Utility of intraoperative frozen section histopathology in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection with alpha-defensin using a lateral flow device: a multicentre study

AIMS

The purpose of this current multicentre study is to analyse the presence of alpha-defensin proteins in synovial fluid using the Synovasure lateral flow device and to determine its diagnostic reliability and accuracy compared with the prosthetic joint infection (PJI) criteria produced by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cohort of 121 patients comprising 85 total knee arthroplasties and 36 total hip arthroplasties was prospectively evaluated between May 2015 and June 2016 in three different orthopaedic centres. The tests were performed on patients with a chronically painful prosthesis undergoing a joint aspiration in a diagnostic pathway or during revision surgery.

RESULTS

Based on the MSIS criteria, 34 patients (28%) would have had a PJI, and 87 patients had no PJI. Testing with the lateral flow device had a sensitivity of 97.1% (95% confidence intervals (CI) 84.5 to 99.9) and a specificity of 96.6% (95% CI 90.3 to 99.2). The positive predictive value was 91.7% (95% CI 77.7% to 98.3), and the negative predictive value was 98.8% (95% CI 93.6 to 99.9). Receiver operator characteristics analysis demonstrated an area under the curve for the Synovasure test of 0.97 (95% CI 0.93 to 1.00).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the Synovasure test has an excellent diagnostic performance to confirm or reject the diagnosis of a PJI. The results are promising for the care of the painful or problematic knee and hip joint arthroplasty and the test should be considered as part of the diagnostic toolbox for PJIs. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1176-82.

Comparison of Leukocyte Esterase Testing of Synovial Fluid with Synovial Histology for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

Background

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a complication of total joint arthroplasty (TJA). The leukocyte esterase (LE) strip test and histology are diagnostic methods for PJI. The aims of this study were to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the LE strip test and to compare it with histology in the diagnosis of PJI.

Material/Methods

Between January and December 2015, 93 patients who underwent TJA with PJI were enrolled in the study. Synovial fluid samples were tested with an LE strip, and three synovial tissue samples from each patient underwent frozen section and formalin-fixed histology. Recent criteria from the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) were used for the diagnosis of PJI.

Results

Ninety-three patients studied included 38 cases of PJI and 55 non-infected cases. Sensitivity and specificity of the LE strip test were 92.1% (95% CI, 77.5–97.9%) and 96.4% (95% CI, 86.4–99.4%), respectively. There was no significant difference in sensitivity (p=0.249) or specificity (p=0.480) between frozen and paraffin sections for histology; the two methods were strongly correlated (ϕ=0.892). Comparison of the LE test results with histology showed a strong correlation (ϕ=0.758, and ϕ=0.840).

Conclusions

The findings of this preliminary study have shown that the LE strip test on synovial fluid showed similar sensitivity and specificity as histology for the diagnosis of PJI, indicating that that further controlled clinical studies should be performed to investigate the role of the LE strip test for the early diagnosis of PJI.

The Role of Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Implant-Related Infections in Orthopaedics and Trauma

Diagnosis of implant-related (periprosthetic joint) infections poses a major challenge to infection disease physicians and orthopaedic surgeons. Conventional diagnostic tests continue to suffer from issues of accuracy and feasibility. Biomarkers are used throughout medicine for diagnostic and prognostic purposes, as they are able to objectively determine the presence of a disease or a biological state. There is increasing evidence to support the measurement of specific biomarkers in serum and/or synovial fluid of patients with suspected periprosthetic joint infections. Promising serum biomarkers include interleukin (IL)-4, IL-6, tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α, procalcitonin, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM-1), and D-dimer. In addition to c-reactive protein and leucocyte esterase, promising biomarkers that can be measured in synovial fluid include antimicrobial proteins such as human β-defensin (HBD)-2 and human β-defensin (HBD)-3, and cathelicidin LL-37, as well as several interleukins such as IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-17, TNF- α, interferon-δ, and vascular endothelial growth factor.

Accuracy of different diagnostic tests for early, delayed and late prosthetic joint infection

BACKGROUND

A combination of laboratory, histopathological and microbiological tests for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) have been strongly recommended. This study aims to characterize the accuracy of individual or group tests, such as culture of sonicate fluid, synovial fluid and peri-implant tissue, C-reactive protein (CRP) and histopathology for detection of early, delayed and late PJI.

METHODS

A prospective study of patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty from February 2009 to February 2014 was performed in a Spanish tertiary health care hospital. The diagnostic accuracy of the different methods was evaluated constructing receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve areas.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty consecutive patients were included: 18 (13.8%) early PJI, 35 (27%) delayed PJI and 77 (59.2%) late PJI. For individual parameters, the area under the ROC curve for peri-implant tissue culture was larger for early (0.917) than for delayed (0.829) and late PJI (0.778), p = 0.033. There was a significantly larger difference for ROC area in the synovial fluid culture for delayed (0.803) than for early (0.781) and late infections (0.679), p = 0.039. The comparison of the areas under the ROC curves for the two microbiological tests showed that sonicate fluid was significantly different from peri-implant tissue in delayed (0.951 vs 0.829, p = 0.005) and late PJI (0.901 vs 0.778, p = 0.000). The conjunction of preoperative parameters, synovial fluid culture and CRP, improved the accuracy for late PJI (p = 0.01). The conjunction of histopathology and sonicate fluid culture increased the area under ROC curve of sonication in early (0.917 vs 1.000); p = 0.06 and late cases (0.901 vs 0.999); p < 0.001.

CONCLUSION

For early PJI, sonicate fluid and peri-implant tissue cultures achieve the same best sensitivity. For delayed and late PJI, sonicate fluid culture is the most sensitive individual diagnostic method. By combining histopathology and peri-implant tissue, all early, 97% of delayed and 94.8% of late cases are diagnosed. The conjunction of histopathology and sonicate fluid culture yields a sensitivity of 100% for all types of infection.

Inadequacy of Joint Aspiration for Detection of Persistent Periprosthetic Infection During Two-Stage Septic Revision Knee Surgery

Despite the lack of validation, synovial aspiration remains a common practice during 2-stage septic revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The goal of this study was to investigate the diagnostic validity of synovial polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) spacer aspiration of temporary knee arthrodesis to detect persistent periprosthetic joint infection before TKA reimplantation. This retrospective cohort study included 73 consecutive patients who underwent 2-stage septic revision TKA according to a standard protocol. After explantation surgery, including temporary arthrodesis with an intramedullary stabilized PMMA spacer, all patients had synovial aspiration 2 weeks before reimplantation to exclude persistent periprosthetic joint infection. Patients had a 2-week antibiotic holiday before aspiration. Sensitivity and specificity of the synovial PMMA spacer joint aspiration for the detection of periprosthetic joint infection were determined and referenced against intraoperative microbiologic and histologic samples obtained at second-stage surgery. Sensitivity of the synovial PMMA spacer aspiration was 21%. Because of poor diagnostic validity, synovial PMMA spacer aspiration cannot be recommended for routine exclusion of persistent periprosthetic joint infection before TKA reimplantation. Therefore, exclusion of persistent periprosthetic joint infection should be supplemented by other diagnostic methods, and it is not necessary to delay TKA reimplantation for PMMA spacer aspiration. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(4):231-234.].

Management of periprosthetic infections

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is considered one of the most challenging complications compromising patient health and is considered an economic burden. Despite all strategies PJI prevalence is between 1%-2%. Considerable efforts have been investigated in the past decade to diminish or erradicate PJI prevalence. This article manages the definition of PJI and the new major and minor criteria from Parvizi et al Then a scientific analysis of every minor and major criteria. Multidisciplinary management is reccommended according to guidelines. A numerous of surgical options exist each and everyone with its indications, contraindications and specific antibiotic therapy regimen. Surgical options are: (1) irrigation and cleaning with retention of the prosthesis with a success rate 0%-89%; (2) single-stage revision surgery with a succes rate of > 80%; and (3) two-stage revision surgery (authors preferred method) with a succes rate of 87%. Radical treatment options like arthrodesis and amputation are reserved for specific group of patients, with a succes rate varying from 60%-100%. The future of PJI is focused on improving the diagnostic tools and to combat biofilm. The cornerstone of management consists in a rapid diagnosis and specific therapy. This article presents the most current diagnostic and treatment criteria as well as the different surgical treatment options depending on the type of infection, bacterial virulence and patient comorbidities.

Serum and Synovial Fluid Interleukin-6 for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

A gold standard for diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has not yet been established. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of serum and synovial fluid interleukin (IL)-6 levels for PJI. The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for studies describing PJI diagnosis using serum and synovial fluid IL-6 and published between January 1990 and October 2016. Seventeen studies were included in the analysis. The pooled sensitivities of serum and synovial fluid IL-6 were 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.63–0.80) and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.82–0.96), respectively. The pooled specificities of serum and synovial fluid IL-6 were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.77–0.95) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.84–0.95), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) of serum and synovial fluid IL-6 were 20 (95% CI: 7–58) and 101 (95% CI: 28–358), respectively, and the pooled areas under the curve (AUCs) were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.79–0.86) and 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94–0.98), respectively. Synovial fluid IL-6 had high diagnostic value for PJI. Although serum IL-6 test was less sensitive than synovial fluid IL-6 test, it may be regularly prescribed for patients with prosthetic failure owing to its high specificity.

Procalcitonin and α-Defensin for Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infections

BACKGROUND

Current methods to diagnose periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) before revision surgery have limited diagnostic accuracy. This meta-analysis was performed to estimate the accuracy of procalcitonin (PCT) and α-defensin for the diagnosis of PJI.

METHODS

Articles on the diagnostic value of PCT or α-defensin for PJI diagnosis were searched in the PubMed database. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, the area under the curve of summary receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC), the positive likelihood ratio, and the negative likelihood ratio were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic ability of PCT and the α-defensin test for the diagnosis of PJI.

RESULTS

The pooled sensitivities for detecting PJI using PCT and α-defensin were 0.53 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.80) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.85-0.99), respectively. The pooled specificities for detecting PJI using PCT and α-defensin were 0.92 (95% CI, 0.45-0.99) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.89-0.98), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratios for detecting PJI using PCT and α-defensin were 13 (95% CI, 3-70) and 496 (95% CI, 71-3456), respectively. The pooled AUCs for PCT and α-defensin were 0.76 (95% CI, 0.72-0.80) and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97-0.99), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio and the negative likelihood ratio of PCT were 6.8 (95% CI, 1.0-48.1) and 0.51 (95% CI, 0.31-0.84), respectively, whereas those of α-defensin were 19.6 (95% CI, 8.2-46.8) and 0.04 (95% CI, 0.01-0.17), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Synovial fluid α-defensin has a great potential to diagnose PJI.

Allergies in orthopaedic and trauma surgery

Hypersensitivity reactions to implants in orthopaedic and trauma surgery are a rare but devastating complication. They are considered as a delayed-type of hypersensitivity reaction (type IV), characterized by an antigen activation of sensitized T-lymphocytes releasing various cytokines and may result in osteoclast activation and bone resorption. Potential haptens are originated from metal alloys or bone-cement. A meta-analysis has confirmed a higher probability of developing a metal hypersensitivity postoperatively and noted a greater risk of failed replacements compared to stable implants. Hypersensitivity to implants may present with a variety of symptoms such as pain, joint effusion, delayed wound/bone healing, persistent secretion, allergic dermatitis (localized or systemic), clicking noises, loss of joint function, instability and failure of the implant. Various diagnostic options have been offered, including patch testing, metal alloy patch testing, histology, lymphocyte transformation test (LTT), memory lymphocyte immunostimulation assay (MELISA), leukocyte migration inhibition test (LIF) and lymphocyte activation test (LAT). No significant differences between in vivo and in vitro methods have been found. Due to unconvincing evidence for screening methods, predictive tests are not recommended for routine performance. Infectious aetiology always needs to be excluded. As there is a lack of evidence on large-scale studies with regards to the optimal treatment option, management currently relies on individual case-by-case decisions. Several options for patients with (suspected) metal-related hypersensitivity exist and may include materials based on ceramic, titanium or oxinium or modified surfaces. Promising results have been reported, but long-term experience is lacking. More large-scaled studies are needed in this context. In patients with bone-cement hypersensitivity, the component suspected for hypersensitivity should be avoided. The development of (predictive) biomarkers is considered as a major contribution for the future.

Intraoperative Frozen Section Histology: Matched for Musculoskeletal Infection Society Criteria

BACKGROUND

The current gold standard to diagnose periprosthetic joint infection (PJI)-the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria, requires a battery of tests, the results of which may not be available at the time of decision-making. Thus, surgeons often rely on intraoperative frozen section histology. However, the accuracy of frozen sections has not been determined when matched for the MSIS criteria. We aimed to (1) assess the value of intraoperative histology in the diagnosis of PJI and (2) evaluate discrepancy rate between frozen and permanent section analysis.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent revision total hip or total knee arthroplasty for either PJI or mechanical failure in 2013 was conducted. Two hundred procedures where tissue samples for frozen sections had been collected were identified and included into the study. Results of frozen sections were compared to the modified MSIS criteria. Discrepancy rate between frozen and permanent sections was also calculated.

RESULTS

Frozen sections had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of 73.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59.7%-87.7%), 98.8% (95% CI, 97.1%-100.0%), 94.1% (95% CI, 90.6%-97.6%), 93.3.4% (95% CI, 84.4%-100.0%), 94.0% (95% CI, 90.7%-97.3%), respectively. There were 10 discrepancies between the results of frozen and permanent sections (N = 421 samples), thereby yielding 97.6% concordance.

CONCLUSION

When matched to the MSIS criteria, intraoperative frozen section histology yields a high specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and moderate sensitivity. The discrepancy rate between frozen and permanent sections is low and both demonstrate good approximation of MSIS criteria.

Intraoperative Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Using a Novel Alpha-Defensin Lateral Flow Assay

BACKGROUND

The present study investigates the novel Synovasure periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) lateral flow test device for detection of alpha-defensin and attempts to determine its diagnostic accuracy for the intraoperative diagnosis of PJI and compares it to frozen section.

METHODS

Forty consecutive patients, who underwent revision surgery, between September 2014 and September 2015 were included. The patients underwent 29 revision total knee arthroplasties and 11 revision total hip arthroplasties. Twelve patients had a confirmed PJI based on Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria, and 28 patients were considered aseptic.

RESULTS

The overall accuracy to detect PJI using the lateral flow assay was 85% (95% CI 70%-93%). The device has a positive predictive value of 80% (95% CI 44%-96%) and a negative predictive value of 87% (95% CI 68%-96%) and showed a sensitivity of 67% (95% CI 35%-89%) and specificity of 93% (95% CI 75%-99%). Frozen section had a lower sensitivity (58% [95% CI 29%-84%]) but a higher specificity (96% [95% CI 80%-100%]). Receiver operator curve analysis demonstrates an area under the curve of the Synovasure PJI Lateral Flow Test Kit and frozen section of 0.80 and 0.77, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The present study suggests that the intraoperative lateral flow test is at least equivalent to intraoperative frozen section and is a useful tool to confirm the absence of PJI. Although the clinical results are promising, they are not as good as previous studies using alpha-defensin levels measured in a laboratory.

Management of Resistant, Atypical and Culture-negative Periprosthetic Joint Infections after Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication following lower extremity total joint arthroplasty (TJA). It is a leading cause of morbidity and revision following TJA. As such, PJI is a significant driver of healthcare costs. The prevalence of PJI related to resistant and atypical organisms is increasing, and approximately 10-30% of PJIs are culture-negative. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current epidemiology, diagnostics, and management of PJI associated with resistant and atypical pathogens and of culture-negative PJIs.

METHODS

The published literature related to the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of atypical, drug-resistant, and culture-negative PJI is reviewed.

RESULTS

The clinical diagnosis of PJI is often challenging, particularly when pathogens are fastidious or when antibiotics have been administered empirically. Molecular diagnostic studies, such as synovial α-defensin, may provide rapid, accurate identification of PJI, even in the setting of concurrent antibiotics administration or systemic inflammatory disease. Once PJI is diagnosed, two-stage exchange arthroplasty remains the gold standard for treating PJI with resistant microorganisms, since there is a high rate of treatment failure with irrigation and debridement and with one-stage exchange arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

Additional research is needed to define the optimal treatment of PJIs associated with rare pathogens, such as fungi and mycobacteria. There is a need for inexpensive, reliable tests that rapidly detect specific microbial species and antimicrobial susceptibilities. Additional research is also required to define the specific organisms, clinical scenarios, surgical techniques, and antimicrobial regimens that allow for reproducible treatment success with prosthetic retention strategies.

Risk factors for unavoidable removal of instrumentation after surgical site infection of spine surgery: A retrospective case-control study

Surgical site infection (SSI) after spine instrumentation is difficult to treat, and often requires removal of instrumentation. The removal of instrumentation after spine surgery is a severe complication that can lead to the deterioration of activities of daily living and poor prognosis. Although there are many reports on SSI after spine surgery, few reports have investigated the risk factors for the removal of instrumentation after spine surgery SSI. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for unavoidable removal of instrumentation after SSI of spine surgery. We retrospectively reviewed 511 patients who underwent spine surgery with instrumentation at Kagoshima University Hospital from January 2006 to December 2014. Risk factors associated with SSI were analyzed via multiple logistic regression analysis. Parameters of the group that needed instrumentation removal were compared with the group that did not require instrumentation removal using the Mann-Whitney U and Fisher's exact tests. The posterior approach was used in most cases (453 of 511 cases, 88.6%). SSI occurred in 16 of 511 cases (3.14%) of spine surgery with instrumentation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified 2 significant risk factors for SSI: operation time, and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification ≥ 3. Twelve of the 16 patients with SSI (75%) were able to keep the instrumentation after SSI. Pseudarthrosis occurred in 2 of 4 cases (50%) after instrumentation removal. Risk factors identified for instrumentation removal after spine SSI were a greater number of past surgeries, low preoperative hemoglobin, high preoperative creatinine, high postoperative infection treatment score for the spine, and the presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. In these high risk cases, attempts should be made to decrease the risk factors preoperatively, and careful postoperative monitoring should be conducted.

Method of intraoperative tissue sampling for culture has an effect on contamination risk

PURPOSE

This prospective study was designed to determine whether exposure of intraoperative tissue samples to the operating room environment affects subsequent culture results.

METHODS

A prospective study conducted on 125 patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty was conducted from August 2013 to December 2015. During surgery, three samples from the infrapatellar fat pad were obtained. The first sample was obtained using clean instruments and placed directly into a specimen cup (direct). The second sample was obtained using clean instruments, placed in the palm of an assistant, then placed in the hands of the scrub nurse, and finally transferred into a specimen cup (glove). The third sample was obtained with clean instruments, placed on a gauze pad on the back table, and transferred to a specimen cup at the time of skin closure (table).

RESULTS

There were two (1.6 %) positive cultures in the direct transfer group, none (0.0 %) in the glove contact group, and eight (6.4 %) in the exposed (table) group; there was a statistically significant difference between the glove contact and table samples (p = 0.01). The organisms isolated were coagulase-negative Staphylococcus in five samples, Proprionibacterium acnes in two samples, Staphylococcus epidermidis in one sample, Pediococcus pentosaceus in one sample, and Corynebacterium in one sample.

CONCLUSIONS

Contamination of tissue samples obtained for culture can occur if samples are exposed to the operating room environment. To prevent potential contamination, samples obtained for culture should be retrieved using clean instruments, transferred to a culture bottle directly, and transported to the microbiology laboratory as soon as possible.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Accuracy of diagnostic tests for prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review

PURPOSE

There are few evidence-based recommendations on the most effective methods for diagnosing prosthetic joint infections (PJIs), and the potency of tests in relation to each other also remains vague. This systematic review aimed to (1) identify systematic reviews reporting accuracies of available approaches for diagnosing PJI, (2) critically appraise their quality and bias, and (3) compare the available approaches in terms of accuracy for diagnosing PJI.

METHODS

PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for meta-analyses reporting accuracies of different diagnostic modalities for PJIs. Thirteen systematic reviews met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and their data were extracted and tabulated by two reviewers in duplicate and independent manners.

RESULTS

The 13 articles reported diagnostic accuracy from 278 clinical studies comprising 27,754 patients and evaluating 13 diagnostic tests grouped into 7 broad categories. Implant sonication had the highest positive likelihood ratio (17.2), followed by bacteriology (15.3) and synovial fluid differentiated cytology (13.3). The highest negative likelihood ratio was for interleukin (IL)-6 serum marker (0.03) followed by synovial fluid cytology and differentiation (0.12 and 0.13, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic tests that are most likely to rule out PJI include serum IL-6, serum C-reactive protein, and synovial fluid cytology. On the other hand, the diagnostic test that is most likely to confirm PJI is implant sonication. Nuclear imaging showed low overall accuracy as diagnostic tests for PJI. The findings of this study could enable clinicians to confirm or rule out PJIs using the most accurate, rapid, least invasive, and cost-effective tools available, thereby enabling fast treatment before formation of resistant biofilms and degradation of patient conditions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review, Level IV.

The Rule of Histology in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Infection: Specific Granulocyte Counting Methods and New Immunohistologic Staining Techniques may Increase the Diagnostic Value

Objective:

The current study investigates the diagnostic accuracy of the criteria described for frozen sections and whether modern leukocyte specific staining techniques including leukocyte peroxidase and Naphtol-AS-D-chloroacetate-esterase will improve the accuracy of the intra-operative histology.

Method:

77 patients undergoing revision total hip and knee arthroplasty were included in this retrospective study. Patients were grouped into septic and aseptic based on intraoperative cultures. Tissue samples were analyzed utilizing the Mirra, Feldman, Lonner, Banit and Athanasou criteria.

Results:

An experienced pathologist had a high specificity (96%), but rather low sensitivity (57%) diagnosing infection. By using the Banit-, Mirra-, or Athanasou-criteria the sensitivity is increased to 0.90. The Feldman- and Lonner-criteria have a lower sensitivity (0.48 and 0.38), however, an increased specificity of 0.96 and 0.98, respectively. The Banit cut off has the highest accuracy (86%). MPOX and NACE staining increased the sensitivity and accuracy up to 100% and 92% respectively.

Conclusion:

Banit’s cut off is the most accurate histologic criteria to diagnose infection. Modern leukocyte specific staining techniques slightly improve the accuracy. The synovial fluid white blood cell count appears to be the most accurate intraoperative test.

Prosthetic Device Infections

The immunocompromised host is a particularly vulnerable population in whom routine and unusual infections can easily and frequently occur. Prosthetic devices are commonly used in these patients and the infections associated with those devices present a number of challenges for both the microbiologist and the clinician. Biofilms play a major role in device-related infections, which may contribute to failed attempts to recover organisms from routine culture methods. Moreover, device-related microorganisms can be difficult to eradicate by antibiotic therapy alone. Changes in clinical practice and advances in laboratory diagnostics have provided significant improvements in the detection and accurate diagnosis of device-related infections. Disruption of the bacterial biofilm plays an essential role in recovering the causative agent in culture. Various culture and nucleic acid amplification techniques are more accurate to guide directed treatment regimens. This chapter reviews the performance characteristics of currently available diagnostic assays and summarizes published guidelines, where available, for addressing suspected infected prosthetic devices.

Prospective Comparison of Blood Culture Bottles and Conventional Swabs for Microbial Identification of Suspected Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BACKGROUND

Early, accurate detection of infection is vital to successful treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Currently, no "gold standard" diagnostic testing exists. The goal of this prospective study was to compare the efficacy of a blood culture bottle system (BCBS) to commonly used culture swabs in confirming PJI in patients with high clinical suspicion.

METHODS

Patients were selected for enrollment based on Musculoskeletal Infection Society guidelines for PJI. erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein were obtained before aspiration. Aspirated fluid was divided between BCBS, swab, and synovial fluid analysis. Forty-nine samples were analyzed.

RESULTS

BCBS yielded 41 positive cultures vs 19 with swab (P < .0001), particularly with respect to Staphylococcus epidermidis. There were no false positive results in the BCBS group, using strict Musculoskeletal Infection Society guidelines.

CONCLUSION

BCBS increased identification of pathogens in lower extremity PJI, providing clinicians with a low-cost, broadly-applicable test.

Quantification of neutrophil polymorphs in infected and noninfected second-stage revision hip arthroplasties

AIMS

In the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), a heavy neutrophil polymorph (NP) infiltrate (&gt;5 per high-power field [HPF] by MSIS criteria) is characteristically seen in periprosthetic tissues. PJI is commonly treated by a two-stage procedure with surgical clearance of infected tissues followed by intensive antibiotic treatment before re-implantation; tissues are sampled at the time of second stage but whether MSIS histological criteria can be used to diagnose the presence or absence of infection in second stage samples has not been established.

METHODS

Periprosthetic tissues from 31 cases of second-stage revision hip arthroplasty (including 3 cases fulfilling the microbiological MSIS criteria for PJI), were analysed histologically after haematoxylin-eosin and chloroacetate esterase (CAE) staining. The extent of the NP infiltrate was determined semiquantitatively and correlated with the microbiological diagnosis.

RESULTS

CAE staining facilitated identification of NPs in arthroplasty tissues and showed that in those cases where an organism was cultured in 2 or more samples, meeting the MSIS microbiological criteria for definite diagnosis of PJI, there was a heavy polymorph infiltrate (&gt;5 NP per HPF on average). It was noted that isolated or scattered NPs were seen in 42.8% of periprosthetic tissues from noninfected second-stage revisions.

CONCLUSIONS

The MSIS histological criteria which support a diagnosis of PJI in specimens from a primary revision hip arthroplasty (i.e. &gt;5 NPs per HPF on average) are also valid for the assessment of a second-stage specimens. NPs can be seen in samples of periprosthetic tissue from uninfected second-stage revisions, indicating that strict histological criteria should be used in evaluating their significance in this context.

Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty has been one of the major challenges in orthopedic surgery. As there is no single absolute test for diagnosis of PJI, diagnostic criteria for PJI have been proposed that include using several diagnostic modalities. Focused history, physical examination, plain radiographs, and initial serologic tests should be followed by joint aspiration and synovial analysis. Newer diagnostic techniques, such as alpha-defensin and interleukin-6, hold great promise in the future diagnosis of equivocal infections.

Are Frozen Sections and MSIS Criteria Reliable at the Time of Reimplantation of Two-stage Revision Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Frozen section histology is widely used to aid in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection at the second stage of revision arthroplasty, although there are limited data regarding its utility. Moreover, there is no definitive method to assess control of infection at the time of reimplantation. Because failure of a two-stage revision can have serious consequences, it is important to identify the cases that might fail and defer reimplantation if necessary. Thus, a reliable test providing information about the control of infection and risk of subsequent failure is necessary.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) At second-stage reimplantation surgery, what is the diagnostic accuracy of frozen sections as compared with the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) as the gold standard? (2) What are the diagnostic accuracy parameters for the MSIS criteria and frozen sections in predicting failure of reimplantation? (3) Do positive MSIS criteria or frozen section at the time of reimplantation increase the risk of subsequent failure?

METHODS

A total of 97 patients undergoing the second stage of revision total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty in 2013 for a diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) were considered eligible for the study. Of these, 11 had incomplete MSIS criteria and seven lacked 1-year followup, leaving 79 patients (38 knees and 41 hips) available for analysis. At the time of reimplantation, frozen section results were compared with modified MSIS criteria as the gold standard in detecting infection. Subsequently, success or failure of reimplantation was defined by (1) control of infection, as characterized by a healed wound without fistula, drainage, or pain; (2) no subsequent surgical intervention for infection after reimplantation surgery; and (3) no occurrence of PJI-related mortality; and diagnostic parameters in predicting treatment failure were calculated for both the modified MSIS criteria and frozen sections.

RESULTS

At the time of second-stage reimplantation surgery, frozen section is useful in ruling in infection, where the specificity is 94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89%-99%); however, there is less utility in ruling out infection, because sensitivity is only 50% (CI, 13%-88%). Both the MSIS criteria and frozen sections have high specificity for ruling in failure of reimplantation (MSIS criteria specificity: 96% [CI, 91%-100%]; frozen section: 95% [CI, 88%-100%]), but screening capabilities are limited (MSIS sensitivity: 26% [CI, 9%-44%]; frozen section: 22% [CI, 9%-29%]). Positive MSIS criteria at the time of reimplantation were a risk factor for subsequent failure (hazard ratio [HR], 5.22 [1.64-16.62], p = 0.005), whereas positive frozen section was not (HR, 1.16 [0.15-8.86], p = 0.883).

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of our results, both frozen section and MSIS are recommended at the time of the second stage of revision arthroplasty. Both frozen section and modified MSIS criteria had limited screening capabilities to identify failure, although both demonstrated high specificity. MSIS criteria should be evaluated at the second stage of revision arthroplasty because performing reimplantation in a joint that is positive for infection significantly increases the risk for subsequent failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Diagnosis of infected total hip arthroplasty

Despite the battery of available tests, the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a challenge. A comprehensive medical history and physical examination with appropriate radiographs followed by erythrocyte sedimentation rate and serum C-reactive protein are the first-line screening test for patients with suspected hip PJI. The second line of investigation of patients with abnormal serology or a strong suspicion for PJI, is joint aspiration. Aspirates should be sent for assessment of white blood cell count, polymorphonuclear percentage, leukocyte esterase strip test, and microbiology. If the first attempt fails, the joint should be re-aspirated at a different time. The International Consensus recommends against infiltration of saline or other fluids into a "dry" joint. In patients not planned for surgery but need further evaluation for PJI, a nuclear imaging study may help. In others with a planned revision surgery, intraoperative samples for frozen section and culture study are the best measures available. Treatment strategies for PJI are well established in the literature. Poor surgical candidates receive oral suppressive antibiotic therapy alone. Acute PJI, presenting within 4 weeks of the index surgery, or as a result of bacteraemia, may be treated with irrigation and debridement and implant retention. Chronic PJI, occurring more than 4 weeks after initial surgery, is treated with 1-stage or 2-stage revision arthroplasty. In some persistent infections or patients who refuse to undergo revision surgery, salvage procedures may be needed.

Utility of Fresh Frozen Section Analysis in Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Pilot Study

The use of intraoperative fresh frozen section (FFS) analysis to determine the presence of infection has been well reported in orthopedic studies. Specifically, the number of polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high-power field has been used to diagnose total joint arthroplasty-related infection. Less commonly, reconstructive surgeons have extended the use of FFS analysis for intraoperative evaluation when suspicion of deep infection with or without hardware is high. The purpose of the present study was to retrospectively review the data from 11 patients undergoing foot and ankle reconstruction in the setting of possible deep infection and determine the usefulness of FFS analysis. A retrospective review of the medical records of patients who had undergone reconstructive foot and ankle revision surgery with intraoperative FFS analysis and tissue/swab cultures available was performed. A positive FFS was defined as >5 polymorphonuclear leukocytes per high-power field. A positive frozen section was associated with a positive tissue culture 4 of 7 times (57%). The sensitivity and specificity of FFS analysis for infection was 80% and 50%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive value of the FFS result was 57.1% and 75%, respectively. In conclusion, FFS analysis and intraoperative cultures correlated only 57% of the time in the present series. This test had moderate sensitivity for detecting infection at 80%, but the specificity was poor (50%). More research is needed to further evaluate the role of FFS analysis in foot and ankle surgery.

Histological analysis of surgical samples and a proposed scoring system for infections in intervertebral discs

Back pain remains one the most prevalent types of pain and disability worldwide. Infection is estimated to be the underlying cause in approximately 0.01% of patients. Despite recent evidence demonstrating prominent infection rates, a standardised algorithm for diagnosis of disc infection is lacking. Histopathological evaluation can aid in confirming inflammatory changes and also in identifying degenerative changes. Hence, standardising practice through a clear scoring system with regards to inflammation and degeneration may have some utility in the clinical setting. To our knowledge no such systems exist specifically for intervertebral disc infection. A literature review of current methods of scoring inflammation and degeneration in spine surgery and orthopaedic surgery was performed. Based on the current evidence, a scoring system for disc inflammatory and degenerative changes was proposed. We propose four domains for consideration: (1) granulation tissue, (2) dense fibrosis, (3) chronic inflammatory cells, and (4) neutrophil count. The non-standardised nature of diagnosing infections and degeneration in the spinal surgery literature means that this scoring system is currently of particular value. Based on a literature review, our proposed method for diagnosis incorporates a combination of histopathological criteria expected to increase diagnostic sensitivity in the setting of disc infection. Overall, scoring can be applied to surgically obtained material and integrated directly into routine pathological practice.

Periprosthetic joint infection

Periprosthetic joint infections are a devastating complication after arthroplasty and are associated with substantial patient morbidity. More than 25% of revisions are attributed to these infections, which are expected to increase. The increased prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and other comorbidities are some of the reasons for this increase. Recognition of the challenge of surgical site infections in general, and periprosthetic joint infections particularly, has prompted implementation of enhanced prevention measures preoperatively (glycaemic control, skin decontamination, decolonisation, etc), intraoperatively (ultraclean operative environment, blood conservation, etc), and postoperatively (refined anticoagulation, improved wound dressings, etc). Additionally, indications for surgical management have been refined. In this Review, we assess risk factors, preventive measures, diagnoses, clinical features, and treatment options for prosthetic joint infection. An international consensus meeting about such infections identified the best practices and further research needs. Orthopaedics could benefit from enhanced preventive, diagnostic, and treatment methods.

Cut-off values of latent infection in patients with rapid migration following bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Although most patients achieve favorable results following bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty (BHA), some experience rapid migration of the prosthesis. We retrospectively reviewed 18 patients with BHA that necessitated revision.

METHODS

We examined soft tissues obtained from periprosthetic lesions. In total, 18 patients with pain and acetabular migration of the BHA prosthesis were included. The patients were divided into a polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN)-positive (≥5 PMNs per high-power field [HPF]) and PMN-negative (<5 PMNs/HPF) group.

RESULTS

Pathological findings showed that 11 patients were PMN-positive, which was indicative of infection. All patients in the PMN-positive group showed no polyethylene particles or foreign body giant cells, while all patients in the PMN-negative group showed polyethylene debris or foreign body giant cells (p < 0.001). BHA survival, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) hip score were significantly different between the PMN-positive and PMN-negative group (p < 0.01). A BHA survival cut-off value of 3270 days was diagnostic for PMN positivity (sensitivity: 100%; specificity: 100%). The cut-off values for CRP and the JOA hip score were 0.43 mg/dl and 56 points, respectively. Four of 11 PMN-positive patients showed no clinical symptoms of infection (asymptomatic PMN-positive group). BHA survival, CRP levels, and JOA hip scores were significantly different between the asymptomatic PMN-positive and PMN-negative group (p < 0.05). A BHA survival cut-off of 3270 days was diagnostic for asymptomatic PMN positivity (sensitivity: 100%; specificity: 100%). The cut-off values for CRP and the JOA hip score were 0.43 mg/dl and 57 points, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that some portion of rapid BHA prosthesis migration is caused by mild infection. Careful pathological examination should be performed to identify infection before removal of the BHA prosthesis in patients who develop migration within 9 years.

Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Infection: Novel Developments

The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has been performed by obtaining a history and physical examination, blood tests, and analysis of the synovial fluid and tissue samples. The measurement of serum biomarkers are routinely used to diagnose PJI. These markers may be elevated in other inflammatory conditions, necessitating the need for more specific biomarkers to diagnose PJI. Serum biomarkers may be more specific to PJI. Synovial CRP, α-defensin, human β-defensin-2 and -3, leukocyte esterase, and cathelicidin LL-37 biomarkers hold promise for the diagnosis of PJI.

A protocol for a systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of blood markers, synovial fluid, and tissue testing in periprosthetic joint infections (PJI)

BACKGROUND

Total joint replacement (TJR) procedures have been one of the most rewarding interventions for treating patients suffering from joint disease. However, developing a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication that is associated with the highest burden of cost and reduction in patients' quality of life compared to other complications following TJRs. One of the main challenges facing clinicians who are treating PJIs is accurately diagnosing infection in a timely fashion. Multiple orthopedic associations have published clinical guidelines for diagnosing PJI which are based solely on consensus approaches, expert opinions, and narrative reviews. We believe that a higher quality of scientific rigor is necessary to establish a diagnostic guideline that represents current evidence more accurately and that identifies important knowledge gaps in PJI diagnosis. Therefore, we will conduct a systematic review on diagnostic performance of blood markers, synovial fluids, and tissue tests for diagnosing PJI.

METHODS/DESIGN

Electronic search strategies will be developed and tested by an experienced medical information specialist in consultation with the review team, and gray literature will be searched using the checklist from CADTH's Grey Matters Light. Two reviewers will independently screen the literature for inclusion using the prespecified eligibility criteria. Non-English language and animal-only studies will be excluded. Quality assessment and data extractions by reviewers will be verified, and disagreements will be resolved through consensus or third party adjudication. We will assess the quality of individual studies using the QUADAS-2 tool and use GRADE to summarize the strength of body of evidence. Analyses of evidence will be conducted in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Diagnostic Test Accuracy Reviews.

DISCUSSION

We will conduct a systemic review of tests (blood markers, synovial fluids, and tissue testing) for diagnosing PJI in patients' knee, hip, and shoulder joint replacements. This will be the first scientifically rigorous and comprehensive systematic review in the field and may feed into an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. We will compare the findings of this review with the consensus-based guides and discuss the differences, similarities, and knowledge gaps.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42015023768.

Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Non-Modular Cementless Long-Stem Distal Fixation for Salvage of Failed Internal Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fracture

Thirty one patients were treated with salvage total hip arthroplasty (THA) for failed internal fixation of intertrochanteric fracture. After a mean follow-up of 47.5 months, all patients reported remarkable pain relief and return to ambulation. Twenty five patients had no pain, and 6 patients complained of residual trochanteric low-grade pain without compromise of activities. The Harris Hip score increased from a preoperative average of 28.4 points to a postoperative average of 85.6 points. All patients demonstrated successful bony union and five had Brooker I or II heterotopic ossification. Seven patients had intraoperative or early complications and were treated successfully. There was no infection, re-fracture, loosening, or revision for any reason. Salvage THA using non-modular cementless long-stem prosthesis represents an effective procedure after failed intertrochanteric fixation.

Occult Infection in Aseptic Joint Loosening and the Diagnostic Role of Implant Sonication

Our aim was to determine the incidence of occult infection and to examine the role of ultrasound sonication of the implants in cases of presumed aseptic loosening in a prospective trial. Joint swabs, aspirates, and deep tissue samples were obtained from around the prosthesis for routine microbiology. Each prosthesis was sonicated and the sonicate examined with Gram staining and extended cultures. There were 106 joints in the study of which 54 were revised for aseptic loosening and 52 were assigned to the control revision group. There were 9 positive cultures with 8/54 positive cultures in the aseptic loosening group and 1/52 in the control revision group (p = 0.017, associated OR 47.7). We found concordant results between sonication fluid culture and conventional samples in 5/9 cultures. Preoperative inflammatory markers were not prognostic for infection. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was the most commonly cultured organism (7/9). Previously unrecognised infection was present in 15% of patients undergoing revision for aseptic loosening. Ultrasound sonication of the removed prosthesis was less sensitive than conventional sampling techniques. We recommend routine intraoperative sampling for patients having revision for aseptic loosening, but we do not support the routine use of ultrasound sonication for its detection.

Evaluation of the Role for Synovial Aspiration in the Diagnosis of Aseptic Loosening After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Aseptic prosthetic loosening is known to be an inflammatory, cellular process. We hypothesized that the synovial cell count would significantly differ among normal controls, patients with aseptic loosening, and patients with other etiologies of aseptic failure after total knee arthroplasty and thus that the cell count would be useful in the diagnosis of aseptic loosening.

METHODS

Over a six-year time period, all patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasties at our institution underwent prospective intraoperative aspiration by the two senior authors. Each patient was assigned to a failure category on the basis of a priori criteria: aseptic loosening, periprosthetic infection, component wear, periprosthetic fracture, component malposition, instability, stiffness, and extensor mechanism failure. Simultaneously, patients with well-functioning total knee replacements underwent aspiration as normal controls. Aspirate characteristics were then compared between groups. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were created to determine optimal white blood-cell cutoffs when periprosthetic infection was compared with each individual failure category.

RESULTS

Thirty normal control patients and 433 patients who underwent revision total knee arthroplasties were included in this study. The synovial white blood-cell count in the normal control group was 558 ± 522 cells/μL, which did not significantly differ (p = 0.091) from that taken from patients with aseptic loosening (947 ± 1027 cells/μL). However, normal controls had significantly higher white blood-cell counts than subjects with stiffness (367 ± 392 cells/μL; p = 0.002) and significantly lower white blood-cell counts than subjects with periprosthetic fractures (1687 ± 1613 cells/μL; p = 0.002). Subjects with aseptic loosening had significantly higher white blood-cell counts than subjects with component malpositioning (p = 0.002) or stiffness (p = 0.001). When individual aseptic failure categories were compared with periprosthetic infection, the optimal white blood-cell cutoff varied widely, including 2104 cells/μL for component malposition and 4697 cells/μL for periprosthetic fracture, and the optimal differential segmented cell count percentages varied from 47% to 83%.

CONCLUSIONS

Although synovial fluid aspirates in patients with aseptic loosening and those with normal total knee arthroplasties did not differ, synovial fluid aspirate characteristics differed among categories of aseptic failure. As a result, the optimal diagnosis of periprosthetic infection on the basis of synovial aspiration results may need to utilize different cutoff values depending on the alternative mode of failure being considered. Large prospective studies will be necessary to validate these threshold values.

[Hip arthroplasty in the presence of proximal femoral deformity]

INTRODUCTION

Proximal femoral deformities may result in pain in the ipsilateral hip joint and profound functional disability, ultimately requiring arthroplasty. 

PROCEDURE

Primary hip replacement procedures in the presence of markedly altered anatomy of the proximal femur present a technical challenge for the orthopedic surgeon. The deformity and its underlying condition, whether congenital or acquired, may complicate canal preparation and affect the choices of implant, exposure and postoperative physiotherapy protocol. Furthermore, a two- or multi-stage treatment may be required, e.g. for implant removal, for femoral osteotomy or to rule out infection.

DISCUSSION

Treatment strategies must be individually tailored, respecting patient needs, the etiology, the anatomic site and the geometry of the deformity encountered, bone quality, soft tissue deficits, the presence of retained implants in the proximal femur, infection status and comorbidities.

How accurate are orthopedic surgeons in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty?: A multicenter study

BACKGROUND

The lack of standardized diagnostic criteria for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) poses a challenge to accurate diagnosis of PJI. Recently, the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) proposed diagnostic criteria for PJI. However, it is not known how well these proposed criteria accommodate real clinical scenarios. We determined what proportion of patients satisfied the MSIS criteria, and if MSIS criteria were not met, what other rationales were used to diagnose PJI.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 303 patients who underwent two-stage exchange arthroplasty for treatment of PJI of the knee at 17 institutions. The rationale for making the diagnosis of PJI was also recorded, if the case did not meet the MSIS criteria. In addition, detailed information about isolated microorganisms were gathered.

RESULTS

Among the 303 patients, 198 met the diagnostic criteria proposed by MSIS. Among the 105 patients who did not meet the MSIS criteria, 88% met two or three minor criteria; however joint fluid analysis or histologic analysis was not performed in 85% of these 105 patients. The most common rationale for the diagnosis of PJI was the presence of abnormal physical findings. Microorganisms were identified in only 52% of all patients; the most common organism was coagulase-negative Staphylococcus.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis of PJI was based on clinical suspicion in approximately one-third of cases. In this series, joint aspiration or histological analysis was not performed in a large number of patients. Thus, surgeons should perform joint fluid and histologic analysis to assure the accuracy of PJI diagnosis.

Clinical utility of antibiotic-loaded hydroxyapatite block for treatment of intractable periprosthetic joint infection and septic arthritis of the hip

OBJECTIVE

Antibiotic-loaded hydroxyapatite block (AHAB) allows gradual release of antibiotics for long duration without thermal damage and, therefore, is potentially a more effective antibacterial spacer than antibiotic-loaded polymethylmethacrylate cement (ALAC). The purposes of this study are to assess the utility of AHAB for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) or septic arthritis (SA) of the hip and to assess the potency of AHAB and ALAC in vitro.

METHODS

AHAB was utilized in two-stage reconstruction surgery for 20 PJI and 7 SA patients. Clinical success was confirmed if the patients did not show any sign of recurrence of infection during the follow-up period. Duration and amount of active vancomycin (VCM) released from AHAB and ALAC spacer were investigated in vitro.

RESULTS

Two-stage reconstruction using AHAB significantly improved hip function and showed 100% clinical success with mean follow-up of 37 months. The in vitro duration of the active effect of VCM released from AHAB (21 days) was longer than that from ALAC (7 days) and the amount of active VCM released from AHAB was higher than that from ALAC.

CONCLUSIONS

AHAB promises to release higher amounts of active VCM for longer durations than ALAC; therefore, it is a promising treatment for intractable PJI or SA.

Use of chloroacetate esterase staining for the histological diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection

A heavy neutrophil polymorph infiltrate [>5 per high-power field (HPF) after examination of at least 5 HPF by Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria] is characteristically seen in peri-implant tissues of infected prosthetic hip and knee joints. We determined whether chloroacetate esterase (CAE) staining facilitated the identification of neutrophil polymorphs in peri-implant tissues in cases of hip and knee arthroplasty infection and reassessed MSIS criteria in the light of our findings. Frozen and paraffin sections of peri-prosthetic tissues of 76 cases of failed hip and knee arthroplasties classified as septic or aseptic loosening microbiologically were analysed histologically by both haematoxylin-eosin and CAE staining. The extent of the neutrophil polymorph infiltrate was determined semiquantitatively and correlated with the microbiological and clinical diagnosis. CAE staining facilitated identification of neutrophil polymorphs in arthroplasty tissues. All cases of aseptic loosening contained fewer than two neutrophil polymorphs per HPF. CAE staining showed that in some cases of septic loosening, fewer than five neutrophil polymorphs per HPF (on average) are present in peri-prosthetic tissues. The histological criterion of more than two neutrophil polymorphs per HPF showed increased sensitivity and accuracy for the diagnosis of septic loosening. CAE is a useful stain that facilitates the identification of neutrophil polymorphs in both frozen and paraffin sections of peri-implant tissues. CAE staining shows that some microbiologically confirmed cases of septic loosening contain relatively few neutrophil polymorphs, indicating that the MSIS histological criterion of more than five neutrophil polymorphs per HPF is too high an index figure for the diagnosis of all cases of hip and knee arthroplasty infection.

Identification of periprosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty

Although total hip arthroplasty (THA) is accepted as one of the most successful surgical procedures in orthopaedic surgery, periprosthetic joint infection after THA continues to be one of the most devastating complications. However, accurate preoperative identification of periprosthetic joint infection in patients presenting with joint pain or radiographic periprosthetic lucencies is often difficult, even after a comprehensive work-up. The purpose of this article is to review the diagnostic options available to improve the management and results of this potentially catastrophic complication.

Diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection: has the era of the biomarker arrived?

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a serious clinical challenge. There is a pressing need for improved diagnostic testing methods; biomarkers offer one potentially promising approach.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We evaluated the diagnostic characteristics of 16 promising synovial fluid biomarkers for the diagnosis of PJI.

METHODS

Synovial fluid was collected from 95 patients meeting the inclusion criteria of this prospective diagnostic study. All patients were being evaluated for a revision hip or knee arthroplasty, including patients with systemic inflammatory disease and those already receiving antibiotic treatment. The Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) definition was used to classify 29 PJIs and 66 aseptic joints. Synovial fluid samples were tested by immunoassay for 16 biomarkers optimized for use in synovial fluid. Sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were performed to assess for diagnostic performance.

RESULTS

Five biomarkers, including human α-defensin 1-3, neutrophil elastase 2, bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, and lactoferrin, correctly predicted the MSIS classification of all patients in this study, with 100% sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of PJI. An additional eight biomarkers demonstrated excellent diagnostic strength, with an area under the curve of greater than 0.9.

CONCLUSIONS

Synovial fluid biomarkers exhibit a high accuracy in diagnosing PJI, even when including patients with systemic inflammatory disease and those receiving antibiotic treatment. Considering that these biomarkers match the results of the more complex MSIS definition of PJI, we believe that synovial fluid biomarkers can be a valuable addition to the methods utilized for the diagnosis of infection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, diagnostic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Utility of intraoperative frozen section in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection

PURPOSE

Intraoperative frozen section (FS) is an effective diagnostic test for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). We evaluated the diagnostic characteristics of single- and multiplex-site intraoperative FS, and evaluated the results of single-site FS combined with those of C-reactive protein (CRP) level and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for assessing PJI.

METHODS

We studied 156 painful joint arthroplasties in 152 consecutive patients presenting for revision total joint arthroplasty due to PJI. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine the optimal cutoff values for CRP level, ESR, and intraoperative FS histopathology. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of the diagnostic tests were assessed using a 2×2 table.

RESULTS

We investigated the diagnostic utility of polymorphonuclear leukocyte number (PMN) per high-power field (HPF) on FS. Our data showed that 5 PMNs per HPF is a suitable diagnostic threshold, with a high accuracy in single- and multiplex-site FS. Five PMNs in any 1 of 5 sites had the highest sensitivity of 0.86 and a specificity of 0.96. Five PMNs in every 1 of 5 sites had greater diagnostic utility, with a specificity of 1; however, the sensitivity of this measure fell to 0.62. Five PMNs in single-site FS had a sensitivity of 0.70 and a specificity of 0.94. Five PMNs in single-site FS or CRP level ≥15 mg/L increased the sensitivity to 0.92; however, the specificity decreased to 0.79.

CONCLUSION

Compared with single-site FS, any 1 positive site on multiplex-site FS may improve sensitivity, while every 1 positive site on multiplex-site FS may improve specificity. Five PMNs in any 1 of 5 sites on FS has excellent utility for the diagnosis of PJI. Additional systematic large-scale studies are needed to verify this result.

Prosthetic joint infection

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a tremendous burden for individual patients as well as the global health care industry. While a small minority of joint arthroplasties will become infected, appropriate recognition and management are critical to preserve or restore adequate function and prevent excess morbidity. In this review, we describe the reported risk factors for and clinical manifestations of PJI. We discuss the pathogenesis of PJI and the numerous microorganisms that can cause this devastating infection. The recently proposed consensus definitions of PJI and approaches to accurate diagnosis are reviewed in detail. An overview of the treatment and prevention of this challenging condition is provided.

Correlation of aspiration results with periprosthetic sepsis in revision total hip arthroplasty

A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients who had undergone revision total hip arthroplasty with a synovial aspiration with greater than 100 WBC since the institution of our electronic medical record. Infection was defined using a combination of criteria. A diagnosis of periprosthetic sepsis was established in 52 of the 253 included hips. No significant differences existed with respect to gender, age, BMI, Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index, or the cause of initial hip degeneration. Using receiver-operating characteristic curves accuracy was maximized for WBC of 745 or segmented cell count of 73.5% with a sensitivity of 98%, specificity of 37%, negative predictive value of 99% and accuracy of 50%. Application of the current American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery Clinical Practice Guidelines (AAOS CPG) thresholds revealed a similar accuracy of 49%.

Indicators for detection of septic arthritis in the acutely swollen joint cohort of those without joint prostheses

Differentiating septic arthritis from culture-negative, acute atraumatic joint effusion is difficult. Studies have attempted to elucidate factors that herald infection, but, due to overlap, most conclude that the diagnosis ultimately relies on clinical judgment. Furthermore, studies are limited by broad inclusion criteria. The current retrospective case study sought to examine (1) which markers differentiate a culture-positive septic joint from culture-negative effusion in patients suspicious for infection despite no growth on Gram stain and without previous surgery in the affected joint and (2) whether threshold values of these markers exist that predict septic arthritis. The study was performed by reviewing records of those who underwent operative irrigation and debridement involving the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, knee, and ankle. Patients were included if they were older than 18 years and had an acutely swollen/painful joint and no organisms on initial Gram stain. Exclusion criteria were lack of serum markers or synovial fluid aspirate, antibiotics within 1 week, adjacent wound or skin infection, recent trauma to the joint, and previous joint infection or surgery to the joint. Several clinical, serological, and synovial parameters were collected and analyzed using paired t test with Bonferonni correction. Serum C-reactive protein was the only significantly different variable between groups. Serum C-reactive protein greater than 10.5 mg/dL was predictive of infection. In those suspicious for infection despite no growth on Gram stain and without previous surgery in the affected joint, C-reactive protein greater than 10.5 mg/dL is suspicious for joint sepsis and should warrant consideration for urgent irrigation and debridement.

The painful total hip replacement: diagnosis and deliverance

Total hip replacement (THR) is a very common procedure undertaken in up to 285 000 Americans each year. Patient satisfaction with THR is very high, with improvements in general health, quality of life, and function while at the same time very cost effective. Although the majority of patients have a high degree of satisfaction with their THR, 27% experience some discomfort, and up to 6% experience severe chronic pain. Although it can be difficult to diagnose the cause of the pain in these patients, this clinical issue should be approached systematically and thoroughly. A detailed history and clinical examination can often provide the correct diagnosis and guide the appropriate selection of investigations, which will then serve to confirm the clinical diagnosis made.