sensitivity and resistance was then investigated. Interaction between ESYT3 and STING was evaluated through multiple immunofluorescent staining and coimmunoprecipitation, and downstream molecules were further analyzed. In vivo models were constructed to assess the combination treatment efficacy of ESYT3 overexpression with radiotherapy.

RESULTS

We found that radioresistant subtype presented immunosuppressive state and activation of DNA damage repair pathways than radiosensitive subtype. ESYT3 expression was remarkably attenuated both in radioresistant LUAD tissues and cells. Clinically, low ESYT3 expression was linked with radioresistance. Overexpression of ESYT3 enabled to alleviate radioresistance, and sensitize LUAD cells to DNA damage induced by irradiation. Mechanically, ESYT3 directly interacted with STING, and activated cGAS-STING signaling, subsequently increasing the generation of type I IFNs as well as downstream chemokines CCL5 and CXCL10, thus improving radioimmune responses. The combination treatment of ESYT3 overexpression with radiotherapy had a synergistic anticancer effect in vitro and in vivo.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, low ESYT3 expression confers resistance to radiotherapy in LUAD, and its overexpression can improve radioimmune responses through activating cGAS-STING-dependent pathway, thus providing an alternative combination therapeutic strategy for LUAD patients.

Efficacy and safety of G-CSF prophylaxis in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer receiving chemoimmunotherapy

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis during chemoimmunotherapy with carboplatin plus etoposide and atezolizumab in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).

METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter study enrolled ES-SCLC patients receiving carboplatin plus etoposide and atezolizumab, categorized into G-CSF and non-G-CSF groups. Demographic and disease-related data were collected. Response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 119 patients (median age: 63 years), the overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 72.3% and 81.5%, respectively. In the G-CSF group, the ORR was 76.4% compared to 60.0% in the non-G-CSF group (p = 0.33), and the DCR was 85.4% versus 70.0%, respectively (p = 0.46). Median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI, 6.8-9.8) in the G-CSF group and 6.8 months (95% CI, 6.2-7.5) in the non-G-CSF group (p = 0.24). Median OS was 13.8 months (95% CI, 9.6-18.1) for the G-CSF group and 10.6 months (95% CI, 7.9-13.3) for the non-G-CSF group (p = 0.47). Grade 3 ≥ adverse events were similar between groups (49.4% vs. 33.3%, respectively, p = 0.12).

CONCLUSION

G-CSF prophylaxis can be safely used in ES-SCLC patients undergoing carboplatin plus etoposide and atezolizumab regimen without significantly altering efficacy or increasing toxicity.

The SUB-urothelial DUrvalumab InjEction-1 (SUBDUE-1) trial: first-in-human trial in patients with bladder cancer

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety of sub-urothelial injection of durvalumab and examine the impact on tissue and circulating immune cell populations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The patients were chemotherapy and immunotherapy naïve (bacille Calmette-Guérin allowed) with non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer or non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer planned for radical cystectomy (RC). The study was a Phase Ib 3 + 3 dose-escalation design with sub-urothelial injection of durvalumab at three pre-determined doses (25, 75, 150 mg) diluted in 25 mL normal saline, injected at 25 locations (25 × 1 mL injections), at least 2 weeks before RC.

RESULTS

A total of 11 patients were recruited (10 male, one female). No significant changes were reported on American Urological Association Symptom Score or O'Leary Interstitial Cystitis Scale. In all, 14 adverse events (AEs) were reported (10 Grade 1, three Grade 2, one Grade 3), none considered immune-related. No Grade 4 or 5 AEs were recorded. All the patients underwent RC. Tissue immune populations changed following durvalumab injection (P = 0.012), with a statistically significant increase in M2-macrophage (CD163) when comparing the 25-150 mg dose (P = 0.021). Basal/mixed cancers showed a larger CD163 increase than luminal cancers (P = 0.033).

CONCLUSION

Sub-urothelial injection of durvalumab is feasible and safe without immune-related AEs and shows local immunological effects.

Miniprotein engineering for inhibition of PD-1/PD-L1 interaction

Miniproteins constitute an excellent basis for the development of structurally demanding functional molecules. The engrailed homeodomain, a three-helix-containing miniprotein, was applied as a scaffold for constructing programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) interaction inhibitors. PD-L1 binders were initially designed using the computer-aided approach and subsequently optimized iteratively. The conformational stability was assessed for each obtained miniprotein using circular dichroism spectroscopy, indicating that numerous mutations could be introduced. The formation of a sizable hydrophobic surface at the inhibitor that fits the molecular target imposed the necessity for the incorporation of additional charged amino acid residues to retain its appropriate solubility. Finally, the miniprotein effectively binding to PD-L1 (KD = 51.4 nM) that inhibits PD-1/PD-L1 interaction in cell-based studies with EC50 = 3.9 μM, was discovered.

Second-line treatment outcomes after first-line chemotherapy plus immunotherapy in Extensive-Stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients: A large French multicenter study

INTRODUCTION

Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy (CT-IO) is the standard treatment for patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC). This study evaluates the effectiveness of second-line (2L) following CT-IO.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients from 10 centers who received a 2L after a first-line CT-IO were included. They were divided into 3 groups: platinum-based, lurbinectedin or others (topotecan, CAV, taxanes). We assessed overall survival (OS) and 2L progression-free survival (2L-PFS) according to treatment and platinum free-interval (PFI) < or ≥ 90 days.

RESULTS

Among 82 patients included, median age was 67.0 years, 29.3 % had a Performans Status ≥ 2, 36.6 % had brain progression, 69.5 % were considered "platine-sensitive" and 30.5 % "platine-resistant" (PFI ≥ or < 90 days, respectively). As 2L, 37/82 patients (45.1 %) received platinum-doublet, 21/82 (25.6 %) lurbinectedin and 24/82 (29.3 %) others. Patients with a PFI ≥ 90 days received mainly platinum-based rechallenge (34/57, 59.6 %). With a median follow-up of 18.5 months, the median OS was 5.0 months (95 %CI, 1.5-7.9) / 6.8 months (95 %CI, 5.5-8.7) for platinum-resistant / sensitive, respectively (log rank p = 0.017). The median 2L-PFS was 1.9 months (95 %CI, 1.2-4.7) / 3.9 months (95 %CI, 2.9-6.0) for platinum-resistant / sensitive, respectively. Median OS was 8.1 (95 %CI, 6.3-12.9) / 4.9 (95 %CI, 3.7-6.8) / 5.1 months (95 %CI, 2.5-7.8) with platinum rechallenge / lurbinectedin / others, respectively (p = 0.017). Median 2L-PFS was 4.6 (95 %CI, 3.9-7.2) / 2.7 (95 %CI, 1.6-3.9) / 2.2 months (95 %CI, 1.5-4.1) with platinum rechallenge / lurbinectedin / others, respectively (p = 0.025).

DISCUSSION

Platinum-based rechallenge after a first-line CT-IO showed promising results despite particularly unfavorable characteristics within our real-word population. Lurbinectedin when used after IO demonstrated as low efficacy as other platinum-free regimens.

Current dilemma and future directions over prophylactic cranial irradiation in SCLC: a systematic review in MRI and immunotherapy era

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the most malignant pathological type of lung cancer with the highest mortality, and the incidence of brain metastasis (BM) is in high frequency. So far, prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has been suggested as an effective treatment for preventing brain metastasis of SCLC. PCI has long been applied to limited-stage SCLC (LS-SCLC) patients who have achieved complete remission after radiotherapy and chemotherapy as a standard treatment. However, the neurocognitive decline is a major concern surrounding PCI. New therapeutic approaches targeting PCI-induced neurotoxicity, including hippocampal protection or memantine, have been increasingly incorporated into the therapeutic interventions of PCI. Helical tomotherapy, RapidArc, and Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with a head-tilting baseplate are recommended for hippocampal protection. Besides, in the MRI and immunotherapy era, the significance of PCI in SCLC patients is controversial. SCLC patients with PCI should be recruited in clinical trials since this is the only way to improve the existing standard of care. This review summarizes the current therapeutic strategy and dilemma over PCI for SCLC, providing a theoretical basis for clinical decision-making and suggestions for PCI practice in clinical.

Navigating first-line therapies for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a frequentist network meta-analysis and systematic review

Aim: To identify the optimal first-line treatment for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).Materials & methods: We conducted a network meta-analysis (CRD42023486863) to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of eight first-line treatment regimens for ES-SCLC, including 15 clinical trials.Results: Our analysis showed that the PD-1/PD-L1 + etoposide combined with platinum (EP) and PD-L1 + vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) + EP regimens significantly enhanced overall survival and progression-free survival, with subgroup analysis revealing that serplulimab ranked as the most promising option for improving overall survival. Integrating anti-angiogenesis drugs into immunochemotherapy presents potential benefits, with an increased incidence of adverse events necessitating further investigation.Conclusion: Our findings offer valuable insights for future research and for developing more effective treatment strategies for ES-SCLC, underscoring the critical need for continued innovation in this therapeutic area.

Facts and Hopes on Cancer Immunotherapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer

Platinum-based chemotherapy plus PD1 axis blockade is the standard of care in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Despite the robust and consistent increase in long-term survival with PD1 axis inhibition, the magnitude of the benefit from immunotherapy seems lower than that for other solid tumors. Several immune evasive mechanisms have been shown to be prominently altered in human SCLC, including T-cell exclusion, downregulation of components of the MHC class I antigen processing and presentation machinery, or upregulation of macrophage inhibitory checkpoints, among others. New immunotherapies aiming to target some of these dominant immune suppressive features are being intensively evaluated preclinically and clinically in SCLC. They include strategies to enhance the efficacy and/or reverse features that promote intrinsic resistance to PD1 axis inhibition (e.g., restoring MHC class I deficiency and targeting DNA damage response) and novel immunomodulatory agents beyond T-cell checkpoint blockers (e.g., T cell-redirecting strategies, antibody-drug conjugates, or macrophage checkpoint blockers). Among them, delta-like ligand 3-targeted bispecific T-cell engagers have shown the most compelling preliminary evidence of clinical efficacy and hold promise as therapies that might contribute to further improve patient outcomes in this disease. In this study, we first provide a brief overview of key tumor microenvironment features of human SCLC. Then, we update the current clinical evidence with immune checkpoint blockade and review other emerging immunotherapy strategies that are gaining increasing attention in SCLC. We finally summarize our future perspective on immunotherapy and precision oncology for this disease.

First-line treatments for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer with immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy: a China-based cost-effectiveness analysis

Objective

To determine the cost-effectiveness of imported immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as atezolizumab and durvalumab, and domestic ICIs like serplulimab and adebrelimab, in combination with chemotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) in China.

Methods

Using a 21-day cycle length and a 20-year time horizon, a Markov model was established to compare the clinical and economic outcomes of five first-line ICIs plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone, as well as against each other, from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Transition probabilities were estimated by combining the results of the CAPSTONE-1 trial and a published network meta-analysis. Cost and health state utilities were collected from multiple sources. Both cost and effectiveness outcomes were discounted at a rate of 5% annually. The primary model output was incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). A series of sensitivity analyses were preformed to assess the robustness of the model.

Results

In the base-case analysis, the addition of first-line ICIs to chemotherapy resulted in the ICERs ranged from $80,425.31/QALY to $812,415.46/QALY, which exceeded the willing-to-pay threshold set for the model. When comparing these first-line immunochemotherapy strategies, serplulimab plus chemotherapy had the highest QALYs of 1.51286 and the second lowest costs of $60,519.52, making it is the most cost-effective strategy. Our subgroup-level analysis yielded results that are consistent with the base-case analysis. The sensitivity analysis results confirmed the validity and reliability of the model.

Conclusion

In China, the combination of fist-line ICIs plus chemotherapy were not considered cost-effective when compared to chemotherapy alone. However, when these fist-line immunochemotherapy strategies were compared with each other, first-line serplulimab plus chemotherapy consistently demonstrated superiority in terms of cost-effectiveness. Reducing the cost of serplulimab per 4.5 mg/kg would be a realistic step towards making first-line serplulimab plus chemotherapy more accessible and cost-effective.

The efficacy and safety of immunotherapy as first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: evaluating based on reconstructed individual patient data

Objective

Selecting between programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor or programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients urgently needs to be answered.

Methods

Eligible phase 3 randomized clinical trials evaluating regimens based on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as first-line treatment in ES-SCLC patients were systematically searched on the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases and major international conferences from 01/01/2018 to 18/09/2023. The individual patient data (IPD) were recuperated from the Kaplan-Meier curves of the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of the included studies using the IPDfromKM method. The reconstructed data were pooled into unified arms, including the PD-L1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy group (PD-L1 group), PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy group (PD-1 group), and PD-1 (L1) inhibitor and chemotherapy plus other (anlotinib group, tiragolumab group, and tremelimumab group). Subsequently, the PD-L1 group was indirectly compared with the other groups. A standard statistical analysis was conducted using the "survival" package for the time-to-event endpoint. The primary outcomes were the OS and PFS of the PD-L1 group and the PD-1 inhibitor group. The secondary outcomes included safety and the 12- and 24-month restricted mean survival time (RMST) of the PD-L1 group and PD-1 group.

Results

A total of 9 studies including 11 immunotherapy cohorts were included. No significant difference in PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.86-1.06), OS (HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.84-1.05), and 12-month and 24-month RMST for OS (P = 0.198 and P = 0.216, respectively) was observed between the PD-L1 group and the PD-1 group. In contrast, the anlotinib group showed significantly better OS (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.55-0.89), PFS (HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.58-0.83), and RMST for OS compared to the PD-L1 group. The tiragolumab group showed similar efficacy to the PD-L1 group. However, the tremelimumab group exhibited inferior efficacy than the PD-L1 group. The incidence of ≥grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was significantly higher in the PD-1 group compared to the PD-L1 group (85.4% vs. 69.6%, P <.001), whereas the incidence of irAEs was similar between the two groups.

Conclusion

This reconstructed IPD analysis revealed that PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy achieved similar efficacy to PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in ES-SCLC patients, whereas PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy had a better safety profile.

Circulating tumor cells: advancing personalized therapy in small cell lung cancer patients

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive cancer with a dismal 5-year survival of < 7%, despite the addition of immunotherapy to first-line chemotherapy. Specific tumor biomarkers, such as delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) and schlafen11 (SLFN11), may enable the selection of more efficacious, novel immunomodulating targeted treatments like bispecific T-cell engaging monoclonal antibodies (tarlatamab) and chemotherapy with PARP inhibitors. However, obtaining a tissue biopsy sample can be challenging in SCLC. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have the potential to provide molecular insights into a patient's cancer through a "simple" blood test. CTCs have been studied for their prognostic ability in SCLC; however, their value in guiding treatment decisions is yet to be elucidated. This review explores novel and promising targeted therapies in SCLC, summarizes current knowledge of CTCs in SCLC, and discusses how CTCs can be utilized for precision medicine.

Real-world evaluation of first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer with atezolizumab plus platinum/etoposide: a focus on patients with brain metastasis

PURPOSE

A previous real-world study conducted in China confirmed that first-line atezolizumab, in combination with etoposide/platinum (EP), leads to significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) compared to EP alone in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). The present study aimed to provide updated survival outcome data and evaluate the clinical efficacy of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in ES-SCLC patients with brain metastasis (BM).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 225 patients with ES-SCLC who were treated with EP alone (EP group) or a combination of EP + atezolizumab (atezolizumab group). Survival outcomes for the total study sample and patients in the BM subgroup were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The atezolizumab group continued to demonstrate significantly longer PFS than the EP group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68). The median overall survival (OS) was 26.2 months in the atezolizumab group vs. 14.8 months in the EP group (HR, 0.63). Additionally, among the BM patients in our study, the median PFS was found to be longer in the atezolizumab group (7.0 months) than in the EP group (4.1 months) (HR, 0.46). The OS of the BM patients did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of atezolizumab to EP as a first-line treatment for ES-SCLC was found to improve survival outcomes. This treatment combination may also prolong PFS in patients with BM, regardless of the administration of cranial irradiation. However, among the BM patients in our study, there was no significant difference in OS between the two treatment groups.

Extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in patients receiving atezolizumab plus carboplatin-etoposide: stratification of outcome based on a composite score that combines gene expression profiling and immune characterization of microenvironment

PURPOSE

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive disease with a dismal prognosis. The addition of immune checkpoints inhibitors to standard platinum-based chemotherapy in first-line setting achieves a durable benefit only in a patient subgroup. Thus, the identification of predictive biomarkers is an urgent unmet medical need.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Tumor samples from naive extensive-stage (ES) SCLC patients receiving atezolizumab plus carboplatin-etoposide were analyzed by gene expression profiling and two 9-color multiplex immunofluorescence panels, to characterize the immune infiltrate and SCLC subtypes. Associations of tissue biomarkers with time-to-treatment failure (TTF), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), were assessed.

RESULTS

42 patients were included. Higher expression of exhausted CD8-related genes was independently associated with a longer TTF and PFS while increased density of B lymphocytes correlated with longer TTF and OS. Higher percentage of M2-like macrophages close to tumor cells and of CD8+T cells close to CD4+T lymphocytes correlated with increased risk of TF and longer survival, respectively. A lower risk of TF, disease progression and death was associated with a higher density of ASCL1+tumor cells while the expression of POU2F3 correlated with a shorter survival. A composite score combining the expression of exhausted CD8-related genes, B lymphocyte density, ASCL1 tumor expression and quantification of CD163+macrophages close to tumor cells, was able to stratify patients into high-risk and low-risk groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, we identified tissue biomarkers and a combined score that can predict a higher benefit from chemoimmunotherapy in ES-SCLC patients.

Management of patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer in the immunotherapy era: An Italian consensus through a Delphi approach

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy represented a turning point for treating extensive small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Although, many issues remain debated.

METHODS

A group of Italian medical and radiation oncologists with expertise in managing patients with ES-SCLC developed a list of statements divided in six areas of interest. The Delphi method was used to assess the consensus on the defined list of statements.

RESULTS

32 statements were included in the final list to be voted by the Delphi panel, and 26 reached a consensus on the agreement. A prompt involvement of a multidisciplinary team is a priority to provide an integrated treatment strategy. First-line recommended treatment is immunotherapy in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy and etoposide for four cycles followed by maintenance immunotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

While awaiting new data from clinical trials and real-world studies, these recommendations can represent a useful tool to guide the management of ES-SCLC patients in daily practice.

Brief Report: Real-World Eligibility for Clinical Trials in Patients With Extensive-Stage SCLC at a Tertiary Care Center

Introduction

The CASPIAN and IMpower133 trials revealed a significant survival benefit of chemotherapy plus immunotherapy in patients with extensive-stage SCLC. The current study characterizes the proportion of real-world patients who would have met eligibility for these trials and highlights factors influencing eligibility in the real-world setting.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of patient data was conducted for stage IV patients with SCLC treated at the Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Canada. Trial eligibility was based on criteria used in the IMpower133 and CASPIAN trials. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Overall survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

Of the 116 patients included, only 12.1% met the overall eligibility criteria for the IMpower133 trial, and 14.7% for the CASPIAN trial. The most common reasons for ineligibility included: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 2 or greater (77.5%), inadequate organ function (48%), and the presence of brain metastases at diagnosis (37.3%). Sixty-one patients (59.8%) met two or more major ineligibility criteria. If trial eligibility was expanded to include ECOG 2 patients, an additional 10.3% would have met eligibility. The median overall survival for all-comers was 6.5 months.

Conclusions

Only a small minority of real-world patients with extensive-stage SCLC would have met eligibility for the IMpower133 and CASPIAN trials, with ECOG greater than or equal to 2, inadequate organ function, and brain metastases comprising the most common reasons for trial ineligibility. Future clinical trials should expand the inclusion criteria to better represent real-world patient populations.

Cost-effectiveness of durvalumab plus tremelimumab in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer from the US healthcare sector's and societal perspectives

Purpose

Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) has a high incidence rate, and economic burdens to patients, healthcare systems, and societies. Durvalumab plus tremelimumab and chemotherapy (T+D+CT) is a novel therapeutic strategy for mNSCLC, which demonstrated promising efficacy in a phase-3 randomized clinical trial, but its economic value remains unclear.

Methods

This economic evaluation used a hypothetical cohort of patients with mNSCLC, with characteristics mirroring those of the participants in the POSEIDON trial. Several partitioned survival models were constructed to estimate 15-year costs and health outcomes associated with the T+D+CT, durvalumab plus chemotherapy (D+CT) and chemotherapy alone (CT) strategies, discounting costs and effectiveness at 3% annually. Costs were in 2023 US dollars. Data were derived from the POSEIDON trial and published literature. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the uncertainty of input parameters and study generalizability. The analysis was designed and conducted from September 2022 to March 2023. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of T+D+CT, compared with CT and D+CT, for mNSCLC from the perspectives of the US healthcare sector and society.

Findings

From the healthcare sector's perspective, the T+D+CT yielded an additional 0.09 QALYs at an increased cost of $7,108 compared with CT, which resulted in an ICER of $82,501/QALY. The T+D+CT strategy yielded an additional 0.02 QALYs at an increased cost of $27,779 compared with the D+CT, which resulted in an ICER of $1,243,868/QALY. The economic results of T+D+CT vs. CT were most sensitive to the annual discount rate, subsequent immunotherapy cost, tremelimumab cost, palliative care and death cost, pemetrexed cost, and durvalumab cost. The T+D+CT strategy was considered cost-effective relative to CT in 59%-82% of model iterations against willingness-to-pay. thresholds of $100,000/QALY gained to $150,000/QALY gained. From the societal perspective, the T+D+CT can be considered as cost-effective as compared with CT or D+CT, independent of histology.

Implications

In this cost-effectiveness analysis, the T+D+CT strategy represented good value compared with CT for patients with mNSCLC from the perspectives of the healthcare sector and the society. This treatment strategy may be prioritized for mNSCLC patients at high risks of disease progression.

Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1-based dual immunotherapies versus PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor alone in patients with advanced solid tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have investigated PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based combination therapies. The debate surrounding the potential additive clinical benefits of combination of two immune-oncology (IO) therapies for cancer patients persists.

METHODS

Both published and grey sources of randomized clinical trials that compared anti-PD-1/PD-L1-based immunotherapy combinations with monotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors were encompassed. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).

RESULTS

Our analysis encompassed 31 studies comprising 10,341 patients, which covered 12 distinct immune-oncology combination regimens. Across all patients, the immunotherapy combinations exhibited the capability to enhance the ORR (OR = 1.23 [95% CI 1.13-1.34]) and extend PFS (HR = 0.91 [95% CI 0.87-0.95]). However, the observed enhancement in OS (HR = 0.96 [95% CI 0.91-1.01]) was of no significance. Greater benefits in terms of PFS (HR = 0.82 [95% CI 0.72 to 0.93]) and OS (HR = 0.85 [95% CI 0.73 to 0.99]) may be particularly pronounced in cases where PD-L1 expression is negative. Notably, despite a heightened risk of any-grade TRAEs (OR = 1.72 [95% CI 1.40-2.11]) and grade greater than or equal to 3 TRAEs (OR = 2.01 [95% CI 1.67-2.43]), toxicity was generally manageable.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that incorporating an additional immunotherapy agent with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors can elevate the response rate and reduce the risk of disease progression, all while maintaining manageable toxicity. However, there remains a challenge in translating these primary clinical benefits into extended overall survival.

Cardiovascular toxicity with CTLA-4 inhibitors in cancer patients: A meta-analysis

Background

With the emergence of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors, the outcomes of patients with malignant tumors have improved significantly. However, the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events has also increased, which can affect tumor treatment. In this study, we evaluated the incidence and severity of adverse cardiovascular events caused by CTLA-4 inhibitors by analyzing reported trials that involved CTLA-4 inhibitor therapy.

Methods

Randomized clinical trials published in English from January 1, 2013, to November 30, 2022, were searched using the Cochrane Library and PubMed databases. All included trials examined all grade and grades 3-5 cardiac and vascular adverse events. These involved comparisons of CTLA-4 inhibitors to placebo, CTLA-4 inhibitors plus chemotherapy to chemotherapy alone, CTLA-4 inhibitors combined with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone, and CTLA-4 inhibitors plus target agent to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus target agent. The odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method.

Results

Overall, 20 trials were included. CTLA-4 inhibitors significantly increased the incidence of all-grade cardiovascular toxicity (OR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.00-1.75, p = 0.05). The incidence of all-grade cardiovascular toxicity increased in malignant tumor patients who received single-agent CTLA-4 inhibitors (OR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.13-2.65, p = 0.01), as well as the incidence rate of grades 3-5 cardiovascular adverse events (OR = 2.00, 95% CI: 1.08-3.70, p = 0.03). Compared with the non-CTLA-4 inhibitor group, CTLA-4 inhibitors plus chemotherapy, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, or target agent did not significantly affect the incidence of cardiac and vascular toxicity. The incidence of grades 3-5 cardiac failure, hypertension, pericardial effusion, myocarditis, and atrial fibrillation were much higher among patients exposed to CTLA-4 inhibitor, but the data were not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that the incidence rate of all cardiovascular toxicity and severe cardiovascular toxicity increased in patients who were administered CTLA-4 inhibitors. In addition, the risk of serious cardiovascular toxic events was independent of the type of adverse event. From these results, physicians should assess the benefits and risks of CTLA-4 inhibitors when treating malignancies.

Molecular Classification of Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Are We Ready for That?

In the last two decades, the increasing availability of technologies for molecular analyses has allowed an insight in the genomic alterations of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) of the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas. This knowledge has confirmed, supported, and informed the pathological classification of NEN, clarifying the differences between neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) and neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and helping to define the G3 NET category. At the same time, the identification genomic alterations, in terms of gene mutation, structural abnormalities, and epigenetic changes differentially involved in the pathogenesis of NEC and NET has identified potential molecular targets for precision therapy. This review critically recapitulates the available molecular features of digestive NEC and NET, highlighting their correlates with pathological aspects and clinical characteristics of these neoplasms and revising their role as predictive biomarkers for targeted therapy. In this context, the feasibility and applicability of a molecular classification of gastrointestinal and pancreatic NEN will be explored.

Immune checkpoint blockade resistance in lung cancer: emerging mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy works by inhibiting suppressive checkpoints that become upregulated after T cell activation, like PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4. While the initial FDA approvals of ICB have revolutionized cancer therapies and fueled a burgeoning immuno-oncology field, more recent clinical development of new agents has been slow. Here, focusing on lung cancer, we review the latest research uncovering tumor cell intrinsic and extrinsic ICB resistance mechanisms as major hurdles to treatment efficacy and clinical progress. These include genomic and non-genomic tumor cell alterations, along with host and microenvironmental factors like the microbiome, metabolite accumulation, and hypoxia. Together, these factors can cooperate to promote immunosuppression and ICB resistance. Opportunities to prevent resistance are constantly evolving in this rapidly expanding field, with the goal of moving toward personalized immunotherapeutic regimens.

Big Decisions on Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Focus on Clinical Care Updates and Patient Perspectives

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an uncommon, aggressive high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma, associated with tobacco use. It is a highly chemosensitive disease that initially responds quickly to systemic therapy, although patients with SCLC tend to develop relapse. Although the landscape of SCLC treatment has remained stagnant for many decades, the field has seen notable advances in the past few years, including the use of immunotherapy, the development of further lines of systemic therapy, the refinement of thoracic and intracranial radiotherapy, and-most recently-the promise of more targeted therapies. Patients with SCLC also must face unique psychosocial burdens in their experience with their cancer, distinct from patients with other lung cancer. In this article, we review the latest literature and future directions in the management and investigation of SCLC, as well as the critical decisions that providers and patients must navigate in the current landscape. We also present the perspectives of several patients with SCLC in conjunction with this summary, to spotlight their individual journeys in the context of this challenging disease.