Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: Focus On Sitagliptin

Glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: targets and new therapies

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a worldwide public health challenge. Despite the availability of many antidiabetes agents and pharmacotherapies targeting cardiovascular risk factors, the morbidity, mortality and economic consequences of T2DM are still a great burden to patients, society, health care systems and the economy. The need for new therapies for glycaemic control is compounded by the fact that existing treatments have limitations either because of their side effects (particularly weight gain and hypoglycaemia) or contraindications that limit their use. Furthermore, none of the current therapies have a significant impact on disease progression. Incretin-based therapies offer a new therapeutic approach to the management of T2DM, and there are also several even newer therapies in development. There are two groups of incretin-based therapies currently available; dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and GLP-1 analogues/mimetics. The former are given orally while the latter subcutaneously. These drugs result in glucose-dependent insulin secretion and glucose-dependent glucagon suppression, with consequent low risk of hypoglycaemia when used as mono- or combination therapy (except when used with sulphonylureas). In addition, they are either weight neutral in the case of DPP-4 inhibitors or cause weight loss in the case of incretin mimetics/analogues. Furthermore, animal studies have shown that these agents prolong beta cell survival which offers the theoretical possibility of slowing the progression to T2DM. In this article we will review the currently available antidiabetes agents with particular emphasis on incretin-based and future therapies. In addition, we will review and discuss the evidence relating to glycaemic control and cardiovascular disease.

Inhibition of DPP-4 with sitagliptin improves glycemic control and restores islet cell mass and function in a rodent model of type 2 diabetes

Inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) activity has been shown to improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes by prolonging and potentiating the actions of incretin hormones. This study is designed to determine the effects of the DPP-4 inhibitor sitagliptin on improving islet function in a mouse model of insulin resistance and insulin secretion defects. ICR mice were pre-treated with high fat diet and a low dose of streptozotocin to induce insulin resistance and impaired insulin secretion, respectively. Diabetic mice were treated with sitagliptin or the sulfonylurea agent glipizide as admixture to high fat diet for ten weeks. Sustained reduction of blood glucose, HbA(1c), circulating glucagon and improvement in oral glucose tolerance were observed in mice treated with sitagliptin. In contrast, glipizide improved glycemic control only during the early weeks and to a lesser degree compared to sitagliptin, and had no effect on circulating glucagon levels or glucose tolerance. The improvement in glycemic control in sitagliptin-treated mice was associated with a significant increase in glucose-dependent insulin secretion in both perfused pancreas and isolated islets. Importantly, in contrast to the lack of effect by glipizide, sitagliptin significantly restored beta and alpha cell mass as well as alpha/beta cell ratio. These data indicate that DPP-4 inhibition by sitagliptin provided better overall improvement of glycemic control compared to glipizide in the high fat diet/streptozotocin induced diabetic mouse model. The ability of sitagliptin to enhance islet cell function may offer insight into the potential for disease modification.

Efficacy and safety of initial combination therapy with sitagliptin and metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 54-week study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the 54-week efficacy and safety of initial combination therapy with sitagliptin and metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control (HbA(1c) 7.5-11%) on diet and exercise.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This was multinational study conducted at 140 clinical sites in 18 countries. Following an initial 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled period, patients entered a double-blind continuation period for an additional 30 weeks. Following the week 24 evaluation, patients remained on their previously assigned active, oral treatments: sitagliptin 50 mg b.i.d. + metformin 1000 mg b.i.d. (S100 + M2000), sitagliptin 50 mg b.i.d. + metformin 500 mg b.i.d. (S100 + M1000), metformin 1000 mg b.i.d. (M2000), metformin 500 mg b.i.d. (M1000), and sitagliptin 100 mg q.d. (S100). Patients initially randomized to placebo were switched to M2000 (designated PBO/M2000) at week 24. This report summarizes the overall safety and tolerability data for the 54-week study and presents efficacy results for patients randomized to continuous treatments who entered the 30-week continuation period.

RESULTS

Of the 1091 randomized patients, 906 completed the 24-week placebo-controlled phase and 885 patients continued into the 30-week continuation period (S100 + M2000 n = 161, S100+M1000 n = 160, M2000 n = 153, M1000 n = 147, S100 n = 141, PBO/M2000 n = 123). At baseline, patients included in the efficacy analysis had mean age of 54 years, mean BMI of 32 kg/m(2), mean HbA(1c) of 8.7% (8.5-8.8% across groups), and mean duration of type 2 diabetes of 4 years. At week 54, in the all-patients-treated analysis of continuing patients, least-squares (LS) mean changes in HbA(1c) from baseline were -1.8% (S100 + M2000), -1.4% (S100 + M1000), -1.3% (M2000), -1.0% (M1000), and -0.8% (S100). The proportions of continuing patients with an HbA(1c) < 7% at week 54 were 67% (S100 + M2000), 48% (S100 + M1000), 44% (M2000), 25% (M1000), and 23% (S100). For the patients completing treatment through week 54, LS mean changes in HbA(1c) from baseline were -1.9% (S100 + M2000), -1.7% (S100 + M1000), -1.6% (M2000), -1.2% (M1000), and -1.4% (S100). Glycemic response was generally durable over time across treatments. All treatments improved measures of beta-cell function (e.g., HOMA-beta, proinsulin/insulin ratio). Mean body weight decreased from baseline in the combination and metformin monotherapy groups and was unchanged from baseline in the sitagliptin monotherapy group. The incidence of hypoglycemia was low (1-3%) across treatment groups. The incidence of gastrointestinal adverse experiences with the co-administration of sitagliptin and metformin was similar to that observed with metformin alone.

LIMITATIONS

The patient population evaluated in the 54-week efficacy analysis was a population of patients who entered the continuation period without receiving glycemic rescue therapy in the 24-week placebo-controlled period. Because the baseline HbA(1c) inclusion criteria ranged from 7.5 to 11% and the glycemic rescue criterion was an HbA(1c) > 8% after week 24, there was a greater likelihood of glycemic rescue in the monotherapy groups; this led to more missing data in the continuation all-patients-treated population(CAPT) analysis and fewer patients contributing to the completers analysis in the monotherapy groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, initial treatment with sitagliptin, metformin, or the combination therapy of sitagliptin and metformin provided substantial and durable glycemic control, improved markers of beta-cell function, and was generally well-tolerated over 54 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes.

New combination treatments in the management of diabetes: focus on sitagliptin-metformin

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is an increasingly prevalent condition worldwide. The complications of this disease are known to significantly increase the morbidity and mortality of those affected, resulting in substantial direct and indirect costs. Although good glycemic control has been shown to reduce the incidence and progression of diabetes-related microvascular complications, blood glucose levels are not adequately controlled in most individuals with diabetes. The reasons for this are many, and include issues such as poor adherence to complex medication regimes; costs of prescribed therapies; and the failure of traditionally prescribed medications to preserve beta cell function over time. However, our armamentarium of glucose-lowering drugs has expanded recently with the development of medications that act via the incretin pathway. Sitagliptin, the first commercially available dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, inhibits the metabolism and inactivation of the incretin hormones GLP-1 and GIP. The subsequent elevation in levels of these hormones and associated prolongation of their actions has been shown to increase insulin secretion and suppress glucagon secretion in a glucose-appropriate fashion. Sitagliptin therapy in individuals with type 2 diabetes has been found to lower significantly hemoglobin A1c (Hb1c) levels with a minimum of adverse side effects such as weight gain or hypoglycemia. Use of sitagliptin in conjunction with the insulin-sensitizing medication metformin has been shown to decrease HbA1c levels more significantly than does either drug alone. This combination of medications is generally well tolerated, with no adverse effects on weight and a very low likelihood of treatment-related hypoglycemia. Use of both drugs will positively affect many of the underlying metabolic abnormalities associated with type 2 diabetes, including the disordered secretion of insulin and glucagon as well as impaired sensitivity to insulin which are known to accompany this disease. Animal studies also suggest that dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor treatment may help to preserve beta cell mass; however, it is unclear at present whether or not this will prove to be the case in humans.

Sitagliptin: an oral agent for glucose control

Sitagliptin (Januvia™) is a new oral agent approved by the US FDA to treat Type 2 diabetes. This is the first approved agent in a new class of antihyperglycemics, dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors. Sitagliptin selectively inhibits the action of DPP-4, the primary enzyme degrading the incretin hormones, allowing glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide to facilitate glucose regulation in response to a meal. Studies demonstrate that sitagliptin decreases hemaglobin A1c, postprandial glucose excursion and fasting plasma glucose. Sitagliptin presents some advantages over other drugs used in the management of diabetes. One advantage is its oral administration; another, is its low incidence of hypoglycemia, similar to that of a placebo. Sitagliptin has a low incidence of adverse events, consisting of stomach discomfort, diarrhea, upper respiratory infection, stuffy or runny nose, sore throat and headache. Unlike many other drugs used to treat diabetes, sitagliptin does not cause weight gain. Animal studies have shown that it can help prevent β-cell apoptosis and improve β-cell functioning; therefore, it may have a role in preventing diabetes, although human data are currently lacking.

Safety and tolerability of sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a pooled analysis

BACKGROUND

Sitagliptin, a highly selective dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, is the first in a new class of oral antihyperglycemic agents (AHAs) for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes. Type 2 diabetes is a life-long disease requiring chronic treatment and management. Therefore, robust assessment of the long-term safety and tolerability of newer therapeutic agents is of importance. The purpose of this analysis was to assess the safety and tolerability of sitagliptin by pooling 12 large, double-blind, Phase IIb and III studies up to 2 years in duration.

METHODS

This analysis included 6139 patients with type 2 diabetes receiving either sitagliptin 100 mg/day (N = 3415) or a comparator agent (placebo or an active comparator) (N = 2724; non-exposed group). The 12 studies from which this pooled population was drawn represent the double-blind, randomized, Phase IIB and III studies that included patients treated with the clinical dose of sitagliptin (100 mg/day) for at least 18 weeks up to 2 years and that were available in a single safety database as of November 2007. These 12 studies assessed sitagliptin as monotherapy, initial combination therapy with metformin, or add-on combination therapy with other oral AHAs (metformin, pioglitazone, sulfonylurea, sulfonylurea + metformin, or metformin + rosiglitazone). Patients in the non-exposed group were taking placebo, pioglitazone, metformin, sulfonylurea, sulfonylurea + metformin, or metformin + rosiglitazone. This safety analysis used patient-level data from each study to evaluate clinical and laboratory adverse experiences.

RESULTS

For clinical adverse experiences, the incidence rates of adverse experiences overall, serious adverse experiences, and discontinuations due to adverse experiences were similar in the sitagliptin and non-exposed groups. The incidence rates of specific adverse experiences were also generally similar in the two groups, with the exception of an increased incidence rate of hypoglycemia observed in the non-exposed group. The incidence rates of drug-related adverse experiences overall and discontinuations due to drug-related adverse experiences were higher in the non-exposed group, primarily due to the increased incidence rate of hypoglycemia in this group. For cardiac- and ischemia-related adverse experiences (including serious events), there were no meaningful between-group differences. No meaningful differences between groups in laboratory adverse experiences, either summary measures or specific adverse experiences, were observed.

CONCLUSION

In patients with type 2 diabetes, sitagliptin 100 mg/day was well tolerated in clinical trials up to 2 years in duration.

Selective small-molecule agonists of G protein-coupled receptor 40 promote glucose-dependent insulin secretion and reduce blood glucose in mice

OBJECTIVE

Acute activation of G protein-coupled receptor 40 (GPR40) by free fatty acids (FFAs) or synthetic GPR40 agonists enhances insulin secretion. However, it is still a matter of debate whether activation of GPR40 would be beneficial for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, since chronic exposure to FFAs impairs islet function. We sought to evaluate the specific role of GPR40 in islets and its potential as a therapeutic target using compounds that specifically activate GPR40.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We developed a series of GPR40-selective small-molecule agonists and studied their acute and chronic effects on glucose-dependent insulin secretion (GDIS) in isolated islets, as well as effects on blood glucose levels during intraperitoneal glucose tolerance tests in wild-type and GPR40 knockout mice (GPR40(-/-)).

RESULTS

Small-molecule GPR40 agonists significantly enhanced GDIS in isolated islets and improved glucose tolerance in wild-type mice but not in GPR40(-/-) mice. While a 72-h exposure to FFAs in tissue culture significantly impaired GDIS in islets from both wild-type and GPR40(-/-) mice, similar exposure to the GPR40 agonist did not impair GDIS in islets from wild-type mice. Furthermore, the GPR40 agonist enhanced insulin secretion in perfused pancreata from neonatal streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats and improved glucose levels in mice with high-fat diet-induced obesity acutely and chronically.

CONCLUSIONS

GPR40 does not mediate the chronic toxic effects of FFAs on islet function. Pharmacological activation of GPR40 may potentiate GDIS in humans and be beneficial for overall glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Safety and efficacy of sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes and chronic renal insufficiency

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety of sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate [creatinine clearance (CrCl) > or =30 to <50 ml/min] or severe renal insufficiency [CrCl <30 ml/min including patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on dialysis]. The efficacy of sitagliptin in this patient population was also assessed.

METHODS

In a 54-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, patients with baseline glycosylated haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) values of 6.5-10% were allocated (2:1) to sitagliptin (for 54 weeks) or the sequence of placebo (for 12 weeks) followed by active treatment with glipizide (for 42 weeks). To achieve plasma concentrations similar to those observed in patients with normal renal function treated with 100 mg sitagliptin once daily, patients with moderate renal insufficiency were allocated to receive sitagliptin 50 mg once daily and patients with severe renal insufficiency to receive 25 mg once daily. Glipizide treatment was initiated at 2.5 or 5 mg/day and uptitrated to a maximum of 20 mg/day.

RESULTS

Patients (N = 91) with a mean baseline HbA(1c) value of 7.7% (range: 6.2-10.3%) were randomized to sitagliptin (n = 65) or placebo (n = 26). After 12 weeks, the mean change [95% confidence interval (CI)] from baseline in HbA(1c) was -0.6% (-0.8, -0.4) in the sitagliptin group compared with -0.2% (-0.4, 0.1) in the placebo group [between-group difference (95% CI) = -0.4% (-0.7, -0.1)]. At 54 weeks, patients continuously treated with sitagliptin had a mean change (95% CI) from baseline in HbA(1c) of -0.7% (-0.9, -0.4). The overall incidence of adverse experiences was generally similar between groups. Between-group differences in incidences of specific clinical adverse experiences were generally small; however, the proportion of patients for whom hypoglycaemia was reported was lower in the sitagliptin group (4.6%) compared with the placebo/glipizide group (23.1%). Consistent with the high mortality risk in this patient population, there were six deaths during this 54-week study [5 of 65 patients (7.7%) in the sitagliptin group and 1 of 26 patients (3.8%) in the placebo/glipizide group]; no death was considered by the investigator to be drug related. The overall incidences of drug-related and serious adverse experiences and discontinuations because of adverse experiences were generally similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, sitagliptin was generally well tolerated and provided effective glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate to severe renal insufficiency, including patients with ESRD on dialysis.

Comprehensive analysis of the mouse renal cortex using two-dimensional HPLC - tandem mass spectrometry

Background

Proteomic methodologies increasingly have been applied to the kidney to map the renal cortical proteome and to identify global changes in renal proteins induced by diseases such as diabetes. While progress has been made in establishing a renal cortical proteome using 1-D or 2-DE and mass spectrometry, the number of proteins definitively identified by mass spectrometry has remained surprisingly small. Low coverage of the renal cortical proteome as well as our interest in diabetes-induced changes in proteins found in the renal cortex prompted us to perform an in-depth proteomic analysis of mouse renal cortical tissue.

Results

We report a large scale analysis of mouse renal cortical proteome using SCX prefractionation strategy combined with HPLC – tandem mass spectrometry. High-confidence identification of ~2,000 proteins, including cytoplasmic, nuclear, plasma membrane, extracellular and unknown/unclassified proteins, was obtained by separating tryptic peptides of renal cortical proteins into 60 fractions by SCX prior to LC-MS/MS. The identified proteins represented the renal cortical proteome with no discernible bias due to protein physicochemical properties, subcellular distribution, biological processes, or molecular function. The highest ranked molecular functions were characteristic of tubular epithelium, and included binding, catalytic activity, transporter activity, structural molecule activity, and carrier activity. Comparison of this renal cortical proteome with published human urinary proteomes demonstrated enrichment of renal extracellular, plasma membrane, and lysosomal proteins in the urine, with a lack of intracellular proteins. Comparison of the most abundant proteins based on normalized spectral abundance factor (NSAF) in this dataset versus a published glomerular proteome indicated enrichment of mitochondrial proteins in the former and cytoskeletal proteins in the latter.

Conclusion

A whole tissue extract of the mouse kidney cortex was analyzed by an unbiased proteomic approach, yielding a dataset of ~2,000 unique proteins identified with strict criteria to ensure a high level of confidence in protein identification. As a result of extracting all proteins from the renal cortex, we identified an exceptionally wide range of renal proteins in terms of pI, MW, hydrophobicity, abundance, and subcellular location. Many of these proteins, such as low-abundance proteins, membrane proteins and proteins with extreme values in pI or MW are traditionally under-represented in 2-DE-based proteomic analysis.

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors for type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

In type 2 diabetes mellitus there is a progressive loss of beta-cell function. One new approach yielding promising results is the use of the orally active dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors like sitagliptin and vildagliptin.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Studies were obtained from computerised searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were included if they were randomised controlled trials in adult people with type 2 diabetes mellitus and had a trial duration of at least 12 weeks.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted data. Pooling of studies was performed by means of fixed-effect meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-five studies of good quality were identified, 11 trials evaluated sitagliptin and 14 trials vildagliptin treatment. Altogether, 6743 patients were randomised in sitagliptin and 6121 patients in vildagliptin studies, respectively. Sitagliptin and vildagliptin studies ranged from 12 to 52 weeks duration. No data were published on mortality, diabetic complications, costs of treatment and health-related quality of life. Sitagliptin and vildagliptin therapy in comparison with placebo resulted in an HbA1c reduction of approximately 0.7% and 0.6%, respectively. Data on comparisons with active comparators were limited but indicated no improved metabolic control following DPP-4 intervention in contrast to other hypoglycaemic agents. Sitagliptin and vildagliptin therapy did not result in weight gain but weight loss was more pronounced following placebo interventions. No definite conclusions could be drawn from published data on sitagliptin and vildagliptin effects on measurements of beta-cell function. Overall, sitagliptin and vildagliptin were well tolerated, no severe hypoglycaemia was reported in patients taking sitagliptin or vildagliptin. All-cause infections increased significantly after sitagliptin treatment but did not reach statistical significance following vildagliptin therapy. All published randomised controlled trials of at least 12 weeks treatment with sitagliptin and vildagliptin only reported routine laboratory safety measurements

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

DPP-4 inhibitors have some theoretical advantages over existing therapies with oral antidiabetic compounds but should currently be restricted to individual patients. Long-term data especially on cardiovascular outcomes and safety are urgently needed before widespread use of these new agents. More information on the benefit-risk ratio of DPP-4 inhibitor treatment is necessary especially analysing adverse effects on parameters of immune function. Also, long-term data are needed investigating patient-oriented parameters like health-related quality of life, diabetic complications and all-cause mortality.

Matrix metalloproteinase processing of CXCL11/I-TAC results in loss of chemoattractant activity and altered glycosaminoglycan binding

The CXCR3 chemokine receptor regulates the migration of Th1 lymphocytes and responds to three ligands: CXCL9/MIG, CXCL10/IP-10, and CXCL11/I-TAC. We screened for potential regulation of T cell responses by matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) processing of these important chemokines. The most potent of the CXCR3 ligands, CXCL11, was identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry as a substrate of the PMN-specific MMP-8, macrophage-specific MMP-12, and the general leukocyte MMP-9. The 73-amino acid residue CXCL11 is processed at both the amino and carboxyl termini to generate CXCL11-(5-73), -(5-63), and -(5-58) forms. NH2-terminal truncation results in loss of agonistic properties, as shown in calcium mobilization and chemotaxis experiments using CXCR3 transfectants and human T lymphocytes. Moreover, CXCL11-(5-73) is a CXCR3 antagonist and interestingly shows enhanced affinity to heparin. However, upon COOH-terminal truncation to position 58 there is loss of antagonist activity and heparin binding. Together this highlights an unexpected site for receptor interaction and that the carboxyl terminus is critical for glycosaminoglycan binding, an essential function for the formation of chemokine gradients in vivo. Hence, MMP activity might regulate CXCL11 tissue gradients in two ways. First, the potential of CXCL11-(5-73) to compete active CXCL11 from glycosaminoglycans might lead to the formation of an antagonistic haptotactic chemokine gradient. Second, upon further truncation, MMPs disperse the CXCL11 gradients in a novel way by proteolytic loss of a COOH-terminal GAG binding site. Hence, these results reveal potential new roles in down-regulating Th1 lymphocyte chemoattraction through MMP processing of CXCL11.

Strategic approach to fit-for-purpose biomarkers in drug development

The strategic, fit-for-purpose use of the combination of robust target engagement and well-qualified disease-related biomarkers enhances understanding of the mechanism of action, ties together preclinical and clinical data, enables the assessment of target engagement, facilitates early proof of concept and dose focusing, and increases the efficiency of early clinical development with improved quality of decision making. Significant progress in biomarker discovery, validation, and qualification has increased drug-development decision making and regulatory applications. Target engagement biomarkers are present early in a pathophysiologic cascade and inform on physical or biological interactions with the molecular target of the drug. Disease-related biomarkers are present late in the pathophysiologic cascade and are linked to clinical benefit; thus, they assess a drug's effect on a particular disease. Together, these concepts lay the groundwork for high-quality drug-development decision making and a framework for the acceptance and qualification of biomarkers for regulatory use.

Sitagliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes: a review of recent clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are a new class of oral antihyperglycemic agents that enhance the body's ability to regulate blood glucose by increasing the active levels of incretins, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP). There are numerous DPP-4 inhibitors in development with sitagliptin as the first approved agent for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the clinical trial results with sitagliptin.

METHODS

Clinical trials published between January 2005 (first sitagliptin publication) and November 2007 were included in this review. Medline was searched using the search terms: MK-0431 or sitagliptin.

FINDINGS

Sitagliptin, an oral, once-daily, and highly selective DPP-4 inhibitor, has been evaluated in clinical trials as monotherapy, as add-on therapy, or as initial combination therapy with metformin. Sitagliptin provided effective fasting and postprandial glycemic control in a wide range of patients with type 2 diabetes. Markers of beta-cell function (HOMA-beta and proinsulin/insulin ratio) were improved with sitagliptin treatment. In these clinical trials, sitagliptin was generally well tolerated with an overall incidence of adverse experiences comparable to placebo, a low risk of hypoglycemia or gastrointestinal adverse experiences, and a neutral effect on body weight. The findings presented in this review are limited to the specific patient population enrolled in each clinical trial and for durations for up to 1 year. Future clinical studies should evaluate whether this class of agents has the potential to delay progression and/or prevent type 2 diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

Sitagliptin has been shown to be effective and well-tolerated in various treatment regimens and may be considered for both initial therapy and as add-on therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes.

Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin monotherapy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes

Efficacy and tolerability of sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, were assessed in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in Japan, 151 patients with inadequate glycemic control [HbA(1c) > or =6.5% to <10%, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) > or =126 to < or =240 mg/dL] were randomized to once-daily sitagliptin 100mg or placebo for 12 weeks. After 12 weeks, the least squares (LS) mean change from baseline HbA(1c) was -0.65% (95% CI: -0.80, -0.50) with sitagliptin versus 0.41% (0.26, 0.56) with placebo [between-group difference=-1.05% (-1.27, -0.84); p<0.001]. LS mean change from baseline FPG was -22.5mg/dL (95% CI: -28.0, -17.0) with sitagliptin versus 9.4 mg/dL (3.9, 14.9) with placebo [between-group difference=-31.9 mg/dL (95% CI: -39.7,-24.1); p<0.001]. More patients achieved HbA(1c) <7% or <6.5% with sitagliptin than with placebo (p<0.001). Following a meal tolerance test, 2-h postprandial glucose was significantly reduced with sitagliptin relative to placebo. Clinical and laboratory adverse experiences were similar between treatments, with no reported hypoglycemia adverse events with sitagliptin. Body weight was unchanged relative to baseline in the sitagliptin group (-0.1 kg), but significantly (p<0.01) different relative to the placebo group (-0.7 kg). In this study, once-daily sitagliptin 100mg for 12 weeks improved fasting and postprandial glycemic control and was generally well tolerated in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.

Initial combination therapy with sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, and metformin for patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus

The two incretin hormones, glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide potentiate nutrient-dependent insulin secretion following meal ingestion. Metabolic control can be improved markedly by administration of exogenous GLP-1, but the native peptide is almost immediately degraded by the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 and, therefore, has little clinical value. Oral formulations that inhibit DPP-4, thereby prolonging the duration of endogenous incretin action, have, therefore, been developed. Sitagliptin, a once-daily, orally active, competitive and fully reversible inhibitor of DPP-4, was, as first in its class, introduced to the market as Januvia™. Recently, the US FDA approved initial combination therapy with sitagliptin and metformin (Janumet™) in order to help more patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus get closer to accepted glycemic control targets, as recommended by standard guidelines. This article reviews initial treatment with Janumet as an alternative to monotherapy.

Intensive Session: New Approaches to Medical Issues in Long-Term Care

This article, based on a series of presentations at the American Medical Directors Association, briefly highlights new advances in medical areas of interest to long-term care physicians. The areas discussed are heart failure, vitamin D, falls, new treatments for diabetes mellitus, blood pressure measurement, anemia, clinical nutrition, pressure ulcers, Clostridium difficile, insomnia, and antipsychotic therapy.