Dietary and genetic probes of atherogenic dyslipidemia

Dietary glycemic index and load in relation to cardiovascular disease risk factors in Cuban American population

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether dietary glycemic index (GI) or glycemic load (GL) had an effect on the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and whether the effects were dependent on the diabetes status in the Cuban American population.

DESIGN

A case–control, single-time-point study.

METHODS

A total of 324 middle-aged Cuban American adults had completed data on fasting blood lipids, physical activity level and usual dietary intake using a validated food frequency questionnaire. Published GI values were assigned to food items and average dietary GI and GL were calculated per participant.

RESULTS

Subjects without type 2 diabetes (T2D) were 3.3 times more likely to be in the recommended, highest high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol category if they were in the second dietary GL tertile as compared with those in the first dietary GL tertile (P = 0.042, 95% confidence interval = 1.94, 10.78).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study suggest that in this sample of Cuban Americans a high GI or GL diet do not adversely affects blood lipids, especially among subjects without T2D.

The triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio in adolescence and subsequent weight gain predict nuclear magnetic resonance-measured lipoprotein subclasses in adulthood

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether the fasting triglyceride-to-high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol (TG/HDL) ratio in adolescence is predictive of a proatherogenic lipid profile in adulthood.

STUDY DESIGN

A longitudinal follow-up of 770 Israeli adolescents 16 to 17 years of age who participated in the Jerusalem Lipid Research Clinic study and were reevaluated 13 years later. Lipoprotein particle size was assessed at the follow-up with proton nuclear magnetic resonance.

RESULTS

The TG/HDL ratio measured in adolescence was strongly associated with low-density lipoprotein, very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL), and HDL mean particle size in young adulthood in both sexes, even after adjustment for baseline body mass index and body mass index change. The TG/HDL ratio measured in adolescence and subsequent weight gain independently predicted atherogenic small low-density lipoprotein and large VLDL particle concentrations (P < .001 in both sexes). Baseline TG/HDL and weight gain interacted to increase large VLDL concentration in men (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescents with an elevated TG/HDL ratio are prone to express a proatherogenic lipid profile in adulthood. This profile is additionally worsened by weight gain.

Carbohydrate restriction favorably alters lipoprotein metabolism in Emirati subjects classified with the metabolic syndrome

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Carbohydrate restriction (CR) has been shown to improve dyslipidemias associated with metabolic syndrome (MetS). We evaluated the effects of CR on lipoprotein subfractions and apolipoproteins in Emirati adults classified with the MetS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

39 subjects (15 men/24 women) were randomly allocated to a CR diet [20-25% energy from carbohydrate (CHO)] for 12 wk (CRD group) or a combination treatment consisting of CRD for 6 wk followed by the American Heart Association diet (50-55% CHO, AHA group) for an additional 6 wk. All subjects reduced body weight, LDL cholesterol and triglycerides (P<0.01). At baseline all subjects had low concentrations of medium VLDL and total HDL particles associated with the very low plasma triglycerides and HDL cholesterol in this population. After 12 wk, the large VLDL subfraction was decreased over time for subjects in the CRD group (P<0.01) while these changes were not observed in those subjects who changed to the AHA diet. The number of medium and small LDL particles decreased for all subjects rendering a less atherogenic lipoprotein profile. In agreement with these results, a significant decrease in apolipoprotein (apo) B was observed (P<0.01). The medium HDL subfraction and apo A-II, which can be considered pro-atherogenic, were also decreased over time in the CRD group only.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that weight loss favorably affects lipoprotein metabolism and that the CRD had a better effect on atherogenic VLDL and HDL than the low fat diet recommended by AHA.

Should we measure routinely oxidised and atherogenic dense low-density lipoproteins in subjects with type 2 diabetes?

Beyond low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol concentrations, in recent years, several clinical studies have shown that both oxidised and small, dense LDL have a strong predictive role for the presence of vascular atherosclerosis. These two lipid parameters seem to have a synergistic impact on cardiovascular risk, with a greater importance in patients at higher-risk, such as those with type-2 diabetes. Increased levels of oxidised and small, dense LDL levels are a feature of diabetic dyslipidaemia, and small, dense LDL have been shown to be a good predictor of future cardiovascular events, at both univariate and multivariate analyses. On the other hand, although the association of oxidised LDL with surrogate markers of atherosclerosis is consistent, the correlation with hard clinical end points seems to be smaller. Yet, measurement of these two lipid parameters has not been widely used in daily practice because of the limited availability of clinical data and methodological problems: lack of availability of easy, cheap and reproducible essays for measurement of oxidised and, particularly, small, dense LDL has reduced their assessment in large clinical end-points trials. However, on the basis of available data, the therapeutic modulation of small, dense LDL is significantly associated with reduced cardiovascular risk, even after adjustment for confounding factors. In conclusion, the routine measurement of oxidised and small, dense LDL in patients with type-2 diabetes cannot be recommended in daily clinical practice so far; yet, their measurement is strongly encouraged to better understand their role on the cardiovascular risk of patients with type-2 diabetes.

Fructose: a highly lipogenic nutrient implicated in insulin resistance, hepatic steatosis, and the metabolic syndrome

As dietary exposure to fructose has increased over the past 40 years, there is growing concern that high fructose consumption in humans may be in part responsible for the rising incidence of obesity worldwide. Obesity is associated with a host of metabolic challenges, collectively termed the metabolic syndrome. Fructose is a highly lipogenic sugar that has profound metabolic effects in the liver and has been associated with many of the components of the metabolic syndrome (insulin resistance, elevated waist circumference, dyslipidemia, and hypertension). Recent evidence has also uncovered effects of fructose in other tissues, including adipose tissue, the brain, and the gastrointestinal system, that may provide new insight into the metabolic consequences of high-fructose diets. Fructose feeding has now been shown to alter gene expression patterns (such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator-1α/β in the liver), alter satiety factors in the brain, increase inflammation, reactive oxygen species, and portal endotoxin concentrations via Toll-like receptors, and induce leptin resistance. This review highlights recent findings in fructose feeding studies in both human and animal models with a focus on the molecular and biochemical mechanisms that underlie the development of insulin resistance, hepatic steatosis, and the metabolic syndrome.

Atherogenic dyslipidemia: cardiovascular risk and dietary intervention

Atherogenic dyslipidemia comprises a triad of increased blood concentrations of small, dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles, decreased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles, and increased triglycerides. A typical feature of obesity, the metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes mellitus, atherogenic dyslipidemia has emerged as an important risk factor for myocardial infarction and cardiovascular disease. A number of genes have now been linked to this pattern of lipoprotein changes. Low-carbohydrate diets appear to have beneficial lipoprotein effects in individuals with atherogenic dyslipidemia, compared to high-carbohydrate diets, whereas the content of total fat or saturated fat in the diet appears to have little effect. Achieving a better understanding of the genetic and dietary influences underlying atherogenic dyslipidemia may provide clues to improved interventions to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease in high-risk individuals.

Fructose consumption: recent results and their potential implications

In addition to acquiring a better understanding of foods that may have intrinsic health benefits, increasing our knowledge of dietary components that may adversely impact health and wellness, and the levels of consumption at which these adverse effects may occur, should also be an important priority for the Foods for Health initiative. This review discusses the evidence that additional research is needed to determine the adverse effects of consuming added sugars containing fructose. Current guidelines recommend limiting sugar consumption in order to prevent weight gain and promote nutritional adequacy. However, recent data suggest that fructose consumption in human results in increased visceral adiposity, lipid dysregulation, and decreased insulin sensitivity, all of which have been associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. A proposed model for the differential effects of fructose and glucose is presented. The only published study to directly compare the effects of fructose with those of commonly consumed dietary sweeteners, high fructose corn syrup and sucrose, indicates that high fructose corn syrup and sucrose increase postprandial triglycerides comparably to pure fructose. Dose-response studies investigating the metabolic effects of prolonged consumption of fructose by itself, and in combination with glucose, on lipid metabolism and insulin sensitivity in both normal weight and overweight/obese subjects are needed.

Reversal of small, dense LDL subclass phenotype by normalization of adiposity

Excess adiposity and high-carbohydrate diets have been associated with an atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype (ALP) characterized by increased concentrations of small, dense low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles (pattern B). We tested whether weight loss and normalization of adiposity could reverse ALP in overweight men with pattern B. After consuming a moderate-carbohydrate, high-fat diet for 3 weeks, pattern B and nonpattern B (pattern A) men were randomized to a weight loss (n = 60 and n = 36, respectively) or control weight-stable arm (n = 20 and n = 17, respectively). Men in the weight loss arm consumed approximately 1,000 fewer calories per day over 9 weeks to induce an average approximately 9 kg weight loss. In the control group, weight stability was maintained for 4 weeks after randomization. Weight loss led to the conversion of pattern B to pattern A in 58% of baseline pattern B men. Among men who achieved BMIs of <25 kg/m(2) (62% of pattern B men vs. 83% of pattern A men), 81% of pattern B men converted to pattern A. Weight loss was associated with a significantly greater decrease in small, dense LDL subclass 3b in pattern B relative to pattern A men. The lipoprotein profiles of pattern A men who converted from pattern B were comparable to those of men with pattern A at baseline. Conversion of LDL subclass pattern B to pattern A and reversal of ALP can be achieved in a high proportion of overweight men by normalization of adiposity.

Small, dense low-density lipoproteins (LDL) are predictors of cardio- and cerebro-vascular events in subjects with the metabolic syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Small, dense low-density lipoproteins (LDL) are a feature of the metabolic syndrome (MS) but their predictive role still remains to be established. We performed a 2-year follow-up study in 124 subjects with MS (63 +/- 6 years), as defined by the American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute guidelines, to assess clinical and biochemical predictors of cerebro- and cardio-vascular events.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors, we measured LDL size and subclasses by gradient gel electrophoresis. Clinical events were registered in the 25% of subjects. At univariate analysis subjects with events had increased prevalence of elevated fasting glucose (P = 0.0117), smoking (P = 0.0015), family history of coronary artery disease (P = 0.0033) and higher levels of total- and LDL-cholesterol (P = 0.0027 and P = 0.0023, respectively); LDL size was lower (P < 0.0001), due to reduced larger subclasses and increased small, dense LDL (all P < 0.0001). At multivariate analysis the following were independent predictors of events (univariate odd ratios were calculated): low HDL-cholesterol (OR 15.4, P = 0.0238), elevated fasting glucose (OR 12.1, P = 0.0102), elevated small, dense LDL (OR 11.7, P = 0.0004), elevated blood pressure (OR 9.2, P = 0.0392), smoking (OR 4.8, P = 0.0054).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study that assessed the predictive role of small, dense LDL beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors in subjects with MS.

The predictive role of atherogenic dyslipidemia in subjects with non-coronary atherosclerosis

BACKGROUND

Recent findings have suggested that subjects with non-coronary atherosclerosis may show elevated prevalence of atherogenic dyslipidemia, including higher triglyceride levels, reduced HDL-cholesterol concentrations and increased levels of small, dense low-density lipoproteins (LDL). These three lipid abnormalities constitute the so-called "atherogenic-lipoprotein-phenotype" (ALP) but its predictive role in these patients still remains to be established.

METHODS

We performed a 2-year follow-up study to assess clinical and biochemical predictors of cardiovascular events in 44 male patients (64+/-5 years, BMI: 27+/-3), 26 with peripheral arterial disease and 18 with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors, we measured LDL size and subclasses by gradient gel electrophoresis.

RESULTS

Clinical events were registered in the 43% of patients. At univariate analysis we found that patients with events had increased prevalence of hypertension (p=.0098), diabetes (p=.0089), family history of cardiovascular diseases (p=.0089), of elevated small, dense LDL (p=.0222) and ALP (p=.0224). At multivariate analysis (including all clinical and laboratory variables) we found the following independent predictors of events: hypertension (OR 8.9, p=.0347), diabetes (OR 9.4, p=.0270), elevated small, dense LDL (OR 6.9, p=.0488) and ALP (OR 8.7, p=.0497).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study that evaluated the predictive role of ALP beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors in patients with peripheral arterial disease or abdominal aortic aneurysm. We confirmed that hypertension and diabetes are strong predictors of cardiovascular events in these subjects but ALP seems to be an independent predictor too. Yet, the therapeutical consequences of these findings need to be tested by future studies.

Consuming fructose-sweetened, not glucose-sweetened, beverages increases visceral adiposity and lipids and decreases insulin sensitivity in overweight/obese humans

Studies in animals have documented that, compared with glucose, dietary fructose induces dyslipidemia and insulin resistance. To assess the relative effects of these dietary sugars during sustained consumption in humans, overweight and obese subjects consumed glucose- or fructose-sweetened beverages providing 25% of energy requirements for 10 weeks. Although both groups exhibited similar weight gain during the intervention, visceral adipose volume was significantly increased only in subjects consuming fructose. Fasting plasma triglyceride concentrations increased by approximately 10% during 10 weeks of glucose consumption but not after fructose consumption. In contrast, hepatic de novo lipogenesis (DNL) and the 23-hour postprandial triglyceride AUC were increased specifically during fructose consumption. Similarly, markers of altered lipid metabolism and lipoprotein remodeling, including fasting apoB, LDL, small dense LDL, oxidized LDL, and postprandial concentrations of remnant-like particle-triglyceride and -cholesterol significantly increased during fructose but not glucose consumption. In addition, fasting plasma glucose and insulin levels increased and insulin sensitivity decreased in subjects consuming fructose but not in those consuming glucose. These data suggest that dietary fructose specifically increases DNL, promotes dyslipidemia, decreases insulin sensitivity, and increases visceral adiposity in overweight/obese adults.

Dyslipidemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Dyslipidemia is one of the major risk factors for cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus. The characteristic features of diabetic dyslipidemia are a high plasma triglyceride concentration, low HDL cholesterol concentration and increased concentration of small dense LDL-cholesterol particles. The lipid changes associated with diabetes mellitus are attributed to increased free fatty acid flux secondary to insulin resistance. The availability of multiple lipid-lowering drugs and supplements provides new opportunities for patients to achieve target lipid levels. However, the variety of therapeutic options poses a challenge in the prioritization of drug therapy. The prevalence of hypercholesterolemia is not increased in patients with diabetes mellitus, but mortality from coronary heart disease increases exponentially as a function of serum cholesterol levels, and lowering of cholesterol with statins reduces diabetic patients' relative cardiovascular risk. Although drug therapy for dyslipidemia must be individualized, most people with diabetes mellitus are candidates for statin therapy, and often need treatment with multiple agents to achieve therapeutic goals.

Carbohydrate restriction has a more favorable impact on the metabolic syndrome than a low fat diet

We recently proposed that the biological markers improved by carbohydrate restriction were precisely those that define the metabolic syndrome (MetS), and that the common thread was regulation of insulin as a control element. We specifically tested the idea with a 12-week study comparing two hypocaloric diets (approximately 1,500 kcal): a carbohydrate-restricted diet (CRD) (%carbohydrate:fat:protein = 12:59:28) and a low-fat diet (LFD) (56:24:20) in 40 subjects with atherogenic dyslipidemia. Both interventions led to improvements in several metabolic markers, but subjects following the CRD had consistently reduced glucose (-12%) and insulin (-50%) concentrations, insulin sensitivity (-55%), weight loss (-10%), decreased adiposity (-14%), and more favorable triacylglycerol (TAG) (-51%), HDL-C (13%) and total cholesterol/HDL-C ratio (-14%) responses. In addition to these markers for MetS, the CRD subjects showed more favorable responses to alternative indicators of cardiovascular risk: postprandial lipemia (-47%), the Apo B/Apo A-1 ratio (-16%), and LDL particle distribution. Despite a threefold higher intake of dietary saturated fat during the CRD, saturated fatty acids in TAG and cholesteryl ester were significantly decreased, as was palmitoleic acid (16:1n-7), an endogenous marker of lipogenesis, compared to subjects consuming the LFD. Serum retinol binding protein 4 has been linked to insulin-resistant states, and only the CRD decreased this marker (-20%). The findings provide support for unifying the disparate markers of MetS and for the proposed intimate connection with dietary carbohydrate. The results support the use of dietary carbohydrate restriction as an effective approach to improve features of MetS and cardiovascular risk.

Obesity-related changes in high-density lipoprotein metabolism

Obesity is associated with a 3-or-more-fold increase in the risk of fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction (1,2,3,4,5,6). The American Heart Association has reclassified obesity as a major, modifiable risk factor for coronary heart disease (7). The increased prevalence of premature coronary heart disease in obesity is attributed to multiple factors (8,9,10). A principal contributor to this serious morbidity is the alterations in plasma lipid and lipoprotein levels. The dyslipidemia of obesity is commonly manifested as high plasma triglyceride levels, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc), and normal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) with preponderance of small dense LDL particles (7,8,9,10). However, there is a considerable heterogeneity of plasma lipid profile in overweight and obese people. The precise cause of this heterogeneity is not entirely clear but has been partly attributed to the degree of visceral adiposity and insulin resistance. The emergence of glucose intolerance or a genetic predisposition to familial combined hyperlipidemia will further modify the plasma lipid phenotype in obese people (11,12,13,14,15).

Who needs to care about small, dense low-density lipoproteins?

BACKGROUND

Increasing evidence suggest that the 'quality' rather than only the 'quantity' of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) exerts a great influence on the cardiovascular risk. Small, dense LDL seem to be an important predictor of cardiovascular events and progression of coronary artery disease (CAD) and their predominance has been accepted as an emerging cardiovascular risk factor by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III.

DISCUSSION

Some studies showed in past years that small, dense LDL are usually elevated in patients at very high cardiovascular risk, such as those with CAD and type 2 diabetes. More recently elevated levels of these particles have been found in other categories of patients at high cardiovascular risk, such as those with non-coronary forms of atherosclerosis (e.g. with carotid artery disease, aortic abdominal aneurysm and peripheral arterial disease) and metabolic diseases (with polycystic ovary syndrome and growth hormone deficiency); notably, in most of them, the predominance of small, dense LDL characterised their type of dyslipidaemia, alone or in combination with elevated triglycerides and reduced high-density lipoproteins cholesterol concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

The therapeutical modulation of small, dense LDL have been shown to significantly reduce cardiovascular risk and weight reduction and increased physical activity may constitute first-line therapy. In addition, lipid-lowering drugs are able to favourably alter these particles and fibrates and nicotinic acid seem to be the most effective agents. Promising data are also available with the use of rosuvastatin, the latest statin introduced in the market, and ezetimibe, a cholesterol absorption inhibitor.

Effect of ezetimibe in patients who cannot tolerate statins or cannot get to the low density lipoprotein cholesterol target despite taking a statin

BACKGROUND

Recent guidelines underline the need for high-risk patients to reach strict low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets (1.8-2.6 mmol/L; 70-100 mg/dL), and specifically mention the possible use of combination therapy (e.g.statin + ezetimibe) to achieve these goals.

METHODS

A retrospective case-note audit was carried out to assess the response to administering ezetimibe in patients unable to tolerate statins (Group 1), or high dose of statins (Group 2) and patients who cannot achieve the LDL-C target (2.6 mmol/L; 100 mg/dL) despite taking a statin (Group 3).

RESULTS

Ezetimibe lowered LDL-C levels by 20-29% across the 3 patient groups after 2-3 months of treatment. High density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels tended to remain unchanged, although there was a consistent trend for a fall if baseline values were 'high'. However, the LDL-C/HDL-C ratio changed significantly and favourably in all groups. The fall in fasting triglyceride levels in all groups was greater (reaching 19-25%) when baseline levels were > or = 1.5 or 1.7 mmol/L (136-150 mg/dL). There were no marked abnormalities in liver function tests or creatine kinase activity. In Group 3 there was a significant trend for a fall in serum creatinine levels across the tertiles of baseline creatinine values. Limitations of the present study include the small sample size (especially in Groups 1 and 2), its short-term duration and the absence of event-based end-points. Therefore, the results are hypothesis-generating rather than conclusive.

CONCLUSIONS

When used alone or added to a statin, ezetimibe favourably altered the LDL-C/HDL-C ratio and lowered triglyceride levels. Ezetimibe was well tolerated in patients with statin intolerance and was associated with a 26% fall in LDL-C. An additional action may be some degree of improved renal function. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Effects of statins, fibrates, rosuvastatin, and ezetimibe beyond cholesterol: the modulation of LDL size and subclasses in high-risk patients

Increasing evidence suggests that the quality-rather than just the quantity-of low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) exerts a great influence on cardiovascular risk. LDLs comprise multiple subclasses with discrete size and density, and different physicochemical composition, metabolic behaviors, and atherogenicity. Individuals generally cluster into 2 broad subgroups. Most have a predominance of large LDLs, and some have a higher proportion of small particles. Small, dense LDLs are good predictors of cardiovascular events and progression of coronary artery disease. Their predominance has been accepted as an emerging cardiovascular risk factor by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III. Several studies have shown that therapeutic modulation of LDL size and subclass is of great benefit in reducing the risk of cardiovascular events. This seems particularly true for statins and fibrates when they are administered to higher-risk patients, such as those with type 2 diabetes or vascular disease. Data reporting outcomes with the use of rosuvastatin, the latest statin molecule introduced to the market, and ezetimibe, a cholesterol absorption inhibitor, are promising.

High-sensitivity C-reactive protein in every chart? The use of biomarkers in individual patients

The use of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) for risk stratification for cardiovascular disease is supported by epidemiologic evidence but remains controversial. The metabolic milieu in which hsCRP is likely to be elevated, namely abdominal obesity and insulin resistance, provides a framework for the understanding of the role of hsCRP as well its limitations. This commentary provides a critical assessment of the data in support of the use of hsCRP in clinical practice.

Associations of apolipoprotein E polymorphism with low-density lipoprotein size and subfraction profiles in Arab patients with coronary heart disease

The APOE gene locus has 3 major alleles, E3, E4 and E2, which variably influence coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. Plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL) profile, another major CHD risk factor, is characterized on the basis of size and density into 2 main patterns: large buoyant LDL and small dense LDL. The latter has also been linked with increased CHD risk. This study investigates associations of specific APOE allelic patterns with LDL size and subfraction profiles in patients with CHD and healthy control subjects. We recruited 2 groups of male subjects: (A) 65 apparently healthy control subjects, median age, 39.0 years (range, 25.0-60.0 years); (B) 50 patients with CHD, median age, 54.0 years (range, 40.0-76.0 years). APOE genotypes were determined by validated polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism methods, and LDL size and subfractions were assessed by a high-resolution, nongradient polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis technique (LIPOPRINT, Quantimetrix, Redondo Beach, CA). Lipid and other biochemical analyses were done by autoanalyzer techniques. The associations of specific APOE alleles and genotypes with LDL size and subfraction patterns were then assessed. As expected, patients with CHD had a worse atherogenic lipoprotein profile (waist-hip ratio, LDL, uric acid, and apolipoprotein B) than the controls. APOE genotype and allele frequencies were similar for both groups. In either group, median percent large buoyant LDL (pattern A) was greater in controls (51.0% vs 46.5%, P<.001) and percent small dense LDL (pattern B) was greater with CHD (9.0% vs 3.0%, P<.001). The latter also had smaller median particle size (26.5 vs 26.9 nm, P<.001). In controls, percent LDL pattern B was significantly lower with APOE2 than with APO non-E2 (4.0% vs 0.0%, P<.05); in patients with CHD, E2 patients had smaller particle size, and pattern B was significantly lower with non-E2 than with E2 (15.0 vs 8.0, P<.05). With respect to E4, control non-E4 had a smaller median percent LDL pattern B than E4; otherwise, there were no significant findings in relation to APOE type and LDL size and subfractions in both subject groups. These results confirm observations in other populations of increased levels of small dense LDL in patients with CHD. Although the APOE allelic pattern, especially APOE2, could be related to LDL subfraction profiles in control subjects, such associations could not be demonstrated in those with CHD.

Using genetic variation to optimize nutritional preemption

One of the promises of nutritional genomics is a set of dietary recommendations that leverage our understanding of nutrient-gene interaction in the preemptive dietary management of complex chronic diseases. Whether nutritional genomics can deliver on this promise is a matter of debate and controversy. Although nutritional genomics is often viewed as an extension of pharmacogenomics, the pharmacogenomics paradigm is a disease-centric reductionistic model that overshadows both the complexities and opportunities to be leveraged in preemptive nutritional pharmacology. Moreover, the pharmacogenomics model tends to set clinical expectations that nutritional genomics may not be able to achieve. The biological boundaries of nutritional pharmacology are being tested in many areas of preventive medicine such as cardiovascular disease and cancer. In this regard, the lessons learned in one disease may be germane to the other. Recent results from the Vitamin Intervention for Stroke Prevention (VISP), the Norwegian Vitamin (NORVIT), and the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) 2 trials underscore the incertitude of translating epidemiologic data into preemptive nutritional guidance. Moving ahead, the genetic determinism of the nutrigenomic model needs to take on a more holistic and phenotypic focus. To the extent this can be done, preemptive nutrition may one day become a safe and practical reality.

Small, dense low-density-lipoproteins and the metabolic syndrome

Small, dense low-density-lipoproteins (LDL) are associated with increased risk for cardiovascular diseases and diabetes mellitus and a reduction in LDL size has been reported in patients with coronary and non-coronary forms of atherosclerosis. LDL size has been accepted as an important predictor of cardiovascular events and progression of coronary artery disease as well as an emerging cardiovascular risk factor by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III. Small, dense LDL, with elevated triglyceride levels and low HDL-cholesterol concentrations, constitute the 'atherogenic lipoprotein phenotype (ALP)', a form of atherogenic dyslipidemia that is a feature of type 2 diabetes and the metabolic syndrome. LDL size and subclasses show specific alterations in patients with the metabolic syndrome that probably significantly increase their cardiovascular risk; however, so far it has not been recommended to incorporate LDL size measurements in treatment plans, when hypolipidemic therapies are installed. Patients with type 2 diabetes are at high cardiovascular risk and it is still on debate if the treatment goals may be identical or whether there are distinct groups with different cardiovascular risks and hence with different treatment goals. Measurements beyond traditional lipids, such as measurements on the presence of small, dense LDL in patients with the metabolic syndrome, may help to identify cardiovascular risk subgroups. In addition, it might be possible in the future to individualize hypolipidemic treatments if more than the traditional lipids are taken into account. LDL size measurement may potentially help to assess cardiovascular risk within the metabolic syndrome and adapt the treatment goals thereafter.

Clinical importance and therapeutic modulation of small dense low-density lipoprotein particles

The National Cholesterol Education Programme Adult Treatment Panel III accepted the predominance of small dense low-density lipoprotein (sdLDL) as an emerging cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor. Most studies suggest that measuring low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle size, sdLDL cholesterol content and LDL particle number provides additional assessment of CVD risk. Therapeutic modulation of small LDL size, number and distribution may decrease CVD risk; however, no definitive causal relationship is established, probably due to the close association between sdLDL and triglycerides and other risk factors (e.g., high-density lipoprotein, insulin resistance and diabetes). This review addresses the formation and measurement of sdLDL, as well as the relationship between sdLDL particles and CVD. The effect of hypolipidaemic (statins, fibrates and ezetimibe) and hypoglycaemic (glitazones) agents on LDL size and distribution is also discussed.

The Changing Roles of Dietary Carbohydrates

The dietary recommendations made for carbohydrate intake by many organizations/agencies have changed over time. Early recommendations were based on the need to ensure dietary sufficiency and focused on meeting micronutrient intake requirements. Because carbohydrate-containing foods are a rich source of micronutrients, starches, grains, fruits, and vegetables became the foundation of dietary guidance, including the base of the US Department of Agriculture’s Food Guide Pyramid. Dietary sufficiency recommendations were followed by recommendations to reduce cholesterol levels and the risk for cardiovascular disease; reduction in total fat (and hence saturated fat) predominated. Beginning in the 1970s, carbohydrates were recommended as the preferred substitute for fat by the American Heart Association and others to achieve the recommended successive reductions in total fat and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Additional research on fats and fatty acids found that monounsaturated fatty acids could serve as an alternative substitution for saturated fats, providing equivalent lowering of LDL-C without concomitant reductions in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and increases in triglycerides witnessed when carbohydrates replace saturated fat. This research led to a sharper focus in the guidelines in the 1990s toward restricting saturated fat and liberalizing a range of intake of total fat. Higher-fat diets, still low in saturated fatty acids, became alternative strategies to lower-fat diets. As the population has become increasingly overweight and obese, the emergence of the metabolic syndrome and its associated disruptions in glucose and lipid metabolism has led to reconsiderations of the role of carbohydrate-containing foods in the American diet. Consequently, a review of the evidence for and against high-carbohydrate diets is important to put this controversy into perspective. The current dietary recommendations for carbohydrate intake are supported by the evidence.

The Clinical Relevance of Low-Density-Lipoproteins Size Modulation by Statins

The predominance of small, dense low density lipoproteins (LDL) has been accepted as an emerging cardiovascular risk factor by the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III; in fact, LDL size seems to be an important predictor of cardiovascular events and progression of coronary heart disease. Several studies have also shown that the therapeutical modulation of LDL size is of great benefit in reducing the risk of cardiovascular events. Hypolipidemic treatment is able to alter LDL subclass distribution and statins are currently the most widely used lipid-lowering agents. Statins are potent inhibitors of hydroxy-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase, the rate-limiting enzyme in hepatic cholesterol synthesis and are the main drugs of choice for the treatment of elevated plasma LDL cholesterol concentrations. Statins potentially lower all LDL subclasses (e.g., large, medium and small particles); thus, their net effect on LDL subclasses or size is often only moderate. However, a strong variation has been noticed among the different agents: analyses of all published studies suggest a very limited role of pravastatin and simvastatin in modifying LDL size and their subclasses, while fluvastatin and atorvastatin seem to be much more effective agents. Finally, rosuvastatin, the latest statin molecule introduced in the market, seems to be promising in altering LDL subclasses towards less atherogenic particles.

Dietary carbohydrate and cholesterol influence the number of particles and distributions of lipoprotein subfractions in guinea pigs

Guinea pigs (n=10/group) were fed one of three diets: a high carbohydrate (CHO) (42% energy), low cholesterol (0.04%) diet (LChHC), a diet with the same amount of CHO but with 0.25% cholesterol (HChHC) or a diet with 11% of energy from CHO and 0.25% cholesterol (HChLC) for 12 weeks. VLDL- and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) were higher in the HChLC and HChHC groups than in the LChHC group (P<.0001). Lipoprotein subclasses and size were analyzed by nuclear magnetic resonance. Dietary cholesterol (HChHC and HChLC groups) resulted in larger VLDL particles (71.1+/-6.9, 78.9+/-3.33 nm, respectively) than those in the LChHC group (44.3+/-10.8 nm). In addition, there were higher concentrations of the large VLDL (>60 nm) and the medium VLDL (>35 nm) in the high cholesterol groups (P<.01). Similarly, the concentration of the medium (>8.2 nm) and small HDL (>7.2 nm) was higher in the HChHC and HChLC groups (P<.001). In contrast, CHO restriction affected the concentrations of LDL subfractions. The number of total LDL particles was lower in the HChLC (291.3+/-85.0 nmol/L) than in the HChHC group (467.6+/-113.1 nmol/L), indicating that the cholesterol in LDL was distributed in less particles in the former group. The concentrations of medium LDL (>19.8 nm) (98.4+/-90.8) and small LDL (>18 nm) (29.3+/-24.9 nmol/L) were lower in the HChLC group than in the HChHC group (261.8+/-105.8 and 64.9+/-27.9 nmol/L, respectively). These results indicate that dietary cholesterol increased the atherogenicity of both VLDL and HDL while CHO restriction increased the number of large LDL and decreased the concentrations of the more atherogenic smaller LDL subfractions.

Carbohydrate restriction improves the features of Metabolic Syndrome. Metabolic Syndrome may be defined by the response to carbohydrate restriction

Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) represents a constellation of markers that indicates a predisposition to diabetes, cardiovascular disease and other pathologic states. The definition and treatment are a matter of current debate and there is not general agreement on a precise definition or, to some extent, whether the designation provides more information than the individual components. We consider here five indicators that are central to most definitions and we provide evidence from the literature that these are precisely the symptoms that respond to reduction in dietary carbohydrate (CHO). Carbohydrate restriction is one of several strategies for reducing body mass but even in the absence of weight loss or in comparison with low fat alternatives, CHO restriction is effective at ameliorating high fasting glucose and insulin, high plasma triglycerides (TAG), low HDL and high blood pressure. In addition, low fat, high CHO diets have long been known to raise TAG, lower HDL and, in the absence of weight loss, may worsen glycemic control. Thus, whereas there are numerous strategies for weight loss, a patient with high BMI and high TAG is likely to benefit most from a regimen that reduces CHO intake. Reviewing the literature, benefits of CHO restriction are seen in normal or overweight individuals, in normal patients who meet the criteria for MetS or in patients with frank diabetes. Moreover, in low fat studies that ameliorate LDL and total cholesterol, controls may do better on the symptoms of MetS. On this basis, we feel that MetS is a meaningful, useful phenomenon and may, in fact, be operationally defined as the set of markers that responds to CHO restriction. Insofar as this is an accurate characterization it is likely the result of the effect of dietary CHO on insulin metabolism. Glucose is the major insulin secretagogue and insulin resistance has been tied to the hyperinsulinemic state or the effect of such a state on lipid metabolism. The conclusion is probably not surprising but has not been explicitly stated before. The known effects of CHO-induced hypertriglyceridemia, the HDL-lowering effect of low fat, high CHO interventions and the obvious improvement in glucose and insulin from CHO restriction should have made this evident. In addition, recent studies suggest that a subset of MetS, the ratio of TAG/HDL, is a good marker for insulin resistance and risk of CVD, and this indicator is reliably reduced by CHO restriction and exacerbated by high CHO intake. Inability to make this connection in the past has probably been due to the fact that individual responses have been studied in isolation as well as to the emphasis of traditional therapeutic approaches on low fat rather than low CHO. We emphasize that MetS is not a disease but a collection of markers. Individual physicians must decide whether high LDL, or other risk factors are more important than the features of MetS in any individual case but if MetS is to be considered it should be recognized that reducing CHO will bring improvement. Response of symptoms to CHO restriction might thus provide a new experimental criterion for MetS in the face of on-going controversy about a useful definition. As a guide to future research, the idea that control of insulin metabolism by CHO intake is, to a first approximation, the underlying mechanism in MetS is a testable hypothesis.