The human amylin analog, pramlintide, reduces postprandial hyperglucagonemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Study reanalysis using a mechanism-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of pramlintide in subjects with type 1 diabetes

This report describes a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model for pramlintide, an amylinomimetic, in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Plasma glucose and drug concentrations were obtained following bolus and 2-h intravenous infusions of pramlintide at three dose levels or placebo in 25 T1DM subjects during the postprandial period in a crossover study. The original clinical data were reanalyzed by mechanism-based population modeling. Pramlintide pharmacokinetics followed a two-compartment model with zero-order infusion and first-order elimination. Pramlintide lowered overall postprandial plasma glucose AUC (AUC(net)) and delayed the time to peak plasma glucose after a meal (T (max)). The delay in glucose T (max) and reduction of AUC(net) indicate that overall plasma glucose concentrations might be affected by differing mechanisms of action of pramlintide. The observed increase in glucose T (max) following pramlintide treatment was independent of dose within the studied dose range and was adequately described by a dose-independent, maximum pramlintide effect on gastric emptying of glucose in the model. The inhibition of endogenous glucose production by pramlintide was described using a sigmoidal function with capacity and sensitivity parameter estimates of 0.995 for I (max) and 23.8 pmol/L for IC(50). The parameter estimates are in good agreement with literature values and the IC(50) is well within the range of postprandial plasma amylin concentrations in healthy humans, indicating physiological relevance of the pramlintide effect on glucagon secretion in the postprandial state. This model may prove to be useful in future clinical studies of other amylinomimetics or antidiabetic drugs with similar mechanisms of action.

Effect of pramlintide on prandial glycemic excursions during closed-loop control in adolescents and young adults with type 1 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Even under closed-loop (CL) conditions, meal-related blood glucose (BG) excursions frequently exceed target levels as a result of delays in absorption of insulin from the subcutaneous site of infusion. We hypothesized that delaying gastric emptying with preprandial injections of pramlintide would improve postprandial glycemia by allowing a better match between carbohydrate and insulin absorptions.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Eight subjects (4 female; age, 15-28 years; A1C, 7.5 ± 0.7%) were studied for 48 h on a CL insulin-delivery system with a proportional integral derivative algorithm with insulin feedback: 24 h on CL control alone (CL) and 24 h on CL control plus 30-μg premeal injections of pramlintide (CLP). Target glucose was set at 120 mg/dL; timing and contents of meals were identical on both study days. No premeal manual boluses were given. Differences in reference BG excursions, defined as the incremental glucose rise from premeal to peak, were compared between conditions for each meal.

RESULTS

CLP was associated with overall delayed time to peak BG (2.5 ± 0.9 vs. 1.5 ± 0.5 h; P < 0.0001) and reduced magnitude of glycemic excursion (88 ± 42 vs. 113 ± 32 mg/dL; P = 0.006) compared with CL alone. Pramlintide effects on glycemic excursions were particularly evident at lunch and dinner, in association with higher premeal insulin concentrations at those mealtimes.

CONCLUSIONS

Pramlintide delayed the time to peak postprandial BG and reduced the magnitude of prandial BG excursions. Beneficial effects of pramlintide on CL may in part be related to higher premeal insulin levels at lunch and dinner compared with breakfast.

Effect of Pramlintide on Weight in Overweight and Obese Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes Patients

OBJECTIVE

Several randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes have shown that adjunctive therapy with pramlintide reduces hemoglobin (Hb)A1c with concomitant weight loss. This analysis further characterizes the weight-lowering effect of pramlintide in this patient population.

RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES

This pooled post hoc analysis of two long-term trials included all patients who were overweight/obese at baseline (BMI > 25 kg/m2), and who were treated with either 120 microg pramlintide BID (n = 254; HbA1c 9.2%; weight, 96.1 kg) or placebo (n = 244; HbA1c 9.4%; weight, 95.0 kg). Statistical endpoints included changes from baseline to week 26 in HbA1c, body weight, and insulin use.

RESULTS

Pramlintide treatment resulted in significant reductions from baseline to week 26, compared with placebo, in HbA1c and body weight (both, p < 0.0001), for placebo-corrected reductions of -0.41% and -1.8 kg, respectively. Approximately three times the number of patients using pramlintide experienced a > or = 5% reduction of body weight than with placebo (9% vs. 3%, p = 0.0005). Patients using pramlintide also experienced a proportionate decrease in total daily insulin use (r = 0.39, p < 0.0001). The greatest placebo-corrected reductions in weight at week 26 were observed in pramlintide-treated patients with a BMI >40 kg/m2 and in those concomitantly treated with metformin (both, p < 0.001), for placebo-corrected reductions of -3.2 kg and -2.5 kg, respectively.

DISCUSSION

These findings support further evaluation of the weight-lowering potential of pramlintide in obese patients with type 2 diabetes.

Islet amyloid polypeptide in pancreatic islets from type 2 diabetic subjects

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP) is a chief constituent of amyloid deposits in pancreatic islets, characteristic histopathology for type 2 diabetes. The goal of this study was to analyze islet cell composition in diabetic islets for the process of transforming water-soluble IAPP in β-cells to water-insoluble amyloid deposits by Immunocytochemical staining using different dilutions of anti-IAPP antibody. IAPP in β-cell granules may initiate β-cell necrosis through apoptosis to form interstitial amyloid deposits in type 2 diabetic islets.

RESULTS

Control islets revealed twice as much β-cells as α-cells whereas 15 of 18 type 2 diabetic cases (83%) revealed α- cells as major cells in larger islets. Diabetic islets consisted of more larger islets with more σ-cells than β-cells, which contribute to hyperglucagonemia. In control islets, percentage of IAPP-positive cells against β-cells was 40-50% whereas percentage for type 2 diabetic islets was about 25%. Amyloid deposits in diabetic islets were not readily immunostained for IAPP using 1: 800 diluted antibody, however, 1: 400 and 1: 200 diluted solutions provided stronger immunostaining in early stages of islet amyloidogenesis after treating the deparaffinized sections with formic acid.

METHODS

Using commercially available rabbit antihuman IAPP antibody, immunocytochemical staining was performed on 18 cases of pancreatic tissues from type 2 diabetic subjects by systematically immunostaining for insulin, glucagon, somatostatin (SRIF) and IAPP compared with controls. Sizes of islets were measured by 1 cm scale, mounted in 10X eye piece.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

α cells were major islet cells in majority of diabetic pancreas (83%) and all diabetic islets contained less IAPP-positive cells than controls, indicating that IAPP deficiency in pancreatic islets is responsible for decreased IAPP in blood. In diabetic islets, water-soluble IAPP disappeared in β-cell granules, which transformed to water-insoluble amyloid deposits. Amyloid deposits were not readily immunostained using IAPP 1: 800 diluted antibody but were stronger immunostained for IAPP in early stages of amyloid deposited islets using less diluted solutions after formic acid treatment. In early islet amyloidogenesis, dying β-cell cytoplasm was adjacently located to fine amyloid fibrils, supporting that IAPP in secretary granules from dying β cells served as nidus for islet β-sheet formation.

Hepatic steatosis in type 1 diabetes

Islet autoimmunity in type 1 diabetes results in the loss of the pancreatic β-cells. The consequences of insulin deficiency in the portal vein for liver fat are poorly understood. Under normal conditions, the portal vein provides 75% of the liver blood supply. Recent studies suggest that non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) may be more common in type 1 diabetes than previously thought, and may serve as an independent risk marker for some chronic diabetic complications. The pathogenesis of NAFLD remains obscure, but it has been hypothesized that hepatic fat accumulation in type 1 diabetes may be due to lipoprotein abnormalities, hyperglycemia-induced activation of the transcription factors carbohydrate response element-binding protein (ChREBP) and sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1c (SREBP-1c), upregulation of glucose transporter 2 (GLUT2) with subsequent intrahepatic fat synthesis, or a combination of these mechanisms. Novel approaches to non-invasive determinations of liver fat may clarify the consequences for liver metabolism when the pancreas has ceased producing insulin. This article aims to review the factors potentially contributing to hepatic steatosis in type 1 diabetes, and to assess the feasibility of using liver fat as a prognostic and/or diagnostic marker for the disease. It provides a background and a case for possible future studies in the field.

Glucoregulatory effects and prolonged duration of action of davalintide: a novel amylinomimetic peptide

AIMS

Davalintide is a second-generation amylinomimetic peptide possessing enhanced pharmacological properties over rat amylin to reduce food intake in preclinical models. The current experiments in rats describe additional glucoregulatory actions of davalintide consistent with amylin agonism, and explore the duration of action of these effects.

METHODS

Subcutaneous (SC) injection of davalintide slowed gastric emptying with equal potency to amylin (ED₅₀'s = 2.3 and 4.1 µg/kg). This effect was maintained for 8 h with davalintide, but not amylin. Intraperitoneal injection of davalintide also reduced food intake with a potency similar to amylin (ED₅₀'s = 5.0 and 11.3 µg/kg). Consistent with amylin agonism, davalintide (10 µg/kg, SC) suppressed the plasma glucagon response over 90 min following an intravenous arginine bolus in anaesthetized rats. The elimination t(½) of davalintide (200 µg/kg, SC) was 26 min, similar to the t(½) of amylin, suggesting that pharmacokinetic-independent mechanisms contribute to davalintide's enhanced duration of action. Binding kinetic studies using ¹²⁵I davalintide revealed no appreciable dissociation from the amylin nucleus accumbens receptor after 7 h while ¹²⁵I rat amylin did dissociate from this receptor (K(off) = 0.013/min). Sustained SC infusion of davalintide (275 µg/kg/day) or amylin (300) decreased plasma glucose after an oral glucose challenge at 2 weeks (by 27 and 31%) and suppressed gastric emptying at 3 weeks (by 29 and 47%), demonstrating durable glucoregulatory actions of both peptides.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show glucoregulatory properties of davalintide consistent with amylin agonism and suggest that slowed receptor dissociation plays a role in davalintide's prolonged pharmacodynamic actions.

The alpha-cell as target for type 2 diabetes therapy

Glucagon is the main secretory product of the pancreatic alpha-cells. The main function of this peptide hormone is to provide sustained glucose supply to the brain and other vital organs during fasting conditions. This is exerted by stimulation of hepatic glucose production via specific G protein-coupled receptors in the hepatocytes. Type 2 diabetic patients are characterized by elevated glucagon levels contributing decisively to hyperglycemia in these patients. Accumulating evidence demonstrates that targeting the pancreatic alpha-cell and its main secretory product glucagon is a possible treatment for type 2 diabetes. Several lines of preclinical evidence have paved the way for the development of drugs, which suppress glucagon secretion or antagonize the glucagon receptor. In this review, the physiological actions of glucagon and the role of glucagon in type 2 diabetic pathophysiology are outlined. Furthermore, potential advantages and limitations of antagonizing the glucagon receptor or suppressing glucagon secretion in the treatment of type 2 diabetes are discussed with a focus on already marketed drugs and drugs in clinical development. It is concluded that the development of novel glucagon receptor antagonists are confronted with several safety issues. At present, available pharmacological agents based on the glucose-dependent glucagonostatic effects of GLP-1 represent the most favorable way to apply constraints to the alpha-cell in type 2 diabetes.

Immunocytochemical staining for islet amyloid polypeptide in pancreatic endocrine tumors

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Islet amyloid polypeptide is originally identified as the chief constituent of amyloid in insulinomas and type 2 diabetic islets. This study aimed to identify islet amyloid polypeptide by immunocytochemical staining in pancreatic endocrine tumors including 30 cases of insulinomas and non-β-cell pancreatic endocrine tumors.

RESULTS

In normal islets, 62% of islet cells and 52% of insulin cells were granularly positive for insulin and IAPP, respectively, with more insulin positive cells than IAPP positive cells and some densely positive staining for insulin and IAPP in irregularly shaped a nuclear, degenerating islet β-cells. In pancreatic endocrine tumors, all 10 insulinomas were positive for islet amyloid polypeptide but 2 glucogonomas, 1 somatostatinoma, 6 of 7 pancreatic polypeptidomas, all 7 gastrinomas and all 3 non-functioning pancreatic endocrine tumors were negative for islet amyloid polypeptide whereas one pancreatic polypeptidoma was positive for islet amyloid polypeptide.

METHODS

Using commercially available rabbit anti-islet amyloid polypeptide antibody, immunocytochemical staining was performed on 30 cases of pancreatic endocrine tumors, consisting of 10 insulinomas, 2 glucagonomas, 1 somatostatinoma, 7 pancreatic polypeptidomas, 7 gastrinomas and 3 non-functioning pancreatic endocrine tumors. Pancreatic tissues containing pancreatic endocrine tumors were systematically immunostained for insulin, glucagon, somatostatin, pancreatic polypeptide, gastrin and chromogranin A, in addition to islet amyloid polypeptide. When normal pancreatic tissues adjacent to pancreatic endocrine tumors were present, insulin, glucagon, somatostatin and islet amyloid polypeptide positive cells were counted for a total of 20 islets, which were divided into large islets and medium islets for each case.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATIONS

All 10 insulinomas and 1 pancreatic polypeptidoma were granularly positive for islet amyloid polypeptide, suggesting all 10 insulinomas contained enough insulin granules for IAPP whereas only one non-β-cell pancreatic endocrine tumor was co-localized with islet amyloid polypeptide in their secretary granules.

Amylin effect in extrapancreatic tissues participating in glucose homeostasis, in normal, insulin-resistant and type 2 diabetic state

Amylin is co-secreted with insulin, responds to the same stimuli, is anorectic, lowers body weight by reducing fat mass, and is proposed for diabetes treatment. We examined the effect of a 3-day constant infusion of close to physiological doses of amylin in Wistar rats, on glucotransporter expression, glycogen content (G), glycogen synthase a activity (GSa) and glucose transport (GT), in liver, muscle and fat from insulin resistant (IR) and type 2 diabetic (T2D) models, compared to normal (N) animals; plasma glucose and insulin were measured. Plasma insulin in IR was higher than in N or T2D, and amylin normalized the value. In both, IR and T2D, liver G was lower than normal, accompanied by GLUT-2, mRNA and protein, higher and lower, respectively, than in N; amylin normalized G in both groups, without changes in GLUT-2, except for an mRNA increase in T2D. In IR and T2D, muscle GSa was reduced, together with respective over- and under-GLUT-4 expression; amylin induced only a trend toward GSa normalization in both groups. In isolated adipocytes, GT and GLUT-4 in IR and T2D were lower and higher, respectively, than in N; after amylin, not only GT was normalized in both groups but also the response to insulin was much more pronounced, including that in N, without major changes in GLUT-4. This suggests that the beneficial effect of amylin in states running with altered glucose homeostasis could occur by partially acting on the hexose metabolism of the liver and mainly on that of the adipose tissue.

A novel oral form of salmon calcitonin improves glucose homeostasis and reduces body weight in diet-induced obese rats

AIM

To investigate the effects of acute and chronic administration of a novel oral formulation of salmon calcitonin (sCT) on glycaemic control, glucose homeostasis and body weight regulation in diet-induced obese (DIO) rats-an animal model of obesity-related insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

DIO rats were acutely given a single dose of oral sCT (0.5 and 2 mg/kg), its oral vehicle N-(5-chlorosalicyloyl)-8-aminocaprylic acid (5-CNAC) or injectable sCT (5 and 10 µg/kg) (n = 8), followed by oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Other DIO rats were chronic treated twice daily with oral vehicle 5-CNAC (n = 6), oral sCT (0.5 and 2 mg/kg) or injectable sCT (10 µg/kg) (n = 8). Fasting and postprandial glucose and pancreatic hormones, body weight and insulin sensitivity were assessed.

RESULTS

A single dose of oral sCT acutely reduced glucose and insulin area under the curve during OGTT by approximately 65 and 85%, respectively, compared with vehicle (p < 0.001). Chronic treatment with oral sCT significantly reduced both fasting and postprandial glucose and insulin levels by approximately 1.5 mM and 65%, respectively, compared with vehicle. Oral sCT concomitantly improved insulin sensitivity (homeostatic model assessment, HOMA). In contrast, injectable sCT resembling higher systemic exposure did not improve glycaemic control, either acutely or during chronic treatment. Furthermore, both oral and injectable sCT reduced body weight by 15% compared with vehicle (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

A novel oral form of sCT showed antidiabetic effects in DIO rats by improving glycaemic control, glucose homeostasis, insulin sensitivity and body weight.

Amylin analogues in the treatment of diabetes mellitus: medicinal chemistry and structural basis of its function

Amylin, (islet amyloid polypeptide) or diabetes-associated peptide is co-secreted with insulin in the islet of Langerhans of diabetic patients in approximately 1:100, amylin-insulin ratio. The soluble form of amylin, an analogue of amylin, is used as a supplement to insulin in the treatment of type 1 diabetes. Co-administration of amylin analogue with insulin to patients with type 1 diabetes induced a larger reduction in proprandial hyperglycemia, with a concomitant reduction in the level of glucagon when compared to insulin monotherapy. The actions of amylin analogues appear to be synergistic to insulin, with which it is co-released from insulin-producing beta cells after a meal. Amylin analogues such as pramlintide has been shown to significantly reduce body weight, HbA1c values and even the dosage of insulin. A moderate weight loss can also be achieved in obese patients with or without diabetes. A major side effect of some amylin analogues includes nausea and excitation of the area postrema. This review examines the medicinal chemistry of amylin and its analogues and their effects.

Islet amyloid polypeptide in pancreatic islets from type 1 diabetic subjects

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Islet amyloid polypeptide is originally isolated as the chief constituent of amyloid deposits in type 2 diabetic islets. Islet amyloid polypeptide hyposecretion was known in type 1 diabetics and this study aimed to detect possibly reduced islet amyloid polypeptide-positive cells in type 1 diabetic islets.

RESULTS

Non-diabetic control islets showed about 60% of islet cells were insulin cells, and 60% of insulin cells were positive for IAPP. In type 1 diabetic islets, islets were generally smaller than control islets, consisting of weaker positive cells for insulin and islet amyloid polypeptide. Medium-sized islets still retained some insulin positive cells, whereas islet amyloid polypeptide positive cells were much less or even absent, but some insulin-negative cells were weakly islet amyloid polypeptide positive. An occasional extra-large islet, representing regenerating islets, consisting of more than 100 islet cells revealed less than 35% insulin and 20% islet amyloid polypeptide positive cells with relatively increased glucagon and somatostatin cells. Both normal and type 1 diabetic islets revealed scattered, densely insulin and islet amyloid polypeptide positive sickle-shaped cytoplasm without granular appearance, consistent with degenerating insulin cells.

METHODS

Using commercially available rabbit anti-islet amyloid polypeptide antibody, immunostaning was performed on ten cases of type 1 diabetic pancreata and eight non-diabetic controls. Both control and type 1 diabetic pancreata were systematically immunostained for insulin, glucagon, somatostatin and islet amyloid polypeptide.

CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION

Control islets consisted of about 60% insulin cells, and about 34% of islet cells were amyloid polypeptide positive with scattered and densely positive for insulin and islet amyloid polypeptide without granular appearance, consistent with degenerating β cells. All islets, including occasional extra-large islets from type 1 diabetics, showed less insulin cells and less islet amyloid polypeptide positive cells with twice increased glucagon and somatostatin cells of the control islets, but some insulin-negative cells were positive for islet amyloid polypeptide, suggesting the presence of islet amyloid polypeptide in degenerating and extra-large regenerating islets. Thus, this immunocytochemical staining revealed generally less islet amyloid positive cells in type 1 diabetic islets, corresponding to severe hyposecretion of islet amyloid polypeptide in type 1 diabetics.

Pramlintide and the treatment of diabetes: a review of the data since its introduction

INTRODUCTION

Postprandial glucose excursions negatively affect glycemic control and markers of cardiovascular health. Pramlintide, an amylinomimetic, is approved for treatment of elevated postprandial glucose levels in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search of PubMed was conducted to locate articles (up to January 2011) pertaining to original preclinical and clinical research and reviews of amylin and pramlintide. Additional sources were selected from reference lists within articles obtained through the original literature search and from the internet. This article describes the known effects of endogenous amylin and the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy of pramlintide. Drug-drug interactions and safety and tolerability are also reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

Pramlintide significantly reduces hemoglobin A(1c) and body weight in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Newer research is focusing on weight loss effects of pramlintide and pramlintide plus metreleptin in nondiabetic obese individuals. Preliminary results of these studies are discussed.

Weight considerations in pharmacotherapy for type 2 diabetes

Obesity has been increasing in prevalence worldwide and the majority of patients with type 2 diabetes are either overweight or obese. Diabetes management in this population has been difficult since a number of antidiabetes agents are associated with weight gain. The effects of various antidiabetes agents and antiobesity agents on glycemic control and body weight will be reviewed. Briefly, sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, and insulin are associated with weight gain, whereas metformin and amylin analogs are weight neutral or associated with modest weight loss. Dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors are weight neutral, whereas glucagon-like peptide-1 analogs are associated with weight loss. The effect of orlistat and sibutramine in type 2 diabetes is also evaluated. The treatment of diabetes should not only focus on glycemic control as its sole intention, but it should factor in the effect of these various agents on weight, as well, since obesity aggravates insulin resistance, beta cell failure, and cardiovascular risk.

Adjunct therapy for type 1 diabetes mellitus

Insulin replacement therapy in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is nonphysiologic. Hyperinsulinemia is generated in the periphery to achieve normal insulin concentrations in the liver. This mismatch results in increased hypoglycemia, increased food intake with weight gain, and insufficient regulation of postprandial glucose excursions. Islet amyloid polypeptide is a hormone synthesized in pancreatic beta cells and cosecreted with insulin. Circulating islet amyloid polypeptide binds to receptors located in the hindbrain and increases satiety, delays gastric emptying and suppresses glucagon secretion. Thus, islet amyloid polypeptide complements the effects of insulin. T1DM is a state of both islet amyloid polypeptide and insulin deficiency. Pramlintide, a synthetic analog of islet amyloid polypeptide, can replace this hormone in patients with T1DM. When administered as adjunctive therapy to such patients treated with insulin, pramlintide decreases food intake and causes weight loss. Pramlintide therapy is also associated with suppression of glucagon secretion and delayed gastric emptying, both of which decrease postprandial plasma glucose excursions. Pramlintide therapy improves glycemic control and lessens weight gain. Agents that decrease intestinal carbohydrate digestion (alpha-glucosidase inhibitors) or decrease insulin resistance (metformin) might be alternative adjunctive therapies in T1DM, though its benefits are marginally supported by clinical data.

Do the actions of glucagon-like peptide-1 on gastric emptying, appetite, and food intake involve release of amylin in humans?

OBJECTIVE

Amylin, cosecreted with insulin, has like glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) been reported to inhibit glucagon secretion, delay gastric emptying, and reduce appetite and food intake. We investigated whether the effects of GLP-1 on gastric emptying, appetite, and food intake are mediated directly or indirectly via release of amylin.

DESIGN

Eleven C-peptide and amylin-negative patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and 12 matched healthy controls participated in a placebo-controlled, randomized, single-blinded, crossover study. With glucose clamped between 6 and 9 mm, near-physiological infusions of GLP-1, human amylin, pramlintide, or saline were given for 270 min during and after a fixed meal. Gastric emptying was measured using paracetamol, appetite using visual analog scales, and food intake during a subsequent ad libitum meal (at 240 min).

RESULTS

In T1DM, gastric emptying, food intake, and appetite were reduced equally during low GLP-1 and amylin infusion compared with the saline infusion (P < 0.05). The controls showed stronger suppression of gastric emptying (P < 0.0001) and food intake (P < 0.01) with GLP-1 compared to amylin. Postprandial glucagon responses were reduced in controls and T1DM during GLP-1 and amylin infusions (P < 0.05). Amylin and pramlintide infusion had similar effects.

CONCLUSIONS

GLP-1 exerts its effect on gastric emptying, appetite, food intake, and glucagon secretion directly, although secretion of amylin may contribute to some of these effects in healthy control subjects.

Diabetes mellitus: new challenges and innovative therapies

Diabetes mellitus is a widespread disease prevalence and incidence of which increases worldwide. The introduction of insulin therapy represented a major breakthrough in type 1 diabetes; however, frequent hyper- and hypoglycemia seriously affects the quality of life of these patients. New therapeutic approaches, such as whole pancreas transplant or pancreatic islet transplant, stem cell, gene therapy and islets encapsulation are discussed in this review. Regarding type 2 diabetes, therapy has been based on drugs that stimulate insulin secretion (sulphonylureas and rapid-acting secretagogues), reduce hepatic glucose production (biguanides), delay digestion and absorption of intestinal carbohydrate (alpha-glucosidase inhibitors) or improve insulin action (thiazolidinediones). This review is also focused on the newer therapeutically approaches such as incretin-based therapies, bariatric surgery, stem cells and other emerging therapies that promise to further extend the options available. Gene-based therapies are among the most promising emerging alternatives to conventional treatments. Some of these therapies rely on genetic modification of non-differentiated cells to express pancreatic endocrine developmental factors, promoting differentiation of non-endocrine cells into β-cells, enabling synthesis and secretion of insulin in a glucose-regulated manner. Alternative therapies based on gene silencing using vector systems to deliver interference RNA to cells (i.e. against VEGF in diabetic retinopathy) are also a promising therapeutic option for the treatment of several diabetic complications. In conclusion, treatment of diabetes faces now a new era that is characterized by a variety of innovative therapeutic approaches that will improve quality-life and allow personalized therapy-planning in the near future.

Characterization of cardiovascular outcomes in a type 2 diabetes glucose supply and insulin demand model

BACKGROUND

The nonsignificant reduction in macrovascular outcomes observed in Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes; Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation; and the Veterans Affairs Diabetes Trial have collectively created uncertainty with respect toward the proper extent of blood glucose reduction and also the optimal therapeutic choice to attain the reduction. In the article entitled "Glucose Supply and Insulin Demand Dynamics of Antidiabetic Agents" in this issue of Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, we presented data for a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model that characterizes the effect of conventional antidiabetic therapies on the glucose supply and insulin demand dynamic. Here, it is our objective to test the hypothesis that, in conjunction with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), patients managed on the glucose supply side of the model would have fewer cardiovascular events versus those managed on the insulin demand side.

METHODS

To test this hypothesis, the electronic medical records of a group model health maintenance organization were queried to compile a population of patients meeting the following inclusion criteria: (1) type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), (2) known date of T2DM diagnosis; (3) ICD-9 or CPT code identification and chart review confirmation of a first major cardiovascular event (myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft, or angioplasty),(4) five years of continuous eligibility, and (5) on antidiabetic therapy at the beginning of the 5-year observation period. These patients were subsequently matched (1:1) to T2DM patients meeting the same criteria who had not experienced an event and were analyzed for differences in glucose control (HbA1C), the glucose supply:insulin demand dynamic (SD ratio), and categorical combinations of both parameters.

RESULTS

Fifty cardiovascular event patients met inclusion criteria and were matched to controls. No difference was observed for the average HbA1c or SD ratio between patients experiencing an event and controls (7.5 +/- 1.0% versus 7.3 +/- 0.9%, p = .275, and 1.2 +/- 0.3 versus 1.3 +/- 0.3, p = .205, respectively). Likewise, for categorical representations, there were no differences in event rate at the pre-identified breakpoints (HbA1c >or=7% versus <7%; 72% versus 64%, p = .391, and SD ratio >or=1 versus <1; 68% versus 76%, p = .373, >or=1.25 versus <1.25; 42% versus 56%, p = .161, >or=1.5 versus <1.5; 22% versus 30%, p = .362, respectively). Analyzing the combined effect of glucose control and the SD dynamic, patients managed at higher glucose values and on the insulin demand side of the model (HbA1c >or=7% and SD ratio <1.25) tended to have greater cardiovascular risk than those managed at an HbA1c <7%, or HbA1c >or=7% with an SD ratio >or=1.25 (61% versus 39%; p = .096).

CONCLUSION

Independently, more aggressive HbA1c reduction and higher SD ratio values were not independently associated with a reduction in cardiovascular outcomes. Combining the parameters, it would appear that patients managed at higher glucose values and on the insulin demand side of the model may have increased cardiovascular risk. Based on these findings, it is pertinent to conduct subsequent works to refine SD ratio estimates and apply the model to larger, long-term T2DM cardiovascular outcome trials. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2010;4(2):382-390.

Diabetes mellitus and gastric emptying: questions and issues in clinical practice

It is long known that both type 1 and type 2 diabetes can be associated with changes in gastric emptying; a number of publications have linked diabetes to delayed gastric emptying of variable severity and often with poor relationship to gastrointestinal symptomatology. In contrast, more recent studies have reported accelerated gastric emptying when adjusted for glucose concentration in patients with diabetes, indicating a reciprocal relationship between gastric emptying and ambient glucose concentrations. This review proposes that gastroparesis or gastroparesis diabeticorum, a severe condition characterized by a significant impairment of gastric emptying accompanied by severe nausea, vomiting, and malnutrition, is often overdiagnosed and not well contrasted with delays in gastric emptying. The article offers a clinically relevant definition of gastroparesis that should help differentiate this rare condition from (often asymptomatic) delays in gastric emptying. The fact that delayed gastric emptying can also be observed in non-diabetic individuals under experimental conditions in which hyperglycaemia is artificially induced suggests that a delay in gastric emptying rate when blood glucose concentrations are high is actually an appropriate physiological response to hyperglycaemia, slowing further increases in blood glucose. The article discusses the strengths and weaknesses of various methodologies for assessing gastric emptying, especially with respect to the diabetes population, and reviews newer diabetes therapies that decelerate the rate of gastric emptying. These therapies may be a beneficial tool in managing postprandial hyperglycaemia because they attenuate rapid surges in glucose concentrations by slowing the delivery of meal-derived glucose.

Artificial pancreas: an emerging approach to treat Type 1 diabetes

Intensive insulin therapy aimed at achieving normal glucose levels significantly reduces the complications that are associated with diabetes but is also associated with an increased risk of low glucose levels (hypoglycemia). The growing use of continuous glucose monitors has stimulated the development of the artificial pancreas, a closed-loop insulin-delivery system aimed at restoring near-normal glucose levels while reducing the risk of hypoglycemia. The artificial pancreas comprises three components: a continuous glucose monitor, an insulin infusion pump and a control algorithm delivering insulin according to real-time glucose readings. In this article, we review closed-loop glucose control, including its components, development, testing and clinical application.

Amylin reduces plasma glucagon concentration in cats

Pancreatic amylin plays an important role in the control of nutrient fluxes and is an established therapy in human diabetes as it reduces post-prandial glucagon secretion and slows gastric emptying. Given the similar pathophysiology of human type-2 and feline diabetes mellitus, we investigated whether amylin reduces plasma glucagon levels in cats. Healthy cats were tested using an intravenous arginine stimulation test (IVAST), a meal response test with the test meal comprising 50% of average daily food intake, and an IV glucose tolerance test (IVGTT). Non-amyloidogenic rat amylin injected 5 min before the respective stimulus significantly reduced plasma glucagon levels under all test situations. In the IVAST and IVGTT, cats treated with amylin also had lower plasma insulin concentrations. It was concluded that amylin does reduce plasma glucagon levels in cats, a feature that has treatment potential in diabetic animals as co-administration of amylin would reduce the insulin requirement to control glycaemia.

Impact of incretin therapy on islet dysfunction: an underlying defect in the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes

Glucose homeostasis is governed by a complex interplay of hormonal signaling and modulation. Insulin, glucagon, amylin, the incretin hormones glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), and other hormones and enzymes interact to maintain glucose homeostasis and normal cellular metabolism. Derangements in these hormonal interactions, particularly insulin deficits and impaired insulin action, result in the development of type 2 diabetes-but only in individuals who have experienced significant dysfunction or loss of beta-cells, located in the pancreatic islets of Langerhans. Much less is known about the impact of alpha-cell dysregulation on glucose homeostasis, although it has been demonstrated that glucagon-secreting alpha-cells, also located in the pancreatic islets, play an important role in glucose metabolism. Because beta-cell dysfunction occurs early in the course of type 2 diabetes and is progressive, early intervention with therapies that improve beta-cell function is desirable. In addition to reducing HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose, the recently developed diabetes therapies GLP-1 receptor agonists (eg, exenatide, liraglutide) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (eg, sitagliptin, vildagliptin) appear to have beneficial effects on beta-cell dysfunction and, possibly, on alpha-cell dysregulation.

Review of pramlintide as adjunctive therapy in treatment of type 1 and type 2 diabetes

Pramlintide (Symlin^®), a synthetic analog of a neurohormone amylin, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use along with premeal insulin in patients with type 1. In patients with type 2 diabetes, pramlintide is approved for addition to premeal insulin in those patients who are either only on premeal insulin or those receiving the combination of insulin and metformin and/or a sulfonylurea. This article reviews the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, dosing, clinical trials, safety, contraindications, and drug interactions of pramlintide therapy. A search for published clinical trials and therapeutic reviews in the English language was done in the following databases: Iowa Drug Information Service (1966 to July 2008), MEDLINE (1966 to July 2008), and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970 to July 2008). Pramlintide and amylin were used as keywords and title words. References of key articles were also reviewed to identify additional publications. Amylin is a 37 amino acid peptide neurohormone cosecreted from the beta cells of the pancreas, along with insulin, in response to meals. Amylin lowers serum glucose by decreasing glucagon release, slowing gastric emptying and decreasing food intake. Pramlintide, a synthetic analog of amylin, reduces 2-hour postprandial blood glucose between 3.4 and 5 mmol/L, reduces A1C by 0.2% to 0.7% and has no effect on fasting glucose levels. The use of pramlintide was associated with up to a 1.6 kg weight loss. Nausea was the most commonly reported adverse event. Pramlintide is an amylin analog that was FDA approved for the treatment of type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Its use results in modest reduction of A1C and the most frequent side effects are hypoglycemia and nausea.

Pramlintide reduces the risks associated with glucose variability in type 1 diabetes

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to determine whether pramlintide added to insulin therapy reduced the risks associated with extreme blood glucose (BG) fluctuations in patients with type 1 diabetes.

METHODS

Self-monitored BG (SMBG) records were retrospectively analyzed from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the effects of pramlintide on intensively treated patients with type 1 diabetes. Two groups--pramlintide (n=119), 30/60 microg administered subcutaneously at each meal, or placebo (n=129)--were matched by age, gender, and baseline hemoglobin A1C. Using SMBG, daily BG profiles, BG rate of change, and low and high BG indices (LBGI and HBGI, respectively) measuring the risk for hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia were calculated.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, pramlintide significantly attenuated the pre- to postprandial BG rate of change (F=83.8, P<0.0001). Consequently, in pramlintide-treated patients, the average post-meal BG (8.4 vs. 9.7 mmol/L [151.2 vs. 174.6 mg/dL]) and postprandial HBGI were significantly lower than placebo (both P<0.0001). Substantial daily BG variation was observed in placebo-treated patients, with most significant hyperglycemia occurring after breakfast and during the night; post-meal BG did not vary significantly throughout the day in pramlintide-treated patients. The reduction in postprandial hyperglycemia in pramlintide-treated patients occurred without increased risk for preprandial hypoglycemia as quantified by the LBGI.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk analysis of the effect of pramlintide treatment demonstrated risk-reduction effects independent of changes in average glycemia, most notably reduced rate and magnitude of postprandial BG fluctuations. These effects were not accompanied by an increased risk of hypoglycemia.

Pramlintide, the synthetic analogue of amylin: physiology, pathophysiology, and effects on glycemic control, body weight, and selected biomarkers of vascular risk

Pramlintide is a synthetic version of the naturally occurring pancreatic peptide called amylin. Amylin and pramlintide have similar effects on lowering postprandial glucose, lowering postprandial glucagon and delaying gastric emptying. Pramlintide use in type 1 and insulin requiring type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with modest reductions in HbA1c often accompanied by weight loss. Limited data show a neutral effect on blood pressure. Small studies suggest small reductions in LDL-cholesterol in type 2 DM and modest reductions in triglycerides in type 1 DM. Markers of oxidation are also reduced in conjunction with reductions in postprandial glucose. Nausea is the most common side effect. These data indicate that pramlintide has a role in glycemic control of both type 1 and type 2 DM. Pramlintide use is associated with favorable effects on weight, lipids and other biomarkers for atherosclerotic disease.

Calcium-activated membrane interaction of the islet amyloid polypeptide: implications in the pathogenesis of type II diabetes mellitus

The role played by Ca(2+) ions in the interaction of the human islet amyloid polypeptide (hIAPP) with model membranes has been investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and circular dichroism (CD) experiments. In particular, the interaction of hIAPP and its rat isoform (rIAPP) with zwitterionic dipalmitoyl-phosphatidylcholine (DPPC), negatively charged dipalmitoyl-phosphatidylserine (DPPS) vesicles and with a 3:1 mixtures of them, has been studied in the presence of Ca(2+) ions. The experiments have evidenced that amorphous, soluble hIAPP assemblies interact with the hydrophobic core of DPPC bilayers. Conversely, the presence of Ca(2+) ions is necessary to activate a preferential interaction of hIAPP with the hydrophobic core of DPPS membranes. These findings support the hypothesis that an impaired cellular homeostasis of Ca(2+) ions may promote the insertion of hIAPP into the hydrophobic core of carrier vesicles which is thought to contribute to an eventual intracellular accumulation of beta-sheet rich hIAPP aggregates.

Guideline for management of postmeal glucose

An estimated 246 million people worldwide have diabetes. Diabetes is a leading cause of death in most developed countries, and is reaching epidemic proportions in many developing and newly industrialized nations. Poorly controlled diabetes is associated with the development of renal failure, vision loss, macrovascular diseases and amputations. Large controlled clinical trials have demonstrated that intensive treatment of diabetes can significantly decrease the development and/or progression of microvascular complications of diabetes. There appears to be no glycaemic threshold for reduction of diabetes complications; the lower the glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), the lower the risk. The progressive relationship between plasma glucose levels and cardiovascular risk extends well below the diabetic threshold. Until recently, the predominant focus of therapy has been on lowering HbA1c levels, with a strong emphasis on fasting plasma glucose. Although control of fasting hyperglycaemia is necessary, it is usually insufficient to obtain optimal glycaemic control. A growing body of evidence suggests that reducing postmeal plasma glucose excursions is as important, or perhaps more important for achieving HbA1c goals. This guideline reviews the evidence on the harmful effects of elevated postmeal glucose and makes recommendations on its treatment, assessment and targets.

Prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes: current role of lifestyle, natural product, and pharmacological interventions

Common complications of type 2 diabetes (T2D) are eye, kidney and nerve diseases, as well as an increased risk for the development of cardiovascular disease and cancer. The overwhelming influence of these conditions contributes to a decreased quality of life and life span, as well as significant economic consequences. Although obesity once served as a surrogate marker for the risk of T2D, we know now that excess adipose tissue secretes inflammatory cytokines that left unchecked, accelerate the progression to insulin resistance and T2D. In addition, excess alcohol consumption may also increase the risk of T2D. From a therapeutic standpoint, lifestyle interventions such as dietary modification and/or exercise training have been shown to improve glucose homeostasis but may not normalize the disease process unless weight loss is achieved and increased physical activity patterns are established. Furthermore, utilization of natural products may serve as a significant adjunct in the fight against insulin resistance but further research is needed to ascertain their validity. Since it is clear that pharmaceutical therapy plays a significant role in the treatment of insulin resistance, this review will also discuss some of the newly developed pharmaceutical therapies that may work in conjunction with lifestyle interventions, and lessen the burden of behavioral change as the only strategy against the development of T2D.

Glucose homeostasis and the gastrointestinal tract: insights into the treatment of diabetes

The gastrointestinal tract is increasingly viewed as a critical organ in glucose metabolism because of its role in delivering glucose to the circulation and in secreting multiple glucoregulatory hormones that, in concert with insulin and glucagon, regulate glucose homeostasis. Under normal conditions, a complex interplay of these hormones acts to maintain plasma glucose within a narrow range despite large variations in the availability of glucose, particularly during transition from the fasting to fed state. In the fed state, the rate at which nutrients are passed from the stomach to the duodenum, termed gastric emptying rate, is a key determinant of postprandial glucose flux. In patients with diabetes, the regulation of glucose metabolism is disrupted resulting in fasting and postprandial hyperglycaemia. Elucidation of the role of the gastrointestinal tract, gut-derived glucoregulatory peptides and gastric emptying rate offers a new perspective on glucose homeostasis and the respective importance of these factors in the diabetes state. This review will highlight the importance of the gastrointestinal tract in playing a key role in glucose homeostasis, particularly in the postprandial period, and the role of established or new therapies that either leverage or modify gastrointestinal function to improve glycaemic state.

The role of prandial pramlintide in the treatment of adolescents with type 1 diabetes

Pramlintide, a synthetic analog of amylin, improves postprandial hyperglycemia. We compared subcutaneous (s.c.) pramlintide injection with square wave pramlintide infusion in adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1DM). Eight subjects with T1DM underwent two randomized studies. Subcutaneous pramlintide (dose = 5 microg/unit of insulin) bolus, was given one time and another time, the same dose was given as a 120-min s.c. infusion. Insulin dose was constant between studies. Gastric emptying was assessed with oral acetaminophen and [l-13C]glucose in meal. Plasma glucagon, pramlintide, and insulin concentrations were measured. Insulin concentrations (p < 0.99) between pramlintide injection versus infusion were similar; however, glucose concentrations were different (p < 0.0001), with the absence of hypoglycemia during pramlintide infusion [AUC (0-120 min) -0.07 +/- 0.2 versus 1.05 +/- 0.24 mg * h/dL (p < 0.0088)]. Insulin-only administration resulted in postprandial hyperglycemia and late postprandial hypoglycemia (p < 0.0001). Two subjects experienced hypoglycemia with pramlintide injection. Pramlintide bolus caused pronounced glucagon suppression (p < 0.0003) and delayed gastric emptying as ([13CO2] p < 0.0003 and acetaminophen p < 0.01) compared with infusion. We conclude that pramlintide bolus may result in an increase in risk of immediate postprandial hypoglycemia. Further modifications in pramlintide delivery are indicated before it can be safely used in children.

Pharmacological actions of the peptide hormone amylin in the long-term regulation of food intake, food preference, and body weight

The ability of amylin to reduce acute food intake in rodents is well established. Longer-term administration in rats (up to 24 days) shows a concomitant reduction in body weight, suggesting energy intake plays a significant role in mediating amylin-induced weight loss. The current set of experiments further explores the long-term effects of amylin (4–11 wk) on food preference, energy expenditure, and body weight and composition. Furthermore, we describe the acute effect of amylin on locomotor activity and kaolin consumption to test for possible nonhomeostatic mechanisms that could affect food intake. Four-week subcutaneous amylin infusion of high-fat fed rats (3–300 μg·kg−1·day−1) dose dependently reduced food intake and body weight gain (ED50for body weight gain = 16.5 μg·kg−1·day−1). The effect of amylin on body weight gain was durable for up to 11 wks and was associated with a specific loss of fat mass and increased metabolic rate. The body weight of rats withdrawn from amylin (100 μg·kg−1·day−1) after 4 wks of infusion returned to control levels 2 wks after treatment cessation, but did not rebound above control levels. When self-selecting calories from a low- or high-fat diet during 11 wks of infusion, amylin-treated rats (300 μg·kg−1·day−1) consistently chose a larger percentage of calories from the low-fat diet vs. controls. Amylin acutely had no effect on locomotor activity or kaolin consumption at doses that decreased food intake. These results demonstrate pharmacological actions of amylin in long-term body weight regulation in part through appetitive-related mechanisms and possibly via changes in food preference and energy expenditure.

Pramlintide acetate injection for the treatment of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Amylin is a hormone cosecreted with insulin by the beta cells of the pancreas. It suppresses postprandial glucagon secretion and slows gastric emptying. Pramlintide acetate is an amylin analogue that was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in March 2005.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the current primary literature on the clinical efficacy and tolerability of pramlintide injection in the treatment of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Among other topics covered are the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and dosing and administration of pramlintide.

METHODS

Pertinent English-language articles were identified through a search of MEDLINE (1966-January 2007), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-present), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (1995-January 2007), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1995-January 2007), and EMBASE Drugs & Pharmacology (1991-1st quarter 2007). The search terms included pramlintide, amylin, gastric emptying, pharmacokinetic, pharmacoeconomic, postprandial hyperglycemia, and glucagon. Articles were selected for review if they described studies having a randomized, double-blind, controlled design and included glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) as an end point.

RESULTS

Pramlintide is administered subcutaneously in the abdominal area or thigh immediately before each main meal to achieve maximal reductions in post-prandial glucose excursions. Its C(max) is reached within 20 minutes, and its t(1/2) is 48 minutes. Metabolism is primarily via the kidneys. Pramlintide therapy was associated with inhibition of postprandial glucagon secretion in 24 patients with type 2 DM; prolonged gastric emptying in 11 patients with type 1 DM; a 23% reduction in total energy intake in 11 patients with type 2 DM; and a reduction in markers of oxidative stress in 18 patients with type 1 DM (all, P <- 0.05 vs placebo). In two 52-week studies in patients with type 1 DM, the groups that received pramlintide 30 to 60 microg QID (n = 243), 60 microg TID (n = 164), and 60 microg QID (n = 161) had respective 0.39%, 0.29%, and 0.34% reductions in HbA(1c) and 0.5-, 0.3-, and 0.6-kg reductions in body weight, respectively (all, P < 0.05 vs placebo). In two 52-week studies in patients with type 2 DM, the groups that received pramlintide 120 microg BID (n = 166) and 150 microg TID (n = 144) had respective 0.62% and 0.6% reductions in HbA(1c) and 1.4- and 1.3-kg reductions in body weight (all, P < 0.05 vs placebo). Hypoglycemia, nausea, vomiting, and anorexia were the most frequently reported (>/=10% occurrence) adverse events in patients receiving pramlintide compared with placebo. These events were mild to moderate and occurred more frequently during the first month of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Pramlintide therapy was associated with reductions in HbA(1c) and body weight in four 52-week studies in patients with type 1 DM and type 2 DM. Hypoglycemia, nausea, vomiting, and anorexia were the most frequently occurring adverse events, particularly during the first month of therapy. Pramlintide was associated with reductions in measures of oxidative stress, but studies are needed to evaluate the effects of this agent on DM-related complications.

Pharmacokinetics of an oral drug (acetaminophen) administered at various times relative to subcutaneous injection of pramlintide in subjects with type 2 diabetes

Pramlintide, an adjunct treatment to mealtime insulin for patients with type 2 and type 1 diabetes, aids glycemic control by suppressing postprandial glucagon secretion, slowing gastric emptying, and enhancing satiety. Because gastric emptying affects oral medication absorption, this placebo-controlled, single-blind, crossover study examined the absorption of 1000 mg of acetaminophen elixir administered -2, -1, 0, +1, and +2 hours relative to pramlintide (120 microg) or 0 hours relative to placebo in 24 patients with type 2 diabetes. When acetaminophen administration occurred 0, +1, or +2 hours relative to pramlintide, the maximum observed plasma concentration of acetaminophen decreased 14% to 29%, and time to maximum observed plasma concentration increased by 0.8 to 1.2 hours compared with administration 0 hours relative to placebo. Pramlintide treatment slowed but did not alter the extent of acetaminophen absorption (area under the concentration-time curve). No serious adverse events or withdrawals were reported. Oral agents should be administered at least 1 hour before or 2 hours after pramlintide injection if rapid onset of action is required for efficacy.

Pramlintide as an adjunct to insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes in a clinical practice setting reduced A1C, postprandial glucose excursions, and weight

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of pramlintide therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes in a clinical practice setting.

METHODS

In this open-label study, 166 insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes added pramlintide therapy (120 microg) during an initiation period in which mealtime insulin was reduced by 30-50%. Insulin doses were subsequently adjusted to optimize glycemic control. Endpoints included safety, as well as change in A1C, postprandial glucose, weight, insulin dose, and patient satisfaction following 6 months of pramlintide treatment.

RESULTS

At 6 months, the change in A1C from baseline (8.3%) was -0.56% (P < 0.05; n = 59). Pramlintide treatment significantly reduced mean postprandial glucose excursions (P < 0.05) and weight (-2.8 kg; P < 0.05; n = 125). Glycemic benefits were achieved with lower mealtime insulin doses (-10.3%; P < 0.05; n = 104). Nausea, primarily mild to moderate, was reported by 29.5% of patients (severe nausea in 2.4%). Rates of severe hypoglycemia were low (0.04 events/patient-year).

CONCLUSIONS

In this uncontrolled, open-label setting, pramlintide initiation while reducing mealtime insulin, followed by insulin dose optimization, resulted in improvements in postprandial glucose excursions and A1C. These improvements in glycemic control were accompanied by weight loss.

Pramlintide in the management of insulin-using patients with type 2 and type 1 diabetes

In patients with diabetes, dysregulation of multiple glucoregulatory hormones results in chronic hyperglycemia and an array of associated microvascular and macrovascular complications. Optimization of glycemic control, both overall (glycosylated hemoglobin [A1C]) and in the postprandial period, may reduce the risk of long-term vascular complications. However, despite significant recent therapeutic advances, most patients with diabetes are unable to attain and/or maintain normal or near-normal glycemia with insulin therapy alone. Pramlintide, an analog of amylin, is the first in a new class of pharmaceutical agents and is indicated as an adjunct to mealtime insulin for the treatment of patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. By mimicking the actions of the naturally occurring hormone amylin, pramlintide complements insulin by regulating the appearance of glucose into the circulation after meals via three primary mechanisms of action: slowing gastric emptying, suppressing inappropriate post-meal glucagon secretion, and increasing satiety. In long-term clinical trials, adjunctive pramlintide treatment resulted in improved postprandial glucose control and significantly reduced A1C and body weight compared with insulin alone. The combination of insulin and pramlintide may provide a more physiologically balanced approach to managing diabetes.

Pramlintide acetate in the treatment of Type 2 and Type 1 diabetes mellitus

Maintenance of glucose homeostasis involves the interplay of multiple glucoregulatory factors, including the pancreatic β-cell hormones insulin and amylin. Amylin, a neuroendocrine hormone, is secreted in response to nutrient intake and suppresses postprandial glucagon secretion, helps regulate gastric emptying, and reduces food intake. Patients with diabetes are deficient in both insulin and amylin - contributing to postprandial hyperglycemia. Pramlintide, an analogue of amylin, is the active ingredient in the SYMLIN^® (pramlintide acetate) injection. SYMLIN is indicated as an adjunctive treatment for insulin-using patients with diabetes and works through mechanisms similar to those of amylin. Clinical trials have demonstrated that pramlintide therapy improves postprandial glucose control, lowers A1C, and is accompanied by a reduction in body weight. Mild-to-moderate nausea and an increased risk of insulin-induced severe hypoglycemia have been the most common side effects. These side effects can be mitigated by gradual pramlintide dose escalation during treatment initiation and proactive mealtime insulin dose reduction upon initiation of pramlintide therapy.

Role of endogenous amylin in glucagon secretion and gastric emptying in rats demonstrated with the selective antagonist, AC187

Amylin is a 37-amino acid polypeptide co-secreted with insulin from the pancreatic beta-cells. It complements insulin's stimulation of the rate of glucose disappearance (Rd) by slowing the rate of glucose appearance (Ra) through several mechanisms, including an inhibition of mealtime glucagon secretion and a slowing of gastric emptying. To determine if endogenous amylin tonically inhibits these processes, we studied the effects of the amylin receptor blocker AC187 upon glucagon secretion during euglycemic, hyperinsulinemic clamps in Sprague-Dawley (HSD) rats, upon gastric emptying in HSD rats, and upon gastric emptying and plasma glucose profile in hyperamylinemic, and genetically obese, Lister Albany/NIH rats during a glucose challenge. Amylin blockade increased glucagon concentration, accelerated gastric emptying of liquids, and resulted in an exaggerated post-challenge glycemia. These data collectively indicate a physiologic role for amylin in glucose homeostasis via mechanisms that include regulation of glucagon secretion and gastric emptying.

The physiology of amylin and insulin: maintaining the balance between glucose secretion and glucose uptake

Glucose homeostasis is accomplished through intricate, and arguably, elegant interactions among several organs and hormones. Historically, glucose homeostasis has been viewed somewhat narrowly--insulin from pancreatic beta cells regulated glucose disposal, while glucagon from pancreatic alpha [corrected] cells regulated glucose appearance during fasting states. But more recent characterization and understanding of the role of incretin hormones from the gut--notably, glucagon-like peptide 1 and gastric inhibitory polypeptide--and amylin from pancreatic beta cells has led to a more complete model of glucose homeostasis. Furthermore, availability of pharmacologic agents to replace, mimic, or enhance the actions of these hormones allows application of this more complete model of glucose homeostasis to the treatment of type 1 and type 2 diabetes. This article provides an overview of the role of the pancreatic hormone amylin in glucose homeostasis and of Pramlintide, a analogue of native amylin, recently approved as adjunct therapy to insulin in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Newer therapeutic options for children with diabetes mellitus: theoretical and practical considerations

Recent studies in adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and T2DM have examined the potential utility, benefits, and side effects of agents that augment insulin secretion after oral ingestion of nutrients in comparison with intravenous nutrient delivery, the so-called incretins. Two families of incretin-like substances are now approved for use in adults. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) or agents that bind to its receptor (exenatide, Byetta) or agents that inhibit its destruction [dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) inhibitors, Vildagliptin] improve insulin secretion, delay gastric emptying, and suppress glucagon secretion while decreasing food intake without increasing hypoglycemia. Pramlintide, a synthetic amylin analog, also decreases glucagon secretion and delays gastric emptying, improves hemoglobin A1c (HbA1C), and facilitates weight reduction without causing hypoglycemia. We review the historical discovery of these agents, their physiology [corrected] and their current applications. Remarkably, only one or two studies have been reported in children. Pediatricians caring for children with T1DM and T2DM should become familiar with these agents and investigate their applicability, as they seem likely to enhance our therapeutic armamentarium to treat children with diabetes mellitus.

Pramlintide in the treatment of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Amylin is a 37-amino acid peptide neurohormone that is cosecreted with insulin from the pancreatic beta cells in response to meals. It lowers serum glucose by decreasing glucagon release, slowing gastric emptying, and decreasing food intake. Pramlintide, a synthetic amylin analogue, is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use with mealtime insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes and patients with type 2 diabetes who are using mealtime insulin only or the combination of insulin and metformin and/or a sulfonylurea.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the available literature on pramlintide with respect to its mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy in type 1 and type 2 diabetes, safety and tolerability, dosing, contraindications, and drug interactions.

METHODS

MEDLINE (1966-April 2005), Iowa Drug Information Service (1966-April 2005), and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-April 2005) were searched for clinical trials and therapeutic reviews published in the English language. The search terms were pramlintide and amylin. The bibliographies of identified articles were reviewed for additional references. All relevant studies were included in the review.

RESULTS

Six studies, ranging in duration from 4 to 52 weeks, examined the effect of administering pramlintide with premeal insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes. In these trials, pramlintide 120 to 270 microg/d reduced glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) by 0.1 % to 0.67%, 1-hour postprandial glucose (PPG) by 4.4 to 7 mmol/L, and 2-hour PPG by 3.6 to 4.8 mmol/L. Five studies, also ranging from 4 to 52 weeks' duration, examined the effect of administering premeal pramlintide in patients with type 2 diabetes. In these trials, pramlintide 90 to 450 microg/d reduced HbA(1c) by 0.3% to 0.62%, 1-hour PPG by 4.8 mmol/L, and 2-hour PPG by 3.4 mmol/L. The principal adverse events reported in clinical trials were nausea and hypoglycemia. The incidence of hypoglycemia in the first 4 weeks of therapy was 2 to 4 times greater with pramlintide compared with placebo; thus, the manufacturer recommends reducing the dose of premeal insulin by 50% when starting pramlintide. Close monitoring of blood glucose levels is recommended when initiating pramlintide therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of pramlintide in addition to insulin in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes was associated with modest reductions in HbA(1c). The primary adverse effects of pramlintide therapy were nausea and hypoglycemia.

Pramlintide acetate

PURPOSE

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, adverse effects, and dosage and administration of pramlintide are reviewed.

SUMMARY

Pramlintide, a synthetic analogue of the human hormone amylin, is the first of a new class of amylinomimetic compounds. It was approved in March 2005 as a subcutaneous injection for the adjunctive treatment of patients who have type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus and have failed to achieve glycemic control despite optimal therapy with insulin. Pramlintide complements the effects of insulin in postprandial glucose regulation by decreasing glucagon secretion. Pramlintide exhibits linear pharmacokinetics, and peak serum levels are reached within 30 minutes of administration. The drug is predominantly renally eliminated, with a mean elimination half-life of 30-50 minutes. Clinical trials have shown that pramlintide suppresses postmeal glucagon secretion, slows gastric emptying, reduces postprandial glucose levels, and improves glycemic control while managing weight loss. Pramlintide has also been shown to decrease hemoglobin A(1c), serum fructosamine, and total cholesterol levels. Pramlintide has been associated with an increased risk of insulin-induced severe hypoglycemia; other adverse events include nausea, anorexia, fatigue, and vomiting. The dosage varies with the type of diabetes. Because of the cost associated with the complications of uncontrolled diabetes, pramlintide may have a beneficial effect on total costs associated with this chronic disease.

CONCLUSION

Pramlintide in combination with insulin is a potential therapeutic option for improving glycemic control in patients with diabetes, but the increased risk of hypoglycemia must be aggressively monitored.

Mechanisms of glucose-induced secretion of pancreatic-derived factor (PANDER or FAM3B) in pancreatic beta-cells

Pancreatic-derived factor (PANDER) is an islet-specific cytokine present in both pancreatic alpha- and beta-cells, which, in vitro, induces beta-cell apoptosis of primary islet and cell lines. In this study, we investigated whether PANDER is secreted by pancreatic alpha- and beta-cells and whether PANDER secretion is regulated by glucose and other insulin secretagogues. In mouse-derived insulin-secreting beta-TC3 cells, PANDER secretion in the presence of stimulatory concentrations of glucose was 2.8 +/- 0.4-fold higher (P < 0.05) than without glucose. Insulin secretion was similarly increased by glucose in the same cells. The total concentration of secreted PANDER in the medium was approximately 6-10 ng/ml (0.3-0.5 nmol/l) after a 24-h culture with glucose. L-Glucose failed to stimulate PANDER secretion in beta-TC3 cells. KCl stimulated PANDER secretion 2.1 +/- 0.1-fold compared with control without glucose. An L-type Ca2+ channel inhibitor, nifedipine, completely blocked both glucose- or KCl-induced insulin and PANDER secretion. In rat-derived INS-1 cells, glucose (20 mmol/l) stimulated PANDER secretion 4.4 +/- 0.9-fold, while leucine plus glutamine stimulated 4.4 +/- 0.7-fold compared with control without glucose. In mouse islets overexpressing PANDER, glucose (20 mmol/l) stimulated PANDER secretion 3.2 +/- 0.5-fold (P < 0.05) compared with basal (3 mmol/l glucose). PANDER was also secreted by alpha-TC3 cells but was not stimulated by glucose. Mutations of cysteine 229 or of cysteines 91 and 229 to serine, which may form one disulfide bond, and truncation of the COOH-terminus or NH2-terminus of PANDER all resulted in failure of PANDER secretion, even though these mutant or truncated PANDERs were highly expressed within the cells. In conclusion, we found that 1) PANDER is secreted from both pancreatic alpha- and beta-cells, 2) glucose stimulates PANDER secretion dose dependently in beta-cell lines and primary islets but not in alpha-cells, 3) PANDER is likely cosecreted with insulin via the same regulatory mechanisms, and 4) structure and conformation is vital for PANDER secretion.