First-line crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer

The molecular features of lung cancer stem cells in dedifferentiation process-driven epigenetic alterations

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) may be dedifferentiated somatic cells following oncogenic processes, representing a subpopulation of cells able to promote tumor growth with their capacities for proliferation and self-renewal, inducing lineage heterogeneity, which may be a main cause of resistance to therapies. It has been shown that the "less differentiated process" may have an impact on tumor plasticity, particularly when non-CSCs may dedifferentiate and become CSC-like. Bidirectional interconversion between CSCs and non-CSCs has been reported in other solid tumors, where the inflammatory stroma promotes cell reprogramming by enhancing Wnt signaling through nuclear factor kappa B activation in association with intracellular signaling, which may induce cells' pluripotency, the oncogenic transformation can be considered another important aspect in the acquisition of "new" development programs with oncogenic features. During cell reprogramming, mutations represent an initial step toward dedifferentiation, in which tumor cells switch from a partially or terminally differentiated stage to a less differentiated stage that is mainly manifested by re-entry into the cell cycle, acquisition of a stem cell-like phenotype, and expression of stem cell markers. This phenomenon typically shows up as a change in the form, function, and pattern of gene and protein expression, and more specifically, in CSCs. This review would highlight the main epigenetic alterations, major signaling pathways and driver mutations in which CSCs, in tumors and specifically, in lung cancer, could be involved, acting as key elements in the differentiation/dedifferentiation process. This would highlight the main molecular mechanisms which need to be considered for more tailored therapies.

ROS1-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer: Understanding biology and optimizing management in the era of new approvals

Rearrangements involving the ROS1 gene are infrequent in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) but represent an important targetable driver alteration. Occurring most commonly in patients with adenocarcinoma who have a light or never smoking history, ROS1 rearrangements can be identified by either fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) or next-generation sequencing techniques. Multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are now available for the effective treatment of ROS1-rearranged NSCLC in the metastatic setting including crizotinib, entrectinib, and repotrectinib as first-line therapy options. In addition, newer targeted therapies with increased selectivity for ROS1 over other targets are also emerging. As treatment of the disease continues to evolve, understanding the clinical course of patients with ROS1-rearranged NSCLC as well as the data supporting the latest therapy options is key to timely, effective, and longitudinal care.

Cardiovascular Considerations During Cancer Therapy: Gaps in Evidence and JACC: CardioOncology Expert Panel Recommendations

The administration of certain cancer therapies can be associated with the development of cardiovascular toxicity or complications. This spectrum of toxicities is broad and requires nuanced approaches for prevention, identification, and management. This expert panel summarizes the consensus of opinions of diverse health care professionals in several key areas: 1) cardioprotection involves strategies aimed at the primary prevention of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity; 2) surveillance entails monitoring for cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity during cancer therapy; 3) permissive cardiotoxicity is the informed continuation of cancer therapy in the presence of cardiovascular toxicity, along with the implementation of mitigating cardiovascular treatments; and 4) special considerations include the invasive management of severe cardiovascular disease in patients receiving treatments for advanced cancer and the exploration of drug-drug interactions in cardio-oncology. In this expert panel, we also highlight gaps in evidence in an effort to continue to advance science in the cardiovascular care of our patients undergoing cancer therapy.

Ensartinib in the treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive locally advanced or metastatic patients with lung squamous or adenosquamous carcinoma: A real-world, retrospective study

AIM

To report the efficacy and safety of ensartinib, an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, in treating patients with ALK-positive advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) or lung adenosquamous carcinoma (LASC) in China.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed data for 36 advanced-stage patients with ALK-positive LUSC (cohort A) and 13 patients with ALK-positive LASC (cohort B) between December 16, 2020 and December 16, 2021. All patients received once-daily ensartinib 225 mg. Outcome analysis included the demographic characteristics, tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAE).

RESULTS

Among the 49 patients, the majority were under 65 years old (73.5%), non-smokers (85.7%), had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0-1 (77.6%), and were at stage IV (71.4%). All patients were included in the efficacy and safety analysis. Seven PFS events were reported in cohort A while no patients experienced PFS events in cohort B. The median PFS was not estimable for both cohorts. In cohort A, the objective response rate (ORR) was 63.9%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 83.3%. In the cohort B, the ORR was 76.9% and the DCR was 100.0%. Rash was the only TRAE reported in the cohort A (8.3%) and cohort B (23.1%). No patients had grade 3 or higher TRAE.

CONCLUSION

Ensartinib has been tentatively proven favorable efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of patients with ALK-positive advanced LUSC or LASC in the real-world. However, confirmatory studies are still needed in larger sample sizes.

ToxProfiler: A novel human-based reporter assay for in vitro chemical safety assessment

In vitro chemical safety assessment often relies on simple and general cytotoxicity endpoint measurements and fails to adequately predict human toxicity. To improve the in vitro chemical safety assessment, it is important to understand the underlying mechanisms of toxicity. Here we introduce ToxProfiler, a novel human-based reporter assay that quantifies the chemical-induced stress responses at a single-cell level and reveals the toxicological mode-of-action (MoA) of novel drugs and chemicals. The assay accurately measures the activation of seven major cellular stress response pathways (oxidative stress, cell cycle stress, endoplasmic reticulum stress, ion stress, protein stress, autophagy and inflammation) that play a role in the adaptive responses prior to cellular toxicity. To assess the applicability of the assay in predicting the toxicity MoA of chemicals, we tested a set of 100 chemicals with well-known in vitro and in vivo toxicological profiles. Concentration response modeling and point-of-departure estimation for each reporter protein allowed for chemical potency ranking and revealed the primary toxicological MoA of chemicals. Furthermore, the assay could effectively group chemicals based on their shared toxicity signatures and link them to specific toxicological targets, e.g. mitochondrial toxicity and genotoxicity, and different human pathologies, including liver toxicity and cardiotoxicity. Overall, ToxProfiler is a quantitative in vitro reporter assay that can accurately provide insight into the toxicological MoA of compounds, thereby assisting in the future mechanism-based safety assessment of chemicals.

Advances in the Treatment of Rare Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is a malignant tumor with the highest morbidity and mortality rate worldwide, with nearly 2.5 million new cases and more than 1.8 million deaths reported globally in 2022. Lung cancer is broadly categorized into two main types: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC), with NSCLC accounting for about 85% of all cases. Early-stage lung cancers often present without obvious symptoms, resulting in most patients being diagnosed at an advanced stage where traditional chemotherapy has limited efficacy. Recent advances in molecular biology have elucidated the pivotal role of gene mutations in tumor development, paving the way for targeted therapies that have markedly benefited patients. Beyond the well-known epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, an increasing number of new molecular targets have been identified, including ROS1 rearrangement, BRAF mutation, NTRK fusion, RET fusion, MET mutation, KRAS G12C mutation, HER2 mutation, ALK rearrangement, and NRG1 fusion. Some of these targeted therapies have already been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and many others are currently undergoing clinical trials. This review summarizes recent advances in NSCLC treatment with molecular targets, highlighting progress, challenges, and their impact on patient prognosis.

Venous thromboembolism is associated with increased all-cause mortality in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolic events (VTE) are often diagnosed in ALK-positive lung cancer although it has not been demonstrated how their co-occurrence affects patients' survival.

METHODS

The study included patients with ALK-positive lung cancer recognized in metastatic stage in the period 2017-2022. All received treatment with ALK inhibitors at The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology in Warsaw. The main aim of the study was to assess overall survival (OS) in relation to VTE occurrence. The additional purpose was to define predictors of VTE and OS.

RESULTS

The study included 54 patients in median age 60 years, men were a minority (25 / 46.3%). VTE was diagnosed in 12 (22.2%) patients: 9 (16.7%) cases with pulmonary embolism (PE), 2 cases with thrombosis in vena cava superior, one case with deep vein thrombosis and thrombosis in vena cava inferior. Among patients with PE: 2 patients died directly due to the first PE episode and one due to a recurrent PE. Patients with VTE had significantly shorter overall survival (median 11.7 vs. 37.4 months, log-rank test p = 0.003). The risk of all-cause mortality was increased significantly in both: VTE (HR = 3.47; 95%CI: 1.61-7.49; p = 0.0016) or alone PE (HR = 2.41; 95%CI: 1.06-5.50; p = 0.037). The risk of VTE diagnosis was significantly increased during active treatment with crizotinib (HR = 8.72; p = 0.0004) or alectinib (HR = 21.47; p = 0.000002). Metastases to liver and baseline leukocyte count > 11 × 10⁹/L were significant predictors of VTE and OS. Khorana score ≥ 3 points predicted OS (HR = 2,66; 95%CI: 1,05-6,75; p = 0,04), but remained insignificant for VTE.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of any type of VTE or alone PE was associated with significantly worse overall survival in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer.

Research progress on the role of bypass activation mechanisms in resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer

The clinical application of small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has significantly improved the quality of life and prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) carrying driver genes. However, resistance to TKI treatment is inevitable. Bypass signal activation is one of the important reasons for TKI resistance. Although TKI drugs inhibit downstream signaling pathways of driver genes, key signaling pathways within tumor cells can still be persistently activated through bypass routes such as MET gene amplification, EGFR gene amplification, and AXL activation. This continuous activation maintains tumor cell growth and proliferation, leading to TKI resistance. The fundamental strategy to treat TKI resistance mediated by bypass activation involves simultaneously inhibiting the activated bypass signals and the original driver gene signaling pathways. Some clinical trials based on this combined treatment approach have yielded promising preliminary results, offering more treatment options for NSCLC patients with TKI resistance. Additionally, early identification of resistance mechanisms through liquid biopsy, personalized targeted therapy against these mechanisms, and preemptive targeting of drug-tolerant persistent cells may provide NSCLC patients with more sustained and effective treatment.

Clinical benefit evaluation of drug treatment regimens for advanced lung cancer:based on ASCO-VF and ESMO-MCBS

BACKGROUND

With the increasing use of novel targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for lung cancer (LC), the life expectancy of patients with LC has notably increased. In China, many drugs with the same mechanism of action have been approved by the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) through phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, differences occur in these drugs' efficacy and adverse effects, all of which have been compared with standard treatments, and data from head-to-head studies are lacking.

METHODS

The key RCTs of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), ALK-TKIs, and ICIs approved by NMPA in advanced LC in China were searched and divided into five groups. The American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework (ASCO-VF v2) and European Society for Medical Oncology Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS v1.1) were used to evaluate the net health benefits (NHB) of RCTs, including efficacy, adverse reactions, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), etc. The consistency of the ASCO-VF and ESMO-MCBS was compared.

RESULTS

As of September 2024, 37 RCTs have been included in the ASCO-VF and ESMO-MCBS. NHB scores ranged from 12.30 to 93.25. Nineteen trials met the ASCO-VF "substantial benefit", and 28 trials achieved the ESMO-MCBS "substantial benefit". Except for icotinib, dacomitinib, and befotertinib, all EGFR-TKIs and ALK-TKIs met the threshold of two frameworks. In the ICI regimens, eight regimens met the threshold of " substantial benefit " as defined by the two frameworks and nine studies showed conflicting results. The correlation coefficient of the 37 pairs of scores in the advanced LC study was estimated to be 0.473(Spearman), and the consistency analysis showed fair agreement.(κ = 0.265, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ASCO-VF and ESMO-MCBS focus on clinical efficacy and consider the adverse effects of drugs and PROs. We look forward to head-to-head studies on the different treatment options and advocate refining the ESMO-MCBS.

SIRT1 silencing promotes EMT and Crizotinib resistance by regulating autophagy through AMPK/mTOR/S6K signaling pathway in EML4-ALK L1196M and EML4-ALK G1202R mutant non-small cell lung cancer cells

Most EML4-ALK rearrangement non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients inevitably develop acquired drug resistance after treatment. The main mechanism of drug resistance is the acquired secondary mutation of ALK kinase domain. L1196M and G1202R are classical mutation sites. We urgently need to understand the underlying molecular mechanism of drug resistance to study the therapeutic targets of mutant drug-resistant NSCLC cells. The silent information regulator sirtuin1 (SIRT1) can regulate the normal energy metabolism of cells, but its role in cancer is still unclear. In our report, it was found that the SIRT1 in EML4-ALK G1202R and EML4-ALK L1196M mutant drug-resistant cells was downregulated compared with EML4-ALK NSCLC cells. The high expression of SIRT1 was related to the longer survival time of patients with lung cancer. Activation of SIRT1 induced autophagy and suppressed the invasion and migration of mutant cells. Further experiments indicated that the activation of SIRT1 inhibited the phosphorylation level of mTOR and S6K by upregulating the expression of AMPK, thus activating autophagy. SIRT1 can significantly enhanced the sensitivity of mutant cells to crizotinib, improved its ability to promote apoptosis of mutant cells, and inhibited cell proliferation. In conclusion, SIRT1 is a key regulator of drug resistant in EML4-ALK L1196M and G1202R mutant cells. SIRT1 may be a novel therapeutic target for EML4-ALK drug resistant NSCLC.

Taiwan Nationwide Study of First-Line ALK-TKI Therapy in ALK-Positive Lung Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The clinical outcomes of patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) advanced lung adenocarcinoma vary according to real-world data.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to investigate the treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS) of patients with ALK+ advanced lung adenocarcinoma treated with first-line ALK-TKIs in Taiwan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated all advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients registered in the National Taiwan Cancer Registry from 2017 to 2020 who had ALK rearrangement and received ALK-TKI treatment, using data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). The TKI treatment sequences were classified into first generation (G1: crizotinib), second generation (G2: ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib), and third generation (G3: lorlatinib).

RESULTS

A total of 587 patients were analyzed, with a median age of 60.0 years, 91 (15.5%) aged ≥ 74 years, 293 (49.9%) female, 397 (67.6%) never smoked, and 534 (91.0%) with stage IV disease. Patients who received next-generation ALK-TKIs during the treatment course had longer median time to ALK-TKI TTD and OS. The TTD of the G1, G1+2, G1+2+3, G2, and G2+3 groups was 7.5 (5.4-11.1), 40.6 (29.4-not calculated (NC)), 50.3 (41.3-NC), 34.3 (29.2-43.0), and 36.3 (22.4-NC) months, respectively (p < 0.001). The median OS of the patients in the G1, G1+2, G1+2+3, G2, and G2+3 groups was 10.6 (7.5-14.6), not reached (NR) (NC-NC), NR (NC-NC), 43.0 (36.3-NC), and NR (30.3-NC) months, respectively (p < 0.001). Compared with treatment with crizotinib alone, the multivariate analysis revealed that treatment with next-generation TKIs was independently associated with longer TTD (G1+2 (hazard ratio (HR), 0.24; 95% CI 0.17-0.33; p < 0.001), G1+2+3 or G1+3 (HR, 0.17; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.10-0.28; p < 0.001), G2 (HR, 0.26; 95% CI 0.19-0.36; p < 0.001), and G2+3 (HR, 0.25; 95% CI 0.14-0.44; p < 0.001)) and median OS (G12 (HR, 0.24; 95% CI 0.17-0.35; p < 0.001), G1+2+3 or G1+3 (HR, 0.09; 95% CI 0.04-0.21; p < 0.001), G2 (HR, 0.22; 95% CI 0.15-0.31; p < 0.001), and G2+3 (HR, 0.20; 95% CI 0.10-0.42; p < 0.001)).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with ALK+ NSCLC, treatments including next-generation ALK-TKIs were independently associated with longer survival outcomes.

Highly sensitive and accurate detection of ALK-TKI resistance mutations by oligoribonucleotide interference-PCR (ORNi-PCR)-based methods

BACKGROUND

Patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are treated with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Although most patients benefit from ALK-TKIs, the development of resistance mutations is common and results in NSCLC recurrence. To identify ALK-TKI-resistant NSCLC at the early recurrent phase, highly sensitive and accurate methods for the detection of mutations are essential.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to establish highly sensitive, accurate, cost-effective, and clinically practical methods for the detection of two frequent ALK-TKI resistance mutations, ALK G1202R and L1196M, by liquid biopsy.

METHODS

The efficacy of oligoribonucleotide interference-PCR (ORNi-PCR) was examined by first optimizing experimental conditions to specifically amplify the ALK-TKI resistance mutant DNA corresponding to ALK G1202R and L1196M mutations. ORNi-PCR was then combined with droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) or real-time PCR to detect these mutations in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) extracted from NSCLC patients.

RESULTS

ORNi-PCR followed by ddPCR/real-time PCR detected 1-10 copy(s) of G1202R and L1196M DNA in model cfDNA. These mutations in patients' cfDNA were identified using ORNi-PCR-based methods, whereas conventional ddPCR failed to detect them.

CONCLUSION

ORNi-PCR followed by ddPCR/real-time PCR enables highly sensitive and accurate detection of ALK mutations by liquid biopsy. Although the clinical data are limited, our results show that these methods are potentially useful for identifying ALK-TKI-resistant NSCLC at the early recurrent phase.

A real-world retrospective study to assess efficacy and safety of alectinib as adjuvant therapy in IB-IIIB NSCLC patients harboring ALK rearrangement

Background

Alectinib has demonstrated promising disease-free survival (DFS) benefit for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with ALK rearrangement positive in phase 3 ALINA trial. However, real-world evidence for the efficacy and safety of alectinib in early-stage ALK-positive NSCLC is limited.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed 68 patients with stage IB-IIIB ALK-positive NSCLC who underwent complete pulmonary resections from April 2010 to July 2023 at a single institution. 38 (55.9%) enrolled patients had N2 lymph node metastasis, and 17 (24.9%) patients had multi-station N2 metastasis. Patients were stratified into two groups according to the adjuvant treatment regimen, with 19 patients in the alectinib group and 49 patients in the chemotherapy group. There were no significant differences in clinicopathological characteristics between the two groups. After curative resection surgery, patients in alectinib group received oral alectinib at a dose of 600 mg twice daily and patients in chemotherapy group received platinum-based doublet chemotherapy regimen every 3 weeks for 4 cycles. The primary endpoint was 3-year DFS. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate DFS and overall survival (OS). Safety analyses were conducted by comparing the incidence of adverse events between the two groups.

Results

At the last follow-up date (January 22th, 2024), A total of 1 (5.3%) and 28 (57.1%) DFS events were observed in alectinib group and chemotherapy group respectively. The 3-year DFS showed significant improvement in the alectinib group compared with chemotherapy group (91.7% vs 60.7%, P=0.051). In the IIIAN2 subgroup, the 3-year DFS rate in the alectinib group reached a satisfactory 87.5%. In both groups, the majority of AEs were graded as level 1 or 2, No grade 3-4 AEs were observed in alectinib group.

Conclusion

Alectinib, as adjuvant therapy, demonstrated favorable efficacy and manageable safety in patients with completely resected ALK-positive stage I B-IIIB non-small cell lung cancer. A limitation of this study is the small sample size, and a larger-scale real-world sample study is needed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of alectinib as adjuvant therapy.

Proportional Hazards Violations in Phase III Cancer Clinical Trials: A Potential Source of Trial Misinterpretation

PURPOSE

Survival analyses of novel agents with long-term responders often exhibit differential hazard rates over time. Such proportional hazards violations (PHV) may reduce the power of the log-rank test and lead to misinterpretation of trial results. We aimed to characterize the incidence and study attributes associated with PHVs in phase III oncology trials and assess the utility of restricted mean survival time and maximum combination test as additional analyses.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Clinicaltrials.gov and PubMed were searched to identify two-arm, randomized, phase III superiority-design cancer trials with time-to-event primary endpoints and published results through 2020. Patient-level data were reconstructed from published Kaplan-Meier curves. PHVs were assessed using Schoenfeld residuals.

RESULTS

Three hundred fifty-seven Kaplan-Meier comparisons across 341 trials were analyzed, encompassing 292,831 enrolled patients. PHVs were identified in 85/357 [23.8%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 19.7%, 28.5%] comparisons. In multivariable analysis, non-overall survival endpoints [OR, 2.16 (95% CI, 1.21, 3.87); P = 0.009] were associated with higher odds of PHVs, and immunotherapy comparisons [OR 1.94 (95% CI, 0.98, 3.86); P = 0.058] were weakly suggestive of higher odds of PHVs. Few trials with PHVs (25/85, 29.4%) prespecified a statistical plan to account for PHVs. Fourteen trials with PHVs exhibited discordant statistical signals with restricted mean survival time or maximum combination test, of which 10 (71%) reported negative results.

CONCLUSIONS

PHVs are common across therapy types, and attempts to account for PHVs in statistical design are lacking despite the potential for results exhibiting nonproportional hazards to be misinterpreted.

The Use of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitors in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treatment-Literature Review

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. The median survival time for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer before the era of molecular-based personalized treatment was 7.9 months. The discovery of predictive factors and the introduction of molecular diagnostics into daily practice made a breakthrough, enabling several years of survival in patients with advanced disease. The discovery of rearrangements in the ALK gene and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors has resulted in a dramatic improvement in the prognosis of patients with this subtype of cancer. Currently, three generations of ALK inhibitors differing in activity, toxicity and degree of penetration into the central nervous system are available in clinical practice. The current state of knowledge on ALK inhibitors used in clinical practice is summarised in this research paper. Methods of diagnosis of abnormalities in ALK have been shown, and the review of research that contributed to the development of the next generation of ALK inhibitors has been presented.

Signaling pathways involved in colorectal cancer: pathogenesis and targeted therapy

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Its complexity is influenced by various signal transduction networks that govern cellular proliferation, survival, differentiation, and apoptosis. The pathogenesis of CRC is a testament to the dysregulation of these signaling cascades, which culminates in the malignant transformation of colonic epithelium. This review aims to dissect the foundational signaling mechanisms implicated in CRC, to elucidate the generalized principles underpinning neoplastic evolution and progression. We discuss the molecular hallmarks of CRC, including the genomic, epigenomic and microbial features of CRC to highlight the role of signal transduction in the orchestration of the tumorigenic process. Concurrently, we review the advent of targeted and immune therapies in CRC, assessing their impact on the current clinical landscape. The development of these therapies has been informed by a deepening understanding of oncogenic signaling, leading to the identification of key nodes within these networks that can be exploited pharmacologically. Furthermore, we explore the potential of integrating AI to enhance the precision of therapeutic targeting and patient stratification, emphasizing their role in personalized medicine. In summary, our review captures the dynamic interplay between aberrant signaling in CRC pathogenesis and the concerted efforts to counteract these changes through targeted therapeutic strategies, ultimately aiming to pave the way for improved prognosis and personalized treatment modalities in colorectal cancer.

Assessing clinical response in early oncology development with a predictive biomarker

In early oncology clinical trials there is often limited data for biomarkers and their association with response to treatment. Thus, it is challenging to decide whether a biomarker should be used for patient selection and enrollment. Most evidence about any potential predictive biomarker comes from preclinical research and, sometimes, clinical observations. How to translate the preclinical predictive biomarker data to clinical study remains an active field of research. Here, we propose a method to incorporate existing knowledge about a predictive biomarker - its prevalence, association with response and the performance of the assay used to measure the biomarker - to estimate the response rate in a clinical study designed with or without using the predictive biomarker. Importantly, we quantify the uncertainty associated with the biomarker and its predictability in a probabilistic model. This model estimates the distribution of the clinical response when a predictive biomarker is used to select patients and compares it to unselected cohort. We applied this method to two real world cases of approved biomarker-guided therapies to demonstrate its utility and potential value. This approach helps to make a data-driven decision whether to select patients with a predictive biomarker in early oncology clinical development.

Revisiting ALK (D5F3) immunohistochemistry: Insights into focal staining and neuroendocrine differentiation

BACKGROUND

Screening for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is crucial for identifying patients eligible for targeted therapy. The FDA-approved ALK (D5F3) immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay, used with the OptiView Amplification Kit, demonstrates excellent sensitivity and specificity in detecting these patients. However, the clinical significance of resulting focal positivity remains unclear, and ALK (D5F3) expression unrelated to ALK fusion is observed in some cases of neuroendocrine differentiation. This study aims to validate these findings with molecular testing and contribute to the accurate interpretation of ALK (D5F3) IHC results.

METHODS

A total of 1619 patients diagnosed with NSCLC and neuroendocrine carcinoma were evaluated using ALK (D5F3) IHC. For cases with strong but focal expression and those with diffuse strong positivity in neuroendocrine differentiation, ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and/or next-generation sequencing (NGS) tests were performed.

RESULTS

Seven out of 1109 adenocarcinomas (0.6%) and six out of 289 squamous cell carcinomas (2.1%) exhibited strong focal ALK (D5F3) expression. Nine out of 209 neuroendocrine carcinomas (4.3%) showed homogeneously strong ALK (D5F3) expression. All these cases, including adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation and combined small cell carcinoma, were negative for ALK fusions by FISH and/or NGS.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that strong but focal ALK (D5F3) immunostaining and strong expression in neuroendocrine differentiation may not indicate ALK fusion. By considering these findings, we can improve the accuracy of patient selection for targeted therapy by minimizing false-positive interpretations of ALK (D5F3) staining.

Correlation between ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer targeted therapy and thrombosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The main adjuvant therapies for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer include ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and chemotherapy. We aimed to compare differences in the incidence of thromboembolism (TE) among different treatment options.

DESIGN

Using a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA).

DATA SOURCES

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov and Web of Science databases before 10 June 2023.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included published randomised controlled trials (RCT) involving comparisons of treatments between chemotherapy and ALK-TKI drugs.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Assessed risk bias with Cochrane tool. Conducted NMA with GEMTC in R, we evaluate the model fit using the deviation information criteria. Estimated posterior distribution using Markov Chain Monte Carlo, 4 chains, 10 fine-tuned iterations, 10 000 iterations per chain, total 50 000 iterations. Monitored potential scale reduction factor for convergence. And checked convergence with Gelman-Rubin statistics and trace plot. Provided surface under the cumulative ranking, lower values indicate less TE event probability.

RESULTS

Analysis of eight RCTs showed that, compared with that for crizotinib, there was a lower risk of total TE with chemotherapy (OR, 0.28; 95% credible intervals (CrI) 0.11 to 0.63), brigatinib (OR 0.31; 95% CrI 0.11 to 0.79) and ceritinib (OR 0.13; 95% CrI 0.03 to 0.45). In addition, analysis of venous TE (VTE) showed similar results, with a lower occurrence for chemotherapy (OR 0.27; 95% CrI 0.1 to 0.62), brigatinib (OR 0.18; 95% CrI 0.04 to 0.6) and ceritinib (OR 0.1; 95% CrI 0.02 to 0.43) compared with that for crizotinib. There were no significant differences in the occurrence of arterial TE among the different treatment options.

CONCLUSION

Compared with chemotherapy, alectinib, lorlatinib, brigatinib and ceritinib, crizotinib significantly increased the risk of TE and VTE.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023373307.

Interstitial lung disease associated with ALK inhibitors and risk factors: an updated comparative pharmacovigilance analysis

Background

Inhibitors of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene mutation are first-line treatments in patients with ALK-positive lung cancer. The FDA label warns of the risk of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients receiving ALK TKIs. However, ILD associated with ALK TKIs is not fully understood. The aim of this study was to characterize the features of ALK TKI-related ILD and to explore risk factors for ALK TKI-related ILD.

Methods

FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) reports from 2011 Q1 to 2023 Q2 were extracted and combined. Standardized MedDRA queries (SMQs) were used to search for AEs at the preferred term (PT) level. Four algorithms were employed to quantify the signals of ILD associated with ALK TKIs. The risk of ILD was further analyzed using logistic regression.

Results

A total of 20,064 reports of ALK TKIs and 640 (3.2%) reports of ILD AEs were extracted. Significant disproportionality was detected in all five ALK TKIs. Interstitial lung disease and pneumonitis were the most common lung toxicities induced by ALK TKIs. Results of further analyses revealed a different spectrum of lung toxicity among the various TKIs. The median time to onset of ILD related to ALK TKIs was 53 days (Q1:12, Q3:209), and more than 70% of AEs occurred within the first 2 months. Logistic regression analysis and risk prediction model both showed that different ALK TKIs and their combination with PPIs, amlodipine, and magnesium oxide were independent risk factors for ILD (p<0.05).

Conclusion

ALK TKIs have different safety profiles regarding lung toxicity, which normally occurs within the first 2 months. Administration in combination with PPIs, amlodipine, and magnesium oxide significantly increases the risk of ILD. These results provide risk prediction for ILD related to ALK TKIs and support pharmacovigilance to promote safe prescribing in oncology.

Non-small-cell lung cancer

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most frequent cancer types and is responsible for the majority of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The management of NSCLC has improved considerably, especially in the past 10 years. The systematic screening of populations at risk with low-dose CT, the implementation of novel surgical and radiotherapeutic techniques and a deeper biological understanding of NSCLC that has led to innovative systemic treatment options have improved the prognosis of patients with NSCLC. In non-metastatic NSCLC, the combination of various perioperative strategies and adjuvant immunotherapy in locally advanced disease seem to enhance cure rates. In metastatic NSCLC, the implementation of novel drugs might prolong disease control together with preserving quality of life. The further development of predictive clinical and genetic markers will be essential for the next steps in individualized treatment concepts.

AXL and SHC1 confer crizotinib resistance in patient-derived xenograft model of ALK-driven lung cancer

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor crizotinib has dramatic effect in non-small cell lung cancer patients with ALK rearrangement. However, most patients eventually develop resistance. To discover therapeutic targets to overcome crizotinib resistance (CR), we generated patient-derived xenograft CR mice and subjected them to phosphorylation profiling, together with CR mice treated with ASP3026 or alectinib. We identified 100 proteins with different phosphorylation status in CR mice. Among them, AXL phosphorylation was increased in CR mice, which could not be reversed by ASP3026 or alectinib. Importantly, the combined treatment of crizotinib and AXL inhibitor in CR mice significantly inhibited tumor growth, compared to crizotinib alone. We also found that SHC1 phosphorylation was increased in CR mice and SHC1 knockdown sensitized ALK-driven cells to crizotinib. Our study provides a new view of signaling pathways leading to CR, suggesting AXL and SHC1 as potential targets for combination therapy to overcome CR.

Cancer Patient-Derived Cell-Based Models: Applications and Challenges in Functional Precision Medicine

The field of oncology has witnessed remarkable progress in personalized cancer therapy. Functional precision medicine has emerged as a promising avenue for achieving superior treatment outcomes by integrating omics profiling and sensitivity testing of patient-derived cancer cells. This review paper provides an in-depth analysis of the evolution of cancer-directed drugs, resistance mechanisms, and the role of functional precision medicine platforms in revolutionizing individualized treatment strategies. Using two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) cell cultures, patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models, and advanced functional assays has significantly improved our understanding of tumor behavior and drug response. This progress will lead to identifying more effective treatments for more patients. Considering the limited eligibility of patients based on a genome-targeted approach for receiving targeted therapy, functional precision medicine provides unprecedented opportunities for customizing medical interventions according to individual patient traits and individual drug responses. This review delineates the current landscape, explores limitations, and presents future perspectives to inspire ongoing advancements in functional precision medicine for personalized cancer therapy.

Genomic and immune heterogeneity of multiple synchronous lung adenocarcinoma at different developmental stages

Multiple synchronous lung cancers (MSLCs) constitute a unique subtype of lung cancer. To explore the genomic and immune heterogeneity across different pathological stages of MSLCs, we analyse 16 MSLCs from 8 patients using single-cell RNA-seq, single-cell TCR sequencing, and bulk whole-exome sequencing. Our investigation indicates clonally independent tumours with convergent evolution driven by shared driver mutations. However, tumours from the same individual exhibit few shared mutations, indicating independent origins. During the transition from pre-invasive to invasive adenocarcinoma, we observe a shift in T cell phenotypes characterized by increased Treg cells and exhausted CD8+ T cells, accompanied by diminished cytotoxicity. Additionally, invasive adenocarcinomas exhibit greater neoantigen abundance and a more diverse TCR repertoire, indicating heightened heterogeneity. In summary, despite having a common genetic background and environmental exposure, our study emphasizes the individuality of MSLCs at different stages, highlighting their unique genomic and immune characteristics.

The likelihood of being helped or harmed as a patient-centred tool to assess ALK-Inhibitors clinical impact and safety in ALK-addicted non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and sensitivity-analysis

BACKGROUND

In untreated ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are available directly comparing next-generation ALK-inhibitors. We conducted a sensitivity analysis using the likelihood of being helped or harmed (LHH).

METHODS

Phase III trials comparing ALK-inhibitors to crizotinib were included. Efficacy outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), PFS in patients with brain metastases and intracranial ORR. Safety outcomes were grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs), dose reductions and discontinuations.

RESULTS

Six RCTs (1524 patients) were included. Lorlatinib and brigatinib had the lowest NNT for intracranial outcomes. Alectinib demonstrated favourable LHHs for grade 3-4 AEs, dose reductions and discontinuations. Brigatinib LHHs were low for common AEs, mainly laboratory anomalies and hypertension. Ensartinib showed mainly skin toxicity. Lorlatinib LHHs were low for specific grade 3-4 AEs, mainly metabolic alterations.

CONCLUSIONS

The four ALK-inhibitors exhibited favourable risk-benefit ratios. Lorlatinib showed the lowest NNT for systemic efficacy and, alongside with Brigatinib, lower NNTs for intracranial efficacy. Alectinib exhibited higher LHHs for AEs.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023389101.

Immunotherapy Improves the Survival of Stage 4 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients at the US Population Level: The Real-World Evidence

INTRODUCTION

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the management of lung cancer and improved lung cancer survival in trials, but its real-world impact at the population level remains unclear.

METHODS

Using data obtained from eight Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries from 2004 through 2019, we addressed the long-term trends in the incidence, incidence-based mortality (IBM), and survival of lung cancer patients in the United States.

RESULTS

The incidence and IBM of both non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) all significantly decreased steadily from 2004 to 2019. The 1-year survival (1-YS) of both NSCLC and SCLC improved over time, with the best improvement observed for Stage 4 NSCLC. Two significant turning points of Stage 4 NSCLC 1-YS were observed over the years: 0.63% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.33%-0.93%) from 2004 to 2010, 0.81% (95% CI: 0.41%-1.21%) from 2010 to 2014 and a striking 2.09% (95% CI: 1.70%-2.47%) from 2014 to 2019. The same two turning points in 1-YS were pronounced for Stage 4 NSCLC in women, which were coincident with the introduction of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and immunotherapy. However, for Stage 4 NSCLC in men, only one significant turning point in the 1-YS starting in 2014 was found, which might only correspond to immunotherapy. Significant period effects in reduced IBM were also observed for both Stage 4 AD and Stage 4 SQCC during the period.

CONCLUSION

This SEER analysis found that immunotherapy improved the survival of Stage 4 NSCLC patients at the population level in the United States. This real-world evidence confirms that immunotherapy has truly revolutionized the management of lung cancer.

Association between oral targeted cancer drug net health benefit, uptake, and spending

BACKGROUND

Targeted cancer drugs (TCDs) have revolutionized oncology but vary in clinical benefit and patient out-of-pocket (OOP) costs. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Value Framework uses survival, toxicity, and symptom palliation data to quantify the net health benefit (NHB) of cancer drugs. We evaluated associations between NHB, uptake, and spending on oral TCDs.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients aged 18-64 years with an incident oral TCD pharmacy claim in 2012-2020 in a nationwide deidentified commercial claims dataset. TCDs were categorized as having high (>60), medium (40-60), and low (<40) NHB scores. We plotted the uptake of TCDs by NHB category and used standard descriptive statistics to evaluate patient OOP and total spending. Generalized linear models evaluated the relationship between spending and TCD NHB, adjusted for cancer indication.

RESULTS

We included 8524 patients with incident claims for 8 oral TCDs with 9 first-line indications in advanced melanoma, breast, lung, and pancreatic cancer. Medium- and high-NHB TCDs accounted for most TCD prescriptions. Median OOP spending was $18.78 for the first 28-day TCD supply (interquartile range [IQR] = $0.00-$87.57); 45% of patients paid $0 OOP. Median total spending was $10 118.79 (IQR = $6365.95-$10 600.37) for an incident 28-day TCD supply. Total spending increased $1083.56 for each 10-point increase in NHB score (95% confidence interval = $1050.27 to $1116.84, P < .01 for null hypothesis H0 = $0).

CONCLUSION

Low-NHB TCDs were prescribed less frequently than medium- and high-NHB TCDs. Total spending on oral TCDs was high and positively associated with NHB. Commercially insured patients were largely shielded from high OOP spending on oral TCDs.

Real-world data on ALK rearrangement test in Chinese advanced non-small cell lung cancer (RATICAL): a nationwide multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) test in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can help physicians provide target therapies for patients harboring ALK gene rearrangement. This study aimed to investigate the real-world test patterns and positive rates of ALK gene rearrangements in advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

In this real-world study (ChiCTR2000030266), patients with advanced NSCLC who underwent an ALK rearrangement test in 30 medical centers in China between October 1, 2018 and December 31, 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Interpretation training was conducted before the study was initiated. Quality controls were performed at participating centers using immunohistochemistry (IHC)-VENTANA-D5F3. The positive ALK gene rearrangement rate and consistency rate were calculated. The associated clinicopathological characteristics of ALK gene rearrangement were investigated as well.

RESULTS

The overall ALK gene rearrangement rate was 6.7% in 23,689 patients with advanced NSCLC and 8.2% in 17,436 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. The quality control analysis of IHC-VENTANA-D5F3 revealed an intra-hospital consistency rate of 98.2% (879/895) and an inter-hospital consistency rate of 99.2% (646/651). IHC-VENTANA-D5F3 was used in 53.6%, real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in 25.4%, next-generation sequencing (NGS) in 18.3%, and fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) in 15.9% in the adenocarcinoma subgroup. For specimens tested with multiple methods, the consistency rates confirmed by IHC-VENTANA-D5F3 were 98.0% (822/839) for FISH, 98.7% (1,222/1,238) for NGS, and 91.3% (146/160) for RT-PCR. The overall ALK gene rearrangement rates were higher in females, patients of ≤ 35 years old, never smokers, tumor cellularity of > 50, and metastatic specimens used for testing in the total NSCLC population and adenocarcinoma subgroup (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the real-world variability and challenges of ALK test in advanced NSCLC, demonstrating a predominant use of IHC-VENTANA-D5F3 with high consistency and distinct clinicopathological features in ALK-positive patients. These findings underscore the need for a consensus on optimal test practices and support the development of refined ALK test strategies to enhance diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic decision-making in NSCLC.

ALKTERNATE: A Pilot Study Alternating Lorlatinib With Crizotinib in ALK-Positive NSCLC With Prior ALK Inhibitor Resistance

Introduction

ALK-positive lung cancers represent a molecularly diverse disease. With drug exposure, driving selection pressure, and resistance pathways, disease relapse will emerge. There is compelling rationale to investigate novel treatment strategies, informed by dynamic circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring.

Methods

The single-arm, pilot study ALKTERNATE investigated fixed alternating cycles of lorlatinib intercalated with crizotinib in individuals resistant to second-generation ALK inhibitors. Dynamic ctDNA explored the correlation with disease response and disease recurrence and defined disease resistance. The primary outcome was time-to-treatment failure, a composite of tolerability, feasibility, and efficacy. Secondary outcomes included standard survival measures, toxicity, pharmacokinetic analysis, and patient-reported outcomes. Tertiary outcomes were proteogenomic analyses of tissue and plasma.

Results

A total of 15 individuals were enrolled; three encountered primary resistance to lorlatinib induction. There were 12 participants who received alternating therapy, and this approach revealed safety, feasibility, and effectiveness. Patient-reported outcomes were maintained or improved on therapy, and toxicity was consistent with previous reports. The pharmacokinetic measures were similar to the single-arm drug experience. Median time-to-treatment failure was 10 months; overall survival was 23 months. ctDNA profiles indicated inferior survival in those with preexistent TP53 mutations and those without clear or cleared ctDNA at trial induction. The study defined a vastly heterogeneous population with an abundance of ALK coexisting with non-ALK resistance variants.

Conclusions

ALKTERNATE revealed feasibility with a novel alternating ALK inhibitor strategy in ALK-positive NSCLC. Results support progressing inquiry into this approach and propose a flexible design with drug(s) selected and alternating time frames, informed by real-time plasma profiling. Moving this concept to treatment naive may also optimize impact.

Mechanisms of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitor-targeted therapy and overcoming strategies

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-targeted therapy has revolutionized cancer treatment by selectively blocking specific signaling pathways crucial for tumor growth, offering improved outcomes with fewer side effects compared with conventional chemotherapy. However, despite their initial effectiveness, resistance to TKIs remains a significant challenge in clinical practice. Understanding the mechanisms underlying TKI resistance is paramount for improving patient outcomes and developing more effective treatment strategies. In this review, we explored various mechanisms contributing to TKI resistance, including on-target mechanisms and off-target mechanisms, as well as changes in the tumor histology and tumor microenvironment (intrinsic mechanisms). Additionally, we summarized current therapeutic approaches aiming at circumventing TKI resistance, including the development of next-generation TKIs and combination therapies. We also discussed emerging strategies such as the use of dual-targeted antibodies and PROteolysis Targeting Chimeras. Furthermore, we explored future directions in TKI-targeted therapy, including the methods for detecting and monitoring drug resistance during treatment, identification of novel targets, exploration of dual-acting kinase inhibitors, application of nanotechnologies in targeted therapy, and so on. Overall, this review provides a comprehensive overview of the challenges and opportunities in TKI-targeted therapy, aiming to advance our understanding of resistance mechanisms and guide the development of more effective therapeutic approaches in cancer treatment.

Discovery of a first-in-class protein degrader for the c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1)

The c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1), an oncogenic driver, is known to induce non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) when overactivated, particularly through the formation of fusion proteins. Traditional targeted therapies focus on inhibiting ROS1 activity with ROS 1 inhibitors to manage cancer progression. However, a new strategy involving the design of protein degraders offers a more potent approach by completely degrading ROS1 fusion oncoproteins, thereby effectively blocking their kinase activity and enhancing anti-tumour potential. Utilizing PROteolysis-TArgeting Chimera (PROTAC) technology and informed by molecular docking and rational design, we report the first ROS1-specific PROTAC, SIAIS039. This degrader effectively targets multiple ROS1 fusion oncoproteins (CD74-ROS1, SDC4-ROS1 and SLC34A2-ROS1) in engineered Ba/F3 cells and HCC78 cells, demonstrating anti-tumour effects against ROS1 fusion-driven cancer cells. It suppresses cell proliferation, induces cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis, and inhibits clonogenicity. The anti-tumour efficacy of SIAIS039 surpasses two approved drugs, crizotinib and entrectinib, and matches that of the top inhibitors, including lorlatinib and taletrectinib. Mechanistic studies confirm that the degradation induced by 039 requires the participation of ROS1 ligands and E3 ubiquitin ligases, and involves the proteasome and ubiquitination. In addition, 039 exhibited excellent oral bioavailability in a mouse xenograft model, highlighting its potential for clinical application. In conclusion, our study presents a promising and novel therapeutic strategy for ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC by targeting ROS1 fusion oncoproteins for degradation, laying the foundation for the development of further PROTAC and offering hope for patients with ROS1 fusion-positive NSCLC.

Redefining Recovery: The Transformative Impact of the ALINA Trial on Adjuvant Therapy for ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

On April 18, 2024, the Food and Drug Administration approved alectinib as an adjuvant treatment for patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after tumor resection. This approval was grounded in the outcomes of the ALINA trial, which demonstrated that alectinib significantly enhances disease-free survival compared to traditional platinum-based chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting. The ALINA trial is notable not just for advancing ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) into the adjuvant setting but also for its innovative approach of comparing them to adjuvant chemotherapy, distinguishing it from other landmark trials.

Evaluation of Combined Chemotherapy and Genomic-Driven Targeted Therapy in Patient-Derived Xenografts Identifies New Therapeutic Approaches in Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients

The combination of chemotherapy and targeted therapy has been validated in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations. We therefore investigated whether this type of combined approach could be more widely used by targeting other genetic alterations present in NSCLC. PDXs were generated from patients with NSCLC adenocarcinomas (ADCs) and squamous-cell carcinomas (SCCs). Targeted NGS analyses identified various molecular abnormalities in the MAPK and PI3K pathways and in the cell cycle process in our PDX panel. The antitumor efficacy of targeted therapies alone or in combination with chemotherapy was then tested in vivo. We observed that trametinib, BKM120, AZD2014 and palbociclib increased the efficacy of each chemotherapy in SCC PDXs, in contrast to a non-insignificant or slight improvement in ADCs. Furthermore, we observed high efficacy of trametinib in KRAS-, HRAS- and NRAS-mutated tumors (ADCs and SCCs), suggesting that the MEK inhibitor may be useful in a wider population of NSCLC patients, not just those with KRAS-mutated ADCs. Our results suggest that the detection of pathogenic variants by NGS should be performed in all NSCLCs, and particularly in SCCs, to offer patients a more effective combination of chemotherapy and targeted therapy.

Sublobar Resection in Early Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutant

BACKGROUND

Lobectomy is a standard surgical procedure for peripherally located early-stage non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) measuring 2 to 4 cm. However, it is unclear whether sublobar resections, such as wedge resection and segmentectomy, are effective in treating tumors with driver mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR).

METHODS

We analyzed the clinicopathologic findings and surgical outcomes of 1395 patients with radiologically solid-dominant NSCLC measuring 2 to 4 cm, without clinical lymph node involvement, who underwent complete resection between 2010 and 2020. The patients, who underwent sublobar resections (n = 231) or lobectomy (n = 1164), were categorized by their EGFR mutation status and the surgical procedures performed. The follow-up was conducted for a median of 45.3 months.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates after sublobar resections (n = 39) were comparable to those after lobectomy (n = 359) in patients with EGFR mutation-positive tumors (80.5% [95% CI, 51.3%-93.2%] vs 88.8% [95% CI, 84.1%-92.1%], respectively; P = .16). Multivariable Cox regression analysis of OS revealed that the surgical procedure was an independent prognostic predictor in the entire cohort (hazard ratio, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-1.0; P = .028), but it was not an independent prognostic predictor in patients with EGFR-mutated tumors (hazard ratio, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.2-1.7; P = .32).

CONCLUSIONS

Sublobar resection with a secure surgical margin could be a viable option for appropriately selected patients with peripheral early-stage NSCLC tumors measuring 2 to 4 cm and harboring EGFR mutations, because it provides comparable OS to that of lobectomy.

Real-World Treatment and Outcomes in ALK-Rearranged NSCLC: Results From a Large U.S.-Based Database

Introduction

ALK-rearranged advanced NSCLC (aNSCLC) represents 4% of all NSCLCs, and multiple ALK-targeted therapies (ALK-inhibitors) are now available for use. Little is known about changes in treatment patterns, or how prognostic factors and sequence of therapy may impact overall survival in the real-world setting. We aim to describe initial and subsequent treatments used, survival outcomes, prognostic factors, and the impact of treatment on overall survival in the largest (N = 739) real-world cohort of patients with ALK+ aNSCLC reported in the literature.

Methods

Retrospective observational cohort study with data drawn from a U.S.-based electronic health record-derived, deidentified database. Eligible patients were diagnosed with ALK+ aNSCLC between 2011-2020 and were treated in multiple different cancer clinics and across multiple geographic regions throughout the United States.

Results

From a cohort of 63,667 patients with aNSCLC, 739 patients with ALK+ NSCLC were eligible for analysis, median age was 63 years, 54% patients were female, and 85% were managed in community setting. More than 168 different treatment sequences were observed, and treatment utilization changed over time. Cohort median overall survival was 37 months (95% confidence interval: 33-45). Positive prognostic factors were as follows: never-smoking history, younger age, treatment in an academic setting, and initial early stage at diagnosis. Initial treatment with a second-generation ALK-inhibitor was associated with improved survival compared with chemotherapy.

Conclusions

For people with ALK+ aNSCLC, this study has identified several important clinical prognostic factors and is practice affirming; first-line treatment with a second-generation ALK-inhibitor improves survival compared with chemotherapy.

Expert Consensus on the Management of Adverse Events of Lorlatinib in the Treatment of ALK+ Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

The use of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as lorlatinib, for the treatment of patients with ALK gene rearrangement (or ALK-positive) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been shown to improve the overall survival and quality of life of these patients. However, lorlatinib is not exempt from potential adverse events. Adequate monitoring and management of these adverse events are critical for increasing patient adherence to lorlatinib, thereby maximizing the benefits of treatment and minimizing the risks associated with treatment discontinuation. Considering that the adverse events of lorlatinib can affect different organs and systems, the participation of a multidisciplinary team, including cardiologists, neurologists, internal medicine specialists, and oncology pharmacists, is needed. This article presents specific and pragmatic strategies for identifying and treating the most relevant adverse events associated with lorlatinib in patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC based on the clinical experience of a multidisciplinary panel of experts.

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Across Three Lines of Therapy in Patients with ALK+ NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are standard first- and second-line treatment for advanced ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated outcomes in patients with ALK+ NSCLC receiving third-line ALK TKI versus non-ALK-directed therapy.

METHODS

Flatiron Health OncoEMR data were extracted for patients with ALK+ NSCLC initiating first-line ALK TKI between January 2015 and March 2022 followed by second-line ALK TKI and third-line ALK TKI (group A) or non-TKI therapy (group B). Time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using multivariate modelling.

RESULTS

Among patients receiving third-line ALK TKI (A, n = 85) or non-TKI therapy (B, n = 43), most received first-line crizotinib (A/B: 64%/60%) and second-line alectinib (36%/30%), ceritinib (24%/19%), or lorlatinib (15%/30%). Common third-line treatments were lorlatinib/alectinib (41%/33%) in A and immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or chemotherapy + immunotherapy (30%/28%/21%) in B. Group A versus B had longer TTD of first-line treatment (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.93; p = 0.020) and second-line treatment (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.33-0.75; p < 0.001) and longer OS from start of first-line treatment (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.19-0.54; p < 0.001) and second-line treatment (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.24-0.66; p < 0.001). For third-line treatment, median TTD (A/B) was 6.2/2.4 months (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.37-1.00; p = 0.049) and OS was 17.6/6.5 months (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.33-0.98; p = 0.042).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving third-line non-ALK-directed therapy had suboptimal outcomes on prior TKIs. Patients with longer duration of prior ALK TKI treatment appeared to benefit from third-line ALK TKIs.

Metastatic Non-Myofibroblastic Sarcoma Harbouring EML4-ALK Fusion-Dramatic Response to ALK Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Development of Resistance Mutations

BACKGROUND

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements are rare in non-myofibroblastic sarcoma and there is limited data on the efficacy of ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and mechanisms of resistance in these patients.

CASE

A 58 year-old man with metastatic non-myofibroblastic sarcoma was found to have an EML4-ALK fusion on molecular sequencing. After progression on first line systemic therapy with doxorubicin, the patient received alectinib, a second generation ALK inhibitor, and had a marked clinical and radiological response. He progressed after 5 months of treatment. Repeat lung biopsy identified the emergence of an ALK I1171N resistance mutation. He was then treated with lorlatinib, again with rapid clinical improvement and significant partial radiological response. He progressed after 4 months, at which time a repeat lung biopsy identified a new ALK kinase domain mutation G1202R. The patient was subsequently treated with chemotherapy, though unfortunately died shortly after due to rapidly progressive disease.

CONCLUSION

This case report adds to a body of evidence demonstrating the potential transformative response to targeted therapy in non-lung solid organ tumours harbouring ALK fusions. This is the first description tracking the development of resistance mutations in a patient with non-myofibroblastic sarcoma and questions the utility of the presence of G1202R mutation as a marker of lorlatinib sensitivity in non-lung ALK rearranged tumours, contrary to experience in lung cancer.

The impact of CYP3A4 genetic polymorphism on crizotinib metabolism and drug-drug interactions

To elucidate the impact of CYP3A4 activity inhibition and genetic polymorphism on the metabolism of crizotinib. Enzymatic incubation systems for crizotinib were established, and Sprague-Dawley rats were utilized for in vivo experiments. Analytes were quantified using LC-MS/MS. Upon screening 122 drugs and natural compounds, proanthocyanidins emerged as inhibitor of crizotinib metabolism, exhibiting a relative inhibition rate of 93.7%. The IC50 values were 24.53 ± 0.32 μM in rat liver microsomes and 18.24 ± 0.12 μM in human liver microsomes. In vivo studies revealed that proanthocyanidins markedly affected the pharmacokinetic parameters of crizotinib. Co-administration led to a significant reduction in the AUC(0-t), Cmax of PF-06260182 (the primary metabolite of crizotinib), and the urinary metabolic ratio. This interaction is attributed to the mixed-type inhibition of liver microsome activity by proanthocyanidins. CYP3A4, being the principal metabolic enzyme for crizotinib, has its genetic polymorphisms significantly influencing crizotinib's pharmacokinetics. Kinetic data showed that the relative metabolic rates of crizotinib across 26 CYP3A4 variants ranged from 13.14% (CYP3A4.12, 13) to 188.57% (CYP3A4.33) when compared to the wild-type CYP3A4.1. Additionally, the inhibitory effects of proanthocyanidins varied between CYP3A4.12 and CYP3A4.33, when compared to the wild type. Our findings indicate that proanthocyanidins coadministration and CYP3A4 genetic polymorphism can significantly influence crizotinib metabolism.

Targeting ALK receptors in non-small cell lung cancer: what is the road ahead?

INTRODUCTION

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene-rearrangements are identified in about 3-5% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), and ALK-rearranged NSCLC is to be considered an oncogene-addicted cancer with peculiar clinical characteristics.

AREAS COVERED

Several ALK inhibitors have been studied and approved for use in the treatment of advanced ALK-rearranged NSCLC with reported superiority in terms of efficacy and safety profile compared with chemotherapy. Second- and third-generation ALK inhibitors (alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib) offer to NSCLC patients a clinically meaningful prolongment of survival with a very good quality of life profile. However, resistances to these agents always occur, with less satisfying options for second-line treatments. Direct comparisons among these agents are not available, and the choice among brigatinib, alectinib, and lorlatinib as first-line treatment remains challenging. Very recently, alectinib has been demonstrated to improve efficacy outcomes compared with chemotherapy also in resected stage IB-IIIA ALK-rearranged NSCLC, extending the clinical benefit offered by ALK inhibitors also to the adjuvant setting.

EXPERT OPINION

Future development of ALK inhibitors in NSCLC treatment includes the search for optimal management of acquired resistance to first-line treatments and the extension of use of ALK inhibitors also to neoadjuvant and preferably to perioperative setting.

Real-world evidence of lorlatinib therapy in Taiwanese patients with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Lorlatinib is a brain-penetrant, third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor indicated for ALK-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In a global phase II study, patients who experience disease progression despite prior treatment with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) was assessed. Herein, we report real-world clinical outcomes of lorlatinib-treated patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC who were heavily pretreated and progressed on first- and second-generation ALK-TKIs, in a Taiwanese population under the lorlatinib expanded access program (EAP).

METHODS

This multicenter observational study examined the effectiveness and safety of ALK-positive advanced NSCLC patients that progressed from previous second-generation ALK-TKI therapy and received lorlatinib treatment subsequently. Patients who received lorlatinib treatment under EAP between Jul 2017 and Sep 2019 were eligible. Patients were followed for at least one year from the first lorlatinib treatment until study completion.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients were eligible for safety analysis (male: 46.0 %; median age: 52.8 [27.5-78.3] years; brain metastases: 81.0 %). Fifty-four patients with more than one-month lorlatinib treatment were included in the effectiveness analysis. Prior to lorlatinib treatment, 10 patients (18.5 %) received one ALK-TKI, 27 (50.0 %) received two ALK-TKIs, and 17 (31.5 %) received three or more ALK-TKIs. The overall median rwPFS was 9.2 months (95 % confidence interval: 5.3-21.1). The best overall response rate (n = 51) was 13.7 %, with a disease control rate of 80.4 %.

CONCLUSION

Lorlatinib exhibits substantial activity and tolerability when used clinically in a later-line setting in a Taiwanese population with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC.

A narrative review on perioperative systemic therapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is operable still carries a high risk of recurrence, approaching 50% of all operable cases despite adding adjuvant chemotherapy. However, the utilization of immunotherapy and targeted therapy moving beyond the metastatic NSCLC setting and into early-stage perioperative management has generated tremendous enthusiasm and has been practice-changing. Adjuvant atezolizumab in NSCLC first demonstrated a clinical benefit with an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Then, with studies studying a significant benefit in major pathologic response in surgical patients treated preoperatively with immunotherapy compared to only chemotherapy, neoadjuvant nivolumab and chemotherapy were evaluated and showed significant event-free survival benefit leading to subsequent studies evaluating perioperative immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Meanwhile, with regards to targeted therapies, adjuvant osimertinib in EGFR-mutated NSCLC and adjuvant alectinib in ALK-rearranged NSCLC have both received regulatory approvals following demonstrated clinical benefit in clinical trials. With rapidly evolving changes in the field, new combinations such as multiple immunotherapy agents and antibody-drug conjugates in development, perioperative NSCLC management has quickly become complicated with different pathways to perioperative treatment. Furthermore, circulating tumor DNA and studies looking at better tools to prognosticate immunotherapy response will help with decision-making regarding which patients should receive immunotherapy and if so, either only pre-operatively or both pre- and post-operatively. In this review, we look at the evolution of systemic therapy in the perioperative setting from adjuvant chemotherapy to adjuvant immunotherapy to perioperative immunotherapy and look at perioperative targeted therapy while looking ahead to future considerations.

Neurocognitive Adverse Events Related to Lorlatinib in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Lorlatinib has been FDA-approved as a systemic therapy for ALK/ROS1-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, it has been associated with an increased frequency of neurocognitive adverse events (NAEs). Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the NAEs related to lorlatinib therapy in NSCLC patients. PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and prominent conference proceedings were searched for eligible studies of lorlatinib in NSCLC patients. NAEs included cognitive, mood, speech, and psychotic effects. A total of 1147 patients from 12 studies were included; 62% had brain metastases. A pooled analysis of NAEs showed frequencies of cognitive effects of 14.57% (95% CI, 8.37 to 24.14, I2 = 84%), mood effects of 11.17% (95% CI, 5.93 to 20.07, I2 = 84%), speech effects of 7.24% (95% CI, 3.39 to 15.20, I2 = 72%), and psychotic effects of 4.97% (95% CI, 3.27 to 7.49, I2 = 21%). Clinical trials reported a significantly higher frequency of mood effects than was indicated by real-world data. These results highlight the importance of educating patients and healthcare professionals about lorlatinib-related NAEs for early detection and management to improve NSCLC patients' quality of life.

Alectinib in Early-Stage Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Challenges

BACKGROUND

Targeted therapies changed the treatment of advanced oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer and could also improve outcomes in resectable disease.

RESULTS

The ALINA trial evaluated the clinical benefit of adjuvant alectinib compared with standard chemotherapy and met the primary endpoint with a significant increase in disease-free survival at 2 years among anaplastic lymphoma kinase positive patients with stage IB-IIIA disease; two phase II trials (ALNEO and NAUTIKA1) are currently evaluating perioperative treatment with alectinib, and the results of the case reports published to date are encouraging.

CONCLUSION

In resectable anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive lung cancer, adjuvant alectinib represents the new standard of care and could soon be used in perioperative treatment.

Optimization of treatment strategies for elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer stands as a malignant neoplasm bearing the highest burden of morbidity and mortality within the elderly population on a global scale. Among the lung cancer subtypes, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) prevails as the most prevalent. As age advances, elderly patients often present with an increased prevalence of comorbidities, diminished organ reserve function, and alterations in drug pharmacokinetics, including absorption, distribution, metabolism, and clearance. These factors collectively contribute to a reduction in their capacity to tolerate therapeutic interventions. Regrettably, there exists a paucity of research data and evidence regarding the management of elderly patients afflicted by advanced lung cancer. This article endeavors to compile and elucidate strategies for the enhancement of treatment approaches, with the aim of aiding clinical decision-making. Prior to the selection of clinical treatment modalities for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC, a comprehensive assessment should be conducted, taking into account various facets, including tumor characteristics, patient age, physiological status, and the presence of comorbidities. The treatment strategy should be implemented in a tiered fashion, thereby affording the opportunity for the tailoring of individualized therapeutic approaches for elderly patients afflicted by advanced NSCLC. The demographic of elderly patients confronting advanced NSCLC presents a complex landscape marked by intricate underlying conditions, necessitating the imperative optimization of treatment strategies.

Case report: Pathological complete response to neoadjuvant brigatinib in stage III non-small cell lung cancer with ALK rearrangement

Purpose

The use of neoadjuvant anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has not been extensively explored. The current case report highlights the notable pathological complete response (pCR) achieved following neoadjuvant brigatinib therapy in a patient with stage IIIA ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Case presentation

A 32-year-old male presented with incidental lung lesions, ultimately diagnosed as clinical stage T3N1M0, IIIA NSCLC with an ALK gene rearrangement. Following a multidisciplinary discussion, the patient opted for neoadjuvant brigatinib therapy, which significantly reduced the tumor size. Subsequently, surgery with curative intent was performed, revealing pCR with no residual tumor cells. The patient remained disease-free during a 13-month follow-up period.

Conclusion

This case report provides compelling evidence of pCR following brigatinib therapy in ALK-positive NSCLC, suggesting that surgery after neoadjuvant therapy with brigatinib may offer a safe and effective approach for patients with ALK-positive NSCLC.

Understanding the treatment response and resistance to targeted therapies in non-small cell lung cancer: clinical insights and perspectives

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of mortality worldwide. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common subtype of lung cancer with a generally poor prognosis. In recent years, advances in targeted therapy and sequencing technology have brought significant improvement in the therapeutic outcomes of patients with advanced NSCLC. Targeted inhibitors directed against specific mutated or rearranged oncogenes, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), and receptor tyrosine kinase ROS proto-oncogene 1(ROS1) among others, exhibit promising anti-tumor activity. Unfortunately, some patients develop acquired resistance and disease progression soon after initial remission. Despite the continuous development of new drugs and strategies to overcome drug resistance, it is still a major challenge in the treatment of NSCLC. The landscape of targeted therapy for NSCLC is evolving rapidly in response to the pace of scientific research. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive review of tumor target antigens and agents related to targeted therapy in NSCLC.

Overcoming Chemoresistance in Cancer: The Promise of Crizotinib

Chemoresistance is a major obstacle in cancer treatment, often leading to disease progression and poor outcomes. It arises through various mechanisms such as genetic mutations, drug efflux pumps, enhanced DNA repair, and changes in the tumor microenvironment. These processes allow cancer cells to survive despite chemotherapy, underscoring the need for new strategies to overcome resistance and improve treatment efficacy. Crizotinib, a first-generation multi-target kinase inhibitor, is approved by the FDA for the treatment of ALK-positive or ROS1-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), refractory inflammatory (ALK)-positive myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) and relapsed/refractory ALK-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). Crizotinib exists in two enantiomeric forms: (R)-crizotinib and its mirror image, (S)-crizotinib. It is assumed that the R-isomer is responsible for the carrying out various processes reviewed here The S-isomer, on the other hand, shows a strong inhibition of MTH1, an enzyme important for DNA repair mechanisms. Studies have shown that crizotinib is an effective multi-kinase inhibitor targeting various kinases such as c-Met, native/T315I Bcr/Abl, and JAK2. Its mechanism of action involves the competitive inhibition of ATP binding and allosteric inhibition, particularly at Bcr/Abl. Crizotinib showed synergistic effects when combined with the poly ADP ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARP), especially in ovarian cancer harboring BRCA gene mutations. In addition, crizotinib targets a critical vulnerability in many p53-mutated cancers. Unlike its wild-type counterpart, the p53 mutant promotes cancer cell survival. Crizotinib can cause the degradation of the p53 mutant, sensitizing these cancer cells to DNA-damaging substances and triggering apoptosis. Interestingly, other reports demonstrated that crizotinib exhibits anti-bacterial activity, targeting Gram-positive bacteria. Also, it is active against drug-resistant strains. In summary, crizotinib exerts anti-tumor effects through several mechanisms, including the inhibition of kinases and the restoration of drug sensitivity. The potential of crizotinib in combination therapies is emphasized, particularly in cancers with a high prevalence of the p53 mutant, such as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC).

Nephrotoxicity of targeted therapy used to treat lung cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, especially non-small cell lung cancer. Early diagnosis and better treatment choices have already provided a more promising prognosis for cancer patients. In targeted therapy, antagonists target specific genes supporting cancer growth, proliferation and metastasis. With the incorporation of targeted therapies in routine cancer therapy, it is imperative that the array of toxicities associated with these agents must be well-recognized and managed, especially since these toxicities are distinct from those seen with conventional cytotoxic agents. Drug-related nephrotoxicity has attracted attention when initiating cancer therapy. Our review aims to summarize the adverse renal effects caused by targeted therapy during lung cancer treatment, mainly focusing on EGFR and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Also, we discuss the possible mechanism of the side effect and provide managements to help improve the renal function in clinical practice.